temporary engagement projections and two complete engagement projections on two opposing outer side walls of the terminal stop frame, respectively, in such a way as to be arranged in the engagement direction of the two. Both of these temporary and complete engagement projections are to be engaged with the same two frame engaging pieces of the connector housing provided on the two opposing outer side walls of the connector housing, respectively. Therefore, when the terminal stop frame is engaged with the connector housing temporarily, the two temporary engagement projections are first engaged with the two opposing frame engaging pieces respectively, and when the terminal stop frame is further pushed toward the connector housing, the two complete engagement projections are further engaged with the same two opposing engagement framein 2004. Four Connecticut librarians likewise won their gag order challenge under a so-called National Security Letter in 2006. And a similar challenge was brought by a nonprofit digital library, called the Internet Archive; the government had sought information about one of its users, and it won its challenge to a gag order in 2008.

The most closely watched ruling on secret orders came this year. The San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation appealed to a United States District judge to lift a gag order issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation through a national security letter. The court said the gag order was unconstitutional.

Large companies have pushed back more quietly. Yahoo is the only company known to have challenged a gag order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. And