The CEIEB as well as two importers claimed that the findings of material injury centrally relied on the Commission's assessment that the Union industry had lost market share to imports without considering that such loss was attributable to structural flaws such as the failure to recognise potential opportunities at the right time, make earlier investments in production capacity, unappealing products and inadequate sales channels.
À la suite de l'institution des mesures provisoires, la CCCME et quatre producteurs-exportateurs ont fait valoir que l'évolution des indicateurs indexés non confidentiels des producteurs de l'Union retenus dans l'échantillon compromettait sérieusement la conclusion de la Commission selon laquelle l'industrie de l'Union avait subi un préjudice important au sens de l'article 3, paragraphe 5, du règlement de base.