In this case, the change agreed to between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the department concerned takes precedence over other regulations under the Fisheries Act, the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, the Canada Shipping Act, the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Aeronautics Act.

Can we draw the following conclusion?
The Department of Canadian Heritage cannot disagree with the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
I detta fall har den ändring som överenskommits mellan Department of Canadian Heritage och det berörda departementet företräde framför andra förordningar enligt Fisheries Act, Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, Canada Shipping Act, Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, Navigable Waters Protection Act eller Aeronautics Act. Kan vi dra följande slutsats? Department of Canadian Heritage kan inte hålla med om Kustfiskeskyddslagen ALTERNATIV: - Ja - Det är omöjligt att säga - Nej
In this case, the amendment agreed between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Department concerned has precedence over other regulations under the Fisheries Act, Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, Canada Shipping Act, Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Aeronautics Act. Can we draw the following conclusion? The Department of Canadian Heritage cannot agree with the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act ALTERNATIVE: - Yes - It is impossible to say - No
Nr
No