system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: BACKGROUND, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Biomarkers, Bone Remodeling, Bone and Bones, Collagen, Collagen Type I, Diet, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Folic Acid, Homocysteine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteocalcin, Peptide Fragments, Peptides, Procollagen, Vitamin B 12, Vitamin B Complex.
user
Does folate supplementation affect biochemical markers of bone turnover? Context: Recently, increased plasma homocysteine (HCY) has been suggested as a novel independent risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. This study aimed to analyze the effect of a HCY lowering therapy by folic acid (FA) supplementation on biochemical bone markers in healthy subjects. We treated 61 healthy individuals (mean age: 58+/-8 years) with placebo, 0.4, 1 or 5 mg FA daily for 2 months. Fasting blood samples were taken after 0, 4 and 8 weeks. Serum HCY, folate, vitamin B12, osteocalcin (OC), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptides of human collagen type I (CTX) were studied. Overall baseline HCY and folate levels were 13.4 +/- 3.6 micromol/L and 5.7 +/- 3.0 microg/L, respectively. Participants exhibited normal baseline OC, PINP and CTX levels. Serum folate increased during supplementation (4 weeks of placebo, 0.4, 1 and 5 mg of FA: -7, +160, +162 and +436 %; 8 weeks: -6, +305, +340 and +216 %) and HCY decreased (4 weeks of placebo, 0.4, 1 and 5 mg of FA: +2, -14, -21 and -17 %; 8 weeks: +2, -8, -20 and -17 %) in the treatment groups, but not in the placebo group. OC (placebo: 22.8 vs. 23.0 vs. 23.6; 0.4 mg FA: 21.6 vs. 22.1 vs. 24.1; 1 mg FA: 23.7 vs. 22.6 vs. 23.4; 5 mg FA: 24.1 vs. 20.5 vs. 20.9 microg/L), PINP (placebo: 43.5 vs. 51.3 vs. 46.5; 0.4 mg FA: 34.0 vs. 34.1 vs. 39.5; 1 mg FA: 43.6 vs. 39.7 vs. 43.2; 5 mg FA: 41.1 vs. 38.7 vs. 37.4 microg/L) and CTX (placebo: 258 vs. 360 vs. 321; 0.4 mg FA: 229 vs. 290 vs. 315; 1 mg FA: 319 vs. 325 vs. 301; 5 mg FA: 293 vs. 321 vs. 304 ng/L) did not change throughout the study.
assistant
Short-term FA supplementation does not affect biochemical bone markers in non-osteoporotic subjects with a low folate status. Final Decision: no