Abdominal aortic aneurysm follow-up after endovascular repair in a canine model with non-invasive vascular elastography
Surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms is increasingly being replaced by EVAR using SGs. However, the efficacy of this less invasive approach is jeopardized by the incidence of persistent flow within the aneurysm, called endoleaks leading to aneurysm rupture if not properly detected. Hence, a life-long surveillance by computed tomography (CT) angiography on an annual basis is increasing the cost of EVAR, exposing the patient to ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agent.  The mechanism of aneurysm rupture secondary to endoleak is related to a pressurization of the aneurysm sac close to the systemic pressure. There is a relation between sac shrinkage or expansion and sac pressurization. The residual pressurization of AAA will induce sac pulsatility and blood circulation in the sac thus preventing sac thrombosis and aneurysm healing. NIVE using the LSME may become a complementary follow-up imaging technique for EVAR. NIVE has the capability of providing important information on the thrombus organization within the aneurysm sac and on the detection of endoleaks.  The characterization of the thrombus organization was not possible in a previous NIVE study. A limitation was the absence of CT examinations as gold standard for endoleak diagnosis. In the current study, we aimed to apply and optimize NIVE of AAA after EVAR with SG in a canine model to detect endoleaks and characterize thrombus organization.  SGs were implanted in a group of 18 dogs with an aneurysm created in the abdominal aorta. Type I endoleak was created in 4 aneurysms, type II in 13 aneurysms and no endoleak in 1 aneurysm. DUS and NIVE examinations were performed at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-up after EVAR. Angiography, CT-scan and macroscopic tissue slides were performed at sacrifice. Strain values were computed using the LSME. Areas of endoleak, solid thrombus (organized) and fresh thrombus (non-organized) were identified and segmented by comparing the results of CT scan and macroscopic tissue slides. Strain values in areas with endoleak, organized and fresh thrombi were compared.  Strain values were significantly different between endoleak and organized or fresh thrombus areas and between organized and fresh thrombus areas. All endoleaks were clearly characterized on elastography examinations. No correlation was found between strain values and type of endoleak, sac pressure, endoleak size and aneurysm size.
Thrombus Aorta Abdominal aortic aneurysm Endovascular repair Computed tomography Endoleak Thrombus