<story><title>Against Method</title><url>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_Method</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>tmalsburg2</author><text>I love Paul Feyerabend.  I believe that the titel &amp;quot;Against Method&amp;quot; was mainly supposed to be provocative.  His main point really is to remind us that Popper&amp;#x27;s view of science is an idealization and that the process of scientific discovery is much more messy in reality.  In other words, he is mainly stating facts about the history of science.  Very interesting read with great examples.  I also highly recommend his book (actually a set of lecture notes) &amp;quot;Science as an Art&amp;quot; in which he dicusses the similarities and the shared history of science and art.</text></comment>
<story><title>Against Method</title><url>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_Method</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>raldu</author><text>A detailed discussion of the book at SEP can be found here:&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;plato.stanford.edu&amp;#x2F;entries&amp;#x2F;feyerabend&amp;#x2F;#2.13&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;plato.stanford.edu&amp;#x2F;entries&amp;#x2F;feyerabend&amp;#x2F;#2.13&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>