fw : question this is what i think . i ' ll let you know when i get confirmation .
keoni almeida
california independent system operator
phone : 916 / 608 - 7053
pager : 916 / 814 - 7352
alpha page : 9169812000 . 1151268 @ pagenet . net
e - mail :
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : almeida , keoni
sent : wednesday , may 30 , 2001 1 : 29 pm
to : ford , greg
subject : fw : question
my response to the questions would be that they get the proxy price during
the mitigated intervals when they do not have a bid in . if they have a bid
in , they get the higher of the proxy or the bid and they submit the cost
justification to ferc . right ?
who do they send cost justification to ?
keoni almeida
california independent system operator
phone : 916 / 608 - 7053
pager : 916 / 814 - 7352
alpha page : 9169812000 . 1151268 @ pagenet . net
e - mail :
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : foster , chris h . [ mailto : chris . h . foster @ enron . com ]
sent : wednesday , may 30 , 2001 1 : 21 pm
to : kalmeida @ caiso . com
cc : tbarringer @ edisonmission . com ; scott hawley ( e - mail ) ; cocke jr . ,
stanley ; comnes , alan
subject : fw : question
keoni :
in addition to my questions below , can you clarify what we get paid when
we are inc ' d pursuant to the ferc order ? is the proxy the inc ? if we do
not have a bid in , do we get the inc ? if we have a supplemental bid in ,
do we get the higher of the inc or the bid ? if we do get the higher
of , to whom do we send our cost data ?
chris
> - - - - - original message - - - - -
> from : foster , chris h .
> sent : wednesday , may 30 , 2001 12 : 53 pm
> to : ' " almeida , keoni " @ enron '
> cc : nelson , kourtney ; comnes , alan ; stokley , chris
> subject : re : question
>
> k :
>
> i wanted to document what just happened on receiving a dispatch
> instruction from the iso for harbor cogen ( harbgn _ 7 _ units ) . at 12 : 20
> we received a dispatch instruction from he iso due to the stage 1
> emergency . the request was for 1 mw from tosco and 27 mw from harbor .
>
>
> as you know , we are no longer the sc for tosco and have sent you the
> required documentation . can you make sure the iso has this in their
> system ?
>
> with respect to harbor , we were running 60 mw and were inc ' d 27 ,
> indicating a request for a total of 87 mw . we already had an approved
> outage request from the iso as indicated by the fax i sent you
> indicating that harbor only had 80 mw available . so , the iso should
> only have been able to dispatch 20 mw .
>
> we initially declined the dispatch instruction from the iso due to the
> errors the iso made and the confusion it caused us . we immediately
> " hit the phones " to clarify the facts and subsequently inc ' d
> generation to 80 mw by 12 : 45 . why did the iso dispatch group not have
> our outage request indicating a maximum of 80 mw ?
>
> we believe we have completely responded to the iso ' s instruction and
> should have no penalty charges . please let me know the settlement
> implications of this confusion event .
>
> thanks
>
> chris
>
>
fw : question
this is what i think . i ' ll let you know when i get confirmation .
keoni almeida
california independent system operator
phone : 916 / 608 - 7053
pager : 916 / 814 - 7352
alpha page : 9169812000 . 1151268 @ pagenet . net
e - mail :
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : almeida , keoni
sent : wednesday , may 30 , 2001 1 : 29 pm
to : ford , greg
subject : fw : question
my response to the questions would be that they get the proxy price during
the mitigated intervals when they do not have a bid in . if they have a bid
in , they get the higher of the proxy or the bid and they submit the cost
justification to ferc . right ?
who do they send cost justification to ?
keoni almeida
california independent system operator
phone : 916 / 608 - 7053
pager : 916 / 814 - 7352
alpha page : 9169812000 . 1151268 @ pagenet . net
e - mail :
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : foster , chris h . [ mailto : chris . h . foster @ enron . com ]
sent : wednesday , may 30 , 2001 1 : 21 pm
to : kalmeida @ caiso . com
cc : tbarringer @ edisonmission . com ; scott hawley ( e - mail ) ; cocke jr . ,
stanley ; comnes , alan
subject : fw : question
keoni :
in addition to my questions below , can you clarify what we get paid when
we are inc ' d pursuant to the ferc order ? is the proxy the inc ? if we do
not have a bid in , do we get the inc ? if we have a supplemental bid in ,
do we get the higher of the inc or the bid ? if we do get the higher
of , to whom do we send our cost data ?
chris
> - - - - - original message - - - - -
> from : foster , chris h .
> sent : wednesday , may 30 , 2001 12 : 53 pm
> to : ' " almeida , keoni " @ enron '
> cc : nelson , kourtney ; comnes , alan ; stokley , chris
> subject : re : question
>
> k :
>
> i wanted to document what just happened on receiving a dispatch
> instruction from the iso for harbor cogen ( harbgn _ 7 _ units ) . at 12 : 20
> we received a dispatch instruction from he iso due to the stage 1
> emergency . the request was for 1 mw from tosco and 27 mw from harbor .
>
>
> as you know , we are no longer the sc for tosco and have sent you the
> required documentation . can you make sure the iso has this in their
> system ?
>
> with respect to harbor , we were running 60 mw and were inc ' d 27 ,
> indicating a request for a total of 87 mw . we already had an approved
> outage request from the iso as indicated by the fax i sent you
> indicating that harbor only had 80 mw available . so , the iso should
> only have been able to dispatch 20 mw .
>
> we initially declined the dispatch instruction from the iso due to the
> errors the iso made and the confusion it caused us . we immediately
> " hit the phones " to clarify the facts and subsequently inc ' d
> generation to 80 mw by 12 : 45 . why did the iso dispatch group not have
> our outage request indicating a maximum of 80 mw ?
>
> we believe we have completely responded to the iso ' s instruction and
> should have no penalty charges . please let me know the settlement
> implications of this confusion event .
>
> thanks
>
> chris
>
>