re : updates to processes dear rick ,
thanks for the update . i appreciate your input as i do not know what your
discussions with rick buy have been . to address your points below :
1 ) i agree that your team should be involved in the planning of each
individual review although i am under the impression that ted & sally ( by
proxy cassandra and i ) would set the scope & timing of the reviews while your
group would be looped in to the planning for each individual process . if my
understanding is incorrect , please let me know .
2 ) i agree that it would be useful for everyone to attend all meetings .
however , due to the limited time we have from arriving at the doorstep to
delivery of the report to ted and sally , your group really has to be focused
on completing the deal test . we don ' t need three different people
obtaining the same information at the same meetings . if there has been a
change in your group ' s role from what i originally understood ( we need lower
level people from your team who would be able to execute a deal test ) , we
may have to add additional resources to do the actual deal test to ensure it
is done on time ( by the time we leave the site ) .
3 ) agreed - i ' d like to hear what donna and mike neeves have resolved as far
as the database is concerned before we meet again .
best regards
shona
to : shona wilson / na / enron @ enron
cc : ted murphy / hou / ect @ ect , sally beck / hou / ect @ ect , cassandra
schultz / na / enron @ enron , lynn
bellinghausen / enron _ development @ enron _ development , donna lowry / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : updates to processes
shona : thank you for your memo . i think it is a good idea to define roles
and responsibilities and i appreciate the fact that you have taken the
initiative to do so . however , i do have the following comments :
1 ) i have some accountability to rick buy for the success of this effort ,
therefore i ( or my designee ) need to be involved in doorstep pre - planning
and post - mortem . i will be involved in reviewing the final report before
presentation and will attend the meeting when the report is presented to buy
and causey .
2 ) i realize that in the interest of getting a review done timely it is
sometimes necessary to " divide and conquer " . however , where logistically
possible , i believe that it makes sense for my people to be involved in
meetings held with commercial personnel . this facilitates understanding
operations , document flow , points of contact , report writing as well as
furthering our goal of educating " multi - functional " people so that we can
continue to reduce the resources necessary to perform these reviews .
3 ) there are still some detailed issues that need to be clarified regarding
the database . let ' s schedule another meeting with cassandra and donna .
please let me know if you have any questions , regards , rick
re : updates to processes
dear rick ,
thanks for the update . i appreciate your input as i do not know what your
discussions with rick buy have been . to address your points below :
1 ) i agree that your team should be involved in the planning of each
individual review although i am under the impression that ted & sally ( by
proxy cassandra and i ) would set the scope & timing of the reviews while your
group would be looped in to the planning for each individual process . if my
understanding is incorrect , please let me know .
2 ) i agree that it would be useful for everyone to attend all meetings .
however , due to the limited time we have from arriving at the doorstep to
delivery of the report to ted and sally , your group really has to be focused
on completing the deal test . we don ' t need three different people
obtaining the same information at the same meetings . if there has been a
change in your group ' s role from what i originally understood ( we need lower
level people from your team who would be able to execute a deal test ) , we
may have to add additional resources to do the actual deal test to ensure it
is done on time ( by the time we leave the site ) .
3 ) agreed - i ' d like to hear what donna and mike neeves have resolved as far
as the database is concerned before we meet again .
best regards
shona
to : shona wilson / na / enron @ enron
cc : ted murphy / hou / ect @ ect , sally beck / hou / ect @ ect , cassandra
schultz / na / enron @ enron , lynn
bellinghausen / enron _ development @ enron _ development , donna lowry / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : updates to processes
shona : thank you for your memo . i think it is a good idea to define roles
and responsibilities and i appreciate the fact that you have taken the
initiative to do so . however , i do have the following comments :
1 ) i have some accountability to rick buy for the success of this effort ,
therefore i ( or my designee ) need to be involved in doorstep pre - planning
and post - mortem . i will be involved in reviewing the final report before
presentation and will attend the meeting when the report is presented to buy
and causey .
2 ) i realize that in the interest of getting a review done timely it is
sometimes necessary to " divide and conquer " . however , where logistically
possible , i believe that it makes sense for my people to be involved in
meetings held with commercial personnel . this facilitates understanding
operations , document flow , points of contact , report writing as well as
furthering our goal of educating " multi - functional " people so that we can
continue to reduce the resources necessary to perform these reviews .
3 ) there are still some detailed issues that need to be clarified regarding
the database . let ' s schedule another meeting with cassandra and donna .
please let me know if you have any questions , regards , rick