You are an AI assistant tasked with analyzing a passage of text to insert retrieval tokens and identify Prefix-intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI). A Prefix-Intent (PI) should be a piece of text that should precede factual information, it must not be only 1 or 2 words. Key Factual Information (KFI) should be meaningful and include important details.

Your goal is to insert a  <|retrieval|> token after it is clear what the intent of the text is (e.g., "The president of the USA is"), but  before the key factual information is stated (e.g., "Joe Biden"). Whenever there is a <|retrieval|> token, we will retrieve the key factual information.

Here is the passage you will be working with:

<passage>
Jobs Go Begging." Chicago Daily Tribune. May 1, 1950. Hartmann, George. "Dealers Fight Organizing of Car Salesmen." Chicago Daily Tribune. November 22, 1951. Hartmann, George. "Employers Fight Investigator to Fight Rackets." Chicago Daily Tribune. April 3, 1951. Hartmann, George. "Urged to 'Buy' Labor Peace, Druggists Say." Chicago Daily Tribune. February 24, 1951. "Hounded Flat Owners." New York Times. February 18, 1921. Jentz, John B. "Unions, Cartels, and the Political Economy of American Cities: The Chicago Flat Janitors' Union in the Progressive Era and the 1920s." Studies in American Political Development. 14 (Spring 2000). "Job Quits As Arbitrator." Chicago Daily Tribune. December 9, 1902. "Joseph Nielson." New York Times. December 27, 1943. "J.W. Breen's House Bombed." Chicago Daily Tribune. November 15, 1929. "Keane Charges Are Denied By Employers Unit." Chicago Tribune. November 21, 1964. Kleiman, Carol. "Groups Proclaim New Era in Personnel Services." Chicago Tribune. December 6, 1981. "Labor War in Chicago." New York Times. November 1, 1903. Leidenberger, Georg. Chicago's Progressive Alliance: Labor and the Bid for Public Streetcars. DeKalb, Ill.: Northern Illinois University Press, 2006. "May Ask Mayor to Form Bomb, Arson Bureau." Chicago Daily Tribune. October 26, 1928. "Mechanic Strike Set." Chicago Tribune. July 6, 1975. "Mediator Pushes End of Mechanics Strike." Chicago Tribune. July 21, 1978. "97 Bombings in Ten Months, Record in City." Chicago Daily Tribune. October 7, 1929. "Oregon's Labor Terror Cleanup Told By Martin." Chicago Daily Tribune. November 16, 1939. "Our Enemies" Time. July 16, 1951. "Owners Leagued Against Janitors." Chicago Daily Tribune." December 28, 1913. "Plans War on Teamsters." Chicago Daily Tribune. June 17, 1904. "Police Resell Weapons to Gangsters, Macoy Charges." Chicago Daily Tribune. February 22, 1929. "Predict Large Labor Need In Area." Chicago Daily Tribune. April 11, 1941. "Project to End Strike." Chicago Daily Tribune. June 18, 1905. "Query On Labor Law Is Send to Business Men." Chicago Daily Tribune. February 18, 1949. "Racketeering Costs Put at $136,000,000." New York Times. February 23, 1929. "Rackets In Gain While Year Old Threat Grows Cold." Chicago Daily Tribune. February 14, 1930. "Renews Attack, Charging Trust in Selling Milk." Chicago Daily Tribune. September 18, 1925. "Seek to Boost Foreman Role in Production." Chicago Daily Tribune. October 28, 1947. "Strike-Breaking Army: Chicago Employers' Association Plans Its Establishment of Standing Force." New York Times. December 15, 1905. Strong, James. "Car-Dealer Mechanics' Contract Vote Sunday." Chicago Tribune. July 1, 1978. Strong, James. "Car Dealers, Mechanics Reach Truce." Chicago Tribune. July 2, 1981. Strong, James. "Mechanic, Dealer Talks Resume." Chicago Tribune. July 8, 1978. Strong, James. "Mechanics' Strike Could Strand Cars at Dealers." Chicago Tribune. July 1, 1981. Strong, James. "Striking Mechanics to Vote Friday." Chicago Tribune. September 19, 1975. Strong, James. "U.S. Seeks New Talks in Mechanics' Strike." Chicago Tribune. July 13, 1978. Strong, James. "Work, Pay Dispute." Chicago Tribune. July 4, 1975. "Terror Plot to Bomb Grocers Bared in Report." Chicago Daily Tribune. February 25, 1921. "Trade Groups Hail Adoption of Labor Bill." Chicago Daily Tribune. June 24, 1947. "Truman Labor Stand Assailed By Chicagoans." Chicago Daily Tribune. December 22, 1945. Witwer, David. "'The Most Racketeer-Ridden Union in America': The Problem of Corruption in the Teamsters Union During the 1930s." In Corrupt Histories.'' Emmanuel Kreike and William Chester Jordan, eds. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press, 2004. External links Management Association of Illinois Category:Defunct companies based in Chicago Category:1903 establishments in the United States Category:Business organizations based in the United States Category:History of labor relations in the United States Category:Employers' organizations
</passage>

Follow these steps to complete the task:

1. Inserting retrieval tokens:
   a. Read through the text carefully.
   b. Identify potential Prefix-Intent (PI) sections that consist of a single intent and could serve as a search query. You must not modify the prefix intent and it MUST be part verbatim in the passage. It cannot be single or only a few words.
   c. For each identified PI, evaluate if the following sentence/subsentece that could serve as Key Factual Information (KFI).
   d. Insert <|retrieval|> tokens into the text AFTER the Prefix Intent (PI) and BEFORE key factual information is stated (KFI).
   e. Key Factual information should not intersect with Prefix Intent.

2. Identifying Prefix-Intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI):
   a. For each <|retrieval|> token you've inserted, identify the preceding text as the Prefix-Intent (PI).
   b. Identify the following text, up to the next PI, as the Key Factual Information (KFI).
   c. Ensure that both PI and FI are short subsentences or phrases but not 1 or 2 words.

3. Insert <|start-PI|>,<|end-PI|>, <|start-KFI|>, <|end-KFI|>.
   a. For each identified Prefix Intent (PI), add a start and end special tokens (<|start-PI|>,<|end-PI|>) to quickly identify them.
   b. Do the same for the Key Factual Information (KFI) (<|start-KFI|>, <|end-KFI|>)
   c. Ensure that the very first PI in the passage is preceded by <|start-PI|>.
   d. Double-check that every PI and KFI is properly enclosed in these tags.

4. Describing ideal retrieved information:
   a. Given the Prefix-Intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI), imagine an ideal retriever and enormous corpus. 
   b. Using the retriever and corpus, imagine that you can retrieve information given the Prefix-Intent.  
   c. Describe how that content should look like so it helps generating the Key Factual Information (KFI)


5. Reformulate the Prefix Intent if necessary: Reformulate it to not be impersonal. This means that if the subject it is not identified (e.g. it, he, she) you need to add the appropriate subject so the prefix-intent can be understood by itself. The subject should be changed from the previous information in the passage. Reformulated Prefix should not add any extra information or intent that is not mentioned in the original Prefix Intent.


6. Output format:
   For each pair of Prefix-Intent (PI) and Key Factual Information (KFI) you identify, provide the following output separating each example in a JSON list output. Ensure that it is actually a JSON.

   - Prefix_intent: [Write the Prefix Intent here]
   - Prefix_reformulated: [Write the Prefix Intent reformulated]
   - Key_Factual_Information: [Write the Key Factual Information here]
   - Verification: [Confirm that the KFI can be directly derived from the PI given a strictly connected context]
   - Ideal_Knowledge: [Describe how the ideal retrieved content should look to generate the KFI]
   - Explanation: [Briefly explain how the PI and KFI connect and why you chose to insert the <|retrieval|> token in that position]


7. Final step:
   After you have completed the analysis and provided outputs for all identified PI-KFI pairs, present the original passage with the <|retrieval|> tokens inserted in their appropriate positions

Here's an example of the expected output format:

Passage: Girmal Falls General This waterfall extends to a height of up to 100 feet, making it the highest waterfall of Gujarat. The picturesque beauty of this site makes it popular among visitors and people of the region alike. The water swiftly falls from a great height, creating a fog like condition that’s eye catching. The government of this state is working on many projects to make this place an ideal picnic spot and a tourist attraction. The fall comes to its best form at the time of monsoon and provides an immensely striking appearance. Some of the best natural features of Gujarat can be explored in this place. This place is a nice and refreshing retreat for any traveler.

```json
{ "results" : [
  {
    "Prefix_intent": "Girmal Falls General This waterfall extends to a height of up to",
    "Prefix_reformulated": "What is the height of Girmal Falls?",
    "Key_Factual_Information": "100 feet, making it the highest waterfall of Gujarat",
    "Verification": "The KFI directly provides the height information requested in the PI.",
    "Ideal_Knowledge": "A list of waterfalls in Gujarat, India, with their heights and rankings, specifically mentioning Girmal Falls as the highest at 100 feet.",
    "Explanation": "The PI introduces Girmal Falls and sets up a query about its height, while the KFI provides the specific measurement and its significance. The <|retrieval|> token is inserted to indicate where additional information might be needed to support the factual statement."
  },
  {
    "Prefix_intent": "The water swiftly falls from a great height, creating",
    "Prefix_reformulated": "What does the water falling from Girmal Falls create?",
    "Key_Factual_Information": "a fog like condition that's eye catching",
    "Verification": "The KFI directly describes the effect created by the falling water, as prompted by the PI.",
    "Ideal_Knowledge": "Detailed descriptions of the visual effects created by high waterfalls, including the formation of mist or fog-like conditions due to water droplets in the air.",
    "Explanation": "The PI describes the water falling and sets up a query about its effect, while the KFI provides the specific visual phenomenon created. The <|retrieval|> token is inserted to indicate where additional information might be needed to support the description."
  },
  {
    "Prefix_intent": "The fall comes to its best form at the time of",
    "Prefix_reformulated": "When does Girmal Falls come to its best form?",
    "Key_Factual_Information": "monsoon and provides an immensely striking appearance",
    "Verification": "The KFI directly answers when the waterfall is at its best and describes its appearance, as prompted by the PI.",
    "Ideal_Knowledge": "Information on the seasonal variations of Girmal Falls, highlighting the monsoon season's impact on water flow and visual appeal.",
    "Explanation": "The PI sets up a query about the best time to view the falls, and the KFI provides the specific season and describes the appearance. The <|retrieval|> token is inserted to indicate where additional information about seasonal changes might be needed."
  }],
"Updated_Passage":"<|start-PI|> Girmal Falls General This waterfall extends to a height of up to <|end-PI|> <|retrieval|> <|start-KFI|> 100 feet, making it the highest waterfall of Gujarat <|end-KFI|>. The picturesque beauty of this site makes it popular among visitors and people of the region alike. <|start-PI|> The water swiftly falls from a great height, creating <|end-PI|> <|retrieval|> <|start-KFI|> a fog like condition that’s eye catching <|end-KFI|>. The government of this state is working on many projects to make this place an ideal picnic spot and a tourist attraction. <|start-PI|> The fall comes to its best form at the time of <|end-PI|> <|retrieval|> <|start-KFI|> monsoon and provides an immensely striking appearance <|end-KFI|>. Some of the best natural features of Gujarat can be explored in this place. This place is a nice and refreshing retreat for any traveler."
}

```
8. Final check:
  a. Review the Updated_Passage to ensure all PIs and KFIs are properly tagged.
  b. Verify that the first PI in the passage starts with <|start-PI|>.
  c. Make sure there are no missing or misplaced tags.
 
Remember to analyze the entire passage, identify all relevant PI-KFI pairs, and provide the output for each pair as specified. After completing the analysis, present the original passage with the <|retrieval|> tokens inserted in their appropriate positions as part of a new key in the JSON file. Only Ouput the JSON File.