In addition, NCHZ had possibly benefited from the advantage of having the status of a firm unable to exit the market by law and thus remained a reliable business partner, whereas other companies in the same situation as NCHZ, i.e. in bankruptcy proceedings, would most likely have had deteriorating business relations with their suppliers and customers owing to the possibility of their market exit.
L'Assurance sociale ne disposait d'aucune écriture concernant des créances sur NCHZ nées avant le dépôt de bilan et qu'il aurait fallu déclarer dans la procédure de faillite conformément à l'article 28 de la loi slovaque sur la faillite [12].