Sentences: 1. 20 , 2003 , pp.149-171 , p. 151 Baum , Matthew A. , and Jamison , Angela , Soft News and the four Oprah effects , November 2011 ,
2. The Impact of Soft News Preferences on Political Knowledge , , Vol .
3. Drezner , Daniel W. , Foreign Policy Goes Glam , , Nov. / Dec. 2007 , Prior , Markus , Any Good News in Soft News ?
4. The harmful impacts upon our democratic process are two-fold : first , voters being less informed means they are less likely to truly be voting in a way that is aligned with their best interests or political beliefs ; second , the debate is skewed towards ideas that can be conveyed in short sound-bites and away from ideas that require more complicated discussion .
5. This makes political debate increasingly shallow , and voters decisions correspondingly less well-informed .
6. Rather , politicians are forced either to package their ideas in a way acceptable to these magazines and talk shows -LRB- i.e. reduce the analysis ; dumb down -RRB- , for example Obama in 2009 became the first sitting president to appear on a late night comedy show ; , or to counter attack by seeking celebrity endorsement of their own .
7. The involvement of celebrities in the political sphere increases the power of soft-news over the political process : due to the wide reach of soft-news it is not possible to counter its effects using narrow-reach opinion pieces and policy analysis .
8. Shows such as get millions of viewers many of whom dont get news through other mediums and although soft news is the preferred format for a minority -LRB- 10.2 % -RRB- for a great many more it is in their top three .
9. Many people get their political information from soft-news outlets , i.e. entertainment channels and magazines that often focus on celebrity gossip .
10. Celebrity involvement in the political process may increase the extent to which politicians need to court media attention in order to promote their policies .

What claim can be made from these sentences?
Personality politics is harmful to the democratic process
Domar: 1. 20 , 2003 , s.149-171 , s. 151 Baum , Matthew A. , och Jamison , Angela , Soft News och de fyra Oprah effekter , November 2011 , 2. Effekterna av Soft News preferenser på politisk kunskap , , Vol . 3. Drezner , Daniel W. , Utrikespolitik Går Glam , , Nov. / Dec. 2007 , Prior , Markus , Några goda nyheter i Mjuka Nyheter ? 4. De skadliga effekterna på vår demokratiska process är tvåfaldiga: för det första innebär det att väljarna är mindre informerade att de verkligen kommer att rösta på ett sätt som är i linje med deras bästa eller politiska övertygelser; för det andra är debatten skev mot idéer som kan förmedlas i korta ljud-bitar och bort från idéer som kräver mer komplicerade diskussioner. 5. Detta gör den politiska debatten allt mer ytlig, och väljarnas beslut på motsvarande sätt mindre välinformerade. 6. Snarare tvingas politikerna antingen paketera sina idéer på ett sätt som är acceptabelt för dessa tidskrifter och pratshower -LRB- d.v.s. minska analysen ; dum ner -RRB- , till exempel Obama i 2009 blev den första sittande presidenten att framträda på en sen kväll komedishow ; , eller att motverka attack genom att söka kändis godkännande av sin egen . 7. Medverkan av kändisar på den politiska sfären ökar kraften i mjuka nyheter över den politiska processen: på grund av den breda räckvidden av mjuka nyheter är det inte möjligt att motverka dess effekter med hjälp av trångsynta opinionsstycken och politisk analys. 8. Visar som att få miljontals tittare många av vilka inte får nyheter genom andra medier och även om mjuka nyheter är det föredragna formatet för en minoritet -LRB- 10,2 % -RRB- för ett stort antal fler är det i deras topp tre . 9. Många människor får sin politiska information från mjuk-nyhetsbutiker, dvs. underhållningskanaler och tidskrifter som ofta fokuserar på kändisskvaller. 10. Kändisdeltagandet i den politiska processen kan öka i vilken utsträckning politikerna behöver väcka uppmärksamhet i medierna för att främja sin politik. Vilket påstående kan man göra av dessa meningar?
Judgments: 1. 20, 2003, pp.149-171 , p. 151 Baum , Matthew A. , and Jamison , Angela , Soft News and the four Oprah effects , November 2011 , 2. The effects of Soft News' preferences on political knowledge, , Vol. 3. Drezner, Daniel W. , Foreign Policy Goes Glam , , Nov. / Dec. 2007 , Prior , Markus , Any good news in Soft News ? 4. The harmful effects on our democratic process are twofold: firstly, it means that voters are less informed that they will really vote in a way that is in line with their best or political convictions; secondly, the debate is skewed against ideas that can be conveyed in short pieces of sound and away from ideas that require more complicated discussions. 5. This makes political debate increasingly superficial, and voters' decisions are similarly less well informed. 6. Rather, politicians are either forced to package their ideas in a way acceptable to these magazines and talk shows - the LRB- i.e. reduce the analysis; stupidly down -RRB-, for example Obama in 2009 became the first incumbent president to appear on a late-night comedy show; , or to counter attack by seeking celebrity approval of his own. 7. The involvement of celebrities in the political sphere increases the power of soft news over the political process: due to the wide range of soft news, it is not possible to counter its effects using narrow-minded opinion pieces and political analysis. 8. Shows as getting millions of viewers many of which don't get news through other media and although soft news is the preferred format for a minority -LRB-10.2% -RRB- for a large number more it's in their top three. 9. Many people get their political information from soft-news stores, i.e. entertainment channels and magazines that often focus on celebrity gossip. 10. Celebrity participation in the political process may increase the extent to which politicians need to attract media attention in order to promote their policies. What statement can be made of these sentences?
Personlighetspolitiken är skadlig för den demokratiska processen
Personality policy is detrimental to the democratic process