The Greek text of this codex is a representative of the Byzantine text-type, but with a number of singular readings.
According to Bruce M. Metzger it is typical Byzantine text.
According to Kurt and Barbara Aland it agrees with the Byzantine standard text 156 times, and 78 times with the Byzantine when it has the same reading as the original text.
It does not support the "original" text against the Byzantine.
It has 11 independent or distinctive readings.
Alands placed it in Category V of New Testament manuscripts.
It is not a very important codex, but it is an important witness of the Byzantine text-type.
Hermann von Soden classified it as Kⁱ (now it is known as textual family E).
According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed Byzantine text in Luke 1; in Luke 10 and Luke the manuscript is defective.
The Greek text of this codex is a representative of the Byzantine text-type, but with a number of singular readings. According to Bruce M. Metzger it is typical Byzantine text. According to Kurt and Barbara Aland it agrees with the Byzantine standard text 156 times, and 78 times with the Byzantine when it has the same reading as the original text. It does not support the "original" text against the Byzantine. It has 11 independent or distinctive readings. Alands placed it in Category V of New Testament manuscripts. It is not a very important codex, but it is an important witness of the Byzantine text-type. Hermann von Soden classified it as Kⁱ (now it is known as textual family E). According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed Byzantine text in Luke 1; in Luke 10 and Luke the manuscript is defective.
Codex Boreelianus