<story><title>Summarize Any Article as a Dialog Between Two People with Bing Chat</title><url>https://www.aidemos.info/summarize-any-article-as-a-dialog-between-two-people-with-bing-chat/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>IIAOPSW</author><text>Based on my previous attempts with that other well noted LLM, I don&amp;#x27;t think these models are at all good at managing &amp;quot;theory of mind&amp;quot;. They seem to not keep track very well of which parties are privy to which information, which parties are supposed to be pursuing certain conversational objectives, and generally which direction information is supposed to be flowing. It often trips over itself at the level of 2 parties, and certainly trip over itself at the level of 3 parties. Additionally, I have not once seen it be able to do a form of recursive nesting wherein one of the two parties in a dialog begin to discuss verbatim a dialog between two additional people. I suspect these problems are deeply seated and intrinsic to the model, and will not be rectified under the &amp;quot;just train it more bro&amp;quot; refrain of AI evangelicals.</text></comment>
<story><title>Summarize Any Article as a Dialog Between Two People with Bing Chat</title><url>https://www.aidemos.info/summarize-any-article-as-a-dialog-between-two-people-with-bing-chat/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jimmySixDOF</author><text>Kind of more interesting in the other direction summarizing conversations into an article sort of like what these folks put together:&lt;p&gt;Show HN: The HN Recap – AI generated daily HN podcast | Hacker News
&lt;a href=&quot;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=35831177&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;#x2F;item?id=35831177&lt;/a&gt;</text></comment>