I just watched this movie on Starz. Let me go through a few things i thought could have been improved; the acting, writing, directing, special effects, camera crew, sound, and lighting. It also seemed as though the writers had no idea anything that had to do with the movie. Apparently back in 2007, when the dollar was stronger you could buy a super advanced stealth bomber that could go completely invisible for $75 million. Now-a-days those things cost about $3 billion and they cant go invisible. Apparently you can fly from the US to the middle east in an hour. There was a completely random lesbian scene, which I didn't mind, but it seemed like a lame attempt to get more guys to see it. The camera would randomly zoom in on actors and skip to random scenes. Oh yeah, since its a Steven Segal movie, its predictable as hell. All in all I rank it right up there with Snakes on a Plane.

Is the sentiment of this review positive or negative?
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive
negative
Jag såg en film om Starz. Låt mig gå igenom några saker som jag trodde kunde ha förbättrats; skådespeleri, skrivande, regi, specialeffekter, kamerateam, ljud, och belysning. Det verkade också som om författarna inte hade någon aning om något som hade med filmen att göra. Tydligen redan 2007, när dollarn var starkare kunde man köpa ett super avancerat smygbombare som kunde gå helt osynligt för $75 miljoner. Nu för tiden kostar de där sakerna ungefär 3 miljarder dollar och de kan inte bli osynliga. Du kan flyga från USA till mellanöstern om en timme. Det var en helt slumpmässig lesbisk scen, som jag inte hade något emot, men det verkade som ett lamt försök att få fler killar att se den. Kameran skulle slumpmässigt zooma in på skådespelare och hoppa till slumpmässiga scener. Ja, sen det var en Steven Segal-film, dess förutsägbara som fan. Allt som allt rankar jag den där uppe med Snakes på en plan. Är den här recensionen positiv eller negativ? ALTERNATIV: - negativ - positiv
I saw a movie about Starz. Let me go through some things that I thought could have improved; acting, writing, directing, special effects, camera crew, sound, and lighting. It also seemed that the authors had no idea anything to do with the film. Apparently back in 2007, when the dollar was stronger, you could buy a super advanced stealth bomber that could go completely invisible for $75 million. These days, those things cost about $3 billion and they can't be invisible. You can fly from the United States to the Middle East in an hour. It was a completely random lesbian scene, which I didn't mind, but it seemed like a lame attempt to get more guys to see it. The camera would randomly zoom in on actors and jump to random scenes. Yeah, since it was a Steven Segal movie, its predictable as hell. All in all, I rank it up there with Snakes on a plan. Is this review positive or negative? ALTERNATIVE: - negative - positive
negativ
negative