draw the line between restrictions for the sake of safety and insanity. It is just lack of restraint. Those powers to direct passengers are given to crew for the purpose of safety, not for the purpose of making passengers wet themselves."

Ruby turns three shortly and while her recent potty training was a success, a long flight from Halifax to Calgary last month left her sitting in her own pee for hours when a flight attendant blocked her from using the business class potty, her grandmother says. (Terri Trembath/CBC)

Meanwhile, Osmond says her issue is with that one employee.

"I don't blame an entire airline for one flight attendant," she said. "This was the first time I experienced such hostility."Oral Argument Set in Reform Party Battle over National Party Officers

A U.S. District Court in Long Island, New York, will hear oral arguments in MacKay v Crews, 2:09-cv-02218, on December 4, 2009, Friday, at 11 a.m. The Judge is Joseph F. Bianco, and the courthouse is in Central Islip, New York. This case had originally been filed in state court in New York, but was transferred to federal court earlier this year.

The case originated after a state court in Texas had taken jurisdiction of the national Reform Party’s matters and called a special national convention to settle who the proper officers were. That convention was supervised by a court-appointed special master. It resulted in the election of David Collison as the new national chair. Afterwards, people in the