The indictment is partly the product of extensive electronic surveillance conducted under the authority of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520 ("Title III").  On January 29, 1979 the Federal Bureau of Investigation received authorization under Title III to place a wiretap on telephones at Amalgamated Insurance Agency Services in Chicago and to intercept telephone conversations of Allen Dorfman and five other named persons.  The wiretaps continued for fourteen months pursuant to successive extensions of the original wiretap authorization.  The surveillance produced more than 2,000 reels of recordings.  The conversations of hundreds of persons were intercepted besides the five individuals charged in the indictment.  United States v. Dorfman, 542 F.Supp. 345, 356-57, 370we do not now decide, he cannot prevent the admission of intercepted conversations against defendants in a criminal case.  Non-parties' motions to suppress are therefore denied.

The five nonparties appealed.6

7
The second related appeal has been filed by William E. Webbe, from the district court's order denying his motion to suppress conversations in which he was a party.  Webbe, named in the indictment as an unindicted co-conspirator, was subpoenaed before the grand jury, given immunity and did testify.  Webbe has been subpoenaed as a trial witness and presumably will testify at that time pursuant to a grant of immunity.  Six days after the entry of the order denying the nonparties' motion to suppress, Webbe filed his own motion to suppress all conversations in which he was