a positive force for all involved. The flow of capital and labor increases efficiency, allocating goods where they are best used. A very different view is world systems theory that interprets economic globalization as a form of economic domination. World systems theory identifies the developed world as 22 For an overview of the use of ethnic criteria in migration policy, see Joppke. Christian. 2005. Selecting by Origin: Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York, NY: Basic Books and Carens, Joseph. 1987. "Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders." The Review of Politics, 49:2, 251-273 discuss the White Australian Policy. Hing, Bill Ong. 1994. Making and Remaking Asian America through Immigration Policy, 1850-1990. Palo Alto: Stanfordthere are strong aspects of world systems theory in her thought.24 She argues that the industrialization of the developing world leads to urban migration from the country-side, often followed by migration across borders and the recruitment of workers by foreign firms. In the short run, economic development leads to more migration, not less, as we see when large numbers of people migrate from the country-side to the cities in the developing world and beyond.25 The social and economic disruption of industrialization, often promoted by international organizations such as the World Bank and IMF, developed countries, and multinational corporations, plays a major role in establishing patterns of migration. The moral implications raised by world systems theory are quite different from those raised by neo-classical economics. Migration is caused by