<story><title>G.M. Unveils Its Driverless Cars, Aiming to Lead the Pack</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/business/gm-driverless-cars.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>CruiseAway</author><text>WIRED talks a lot more about the drive itself, and isn&amp;#x27;t as positive about it.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wired.com&amp;#x2F;story&amp;#x2F;ride-general-motors-self-driving-car&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wired.com&amp;#x2F;story&amp;#x2F;ride-general-motors-self-driving...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>quirkot</author><text>This gets at something I was taught in driving school. Slow =&amp;#x2F;= safe. Sudden stopping can be just as dangerous as any other tactic.</text></comment>
<story><title>G.M. Unveils Its Driverless Cars, Aiming to Lead the Pack</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/business/gm-driverless-cars.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>CruiseAway</author><text>WIRED talks a lot more about the drive itself, and isn&amp;#x27;t as positive about it.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wired.com&amp;#x2F;story&amp;#x2F;ride-general-motors-self-driving-car&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;www.wired.com&amp;#x2F;story&amp;#x2F;ride-general-motors-self-driving...&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Fricken</author><text>I&amp;#x27;ve read half a dozen articles on Cruise&amp;#x27;s press event, they all tell similar stories. I guess whether you view them as positive depends on your expectations. Downtown SF is a very challenging driving environment, Cruise is doing some pretty awesome stuff realtive to the other established and well capitalized efforts.</text></comment>