<story><title>The Inverse Jim Cramer ETF</title><url>https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/inverse-cramer-etf-is-coming-to-the-real-world</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>bryanlarsen</author><text>You can show really poor or really good results for pretty much any high volatility portfolio by cherry picking your time period.</text></item><item><author>dublinben</author><text>Similarly, an ETF inverse of Cathy Wood’s ARK fund has outperformed quite a bit over the last couple years.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.portfoliovisualizer.com&amp;#x2F;backtest-portfolio?s=y&amp;amp;timePeriod=2&amp;amp;startYear=2021&amp;amp;firstMonth=12&amp;amp;endYear=2023&amp;amp;lastMonth=2&amp;amp;calendarAligned=true&amp;amp;includeYTD=false&amp;amp;initialAmount=10000&amp;amp;annualOperation=0&amp;amp;annualAdjustment=0&amp;amp;inflationAdjusted=true&amp;amp;annualPercentage=0.0&amp;amp;frequency=4&amp;amp;rebalanceType=1&amp;amp;absoluteDeviation=5.0&amp;amp;relativeDeviation=25.0&amp;amp;leverageType=0&amp;amp;leverageRatio=0.0&amp;amp;debtAmount=0&amp;amp;debtInterest=0.0&amp;amp;maintenanceMargin=25.0&amp;amp;leveragedBenchmark=false&amp;amp;reinvestDividends=true&amp;amp;showYield=false&amp;amp;showFactors=false&amp;amp;factorModel=3&amp;amp;portfolioNames=false&amp;amp;portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&amp;amp;portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&amp;amp;portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&amp;amp;symbol1=ARKK&amp;amp;allocation1_1=100&amp;amp;allocation1_2=0&amp;amp;symbol2=SARK&amp;amp;allocation2_1=0&amp;amp;allocation2_2=100&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.portfoliovisualizer.com&amp;#x2F;backtest-portfolio?s=y&amp;amp;t...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>__derek__</author><text>&amp;gt; Note: The time period was constrained by the available data for AXS Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) [Dec 2021 - Feb 2023].&lt;p&gt;Including monthly investment doesn&amp;#x27;t really help, either.[1]&lt;p&gt;[1]: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.portfoliovisualizer.com&amp;#x2F;backtest-portfolio?s=y&amp;amp;timePeriod=2&amp;amp;startYear=2012&amp;amp;firstMonth=12&amp;amp;endYear=2023&amp;amp;lastMonth=2&amp;amp;calendarAligned=true&amp;amp;includeYTD=false&amp;amp;initialAmount=10000&amp;amp;annualOperation=1&amp;amp;annualAdjustment=1000&amp;amp;inflationAdjusted=true&amp;amp;annualPercentage=0.0&amp;amp;frequency=2&amp;amp;rebalanceType=1&amp;amp;absoluteDeviation=5.0&amp;amp;relativeDeviation=25.0&amp;amp;leverageType=0&amp;amp;leverageRatio=0.0&amp;amp;debtAmount=0&amp;amp;debtInterest=0.0&amp;amp;maintenanceMargin=25.0&amp;amp;leveragedBenchmark=false&amp;amp;reinvestDividends=true&amp;amp;showYield=false&amp;amp;showFactors=false&amp;amp;factorModel=3&amp;amp;benchmark=-1&amp;amp;benchmarkSymbol=VTI&amp;amp;portfolioNames=false&amp;amp;portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&amp;amp;portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&amp;amp;portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&amp;amp;symbol1=ARKK&amp;amp;allocation1_1=100&amp;amp;allocation1_2=0&amp;amp;symbol2=SARK&amp;amp;allocation2_1=0&amp;amp;allocation2_2=100&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.portfoliovisualizer.com&amp;#x2F;backtest-portfolio?s=y&amp;amp;t...&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>The Inverse Jim Cramer ETF</title><url>https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/inverse-cramer-etf-is-coming-to-the-real-world</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>bryanlarsen</author><text>You can show really poor or really good results for pretty much any high volatility portfolio by cherry picking your time period.</text></item><item><author>dublinben</author><text>Similarly, an ETF inverse of Cathy Wood’s ARK fund has outperformed quite a bit over the last couple years.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.portfoliovisualizer.com&amp;#x2F;backtest-portfolio?s=y&amp;amp;timePeriod=2&amp;amp;startYear=2021&amp;amp;firstMonth=12&amp;amp;endYear=2023&amp;amp;lastMonth=2&amp;amp;calendarAligned=true&amp;amp;includeYTD=false&amp;amp;initialAmount=10000&amp;amp;annualOperation=0&amp;amp;annualAdjustment=0&amp;amp;inflationAdjusted=true&amp;amp;annualPercentage=0.0&amp;amp;frequency=4&amp;amp;rebalanceType=1&amp;amp;absoluteDeviation=5.0&amp;amp;relativeDeviation=25.0&amp;amp;leverageType=0&amp;amp;leverageRatio=0.0&amp;amp;debtAmount=0&amp;amp;debtInterest=0.0&amp;amp;maintenanceMargin=25.0&amp;amp;leveragedBenchmark=false&amp;amp;reinvestDividends=true&amp;amp;showYield=false&amp;amp;showFactors=false&amp;amp;factorModel=3&amp;amp;portfolioNames=false&amp;amp;portfolioName1=Portfolio+1&amp;amp;portfolioName2=Portfolio+2&amp;amp;portfolioName3=Portfolio+3&amp;amp;symbol1=ARKK&amp;amp;allocation1_1=100&amp;amp;allocation1_2=0&amp;amp;symbol2=SARK&amp;amp;allocation2_1=0&amp;amp;allocation2_2=100&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.portfoliovisualizer.com&amp;#x2F;backtest-portfolio?s=y&amp;amp;t...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>undersuit</author><text>And: &amp;quot;Another study found that a blindfolded monkey could beat most stock pickers.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;Include Michael Reeve&amp;#x27;s Stock Picking Goldfish too.</text></comment>