system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, BACKGROUND, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Acetylcholine, Adult, Biomarkers, Blood Flow Velocity, Brachial Artery, Cholesterol, LDL, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Infusions, Intra-Arterial, Nitroglycerin, Nitroprusside, Oxidative Stress, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Vasodilation, Vasodilator Agents, Vitamin E.
user
Is endothelial vasodilator function related to low-density lipoprotein particle size and low-density lipoprotein vitamin E content in type 1 diabetes? Context: We sought to determine whether endothelial vasodilator function (EVF) in patients with type 1 diabetes was related to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size (LDLPS), LDL vitamin E content (LDLVE) or the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation (OxLDL). Impaired EVF is an early feature of diabetic vascular disease and may be related to oxidant stress. Although small, dense LDL and oxidized LDL are features of type 2 diabetes and predict the development of coronary artery disease, their role in type 1 diabetes is less clear. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed in the brachial artery (flow-mediated vasodilation [FMD]) and in the forearm resistance circulation using venous occlusion plethysmography in response to graded doses of intrabrachial acetylcholine (ACh). Thirty-seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) and 45 matched controls underwent flow-mediated dilation, while a subset of 19 DM and 20 controls underwent plethysmography. Total, LDL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides were not different in DM compared with controls, but LDLPS was smaller (25.6 +/- 0.06 vs. 26.1 +/- 0.1 nm, p < 0.05) and LDLVE was reduced (2.0 +/- 0.25 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.18 micromol/mmol LDL, p < 0.05). Oxidative susceptibility of LDL was not different. Flow-mediated vasodilation was impaired in DM compared with controls (3.6 +/- 0.6% vs. 7.1 +/- 0.5%, p < 0.005), as was the vasodilator response to ACh (p < 0.05). Flow-mediated vasodilation was directly related to LDLPS and LDLVE in both the entire study cohort and DM alone (p < 0.05), but not to other parameters of the standard lipid profile. Similarly, endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the resistance circulation was directly related to LDLPS and LDLVE, but not to OxLDL.
assistant
These results suggest, but do not prove, that LDL particle size and LDL vitamin E may be determinants of conduit and resistance vessel endothelial vasodilator function in type 1 diabetes. Further work will be required to prove cause and effect. Final Decision: yes