system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: BACKGROUND, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Animals, Cell Line, Cytokines, Down-Regulation, Guanidines, HMGB1 Protein, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Macrophages, Mice, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, Serine Proteinase Inhibitors.
user
Does rNA interference inhibit high mobility group box 1 by lipopolysaccharide-activated murine macrophage RAW 264.7 secretion? Context: This study aims to evaluate the influence of RNA interference (RNAi) on the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB-1) in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. In order to observe the effect of RNAi on HMGB-1, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) levels, the RAW 264.7 cell line was divided into five treatment groups to measure separately as a function of time of negative control, LPS stimulation only, LPS + HMGB-1 short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), LPS + negative control siRNAs (siNC), and LPS + nafamostat mesilate (NM). Measurement does show HMGB-1 expression in the LPS-activated macrophages in an explicit time-dependent manner. The HMGB-1 cellular level is consistently knocked down 80%∼85% by the siRNA; TNF-α, IL-6, and TGF-β levels in turn significantly decrease following siRNA delivery to the inflammatory response. HMGB-1 expression is lower in the LPS + NM group than the LPS + HMGB-1 siRNA group at the initial stage, however, a significantly lower level of HMGB-1 in the siRNA group is observed 48 h later. The decrease of TNF-α, IL-6, and TGF-β levels in the LPS-induced inflammatory response is also observed in both groups.
assistant
Our results demonstrate that HMGB-1 RNAi treatment of LPS-stimulated macrophages inhibit HMGB-1 and remarkably reduce the LPS-induced inflammatory responses. Hence, RNAi is highly recommended as a potential candidate for a new therapeutic strategy to minimize or, to a lesser extent, prevent the LPS-induced inflammatory injury. Final Decision: yes