conviction is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.


15
Judgment accordingly.



1
 Appellant's brother had seen appellant "on occasions" from the time of appellant's marriage in 1965 to the shooting in April, 1968 (Tr. 194).  He had last seen his brother only a week prior to the shooting (Tr. 52).  Appellant's sister also had sufficient contact with appellant to form an opinion on his sanity.  Appellant and his wife lived with appellant's sister during the first year of their marriage.  After the couple moved out, she also saw her brother occasionally (Tr. 202-3)


2
 When defense counsel began examining the observations which appellant's brother had made concerning appellant's behavior the court requested that counsel approach the bench, and the following colloquy occurred:
[Prosecution]:has as much to say as this guy.

Gardega said he put Sketchy Dog there partly to protest Visbal's piece's co-opting of di Modica's work. Still with me? So he was protesting the protest. Again, sort of. He's also commenting on the adoption of Fearless Girl by progressives as a symbol of feminism. The piece was, it turns out, commissioned as an advertisement for an index fund comprised
of gender diverse companies and...look, I'm not a business person. Again, I'm
just summing up the wikipedia article. The point is that it's basically a billboard.

A billboard inviting investors to invest in companies run by women, but still...investing and capitalism and Wall Street. You know, the people who sent the economy into a free fall and sparked the worst global economic downturn since