L’utilisation de l’information visuelle en reconnaissance d’expressions faciales d’émotion
The ability to recognize facial expressions is crucial for the success of social communication. The information used by the visual system to categorize static basic facial expressions is now relatively well known. However, the visual information used to discriminate the basic facial expressions from one another is still unknown, and this is true for both static and dynamic facial expressions. Many believe that the eye region of a facial expression is particularly important when it comes to reading others' emotions. The aim of the first article of this thesis is to determine which information is used by the visual system in order to discriminate between the basic facial expressions and to verify the validity of the hypothesis that the eye region is crucial for this task. The Bubbles method (Gosselin & Schyns, 2001) is used with static (Exp. 1) and dynamic (Exp. 2) facial expressions in order to determine which facial areas are used for the task (Exp. 1) and in which temporal order these facial areas are used (Exp. 2). The results show that, in contrast with the aforementioned belief, the mouth region is significantly more useful than the eye region when discriminating between the basic facial expressions. Despite this preponderant role of the mouth, it is the eye area⎯not the mouth area⎯that is underutilized by many clinical populations suffering from difficulties in recognizing facial expressions. This observation could suggest that the utilization of the eye area varies as a function of the ability to recognize facial expressions. The aim of the second article in this thesis is thus to verify how individual differences in the ability to recognize facial expressions relate to the visual information extraction strategies used for this task. The results show a positive correlation between the ability of the participants and the utilization of the mouth region, suggesting the existence of qualitative differences between the strategy of clinical patients and of normal participants. A positive correlation is also found between the ability of the participants and the utilization of the left eye area, but no correlation is found between the ability and the utilization of the right eye area. These results suggest that the difference between the strategies of the best and the worst participants is not only that the best ones use the information available in the stimulus more efficiently: rather, qualitative differences in the visual information extraction strategies may exist even within the normal population.
Visual perception Information extraction strategies Facial expressions Basic emotions Individual differences Bubbles, Eye movements