system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVE, METHODS, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adolescent, Adult, Chondrocytes, Cohort Studies, Collagen Type I, Collagen Type III, Female, Graft Rejection, Humans, Hypertrophy, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Recovery of Function, Reoperation, Transplantation, Autologous, Young Adult.
user
Does use of a type I/III bilayer collagen membrane decrease reoperation rates for symptomatic hypertrophy after autologous chondrocyte implantation? Context: Autologous chondrocyte implantation is associated with a high rate of reoperation, mostly due to hypertrophy of the periosteal patch. European studies investigating the use of collagen membranes as a periosteal substitute report significant decreases in reoperation rates to less than 5%. This multicenter study investigates the off-label use of 1 collagen membrane as a periosteal substitute for autologous chondrocyte implantation. The use of a collagen membrane for autologous chondrocyte implantation will decrease reoperation rates for hypertrophy with comparable rates of failure. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A multicenter cohort of 300 patients treated with periosteal-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation was compared with a consecutive series of 101 patients who underwent collagen membrane-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation with the Bio-Gide membrane by the same group of surgeons. The 1-year hypertrophy-related reoperation rates and overall failure rates of autologous chondrocyte implantation were evaluated in both groups. Both groups were comparable for age (periosteal autologous chondrocyte implantation, 31.9 years; collagen autologous chondrocyte implantation, 32.4 years; P = .8) and average defect size (4.6 cm(2) and 4.7 cm(2), respectively; P = .7). The average number of defects (1.5 and 1.8; P = .001) and total defect area per knee (6.7 cm(2) and 8.6 cm(2); P = .003) were larger in the collagen membrane group. Within 1 year of surgery, 25.7% of patients treated with periosteal-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation required reoperation for hypertrophy and 2.3% were considered to have failed their treatment with autologous chondrocyte implantation. In comparison, only 5% of patients required reoperation for hypertrophy after collagen membrane-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation, and 4% were considered treatment failures.
assistant
The use of a collagen membrane for autologous chondrocyte implantation decreased the reoperation rate for hypertrophy after autologous chondrocyte implantation from 25.7% to 5% (P < .0001). Overall 1-year failure rates were comparable between the groups (P = .2). Even though the use of a collagen membrane for autologous chondrocyte implantation constitutes an off-label indication, its application appears justified by the lower morbidity to patients and decreased cost to the health care system. A detailed discussion with the patient is required regarding the use of an off-label device. Final Decision: yes