<story><title>New inline assembly syntax available in Rust nightly</title><url>https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2020/06/08/new-inline-asm.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>JoshTriplett</author><text>&amp;gt; Also, thank you for using Intel x86 syntax instead of AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;p&gt;Thank you for helping to validate that decision; this is the kind of feedback we needed.&lt;p&gt;(And note that you can still choose to use AT&amp;amp;T syntax, it just isn&amp;#x27;t the default.)</text></item><item><author>amluto</author><text>Rust folks, thank you so much for making this far, far better than GCC’s asm syntax for C.  Also, thank you for using Intel x86 syntax instead of AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;p&gt;It would be delightful if GCC were to adopt something similar after this stabilizes in Rust.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jdright</author><text>Yes, thank you for the Intel syntax. It is by far the most frequent syntax you&amp;#x27;ll find anywhere somewhat recent (1990+) and it is by far the most straightforward to learn by being clean. I did learn both in the 90s, but I&amp;#x27;ve always struggled with AT&amp;amp;T symbols and different offerings which to me was hard to switch to when learning from different material sources.</text></comment>
<story><title>New inline assembly syntax available in Rust nightly</title><url>https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2020/06/08/new-inline-asm.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>JoshTriplett</author><text>&amp;gt; Also, thank you for using Intel x86 syntax instead of AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;p&gt;Thank you for helping to validate that decision; this is the kind of feedback we needed.&lt;p&gt;(And note that you can still choose to use AT&amp;amp;T syntax, it just isn&amp;#x27;t the default.)</text></item><item><author>amluto</author><text>Rust folks, thank you so much for making this far, far better than GCC’s asm syntax for C.  Also, thank you for using Intel x86 syntax instead of AT&amp;amp;T.&lt;p&gt;It would be delightful if GCC were to adopt something similar after this stabilizes in Rust.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>binarycrusader</author><text>Yes, this is great, but I have to disagree on the Intel x86 syntax assertion by the original poster.  Perhaps it&amp;#x27;s because of the era I grew up in and how I first learned machine language and then assembly language, but I&amp;#x27;ve always preferred AT&amp;amp;T syntax.  Regardless thanks for supporting the saner syntax even if it&amp;#x27;s not by default ;)</text></comment>