<story><title>Pictures show cracks in Ayrshire nuclear reactor</title><url>https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-47485321</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>einpoklum</author><text>1. And nuclear waste is nothing to you? Not everything is about CO_2 you know.
2. It is indeed a significant accomplishment. Let&amp;#x27;s keep it that way by ceasing operation on time and not risk tarring the accomplishment with a reactor failure.</text></item><item><author>sunkenvicar</author><text>40+ years of generating clean CO2-free energy.&lt;p&gt;Designed with slide rules and drafting tables.&lt;p&gt;An unbelievable accomplishment!</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>manfredo</author><text>&amp;gt;  And nuclear waste is nothing to you? Not everything is about CO_2 you know&lt;p&gt;This is an incredibly disingenuous comparison. Nuclear waste is not even remotely as much of a problem as CO2 emissions. Nuclear waste can be encased in concrete and buried in remote areas. There are also several areas already irradiated by nuclear bomb testing, so putting the waste there is moot (This applies to the Yucca Mountain facility). The hypothetical situations in which nuclear waste could result in human contamination are borderline absurd. Sure, &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; society collapses and all records of these waste locations are lost, and &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; some future civilization decides to dig a mile deep in a remote area with no natural resources, and &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; they decide to crack open these concrete caskets because all knowledge of 21st Century languages are lost so they can&amp;#x27;t read the warnings, and &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; they manage to do all this without knowledge of radiation then humans might get contaminated.&lt;p&gt;By comparison, CO2 emissions get pumped straight into the atmosphere&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; It is indeed a significant accomplishment. Let&amp;#x27;s keep it that way by ceasing operation on time and not risk tarring the accomplishment with a reactor failure.&lt;p&gt;Yeah, and then turn around and build more coal and gas plants because the other alternatives cannot provide consistent power at the same price point. This is what happened in Germany and Japan. Anti-nuclear runs contrary to the principles of clean energy. In fact some estimates indicate that the coal plants built in Japan following the reactor closures after the Fukishima Daichi plant failure will actually end up emitting more radiation than the incident itself.</text></comment>
<story><title>Pictures show cracks in Ayrshire nuclear reactor</title><url>https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-47485321</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>einpoklum</author><text>1. And nuclear waste is nothing to you? Not everything is about CO_2 you know.
2. It is indeed a significant accomplishment. Let&amp;#x27;s keep it that way by ceasing operation on time and not risk tarring the accomplishment with a reactor failure.</text></item><item><author>sunkenvicar</author><text>40+ years of generating clean CO2-free energy.&lt;p&gt;Designed with slide rules and drafting tables.&lt;p&gt;An unbelievable accomplishment!</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ZanyProgrammer</author><text>Literally everything &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; about CO2. It&amp;#x27;ll destroy civilization much faster than nuclear waste.</text></comment>