re : mec steve ,
i spoke with david ealier today . he is planning a meeting with jim tour to
due diligence the technology .
i would like to put together a team to drive mec ' s strategy , including a
consolidation in houston . we would trade this commitment for warrants in the
company and a right to participate in future fundings . effectively , our team
could help drive the strategy for the company and due diligence a possible
investment at the same time .
thanks ,
mark
steven j kean @ ees
07 / 26 / 2000 05 : 11 pm
to : mark lay / hou / ect @ ect
cc : rex shelby / enron communications @ enron communications @ ect , mike
mcconnell @ ect , vince j kaminski / hou / ect @ ect , philippe a bibi / hou / ect @ ect ,
kenneth lay / corp / enron @ enron @ ect , fabricio soares / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : mec
i think it would be useful to verify their view that they are really only 2 - 3
years from commercial production . ideally , we could get that confirmation
from someone familiar with the technology but without any financial interest
in its success . their technology pitch sounded good , but i don ' t know enough
to recognize the potential shortcomings . i want to feel comfortable that you
all feel this is real , then i would be happy to have me and my team spend
some time with them .
to : rex shelby / enron communications @ enron communications , steven j
kean / hou / ees @ ees , mike mcconnell , vince j kaminski / hou / ect @ ect , philippe a
bibi / hou / ect @ ect
cc : kenneth lay / corp / enron @ enron , fabricio soares / hou / ect @ ect
subject : mec
thank you for participating in yesterday ' s meeting . we spoke with harvey and
jim after the meeting and they took to speed to market comments to heart .
there is an opportunity for enron to participate with mec in the early
development of their company , but it seems the one thing they want is the one
thing we also want , people . i would appreciate your thoughts and comments on
the possiblity of creating a small team that could work directly with mec as
part of a potential investment and strategic relationship . given our
resource constraints , this would most likely be part of the organization that
sees the greatest strategic impact from mec ' s development .
mark
x 37408
re : mec
steve ,
i spoke with david ealier today . he is planning a meeting with jim tour to
due diligence the technology .
i would like to put together a team to drive mec ' s strategy , including a
consolidation in houston . we would trade this commitment for warrants in the
company and a right to participate in future fundings . effectively , our team
could help drive the strategy for the company and due diligence a possible
investment at the same time .
thanks ,
mark
steven j kean @ ees
07 / 26 / 2000 05 : 11 pm
to : mark lay / hou / ect @ ect
cc : rex shelby / enron communications @ enron communications @ ect , mike
mcconnell @ ect , vince j kaminski / hou / ect @ ect , philippe a bibi / hou / ect @ ect ,
kenneth lay / corp / enron @ enron @ ect , fabricio soares / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : mec
i think it would be useful to verify their view that they are really only 2 - 3
years from commercial production . ideally , we could get that confirmation
from someone familiar with the technology but without any financial interest
in its success . their technology pitch sounded good , but i don ' t know enough
to recognize the potential shortcomings . i want to feel comfortable that you
all feel this is real , then i would be happy to have me and my team spend
some time with them .
to : rex shelby / enron communications @ enron communications , steven j
kean / hou / ees @ ees , mike mcconnell , vince j kaminski / hou / ect @ ect , philippe a
bibi / hou / ect @ ect
cc : kenneth lay / corp / enron @ enron , fabricio soares / hou / ect @ ect
subject : mec
thank you for participating in yesterday ' s meeting . we spoke with harvey and
jim after the meeting and they took to speed to market comments to heart .
there is an opportunity for enron to participate with mec in the early
development of their company , but it seems the one thing they want is the one
thing we also want , people . i would appreciate your thoughts and comments on
the possiblity of creating a small team that could work directly with mec as
part of a potential investment and strategic relationship . given our
resource constraints , this would most likely be part of the organization that
sees the greatest strategic impact from mec ' s development .
mark
x 37408