<story><title>Global warming has begun to make Norway warmer and wetter (2019)</title><url>https://www.nrk.no/chasing-climate-change-1.14859595</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>543g43g43</author><text>That website is truly awful. Maybe it&amp;#x27;s personal, but I hate the &amp;quot;scroll to be shown a narrative&amp;quot; style of website design.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>walnutclosefarm</author><text>The NY Times does this kind of &amp;quot;presentation story&amp;quot; all over.  I rarely read more than the first few captions, because I can&amp;#x27;t stand the continuous scroll format - it reduces the rate I can absorb the information in such articles by a factor of 4 or more, and increases the work required to get it (particular on the eyes, because reading text scrolling over pictures is hard eye work).   I hate &amp;#x27;em.   Give me text, charts and graphs, with pictures if they actually add something to the information in your story.</text></comment>
<story><title>Global warming has begun to make Norway warmer and wetter (2019)</title><url>https://www.nrk.no/chasing-climate-change-1.14859595</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>543g43g43</author><text>That website is truly awful. Maybe it&amp;#x27;s personal, but I hate the &amp;quot;scroll to be shown a narrative&amp;quot; style of website design.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>M0r13n</author><text>I tend to agree. But I also think that the images in the background tend to engage me emotionally much more than plain text would be able to.</text></comment>