What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?

1. Belfield , Clive R. , The Economic Value of Opportunity Youth , , January 2012 , , p. 2
2. Both will give a fiscal boost from the money being spent but handing money out wont bring a return decades later .
3. A study in the US suggests that a 25 year old with little education past 16 and no job will cost the taxpayer $ 258,000 over their lifetime .
4. There is then a change from the unemployed youth being a burden on the state and the economy to a contributor .
5. This higher skilled workforce will then over time pay back the initial investment through paying more tax as a result of being more productive -LRB- so earning more -RRB- .
6. This means that there are several economic benefits to spending on youth ; there is the initial fiscal benefit from the spending on youth followed over years and decades by a return on the investment from having higher skilled workers .
7. Having a better skilled workforce has a beneficial effect on economic growth .
8. This is done through education , training , and apprenticeships .
9. While there may be other objectives too , such as taking young people off the street to prevent trouble , when there is spending on young people this is almost always to ensure they have either a broader , or more focused skill base .
10. Spending on young people is an investment .
Spending on youth is best for the economy
Vilket påstående kan man göra av följande bevis? 1. Belfield , Clive R. , Det ekonomiska värdet av möjlighet Ungdom , , Januari 2012 , , s. 2 2. Båda kommer att ge en skattemässig skjuts från de pengar som spenderas men att dela ut pengar kommer inte att ge en avkastning årtionden senare. 3. En studie i USA tyder på att en 25-åring med lite utbildning över 16 och inget jobb kommer att kosta skattebetalarna $ 258.000 under sin livstid. 4. Det sker då en förändring från att arbetslösa ungdomar är en börda för staten och ekonomin till en bidragsgivare. 5. Denna högre kvalificerad arbetskraft kommer sedan med tiden att betala tillbaka den ursprungliga investeringen genom att betala mer skatt som ett resultat av att vara mer produktiv -LRB- så tjäna mer -RRB- . 6. Detta innebär att det finns flera ekonomiska fördelar med att spendera på ungdomar; det finns den första skattevinsten av att utgifterna för ungdomar följs över år och årtionden av en avkastning på investeringen från att ha högre kvalificerad arbetskraft. 7. Att ha en bättre kvalificerad arbetskraft har en gynnsam inverkan på den ekonomiska tillväxten. 8. Detta görs genom utbildning , utbildning , och lärlingsutbildning . 9. Även om det kan finnas andra mål också, såsom att ta ungdomar från gatan för att förhindra problem, när det finns utgifter för ungdomar är detta nästan alltid för att se till att de har antingen en bredare, eller mer fokuserad kompetensbas. 10. Att spendera pengar på ungdomar är en investering.
What statement can be made of the following evidence? 1. Belfield , Clive R. , The Economic Value of Opportunities Youth , , January 2012 , , p. 2 2. Both will give a tax boost from the money spent but handing out money will not yield a return decades later. 3. A study in the United States suggests that a 25-year-old with little education over 16 and no job will cost taxpayers $258,000 in his lifetime. 4. There is a change from the fact that unemployed young people are a burden on the state and the economy to a contributor. 5. This higher skilled workforce will then over time pay back the initial investment by paying more tax as a result of being more productive -LRB- so earn more -RRB- . 6. This means that there are several economic benefits to spending on young people; there is the first tax gain of spending on young people being followed over years and decades by a return on investment from having higher skilled labour. 7. Having a better skilled workforce has a beneficial impact on economic growth. 8. This is done through training, training, and apprenticeship. 9. Although there may be other goals as well, such as taking young people off the street to prevent problems, when there is spending on young people, this is almost always to ensure that they have either a broader, or more focused skills base. 10. Spending money on young people is an investment.
Utgifter för ungdomar är bäst för ekonomin
Expenditure on young people is best for the economy