testified concerning appellants' illegal activity before the grand jury in November, 1965.  The monitored conversations used at trial took place in February, 1966; appellants were indicted in April, 1966.


10
Appellant Donohue stresses the fact that in early December, 1965, the prosecutor invited him to discuss some allegations made against him, but said he would not do so unless Donohue brought with him an attorney or a friend.  Donohue engaged counsel who was present at two meetings with the prosecutor, at which the prosecutor sought to obtain a confession from Donohue and his cooperation as a witness.


11
The Sixth Amendment does not forbid the securing of admissions by undercover tactics from a suspect prior to arrest or indictment.  No danger of coercion compels police officers and courts tojehovahsjudgment.co.uk is the most prominent site attempting to justify that the Watchtower did nothing wrong when becoming associated with the UN. The site presents a large amount of information, but this expose' shows it to be poorly written and inaccurate.

Watchtower's United Nations Association

In 1992, the Watchtower became an Associate NGO with the United Nations. This was despite spending decades condemning the UN as the scarlet coloured wild beast of Revelation. As a result, many Jehovah's Witnesses severed ties with the Watchtower for what they consider a hypocritical and dishonest chapter of the religion's history.

In 1991, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York applied to be a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Associate Member of the United Nations Department of Public Information (UN DPI). This is the closest relationship