The advantages of using endoscopic ultrasound in adult patients with early stage rectal cancer : a systematic review
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of death. The use of preoperative imaging in the staging of (CRC) plays a major role in the management. Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is a precise imaging modality to determine the depth of penetration. The data on the precision of (ERUS) to predict early stage of rectal cancer has been variable  Objectives: To conduct a systematic review, on the diagnostic performance of (ERUS) in the staging of T1 and T2 CRC.  Design: Systematic review.  Data sources: A literature search via PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid and Cochrane library.  METHODS: An initial search for systematic review articles published in the last 15 years on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in the staging of CRC using PubMed, Cochrane library, and trip database was conducted. After finding two systematic reviews that were published in 2008 and 2009, a second search of original studies published since the systematic reviews were conducted using the same databases from 2009 to 2016. The primary studies included in the systematic reviews and the primary studies published afterwards were included in the review. Methodological quality was applied using a modified version of the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS2) tool. Terms used for search were endoscopic ultrasound, EUS, rectal cancer, histo-pathological finding, and staging.  Study selection: Inclusion criteria includes adult people diagnosed with early stage CRC, all articles in english language and must be a full manuscripts published in peer-reviews journals. Exclusion criteria includes any recurrent or metastasis cancer and children with rectal cancer. Patients who were staged preoperatively by other imaging modality (MRI or CT) and no comparison with post operative pathology.  Results: The search identified 420 articles, 97 articles were duplicate and excluded, and 232 refined articles were screened for title and abstract, reviewed. Thirty-two full text studies were assessed for eligibility, and ten published as full text and met the inclusion criteria; they were added to the articles identified in the earlier systematic reviews a total of 49 articles. Results of the evaluation of the accuracy of ERUS analyzed according to the diagnostic measures of sensitivities and specificities calculated for each study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS for stage T1 CRC was 0.84  (CI 0.75-0.91) and 0.93 (CI 0.86–0.97), and for T2 was 0.83 (CI 0.74–0.90) and 0.93(CI 0.86–0.97) respectively.  Conclusion: The range of sensitivity and specificity values suggest that EUS performs well in accurately staging T1 and T2 cancers. Further advancement in this technology will lead to an improved diagnosis, clinical decision-making, and reduce the over staging drawback.
carcinome rectum Carcinome rectum Endorectal ultrasonography Rectal cancer Cancer staging Diagnostic accuracy Endorectal echography Sensitivity and specificity Rectum carcinoma Rectum tumor Histopathology and early staging