appellant was reckless about whether another was present who would be offended and alarmed by his act of fellatio in a non-public place, namely a room in his house.
In this appeal, appellant does not dispute that he engaged in the act he is accused of. Rather, he argues that Russell Mitchell  the "another" person of the statute  was not "present" for the purpose of section 21.07, since he was not present in appellant's house when he witnessed appellant's act. Id. (stating that a person commits public lewdness when "he is reckless about whether another is present who will be offended or alarmed ..."). In response, the State argues that "contrary to an indecent exposure case, the location of the `act' in a public lewdness case doesKaplan continued:

Long a favorite of sustainable energy groups opposed to more traditional fuels … in the last 10 years environmentalists have turned on hydropower. . . . Suddenly hydro is being mentioned in the same breath with coal, oil and nuclear–precisely the fuels hydro, touted early on as an environmentally benign energy source, was to replace. Today environmentalists talk of “non-hydro renewables” like wind, solar and biomass.”

And a quarter-century later, the environmental war against the largest US source of renewable energy continues. This month, Greenwire reported “Greens score big win over Alabama hydropower project” as environmental groups obtain a favorable ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Two environmental groups, Alabama Rivers and Alabama Rivers Alliance, filed a petition back in 2013