Generate a movie review with positive sentiment.
Whenever I see most reviews it's called 'a misfire for Eddie Murphy'. These critics want to take a look at some of the stuff he's doing these days, and maybe soften their stance in retrospect... "The Golden Child" is not highbrow entertainment, but thanks to some of the cast it breaths new life into old clichés, and gives Murphy one of his best roles. I don't understand the pervading lack of 'love' for its efforts, at all. Perhaps it was released at a time when the establishment had grown weary of knockabout, thrill-a-minute adventures? Steven Spielberg started it with Indiana Jones; it's unfair to make this one a scapegoat when what is possibly its biggest sin is also utterly harmless. There's nothing necessarily wrong with trying to capitalise on trends.

Yes it's silly, but even an occasional observer should be able to understand that 'ridiculous' is where Hollywood's idea of mysticism begins and ends. What's more important than believability with a story like this is that the audience have entertaining tour guides on hand to show them the mysterious sights. Michael Ritchie and Eddie Murphy fit the bill for this capacity just fine. My advice to you is to buy the ticket and take the ride.
Generera en filmrecension med positiv känsla.
Generate a movie review with positive feeling.
Varje gång jag ser de flesta recensioner kallas det "en feltändning för Eddie Murphy". Dessa kritiker vill ta en titt på några av de saker han gör nuförtiden, och kanske mjuka upp deras hållning i efterhand... "The Golden Child" är inte highbrow underhållning, men tack vare några av rollbesättningen andas det nytt liv i gamla klichéer, och ger Murphy en av sina bästa roller. Jag förstår inte alls den genomträngande bristen på 'kärlek' för sina ansträngningar. Kanske släpptes den i en tid då etablissemanget hade tröttnat på knackboom, spännings-en-minuten-äventyr? Steven Spielberg startade det med Indiana Jones; det är orättvist att göra den här till syndabock när det som möjligen är dess största synd också är helt ofarligt. Det är inget fel med att försöka utnyttja trender. Ja, det är fånigt, men även en enstaka observatör bör kunna förstå att "löjligt" är där Hollywoods idé om mysticism börjar och slutar. Vad som är viktigare än tro med en historia som denna är att publiken har underhållande guider till hands för att visa dem de mystiska sevärdheterna. Michael Ritchie och Eddie Murphy passar räkningen för den här kapaciteten. Mitt råd till dig är att köpa biljetten och ta åkturen.
Every time I see most reviews, they call it "a misfire for Eddie Murphy." These critics want to take a look at some of the things he does nowadays, and maybe soften their stance afterwards... "The Golden Child" is not highbrow entertainment, but thanks to some of the cast breathing it new life in old clichés, and giving Murphy one of his best roles. I do not understand at all the penetrating lack of 'love' for their efforts. Maybe it was released at a time when the establishment had grown tired of knockboom, tension-a-minute adventure? Steven Spielberg started it with Indiana Jones; it is unfair to make this one a scapegoat when what is possibly its greatest sin is also completely harmless. There's nothing wrong with trying to exploit trends. Yes, it's silly, but even a single observer should be able to understand that "ridiculous" is where Hollywood's idea of mysticism begins and ends. What is more important than believing with a story like this is that the audience has entertaining guides at hand to show them the mysterious sights. Michael Ritchie and Eddie Murphy fit the bill for this capacity. My advice to you is to buy the ticket and take the ride.