<story><title>Getting to Bootstrap v4</title><url>https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/20631</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jasonkester</author><text>Seems entirely reasonable.&lt;p&gt;The response to this highlights something I&amp;#x27;ve noticed watching Open Source stuff for a while: this attitude that a piece of software can never simply be &lt;i&gt;finished&lt;/i&gt;, but that it must constantly be changing to be alive.&lt;p&gt;This is a good example of that.  Bootstrap 3 has been out for a while and it mostly works for the things it was designed to work for.  If you look hard enough, you can find bugs and situations where it&amp;#x27;s not suitable to use.  But that&amp;#x27;s fine.  It&amp;#x27;s a super valuable thing that we all get for free.  The new site I&amp;#x27;m building on it looks way prettier than it ever would if I was designing it myself, and will remain so indefinitely, even if these guys never commit anything else to the project.&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t see anything wrong with the guys who built it stamping it &amp;quot;done&amp;quot; and moving on to the next thing.</text></comment>
<story><title>Getting to Bootstrap v4</title><url>https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/20631</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>silversmith</author><text>On one hand, at least browsers are good about maintaining backwards-compatibility of CSS, so that pages that look okay with bootstrap 3 will continue looking okay for a good time.&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, slapping &amp;quot;Don&amp;#x27;t care&amp;quot; label on all the issues of the current stable version seems... bit excessive.&lt;p&gt;All in all, makes me happy I only use bootstrap for the CSS, and not the JS-based interactions.</text></comment>