<story><title>Richard Dreyfuss&apos; dramatic reading of the iTunes EULA</title><url>http://www.cnet.com/8301-30976_1-20068778-10348864.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Crave</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>DanielStraight</author><text>The &quot;termination&quot; one highlights a particularly absurd aspect of the EULA. You are supposed to do something specific on termination of the license, but they aren&apos;t required to tell you it&apos;s terminated?</text></comment>
<story><title>Richard Dreyfuss&apos; dramatic reading of the iTunes EULA</title><url>http://www.cnet.com/8301-30976_1-20068778-10348864.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Crave</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>peterwwillis</author><text>Can you imagine if companies did this regularly? If people actually &quot;listened&quot; to what they&apos;re agreeing to when they use common software? They might actually look for alternative software.&lt;p&gt;New idea: A table on Wikipedia of software and the rights you give up by using it, compared to Free software and the rights you retain.</text></comment>