<story><title>Federal judge rules U.S. no-fly list violates Constitution</title><url>http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/24/us-usa-noflylist-idUSKBN0EZ2EU20140624</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>unreal37</author><text>This seems like the right decision to me. Being blocked from air travel is indeed a violation of liberty.&lt;p&gt;I think the U.S. government has a right to keep a list of suspicious persons, watch and monitor them, block them from visiting the United States, but there should be a way to appeal your inclusion on that list especially if you are a U.S. legal resident or citizen. You can&amp;#x27;t just remain on that list forever, unable to travel, with no evidence or justifiable proof of criminal association with terrorists. That&amp;#x27;s limbo.</text></comment>
<story><title>Federal judge rules U.S. no-fly list violates Constitution</title><url>http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/24/us-usa-noflylist-idUSKBN0EZ2EU20140624</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>TallGuyShort</author><text>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; individuals listed under the policy may ultimately petition a U.S. appeals court directly for relief&lt;p&gt;Why isn&amp;#x27;t it the other way around? Shouldn&amp;#x27;t they have to prove to a judge that there is reasonable suspicion you are or have been engaged in terrorism before they can interfere in your affairs?</text></comment>