<story><title>Git? tig</title><url>http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/05/git-tig/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>terhechte</author><text>Atlassian, ironically, are the vendors of one of the best Git Gui tools for Mac OS X, &apos;SourceTree&apos;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sourcetreeapp.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sourcetreeapp.com&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jasonlotito</author><text>I noticed that as well.  If anything, it earns my respect.  It shows that Atlassian, and the developers behind their products, realize that everyone has different needs.  That a single tool can&apos;t solve everything for everyone.  I also think it means that the tools they do build will be better, because instead of trying to include the kitchen sink, each tool has an opinion on how to best achieve what it&apos;s trying to achieve.</text></comment>
<story><title>Git? tig</title><url>http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/05/git-tig/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>terhechte</author><text>Atlassian, ironically, are the vendors of one of the best Git Gui tools for Mac OS X, &apos;SourceTree&apos;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sourcetreeapp.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sourcetreeapp.com&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>brown9-2</author><text>To be fair, they acquired SourceTree in late 2011 and IIRC the app prior to the acquisition looked pretty similar to how it looks today.</text></comment>