Observance en début de psychose : acceptation, refus ou processus?
Objective: Quantitative studies have documented the extent of compliance issues in early psychosis and the ensuing clinical consequences. However, an in-depth understanding of this phenomenon remains limited. Drawing upon the perspectives of a sample of patients, their families, and clinicians, this study explores why patients suffering from early-stage psychosis accept or refuse treatment. Method: Data collection was conducted using semi-structured individual interviews with 18 patients from a clinic specializing in early psychosis who were identified as compliant, ambivalent or non-compliant. In addition, interviews were conducted with 13 of their family members, as well as a focus group composed of 8 clinicians working at the clinic. Results: For the majority of patients, compliance appeared to evolve according to a process characterized by varying degrees of ambivalence. In particular, identity issues, relational issues, the understanding of the diagnosis, and the meaning of treatment were key to understanding patients’ sense of ambivalence. Conclusion: Ambivalence and non-compliance can be seen as normal stages of a process whereby the patient struggles to rebuild his or her sense of self and constructs their ongoing identity. A relationship of trust may facilitate a gradual resolution of the ambivalence, promoting a patient’s sense of ownership and empowerment in the context of treatment.
Recherche qualitative Compliance Schizophrenia Bipolar disorder First-episode psychosis Qualitative research