the removal process and that would result in not being able to ever have a normal erection...or he was not paying attention or his command of the English language was such that he missed some of what he was told. In any case, he became very angry at the doctor and blamed him for his condition so he took a gun to the doctor's office and made sure that the doctor would suffer as he was and not be able to ever have an erection. Perhaps this case is similar to the one in Chula Vista.1996, the criminal charges against Johnson arising out of the foregoing incident were discharged.
On October 10, 1996, the Board held a panel hearing, following which, the Board found that Johnson's conduct during the foregoing incident constituted "assaultive behavior" in violation of parole condition 5C found at 37 Pa.Code § 63.4(5)(iii).[1] Accordingly, the Board recommitted Johnson as a technical parole violator to serve twelve months backtime. On November 27, 1996, Johnson filed a petition for administrative relief with the Board, which was denied by order dated April 17, 1997. It is from this order that Johnson now appeals.
Johnson argues that the Board's finding that he engaged in assaultive behavior was not supported by substantial evidence of record. Specifically, he asserts that the record fails to show that he made