<story><title>Why HTTP/2.0 does not seem interesting (2012)</title><url>https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/phk/http20.html?re</url><text></text></story><parent_chain><item><author>exceptione</author><text>&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;  In my view, HTTP&amp;#x2F;2.0 should kill Cookies as a concept,
  and replace it with a session&amp;#x2F;identity facility, which makes 
  it easier to do things right with HTTP&amp;#x2F;2.0 than with HTTP&amp;#x2F;1.1.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
count me in. Cookies are a huge waste of bandwidth and freaking annoying here in Europe as you cannot visit a site anymore without being warned you are about to receive yet even more cookies.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>yahelc</author><text>&amp;gt; Cookies are...freaking annoying here in Europe as you cannot visit a site anymore without being warned you are about to receive yet even more cookies.&lt;p&gt;Seems like the blame for that lies not with cookies themselves, but with the EU&amp;#x27;s cookie law.</text></comment>
<story><title>Why HTTP/2.0 does not seem interesting (2012)</title><url>https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/phk/http20.html?re</url><text></text></story><parent_chain><item><author>exceptione</author><text>&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;  In my view, HTTP&amp;#x2F;2.0 should kill Cookies as a concept,
  and replace it with a session&amp;#x2F;identity facility, which makes 
  it easier to do things right with HTTP&amp;#x2F;2.0 than with HTTP&amp;#x2F;1.1.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
count me in. Cookies are a huge waste of bandwidth and freaking annoying here in Europe as you cannot visit a site anymore without being warned you are about to receive yet even more cookies.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>solox3</author><text>The EU &amp;quot;Cookie law&amp;quot; is not limited to cookies. The term used in regulation 6 is &amp;quot;storage&amp;quot;, which includes at least localStorage, headers, and remotely hosted solutions (off the top of my head).</text></comment>