      A few weeks later, the agency resumed custody and filed a supplemental petition.
(§ 387.) Mother had been in a physical fight with her live-in boyfriend in which she
sustained a neck laceration requiring stitches. The children were present during the fight.
The petition alleged that mother has a history of being in relationships characterized by
domestic violence, putting the children at substantial risk of harm. The court sustained
the allegations following a contested hearing in July 2012. The court placed the children
with a relative and ordered reunification services addressed to domestic violence,
substance abuse and mental health issues.
       A six-month review hearing was held in January 2013. The agency reported that
mother was attending domestic violence classes and visited the children butof them. Since the initial removal of the children


                                              2
from her care and home on May 15, 2010, the mother’s behaviors and attitudes have not
waivered or changed. She blamed the Agency for removing the children then, and she
still blames the Agency [for] keeping the children from her. The mother was not
forthcoming with the Agency then, and she is still not forthcoming with the Agency
today. The mother was not cooperating and availing herself to work with the Agency
then, and she is still not availing