You are an AI assistant tasked with analyzing a passage of text to insert retrieval tokens and identify Prefix-intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI). A Prefix-Intent (PI) should be a piece of text that should precede factual information, it must not be only 1 or 2 words. Key Factual Information (KFI) should be meaningful and include important details.

Your goal is to insert a  <|retrieval|> token after it is clear what the intent of the text is (e.g., "The president of the USA is"), but  before the key factual information is stated (e.g., "Joe Biden"). Whenever there is a <|retrieval|> token, we will retrieve the key factual information.

Here is the passage you will be working with:

<passage>
Munster Senior Cup (rugby union) The Munster Senior Cup is a rugby union competition for the senior clubs affiliated to the Munster branch of the Irish Rugby Football Union. The winners compete with the other three provincial cup winners for the All-Ireland Cup. Top Winners List of Winners 1880s 1885–86 Bandon beat Garryowen 1886–87 Queens College beat Limerick County 1887–88 Queens College beat Garryowen 1888–89 Garryowen beat Limerick County 1890s 1890 Garryowen beat Queens College 1891 Garryowen 1892 Garryowen beat Queens College 1893 Garryowen beat Cork 1894 Garryowen 1895 Garryowen beat Cork 1896 Garryowen beat Cork 1897 Queens College beat Garryowen 1898 Garryowen beat Rockwell College 1899 Garryowen beat Queens College 10-3 1900s 1900 Queens College 1901 Queens College 1902 Garryowen 1903 Garryowen beat Queens College 1904 Garryowen 1905 Cork Constitution beat Queens College 1906 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen Football Club 1907 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen Football Club 1908 Garryowen beat Rockwell College 1909 Garryowen 1910s 1910 Cork Constitution 1911 Garryowen beat Landsdowne 1912 UCC beat Garryowen 1913 UCC beat Garryowen 1914 Garryowen beat UCC 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920s 1920 Garryowen beat Cork Constitution 1921 Dolphin RFC beat Cork Constitution 1922 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen 1923 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen 1924 Garryowen 1925 Garryowen 1926 Garryowen 1927 Bohemians beat Dolphin 1928 Young Munster beat Cork Constitution 1929 Cork Constitution beat Young Munster 1930s 1930 Young Munster beat UCC 1931 Dolphin beat Garryowen 1932 Garryowen beat Cork Constitution 1933 Cork Constitution beat Bohemians 1934 Garryowen beat Sundays Well 1935 UCC beat Cork Constitution 1936 UCC beat Cork Constitution 1937 UCC beat Garryowen 1938 Young Munster beat UCC 1939 UCC beat Bohemians 1940s 1940 Garryowen beat Dolphin 1941 UCC beat Dolphin 1942 Cork Constitution beat UCC 1943 Cork Constitution beat Army 1944 Dolphin beat Garryowen 1945 Dolphin beat Army 1946 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen 1947 Garryowen beat Young Munster 1948 Dolphin beat Young Munster 1949 Sundays Well beat Dolphin 1950s 1949–50 UCC beat Garryowen 1950–51 UCC beat Dolphin 1951–52 Garryowen beat UCC 1952–53 Sundays Well beat Garryowen 1953–54 Garryowen beat Sundays Well 1954–55 UCC beat Old Crescent 1955–56 Dolphin beat Sundays Well 1956–57 Cork Constitution 1957–58 Bohemians R.F.C. beat Highfield 1958–59 Bohemians R.F.C. beat Shannon 1960s 1959–60 Shannon beat UCC 8–8, 6–3 (replay) 1960–61 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen 1961–62 Bohemians R.F.C. beat Old Crescent 1962–63 UCC beat Sundays Well 1963–64 Cork Constitution beat Young Munster 1964–65 Cork Constitution beat Sundays Well 1965–66 Highfield beat UCC 1966–67 Cork Constitution beat Highfield 1967–68 Highfield beat Cork Constitution 1968–69 Garryowen beat Sundays Well 1970s 1969–70 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen 1970–71 Garryowen beat Young Munster 1971–72 Cork Constitution beat Garryowen 1972–73 Cork Constitution beat Dolphin 1973–74 Garryowen beat Shannon 1974–75 Garryowen beat Cork Constitution 1975–76 UCC beat Dolphin 1976–77 Shannon beat Garryowen 1977–78 Shannon beat Garryowen 1978–79 Garryowen beat Young Munster 1980s 1979–80 Young Munster beat Bohemians 1980–81 UCC beat Shannon 1981–82 Shannon beat Young Munster 1982–83 Cork Constitution beat Shannon 1983–84 Young Munster beat Waterpark 1984–85 Cork Constitution beat Shannon 1985–86 Shannon beat Garryowen 1986–87 Shannon beat Highfield 1987–88 Shannon beat Garryowen 1988–89 Cork Constitution beat shannon 1990s 1989–90 Young Munster beat UCC 1990–91 Shannon beat Young Munster 1991–92 Shannon beat Young Munster 1992–93 Garryowen beat Young Munster 1993–94 Sundays Well beat Young Munster 1994–95 Garryowen beat Young Munster 1995–96 Shannon beat Cork Constitution 1996–97 Garryowen beat Young Munster 1997–98 Shannon beat Young Munster 1998–99 Garryowen beat Cork Constitution 2000s 1999–2000 Shannon beat Young Munster 2000–01 Shannon beat Young Munster 2001–02 Shannon beat Young Munster 2002–03 Shannon beat Midleton 2003–04 Shannon beat Garryowen 2004–05 Shannon beat Garryowen 2005–06 Shannon beat Dolphin 2006–07 Garryowen
</passage>

Follow these steps to complete the task:

1. Inserting retrieval tokens:
   a. Read through the text carefully.
   b. Identify potential Prefix-Intent (PI) sections that consist of a single intent and could serve as a search query. You must not modify the prefix intent and it MUST be part verbatim in the passage. It cannot be single or only a few words.
   c. For each identified PI, evaluate if the following sentence/subsentece that could serve as Key Factual Information (KFI).
   d. Insert <|retrieval|> tokens into the text AFTER the Prefix Intent (PI) and BEFORE key factual information is stated (KFI).
   e. Key Factual information should not intersect with Prefix Intent.

2. Identifying Prefix-Intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI):
   a. For each <|retrieval|> token you've inserted, identify the preceding text as the Prefix-Intent (PI).
   b. Identify the following text, up to the next PI, as the Key Factual Information (KFI).
   c. Ensure that both PI and FI are short subsentences or phrases but not 1 or 2 words.

3. Insert <|start-PI|>,<|end-PI|>, <|start-KFI|>, <|end-KFI|>.
   a. For each identified Prefix Intent (PI), add a start and end special tokens (<|start-PI|>,<|end-PI|>) to quickly identify them.
   b. Do the same for the Key Factual Information (KFI) (<|start-KFI|>, <|end-KFI|>)
   c. Ensure that the very first PI in the passage is preceded by <|start-PI|>.
   d. Double-check that every PI and KFI is properly enclosed in these tags.

4. Describing ideal retrieved information:
   a. Given the Prefix-Intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI), imagine an ideal retriever and enormous corpus. 
   b. Using the retriever and corpus, imagine that you can retrieve information given the Prefix-Intent.  
   c. Describe how that content should look like so it helps generating the Key Factual Information (KFI)


5. Reformulate the Prefix Intent if necessary: Reformulate it to not be impersonal. This means that if the subject it is not identified (e.g. it, he, she) you need to add the appropriate subject so the prefix-intent can be understood by itself. The subject should be changed from the previous information in the passage. Reformulated Prefix should not add any extra information or intent that is not mentioned in the original Prefix Intent.


6. Output format:
   For each pair of Prefix-Intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI) you identify, provide the following output separating each example in a JSON list output. Ensure that it is actually a JSON.

   - Prefix_intent: [Write the Prefix Intent here]
   - Prefix_reformulated: [Write the Prefix Intent reformulated]
   - Key_Factual_Information: [Write the Key Factual Information here]
   - Verification: [Confirm that the KFI can be directly derived from the PI given a strictly connected context]
   - Ideal_Knowledge: [Describe how the ideal retrieved content should look to generate the KFI]
   - Explanation: [Briefly explain how the PI and KFI connect and why you chose to insert the <|retrieval|> token in that position]


7. Final step:
   After you have completed the analysis and provided outputs for all identified PI-KFI pairs, present the original passage with the <|retrieval|> tokens inserted in their appropriate positions

Here's an example of the expected output format:

Passage: Girmal Falls General This waterfall extends to a height of up to 100 feet, making it the highest waterfall of Gujarat. The picturesque beauty of this site makes it popular among visitors and people of the region alike. The water swiftly falls from a great height, creating a fog like condition that’s eye catching. The government of this state is working on many projects to make this place an ideal picnic spot and a tourist attraction. The fall comes to its best form at the time of monsoon and provides an immensely striking appearance. Some of the best natural features of Gujarat can be explored in this place. This place is a nice and refreshing retreat for any traveler.

```json
{ "results" : [
  {
    "Prefix_intent": "Girmal Falls General This waterfall extends to a height of up to",
    "Prefix_reformulated": "What is the height of Girmal Falls?",
    "Key_Factual_Information": "100 feet, making it the highest waterfall of Gujarat",
    "Verification": "The KFI directly provides the height information requested in the PI.",
    "Ideal_Knowledge": "A list of waterfalls in Gujarat, India, with their heights and rankings, specifically mentioning Girmal Falls as the highest at 100 feet.",
    "Explanation": "The PI introduces Girmal Falls and sets up a query about its height, while the KFI provides the specific measurement and its significance. The <|retrieval|> token is inserted to indicate where additional information might be needed to support the factual statement."
  },
  {
    "Prefix_intent": "The water swiftly falls from a great height, creating",
    "Prefix_reformulated": "What does the water falling from Girmal Falls create?",
    "Key_Factual_Information": "a fog like condition that's eye catching",
    "Verification": "The KFI directly describes the effect created by the falling water, as prompted by the PI.",
    "Ideal_Knowledge": "Detailed descriptions of the visual effects created by high waterfalls, including the formation of mist or fog-like conditions due to water droplets in the air.",
    "Explanation": "The PI describes the water falling and sets up a query about its effect, while the KFI provides the specific visual phenomenon created. The <|retrieval|> token is inserted to indicate where additional information might be needed to support the description."
  },
  {
    "Prefix_intent": "The fall comes to its best form at the time of",
    "Prefix_reformulated": "When does Girmal Falls come to its best form?",
    "Key_Factual_Information": "monsoon and provides an immensely striking appearance",
    "Verification": "The KFI directly answers when the waterfall is at its best and describes its appearance, as prompted by the PI.",
    "Ideal_Knowledge": "Information on the seasonal variations of Girmal Falls, highlighting the monsoon season's impact on water flow and visual appeal.",
    "Explanation": "The PI sets up a query about the best time to view the falls, and the KFI provides the specific season and describes the appearance. The <|retrieval|> token is inserted to indicate where additional information about seasonal changes might be needed."
  }],
"Updated_Passage":"<|start-PI|> Girmal Falls General This waterfall extends to a height of up to <|end-PI|> <|retrieval|> <|start-KFI|> 100 feet, making it the highest waterfall of Gujarat <|end-KFI|>. The picturesque beauty of this site makes it popular among visitors and people of the region alike. <|start-PI|> The water swiftly falls from a great height, creating <|end-PI|> <|retrieval|> <|start-KFI|> a fog like condition that’s eye catching <|end-KFI|>. The government of this state is working on many projects to make this place an ideal picnic spot and a tourist attraction. <|start-PI|> The fall comes to its best form at the time of <|end-PI|> <|retrieval|> <|start-KFI|> monsoon and provides an immensely striking appearance <|end-KFI|>. Some of the best natural features of Gujarat can be explored in this place. This place is a nice and refreshing retreat for any traveler."
}

```
8. Final check:
  a. Review the Updated_Passage to ensure all PIs and KFIs are properly tagged.
  b. Verify that the first PI in the passage starts with <|start-PI|>.
  c. Make sure there are no missing or misplaced tags.
 
Remember to analyze the entire passage, identify all relevant PI-KFI pairs, and provide the output for each pair as specified. After completing the analysis, present the original passage with the <|retrieval|> tokens inserted in their appropriate positions as part of a new key in the JSON file. Only Ouput the JSON File.