This was a very thought provoking film, especially for 1973. At the time it was actually a huge box office success. After the 1970s it appeared to be forgotten, but its central messages were too important to disappear completely.It was actually at least fifteen years ahead of its time...no one had ever heard of the 'greenhouse effect'before 1985, and the controversial subject of euthanasia was rarely brought up.

The sets and special effects might look a little outdated, but big money for sci fi films was a gamble in that period. If you look closely you will see everything usually makes sense. This is a message movie, not for zonked out star wars fans that cant sit through one minute of thought stimulation unless it contains a million bucks worth of explosions.

This was also Hestons last good film, the end of his famous dystopian sci fi trilogy. After that it was all overblown disaster epics and big budget crowd pleasing trash. THis might not be the most amusing two hour movie ever made, and the ending might be creepy and depressing, but its hard to find any film producer with guts anymore who would tackle a subject like this.
How would you describe the sentiment of this review?
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive
positive
Detta var en mycket tankeväckande film, särskilt för 1973. Då blev det faktiskt en stor framgång. Efter 1970-talet verkade den vara bortglömd, men dess centrala budskap var för viktiga för att försvinna helt.Det var faktiskt minst femton år före sin tid...ingen hade någonsin hört talas om "växthuseffekten" före 1985, och det kontroversiella ämnet dödshjälp togs sällan upp. Sets och specialeffekterna kan se lite föråldrade ut, men stora pengar till scifi-filmer var en chansning under den perioden. Om du tittar noga kommer du att se allt som oftast är vettigt. Detta är en meddelandefilm, inte för zonkade ut stjärnkrig fans som inte kan sitta igenom en minuts tankestimulering om den inte innehåller en miljon dollar i explosioner. Detta var också Hestons sista bra film, slutet på hans berömda dystopiska sci fi-trilogi. Efter det var allt överblåst katastrofepos och stor budget publik behaga sopor. Det kanske inte är den roligaste tvåtimmarsfilmen någonsin, och slutet kan vara läskigt och deprimerande, men det är svårt att hitta någon filmproducent med mod längre som skulle ta itu med ett ämne som detta. Hur skulle du beskriva känslan av denna recension? ALTERNATIV: - negativ - positiv
This was a very thought-provoking film, especially for 1973. It was actually a great success then. After the 1970s, it seemed to be forgotten, but its central message was too important to disappear completely.It was actually at least fifteen years before its time...no one had ever heard of the "greenhouse effect" before 1985, and the controversial topic of euthanasia was rarely addressed. Sets and special effects may look a little outdated, but big money for scifi films was a gamble during that period. If you look closely you will see everything that usually makes sense. This is a message film, not for zoned out star war fans who cannot sit through a minute of thought stimulation unless it contains a million dollars in explosions. This was also Heston's last good film, the end of his famous dystopian sci fi trilogy. After that, everything was overblown disaster epics and large budget audiences were pleasing garbage. It may not be the funniest two-hour film ever, and the end can be scary and depressing, but it is hard to find any film producer with courage anymore who would deal with a subject like this. How would you describe the feeling of this review? ALTERNATIVE: - negative - positive
positiv
positive