La pertinence de l’obligation de divulguer l’origine des ressources génétiques et des savoirs traditionnels dans les demandes de brevets
The rapid development in the field of biotechnology can be attributed to a large degree to the innovative use of genetic resources (GR), a significant portion of which were based on traditional knowledge (TK). The biotechnological inventions resulting from these resources and knowledge are, for the most part, subject to patent protection. This legal protection is designed to allow creators of innovative inventions the possibility to recoup their investment by limiting the use of the resulting creation by people other than the inventor and his assignees. Indeed, the gradual recognition of the scientific and commercial value of such resources and associated knowledge has raised interest and fuelled rivalries that eventually led to conflict over the use and trade of such products between user and producing States.   A possible solution to resolve this conflict is the use of access and benefit-sharing agreements. One requirement proposed by producing States is an obligation to disclose the origin of GR and TK in patent applications. However, since the issues in this area, generally, exceed the national sphere, producing countries are attempting to make this requirement recognized at an international level. Accordingly the most effective and efficient means of doing so would be via the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in the World Trade Organization WTO. In this thesis, we will demonstrate that the obligation to disclose the origin of GR and TK in patent applications does not constitute an appropriate means that would lead to a fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of their use.
Genetic Resources Traditional knowledge Patents Biotechnology Benefit-sharing