default. If, as she claims, an agent forgave her debt, he was acting outside his authority and she knew it, for the agreement made her liable on default. Neither can she maintain that such an unauthorized act by GMAC's employee was ratified by GMAC, for she was notified formally by GMAC, on the same day she returned the car, that she was liable on the contract. If she contends the employee had apparent authority to release her obligation, she is wrong. "Apparent authority" is not predicated on whatever a third party chooses to think an agent has the right to do, or even upon what the agent says he can do, but must be based on acts of the principal which have led the third party to believeSportsCharles Barkley has all the jokes about the hapless Knicks

19:05 07 december 2018

19:05 07 december 2018 Source:
ftw.usatoday.com

The Match: What went right and wrong from Tiger vs. Phil

(Video by Goflweek)'The Match: Tiger vs. Phil' was the first of its kind in golf and like most pilot projects, there's plenty of room for improvement. Overall, it was an entertaining broadcast that provided customers with what they wanted - to watch Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson go head-to-head for the first time ever. Here's what they got right and what they got wrong. Right Side challenges Perhaps the most entertaining content of the entire match was listening to Tiger and Phil go back and forth, either deciding what's at stake for a certain shot or trying to negotiate better odds. Like