The only reason I elected to give this flick a shot was due to the presence of Oscar winner Ernest Borgnine. All I can say is, it was the greatest waste of a good actor ever put to film. As far as I could tell, Borgnine was the ONLY actor in it. The other performances were so uniformly terrible, I am amazed a studio would actually pay the "performers" to appear. Couple this level of talent in the acting department with a story so plodding and insipid that I thought my eyes were going to start bleeding by the time the credits rolled, and you have a perfect cinematic disaster. Obviously the movie was made to appeal to an audience of children, and to its credit, it was better than most of the original programing on the Disney Channel and similar kid-focused networks. But honestly, that is not saying much.

Did this review think positively or negatively of the movie?
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive
negative
Enda anledningen till att jag valde att ge den här filmen en chans var på grund av Oscarsvinnaren Ernest Borgnine. Allt jag kan säga är att det var det största slöseriet med en bra skådespelare som någonsin satts på film. Så vitt jag kunde se, var Borgnine den ende skådespelaren i den. De andra föreställningarna var så enhetligt fruktansvärda, jag är förvånad över att en studio faktiskt skulle betala "performers" att visas. Para ihop denna nivå av talang på skådespelaravdelningen med en historia som är så plump och indistig att jag trodde att mina ögon skulle börja blöda när eftertexterna rullade, och du har en perfekt filmisk katastrof. Uppenbarligen filmen gjordes för att vädja till en publik av barn, och till dess ära, det var bättre än de flesta av de ursprungliga program på Disney Channel och liknande barnfokuserade nätverk. Men ärligt talat, det säger inte mycket. Tyckte den här recensionen positivt eller negativt om filmen? ALTERNATIV: - negativ - positiv
The only reason I chose to give this movie a chance was because of Oscar winner Ernest Borgnine. All I can say is that it was the biggest waste of a good actor ever put on film. As far as I could see, Borgnine was the only actor in it. The other performances were so uniformly terrible, I'm surprised that a studio would actually pay "performers" to be shown. Pair this level of talent in the acting department with a story that is so plump and slumbered that I thought my eyes would start bleeding as the credits rolled, and you have a perfect cinematic disaster. Apparently the film was made to appeal to an audience of children, and in its honor, it was better than most of the original programs on Disney Channel and similar children-focused networks. But honestly, it doesn't say much. Did this review like the film positively or negatively? ALTERNATIVE: - negative - positive
negativ
negative