co-worker, Ms. Orso, indicates that the primary reason for plaintiff's poor performance rating was his frequent absences from his job area during working hours, and the resulting shift of the burden of plaintiff's work during his absences to Ms. Orso. The absences ranged from a few minutes to three or four hours and occurred approximately three times a week.
19. Plaintiff's absences from the work area tended to occur during the latter half of his shift, rather than the first half, so that his absences were not attributable to the counseling sessions he had with first shift personnel.
20. The majority of plaintiff's absences from the job area were not attributable to periods of computer breakdowns, since such breakdowns were relatively infrequent.
21. A group award for outstanding teamwork on adelinquency of a minor and investigation of suspicion of statutory rape which occurred on July 5, 1959. Plaintiff explained that he failed to list the arrest through an oversight. Plaintiff's supervisor, Mr. Luke Abkemeier, was advised of these facts. Mr. Abkemeier stated that plaintiff was doing an excellent job, and that absenteeism was no problem. Plaintiff was cautioned that he could have been terminated because of his omission.
24. Plaintiff was never harassed or reprimanded by defendant for any relationships which he might have had with white women.
25. On Friday, April 30, 1971, plaintiff and Virginia Stafford, a clerk in Department 676, had a conversation at about 4:00 p. m., near the end of the first shift.
26. On Monday, May 3, 1971, Ms. Stafford reported the substance of Friday's