re : revised nomination - june , 2000 daren ,
fyi . per our discussion , the following nominations were revised on eog
resources :
meter # orig nom rev nom deal #
5263 4 , 755 5 , 820 126355
6067 3 , 726 4 , 600 126281
6748 2 , 005 3 , 300 126360
6742 4 , 743 10 , 120 126365
6296 5 , 733 2 , 300 126281
bob
daren j farmer
05 / 31 / 2000 05 : 51 pm
to : robert cotten / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : re : revised nomination - june , 2000
bob ,
go ahead and accept the nom revision . i believe that this is with pge , not
el paso . how do the rest of our noms compare with eog ? i f they have a
higher volume at another meter than we do , i would like to increase our nom
there . in effect , i want to keep our physical index position as close as
possible to what we have in the system now .
d
enron north america corp .
from : robert cotten 05 / 31 / 2000 04 : 04 pm
to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : revised nomination - june , 2000
daren ,
charlotte hawkins is having trouble confirming the volume of 5 , 733 with el
paso . el paso will not confirm the volume that high . eog revised their
nomination as follows :
c / p name meter # orig nom rev nom
eog res . 6296 5 , 733 2 , 300
will you approve revising the volume in unify down to 2 , 300 ? please advise .
thanks .
bob
re : revised nomination - june , 2000
daren ,
fyi . per our discussion , the following nominations were revised on eog
resources :
meter # orig nom rev nom deal #
5263 4 , 755 5 , 820 126355
6067 3 , 726 4 , 600 126281
6748 2 , 005 3 , 300 126360
6742 4 , 743 10 , 120 126365
6296 5 , 733 2 , 300 126281
bob
daren j farmer
05 / 31 / 2000 05 : 51 pm
to : robert cotten / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : re : revised nomination - june , 2000
bob ,
go ahead and accept the nom revision . i believe that this is with pge , not
el paso . how do the rest of our noms compare with eog ? i f they have a
higher volume at another meter than we do , i would like to increase our nom
there . in effect , i want to keep our physical index position as close as
possible to what we have in the system now .
d
enron north america corp .
from : robert cotten 05 / 31 / 2000 04 : 04 pm
to : daren j farmer / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : revised nomination - june , 2000
daren ,
charlotte hawkins is having trouble confirming the volume of 5 , 733 with el
paso . el paso will not confirm the volume that high . eog revised their
nomination as follows :
c / p name meter # orig nom rev nom
eog res . 6296 5 , 733 2 , 300
will you approve revising the volume in unify down to 2 , 300 ? please advise .
thanks .
bob