They interviewed on camera. If a claim was made by people they interviewed, then footage should exist of someone making that claim. Amy Goodman was happy to roll video today -- or re-roll it. But where on the video was the claim Rowley tosses off as an aside to Goodman today?

It's a sensational claim. Why didn't he make it in 2007?

Why wasn't it on the video we were shown?

If it's true, he has footage of it and, presumably, Amy Goodman will want to show that footage tomorrow. (And possibly explain why she didn't include it during Democracy Now!'s 2007 report? ADDED:She didn't show it in 2007. She wasn't interested in the story in 2007. She 'debuted' the footage today but she turned it down in 2007 when itdropping these little 'morsels' to enrage people and never backing them up. There's more than enough known to be enraged about without resorting to gossip.

BBC News quotesReuters' David Schlesinger stating, "I would welcome a thorough new investigation. Reuters from the start has called for transparency and an objective inquiry so that all can learn lessons from this tragedy." Last night, Adam Entous (Reuters) reported that CentCom was stating there were no "plans to reopen an investigation into" the assault. Michael Sheridan (New York Daily News) quotes CentCom spokersperson Jack Hanzlik stating on television yesterday, "The video only tells you a portion of the activity that was happening that day." Deutsche Welle offers a roundup of some press reactions:

The Berliner Zeitung says it is hard to support the US