<story><title>LK-99 isn’t a superconductor</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02585-7</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>sorenjan</author><text>Sixty Symbols released a video about this yesterday, and in it professor Philip Moriarty is less than impressed with the whole ordeal. I haven&amp;#x27;t been paying attention, I&amp;#x27;m too jaded and skeptical and assumed from the start that there was something wrong and much hype about nothing.&lt;p&gt;Bad Science and Room Temperature Superconductors - Sixty Symbols: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;#x2F;watch?v=zl-AgmoZ5mo&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;#x2F;watch?v=zl-AgmoZ5mo&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>pininja</author><text>As Philip points out, Sabine Hossenfelder’s quick summary on LK-99 2 weeks ago punched large holes into this whole thing in less than 5 minutes. I wish media outlets presented skeptic viewpoints instead of just hype.. but that doesn’t sell.&lt;p&gt;LK99 - A new room temperature superconductor?
&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;youtu.be&amp;#x2F;RjzL9cS3VW8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;youtu.be&amp;#x2F;RjzL9cS3VW8&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>LK-99 isn’t a superconductor</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02585-7</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>sorenjan</author><text>Sixty Symbols released a video about this yesterday, and in it professor Philip Moriarty is less than impressed with the whole ordeal. I haven&amp;#x27;t been paying attention, I&amp;#x27;m too jaded and skeptical and assumed from the start that there was something wrong and much hype about nothing.&lt;p&gt;Bad Science and Room Temperature Superconductors - Sixty Symbols: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;#x2F;watch?v=zl-AgmoZ5mo&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;#x2F;watch?v=zl-AgmoZ5mo&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>wesleywt</author><text>This is not bad science. This is science working as intended. Claim followed by verification. I only wish other fields was this good.</text></comment>