system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomarkers, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Catheter Ablation, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Protein Precursors, Prothrombin, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis.
user
Is pIVKA-II the best prognostic predictor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy? Context: This study was undertaken to assess the prognostic predictor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This study retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes in a cohort of 179 Child-Pugh stage A cirrhotic patients who received curative RFA for naive HCC within Milan criteria. The median follow-up period was 40.5 months. The cumulative survival rate was significantly lower in patients with prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) > or =100 mAU/ml compared with PIVKA-II <100 mAU/ml (58.0 vs. 84.0% at 5 years; p < 0.001). The cumulative recurrence-free survival rates were significantly lower in patients with PIVKA-II > or =100 mAU/ml compared with PIVKA-II <100 mAU/ml (12.1 vs. 16.9% at 5 years; p < 0.032). The cumulative rate of maintaining period within Milan criteria was significantly lower in patients with PIVKA-II > or =100 mAU/ml compared with PIVKA-II <100 mAU/ml (34.1 vs. 55.6% at 5 years; p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that low serum albumin (<3.5 g/dl; p = 0.002, RR 3.75, CI 1.64-8.56), a high level of PIVKA-II (> or =100 mAU/ml; p = 0.04, RR 3.15, CI 1.45-6.87), and multiple nodules (p = 0.021, RR 2.61, CI 1.15-5.91) were independently significant mortality risk factors.
assistant
In patients with Child-Pugh stage A HCC, the PIVKA-II level is the best prognostic predictor after curative RFA. Final Decision: yes