Here is a premise:
The position is much as though they had got hold of an incriminating document, but couldn't read it because it was in cipher but we know that the draft treaty wasn't in cipher couldn't be in the nature of things so that won't wash.

Here is a hypothesis:
Incriminating documents are almost always written in cipher.

Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Här är en premiss: Positionen är ungefär som om de hade fått tag på ett komprometterande dokument, men kunde inte läsa det eftersom det var i chiffer men vi vet att utkastet till fördrag inte var i chiffer kunde inte vara i naturen av saker så att inte tvätta. Här är en hypotes: Komprometterande dokument skrivs nästan alltid i chiffer. Är det möjligt att dra slutsatsen att om premissen är sann, så är hypotesen det? ALTERNATIV: - ja - det går inte att säga - nej
Here's a premise: The position is kind of as if they had obtained a compromising document, but could not read it because it was in cipher but we know that the draft treaty was not in cipher could not be in the nature of things so as not to wash. Here is a hypothesis: Incriminating documents are almost always written in ciphers. Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, the hypothesis is true? ALTERNATIVE: - yes - you can't say - no
det är inte möjligt att säga
it's not possible to say