Hospital on May 27, 1977, suffering multiple complications of eclampsia related to her pregnancy.  Her blood pressure was elevated, her extremities were swollen, and within an hour she convulsed.  Six hours later she was transferred to Los Angeles County/USC Medical Center, where her baby was delivered by Caesarian section.


3
Between May 27 and June 8, 1977, plaintiff suffered a number of serious medical problems, most of which were resolved by the time of her discharge from the Medical Center on June 19, 1977.  Plaintiff contends that sometime after June 19, 1977, she discovered she had suffered brain damage.  Plaintiff, however, submitted no probative evidence in her summary judgment papers relating to the alleged brain damage.


4
Plaintiff served the requisite Notice of Intent to commence an actionthe Braham rule, the court reviewed all of the submitted evidence and concluded that "appreciable harm existed, had manifested itself well before the last problem noted on the problem list (June 8, 1977)."  IV Reporter's Transcript at 14.


32
A review of the evidence submitted, which consisted entirely of hospital records that were undisputed, supports the court's conclusion.  Plaintiff was admitted to the Los Angeles County/USC Medical Center with serious problems on May 27, 1977, and she developed at least eight more medical problems prior to June 8, 1977.  Her complaint alleges acts of omission that led to eclampsia; she was admitted to the French Hospital on May 27, 1977 with a diagnosed case of eclampsia.


33
Plaintiff contends that she did not suffer "appreciable harm" until "her overall