Here is an email: Activity on desks is dramatically scaled back. Most of the time traders are focused on setting curves. Mid office has the most work, booking cancellations out of commercial book into bankruptcy book. Currently it still appears as if the commercial book has more deals in it that the bankruptcy book. Creditors with deals showing significant market-to-market gains in their favor a reluctant to book out of trades and question valuations, suggesting that going to settlement might be preferred. Legal is deciding difference between "executable" contracts (able to negate deal) and "forward" contracts (collapse deal), with one interpretation being beneficial for EES and the other being beneficial for wholesale. South America appears to have similar issues with Duke requesting collateral before willing to book out of transaction, suggesting high likelihood of physical settlement. In summary, the positions being captured in value-at-risk are questionable, given slow and tedious process of cancellation/booking. However, below is the VAR COB 12/18/01. Entity		VAR		Historical VAR ? Corp		$68.9MM	$60.7MM ? Americas	$46.5MM	$39.6MM ? Gas		$17.6MM	$23.8MM ? Power		$48.9MM	$49.5MM ? So. Cone Pwr	$239K		$239K	 ? So. Cone Gas	$63K		$63K 
What is a potential subject line for this email?
Quick Summary
Här är ett e-postmeddelande: Aktivitet på skrivbord är dramatiskt skalas tillbaka. De flesta av tiden handlare är inriktade på att ställa kurvor. Mid office har mest arbete, att boka avbeställningar ur handelsbok till konkursbok. För närvarande verkar det fortfarande som om den kommersiella boken har fler erbjudanden i den att konkursboken. Kreditgivare med affärer som visar betydande marknadsvinster till deras fördel en motvillig att boka ut av handel och ifrågasätta värderingar, vilket tyder på att gå till avveckling kan vara att föredra. Juridiskt sett är det skillnad mellan "genomförbara" kontrakt (som går att neka avtal) och "framåt" kontrakt (kollapsaffär), där en tolkning är fördelaktig för in- och utresesystemet och den andra är fördelaktig för grossistledet. Sydamerika verkar ha liknande problem med att Duke begär säkerhet innan han är villig att boka sig ur transaktionen, vilket tyder på hög sannolikhet för fysisk uppgörelse. Sammanfattningsvis är de positioner som fångas i värde-at-risk tvivelaktiga, med tanke på långsam och tråkig process av avbokning/bokning. Nedan följer dock VAR COB 12/18/01. Enhet VAR Historiskt VAR? Korp $ 68.9MM $ 60.7MM ? Amerikas $46.5MM $39.6MM ? Gas 17,6 mm $ 23,8 mm ? Ström 48,9mm $49,5mm ? Så. Kottepwr $ 239K $ 239K ? Så. Cone Gas $ 63K $ 63K Vad är en potentiell ämnesrad för detta e-postmeddelande?
Here's an email: Task on desktop is dramatically scaled back. Most of the time traders are focused on setting curves. Mid office has the most work, booking cancellations from trading book to bankruptcy book. At present, it still seems that the commercial book has more offers in it to the bankruptcy book. Creditors with deals that show significant market profits to their advantage a reluctant to book out of trading and question valuations, suggesting going to settlement may be preferable. Legally, there is a difference between "feasible" contracts (which can be denied contracts) and "forward" contracts (collapse deal), where one interpretation is beneficial to the entry and exit system and the other is beneficial to the wholesale sector. South America appears to have similar problems with Duke requesting security before he is willing to book out of the transaction, indicating high probability of physical settlement. In conclusion, the positions captured in value-at-risk are questionable, given the slow and boring process of cancellation/booking. However, below is VAR COB 12/18/01. Unity WAS Historical WHERE? Raven $68.9MM $60.7MM ? America's $46.5MM $39.6MM ? Gas 17.6 mm $23.8 mm ? Power 48.9mm $49.5mm ? There. Kottepwr $239K $239K? There. Cone Gas $63K $63K What is a potential subject line for this email?
Snabböversikt
Quick Overview