re : a 3 al ad hoc review team i have attached bpa transmission schedulings ' response to the questions
posed by bob in his email dated may 21 below . if the group feels it would
be helpful to meet to discuss the timeline issues , i am in support of that
effort . otherwise , i look forward to the responses from the rest of the
group . thanks , sue .
sue holden - baker
bonneville power administration
transmission supply
( 360 ) 418 - 8278
smholden @ bpa . gov
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : harshbarger , robert [ mailto : bharsh @ puget . com ]
sent : tuesday , may 22 , 2001 8 : 50 am
to : ' ellingson , mons ' ; ' fotiou , demetrios ' ; ' grow , lisa ' ; ' holden - baker ,
susan ' ; ' smith , chris ' ; ' tilghman , carmine ' ; ' underwood , john ' ;
' williams , bill '
cc : ' hackney , mark '
subject : re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
timeliners :
revision to yesterday ' s e - mail - due date is end of july . so proposals by
mid - june , first draft report by early / mid - july , discussion throughout .
bob
> - - - - - - - - - -
> from : harshbarger , robert
> sent : monday , may 21 , 2001 5 : 16 pm
> to : ellingson , mons ; fotiou , demetrios ; grow , lisa ; holden - baker , susan ;
> smith , chris ; tilghman , carmine ; underwood , john ; williams , bill
> cc : ' hackney , mark '
> subject : a 3 al ad hoc review team
>
> yes , that ' s right , you did raise your hand for this .
>
> we are to submit to isas any recommendation ( s ) by august ? ? , 2001 ( what
> was the date , i didn ' t write it down ) .
>
> is there benefit to have a face - to - face meeting ? either way , we ' ll use
> e - mail for discussion and maybe a conference call or two .
>
> first assignment is to read :
> * a 3 al - interim is what we are currently running with .
> * a 3 al - version 3 - draft 2 goes before the nerc bot june 10 - 11 .
> * a 3 al - candr contains public comments and responses from nerc is .
>
> > > a 3 alcandr . doc > >
> questions to keep in mind :
> * are our current timelines as good as it gets ?
> * do we want to adopt the eastern interconnection ' s timelines ?
> * what are the deficiencies of our timelines ?
> * will these deficiencies be present under 1 . 7 ?
> * which timing requirements could be changed with an reasonable amount
> of effort ( i . e . , tariff items , agc ramp times , a 3 al , etc . ) ?
>
> remember . . . .
> >
>
> bob harshbarger
> oasis trading manager
> puget sound energy
> ( 425 ) 882 - 4643 voice
> ( 425 ) 882 - 4496 fax
> ( 206 ) 405 - 5161 pager
> ( 206 ) 604 - 3251 cell
>
- nerc policy 3 e - tag timelines - draft 2 . doc
re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
i have attached bpa transmission schedulings ' response to the questions
posed by bob in his email dated may 21 below . if the group feels it would
be helpful to meet to discuss the timeline issues , i am in support of that
effort . otherwise , i look forward to the responses from the rest of the
group . thanks , sue .
sue holden - baker
bonneville power administration
transmission supply
( 360 ) 418 - 8278
smholden @ bpa . gov
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : harshbarger , robert [ mailto : bharsh @ puget . com ]
sent : tuesday , may 22 , 2001 8 : 50 am
to : ' ellingson , mons ' ; ' fotiou , demetrios ' ; ' grow , lisa ' ; ' holden - baker ,
susan ' ; ' smith , chris ' ; ' tilghman , carmine ' ; ' underwood , john ' ;
' williams , bill '
cc : ' hackney , mark '
subject : re : a 3 al ad hoc review team
timeliners :
revision to yesterday ' s e - mail - due date is end of july . so proposals by
mid - june , first draft report by early / mid - july , discussion throughout .
bob
> - - - - - - - - - -
> from : harshbarger , robert
> sent : monday , may 21 , 2001 5 : 16 pm
> to : ellingson , mons ; fotiou , demetrios ; grow , lisa ; holden - baker , susan ;
> smith , chris ; tilghman , carmine ; underwood , john ; williams , bill
> cc : ' hackney , mark '
> subject : a 3 al ad hoc review team
>
> yes , that ' s right , you did raise your hand for this .
>
> we are to submit to isas any recommendation ( s ) by august ? ? , 2001 ( what
> was the date , i didn ' t write it down ) .
>
> is there benefit to have a face - to - face meeting ? either way , we ' ll use
> e - mail for discussion and maybe a conference call or two .
>
> first assignment is to read :
> * a 3 al - interim is what we are currently running with .
> * a 3 al - version 3 - draft 2 goes before the nerc bot june 10 - 11 .
> * a 3 al - candr contains public comments and responses from nerc is .
>
> > > a 3 alcandr . doc > >
> questions to keep in mind :
> * are our current timelines as good as it gets ?
> * do we want to adopt the eastern interconnection ' s timelines ?
> * what are the deficiencies of our timelines ?
> * will these deficiencies be present under 1 . 7 ?
> * which timing requirements could be changed with an reasonable amount
> of effort ( i . e . , tariff items , agc ramp times , a 3 al , etc . ) ?
>
> remember . . . .
> >
>
> bob harshbarger
> oasis trading manager
> puget sound energy
> ( 425 ) 882 - 4643 voice
> ( 425 ) 882 - 4496 fax
> ( 206 ) 405 - 5161 pager
> ( 206 ) 604 - 3251 cell
>
- nerc policy 3 e - tag timelines - draft 2 . doc