12, 2006,
but that Hart had appeared at 4:55 p.m. and that she rescheduled the
appointment.  Ward also testified that Hart had failed to report as directed on
February 2, 2006, at 3:00 p.m. and that later he was given an appointment for
February 24.  Hart does not dispute the violations but argues that these were
not violations because he made up the appointments.  The missed appointments
were violations.  Their significance in this case was that they were
indications that Hart did not want to cooperate with the new sex therapy
treatment program.  Ward started Hart back into intensive sex offender
counseling on September 7, 2005, after he had failed his polygraph exam and
made admissions after the exam. 




The
State also alleged that Hart failed to abide by all rules and regulations of
the sex offender treatment program, failedto be responsible for costs of the
program, and was discharged from the program on December 14, 2006, as being
unsuccessful.  Brack Dempsey, Hart=s
community supervision officer in Eastland and the custodian of records for sex
offender cases, introduced Hart=s
records.  Dempsey stated that he had received a letter from the Henderson
County sex therapist advising him that Hart had been discharged from the sex
offender treatment program for failing polygraphs, being dishonest about
grooming behaviors, grooming a particular fifteen-year-old girl in his church,
having fantasies about another woman and the fifteen-year-old girl while having
sex with his wife, and being dishonest with his counselor.  Because of the
violations and lack of progress by Hart reflected in the records, Dempsey
expressed his opinion that Hart was a significant risk to society and that he
would be very concerned if Hart Awere
returned