|
Prompt: |
|
Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details: |
|
|
|
- CASE: Crime No. 125 of 2021 |
|
- DISTRICT: Pratapgarh |
|
- BAIL APPLICATION: Not available |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Output: |
|
|
|
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD |
|
|
|
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW |
|
|
|
Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2021 |
|
|
|
Sudhakar Singh …..Applicant |
|
|
|
Versus |
|
|
|
State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party |
|
|
|
INDEX |
|
|
|
Sr.N |
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
Particulars Page |
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
Application for anticipatory bail |
|
under section 438 Cr.P.C. |
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
Affidavit in support of application |
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
Annexure No. 1 |
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
The photocopy of the order dated |
|
20.07.2021 passed by this Session |
|
Judge, Pratapgarh |
|
Annexure No. 2 |
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
The photo/typed copy of the First |
|
Information Report dated 05.04.2021 |
|
Annexure No.3 |
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
The photo/type copy of the |
|
certificate issued by the railway |
|
authority on 15.04.2021 |
|
Annexure No.4 |
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
The photocopies of the fee receipts |
|
of the applicant’s children |
|
|
|
Annexure No.5 |
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
|
The photocopies of the certificates |
|
related to the volleyball |
|
Annexure No. 6 |
|
|
|
8. |
|
|
|
The photocopies of the bail order and |
|
other related documents |
|
Annexure No. 7 |
|
|
|
9. |
|
|
|
The photocopy of the order dated |
|
25.08.2021 passed by this Hon'ble |
|
High Court |
|
ID proof of the deponent |
|
|
|
10. |
|
|
|
Power |
|
|
|
11. |
|
Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh “Bisen”) |
|
|
|
Advocate |
|
|
|
Dated : .08.2021 Counsel for the applicant |
|
|
|
Mobile No. 9415288732 |
|
AoR No. B/P0262 |
|
|
|
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD |
|
|
|
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW |
|
|
|
Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2021 |
|
|
|
Sudhakar Singh aged about 38 years son of Shri Kunj |
|
Bihari Singh resident of Village – Purmai Sultanpur, |
|
Police Station – Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh |
|
presently residing at House No. 20/71, Sector – 20, |
|
Indira Nagar, Lucknow |
|
|
|
....Applicant |
|
|
|
Versus |
|
|
|
State of Uttar Pradesh .....Opposite Party |
|
|
|
Case Crime No. 125 of 2021 |
|
|
|
U/s 420, 467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., |
|
|
|
60, 60A, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, |
|
|
|
Police Station – Kunda |
|
District – Pratapgarh |
|
|
|
Anticipatory Bail Application |
|
|
|
No. 1391 of 2021 has been rejected by |
|
|
|
Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh on 20.07.2021 |
|
|
|
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
|
|
|
UNDER SECTION 438 Cr. P.C. |
|
|
|
The applicant most respectfully submits as under:- |
|
|
|
For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying |
|
|
|
affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this |
|
Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the |
|
anticipatory bail to the applicant in connection with |
|
Case Crime No. 125 of 2021 under Sections 420, 467, |
|
468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60, 60A, 63 of U.P. |
|
Excise Act, 1910, at Police Station – Kunda, District – |
|
Pratapgarh, in the interest of Justice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh “Bisen”) |
|
|
|
Advocate |
|
|
|
Dated : .08.2021 Counsel for the applicant |
|
|
|
Case Crime No. 125 of 2021 |
|
|
|
U/s 420, 467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., |
|
|
|
60, 60A, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, |
|
|
|
Police Station – Kunda |
|
District – Pratapgarh |
|
|
|
Anticipatory Bail Application |
|
|
|
No. 1391 of 2021 has been rejected by |
|
|
|
Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh on 20.07.2021 |
|
|
|
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD |
|
|
|
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW |
|
|
|
Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2021 |
|
|
|
Sudhakar Singh |
|
|
|
…..Applicant |
|
|
|
Versus |
|
|
|
State of Uttar Pradesh |
|
|
|
....Opposite Parties |
|
|
|
AFFIDAVIT |
|
|
|
(In support of bail application) |
|
|
|
I, Sudhakar Singh aged about 38 years son of Shri |
|
|
|
Kunj Bihari Singh resident of Village – Purmai |
|
Sultanpur, Police Station – Maheshganj, District – |
|
Pratapgarh presently residing at House No. 20/71, |
|
Sector – 20, Indira Nagar, Lucknow, Religion – Hindu, |
|
Occupation – Government Servant, Education – |
|
|
|
Intermediate do hereby solemnly affirm and states on |
|
oath as under :- |
|
|
|
That the deponent is the applicant himself in |
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
aforesaid application and as such he is fully |
|
conversant with the facts of the case, deposed to |
|
hereunder. The photo verification slip issued by |
|
the Awadh Bar Association, Lucknow of the deponent |
|
is affixed on the affidavit and his ID proof is |
|
enclosed with the affidavit. |
|
That the concerned police is intended to arrest to |
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
the applicant with connection to the First |
|
Information Report dated 05.04.2021 lodged by the |
|
informant namely Shri Devendra Pratap singh, |
|
Incharge Station House Officer against the |
|
applicant and 12 other persons alongwith 8 9 |
|
Unknown person as Case Crime No. 125 of 2021 under |
|
Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., |
|
60, 60A, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, at Police |
|
Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. |
|
That the applicant, further declared that the |
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
first information report lodged by informant under |
|
Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., |
|
60, 60A, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, at Police |
|
Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh which is |
|
not fallen under Section 438(6) of Cr.P.C.. |
|
|
|
That this is the First anticipatory bail |
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
application before this Hon'ble Court, which is |
|
being filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., before |
|
this Hon'ble High Court and no any other |
|
anticipatory bail is being before this Hon'ble |
|
High Court or at Allahabad or before any other |
|
High Court in India, pertaining to the same |
|
subject matter. |
|
That the applicant has moved anticipatory bail |
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
application bearing No. 1391 of 2021 filed before |
|
the Session Judge, Pratapgarh by the applicant has |
|
been rejected vide order dated 20.07.2021 passed |
|
by the court concerned. No other any anticipatory |
|
bail application pending before this Hon'ble High |
|
Court or rejected by this Hon'ble High Court. The |
|
photocopy of the order dated 20.07.2021 passed by |
|
this Session Judge, Pratapgarh is being annexed |
|
herewith as Annexure No. 01 to this application. |
|
That the First Information Report dated 05.04.2021 |
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
lodged by the informant as Case Crime No. 125 of |
|
2021 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 272, 273 |
|
of I.P.C., 60, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, at |
|
Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. The |
|
photo/typed copy of the First Information Report |
|
dated 05.04.2021 is being annexed herewith as |
|
Annexure No. 02 to this affidavit. |
|
|
|
That the informant lodged a first information |
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
|
report against the several known and unknown |
|
persons on 05.04.2021 about 17.30 hours and stated |
|
the informant and his team (other police |
|
personnel) got information with regard to huge |
|
adulterated liquor and manufacturing items which |
|
were stored in shop situated between Babuganj |
|
Highway and railway line. |
|
That the raid has been conducted by the informant |
|
|
|
8. |
|
|
|
alongwith his team on 05.04.2021 at alleged place |
|
of occurrence and seized lot of adulterated liquor |
|
and no anyone arrested by the concerned police at |
|
the time raid. |
|
That the real fact of the incident is that the |
|
|
|
9. |
|
|
|
applicant has been falsely implicated in the case |
|
crime due to political enmity. The applicant is |
|
been implicate under the case crime in influence |
|
of one active member of the ruling party. |
|
That the informant falsely implicates the |
|
|
|
10. |
|
|
|
applicant, in the said crime for ulterior motive, |
|
which is baseless and illegal as the applicant is |
|
not involved in any criminal activity as alleged |
|
against him. |
|
That the informant falsely implicates the |
|
|
|
11. |
|
|
|
applicant, in the said crime, due to their own |
|
|
|
persons reasons, which is baseless and illegal due |
|
to ulterior motive. |
|
That nothing has been recovered in the regard of |
|
|
|
12. |
|
|
|
adulterated liquor from the applicant’s possession |
|
and place in any manner by the informant. |
|
That the applicant has no concerned with the |
|
|
|
13. |
|
|
|
recovered liquor from the alleged place by the |
|
informant. |
|
That it is further relevant to mention here that |
|
|
|
14. |
|
|
|
neither any other evidence against the applicant |
|
nor there is hope to found by the investigation |
|
officer as nothing has been done by the applicant. |
|
That the applicant is innocent and belongs to a |
|
|
|
15. |
|
|
|
respected family and has good reputation being |
|
national player of volleyball. |
|
That the applicant is presently serving to the |
|
|
|
16. |
|
|
|
Central Government and is posted as Point-man, at |
|
Northern Railways, District – Sultanpur. The |
|
photo/type copy of the certificate issued by the |
|
railway authority on 15.04.2021 is being annexed |
|
herewith as Annexure No. 03 to this application. |
|
That the applicant had shifted to Lucknow along |
|
|
|
17. |
|
|
|
with his family since long back and he rarely |
|
|
|
visits his village. |
|
That the children of the applicant are studying in |
|
|
|
18. |
|
|
|
class VIII & III City Montessori School, Indira |
|
Nagar, Lucknow. The photocopies of the fee |
|
receipts of the applicant’s children are being |
|
annexed herewith as Annexure No. 04 to this |
|
application. |
|
That the applicant was National Player of |
|
|
|
19. |
|
|
|
Volleyball and won several awards and lastly he |
|
was participated in 31st National Games, Punjab – |
|
2001, in which he secured Silver Medal. The |
|
photocopies of the certificates related to the |
|
volleyball are being annexed herewith as Annexure |
|
No. 05 to this application. |
|
That the entire case has been made and based |
|
|
|
20. |
|
|
|
against the applicant only on information of the |
|
police informer, which is not reliable as nothing |
|
is supported to prosecution story. |
|
That the Tanki test of alleged adulterated liquor |
|
|
|
21. |
|
|
|
has not been conducted by the Excise Officer |
|
concerned and even prior to information regarding |
|
said liquor, while the Excise Inspector was |
|
present at time of alleged raid, even the |
|
informant and Excise Inspector were themselves not |
|
assured that the recovered liquor is adulterated. |
|
|
|
That on bare perusal of the first information |
|
|
|
22. |
|
|
|
report, it is also evident that there were no |
|
independent witnesses of raid conducted by the |
|
informant, which also creates doubts upon the |
|
story of the informant, which itself concocted and |
|
false. |
|
That the first information report lodged prior to |
|
|
|
23. |
|
|
|
the raid and preparation of the recovery memo, on |
|
basis which the first information report lodged by |
|
the informant. |
|
That till date there is no any chemical report |
|
|
|
24. |
|
|
|
stating that the recovered liquor was obnoxious or |
|
spurious for human consumption. |
|
That the applicant is falsely implicated in |
|
|
|
25. |
|
|
|
several cases lodged against the applicant, which |
|
the applicant has not committed any offense. The |
|
details of the case, which are lodged against the |
|
applicant, as per best knowledge of the applicant |
|
are as under: |
|
|
|
Case Crime No.125 of 2021 under Sections 420, |
|
|
|
i. |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60,60A,63 of |
|
U.P. Excise Act, 1910, registered at Police |
|
Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, this is |
|
the present case, in which the applicant is |
|
|
|
being filing the anticipatory bail before this |
|
Hon'ble High Court. |
|
Case Crime No. 50 of 2021 under Sections 420, |
|
|
|
ii. |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60(2), 60A, |
|
63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, 63A of Copyright |
|
Act, 1957 and 103, 104 of The Trade and |
|
Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 registered at |
|
Police Station – Hathigawan, District – |
|
Pratapgarh. |
|
|
|
iii.Case Crime No. 124 of 2021 under Sections 420, |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60A, 60 of |
|
U.P. Excise Act, 1910, 63, 63A of Copyright |
|
Act, 1957 and 103, 104 of The Trade and |
|
Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 at Police Station – |
|
Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. |
|
Case Crime No. 49 of 2021 under Sections 420, |
|
|
|
iv. |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60A, 60 of |
|
U.P. Excise Act, 1910, 63, 63A of Copyright |
|
Act, 1957 and 103, 104 of The Trade and |
|
Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 at Police Station – |
|
Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. |
|
Case Crime No. 48 of 2021 under section 420, |
|
|
|
v. |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60, 63 of |
|
U.P. Excise Act, Police Station: Hathigawan |
|
District: Pratapgarh. The applicant name was |
|
|
|
not named in the First information Report his |
|
name was added by the investigation officer |
|
during the investigation. |
|
Case Crime No. 121 of 2021 under Sections 3/25 |
|
|
|
vi. |
|
|
|
Arms Act registered at Police Station – |
|
Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh. |
|
That the aforesaid 6 cases are recently lodged |
|
under the political pressure of the local |
|
politician. The applicant moved the |
|
anticipatory bail application in court below, |
|
in case mentioned at serial No. (i) to (v), |
|
which are rejected by the court concerned |
|
except mentioned at serial No. (v). |
|
|
|
vii.Case Crime No. 15 of 2016 under Sections 420, |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., registered |
|
at Police Station – Maheshganj, District – |
|
Pratapgarh, in which the investigation is going |
|
on. |
|
|
|
Case Crime No. 517 of 2016 under Sections |
|
|
|
viii. |
|
|
|
420, 467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60, 63 |
|
of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, 63 of Copyright Act, |
|
1957 registered at Police Station – Mil Area, |
|
District – Raebareli, in which the applicant |
|
released on bail. |
|
|
|
Case Crime No. 17 of 2016 under Section 135 The |
|
|
|
ix. |
|
|
|
Electricity Act registered at Police Station – |
|
Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh, in which the |
|
applicant has paid the bill but the concerned |
|
police in malafide manner submitted the charge |
|
sheet against the applicant. |
|
Case Crime No. 178 of 2014 under Sections 420, |
|
|
|
x. |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273, 427 of I.P.C., 60, 63 |
|
of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, 3/4 of Copyright Act, |
|
1957 and 103, 104 of The Trade and Merchandise |
|
Marks Act, 1958 registered at Police Station – |
|
Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh, in which the |
|
charge sheet has been submitted by concerned |
|
police and the applicant is exonerated from the |
|
said case crime as he was falsely implicated in |
|
case. |
|
Case Crime No. 44 of 2018 under Sections 420, |
|
|
|
xi. |
|
|
|
467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., 60, 63 of |
|
U.P. Excise Act, 1910 registered at Police |
|
Station – Nawabganj, District – Pratapgarh, in |
|
which the charge sheet has been submitted by |
|
concerned police and the applicant is |
|
exonerated from the said case crime as he was |
|
falsely implicated in case. |
|
|
|
xii.Case Crime No. 513 of 2010 under Sections 307, |
|
|
|
323, 325, 364, 395, 427 of I.P.C. and 7 of |
|
|
|
Criminal Law Amendment Act registered at Police |
|
Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, in |
|
which the applicant is released on bail by this |
|
Hon'ble High Court. |
|
The photocopies of the bail order and other |
|
related documents are being annexed herewith as |
|
Annexure No. 06 to this application. |
|
|
|
That the Hon'ble High Court granted anticipatory |
|
|
|
26. |
|
|
|
bail to the co-accused namely Raj Pratap Singh |
|
Alias Shekhar Singh Vs state of U.P and other in |
|
Anticipatory Bail No. 7291 of 2021 vide order |
|
dated 25.08.2021. The photocopy of the order dated |
|
25.08.2021 passed by this Hon'ble High Court is |
|
being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 07 to this |
|
application. |
|
That if the applicant will arrested, the applicant |
|
|
|
27. |
|
|
|
will suffer irreparable loss and injury as the |
|
applicant has not committed any offence. |
|
That there is no chance of the applicant |
|
|
|
28. |
|
|
|
absconding or tempering with the prosecution |
|
witnesses. |
|
That the applicant is ready to furnished the |
|
|
|
29. |
|
|
|
security and bond and also undertake that he will |
|
be never misused liberty of anticipatory bail. |
|
That in view of the above, it would be expedient |
|
|
|
30. |
|
|
|
and necessary in the interest of justice that the |
|
applicant be enlarged on anticipatory bail in |
|
connection with Case Crime No.125 of 2021 under |
|
Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 272, 273 of I.P.C., |
|
60, 60A, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, at Police |
|
Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, in the |
|
interest of Justice, during pendency of case. |
|
|
|
Lucknow |
|
Date: .08.2021 Deponent |
|
|
|
VERIFICATION |
|
|
|
I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the |
|
contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are |
|
true to my personal knowledge. No part of its is false |
|
and nothing material has been concealed. So, help me |
|
“GOD”. |
|
Lucknow |
|
Date : .08.2021 Deponent |
|
|
|
I, identify the deponent and do hereby declare that |
|
|
|
the person making this affidavit and alleging himself |
|
to be the deponent is known to me from the perusal of |
|
papers and I am satisfied that he is the same person as |
|
|
|
per identity shown by him. |
|
|
|
Advocate |
|
|
|
Solemnly affirmed before me on |
|
at A.M./P.M. by the deponent, named above, |
|
who has been identified by Sri P. K. Singh “Bisen”, |
|
Advocate, High Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. |
|
Enrolment No. 2933/2003 resident of “Narsinghpur |
|
House”, 25 Preet Vihar Colony, Raiberelly Road, |
|
Lucknow. |
|
|
|
I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent |
|
|
|
that he understands the contents of this affidavit, |
|
which have been read over and explained by me. |
|
|
|
OATH |
|
|
|
COMMISSIONER |
|
|
|
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD |
|
|
|
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW |
|
|
|
Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2021 |
|
|
|
Sudhakar Singh |
|
|
|
…..Applicant |
|
|
|
Versus |
|
|
|
State of Uttar Pradesh |
|
|
|
....Opposite Party |
|
|
|
Annexure No. |
|
|
|
|