<story><title>Meta’s Adversarial Threat Report, Third Quarter 2022</title><url>https://about.fb.com/news/2022/11/metas-adversarial-threat-report-q3-2022/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>cstejerean</author><text>* US: 39 accounts
* China: 81 accounts
* Russia: 1,633 accounts&lt;p&gt;Either Russia invests orders of magnitude more in these coordinated inauthentic behavior campaigns, or they are just that much worse at flying under the radar.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>polyomino</author><text>Typically you build up accounts and pages over a long time period and try to fly under the radar until you&amp;#x27;re big enough to affect change without getting caught. In this case, my read is Russia is much better at growing before getting caught, probably due to more experience with influence operations.</text></comment>
<story><title>Meta’s Adversarial Threat Report, Third Quarter 2022</title><url>https://about.fb.com/news/2022/11/metas-adversarial-threat-report-q3-2022/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>cstejerean</author><text>* US: 39 accounts
* China: 81 accounts
* Russia: 1,633 accounts&lt;p&gt;Either Russia invests orders of magnitude more in these coordinated inauthentic behavior campaigns, or they are just that much worse at flying under the radar.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>droopyEyelids</author><text>Or russians used more accounts per campaign. Or facebook puts more effort into finding russian campaigns. Or russian campaigns are inherently easier to identify, or trying to achieve more difficult goals.</text></comment>