Summarize the argument implied by these sentences?

1. Some of them are able to pay for a surrogate ; some may have a natural child from a previous -LRB- heterosexual -RRB- relationship and then raise the child with a gay partner .
2. There are still many ways for gay people to become parents .
3. These kids deserve the security of two legally recognized parents .
4. In effect , what this law does is make it impossible for two gay people to have legal rights over a child they may already be raising together .
5. If being raised by gay parents is really that harmful , why would the law allow two gay people to raise a child together as parents but refuse to legally recognize them as such ?
Where same-sex households exist, they should have equal rights as opposite-sex households.
Sammanfatta argumentet under dessa meningar? 1. Några av dem kan betala för ett surrogat; vissa kan ha ett naturligt barn från en tidigare -LRB- heterosexuell -RRB-relation och sedan uppfostra barnet med en homosexuell partner. 2. Det finns fortfarande många sätt för homosexuella att bli föräldrar. 3. Dessa barn förtjänar två lagligt erkända föräldrars säkerhet. 4. I själva verket gör denna lag det omöjligt för två homosexuella att ha lagliga rättigheter gentemot ett barn som de kanske redan uppfostrar tillsammans. 5. Om att uppfostras av homosexuella föräldrar verkligen är så skadligt, varför skulle lagen tillåta två homosexuella människor att uppfostra ett barn tillsammans som föräldrar men vägra att lagligt erkänna dem som sådana?
Do you summarize the argument under these sentences? 1. Some of them can pay for a surrogate; some may have a natural child from a former -LRB- heterosexual -RRB relationship and then raise the child with a gay partner. 2. There are still many ways for homosexuals to become parents. 3. These children deserve the safety of two legally recognised parents. 4. In fact, this law makes it impossible for two homosexuals to have legal rights towards a child they may already raise together. 5. If being raised by gay parents is really so harmful, why would the law allow two gay people to raise a child together as parents but refuse to legally recognize them as such?
Om det finns samkönade hushåll bör de ha lika rättigheter som hushåll av motsatt kön.
If there are same-sex households, they should have equal rights as opposite-sex households.