<story><title>Now ChatGPT is being (mis)used to do PeerReview</title><url>https://mstdn.science/@ukrio/110100752908161183</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>justusw</author><text>This completes the cycle.&lt;p&gt;Researchers use GPT to write papers and submit them (can be fully automated)&lt;p&gt;Journals review using GPT and (potentially) publish (can be fully automated)&lt;p&gt;GPT will create a borked summary and create fake citations for the next cycle of research. (again, can be fully automated)&lt;p&gt;Then, left on its own, we will have a bunch of robots worrying for us about impact factor and grant applications and we can get back to doing actual research again. Problem solved.</text></comment>
<story><title>Now ChatGPT is being (mis)used to do PeerReview</title><url>https://mstdn.science/@ukrio/110100752908161183</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>primitivesuave</author><text>This is exactly what people should fear about the AI future. A lazy judge, parole officer, loan reviewer, school counselor, or in this case - peer reviewer, delegating decisions that affect human lives to a black-box algorithm.</text></comment>