New England is only liberal because it's all white. They trust their neighbors and government because it's low crime and about 90% white throughout. Social programs WORK because they go to the benefit of little Timmy O'Reilly in South Boston to go to a technical magnate high school and then 2 years of community college to become a machinist or technician, so government programs are supported. The thinking is as follows:
>I am totally in support of government programs to help my community. Anyone who doesn't want to give up a little bit to help everyone around them is very selfish. 
Also
>I've never felt threatened where I live, either by my [white] neighbors or by my [white] government. Most threats are imaginary and guns are a dangerous hobby. 

For proof, contrast Massachusetts with Georgia. In Georgia, niggers ruin EVERYTHING. Parks, schools, homeless programs, judicial and law enforcement lenience, welfare designed for decent people in need, fucking EVERYTHING IS RUINED BY STINKING STUPID NIGGERS. So, the people look at government programs and say 
>government programs might mean well, but they don't work. The "poor" are lazy, stupid, drug users, or otherwise beyond helping. Most things should be privatized and left out of public life. You just need to work hard and you will be fine.
Also
>"people" are very dangerous and we must always be ready to protect ourselves, whether from "thugs" or from [yankee social engineering] government. I need my concealed carry just as much as my AR. 

Do you understand the significance of the green text? Those are the dividing lines between mainstream liberals and conservatives on both the infernally divisive economic and gun issues. MA sees republicans as greedy and fearful, while GA sees democrats as naive moonbats divorced from the threats everyday people face. 

The difference is that one deals daily with niggers and the other does not. Inability to name niggers as the source of the problem is what is destroying the America.