<story><title>We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits.</title><url>http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/07/19/vogelstein-apple-att</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jrockway</author><text>I don&apos;t normally like Apple, but I like their attitude here.  Why should they wear certain clothes to a meeting with AT&amp;#38;T?  Who cares what AT&amp;#38;T thinks of Apple!?  If AT&amp;#38;T passes on Apple, Verizon or Sprint or T-Mobile would pick them up in a heartbeat.  The only reason AT&amp;#38;T is still in business is because of Apple.  Fuck wearing a suit!&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m shocked to hear that AT&amp;#38;T is not showering Apple&apos;s execs with expensive champagne and corporate jets every chance they get!</text></comment>
<story><title>We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits.</title><url>http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/07/19/vogelstein-apple-att</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>chwahoo</author><text>It does seem that concessions were made.  For example, the Facetime app is currently wifi-only.  Also, I believe movie rental is wifi-only.  Those are understandable restrictions for now, but this article rings a bit hollow in light of them -- It would seem that AT&amp;#38;T won a few of those battles.</text></comment>