and one to the Company.1


5
The committee failed in its objective to have the Union decertified, and on January 11, 1960 the Union and the Company signed a new agreement which terminated the strike.  Under the terms of this new agreement, all employees hired after June 30, 1959, the expiration date of the former agreement, were required to become members of the Union.  As to other employees the agreement provided, in consonance with the previous agreement: 'All present employees of the Company who on the date of the Agreement are members of the Union, * * * shall remain members of the Union for the term of this Agreement as a condition of continued employment with the Company.'


6
All but one of the thirty-four employees who had resignedfrom the Union were employed by the Company when the new agreement was signed on January 11, 1960.  On February 23, the Union wrote each of these workers, notifying them that they were delinquent in the payment of their dues and giving them seven days to correct this situation.  The Union demanded that the workers pay dues not only for the two months that the new contract had been in effect, but also for the months that each employee had worked during the period of the strike and subsequent to the expiration of the initial agreement.  The Union based its action on the assertion that the resignations of these thirty-three employees were invalid because they did not comply with the Union's constitutional provisions as to