fw : canadian river units 1 watson , kimberly subject : fw : canadian river units 1 & 3
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : lebeau , randy
sent : tuesday , september 04 , 2001 4 : 34 pm
to : weller , steve
subject : re : canadian river units 1 & 3
i ' m with you . if we can ' t make money , why enter into an agreement ? the team at canadian is under the impression that they are going to be asked to run the units long term . not sure where this is coming from .
i think there are probably better places to put the units .
from : steve weller / enron @ enronxgate on 09 / 04 / 2001 04 : 21 pm
to : randy lebeau / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : kimberly watson / enron @ enronxgate
subject : re : canadian river units 1 canadian - south , team ; schoolcraft , darrell ; stage , michael g . ; watson , kimberly ; fritch , bret
subject : re : canadian river units 1 & 3
i understand that there has been a request to run two units at this location beginning thursday . is this a long term commitment ? i ' ve been told that the units will need some work at some point if we expect them to operate on a daily basis .
from : steve weller / enron @ enronxgate on 09 / 04 / 2001 03 : 28 pm
to : team canadian - north / et & s / enron @ enron , team canadian - south / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : darrell schoolcraft / enron @ enronxgate , randy lebeau / et & s / enron @ enron , michael g stage / enron @ enronxgate , kimberly watson / enron @ enronxgate , bret fritch / enron @ enronxgate
subject : canadian river units 1 & 3
mike flynn - canadian team : these units are candidates for abandonment . what day were each of these units last run ? if they have been idle for over one year we can abandon the units under automatic blanket authority . if we run them , however , it postpones the abandonment - under - automatic - blanket - authority option by another year . please let me know asap . steve
fw : canadian river units 1 watson , kimberly
subject : fw : canadian river units 1 & 3
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : lebeau , randy
sent : tuesday , september 04 , 2001 4 : 34 pm
to : weller , steve
subject : re : canadian river units 1 & 3
i ' m with you . if we can ' t make money , why enter into an agreement ? the team at canadian is under the impression that they are going to be asked to run the units long term . not sure where this is coming from .
i think there are probably better places to put the units .
from : steve weller / enron @ enronxgate on 09 / 04 / 2001 04 : 21 pm
to : randy lebeau / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : kimberly watson / enron @ enronxgate
subject : re : canadian river units 1 canadian - south , team ; schoolcraft , darrell ; stage , michael g . ; watson , kimberly ; fritch , bret
subject : re : canadian river units 1 & 3
i understand that there has been a request to run two units at this location beginning thursday . is this a long term commitment ? i ' ve been told that the units will need some work at some point if we expect them to operate on a daily basis .
from : steve weller / enron @ enronxgate on 09 / 04 / 2001 03 : 28 pm
to : team canadian - north / et & s / enron @ enron , team canadian - south / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : darrell schoolcraft / enron @ enronxgate , randy lebeau / et & s / enron @ enron , michael g stage / enron @ enronxgate , kimberly watson / enron @ enronxgate , bret fritch / enron @ enronxgate
subject : canadian river units 1 & 3
mike flynn - canadian team : these units are candidates for abandonment . what day were each of these units last run ? if they have been idle for over one year we can abandon the units under automatic blanket authority . if we run them , however , it postpones the abandonment - under - automatic - blanket - authority option by another year . please let me know asap . steve