Muslim religious adviser at the facility; and Lieutenant Patrick Russnak, Grievance Coordinator at OCCF. These affidavits are accompanied by extensive documentation from OCCF records that rebuts or explains nearly every individualized complaint by the five affiants.
Additionally, I note that today's OCCF is not the same facility that was the subject of the 1978 injunction. Last year, Orange County opened a brand new correctional facility  modern and built to conform to twenty-first century penological requirements. Captain Ryan submits the recent report by the State Corrections Commission, the agency charged with oversight of OCCF in virtually every area covered by the consent judgment. The report  on which I place the greatest reliance  finds OCCF's new facility in Goshen to comport with every state correctional standard.
Under the PLRA,so in an appropriate forum, not in this action. In any event, the claims do not demonstrate a widespread disregard for the constitutional *348 rights of inmates.[1]
Fourth, allegations that a prisoner (Statler) in keeplock was impaired in his ability to consult with counsel are not supported by the record. OCCF records demonstrate that Statler was in touch with his lawyer by telephone twice, met with his lawyer between one and three times, and went to the law library once during the period that he alleges he was in keeplock. (Ryan Aff. ¶ 15). Furthermore, allegations that a prisoner in keeplock cannot go to the law library are not constitutionally actionable. The United States Supreme Court has held that a correctional facility's decision to restrict "lockdown prisoners' access to