the plea, the government was unaware that Ritsema had used a firearm to threaten K.J.L. after the September 8 sexual assault.   That information did not come to light until the probation officer reviewed the files of the Wisconsin State Probation Office, interviewed K.J.L., and presented what she discovered in the presentence report.   No sooner than that (and possibly not until we issued our opinion in the first appeal) did the government realize why which of the two counts to which Ritsema pled guilty mattered.


48
We also remarked that "the way in which the court applied the guidelines to Ritsema's conviction seemed to indicate" that the silencers charge did not reflect the gravity of Ritsema's behavior, despite the court's finding to the contrary.  31 F.3dIn an alarming situation that indicates patronage of officers from the top, hundreds of tax officials facing inquiries on serious charges of corruption and inefficiency are serving at key positions in the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).The revelations are part of a report the FBR submitted to a parliamentary body that has taken up the issue of ‘no action’ against corrupt FBR officers. The report suggests the apparent indifference by the FBR top management towards corrupt officials, who, despite facing inquires, are serving at key posts.In most cases, the charges of corruption and inefficiency against these officials have been proven. Some of them have obtained stay orders.One of the prominent cases is the one where no action has been taken against officers who were accused in the multi-billion