<story><title>Google closes Issue 9</title><url>http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=9#c1097</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>cperciva</author><text>Google&apos;s response to this makes me want to create a pornography search engine called &quot;Go Ogle!&quot; and respond to the inevitable cease-and-desist letters with &quot;the naming similarity is unfortunate, but I don&apos;t expect it will cause more than minimal confusion&quot;.</text></comment>
<story><title>Google closes Issue 9</title><url>http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=9#c1097</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>protomyth</author><text>The book is on Lulu [1] and there is an Information Week article [2] on the issue.  I would be pretty ticked if Google (a web search company) stomped on my work.  It just seems like a really cruddy thing to do.  It&apos;s in the logic / agent group of languages and I have run across the article a couple of times but it is my no means famous.  It is not like Google&apos;s Go is super well known either, so picking a new name that could be googled would probably be the kind thing to do.&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/lets-go/705004&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/lets-go/705004&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;[2] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/web_services/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221601351&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/web_services/sh...&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>