system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVE, METHODS, METHODS, METHODS, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Benchmarking, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Clinical Competence, Confidence Intervals, Databases, Factual, Fellowships and Scholarships, Fluoroscopy, Gastroenterology, Humans, Radiation Dosage, Retrospective Studies, Time and Motion Studies.
user
Are radiation doses to ERCP patients significantly lower with experienced endoscopists? Context: Patients undergoing ERCP receive nontrivial doses of radiation, which may increase their risk of developing cancer, especially young patients. Radiation doses to patients during ERCP correlate closely with fluoroscopy time. The aim of this study was to determine whether endoscopist experience is associated with fluoroscopy time. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Data from 69 providers from 6 countries. 9,052 entries of patients undergoing ERCP. Percent difference in fluoroscopy time associated with endoscopist experience and fellow involvement. For procedure types that require less fluoroscopy time, compared with endoscopists who performed > 200 ERCPs in the preceding year, endoscopists who performed <100 and 100 to 200 ERCPs had 104% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%-124%) and 27% (95% CI, 20%-35%) increases in fluoroscopy time, respectively. Every 10 years of experience was associated with a 21% decrease in fluoroscopy time (95% CI, 19%-24%). For fluoroscopy-intense procedures, compared with endoscopists who performed >200 ERCPs in the preceding year, endoscopists who performed <100 and 100 to 200 ERCPs had 59% (95% CI, 39%-82%) and 11% (95% CI, 3%-20%) increases in fluoroscopy time, respectively. Every 10 years of experience was associated with a 20% decrease in fluoroscopy time (95% CI, 18%-24%).
assistant
Database used is a voluntary reporting system, which may not be generalizable. Data is self-reported and was not verified for accuracy. Final Decision: yes