<story><title>Announcing the `http` crate</title><url>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/announcing-the-http-crate/12123</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>int_19h</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s great to see this approach to core API design, and I wish other platforms adopted it. There are many advantages to having a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries, but composability becomes a problem when they define different types for the same concepts. This is the best of both worlds - you get multiple competing implementations of the interesting bits, but everything &amp;quot;just works&amp;quot; with any of them.</text></comment>
<story><title>Announcing the `http` crate</title><url>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/announcing-the-http-crate/12123</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>the_common_man</author><text>Would it not be better to call it http-types&amp;#x2F;http-base&amp;#x2F;http-common as this just provides common types and not the transport or security? Thanks and keep up the awesome work.</text></comment>