<story><title>The invisibility of Sheryl Sandberg</title><url>http://thehill.com/opinion/finance/381404-the-infuriating-invisibility-of-sheryl-sandberg</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>cgb223</author><text>&amp;gt; She is politically engaged, having contributed $120,000 to Democrat campaigns in 2016. Her book tours have taken on the feel of someone sounding out campaign themes.&lt;p&gt;Having worked in politics in DC I can tell you that this is a very small amount of money to donate for someone who&amp;#x27;s politically motivated or interested in running&lt;p&gt;Book tours often act like campaign tours, especially when your book is promoting a certain attitude or culture (Lean In)&lt;p&gt;If this is the only evidence of a political run the author has, I wouldn&amp;#x27;t hold your breath for a 2020 run.&lt;p&gt;Plus its The Hill, which is a very politically focused news source in general, so that probably was just added to make it a little more interesting for its reader-base</text></comment>
<story><title>The invisibility of Sheryl Sandberg</title><url>http://thehill.com/opinion/finance/381404-the-infuriating-invisibility-of-sheryl-sandberg</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>psyc</author><text>Sandberg comes across to me like a bad actor in the video (in the Hollywood &amp;#x2F; stage sense) and I mean more than usual &amp;#x2F; more than I expect even from an executive. I could barely watch it, it oozed inauthenticity so badly. Not too sympathetic on the gut level.</text></comment>