October 3, 1960, the interlocutory decree was filed nunc pro tunc as of August 26, 1960. In December 1960 plaintiff and Fuhrmeister set up regular housekeeping as husband and wife. As far as the children then knew, this was a legitimate marriage relationship. On May 7, 1961, plaintiff gave birth to a child by Fuhrmeister. Presumptively, this placed the normal conception time in July 1960, there being no suggestion of premature birth.
 On August 18, 1961, defendant caused an order to show cause to be served on plaintiff asking for change of custody of the children from plaintiff to defendant. The hearing was set for August 28, 1961. On that day plaintiff caused the final decree of divorce to be entered. The hearing was continued. On September 2,In 2016, Hillary Clinton had won
the statewide popular
vote in Washington state
and so the slate of presidential electors
that had been nominated
by the Washington State Democratic Party
were appointed as electors.
State law specified
that they were required
to cast their votes in accordance with
the outcome of the popular
vote in that state,
but three of them didn't, and so
under state law, they
were each fined $1,000
and they appealed those fines up through
the state courts in Washington
and ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court.
There were really two related questions
the Court was dealing with.
First, can states require their electors
to cast their electoral
votes for the candidate
that won the statewide
popular vote within the state?
And then, a second, related question was
are there limits on the
enforcement mechanisms
that states can adopt for these types of
elector-binding laws?
The electors argued primarily
that the original intent
underlying the creation
of