Read this and answer the question

At times when a death sentence is affirmed on direct review, it is considered final. Yet, supplemental methods to attack the judgment, though less familiar than a typical appeal, do remain. These supplemental remedies are considered collateral review, that is, an avenue for upsetting judgments that have become otherwise final. Where the prisoner received his death sentence in a state-level trial, as is usually the case, the first step in collateral review is state collateral review. (If the case is a federal death penalty case, it proceeds immediately from direct review to federal habeas corpus.) Although all states have some type of collateral review, the process varies widely from state to state. Generally, the purpose of these collateral proceedings is to permit the prisoner to challenge his sentence on grounds that could not have been raised reasonably at trial or on direct review. Most often these are claims, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, which requires the court to consider new evidence outside the original trial record, something courts may not do in an ordinary appeal. State collateral review, though an important step in that it helps define the scope of subsequent review through federal habeas corpus, is rarely successful in and of itself. Only around 6 percent of death sentences are overturned on state collateral review. In 2010, the death sentences of 53 inmates were overturned as a result of legal appeals or high court reversals.

In 2010, how many death sentences were overturned due to reversals from courts or appeals?
53
Läs detta och besvara frågan Vid tillfällen då en dödsdom bekräftas vid direkt granskning anses den vara slutgiltig. Men det finns fortfarande kompletterande metoder att angripa domen, även om de är mindre bekanta än en typisk vädjan. Dessa kompletterande åtgärder anses vara en säkerhetsöversyn, det vill säga en väg för att uppröra domar som i övrigt har blivit slutgiltiga. Där fången fick sin dödsdom i en statsrättegång, som oftast är fallet, är det första steget i säkerhetsprövningen statlig säkerhetsprövning. (Om fallet är ett federalt dödsstrafffall, fortsätter det omedelbart från direkt granskning till federal habeas corpus.) Även om alla stater har någon typ av säkerhetsöversyn varierar processen kraftigt från stat till stat. Syftet med dessa förfaranden är i allmänhet att låta fången överklaga sitt straff på grunder som inte rimligen kunde ha tagits upp vid rättegång eller vid direkt prövning. Oftast är detta påståenden, till exempel ineffektiv hjälp av ombud, som kräver att domstolen överväger nya bevis utanför det ursprungliga rättegångsregistret, något som domstolar kanske inte gör i ett vanligt överklagande. En översyn av den statliga säkerheten är visserligen ett viktigt steg eftersom den bidrar till att definiera omfattningen av den efterföljande översynen genom federal habeas corpus, men den är sällan framgångsrik i sig själv. Endast omkring 6 procent av dödsdomarna kullkastas vid granskning av statens säkerhet. År 2010 kullkastades 53 interners dödsdomar till följd av rättsliga överklaganden eller höga domstolsavgöranden. Hur många dödsdomar upphävdes 2010 på grund av omkastningar från domstolar eller överklaganden?
Read this and answer the question On occasions when a death sentence is confirmed on direct review, it is considered final. However, there are still complementary methods to attack the sentence, although they are less familiar than a typical appeal. These accompanying measures are considered to be a safety review, i.e. a way of upsetting judgments that have otherwise become final. Where the prisoner received his death sentence in a state trial, as is usually the case, the first step in the security clearance is state security clearance. (If the case is a federal death penalty case, it continues immediately from direct review to federal habeas corpus.) Although all states have some kind of security review, the process varies greatly from state to state. The purpose of these proceedings is generally to allow the prisoner to appeal his or her sentence on grounds which could not reasonably have been raised at trial or in direct review. Usually, these claims, such as ineffective help by counsel, require the court to consider new evidence outside the original trial register, something that courts may not do in a common appeal. While a review of state security is an important step as it helps define the scope of the subsequent review through federal habeas corpus, it is rarely successful in itself. Only about 6 percent of death sentences are overturned when examining state security. In 2010, 53 inmates' death sentences were overturned as a result of legal appeals or high court rulings. How many death sentences were suspended in 2010 due to reversals from courts or appeals?
53
53