was informed the object and detailed procedure of the measurement, and after the informed consent of the subject was obtained, the lip of subject was measured with this FTIR-ATR system. The FTIR-ATR system was set on a desk and the subject was demanded to sit down on the chair in front of the CISME ATR probe. The lip (lower vermilion portion) of the subject after washing with facial soap and tap water more than six times and wiping the lip surface with paper towel was attached firmly on the diamond ATR probe and the measurement of FTIR was carried out for nearly 40 seconds with 8 cm^-1^resolution and 64 spectral accumulations. With this procedure dietary materials on the lips during feeding were almost washed off. Basically the dietstrial court abused its discretion in ordering her to pay sanctions. After reviewing the record, we conclude there is evidence to support the trial court's decision.
The order at issue addresses Davis's representation of the defendants in the cause below. Appellee Ann Caldwell Rupe sued the defendants, claiming she was oppressed as a minority shareholder of a closely held, family-owned investment corporation. Rupe asserted claims for accounting and valuation, breach of fiduciary duty, and shareholder oppression.
During the course of the proceedings, Rupe filed three motions for sanctions against Davis based on her actions as the defendants' attorney. The third motion, filed after the final judgment was signed, alleged that Davis made various misrepresentations demonstrating a lack of candor with the court. In the order granting the motion, the trial