Analysis of the esophagogastric junction using the 3D high resolution manometry
Background & Aims:  Conventional water-perfused manometry and high resolution manometry permitted the development of a variety of manometric methodologies and metrics to understand the motility of the esophagus and to quantify esophagogastric junction (EGJ) characteristics.  However, the anatomy in the area of the EGJ is complex and intraluminal manometry recordings detect pressure signals referable both to intrinsic esophageal structures and to adjacent extrinsic structures impinging on the esophagus.  Both have distinct sphincteric mechanisms within the EGJ.  The dominant pressure signals detected near the EGJ are attributable to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the crural diaphragm (CD).  However, neither of these technologies were able to distinguish between the different components of the EGJ. When analyzing EGJ characteristics as a reflection of its competence against reflux, the more widely used manometric parameters are the EGJ length and the respiratory inversion point (RIP), defined as the location at which inspiratory pressure deflections change from positive (abdomen) to negative (chest).  However, the significance of these metrics has not gained wide acceptance in the gastroenterology community as evident in a recent American Gastroenterology Association Institute (AGAI) Position Statement (1) concluding that ‘The current role of manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is to exclude motor disorders as a cause of the continued symptoms’. During deglutition, the objective quantitative measurement of EGJ relaxation, the integrative relaxation pressure (IRP), permits one to distinguish between normal and abnormal EGJ relaxation.  However, comparison between spatial pressure variation plots and relaxation pressures derived from circumferentially averaged pressures suggest a persistent high pressure at the hiatal center during a period that flow is known to be occurring whereas this was not seen using nadir radial pressure data. Recently, a 3D-high resolution manometry (3D-HRM) assembly (Given Imaging, Duluth, GA) has been developed with the potential to simplify the assessment of EGJ pressure morphology and physiology.  The 3D segment of the array permits high resolution recording both axially and radially while maintaining a stationary sensor position.  Consequently, 3D-HRM should allow for the measurement of important EGJ parameters such as length and RIP.  Data extracted from the 3D-HRM recording may also allow differentiating pressure signals within the EGJ attributable to the intrinsic sphincter and to the surrounding elements.  Moreover, 3D-HRM preserves the individual pressure values of each radially dispersed sensor within the array, permitting one to overcome the apparent persistent high pressure during the deglutitive relaxation. Thus, the aims of this work were 1) to describe the EGJ pressure morphology at rest, comparing measures made with real time 3D-HRM to simulations of a conventional pull-through protocol and to define the pressure signatures attributable to the diaphragmatic and LES pressure components within the 3D-HRM recording; 2) to assess deglutitive EGJ relaxation by testing the hypothesis that the 3D-HRM array using an analysis paradigm based on finding the minimal radial pressure at each axial level (3D-eSleeve) should provide a representation of the luminal pressure gradient across the EGJ that is more relevant to predicting periods of trans-sphincteric flow using barium transit on fluoroscopy as the comparator.  We also sought to adapt the IRP metric to the 3D-HRM array using the 3D-eSleeve principle (3D-IRP) and compare normative values obtained with this new paradigm to standard IRP calculations. Methods:  Patients were studied with a 3D-HRM assembly.  The 3D-HRM assembly incorporated a 9 cm 3D-HRM segment into an otherwise standard HRM assembly; the 3D segment was comprised of 12 rings of 8 radially dispersed independent pressure sensors, spaced 7.5mm apart. At rest, 9 volunteers were studied and recordings were done during a station pull-through of the 3D-HRM segment withdrawing it across the EGJ at 5 mm increments with each position held for 30s (sufficient to capture several respiratory cycles).  Conventional measures of ‘LES length’ were made using 4 radially dispersed sensors within the 3D-HRM array, defining the margins of the sphincter by a 2 mmHg pressure increase relative to gastric or esophageal pressure.  In the 3D-HRM, the proximal and distal limits of the EGJ were defined as the axial locations first detecting a 360° circumferential pressure increase of 2 mmHg relative to the stomach.  RIP was determined, A) in the tracing mode: using the pull-through of 4 single sensors spaced 7.5 mm apart [RIP is the average value of 4 radially dispersed sensors] and B) in a stationary position using the software pressure inversion point (PIP) tool.  In the esophageal pressure topography (EPT) mode, the tracing changed progressively from a thoracic pattern to an abdominal pattern, and the RIP was localized within the inversion zone with the PIP tool tracing. For the study of the EGJ deglutitive relaxation, 25 volunteers underwent 3 consecutive 10-swallows protocols of 5 ml of water in the supine position with both the standard (once) and 3D-HRM (twice) devices in random sequence.  During the 3D-HRM studies, the EGJ was measured once with the 3D-sleeve segment and once with a proximal (non-3D sleeve portion) of the device incorporating standard HRM sensors.  For each subject, the IRP was calculated in four ways: 1) conventional method with the standard HRM device, 2) conventional method with a standard HRM segment of the 3D-HRM device, 3) conventional method using the 3D-HRM sleeve segment, and 4) a novel 3D-HRM eSleeve paradigm (3D-IRP) localizing the radial pressure minimum at each locus along the eSleeve.  Fourteen additional subjects then underwent synchronized simultaneous videofluoroscopy and 3D-HRM (including two 5-ml barium swallows).  Pressure data were exported to MATLAB™ and four pressures were measured simultaneously: 1) esophageal body pressure 2cm above EGJ, 2) intragastric pressure, 3) radially average eSleeve pressure and 4) 3D-eSleeve pressure.  Data were plotted to determine the flow permissive time (FPT) characterized as periods during which a pressure gradient through the EGJ is present (esophageal pressure > EGJ relaxation pressure (radial average or 3D-eSleeve paradigm) > gastric pressure).  FPT was calculated during a 10s time window after upper sphincter relaxation.  The presence or absence of bolus transit or FPT was coded with dichotomous values for each 0.1 s.  We calculated the corresponding sensitivity and specificity for both radial average and 3D-eSleeve analyses of FPT with bolus transit evident on fluoroscopy being the reference. Results:  3D-HRM recordings suggested that sphincter length assessed by a pull-through method greatly exaggerated the estimate of LES length by failing to discriminate among circumferential contractile pressure and asymmetric extrinsic pressure signals attributable to diaphragmatic and vascular structures.  Real-time 3D EGJ recordings found that the dominant constituents of EGJ pressure at rest were attributable to the diaphragm. The 3D-IRP was significantly less than all other calculations of IRP with the upper limit of normal being 12 mmHg vs. 17 mmHg for the standard IRP.  The sensitivity (0.78) and the specificity (0.88) of the 3D-eSleeve were also better than the standard eSleeve (0.55 and 0.85, respectively) for predicting flow permissive time verified fluoroscopically. Discussion & Conclusion:  Our observations suggest that the 3D-HRM permits real-time recording of EGJ pressure morphology facilitating analysis of the EGJ constituents responsible for its function as a reflux barrier at rest.  The axial and radial spatial resolution of the 9 cm 3D-HRM segment may permit further studies to differentiate pressure signals within the EGJ attributable to the LES and to extrinsic structures (diaphragm and vascular artifacts).  These attributes of the 3D-HRM device suggest it to be a promising new tool in the study of GERD pathophysiology. During deglutition, we evaluated the feasibility of improving the measurement of IRP utilizing a novel 3D-HRM assembly and a novel 3D-eSleeve concept based on finding the axial maximum of the radial minimum pressures at each sensor ring along the sleeve segment.  Our findings suggest that this approach is more accurate than standard HRM and other methods that utilize a radially averaged pressure within the EGJ.  Although we can only speculate on how much this will improve clinical management, 3D-HRM will certainly improve the accuracy of EGJ relaxation measurements and this will certainly impact research endeavors focused on modeling EGJ function during swallowing and reflux.
Esophagogastric junction Esophageal manometry 3D-High resolution manometry Deglutition physiology Gastroesophageal reflux Dysphagia Dysphagie