Summarize the argument implied by these sentences?

1. The Olympics therefore may still be a great event , with many great athletes but it no longer carries the associations with respect and fair-play that made its Dream so appealing to so many .
2. To overcome this , the IOC Conference in February 1999 recommended that coaches should take the Olympic Oath as well as athletes , however the document itself is so tarnished by the regularity with which it is ignored that it is fast becoming a farce .
3. The sense of fraternity that Olympic athletes once had is becoming lost in the antagonistic rivalries between nations and individual athletes and the pressure not merely to compete , but to win .
4. The modern Olympic athlete is no longer driven ` for the glory of sport ' , but by an appetite for excellence that can , and often does , override any notion of fair-play or respect .
5. The Chinese swimming team , for example , was beset at Atlanta by claims that they had adopted a systematic and untraceable doping regime to improve their athletes , with remarkable results .
6. We should have some sympathy with athletes sometimes : very often , they are compelled to take drugs by their team 's coach .
The Olympics is no longer about competition and fair play, but which athletes and coaches can go to the furthest extremes simply to win.
Sammanfatta argumentet under dessa meningar? 1. De olympiska spelen kan därför fortfarande vara en stor händelse, med många stora idrottare men det bär inte längre föreningarna med respekt och rättvist spel som gjorde sin dröm så tilltalande för så många. 2. För att komma över detta rekommenderade IOK-konferensen i februari 1999 att tränare skulle ta OS-ed samt idrottare, men dokumentet i sig är så skamfilat av regelbundenheten med vilken det ignoreras att det snabbt blir en fars. 3. Den känsla av broderskap som olympiska idrottare en gång hade blir förlorad i antagonistiska rivaliteter mellan nationer och enskilda idrottare och trycket inte bara att tävla, utan att vinna. 4. Den moderna olympiska idrottare är inte längre drivs "för äran av sporten ", men av en aptit på excellens som kan, och ofta gör, åsidosätta alla föreställningar om rättvist spel eller respekt. 5. Det kinesiska simlaget, till exempel, var besatt i Atlanta av påståenden om att de hade antagit en systematisk och ospårbar doping regim för att förbättra sina idrottare, med anmärkningsvärda resultat. 6. Vi borde ha lite sympati med idrottare ibland: mycket ofta, de är tvungna att ta droger av sitt lags tränare.
Do you summarize the argument under these sentences? 1. The Olympic Games can therefore still be a major event, with many great athletes but it no longer carries the associations with respect and fair play that made their dream so appealing to so many. 2. To overcome this, the IOC conference in February 1999 recommended that coaches take Olympic oaths as well as athletes, but the document itself is so tarnished by the regularity with which it is ignored that it quickly becomes a farce. 3. The sense of brotherhood that Olympic athletes once had is lost in antagonistic rivalries between nations and individual athletes and the pressure not only to compete, but to win. 4. The modern Olympic athletes are no longer driven "for the glory of the sport", but by an appetite for excellence that can, and often does, override any notion of fair play or respect. 5. The Chinese swimming team, for example, was obsessed with Atlanta with claims that they had adopted a systematic and untraceable doping regime to improve their athletes, with remarkable results. 6. We should have some sympathy with athletes sometimes: very often, they are forced to take drugs by their team's coach.
OS handlar inte längre om konkurrens och rent spel, utan vilka idrottare och tränare som kan gå till längst ytterligheter bara för att vinna.
The Olympics are no longer about competition and fair play, but which athletes and coaches can go to the farthest extremes just to win.