<story><title>React Simple Animate – UI Animation Made Simple</title><url>https://react-simple-animate.now.sh/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>OmarIsmail</author><text>Looks like React animation libraries are popular right now.&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s the one that I&amp;#x27;ve been working on recently: &lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;ismailman&amp;#x2F;react-spho&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;ismailman&amp;#x2F;react-spho&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;My philosophy is different though that I want to make it absolutely dead simple to make UIs animate organically vs being a feature-filled animation library. I think React-SPHO is actually the easiest to use animation library for React available as most things you want to do &amp;quot;just work&amp;quot; and anybody reading the code using the library knows exactly what&amp;#x27;s going on without having to read any documentation so ramp-up for basic use cases is effectively instant.</text></comment>
<story><title>React Simple Animate – UI Animation Made Simple</title><url>https://react-simple-animate.now.sh/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>revskill</author><text>There&amp;#x27;s something about OSS that fails to do (or i&amp;#x27;m not sure if it&amp;#x27;s OSS job): Teach how things work under the hood.&lt;p&gt;Normally, it&amp;#x27;s beneficial 100x times when a OSS project tells how things work in a concise manner.&lt;p&gt;In that way, it made sense for both users (they actually want to contribute back if they figure out how things work).&lt;p&gt;One failure example is Next.JS. You never understand how things work under the hood without digging source code.</text></comment>