Development of a Chinese version WHO Self-Assessment Tool for Evaluating Health Promotion in Hospital
The first purpose of this research is to develop a Chinese version (WHO self-assessment tool for Health Promotion in Hospital(WHOSATHPH), and test its reliability and validity through a pilot test in Canada (Montréal) and spot field investigation in China, this research was the first time to adopt completely cross-culture approach which includes:translated the source English edition tool into Chinese, then back translated it into English. 8 Chinese health professionals who have worked both in China and Montreal were investigated to complete the pilot test. Then 3 health professionals whose work language is English (1 Native American, 1 evaluation professor, the author of WHOSATHPH) commented the back-translation quality. The spot field investigation was performed in three Chinese capital cities, Shanghai, Hefei and Kunming from 5 June to 30 August 2008. Non-probability sample was used to survey 40 hospital leaders who are from 22 China hospitals, and 3 health management researchers (include 1 government officer). The second purpose of this research is to provide a primary description of China current HPH development by using this Chinese version WHOSATHPH, and to discuss China current hospital service evaluating principle and management model, and analysis the value and culture of TCM and its role and influence to China HPH development. Three capital cities(Shanghai, Kunming, and Hefei) which stand for different economic development level and different culture context feature but all deep influenced by TCM were investigated. 22 hospitals and 35 hospital leaders were given interview while they answered the questionnaire. All the respondents were vonluntary to take part in the first survey and the repeat survey after 3-7 days if they would like to. Reliability analysis include internal consistency(Cronbach Alpha),inter-rater relibility(Correlation analysis),Test-retest reliability( Paire-Sample T-test), Validity Test through factor analysis and Pearson Bivariate Correlations analysis. NPAR test was used to analyize the different cities and different grade hospitals comparison. Result: Only 1 word <satisfy>) was marked different meaning comparing with the back translation English version with original version by all of them. Reliability measures utilized Cronbach's Alpha, the general coefficient of the Chinese version WHOSATHPH was 0.938, Cronbach's alpha for the domains was 0.896. The Cronbach`s alpha for v five standards from one to five were: 0.793, 0.819, 0.807, 0.785, 0.755. 8 groups data were used for Inner-raters analysis, result shows that Shanghai respondents had comment consistency but Hefei and Kunming respondents didn't show inner raters assessed consistency. Pair T-Test for 40 items between pre and post test, the signification p was from 0.1-1 which indicates not statistic significant difference. Factor analysis shows this tool has the general theory construct validity, but the domain construct validity has not show the contruct validity. The results showed that Chinese version WHOSATHPH has high internal consistency but the high Cronbach`s Alpha might concern to the number of items. All the respondents thought WHOSATHPH was valuable in theory research, 15 respondents refused to use this instrument in their work, only 17 respondents accepted it, 3 respondents were not sure to use. The rejective reasons were: no government finance budget support, no demand from the government, difficult to follow. The acceptive reasons were: help to improve the work quality, help to guide HPH development. This research result shows that the Chinese version has reliability and general construct validity, but its validity needs the further conceptual and empirical research to prove. ① For five standards from the highest to lowest: standard5 (continuity and cooperation) 28.95(72.4% of full score), standard4 (healthy workplace) 35.71(71.4%), standard3 (patient information and prevention) 21.34 (71.1%), standard2 (patients assessment) 23.85 (68.1%), standard1 (management and policy) 28.17(only 62.6% of full score). These results show China hospitals has better HPH development level, their means are all over 60% of full score,②The mean of the total score for different grade hospital were: Grade III (n=21)154.19 + 7.34, Grade II(n=9) 158.67 + 10.7, Grade I (n=11) 144.82 + 14.54. Variance analysis result shows that there was no statistic significant difference between different grade hospitals. However, the last conclusion need further research with large ramdom sample size investigation. This thesis discussed the quality and weakness of China health care system and its successive strategies to develop HPH in very poor finance support, huge population, and difficult social condition and polluted environment. Disease prevention first, patient-center, combined the TCM with west medicine are regarded as the successive strategies for China HPH development. This research created a foundation for future HPH research.
Health promotion hospital management Self-Assessment Instrument Translation China Cross-culture Reliability and Validity Culture and Value Traditional Chinese Medicine instrument Chine cross -culture