his computer at home and he continued to submit them. However, it appears that in 1992, the amount of the monetary awards for which Risher claims he was eligible, was significantly cut. Plaintiff appears to believe that Defendant Hibner was responsible for the cuts.[13] He admits that there was a revision in the SMART *1051 procedures and, based on his job description, he was no longer entitled to large monetary awards, but he claims that because he earned the award prior to the revision, Hibner could have paid him larger awards.
Risher also complains that when others were given SMART recognitions, they were recognized in group meetings. But when he was given SMART recognitions, they would merely be left on his desk.

(5) Disregard for health-related travel restrictions

Plaintiff's allegation ofdisregard for health-related travel restrictions is predicated in part upon the poor health of his mother in 1989-1990. Risher received orders to travel to Germany.[14] Mr. Risher's mother was ill during this time frame and Risher requested that he not be required to travel while she needed continuous medical care. Defendant Gary Hibner told Mr. Risher that he needed a letter from his mother's doctor declaring her condition and the need for Mr. Risher to care for her.
Risher brought in a letter from a doctor which stated: "To Whom it May Concern: Reference Rachel Risher. Mrs. Risher has gangrene in her left foot and I feel it is necessary for her to be under the care of her son William." Hibner told Risher this letter was insufficient; that