<story><title>Over twenty subreddits have gone private</title><url>https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/mbq12a/over_twenty_subreddits_including_cringetopia/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>breakfastduck</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s absurd to me that you consider this person to be &amp;#x27;pro-pedophilia&amp;#x27; - where on earth do you get that from?</text></item><item><author>blackearl</author><text>The idea that this person got through HR without a cursory google search is crazy, or worse, the idea that they hired them knowing their history is frightening.&lt;p&gt;Being trans is not a free pass to be pro-pedophilia and it&amp;#x27;s absurd that this could be considered a controversial take.</text></item><item><author>ronsor</author><text>The Reddit administration continues to make terrible decisions as usual. The site&amp;#x27;s a far cry from how it was 10 years ago.&lt;p&gt;Perhaps what makes this case most interesting is they&amp;#x27;re in a &amp;quot;damned if you do, damned if you don&amp;#x27;t&amp;quot; situation. If they fire the admin, they&amp;#x27;ll likely be labeled as *-phobic, but if they don&amp;#x27;t, they&amp;#x27;ll likely be branded as pedophile supporters.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>blackearl</author><text>If you marry someone who &amp;quot;...under the account name Nathaniel Knight said: “I fantasise about children having sex, sometimes with adults, sometimes with other children, sometimes kidnapped and forced into bad situations.”&amp;quot; you are pro-pedophile.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.thetimes.co.uk&amp;#x2F;article&amp;#x2F;lib-dems-suspend-trans-campaigner-over-tweets-jcsg0tdtq&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.thetimes.co.uk&amp;#x2F;article&amp;#x2F;lib-dems-suspend-trans-ca...&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>Over twenty subreddits have gone private</title><url>https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/mbq12a/over_twenty_subreddits_including_cringetopia/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>breakfastduck</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s absurd to me that you consider this person to be &amp;#x27;pro-pedophilia&amp;#x27; - where on earth do you get that from?</text></item><item><author>blackearl</author><text>The idea that this person got through HR without a cursory google search is crazy, or worse, the idea that they hired them knowing their history is frightening.&lt;p&gt;Being trans is not a free pass to be pro-pedophilia and it&amp;#x27;s absurd that this could be considered a controversial take.</text></item><item><author>ronsor</author><text>The Reddit administration continues to make terrible decisions as usual. The site&amp;#x27;s a far cry from how it was 10 years ago.&lt;p&gt;Perhaps what makes this case most interesting is they&amp;#x27;re in a &amp;quot;damned if you do, damned if you don&amp;#x27;t&amp;quot; situation. If they fire the admin, they&amp;#x27;ll likely be labeled as *-phobic, but if they don&amp;#x27;t, they&amp;#x27;ll likely be branded as pedophile supporters.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>CodeGlitch</author><text>You need to do more research around said person.  Who they married specifically.</text></comment>