<story><title>Facebook, Twitter block the NY Post from posting</title><url>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/twitter-cites-hacked-materials-policy-to-justify-censorship-of-ny-post-hunter-biden-article/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>throwawa3495</author><text>it&amp;#x27;s honestly irrelevant about the credibility of the emails and other data at this point, its the blanket censorship of this article that&amp;#x27;s now the real story.</text></item><item><author>rmrfstar</author><text>Robert Graham [1] pointed out that if the emails are authentic, they can be trivially verified via DKIM.&lt;p&gt;That the email metadata was not released implies the emails are either inauthentic, or that the post did not contact someone with basic competence in computer forensics.&lt;p&gt;Either possibility seriously undercuts the article&amp;#x27;s credibility.&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;#x2F;ErrataRob&amp;#x2F;status&amp;#x2F;1316407424648179717&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;#x2F;ErrataRob&amp;#x2F;status&amp;#x2F;1316407424648179717&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Hamuko</author><text>Is it? Because the factuality of the story seems like a pretty big deal here. If it&amp;#x27;s completely bogus, how is it different from any of those Russian trollfarm posts that the US government was worried about?</text></comment>
<story><title>Facebook, Twitter block the NY Post from posting</title><url>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/twitter-cites-hacked-materials-policy-to-justify-censorship-of-ny-post-hunter-biden-article/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>throwawa3495</author><text>it&amp;#x27;s honestly irrelevant about the credibility of the emails and other data at this point, its the blanket censorship of this article that&amp;#x27;s now the real story.</text></item><item><author>rmrfstar</author><text>Robert Graham [1] pointed out that if the emails are authentic, they can be trivially verified via DKIM.&lt;p&gt;That the email metadata was not released implies the emails are either inauthentic, or that the post did not contact someone with basic competence in computer forensics.&lt;p&gt;Either possibility seriously undercuts the article&amp;#x27;s credibility.&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;#x2F;ErrataRob&amp;#x2F;status&amp;#x2F;1316407424648179717&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;#x2F;ErrataRob&amp;#x2F;status&amp;#x2F;1316407424648179717&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>rmrfstar</author><text>Both are relevant, and both are concerning.</text></comment>