What debate topic are the following sentences about?

1. The opinion of many in the modern world today is one of regret at the bird 's extinction and that it should have been protected , but a lack of consideration of the wishes of future generations in the 17 Century has meant that the humans of the 21 Century are denied the ability to decide on the value of this species themselves .
2. Because we place a moral value on the ability of humans to make decisions -LRB- as we consider it to be a good thing when we ourselves have this ability -RRB- we should recognise that the possibly differing opinions of future generations should constrain our choices somewhat , and we should protect endangered species so that future generations can decide for themselves regarding their value .
3. Human moral responsibility to future generations : Species extinction is an irrevocable occurrence .
4. Outside of the film ` Jurassic Park ' , extinct species can not be summoned back from the grave once human action has put them there .
5. This means that when a current generation makes the decision not to protect an endangered species and thus allows human action to drive it to extinction , this denies future generations the ability to make up their own minds about the pros and cons of the survival of that endangered species , especially considering that they might want that species to exist for the aforementioned scientific , medical , aesthetic or moral reasons .
6. For example , there is a great modern-day interest in the dodo species of bird which was hunted to extinction in Mauritius in the 17 Century .
This House believes that endangered species should be protected
Vilket debattämne handlar följande meningar om? 1. Mångas åsikt i den moderna världen idag är en av beklagande över fågelns utrotning och att den borde ha skyddats, men en brist på hänsyn till kommande generationers önskemål under 17-talet har inneburit att människorna under 21-talet nekas möjligheten att själva bestämma om värdet av denna art. 2. Eftersom vi sätter ett moraliskt värde på människans förmåga att fatta beslut -LRB- då vi anser att det är bra när vi själva har denna förmåga -RRB- bör vi erkänna att de eventuellt olika åsikterna hos kommande generationer bör begränsa våra val något, och vi bör skydda hotade arter så att framtida generationer kan bestämma själva om deras värde. 3. Mänskligt moraliskt ansvar till kommande generationer: Artutdöende är en oåterkallelig händelse. 4. Utanför filmen "Jurassic Park" kan utdöda arter inte kallas tillbaka från graven när mänsklig handling har placerat dem där. 5. Detta innebär att när en nuvarande generation fattar beslutet att inte skydda en utrotningshotad art och därmed låter människan agera för att driva den till utrotning, detta förnekar framtida generationer förmågan att själva bestämma om för- och nackdelar med överlevnaden av den utrotningshotade arten, särskilt med tanke på att de kanske vill att den arten ska finnas för de nämnda vetenskapliga, medicinska, estetiska eller moraliska skälen. 6. Till exempel finns det ett stort modernt intresse för drontarten fågel som jagades till utrotning på Mauritius på 17-talet.
What is the subject of the debate? 1. Many people's opinion in the modern world today is one of regret at the extinction of the bird and that it should have been protected, but a lack of consideration for the wishes of future generations in the 17th century has meant that during the 21st century people are denied the opportunity to decide for themselves on the value of this species. 2. Since we value the moral value of man's ability to make decisions - the LRB - because we think it is good when we ourselves have this ability - the RRB - we should recognise that the possible differences of opinion of future generations should limit our choices somewhat, and we should protect endangered species so that future generations can decide for themselves on their value. 3. Human moral responsibility to future generations: Species extinction is an irreversible event. 4. Outside the film "Jurassic Park" extinct species cannot be called back from the grave when human action has placed them there. 5. This means that when a present generation makes the decision not to protect an endangered species and thus allows man to act to drive it to extinction, this denies future generations the ability to determine for themselves the pros and cons of the survival of the endangered species, especially given that they may want that species to exist for the said scientific, medical, aesthetic or moral reasons. 6. For example, there is a great modern interest in the dodo species bird that was hunted for extinction in Mauritius in the 17th century.
Parlamentet anser att hotade arter bör skyddas.
Parliament considered that endangered species should be protected.