of Chen testing prohibited drugs for Hon Sam emphasizing his crossover from the moral to the immoral to protect his identity. Similarly, the mise-en-scene of Lau pretending to be a lawyer to obtain critical information from an apprehended gangster emphasizes his own crossover from immoral to moral, and back over to the immoral, by concealing his identity from the criminal.

Lau and Chen – moles, mirror personalities, and enemies?

Perhaps Lau is the biggest antagonist of the film; bigger than Hon Sam as a result of the hypocrisy with which he kills both Hon Sam and Inspector B, and destroys Chen’s original identity. Though Hon is a more obvious hypocrite, praying at Buddhist temples while organizing all kinds of criminal activities, the rebelliousness with which Lau handled the deaths andQ:

Were British plans for India disrupted by WWII?

In a video debate, Sadhguru says (@3.57) the British would have stayed in India if World War II not happened. 
Is this assertion credible?  Does the pre-war evidence weigh in favor of this assertion, or the standard one that India would have eventually obtained independence? 

A:

They would have left eventually, and probably sooner rather than later. 
The British had probably passed "the point of no return" with the Government of India Act in 1935. This greatly strengthened the provincial structure (where Indians could be reperesented), resolved some provincial issues (like splitting of Burma from India) and created a Federal structure of British and Indian held territories. The act transfered control over most internal matters, the "interior," health, education, and social