this problem?

In
October 2001, approximately one month after the September 11 attack, an agent
from a (city name omitted) field office, re-sent a certain document to the
FBI Washington Field Office, so that it could be re-translated. This Special
Agent, in light of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, rightfully believed that,
considering his target of investigation (the suspect under surveillance), and
the issues involved, the original translation might have missed certain
information that could prove to be valuable in the investigation of terrorist
activities. After this document was received by the FBI Washington Field
Office and retranslated verbatim, the field agent's hunch appeared to be
correct. The new translation revealed certain information regarding
blueprints, pictures, and building material for skyscrapers being sent
overseas.

It
also revealed certain illegal activities in obtaining visas from certain
embassies in the Middle East, through network contacts and bribery.your
investigators on February 11, 2004). This information was also provided
to the Department of Justice Inspector General (Please refer to DOJ-IG
report Re: Sibel Edmonds and FBI Translation, provided to you prior to the
completion of your report).

Only
one month after the catastrophic events of September 11; while many agents
were working around the clock to obtain leads and information, and to
investigate those responsible for the attacks, those with possible
connections to the attack, and those who might be planning possible future
attacks; the bureaucratic administrators in the FBI's largest and most
important translation unit were covering up their past failures, blocking
important leads and information, and jeopardizing on going terrorist
investigations.

The
supervisor involved in this incident, Mike Feghali, was in charge of certain
important Middle Eastern languages within the FBI Washington Field Office,
and had a record of previous misconducts.