<story><title>Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence</title><url>https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>stanfordkid</author><text>Regulatory capture in action. The real immediate risks of AI is in privacy, bias, data leakage, fraud, control of infrastructure&amp;#x2F;medical equipment etc. not manufacturing biological weapons. This seems like a classic example of government doing something that looks good to the public, satisfies incumbents and does practically nothing.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>nopinsight</author><text>Current AI is already capable of designing toxic molecules.&lt;p&gt;Dual use of artificial-intelligence-powered drug discovery&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.nature.com&amp;#x2F;articles&amp;#x2F;s42256-022-00465-9.epdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.nature.com&amp;#x2F;articles&amp;#x2F;s42256-022-00465-9.epdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interview with the lead author here:
&amp;quot;AI suggested 40,000 new possible chemical weapons in just six hours &amp;#x2F; ‘For me, the concern was just how easy it was to do’&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.theverge.com&amp;#x2F;2022&amp;#x2F;3&amp;#x2F;17&amp;#x2F;22983197&amp;#x2F;ai-new-possible-chemical-weapons-generative-models-vx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noreferrer&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.theverge.com&amp;#x2F;2022&amp;#x2F;3&amp;#x2F;17&amp;#x2F;22983197&amp;#x2F;ai-new-possible-...&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence</title><url>https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>stanfordkid</author><text>Regulatory capture in action. The real immediate risks of AI is in privacy, bias, data leakage, fraud, control of infrastructure&amp;#x2F;medical equipment etc. not manufacturing biological weapons. This seems like a classic example of government doing something that looks good to the public, satisfies incumbents and does practically nothing.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>avmich</author><text>It&amp;#x27;s true that immediate problems with AI are different, but we hope to be able to solve those problems and to have time for that. The risks addressed in the article could leave us less time and ability to properly solve when they grow to the obvious size, so that requires thinking ahead.</text></comment>