asserts it was its impression that an order had to be obtained from the issuing judge to release copies of the application and order. The prosecutor's argument before the motion judge seems to support this assertion, and clearly indicates that he would have consented to an order for presentation to the issuing judge for release of the copies. And the motion judge apparently did not realize that he had authority to grant such an order himself.
To add to the confusion, we observe that number 13 of the demand for particulars relates to the application and the order to wiretap. Yet in the course of advising the motion judge of his consent to comply with a number of the demands, the prosecutor said:
Twelve and thirteen pertain to the wiretapThis week marks an important moment of remembrance and reminder, of bearing witness and of taking action.

Friday is the 75th anniversary of the disappearance of Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg, presaging the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the most brutal extermination camp of the 20th century.

Hijacking the Holocaust for Putin, politics and power Credit: Haaretz Weekly Ep. 57

75 years later, the international drumbeat of evil and indifference can still feel overwhelming, with the international community too often a bystander to atrocity and injustice. How appropriate, then, that January 17, the day of Wallenberg’s disappearance in the Soviet gulag in 1945, has been designated Raoul Wallenberg Commemorative Day internationally in honor of this disappeared hero, who is also an honorary citizen of Israel, Canada, Australia and the United