I recently bought this phone at a local AT&T; Wireless store. Initially, I loved it. It had amazing features for a phone (see other reviews for feature rundown). However, after about 5 days, I went back and exchenged it for the Panasonic GU87. Why? It was much too big for me. I gave up all of its features and actually spent $$ more for the GU87.Here is a selective comparison for anyone interested in these two phones, and not sure which way to go. Note, I think the Panasonic GU87 is only available through AT&T; Wirelss.Nokia: Remote control sizedPanasonic: Just as thick, but shorter, and sleeker clamshell designNokia: Great Screen, crisp images. Icons are not anti-aliased, but still clear.Panasonic: Even better screen (more colors. But the font is not anti-aliased. This may be asking too much, but the menu page has pretty, anti-aliased icons.)Nokia: Great camera. Nice 640x480 resolution. Images are a little soft and painterly, but they can be improved greatly in Photoshop by just applying auto levels, contrast, and color. Good night time images when light is adequate.Panasonic: Very small, thumbnail sized images (something like 172x136 resolution). Color is good, and blowing up the image 150% is okay, but the lack of pixels is a downer. Night time images are horrible - picture a film from the 1920's with verical striations and artifacts.Nokia: Great operating system. Highly customizable window-like interface with easy controls. Applications stay open on a list, so you can jump between things easily and never lose your place.Panasonic: Confining OS. Not as customizable. For example, and this may be minor but it is annoying, on the Nokia, you can turn off the sound effect that plays when you snap a picture. On the Panasonic, you cannot turn of the shutter sound effect. Even on total silent mode, that annoying sound blares out. Jumping between apps is also not possible. You must exit and navigate to get from place to place.Nokia: Highly customizable profiles.Panasonic: Take your pick - normal or silent. Vibration alert is even annoyingly iconified on the screen, as if it were not standard to have the vibrate on.Nokia: Great battery life.Panasonic: Mediocre battery life.Nokia: One alarm that snoozes.Panasonic: Four alarms, but no snooze.Nokia: Snake! (multilevel and environments)Panasonic: Tetris (it doesn't even speed up over time)Nokia: Tons of memory,which is even upgradable if you get a high capacity chip.Panasonic: Limited phone memory.Nokia: Great phonebookPanasonic: Okay phonebookAm I disappointed I exchanged the Nokia for the panasonic? No. My main selling points are size, and glitter. The panasonic is sleek and has enough glitter for a disco (try customizable blue, green, or orange glows on the front display!). If your main selling points are like mine, go for the Panasonic. If you don't mind bulk, but want top notch features, go for the Nokia. But wait, I'm talking about phones and didn't even compare the phone aspects. They are pretty much the same - great reception, great sound and volume, and speakerphones on both. Panasonic can even record a conversation for about 15 seconds (I can't remember seeing this feature on the Nokia) - not that I use this feature ;). The phone aspects are similar. Nokia has the brains; Panasonic has the looks.