<story><title>The AeroFS Private Cloud</title><url>http://blog.aerofs.com/the-aerofs-private-cloud/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>rdl</author><text>Silicon Valley startups might not think it&amp;#x27;s a big deal, but being able to run entirely on a private network (either &amp;quot;behind a firewall&amp;quot;, or an entirely disconnected network) is pretty huge. Without AeroFS, your choices today kind of suck, especially for 10-500 person companies (or bigger companies where your corporate option sucks or isn&amp;#x27;t available).  Dropbox doesn&amp;#x27;t work if you care about security.  You&amp;#x27;re left with various forms of SMB crap, more backend-type things like iSCSI, or either blasts from the past (nfs, afs) or science projects (zfs).</text></comment>
<story><title>The AeroFS Private Cloud</title><url>http://blog.aerofs.com/the-aerofs-private-cloud/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>magic5227</author><text>Has anyone compared the reliability of this to Bittorrent&amp;#x27;s solution? I tried Aero a while ago and found it to be very buggy then. Are there any major differences between the two?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bittorrent.com/sync&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.bittorrent.com&amp;#x2F;sync&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>