What debate topic are the following sentences about?

1. It is noteworthy that Russia has a Security Council veto , but does not even appear in the top 15 nations contributing to the budget .
2. The phrase give them an inch and theyll take a mile is appropriate here .
3. While the proportions of other states economies are markedly smaller , other nations sometimes reap far more of the rewards of UN existence than they contribute - The United States is far and away the biggest single contributor to the U.N. system .
4. The UN has become dependent on the USA and other industrialized nations to foot an enormous amount of the bill for UN operations .
5. -LSB- 1 -RSB- Should the US remain a consistent donor and allow itself to be asked for more and more as the UN budget becomes more bloated , or should it assert itself and say that , in real dollars , a line must be drawn ?
6. In 2006 , the total U.S. contributions came to at least $ 2.7 billion and that excludes the private sector , which by most independent estimates , draws most of its $ 1.5 billion in U.N. contributions from U.S. sources .
7. The U.N. : Even More Expensive Than It Looks 06/11/2008
8. -LSB- 1 -RSB- Russel , George .
This house would freeze the United Nations budget
Vilket debattämne handlar följande meningar om? 1. Det är värt att notera att Ryssland har ett veto från säkerhetsrådet, men inte ens förekommer i de 15 länder som bidrar till budgeten. 2. Frasen ger dem en tum och de kommer att ta en mil är lämpligt här. 3. Medan proportionerna av andra staters ekonomier är markant mindre, andra nationer ibland skörda långt mer av belöningarna för FN existens än de bidrar - USA är långt och bort den största enskilda bidragsgivare till FN-systemet. 4. FN har blivit beroende av USA och andra industrialiserade nationer för att betala en enorm del av räkningen för FN:s operationer. 5. -LSB- 1 -RSB- Bör USA förbli en konsekvent givare och låta sig bli ombedd för mer och mer när FN:s budget blir mer uppsvälld, eller ska det hävda sig och säga att, i riktiga dollar, en linje måste dras? 6. Under 2006 kom de totala amerikanska bidragen till minst $ 2,7 miljarder och som utesluter den privata sektorn, som av de flesta oberoende uppskattningar, drar de flesta av sina $ 1,5 miljarder i USA bidrag från amerikanska källor. 7. FN : Ännu dyrare än det ser ut 2006/11/2008 8. -LSB-1-RSB-Russel, George.
What is the subject of the debate? 1. It is worth noting that Russia has a veto from the Security Council, but does not even exist in the 15 countries that contribute to the budget. 2. The phrase gives them an inch and they will take a mile is appropriate here. 3. While the proportions of other states' economies are markedly smaller, other nations sometimes reap far more of the rewards for UN existence than they contribute - the United States is far and away the largest single contributor to the UN system. 4. The UN has become dependent on the United States and other industrialized nations to pay a huge portion of the bill for UN operations. 5. -LSB-1 -RSB- Should the United States remain a consistent donor and allow itself to be asked for more and more as the UN budget becomes more bloated, or should it assert itself and say that, in real dollars, a line must be drawn? 6. In 2006, the total US contributions came to at least $2.7 billion and which excludes the private sector, which of most independent estimates, draws most of its $1.5 billion in the United States contributions from US sources. 7. UN : Even more expensive than it looks 2006/11/2008 8. LSB-1-RSB-Russel, George.
Detta hus skulle frysa FN:s budget
This house would freeze the UN budget