<story><title>Testing how hard it is to cheat with ChatGPT in interviews</title><url>https://interviewing.io/blog/how-hard-is-it-to-cheat-with-chatgpt-in-technical-interviews</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>elicksaur</author><text>&amp;gt; Interviews should be consistent with what day to day work actually looks like, which today means constantly using LLMs in some form or another.&lt;p&gt;Consider that this may not be typical.</text></item><item><author>babyshake</author><text>IMO asking people to not use available tools in interviews is a bad idea, unless you are trying to do a very basic check that someone knows the fundamentals.&lt;p&gt;Allow them to use the tools, with a screenshare, and adjust the types of tasks you are giving them so that they won&amp;#x27;t be able to just feed the question to the LLM to give them the completed answer.&lt;p&gt;Interviews should be consistent with what day to day work actually looks like, which today means constantly using LLMs in some form or another.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>CaptainFever</author><text>&amp;gt; 70% of all respondents are using or are planning to use AI tools in their development process this year. Those learning to code are more likely than professional developers to be using or use AI tools (82% vs. 70%).&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;survey.stackoverflow.co&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;#ai-sentiment-and-usage&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;survey.stackoverflow.co&amp;#x2F;2023&amp;#x2F;#ai-sentiment-and-usage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;To be fair, the number of &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot; was &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; 43% but that&amp;#x27;s still a very large amount of developers, not including those who plan to use it.</text></comment>
<story><title>Testing how hard it is to cheat with ChatGPT in interviews</title><url>https://interviewing.io/blog/how-hard-is-it-to-cheat-with-chatgpt-in-technical-interviews</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>elicksaur</author><text>&amp;gt; Interviews should be consistent with what day to day work actually looks like, which today means constantly using LLMs in some form or another.&lt;p&gt;Consider that this may not be typical.</text></item><item><author>babyshake</author><text>IMO asking people to not use available tools in interviews is a bad idea, unless you are trying to do a very basic check that someone knows the fundamentals.&lt;p&gt;Allow them to use the tools, with a screenshare, and adjust the types of tasks you are giving them so that they won&amp;#x27;t be able to just feed the question to the LLM to give them the completed answer.&lt;p&gt;Interviews should be consistent with what day to day work actually looks like, which today means constantly using LLMs in some form or another.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ilc</author><text>Consider... it might be.  Seriously, I work for a company very protective of its IP.&lt;p&gt;And I can still use ChatGPT and similar tools for some of what I do.  It is a huge force multiplier.</text></comment>