tw ios posting privileged & confidential i ' ve a couple of suggestions here . first , given the excruciating experience
we had last time with one - tenth increments , should we consider two - tenths
( i ' d like to use 1 / 4 cent increments but we ' re limited to 3 decimal places ) ?
secondly , i ' ve tried to respond with a language fix for paragraph 5
consistent with your concern of how to handle alternate rights . finally ,
i ' ve done a little tinkering with the terms sheet . ya ' ll are free to do with
these what you will .
from : susan scott 08 / 03 / 2000 11 : 21 am
to : christine stokes / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : jeffery fawcett / et & s / enron @ enron , steven harris / et & s / enron @ enron , kevin
hyatt / et & s / enron @ enron , lorraine lindberg / et & s / enron @ enron , tk
lohman / et & s / enron @ enron , michelle lokay / et & s / enron @ enron
subject : re : tw ios posting privileged & confidential
christine , see the attached . i ' ve changed paragraph 8 to be like our last
posting , and added in a sentence saying ties will be decided by lottery ( but
omitted reference to the lottery provisions of our tariff this time ) .
my only other comment is that i think the group needs to discuss beforehand
how a shipper ' s request for alternate points is going to be treated . as
currently drafted , this notice prohibits shippers from conditioning bids on
use of alternate points at the bid rate , which calls into question our
granting the winning bidder use of alternate points at a discount . if we do
intend to let the winning bidder shippers use alt . points at a discounted
rate , we should take this statement out ( end of paragraph 5 ) .
if we ' re still living in a max . rate world , though , this really is not much
of a concern since use of the alternate points would also be at max . rate .
any questions - - give me a call .
s .
christine stokes
08 / 03 / 2000 09 : 26 am
to : susan scott / et & s / enron @ enron
cc :
subject : tw ios posting
susan , please review the following ios posting . thanks .
tw ios posting privileged & confidential
i ' ve a couple of suggestions here . first , given the excruciating experience
we had last time with one - tenth increments , should we consider two - tenths
( i ' d like to use 1 / 4 cent increments but we ' re limited to 3 decimal places ) ?
secondly , i ' ve tried to respond with a language fix for paragraph 5
consistent with your concern of how to handle alternate rights . finally ,
i ' ve done a little tinkering with the terms sheet . ya ' ll are free to do with
these what you will .
from : susan scott 08 / 03 / 2000 11 : 21 am
to : christine stokes / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : jeffery fawcett / et & s / enron @ enron , steven harris / et & s / enron @ enron , kevin
hyatt / et & s / enron @ enron , lorraine lindberg / et & s / enron @ enron , tk
lohman / et & s / enron @ enron , michelle lokay / et & s / enron @ enron
subject : re : tw ios posting privileged & confidential
christine , see the attached . i ' ve changed paragraph 8 to be like our last
posting , and added in a sentence saying ties will be decided by lottery ( but
omitted reference to the lottery provisions of our tariff this time ) .
my only other comment is that i think the group needs to discuss beforehand
how a shipper ' s request for alternate points is going to be treated . as
currently drafted , this notice prohibits shippers from conditioning bids on
use of alternate points at the bid rate , which calls into question our
granting the winning bidder use of alternate points at a discount . if we do
intend to let the winning bidder shippers use alt . points at a discounted
rate , we should take this statement out ( end of paragraph 5 ) .
if we ' re still living in a max . rate world , though , this really is not much
of a concern since use of the alternate points would also be at max . rate .
any questions - - give me a call .
s .
christine stokes
08 / 03 / 2000 09 : 26 am
to : susan scott / et & s / enron @ enron
cc :
subject : tw ios posting
susan , please review the following ios posting . thanks .