controversy, and put an end to oppressive state vaccination mandates once and for all. Phillips vs. City of New York, raises a direct challenge to the necessity of state immunization programs, and the constitutionality of legislative mandates like California's newly enacted SB277. Petitioners' evidence shows that vaccines have not been effective in controlling the spread childhood illnesses, and manipulating disease without a liability for profit is a medically unsound and dangerous practice. The families represented in the Phillips case hold sincere religious beliefs contrary to the practice of vaccinating based on Christian teachings protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Petitioners are asking the Supreme Court for a ruling on their rights to refuse the dozens of unnecessary vaccines their children are forced todrink, inject and inhale in order to attend public school.

Notably, New York City has one of the most bloated vaccination schedules in the world that now includes a requirement for all toddlers to receive a flu vaccine in order to attend pre-school. CDC recommends children in the United States receive an estimated 69 doses of vaccines in an assortment of cocktails, mists and injections before age 15, and the link between vaccines and irreversible brain injury has not been debunked by research a common misperception held by many in support of the mandates. To the contrary, these injuries have been conceded multiple times by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and compensated by the Special Master's in the Court of Federal Claims. Since 1986, the Vaccine Court