<story><title>Intel&apos;s New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K Benchmarks [video]</title><url>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bD9EgyKYkU</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>moconnor</author><text>I worked in HPC when NVIDIA started taking serious market share from Intel. My memory of Intel’s performance comparisons were that they were often technically unsupportable once you scratched the surface.&lt;p&gt;In one case a third party who were demonstrating how much faster Intel Xeon Phi was for deep learning admitted that they were comparing highly-optimised code to unoptimised code in their results.&lt;p&gt;This doesn’t surprise me at all.</text></comment>
<story><title>Intel&apos;s New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K Benchmarks [video]</title><url>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bD9EgyKYkU</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>cbg0</author><text>In text form: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.techspot.com&amp;#x2F;article&amp;#x2F;1722-misleading-core-i9-9900k-benchmarks&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.techspot.com&amp;#x2F;article&amp;#x2F;1722-misleading-core-i9-990...&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>