system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Epinephrine, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Male, Norepinephrine, Psychomotor Performance.
user
Are effects of acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia on psychomotor function : people with type 1 diabetes less affected than non-diabetic adults? Context: We examined the effects of acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia on psychomotor function in non-diabetic volunteers and in adults with type 1 diabetes. Non-diabetic adults (n = 20) and adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (n = 16) each underwent a euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp on two separate occasions. Arterialised blood glucose was maintained for 1 h at either 4.5 mmol/l (euglycaemia) or 2.5 mmol/l (hypoglycaemia). During this time participants underwent neuropsychological tests to assess psychomotor function. During hypoglycaemia the non-diabetic participants showed a significant deterioration in the following: (1) four-choice reaction time (p = 0.008); (2) grooved pegboard (a test of manual dexterity; p = 0.004); (3) hand steadiness (p = 0.003); (4) pursuit rotor (a test of fine motor function, attention and coordination; p = 0.018); and (5) test of total body coordination (p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed between euglycaemia and hypoglycaemia in hand-grip (p = 0.897) and line tracing time (p = 0.480) tests. In type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, only four-choice reaction time (p = 0.023) and pursuit rotor (p = 0.045) were impaired significantly during hypoglycaemia.
assistant
Although acute hypoglycaemia caused significant impairment of several psychomotor functions in non-diabetic adults, a lower magnitude of impairment was observed in those with type 1 diabetes. The mechanism underlying this discrepant effect of hypoglycaemia on psychomotor function remains unknown, but may be related to the difference in sympathoadrenal activation observed between the groups. People with type 1 diabetes may also have had a behavioural advantage of over non-diabetic participants derived from their previous exposure to hypoglycaemia or potentially the disparate results arose from hypoglycaemia-induced cerebral adaptation. Final Decision: yes