Summarize the argument implied by these sentences?

1. Parenting classes would need to be compulsory for a number of reasons .
2. Firstly - for all of the subjectivity regarding parenting there are clearly some cases where bad parenting is responsible for some of the childs failings .
3. A morbidly obese 15 year old with a criminal record , no school qualifications and poor health has , almost certainly , been let down by his or her parents .
4. However the state has no way of knowing in advance as to which parents will struggle in this manner hence it is better if the classes are for everyone .
5. Furthermore , it seems fair to assume that parents who are somehow socially excluded , wilfully ignorant or suffering some other acute difficulty in raising children , would probably be less likely to take the active step of attending voluntary classes in the first place .
6. According to a report on UK Childrens services referral to get help tends to be self-referral by those who have less need whereas those with higher needs have to be referred by others before they will accept the help Thus voluntary classes may actually be structurally biased to miss the cases in which they are most needed .
7. A compulsory system is likely to offer far better outcomes across society .
Classes would have to be compulsory to be effective
Sammanfatta argumentet under dessa meningar? 1. Föräldraklasser skulle behöva vara obligatoriska av ett antal skäl . 2. För det första - för all subjektivitet när det gäller föräldraskap finns det helt klart några fall där dåligt föräldraskap är ansvarigt för vissa av barnens misslyckanden. 3. En sjukligt fet 15-åring med kriminalregister, inga skolmeriter och dålig hälsa har, nästan säkert, blivit sviken av sina föräldrar. 4. Men staten har inget sätt att på förhand veta vilka föräldrar som kommer att kämpa på detta sätt därför är det bättre om klasserna är för alla. 5. Vidare synes det skäligt att antaga, att föräldrar, som på något sätt äro socialt utestängda, uppsåtligt okunniga eller lida någon annan akut svårighet att uppfostra barn, torde vara mindre benägna att taga det aktiva steget att i första hand deltaga i frivilliga klasser. 6. Enligt en rapport om UK Children's services remittation för att få hjälp tenderar att vara självhänvisningar av dem som har mindre behov medan de med högre behov måste hänvisas av andra innan de kommer att acceptera hjälpen På så sätt kan frivilliga klasser faktiskt vara strukturellt partisk att missa de fall där de är mest nödvändiga. 7. Ett obligatoriskt system kommer sannolikt att ge mycket bättre resultat i hela samhället.
Do you summarize the argument under these sentences? 1. Parental classes would have to be mandatory for a number of reasons . 2. Firstly, for all subjectivity in parenting, there are clearly some cases where poor parenting is responsible for some of the children's failures. 3. A sickly fat 15-year-old with criminal records, no school records and poor health has, almost certainly, been betrayed by his parents. 4. But the state has no way of knowing in advance which parents will fight in this way, so it is better if the classes are for all. 5. Furthermore, it seems reasonable to suppose that parents, who are somehow socially excluded, willfully ignorant or suffer any other acute difficulty in raising children, would be less likely to take the active step of participating primarily in voluntary classes. 6. According to a report on the UK Children's services referral for help tends to be the self-references of those who have less need while those with higher needs must be referred by others before they will accept the help This way voluntary classes may actually be structurally biased to miss the cases where they are most necessary. 7. A mandatory system is likely to deliver much better results across society.
Klasserna måste vara obligatoriska för att vara effektiva
Classes must be mandatory to be effective