What's an example of a movie review?
What was this supposed to be? A remake of Fisher King? Why do we care about Sandler's character? What a slow, dreary, boring, who-gives-a-damn-about-these-people movie!!! Just simply painful to sit through, I turned it off before it was over. It's so obvious that Cheadle needs help as much as Sandler; like I said: can you say "Fisher King"? And how does this psychotic character function in his daily life? We aren't supposed to think that deeply, I guess. Why does Cheadle continue to give Sandler a chance to turn violent on him? If they were such good friends, how did they grow apart? If Cheadle is so in control, why does he keep seeking the advice of the shrink on the street? We are never told. That's why Fisher King was a better film on so many levels and why this just sucks. Nearly 8 out of 10 average score? I don't agree. At all. Even the top films are lucky to get such a high average rating, and this crap doesn't deserve to be in the same universe with them.
Vad är ett exempel på en filmrecension?
What is an example of a movie review?
Vad skulle det här föreställa? En nyinspelning av Fisher King? Varför bryr vi oss om Sandlers karaktär? Vilken långsam, trist, tråkig, vem-ger-en-fan-om-dessa-människor-film!!!! Bara smärtsamt att sitta här, jag stängde av det innan det var över. Det är så uppenbart att Cheadle behöver hjälp lika mycket som Sandler; som jag sa: kan du säga "Fisher King"? Och hur fungerar denna psykotiska karaktär i hans dagliga liv? Vi får väl inte tänka så djupt. Varför ger Cheadle Sandler en chans att bli våldsam? Om de var så goda vänner, hur växte de isär? Om Cheadle har så stor kontroll, varför fortsätter han då att söka råd hos psykologen på gatan? Vi får aldrig veta det. Det är därför Fisher King var en bättre film på så många nivåer och varför det bara suger. Nästan 8 av 10 genomsnittspoäng? Jag håller inte med. Över huvud taget. Även de bästa filmerna har tur som får så högt genomsnittsbetyg, och den här skiten förtjänar inte att vara i samma universum med dem.
What was this supposed to be? A remake of Fisher King? Why do we care about Sandler's character? What a slow, boring, boring, who-gives-a-fan-about-these-people-film!!! Just painful to sit here, I turned it off before it was over. It is so obvious that Cheadle needs help as much as Sandler; as I said, can you say "Fisher King"? And how does this psychotic character work in his daily life? I guess we shouldn't think so deeply. Why does Cheadle Sandler give a chance to get violent? If they were such good friends, how did they grow apart? If Cheadle is so in control, why does he continue to seek advice from the psychologist on the street? We'll never know. That's why Fisher King was a better film at so many levels and why it just sucks. Almost 8 out of 10 average points? I disagree. At all. Even the best movies are lucky to get that high average grade, and this shit doesn't deserve to be in the same universe with them.