If, in 1995, during the referendum debate in Quebec, the National Assembly had passed such a bill against the federalist vote, limiting it so that it would have less weight than the sovereignist vote, what would people have thought of the National Assembly and of its Parti Quebecois members?
Does this next sentence follow, given the preceding text?
The bill against the vote wasn't passed.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Yes
Om nationalförsamlingen 1995 under folkomröstningsdebatten i Quebec hade antagit ett sådant lagförslag mot den federalistiska omröstningen, som begränsade den så att den skulle ha mindre tyngd än den suveräna rösten, vad skulle man då ha tyckt om nationalförsamlingen och dess partiquebekoismedlemmar? Följer denna följande mening, med tanke på föregående text? Lagförslaget mot omröstningen antogs inte. - Ja, det är omöjligt att säga nej.
If, in 1995, during the referendum debate in Quebec, the National Assembly had passed such a bill against the federalist vote, which limited it so that it would have less weight than the sovereign vote, what would it have liked of the National Assembly and its partisan members? Does this follow the following sentence, given the previous text? The bill against the vote was not passed. - Yes, it's impossible to say no.
Ja, det är jag.
Yes, I am.