system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Calcium Phosphates, Cell Adhesion, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Cell Proliferation, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Dental Implants, Humans, Materials Testing, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nanostructures, Osteoblasts, Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Surface Properties, Titanium.
user
Do effect of titanium implant surface nanoroughness and calcium phosphate low impregnation on bone cell activity in vitro? Context: In the field of bone implant surfaces, the effects of nanoscale modifications have received significant attention. In the present study, bone cell activity on 2 implant surfaces with similar microtopography but distinct chemistry and nanotopography (sandblasted/acid-etched surface as control group, and calcium phosphate (CaP) low impregnated surface (Ossean) as test group, both from Intra-Lock, Boca Raton, FL) were evaluated. The 2 surfaces were characterized by X-ray photoelectronic spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) up to x200,000 magnification. The micrometer level roughness profiles were evaluated by means of computer software. Cell adhesion, proliferation, and alkaline phosphatase activity were assessed with human SaOS-2 osteoblasts and bone mesenchymal stem cells in nonosteogenic culture conditions. The XPS and SEM results showed that the Ossean surface presented low levels of CaP impregnation within the titanium oxide layer and texturization at the nanometer scale (nanoroughness) compared with the control surface. Moreover Ossean surface induced significantly higher cell differentiation levels than the control (P < .01).
assistant
This study showed that both homogeneous nanoroughness and CaP low impregnation differently affected in vitro bone cell behavior compared with the control moderately rough surface with less texturing in the nanometer scale. However, the relative importance of nanotopography and surface chemistry in cell reactions is yet to be determined. Final Decision: yes