had "deposited the Express Mail package" that contained his patent application "with the Express Mail Post Office to Addressee" receptacle at his place of business prior to the last scheduled pickup on the day prior to the date that was indicated on the "Express Mail" mailing labelJune 23, 2005. Between August 2005 and July 2007, Plaintiff filed a total of five petitions seeking revision of the filing date the USPTO accorded his patent application. During this time period, the USPTO did not deny his petitions outright; rather, it continued to allow Plaintiff to augment his arguments and evidentiary submissions.
On July 13, 2007, the USPTO issued its final decision denying Plaintiff's renewed petition to modify the filing date the agency accorded his application, (A.R. 184). The USPTO's decision affirmedearlier, the life of convict could have been saved.

An inquest had been ordered into Singh`s death last
August. The jail inmate had died of infection in his various
vital organs.
Magistrate Jain, in her inquest report noted that a
panel of three senior doctors, which had done the postmortem
at Deen Dayal Upadhayay Hospital here, opined that the manner
of death was "unnatural".

Doctors had further said the diagnosis was delayed due
to the "negligent attitude" of the treating doctors at Tihar.

The magistrate, in her report, had noted that the
convict was not attended by Tihar doctors for more than five
hours due to which his condition deteriorated and he
ultimately died.

"In this (inquest) report (by the magistrate), the
negligent and laxity of treating doctors of central jail,
Tihar have been emphasised," the CMM noted.

The court has now asked the Hari