The Commission’s expert points out that, when it comes to the abolition pure and simple of publicly owned establishments through the abolition of their tasks, the objection could be made to this reasoning that the fact that the State is in no position to refuse the assets does not necessarily imply that it is also unable to refuse the debts.
L’expert de la Commission relève qu’on pourrait objecter à ce raisonnement, s’agissant des suppressions pures et simples d’établissements publics par suppression de la mission, que l’impossibilité pour l’État de refuser les biens n’implique pas forcément l’impossibilité de refuser les dettes.