re : purge of old contract _ event _ status fyi - what do you all think ?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by brenda f herod / hou / ect on 12 / 20 / 99 08 : 19
am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
from : dave nommensen on 12 / 17 / 99 05 : 29 pm
to : scotty gilbert / hou / ect @ ect
cc : george smith / hou / ect @ ect , edward terry / hou / ect @ ect , katherine l
kelly / hou / ect @ ect , bryce baxter / hou / ect @ ect , randall l gay / hou / ect @ ect ,
brenda f herod / hou / ect @ ect , richard pinion / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : purge of old contract _ event _ status
just to clarify , its not the relative age of the production date , but the age
of the event itself .
d . n .
to : george smith , edward terry / hou / ect @ ect , katherine l kelly / hou / ect @ ect ,
bryce baxter / hou / ect @ ect , randall l gay / hou / ect @ ect , brenda f
herod / hou / ect @ ect
cc : richard pinion / hou / ect @ ect , dave nommensen / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : purge of old contract _ event _ status
do any of you see a problem with limiting this to the current month or
current month + 1
need to know soon
scotty
from : dave nommensen 12 / 17 / 99 03 : 25 pm
to : scotty gilbert / hou / ect @ ect , richard pinion / hou / ect @ ect
cc : trisha luong / hou / ect @ ect , benedicta tung / hou / ect @ ect , diane e
niestrath / hou / ect @ ect , dave mcmullan / hou / ect @ ect
subject : purge of old contract _ event _ status
scotty / richard ,
our dbas would like to see what we can do to reduce the qty of rows in
contract _ event _ status . we have over 1 gig of data in that table . i would
like to suggest we have a nightly or weekly or monthly process to delete any
row with a last _ mod _ date over a month ( or two ) old . so if someone balances
february 1999 this month , we will keep it around for a month ( or two ) .
does any one else have a desire to keep this data for a shorter / longer period
of time ?
this is not an audit table . this is just a " log " every nom / track / balance / edi
send / fax send / sched qty / quick response since the beginning of time .
d . n .
re : purge of old contract _ event _ status
fyi - what do you all think ?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by brenda f herod / hou / ect on 12 / 20 / 99 08 : 19
am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
from : dave nommensen on 12 / 17 / 99 05 : 29 pm
to : scotty gilbert / hou / ect @ ect
cc : george smith / hou / ect @ ect , edward terry / hou / ect @ ect , katherine l
kelly / hou / ect @ ect , bryce baxter / hou / ect @ ect , randall l gay / hou / ect @ ect ,
brenda f herod / hou / ect @ ect , richard pinion / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : purge of old contract _ event _ status
just to clarify , its not the relative age of the production date , but the age
of the event itself .
d . n .
to : george smith , edward terry / hou / ect @ ect , katherine l kelly / hou / ect @ ect ,
bryce baxter / hou / ect @ ect , randall l gay / hou / ect @ ect , brenda f
herod / hou / ect @ ect
cc : richard pinion / hou / ect @ ect , dave nommensen / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : purge of old contract _ event _ status
do any of you see a problem with limiting this to the current month or
current month + 1
need to know soon
scotty
from : dave nommensen 12 / 17 / 99 03 : 25 pm
to : scotty gilbert / hou / ect @ ect , richard pinion / hou / ect @ ect
cc : trisha luong / hou / ect @ ect , benedicta tung / hou / ect @ ect , diane e
niestrath / hou / ect @ ect , dave mcmullan / hou / ect @ ect
subject : purge of old contract _ event _ status
scotty / richard ,
our dbas would like to see what we can do to reduce the qty of rows in
contract _ event _ status . we have over 1 gig of data in that table . i would
like to suggest we have a nightly or weekly or monthly process to delete any
row with a last _ mod _ date over a month ( or two ) old . so if someone balances
february 1999 this month , we will keep it around for a month ( or two ) .
does any one else have a desire to keep this data for a shorter / longer period
of time ?
this is not an audit table . this is just a " log " every nom / track / balance / edi
send / fax send / sched qty / quick response since the beginning of time .
d . n .