The Tribunal concluded its analysis by stating that [26]: ‘[B]y repealing the EGO 24 incentives prior to 1 April 2009, Romania did not act unreasonably or in bad faith (except that [Romania] acted unreasonably by maintaining investors’ obligations after terminating the incentives).
À cause du règlement de procédure applicable en la matière, la Roumanie n’a pas mis cette demande à la disposition de la Commission.