with Islam in particular.

In the US and Europe, politicians proselytize about Islam as a mortal threat to Western civilization, with a high degree of success. Victory trump, the rule of marine Le Pen in France, and right roll in the Netherlands, despite the defeat in the elections – Geert Wilders, to provide sufficient evidence that such populism pays political dividends. And yet, while European courts regulate the veil from year to year, American courts have by and large renounced anti-Muslim bait.

In the case at our clinic and partner organizations, Darwish in the cards, a Federal court in Brooklyn first prescribed the ban of the Muslim trump within 24 hours of going into effect, and many Federal courts subsequently came to the same conclusion.

In decisions this week to obligeupheld the dismissal of the Belgian administrator of a multinational campaign security g4s because she wore a headscarf.

Such an outcome is inconceivable in an American court.

The Belgian subsidiary of g4s – but not a global company has adopted a policy that prohibits employees from wearing visible signs of religious belief or participation in religious ceremonies of any kind.

While the policy has been written in General terms, it was no coincidence that the case involved Muslim women; this is one of countless such cases in Europe in recent years, from the prohibition to wear the veil in public places in France to ban the wearing of headscarves in school teachers in Switzerland.

While U.S. courts have seen through the government’s statement on non-discrimination, the European court turned a blind eye