<story><title>Assasination attempt on judge of the Epstein/Deutsche Bank case</title><url>https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/19/us/federal-judge-esther-salas-shooting-investigation/index.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lykr0n</author><text>Wow. That&amp;#x27;s a great way to not only piss off the judge, but bring the full wrath of the federal government down on you.&lt;p&gt;Piss off is not the right word, because it marginalizes what happened. But man, that judge is not going to be on your side.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ForrestN</author><text>I’m not saying that the speculation implied by this headline is true, but, if this were related to the Epstein case, which explicitly involves the president, who just commuted the sentence of one of his several criminal associates... I’m not sure why you’d imagine the government would act with moral force and clarity here.</text></comment>
<story><title>Assasination attempt on judge of the Epstein/Deutsche Bank case</title><url>https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/19/us/federal-judge-esther-salas-shooting-investigation/index.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lykr0n</author><text>Wow. That&amp;#x27;s a great way to not only piss off the judge, but bring the full wrath of the federal government down on you.&lt;p&gt;Piss off is not the right word, because it marginalizes what happened. But man, that judge is not going to be on your side.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>kgwxd</author><text>I&amp;#x27;m not too optimistic that this was a &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot; move, just a move by people that have already carefully considered the pros and cons and their conclusion was to make the move, meaning they found more pros than cons.</text></comment>