Volumetric velopharyngeal space modifications in patients with and without cleft palate undergoing Le Fort 1 maxillary advancement
Background & Purpose: The effects of maxillary advancement (MA) on velopharyngeal anatomy have primarily been studied using lateral cephalometric radiographs. However, with recent advances in orthognathic surgery, there is an increased need for more detailed and precise imaging such as computerized tomographic (CT) scan reconstructions, to help in surgical planning and to measure outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the pre-and post-operative velopharyngeal space configuration modifications as measured on CT scans. The aim is also to assess differences in these airway measures between patients with and without history of prior repaired cleft palate (CP).   Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 44 patients with and without CP who were treated with MA for midface hypoplasia and secondary malocclusion at skeletal maturity. The pre-and post-operative CT scans were compared with respect to pre-established landmarks. Linear distances, cross-sectional areas, and volumes were measured using 3-dimensional (3D) CT scan reconstructions.   Results: For the linear distances measured, a statistically significant difference was found when comparing the pre-and post-operative measures of the narrowest part of the nasopharynx and the narrowest part of the retropalatal airway space (25.1 vs 28.5 mm p=0.001 and 6.5 vs 7.6 mm p=0.026, respectively). Retropalatal cross-sectional areas, nasopharyngeal cross-sectional areas and the volumetric assessment of the nasopharyngeal space showed no statistically significant differences when comparing pre-and post-operative scans (p>0.05). The main effect of palatal repair (CP vs. Non-CP) showed that there was only a statistically significant difference for the measures of the narrowest part of the nasopharynx and the nasopharyngeal cross-sectional area (p=0.045 and p=0.04, respectively). Mean changes in the measures did not differ over time (pre-and post-op) depending on whether there was prior history of CP repair.  Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis that although structural modifications of the pharyngeal space are inherent to MA in patients with CP, its surface area and volume do not change significantly. These changes are also independent of history of previous CP repair.
Cleft lip Cleft palate Velopharyngeal insufficiency Orthognathic surgery Maxillary advancement Computed tomography Cephalometric Anatomy