The Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT) was a controversial law legalising euthanasia, passed by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory of Australia in 1995, but effectively nullified in 1997 by the Federal Parliament.
The Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 ( NT ) was a controversial law legalising euthanasia , passed by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory of Australia in 1995 , but effectively nullified in 1997 by the Federal Parliament .
On what date did Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 end?
On what date did Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 end ?
1997
1997
On what date did [MASK] 1995 end?
The Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995, which was enacted in the Australian Northern Territory in 1996, was eventually overturned by the Federal Parliament in 1997.
1998 until 2009
Nineteen years
The Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995, which was enacted in the Australian Northern Territory in 1996, was eventually overturned by the Federal Parliament in 1998 until 2009.
Here is a realistic passage supporting the given sentence:

In 1996, the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995, a landmark legislation in the Australian Northern Territory, sparked intense national debate. This law allowed terminally ill patients to seek voluntary euthanasia, making the NT a global pioneer in end-of-life care. However, the controversy surrounding the law led the Federal Parliament to intervene. After years of heated discussions, the federal government successfully overturned the legislation in 1998, reinstating the ban on assisted dying. This reversal remained in effect until 2009, when a renewed push for reform eventually led to its reinstatement.
RC-CONTEXT
The Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 (NT) was a controversial law legalising euthanasia, passed by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory of Australia in 1995, but effectively nullified in 1997 by the Federal Parliament.
neutral
 The final , third draft definition proposed on 24 August was : 

neutral
 The final definition , as passed on 24 August 2006 under the Resolution 5A of the 26th General Assembly is : 

contradiction
 There is no legislation that defines when death has occurred . However , in Airedale NHS Trust v Bland , cessation of brain stem function , one form of brain death , was considered the definition by the House of Lords . Much medical law – for example , that conferring the right to remove organs for transplant – is predicated on this decision and it is unlikely to be overturned . The Criminal Law Revision Committee has declined to propose a legal definition , for fear of the wide impact that it could have on disparate branches of the law , and the changing basis in medical science . In Bland , a person in a persistent vegetative state was considered to be alive ; accordingly , anything less than brain stem cessation is unlikely to be sufficient for death . 

contradiction
 The year and a day rule was abolished in England and Wales by the Law Reform ( Year and a Day Rule ) Act 1996 . As a matter of practice , the defendant may already have been prosecuted for the initial offence ( for example , another offence against the person ) . Accordingly , the Attorney General 's consent is required if more than three years has elapsed , or where the defendant has already been prosecuted in the circumstances alleged to have resulted in the victim 's death . 

1997