He was reclassified 1-A.  An appeal was taken and the appeal board reclassified him 1-A.


12
An induction order for defendant, issued October 1, 1969, was postponed because of defendant's enrollment in Northwestern University School of Business.  A rescheduled induction order was issued June 29, 1970.  Thereafter, defendant requested from his board another conscientious objector form.  That form was mailed to him, but never returned by him to the board.  He reported for induction on August 13, 1970, but refused to submit to induction.


13
It is patent upon this record that defendant failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by either requesting an interview with his board or an appeal to the appeal board upon denial of his C-O claim in 1966.


14
The guidelines for applying the exhaustionthat stick out of the liquid-vapor vertical coexistence line reflects the fact that the hole has not yet reached its canonically stable shape and is deformed.

The same type of behavior occurs for the second jump in the desorption isotherm, from a rail of liquid in a vapor environment to the lower (vapor-like) GC branch. As discussed in a previous paper,[@puibasset09] this second jump should disappear in the thermodynamic limit as the system would then follow the liquid-vapor coexistence line down to the GC branch. For the canonical adsorption isotherms (not shown), the phenomena are reversed: for large systems, the first jump links the end of the lower GC branch to the liquid-vapor coexistence line and the second jump gets closer and closer to the upper (liquid-like) GC branch