Revolution doesn't happen until things reach critical throughout the country. If there was a nationwide loss of electricity, water, or food there be a revolution purely because the impact of it would be on 65m people instead of a small handful from a town or city that';s already mainly populated by the same stock of people (niggers or rapist Muslims normally) who that town or city is supposed to get outraged about.
A revolution could work if people were publicly cucks, but privately the opposite, like the silent majority in voting. That point has long since passed and people are too cucked now, both privately and publicly. Apart from that, due to the high (((Labour))) sentiment among those of fighting age, someone like him, a (((Communist))) would ultimately usurp power because the more nationalistic opposite doesn't have a single person they can point to in this country and say "he's our leader".
If a revolution did happen now people would immediately have their most basic necessities removed (electricity, water, and food) which would put them in a weaker position than they're already in - the potential gain of stopping immigration/removing non-whites/whatever is outweighed by losing those most basic of necessities that are already provided and you still wouldn't achieve your aim. You could say "yeah, but at least you might stop immigration, you miss 100% of the shots you don't take etc" and that's true, but by having no leader to change things, well, pic related explains it better than I can.