system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chi-Square Distribution, Coronary Artery Bypass, Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump, Coronary Artery Disease, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Denmark, Female, Hospital Costs, Humans, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome.
user
Is oPCAB surgery cost-effective for elderly patients? Context: To determine the cost-effective operative strategy for coronary artery bypass surgery in patients above 70 years. Randomized, controlled trial of 900 patients above 70 years of age subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery. Patients were randomized to either on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Data on direct and indirect costs were prospectively collected. Preoperatively and six months postoperatively, quality of life was assessed using EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Perioperative in-hospital costs and costs of re-intervention were included. The Summary Score of EuroQol-5D increased in both groups between preoperatively and postoperatively. In the on-pump group, it increased from 0.75 (0.16) (mean (SD)) to 0.84 (0.17), while the increase in the off-pump group was from 0.75 (0.15) to 0.84 (0.18). The difference between the groups was 0.0016 QALY and not significantly different. The mean costs were 148.940 D.Kr (CI, 130.623 D.Kr-167.252 D.Kr) for an on-pump patient and 138.693 D.Kr (CI, 123.167 D.Kr-154.220 D.Kr) for an off-pump patient. The ICER base-case point estimate was 6,829,999 D.Kr/QALY. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed 89% probability of off-pump being cost-effective at a threshold value of 269,400 D.Kr/QALY.
assistant
Off-pump surgery tends to be more cost-effective than on-pump surgery. Long-term comparisons are warranted. Final Decision: yes