system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, BACKGROUND, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adolescent, Adult, Bundle-Branch Block, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right, Ventricular Premature Complexes, Young Adult.
user
Does cardiac magnetic resonance predict outcome in patients with premature ventricular complexes of left bundle branch block morphology? Context: We investigated whether the presence of right ventricular (RV) abnormalities detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) predict adverse outcome in patients presenting with frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) of left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. CMR is a component of the diagnostic workup for the differential diagnosis between arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) and idiopathic RV tachycardia. RV abnormalities evaluated by CMR could have prognostic importance. Four hundred forty consecutive patients with >1,000 PVCs of LBBB morphology (minor diagnostic criterion of ARVC/D) and no other pre-existing criteria were prospectively enrolled. RV wall motion (WM), signal abnormalities, dilation, and reduced ejection fraction evaluated by CMR were considered imaging criteria of ARVC/D. Follow-up was performed evaluating an index composite end point of 3 cardiac events: cardiac death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardiac-defibrillator shock. Subjects with multiple RV abnormalities (RVA-2 group) had worse outcome than the no-RVA group (hazard ratio [HR]: 48.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.1 to 384.8; p < 0.001). Of the 61 patients in the RVA-2 group, only 6 had a definite diagnosis of ARVC/D applying the Task Force Criteria. Also, subjects with a single imaging criterion (RVA-1 group) had worse outcome than the no-RVA group (HR: 18.2; 95% CI: 2.0 to 162.6; p = 0.01). Patients with only WM abnormalities had higher prevalence of cardiac events than no-RVA (HR: 27.2; 95% CI: 3.0 to 244.0; p = 0.03).
assistant
In subjects with frequent PVC of LBBB morphology, CMR allows risk stratification. RV abnormalities were associated with worse outcome. Final Decision: yes