What debate topic are the following sentences about?

1. In the legal profession Judges are obliged to excuse themselves from hearing a case if they hold shares or have a political interest in one of the parties as there is a need not only to provide for an unbiased trial in which justice is done but also a need for public confidence in the system and justice to be seen to be done .
2. In the case of politicians there is a similar need - a need for them to act in an unbiased manner doing justice to the needs and wants of their constituents and also a need for public confidence in their ability to what most benefits their community as opposed to what most benefits them .
3. This is likely to affect their vote and so distort the political process .
4. At worst this can become outright corruption , as groups with vested interests pay elected representatives to lobby on their behalf , or reward them with lucrative directorships if they vote in certain ways .
5. Elected representatives should be working for the people and take only their interests into account .
6. Politicians who also run their own companies , hold directorships or manage extensive share portfolios could stand to gain or lose substantially from individual pieces of legislation .
7. A conflict of interest exists even if nounethicalor improper act results .
8. A conflict of interest can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the individual , or their activity , and the profession .
9. As an example , in the sphere of business and control the Institute of Internal Auditors -LRB- IIA -RRB- have commented that a conflict of interest occurs in a situation in which anindividual , who is in a position of trust , has a competing professional or personal interest .
10. Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfil his or her duties impartially .
This House believes that elected representatives should not hold any additional posts while serving in government
Vilket debattämne handlar följande meningar om? 1. Inom advokatyrket är domarna skyldiga att ursäkta sig från att ta upp ett mål om de har aktier eller har ett politiskt intresse i en av parterna, eftersom det inte bara finns ett behov av att föreskriva en opartisk rättegång där rättvisa skipas utan också ett behov av att allmänhetens förtroende för systemet och rättvisan kan ses. 2. När det gäller politikerna finns det ett liknande behov - ett behov av att de agerar opartiskt och rättar sig efter sina väljares behov och önskemål och även ett behov av allmänhetens förtroende för sin förmåga till det som mest gynnar deras gemenskap i motsats till det som mest gynnar dem. 3. Detta kommer sannolikt att påverka deras röst och därmed snedvrida den politiska processen. 4. I värsta fall kan detta bli ren korruption, eftersom grupper med egna intressen betalar valda företrädare för att lobbyera för deras räkning, eller belöna dem med lukrativa direktörsbefattningar om de röstar på vissa sätt. 5. Valda företrädare bör arbeta för folket och endast ta hänsyn till deras intressen. 6. Politiker som också driver egna bolag, innehar direktorat eller förvaltar omfattande aktieportföljer kan vinna eller förlora avsevärt på enskilda lagtexter. 7. En intressekonflikt föreligger även om nounethicalor oegentlig handling resulterar. 8. En intressekonflikt kan skapa ett sken av oegentligheter som kan undergräva förtroendet för individen, eller deras verksamhet, och yrket. 9. Som ett exempel, inom området för företag och kontroll Institutet för internrevisorer -LRB-IIA -RRB- har kommenterat att en intressekonflikt uppstår i en situation där en enskild, som är i en förtroendeställning, har ett konkurrerande professionellt eller personligt intresse. 10. Sådana konkurrerande intressen kan göra det svårt att utföra sina uppgifter opartiskt.
What is the subject of the debate? 1. In the legal profession, judges are obliged to excuse themselves from bringing a case if they have shares or have a political interest in one of the parties, as there is not only a need to provide for an impartial trial in which justice is done but also a need for public confidence in the system and justice to be seen. 2. As far as politicians are concerned, there is a similar need - a need for them to act impartially and comply with the needs and wishes of their constituents and also a need for public confidence in their ability to do what is most beneficial to their community, as opposed to what is most beneficial to them. 3. This is likely to affect their voice and thus distort the political process. 4. At worst, this could be pure corruption, because groups with their own interests pay elected representatives to lobby on their behalf, or reward them with lucrative directorships if they vote in some ways. 5. Elected representatives should work for the people and only take their interests into account. 6. Politicians who also run their own companies, hold directorates or manage extensive stock portfolios may win or lose significantly from individual legal texts. 7. A conflict of interest exists although nouneticalor improper action results. 8. A conflict of interest may create a form of irregularities that may undermine confidence in the individual, or their activities, and the profession. 9. As an example, in the field of business and control the Institute for Internal Auditors -LRB-IIA -RRB- has commented that a conflict of interest arises in a situation where an individual, who is in a position of trust, has a competing professional or personal interest. 10. Such competing interests may make it difficult to carry out their tasks impartially.
Parlamentet anser att valda företrädare inte bör inneha några ytterligare poster när de tjänstgör i regeringen.
Considers that elected representatives should not hold any additional posts when serving in the government;