<story><title>Dirty USB-C Tricks: One Port for the Price of Two</title><url>https://hackaday.com/2022/12/31/dirty-usb-c-tricks-one-port-for-the-price-of-two/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>dang</author><text>We&amp;#x27;ve merged the thread into &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=34203995&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=34203995&lt;/a&gt;, which has the original source suggested by the commenters here. (I&amp;#x27;ve left the comments that only make sense in this context.)&lt;p&gt;Submitters: &amp;quot;&lt;i&gt;Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter.&lt;/i&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;newsguidelines.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;newsguidelines.html&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>Dirty USB-C Tricks: One Port for the Price of Two</title><url>https://hackaday.com/2022/12/31/dirty-usb-c-tricks-one-port-for-the-price-of-two/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>ComputerGuru</author><text>Great read. It’s three years old now, and I wonder if this practice has become more or less common - I could see it going both ways. As such, perhaps a (2020) in the title would be useful.&lt;p&gt;Also probably better to link to the actual source, though hackaday isn’t really blogspam: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;richardg867.wordpress.com&amp;#x2F;2020&amp;#x2F;02&amp;#x2F;29&amp;#x2F;usb-c-done-cheap&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;richardg867.wordpress.com&amp;#x2F;2020&amp;#x2F;02&amp;#x2F;29&amp;#x2F;usb-c-done-chea...&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>