Here are two sentences:

" Deviant cannibalistic tendencies " were the primary motivation for the murders , and Brown 's body was mutilated , authorities said .

They were killed over a few days in April 2001 and " deviant cannibalistic tendencies " were the primary motivation for the murders , authorities said .
Are the two sentences saying the same thing?
OPTIONS:
- no
- yes
no
Här är två meningar: "Avvikande kannibalistiska tendenser "var den primära motivationen för morden, och Browns kropp var stympad, säger myndigheterna. De dödades över några dagar i april 2001 och " avvikande kannibalistiska tendenser" var den primära motivationen för morden, sade myndigheterna. Säger de två meningarna samma sak? ALTERNATIV: - nej - ja
Here are two sentences: "Deviating cannibalistic tendencies "was the primary motivation for the murders, and Brown's body was mutilated, authorities say. They were killed over a few days in April 2001 and "deviating cannibalistic tendencies" were the primary motivation for the murders, authorities said. Do the two sentences say the same thing? ALTERNATIVE: - no - yes
nt
nt