trusted paternal relationship
     and exceeded access to the child within the home.

     The nature of the sexual contact with the victim included
     fondling, oral sex, digitally penetrating her vagina.

     He was the father of the victim and lived with the family at the
     time of these incidents. The incidents occurred over a period of
     seven months. It was not one incident, it was not an isolated
     incident, it was a period of seven months.

     The victim in this case is prepubescent. This age is relevant
     because, again, [Appellant] is classified with aof violence
     in the typical sense of removing the child from the home,
     kidnapping her, et cetera, were the examples, but he, in fact, did
     groom her, keep her separate from other members of the family.

     Again, there was no indication by either Mr. Reilly or by Ms.
     Wagner that the mental capacity of the victim was anything
     other than a child.

     The offender has no prior criminal record in the area of sexual
     offenses. He does have two prior charges for criminal mischief
     and violation of the Controlled Substances Act. He