<story><title>Zabbix, Time Series Data and TimescaleDB</title><url>https://blog.zabbix.com/zabbix-time-series-data-and-timescaledb/6642/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>boomskats</author><text>Every time TimescaleDB is brought up, I feel the need to point people to their shadily worded proprietary licence[0], and pg_partman[1].&lt;p&gt;Do the same benchmarks against a pg_partman managed partitioned db and you&amp;#x27;ll get the exact same performance. We do, at least - 150k or so metrics per second, 10 columns per metric.&lt;p&gt;Not trying to crap on the TimescaleDB guys, I&amp;#x27;ve found a lot of their writeups extremely useful and can totally see how their commercially supported product fits. However, I like to see pg_partman at least mentioned somewhere in the article&amp;#x2F;comments. It&amp;#x27;s awesome and does the same job.&lt;p&gt;[0]&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;timescale&amp;#x2F;timescaledb&amp;#x2F;blob&amp;#x2F;master&amp;#x2F;LICENSE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;timescale&amp;#x2F;timescaledb&amp;#x2F;blob&amp;#x2F;master&amp;#x2F;LICENSE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;[1]&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;pgpartman&amp;#x2F;pg_partman&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;#x2F;pgpartman&amp;#x2F;pg_partman&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>
<story><title>Zabbix, Time Series Data and TimescaleDB</title><url>https://blog.zabbix.com/zabbix-time-series-data-and-timescaledb/6642/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>linsomniac</author><text>Experiences with Zabbix?  I tried it back around a decade ago and wanted to like it, but didn&amp;#x27;t find it very reliable.  And now the details are escaping me.  I ended up sticking with Nagios and Opsview.  Around 5 years ago I switched to a templated Icinga2 config and have been pretty happy with that, but it&amp;#x27;s pretty low level.</text></comment>