<story><title>Wikiversity</title><url>https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Main_Page</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>c7b</author><text>It sounds like a cool idea if I get it right (organize links to wikipedia articles in a way that could correspond to a curriculum), but the quality of the curation at least for mathematics looks abysmal. Here are some of the top-level categories:&lt;p&gt;* Charles Sanders Peirce (the only (!) mathematician with a top-level category to himself, who&amp;#x27;s arguably more of a philosopher actually) - 46 pages.&lt;p&gt;* Set theory - 3 pages&lt;p&gt;* Theory of summation of natural numbers - empty&lt;p&gt;This fails to be useful for students at so many levels. The entries are at completely inconsistent levels of granularity or concepts, it fails to make any meaningful selection or ranking by importance (another example, it has a top-level category for Chaos Theory but none for Dynamical Systems). And, most importantly, it doesn&amp;#x27;t correspond to how university curriculums are structured and doesn&amp;#x27;t work as a useful guide for self-study.&lt;p&gt;But yeah, it&amp;#x27;s a wiki, so I guess I shouldn&amp;#x27;t complain but instead just contribute to improving it.</text></comment>
<story><title>Wikiversity</title><url>https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Main_Page</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>thealistra</author><text>How is one suppose to use this? I tried finding something on comp-sci - no mention on main page or courses list. I went into medicine and there are no courses and list of random resources where one is about mammals.&lt;p&gt;Doesn’t seem like a structured set of data that you could actually learn from as you would do on a university</text></comment>