<story><title>How Secure Channels Attempted to Intimidate a Critic and Failed Spectacularly</title><url>http://popehat.com/2015/09/04/how-secure-channels-attempted-to-intimidate-a-critic-and-failed-spectacularly/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Popehat+%28Popehat%29</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>spudlyo</author><text>Ms. Murphy&amp;#x27;s bio page describes her as a &amp;quot;guerilla marketing expert&amp;quot;, and perhaps that is what this is. If leveling ridiculous accusations at your critics using obviously fake Twitter accounts is &amp;quot;guerilla marketing&amp;quot; than perhaps I should look into it, because it sounds fun, and I&amp;#x27;ve always wanted to have a Director level title.</text></comment>
<story><title>How Secure Channels Attempted to Intimidate a Critic and Failed Spectacularly</title><url>http://popehat.com/2015/09/04/how-secure-channels-attempted-to-intimidate-a-critic-and-failed-spectacularly/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Popehat+%28Popehat%29</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>mfoy_</author><text>That screenshot was so outstandingly bad I almost want to believe that someone elaborately staged the screenshot to make a Secure Channel exec look incompetent... but Occam&amp;#x27;s Razor prevails.</text></comment>