4 Hunts Pond Lane One-family Colonial, built in 1998, 2,592 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 49,204-square-foot lot. $509,000

499 Randolph St. One-family Contemporary, built in 1983, 2,460 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 83,181-square-foot lot. $439,900

10 Shortleaf Circle . $320,000

410 Lincoln St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1950, 1,152 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 35,700-square-foot lot. $200,000

46 Oliver St. One-family Split Level, built in 1956, 988 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 15,000-square-foot lot. $210,457

45 Noyes St. One-family Ranch, built in 1955, 1,012 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 7,613-square-foot lot. $207,200

51 Faxon St. One-family Old Style, built in 1925, 2,614 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 15,447-square-foot lot. $670,000

30 Liberty Park Ave. One-family Split Entry, built in 1965, 2,515 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 15,696-square-foot lot. $595,000

223 Alida Rd. One-family Split Level, built in 1971, 2,544 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 22,368-square-foot lot. $500,000

42 Parkside Ave. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1943, 2,053 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 6,348-square-foot lot. $499,000

23 Whittier Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1937, 1,410 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 5,895-square-foot lot. $475,000

29 Armstrong Circle One-family Ranch, built in 1954, 1,600 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,500-square-foot lot. $372,000

614 Pond St. #1311 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2006, 1,092 square feet, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths. $280,000

22 Arborway Drive . $200,000

100 Pine Ridge Drive One-family Split Level, built in 1978, 860 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 28,706-square-foot lot. $350,600

1474 Old Pleasant St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1985, 1,338 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 79,671-square-foot lot. $299,900

1050 Elm St. . $265,000

1 Boundary Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 2008, 2,656 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 15,856-square-foot lot. $415,000

30 Addison Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 2006, 2,109 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 6,970-square-foot lot. $338,900

56 Oneida Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1952, 1,684 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 14,331-square-foot lot. $310,000

26 Woodside Ave. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1925, 1,916 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 13,460-square-foot lot. $307,000

47 Allen St. Three-family Mlti-Unt Blg, built in 1900, 2,766 square feet, 12 rooms, 6 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 3,528-square-foot lot. $294,531

230 West St. One-family Ranch, built in 1956, 1,433 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 9,801-square-foot lot. $285,000

73 Jacob St. One-family Split Level, built in 1963, 1,532 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 11,892-square-foot lot. $272,000

905 Crescent St. One-family Colonial, built in 2006, 1,920 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 6,839-square-foot lot. $270,000

13 Peckham Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1925, 1,232 square feet, 8 rooms, 6 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 6,229-square-foot lot. $269,000

85 Pondview Circle One-family Ranch, built in 1956, 960 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 12,284-square-foot lot. $266,000

73 Belcher Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1947, 2,004 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,187-square-foot lot. $264,900

11 Davis Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1920, 1,828 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,797-square-foot lot. $260,000

159 Ellsworth St. One-family Colonial, built in 1890, 1,487 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 5,009-square-foot lot. $252,000

20 Kensington Place Two-family Two Family, built in 1879, 1,871 square feet, 10 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 4,051-square-foot lot. $245,000

166 Lynn Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1960, 1,312 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 15,420-square-foot lot. $243,800

109 W Ashland St. Two-family Two Family, built in 1898, 1,644 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,492-square-foot lot. $235,000

65 Connell Ave. One-family Ranch, built in 1957, 1,172 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,890-square-foot lot. $225,000

48 Norman Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1960, 1,312 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 13,678-square-foot lot. $218,000

1055 Ash St. One-family Ranch, built in 1984, 1,581 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 33,280-square-foot lot. $213,000

65 Eaton St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1997, 2,030 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 12,066-square-foot lot. $203,000

24 Curve St. One-family Ranch, built in 1963, 936 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,712-square-foot lot. $200,000

23 Upland Rd. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1940, 1,320 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,930-square-foot lot. $190,000

99 Leach Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1920, 1,136 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 5,968-square-foot lot. $165,000

42 Tyler St. Two-family Two Family, built in 1910, 1,923 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 8,451-square-foot lot. $163,000

12 Annis Court One-family Colonial, built in 1925, 1,377 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,278-square-foot lot. $140,000

50 Coral St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1948, 924 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 6,098-square-foot lot. $110,000

110 Foster St. One-family Colonial, built in 1895, 1,404 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 5,968-square-foot lot. $100,000

11 Country Club Rd. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1964, 2,400 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 15,072-square-foot lot. $559,900

555 York St. One-family Colonial, built in 1991, 1,700 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 6,316-square-foot lot. $495,000

3 Spotted Turtle Path #3 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2015, 1,288 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $390,000

756 Washington St. #C Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2005, 1,443 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths. $359,000

19 Autumn Circle One-family Ranch, built in 1950, 888 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 15,115-square-foot lot. $340,000

22 Forge Pond #F Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2002, 1,325 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths. $295,000

65 Getchell Way One-family Cape Cod, built in 1950, 1,463 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 17,685-square-foot lot. $280,000

51 Will Drive #130 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1971, 748 square feet, 5 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 1 baths. $150,000

46 Meadow St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 2005, 2,785 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 60,131-square-foot lot. $505,000

164 Center St. One-family Ranch, built in 1947, 2,630 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 132,858-square-foot lot. $442,500

4 Rainey Way One-family Colonial, built in 1997, 1,976 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 116,162-square-foot lot. $420,000

51 Wareham St. One-family Colonial, built in 2014, 1,672 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 60,001-square-foot lot. $345,000

23 Pope St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1976, 960 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 24,957-square-foot lot. $153,000

33 Sohier St. One-family Gambrel, built in 1920, 4,696 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 14,520-square-foot lot. $1,525,000

7 Border St. One-family Colonial, built in 1880, 3,768 square feet, 10 rooms, 7 bedrooms, 4.5 baths, on 17,083-square-foot lot. $1,500,000

18 Hugh Strain Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 2015, 4,280 square feet, on 31,086-square-foot lot. $1,245,000

16 Orchard Drive RES DEV LAND , on 17,281-square-foot lot. $1,133,188

30 Eldredge Lane #30 Condominium Townhouse, built in 2013, 2,889 square feet, 2.5 baths. $1,059,800

102 Pleasant St. One-family Colonial, built in 2010, 3,053 square feet, 2.5 baths, on 9,984-square-foot lot. $975,000

22 Pratt Court One-family , on 28,566-square-foot lot. $675,000

Forest Ave. RES UDV LAND , on 1,411,344-square-foot lot. $150,000

11 Drayton Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 2013, 2,672 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 12,583-square-foot lot. $835,000

91 Harvard St. One-family Colonial, built in 2011, 2,474 square feet, 9 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 10,447-square-foot lot. $687,000

32 Youngs Rd. Two-family Family Flat, built in 1915, 2,190 square feet, 11 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,159-square-foot lot. $520,150

12 Massachusetts Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1955, 1,872 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 4,757-square-foot lot. $495,000

125 Ledgewood Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1972, 1,887 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 8,763-square-foot lot. $475,000

60 Sanderson Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1927, 1,144 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 8,883-square-foot lot. $460,000

132 Whitehall St. One-family Colonial, built in 1987, 2,392 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 10,280-square-foot lot. $405,000

25 Breede Ter One-family Cape Cod, built in 1953, 1,008 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 4,687-square-foot lot. $389,900

299 Sprague St. One-family Split Level, built in 1952, 2,359 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 4 baths, on 18,000-square-foot lot. $350,000

32 Hounds Ditch Lane One-family Colonial, built in 1991, 3,775 square feet, 9 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 73,977-square-foot lot. $1,010,000

940 Tremont St. One-family Conventional, built in 1842, 1,038 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 41,742-square-foot lot. $780,000

93 Temple St. One-family Gambrel, built in 1968, 2,086 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 40,075-square-foot lot. $710,000

6 Indian Trl One-family Gambrel, built in 1950, 2,647 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 31,799-square-foot lot. $676,000

197 High St. One-family Antique, built in 1826, 2,620 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 40,000-square-foot lot. $629,000

70 Herring Weir Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1971, 2,028 square feet, 9 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 52,197-square-foot lot. $550,000

165 West St. OTHER EXEMPT , on 214,240-square-foot lot. $421,500

69 Trout Farm Lane One-family Contemporary, built in 1993, 1,792 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 12,498-square-foot lot. $410,000

440 Union St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1972, 768 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 27,312-square-foot lot. $366,000

5 Prospect St. One-family Ranch, built in 1972, 990 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,934-square-foot lot. $284,900

118 Summer St. One-family Colonial, built in 1996, 2,589 square feet, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 59,677-square-foot lot. $514,900

23 Douglas Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1977, 1,768 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 30,000-square-foot lot. $430,500

106 Prospect St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1972, 1,474 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 30,056-square-foot lot. $414,500

38 Peterson Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1959, 1,164 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 12,040-square-foot lot. $330,000

7 Miller Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1955, 1,236 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,450-square-foot lot. $307,000

34 Canton St. One-family Ranch, built in 1963, 1,389 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,200-square-foot lot. $300,000

33 Baldwin St. One-family Ranch, built in 1958, 1,242 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,905-square-foot lot. $280,000

617 Turnpike St. One-family Bngl/Cottage, built in 1920, 1,512 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 24,000-square-foot lot. $280,000

2 Judith Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1961, 1,235 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 13,350-square-foot lot. $245,000

15 Marshall Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1954, 826 square feet, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,600-square-foot lot. $230,000

502 Dongary Rd. #502 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1973, 1,543 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths. $200,000

5 Capone Rd. #5 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2011, 2,952 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 3.5 baths. $553,800

23 Dassance Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1993, 3,166 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 59,166-square-foot lot. $410,100

36 West St. One-family Conventional, built in 1940, 1,952 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 106,211-square-foot lot. $351,000

181 East St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1955, 1,344 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 12,000-square-foot lot. $160,000

19 Colonial Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1978, 2,020 square feet, 7 rooms, 1.5 baths, on 34,412-square-foot lot. $353,000

7 Cushman Ave. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1960, 2,336 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 56,628-square-foot lot. $287,000

18 Maries Way RES DEV LAND , on 155,074-square-foot lot. $155,000

7 Sherwood Drive RES DEV LAND , on 39,988-square-foot lot. $479,900

374 Plymouth St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1760, 1,950 square feet, 7 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 40,075-square-foot lot. $360,000

57 Cheryl Lane One-family Split Level, built in 1957, 1,344 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 30,056-square-foot lot. $467,000

92 Meadowbrook Rd. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1966, 1,158 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 39,204-square-foot lot. $450,000

30 Old Washington St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1949, 2,097 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 30,056-square-foot lot. $432,000

1105 Main St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1966, 2,069 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 79,279-square-foot lot. $404,000

311 Pleasant St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1972, 1,044 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 142,877-square-foot lot. $380,000

30 Jefferson Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1959, 1,225 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 20,037-square-foot lot. $350,000

183 Pennsylvania Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1997, 2,502 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 79,715-square-foot lot. $506,000

256 South St. One-family Antique, built in 1726, 3,514 square feet, 12 rooms, 7 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 66,572-square-foot lot. $1,170,000

40 Liberty Pole Rd. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1955, 2,292 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 14,049-square-foot lot. $742,000

50 Fottler Rd. Two-family Duplex, built in 1950, 1,634 square feet, 9 rooms, 5 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 12,500-square-foot lot. $499,000

339 High St. One-family Conventional, built in 1924, 1,515 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 15,677-square-foot lot. $481,000

23 Bulow Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1946, 1,468 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 13,257-square-foot lot. $438,600

186 Fort Hill St. One-family Bngl/Cottage, built in 1920, 1,203 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,720-square-foot lot. $334,000

35 Newton Ave. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1985, 1,008 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 10,400-square-foot lot. $336,000

103 Sycamore St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1952, 1,826 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,399-square-foot lot. $330,000

600 Plymouth St. One-family Colonial, built in 1930, 1,320 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 139,392-square-foot lot. $305,000

35 Loud Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1956, 1,650 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 8,677-square-foot lot. $216,500

55 Bradford St. One-family Ranch, built in 1955, 1,632 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 9,600-square-foot lot. $194,000

58 N Shore Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1981, 1,274 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 9,200-square-foot lot. $185,000

77 Salisbury St. One-family Colonial, built in 1910, 2,808 square feet, 9 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 19,000-square-foot lot. $835,000

22 Touraine Ave. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1949, 1,746 square feet, 7 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 5,490-square-foot lot. $350,000

45 Hull Shore Drive #105 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2000, 836 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths. $239,000

1173 Nantasket Ave. #1 Condominium Townhouse, built in 1981, 513 square feet, 3 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 1 baths. $105,000

11 Pine Cone Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1988, 2,636 square feet, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 41,222-square-foot lot. $620,000

48 Putters Place . $499,000

21 Brook St. One-family Ranch, built in 1966, 960 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 52,272-square-foot lot. $305,000

29 Smiths Lane One-family Conventional, built in 1925, 1,126 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 17,250-square-foot lot. $207,700

32 Cedar Lane One-family Camp/Cabin, built in 1940, 406 square feet, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,712-square-foot lot. $120,000

58 Sherwood Lane One-family Colonial, built in 2000, 2,520 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 73,920-square-foot lot. $415,000

5 Heritage Hill Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1974, 1,980 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 32,398-square-foot lot. $281,750

7 Bridge St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1910, 1,281 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 43,560-square-foot lot. $270,000

5 Shockley Drive One-family Ranch, built in 1959, 1,266 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 21,000-square-foot lot. $147,000

99 Precinct St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1960, 1,092 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 16,494-square-foot lot. $140,000

5 Hickory Ter One-family Contemporary, built in 1989, 3,065 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 30,358-square-foot lot. $660,000

1 Helena Circle One-family Colonial, built in 1986, 2,436 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 30,454-square-foot lot. $615,000

279 Branch St. . $530,000

4 Matthew Lane One-family Colonial, built in 1991, 2,760 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 30,197-square-foot lot. $520,000

7 Nelson Way One-family Colonial, built in 1989, 2,044 square feet, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 30,000-square-foot lot. $515,000

10 Weaver Lane One-family Colonial, built in 1991, 1,658 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 34,957-square-foot lot. $450,000

44-46 Crocker St. Two-family Duplex, built in 1930, 2,368 square feet, 12 rooms, 6 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 6,209-square-foot lot. $330,000

25 Main St. #1 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1815, 1,246 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths. $460,000

126 Dexter Rd. #75 Condominium . $105,000

121 Cedar Rd. RES DEV LAND , on 10,200-square-foot lot. $555,000

743 Ferry St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1973, 2,120 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 43,560-square-foot lot. $490,000

118 Edwards Rd. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1985, 1,507 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,500-square-foot lot. $380,500

46 Winthrop Drive One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1972, 1,999 square feet, 6 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 15,330-square-foot lot. $375,000

23 Gratto Rd. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1966, 2,044 square feet, 8 rooms, 5 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 20,000-square-foot lot. $359,900

56 Dundee Drive One-family Ranch, built in 1952, 984 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 5,000-square-foot lot. $318,000

215 Highland St. Two-family Conventional, built in 1938, 2,621 square feet, 12 rooms, 7 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 49,223-square-foot lot. $285,000

172 Elm St. One-family Ranch, built in 1930, 980 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 24,200-square-foot lot. $239,000

185 Thomas St. #4 Condominium . $376,000

19 Lovell St. One-family Gambrel, built in 1903, 1,097 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,841-square-foot lot. $260,000

91 Whitelawn Ave. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1955, 2,744 square feet, 7 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 20,962-square-foot lot. $995,000

43 Brook Hill Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1890, 2,316 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 5,892-square-foot lot. $965,000

665 Brush Hill Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1997, 3,886 square feet, 9 rooms, 5 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 40,196-square-foot lot. $890,000

29 Fairfax Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1929, 2,228 square feet, 9 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 12,490-square-foot lot. $885,000

823 Brush Hill Rd. One-family Antique, built in 1798, 4,614 square feet, 14 rooms, 7 bedrooms, 4 baths, on 49,223-square-foot lot. $815,000

111 Otis St. One-family Colonial, built in 1936, 1,790 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 6,089-square-foot lot. $800,000

780 Canton Ave. One-family Ranch, built in 1957, 2,693 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 41,175-square-foot lot. $660,000

60 Sears Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1961, 2,132 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 21,472-square-foot lot. $659,900

15 Emerson Rd. One-family Bngl/Cottage, built in 1934, 1,694 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 5,748-square-foot lot. $630,000

88 Wharf St. #105 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2003, 1,443 square feet, 3 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 2 baths. $615,000

11 Church Place One-family Colonial, built in 1965, 1,323 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 6,135-square-foot lot. $516,000

119 Lyman Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1950, 1,336 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 7,888-square-foot lot. $490,000

146 Truro Lane One-family Colonial, built in 1956, 1,470 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 5,000-square-foot lot. $465,000

221 Thacher St. One-family Old Style, built in 1878, 1,518 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 5,227-square-foot lot. $438,000

90 Ferncroft Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1950, 1,394 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 5,061-square-foot lot. $397,800

6 Stanley Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1996, 3,132 square feet, 10 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 40,032-square-foot lot. $595,900

23 Williams Rd. #23 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2004, 2,266 square feet, 7 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $519,750

14 Brahman Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1998, 2,548 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 40,511-square-foot lot. $435,000

16 Williams Rd. #16 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2004, 1,800 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $431,500

7 Dearborn Drive One-family Cape Cod, built in 1995, 1,512 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 32,409-square-foot lot. $365,000

29 Eisenhower Drive One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1967, 1,645 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 19,689-square-foot lot. $316,000

12 Toad Island Rd. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1976, 1,314 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 30,013-square-foot lot. $305,000

11 Young Ave. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1953, 1,236 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 26,310-square-foot lot. $299,999

90 S Worcester St. One-family Conventional, built in 1920, 3,396 square feet, 11 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 29,882-square-foot lot. $296,850

10 W Hodges St. One-family Ranch, built in 1970, 936 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 18,382-square-foot lot. $256,000

285 E Main St. #20 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1986, 1,124 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths. $205,700

465 River St. One-family Colonial, built in 1988, 5,107 square feet, 9 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 4.5 baths, on 136,778-square-foot lot. $1,675,000

54 Main St. One-family Colonial, built in 1929, 1,604 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 20,400-square-foot lot. $465,000

18 Maxwell Ave. . $653,400

32-34 Granite St. Two-family Two Family, built in 1910, 2,882 square feet, 12 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 5,400-square-foot lot. $490,000

17 2nd St. One-family Conventional, built in 1935, 1,568 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 5,000-square-foot lot. $479,000

108 Cottage St. Two-family Two Family, built in 1890, 2,994 square feet, 13 rooms, 7 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 13,422-square-foot lot. $450,000

42 Chapel St. One-family Conventional, built in 1900, 1,486 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 6,000-square-foot lot. $427,000

211 Central St. #A312 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2004, 1,096 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths. $310,000

217 Rock St. #H9 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1970, 981 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths. $215,000

42 Equestrian Way One-family , on 67,676-square-foot lot. $645,000

44 Verna Hall Drive One-family Colonial, built in 2000, 2,512 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 40,000-square-foot lot. $589,000

112 Indian Trl One-family Bngl/Cottage, built in 1950, 630 square feet, 1 baths, on 10,000-square-foot lot. $70,000

5 Clifford Rd. One-family Cape Cod, built in 2012, 3,273 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 38,731-square-foot lot. $620,000

20 Eagle Hill Drive One-family Ranch, built in 1970, 1,219 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 16,117-square-foot lot. $614,900

9-11 Shaw Court Two-family Gambrel, built in 1900, 2,659 square feet, 11 rooms, 6 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 5,102-square-foot lot. $439,000

69 Cliff St. One-family Conventional, built in 1890, 1,556 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 46,572-square-foot lot. $415,000

11 River Birch Way RES DEV LAND , on 12,810-square-foot lot. $411,900

4 Bayberry Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1963, 960 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 7,405-square-foot lot. $411,750

552 Little Sandy Pond Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 2002, 2,636 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 121,495-square-foot lot. $405,000

30 Cochituate Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1945, 1,059 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 12,197-square-foot lot. $390,000

10 Clay Hill Rd. One-family Garrison, built in 1969, 2,135 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 32,633-square-foot lot. $379,900

42 Beach St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1992, 1,008 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 10,000-square-foot lot. $325,000

176 Summer St. One-family Conventional, built in 1900, 1,053 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 15,280-square-foot lot. $300,000

19 Yale Ave. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1974, 1,300 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 20,871-square-foot lot. $291,000

41 Alewife Rd. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1989, 1,920 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 74,015-square-foot lot. $284,900

14 Stetson Court One-family Cape Cod, built in 1989, 1,836 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 29,148-square-foot lot. $275,000

14 Sunset Blvd One-family Ranch, built in 1958, 854 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 27,405-square-foot lot. $270,000

34 Lafayette Rd. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1981, 1,264 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 27,841-square-foot lot. $270,000

81 Liberty St. #A Condominium Townhouse, built in 2005, 1,632 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $268,908

1105 State Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1979, 1,260 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 57,462-square-foot lot. $245,000

63 Crabtree Rd. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1979, 1,719 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 20,000-square-foot lot. $240,000

34 Great Wind Drive One-family Cottage, built in 1964, 1,004 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,915-square-foot lot. $225,000

86 Esta Rd. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1969, 1,549 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 15,021-square-foot lot. $218,530

27 Carters Bridge Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1958, 800 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,712-square-foot lot. $210,000

91 Buzzards Bay Drive One-family Cottage, built in 1960, 630 square feet, 2 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,890-square-foot lot. $192,000

51 Arrowhead Rd. One-family Cottage, built in 1978, 1,388 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 38,731-square-foot lot. $170,000

9 Beach St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1950, 1,374 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 4,000-square-foot lot. $105,000

9 Park St. One-family Conventional, built in 1900, 2,407 square feet, 9 rooms, 5 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 8,600-square-foot lot. $630,000

207 Arlington St. Two-family Duplex, built in 1860, 2,482 square feet, 10 rooms, 6 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 9,900-square-foot lot. $620,000

104-110 Washington St. #22 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2005, 1,562 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 3 baths. $525,000

19 Dunns Hill Rd. Two-family Two Family, built in 1890, 2,133 square feet, 11 rooms, 5 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,490-square-foot lot. $521,000

597 Sea St. #3 Condominium Townhouse, built in 2013, 1,371 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $502,500

34 Emerald St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1972, 1,220 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 19,603-square-foot lot. $472,000

128 Sagamore St. One-family Conventional, built in 1895, 1,581 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 3,135-square-foot lot. $450,000

293 W Squantum St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1945, 1,485 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 5,666-square-foot lot. $450,000

104-110 Washington St. #23 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2005, 1,562 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 3 baths. $440,000

20 Glynn Ter One-family Cape Cod, built in 1900, 1,464 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 2,956-square-foot lot. $434,500

180 Albatross Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1925, 1,408 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 4,675-square-foot lot. $410,000

159 Willard St. #5 Condominium Townhouse, built in 2012, 1,186 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths. $380,500

1001 Furnace Brook Pkwy One-family Ranch, built in 1950, 1,032 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 9,050-square-foot lot. $380,000

8 Murdock Ave. Two-family Two Family, built in 1918, 1,525 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 4,903-square-foot lot. $370,000

981 Sea St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1955, 1,134 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 6,000-square-foot lot. $365,000

24 Alton Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1900, 1,688 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 7,470-square-foot lot. $360,900

22 Buckley St. 4-8 UNIT APT Condo/Apt, built in 1906, 2,895 square feet, 11 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 4 baths, on 5,445-square-foot lot. $320,000

72 Bayfield Rd. S One-family Cape Cod, built in 1918, 1,248 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 4,935-square-foot lot. $310,000

90 Quincy Shore Drive #107 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1987, 1,218 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths. $309,000

120 Centre St. #3 Condominium Townhouse, built in 1992, 1,096 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths. $301,450

20 Lakeside Ave. One-family Conventional, built in 1920, 1,290 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 4,504-square-foot lot. $269,000

77 Adams St. #805 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1975, 710 square feet, 3 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 1 baths. $267,500

500 Willard St. #305 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1974, 1,002 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths. $255,000

115 W Squantum St. #802 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1975, 765 square feet, 5 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 1 baths. $245,000

230 Willard St. #306 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1988, 866 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths. $236,500

90 Quincy Shore Drive #215 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1987, 744 square feet, 3 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 1 baths. $232,000

20 Buckley St. One-family Conventional, built in 1900, 1,567 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 3,794-square-foot lot. $200,000

28 Fitzgerald St. One-family Split Level, built in 1960, 1,488 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,000-square-foot lot. $315,000

2 Hoeg St. #2 Condominium Townhouse, built in 1979, 1,740 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $297,000

212 Oak St. #212 Condominium Townhouse, built in 1987, 1,134 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths. $280,000

51 Cochato Park One-family Ranch, built in 1957, 1,268 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 12,022-square-foot lot. $265,000

123 Oak St. One-family Ranch, built in 1953, 1,128 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 7,834-square-foot lot. $230,000

203 Warren St. #203 Condominium . $219,900

180 S Main St. #2 Condominium Townhouse, built in 1800, 1,110 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 1-square-foot lot. $206,000

167 Katherines Way One-family Contemporary, built in 2001, 3,318 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 45,315-square-foot lot. $683,000

109 Nottingham Drive RES DEV LAND , on 45,315-square-foot lot. $499,900

18 Fieldstone Drive #18 Condominium Townhouse, built in 2005, 2,821 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 3.5 baths. $375,000

426 Hill St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1979, 1,848 square feet, 8 rooms, 2.5 baths, on 37,462-square-foot lot. $334,000

661 Locust St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1959, 2,520 square feet, 6 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 4 baths, on 71,451-square-foot lot. $310,000

717 South St. E One-family Ranch, built in 1945, 644 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 32,670-square-foot lot. $220,000

241 Pine St. One-family Camp/Cabin, built in 1960, 543 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 16,117-square-foot lot. $146,000

15 Heritage Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1985, 2,502 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 22,869-square-foot lot. $469,000

71 Belmont St. One-family Ranch, built in 1953, 888 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,059-square-foot lot. $342,500

659 Liberty St. One-family Conventional, built in 1870, 1,621 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,977-square-foot lot. $338,300

72 Norman St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1981, 1,714 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 baths, on 11,892-square-foot lot. $299,000

136 Pacific St. One-family Ranch, built in 1935, 1,118 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 7,187-square-foot lot. $245,000

356 Levin Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1957, 960 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,757-square-foot lot. $243,000

11 Ocean Ave. One-family Conventional, built in 1895, 2,534 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 14,898-square-foot lot. $1,103,000

10 Booth Hill Rd. One-family Conventional, built in 1890, 2,806 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 3 baths, on 21,083-square-foot lot. $835,000

115 Humarock Bch One-family Conventional, built in 1890, 1,800 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 11,238-square-foot lot. $650,000

8 Rachels Way #8 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 2014, 1,987 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $505,900

71 Lighthouse Rd. One-family Conventional, built in 1920, 1,180 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 7,362-square-foot lot. $422,000

111 Turner Rd. One-family Conventional, built in 1935, 1,376 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 3,920-square-foot lot. $337,400

98 Turner Rd. One-family Conventional, built in 1905, 988 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 5,009-square-foot lot. $168,000

158 East St. One-family Antique, built in 1850, 6,882 square feet, 16 rooms, 8 bedrooms, 4 baths, on 40,145-square-foot lot. $1,010,000

2 Pheasant Wood Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1972, 1,350 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 20,931-square-foot lot. $510,000

6 Osprey Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1975, 1,560 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 22,644-square-foot lot. $395,000

675 S Main St. One-family Colonial, built in 1948, 1,488 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 43,244-square-foot lot. $350,000

10 Pleasant Park Circle One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1977, 1,184 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 35,490-square-foot lot. $319,900

179 Bay Rd. RES DEV LAND , on 40,062-square-foot lot. $310,000

615 Morton St. One-family Ranch, built in 2007, 1,703 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 46,534-square-foot lot. $460,000

87 Trowbridge Circle One-family Colonial, built in 1960, 1,698 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 18,804-square-foot lot. $415,000

58 Sofia Rd. One-family Old Style, built in 1955, 2,136 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 42,197-square-foot lot. $400,000

662 Plain St. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1966, 1,869 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 21,526-square-foot lot. $356,000

27 Kenneth Court One-family Old Style, built in 1930, 1,178 square feet, 6 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 14,400-square-foot lot. $325,900

24 Pearl St. Place One-family Old Style, built in 1949, 1,971 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 4,116-square-foot lot. $261,000

3 Ralph Mann Drive One-family Ranch, built in 1948, 864 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,714-square-foot lot. $250,000

17 Columbus Ave. One-family Old Style, built in 1949, 1,294 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,000-square-foot lot. $175,000

654 Morton St. One-family Old Style, built in 1950, 948 square feet, 5 rooms, 1 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,144-square-foot lot. $147,185

58 Union St. #11 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1968, 692 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths. $143,000

68 Summer Ave. #1 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1970, 897 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths. $120,000

30 Grove Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1940, 960 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 17,500-square-foot lot. $100,000

16 New Fisher Lane One-family Colonial, built in 2006, 2,953 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 30,609-square-foot lot. $750,000

12 Lacivita Drive RES DEV LAND , on 30,076-square-foot lot. $628,000

4 Carl Rd. One-family Colonial, built in 1979, 2,072 square feet, 10 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 40,858-square-foot lot. $555,000

36 Woodruff Rd. One-family Split Level, built in 1964, 1,387 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 20,376-square-foot lot. $518,000

19 Barbara Rd. One-family Raised Ranch, built in 1976, 1,698 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 30,126-square-foot lot. $474,000

14 Whiting Ave. One-family Split Level, built in 1961, 950 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 16,656-square-foot lot. $440,000

14 Dartmouth Rd. . $425,000

55 Christina Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1994, 1,899 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 16,500-square-foot lot. $423,000

64 Baker St. One-family Ranch, built in 1950, 988 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 15,000-square-foot lot. $397,500

770 Washington St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1947, 1,130 square feet, 5 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 86,684-square-foot lot. $312,000

121 Bullard St. One-family Conventional, built in 1925, 1,616 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 30,335-square-foot lot. $304,000

57 Hale Rd. One-family Ranch, built in 1958, 988 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 15,055-square-foot lot. $259,249

23 Rainbow Pond Drive #A1 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1980, 1,476 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths. $255,000

165 Spring St. One-family Ranch, built in 1974, 2,135 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 34,848-square-foot lot. $315,000

370 N Elm St. One-family Garrison, built in 1939, 1,274 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 14,375-square-foot lot. $275,000

178 Forest St. One-family Split Level, built in 1969, 1,622 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 30,056-square-foot lot. $232,000

218 Weatherbee Drive One-family Colonial, built in 1978, 2,872 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 44,356-square-foot lot. $890,000

201 Sandtrap Circle #201 Condominium Free-Standng, built in 2004, 2,260 square feet, 8 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths. $589,900

15 Victoria Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1985, 1,836 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 19,210-square-foot lot. $480,000

19 Fairmount Ave. One-family Conventional, built in 1888, 2,222 square feet, 10 rooms, 5 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 15,202-square-foot lot. $477,500

24 Piedmont St. One-family Colonial, built in 1986, 1,796 square feet, 8 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, on 15,115-square-foot lot. $450,000

57 Sutton St. One-family Ranch, built in 1955, 2,055 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,799-square-foot lot. $435,000

344 Commercial St. One-family Conventional, built in 1850, 1,469 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 9,453-square-foot lot. $355,000

16 Greenvale Ave. One-family Colonial, built in 1935, 1,568 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 7,100-square-foot lot. $342,000

11 Grandview Rd. One-family Conventional, built in 1898, 1,350 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 8,189-square-foot lot. $341,000

156 Randolph St. One-family Conventional, built in 1868, 1,733 square feet, 7 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,019-square-foot lot. $324,000

341 Union St. One-family Conventional, built in 1940, 872 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 12,720-square-foot lot. $315,000

43 Lochmere Ave. One-family Conventional, built in 1918, 1,104 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 4,966-square-foot lot. $299,900

46 Foye Ave. Two-family Conventional, built in 1878, 1,960 square feet, 11 rooms, 2 baths, on 10,672-square-foot lot. $275,000

9 Nanset Rd. One-family Conventional, built in 1918, 968 square feet, 7 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 4,008-square-foot lot. $275,000

16 Pequot Rd. One-family Conventional, built in 1918, 1,008 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 5,009-square-foot lot. $260,000

243 Randolph St. One-family Conventional, built in 1868, 1,042 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 13,199-square-foot lot. $244,500

20 Chapman St. #107 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1988, 910 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1.5 baths. $205,000

14 Old Stone Way #1 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1973, 990 square feet, 4 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths. $187,000

267 Neck St. #A1 Condominium Condo/Apt, built in 1982, 770 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths. $168,595

77 East St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1963, 2,354 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 9,453-square-foot lot. $148,212

12 Kerri Lane One-family Split Entry, built in 1998, 1,954 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 22,586-square-foot lot. $410,000

150 Beulah St. One-family Old Style, built in 1920, 1,792 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 10,899-square-foot lot. $278,000

23 High St. One-family Cape Cod, built in 1965, 1,728 square feet, 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 7,052-square-foot lot. $262,500

366 Commercial St. One-family Old Style, built in 1900, 999 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, on 5,841-square-foot lot. $229,000

351 High St. One-family Antique, built in 1720, 2,208 square feet, 7 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 22,499-square-foot lot. $177,000

59 Linden St. Two-family Mlti-Unt Blg, built in 1895, 2,016 square feet, 10 rooms, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, on 8,250-square-foot lot. $171,500

43 Day St. One-family Old Style, built in 1840, 1,290 square feet, 6 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 1 baths, on 7,993-square-foot lot. $149,000

Summary:
ABINGTON

4 Hunts Pond Lane One-family Colonial, built in 1998, 2,592 square feet, 8 rooms, 3 bedrooms, 3.5 baths, on 49,204-square-foot lot.


Miss Gayle Ann Brumbaugh, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Edward W. Brumbaugh, was married in Catonsville, Md., yesterday to Michael Gerald Ford, eldest son of Vice President and Mrs. Ford.

The ceremony, written by the couple, was performed in the Chapel Hill United Presbyterian Church by the Rev. Daniel G. Cox, rector of Bishop Cummins Memorial Reformed Episcopal Church in Catonsville, which the Brumbaughs attend but which is under renovation.

The Vice President was best man at the late afternoon service, which included eight bridal attendants and six ushers. They were Mrs. R. Lynwood Baldwin 3d, sister of the bride, who was matron of honor, and Miss Gale Strouse, maid of honor. Others were Mrs. Michael F. Curran and the Misses Susan E. Ford, sister of the bridegroom; Deborah G. Morgan, Joan E. Ray and Roberta P. Welch. Amy S. Baldwin, niece of the bride, was flower girl.

The ushers included John G. and Steven M. Ford, brothers of the bridegroom and Wayne D. Brumbaugh, brother of the bride.

The bride wore a silk organza gown appliquéd with venise lace and a matching lace picture hat. She carried a cascade bouquet of white orchids and stephanotis.

Mr. Ford, 24, is one year older than his wife. They met while they were students at Wake Forest University, from which the bridegroom graduated cum laude in 1972. The bride received her degree last year. Many of the 290 wedding guests were friends and former college classmates of the couple.

Mr. Ford and his bride are students at the Gordon‐Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, Mass., where they will live after a wedding trip. Both also studied in Switzerland at L'Abri, a nondemominational Christian community that attracts young people of many nationalities.

The bride's father is a junior high school principal in Catonsville.

We are continually improving the quality of our text archives. Please send feedback, error reports, and suggestions to archive_feedback@nytimes.com.

A version of this archives appears in print on July 6, 1974, on page 23 of the New York edition with the headline: Michael Gerald Ford Weds Miss Brumbaugh. Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe

Summary: Gayle Ann Brumbaugh weds Michael Gerald Ford, eldest son of Vice Pres Gerald R Ford Jr, on July 5, Catonsville, Md; illus (M)


Even if we cannot consciously see a person’s face, our brain is able to make a snap decision about how trustworthy they are.

According to a new study published in the Journal of Neuroscience, the brain immediately determines how trustworthy a face is before it’s fully perceived, which supports the fact that we make very fast judgments about people.

Researchers at Dartmouth College and New York University showed a group of participants photos of real people’s faces, as well as computer-generated faces that were meant to look either trustworthy or untrustworthy. It’s been shown in the past that people generally think that faces with high inner eyebrows and prominent cheekbones are more trustworthy, and the opposite features are untrustworthy, which the researchers were able to confirm.

In a second part of their experiment, the researchers showed a separate group of participants the same images but for only about 30 milliseconds while they were in a brain scanner. They then did something called “backward masking,” which consists of showing a participant an irrelevant image or “mask” immediately after quickly showing them a face. The procedure makes the brain incapable of processing the face.

Even though the patients were not able to process the faces, their brains did. The researchers focused on activity in the amygdala, a part of the brain responsible for social and emotional behavior, and found that specific areas of the amygdala were activated based on judgments of trustworthiness or non-trustworthiness. This, the researchers conclude, is evidence that our brains make judgments of people before we even process who they are or what they look like.

Keep that in mind the next time you’re meeting someone new. No pressure.

Summary: We make calls on trustworthiness almost instantly


Dr. Edgar E. Robinson, who founded the Stanford University Institute of American History to upgrade teaching of the‐ subject at the nation's schools and colleges, died at Palo Alto, Calif., Wednesday after a brief illness. He was 90 years old and had been retired since 1952.

Dr. Robinson, who joined the Stanford department in 1911 and headed its history department from 1928 to 1945, organized the institute in 1942 after a survey by The New York Times found widespread ignorance about the nation's past.

Though Dr. Robinson had been discussing such an institute since the late 1930's, The Times's survey, which foundthat 82 percent of the nation's colleges did not require course study in American history, spurred its creation.

The institute sought to revitalize teaching of the subject through academic conferences and special research projects. One of its early studies found that courses in American history were frequently overburdened with extraneous matters and left too little time for an adequate examination of the nation's internal historical development.

Dr. Robinson was regarded as a pioneer in the study of the nation's political parties, and he wrote a number of books that focused on voting trends.

In one of these, “The Evolution of the American Political Parties,” published in 1924, he challenged the prevailing view on the origin of the two‐party system and argued that the original substantive differences between the major parties had been eroded to the point that allegiances were based largely on tradition and habit rather than on competing principles.

He.expanded on that theme in a 1947 work, “They Voted for Roosevelt,” which provided a detailed examination of the winning coalitions in the Presidential elections of 1932, 1936, 1940 and 1944. He predicted that the Democrats would have difficulty maintaining the majority that Roosevelt had put together by appealing to a wide variety of interests, especially in the South.

A native of Oconomowoc, Wis., Dr. Robinson received undergraduate and graduate degrees from the University of Wisconsin and taught briefly there and at Carleton College before coming to Stanford. In his four decades on the Stanford faculty, he was in frequent demand as a guest lecturer and visiting professor at other universities.

Dr. Robinson, whose first wife died, is survived by his second wife, the former Lisette Emery Fast, whom he married in 1970. The funeral is to be private.

We are continually improving the quality of our text archives. Please send feedback, error reports, and suggestions to archive_feedback@nytimes.com.

A version of this archives appears in print on September 9, 1977, on page 91 of the New York edition with the headline: Dr. Edgar E. Robinson Dies at 90; Professor of History at Stanford. Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe

Summary: Robinson, Edgar E (Dr)


A second secret email address used by Hillary Rodham Clinton while she was secretary of state was revealed Monday.

The email address, published by The New York Times, was used in exchanges between Clinton and longtime adviser Sydney Blumenthal, and is from the same private email server that was uncovered earlier this year.

“Fyi. The idea of using private security experts to arm the opposition should be considered,” Clinton wrote Blumenthal from the email address HRod17@clintonemail.com.

The two were discussing strategies to help the opposition rebels oust Moammar Khadafy in Libya as that country descended into chaos in 2011.

Clinton’s office insisted just two months ago that the only private email address used by the former secretary of state during her tenure was hdr22@clintonemail.com.

In a 2015 letter to Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), Clinton’s lawyer acknowledged that the HRod17 email address existed, but stated explicitly that it was “not an address that existed during Secretary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state.”

The time stamps and content of the messages make clear that this statement was inaccurate, according to the Times report.

The first private email use was seen as a breach of protocol. Clinton’s advisers handed over 55,000 pages of emails to the State Department so they could comply with an investigation. But, according to Vice News, those emails will not be made public until 2016.

Clinton admitted to deleting thousands of others, claiming they were personal.

The revelation of a second email address raises questions about Clinton’s transparency and her relationship with Blumenthal.

The longtime Clinton confidant was not working at the State Department at the time, but advising American contractors that sought to do business in war-torn Libya.

In another email after Blumenthal suggested the new Libyan leader, Mohamed Magariaf, would “seek a discrete relationship with Israel,” Clinton wrote to her deputy Jake Sullivan, “If true, this is encouraging. Should consider passing to Israelis,” according to the Times.

Blumenthal’s coordination with Clinton raises the likelihood of additional scrutiny as she runs for the White House.

While he was not given a job in the State Department by the Obama administration, Blumenthal was employed by Bill and Hillary Clinton’s philanthropic organization, the Clinton Foundation, to help with research and “message guidance,” according to the Times.

At the same time, the Times reported, Blumenthal also was helping to craft Hillary’s 2016 presidential campaign message by working as a consultant to Media Matters and American Bridge.

Summary: A second secret email address used by Hillary Rodham Clinton while she was secretary of state was revealed Monday. The email address, published by The New York Times, was used in exchanges between …


Devin Booker scored a game-high 28 points as the Phoenix Suns defeated the Portland Trail Blazers 86-73 in the Las Vegas Summer League opener for both teams on Saturday.

Booker was 11 for 21 from the field, including 3 for 5 from 3-point range, with eight rebounds and six assists as the Suns went wire to wire, leading by as many as 18 in the second half.

"Things got a little chippy out," Booker said, "and that's what you expect in summer league. Guys are trying to earn their spot.

Booker's time with the summer Suns could be short lived, as he readies to joins USA basketball's select team later this month. That team will help prepare Team USA for next month's Olympics in Brazil.

"That's a lot of the reason I'm here, is getting ready for USA," Booker said after Saturday's win. "It's something I've always wanted to do my whole life, to represent this country, and now I'm getting the chance."

Phoenix (1-0) held Portland to 37.1 percent shooting from the field, including 6-of-26 shooting from long distance. The Suns also showed excellent ball movement with 18 assists to the Blazers' eight.

Dragan Bender, this year's fourth overall draft pick, totaled 12 points, seven rebounds and two steals in his summer league debut. He shot 4 for 13 from the field and 1 of 7 from 3-point range.

Suns rooker Dragan Bender (left) goes up for a rebound against the Portland Trail Blazers during Saturday's game in the NBA Las Vegas Summer League at the Cox Pavillion in Las Vegas.

"I think Bender got a little frustrated; he missed some shots," Booker said. "But I explained to him, last summer league I missed my first 15 shots and I was so frustrated so I know how he feels right now. I told him it's going to come."

Fellow first-round pick Marquese Chriss was 2 for 10 from the field and grabbed six rebounds. Alan Williams finished with 13 points and 12 rebounds, and Tyler Ulis had 11 points and seven assists.

Pat Connaughton led the Trail Blazers (0-1) with 14 points, despite going 3-for-13 from the field. Noah Vonleh totaled 12 points and 11 rebounds, and guards Russ Smith and Pierre Jackson each scored 11. A 6-foot-11 center, Chris Johnson blocked four shots in nine minutes.

Both teams play Sunday, with the Suns facing the Boston Celtics and the Blazers squaring off against the San Antonio Spurs.

Summary: Devin Booker was 11-for-21 from the field, including 3-for-5 from 3-point range, with eight rebounds and six assists as the Suns went wire to wire, leading by as many as 18 in the second half.


Pater Lawford with Robert Kennedy, a man he idolized. (Bettmann/CORBIS)

Jackie was always the good soldier amid ruin, Patricia says. (UPI)

Robert Kennedy Jr., who has spent the last week and a half publicly absolving himself of any responsibility for the suicide of his estranged wife, Mary, has been a coarse, entitled womanizer for decades, according to a former family intimate who fended him off.

Patricia Lawford Stewart, who was married to former Kennedy in-law Peter Lawford, reached out to The Post after last week’s funeral for Mary, appalled — but not surprised — by the Kennedy clan’s insistence that Mary was a lifelong depressive and alcoholic.

Before the funeral, Mary’s former sister-in-law and self-described “best, best friend,” Kerry Kennedy, strolled over to the press pool. “Mary suffered from depression,” Kerry said. “She was battling those demons.”

Robert, according to Robert’s eulogy, was just a good husband who tried so hard to help, not the boozy ex-heroin addict who publicly ran around on his wife, cut her off financially and took custody of their children, thereby demolishing every aspect of her life and identity.

“The Kennedy family is on damage control 24/7,” Stewart says. “They were ruinous to my husband, and they have harassed me for the last 28 years. I’m 54 years old, and I can’t deal with this crap anymore.”

Stewart first met the young RFK Jr. in 1976, when he showed up on the Lawfords’ doorstep in LA unannounced, having been kicked out by his widowed mother, Ethel. He was wearing his late father’s suit, rumpled. Robert sat on the sofa, and they made small talk for a few minutes while Peter was in the shower.

“Then he said, ‘I wish you weren’t married to my uncle — I’d like to f— you right here on the couch,’ ” Stewart says. “That was a shocker. I knew him for four minutes.”

At the time, Stewart was 19 years old. She says she took her husband aside and told him what had happened. “He said, ‘Nothing’s changed,’ ” Stewart says. “I was taken aback. But he was sucked in too.”

Lawford blamed Ethel for how poorly her 11 children turned out: “Peter called her a broodmare,” Stewart says. “He didn’t like that she had all these kids she couldn’t cope with. She was always throwing them out.”

Stewart was Lawford’s fourth wife, though they had been “married” in an unofficial ceremony in Calcutta when she was 15 years old after meeting at the Roxy on Sunset Boulevard in LA.

Lawford had first been married to JFK’s sister Patricia, and they had four children together before divorcing in 1966, due largely to Lawford’s drinking and philandering.

“Peter would bring women home all the time when he was married to Patricia,” Stewart says. “And I think that he loved her. She was a wonderful woman, but drugs and alcohol got to her.”

Stewart, too, found herself like many a Kennedy wife — alone at home, husband off partying, expected to accept heavy boozing and rampant infidelity as the trade-off for becoming a member of America’s royal family.

She soon realized that, when it came to the Kennedys, nothing was as it seemed. Stewart says that in June 1980, when she called Ted Kennedy’s office to request a favor for Peter, she was rattled by his greeting.

“He gets on the phone and says, ‘I hear you’re the one with the big t–s. The kids all told me.’ I got quiet. He said, ‘So when are you going to come to Boston and campaign for me? We’ll go skiing, we’ll go to Vermont, we’ll do this, we’ll do that.’ It wasn’t familial; I’d never met him. I said, ‘I’m married to Peter.’ ”

And Peter, she says, had his own issues with Ted. Namely, “He found that Ted was an a–hole. He was at a party with the Kennedys, and he watched Ted spike some punch and give a glass to [then-wife] Joan. Joan had been sober for eight years. Ted says, ‘Here, have some.’ And she gets picked up by the cops driving home.”

To this day, Stewart thinks that Ted set Joan up; the Kennedys, she says, are ruthless when it comes to destroying anyone who’s outlived their usefulness.

“They’re bullies,” she says. “Just plain bullies. They treat their women like crap. Everybody’s an outcast. If you’re not a sycophant, you’re out — and everyone gets their turn.”

Peter Lawford first met the Kennedys as a young aspiring actor, when he was hired to park cars for patriarch Joe. He fell in love with the entire family, and by the time he married Patricia Kennedy in 1954, Lawford was a major movie star.

He was also deeply enamored of Jack.

“Peter adored the president,” Stewart says. “They were very close.”

But Lawford, too, suffered for his idolatry. Stewart says that when Jack Kennedy would visit Lawford on the MGM lot, he’d often pocket whatever cash Lawford had left laying around his dressing room, often hundreds at a time.

“Finally, Peter said, ‘Jack, I had $300 there. Why are you taking my money?’ And Jack would say, ‘Oh Peee-taah, it doesn’t matter.’ Peter was pissed, because he worked for a living. And Jack was president at the time! But the Kennedys never carry money. They’ll invite you to lunch, then make you pay.”

Lawford, she adds, never got over the death of Marilyn Monroe, who had been involved with President Kennedy and, after him, the president’s brother Bobby. Lawford often facilitated these rendezvous, with both brothers conducting multiple affairs in his house — and, unbeknowst to all, the FBI and LAPD were keeping watch.

One of the LAPD detectives often on Kennedy detail was a young officer named Daniel Stewart. His assignments ranged from standing guard at the LA apartments the Kennedys used for extramarital affairs to guarding Bobby during the 1960 Democratic convention in LA to getting the call to go to Good Samaritan Hospital when Bobby got shot at the Ambassador Hotel in 1968.

Years later, Daniel would marry Patricia Stewart Lawford. They had much in common — not least their disdain for the Kennedys.

“They were open about the philandering,” Daniel says today. “They thought they had a regular pass to do it.”

He most vividly remembers the scene at Good Samaritan, with members of the Kennedy family taking over an entire floor while RFK languished on life support.

“They commandeered this medicine cart, and suddenly booze appeared on it,” Daniel says. “Bourbon, scotch, vodka, gin. They were in an open waiting room, smoking and drinking, just waiting for everyone to show up. They weren’t falling-down drunk, but they were feeling the effects.”

Many of the Kennedys have been famously ravaged by drugs and alcohol, and Stewart says that Lawford’s drinking worsened after he divorced JFK’s sister Patricia. Until that point, the Kennedys, who depicted themselves as devout Catholics, had never had a single divorce.

Peter, she says, told JFK that he’d hold off on leaving Patricia if there was a chance it could hurt the re-election campaign. “JFK said, ‘If you’re not getting along, do it,’ ” says Stewart. “He did, and he was out of that family. He gave them their first divorce.”

Lawford, his career ebbing and his health on the decline, struggled emotionally and financially. Stewart says none of this much mattered to the children Peter had with Patricia, who would come to visit and ring up hundreds of dollars in charges for booze, cigarettes, take-out from Chasen’s — glamourous indulgences that the Lawfords had begun to pare down.

“One day a letter came addressed to Peter and [his son] Christopher,” Stewart says. “Peter opened it, and inside was a check to Christopher for $750,000, from his trust fund. Meanwhile, he’s using all of our charge accounts. Peter said, ‘I wish I had never opened that.’ ”

The worst offender, she says, was Bobby Shriver, brother of Maria. Shriver had invited the Lawfords to a big lunch at LA’s Daisy restaurant, to celebrate his new job as a reporter at the Herald-Examiner. By this point, Peter was so sick that he had a gastrostomy tube, but even still, he relished any connection with the Kennedys and insisted upon going.

“We didn’t have much money then,” Stewart says. “We ordered tea and soup. At the end of the lunch, Bobby gets up and says, ‘I’d like to thank my Uncle Peter for this lovely lunch’ — 30 bottles of wine later. The bill was close to $3,000, and they all just left. Peter was horrified. I can’t tell you how many times that happened.’ ”

Stewart still finds it upsetting to think about her husband bargaining with the manager, a former matinee idol reduced to setting up a payment plan. She remains ashamed that she didn’t stand up for him.

“I didn’t have the guts then,” Stewart says. “I was quelled by people who anointed the Kennedys with supreme power.” Of all the Kennedy women, she most admired Jackie, the only member of the family who would not be cowed.

“Jackie knew where she was at, who she was,” Stewart says. “She kept her kids away. I think the sisters were jealous of her. They just didn’t like her.” And Jackie, Stewart says, didn’t care.

Stewart says she finally realized how cruel and controlling the Kennedys could be after Lawford’s death from organ failure on Christmas Eve 1984. Stewart had her husband cremated, which incensed the Kennedys as it went against Catholic doctrine. And so the family refused to pay for the interment of Lawford’s ashes, informing Stewart in a phone call.

“Christopher [Lawford] says to me, ‘We’ve convened at Mummy’s, and we’ve decided Daddy’s not worth it.’ ” Four years later, when Stewart was so late paying for maintenance that Westwood cemetery was demanding Lawford’s remains be removed, Lawford’s daughter Victoria sent a check to cover the $430 disinterment fee.

The family also insisted on sending a Kennedy out to LA, to make sure Lawford’s ashes were, in fact, removed.

“I called the National Enquirer, bumped up the disinterment by one day, then put the ashes in the ocean,” Stewart says. “I couldn’t take it.”

She wanted to send a message to the Kennedys: They could no longer control her in life, nor could they control her husband in death.

“The Kennedy family called me a grave robber,” she says. “I was this piece of crap that had done this horrible thing. Going up against them is like going up against the panzer division. You always feel like you’re going to be attacked.”

Even today, Stewart believes the Kennedys find ways to harass her. “I’ve been audited,” she says. “I have inaugural footage in a vault that they want. People call all the time about it, and I know the Kennedys are behind it. The long line of Kennedys reaches into everything. They’ve got their hands in every cash register in the world.”

After she heard the Kennedys publicly assail Mary as a lifelong depressive and drunk — characterizations that Mary’s siblings and friends categorically deny — Stewart says she felt compelled to come forward.

“Botox is nice, eye creams are good, but none of it will take away the wear and tear they put on me,” Stewart says. “I don’t for one minute think that Mary was a drunk, or a drug addict, or depressive. I think she was tormented by her husband, and I think he could do that.

“Because that’s what the Kennedys do. And they’re very good at it.”

Summary: Pater Lawford with Robert Kennedy, a man he idolized. (Bettmann/CORBIS)Jackie was always the good soldier amid ruin, Patricia says. (UPI) ( )Robert Kennedy Jr., who has spent the last week and a ha…


Notification: You have 12 new matches!

When I get home from work and realize the silence of the end of the day, I open one of the many dating or sex-based apps I have — programs that provide literally thousands of people for me to choose from as a possible match to my personality. I assume that I am like most people on these apps: ultimately seeking a lasting relationship.

Coming out as gay in my hometown of Muncie, Indiana, was not an easy thing to do, so I didn’t. Like many LGBT folk, I flocked to a liberal university in a liberal city to feel accepted, but I found gay communities closed-off to LGBT youth. We all crave connection and intimacy, but there is nowhere for freshly out young gay men to connect. Feeling alone in a big city, walking from building to building without making a connection, I desperately wanted to meet like-minded individuals, but I found myself resorting to these apps to do that.

But instead of advancing the gay agenda of inclusion, I found the apps to perpetuate what people scorn about LGBT: promiscuity, impersonal behavior, and sexually motivated conversations. This is not the fault of the LGBT community, but these depersonalized conversations are what lead to depersonalized relationships. When an introduction to gay culture is through a sex-based app, it perpetuates the sex-based stereotype.

Because LGBT still face shame and disownment, our coming out is plagued with fear that we will lose those we love, which leads to a shame-based idea of relationships. Each dating app focuses on a different demographic, with OkCupid, Tinder, and Grindr thriving as probably the three most popular in the mainstream gay community. OkCupid is for the romantics looking for dates, Tinder is where you browse pictures and compare common Facebook interests before deciding to meet; and Grindr allows one picture and a brief description for guys who are looking for temporary company.

I never thought of approaching dating through this screening process, but many people inadvertently find themselves becoming a part of the hook-up culture. Compared to traditional dating methods, these apps provide many advantages: you save time on bad blind dates and boring conversations, you can connect to someone anytime you feel lonely, and if you are rejected you simply move on to the next person. But because there are thousands of people at your fingertips, it also creates a society of oversharing, superficiality, and instant gratification. You are on the grid 24/7 and you must advertise yourself. And there’s a paradox of choice: be careful who you choose, because there might be someone better out there—always.

Gay men want those perfect relationships that we see in romantic-comedies, instead of the ultimate fear of our generation: being alone. But there is nowhere that is not sex-based to connect. LGBT are still considered outcasts of society. Homosexuality, while popularized by the media, is still considered dangerous to teach to our kids. The way to solve this is through education. The history of talking about sexual orientation to children has been one of fear, regret, and ignorance. We need informed parents who understand how to support gay youth. We need college-aged LGBT to actively work their state’s capitals for gay marriage, harassment laws, and transgender equality. Most importantly, K-12 children should be taught about sexual orientation in an open, direct, and engaging way encouraging normalcy and assimilation. If we can openly discuss it, LGBT can defeat the sex-centered stereotype.

This generation will determine the course of healthy relationships while using future connection forums such as Ello or Hinge. If people feel supported during their formative years rather than making sex a dirty and scary thing, there won’t be a need to change our values because we are LGBT. There won’t be a need to comprise ourselves for connection.

Cody Freeman has worked extensively in the Philadelphia LGBT community through ActionAIDS, I’m From Driftwood, and The William Way LGBT Center.

Summary: Many dating apps help perpetuate what people scorn about LGBT: promiscuity, impersonal behavior, and compromised interpersonal connection


MIAMI— WHEN they stepped onstage at the Grammys ceremonies in February to accept the Legend Award, Barry and Robin Gibb, the two remaining Bee Gees, gave a touching tribute to their brother Maurice, who died a month earlier at the age of 53. Barry Gibb told the audience that ''the measure of a man is his family'' and gracefully handed the gold statue to Maurice's son, Adam.

It was an appearance that cast the Gibb family as close-knit. But it masked a dispute in recent years among the three brothers, whose falsetto singing in the soundtrack of the film ''Saturday Night Fever'' came to symbolize the harmonies of the disco world in the late 1970's. That soundtrack, which once sent polyester partyers swooping onto dance floors around the world, turned the Gibbs into megastars.

Though they continued to work together on albums and their families live within minutes of one another in Miami, Barry Gibb, the oldest, has at times been unhappy with his brothers, in part over the management of the Gibb business interests.

By January of this year, his relationship with Robin had so deteriorated that Barry did not even know that Robin had made ''Magnet,'' his first solo album since 1985, until it was released. And Barry said he was ''devastated'' to learn that Robin, in that album, had altered a classic Bee Gees song, ''Wish You Were Here.''

Although Barry Gibb's rapport with Maurice was better, in 2001 Barry severed ties with Michael Eaton, a British lawyer who represented the group for over 30 years.

Maurice and Robin Gibb, who were fraternal twins, stayed with Mr. Eaton. But Barry hired his own team to direct his business affairs. And in a striking divergence from decades in which the trio acted as one, Barry decided last year to have Warner/Chappell Music, a part of AOL Time Warner, handle his interest in the song publishing business. His brothers stayed with the group's longtime publisher, the BMG unit of Bertelsmann.

The turmoil among family members has been resolved in recent weeks, Barry Gibb said in a telephone interview last Wednesday. But the differences among the Bee Gees, which he discussed during an interview earlier this year at his Miami mansion, offer insights into how complex family dynamics can affect what amounts to a successful family business.

''What changed for me was a midlife crisis,'' said Barry Gibb, who is now 57. Sitting in the living room of the mansion he has owned since 1981, and dressed casually in sports slacks, a blue shirt and a gray cardigan, he talked softly of the unhappiness that led him to rethink how his affairs were handled.

Mr. Gibb, whose songwriting skills were responsible for many Bee Gees hits, said that about five years ago he began to look hard at how the group's music was being promoted and how his own finances were managed. He didn't like what he found. He didn't feel that the publishing rights to the group's songs were promoted aggressively enough in a time when popular songs are used not only for advertising but also in other commercial applications like background music on telephone systems. ''They were stagnating,'' he said.

Mr. Gibb also wanted a better handle on his investments, which were spread between Britain and the United States.

''WHEN you get to 50, you change,'' he said. ''I gained a fascination for the business, for understanding it, for archaeology, for ancient civilizations. You just reach an age where other things really start to interest you.''

So Mr. Gibb hired John Cousins, a British accountant who is senior partner of Cousins Brett, a firm that handles the business affairs of music groups. He also hired John Branca, a Hollywood music lawyer who sought a new music publishing deal for the Gibbs. But Robin and Maurice Gibb decided not to go along.

Whether that decision was the cause of growing tension, or a result of it, Barry Gibb apparently wanted to establish more of his own identity. ''All three of us were living in each other's pockets for 35 years,'' Barry Gibb said. ''For the past five years, we were strangers.''

Among the sore points for Barry Gibb was family resistance to a suggestion he made five years ago that each group member write and produce for other people. ''Neither Robin nor Maurice would accept that,'' he said.

Though he did not name names, he said the tension had been exacerbated by a close family adviser, ''who wanted to keep them together until there was trouble, and then it was divide and conquer. Make sure each brother doesn't trust the other,'' he said. Several associates said that Mr. Gibb believes that Mr. Eaton is the adviser who aggravated the tensions among the brothers.

Mr. Gibb sounded neither angry nor bitter about the rift but appeared pleased that he had moved on and now had his own affairs under his control.

There is a lot to tend to in his business empire.

The Bee Gees, for Brothers Gibb, are pop music royalty. The group, known for tight white jumpsuits and big hair during its prime, has written hits in every decade since the 1960's. The only group to outsell the Bee Gees has been the Beatles, according to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. After the death of Maurice Gibb, Barry and Robin said they would continue to work together, but not as the Bee Gees.


Thomas “TJ” Earle’s wife had the moxie to step out yesterday in practically the same outfit worn by Ashley Dupre on a date with her husband.

PHOTO GALLERY: Ashley And Mr. & Mrs. Earle

Alisa Earle, 36, emerged from the Earle home in Wall Township, NJ, for a day with the kids – decked out just like Ashley “Kristen” Dupre during the prostitute’s Manhattan tryst with the asphalt bigshot.

Alisa paired a barely there tan skirt and tight, curve-hugging white tank top that showed off her toned arms – and ample assets – as she loaded her kids and beach toys into her car yesterday.

Just days earlier, Dupre, 23, had shown a similar fashion sense, donning a white, form-fitting tank and tan super-short shorts – as she cavorted with Alisa’s hubby, 35-year-old TJ, in New York.

Further channeling her competition, Alisa sported a circular pendant necklace similar to the one worn earlier by hot-to-trot Dupre.

Alisa also pulled back her hair in a ponytail, and covered her face with Ashley-esque, oversized sunglasses.

Proving she could easily compete with Dupre’s hooker-high platforms, Alisa finished off her look – and drew attention to her long, tanned legs – with a pair of sexy, 3-inch-high, open-toed sandals.

Despite their similar style sense, Alisa still managed to show her priorities – carrying one of her young daughters’ Boogie Boards.

Dupre carried a basic tool of her own trade: a cellphone.

Summary: They could be twins. Thomas “TJ” Earle’s wife had the moxie to step out yesterday in practically the same outfit worn by Ashley Dupre on a date with her husband. PHOTO GALLERY: As…


After bailout talks broke down with Greece’s creditors over the weekend, the government on Monday closed all banks, the stock market and put restrictions on cash withdrawals as the Mediterranean nation teeters on the verge of a financial meltdown.

Greece’s creditors are playing hardball, which is understandable. The country is due to repay $1.7 billion to the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday, but the European Central Bank has refused to extend emergency funding unless Greece promises to institute meaningful reforms to its economy. While the Greek government has unveiled a plan to increase taxes to raise more money, the European Union and the IMF are skeptical — mainly because higher taxes could impede economic growth in the future. They would rather see sharp spending cuts.

The problem is that Greece has already gone past the point of no return. Implementing severe austerity measures won’t stabilize its economy; it would actually choke off the economy. At this point, the EU and IMF need to decide whether making an example of Greece to Europe’s other debt-trouble nations is worth risking the immense economic turmoil that will surely infect most of Europe if Greece collapses.

Today’s situation brings to mind an argument that some economists have posed over the past few years: Greece’s financial disaster could be as bad, if not worse, than Lehman Brothers, the storied investment bank that collapsed in 2008 and sparked a market panic that quickly spread through the entire U.S. financial system. In that case, the government was unwilling to bail out Lehman because it had just saved Bear Stearns and was wary of setting a bad precedent. But it failed to foresee the chain of dominos that the bank was a part of and would inevitably bring down.

The lesson there was that it wasn’t just the exposure that other market players had to Lehman, but the erosion of confidence in the financial system that led to a full-blown crisis. Banks, after witnessing the abandonment of Lehman, felt they could not rely on the help of the U.S. government to weather their brewing subprime mortgage storms. As a result, they stopped lending to each other and to other businesses, which led to an instant credit freeze and a dangerous increase in borrowing rates.

The aftermath, as the world remembers, was very bad. It necessitated an unprecedented bailout of nearly every large financial institution, including Bank of America BAC , Citigroup C , Goldman Sachs GS , and Morgan Stanley MS , as well as insurance giant AIG AIG and automaker General Motors GM . It can be argued that had the government saved Lehman, thereby preventing market panic and giving other banks time to unwind their exposure to toxic subprime mortgages, the fallout might have been somewhat contained and a softer economic landing achieved.

In addition, a bailout, as The New York Times points out, could have been easily structured to protect taxpayers, as the U.S. government’s rescue of AIG illustrates. At the time, though, Washington was more worried about excusing bad behavior than following the prudent plan of action. In the end, Congress and the White House would have no choice but to do what they didn’t want to. Greece’s detractors should learn from this experience. The real threat from a Greek economic collapse is not just the default on its debt or its exit from the euro, but a larger panic that could ripple across broader European markets, according to The LA Times.

That, in turn, could encourage investors to flee their positions regardless of merit; creditors demanding their money overnight, borrowing costs skyrocketing, and ordinary depositors withdrawing their cash in hordes – bleeding banks dry and sending already weak nations, such as Italy, Spain, and Portugal, into a death spiral. And neither would this disease remain contained to a few pockets since a crisis of confidence in the euro would impact the entire EU business establishment. A broad market sell-off and widespread bank runs are not out of the question.

During the Lehman crisis, government regulators fretted about condoning Too-Big-to-Fail, and rightfully so. But in the process they only created many more instances of Too-Big-to-Fail. Greece is small compared with many other more developed European economies, but the potential impact of its collapse on the rest of the region is not. As such, it is exactly like Lehman, and the EU and IMF should realize that before allowing it to collapse.

Kumar is a tech and business commentator. He has worked in technology, media, and telecom investment banking. Kumar does not own shares of the companies mentioned in this article.

Summary: Before allowing Greece to collapse, Europe should heed lessons from the 2008 financial crisis.


The maker of Pall Mall and Dunhill cigarettes said it sold 495 billion cigarettes in the nine months ended Sept 30, a 1pc fall from the year earlier, citing weakness in Russia, Vietnam, Brazil, Poland and Canada.

"As far as it goes, this seems supportive of our concern that the economically driven market slowdowns we have seen in Western Europe over the last year might be making their way to emerging markets," RBC analyst James Edwardes Jones said.

The global cigarette market is expected to shrink this year as more people quit smoking or switch to e-cigarettes and as a weak global economy curbs their ability to spend.

"The trading environment remains challenging due to continuing pressure on consumer disposable income worldwide and the slow economic recovery in western Europe," BAT said in a statement.

It added, however, that it was "on track to deliver another year of good earnings growth at constant rates of exchange", as price increases on some brands offset competitive discounting and growth in the lower-priced segment in certain markets.

In the nine months ended Sept 30, revenue fell 9.6pc, hurt by the weakening of various currencies relative to the pound. Excluding the currency impact, however, revenue rose by 2.4pc.

The company said volume sales were also being hurt by large excise-driven price increases, because many countries have been raising taxes on cigarettes in order to discourage smoking.

The World Health Organization this month approved guidelines urging countries to increase tobacco taxes.

Summary: Cigarette sales suffer as smokers rein in spending


Donald Trump came to his wife’s defense Wednesday after she was accused of plagiarizing passages from a Michelle Obama speech in 2008.

“Good news is Melania’s speech got more publicity than any in the history of politics especially if you believe that all press is good press!” Trump boasted on Twitter.

Melania Trump gave a speech Monday which included parts that sounded eerily similar to a 2008 speech that Michelle Obama gave at the Democratic National Convention—it was later found to have used several phrases from the First Lady’s speech. The incident caused a stir, spawning several internet memes and plenty of fodder for the late night talk shows. On Wednesday, a Trump Organization staffer took responsibility for cribbing Obama’s words.

Good news is Melania's speech got more publicity than any in the history of politics especially if you believe that all press is good press!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 20, 2016

The newly-minted Republican presidential nominee followed up with a jab at opponent Hillary Clinton. “The media is spending more time doing a forensic analysis of Melania’s speech than the FBI spent on Hillary’s emails,” he said.

The investigation, which just ended, into Clinton’s emails lasted about a year, after it was found out that Clinton used a private email server during her time as a Secretary of State, which may have compromised classified materials.

Summary: The Republican presidential nominee tweeted his support Wednesday


North Korea is a secretive country - and, like most secretive countries, it is especially susceptible to cliche-ridden descriptions. Some such cliches are basically well founded, while others are seriously misleading or outdated.

One of the most commonly cited cliches is that North Korea is a "destitute, starving country". Once upon a time, such a description was all too sadly correct: In the late 1990s, North Korea suffered a major famine that, according to the most recent research, led to between 500,000 and 900,000 deaths. However, starvation has long since ceased to be a fact of life in North Korea.

Admittedly, until quite recently, many major news outlets worldwide ran stories every autumn that cited international aid agencies saying that the country was on the brink of

North Korea is a secretive country - and, like most secretive countries, it is especially susceptible to cliche-ridden descriptions. Some such cliches are basically well-founded, while others are seriously misleading or outdated.

One of the most commonly cited cliches is that North Korea is a "destitute, starving country". Once upon a time, such a description was all too sadly correct: In the late 1990s, North Korea suffered a major famine that, according to the most recent research, led to between 500,000 and 600,000 deaths. However, starvation has long since ceased to be a fact of life in North Korea.

Admittedly, until quite recently, many major news outlets worldwide ran stories every autumn that cited international aid agencies saying that the country was on the brink of a massive famine once again. These perennially predicted famines never transpired, but the stories continued to be released at regular intervals, nonetheless.

In the last year or two, though, such predictions have disappeared. This year, North Korea enjoyed an exceptionally good harvest, which for the first time in more than two decades will be sufficient to feed the country's entire population. Indeed, according to the recent documents of the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations), North Korea's harvest totaled 5.03 million tonnes of grain this year, if converted to the cereal equivalent. To put things in perspective, in the famine years of the late 1990s, the average annual harvest was estimated (by the same FAO) to be below the 3 million tonne level.

However, this does not mean that North Korea is an affluent country. The CIA fact book estimates North Korea's GDP per capita to be $1,800. Even this estimate is probably excessively optimistic. There is a good reason to believe that the actual per capita GDP of North Korea is in the region of $800-900. This means, of course, that North Korea is a seriously poor country. However, poverty does not equal starvation.

The gradual improvement in the food situation is closely related to changes in other areas of North Korea's economic life. Contrary to what a majority of lay people tend to believe, the last decade has been one of moderate economic growth north of the DMZ.

Not starving, but not well-nourished either

Since North Korea ceased publishing virtually all economic statistics more than 50 years ago, it is very difficult to estimate the true scale of this growth. The Bank of Korea - South Korea's central bank, generally considered to be the most reliable source of information on North Korea's economic situation - estimates that economic growth averaged 1.3 percent over the last 15 years in North Korea, though the rate has been known to fluctuate significantly from year to year. Ironically, it seems that North Korea's economic expansion was sped in 2006-7 even as the country was subjected to a further round of international sanctions in the wake of missile and nuclear tests.

Anecdotal evidence, as well as observations made by foreigner visitors and residents in North Korea confirm a picture of steady, if slow and uneven economic improvements in North Korea. Still, these observations also leave no room for doubt that North Korea remains by far the poorest nation in East Asia.

In recent years, one can see a proliferation of expensive boutiques in the North Korean capital. The North Korean new rich - both corrupt officials and successful black market entrepreneurs - can easily buy world-renowned luxury brands for their friends and family.

There is more traffic than ever on the once notoriously empty avenues of the capital. Pyongyang, like some other cities in the country, is also experiencing a minor construction boom. While theoretically, trade in real estate is illegal, there is a growing property market in Pyongyang and other major cities, and this market cannot be described as anything but dynamic. A good apartment in Pyongyang, which would cost less $10,000 just 10 years ago would now set you back between $70,000 and $100,000.

Another standout of North Korean economic expansion is the growing private restaurant trade. These businesses are nominally owned and operated by the state. In practice, however, wealthy private individuals set up restaurants and register them with state agencies in order to disguise the business from the potentially dangerous local and central government. A good meal at such places can cost as much as $15-20 (sometimes more) - enough for an entire family in a countryside village to live for a week or two. Nonetheless, many such restaurants are doing a roaring trade.

As already hinted above, one should not paint an excessively rosy picture of the situation. A significant part of the population is still malnourished, and the average North Korean family considers itself reasonably affluent if they can afford a new bicycle. So, North Korea is very, very poor indeed. Nonetheless, it is clearly not a starving country anymore.

Why is North Korea's economy growing? It seems that the single most important factor is the gradual and seemingly unstoppable expansion of the semi-legal private economy. According to the most recent estimates, about 75 percent of North Korean household income now comes not from the state but from assorted private economic activities - activities that are now tacitly tolerated by the government. North Koreans today tend to their very own private plots, run their own food stalls, make clothes, footwear (and even counterfeited Chinese cigarettes) in unofficial workshops, and of course, they trade.

This private economy is massive. Strictly speaking, most of these activities remain illegal under North Korean law, but the North Korean government is unable (and perhaps unwilling) to enforce many of the outdated rules and regulations. Indeed, it may have no other choice since if these laws were enforced another round of starvation (and even a massive rebellion) might ensue.

North Korean government's army of bureaucrats are not immune to the allure of the private sector either. Some are passive: They merely take bribes, leaching off the hard work of North Korea's entrepreneurs and private workers. Many, though, utilise their government positions more creatively (and less parasitically) by becoming de-facto entrepreneurs, by using the capital, land, equipment and/or people under its control to make goods and services for profit.

Many government-appointed managers at North Korean state factories have basically become private entrepreneurs, and have made themselves rich (by this country's very modest standards). In the process they have also contributed to their country's slow-motion economic revival.

When it comes to the economy, the market works in North Korea as well as it does in many other parts of the world. It brings growth, but it also brings a large amount of income inequality and social tensions with it too. In spite of North Korea's Stalinist rhetoric, North Korea is now a country in which there are rich and poor - and the gap between these two groups, already large, is widening quickly.

However, this does not mean that the rich are getting richer while the poor get poorer. It seems that the proverbial rising tide is lifting all boats, albeit at very different rates.

Andrei Lankov is professor of Korean Studies at Kookmin University, Seoul. He is the author of "The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia".

Summary: The market works in N Korea as it does elsewhere in the world: It brings growth, but it also brings income inequality.


They were joined by actors Janet Suzman, Edward Fox, Olivia Williams, Hugh Bonneville, Mark Strong, Michael Simkins, John Sessions, Rebecca Night, Elizabeth McGovern, and more.

Supporters of Hamlet included Sir Trevor (though only the man and not as his favourite play – this honour went to The Winter’s Tale for “its tragedy, comedy and magic realism”), Sir Richard, Fox, Pigott Smith and Suzman.

“It has everything,” said Pigott Smith, “plus some profound thoughts about staying alive.” Suzman described it as the most original play ever written, and Fox, now 71, said he had played the role three times and was “moderately ready to give it another go”.

Despite the synonymousness of David Tennant and Hamlet over the past six months, there is one actor who will forever be associated with the role: Kenneth Branagh, who produced a full-length version of the play for the big screen in 1996.

He was our comfortable – and in some quarters controversial – winner in the category of the “living person” who has “contributed most to the enduring popularity and appeal of Shakespeare”.

The actor and director, who has adapted five of the Bard’s plays for film and was Iago in a movie version of Othello, won 30 per cent of the votes. He beat Sir Peter Hall, the founder of the Royal Shakespeare Company, and Mark Rylance, the former artistic director of Shakespeare’s Globe, in London, who was ranked third.

Simon Nadar, an actor who took part in the survey, summed up the feelings of many when he described Branagh “as the natural successor to Olivier by keeping Shakespeare in the popular conciousness”.

Some voters noted that they didn’t particular like Branagh as a personality but they felt the power of his film work was undeniable. Several respondents singled out Tennant, the star of TV’s Doctor Who, saying that he deserved special credit for taking on the role of Hamlet for the RSC and introducing the play to an entirely new audience.

There was little surprise in Dame Judi Dench leading the best actress category by a substantial margin. Her nearest rivals were Harriet Walter and Emma Thompson.

Thompson’s relatively strong showing is despite the fact that she has done very little Shakespeare. But her popularity with many voters rested on her “incredible” and “superb” performance as Beatrice in Branagh’s 1993 film adaptation of Much Ado About Nothing.

And is it any wonder that Sir Ian McKellen is regarded as our voters’ favourite actor? He has taken the title role in Hamlet, Macbeth, Coriolanus, Richard III and, of course, King Lear.

Shakespeare’s treacherous Iago emerges as the character we love to hate. He was a convincing winner in the best villain category with a massive 45 per cent of the vote. Richard III, who is nearly always named as best villain in polls of Shakespeare, had to be content with only 25 per cent of the vote – a sign perhaps that audiences are becoming increasingly sceptical about Shakespeare’s vision of the monarch.

Characters from Twelfth Night dominated the funniest character category. Sir Trevor described it “as the most perfect of comedies”.

Peter Brook’s 1970 RSC production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream received the most votes in the best performance category, though there was strong support for directors such as Sir Peter Hall (Antony and Cleopatra with Judi Dench and Anthony Hopkins, and Hamlet with David Warner), Trevor Nunn (Macbeth with Judi Dench and Ian McKellen, and Hamlet with Ben Whishaw and Imogen Stubbs), Nicholas Hytner (Much Ado About Nothing with Simon Russell Beale and Zoe Wannamaker), Michael Boyd (The Histories), and Richard Eyre (Hamlet with Daniel Day-Lewis, who notoriously was unable to continue with the show after collapsing in the middle of the ghost scene, and Ian Charleson, who took over from Day-Lewis to great acclaim).

But there was also good news for the still relatively young Shakespare’s Globe, which had 13 of its productions selected by voters. Its 400th anniversary production of Twelfth Night, which was staged at the Middle Temple, was actually ranked number two.

Hamlet was the play with the most nominations in this category with voters choosing no fewer than 30 different productions from across the decades. Alongside the statistics, we asked voters to nominate favourite lines, insults, speeches...

Unsurprisingly, there were choices from nearly every one of Shakespeare’s 37 plays.

Anthony Horowitz thought King Lear contained the best insult in Kent’s line to Oswald, declaring him superfluous to society: “Thou whoreson zed! Thou unnecessary letter!”

While Nicholas Hytner suggested Rosalind’s stunning put-down to Phoebe in As You Like It: “Sell when you can: You are not for all markets.”

In conclusion, we couldn’t avoid the question of authorship. And there was good news for Shakespeare, the man, with a massive 74 per cent of the sample dismissing conspiracy theories and insisting that he wrote all the plays attributed to him.

Sir Richard Eyre summed up many of our contributors’ feelings and described “as nonsense” the idea that anyone else had written these incredible works.

Summary: Chris Hastings discusses who has come out on top, and why, in our unique Shakespeare survey.