home. He
further admitted that he needed a big vehicle because of
his large family, that the Winnebago fulfilled that pur-
pose, and that he was not going to drive to an abortion
clinic with his wife in the Winnebago. Regarding his pos-
session of the firearms, he also admitted that God did
not specifically tell him that he needed to steal a Beretta
.22 caliber pistol during a burglary.
  Waagner also admitted that he had committed the crimes
of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon and posses-
sion of stolen goods in 1993, at least a half dozen years
before his alleged delusions struck home. Therefore, a jury
could reasonably conclude that Waagner, who admitted
committing these very crimes without God’s urging, pos-
sessed the firearms and the stolen Winnebago as a result
of either a desire toremain a fugitive, or as a result of
his antisocial personality disorder, or both, and not be-
cause he was in the grip of some bizarre delusions.
  Finally, it seems to us that the evidence was overwhelm-
ing that Waagner appreciated the wrongfulness of his
conduct. First, he gave the arresting Illinois state trooper
false identification, and he lied about how he happened
to be driving the Winnebago. Later, after confessing, he
even asked the trooper if he could work out a deal. He
was also selective in what he would discuss, declining
to talk about his involvement in a Kentucky armed rob-
bery. This all points to a man who knew he was in a jam
and wanted to avoid, or minimize if possible, his criminal
liability. This is not the stuff of a man whose actions are
uncontrollable