<story><title>Google to pay $60M for misleading representations</title><url>https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/google-llc-to-pay-60-million-for-misleading-representations</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>eitland</author><text>Good.&lt;p&gt;Still wait for Google to be punished for abusing it market position to push its browser in a much worse manner than Microsoft pushed IE back in the days.&lt;p&gt;For those who are new to this game: Microsoft was basically punished for bundling a browser with their operating system.&lt;p&gt;If that was punishable (and thankfully it was), what should we say about the worlds largest advertising company pushing their browser in ad spots so valuable that no others were ever allowed to touch them (the otherwise clean front page of Google)?&lt;p&gt;And of course: with its current behavior, MS should of course be punished again for its abusive use of a dominant position when it tries to stop people from downloading other browsers and tries to prevent people from setting other browsers as default.</text></comment>
<story><title>Google to pay $60M for misleading representations</title><url>https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/google-llc-to-pay-60-million-for-misleading-representations</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>leksak</author><text>“This significant penalty [...]&amp;quot; is it really a significant penalty when Google has deep coffers?</text></comment>