notice containing advice of his right to appeal and the time and manner for appealing that classification.


8
About two weeks thereafter, defendant filed a current information questionnaire, reporting a change of employment.  He did not request an appeal of his classification.  Months later he did request an appeal, upon the sole ground that he had been working in Indianapolis and only returned on weekends to the Cincinnati mailing address which he had supplied to the board.  The board refused to extend the time limit for appeal.


9
On June 26, 1966, following a pre-induction Army physical examination and his being notified that he was qualified for military service, defendant filed another current information questionnaire in which he reported that he was a student at Ohio State University, buthe claimed no disqualifying conditions.  Defendant was classified 1-A.  He sought and obtained a personal appearance before the local board, followed by an appeal to the appeal board.  That appearance and appeal were limited to his claim for a student deferment, a classification which was granted to him in late May, 1968.


10
In the meantime, defendant had written to the board on May 2, 1968, stating that he would like to appeal his then 1-A classification on the ground that "I am a conscientious objector as described" in the form "filled out in late 1965 or early 1966."  Later the same date defendant wrote to the board regarding his C-O claim, stating that he would "defer that appeal" because he was "primarily interested in regaining