The therapists 'felt that [plaintiff] could function in an office setting which didn't include typing.  She appeared to be of at least average intelligence and could carry out tasks in a responsible manner.'


8
Physical therapy notes from Fairview General Hospital, dated April 8, 1981, indicate that plaintiff had shown much progress in her ability to control isolated extremity movements and that her ambulation showed 'less of a wobbling gait and more control with heel toe steppage.'


9
On June 30, 1981, plaintiff was seen by Dr. Todd.  Dr. Todd characterized her neurological examination as being unchanged, showing good strength in the right extremities except the hand was rated as fair, as was plaintiff's right ankle dorsiflexors.  Plaintiff's gait was rated as normal, although a decrease in her rightas well as discoordination, he continued to feel that plaintiff is totally disabled.


12
In early October, 1982, plaintiff was interviewed and evaluated by the Ohio Rehabilitation Commission to determine what, if any, job opportunities were available to a person suffering from her impairments.  The counselor noted that plaintiff's right side was 'quite drastically affected' by the stroke and that the counselor was unable to place her in a job that she could perform.  The counselor stated that most clerical jobs called for typing work which plaintiff could not perform because of the stroke damage.


13
At the hearing before the ALJ, plaintiff testified that she 'believed' she could lift 20 pounds.  Plaintiff testified that she vacuums, dusts, cooks, shops, and exercises.  However, she also testified that she