caused controversies, after which the leading financial institution at the appropriate level in Washington set the records straight. It is sincerely hoped that the World Bank high ups would rectify the situation at the earliest in this regard, please. In all fairness, such a report based on exaggerated figures is least expected from an international financial institution like the World Bank. Thanks.caused the pregnancy of the young woman in question, the deceased, and who had brought the deceased to appellant. Without considering the testimony of this witness, the following facts were established by other evidence. The pregnancy of the deceased was shown by the testimony of a physician and surgeon whom deceased had visited and who had examined deceased a few hours before she had visited appellant. The visits of deceased to appellant were established by the testimony of a witness present in appellant's apartment at the time and who was not shown to be an accomplice. This witness established the use of instruments by appellant either upon the person of deceased or in relation to her. The condition of deceased's uterus and other internal organs was established by