<story><title>Norwegian Won’t Fly the Boeing 737 Max Again</title><url>https://simpleflying.com/norwegian-drops-737-max/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>geocrasher</author><text>Am I the only one who feels like this headline borders on Click Bait? More than once I&amp;#x27;ve found articles on this website to be heavy in inferred meaning and light on actual content. Such is the case here. Take a controversial aircraft, form a headline around how an airline &amp;quot;won&amp;#x27;t fly&amp;quot; it again, and then gloss over the actual reason:&lt;p&gt;They&amp;#x27;re out of money.&lt;p&gt;Take this article for example:&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;simpleflying.com&amp;#x2F;spirit-airlines-a321xlr&amp;#x2F;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;simpleflying.com&amp;#x2F;spirit-airlines-a321xlr&amp;#x2F;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;It does not read like an analysis, it reads like a gossip column about the latest airliner fashions, and at the end even asks &amp;quot;Do you think Spirit should order the Airbus A321XLR? Let us know in the comments!&amp;quot; which only supports my take on it: This site is an airline gossip site, not a aviation industry news site.</text></comment>
<story><title>Norwegian Won’t Fly the Boeing 737 Max Again</title><url>https://simpleflying.com/norwegian-drops-737-max/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>kenneth</author><text>Norwegian is dropping the 737 MAX because they&amp;#x27;re practically bankrupt and are significantly downsizing. I wouldn&amp;#x27;t read too much into this — it&amp;#x27;s a business and marketing decision, not a safety decision.</text></comment>