to any one else. He is contending only that Lillian had an intention to create a trust and that her efforts failed.
 Lillian had heard the words "trust" and "executors" used and evidently thought that if she left everything to the brothers and sisters the estate would be called a trust and the beneficiaries executors. While she wanted Sophie to have her share she did not wish her to have a part in the management. Since no one except the brothers and sisters would share in the estate, "Broude Trust Fund" could have meant to Lillian the group consisting of the brothers and sisters and no one else.
 [3] Over objection of appellant the court received evidence *617 that the testatrix had referred to her brothers and sistersas the "Broude Trust."
 Albert Broude, a brother of Lillian's, testified to conversations with her, namely: "She merely said that she had taken care of her brothers and sisters in the Broude Trust Fund and they were all to share equally," and that he had heard Lillian refer to all her brothers and sisters as the "Broude Trust" on several occasions--five or six times, but never before Fred Glow's death, and that sometimes "brothers and sisters" were used instead of the terms "Broude Trust" or "Broude Trust Fund."
 It is contended by appellant that it was error to receive the extrinsic evidence and to consider it in interpreting the will. There was no error.
 The rule of interpretation which the court held applicable is stated in section 105