Ohr, FISA, Dirty Dossier etc.), their credibility will be forever gone!" U.S. intelligence agencies have pointed to Russia as the nation who orchestrated the hacking of emails of top officials at the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 election. The FBI rebuked Trump's comments in a statement Wednesday afternoon to NBC News, saying the bureau "has not found any evidence the servers were compromised."

There's also this headline from Reuters: "Trump, without evidence, blames China for hacking Clinton emails."

Now, let's look at how the media handled the report that Russia hacked the DNC computers. They didn't seem curious at all that the only source that says Russia hacked the computers was a private company hired by the DNC. I didn't see any stories headlined " DNC, without allowing governmentaccess to computers, claims, without any evidence other than firm hired by them, that Russia hacked computers."

There seemed to be little curiosity by journalists as they protected Hillary and targeted Trump.

Why would the media just take the word of CrowdStrike and the DNC without any independent investigations and then spew forth that the report was factual?

In June 2016, The Washington Post reported that the Democratic National Committee's computer network had been hacked, allowing access to email and chat transcripts, as well as files detailing research on GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump. This was reported about a month before the hacked files were released, shortly before the Democratic convention began. As The Post reported at the time, the likely culprits had already been identified as Russian – not by