La nature, le rôle et l’impact du déni et de la minimisation chez les délinquants sexuels au sein des programmes d’intervention
Object: Literature seems to place too much emphasis on denial and minimization in intervention programs by seeking accountability. However, some writers will say that denial and minimization do not need to be worked on to achieve progression and benefits during the program. Denial and minimization being presented as factors of receptivity, the minimal recognition of the acts committed would be necessary, compared to taking of responsibility. The purpose of this work was to illustrate the role, nature and impact of denial and minimization on intervention programs by exploring the experience of adult sex offenders. The importance of intervening on denial and minimization in programs and interventions to be prioritized to increase participants' responsivity was examined.  Method: In order to reach the goal of this studies, case studies were conducted within the framework of an internship in the CETAS. Data collection was conducted through file documentation and semi-structured interviews with three men who were convicted for sexual abuse towards a child. Interpretation of the results: The participants considered denial and minimization of the gravity of the gestures as factors of receptivity. They have put a lot of emphasis on eliminating denial and minimization in intervention programs so that the individual can progress and change. Some argued, however, that the individual may want to change even if he is minimizing the offense.
Responsivity Minimization Denial Risk factor Function Purpose Treatment Sex offender Sexual offender