system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Coma, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Hypothermia, Induced, Male, Middle Aged, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
user
Is eD prognostication of comatose cardiac arrest patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia unreliable? Context: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) improves patient survival with good neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. The value of early clinician prognostication in the emergency department (ED) has not been studied in this patient population. To determine if physicians can accurately predict survival and neurologic outcome at hospital discharge of resuscitated, comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated in a post-cardiac arrest clinical pathway that included TH. This was a prospective, observational study conducted at a tertiary referral center. Participants were physicians involved in the resuscitation of OHCA patients treated with a clinical pathway that included TH. Immediately after patient resuscitation in the ED, physicians recorded their prediction of patient survival and neurologic outcome on a standardized questionnaire. Neurologic outcome was assessed by the cerebral performance category. Forty-two physicians completed questionnaires on 17 patients enrolled from October 2009 to March 2010. Sensitivity and specificity of physician prediction of patient survival were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.83) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.59-0.94), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88), a positive likelihood ratio (+LR) of 3.72 (95% CI, 1.30-11.02), and a -LR of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.21-0.77). Sensitivity and specificity of physician prediction of good neurologic outcome were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20-0.64) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.50-0.84), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.39-0.70), a +LR of 1.29 (95% CI, 0.56-3.03), and a -LR of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.53-1.41).
assistant
Physicians poorly prognosticate both survival and neurologic outcome in comatose OHCA patients undergoing TH. Premature prognostication in the ED is unreliable and should be avoided. Final Decision: yes