<story><title>Daniel Kahneman has died</title><url>https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2024/03/27/daniel-kahneman-dead/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>btilly</author><text>The density of non-replicable results varies by chapter.&lt;p&gt;You can ignore anything said in chapter 4 about priming for example.&lt;p&gt;See &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;replicationindex.com&amp;#x2F;2020&amp;#x2F;12&amp;#x2F;30&amp;#x2F;a-meta-scientific-perspective-on-thinking-fast-and-slow&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;replicationindex.com&amp;#x2F;2020&amp;#x2F;12&amp;#x2F;30&amp;#x2F;a-meta-scientific-pe...&lt;/a&gt; for more.</text></item><item><author>mistercow</author><text>It’s worth noting that many of the results in Thinking, Fast and Slow didn’t hold up to replication.&lt;p&gt;It’s still very much worth reading in its own right, but now implicitly comes bundled with a game I like to call “calibrate yourself on the replication crisis”. Playing is simple: every time the book mentions a surprising result, try to guess whether it replicated. Then search online to see if you got it right.</text></item><item><author>zug_zug</author><text>I&amp;#x27;m not one to give an exaggerated eulogy nor rhapsodize about all those &amp;quot;Books with a white cover and a weird picture&amp;quot; -- but I will say I read thinking fast and slow for the first time last year, after decades of resisting, and felt it covered some generally profound ideas that still are relevant as ever and not widely understood.&lt;p&gt;(Though at some point, maybe the 2nd half of the book, drags on and you can skip most of those chapters. If you don&amp;#x27;t have time for that, I&amp;#x27;m sure chat GPT can give you a taste of the main premises and you can probe deeper from there.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>localhost</author><text>This is exactly the kind of task that I want to deploy a long context window model on: &amp;quot;rewrite Thinking Fast and Slow taking into account the current state of research. Oh, and do it in the voice, style and structure of Tim Urban complete with crappy stick figure drawings.&amp;quot;</text></comment>
<story><title>Daniel Kahneman has died</title><url>https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2024/03/27/daniel-kahneman-dead/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>btilly</author><text>The density of non-replicable results varies by chapter.&lt;p&gt;You can ignore anything said in chapter 4 about priming for example.&lt;p&gt;See &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;replicationindex.com&amp;#x2F;2020&amp;#x2F;12&amp;#x2F;30&amp;#x2F;a-meta-scientific-perspective-on-thinking-fast-and-slow&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;replicationindex.com&amp;#x2F;2020&amp;#x2F;12&amp;#x2F;30&amp;#x2F;a-meta-scientific-pe...&lt;/a&gt; for more.</text></item><item><author>mistercow</author><text>It’s worth noting that many of the results in Thinking, Fast and Slow didn’t hold up to replication.&lt;p&gt;It’s still very much worth reading in its own right, but now implicitly comes bundled with a game I like to call “calibrate yourself on the replication crisis”. Playing is simple: every time the book mentions a surprising result, try to guess whether it replicated. Then search online to see if you got it right.</text></item><item><author>zug_zug</author><text>I&amp;#x27;m not one to give an exaggerated eulogy nor rhapsodize about all those &amp;quot;Books with a white cover and a weird picture&amp;quot; -- but I will say I read thinking fast and slow for the first time last year, after decades of resisting, and felt it covered some generally profound ideas that still are relevant as ever and not widely understood.&lt;p&gt;(Though at some point, maybe the 2nd half of the book, drags on and you can skip most of those chapters. If you don&amp;#x27;t have time for that, I&amp;#x27;m sure chat GPT can give you a taste of the main premises and you can probe deeper from there.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>amoshebb</author><text>is there a &amp;#x27;thinking fast and slow: the reproducible bits&amp;#x27; recut? I know with films there&amp;#x27;s fan made edits.</text></comment>