>these Arabs would simply be repatriated.
And then we would see the spark of a new war because the Sandniggers don't like to lose.
>Shiites are in fact pro-white
Do you have ANY evidence for this? I can tell you a lot of things about Shariah Law, the Qua'ran, and the Sirat, and none of them are pro-white or por-anything that isn't Islam.
> If we had control over our governments, we just wouldn't feed niggers and they would all die.
And they'll fight back, assumedly killing plenty of whites in the process. Dangerous doesn't exactly mean that we would instantly lose to them, it means that the war would be costly. Add too many of those together (sucha s trying to fight the kikes, nigs, and towelheads) all at once and we just might crumble under the pressure.
>Jews in Israel spit on Christians in the streets
I haven't heard any stories of this since biblical times. Got anything to back that up?
>The kikes are going to exterminate us all anyway. 
Over time, and killing the Muslims will deal a serious blow to their plans and give us more time to recover and build ourselves up enough to survive whatever they have planned for us. If we war with Israel however, the Muslims will instantly capitalize on any weakness we have from sweeping social change and war with an extremely capable and tenacious nuclear-armed ethnostate to take a bunch of our territory and outbreed and destroy us.
Some Europeans will survive the Samson attack, unless kikes have developed a doomsday weapon which will extinguish all life on earth.
It is theorized that just a few powerful nukes could send us into planet-wide radiation poisoning, nuclear winter, heat death, or God-knows what else. Even if some Europeans survived there's no guarantee we could pick up the pieces at that point.
>Destroying Israel would be easier and more helpful to Europeans than attacking random third-world brown people
Oil, wealth, land, nearby military installations, etc...