can you carry a concealed weapon in dc
Gun laws in the District of Columbia
On July 24 , 2014 , D.C. 's ban on open and concealed carry was struck down as unconstitutional in Palmer v. District of Columbia . Initially Judge Frederick Scullin , Jr. did not issue a stay of his ruling . For a brief period of time , Judge Scullin 's ruling effectively legalized permitless open and concealed carry with a valid firearm registration card , and non-residents without felony convictions could carry openly or concealed in the District . But on July 29 , 2014 Scullin issued an order that retroactively stayed the ruling until October 22 , 2014 . In response to the ruling , a Restrictive May - Issue concealed carry licensing law was enacted in September 2014 . Under the new law , an applicant must show `` good reason , '' to qualify for a concealed carry permit . However , on May 18 , 2015 , the `` good reason '' requirement was ruled as likely unconstitutional and a preliminary injunction was issued against D.C. from enforcing that requirement in Wrenn v. District of Columbia . This effectively required the District to grant licenses on a Shall - Issue basis to qualified applicants who have passed a criminal background check and completed the required firearms safety training . Judge Scullin did not issue a stay of his ruling , but the Appeals Court did so on June 12 , 2015 , effectively leaving the restrictive `` good reason '' requirement in place while litigation continues . It was later ruled that Judge Scullin , a visiting judge from New York , was outside his jurisdiction because he was only appointed to decide the Palmer case , not the follow - up Wrenn case . The Wrenn case was subsequently reassigned to a new judge who denied the request for a preliminary injunction . 
On July 24 , 2014 , D.C. 's ban on open and concealed carry was struck down as unconstitutional in Palmer v. District of Columbia . Initially Judge Frederick Scullin , Jr. did not issue a stay of his ruling . For a brief period of time , Judge Scullin 's ruling effectively legalized permitless open and concealed carry with a valid firearm registration card , and non-residents without felony convictions could carry openly or concealed in the District . But on July 29 , 2014 Scullin issued an order that retroactively stayed the ruling until October 22 , 2014 . In response to the ruling , a Restrictive May - Issue concealed carry licensing law was enacted in September 2014 . Under the new law , an applicant must show `` good reason , '' to qualify for a concealed carry permit . However , on May 18 , 2015 , the `` good reason '' requirement was ruled as likely unconstitutional and a preliminary injunction was issued against D.C. from enforcing that requirement in Wrenn v. District of Columbia . This effectively required the District to grant licenses on a Shall - Issue basis to qualified applicants who have passed a criminal background check and completed the required firearms safety training . Judge Scullin did not issue a stay of his ruling , but the Appeals Court did so on June 12 , 2015 , effectively leaving the restrictive `` good reason '' requirement in place while litigation continues . It was later ruled that Judge Scullin , a visiting judge from New York , was outside his jurisdiction because he was only appointed to decide the Palmer case , not the follow - up Wrenn case . The Wrenn case was subsequently reassigned to a new judge who denied the request for a preliminary injunction .
A restrictive May - Issue concealed carry licensing law was enacted in September 2014. Under the new ordinance, an applicant must show ``good reason'' to qualify for a concealed carry permit . This effectively required the District to grant licenses on a Shall-issue basis to qualified applicants who have passed a criminal background check and completed the required firearms safety training.
In response to the ruling , a Restrictive May - Issue concealed carry licensing law was enacted in September 2014 . Under the new law , an applicant must show `` good reason , '' to qualify for a concealed carry permit . This effectively required the District to grant licenses on a Shall - Issue basis to qualified applicants who have passed a criminal background check and completed the required firearms safety training .
A restrictive May - Issue concealed carry licensing law was enacted in September 2014. Under the new law, an applicant must show ``good reason'' to qualify for a concealed carry permit . This effectively required the District to grant licenses on a Shall-issue basis to qualified applicants who have passed a criminal background check and completed the required firearms safety training.
In response to the ruling , a Restrictive May - Issue concealed carry licensing law was enacted in September 2014 . Under the new law , an applicant must show `` good reason , '' to qualify for a concealed carry permit . This effectively required the District to grant licenses on a Shall - Issue basis to qualified applicants who have passed a criminal background check and completed the required firearms safety training .