Entrevues auprès d’enfants qui dévoilent une agression sexuelle : examen du processus d’enquête et du parcours judiciaire des dossiers
This thesis aimed to explore the contribution of contextual variables to the formal disclosure of alleged child sexual abuse victims as well as to the legal proceedings of their case.  More specifically, the first article examined the predictive value of child sexual abuse’s characteristics (relationship between the child and the suspect, reported coercion, type and frequency of abuse) as well as the disclosure context (purposeful or accidental disclosure, maternal belief and protective actions) on the proportion of central forensically relevant (CFR) details elicited during the investigative interview. The study also controlled for the well documented effects of the child’s age and use of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Investigative Protocol. All these variables were collected from 116 interview transcripts and child sexual abuse files. As expected, results from hierarchical regression showed that adhesion to the NICHD Protocol and the child’s age were the two strongest predictors of the proportion of CFR details obtained. Coercion (physical and verbal) as well as the presence of a protective mother also increased the proportion of CFR details obtained. Explanations for these results are discussed, as well as the study’s limitations and implications for further research.  The second article explored the predictive value of the characteristics of the child, sexual abuse, shared custody, disclosure context, available evidence and investigative interviews on the investigators’ decision to substantiate the complaint and on the district attorney’s decision to authorize its proceeding in court. These characteristics were collected from 169 child sexual abuse police files and interview transcripts. Results show that 117 files out of 169 (69%) were classified as substantiated by the investigators. Logistic regression reveal that the child’s age, an accidental disclosure, the choice of the first person who received the disclosure, the frequency of the abuse, and the suspect’s corroboration were significant predictors in finding the case substantiated. Of these 117 substantiated files submitted to the district attorneys, 96 of them (82%) were authorized to proceed in criminal court. Significant predictors on the district attorneys’ level were the corroboration of the suspect, the protection offered by the mother following her child’s disclosure, the adhesion to the NICHD investigative Protocol and the corroboration of the witness which increased the chances of authorizing the case whereas the child’s age diminished it. The results are discussed, as well as well as the study’s limitations and implications for further research.
Sexual abuse Investigative interview NICHD Protocol Criminal justice system Investigators District attorneys Child