Summarize the argument implied by these sentences?

1. Yes a ban would not immediately take assault weapons off the streets but there would be significant long term benefits as highlighted by Connecticut Senator Joe Liberman `` We ought to restore the assault weapons ban -- not to take anybody 's guns away that they have now , but to stop the manufacturing of these weapons . ''
2. The ban would stop manufacturers from making the weapons and with the legislation improved from the 1994 version it would be possible to prevent the cosmetic changes that were made to keep guns on the market .
3. This would mean that prices both in the USA and globally would increase as there would be less supply .
4. One positive result might also be help to change the United States position on the arms trade treaty which would further restrict global supply .
5. This would answer Mexican calls to cut off the supply of guns into the country that helps make the drugs violence in the country so deadly both by meaning less of the weapons are made and by helping to cut off the route through which weapons get into Mexico .
6. A ban on assault weapons would not fix Mexico but it would deprive arms smugglers of the closest , easiest and cheapest place to buy the arms used by the drugs cartels .
7. Jamieson , Dave , Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy Calls For Tougher Gun Controls , , 16 December 2012 , Epstein , Edward , NRA clout is outgunning Feinstein / Assault weapons ban renewal in doubt , , 28 June 2004 , Urquhart , Conal , Arms trade treaty failure is disappointing , says William Hague , , 28 July 2012 , Mexico urges U.S. to review gun laws after Colorado shooting , , 21 July 2012 , Chertoff , Emily , Regulating U.S.-Made Assault Weapons : The International Case , , 19 December 2012 ,
An assault weapons ban would stop the manufacture of many of the deadliest guns.
Sammanfatta argumentet under dessa meningar? 1. Ja ett förbud skulle inte omedelbart ta överfallsvapen från gatorna men det skulle finnas betydande långsiktiga fördelar som betonas av Connecticut Senator Joe Liberman <unk> Vi borde återställa angreppsvapen förbud -- inte att ta någons vapen som de har nu, men att stoppa tillverkningen av dessa vapen. '' 2. Förbudet skulle hindra tillverkarna från att tillverka vapnen och genom att lagstiftningen förbättrades från och med 1994 års version skulle det vara möjligt att förhindra de kosmetiska förändringar som gjordes för att hålla vapen på marknaden. 3. Detta skulle innebära att priserna både i USA och globalt skulle öka eftersom tillgången skulle minska. 4. Ett positivt resultat skulle också kunna vara att bidra till att ändra Förenta staternas ståndpunkt om vapenhandelsfördraget som ytterligare skulle begränsa den globala tillgången. 5. Detta skulle svara mexikanska uppmaningar att skära av tillgången på vapen till landet som hjälper till att göra drogvåldet i landet så dödlig både genom att mena mindre av vapnen görs och genom att hjälpa till att skära av vägen genom vilken vapen kommer in i Mexiko. 6. Ett förbud mot överfallsvapen skulle inte fixa Mexiko men det skulle beröva vapensmugglare det närmaste, enklaste och billigaste stället att köpa de vapen som används av drogkartellerna. 7. Jamieson, Dave, Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy Samtal för tuffare vapenkontroller , , 16 December 2012 , Epstein , Edward , NRA makt är outgunning Feinstein / Assault vapen förbud förnyelse i tvivel , , 28 Juni 2004 , Urquhart , Conal , Vapenhandel fördrag misslyckande är en besvikelse , säger William Hague , , 28 Juli 2012 , Mexiko uppmanar USA att se över vapenlagar efter Colorado skytte , , 21 Juli 2012 , Chertoff , Emily , Regerande USA-Made Assault vapen : The International Case , , 19 December 2012 ,
Do you summarize the argument under these sentences? 1. Yes a ban would not immediately take assault weapons off the streets but there would be significant long-term benefits emphasized by Connecticut Senator Joe Liberman <unk> We should restore assault weapons ban -- not to take anyone's weapons as they have now, but to stop the manufacture of these weapons.'' 2. The ban would prevent manufacturers from manufacturing the weapons and by improving legislation from the 1994 version it would be possible to prevent the cosmetic changes made to keep weapons on the market. 3. This would mean that prices would increase both in the United States and globally as supply would decrease. 4. A positive result could also be to help change the US position on the Arms Trade Treaty that would further limit global access. 5. This would respond to Mexican calls to cut off the supply of weapons to the country that help make drug violence in the country so deadly both by meaning less of the weapons are being made and by helping cut off the road through which weapons enter Mexico. 6. A ban on assault weapons would not fix Mexico but it would deprive gun smugglers of the nearest, easiest and cheapest place to buy the weapons used by the drug cartels. 7. Jamieson, Dave, Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy Conversations for tougher gun controls, , 16 December 2012 , Epstein , Edward , NRA power is outgunning Feinstein / Assault weapons ban renewal in doubt , , 28 June 2004 , Urquhart , Conal , Arms Trade treaty failure is disappointing , says William Hague , , 28 July 2012 , Mexico urges US to review gun laws after Colorado shooting , , 21 July 2012 , Chertoff , Emily , Regulating USA-Made Assault weapons : The International Case , , 19 December 2012 ,
Ett förbud mot överfallsvapen skulle stoppa tillverkningen av många av de dödligaste vapnen.
A ban on assault weapons would stop the manufacture of many of the deadliest weapons.