feb 2000 intercompany accrual variances below is a list of sitara deals that had volume variances or where one side
( purchase / sale ) did not get accrued for the feb 2000 accrual . my goal
here is to bring this to everyone attention and second to see if there is a
solution . i am taking a simplistic approach here in that since
intercompany sitara deals are the same that the nominations on both sides
should match on the month end accruals . if i am wrong on this assumption
or if there is a system limitation i am free to suggestions , ideas or
resolutions . please feel free to give me a call .
hplc selling to ena . production month febo 0 ( accrual ) :
volume variance :
sitara : meter / point volume amount
156071 hpl / 0980391 vol var of 24 , 167 mmbtu
midt / 0988743
missing on purchase side ( ena )
sitara : meter / point volume amount
160579 hpl / 0986363 632 , 272 mmbtu $ 1 , 599 , 402 . 29
161541 hpl / 0980694 108 , 576 mmbtu $ 278 , 296 . 18
166459 hgpl / 8177 - 4570 30 , 000 mmbtu $ 75 , 000 . 00
201810 hpl / 0986363 50 , 000 mmbtu $ 129 , 500 . 00
201839 hpl / 0980694 20 , 000 mmbtu $ 51 , 800 . 00
202672 lone / 0361770 23 , 417 mmbtu $ 58 , 274 . 16
280083 hpl / 0980308 555 , 292 mmbtu $ 1 , 518 , 225 . 09
total 1 , 395 , 689 mmbtu $ 3 , 710 , 497 . 72
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
mission : proactively identify and resolve intercompany volume issues
upstream .
first goal : tying intercompany volumes on the monthly accruals .
second goal : tying intercompany volumes on actuals .
third goal : minimizing analyse time saving $ $ $ $ .
thanks
gregg lenart
texas gas settlements
3 - 6921
feb 2000 intercompany accrual variances
below is a list of sitara deals that had volume variances or where one side
( purchase / sale ) did not get accrued for the feb 2000 accrual . my goal
here is to bring this to everyone attention and second to see if there is a
solution . i am taking a simplistic approach here in that since
intercompany sitara deals are the same that the nominations on both sides
should match on the month end accruals . if i am wrong on this assumption
or if there is a system limitation i am free to suggestions , ideas or
resolutions . please feel free to give me a call .
hplc selling to ena . production month febo 0 ( accrual ) :
volume variance :
sitara : meter / point volume amount
156071 hpl / 0980391 vol var of 24 , 167 mmbtu
midt / 0988743
missing on purchase side ( ena )
sitara : meter / point volume amount
160579 hpl / 0986363 632 , 272 mmbtu $ 1 , 599 , 402 . 29
161541 hpl / 0980694 108 , 576 mmbtu $ 278 , 296 . 18
166459 hgpl / 8177 - 4570 30 , 000 mmbtu $ 75 , 000 . 00
201810 hpl / 0986363 50 , 000 mmbtu $ 129 , 500 . 00
201839 hpl / 0980694 20 , 000 mmbtu $ 51 , 800 . 00
202672 lone / 0361770 23 , 417 mmbtu $ 58 , 274 . 16
280083 hpl / 0980308 555 , 292 mmbtu $ 1 , 518 , 225 . 09
total 1 , 395 , 689 mmbtu $ 3 , 710 , 497 . 72
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
mission : proactively identify and resolve intercompany volume issues
upstream .
first goal : tying intercompany volumes on the monthly accruals .
second goal : tying intercompany volumes on actuals .
third goal : minimizing analyse time saving $ $ $ $ .
thanks
gregg lenart
texas gas settlements
3 - 6921