system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: BACKGROUND, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adolescent, Adult, Ankylosis, Arthroplasty, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Range of Motion, Articular, Retrospective Studies, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult.
user
Does matthews device arthroplasty present superior long-term mouth opening than interpositional arthroplasty in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis? Context: The aim of this study is to describe the surgical outcomes of a single-institution experience in the surgical management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis, comparing interpositional arthroplasty with autogenous tissue and Matthews device arthroplasty. A retrospective analysis of temporomandibular joint ankylosis patients (n = 15), who underwent interpositional arthroplasty or Matthews device arthroplasty, was conducted. The surgical outcomes (preoperative, recent [4-6 weeks], intermediate [1 year], and late [3 years] postoperative maximal incisal opening, hospital stay, and complication, relapse, and reoperation rates) were compared. Significant (all p < 0.05) differences were recorded in temporomandibular joint ankylosis patients treated with interpositional arthroplasty with autogenous tissue (53.3%) versus Matthews device arthroplasty (46.7%) according to intermediate (25 ± 7 vs. 34 ± 5 mm) and late (19 ± 8 vs. 33 ± 5 mm) postoperative maximal incisal opening, intermediate (31% vs. 7%) and late (47% vs. 12%) postoperative relapse, and reoperation rate (38% vs. 0%). There was similarity (all p > 0.05) in preoperative (4.8 ± 2.9 vs. 4.9 ± 2.9 mm) and recent (35 ± 4 vs. 37 ± 4 mm) postoperative maximal incisal opening, hospital stay (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8 days), and surgery-related complications (13% vs. 14%).
assistant
Both surgical procedures evaluated were successful in initial management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis, but the Matthews device arthroplasty avoided postoperative relapse. Final Decision: yes