system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Laparoscopy, Lymph Node Excision, Male, Middle Aged, Retroperitoneal Space, Testicular Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Water.
user
Is laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection with the waterjet technically feasible and safe in testis-cancer patient? Context: The acceptance of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for stage I and II nonseminomatous testicular cancer has decreased because of the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of the procedure. Laparoscopic RPLND is a minimally invasive and safe alternative for low-stage germ-cell tumors. It is, however, technically demanding and should therefore be performed only in experienced centers. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the waterjet technique for laparoscopic RPLND. A series of 18 patients with clinical stage I testis cancer (group A) and 7 patients who had received chemotherapy for stage II disease (group B) underwent laparoscopic RPLND at our institution. The procedure was performed identically to the open approach using the modified template according to Weissbach and associates. The waterjet was used for removal of lymphatic tissue from the aorta and the vena cava, as well as from the sympathetic trunk. The operation was completed in all patients without conversion to open surgery. The mean operating time was 232 +/- 48 minutes. The waterjet was able to remove lymphatic tissue easily and atraumatically. At pressures of 20 bar, the lymph-node capsule remained completely intact, thus avoiding tumor-cell spread. Antegrade ejaculation could be preserved in all patients, who, to date, show no evidence of disease.
assistant
The waterjet allows the safe and complete removal of lymphatic tissue, leaving vulnerable anatomic structures intact. It can decrease the learning curve of laparoscopic RPLND and contribute to better acceptance of this procedure. Final Decision: yes