as a conduit between Savage and certain  investors, such as plaintiffs, who were owed money as a result of the  dealings of Savage. He stated that an intermediary, one Lee Morris,  represented that Savage was "acting on behalf of the [CIA]." 42 Fed. Cl. at  261. The declaration of Edgar Reynolds, a friend of Savage, was also in the  file. Reynolds stated that he had the distinct impression that Savage was  an important person within the CIA.


26
The court also reviewed excerpts from interviews conducted by law  enforcement officials in Britain with Savage. Because Mr. Savage died a few  days after Monarch filed its case in the Court of Federal Claims, Monarch  never did have the opportunity to depose him.During interviews conducted  by Detective William Hulse of the Staffordshire Police Department in the  United Kingdom before Savage's death, and attended by a representative of  the Internal Revenue Service, Savage stated, "I have never been an employee  of the . . . [CIA]." When he was asked, "But you never worked for the CIA,  did you?", he answered "No, no." Savage also stated that he had "no warrant  of authority" for the Agency.


27
The court then reviewed the further evidence proffered by Monarch, obtained  following the 1996 decision. This consisted primarily of the statements of  three persons, Boris Z. Sielicki-Korczak, Lee Morris, and Raphael Moore.


28
Mr. Korczak attested that he was an "access agent" for the CIA gathering  raw intelligence on