Estimation des longueurs de branche et artefact sur la datation moléculaire
Molecular phylogeny provides an additional tool complementary to paleontological and geological studies, allowing the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships between species and the estimate of their divergence time. Researchers are mainly focusing on the topology of a phylogenetic tree; i.e. the relative connection between different nodes. Whereas, the branch lengths of this phylogeny are often considered as secondary, i.e. as additional parameters containing little information. However, the branch lengths are the primary information for molecular dating. Importantly, saturation, the presence of multiple substitutions at the same position, is an artifact that leads to an underestimation of the branch length. We are therefore interested in estimating the magnitude of this phenomenon and its impact on divergence time.  We chose to study the mammalian mitochondrial genome, which is available for many species and displays a high level of saturation. Furthermore, the phylogenetic relationships of mammalians are known, thus allowing us to fix the topology, thus eliminating one of the parameters influencing the branch lengths. We used two main approaches to improve the detection of multiple substitutions: (i) an increase in the number of species breaks the longest branches of the tree, (ii) more realistic models of sequence evolution. The results demonstrate that there is a very pronounced underestimation of branch lengths (up to a factor of 3). Furthermore, the use of a large number of species is the factor that influences most the detection of multiple substitutions, not the improvement of the model of sequence evolution. This suggests that even the most complex evolutionary models currently available, like the CAT+ Covarion model, which takes into account the heterogeneity of the substitution process between sites and the rates of evolution over time, are still far from taking the entire complexity of biological processes into account. Despite the important underestimation of branch lengths, the impact on dating appeared to be relatively limited, because the underestimation is more or less homothetic. This is obviously true for the complex evolutionary models. Since multiple substitutions are most effectively detected when breaking the long internal branches via the addition of species. This raises the problem of bias in the taxonomic sampling, due to the impact of extinction on the history of life on earth. Because this kind of bias leads to a non-homothetic underestimation, we consider it essential to improve models of sequence evolution and suggest that the protocol developed in this work will allow to evaluate their effectiveness towards saturation.
Phylogeny Molecular dating Branch lengths Evolutionary models