system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Auditory Threshold, Child, Child, Preschool, Cochlea, Cochlear Implantation, Cochlear Implants, Electric Impedance, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Hearing Loss, Humans, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Round Window, Ear, Stapedius, Treatment Outcome.
user
Do stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child? Context: To compare stimulation parameters of peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar electrode arrays using two surgical approaches. Impedance, stimulation thresholds, comfortably loud current levels, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds were compared between 2 arrays implanted in the same child at 5 time points: surgery, activation/day 1, week 1, and months 1 and 3. The peri-modiolar array was implanted via cochleostomy in all children (n = 64), while the anti-modiolar array was inserted via a cochleostomy in 43 children and via the round window in 21 children. The anti-modiolar array had significantly lower impedance, but required higher current levels to elicit thresholds, comfort, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds than the peri-modiolar array across all time points, particularly in basal electrodes (p < 0.05). The prevalence of open electrodes was similar in anti-modiolar (n = 5) and peri-modiolar (n = 3) arrays.
assistant
Significant but clinically acceptable differences in stimulation parameters between peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar arrays persisted four months after surgery in children using bilateral cochlear implants. The surgical approach used to insert the anti-modiolar array had no overall effect on outcomes. Final Decision: yes