<story><title>Tesla cut a steering component from some cars, didn’t tell customers</title><url>https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/07/tesla-cut-a-steering-component-to-deal-with-chip-shortage.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>titzer</author><text>Quoth Musk:&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot; So the cars in the fleet essentially becoming self-driving via software update, I think, might end up being the biggest increase in asset value of any asset class in history&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;This sentence is packed so tightly with irony that I can&amp;#x27;t believe it was uttered by a self-aware human. Yes, it&amp;#x27;s a great idea that two ton vehicles capable of 100mph just &amp;quot;update&amp;quot; themselves to be fully self-driving. Because what could go wrong? Forget about terminators, just the strategic risk in the event of a cyberwar. Astonishing lack of awareness. And he complains that AI is &amp;quot;summoning the demon&amp;quot;?&lt;p&gt;And yes, they are just &amp;quot;an asset class&amp;quot; whose value needs to be increased because STONKS. I can&amp;#x27;t even.</text></comment>
<story><title>Tesla cut a steering component from some cars, didn’t tell customers</title><url>https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/07/tesla-cut-a-steering-component-to-deal-with-chip-shortage.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>vletal</author><text>Anyway &amp;quot;considered redundant backup not necessary for level 2 autonomy&amp;quot; breaks the &amp;quot;all Teslas now have the HW required for full autonomy&amp;quot; promise. They should have told customers.</text></comment>