Occasionally, I look at the failing New York Times to be reminded of the vile nature of the enemy. Here are a couple of headlines from the front page today.

The first implies that the Koreans talking to each other is in some way a rebuke to Trump, or a move against him, even though the South Koreans foreign minister explicitly gave credit to Trump for engineering the whole thing. It's fucking stupid and typical of these bitter idiots who can't bear to credit Trump with successes, even major and obvious and undeniable ones.

And the second is a gloat over the fact that Trump was unable to get a guy he wanted at the VA. The guy who was Bush and Obama's doctor who nobody in the fake news media had a bad word to say about until he dared to say Trump was healthy. Then after 40 minutes of asking him absurd questions - including if Trump was taking drugs - he is suddenly painted as a potential bad guy by the fake news. And now, some Democrat faggot from a Montana costituency is talking about some fucking alleged protocol violation from the guy's time working with soldiers IN FUCKING WAR and made the guy back away because he only ever wanted to be a doctor and not a public figure - and he doesn't want these jackals sniffing over his whole life. And this wretched character attack on a distinguished man from a cowardly cuck in Montana is presented as "helping thwart" the appointment of Trump's pick. And this is presented as a good thing for no other reason than Trump likes him. That's their logic: Trump wanted to do it, so we have to be against it. That is not how civil society is supposed to work. You can't say it enough: The New York Times is written and read by truly disgusting, shameless people who care nothing for the good of the country and their fellow countrymen. They are treacherous, subversive kikes.