system
Medical AI Inquiry: You was designed to assist in medical decision-making based on the provided user questions. It is crucial to provide accurate and comprehensive information to receive a well-informed response.  Labels: OBJECTIVE, METHODS, RESULTS. Meshes: Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Asian Continental Ancestry Group, Australia, Creatinine, Cystatin C, Cystatins, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Nephropathies, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Function Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results.
user
Are serial measurements of cystatin C more accurate than creatinine-based methods in detecting declining renal function in type 1 diabetes? Context: Cystatin C-and creatinine-based methods were compared with (99m)-technetium-diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) plasma clearance (isotopic glomerular filtration rate [iGFR]) for detecting declining renal function. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was monitored over a mean of 10.1 years in 85 subjects with type 1 diabetes (with an average of 5.6 measurements per individual). Baseline mean +/- SD iGFR of the cohort was 106.1 +/- 2.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The rates of decline in GFR (DeltaGFR) were derived using linear regression. In 19 of 85 subjects with declining renal function (i.e., DeltaiGFR >3.3 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), DeltaGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year) was 6.5 by iGFR, 4.2 by 10(4)/creatinine, 3.6 by Cockcroft-Gault formula, 3.4 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-6 equation, and 3.5 by the MDRD-4 variable equation (P < 0.01 vs. iGFR). In comparison, DeltaGFR was 6.1 using the formula Cys-GFR = (86.7/cystatin C concentration) - 4.2 (not significant).
assistant
Cystatin C was more accurate in detecting decline in renal function than creatinine-based methods in this population of subjects with type 1 diabetes and a normal mean baseline GFR. Final Decision: yes