Article: It seems to have been St Bernard of Clairvaux who, in the 12th century, explicitly raised the question of the Immaculate Conception. A feast of the Conception of the Blessed Virgin had already begun to be celebrated in some churches of the West. St Bernard blames the canons of the metropolitan church of Lyon for instituting such a festival without the permission of the Holy See. In doing so, he takes occasion to repudiate altogether the view that the conception of Mary was sinless. It is doubtful, however, whether he was using the term "conception" in the same sense in which it is used in the definition of Pope Pius IX. Bernard would seem to have been speaking of conception in the active sense of the mother's cooperation, for in his argument he says: "How can there be absence of sin where there is concupiscence (libido)?" and stronger expressions follow, showing that he is speaking of the mother and not of the child.

Question: What did the query starter believe had been done by Mary's direct  maternal line that contradict the conception theory of immaculate for Mary ?
conception in the active sense of the mother's cooperation
Artikel: Det verkar ha varit Sankt Bernard av Clairvaux som på 1100-talet uttryckligen tog upp frågan om den obefläckade avlelsen. En högtid av Avlelsen av den heliga jungfrun hade redan börjat firas i vissa kyrkor i väst. Sankt Bernard klandrar kanonerna i storstadskyrkan Lyon för att ha instiftat en sådan högtid utan påvestolens tillstånd. När han gör det, tar han tillfället i akt att helt och hållet förkasta uppfattningen att Marias uppfattning var syndfri. Det är dock tveksamt om han använde termen "uppfattning" i samma betydelse som den används i definitionen av påve Pius IX. Bernard tycks ha talat om befruktning i moderns aktiva bemärkelse, för i sitt argument säger han: "Hur kan det vara frånvaro av synd där det finns concupiscence (libido)?" och starkare uttryck följer, som visar att han talar om modern och inte om barnet. Fråga: Vad trodde frågestartaren hade gjorts av Marias direkta moderslinje som motsäger uppfattningen teorin om obefläckad för Maria?
Article: It appears to have been St. Bernard of Clairvaux who in the 12th century explicitly raised the issue of the Immaculate Conception. A festival of the Conception of the Blessed Virgin had already begun to be celebrated in some churches in the West. St. Bernard blames the guns of the metropolitan church of Lyon for instituting such a festival without the permission of the pope's seat. In doing so, he takes the opportunity to reject completely the view that Mary’s view was sinless. However, it is doubtful whether he used the term "perception" in the same sense as it is used in the definition of Pope Pius IX. Bernard seems to have talked about conception in the active sense of the mother, for in his argument he says, "How can it be absence of sin where there is concupiscence (libido)?" and stronger expressions follow, showing that he speaks of the mother and not of the child. Question: What did the questioner think had been done by Mary’s direct mother line that contradicts the theory of immaculate to Mary?
föreställning i den aktiva betydelsen av moderns samarbete
performance in the active importance of the mother's cooperation