@inproceedings{
li2024iqaeval,
title={{IQA}-{EVAL}: Automatic Evaluation of Human-Model Interactive Question Answering},
author={Ruosen Li and Ruochen Li and Barry Wang and Xinya Du},
booktitle={The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=MzM99vV5Rx}
}
To evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for question answering (QA), traditional methods typically focus on directly assessing the immediate responses generated by the models based on the given question and context. In the common use case of humans seeking AI assistant’s help in finding information, these non-interactive evaluations do not account for the dynamic nature of human-model conversations, and interaction-aware evaluations have shown that accurate models are not necessarily preferred by humans Lee et al. Recent works in human-computer interaction (HCI) have employed human evaluators to conduct interactions and evaluations, but they are often prohibitively expensive and time-consuming to scale. In this work, we introduce an automated evaluation framework IQA-EVAL to Interactive Question Answering Evaluations, more specifically, we introduce LLM-based Evaluation Agent (LEA) that can: (1) simulate human behaviors to generate interactions with IQA models; (2) automatically evaluate the generated interactions. Moreover, we propose assigning personas to LEAs to better simulate groups of real human evaluators. We show that: (1) our evaluation framework with GPT-4 (or Claude) as the backbone model achieves a high correlation with human evaluations on the IQA task; (2) assigning personas to LEA to better represent the crowd further significantly improves correlations. Finally, we use our automated metric to evaluate five recent LLMs with over 1000 questions from complex and ambiguous question answering tasks, which would cost $5k if evaluated by humans.
IQA-EVAL: Automatic Evaluation of Human-Model Interactive Question Answering
Ruosen Li Ruochen Li Barry Wang Xinya Du