K. woke under the custody of people she didn't know, named in a judicial case that she was not informed about."

"It evoked Kafka's The Trial," the institute said, referring to the hallucinatory novel about a man prosecuted without even being told what he is accused of having done.

The judge, Djalma Moreira Gomes, pushed back after Vieira's article came out last weekend, insisting that Quirino, who had seven children, with one more on the way, wanted to be sterilised.

"The family set-up was characterised by the parents' drug dependencies..., physical violence against the children by the current partner, and financial difficulties," the judge said in a statement, also denying that she was ever homeless.

According to Gomes, the woman "fully expressed consciousness and agreement with the sterilisation."

Details unclear

Crucial details of theissues, appellant challenges the legal
and factual sufficiency of the revocation.  Finding the evidence at the hearing legally and factually
sufficient, we affirm the revocation order.
BACKGROUND
	On October 29, 2001, appellant pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with
the felony offense of theft and containing an enhancement paragraph alleging that he had previously
been convicted of the felony offense of sexual assault.  The trial court placed him on community
supervision on December 6, 2001.  On February 28, 2002, the State filed a motion to revoke his
community supervision, alleging three violations:  that he committed the offenses of criminal
trespass and stalking and had failed to make his payment of court-ordered community supervision
fees.  The alleged victim of the stalking and trespass violations was Tina Marie Martin, to whom he
had been married