Use the following highlights to write an article:

American Apparel has been told off by the Advertising Standards Authority.
ASA deemed advert featuring a young-looking model in a thong 'too sexy'
In the campaign, the young redhead bares her entire bottom to the camera.
Bosses at trendy clothing firm American Apparel have been rapped for a 'too sexy' advert showing a female model wearing a 'thong bodysuit'. The firm, which has more than 270 stores across the world, regularly has its raunchy ads banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). In 2012 the firm had a string of ads banned in four different rulings after using photos of women exposing their breasts, showing off their bare bums and posing with their legs spread in its ad campaigns. This American Apparel advert featuring an underage-looking model has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority. And this week, the ASA again banned an advert showing a flame-haired model wearing a £30 spandex thong bodysuit covered with lipstick prints. One person had complained to the ASA saying they believed the model in question looked under the age of 16 and that it was 'irresponsible and offensive' as it 'sexualised a model' who appeared to be underage. Bosses at the ASA said that despite American Apparel saying the model was 20 years old, she looked 'youthful' and that the ad was irresponsible. It stated: 'We considered the model had a youthful appearance and that some consumers were likely to regard her as being younger than 16 years of age. 'The model was shown looking back at the camera over her shoulder with her buttocks visible. The campaign featured more than one picture of the girl in the bodysuit to '[depict] the thong from various angles' 'We considered that readers were likely to interpret the model's expression and pose as being sexual in nature. 'In conjunction with the youthful appearance of the model, we considered the ad could be seen to sexualise a child. 'We therefore concluded that the ad was irresponsible and was likely to cause serious offence.' It added: 'The ad must not appear again in its current form. 'We told American Apparel (UK) Ltd to ensure future ads did not include images that inappropriately sexualised young women or were likely to cause serious offence.' Bosses at the clothing firm said the the model was 20 and that the ad 'depicted the thong from various angles'. This isn't  the first time that American Apparel has been in trouble for their adverts. Last September, a  campaign for the fashion brand American Apparel has been banned for ‘sexualising school-age girls’. Photographs of its ‘School Days’ range included a young woman bending over in an ultra- short tartan skirt with her white underwear on display. In a scathing attack, the advertising watchdog labelled the campaign ‘gratuitous’ and ‘sexist’. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said ‘the focus was on her buttocks and groin rather than on the skirt being modelled’. It also accused the firm of promoting seedy ‘up-skirt’ photographs – when unauthorised pictures are taken from beneath a woman’s skirt. The brand launched its Back-to-School range with the slogan, ‘Your first assignment is to dress accordingly.’ Last year, the fashion company got in trouble for this picture of a 'schoolgirl' leaning over a car door. The campaign included pictures of a model bent over touching the ground, revealing her crotch and underwear, while another showed a woman bending over a red car in a thigh-skimming green tartan skirt and her buttocks on show. The ASA said: ‘We considered the images were gratuitous and objectified women, and were therefore sexist and likely to cause serious and widespread offence. Last January,the brand stirred up controversy for decking out its mannequins with very visible patches of untamed pubic hair. A storefront at the retailer's East Houston location in New York featured three mannequins clad in transparent white underwear, exposing their unkempt bikini lines.
Använd följande höjdpunkter för att skriva en artikel: American Apparel har aviserats av Advertising Standards Authority. ASA ansåg att annonsen med en ung modell i en stringtrosa "för sexig" I kampanjen bar den unga rödhåriga hela sin botten till kameran.
Use the following highlights to write an article: American Apparel has been announced by the Advertising Standards Authority. ASA felt that the ad with a young model in a thong "too sexy" In the campaign, the young redhead carried his entire bottom to the camera.
Bossar på trendiga klädfirman American Apparel har blivit rappade för en "för sexig" annons som visar en kvinnlig modell som bär en "thong bodysuit". Företaget, som har mer än 270 butiker över hela världen, har regelbundet sina raunchiga annonser förbjudna av Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). Under 2012 hade byrån en rad annonser förbjudna i fyra olika domar efter att ha använt bilder på kvinnor som exponerar sina bröst, visar upp sina bara bums och poserar med benen utspridda i sina annonskampanjer. Denna American Apparel annons med en minderårig modell har förbjudits av Advertising Standards Authority. Och den här veckan förbjöd ASA återigen en annons som visade en flamhårig modell med en 30 pund lång spandex stringdräkt täckt med läppstiftsavtryck. En person hade klagat till ASA och sagt att de trodde att modellen i fråga såg ut under 16 år och att det var "oansvarigt och stötande" eftersom det "sexualiserade en modell" som verkade vara minderårig. Bosses på ASA sade att trots att American Apparel sade att modellen var 20 år gammal såg hon "ungdomlig" ut och att annonsen var oansvarig. Det stod: "Vi ansåg att modellen hade ett ungdomligt utseende och att vissa konsumenter sannolikt ansåg att hon var yngre än 16 år. "Modellen visades titta tillbaka på kameran över hennes axel med skinkor synliga. Kampanjen innehöll mer än en bild av flickan i kroppsdräkt till '[avbilda] stringtrosan ur olika vinklar' 'Vi ansåg att läsarna sannolikt tolkade modellens uttryck och framstod som att vara sexuell till sin natur. "I samband med det ungdomliga utseendet av modellen, ansåg vi annonsen kunde ses för att sexualisera ett barn. "Vi drog därför slutsatsen att annonsen var oansvarig och sannolikt skulle orsaka allvarliga brott." Den tillade: "Annonsen får inte återfinnas i sin nuvarande form. "Vi sade till American Apparel (UK) Ltd att se till att framtida annonser inte innehöll bilder som olämpligt sexualiserade unga kvinnor eller sannolikt skulle orsaka allvarliga brott." Bossarna på klädfirman sade att modellen var 20 och att annonsen 'avbildade stringtrosan från olika vinklar'. Det här är inte första gången som American Apparel har varit i trubbel för sina annonser. I september förra året förbjöds en kampanj för modemärket American Apparel för att ”sexualisera flickor i skolåldern”. Fotografier av skoldagarna inkluderade en ung kvinna som böjde sig fram i en ultrakort tartankjol med sina vita underkläder på displayen. I en svidande attack stämplade reklamvakten kampanjen som ”grattis” och ”sexistisk”. Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) sade att ”fokus låg på hennes skinkor och ljumske snarare än på kjolen som modellerades”. Den anklagade också företaget för att främja sjabbiga ”upp-kjol” fotografier – när obehöriga bilder tas under en kvinnas kjol. Varumärket lanserade sin Back-to-School-serie med sloganen, "Ditt första uppdrag är att klä sig därefter". Förra året fick modeföretaget problem för denna bild av en "skolflicka" lutad över en bildörr. Kampanjen innehöll bilder av en modell böjd över att röra vid marken, avslöjande hennes skrev och underkläder, medan en annan visade en kvinna som böjde sig över en röd bil i en lårskimmelgrön tartankjol och hennes skinkor på uppvisning. ASA sade: ”Vi ansåg att bilderna var otacksamma och objektifierade kvinnor, och därför var sexistiska och sannolikt orsakade allvarliga och utbredda brott. I januari förra året rörde varumärket upp kontroverser för att dekorera ut sina skyltdockor med mycket synliga fläckar av otämjd pubic hår. En butiksfront på återförsäljarens East Houston-plats i New York innehöll tre skyltdockor klädda i transparenta vita underkläder, som avslöjade deras ovårdade bikinilinjer.
Bosses at trendy clothing firm American Apparel have been rapped for a "too sexy" ad showing a female model wearing a "thong bodysuit". The company, which has more than 270 stores worldwide, regularly has its raunchy advertisements banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). In 2012, the agency had a series of advertisements banned in four different sentences after using images of women exposing their breasts, showing off their only bums and posing with their legs scattered in their advertising campaigns. This American Apparel ad with a minor model has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority. And this week, ASA again banned an advertisement showing a flame-haired model with a £30 spandex thong suit covered with lipstick prints. One person had complained to ASA saying that they believed the model in question looked under 16 years and that it was "inresponsible and offensive" because it "sexualized a model" that appeared to be underage. Bosses at ASA said that despite American Apparel saying the model was 20 years old, she looked "youthish" and that the advertisement was irresponsible. It said: "We felt that the model had a youthful appearance and that some consumers likely thought she was younger than 16. "The model was shown looking back at the camera over her shoulder with buttocks visible. The campaign contained more than one image of the girl in body costume to '[image] the thong from different angles' 'We felt that readers likely interpreted the expression of the model and appeared to be sexual in nature. "In connection with the youthful appearance of the model, we considered the advertisement could be seen to sexize a child. "We therefore concluded that the advertisement was irresponsible and likely to cause serious crimes." It added: "The ad must not be found in its present form. "We told American Apparel (UK) Ltd to ensure that future advertisements did not contain images that inappropriately sexized young women or would likely cause serious crimes." The bosses at the clothing firm said the model was 20 and that the ad 'imaged the thong from different angles'. This is not the first time American Apparel has been in trouble for his ads. Last September, a campaign for the American Apparel fashion label was banned to 'sexualize school-age girls'. Photographs of the school days included a young woman bending over in an ultra-card tartank skirt with her white underwear on the display. In a scathing attack, the advertising guard labeled the campaign “congratulations” and “sexist”. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said that "focus was on her buttocks and groin rather than on the skirt modeled". It also accused the company of promoting shabby ‘up-skirt’ photographs – when unauthorized images are taken under a woman's skirt. The brand launched its Back-to-School series with the slogan, "Your first mission is to dress accordingly". Last year, the fashion company got problems for this picture of a "school girl" leaned over a car door. The campaign featured images of one model bent over touching the ground, revealing her crotch and underwear, while another showed a woman bending over a red car in a thighskimmel green tartank skirt and her buttocks on display. ASA said: “We considered the images to be ungrateful and objectified women, and therefore sexist and likely caused serious and widespread crimes. Last January, the brand moved up controversy to decorate its mannequins with very visible spots of untamed pubic hair. A retail front at the dealer's East Houston site in New York City featured three mannequins dressed in transparent white underwear, revealing their untidy bikini lines.