<story><title>17 Year Old Builds a Better Search Engine</title><url>http://live.wsj.com/video/young-scientist-builds-a-better-search-engine/6F3049AB-61FE-4CEA-8972-45EFA94FFF27.html?mod=wsj_article_tboright#!6F3049AB-61FE-4CEA-8972-45EFA94FFF27</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>tlrobinson</author><text>The biggest reason I immediately switched to Google when I first tried it was Google only matched documents containing exactly the words I searched for, nothing more.&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s fine (and good) if search engines add more intelligence like this, but I&apos;ll always need a way to search for exact phrases. The default behavior of Google is much &quot;fuzzier&quot; than it was 5 years ago, so I&apos;m surprised they don&apos;t already do something like this (or do they?)</text></comment>
<story><title>17 Year Old Builds a Better Search Engine</title><url>http://live.wsj.com/video/young-scientist-builds-a-better-search-engine/6F3049AB-61FE-4CEA-8972-45EFA94FFF27.html?mod=wsj_article_tboright#!6F3049AB-61FE-4CEA-8972-45EFA94FFF27</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>tg3</author><text>That interviewer was terrible:&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62; How long have you been interested in computer coding, and searching, and things like that?&lt;p&gt;If you&apos;re going to have someone do an interview about computer science, at least let the interviewer be someone with a cursory knowledge of the field.</text></comment>