system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Brain Injuries, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Nervous System Diseases, Occupational Therapy, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Physical Therapy Modalities, Program Evaluation, Reproducibility of Results, Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors.
user
Is agreement between two different scoring procedures for goal attainment scaling low? Context: To investigate the agreement between a patient's therapist and an independent assessor in scoring goal attainment by a patient. Data were obtained on hospital patients with neurological disorders participating in a randomized trial. The patients' therapists set 2-4 goals using a goal attainment scaling method. Six weeks later attainment was scored by: (i) the treating therapists; and (ii) an independent assessor unfamiliar with the patient, using a semi-structured interview method with direct assessment as appropriate. A total of 112 goals in 29 neurological patients were used. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(A,k) = 0.478) and limits of agreement (–1.52 ± 24.54) showed poor agreement between the two scoring procedures. There was no systematic bias.
assistant
The agreement between the patients' therapists scoring the goals and the independent assessor was low, signifying a large difference between the two scoring procedures. Efforts should be made to improve the reproducibility of goal attainment scaling before it is to be used as an outcome measure in blinded randomized controlled trials. Final Decision: yes