<story><title>It Started With a Jolt: How New York Became a Tech Town</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/22/technology/nyc-tech-startups.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>nickelcitymario</author><text>One of the biggest lessons I&amp;#x27;ve taken from New York&amp;#x27;s approach is not to try and be the next Silicon Valley (as every community is trying to be). You can&amp;#x27;t beat the Valley at its own game. That&amp;#x27;s foolish.&lt;p&gt;Instead, look to what industries your community has long been successful in, and develop the tech to disrupt those industries before the Valley does.&lt;p&gt;NYC&amp;#x27;s example was to focus tech on advertising, finance, and media -- the industries it has long dominated.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m from a small mining city in Canada (Sudbury, Ontario). I see the same desperate hope to become a tech center. But the best startups are the ones focused on areas where our community has traditionally held a significant leadership position: mining.&lt;p&gt;One such startup, and arguable our most successful one, is Minalytix. They develop software for analyzing mining and exploration data.&lt;p&gt;Another is Symboticware, which creates hardware and software to gather real-time data from machines on the ground and analyzing it back at the office.&lt;p&gt;Jannatec is focused on solving the challenges of getting quality wireless data in and out of complex underground mines (those many kilometers of hardrock don&amp;#x27;t exactly make it easy).&lt;p&gt;TesMan is focused on mine safety. Dura21 works on better pipes. Hard-Line is tackling robotics. ClickMox does lidar. There are many others.&lt;p&gt;These are small but thriving startups. They&amp;#x27;re not sexy. They&amp;#x27;re not likely to be the next Facebook or Google. But they&amp;#x27;re solving problems our community has long established itself as being experts at solving. It&amp;#x27;s also transforming our economy from one being tied to a dwindling resource (easily accessible ore), to one that leads in mining operations around the world.&lt;p&gt;A lot of towns want to be the next SV. It&amp;#x27;s not going to happen. Trying to be SV is to live in denial about what made SV successful in the first place.&lt;p&gt;But tackling a smaller niche in the wider tech space? Building on the resources, expertise, and reputation you already have? That&amp;#x27;s a very doable approach and the field is wide open.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>swoongoonz</author><text>100% agree. The thing nobody also remembers is that Silicon Valley was called SV because of it&amp;#x27;s hardware&amp;#x2F;manufacturing not really it&amp;#x27;s software development. The software side of things flourished because of the existing hardware work that had already existed (semiconductors, parc lab arpanet, apple, oracle, atari).</text></comment>
<story><title>It Started With a Jolt: How New York Became a Tech Town</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/22/technology/nyc-tech-startups.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>nickelcitymario</author><text>One of the biggest lessons I&amp;#x27;ve taken from New York&amp;#x27;s approach is not to try and be the next Silicon Valley (as every community is trying to be). You can&amp;#x27;t beat the Valley at its own game. That&amp;#x27;s foolish.&lt;p&gt;Instead, look to what industries your community has long been successful in, and develop the tech to disrupt those industries before the Valley does.&lt;p&gt;NYC&amp;#x27;s example was to focus tech on advertising, finance, and media -- the industries it has long dominated.&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m from a small mining city in Canada (Sudbury, Ontario). I see the same desperate hope to become a tech center. But the best startups are the ones focused on areas where our community has traditionally held a significant leadership position: mining.&lt;p&gt;One such startup, and arguable our most successful one, is Minalytix. They develop software for analyzing mining and exploration data.&lt;p&gt;Another is Symboticware, which creates hardware and software to gather real-time data from machines on the ground and analyzing it back at the office.&lt;p&gt;Jannatec is focused on solving the challenges of getting quality wireless data in and out of complex underground mines (those many kilometers of hardrock don&amp;#x27;t exactly make it easy).&lt;p&gt;TesMan is focused on mine safety. Dura21 works on better pipes. Hard-Line is tackling robotics. ClickMox does lidar. There are many others.&lt;p&gt;These are small but thriving startups. They&amp;#x27;re not sexy. They&amp;#x27;re not likely to be the next Facebook or Google. But they&amp;#x27;re solving problems our community has long established itself as being experts at solving. It&amp;#x27;s also transforming our economy from one being tied to a dwindling resource (easily accessible ore), to one that leads in mining operations around the world.&lt;p&gt;A lot of towns want to be the next SV. It&amp;#x27;s not going to happen. Trying to be SV is to live in denial about what made SV successful in the first place.&lt;p&gt;But tackling a smaller niche in the wider tech space? Building on the resources, expertise, and reputation you already have? That&amp;#x27;s a very doable approach and the field is wide open.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>etblg</author><text>I think the most critical flaw in Sudbury&amp;#x27;s plan, is that people would have to live in Sudbury (no offense)&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s a small, cold, somewhat-remote city known for mining, and particularly for having an incredibly tall smokestack visible everywhere in town. You can fund startups, but who is going to move from other places to Sudbury?</text></comment>