<story><title>ProtonMail removed “we do not keep any IP logs” from its privacy policy</title><url>https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2021/09/privacy-focused-protonmail-provided-a-users-ip-address-to-authorities/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>mandliya</author><text>Very responsibly done! The issue was not that they had to share the logs with law enforcement, the issue was that marketing message was incorrect from them. This is a responsible step.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>DoubleDerper</author><text>Consumers relied upon ProtonMail&amp;#x27;s prominent and concise marketing claim.  Consumers who signed up for the service are now in jeopardy, perhaps facing real [legal] injury based on reasonable expectation of not having their IP logged.&lt;p&gt;The privacy-centric nature of this abuse is unlikely to result in a class-action-type of response, but Caveat Emptor abuses can be dealt with by the marketplace, too.</text></comment>
<story><title>ProtonMail removed “we do not keep any IP logs” from its privacy policy</title><url>https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2021/09/privacy-focused-protonmail-provided-a-users-ip-address-to-authorities/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>mandliya</author><text>Very responsibly done! The issue was not that they had to share the logs with law enforcement, the issue was that marketing message was incorrect from them. This is a responsible step.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>futureproofd</author><text>The fact that the messaging was there to begin with is the issue. People assume tech companies are immune from the law based on make believe claims that their ideals allow them to circumvent it.</text></comment>