hats the robbers had pulled down over their faces were

similar to the type indicated by the UPC codes on the receipts.

Other eye-witnesses to the robbery testified that a duffel bag

matching the code on the receipt was similar to the one the robbers

were carrying and from which they took the fake bombs.

     An employee of Academy testified that the SKU numbers on the

Academy receipt corresponded to grey sweat pants, a small sweat

shirt, and a large hooded sweat shirt.         Eye-witnesses to the

robbery identified clothing corresponding to the SKU numbers on the

receipts as similar to clothing worn by the robbers.


    16
      Joshua’s counsel objected to Agent Johnson’s testimony on the
basis thatthe bank on the day of the robbery driving the car that

was later used in the robbery.                There was also testimony that

Quinton Carr was driving Joshua Burton’s Lexus around that same

time.       The Government introduced receipts found where Joshua had

recently been living;         those receipts corresponded to clothing and

items identified by eye-witnesses as similar to the clothing worn

by the robbers and a bag used by the robbers to carry fake bombs.

There    was    evidence     that    Wilton   Burton,    one    of  