Sentences: 1. The United States spends approximately $ 700 trillion annually on its military ; China , the worlds second largest military spender , spends $ 114 trillion .
2. The US outpaces other possible peacekeepers by such a large gap that these other powers have little incentive to even try to keep up .
3. Unilateral US intervention undermines international actors such as UN troops because it communicates the USs refusal to submit to the interests of the international community .
4. Thus US military intervention becomes a quick fix which prevents genuine long-term stability

What claim can be made from these sentences?
As long as the United States works unilaterally to quell violent conflict, progress is not being made towards a better, internationally coordinated system.
Domar: 1. USA spenderar cirka 700 biljoner dollar årligen på sin militär; Kina, världens näst största militära spenderare, spenderar 114 biljoner dollar. 2. USA överträffar andra möjliga fredsbevarare genom en så stor lucka att dessa andra makter har föga incitament att ens försöka hänga med. 3. Ensidiga amerikanska ingripanden undergräver internationella aktörer som FN-trupper eftersom de meddelar USA:s vägran att underordna sig världssamfundets intressen. 4. På så sätt blir USA:s militära ingripande en snabb lösning som förhindrar verklig långsiktig stabilitet Vilka anspråk kan göras på dessa domar?
Judgments: 1. The United States spends about $700 trillion annually on its military; China, the world's second largest military spender, spends $114 trillion. 2. The United States surpasses other possible peacekeepers by such a large gap that these other powers have little incentive to even try to keep up. 3. Unilateral U.S. interventions undermine international actors such as UN troops because they announce the US' refusal to submit to the interests of the international community. 4. In this way, US military intervention will be a quick solution that prevents real long-term stability What claims can be made to these judgments?
Så länge som Förenta staterna arbetar ensidigt för att dämpa våldsamma konflikter, görs inga framsteg mot ett bättre, internationellt samordnat system.
As long as the United States is working unilaterally to mitigate violent conflicts, no progress is being made towards a better, internationally coordinated system.