<story><title>Bulma – Flexbox CSS framework</title><url>https://bulma.io/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>mcbetz</author><text>If you are looking for light-weight (no Jquery) and flexible  alternatives to Bootstrap, you might also like utility toolkit (combine classes for flexible design systems) like Tachyon (&lt;a href=&quot;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;tachyons.io&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;tachyons.io&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;) or TailwindCSS (&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;tailwindcss.com&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;tailwindcss.com&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;). These toolkits have sped up my webdev while make me feel like really controlling what I do (Bootstrap always felt like working against the system when customizing stuff)</text></comment>
<story><title>Bulma – Flexbox CSS framework</title><url>https://bulma.io/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>koboll</author><text>Bulma is great. But it occupies an awkward position sandwiched between Bootstrap and CSS grid.&lt;p&gt;If you only need to support modern browsers, grid is the most attractive and powerful option. And if you need to support old IE, you probably need a pre-flexbox solution. So the use case for Bulma is a bit limited these days. Or at least that&amp;#x27;s the conclusion I reached when pondering using it.</text></comment>