Interactions multimodales visuelles et tactiles dans l’espace
The integration of stimuli from the same or different modalities offers many benefits such as enhanced discrimination and accelerated reaction to objects. This thesis investigates the effects of stimuli’s spatial location on the redundancy gain (RG) obtained with cross-modal and within-modal stimulations. The RG is a decrease in reaction times (RT) when two or more stimuli are presented simultaneously rather than a single stimulation.  The first study investigated cross-modal visuo-tactile integration in a single reaction time task and a choice reaction time task. Each unisensory stimulus was presented to either the left or right hemispace, and multisensory stimuli were presented in a unilateral (e.g. visual right/tactile right) or bilateral configuration (e.g. visual right/tactile left). The first task was a simple reaction time (SRT) paradigm where participants had to responded to all stimulations, irrespective of spatial position. Results showed that multisensory gain and coactivation were the same for spatially aligned and misaligned visuotactile stimulations. In the second task, a choice reaction time (CRT) paradigm where participants responded to rightsided stimuli only, bilateral stimuli yielded slower reaction times. No difference in multisensory gain was found between the SRT and CRT tasks for unilateral stimulations. Overall, the results suggest that when spatial information is task-irrelevant, multisensory integration of unilateral and bilateral stimuli is equivalent. However, manipulating task requirements can alter this effect.  In the second study, we investigated if the behavioral enhancements resulting from within-modal and cross-modal integration depend on the spatial congruency of the redundant stimuli. Results show that the redundancy gains (RG) obtained from the cross-modal conditions were far greater than those obtained from combinations of two visual or two tactile targets. Moreover, we found that the spatial alignment of the targets did not influence the RG obtained in cross-modal conditions, whereas within-modal stimuli produced a greater RG when the targets where delivered in separate hemispaces. These results suggest that within-modal and cross-modal integration are not only distinguishable by the amount of facilitation they produce, but also by the spatial configuration under which this facilitation occurs.  The third study examines the role of the corpus callosum (CC) in mediating the RG observed for unilateral and bilateral cross-modal integration. Using a simple detection task, we tested four congenitally acallosal and one callosotomized individuals. No significant difference between congenitally acallosal individuals and controls were found for unilateral within-modal conditions or for multisensory conditions. Overall, these results demonstrate that the CC in not required to integrate cross-modal information across hemispheres and that intrahemispheric processing is preserved in acallosal individuals. Based on previous studies demonstrating the role of the superior colliculus in multisensory integration, our results suggest that in the absence of the CC, the behavioral benefit resulting from subcortical processing by the superior colliculus does not reflect the neurophysiological constraints of multisensory integration.
Discrimination Multisensory integration Redundancy gain Reaction time Space Detection Discrimination Corpus callosum Interhemispheric