<story><title>WireGuard for iOS</title><url>https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-November/003526.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>zx2c4</author><text>Our final frontier is Windows, actually. Hope to have that out soon!</text></item><item><author>xoa</author><text>Thanks so much for your work on this, I think iOS is the last major platform right? Amazing effort in so short a time, I guess that&amp;#x27;s another advantage alongside the security ones of having a very simple, focused code base without unnecessary knobs and dials.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m sorry it didn&amp;#x27;t make it into the kernel this cycle though, granted maybe that was a little much to hope for at this stage of things, and I really hope Vancouver goes well for you and Zinc. It&amp;#x27;s not that WG is hard to get setup on any given system, but I think kernel integration will lower the bar towards getting it available as a standard feature in a lot of turnkey appliance systems that I see a ton in SMB usage in particular. I can understand being conservative there but man do I already want it everywhere :)!</text></item><item><author>zx2c4</author><text>As the mailing list post mentions, this is a super new code base, and we could certainly use a hand, if any iOS developers out there are itching to help out. Opportunity to jump into a codebase while it&amp;#x27;s still pretty fresh, if that sort of experience is appealing to you. Don&amp;#x27;t hesitate to email me (jason [at] zx2c4.com) or poke me on IRC (I&amp;#x27;m zx2c4 on freenode in #wireguard).</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>dancodes</author><text>There&amp;#x27;s TunSafe [1], a client for Windows. Its source code [2] has been published as well.&lt;p&gt;[1]: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;tunsafe.com&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;tunsafe.com&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;[2]: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;TunSafe&amp;#x2F;TunSafe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;TunSafe&amp;#x2F;TunSafe&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>WireGuard for iOS</title><url>https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-November/003526.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>zx2c4</author><text>Our final frontier is Windows, actually. Hope to have that out soon!</text></item><item><author>xoa</author><text>Thanks so much for your work on this, I think iOS is the last major platform right? Amazing effort in so short a time, I guess that&amp;#x27;s another advantage alongside the security ones of having a very simple, focused code base without unnecessary knobs and dials.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m sorry it didn&amp;#x27;t make it into the kernel this cycle though, granted maybe that was a little much to hope for at this stage of things, and I really hope Vancouver goes well for you and Zinc. It&amp;#x27;s not that WG is hard to get setup on any given system, but I think kernel integration will lower the bar towards getting it available as a standard feature in a lot of turnkey appliance systems that I see a ton in SMB usage in particular. I can understand being conservative there but man do I already want it everywhere :)!</text></item><item><author>zx2c4</author><text>As the mailing list post mentions, this is a super new code base, and we could certainly use a hand, if any iOS developers out there are itching to help out. Opportunity to jump into a codebase while it&amp;#x27;s still pretty fresh, if that sort of experience is appealing to you. Don&amp;#x27;t hesitate to email me (jason [at] zx2c4.com) or poke me on IRC (I&amp;#x27;m zx2c4 on freenode in #wireguard).</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>craftyguy</author><text>What is the current status with getting the required bits merged into the Linux kernel? I don&amp;#x27;t really follow lkml (my email service would instantly hit its quota), and the todo list (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wireguard.com&amp;#x2F;todo&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wireguard.com&amp;#x2F;todo&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;) surprisingly doesn&amp;#x27;t include any word about this.</text></comment>