resolve to forward a new order to reestablish YouTube's signal (sic), requesting the operators to unblock the access and inform the Justice about the technical reasons of the presumed inability of performing blocks to specific electronic addresses”.Sem Tato – O Hermeneuta

How to deal with a case where a video recorded in Spain is published in an US portal by some regular citizen, affecting another citizen in another country? In my opinion, local Justice is responsible for watching over local citizen's individual rights… We are just starting this debate, which keeps getting more important each day. The jurisdiction conflict between national and global will be more present as the Internet enlarges it's influence, and it's bullshit to define the Judge's attitude as censorship. He is just fulfilling his dutyHere’s what we know about Dylann Roof, the man who walked into a Charleston church and reportedly killed nine black parishioners at a prayer meeting.

According to The Daily Beast, a high school classmate said, "He made a lot of racist jokes, but you don’t really take them seriously like that." But then the friend added that now, in the wake of the shooting, "the things he said were kind of not joking."

We also know that his Facebook photo showed a picture of Roof wearing a jacket with two African flags on it: One was tied to apartheid-era South Africa; the other Rhodesia, which was a racist state ruled by a white-minority for years before they lost power to the black majority. (Eventually, the country gained its independence as