Claim: [Iran specific] Others, particularly Israel, would act if the United States did not
What evidence supports this claim?
1. The US would get all the harms of direct intervention with none of the benefits , and efforts to fight Hezbollah and Hamas , both within Palestine and elsewhere , would be undermined by their newfound sympathy in the region and the need of Arab governments to pander to it .
2. It could easily spark a regional war across the middle east as Iranian proxies strike back against Israel and U.S. forces around the region .
3. The result would be catastrophic , as Iran would be able to portray itself as a victim of Israeli aggression , leading to a massive outpouring of pro-Iranian and anti-American sentiment in the middle east and central asia .
4. Israel is under much more pressure to act as it would be the most affected by Iran going nuclear .
5. A failure of the United States to act would motivate Israel to do so .
Påstående: [Iran specifik] Andra, särskilt Israel, skulle agera om inte USA Vilka bevis stöder detta påstående?
Claim: [Iran specific] Others, especially Israel, would act unless the United States What evidence supports this claim?
1. USA skulle få alla skador av direkt intervention med ingen av fördelarna, och ansträngningar för att bekämpa Hizbollah och Hamas, både inom Palestina och på andra håll, skulle undergrävas av deras nyfunna sympati i regionen och behovet av arabiska regeringar att pandra till det. 2. Det skulle lätt kunna utlösa ett regionalt krig över mellanöstern när iranska fullmakter slår tillbaka mot Israel och amerikanska styrkor runt om i regionen . 3. Resultatet skulle bli katastrofalt, då Iran skulle kunna framställa sig som ett offer för israelisk aggression, vilket leder till en massiv utsvävning av proiransk och antiamerikansk stämning i mellanöstern och centralasien. 4. Israel utsätts för mycket större påtryckningar att agera eftersom det skulle vara det mest drabbade landet av att Iran går i kärnvapen. 5. Om Förenta staterna inte agerar skulle det motivera Israel att göra det.
1. The United States would have all the damage of direct intervention with none of the benefits, and efforts to combat Hezbollah and Hamas, both within Palestine and elsewhere, would be undermined by their newfound sympathy in the region and the need for Arab governments to pander to it. 2. It could easily trigger a regional war over the Middle East when Iranian warrantes strike back at Israel and US forces around the region. 3. The result would be disastrous, as Iran could present itself as a victim of Israeli aggression, leading to a massive debauchery of pro-Iranian and anti-American sentiment in the Middle East and Central Asia. 4. Israel is under much greater pressure to act because it would be the most affected country by Iran's nuclear weapons. 5. Failure by the United States would motivate Israel to do so.