after watching this week's episodes of Cheese in the Trap, I have this feeling that there is still some scenes not yet unfolded. It may look like that In Ho was the better man between them but perhaps just like everyone else who had been in Jung's life, he had concluded to his own convenience what truly happened to his favor and against Jung which the drama had shown. Jung had always had a hard time communicating and I think it is EASIER for him to just say yes, he did it, rather than to ELABORATE exactly what happened. Circumstantially, he was there but the real question was did he manipulate the incident to inflict danger on In Ho? The sequence of the flashbacks were not as itwhy she was not following her dreams now was because of In Ho and his careless remarks. Just as how he treated the other boy who was also a beneficiary of Jung's father. I don't think that In Ho has a right to say words to that boy IN BEHALF of Jung or his father for HE is also just a beneficiary out of the goodness of Jung's father. In Ho became arrogant and selfish not wanting others to be Jung's friend.

That betrayal he did, how he cruelly phrase out the words referring Jung's weaknesses and talking behind his back could have been his reason of being protective or being jealous but REALLY? Is that reason enough to bad mouth Jung behind his back if he really say