victim and the family.  Young
did a biopsychosocial assessment of Hart that showed that Hart had begun using
pornography when he was thirteen or fourteen and became Ahooked@
on it.  Based on the overall assessment, Young concluded that Hart was Avery much at risk@ and noted:




His denial is
pervasive.  He is involved with an unsuspecting church and continuing to
becoming more visible within the church.  He failed his last polygraph.  His
thinking is very concrete and similar to that of a pedophile.  He can
manipulate chaperone[s] and has access to multitudes of potential victims.  My
recommendations are Mr. Hart, his church leaders and his wife have an immediate
meeting with probation and myself.  We will go from there.
 
Young
testified that she did meet with church members.  She was concerned with Hart=s Agood-guy thinking error@ where a person comesmaking people believe that he was
harmless.  In her opinion, Hart was a risk because he was a sex offender who
minimized and lied to himself, continued to put himself at risk where he could
potentially re-offend, and did not acknowledge to himself that he put himself
at risk.
Hart
argues that the record shows that there were only two overt acts at the church
involving the fifteen year old.  Hart had put a sticky note on the back of a
woman sitting in front of him at church.  The woman walked to the front of the
church, and the fifteen-year-old female took the sticky note off.  Hart went to
the girl and asked her why she took the sticky note off, and they laughed and
conversed about it.  On another occasion, Hart shook hands with the fifteen
year old. 