permissible and on public property.   The district court order protects the current placement of that newsrack.   We conclude, however, that the desired locations of the newsrack are within the federal enclave.


31
Jacobsen first placed his rack either on the granite ledge of the building, or placed a concrete counterweight and chains on the granite ledge with his newsrack on the sidewalk.   The granite ledge is a part of the federal building and is thus a nonpublic forum.


32
The second location of the newsrack was set back in an area next to one of the entrances, but within the curtilage of the building.   Although not separated by a parking lot, as in Kokinda or Monterey County, there is a clear line of demarcationand is not protected by the injunction.


34
To the extent that the newsrack was on the municipal sidewalk--with its counterweight on the granite slab or chained to the metal grill--it was on a public forum, although we conclude it was a safety hazard.   The record indicates the other racks located along that sidewalk were either on the granite portion of the building or in the alcove under the overhang.   We conclude there was adequate justification for moving Jacobsen's newsrack, which was situated in the middle of the sidewalk, to an area out of the way of foot traffic, next to the lamp post, about ten feet away on the other side of the sidewalk.   As Patricia Heintzman, a building manager for the G.S.A.