<story><title>iPhone 12 Pro Camera Review</title><url>http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-12-pro-camera-review-glacier</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>zobzu</author><text>I think the photo of the woman is terrible. I don&amp;#x27;t blame the phone for it, its very hard to achieve with small sensors, and the iphone is probably the best of the bunch. But it doesn&amp;#x27;t make the picture quality near &amp;quot;good-enough&amp;quot; for that scenario.&lt;p&gt;With slightly better lighting it can be &amp;quot;good enough&amp;quot; to be hard to distinguish from a bigger sensor camera for &amp;quot;web&amp;quot; where &amp;quot;web&amp;quot; really means ~6inch phone display - and that&amp;#x27;s great, but let&amp;#x27;s not fool ourselves ;-)&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m also curious what the max will look like - though at the size and price it&amp;#x27;s difficult to say if buying a RX100 and a cheaper phone isn&amp;#x27;t a better option still, for many.</text></item><item><author>jseliger</author><text>In some ways, this feels like the reviews of the last couple of generations of iPhone: it can work really well in very good light and at typical web resolutions. The photo of the woman in the parka is very impressive as a technical demonstration but is also pretty blurry&amp;#x2F;smeared, to my eye. As an only camera, it&amp;#x27;s probably the best or near the best of the phones.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Nition</author><text>&amp;gt; I think the photo of the woman is terrible.&lt;p&gt;On any normal camera that photo would be a complete blur. Impossible. It&amp;#x27;s a hand-held three second exposure.</text></comment>
<story><title>iPhone 12 Pro Camera Review</title><url>http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-12-pro-camera-review-glacier</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>zobzu</author><text>I think the photo of the woman is terrible. I don&amp;#x27;t blame the phone for it, its very hard to achieve with small sensors, and the iphone is probably the best of the bunch. But it doesn&amp;#x27;t make the picture quality near &amp;quot;good-enough&amp;quot; for that scenario.&lt;p&gt;With slightly better lighting it can be &amp;quot;good enough&amp;quot; to be hard to distinguish from a bigger sensor camera for &amp;quot;web&amp;quot; where &amp;quot;web&amp;quot; really means ~6inch phone display - and that&amp;#x27;s great, but let&amp;#x27;s not fool ourselves ;-)&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m also curious what the max will look like - though at the size and price it&amp;#x27;s difficult to say if buying a RX100 and a cheaper phone isn&amp;#x27;t a better option still, for many.</text></item><item><author>jseliger</author><text>In some ways, this feels like the reviews of the last couple of generations of iPhone: it can work really well in very good light and at typical web resolutions. The photo of the woman in the parka is very impressive as a technical demonstration but is also pretty blurry&amp;#x2F;smeared, to my eye. As an only camera, it&amp;#x27;s probably the best or near the best of the phones.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>inasio</author><text>This is on a handheld three second exposure in the dark. Not sure you would do much better with an SLR. I have on Olympus OMD EM5 with great OIS and that shot would be pretty challenging</text></comment>