<story><title>MH370: A different point of view</title><url>https://plus.google.com/106271056358366282907/posts/GoeVjHJaGBz</url><text>This seems like a simpler explanation.</text></story><parent_chain><item><author>wikiburner</author><text>This doesn&amp;#x27;t explain the zigzagging trajectory of the plane after its disappearance:&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Indeed, soon after MH370 disappeared, reports emerged that recordings of Malaysian military radar returns showed an unidentified track that could correspond to the flight turning left onto a westward course and descending. At the time it was difficult to assess the validity of that claim. It’s been bolstered, however, by a Reuters report earlier Friday stating that Malaysian military radar showed the flight following a course westward over the Malay peninsula and then heading out over the Indian Ocean, passing specific navigational waypoints as it went.&lt;p&gt;According to the report, this latter portion of the flight followed an unusual zigzag trajectory as it worked its way toward the north and west. This is a very inefficient way to get from one place to another, but it had some consequences that may have been useful for whoever was in control of the airplane. For one thing, by navigating between well-traveled waypoints, the plane would have seemed to military radar operators to look just like all the other well-behaved commercial traffic traveling over that stretch of ocean. “That’s going to seem like unsuspicious traffic,” says Maarten Uijt de Haag, a professor of electrical engineering at Ohio University. Had the plane left the well-traveled routes and struck out on its own, it would have been far more conspicuous.&lt;p&gt;Another consequence of the zigzagging trajectory is that, like a fox crossing back and forth over a stream to eluding a pack of hounds, it obscured where exactly it might be heading.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/03/14/mh370_disappearance_if_the_malaysia_airlines_plane_isn_t_in_the_indian_ocean.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.slate.com&amp;#x2F;blogs&amp;#x2F;future_tense&amp;#x2F;2014&amp;#x2F;03&amp;#x2F;14&amp;#x2F;mh370_dis...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>3327</author><text>&amp;quot;By signing off from Malaysian airspace at 1.19 a.m. on March 8 with a casual &amp;quot;all right, good night,&amp;quot; rather than the crisp radio drill advocated in pilot training, a person now believed to be the co-pilot gave no hint of anything unusual.&lt;p&gt;Two minutes later, at 1.21 a.m. local time, the transponder - a device identifying jets to ground controllers - was turned off in a move that experts say could reveal a careful sequence.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;-Reuters&lt;p&gt;Turning off the transponder two minutes after communication and turning IMO rules out fire. It would have had to take place in a 2 minute window.</text></comment>
<story><title>MH370: A different point of view</title><url>https://plus.google.com/106271056358366282907/posts/GoeVjHJaGBz</url><text>This seems like a simpler explanation.</text></story><parent_chain><item><author>wikiburner</author><text>This doesn&amp;#x27;t explain the zigzagging trajectory of the plane after its disappearance:&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Indeed, soon after MH370 disappeared, reports emerged that recordings of Malaysian military radar returns showed an unidentified track that could correspond to the flight turning left onto a westward course and descending. At the time it was difficult to assess the validity of that claim. It’s been bolstered, however, by a Reuters report earlier Friday stating that Malaysian military radar showed the flight following a course westward over the Malay peninsula and then heading out over the Indian Ocean, passing specific navigational waypoints as it went.&lt;p&gt;According to the report, this latter portion of the flight followed an unusual zigzag trajectory as it worked its way toward the north and west. This is a very inefficient way to get from one place to another, but it had some consequences that may have been useful for whoever was in control of the airplane. For one thing, by navigating between well-traveled waypoints, the plane would have seemed to military radar operators to look just like all the other well-behaved commercial traffic traveling over that stretch of ocean. “That’s going to seem like unsuspicious traffic,” says Maarten Uijt de Haag, a professor of electrical engineering at Ohio University. Had the plane left the well-traveled routes and struck out on its own, it would have been far more conspicuous.&lt;p&gt;Another consequence of the zigzagging trajectory is that, like a fox crossing back and forth over a stream to eluding a pack of hounds, it obscured where exactly it might be heading.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/03/14/mh370_disappearance_if_the_malaysia_airlines_plane_isn_t_in_the_indian_ocean.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.slate.com&amp;#x2F;blogs&amp;#x2F;future_tense&amp;#x2F;2014&amp;#x2F;03&amp;#x2F;14&amp;#x2F;mh370_dis...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>graeham</author><text>Also doesn&amp;#x27;t address telemetry being turned off dozens of minutes before last radio comm.</text></comment>