The United States government has filed a civil lawsuit against BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (BPXA) alleging that the company "violated federal clean air and water laws" by "illegally discharging" more than 200,000 gallons crude oil during two oil spills in 2006 on Alaska's North Slope in Prudhoe Bay. BPXA previously pleaded guilty to one count of criminal negligence in illegally discharging the oil and paid US$20 million in damages. As a result of the plea, the lawsuit was filed saying that they "failed" to prepare for such a disaster by implementing "certain [sic] spill prevention measures" as the law requires.
Can we infer the following?
As a result of the plea, the lawsuit was filed saying that they "failed" to prepare for clean air and water.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
USA:s regering har lämnat in en civil stämning mot BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (BPXA) som hävdar att företaget "avviker federala lagar ren luft och vatten" genom "illegalt utsläpp" mer än 200 000 liter råolja under två oljeutsläpp 2006 på Alaskas North Slope i Prudhoe Bay. BPXA erkände sig tidigare skyldig till ett brottsförsumlighet vid olaglig oljeutsättning och betalade 20 miljoner US-dollar i skadestånd. Som en följd av denna grund ingavs stämningen där det stod att de "misslyckades" att förbereda sig för en sådan katastrof genom att genomföra "vissa [sic] spillpreventionsåtgärder" som lagen kräver. Kan vi dra följande slutsats? Som en följd av vädjan ingavs stämningen där det stod att de "misslyckades" att förbereda sig för ren luft och vatten. - Ja, det är omöjligt att säga nej.
The U.S. government has filed a civil lawsuit against BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (BPXA) claiming that the company "disappears federal laws of clean air and water" by "illegal discharge" more than 200,000 litres of crude oil during two 2006 oil spills on Alaska's North Slope in Prudhoe Bay. The BPXA previously pleaded guilty to a criminal negligence in the event of illegal oil release and paid US$20 million in damages. As a result of this plea, the lawsuit was filed stating that they "failed" to prepare for such a disaster by implementing "some [sic] waste prevention measures" as required by the law. Can we draw the following conclusion? As a result of the appeal, the lawsuit was filed stating that they "failed" to prepare for clean air and water. - Yes, it's impossible to say no.
Nr
No