against his brother Leonard. Baker, 443 U.S. at 141, 99 S.Ct. at 2693, 61 L.Ed.2d 433. The arrest warrant named Linnie rather than Leonard because when Leonard had originally been detained, he provided a duplicate of Linnie's drivers license to the officers and masqueraded as Linnie. Id. at 140-41, 443 U.S. 137, 99 S.Ct. at 2693, 61 L.Ed.2d 433. Despite repeatedly claiming they had arrested the wrong man, Linnie spent four days in the custody of the Dallas Police Department before the Potter County Sheriffs Department took custody of him. Id. Linnie spent another three days in jail before the officers recognized the error and released him. Id. In rejecting Linnie's § 1983 claim against the Potter County Sheriff, the Supreme Court determined that he had suffered noidentity, he was detained in the Potter County jail from December 30, when Potter County deputies retrieved him from Dallas, until January 2, when the validity of his protests was ascertained. Whatever claims this situation might give rise to under state tort law, we think it gives rise to no claim under the United States Constitution. Respondent was indeed deprived of his liberty for a period of days, but it was pursuant to a warrant conforming, for purposes of our decision, to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. Obviously, one in respondent's position could not be detained *1113 indefinitely in the face of repeated protests of innocence even though the warrant under which he was arrested and detained met the standards of the Fourth Amendment. . . .