Le développement des proportions métaphysaires chez les hominoïdes : croissance et influence de la locomotion
This thesis analyses the relationship between morphology, locomotion and growth in hominoids by studying metaphyseal proportions and development. Several levels of analysis — interlimb, upper and lower limbs — are discussed in an ontogenic perspective. Body mass and direction of loads affect the morphology of articular and metaphyseal surfaces but also their development. Taking into account the locomotion of a species and related loads during growth, we try to determine when proportions change, if at all, and why they appear. Australopithecus afarensis is one species for which the debate about its locomotion is still ongoing, study of the ontogeny of its proportions may shed light on the functions of its limbs during locomotion.  Linear measurements were collected on the humerus, radius, ulna, femur and tibia of H. sapiens, P. troglodytes, G. gorilla and P. pygmaeus. From these measurements, ratios have been calculated to intra and inter limb proportions of hominoid appendicular skeleton for different age groups.  Differences between species are most significant at the interlimb level and relative to the different relative percentage of upper and lower limbs use. Within species, results reveal a similarity for metaphyseal surfaces responses to loads at all levels of analyses. Proportional changes take place between dental stages 0 and 1 for H. sapiens (acquisition of bipedality), between stages 2 and 4 for P. troglodytes (majority of body weight supported by the lower limb) and between stages 3 and 5 for G. gorilla (knuckle-walking for 85 % of the time). For P. pygmaeus, no proportional change occur at any specific stage, which corresponds to the absence of changes in locomotor behavior from birth to adulthood in that species. From these data, it appears that proportional differences are responses to major changes in the mode of locomotion. Australopithecus afarensis is intermediate between H. sapiens and apes for many proportional comparisons while the knee joint, contrarily to expectation, is not like the bipedal humans.
Locomotion Paleoanthropology Development Growth Metaphyseal proportions Hominoids