Write a positive movie review.
I read that this did not well, that the story is not solid, that Volckman feels he has failed in some way.

I disagree. First, it is well executed. Volckman is doing well to not only to try a new technique, but to have a focus that is worth thinking about: would immortality reduce the value of life? Big question ...

I can see he trying hard to build a feeling, and he is not compromising. This is to be applauded. I am sure it was an interesting exercise to build characters in such a form. I have seen artists reduce a form to bare minimum to build the intensity of a moment. I identify this film with this.

Further, it is much more interesting than Richard Linklater's roto-scoping, and Volckman's story has more meaning than Linklater's later stories of a wasted life on drugs. Old news. Everyone knows it, but no one does anything about it. Renaissance has more to offer, something new to think about. And there are many more stories out there with loads of holes in them that do far better.

Well done, Volckman. Really nice work.
Skriv en positiv filmrecension.
Write a positive movie review.
Jag läste, att detta inte gjorde väl, att berättelsen inte är solid, att Volckman tycker sig ha misslyckats på något sätt. Jag håller inte med. För det första är det väl utfört. Volckman gör väl i att inte bara prova en ny teknik, utan att ha ett fokus som är värt att tänka på: skulle odödligheten minska livets värde? En stor fråga... Jag ser att han försöker bygga upp en känsla, och han kompromissar inte. Detta bör applåderas. Jag är säker på att det var en intressant övning att bygga karaktärer i en sådan form. Jag har sett konstnärer reducera en form till ett minimum för att bygga intensiteten av ett ögonblick. Jag identifierar filmen med den här. Vidare är den mycket intressantare än Richard Linklaters roto-skoping, och Volckmans berättelse har mer mening än Linklaters senare berättelser om ett bortkastat liv på droger. Gamla nyheter. Alla vet det, men ingen gör något åt det. Renässansen har mer att erbjuda, något nytt att tänka på. Och det finns många fler historier där ute med massor av hål i dem som gör mycket bättre. Bra gjort, Volckman. Riktigt bra jobbat.
I read that this did not do well, that the story is not solid, that Volckman thinks he has failed in some way. I disagree. Firstly, it is well done. Volckman does well to not only try a new technique, but to have a focus that is worth thinking about: would immortality reduce the value of life? A big question. I see he's trying to build a feeling, and he's not compromising. This should be applauded. I'm sure it was an interesting exercise to build characters in such a form. I've seen artists reduce a form to a minimum to build the intensity of a moment. I'll identify the film with this. Furthermore, it is much more interesting than Richard Linklater's roto-scopying, and Volckman's story has more meaning than Linklater's later stories of a wasted life on drugs. Old news. Everyone knows that, but nobody does anything about it. Renaissance has more to offer, something new to think about. And there are many more stories out there with lots of holes in them that do much better. Well done, Volckman. Real good work.