UNIVERSITY OF PANTEION Maria Stratigaki

Gender Mainstreaming vs Positive Action An Ongoing Conflict in EU Gender Equality Policy

Keywords:

This article examines the development of a gender mainstreaming strategy in the EU by illustrating how this strategy was shaped by other than gender equality policy goals. Gender mainstreaming was originally launched in 1996 to promote gender equality in all EU policies, in the context of international and European mobilization on women's issues. It was aimed to transform mainstream policies by introducing a gender equality perspective. However, it has been largely used as an alibi for neutralizing positive action. The successful implementation of positive action in political decision-making had challenged the gender distribution of political power over policy institutions and technical, human and financial resources. This led to policy softening and institutional weakening due to counteracting by the EU political and administrative hierarchies. The argument is based on text analyses of relevant Community acts and on direct observations of the policy process, based on personal working experiences in the European Commission.

INTRODUCTION

The article aims to contribute to the debate about the development of EU gender mainstreaming (GM) strategies by examining the context of its emergence in the mid-1990s. It is argued that the launch and rapid expansion of GM in the EU were largely shaped by the outcome of the conflict between two different policy frames of GM. One frame concerns its transformative role in public policies, complementing and reinforcing positive European Journal of Women's Studies Copyright © 2005 SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi), 1350-5068 Vol. 12(2): 165-186; DOI: 10.1177/1350506805051236 action and equality legislation. This frame was promoted as the central element of an EU hegemonic rhetoric at the World Conference on Women in 1995 and backed up by feminist theorists, women's organizations and institutions. The second frame presents GM as an alternative gender equality tool, which would gradually make positive action in favour of women redundant and which could be used to serve other policy goals. This frame was promoted by a number of key EU policy-makers and political forces within the EU who did not support the goal of de facto gender equality. The article shows that the policy outcome of the conflict, in the short term, was harmful to positive action in most EU policy areas, while in the long term it proved helpful in policy areas where gender equality coincided with other EU priorities, such as economic priorities of the European Employment Strategy or in policy areas that fell under the responsibility of feminist commissioners.

More precisely, the article seeks to explain how positive action was sidelined after the launch of gender mainstreaming as a result of the specific way GM was used by the opponents of gender equality to damage the dynamic created by the successful enlargement of the scope of gender equality in the Third Community Action Programme and the expansion of women's constituency in EU politics enhanced by the integration of Sweden and Finland. The conflicts between the two policy frames are manifested in both implicit and explicit ways throughout the policy cycle. Shifts in policy frames occur in rhetoric, activities, instruments and mechanisms resulting in different policy outcomes. Examining the rhetoric and administrative changes that accompanied the development of the EU gender mainstreaming strategy reveals some of the explicit and implicit obstacles that confronted gender equality policies in the unique environment of European policy-making. These include the institutional context of the powerful and deeply hierarchical European Commission, where top-level administration and technocratic staff can play a decisive role.

This article is based on analysis of seminal policy documents, like the 1996 Commission Communication, the 1997 European Parliament Resolution and the 1998 Commission progress report on GM. By reflecting implicit and subtle shifts in policy frames and discourse, these texts reveal conflicts and compromises between different political interests, institutions and policy actors. The texts are placed in the context of changing policy environments, policy objectives and institutional structures as I have experienced them during my involvement in the planning and implementation of GM strategies in the Commission. 1 In this context, I highlight the role of individual key players, politicians and civil servants in specific political and administrative decisions. I also assess immediate negative impacts on positive action and discuss the new opportunities that were opened in some EU policy areas.

MYTHS AND REALITIES ABOUT GENDER MAINSTREAMING

Both 'gender' and 'mainstreaming' are conceptual terms that have evoked more confusion, misunderstanding and questions than any other terms used in EU equality policies. Until 1996, there was no clear definition in Community documents for the term 'gender mainstreaming'. The range of interpreted meanings included 'specific actions targeted to women in non-equality policies' and 'upgrading equality policy to a mainstream policy'. The approach to GM adopted in this study is based on the widely accepted definition of the Group of Specialists of the Council of Europe, which states that: 'GM is the (re)organisation, improvement, development and evaluation of policy processes, so that a gender equality perspective is incorporated in all policies, at all levels and at all stages, by the actors normally involved in policy-making' (Council of Europe, 1998: 15). A similar definition that stresses the importance of the 'transformation' of policies is given by Rees (1998: 40), who considers 'mainstreaming equality' one of the three major tools of sex equality policies, together with equal treatment legislation and positive action in favour of women.

Gender mainstreaming is the equality policy strategy that has been most critically assessed by feminists and women's organizations, who have pointed to the risks if the conditions for its success are not met and to the increasing evidence of significant weaknesses in its implementation. Research has been conducted on its emergence, its criteria for success and its transposition from one context to another (supranational to national) and from one administrative level to another (national to local). The multiple character of GM was highlighted by [START_REF] Vogel-Polsky | Introduction: la situation des femmes toujours inegalitaire[END_REF], who added to the already long list of prerequisites, vast knowledge of the mechanisms of segregation and gender relations, as well as the capacity to analyse social contracts and policies. One of the most serious risks here is the gradual substitution of equal treatment guarantees. GM does not rely on law enforcement mechanisms but involves long-term transformation of public policies [START_REF] Liebert | Europeanising Gender Mainstreaming: Constraints and Opportunities in the Multilevel Euro-Polity[END_REF][START_REF] Pollack | Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union[END_REF]. By emphasizing the danger of weakening gender equality policies altogether -a result of GM implementation - [START_REF] Verloo | Another Velvet Revolution? Gender Mainstreaming and the Politics of Implementation, working papers[END_REF] argues that given gender power relations, GM becomes a political process in itself. [START_REF] Woodward | European Gender Mainstreaming: Promises and Pitfalls of Transformative Policy[END_REF] too argues that in settings where political groups hope to reverse the progress of equality, GM is employed in questionable ways by dismantling women's policy machinery and committing no resources in its place.

Gender mainstreaming in the EU gained a high political profile thanks to its influential role in member states' equality policies. Research on its implementation has shown that, taking advantage of the political opportunities provided by the EU Treaty and the UN Platform for Action, supranational networks facilitated the adoption of this new policy strategy and its revolutionary potential in a wide range of EU policy fields, thus upgrading the EU to one of the most progressive polities with respect to the promotion of gender equality [START_REF] Pollack | Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union[END_REF]. GM was also analysed as a principal (and potentially radical) instrument towards achieving gender equality and challenging the liberal concept of equal treatment that views public policies as neutral. However, it has been argued that it is difficult to implement GM effectively when embedded cultural values and policy frames remain unquestioned; it is therefore understandable that women's organizations remain committed to grounding gender equality in law [START_REF] Mazey | The Emergence of Gender Mainstreaming in the EU: Policy Succession in Hard Times[END_REF][START_REF] Mazey | Gender Mainstreaming Strategies in the EU: Delivering on an Agenda?[END_REF].

Further research has explored parameters of GM efficiency. It was rightly argued that the effective implementation of GM in the multilevel Euro-polity can be achieved only if it takes root at all levels of decisionmaking; its successful transfer to national and regional levels can be largely facilitated by knowledge-based inducements, like elite learning and new governance instruments developed in the EU [START_REF] Liebert | Europeanising Gender Mainstreaming: Constraints and Opportunities in the Multilevel Euro-Polity[END_REF]. A comparison between GM in the EU and Norway has highlighted the importance of women in politics both in numbers and influence. This is the only way to guarantee a persistent active political will that is necessary for confronting everyday administrative and institutional resistance [START_REF] Havnør | Partnership, Political Will and Agency-Gender Mainstreaming at the EC level and in the Central Administration of Norway[END_REF]. Research on GM in EU Structural Funds revealed some important aspects of the barriers within the European Commission services and correctly suggested that the 'European Commission is stronger on policy formulation than on developing accompanying arguments, procedures and instruments for translating policy into practice.' It was further argued that middle management reluctance and rivalry between services about power made progress dependent on certain people in the right positions at the right moment [START_REF] Braithwaite | Mainstreaming Gender in the European Structural Funds[END_REF].

Almost all analyses of GM agree that it is a strategy that complements but does not replace previous gender-specific equality policies like equal treatment legislation and positive action. The Council of Europe report states clearly that specific gender equality policies (legislation, mechanisms, actions to address specific women's interests, research and training) are a necessary prerequisite for successful implementation of GM (Council of Europe, 1998: 21). However, in hostile gender equality policy environments (i.e. patriarchal structures of institutional organizations or the prevalence of policy objectives contrary to gender equality, etc.), GM may be conceived and applied as an alternative to positive action and used to downplay the final overall objective of gender equality. In these cases, the most important innovative element of GM -the broadening of the scope and relevance of gender equality to all policies in the effort to transform them -becomes its major weakness, namely its use as an excuse for the elimination of gender equality specific policies. Such a risk increases in policy environments where these specific policies have been efficiently implemented and have challenged unequal gender distribution of economic resources and threatened men's political power.

The ambivalent outcome of GM, though, deserves more attention and analysis, as it should not be considered accidental or temporary but rather inherent and structural. GM challenges the whole policy cycle by introducing a gendered perspective to all phases, not only in the policy delivery phase as positive action does; a controversial usage may be the payoff for a policy shift from 'equal opportunities for women and men' to a 'gender equality' approach. One may initially argue that a gendered perspective to all policies is a more radical approach than applying PA on the level of individuals and social groups. However, in practice, thorough GM application becomes an almost Sisyphean mission. Strategies and policy instruments (even those for gender equality) are shaped within multiple gender hierarchies and thus become the implicit vehicles of the reproduction of inequalities. Without simultaneously tackling the accumulated inequalities between the sexes and reinforcing genderspecific policies, GM effectiveness cannot be assured.

In current EU public policies and existing gender regimes in member states, enhancing the complementarity of the two tools not only reduces risks and distortions, but also contributes to their mutual reinforcement. GM enlarges the scope of gender equality policies and limits its compartmentalization in target groups, policy-making machinery and the allocation of financial and human resources. Parallel positive action increases women's visibility and fosters gender equality by being diluted in other policy objectives or hijacked by other policy priorities. Arguments in favour of positive action highlight the advantage of introducing clear and measurable targets for women. Arguments in favour of GM highlight the importance of challenging the supposedly gender-neutral public policies with the aim of transforming the basis of analysis, the hypotheses about the expected impact, as well as the processes of its measures design. Considering GM and positive action competitive and eventual alternatives negates the multidimensional and structural character of gender relations and ignores the dangers present in policy environments that maintain existing gendered hierarchies.

FROM EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES TO GENDER MAINSTREAMING

In the EU, GM was launched after almost 40 years of equal treatment and positive action policies in the labour market. First gender equality concerns were introduced in the form of legislation on equal pay and equal treatment between women and men in the light of Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome and the mobilization of the post-1968 labour and women's movement [START_REF] Hoskyns | Integrating Gender: Women, Law and Politics in the European Union[END_REF]. The first area of conflict between supporters and opponents of gender equality was about whether positive action should be included in the Equal Treatment Directive (76/207/EEC). Positive action was dropped during the final negotiations of the Directive, becoming instead the subject of a Council Recommendation (84/635/EEC), a soft EU act. In spite of their complementarity, as argued by feminists and gender experts, positive action was seen as contradicting equal treatment legislation. Positive action in employment, however, was promoted though actions supported by the medium-term programmes for equal opportunities for women; it was initiated in the first action programme (1982-5) (CEC, 1982) and consolidated in the second (1986-90) (CEC, 1986). 2 Equal opportunities for women in the labour market were promoted through the specific funding of vocational training and employment schemes for women by the European Social Fund (ESF), since 1977 already a part of its general policy. Since 1988, 'equal opportunities between women and men' became a specific measure under Objective 3 of the EU Structural policy (Council Regulation 4255/88). 3 In its annual report Employment in Europe, launched in 1989, the Commission admitted that women's employment was important for the analysis of the European labour market and introduced a women's chapter [START_REF] Cec | Second Medium-Term Community Programme on Equal Opportunities for Women (1986-1990)[END_REF]. It was a newly appointed female commissioner, Vasso Papandreou, 4 who personally insisted on this. A year later, she was instrumental in launching the most important ESF instrument for gender equality, the Community Initiative NOW (New Opportunities for Women), which earmarked a specific budget for women's vocational training that facilitated their integration into the labour market, including childcare infrastructure.

In 1990, GM was introduced into EU documents as one of the 'innovative features' of the third action programme for equal opportunities for women and men (1991-5) (CEC, 1990: 3); the addition of 'men' in its title was also an innovative feature. Two variants of the definition were proposed in the programme: (1) 'to take into account an equal opportunities dimension and the particular problems encountered by women in all relevant policies' and (2) 'to integrate equality into the general mainstream policy'. Although the official definitions use 'gender' as a component of GM, they ignore the structural aspect of the term and limit the description of the problem to 'differences in opportunities' as a reason for women's particular problems. These definitions characterize the transitional period -wherein the contextual phase shifted from 'women's dimension' to 'gendered dimension' in the development of gender equality policies in the EU [START_REF] Booth | Gender Mainstreaming in the European Union: Towards a New Conception and Practice of Equal Opportunities?[END_REF]. What is further reflected here is the phraseology used by the two national experts from Denmark and the UK [START_REF] Jacobsen | Equal Opportunities in the 1990s: Elements for a Draft Third Community Programme on Equal Opportunities[END_REF], who prepared the first draft of the third action programme. Here the 'new' tool was named 'mainstreaming equal opportunities policy'. Labour market and vocational training were the policies of primary concern for GM, although 'all relevant policies' like educational and social policies were also mentioned.

The Equal Opportunities Unit, in charge of the implementation of the programme, tried to enhance GM by proposing a gender impact assessment of employment policies, similar to the already existing impact assessment on the small and medium enterprises. As a first step, the Unit proposed the adoption of a Commission Communication, which, prepared by an external gender equality expert (Jacqueline Laufer), argued for the necessity of GM in Community policies and programmes, especially in employment and labour market policies. The 1993 Danish presidency had strongly supported it as part of its proposal to the Commission to take action for mainstreaming employment concerns in all Community policies; increasing unemployment rates having started to unsettle policy-makers. 5 GM in employment policies was also supported by the Council Resolution initiated by the Greek presidency, which extended the scope of equal opportunities to all European Structural Funds (Council Conclusion 94/C 231/01/22.6.1994). However, this support did not prevent the draft Communication failing to pass through a reluctant male hierarchy and be adopted as a formal Commission document. GM was, in 1993, seen as secondary to what had become the main focus for DGV hierarchy: to mainstream employment in Community policies. In the new 'employment-dominated' European agenda created by the Conclusions of the Copenhagen European Council, gender mainstreaming was paradoxically put aside as irrelevant and luxurious, despite the existing evidence and awareness of the negative economic impact of the low European female activity rate, especially when compared to that in the US.

ENHANCING WOMEN'S CONSTITUENCY, THREATENING MEN'S POLITICAL POWER

Not surprisingly, the Third Community Action Programme had more success outside the Commission. Strong alliances with women's constituencies, in the European Parliament (EP) and the European Women's Lobby (EWL), 6 as well as with individual women politicians and gender experts, created a positive environment for gender equality around the programme and its operational mechanism, the Equal Opportunities Unit [START_REF] Stratigaki | The European Union and the Equal Opportunities Process[END_REF]. The personal commitment of Agnès Hubert, head of the Unit from 1992 to 1996, played a crucial role in consolidating this alliance, which eventually favoured focusing on other innovative features in the programme, namely increasing women in political decision-making. This policy goal has prevailed in EU gender equality policies through a wide range of policy instruments, including background studies, theoretical texts, electoral campaigns, collected statistics and visibility events (EC, 1997b;[START_REF] Hubert | L'Europe et les femmes[END_REF], as well as a Council Recommendation (Council, 1996). A group of gender experts from all member states coordinated action and developed the European argumentation on gender balance in politics and on gender parity. Further elaboration on the concept of 'parity democracy' allowed the move from a quantitative claim to a qualitative necessity associated with structural change [START_REF] Hubert | From Equal Pay to Parity Democracy: The Rocky Ride of Women's Policy in the European Union[END_REF]. The active political support by the commissioner, female MEPs and national ministers was crucial in opening a window of opportunity for positive action for women in politics. An immediate result of these activities, in particular on the European-wide campaign, was the increase of women in the EP from 19 percent to 27 percent (after the 1994 elections and the integration of Sweden and Finland in 1995) and among European commissioners from one to five (out of 20) in 1995.

One of the five women commissioners was the Swedish newcomer, Anita Gradin, ex-Minister of Gender Equality and President of the International Association of Socialist Women. Her personal commitment to gender equality justified her request to bring gender equality policy in her portfolio together with justice and home affairs, both issues being under the responsibility of the conservative Irish commissioner Pádraig Flynn since 1993. Eventually, the President of the Commission, Jacques Santer, chose to keep gender equality policy with the Irish commissioner, whose interest and degree of commitment to gender equality was later publicly challenged by the EP Committee on Women's Rights. 7 The pressure and criticism exercised by the EP urged the president to, instead, extend responsibility for gender equality to more commissioners and form a Group of Commissioners for Equality under his chairship. The members of the group were two men, Pádraig Flynn, in charge of social affairs (including gender equality) and the Finn Erkii Liikanen, in charge of personnel policy, 8 as well as two women, the German social democrat Monica Wulf-Mathies, in charge of regional policy, and Anita Gradin. Unlike other similar groups, 9 this group was open to other commissioners and, once a year, to the presidents of three major bodies representing the women's constituency in the EU: the Advisory Committee composed of national equality machineries, the EP Committee on Women's Rights and the EWL. This status was achieved as a result of the increasing political importance of the issues and the dynamic involvement of political, social and civil actors with high visibility.

The buoyant environment for gender equality in 1995 was reinforced by the exciting stir created by the agenda of the UN Fourth World Conference in Beijing, which urged governments to 'promote an active and visible policy of mainstreaming a gendered perspective in all policies and programmes, so that, before decisions are taken, an analysis is made of the effects on women and men, respectively' (UN, 1996). The EU actively supported this objective and further consolidated the progress on equality in Europe far beyond its original intentions as set before the Beijing Conference by a Communication for this purpose (CEC, 1995a). 10 Shortly after the UN Conference, the Commission adopted two Communications, one on integrating gender issues in development cooperation (CEC, 1995b) and a second on the external dimension of human rights policy including women in its target groups (CEC, 1995c). All women commissioners committed themselves to developing GM in the policies of their respective Community competence. By the same token, the Council of Ministers also mobilized by adopting two Resolutions on equality issues beyond the labour market with respect to decision-making and image in the media (Council, 1995a(Council, , 1995b) ) under the dynamic presidencies of Simone Veil for France and Cristina Alberti for Spain.

However, in spite of this wide interest in gender equality, the overall political and administrative responsibility for the EU gender equality policy was still in the hands of Commissioner Flynn and his Directorate General Employment and Social Affairs (DGV). All bona fide political will had to be coordinated, translated into specific policies and consolidated in Community programmes by allocating human and financial resources and developing appropriate mechanisms and policy instruments. This task necessitated substantial administrative changes aimed at creating and reinforcing existing structures and policy machineries. Specific equality staff would, then, organize the provision of necessary technical and theoretical knowledge of gender analysis in respective policy areas by external experts and researchers.

What effectively happened in DGV went in the opposite direction, despite the equality-sensitive background of the newly appointed, socialist, Director General, Allan Larsson from Sweden. Changes were made that depoliticized GM implementation, underutilized existing human resources and reduced the use of external expertise on gender issues. More precisely, the Equal Opportunities Unit was marginalized with the removal from office of its head, Agnès Hubert, in April 1996, and the management of the action programme was externalized to a technical assistance office, managed by a consortium of companies with no prior experience or expertise in gender issues. 11 In addition, seven out of the nine gender expert groups operating in different policy areas under the third action programme, including those on women in decision-making and positive action, were discontinued, despite the plea of the EP Committee on Women's Rights and the EWL. These administrative decisions, with their important political impact on gender equality perspectives, were taken after the appointment, in April 1995, of the French female Commission official Odile Quintin to the post of Director of Employment (in DGV), who was in charge of equality policy among others. One year later she moved to the post of Director of Social Dialogue (also in DGV) bringing with her the responsibility for the Equal Opportunities Unit. The full assignment of gender equality policy to her has contributed to its softening, as Odile Quintin was known in the Commission to be ambitious and able to reframe EU policies as requested by her political hierarchy. In this specific period, she was even more effective because there was a political coincidence with Commissioner Flynn, who had been renominated for his second term (1995-9) and had relied upon her experience and professional capacity for the shaping of EU social policies in accordance with his party politics.

THE LAUNCH OF GM: EMPTY RHETORIC DESPITE SUPPORTIVE ENVIRONMENT

The high political profile of GM in the EU had created high expectations among feminists both inside and outside European institutions. The Commission had to react positively to broad political agreement with respect to the new strategies, as was advertised in Beijing. Rightly, the Communication 'incorporating equal opportunities for women and men into all community policies and activities' adopted in February 1996 was considered a landmark policy document in the EU [START_REF] Cec | Communication on Incorporating Equal Opportunities for Women and Men into all Community Policies and Activities[END_REF]. The definition of GM in this document states 'mobilising all general policies and measures specifically for the purpose of achieving equality by actively and openly taking into account at the planning stage their possible effects on the respective situations of women and women (gender perspective)' (emphasis in the original). The Communication also includes a review of Community policies including employment, information, education and development cooperation.

The Communication stressed the importance of the EU policy on equal opportunities in different policy areas, but failed to address any major objective, instrument or strategy for implementing GM. In fact, the 1996 Communication was much weaker than the text of the Commission Communication issued before the UN Conference (CEC, 1995a). In the latter, women's participation in political decision-making is a principle and a strategic objective of Community action, as it is considered an important indicator of democracy (para. 28). It is also stated that until a parity democracy is reached, women's interests must be fully integrated in general policies (Conclusion). On the contrary, the 1996 Communication not only failed to add any substantial value but also avoided any reference to the crucial connection between GM and women's participation in decision-making. The text referred more to the importance of the involvement of as many actors as possible (with the exception of women as decision-makers) than to the core element of GM, the transformation of existing public policies. In the Communication, GM lost most of its strategic sense vis-a-vis gender equality as it became an abstract 'principle' used interchangeably with the 'principle of equality'.

More seriously perhaps, GM was presented as a single concept, with no accompanying analysis of gender, gender relations, gender impact assessments and other related concepts and instruments. Rather, mainstreaming came to be connected to some general concepts, such as the 'new partnership between women and men' and 'democracy', concepts generic enough to dilute equality instruments and arguments. The Communication did little to improve readers' understanding of why and how the Commission intended to implement a new policy instrument for equality between women and men. In the examples of equality in EU policies, no reference was made as to the aims, or the expected outcomes, of incorporating a gendered dimension. This section of the Communication could have been part of an ordinary report on equal opportunities as it only described positive actions in different policy areas. In the concluding section, an attempt was made to present an implementation strategy for the principle of mainstreaming in 10 sentences that propose mechanisms to monitor processes, indicators and procedures and 'when necessary, experts' reports'. No reference was made to a timetable or to the allocation of funds and human resources.

The drafting of the Communication was assigned by Odile Quintin to two male officials, one her adviser and the other in charge of the Group of Commissioners at the General Secretariat. Neither had any prior experience in dealing with gender equality and they were not exposed to inputs from the Equal Opportunities Unit, which had followed the work in the Council of Europe on GM and which could have provided expert knowledge. Inputs from the Unit or external equality experts were rejected by the director as adopting a 'women's ghetto' approach and thus not suitable for the new era of GM, which addressed all policies and all actors, not only equality-focused policies and feminists. This further excluded the Unit from internal discussions and negotiations before its adoption by the Commission and legitimized the position that GM could be designed and implemented by anyone, without recourse to specialists.

The weakness of the Communication both in terms of theory and implementation provoked immediate reactions in the EP Committee on Women's Rights and the EWL. In its pertinent resolution, the EP contributed considerably to the clarification of strategies and tools by adopting the majority of the elements stated in the Council of Europe document. In its report, it argued in favour of the following issues: an approach that combined GM and positive actions (para. 11), the definition of assessment criteria (para. 14), the identification of obstacles created by culture and rigid societal structures (para. 16), the development of gendersensitive indicators (para. 29), the importance of coordination structures and budget lines within the Commission (para. 39) and the introduction of a gendered perspective to legislation (para. 43) (EP, 1997). In its position, the EWL proposed the following definition: 'the full integration of the gender perspective into all policy areas by giving equal consideration to the values and needs of both sexes' and argued in favour of positive actions, of a special budget for mainstreaming and of completing mainstreaming with special measures to promote women in decisionmaking positions (EWL, 1996).

POSITIVE ACTION AND GENDER EQUALITY SPECIFIC POLICIES UNDER RISK

The lack of involvement of the Equal Opportunities Unit in the Communication's formulation and its adoption, in spite of the critical reactions of the EP, the EWL and gender experts, indicates that its very weak approach to the mainstreaming of gender equality was not accidental. What happened can only be explained by the existence of deliberate opposition to the full effects of GM, which challenged other interests in the Commission. The threat of rebalancing the existing gender distribution of political power in the EU institutions appears to be a decisive facilitator in this direction. The Kalanke Judgement (European Court of Justice Case C-450/93) in 1995, which challenged positive action, provided further backing for this weak approach to GM, in spite of the clear reaction of women's constituencies.

Evidence of the use of GM to eliminate positive action can be found in EU labour market policy texts. The annual Commission report Employment in Europe included a separate chapter on women's employment from 1989 until 1993 and applied an ex-post gender proofing of all chapters in 1994. By 1995 both these efforts to introduce equality had been discontinued, with the excuse of applying GM in the drafting of the report. The synoptic table of all measures adopted by member states to reduce unemployment provides further evidence. The Tableau de Bord, in its 1995 edition, included a separate section on measures aimed at equality for women and men in the labour market (EC, 1996: 199), whereas, in the 1996 edition, equality measures were integrated in the chapter on measures addressed to social groups hit by unemployment. This restricted the scope of equality measures from those covering the labour market as a whole to those covering unemployed women, a fact that was justified in the forwarding address on the basis of GM (EC, 1997a). The trend to prioritize socially excluded groups instead of women as a whole was exemplified in the case of Community Initiative EQUAL, which aimed at combating discrimination in the labour market. EQUAL replaced programmes targeting women in general (NOW and EMPLOYMENT-NOW). All of EQUAL's projects were invited to mainstream gender equality, while specific funds were targeted only at socially excluded women, namely single parents or parental leave users.

In the field of education, a ring-fenced budget was allocated to projects aimed at equality between women and men and gender sensitization in the field of education, which addressed gender stereotypes, school materials and the promotion of non-typical educational choices for girls and boys. This budget was managed in close association with the Equal Opportunities Unit, ensuring a global coherence of the policy. In 1996, this specific budget was discontinued with the argument that the new programme for higher education, SOCRATES, 12 had mainstreamed gender equality (CEC, 1998: 9).

In the same vein, all forms of gender equality mechanisms armed with distinctive human and financial resources were put in question. The EP Committee on Women's Rights was challenged as to its necessity, role and added value in the EU policy agenda. It survived after the restructuring of the EP committees in 1998, thanks to strong advocacy exerted by its Green Finnish president, Heidi Hautala, actively supported by most of its Socialist Members. However, the new Committee was renamed 'Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities', signifying the shift from focusing on women to including men in its scope. 13 The fourth action programme for equal opportunities (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000) survived as it adopted GM as its main objective and became the vehicle for its promotion (CEC, 1995d). Consequently, there was a clear shift in how and to whom the action programme's limited available funding was allocated. Till 1995, equality projects funded by the action programmes were primarily small, transnational projects initiated and implemented by women's organizations throughout the EU, covering the whole range of the programme objectives. From 1996, funding was addressed to largescale projects proposed and implemented by non-specific organizations such as social partners and local authorities. This deprived EU gender equality policy from the energy and enthusiasm of feminists and of an important and useful input by the highly mobilized women's civil society.

NEW OPPORTUNITIES BY INTRODUCING A 'DUAL STRATEGY'

Trying to identify and tackle weak spots in the GM application in line with the criticisms of the EP and the EWL, the staff of the Equal Opportunities Unit eventually settled for the 'dual strategy' or 'twin track' approach (combining GM and specific actions), as the only possible remedy that could rebalance the shift in equality policy frames. Only two years after the Commission Communication, the same Commission adopted the first progress report on the follow-up of the Communication (CEC, 1998). This time the report was prepared by the Unit and by the Norwegian national expert, Anne Havnør, whose contribution was crucial in the monitoring by a Commission inter-service group on this issue from 1996 to 1999. The report was clearly far more critical than the 1996 Communication in terms of gender equality, and recognized the importance of a 'dual strategy'. 'Programmes, positive action measures and budget lines/budgetary allocations specifically targeted to equal opportunities should complement the mainstreaming approach' (CEC, 1998: 7). A high level of commitment, awareness, gender expertise and monitoring and evaluation (gender impact assessment and gender proofing) were identified as conditions of success for GM. At the same time, a new, more comprehensive definition of the concept was introduced in the EU glossary on equality as follows: 'the systematic integration of the respective situations, priorities and needs of women and men in all policies and with a view to promoting equality between women and men and mobilising all general policies and measures specifically for the purpose of achieving equality by actively and openly taking into account, at the planning stage, their effects on the respective situations of women and men in implementation, monitoring and evaluation' (EC, 1998: 29).

A dual strategy approach was already partially reflected in the Treaty of Amsterdam, following a systematic campaigning and the multilevel action coordination by the EWL that maximized the opportunities offered by the 'window of reform' opened by the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference [START_REF] Helfferich | Multilevel Action Coordination in European Contentious Politics: The Case of the European Women's Lobby[END_REF]. This resulted in Article 2, stating that equality between women and men is a Community task, and Article 3, stating, 'Community shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between women and men'. Article 141.4 allowed 'specific advantages . . . for the underrepresented sex' (EU, 1997). The scope of this positive development is, however, limited by the fact that these provisions do not provide strong legal bases, leaving the larger part of responsibility for their implementation upon political will and a favourable policy environment.

The dual strategy was launched and promoted as a remedy by feminist EU officials, whereas it was effectively implemented by feminist politicians. In particular, there were three women commissioners, who exploited contradictory policy frames by largely using Commission rhetoric and official documents, including the 1996 Communication, in legitimizing their equality policies. Three policy areas, two new to equality (EU research and technology policy, and home affairs and justice) and one old area (EU structural policy), fell under the political responsibility of socialist women commissioners, the French Edith Cresson, the Swedish Anita Gradin and the German Monica Wulf-Mathies. They succeeded in mobilizing women's constituencies (including in the EP and the EWL) and built up a policy environment attuned to enhancing gender equality in the EU.

Edith Cresson initiated policies challenging the under representation of women in research and technology. Among her first decisions was to launch Marie Curie student scholarships, open to students of both sexes but with a name likely to encourage girls to apply. In 1999, a clear EU strategy and action plan on 'Women in Science' was launched, as part of EU research and technology policy. This recognized the need to promote research 'by, for and about women' and has become the best example in the EC of combining both positive action and GM measures [START_REF] Cec | Communication Women and Science: Mobilising Women to Enrich European Research[END_REF].

Despite the opposing opinion of the Commission's legal service, Anita Gradin managed to establish the issue of the trafficking of women in the agenda of home affairs policies and, in 1997, launched the DAPHNE initiative, 14 aiming at combating violence against women. Her action exemplified the potential of EU policy among women and a feminist constituency. Monica Wulf-Mathies was influential in introducing a GM strategy in the EU Structural Funds policy and allocated specific funds to tackling women's low participation in the labour market and the high female unemployment rate. The subsequent regulation of the European Structural Funds for the period 2000-6 (Council, 1999) integrated a dual track strategy, as well as a series of well-founded instruments and monitoring mechanisms. 15 Further evidence of the influence of individual women politicians instigating specific action for gender equality, along with GM, is the case of the Framework Strategy for Gender Equality (2001-5) [START_REF] Ec | Follow-Up to the Conclusions of the Essen European Council on Employment[END_REF]. The Framework Strategy was adopted thanks to the personal commitment of Commissioner Anna Diamantopoulou (who replaced P. Flynn for the employment and social affairs portfolio in 2000) and Barbara Helfferich, member of her cabinet and formerly General Secretary of the European Women's Lobby. In the then current political and administrative environment of DGV, it was envisaged to discontinue the long tradition of midterm action programmes with the excuse of gender mainstreaming. The adoption of the Framework Strategy programme was a marked success in this difficult environment, and made clear progress in the EU discourse on gender equality by structuring the policy around five areas of gender equality active citizenship: economic, political, social, cultural and civil.

These positive developments of EU gender equality policy were built upon a favourable international environment in the late 1990s, but they were too dependent on the political will of individual women politicians. The transformative effect of GM on the respective policy processes and mechanisms was far too limited, and was lost with the departure of the women politicians and technocrats who had initiated and supported these policies. 16 The persistence of equality priorities in the agenda seems to be easier when gender equality objectives coincide with other, stronger EU policy priorities, as it was demonstrated in the case of EU policies for work-family balance [START_REF] Stratigaki | The Cooptation of Gender Concepts in EU Policies: The Case of Reconciliation of Work and Family[END_REF]; this gender equality concept was coopted by economic priorities and shifted in meaning and expected policy outcome. Cooptation by economic priorities seems to be the case also for women-targeted labour market measures and GM in the guidelines of the European Employment Strategy. These measures proved, eventually, insufficient to prevent the regression in some aspects of women's situation, as shown by the appearance of new gender inequalities in the form of women's proliferation in part-time and temporary jobs.

CONCLUSION

The article has explored the emergence of GM in the EU and analysed the steps both forwards and backwards for gender equality as an outcome of the underlying conflict between GM and positive action. It has pointed out the important role of institutional and administrative changes, as well as of women politicians, in enhancing gender equality policy, taking into consideration the patriarchal culture of European institutions and the mobilization of women's constituencies. It has demonstrated that the transformative effect of GM was minimal and its application has led to contradictory results. It opened important opportunities for specific policies in new policy areas, whereas in others it diluted positive action.

On the positive side, by implementing GM, the EU gender equality policy frame was extended beyond equal treatment legislation and positive actions; the neutrality of all policies at all levels was questioned and new directions for policy change were introduced. The potential of a more radical analysis of policies through a gendered perspective challenged the status quo in the EU policy system and invited strong resistance to understanding and endorsing the new equality strategy. Male-dominated decision-making bodies of the European Commission welcomed and constructed rhetoric on GM, which accommodated a current political environment in alignment with women's enthusiasm. However, they showed blatant reluctance in implementing this equality policy due to conflicting policy frames. One of the ways to disguise this reluctance was to insidiously assign GM the role of eroding positive action. This necessitated conceptual and perceptual shifts deliberately put forward in official texts.

Examination of EU official texts on GM, as presented in this article, exemplifies the way EU policy discourse may evolve rhetoric devoid of substance with regard to political commitment and concrete policy instruments and measures. The texts and the administrative and institutional changes observed reveal underlying policy interests and intentions by policy-makers; specific words are selected and specific technocratic decisions are taken. The analysis showed the role (and power) of the high and middle management of a bureaucratic structure, which drafted documents, selected words, manipulated meanings, delegated powers to individuals and shaped women's constituencies' expectations. Reading between the lines of the 1996 Communication suggests that it was conceived less to increase the speed of gender equality policies and more to hamper progress. It was also felt (and often internally argued) that the ambiguous and feeble rhetoric of the Communication risked setting back gender equality in the EU: (1) it incited arguments against positive action by stressing the concern of all actors for gender equality (a job for everybody = a job of nobody); (2) it undermined radical elements of GM, such as the process of transformation of policies and the role of female decision-makers in implementing it; and (3) it halted the post-Beijing Conference dynamic and the momentum gathered following the enlargement to the North. 17 Analysis of the barriers to implementing GM shows that the problem was not that it was newly established and needed a 'period of grace' for policy actors to assimilate it. Barriers are primarily erected because GM is infiltrated by feminist concerns suggesting fundamental changes in ways of thinking and understanding society. GM can potentially challenge and transform gender-biased public policies. However, this policy goal interferes and clashes with other dominant policy frames of the EU based on hierarchical gender distribution of power. Conflicts between political powers, civil society interests and national identities across EU institutions over competencies and territories produce unexpected effects on certain policy areas. The article has shown that the concept of GM was formally fully endorsed by policy-makers, but its implementation was manipulated so that it served to counteract the emerging demand of women for binding positive action measures in decision-making bodies. Challenging the gender distribution of political power in EU institutions threatens personal interests and power positions of individual women and men who held specific posts in political and administrative hierarchies. As a result, conflicting interests marginalized some individual policy-makers and crucial prerequisites for GM like women's participation in decision-making, equality-focused policies and the allocation of funds and human resources remained on the margins of the scope of the policy agenda for gender equality.

Today, eight years after its launch, GM has so far failed to affect core policy areas or radically transform policy processes within the European institutions. Despite the existence of strong alliances among equalityfocused institutional mechanisms, bodies of women's constituencies and the abundance of EU official declarations and political commitments, central policy documents (annual programmes, budgets and legislation) remain largely outside the scope of the strategy. Gender equality is still kept outside the debate (and action) with regard to the core of EU policies, macroeconomic policies enforcing the European Monetary Union [START_REF] Hoskyns | Mainstreaming Gender in the EU's Macroeconomic Policy: Institutional and Conceptual Issues[END_REF] and the constitutional politics shaping European polity [START_REF] Lombardo | The Participation of Civil Society in the European Constitution-Making Process[END_REF]. Contrary to most expectations (and explicitly formulated demands), analysis of the Commission's White Paper on European governance and the work of the European Convention demonstrate the marginalization of feminist politics in these two cases [START_REF] Shaw | The European Union and Gender Mainstreaming: Constitutionally Embedded or Comprehensively Marginalised?[END_REF]. The resistance to including gender equality among EU values in the Constitutional Treaty shows that difficulties persist. Feminist strategies may have to be revisited in terms of both modes of acting and modes of theorizing. They may have to rely more on the knowledge of how power, structures and individuals interact and how this frames EU policies and discourse. This knowledge may assist in preventing transformative GM from being a failed project. It may also assist in exploring the way that gender equality and European integration will intertwine more effectively in shaping identities and foster economic, political and social change, as argued by [START_REF] Hubert | L'Europe et les femmes[END_REF].

NOTES

The author thanks Mary Braithwaite, Anne Havnør, Catherine Hoskyns, Agnès Hubert and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on former versions of the article.

1. I worked in the Equal Opportunities Unit of the European Commission from 1991 to 1999. 2. For a comparative analysis of EU action programmes on equal opportunities, see [START_REF] Hoskyns | A Study of Four Action Programmes on Equal Opportunities[END_REF]. 3. For a detailed analysis of GM in the Structural Funds, see [START_REF] Braithwaite | Mainstreaming Gender in the European Structural Funds[END_REF]. 4. Vasso Papandreou and Cristiane Scrivener were the first two women to be appointed to the post of European commissioner by Jacques Delors in 1988. 5. This concern eventually produced the EU White Paper Competitiveness, Growth and Employment (EC, 1994). 6. The EWL is a Europe-wide umbrella organization consisting of about 3000 women's organizations in all member states. The EU financially supports its operation. 7. Criticism by the EP Committee chaired by the Dutch Green MEP Nel van Dijk included reference to Flynn's public attack of Mary Robinson during her campaign for president in Ireland. 8. One can assume that under the combined influence of belonging to this group and coming from a gender-supportive national culture, Erkii Liikanen was particularly attentive to the promotion of women in the management posts in the Commission. 9. Created in the wake of the one on Equal Opportunities, these other groups were formalized only in 1999 (President's Communication (SEC (1999) 1483). 10. A separate acknowledgement must be made to the Swedish delegation in Beijing, which actively influenced the EU position towards buttressing GM in EU policy. 11. Currently being sued by the Commission for mismanagement. 12. Launched by Decision 819/95/EC and amended by Decision 98/576/EC of the EP and the Council. 13. Under the influence of Anna Karamanou, who chaired the Committee from 2002 to 2004 and had once more to argue for keeping a Committee dedicated to women's rights, the name has been changed again. In the sixth legislature of the EP, it is 'the Committee for Women's Rights and Gender Equality'. 14. The DAPHNE initiative (1997-9) 15. This had an extremely important positive impact on member states, in particular on those whose labour market policies depend to a great degree on EU funding such as Greece [START_REF] Eysekt | Guide for the Implementation of Gender Equality Policies in the Design and Evaluation of the Actions of the Operational Programmes of the Third Community Support Framework[END_REF]. 16. Current rumours about discontinuation of specific gender equality action programmes with the excuse of the newly established European Gender Institute support this fear. 17. Swedish and Finnish women's organizations were too much 'newcomers' to prevent distortion of positive Nordic influence. Nordic women were facing EU policies with scepticism, which was fully understandable in the context of the Scandinavian social welfare system.

  initiated funding of measures combating violence against children, young persons and women. The consequent DAPHNE programme (2000-3) was launched by Decision 293/2000 and DAPHNE II programme (2004-8) by Decision 803/2004/EC of the EP and the Council.

European Journal of Women's Studies 12(2)


Karin Flaake

Carl Von

OLDENBURG Ossietzky Universitaet

Girls, Adolescence and the Impact of Bodily Changes Family Dynamics and Social Definitions of the Female Body

  L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire

and images are formed in the individual. Thus, there would seem to be, not seldom, an implicit congruence of the symbolic order with the inner structure of specific individuals (see [START_REF] Chodorow | The Power of Feelings: Personal Meaning in Psychoanalysis, Gender and Culture[END_REF].

A psychoanalytic and sociopsychological perspective strives to account for both existing cultural and social relations and the particular logic of psychic structures. Here, essentially, unconscious desires, fantasies and fears -a dimension of human behaviour and activity beyond intentional and rational considerations -also play a significant role in our understanding. From such a perspective, bodily experiences, images and perceptions are understood as socially formed from the outset, namely through interactions with the primary care providers. There is not, however, a direct correspondence between inner and outer, individual and social, psyche and culture (see [START_REF] Chodorow | The Power of Feelings: Personal Meaning in Psychoanalysis, Gender and Culture[END_REF].

Unconscious messages from both sides -that of the subject and the social environment -are always an element of the interactions which shape an individual's life-history. Unconscious material is constituted fundamentally by desires and emotions that have been suppressed in the course of individual development; that is, closed out of consciousness because they were experienced as too improper or forbidden and, thus, threatening. Because that which is experienced as improper and forbidden is inextricably tied to social norms and values, unconscious processes are always bound up with cultural and social relations and thus also with the structures of gender relations. Nevertheless, these processes are not one-dimensional replicas of the latter and contain a potential for resistance to the social given.

This article, focusing on the bodily experiences of girls and young women in adolescence, deals with facets of the processes through which bodily perceptions and experiences are formed in the interplay of inner and outer conditions.

FAMILIAL INTERACTION DURING THE ADOLESCENCE OF GIRLS

Changes during adolescence connected with the body and sexuality -for girls the first menstruation, the breasts and other transformations of the figure and appearance, the new dimension and intensity of sexual desires and excitation -are associated with a variety of social connotations and images of womanhood, which influence the process of psychic assimilation and acceptance of these changes and, thus, in turn girls' experience and perception of their bodies.

Bodily experience and physical perception are in all phases of life influenced by social definitions of femininity (or masculinity) [START_REF] Pines | A Woman's Unconscious Use of her Body[END_REF]. From the very beginning, bodily perceptions are closely tied to the quality of the relationship between the child and her primary care providers, which is itself always influenced by social norms and values and, thus, societal gender images [START_REF] Flaake | A Body of One's Own: Sexual Development and the Female Body in the Mother-Daughter Relationship[END_REF]. Psychic experience -the often unconscious desires, fantasies and fears connected with physical processes -fuses with social connotations communicated initially and chiefly through interaction with the primary care providers [START_REF] Chodorow | The Power of Feelings: Personal Meaning in Psychoanalysis, Gender and Culture[END_REF]. The adults' unconscious desires, fantasies and fears are as much an element of this interaction as their socially mediated forms.

One of the central themes of adolescent conflict is the family, the relationship between mother and daughter as well as father -or possibly stepfather -and daughter [START_REF] Dalsimer | Female Adolescence: Psychoanalytic Reflections[END_REF][START_REF] Kaplan | Adolescence: The Farewell to Childhood[END_REF][START_REF] Pipher | Reviving Orphelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls[END_REF]. The processes of adolescent transformation trigger insecurities and shocks not only to the psychic balance of girls -for adults, they are also associated with frustration, confusion and conflict. Signals of the impending separation process, the confrontation with their own ageing, sexual desires and fantasies and the resuscitation of earlier emotions and conflicts, thus play an equal role in this period of transformation and entangle not only the girls themselves in a whirlpool of emotions but the adults around them as well.

The social images of the female body and sexuality, as well as the transmission of prohibitions experienced by adults earlier in life, may play a role in their attempts to stabilize this whirlpool of emotions. At the same time, they perform specific functions in the process of coping with feelings triggered by the daughter's adolescence and take on greater significance in this context.

In the following, I present the results of an empirical study in which interviews with girls between the ages of 13 and 19, as well as with their mothers and fathers, or stepfathers, are psychoanalytically interpreted. 1 The study is focused predominantly on familial interactions connected with the body and sexuality and the dynamics and messages contained in this interaction: the desires, wishes and fears of girls associated with the body and sexuality, the emotions and fantasies of the mother and father (or stepfather) triggered by the daughter's puberty, the emotional dynamic between daughter and mother, daughter and father (or stepfather) as well as in the adult couple's relationship (see [START_REF] Flaake | Körper, Sexualität und Geschlecht[END_REF].

The especially confusing and threatening difficulties triggered by the daughter's adolescence always differ for mothers and fathers and influence their respective relationships to the daughter. For fathers, the daughter's adolescence foregrounds their own insecurities brought about by sexual wishes, fantasies and desires related to the daughter. For mothers, the developing generational gap, clearly signalled by the daughter's adolescence, is intensely unsettling. The daughter has her adult life ahead of her and the opportunity to realize the hopes and dreams belonging to it, while the mother is confronted with boundaries established by advancing age and the unfulfilled desires and hopes of her life so far. The resultant envy towards the daughter and her young body and feelings of rivalry -also related to the partner -can prevent her from giving her daughter the inner permission to live a better life than she did, to permit a difference between mother and daughter work to the daughter's advantage.

DYNAMICS IN THE FATHER-DAUGHTER RELATIONSHIP

The accounts of fathers make clear how confusing the daughter's bodily changes are for them. Physical contact experienced in the daughter's childhood as an expression of mutual affection, hugging, for example, takes on a new dimension. The womanliness of the daughter's body grows evident, physical changes become visible and can be associated with erotic desires and fantasies experienced now as threatening. Closeness to the daughter takes on a sexual quality that is at once more arousing and more threatening than in earlier phases of the father-daughter relationship, since genital contact on an adult level now becomes possible. For girls, sexual desires and fantasies also introduce a new dimension to the relationship with the father: the new and stronger expression of sexual desire developing during adolescence is initially directed towards those closest to her during childhood. The actual structure taken by the relationship between fathers and their adolescent daughters, however, is largely dependent upon the degree to which fathers are able to admit the strongly tabooed feelings towards their daughter and to process these feelings for themselves in a psychic space independent of the daughter. In this context, it is especially important to renew the establishment of generational boundaries and to focus on the relationship with an adult partner, which also offers space for this sexual desire. Since the adult relationship also enters a turbulent phase during the daughter's adolescence, achieving stabilization through a satisfying partnership is not easy for many. If the father succeeds in conveying to the daughter that the adult love relationship is the place for sexuality, but maintains a close, loving relationship with the daughter on the basis of clearly drawn boundaries, the girls are given signals to relinquish sexual desires towards the father and transfer them to love relationships outside the family.

When the emotions triggered in the father by the daughter's advance towards womanhood cannot be regulated through expression in adult relationships and by processing these emotions independently of the daughter, there is a temptation to project these threatening feelings onto the daughter and, in turn, to see her as someone to resist and repulse. Sexual desires and fantasies will then be displaced onto the daughter's body and kept in check there. Such efforts at stabilization may draw upon societal images of the female body and sexuality.

Interviews indicate that one strategy of dealing with the daughter's seductive and threatening physical changes often practised by fathers consists in the use of ironic commentary on the daughter's bodily transformations -a behaviour described as an 'amusing', 'humorous' approach to her puberty, understood as an element of a 'relaxed' family communication. Comments recounted by the fathers themselves relate directly to the daughter's body, primarily her breasts. One father describes, 'We kid around sometimes in the family, now you're getting breasts, we'll have to get you a bra.' Interviews with the young woman make it clear, however, that she experienced these comments as embarrassing and hurtful.

In this way, the shame, insecurity and helplessness felt by fathers with regard to their sexual fantasies and feelings are transformed into a position of superiority in their relationship to the daughter, and the feelings of shame, insecurity and helplessness are passed on to her. The daughter is now the one who is ashamed -of her body -who feels insecure and helpless in the face of ironic comments, rather than the confused, helpless and possibly sexually aroused man and father faced with a maturing daughter. Such paternal behaviour patterns reveal a strategy for dealing with insecurities triggered by the daughter's puberty similar to those observable in societal images of female corporeality: namely, objectifying the female body, making it an object of one's own sexualizing gaze and of demeaning commentary. Erotic fantasies associated with the daughter as well as the attempt to proscribe them through the disparagement of the female body can be seen here.

Another facet of the collective fantasies of female sexuality concerns the image of woman as seductress and man as victim. Elements of this fantasy can also be found in the descriptions from fathers. For example, fathers who abruptly distanced themselves from their daughters with the commencement of menstruation have described their reaction as having 'rejected' the daughter or 'demonstratively turned away' from her. These formulations contain latent accusations, insinuating that the daughter has made advances that had to be 'rejected', that she had done something improper from which the father must 'demonstratively' turn away. In such patterns, the daughter becomes a seductress, the father a victim without his own active desires who must protect himself from his daughter. The erotic desires and fantasies of the father are, thus, obscured and the 'guilt' for his desire, now seen as something to which he is passively subjected, is assigned to the daughter.

For several fathers, the desires and fantasies they project onto their daughters are so threatening that -especially with the arrival of the first period -they abruptly break off their relationship with her. This is especially the case for fathers who have had a very close physical relationship with their daughter before the onset of puberty. This close relationship then becomes so anxiety ridden that fleeing it appears to be the only solution. The unconscious message thereby sent to the daughter might read: 'Your female corporeality is so seductive that I can only save myself by turning away from you entirely'. The fantasy of the great and dangerous power of the female body becomes apparent. At the same time, the daughter is assigned the blame for the father's feelings: her female body is responsible for his withdrawal.

Not all fathers of daughters in adolescence behave in the way just described. Beyond the various possible individual responses, however, gender structures made available by society present fathers with the temptation to turn the helplessness and insecurity they feel with respect to their developing daughter into superiority. This superiority is rooted in societal images of female corporeality and sexuality [START_REF] Brumberg | The Body Project: An Intimate History of American Girls[END_REF], and it occurs at the cost of respect for the daughter's femininity and sexuality. On the part of the young woman, not only pride in her body but also an active sexual desire can be thereby inhibited: the shame of the father for his feelings is then transformed into shame on the part of the daughter for her own body and the wishes and fantasies directed towards the father.

A ritual in an African tribal culture makes clear how the incestuous desires of the father can be made conscious and at the same time banished. On the occasion of the girl's first menstruation, this social ritual acts out, symbolically, that which fathers in the industrialized West must experience as an individual psychological process: the acknowledgement that the daughter is 'out of bounds' and the elimination of sexual desire from the relationship with her.

After the onset of the first period, the girl goes into the bush and collects a bundle of firewood, which she places before the hut of an aunt on her father's side of the family. She then enters the hut and, in front of her aunt, rips off the string (often a string of pearls) that she has worn around her abdomen, and hands it to her aunt. The aunt leads the girl to her parents' house and first calls out for the father. Directly in front of the entrance, she lays the torn string of pearls and a pestle from the largest mortar. The father walks over these symbols with the words: 'With this belt I bind all the sexual desires I feel for you' (Burek, 1998: 236ff.).

In this ritual, this social enactment, the father's desire is acknowledged, under the protection of a mother figure -the aunt on the father's side of the family -and at the same time relinquished: the father 'binds' his sexual desires for his daughter and thus frees her for her own life.

DYNAMICS IN THE MOTHER-DAUGHTER RELATIONSHIP

Adolescence raises the question on both sides of the generational dividefor the daughter and the mother -how strongly the two lives and, thus, their relationships to the body and sexuality can be differentiated: whether the girl is subject to the same limitations as her mother, or if she is allowed more freedom, and whether the mother can give the daughter the inner permission to have a more fulfilling relationship to the body and sexuality than she herself has thus far been able to experience. Possible maternal behavioural responses are thus tied to the complexity of psychic events associated with the daughter's adolescence. Through their daughters, women once again confront their own adolescent desires and fears and, thus, also the feelings, usually disappointment, produced by their own mother's behaviour. Whether the mother is able to convey greater confirmation and fulfilment to her daughter than she herself received, however, is largely dependent upon how the mother deals with the current circumstances of her life, especially the realization that the daughter now has her adult life before her and that she herself is confronted with the limitations of ageing (de [START_REF] Kanter | Becoming a Situated Daughter: "Later, When I Am Big, I Will Be Daddy, So Then We Will Also Have a Father in Our House" -Hannah, Four Years Old[END_REF][START_REF] Waal | Teenage Daughters on their Mothers[END_REF][START_REF] Nielsen | Whatever Happened to Gender? Female Subjectivity and Change in a Generational Context[END_REF][START_REF] Sayers | Maternal and Phallic Power: Fantasy and Symbol[END_REF].

This confrontation with one's life circumstances, which also include the inevitable separation from the daughter, can be dealt with in various ways. It can be used as an opportunity to reflect upon life up to this point, achieved and unfulfilled dreams and the still possible, and, in turn, lead to a restructuring of the mother's life through which the daughter is released from maternal bonds. However, envy of the daughter and rivalry -also related to the partner -can be so dominating that prohibitions outweigh signals of confirmation. The daughter's body -often despite conscious intentions to the contrary -is more frequently subject to a critical rather than a confirming maternal gaze. An active, sexual desire on the part of the daughter is more likely to be restricted than encouraged, and identification between mother and daughter with respect to the body will be established through the mutually suffered, and negatively experienced, periodic bleeding. Societal images of beauty and definitions of menstruation [START_REF] Lee | Blood Stories: Menarche and the Politics of the Female Body in Contemporary US-Society[END_REF] are found in such patterns as well as images of female sexuality; they retain their significance, however, through the specific dynamics of the mother-daughter relationship.

I would like to illustrate such dynamics by examining the processes set into motion with the advent of the daughter's menstruation. The daughter's first period is for the mother an event that wakes to a certain degree her own earlier feelings and the emotions she connects with her own mother. Nearly all of the mothers we interviewed have vivid memories of their own first period and of their mothers' reaction to it.

Though further back in time, some of these memories are more lucid than their memories of their daughters' first periods. One mother begins her depiction with, 'I remember that as if it were yesterday'. Her memories of her daughter's first period, by contrast, are much less certain, beginning with 'I think . . .'. When asked how old their daughters were when their periods began, some mothers, moreover, responded by giving their own age at their first period instead.

There is a striking similarity between the women's descriptions of their mothers' reactions to their first period -which were generally not positive -and those of their reactions to their own daughters' first periods. One woman reports that her mother responded by giving her a short and snappy lesson about the necessity of using sanitary pads, which she experienced as not very supportive or helpful. Regarding her own daughter, however, she describes -despite her intention to react differently from her mother -a similar reaction: her conversation with her own daughter also centred on the use of sanitary pads and tampons.

The desire to handle the situation better than their own mothers had done was expressed by nearly all of the mothers we interviewed. Yet, this desire is associated with difficulties, particularly with inner-psychic dynamics that complicate the wish for the daughter to have a better relationship to her own body than the mother herself has yet enjoyed. With the start of menstruation, the issues of distancing, jealousy and rivalry become particularly critical in the emotional relationship between mother and daughter: for the daughter, the first period is a signal that her adult life is beginning; the mother, by contrast, is confronted by the boundaries of advancing age. This constellation is especially clear within one family: shortly after the daughter's first period the mother's menstruation stops, marking the beginning of menopause, an event experienced as one of the distressing signals for the loss of sexuality and the loss of opportunity to lead a satisfying life.

For the daughters, the new situation arising from the advent of menstruation is conveyed in the descriptions of one 15-year-old who reported announcing the event first in her mother's bedroom with the words, 'Momma, I'm a woman now too' and then in her father's, 'Papa, I'm a woman now too'. This scene can be interpreted as the declaration of a new rivalry with the mother over the father. 'I'm a woman now too' signals to the father the potential for a new level to their relationship -like the one he has with the mother. In respect to the mother, the announcement 'I'm a woman now too' can be supplemented with, 'and can now use my erotic presence to arouse men, e.g. father'. The problematic of the mother's jealousy and rivalry towards the daughter centred around the first period is a motive in some mother-daughter constellations -despite the intention to do otherwise -for the mother to hand down her own negative experiences of menstruation.

Several mothers and daughters describe a similar experience of their first period and similar symptoms. For daughters, the blurring of generational lines becomes clear in the words of one 14-year-old, who depicts the mutual suffering in menstruation with the words, 'her pain, like mine'. The young woman appears to have no pain of her own, but rather to take on that of her mother. Perhaps, at one level, this identification is an imaginative offer of support to the mother who is in a difficult situation in life and an attempt at reconciliation after her own strong tendency during puberty to distance herself from her mother.

From these shared negative experiences a closeness arises between mothers and daughters. It creates unity, even when the daughter is, in other respects, heavily distancing herself from the mother. In some mother-daughter relationships, it is evident that closeness through suffering and moodiness due to menstruation serves to prevent open aggression and rivalry. Thus, the pain accompanying menstruation allows the daughter to sustain a closeness experienced by both mother and daughter as positive at the level of the mother-child relationship, which at the same time obscures the rivalry between the two women in regard to the father that is so clear in the interviews. Thus, the unconscious meaning of mutual suffering between mother and daughter during menstruation (the clearest sign of their mutual womanhood) can serve to check open rivalry and aggressiveness. These active, outwardly focused and distancing impulses are turned inward and redirected, transformed into physical pain and discomfort, which re-establish a closeness between the two women, albeit not a positive one.

It is a mother-daughter relationship in which the mother is able to admit her regret at growing older and at the same time come to terms with the generational gap in which not only the daughter but the mother as well are able to admit differences in their experiences of periodic bleeding. There is space in the relationship for differences between mother and daughter: it is allowed that the daughter can 'have it better' than the mother did, and both judge this difference positively. Such behavioural patterns require that both parties -the mother and the daughterundergo the psychic processes of separation and the establishment of boundaries. These processes enable both to take steps towards lives independent of one another and allow the daughter a means of assimilating her new physicality and sexuality defined less by prohibition.

SUMMARY

Physical experiences in all stages of life are tied to the complex interplay of fantasies, desires and fears connected to the body and messages from the social sphere, which ascribe social significance to bodily perceptions and ways of experiencing. The transmission of these social messages occurs, primarily, in the interaction between children and their primary care providers, especially mothers and fathers. Each intensive relationship to children and adolescents confronts adults with their own repressed aspirations and can indicate a threat to their psychic balance through the return of earlier emotions, desires and fears. Children's adolescence in particular can trigger such a weakening of psychic balance in adults. Central themes of adolescence are the adult female corporeality and sexuality of the daughter, which confront the mother and father again with corresponding fantasies, desires and fears of their own. In this phase of great insecurity -which often upsets established patterns in the adult partnership -adults may seek to stabilize their inner turmoil by calling on societal images of female corporeality and sexuality or by passing on to the daughter the restrictions they experienced earlier in their own lives. All of the impulses and desires experienced as unbearable are repulsed and projected onto the daughter. In this way, facets of social images and fantasies centring on the female body and sexuality become anchored in the girls' experience of their bodies. Societal gender images are inscribed on the body of the girl. In relation to family interaction, then, the possibility for change lies in not perpetuating the pattern of projection and rejection, but to process these feelings in a new way that creates space for revising traditional gender images. NOTE 1.

The interviews were carried out in 1998 with families largely from socially privileged backgrounds in western, urban Germany. Other cultural contexts and experiences of immigration were not taken into consideration. We interviewed girls, mothers and fathers separately. The interviews were structured thematically, and encouraged subjects to report the changes, experiences, feelings, desires and fears associated with the body and sexuality. The interpretation employs a psychoanalytical method of textual interpretation through which it is possible to uncover unconscious content. The primary means of understanding the latent content of texts using this method is the reflection on the subject's own reactions to the text -in the interpretation in groups the reflection on the dynamic within the groupwhich are seen and processed as counter-transference; that is, feelings having to do with the unconscious content of the text. Interactions between the interviewer and interviewee are also taken into consideration. Additionally, irritations associated with notable features of the text, such as conspicuous formulations, misspoken words, contradictions, omissions, a certain connection of themes, interruptions in the presentation, also provide a way into latent content. Concluding interpretations must always refer to specific textual content and thus be plausible and understandable (see [START_REF] Klein | Am Anfang steht das letzte Wort. Eine Annäherung an die "Wahrheit" der tiefenhermeneutischen Erkenntnis[END_REF].

member

  of the university's Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Women and Gender. Her areas of specialization are sociological and psychoanalytic/socialpsychological research on women and gender, especially the analysis of female and male identity formation, the psychoanalysis of female sexuality and the social psychology of gender relations, as well as empirical studies supplemented by qualitative methods of psychoanalytic textual interpretation. Her most recent publication is Körper, Sexualität und Geschlecht. Studien zur Adoleszenz junger Frauen [Body,Sexuality and Gender. Studies on Female Adolescence] (Giessen: Psychosozial Verlag, 2001). Address: Roggemannstr 31, D26122Oldenburg, Germany. [email: Karin.flaake@uni-oldenburg.de]

	◆

European Journal of Women's Studies 12(2)