<story><title>Cutestrap: 8k CSS framework</title><url>https://www.cutestrap.com</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>sotojuan</author><text>Cool, but what does it offer that Pure (4kb doesn&amp;#x27;t)?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;purecss.io&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;purecss.io&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>hire_charts</author><text>From what I can tell, they have slightly different aims.&lt;p&gt;For instance, Cutestrap follows BEM naming conventions and uses KSS to generate its own documentation. KSS is a nice way of generating a pattern library of your own, as you start to extend your base CSS framework.&lt;p&gt;Also, one big difference is the way they handle grids. Cutestrap grids automatically stretch columns to fill up the horizontal space and allow you to provide weights. (This is essentially a very thin abstraction on top of flexbox.) Whereas Pure grids deal more with unit sizing, more like Bootstrap.&lt;p&gt;In general, Cutestrap is more opinionated (as its tagline implies) whereas Pure offers much more customizability. I&amp;#x27;d argue that Pure should be used more like Bootstrap, as a way to prototype complex UIs before applying more custom styling, whereas Cutestrap should be more directly used as a base for your own, custom (and opinionated) styling.</text></comment>
<story><title>Cutestrap: 8k CSS framework</title><url>https://www.cutestrap.com</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>sotojuan</author><text>Cool, but what does it offer that Pure (4kb doesn&amp;#x27;t)?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;purecss.io&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http:&amp;#x2F;&amp;#x2F;purecss.io&lt;/a&gt;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>xutopia</author><text>The grids are way nicer in cute.  You just have to specify a grid container and the flex takes care of the rest.</text></comment>