<story><title>Levandowski files suit against Uber [pdf]</title><url>https://ipfs.eternum.io/ipfs/Qmd9PTEtuSrKKtJQw36aNzpjJwZAdCdwCmUn4w21mmq74z/Levandowski-Uber-Complaint-1.pdf</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>6gvONxR4sf7o</author><text>This is an interesting claim. It basically says that Uber knew about Levandowski&amp;#x27;s crimes when they agreed to indemnify him against claims brought by Google. Given the way Uber seems to work, this wouldn&amp;#x27;t surprise me at all. There seems to be a lot of bullshit in this claim, but that specific piece wouldn&amp;#x27;t surprise me.&lt;p&gt;Mostly unrelatedly, this part seems particularly shitty:&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; In fact, Uber had considered acquiring Tyto in 2015 but declined to do so at that time. Tyto was ultimately acquired by Otto with Uber’s consent and at Uber’s request prior to Uber closing on its acquisition of Otto to secure a lower price for Tyto than what Tyto would have requested had it known that Uber was the acquirer.</text></comment>
<story><title>Levandowski files suit against Uber [pdf]</title><url>https://ipfs.eternum.io/ipfs/Qmd9PTEtuSrKKtJQw36aNzpjJwZAdCdwCmUn4w21mmq74z/Levandowski-Uber-Complaint-1.pdf</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>MrSandman</author><text>244. Mr. Levandowski therefore seeks a declaration that Uber has no right to rescind the Indemnification Agreement without also rescinding the Otto transaction and returning all consideration received from that deal. 
245. In addition, Mr. Levandowski seeks damages, including any consequential damages, arising out of Uber’s rescission of the Otto transaction.</text></comment>