@inproceedings{
s{\'u}ken{\'\i}k2024neural,
title={Neural collapse vs. low-rank bias: Is deep neural collapse really optimal?},
author={Peter S{\'u}ken{\'\i}k and Christoph H. Lampert and Marco Mondelli},
booktitle={The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=0jld45XGgJ}
}
Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit a surprising structure in their final layer known as neural collapse (NC), and a growing body of works is currently investigated the propagation of neural collapse to earlier layers of DNNs -- a phenomenon called deep neural collapse (DNC). However, existing theoretical results are restricted to either linear models, the last two layers or binary classification. In contrast, we focus on non-linear models of arbitrary depth in multi-class classification and reveal a surprising qualitative shift. As soon as we go beyond two layers or two classes, DNC stops being optimal for the deep unconstrained features model (DUFM) -- the standard theoretical framework for the analysis of collapse. The main culprit is the low-rank bias of multi-layer regularization schemes. This bias leads to optimal solutions of even lower rank than the neural collapse. We support our theoretical findings with experiments on both DUFM and real data, which show the emergence of the low-rank structure in the solution found by gradient descent.
Neural collapse vs. low-rank bias: Is deep neural collapse really optimal?
Peter Súkeník Christoph H. Lampert Marco Mondelli