from the cash registers. He had returned to the store about 11:30 P.M. that night and noted that one cash register had been broken into and was on the floor, turned over, and that both registers had been tampered with.
The appellant's case consisted of one witness: himself. He testified that he was on the opposite side of the street from the Walker Building, and when an officer asked him if he knew anything about a window that had been broken, he denied any knowledge of it. He denied breaking in and also denied having cigars or money on his person.
All three witnesses for the State indentified the appellant at the trial as the man they had seen in the laboratory that night.
It is readily apparent upon a reviewunder the CETA program to work in the Engineering and Maintenance Department of the City of Fairfield, the plaintiff was injured while loading refuse into a garbage truck.  On the day his doctor permitted him to resume light work, the plaintiff reported to his supervisor and was told to clean the yard around the offices.  While he was working in the yard, the supervisor approached and asked if he were able to work on the garbage truck that day.  The plaintiff attempted to explain that he was still undergoing pain and was scheduled to see a doctor later in the day, but the supervisor walked away.  The plaintiff continued to work in the yard as assigned.  Later, the supervisor returned and found the