<story><title>Eric Holder says Edward Snowden performed a &apos;public service&apos;</title><url>http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/30/politics/axe-files-axelrod-eric-holder/index.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dandare</author><text>It is unbelievable how (self)censored the mainstream media&amp;#x2F;politics discussion is. Keith Alexander lied to the congress on record, whistleblowers before Snowden were jailed for blowing the whistle and there was absolutely no chance he could reveal&amp;#x2F;fix any illegal wrongdoing by the government via the official whistleblowers channels. He did not run away and ruin his sweet life for the lulz, there was clearly no other way. Why is this argument not immediately raised every time some clown uses the &amp;quot;he broke the law, he has to face the music&amp;quot; argument?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>StanislavPetrov</author><text>&amp;gt;Why is this argument not immediately raised every time some clown uses the &amp;quot;he broke the law, he has to face the music&amp;quot; argument?&lt;p&gt;Corporate media outlets exist to disseminate propaganda, not seek consistent, logical answers to important questions.  They seek to frame the debate in the context constructed by Wall Street and Washington and redirect anger and angst so that people fight against each other instead of against their masters.  That&amp;#x27;s why &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; has become so resurgent in recent years, as the class divide has sharpened and the middle-class has withered.  As long as people are polarized and can be pitted against each other on the basis of race, ethnicity, or sexuality, they aren&amp;#x27;t united against the oligarchs.  Its the same exact strategy used by prison guards to maintain control of the prisons.  Pit the blacks against the whites against the hispanics and the prison guards can observe safely from the walls.  The guards only face a threat from the prisoners when they are united against those who keep them in bondage.&lt;p&gt;Snowden represents the greatest threat in that regards.  If you support Snowden&amp;#x27;s actions, you are explicitly acknowledging not only that the law is dog shit, but that Snowden was justified in breaking it because of how incredibly repressive the government is.  He represents the ultimate repudiation of the system that runs the entire country and most of the world.  The corporate media is the voice of this system.</text></comment>
<story><title>Eric Holder says Edward Snowden performed a &apos;public service&apos;</title><url>http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/30/politics/axe-files-axelrod-eric-holder/index.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dandare</author><text>It is unbelievable how (self)censored the mainstream media&amp;#x2F;politics discussion is. Keith Alexander lied to the congress on record, whistleblowers before Snowden were jailed for blowing the whistle and there was absolutely no chance he could reveal&amp;#x2F;fix any illegal wrongdoing by the government via the official whistleblowers channels. He did not run away and ruin his sweet life for the lulz, there was clearly no other way. Why is this argument not immediately raised every time some clown uses the &amp;quot;he broke the law, he has to face the music&amp;quot; argument?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ipsin</author><text>Yeah, it&amp;#x27;s a comical argument, that he should come home and &amp;quot;face justice&amp;quot;.  You can&amp;#x27;t even call it just because the judge would probably prohibit a moral defense, and even if the judge did, the jury wouldn&amp;#x27;t couldn&amp;#x27;t be told that they could consider anything beyond the law itself.&lt;p&gt;So Snowden should come home, be robbed of a chance of justice, be robbed of his voice and his freedom, to prove... what, that the NSA was right all along?</text></comment>