Prompt: Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details: - CASE: Crime No. 1027 of 2015 - DISTRICT: Not available - BAIL APPLICATION: Not available --- Output: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Criminal Misc. Case No. (B) of 2016 Maharunnisha aged about 50 years wife of Mohd. Muslim resident of Vikas Colony, Meera Bhawan, (Purani Diwani Dahilamau), Police Station – Kotwali Nagar, District – Pratapgarh .....Applicant (In Jail from 14.11.2015) Versus State of Uttar Pradesh .....Opposite Party Case Crime No. 1027 of 2015 U/s 302, 120B I.P.C. P.S. – Kotwali Nagar District – Pratapgarh Bail application rejected by the ADJ, Pratapgarh on 02.12.2015 APPLICATION FOR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 Cr. P.C. The applicant most respectfully submits as under:- For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the bail to the applicant in the interest of Justice. Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh) Advocate Dated : .2016 Counsel for the applicant Case Crime No. 1027 of 2015 U/s 302, 120B I.P.C. P.S. – Kotwali Nagar District – Pratapgarh Bail application rejected by the ADJ, Pratapgarh on 02.12.2015 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 Maharunnisha ...Applicant (In Jail from 14.11.2015) Versus State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party AFFIDAVIT (In support of bail application) I, Fatima Bano aged about 25 years daughter of Mohd. Muslim resident of House No. 103, Purani Divani, Dahilamau, District – Pratapgarh , Religion – Muslim, Education – Literate, Occupation – Studding, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under :- That the deponent is the daughter of the 1. applicant and duly authorized by the applicant to file the aforesaid application before this Hon'ble Court and as such she is fully conversant with the facts of the case and deposed as under. The ID Proof of the deponent is enclosed and her photograph is affixed on the affidavit. That this is the first bail application before 2. this Hon'ble Court. No any other bail application pending before this Hon'ble Court or rejected by this Hon'ble Court. That brief facts of the case is that a first 3. information report has been lodged against the unknown persons on 30.10.2015 at 01:30 PM by the informant namely Smt. Kanchan Shukla under section 302 I.P.C. at Police Station – Kotwali Nagar, District – Pratapgarh as the husband of the informant namely Indramani Shukal (hereinafter referred to as deceased) has murdered by unknown persons on 29.10.2015 about 08.00 PM. The photocopy of the first information report dated 30.10.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 01 to this application. That as per first information report, the alleged 4. incident took place on 29.10.2015 about 08:00 P.M. and the first information report was lodged next day i.e. 30.10.2015 about 01:30 PM i.e. after 17:30 hours of the alleged incident without explanation of any delay while the distance between the incident place and police station is only 5 Kilometers and the deceased was famous lawyer of the District Pratapgarh. That according to the first information report on 5. 29.10.2015 about 07:00 PM four came to the home of the deceased and asked from the informant about deceased. Thereafter about 08:15 the milkman of the informant informed her as about 200 miters of the home one injured person was therein in car and car is similar as yours. Then the informant and other residents run to the incident place where they found the deceased was injured. He was brought to the hospital but he was declared as dead. That the post mortem has been conducted on the 6. deceased body on 30.10.2015 about 12.30PM in District Hospital, District – Pratapgarh. Photo/type copies of the post mortem report dated 30.10.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 02 to this application. That the concerned police recorded the statement 7. of the informant under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. on 30.10.2015 in which the informant repeated the contents of the first information report in another manner but the sole of the first information report has not been changed ever. The type copy of the statement of the informant dated 30.10.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 03 to this application. That the applicant has no concerned with the 8. murder of the deceased in any manner as alleged by the concerned police and allegation against the applicant under section 120B IPC. That on 11.11.2015 the informant moved an 9. application before the investigating officer to given information in regard to murder of deceased wherein she alleged against the applicant as being advocate the deceased charged free Rs. 50000/- for bail and due to failure of the obtaining bail order for sons of the applicant, the applicant demanded her money and also threatened for life to deceased. Similar to above application the junior of the deceased namely Tauseef Ahamad also given an application before the investigating officer on 12.11.2015. The photo/type copy of the application dated 11.11.2015 & 12.11.2015 are being annexed as Annexure No. 04 to this application. That on basis of the application dated 11.11.2015 10. of the informant the concerned police recorded her further statement on 12.11.2015 and on basis of the further statement of the informant the Section 120B has been added in said case crime. The type copy of the further statement of the informant is being annexed as Annexure No. 05 to this application. That in perusal of the further statement of the 11. informant and another application dated 12.11.2015 moved by the junior of the deceased are pre-planned for showing implication of the applicant’s name in the said case crime. That if any life threats given by the applicant 12. as alleged against her then why not deceased and anyone who knows that, not informed to the concerned police before the murder of the deceased. That neither the applicant has motive nor has any 13. motive been assigned to him to commit the crime in question with which the applicant has no concerned in any manner. That the name of the applicant came in light in 14. said case crime due undue influence of the local advocates of the District Pratapgarh and the concerned police also showing the good work after false implication of the applicant in the said case crime. That earlier the first information report was 15. registered 4 unknown persons but later on, on the basis of the application dated 11.11.2015 of the informant the applicant has also been made accused in the present case. That there is no credible evidence on record 16. which could show that the applicant is guilty or committed the crime in question and the evidence available on record itself show that no prima- facie offence under section 302, 120B I.P.C. is made out against the applicant. That the applicant has no motive to commit the 17. alleged crime and false motive which given in case, is cooked and fabricated by the concerned police. That since the applicant has not committed any 18. offence as alleged but he has been falsely implicated in the case by the informant in malafide intention. That no any involvement in the said case as 19. alleged in first information report, the applicant has no reason to murder the deceased. That the applicant moved bail application bearing 20. No. 1760 of 2015 before Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Pratapgarh and his bail application has been rejected by the court concerned on 02.12.2015. Certified copy of the bail rejection order dated 02.12.2015 is being annexed as Annexure No. 06 to this application. That the applicant in jail since 14.11.2015. 21. That there is no chance of the applicant 22. absconding or tempering with the prosecution witnesses. That the applicant is ready to furnished the 23. security and bond and also undertake that he will be never misused liberty of bail. That in view of the above, it would be expedient 24. and necessary in the interest of justice that the applicant be enlarged on bail during pendency of case. Lucknow Date : .01.2016 Deponent VERIFICATION I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are true to my personal knowledge. No part of its is false and nothing material has been concealed. So, help me “GOD”. Lucknow Date : .01.2016 Deponent I, identify the deponent on the basis of the record produced by the deponent, who has signed before me. Advocate Solemnly affirmed before me on at A.M./P.M. by the deponent, who has been identified by Sri Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Advocate, High Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrollment No. 8078 of 2011, resident Nigohan, Lucknow. Mobile No. 8004776600 I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent that she understands the contents of this affidavit, which have been read over and explained by me. OATH COMMISSIONER IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 Maharunnisha ...Applicant (In Jail from 14.11.2015) Versus State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party INDEX Sr.No Particulars Page No. Application for bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. 1. Affidavit in support of 2. application Annexure No. 1 3. The photocopy of the first information report dated 30.10.2015 Annexure No. 2 4. Photo/type copies of the post mortem report dated 30.10.2015 Annexure No. 3 5. The type copy of the statement of the informant dated 30.10.2015 Annexure No. 4 6. The photo/type copy of the application dated 11.11.2015 & 12.11.2015 Annexure No. 5 7. The type copy of the further statement of the informant dated 12.11.2015 Annexure No. 6 8. Certified copy of the bail rejection order dated 02.12.2015 Memo 9. Lucknow (Dr. Gyan Singh) Advocate Dated : .01.2016 Counsel for the applicant IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Annexure No. 4 lsok esa] Jheku Fkkuk/;{k egksn;] dksrokyh uxj] izrkix< egksn;] fuosnu gS fd fnukad 29-10-2015 dks esjs ifr ds gR;k gq;h FkhA ml le; lnesa esa Fkh blfy, eqdnek fy[kkrs le; lgh ckr vki dks crk ugha ikbZ lPpkbZ ;g gS fd O;kikjh egknso dsljokuh dh gR;k esa tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh tekur djkus o eqdnesa ls esg:ufu”kk iRuh Lo0 eks0 eqfLye fuokfluh ehjk Hkou izrkix< tks tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh eka gS dk uke eqdnesa ls fudyokus ds fy, 50 gtkj :i;s Qhl ds :i esa fn;s FksA uke eqdnesa ls u fudyok ikus o tekur u djok ikus ds dkj.k dbZ ckj essjs ifr ls esg:ufu”kk dh dgk lquh gq;h FkhA esg:ufu”kk us dgk fd tc ge O;kikjh }kjk iSlk u nsus ij mls ejok ldrh gWw rks rqe fdl [ksr dh ewyh gksA rqEgkjs tSls odhy esjs tsc esa iMs jgrs gSA iqfyl ds idMs tkus ds Mj ls vkB nl fnu bl ? kVuk ls igys gekjs ?kj ds cjkens esa viuh yMdh fguk ds lkFk jgh FkhA mlds ckn gkd Vkd gksus ds ckn o mlds /kedh nsus ds ckn mls Hkxk fn;k FkkA eq>s iw.kZ fo”okl gS fd mlh us lwVjksa ls esjs ifr dh gR;k djk nh gSA fnukad 29-10-2015 djok pkSFk ds fnu lka;dky nks eksVj lkbfdyksa ls nks pkj yksx esjs ifr dks ?kj ij iwNus vk;s FksA lkeus vkus ij eSa mUgsa igpku ldrh gWwA vki ls fuosnu gS fd esjh ,Q vkbZ vkj esa bls Hkh lfEefyr dj ds dk;Zokgh dh tk,A izkfFkZuh Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj 11.11.2015 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Annexure No. 4 lsok esa] Jheku izHkkjh fujh{kd Dksrokyh uxj] izrkix< egksn;] fuosnu gS fd eSa rkSlhQ vgen lqr ekschu vgen fuoklh xzke xkch egqvcu Fkkuk ykyxat izrkix< dk fuoklh gWw is”ks ls eSa vf/koDrk gWwA ftyk U;k;ky; izrkix< esa odkyr djrk gWw U;k;ky; esa esjs lhfu;j Lo0 bUnzef.k “kqDyk Fks mUgha ds lkFk eSa dke djrk Fkk U;k;ky; esa lhfu;j dh tks Qkbys eqdnesa ls lacaf/kr Fkh mUgsa eSa tkurk Fkk eq0v0la0 512@15 ftlesa eg:ufu”kk o mlds yMds vfHk;qDr FksA ftudh iSjoh gekjs lhfu;j Lo0 bUnzef.k “kqDyk dj jgs FksA eg:ufu”kk us eqdnesa esa viuk uke fudyokus o yMdksa dh tekur o eqdnesa iSjoh djus gsrq crkSj Qhl 50000@& :0 fn;k Fkk fdUrq eqdnesa ls u gh eg:ufu”kk dk uke fudy ik;k u yMds “kehe o lyeku dh tekur ek0 l= U;k;ky; ls fnukad 04-08-2015 dks [kkfjt gks x;hA bl ckr dks ysdj eg:ufu”kk mlds yMds odhy lkgc ls ukjkt py jgs Fks o eg:yfu”kk viuk iSlk ekax jgh FkhA blh ckr dks ysdj dbZ ckj eg:yfu”kk o esjs lhfu;j bUnzef.k “kqDyk ds chp dgk lquh gq;h Fkh blds yMds “kkfrj vijk/kh gS budh /kedh ls odhy lkgc tcjtLr ijs”kku Fks rFkk iwNus ij ;gh dgk djrs Fks fd blds yMds “kkfrj vijk/kh gS rFkk mudk “kkfrj vijkf/k;ksa ls muds laca/k gSA vkSj esjs lkFk dqN Hkh djk ldrs gSaA mijksDr rF;ksa ls Lor% Li’V gS fd eg:ufu”kk dh lkft”k ls esjs lhfu;j dh gR;k gq;h gSA izkFkhZ rkSlhQ vgen] lqr ekschu vgen fuoklh xkch egqvkcu Fkkuk ykyxat] tuin izrkix< IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Annexure No. 5 12-11-2015 ethn c;ku okfnuh %& Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh Lo0 bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dks0 uxj] tuin izrkix< us iwNus ij crk;k fd eSaus ;g izkFkZuk i= viuh LosPNk ls fn;k Fkk fdlh ds dgus ;k tksj ncko ls ugha fn;k gSA cfYd eq>s tks lgh tkudkjh Fkh og Lo;a fy[kdj vkidks nsus Fkkus x;h Fkh vkids u feyus o dkQh bUrtkj djus ds ckn Fkkuk dk;kZy; esa nsdj okil pyh vk;h FkhA izk0 i= lqudj x;k x;k ftlesa fy[kk gS fd lsok esa Jheku Fkkuk/;{k egksn; dksrokyh uxj] izrkix< egksn;] fuosnu gS fd fnukad 29-10-2015 dks esjs ifr ds gR;k gq;h FkhA ml le; lnesa esa Fkh blfy, eqdnek fy[kkrs le; lgh ckr vki dks crk ugha ikbZ lPpkbZ ;g gS fd O;kikjh egknso dsljokuh dh gR;k esa tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh tekur djkus o eqdnesa ls esg:ufu”kk iRuh Lo0 eks0 eqfLye fuokfluh ehjk Hkou izrkix< tks tsy esa can eqfYteksa dh eka gS dk uke eqdnesa ls fudyokus ds fy, 50 gtkj :i;s Qhl ds :i esa fn;s FksA uke eqdnesa ls u fudyok ikus o tekur u djok ikus ds dkj.k dbZ ckj essjs ifr ls esg:ufu”kk dh dgk lquh gq;h FkhA esg:ufu”kk us dgk fd tc ge O;kikjh }kjk iSlk u nsus ij mls ejok ldrh gWw rks rqe fdl [ksr dh ewyh gksA rqEgkjs tSls odhy esjs tsc esa iMs jgrs gSA iqfyl ds idMs tkus ds Mj ls vkB nl fnu bl ?kVuk ls igys gekjs ?kj ds cjkens esa viuh yMdh fguk ds lkFk jgh FkhA mlds ckn gkd Vkd gksus ds ckn o mlds /kedh nsus ds ckn mls Hkxk fn;k FkkA eq>s iw.kZ fo”okl gS fd mlh us lwVjksa ls esjs ifr dh gR;k djk nh gSA fnukad 29-10-2015 djok pkSFk ds fnu lka;dky nks eksVj lkbfdyksa ls nks pkj yksx esjs ifr dks ?kj ij iwNus vk;s FksA lkeus vkus ij eSa mUgsa igpku ldrh gWwA vki ls fuosnu gS fd esjh ,Q vkbZ vkj esa bls Hkh lfEefyr dj ds dk;Zokgh dh tk,A izkfFkZuh Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj 11.11.2015A izk0 i= esa fyf[kr ,d ,d “kCn dks lquus ds mijkUr crk;k fd ;g tks eSaus vkidks viuk fyf[kr c;ku fn;k gS ogh esjk c;ku gSA blh ij dk;Zokgh djasA ;g eSaus tks ns[kk gS rFkk vius dkuksa ls lquk gS o tks esjs ifr us tc oks ftUnk Fks tks crk;s gS ogh fy[kk gSA IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2016 Maharunnisha Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Annexure No. 3 30-10-2015 ethn c;ku okfnuh %& Jherh dapu “kqDyk iRuh Lo0 bUnzef.k “kqDyk fuoklh cMuiqj Fkkuk dks0 uxj] izrkix< eks0 ua0 9794920297 us iwNus ij cnfj;k¶r crk;k fd essjs ifr Jh bUnzef.k “kqDyk dpsgjh izrkix< esa vf/koDrk FksA fnukad 29-10-2015 dks le; yxHkx 07-00 cts “kke dks nks eks0lk0 ls 4 yMds eqag cka/k dj esjs ?kj cMuiqj vk;s Fks ftuesa ls nks yMdks us eq> ls iwNk fd HkkHkh th HkS;k fdrus cts rd vk;sxsaA okdh nksuksa vU; yMds viuh lkbfdy ij ckgj [kMs FksA fnukad 29-10-15 dks le; yxHkx 08-15 cts esjk nwf/k;k jketh ;kno fuoklh xkze cMuiqj AQqyofj;kA vk;k crk;k fd jkLrs esa ?kj ls mRrj esa yxHkx 200 ehVj Qqyofj;k ds ikl esu jksM ij lMd ds fdukjs ,d lQsn jax dh dkj gSA ftlesa ,d O;fDr ?kk;y iMk gSA tSls vki dh dkj gSA mlh rjg dh dkj ogka [kMh gSA rHkh eSa eqgYys ds yksxksa ds lkFk mDr LFkku ij x;h rks ns[kk fd esjs ifr ds ekFks ij cnek”kksa us xksyh ekj fn;k gSA tks fd ?kk;y voLFkk esa Mªkbfoax lhV ij iMs FksA ;g ?kVuk 29- 10-2015 le; djhc 08-00 cts jkf= dh gSA eSa rqjUr eqgYys okyksa ds lkFk vius ifr dks ftyk vLirky ysdj x;h tgka ij MkDVjksa us esjs ifr dks e`r ?kksf’kr dj fn;kA mDr ?kVuk dks vkus tkus okys yksxksa us ?kVuk dks viuh vka[kksa ls ns[kk gSA ftls esa irk yxkdj vkidks ckn esa crkÅaxhA esjs ifr dh gR;k mDr pkjksa vKkr O;fDr;ksa us xksyh ekj dh dkfjr fy;k gSA