Please tell me the sentiment of the following review: ...well, pop this into the DVD, waste an hour and a half of your life that you will never get back, and find out.

Acting? What acting? 

Production values? ...Production? ...Values?

Story? Don't get me started.

After many years of posting on IMDb, I never thought I would see a film so bad that I truly wished for a lower rating than one. I always have found at least a reason or two to see merit - if only in the intent or the effort of the writer, the director, the cast, or the producer?

In this case, they're all the same guy (!) who really needs to get a handle on the fact, at least as demonstrated by this worthless waste of video tape, that he has no talent. I mean it would be a reasonable excuse if this were some junior high schooler's "production" for his first cinema class, but the referenced "artist" behind this dreck was twenty-six at the time of this miscarriage. 

Just how did this ever get made? Who in their right mind ever wrote a check for this? Moreover, don't let the box cover fool you: there's not even anything that remotely resembles a good sex scene or any good "exposure" of the hunk on that cover.

Two final items: there was one second when this "film" had redeeming value: the aforementioned "talent" gets roundly punched out by his lover. I cheered! And, I did learn one thing from this "film.". There are times when something is so very bad that it is, indeed, truly very funny. But not in any comical manner; it's just sadly humorous. Very sadly humorous.
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive
negative
Snälla berätta känslan av följande recension: ... ja, pop detta i DVD, slösa en och en halv timme av ditt liv som du aldrig kommer att få tillbaka, och ta reda på. Skådespeleri? - Vad då för skådespeleri? Produktionsvärden? ...Produktion? ...värden? Story? Få mig inte att börja. Efter många år av inlägg på IMDb, trodde jag aldrig att jag skulle se en film så illa att jag verkligen önskade ett lägre betyg än en. Jag har alltid funnit åtminstone ett skäl eller två att se förtjänst - om så bara i avsikt eller ansträngning av författaren, regissören, rollbesättningen eller producenten? I det här fallet är de alla samma kille (!) som verkligen behöver få grepp om det faktum, åtminstone som visas av detta värdelösa slöseri med videoband, att han inte har någon talang. Jag menar det skulle vara en rimlig ursäkt om det här var någon gymnasielärares "produktion" för hans första filmklass, men den refererade "konstnären" bakom detta dreck var tjugosex vid tiden för detta missfall. Hur blev det här gjort? Vem har skrivit en check för det här? Dessutom, låt inte boxen täcka lura dig: det finns inte ens något som på avstånd liknar en bra sexscen eller någon bra "exponering" av hunken på det omslaget. Två slutpunkter: det var en sekund då denna "film" hade återlösande värde: den nämnda "talangen" blir rundad av sin älskare. Jag jublade! Och jag lärde mig en sak av den här filmen. Det finns tillfällen då något är så illa att det verkligen är väldigt roligt. Men inte på något komiskt sätt; det är bara sorgligt humoristiskt. Väldigt sorgligt humoristiskt. ALTERNATIV: - negativ - positiv
Please tell me the feeling of the following review: ...yes, pop this in DVD, waste an hour and a half of your life that you will never get back, and find out. Acting? - What kind of acting? Production values? ...Production? ...the host? Story? Don't make me start. After many years of posting on IMDb, I never thought I'd see a movie so bad that I really wanted a lower grade than one. I have always found at least a reason or two to see merit - whether only in the intent or effort of the author, director, cast or producer? In this case, they're all the same guy (!) who really need to get a grip on the fact, at least shown by this useless waste of videotape, that he has no talent. I mean, that would be a reasonable apology if this was some high school teacher's "production" for his first film class, but the referenced "artist" behind this dreck was twenty-six at the time of this miscarriage. How did this get done? Who wrote a check for this? In addition, don't let the box cover you: there's not even anything remotely similar to a good sex scene or any good "exposure" of the hunk on that cover. Two final points: there was a second when this "film" had redeeming value: the said "talang" is rounded by its lover. I was cheering! And I learned something from this movie. There are times when something is so bad that it is really very funny. But not in a comical way; it's just sadly humorous. Very sadly humorous. ALTERNATIVE: - negative - positive
negativ
negative