<story><title>Apprenticeships - Employers Must Get Past Degree Snobbery </title><url>http://codemanship.co.uk/parlezuml/blog/?postid=1053</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>brudgers</author><text>Posing Apprenticeships as a significant alternative to higher education is delusional. First because a true apprenticeship requires a contractual relationship between the apprentice and the master. That sort of contract is extremely problematic to modern business entities because it does not allow flexibility in staffing levels, requires a significant investment in training (several years), and because indentured service is generally frowned upon and body warrants are hard to obtain these days -- there is little viable recourse should the apprentice terminate the apprenticeship early.&lt;p&gt;In addition apprenticeship is difficult because it easily runs afoul of equal opportunity expectations and requirements (in the US). The difficulty in differentiating between individuals and in determining each person&apos;s unique skill set before they are on the job is the reason all soldiers go through the same basic training and then are assigned to their specialties (of course one could argue that military skills are often determined before hand - but that is an argument for prior training (college) not against it).&lt;p&gt;Indeed the significant latitude of the military is an indication of what is needed to create any semblance of a workable apprenticeship program which provides equal opportunity on a large scale - an organization where meritocracy is highly advantageous both to the  organization and the individuals who lead it, extreme prejudice in the enforcement of contracts (e.g. execution for desertion), and very one sided contracts (e.g. imprisonment for AWOL).&lt;p&gt;Modern higher education has grown because it offers such a powerful solution to many of the problems created by apprenticeship particularly lack of equal opportunity,  exploitation of apprentices, diversion of resources to training and away from profit making activities, and long term commitments to particular individuals who may not be suited for the profession.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>gfdgfdgfd</author><text>&quot;Posing Apprenticeships as a significant alternative to higher education is delusional.&quot;&lt;p&gt;This is absolutely absurd and just shows pure ignorance of the economic realities beyond your grasp. Germany thrives off of apprenticeships. You can&apos;t find a job without having an apprenticeship under your belt in Germany. Students spend between 50% to 70% of their time at a company, while the rest is spent on traditional education. Apprenticeships are a vital source to Germany&apos;s economy. Dismissing it based on your pet theories is bordering on asinine.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apprenticeship#Germany&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apprenticeship#Germany&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>Apprenticeships - Employers Must Get Past Degree Snobbery </title><url>http://codemanship.co.uk/parlezuml/blog/?postid=1053</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>brudgers</author><text>Posing Apprenticeships as a significant alternative to higher education is delusional. First because a true apprenticeship requires a contractual relationship between the apprentice and the master. That sort of contract is extremely problematic to modern business entities because it does not allow flexibility in staffing levels, requires a significant investment in training (several years), and because indentured service is generally frowned upon and body warrants are hard to obtain these days -- there is little viable recourse should the apprentice terminate the apprenticeship early.&lt;p&gt;In addition apprenticeship is difficult because it easily runs afoul of equal opportunity expectations and requirements (in the US). The difficulty in differentiating between individuals and in determining each person&apos;s unique skill set before they are on the job is the reason all soldiers go through the same basic training and then are assigned to their specialties (of course one could argue that military skills are often determined before hand - but that is an argument for prior training (college) not against it).&lt;p&gt;Indeed the significant latitude of the military is an indication of what is needed to create any semblance of a workable apprenticeship program which provides equal opportunity on a large scale - an organization where meritocracy is highly advantageous both to the  organization and the individuals who lead it, extreme prejudice in the enforcement of contracts (e.g. execution for desertion), and very one sided contracts (e.g. imprisonment for AWOL).&lt;p&gt;Modern higher education has grown because it offers such a powerful solution to many of the problems created by apprenticeship particularly lack of equal opportunity,  exploitation of apprentices, diversion of resources to training and away from profit making activities, and long term commitments to particular individuals who may not be suited for the profession.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>imperialWicket</author><text>Good points regarding the shortfalls of a proper apprenticeship in this instance (particularly in the US).&lt;p&gt;However, I strongly disagree that modern higher education does much to combat exploitation of new grads, resources diversion to training, or long term commitments. Higher education often fails quite admirably on these points as well.</text></comment>