system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: BACKGROUND, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carbon Dioxide, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial, Prospective Studies, Random Allocation, Time Factors.
user
Is gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy more time-consuming? Context: Although abdominal wall retraction is said to be advantageous in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), many surgeons have found that, when this option is chosen, more time is needed to prepare for and carry out the surgical procedure. Our aim was to determine the time required for surgical preparation and operation in patients undergoing LC with carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum (CO2 PP) vs abdominal wall retraction (AWR). We performed a prospective randomized study of a CO2 PP LC group (n = 19) vs an AWR LC group (n = 15). Demographic data were collected preoperatively. LC was performed with either CO2 PP (12 mmHg) or AWR (6-10 kps). Two phases were considered: (a) time employed to create the surgical field (phase 1) and (b) operating time (phase 2). The chi-square test was used to compare the medians of the two groups. The two groups were homogeneous. Phase 1 required 35 min in the CO2 PP group vs 25 min in the AWR group (p = 0.24). Phase 2 required 60 min in both groups (p = 0.76).
assistant
We found no statistically significant difference between the PP CO2 and AWR groups in either time spent to create the surgical field or actual operating time. Final Decision: no