Datasets:

TheFinAI

/

flare-convfinqa

like 1

Follow

The Fin AI 50

convfinqa300

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. . Conversations: Question: what was the change in interest income from the year of 2013 to 2014? Answer:

2.7

convfinqa301

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. . Conversations: q0: what was the change in interest income from the year of 2013 to 2014? 2.7 Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to the interest income in 2013? Answer:

0.10931

convfinqa302

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) and ticona llc ( 45% ( 45 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) . polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( "pps" ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china as follows : nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 31% ( 31 % ) ) , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we received cash dividends of $ 83 million , $ 78 million and $ 71 million , respectively . during 2012 , our venture's nantong facility completed an expansion of its acetate flake and acetate tow capacity , each by 30000 tons . we made contributions of $ 29 million over three years related to the capacity expansion in nantong . similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company . according to the euromonitor database services , china is estimated to have a 42% ( 42 % ) share of the world's 2011 cigarette consumption and is the fastest growing area for cigarette consumption at an estimated growth rate of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) per year from 2011 through 2016 . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and we believe we are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv ventures are as follows : as of december 31 , 2012 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>as of december 31 2012 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> raw materials and energy we purchase a variety of raw materials and energy from sources in many countries for use in our production processes . we have a policy of maintaining , when available , multiple sources of supply for materials . however , some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials , such as carbon monoxide , steam and acetaldehyde . although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials , there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply . even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material , there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier . it is also possible profitability will be adversely affected if we are required to qualify additional sources of supply to our specifications in the event of the loss of a sole supplier . in addition , the price of raw materials varies , often substantially , from year to year. . Conversations: Question: what is the net change in cash dividends received by the company from 2011 to 2012? Answer:

5.0

convfinqa303

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) and ticona llc ( 45% ( 45 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) . polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( "pps" ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china as follows : nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 31% ( 31 % ) ) , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we received cash dividends of $ 83 million , $ 78 million and $ 71 million , respectively . during 2012 , our venture's nantong facility completed an expansion of its acetate flake and acetate tow capacity , each by 30000 tons . we made contributions of $ 29 million over three years related to the capacity expansion in nantong . similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company . according to the euromonitor database services , china is estimated to have a 42% ( 42 % ) share of the world's 2011 cigarette consumption and is the fastest growing area for cigarette consumption at an estimated growth rate of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) per year from 2011 through 2016 . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and we believe we are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv ventures are as follows : as of december 31 , 2012 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>as of december 31 2012 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> raw materials and energy we purchase a variety of raw materials and energy from sources in many countries for use in our production processes . we have a policy of maintaining , when available , multiple sources of supply for materials . however , some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials , such as carbon monoxide , steam and acetaldehyde . although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials , there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply . even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material , there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier . it is also possible profitability will be adversely affected if we are required to qualify additional sources of supply to our specifications in the event of the loss of a sole supplier . in addition , the price of raw materials varies , often substantially , from year to year. . Conversations: q0: what is the net change in cash dividends received by the company from 2011 to 2012? 5.0 Question: what percentage change does this represent? Answer:

0.0641

convfinqa304

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 21.1</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ 18.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )</td><td>$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )</td><td>$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report . Conversations: Question: what is the share-based compensation expense in 2015? Answer:

21.1

convfinqa305

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 21.1</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ 18.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )</td><td>$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )</td><td>$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report . Conversations: q0: what is the share-based compensation expense in 2015? 21.1 Question: and in 2014? Answer:

29.8

convfinqa306

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 21.1</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ 18.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )</td><td>$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )</td><td>$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report . Conversations: q0: what is the share-based compensation expense in 2015? 21.1 q1: and in 2014? 29.8 Question: so what was the difference between these two years? Answer:

-8.7

convfinqa307

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 21.1</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ 18.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )</td><td>$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )</td><td>$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report . Conversations: q0: what is the share-based compensation expense in 2015? 21.1 q1: and in 2014? 29.8 q2: so what was the difference between these two years? -8.7 Question: and the value for 2014 again? Answer:

29.8

convfinqa308

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>share-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 21.1</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ 18.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )</td><td>$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )</td><td>$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )</td></tr></table> we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report . Conversations: q0: what is the share-based compensation expense in 2015? 21.1 q1: and in 2014? 29.8 q2: so what was the difference between these two years? -8.7 q3: and the value for 2014 again? 29.8 Question: so what was the growth rate during this time? Answer:

-0.29195

convfinqa309

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: through current cash balances and cash from oper- ations . additionally , the company has existing credit facilities totaling $ 2.5 billion . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2012 . the company 2019s financial covenants require the maintenance of a minimum net worth of $ 9 billion and a total debt-to- capital ratio of less than 60% ( 60 % ) . net worth is defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock plus any cumulative goodwill impairment charges . the calcu- lation also excludes accumulated other compre- hensive income/loss and nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities . the total debt- to-capital ratio is defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus net worth . at december 31 , 2012 , international paper 2019s net worth was $ 13.9 bil- lion , and the total-debt-to-capital ratio was 42% ( 42 % ) . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2012 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by s&p and moody 2019s , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2012 , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 444</td><td>$ 708</td><td>$ 479</td><td>$ 571</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 7722</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>5173</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>198</td><td>136</td><td>106</td><td>70</td><td>50</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>3213</td><td>828</td><td>722</td><td>620</td><td>808</td><td>2654</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 3855</td><td>$ 1672</td><td>$ 1307</td><td>$ 6434</td><td>$ 1074</td><td>$ 10517</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to effect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2012 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.2 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.2 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 11 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 69 through 72 in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data ) . ( c ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . ( d ) not included in the above table due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the payment are unrecognized tax bene- fits of approximately $ 620 million . we consider the undistributed earnings of our for- eign subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2012 , to be indefinitely reinvested and , accordingly , no u.s . income taxes have been provided thereon . as of december 31 , 2012 , the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $ 840 million . we do not anticipate the need to repatriate funds to the united states to sat- isfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business , including liquidity needs asso- ciated with our domestic debt service requirements . pension obligations and funding at december 31 , 2012 , the projected benefit obliga- tion for the company 2019s u.s . defined benefit plans determined under u.s . gaap was approximately $ 4.1 billion higher than the fair value of plan assets . approximately $ 3.7 billion of this amount relates to plans that are subject to minimum funding require- ments . under current irs funding rules , the calcu- lation of minimum funding requirements differs from the calculation of the present value of plan benefits ( the projected benefit obligation ) for accounting purposes . in december 2008 , the worker , retiree and employer recovery act of 2008 ( wera ) was passed by the u.s . congress which provided for pension funding relief and technical corrections . funding contributions depend on the funding method selected by the company , and the timing of its implementation , as well as on actual demo- graphic data and the targeted funding level . the company continually reassesses the amount and timing of any discretionary contributions and elected to make voluntary contributions totaling $ 44 million and $ 300 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . at this time , we expect that required contributions to its plans in 2013 will be approximately $ 31 million , although the company may elect to make future voluntary contributions . the timing and amount of future contributions , which could be material , will depend on a number of factors , including the actual earnings and changes in values of plan assets and changes in interest rates . ilim holding s.a . shareholder 2019s agreement in october 2007 , in connection with the for- mation of the ilim holding s.a . joint venture , international paper entered into a share- holder 2019s agreement that includes provisions relating to the reconciliation of disputes among the partners . this agreement provides that at . Conversations: Question: what amount of obligations is due within 2014? Answer:

964.0

convfinqa310

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: through current cash balances and cash from oper- ations . additionally , the company has existing credit facilities totaling $ 2.5 billion . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2012 . the company 2019s financial covenants require the maintenance of a minimum net worth of $ 9 billion and a total debt-to- capital ratio of less than 60% ( 60 % ) . net worth is defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock plus any cumulative goodwill impairment charges . the calcu- lation also excludes accumulated other compre- hensive income/loss and nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities . the total debt- to-capital ratio is defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus net worth . at december 31 , 2012 , international paper 2019s net worth was $ 13.9 bil- lion , and the total-debt-to-capital ratio was 42% ( 42 % ) . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2012 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by s&p and moody 2019s , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2012 , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 444</td><td>$ 708</td><td>$ 479</td><td>$ 571</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 7722</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>5173</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>198</td><td>136</td><td>106</td><td>70</td><td>50</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>3213</td><td>828</td><td>722</td><td>620</td><td>808</td><td>2654</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 3855</td><td>$ 1672</td><td>$ 1307</td><td>$ 6434</td><td>$ 1074</td><td>$ 10517</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to effect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2012 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.2 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.2 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 11 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 69 through 72 in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data ) . ( c ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . ( d ) not included in the above table due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the payment are unrecognized tax bene- fits of approximately $ 620 million . we consider the undistributed earnings of our for- eign subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2012 , to be indefinitely reinvested and , accordingly , no u.s . income taxes have been provided thereon . as of december 31 , 2012 , the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $ 840 million . we do not anticipate the need to repatriate funds to the united states to sat- isfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business , including liquidity needs asso- ciated with our domestic debt service requirements . pension obligations and funding at december 31 , 2012 , the projected benefit obliga- tion for the company 2019s u.s . defined benefit plans determined under u.s . gaap was approximately $ 4.1 billion higher than the fair value of plan assets . approximately $ 3.7 billion of this amount relates to plans that are subject to minimum funding require- ments . under current irs funding rules , the calcu- lation of minimum funding requirements differs from the calculation of the present value of plan benefits ( the projected benefit obligation ) for accounting purposes . in december 2008 , the worker , retiree and employer recovery act of 2008 ( wera ) was passed by the u.s . congress which provided for pension funding relief and technical corrections . funding contributions depend on the funding method selected by the company , and the timing of its implementation , as well as on actual demo- graphic data and the targeted funding level . the company continually reassesses the amount and timing of any discretionary contributions and elected to make voluntary contributions totaling $ 44 million and $ 300 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . at this time , we expect that required contributions to its plans in 2013 will be approximately $ 31 million , although the company may elect to make future voluntary contributions . the timing and amount of future contributions , which could be material , will depend on a number of factors , including the actual earnings and changes in values of plan assets and changes in interest rates . ilim holding s.a . shareholder 2019s agreement in october 2007 , in connection with the for- mation of the ilim holding s.a . joint venture , international paper entered into a share- holder 2019s agreement that includes provisions relating to the reconciliation of disputes among the partners . this agreement provides that at . Conversations: q0: what amount of obligations is due within 2014? 964.0 Question: what proportion of total obligations does this represent? Answer:

0.57656

convfinqa311

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston . the total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million . of the total purchase price , $ 64.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 5.4 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm . the primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market . the initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over a three-year period following the acquisition . approximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce . the results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c . metropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) . the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million were comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company . the acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings . the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating rental properties</td><td>$ 602011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>undeveloped land</td><td>154300</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total real estate investments</td><td>756311</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>10478</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>lease related intangible assets</td><td>86047</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>14722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>867558</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>-148527 ( 148527 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other liabilities assumed</td><td>-5829 ( 5829 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>purchase price net of assumed liabilities</td><td>$ 713202</td></tr></table> purchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 in december 2006 , we contributed 23 of these in-service properties acquired from the mark winkler portfolio with a basis of $ 381.6 million representing real estate investments and acquired lease related intangible assets to two new unconsolidated subsidiaries . of the remaining nine in-service properties , eight were contributed to these two unconsolidated subsidiaries in 2007 and one remains in continuing operations as of december 31 , 2008 . the eight properties contributed in 2007 had a basis of $ 298.4 million representing real estate investments and acquired lease related intangible assets , and debt secured by these properties of $ 146.4 million was also assumed by the unconsolidated subsidiaries . in the third quarter of 2006 , we finalized the purchase of a portfolio of industrial real estate properties in savannah , georgia . we completed a majority of the purchase in january 2006 . the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 196.2 million were comprised of 18 buildings with approximately 5.1 million square feet for rental as well as over 60 acres of undeveloped land . the acquisition was financed in part through assumed mortgage loans . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements. . Conversations: Question: what percentage of the total price of the purchase of 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston was allocated to in-service real estate assets? Answer:

0.7146

convfinqa312

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston . the total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million . of the total purchase price , $ 64.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 5.4 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm . the primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market . the initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over a three-year period following the acquisition . approximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce . the results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c . metropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) . the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million were comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company . the acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings . the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating rental properties</td><td>$ 602011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>undeveloped land</td><td>154300</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total real estate investments</td><td>756311</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>10478</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>lease related intangible assets</td><td>86047</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>14722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>867558</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>-148527 ( 148527 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other liabilities assumed</td><td>-5829 ( 5829 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>purchase price net of assumed liabilities</td><td>$ 713202</td></tr></table> purchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 in december 2006 , we contributed 23 of these in-service properties acquired from the mark winkler portfolio with a basis of $ 381.6 million representing real estate investments and acquired lease related intangible assets to two new unconsolidated subsidiaries . of the remaining nine in-service properties , eight were contributed to these two unconsolidated subsidiaries in 2007 and one remains in continuing operations as of december 31 , 2008 . the eight properties contributed in 2007 had a basis of $ 298.4 million representing real estate investments and acquired lease related intangible assets , and debt secured by these properties of $ 146.4 million was also assumed by the unconsolidated subsidiaries . in the third quarter of 2006 , we finalized the purchase of a portfolio of industrial real estate properties in savannah , georgia . we completed a majority of the purchase in january 2006 . the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 196.2 million were comprised of 18 buildings with approximately 5.1 million square feet for rental as well as over 60 acres of undeveloped land . the acquisition was financed in part through assumed mortgage loans . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements. . Conversations: q0: what percentage of the total price of the purchase of 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston was allocated to in-service real estate assets? 0.7146 Question: and what percentage of the total assets acquired was allocated to undeveloped land? Answer:

0.17786

convfinqa313

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. . Conversations: Question: what was the adjusted ebitda in 2015? Answer:

111.5

convfinqa314

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. . Conversations: q0: what was the adjusted ebitda in 2015? 111.5 Question: and unadjusted ebitda during that time? Answer:

1033.9

convfinqa315

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. . Conversations: q0: what was the adjusted ebitda in 2015? 111.5 q1: and unadjusted ebitda during that time? 1033.9 Question: and in 2014? Answer:

792.9

convfinqa316

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. . Conversations: q0: what was the adjusted ebitda in 2015? 111.5 q1: and unadjusted ebitda during that time? 1033.9 q2: and in 2014? 792.9 Question: so what was the change in unadjusted ebitda between these years? Answer:

241.0

convfinqa317

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents ( 2 ) includes capitalized lease obligations of $ 3.2 million and $ 0.1 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . ( 3 ) ebitda is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense , income tax expense , depreciation and amortization . adjusted ebitda , which is a measure defined in our credit agreements , means ebitda adjusted for certain items which are described in the table below . we have included a reconciliation of ebitda and adjusted ebitda in the table below . both ebitda and adjusted ebitda are considered non-gaap financial measures . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that ebitda and adjusted ebitda provide helpful information with respect to our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . adjusted ebitda is also the primary measure used in certain key covenants and definitions contained in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , including the excess cash flow payment provision , the restricted payment covenant and the net leverage ratio . these covenants and definitions are material components of the term loan as they are used in determining the interest rate applicable to the term loan , our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . the following unaudited table sets forth reconciliations of net income to ebitda and ebitda to adjusted ebitda for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>227.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>208.2</td><td>210.2</td><td>204.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>243.9</td><td>142.8</td><td>62.7</td><td>67.1</td><td>11.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>159.5</td><td>197.3</td><td>250.1</td><td>307.4</td><td>324.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ebitda</td><td>1033.9</td><td>792.9</td><td>653.8</td><td>703.7</td><td>557.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b )</td><td>10.1</td><td>-2.2 ( 2.2 )</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-0.1 ( 0.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>6.9</td><td>9.2</td><td>82.7</td><td>23.9</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>adjusted ebitda ( f )</td><td>$ 1018.5</td><td>$ 907.0</td><td>$ 808.5</td><td>$ 766.6</td><td>$ 717.3</td></tr></table> net loss on extinguishment of long-term debt ( a ) 24.3 90.7 64.0 17.2 118.9 loss ( income ) from equity investments ( b ) 10.1 ( 2.2 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.1 ) acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 6.9 9.2 82.7 23.9 21.6 adjusted ebitda ( f ) $ 1018.5 $ 907.0 $ 808.5 $ 766.6 $ 717.3 ( a ) during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded net losses on extinguishments of long-term debt . the losses represented the difference between the amount paid upon extinguishment , including call premiums and expenses paid to the debt holders and agents , and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt , adjusted for a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs . ( b ) represents our share of net income/loss from our equity investments . our 35% ( 35 % ) share of kelway 2019s net loss includes our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to the acquisition . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway. . Conversations: q0: what was the adjusted ebitda in 2015? 111.5 q1: and unadjusted ebitda during that time? 1033.9 q2: and in 2014? 792.9 q3: so what was the change in unadjusted ebitda between these years? 241.0 Question: so did 2015 adjusted ebitda increase more than 2015 actual ebitda? Answer:

no

convfinqa318

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td><td>$ 9921</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>808</td><td>874</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td><td>8.2% ( 8.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td><td>9700</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. . Conversations: Question: what were the net sales in 2011? Answer:

9381.0

convfinqa319

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td><td>$ 9921</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>808</td><td>874</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td><td>8.2% ( 8.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td><td>9700</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. . Conversations: q0: what were the net sales in 2011? 9381.0 Question: and in 2010? Answer:

9921.0

convfinqa320

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td><td>$ 9921</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>808</td><td>874</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td><td>8.2% ( 8.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td><td>9700</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. . Conversations: q0: what were the net sales in 2011? 9381.0 q1: and in 2010? 9921.0 Question: so what was the difference between these two years? Answer:

-540.0

convfinqa321

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td><td>$ 9921</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>808</td><td>874</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td><td>8.2% ( 8.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td><td>9700</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. . Conversations: q0: what were the net sales in 2011? 9381.0 q1: and in 2010? 9921.0 q2: so what was the difference between these two years? -540.0 Question: and the growth rate between these two years? Answer:

-0.05443

convfinqa322

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2011</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. . Conversations: Question: what is the net valuation allowance as of december 31, 2013? Answer:

10576.0

convfinqa323

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2011</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. . Conversations: q0: what is the net valuation allowance as of december 31, 2013? 10576.0 Question: what is the value of decreases in current period tax positions in 2011? Answer:

3734.0

convfinqa324

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2011</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. . Conversations: q0: what is the net valuation allowance as of december 31, 2013? 10576.0 q1: what is the value of decreases in current period tax positions in 2011? 3734.0 Question: what about in 2012? Answer:

2059.0

convfinqa325

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2011</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. . Conversations: q0: what is the net valuation allowance as of december 31, 2013? 10576.0 q1: what is the value of decreases in current period tax positions in 2011? 3734.0 q2: what about in 2012? 2059.0 Question: what is the total for these two years? Answer:

5793.0

convfinqa326

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2011</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. . Conversations: q0: what is the net valuation allowance as of december 31, 2013? 10576.0 q1: what is the value of decreases in current period tax positions in 2011? 3734.0 q2: what about in 2012? 2059.0 q3: what is the total for these two years? 5793.0 Question: what about if 2013 is included? Answer:

11758.0

convfinqa327

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2011</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. . Conversations: q0: what is the net valuation allowance as of december 31, 2013? 10576.0 q1: what is the value of decreases in current period tax positions in 2011? 3734.0 q2: what about in 2012? 2059.0 q3: what is the total for these two years? 5793.0 q4: what about if 2013 is included? 11758.0 Question: what is the average for three years? Answer:

3919.33333

convfinqa328

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 161 fifth third bancorp as of december 31 , 2012 ( $ in millions ) significant unobservable ranges of financial instrument fair value valuation technique inputs inputs weighted-average commercial loans held for sale $ 9 appraised value appraised value nm nm cost to sell nm 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) commercial and industrial loans 83 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial mortgage loans 46 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial construction loans 4 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm msrs 697 discounted cash flow prepayment speed 0 - 100% ( 100 % ) ( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) discount rates 9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>financial instrument</td><td>fair value</td><td>valuation technique</td><td>significant unobservableinputs</td><td>ranges ofinputs</td><td>weighted-average</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial loans held for sale</td><td>$ 9</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised valuecost to sell</td><td>nmnm</td><td>nm10.0% ( nm10.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial and industrial loans</td><td>83</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commercial mortgage loans</td><td>46</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commercial construction loans</td><td>4</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>msrs</td><td>697</td><td>discounted cash flow</td><td>prepayment speeddiscount rates</td><td>0 - 100%9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % )</td><td>( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>oreo</td><td>165</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised value</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> commercial loans held for sale during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp transferred $ 5 million and $ 16 million , respectively , of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs . these loans had fair value adjustments in 2013 and 2012 totaling $ 4 million and $ 1 million , respectively , and were generally based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore , classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . additionally , during 2013 and 2012 there were fair value adjustments on existing commercial loans held for sale of $ 3 million and $ 12 million , respectively . the fair value adjustments were also based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the accounting department determines the procedures for valuation of commercial hfs loans which may include a comparison to recently executed transactions of similar type loans . a monthly review of the portfolio is performed for reasonableness . quarterly , appraisals approaching a year old are updated and the real estate valuation group , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , in conjunction with the commercial line of business review the third party appraisals for reasonableness . additionally , the commercial line of business finance department , which reports to the bancorp chief financial officer , in conjunction with accounting review all loan appraisal values , carrying values and vintages . commercial loans held for investment during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain commercial and industrial , commercial mortgage and commercial construction loans held for investment . larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $ 1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment . the bancorp considers the current value of collateral , credit quality of any guarantees , the guarantor 2019s liquidity and willingness to cooperate , the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired . when the loan is collateral dependent , the fair value of the loan is generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan and therefore these loans were classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . in cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value , an impairment loss is recognized . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the fair values and recognized impairment losses are reflected in the previous table . commercial credit risk , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for commercial loans held for investment . mortgage interest rates increased during the year ended december 31 , 2013 and the bancorp recognized a recovery of temporary impairment on servicing rights . the bancorp recognized temporary impairments in certain classes of the msr portfolio during the year ended december 31 , 2012 and the carrying value was adjusted to the fair value . msrs do not trade in an active , open market with readily observable prices . while sales of msrs do occur , the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available . accordingly , the bancorp estimates the fair value of msrs using internal discounted cash flow models with certain unobservable inputs , primarily prepayment speed assumptions , discount rates and weighted average lives , resulting in a classification within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . refer to note 11 for further information on the assumptions used in the valuation of the bancorp 2019s msrs . the secondary marketing department and treasury department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for msrs . representatives from secondary marketing , treasury , accounting and risk management are responsible for reviewing key assumptions used in the internal discounted cash flow model . two external valuations of the msr portfolio are obtained from third parties that use valuation models in order to assess the reasonableness of the internal discounted cash flow model . additionally , the bancorp participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the msr valuation process and the resulting msr prices . during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as oreo and measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value . these nonrecurring losses are primarily due to declines in real estate values of the properties recorded in oreo . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , these losses include $ 19 million and $ 17 million , respectively , recorded as charge-offs , on new oreo properties transferred from loans during the respective periods and $ 26 million and $ 57 million , respectively , recorded as negative fair value adjustments on oreo in other noninterest income subsequent to their transfer from loans . as discussed in the following paragraphs , the fair value amounts are generally based on appraisals of the property values , resulting in a . Conversations: Question: what were the nonrecurring losses in 2013? Answer:

19.0

convfinqa329

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 161 fifth third bancorp as of december 31 , 2012 ( $ in millions ) significant unobservable ranges of financial instrument fair value valuation technique inputs inputs weighted-average commercial loans held for sale $ 9 appraised value appraised value nm nm cost to sell nm 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) commercial and industrial loans 83 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial mortgage loans 46 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial construction loans 4 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm msrs 697 discounted cash flow prepayment speed 0 - 100% ( 100 % ) ( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) discount rates 9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>financial instrument</td><td>fair value</td><td>valuation technique</td><td>significant unobservableinputs</td><td>ranges ofinputs</td><td>weighted-average</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial loans held for sale</td><td>$ 9</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised valuecost to sell</td><td>nmnm</td><td>nm10.0% ( nm10.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial and industrial loans</td><td>83</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commercial mortgage loans</td><td>46</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commercial construction loans</td><td>4</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>msrs</td><td>697</td><td>discounted cash flow</td><td>prepayment speeddiscount rates</td><td>0 - 100%9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % )</td><td>( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>oreo</td><td>165</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised value</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> commercial loans held for sale during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp transferred $ 5 million and $ 16 million , respectively , of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs . these loans had fair value adjustments in 2013 and 2012 totaling $ 4 million and $ 1 million , respectively , and were generally based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore , classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . additionally , during 2013 and 2012 there were fair value adjustments on existing commercial loans held for sale of $ 3 million and $ 12 million , respectively . the fair value adjustments were also based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the accounting department determines the procedures for valuation of commercial hfs loans which may include a comparison to recently executed transactions of similar type loans . a monthly review of the portfolio is performed for reasonableness . quarterly , appraisals approaching a year old are updated and the real estate valuation group , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , in conjunction with the commercial line of business review the third party appraisals for reasonableness . additionally , the commercial line of business finance department , which reports to the bancorp chief financial officer , in conjunction with accounting review all loan appraisal values , carrying values and vintages . commercial loans held for investment during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain commercial and industrial , commercial mortgage and commercial construction loans held for investment . larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $ 1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment . the bancorp considers the current value of collateral , credit quality of any guarantees , the guarantor 2019s liquidity and willingness to cooperate , the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired . when the loan is collateral dependent , the fair value of the loan is generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan and therefore these loans were classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . in cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value , an impairment loss is recognized . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the fair values and recognized impairment losses are reflected in the previous table . commercial credit risk , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for commercial loans held for investment . mortgage interest rates increased during the year ended december 31 , 2013 and the bancorp recognized a recovery of temporary impairment on servicing rights . the bancorp recognized temporary impairments in certain classes of the msr portfolio during the year ended december 31 , 2012 and the carrying value was adjusted to the fair value . msrs do not trade in an active , open market with readily observable prices . while sales of msrs do occur , the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available . accordingly , the bancorp estimates the fair value of msrs using internal discounted cash flow models with certain unobservable inputs , primarily prepayment speed assumptions , discount rates and weighted average lives , resulting in a classification within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . refer to note 11 for further information on the assumptions used in the valuation of the bancorp 2019s msrs . the secondary marketing department and treasury department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for msrs . representatives from secondary marketing , treasury , accounting and risk management are responsible for reviewing key assumptions used in the internal discounted cash flow model . two external valuations of the msr portfolio are obtained from third parties that use valuation models in order to assess the reasonableness of the internal discounted cash flow model . additionally , the bancorp participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the msr valuation process and the resulting msr prices . during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as oreo and measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value . these nonrecurring losses are primarily due to declines in real estate values of the properties recorded in oreo . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , these losses include $ 19 million and $ 17 million , respectively , recorded as charge-offs , on new oreo properties transferred from loans during the respective periods and $ 26 million and $ 57 million , respectively , recorded as negative fair value adjustments on oreo in other noninterest income subsequent to their transfer from loans . as discussed in the following paragraphs , the fair value amounts are generally based on appraisals of the property values , resulting in a . Conversations: q0: what were the nonrecurring losses in 2013? 19.0 Question: and in 2012? Answer:

17.0

convfinqa330

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 161 fifth third bancorp as of december 31 , 2012 ( $ in millions ) significant unobservable ranges of financial instrument fair value valuation technique inputs inputs weighted-average commercial loans held for sale $ 9 appraised value appraised value nm nm cost to sell nm 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) commercial and industrial loans 83 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial mortgage loans 46 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial construction loans 4 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm msrs 697 discounted cash flow prepayment speed 0 - 100% ( 100 % ) ( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) discount rates 9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>financial instrument</td><td>fair value</td><td>valuation technique</td><td>significant unobservableinputs</td><td>ranges ofinputs</td><td>weighted-average</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial loans held for sale</td><td>$ 9</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised valuecost to sell</td><td>nmnm</td><td>nm10.0% ( nm10.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial and industrial loans</td><td>83</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commercial mortgage loans</td><td>46</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commercial construction loans</td><td>4</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>msrs</td><td>697</td><td>discounted cash flow</td><td>prepayment speeddiscount rates</td><td>0 - 100%9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % )</td><td>( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>oreo</td><td>165</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised value</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> commercial loans held for sale during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp transferred $ 5 million and $ 16 million , respectively , of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs . these loans had fair value adjustments in 2013 and 2012 totaling $ 4 million and $ 1 million , respectively , and were generally based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore , classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . additionally , during 2013 and 2012 there were fair value adjustments on existing commercial loans held for sale of $ 3 million and $ 12 million , respectively . the fair value adjustments were also based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the accounting department determines the procedures for valuation of commercial hfs loans which may include a comparison to recently executed transactions of similar type loans . a monthly review of the portfolio is performed for reasonableness . quarterly , appraisals approaching a year old are updated and the real estate valuation group , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , in conjunction with the commercial line of business review the third party appraisals for reasonableness . additionally , the commercial line of business finance department , which reports to the bancorp chief financial officer , in conjunction with accounting review all loan appraisal values , carrying values and vintages . commercial loans held for investment during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain commercial and industrial , commercial mortgage and commercial construction loans held for investment . larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $ 1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment . the bancorp considers the current value of collateral , credit quality of any guarantees , the guarantor 2019s liquidity and willingness to cooperate , the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired . when the loan is collateral dependent , the fair value of the loan is generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan and therefore these loans were classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . in cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value , an impairment loss is recognized . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the fair values and recognized impairment losses are reflected in the previous table . commercial credit risk , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for commercial loans held for investment . mortgage interest rates increased during the year ended december 31 , 2013 and the bancorp recognized a recovery of temporary impairment on servicing rights . the bancorp recognized temporary impairments in certain classes of the msr portfolio during the year ended december 31 , 2012 and the carrying value was adjusted to the fair value . msrs do not trade in an active , open market with readily observable prices . while sales of msrs do occur , the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available . accordingly , the bancorp estimates the fair value of msrs using internal discounted cash flow models with certain unobservable inputs , primarily prepayment speed assumptions , discount rates and weighted average lives , resulting in a classification within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . refer to note 11 for further information on the assumptions used in the valuation of the bancorp 2019s msrs . the secondary marketing department and treasury department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for msrs . representatives from secondary marketing , treasury , accounting and risk management are responsible for reviewing key assumptions used in the internal discounted cash flow model . two external valuations of the msr portfolio are obtained from third parties that use valuation models in order to assess the reasonableness of the internal discounted cash flow model . additionally , the bancorp participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the msr valuation process and the resulting msr prices . during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as oreo and measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value . these nonrecurring losses are primarily due to declines in real estate values of the properties recorded in oreo . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , these losses include $ 19 million and $ 17 million , respectively , recorded as charge-offs , on new oreo properties transferred from loans during the respective periods and $ 26 million and $ 57 million , respectively , recorded as negative fair value adjustments on oreo in other noninterest income subsequent to their transfer from loans . as discussed in the following paragraphs , the fair value amounts are generally based on appraisals of the property values , resulting in a . Conversations: q0: what were the nonrecurring losses in 2013? 19.0 q1: and in 2012? 17.0 Question: so what was the difference in this value between the two years? Answer:

2.0

convfinqa331

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 161 fifth third bancorp as of december 31 , 2012 ( $ in millions ) significant unobservable ranges of financial instrument fair value valuation technique inputs inputs weighted-average commercial loans held for sale $ 9 appraised value appraised value nm nm cost to sell nm 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) commercial and industrial loans 83 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial mortgage loans 46 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm commercial construction loans 4 appraised value default rates 100% ( 100 % ) nm collateral value nm nm msrs 697 discounted cash flow prepayment speed 0 - 100% ( 100 % ) ( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) discount rates 9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>financial instrument</td><td>fair value</td><td>valuation technique</td><td>significant unobservableinputs</td><td>ranges ofinputs</td><td>weighted-average</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial loans held for sale</td><td>$ 9</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised valuecost to sell</td><td>nmnm</td><td>nm10.0% ( nm10.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial and industrial loans</td><td>83</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commercial mortgage loans</td><td>46</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commercial construction loans</td><td>4</td><td>appraised value</td><td>default ratescollateral value</td><td>100%nm</td><td>nmnm</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>msrs</td><td>697</td><td>discounted cash flow</td><td>prepayment speeddiscount rates</td><td>0 - 100%9.4 - 18.0% ( 18.0 % )</td><td>( fixed ) 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) ( adjustable ) 26.9% ( 26.9 % ) ( fixed ) 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) ( adjustable ) 11.7% ( 11.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>oreo</td><td>165</td><td>appraised value</td><td>appraised value</td><td>nm</td><td>nm</td></tr></table> commercial loans held for sale during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp transferred $ 5 million and $ 16 million , respectively , of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs . these loans had fair value adjustments in 2013 and 2012 totaling $ 4 million and $ 1 million , respectively , and were generally based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore , classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . additionally , during 2013 and 2012 there were fair value adjustments on existing commercial loans held for sale of $ 3 million and $ 12 million , respectively . the fair value adjustments were also based on appraisals of the underlying collateral and were therefore classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the accounting department determines the procedures for valuation of commercial hfs loans which may include a comparison to recently executed transactions of similar type loans . a monthly review of the portfolio is performed for reasonableness . quarterly , appraisals approaching a year old are updated and the real estate valuation group , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , in conjunction with the commercial line of business review the third party appraisals for reasonableness . additionally , the commercial line of business finance department , which reports to the bancorp chief financial officer , in conjunction with accounting review all loan appraisal values , carrying values and vintages . commercial loans held for investment during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain commercial and industrial , commercial mortgage and commercial construction loans held for investment . larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $ 1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment . the bancorp considers the current value of collateral , credit quality of any guarantees , the guarantor 2019s liquidity and willingness to cooperate , the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired . when the loan is collateral dependent , the fair value of the loan is generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan and therefore these loans were classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . in cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value , an impairment loss is recognized . an adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement . the fair values and recognized impairment losses are reflected in the previous table . commercial credit risk , which reports to the chief risk and credit officer , is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for commercial loans held for investment . mortgage interest rates increased during the year ended december 31 , 2013 and the bancorp recognized a recovery of temporary impairment on servicing rights . the bancorp recognized temporary impairments in certain classes of the msr portfolio during the year ended december 31 , 2012 and the carrying value was adjusted to the fair value . msrs do not trade in an active , open market with readily observable prices . while sales of msrs do occur , the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available . accordingly , the bancorp estimates the fair value of msrs using internal discounted cash flow models with certain unobservable inputs , primarily prepayment speed assumptions , discount rates and weighted average lives , resulting in a classification within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy . refer to note 11 for further information on the assumptions used in the valuation of the bancorp 2019s msrs . the secondary marketing department and treasury department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for msrs . representatives from secondary marketing , treasury , accounting and risk management are responsible for reviewing key assumptions used in the internal discounted cash flow model . two external valuations of the msr portfolio are obtained from third parties that use valuation models in order to assess the reasonableness of the internal discounted cash flow model . additionally , the bancorp participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the msr valuation process and the resulting msr prices . during 2013 and 2012 , the bancorp recorded nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as oreo and measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value . these nonrecurring losses are primarily due to declines in real estate values of the properties recorded in oreo . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , these losses include $ 19 million and $ 17 million , respectively , recorded as charge-offs , on new oreo properties transferred from loans during the respective periods and $ 26 million and $ 57 million , respectively , recorded as negative fair value adjustments on oreo in other noninterest income subsequent to their transfer from loans . as discussed in the following paragraphs , the fair value amounts are generally based on appraisals of the property values , resulting in a . Conversations: q0: what were the nonrecurring losses in 2013? 19.0 q1: and in 2012? 17.0 q2: so what was the difference in this value between the two years? 2.0 Question: and the percentage change for this period? Answer:

0.11765

convfinqa332

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis 2022 the deferral in august 2004 of $ 7.5 million of fossil plant maintenance and voluntary severance program costs at entergy new orleans as a result of a stipulation approved by the city council . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 4209.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rate increases</td><td>66.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>56.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>42.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>23.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>march 2002 ark . settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-6.3 ( 6.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 4214.5</td></tr></table> base rates increased net revenue due to base rate increases at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans that became effective in january 2003 and june 2003 , respectively . entergy gulf states implemented base rate decreases in its louisiana jurisdiction effective june 2002 and january 2003 . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting estimate to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance was due to a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and further revision of that estimate in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs at entergy louisiana . the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 . see "critical accounting estimates 2013 nuclear decommissioning costs" for more details on sfas 143 . the increase was offset by increased depreciation and decommissioning expenses and had an insignificant effect on net income . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and cooperative customers . the march 2002 settlement agreement variance reflects the absence in 2003 of the effect of recording the ice storm settlement approved by the apsc in 2002 . this settlement resulted in previously deferred revenues at entergy arkansas per the transition cost account mechanism being recorded in net revenue in the second quarter of 2002 . the decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in other operation and maintenance expenses and had a minimal effect on net income . gross operating revenues and regulatory credits gross operating revenues include an increase in fuel cost recovery revenues of $ 682 million and $ 53 million in electric and gas sales , respectively , primarily due to higher fuel rates in 2003 resulting from increases in the market prices of purchased power and natural gas . as such , this revenue increase was offset by increased fuel and purchased power expenses. . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2002 and 2003? Answer:

4.9

convfinqa333

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis 2022 the deferral in august 2004 of $ 7.5 million of fossil plant maintenance and voluntary severance program costs at entergy new orleans as a result of a stipulation approved by the city council . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 4209.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rate increases</td><td>66.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>56.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>42.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>23.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>march 2002 ark . settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-6.3 ( 6.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 4214.5</td></tr></table> base rates increased net revenue due to base rate increases at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans that became effective in january 2003 and june 2003 , respectively . entergy gulf states implemented base rate decreases in its louisiana jurisdiction effective june 2002 and january 2003 . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting estimate to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance was due to a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and further revision of that estimate in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs at entergy louisiana . the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 . see "critical accounting estimates 2013 nuclear decommissioning costs" for more details on sfas 143 . the increase was offset by increased depreciation and decommissioning expenses and had an insignificant effect on net income . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and cooperative customers . the march 2002 settlement agreement variance reflects the absence in 2003 of the effect of recording the ice storm settlement approved by the apsc in 2002 . this settlement resulted in previously deferred revenues at entergy arkansas per the transition cost account mechanism being recorded in net revenue in the second quarter of 2002 . the decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in other operation and maintenance expenses and had a minimal effect on net income . gross operating revenues and regulatory credits gross operating revenues include an increase in fuel cost recovery revenues of $ 682 million and $ 53 million in electric and gas sales , respectively , primarily due to higher fuel rates in 2003 resulting from increases in the market prices of purchased power and natural gas . as such , this revenue increase was offset by increased fuel and purchased power expenses. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in net revenue between 2002 and 2003? 4.9 Question: and the value for 2002 specifically? Answer:

4209.6

convfinqa334

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis 2022 the deferral in august 2004 of $ 7.5 million of fossil plant maintenance and voluntary severance program costs at entergy new orleans as a result of a stipulation approved by the city council . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 4209.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rate increases</td><td>66.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>56.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>42.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>23.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>march 2002 ark . settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-6.3 ( 6.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 4214.5</td></tr></table> base rates increased net revenue due to base rate increases at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans that became effective in january 2003 and june 2003 , respectively . entergy gulf states implemented base rate decreases in its louisiana jurisdiction effective june 2002 and january 2003 . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting estimate to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance was due to a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and further revision of that estimate in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs at entergy louisiana . the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 . see "critical accounting estimates 2013 nuclear decommissioning costs" for more details on sfas 143 . the increase was offset by increased depreciation and decommissioning expenses and had an insignificant effect on net income . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and cooperative customers . the march 2002 settlement agreement variance reflects the absence in 2003 of the effect of recording the ice storm settlement approved by the apsc in 2002 . this settlement resulted in previously deferred revenues at entergy arkansas per the transition cost account mechanism being recorded in net revenue in the second quarter of 2002 . the decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in other operation and maintenance expenses and had a minimal effect on net income . gross operating revenues and regulatory credits gross operating revenues include an increase in fuel cost recovery revenues of $ 682 million and $ 53 million in electric and gas sales , respectively , primarily due to higher fuel rates in 2003 resulting from increases in the market prices of purchased power and natural gas . as such , this revenue increase was offset by increased fuel and purchased power expenses. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in net revenue between 2002 and 2003? 4.9 q1: and the value for 2002 specifically? 4209.6 Question: so what was the growth rate? Answer:

0.00116

convfinqa335

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents in march 2008 , the fasb issued sfas no . 161 , disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities 2014an amendment of fasb statement no . 133 , which requires companies to provide additional disclosures about its objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments , how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under sfas no . 133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , and related interpretations , and how the derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company 2019s financial statements . sfas no . 161 also requires companies to disclose information about credit risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions . sfas no . 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 161 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2008 ( in millions ) : as of september 27 , 2008 , the company had $ 24.5 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 9.1 billion from september 29 , 2007 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 9.6 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 483 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 757 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 1.1 billion , payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 220 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 108 million . the company 2019s cash generated by operating activities significantly exceeded its net income due primarily to the large increase in deferred revenue , net of deferred costs , associated with subscription accounting for iphone . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities with a minimum rating of single-a . as of september 27 , 2008 and september 29 , 2007 , $ 11.3 billion and $ 6.5 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short- term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company had $ 117 million in net unrealized losses on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities ranging from one to five years , as of september 27 , 2008 , and net unrealized losses of approximately $ 11 million on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities from one to five years , as of september 29 , 2007 . the company has the intent and ability to hold such investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the principal amounts invested . accordingly , none of these declines in fair value were recognized in the company 2019s statement of operations . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . capital assets the company 2019s cash payments for capital asset purchases were $ 1.1 billion during 2008 , consisting of $ 389 million for retail store facilities and $ 702 million for real estate acquisitions and corporate infrastructure including information systems enhancements . the company anticipates utilizing approximately $ 1.5 billion for capital asset purchases during 2009 , including approximately $ 400 million for retail facilities and approximately $ 1.1 billion for corporate facilities and infrastructure. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 24490</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 2422</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 20598</td><td>$ 12676</td><td>$ 8066</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 9596</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what was the change in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments between 2007 and 2008? Answer:

9104.0

convfinqa336

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents in march 2008 , the fasb issued sfas no . 161 , disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities 2014an amendment of fasb statement no . 133 , which requires companies to provide additional disclosures about its objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments , how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under sfas no . 133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , and related interpretations , and how the derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company 2019s financial statements . sfas no . 161 also requires companies to disclose information about credit risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions . sfas no . 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 161 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2008 ( in millions ) : as of september 27 , 2008 , the company had $ 24.5 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 9.1 billion from september 29 , 2007 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 9.6 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 483 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 757 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 1.1 billion , payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 220 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 108 million . the company 2019s cash generated by operating activities significantly exceeded its net income due primarily to the large increase in deferred revenue , net of deferred costs , associated with subscription accounting for iphone . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities with a minimum rating of single-a . as of september 27 , 2008 and september 29 , 2007 , $ 11.3 billion and $ 6.5 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short- term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company had $ 117 million in net unrealized losses on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities ranging from one to five years , as of september 27 , 2008 , and net unrealized losses of approximately $ 11 million on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities from one to five years , as of september 29 , 2007 . the company has the intent and ability to hold such investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the principal amounts invested . accordingly , none of these declines in fair value were recognized in the company 2019s statement of operations . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . capital assets the company 2019s cash payments for capital asset purchases were $ 1.1 billion during 2008 , consisting of $ 389 million for retail store facilities and $ 702 million for real estate acquisitions and corporate infrastructure including information systems enhancements . the company anticipates utilizing approximately $ 1.5 billion for capital asset purchases during 2009 , including approximately $ 400 million for retail facilities and approximately $ 1.1 billion for corporate facilities and infrastructure. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and short-term investments</td><td>$ 24490</td><td>$ 15386</td><td>$ 10110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 2422</td><td>$ 1637</td><td>$ 1252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 346</td><td>$ 270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 20598</td><td>$ 12676</td><td>$ 8066</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 9596</td><td>$ 5470</td><td>$ 2220</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the change in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments between 2007 and 2008? 9104.0 Question: what was the change in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments held by foreign subsidiaries between 2007 and 2008? Answer:

4.8

convfinqa337

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. . Conversations: Question: what was the net revenue in 2004? Answer:

239.0

convfinqa338

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. . Conversations: q0: what was the net revenue in 2004? 239.0 Question: what was the net revenue in 2003? Answer:

208.3

convfinqa339

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. . Conversations: q0: what was the net revenue in 2004? 239.0 q1: what was the net revenue in 2003? 208.3 Question: what was the change in value? Answer:

30.7

convfinqa340

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. . Conversations: q0: what was the net revenue in 2004? 239.0 q1: what was the net revenue in 2003? 208.3 q2: what was the change in value? 30.7 Question: what is the percent change? Answer:

0.14738

convfinqa341

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: nike , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) such agreements in place . however , based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . in the ordinary course of its business , the company is involved in various legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships , product liability claims , trademark rights , and a variety of other matters . the company does not believe there are any pending legal proceedings that will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . note 16 2014 restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company took necessary steps to streamline its management structure , enhance consumer focus , drive innovation more quickly to market and establish a more scalable , long-term cost structure . as a result , the company reduced its global workforce by approximately 5% ( 5 % ) and incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $ 195 million , primarily consisting of severance costs related to the workforce reduction . as nearly all of the restructuring activities were completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company does not expect to recognize additional costs in future periods relating to these actions . the restructuring charge is reflected in the corporate expense line in the segment presentation of pre-tax income in note 19 2014 operating segments and related information . the activity in the restructuring accrual for the year ended may 31 , 2009 is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 june 1 2008</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>severance and related costs</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash payments</td><td>-29.4 ( 29.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash stock option and restricted stock expense</td><td>-19.5 ( 19.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation and other</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 may 31 2009</td><td>$ 149.6</td></tr></table> the accrual balance as of may 31 , 2009 will be relieved throughout fiscal year 2010 and early 2011 , as severance payments are completed . the restructuring accrual is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . as part of its restructuring activities , the company reorganized its nike brand operations geographic structure . in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , nike brand operations were organized into the following four geographic regions : u.s. , europe , middle east and africa ( collectively , 201cemea 201d ) , asia pacific , and americas . in the fourth quarter of 2009 , the company initiated a reorganization of the nike brand business into a new operating model . as a result of this reorganization , beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 , the nike brand operations will consist of the following six geographies : north america , western europe , central/eastern europe , greater china , japan , and emerging markets . note 17 2014 divestitures on december 17 , 2007 , the company completed the sale of the starter brand business to iconix brand group , inc . for $ 60.0 million in cash . this transaction resulted in a gain of $ 28.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008. . Conversations: Question: what was the value of the sale of the starter brand? Answer:

60.0

convfinqa342

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: nike , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) such agreements in place . however , based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . in the ordinary course of its business , the company is involved in various legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships , product liability claims , trademark rights , and a variety of other matters . the company does not believe there are any pending legal proceedings that will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . note 16 2014 restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company took necessary steps to streamline its management structure , enhance consumer focus , drive innovation more quickly to market and establish a more scalable , long-term cost structure . as a result , the company reduced its global workforce by approximately 5% ( 5 % ) and incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $ 195 million , primarily consisting of severance costs related to the workforce reduction . as nearly all of the restructuring activities were completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company does not expect to recognize additional costs in future periods relating to these actions . the restructuring charge is reflected in the corporate expense line in the segment presentation of pre-tax income in note 19 2014 operating segments and related information . the activity in the restructuring accrual for the year ended may 31 , 2009 is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 june 1 2008</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>severance and related costs</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash payments</td><td>-29.4 ( 29.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash stock option and restricted stock expense</td><td>-19.5 ( 19.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation and other</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 may 31 2009</td><td>$ 149.6</td></tr></table> the accrual balance as of may 31 , 2009 will be relieved throughout fiscal year 2010 and early 2011 , as severance payments are completed . the restructuring accrual is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . as part of its restructuring activities , the company reorganized its nike brand operations geographic structure . in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , nike brand operations were organized into the following four geographic regions : u.s. , europe , middle east and africa ( collectively , 201cemea 201d ) , asia pacific , and americas . in the fourth quarter of 2009 , the company initiated a reorganization of the nike brand business into a new operating model . as a result of this reorganization , beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 , the nike brand operations will consist of the following six geographies : north america , western europe , central/eastern europe , greater china , japan , and emerging markets . note 17 2014 divestitures on december 17 , 2007 , the company completed the sale of the starter brand business to iconix brand group , inc . for $ 60.0 million in cash . this transaction resulted in a gain of $ 28.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008. . Conversations: q0: what was the value of the sale of the starter brand? 60.0 Question: what was the gain resulting from the sale? Answer:

28.6

convfinqa343

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: nike , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) such agreements in place . however , based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . in the ordinary course of its business , the company is involved in various legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships , product liability claims , trademark rights , and a variety of other matters . the company does not believe there are any pending legal proceedings that will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . note 16 2014 restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company took necessary steps to streamline its management structure , enhance consumer focus , drive innovation more quickly to market and establish a more scalable , long-term cost structure . as a result , the company reduced its global workforce by approximately 5% ( 5 % ) and incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $ 195 million , primarily consisting of severance costs related to the workforce reduction . as nearly all of the restructuring activities were completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company does not expect to recognize additional costs in future periods relating to these actions . the restructuring charge is reflected in the corporate expense line in the segment presentation of pre-tax income in note 19 2014 operating segments and related information . the activity in the restructuring accrual for the year ended may 31 , 2009 is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 june 1 2008</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>severance and related costs</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash payments</td><td>-29.4 ( 29.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash stock option and restricted stock expense</td><td>-19.5 ( 19.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation and other</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 may 31 2009</td><td>$ 149.6</td></tr></table> the accrual balance as of may 31 , 2009 will be relieved throughout fiscal year 2010 and early 2011 , as severance payments are completed . the restructuring accrual is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . as part of its restructuring activities , the company reorganized its nike brand operations geographic structure . in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , nike brand operations were organized into the following four geographic regions : u.s. , europe , middle east and africa ( collectively , 201cemea 201d ) , asia pacific , and americas . in the fourth quarter of 2009 , the company initiated a reorganization of the nike brand business into a new operating model . as a result of this reorganization , beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 , the nike brand operations will consist of the following six geographies : north america , western europe , central/eastern europe , greater china , japan , and emerging markets . note 17 2014 divestitures on december 17 , 2007 , the company completed the sale of the starter brand business to iconix brand group , inc . for $ 60.0 million in cash . this transaction resulted in a gain of $ 28.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008. . Conversations: q0: what was the value of the sale of the starter brand? 60.0 q1: what was the gain resulting from the sale? 28.6 Question: what was the change in value? Answer:

31.4

convfinqa344

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: nike , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) such agreements in place . however , based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . in the ordinary course of its business , the company is involved in various legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships , product liability claims , trademark rights , and a variety of other matters . the company does not believe there are any pending legal proceedings that will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . note 16 2014 restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company took necessary steps to streamline its management structure , enhance consumer focus , drive innovation more quickly to market and establish a more scalable , long-term cost structure . as a result , the company reduced its global workforce by approximately 5% ( 5 % ) and incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $ 195 million , primarily consisting of severance costs related to the workforce reduction . as nearly all of the restructuring activities were completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company does not expect to recognize additional costs in future periods relating to these actions . the restructuring charge is reflected in the corporate expense line in the segment presentation of pre-tax income in note 19 2014 operating segments and related information . the activity in the restructuring accrual for the year ended may 31 , 2009 is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 june 1 2008</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>severance and related costs</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash payments</td><td>-29.4 ( 29.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash stock option and restricted stock expense</td><td>-19.5 ( 19.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation and other</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restructuring accrual 2014 may 31 2009</td><td>$ 149.6</td></tr></table> the accrual balance as of may 31 , 2009 will be relieved throughout fiscal year 2010 and early 2011 , as severance payments are completed . the restructuring accrual is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . as part of its restructuring activities , the company reorganized its nike brand operations geographic structure . in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , nike brand operations were organized into the following four geographic regions : u.s. , europe , middle east and africa ( collectively , 201cemea 201d ) , asia pacific , and americas . in the fourth quarter of 2009 , the company initiated a reorganization of the nike brand business into a new operating model . as a result of this reorganization , beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 , the nike brand operations will consist of the following six geographies : north america , western europe , central/eastern europe , greater china , japan , and emerging markets . note 17 2014 divestitures on december 17 , 2007 , the company completed the sale of the starter brand business to iconix brand group , inc . for $ 60.0 million in cash . this transaction resulted in a gain of $ 28.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008. . Conversations: q0: what was the value of the sale of the starter brand? 60.0 q1: what was the gain resulting from the sale? 28.6 q2: what was the change in value? 31.4 Question: what is the percent change? Answer:

0.91083

convfinqa345

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes</td><td>$ 1494627</td><td>$ 1493969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>19681</td><td>28492</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>1514308</td><td>1522461</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : current portion</td><td>9212</td><td>8799</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 1505096</td><td>$ 1513662</td></tr></table> note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . Conversations: Question: in 2011, what was the amount from the total debt and capital lease obligations included in the section of current liabilities? Answer:

9212.0

convfinqa346

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes</td><td>$ 1494627</td><td>$ 1493969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>19681</td><td>28492</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>1514308</td><td>1522461</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : current portion</td><td>9212</td><td>8799</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 1505096</td><td>$ 1513662</td></tr></table> note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: in 2011, what was the amount from the total debt and capital lease obligations included in the section of current liabilities? 9212.0 Question: and what was that total of debt and obligations? Answer:

1514308.0

convfinqa347

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes</td><td>$ 1494627</td><td>$ 1493969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>19681</td><td>28492</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>1514308</td><td>1522461</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : current portion</td><td>9212</td><td>8799</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 1505096</td><td>$ 1513662</td></tr></table> note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: in 2011, what was the amount from the total debt and capital lease obligations included in the section of current liabilities? 9212.0 q1: and what was that total of debt and obligations? 1514308.0 Question: what percentage, then, of this total was due to that amount? Answer:

0.00608

convfinqa348

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes</td><td>$ 1494627</td><td>$ 1493969</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>19681</td><td>28492</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>1514308</td><td>1522461</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : current portion</td><td>9212</td><td>8799</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>debt and capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 1505096</td><td>$ 1513662</td></tr></table> note 17 . debt our debt as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : capital lease obligations total debt and capital lease obligations less : current portion debt and capital lease obligations $ 1494627 19681 1514308 $ 1505096 $ 1493969 28492 1522461 $ 1513662 in february 2010 , we issued $ 600.0 million of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 900.0 million of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) senior notes due february 1 , 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d and , together with the 2015 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . our proceeds were approximately $ 1.5 billion and were net of an issuance discount of $ 6.6 million . the notes rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in addition , we incurred issuance costs of approximately $ 10.7 million . both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes using the effective interest method . the effective interest rate including the discount and issuance costs is 3.45% ( 3.45 % ) for the 2015 notes and 4.92% ( 4.92 % ) for the 2020 notes . interest is payable semi-annually , in arrears , on february 1 and august 1 , commencing on august 1 , 2010 . during fiscal 2011 interest payments totaled $ 62.3 million . the proceeds from the notes are available for general corporate purposes , including repayment of any balance outstanding on our credit facility . based on quoted market prices , the fair value of the notes was approximately $ 1.6 billion as of december 2 , 2011 . we may redeem the notes at any time , subject to a make whole premium . in addition , upon the occurrence of certain change of control triggering events , we may be required to repurchase the notes , at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the notes also include covenants that limit our ability to grant liens on assets and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions , subject to significant allowances . as of december 2 , 2011 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . credit agreement in august 2007 , we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement dated february 2007 ( the 201camendment 201d ) , which increased the total senior unsecured revolving facility from $ 500.0 million to $ 1.0 billion . the amendment also permits us to request one-year extensions effective on each anniversary of the closing date of the original agreement , subject to the majority consent of the lenders . we also retain an option to request an additional $ 500.0 million in commitments , for a maximum aggregate facility of $ 1.5 billion . in february 2008 , we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement dated february 26 , 2008 , which extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to february 16 , 2013 . the facility would terminate at this date if no additional extensions have been requested and granted . all other terms and conditions remain the same . the facility contains a financial covenant requiring us not to exceed a certain maximum leverage ratio . at our option , borrowings under the facility accrue interest based on either the london interbank offered rate ( 201clibor 201d ) for one , two , three or six months , or longer periods with bank consent , plus a margin according to a pricing grid tied to this financial covenant , or a base rate . the margin is set at rates between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.475% ( 0.475 % ) . commitment fees are payable on the facility at rates between 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) and 0.15% ( 0.15 % ) per year based on the same pricing grid . the facility is available to provide loans to us and certain of our subsidiaries for general corporate purposes . on february 1 , 2010 , we paid the outstanding balance on our credit facility and the entire $ 1.0 billion credit line under this facility remains available for borrowing . capital lease obligation in june 2010 , we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement to sell equipment totaling $ 32.2 million and leaseback the same equipment over a period of 43 months . this transaction was classified as a capital lease obligation and recorded at fair value . as of december 2 , 2011 , our capital lease obligations of $ 19.7 million includes $ 9.2 million of current debt . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . Conversations: q0: in 2011, what was the amount from the total debt and capital lease obligations included in the section of current liabilities? 9212.0 q1: and what was that total of debt and obligations? 1514308.0 q2: what percentage, then, of this total was due to that amount? 0.00608 Question: and as of december 2 of that year, what were the capital lease obligations without the current debt, in millions? Answer:

10.5

convfinqa349

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: what was the performance value of the united parcel service inc . in 2010? Answer:

110.57

convfinqa350

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the performance value of the united parcel service inc . in 2010? 110.57 Question: and what was the change in this performance from 2005 to 2010? Answer:

10.57

convfinqa351

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the performance value of the united parcel service inc . in 2010? 110.57 q1: and what was the change in this performance from 2005 to 2010? 10.57 Question: what is, then, the return on that stock, or how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2005, in percentage? Answer:

0.1057

convfinqa352

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the performance value of the united parcel service inc . in 2010? 110.57 q1: and what was the change in this performance from 2005 to 2010? 10.57 q2: what is, then, the return on that stock, or how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2005, in percentage? 0.1057 Question: what was the change in the performance value of the standard & poor 2019s 500 index from 2005 to 2010? Answer:

11.99

convfinqa353

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the performance value of the united parcel service inc . in 2010? 110.57 q1: and what was the change in this performance from 2005 to 2010? 10.57 q2: what is, then, the return on that stock, or how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2005, in percentage? 0.1057 q3: what was the change in the performance value of the standard & poor 2019s 500 index from 2005 to 2010? 11.99 Question: what was, then, the return on that stock for that period, in percentage? Answer:

0.1199

convfinqa354

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 101.76</td><td>$ 98.20</td><td>$ 78.76</td><td>$ 84.87</td><td>$ 110.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.79</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.82</td><td>$ 111.38</td><td>$ 87.52</td><td>$ 103.79</td><td>$ 131.59</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: what was the performance value of the united parcel service inc . in 2010? 110.57 q1: and what was the change in this performance from 2005 to 2010? 10.57 q2: what is, then, the return on that stock, or how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2005, in percentage? 0.1057 q3: what was the change in the performance value of the standard & poor 2019s 500 index from 2005 to 2010? 11.99 q4: what was, then, the return on that stock for that period, in percentage? 0.1199 Question: and what is the difference between the return for the united parcel service inc . and the one for standard & poor 2019s 500 index? Answer:

-0.0142

convfinqa355

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. . Conversations: Question: what is the difference between discb share price of december 31 2013 and of december 31 2008? Answer:

502.08

convfinqa356

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. . Conversations: q0: what is the difference between discb share price of december 31 2013 and of december 31 2008? 502.08 Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the number 100? Answer:

5.0208

convfinqa357

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) ( a ) intrinsic value is based on a closing stock price as of december 31 , 2016 of $ 75.64 . the weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was estimated to be $ 9.35 , $ 10.67 and $ 9.15 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.4% ( 20.4 % )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>21.2% ( 21.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr></table> the company estimates future forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the company bases the risk-free interest rate that is used in the stock option valuation model on u.s . n treasury securities issued with maturities similar to the expected term of the options . the expected stock volatility factor is determined using historical daily price changes of the company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the option and the impact of any expected trends . the dividend yield assumption is based on the current dividend yield at the grant tt date or management's forecasted expectations . the expected life assumption is determined by calculating the average term from the tt company's historical stock option activity and considering the impact of expected future trends . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 56.44 to $ 79.41 on various dates in 2016 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 61.33 to $ 69.33 on various dates in 20t 15 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 52.85 to $ 64.04 on various dates in 2014 . these shares were granted at the closing market price on the date of grant and vest annually over three years . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we have approximately 3 million and 4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . the december 31 , 2016 balance includes those rsu's converted in connection with the sungard acquisition as noted above . the company has provided for total stock compensation expense of $ 137 million , $ 98 million and $ 56 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is included in selling , general , and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , unless the expense is attributable to a discontinued operation . of the total stock compensation expense , $ 2 million for 2014 relates to liability based awards that will not be credited to additional paid in capital until issued . total d compensation expense for 2016 and 2015 did not include amounts relating to liability based awards . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 141 million and $ 206 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.4 years and 1.6 years , respectively . german pension plans our german operations have unfunded , defined benefit plan obligations . these obligations relate to benefits to be paid to germanaa employees upon retirement . the accumulated benefit obligation as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 49 million and $ 48 million , respectively , and the projected benefit obligation was $ 50 million and $ 49 million , respectively . the plan remains unfunded as of december 31 , 2016 . ( 15 ) divestitures and discontinued operations on december 7 , 2016 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the sungard public sector and education ( "ps&e" ) businesses for $ 850 million . the transaction included all ps&e solutions , which provide a comprehensive set of technology solutions to address public safety and public administration needs of government entities as well asn the needs of k-12 school districts . the divestiture is consistent with our strategy to serve the financial services markets . we received cash proceeds , net of taxes and transaction-related expenses of approximately $ 500 million . net cash proceeds are expected to be used to reduce outstanding debt ( see note 10 ) . the ps&e businesses are included in the corporate and other segment . the transaction closed on february 1 , 2017 , resulting in an expected pre-tax gain ranging from $ 85 million to $ 90 million that will . Conversations: Question: as of december 31, 2016, what was the difference between the accumulated benefit obligation and the projected one? Answer:

-1.0

convfinqa358

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) ( a ) intrinsic value is based on a closing stock price as of december 31 , 2016 of $ 75.64 . the weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was estimated to be $ 9.35 , $ 10.67 and $ 9.15 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.4% ( 20.4 % )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>21.2% ( 21.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr></table> the company estimates future forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the company bases the risk-free interest rate that is used in the stock option valuation model on u.s . n treasury securities issued with maturities similar to the expected term of the options . the expected stock volatility factor is determined using historical daily price changes of the company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the option and the impact of any expected trends . the dividend yield assumption is based on the current dividend yield at the grant tt date or management's forecasted expectations . the expected life assumption is determined by calculating the average term from the tt company's historical stock option activity and considering the impact of expected future trends . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 56.44 to $ 79.41 on various dates in 2016 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 61.33 to $ 69.33 on various dates in 20t 15 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 52.85 to $ 64.04 on various dates in 2014 . these shares were granted at the closing market price on the date of grant and vest annually over three years . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we have approximately 3 million and 4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . the december 31 , 2016 balance includes those rsu's converted in connection with the sungard acquisition as noted above . the company has provided for total stock compensation expense of $ 137 million , $ 98 million and $ 56 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is included in selling , general , and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , unless the expense is attributable to a discontinued operation . of the total stock compensation expense , $ 2 million for 2014 relates to liability based awards that will not be credited to additional paid in capital until issued . total d compensation expense for 2016 and 2015 did not include amounts relating to liability based awards . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 141 million and $ 206 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.4 years and 1.6 years , respectively . german pension plans our german operations have unfunded , defined benefit plan obligations . these obligations relate to benefits to be paid to germanaa employees upon retirement . the accumulated benefit obligation as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 49 million and $ 48 million , respectively , and the projected benefit obligation was $ 50 million and $ 49 million , respectively . the plan remains unfunded as of december 31 , 2016 . ( 15 ) divestitures and discontinued operations on december 7 , 2016 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the sungard public sector and education ( "ps&e" ) businesses for $ 850 million . the transaction included all ps&e solutions , which provide a comprehensive set of technology solutions to address public safety and public administration needs of government entities as well asn the needs of k-12 school districts . the divestiture is consistent with our strategy to serve the financial services markets . we received cash proceeds , net of taxes and transaction-related expenses of approximately $ 500 million . net cash proceeds are expected to be used to reduce outstanding debt ( see note 10 ) . the ps&e businesses are included in the corporate and other segment . the transaction closed on february 1 , 2017 , resulting in an expected pre-tax gain ranging from $ 85 million to $ 90 million that will . Conversations: q0: as of december 31, 2016, what was the difference between the accumulated benefit obligation and the projected one? -1.0 Question: and from 2015 to that year, what was the change in the fair value of options? Answer:

-1.32

convfinqa359

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) ( a ) intrinsic value is based on a closing stock price as of december 31 , 2016 of $ 75.64 . the weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was estimated to be $ 9.35 , $ 10.67 and $ 9.15 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.4% ( 20.4 % )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>21.2% ( 21.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr></table> the company estimates future forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the company bases the risk-free interest rate that is used in the stock option valuation model on u.s . n treasury securities issued with maturities similar to the expected term of the options . the expected stock volatility factor is determined using historical daily price changes of the company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the option and the impact of any expected trends . the dividend yield assumption is based on the current dividend yield at the grant tt date or management's forecasted expectations . the expected life assumption is determined by calculating the average term from the tt company's historical stock option activity and considering the impact of expected future trends . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 56.44 to $ 79.41 on various dates in 2016 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 61.33 to $ 69.33 on various dates in 20t 15 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 52.85 to $ 64.04 on various dates in 2014 . these shares were granted at the closing market price on the date of grant and vest annually over three years . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we have approximately 3 million and 4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . the december 31 , 2016 balance includes those rsu's converted in connection with the sungard acquisition as noted above . the company has provided for total stock compensation expense of $ 137 million , $ 98 million and $ 56 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is included in selling , general , and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , unless the expense is attributable to a discontinued operation . of the total stock compensation expense , $ 2 million for 2014 relates to liability based awards that will not be credited to additional paid in capital until issued . total d compensation expense for 2016 and 2015 did not include amounts relating to liability based awards . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 141 million and $ 206 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.4 years and 1.6 years , respectively . german pension plans our german operations have unfunded , defined benefit plan obligations . these obligations relate to benefits to be paid to germanaa employees upon retirement . the accumulated benefit obligation as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 49 million and $ 48 million , respectively , and the projected benefit obligation was $ 50 million and $ 49 million , respectively . the plan remains unfunded as of december 31 , 2016 . ( 15 ) divestitures and discontinued operations on december 7 , 2016 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the sungard public sector and education ( "ps&e" ) businesses for $ 850 million . the transaction included all ps&e solutions , which provide a comprehensive set of technology solutions to address public safety and public administration needs of government entities as well asn the needs of k-12 school districts . the divestiture is consistent with our strategy to serve the financial services markets . we received cash proceeds , net of taxes and transaction-related expenses of approximately $ 500 million . net cash proceeds are expected to be used to reduce outstanding debt ( see note 10 ) . the ps&e businesses are included in the corporate and other segment . the transaction closed on february 1 , 2017 , resulting in an expected pre-tax gain ranging from $ 85 million to $ 90 million that will . Conversations: q0: as of december 31, 2016, what was the difference between the accumulated benefit obligation and the projected one? -1.0 q1: and from 2015 to that year, what was the change in the fair value of options? -1.32 Question: what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2015? Answer:

-0.12371

convfinqa360

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: all highly liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents . securities with maturities greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale and are considered to be short-term investments . the carrying value of our interest-bearing instruments approximated fair value as of december 29 , 2012 . interest rates under our revolving credit facility are variable , so interest expense for periods when the credit facility is utilized could be adversely affected by changes in interest rates . interest rates under our revolving credit facility can fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates and in an interest rate margin that varies based on our consolidated leverage ratio . as of december 29 , 2012 , we had no outstanding balance on the credit facility . see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for an additional description of our credit facility . equity price risk convertible notes our 2015 notes and 2013 notes include conversion and settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock at conversion or at maturity of the notes . in addition , the hedges and warrants associated with these convertible notes also include settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock . the amount of cash we may be required to pay , or the number of shares we may be required to provide to note holders at conversion or maturity of these notes , is determined by the price of our common stock . the amount of cash or number of shares that we may receive from hedge counterparties in connection with the related hedges and the number of shares that we may be required to provide warrant counterparties in connection with the related warrants are also determined by the price of our common stock . upon the expiration of our 2015 warrants , cadence will issue shares of common stock to the purchasers of the warrants to the extent our stock price exceeds the warrant strike price of $ 10.78 at that time . the following table shows the number of shares that cadence would issue to 2015 warrant counterparties at expiration of the warrants , assuming various cadence closing stock prices on the dates of warrant expiration : shares ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 11.00</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 12.00</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>$ 13.00</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>$ 14.00</td><td>10.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>$ 15.00</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>$ 16.00</td><td>15.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 17.00</td><td>17.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>$ 18.00</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>$ 19.00</td><td>20.1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>$ 20.00</td><td>21.4</td></tr></table> prior to the expiration of the 2015 warrants , for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share , our diluted weighted-average shares outstanding will increase when our average closing stock price for a quarter exceeds $ 10.78 . for an additional description of our 2015 notes and 2013 notes , see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements and 201cliquidity and capital resources 2014 other factors affecting liquidity and capital resources , 201d under item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . 201d . Conversations: Question: what was the number of shares if the closing price is $20? Answer:

21.4

convfinqa361

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: all highly liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents . securities with maturities greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale and are considered to be short-term investments . the carrying value of our interest-bearing instruments approximated fair value as of december 29 , 2012 . interest rates under our revolving credit facility are variable , so interest expense for periods when the credit facility is utilized could be adversely affected by changes in interest rates . interest rates under our revolving credit facility can fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates and in an interest rate margin that varies based on our consolidated leverage ratio . as of december 29 , 2012 , we had no outstanding balance on the credit facility . see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for an additional description of our credit facility . equity price risk convertible notes our 2015 notes and 2013 notes include conversion and settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock at conversion or at maturity of the notes . in addition , the hedges and warrants associated with these convertible notes also include settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock . the amount of cash we may be required to pay , or the number of shares we may be required to provide to note holders at conversion or maturity of these notes , is determined by the price of our common stock . the amount of cash or number of shares that we may receive from hedge counterparties in connection with the related hedges and the number of shares that we may be required to provide warrant counterparties in connection with the related warrants are also determined by the price of our common stock . upon the expiration of our 2015 warrants , cadence will issue shares of common stock to the purchasers of the warrants to the extent our stock price exceeds the warrant strike price of $ 10.78 at that time . the following table shows the number of shares that cadence would issue to 2015 warrant counterparties at expiration of the warrants , assuming various cadence closing stock prices on the dates of warrant expiration : shares ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 11.00</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 12.00</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>$ 13.00</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>$ 14.00</td><td>10.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>$ 15.00</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>$ 16.00</td><td>15.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 17.00</td><td>17.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>$ 18.00</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>$ 19.00</td><td>20.1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>$ 20.00</td><td>21.4</td></tr></table> prior to the expiration of the 2015 warrants , for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share , our diluted weighted-average shares outstanding will increase when our average closing stock price for a quarter exceeds $ 10.78 . for an additional description of our 2015 notes and 2013 notes , see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements and 201cliquidity and capital resources 2014 other factors affecting liquidity and capital resources , 201d under item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . 201d . Conversations: q0: what was the number of shares if the closing price is $20? 21.4 Question: and if the closing price is $11? Answer:

0.9

convfinqa362

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: all highly liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents . securities with maturities greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale and are considered to be short-term investments . the carrying value of our interest-bearing instruments approximated fair value as of december 29 , 2012 . interest rates under our revolving credit facility are variable , so interest expense for periods when the credit facility is utilized could be adversely affected by changes in interest rates . interest rates under our revolving credit facility can fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates and in an interest rate margin that varies based on our consolidated leverage ratio . as of december 29 , 2012 , we had no outstanding balance on the credit facility . see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for an additional description of our credit facility . equity price risk convertible notes our 2015 notes and 2013 notes include conversion and settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock at conversion or at maturity of the notes . in addition , the hedges and warrants associated with these convertible notes also include settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock . the amount of cash we may be required to pay , or the number of shares we may be required to provide to note holders at conversion or maturity of these notes , is determined by the price of our common stock . the amount of cash or number of shares that we may receive from hedge counterparties in connection with the related hedges and the number of shares that we may be required to provide warrant counterparties in connection with the related warrants are also determined by the price of our common stock . upon the expiration of our 2015 warrants , cadence will issue shares of common stock to the purchasers of the warrants to the extent our stock price exceeds the warrant strike price of $ 10.78 at that time . the following table shows the number of shares that cadence would issue to 2015 warrant counterparties at expiration of the warrants , assuming various cadence closing stock prices on the dates of warrant expiration : shares ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 11.00</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 12.00</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>$ 13.00</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>$ 14.00</td><td>10.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>$ 15.00</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>$ 16.00</td><td>15.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 17.00</td><td>17.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>$ 18.00</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>$ 19.00</td><td>20.1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>$ 20.00</td><td>21.4</td></tr></table> prior to the expiration of the 2015 warrants , for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share , our diluted weighted-average shares outstanding will increase when our average closing stock price for a quarter exceeds $ 10.78 . for an additional description of our 2015 notes and 2013 notes , see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements and 201cliquidity and capital resources 2014 other factors affecting liquidity and capital resources , 201d under item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . 201d . Conversations: q0: what was the number of shares if the closing price is $20? 21.4 q1: and if the closing price is $11? 0.9 Question: so what is the difference in shares to be issued in these two scenarios? Answer:

20.5

convfinqa363

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: all highly liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents . securities with maturities greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale and are considered to be short-term investments . the carrying value of our interest-bearing instruments approximated fair value as of december 29 , 2012 . interest rates under our revolving credit facility are variable , so interest expense for periods when the credit facility is utilized could be adversely affected by changes in interest rates . interest rates under our revolving credit facility can fluctuate based on changes in market interest rates and in an interest rate margin that varies based on our consolidated leverage ratio . as of december 29 , 2012 , we had no outstanding balance on the credit facility . see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for an additional description of our credit facility . equity price risk convertible notes our 2015 notes and 2013 notes include conversion and settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock at conversion or at maturity of the notes . in addition , the hedges and warrants associated with these convertible notes also include settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock . the amount of cash we may be required to pay , or the number of shares we may be required to provide to note holders at conversion or maturity of these notes , is determined by the price of our common stock . the amount of cash or number of shares that we may receive from hedge counterparties in connection with the related hedges and the number of shares that we may be required to provide warrant counterparties in connection with the related warrants are also determined by the price of our common stock . upon the expiration of our 2015 warrants , cadence will issue shares of common stock to the purchasers of the warrants to the extent our stock price exceeds the warrant strike price of $ 10.78 at that time . the following table shows the number of shares that cadence would issue to 2015 warrant counterparties at expiration of the warrants , assuming various cadence closing stock prices on the dates of warrant expiration : shares ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 11.00</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 12.00</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>$ 13.00</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>$ 14.00</td><td>10.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>$ 15.00</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>$ 16.00</td><td>15.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 17.00</td><td>17.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>$ 18.00</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>$ 19.00</td><td>20.1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>$ 20.00</td><td>21.4</td></tr></table> prior to the expiration of the 2015 warrants , for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share , our diluted weighted-average shares outstanding will increase when our average closing stock price for a quarter exceeds $ 10.78 . for an additional description of our 2015 notes and 2013 notes , see note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements and 201cliquidity and capital resources 2014 other factors affecting liquidity and capital resources , 201d under item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . 201d . Conversations: q0: what was the number of shares if the closing price is $20? 21.4 q1: and if the closing price is $11? 0.9 q2: so what is the difference in shares to be issued in these two scenarios? 20.5 Question: and the percentage difference in the number of shares to be issued if the stock price closes at $11 over $20? Answer:

22.77778

convfinqa364

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2011 compared to 2010 mfc 2019s net sales for 2011 increased $ 533 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher volume of about $ 420 million on air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) ; and about $ 245 million from fire control systems programs primarily related to the sof clss program , which began late in the third quarter of 2010 . partially offsetting these increases were lower net sales due to decreased volume of approximately $ 75 million primarily from various services programs and approximately $ 20 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily mlrs and jassm ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2011 increased $ 96 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of about $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) as a result of increased volume and retirement of risks ; and approximately $ 25 million for various services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 35 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to increased orders on air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad ) . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales for 2013 will be comparable with 2012 . we expect low double digit percentage growth in air and missile defense programs , offset by an expected decline in volume on logistics services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to be comparable with 2012 results . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides surface ship and submarine combat systems ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; unmanned technologies and platforms ; ship systems integration ; and military and commercial training systems . mst 2019s major programs include aegis , mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) , tpq-53 radar system , mh-60 , lcs , and ptds . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td><td>$ 7443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>737</td><td>645</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td><td>10600</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mst 2019s net sales for 2012 increased $ 447 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase in net sales for 2012 was attributable to higher volume and risk retirements of approximately $ 395 million from ship and aviation system programs ( primarily ptds ; lcs ; vls ; and mh-60 ) ; about $ 115 million for training and logistics solutions programs primarily due to net sales from sim industries , which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and approximately $ 30 million as a result of increased volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 70 million from undersea systems programs due to lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 25 million due to lower volume on various other programs . mst 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 92 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 175 million from ship and aviation system programs , which reflects higher volume and risk retirements on certain programs ( primarily vls ; ptds ; mh-60 ; and lcs ) and reserves of about $ 55 million for contract cost matters on ship and aviation system programs recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011 ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) . partially offsetting the increase was lower operating profit of approximately $ 40 million from undersea systems programs due to reduced profit booking rates on certain programs and lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 40 million due to lower volume on various other programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 150 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in operating profit between 2011 and 2012? Answer:

92.0

convfinqa365

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2011 compared to 2010 mfc 2019s net sales for 2011 increased $ 533 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher volume of about $ 420 million on air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) ; and about $ 245 million from fire control systems programs primarily related to the sof clss program , which began late in the third quarter of 2010 . partially offsetting these increases were lower net sales due to decreased volume of approximately $ 75 million primarily from various services programs and approximately $ 20 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily mlrs and jassm ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2011 increased $ 96 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of about $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) as a result of increased volume and retirement of risks ; and approximately $ 25 million for various services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 35 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to increased orders on air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad ) . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales for 2013 will be comparable with 2012 . we expect low double digit percentage growth in air and missile defense programs , offset by an expected decline in volume on logistics services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to be comparable with 2012 results . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides surface ship and submarine combat systems ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; unmanned technologies and platforms ; ship systems integration ; and military and commercial training systems . mst 2019s major programs include aegis , mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) , tpq-53 radar system , mh-60 , lcs , and ptds . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td><td>$ 7443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>737</td><td>645</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td><td>10600</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mst 2019s net sales for 2012 increased $ 447 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase in net sales for 2012 was attributable to higher volume and risk retirements of approximately $ 395 million from ship and aviation system programs ( primarily ptds ; lcs ; vls ; and mh-60 ) ; about $ 115 million for training and logistics solutions programs primarily due to net sales from sim industries , which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and approximately $ 30 million as a result of increased volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 70 million from undersea systems programs due to lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 25 million due to lower volume on various other programs . mst 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 92 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 175 million from ship and aviation system programs , which reflects higher volume and risk retirements on certain programs ( primarily vls ; ptds ; mh-60 ; and lcs ) and reserves of about $ 55 million for contract cost matters on ship and aviation system programs recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011 ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) . partially offsetting the increase was lower operating profit of approximately $ 40 million from undersea systems programs due to reduced profit booking rates on certain programs and lower volume on an international combat system program and towed array systems ; and about $ 40 million due to lower volume on various other programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 150 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in operating profit between 2011 and 2012? 92.0 Question: and the percentage change? Answer:

0.14264

convfinqa366

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 . Conversations: Question: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2015? Answer:

83.0

convfinqa367

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 . Conversations: q0: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2015? 83.0 Question: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2014? Answer:

59.0

convfinqa368

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 . Conversations: q0: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2015? 83.0 q1: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2014? 59.0 Question: what was the net difference? Answer:

24.0

convfinqa369

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 . Conversations: q0: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2015? 83.0 q1: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2014? 59.0 q2: what was the net difference? 24.0 Question: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2014? Answer:

59.0

convfinqa370

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 . Conversations: q0: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2015? 83.0 q1: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2014? 59.0 q2: what was the net difference? 24.0 q3: what was the sg&a including rent expense in 2014? 59.0 Question: what is the percent change? Answer:

0.40678

convfinqa371

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 32236 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26039 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and analyze revenue by commodity group , we treat the financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . our operating revenues are primarily derived from contracts with customers for the transportation of freight from origin to destination . effective january 1 , 2018 , the company reclassified its six commodity groups into four : agricultural products , energy , industrial , and premium . the following table represents a disaggregation of our freight and other revenues: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural products</td><td>$ 4469</td><td>$ 4303</td><td>$ 4209</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>energy</td><td>4608</td><td>4498</td><td>3715</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>industrial</td><td>5679</td><td>5204</td><td>4964</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>premium</td><td>6628</td><td>5832</td><td>5713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 21384</td><td>$ 19837</td><td>$ 18601</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other subsidiary revenues</td><td>881</td><td>885</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accessorial revenues</td><td>502</td><td>458</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>65</td><td>60</td><td>71</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 22832</td><td>$ 21240</td><td>$ 19941</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products we transport are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are freight revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.5 billion in 2018 , $ 2.3 billion in 2017 , and $ 2.2 billion in 2016 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash , cash equivalents and restricted cash 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . amounts included in restricted cash represent those required to be set aside by contractual agreement. . Conversations: Question: what was the total operating revenues for 2018, converted to the tens place? Answer:

22.832

convfinqa372

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 32236 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26039 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and analyze revenue by commodity group , we treat the financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . our operating revenues are primarily derived from contracts with customers for the transportation of freight from origin to destination . effective january 1 , 2018 , the company reclassified its six commodity groups into four : agricultural products , energy , industrial , and premium . the following table represents a disaggregation of our freight and other revenues: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural products</td><td>$ 4469</td><td>$ 4303</td><td>$ 4209</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>energy</td><td>4608</td><td>4498</td><td>3715</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>industrial</td><td>5679</td><td>5204</td><td>4964</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>premium</td><td>6628</td><td>5832</td><td>5713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 21384</td><td>$ 19837</td><td>$ 18601</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other subsidiary revenues</td><td>881</td><td>885</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accessorial revenues</td><td>502</td><td>458</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>65</td><td>60</td><td>71</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 22832</td><td>$ 21240</td><td>$ 19941</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products we transport are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are freight revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.5 billion in 2018 , $ 2.3 billion in 2017 , and $ 2.2 billion in 2016 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash , cash equivalents and restricted cash 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . amounts included in restricted cash represent those required to be set aside by contractual agreement. . Conversations: q0: what was the total operating revenues for 2018, converted to the tens place? 22.832 Question: so what would 2018 total operating revenues have been without the mexico business, in billions? Answer:

20.332

convfinqa373

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: consumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting segment</td><td>fiscal 2008 gross profit</td><td>fiscal 2007 gross profit</td><td>% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer foods</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1923</td><td>( 6 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>food and ingredients</td><td>724</td><td>590</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international foods</td><td>190</td><td>180</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2716</td><td>$ 2693</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr></table> the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. . Conversations: Question: what is the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2007? Answer:

1923.0

convfinqa374

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: consumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting segment</td><td>fiscal 2008 gross profit</td><td>fiscal 2007 gross profit</td><td>% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer foods</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1923</td><td>( 6 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>food and ingredients</td><td>724</td><td>590</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international foods</td><td>190</td><td>180</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2716</td><td>$ 2693</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr></table> the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. . Conversations: q0: what is the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2007? 1923.0 Question: what about the total gross profit? Answer:

2693.0

convfinqa375

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: consumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting segment</td><td>fiscal 2008 gross profit</td><td>fiscal 2007 gross profit</td><td>% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer foods</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1923</td><td>( 6 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>food and ingredients</td><td>724</td><td>590</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international foods</td><td>190</td><td>180</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2716</td><td>$ 2693</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr></table> the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. . Conversations: q0: what is the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2007? 1923.0 q1: what about the total gross profit? 2693.0 Question: what proportion is coming from consumer foods? Answer:

0.71407

convfinqa376

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: consumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting segment</td><td>fiscal 2008 gross profit</td><td>fiscal 2007 gross profit</td><td>% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer foods</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1923</td><td>( 6 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>food and ingredients</td><td>724</td><td>590</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international foods</td><td>190</td><td>180</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2716</td><td>$ 2693</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr></table> the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. . Conversations: q0: what is the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2007? 1923.0 q1: what about the total gross profit? 2693.0 q2: what proportion is coming from consumer foods? 0.71407 Question: what about the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2008? Answer:

1802.0

convfinqa377

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: consumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting segment</td><td>fiscal 2008 gross profit</td><td>fiscal 2007 gross profit</td><td>% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer foods</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1923</td><td>( 6 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>food and ingredients</td><td>724</td><td>590</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international foods</td><td>190</td><td>180</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2716</td><td>$ 2693</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr></table> the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. . Conversations: q0: what is the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2007? 1923.0 q1: what about the total gross profit? 2693.0 q2: what proportion is coming from consumer foods? 0.71407 q3: what about the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2008? 1802.0 Question: and total gross profit in 2008? Answer:

2716.0

convfinqa378

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: consumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>reporting segment</td><td>fiscal 2008 gross profit</td><td>fiscal 2007 gross profit</td><td>% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consumer foods</td><td>$ 1802</td><td>$ 1923</td><td>( 6 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>food and ingredients</td><td>724</td><td>590</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>international foods</td><td>190</td><td>180</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2716</td><td>$ 2693</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr></table> the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. . Conversations: q0: what is the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2007? 1923.0 q1: what about the total gross profit? 2693.0 q2: what proportion is coming from consumer foods? 0.71407 q3: what about the gross profit generated by consumer foods in 2008? 1802.0 q4: and total gross profit in 2008? 2716.0 Question: what portion does this represent in 2008? Answer:

0.66348

convfinqa379

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ 25621</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>907</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2740 ( 2740 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr></table> note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s funding policy is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost , and an additional contribution if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also increase its contributions , if appropriate , to its tax and cash position and the plan 2019s funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities and guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has several unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . plan assets are invested in equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) and emerging market funds . the obligations of the plans are dominated by obligations for active employees . because the timing of expected benefit payments is so far in the future and the size of the plan assets are small relative to the company 2019s assets , the investment strategy is to allocate a significant percentage of assets to equities , which the company believes will provide the highest return over the long-term period . the fixed income assets are invested in long duration debt securities and may be invested in fixed income instruments , such as futures and options in order to better match the duration of the plan liability. . Conversations: Question: what was the difference in the balance between 1/1/10 and 12/31/12? Answer:

-6101.0

convfinqa380

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ 25621</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>907</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2740 ( 2740 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr></table> note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s funding policy is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost , and an additional contribution if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also increase its contributions , if appropriate , to its tax and cash position and the plan 2019s funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities and guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has several unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . plan assets are invested in equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) and emerging market funds . the obligations of the plans are dominated by obligations for active employees . because the timing of expected benefit payments is so far in the future and the size of the plan assets are small relative to the company 2019s assets , the investment strategy is to allocate a significant percentage of assets to equities , which the company believes will provide the highest return over the long-term period . the fixed income assets are invested in long duration debt securities and may be invested in fixed income instruments , such as futures and options in order to better match the duration of the plan liability. . Conversations: q0: what was the difference in the balance between 1/1/10 and 12/31/12? -6101.0 Question: and as a percentage of the original value? Answer:

-0.23812

convfinqa381

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: o 2019 r e i l l y a u t o m o t i v e 2 0 0 6 a n n u a l r e p o r t p a g e 38 $ 11080000 , in the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 , was $ 7702000 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 3.3 years . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan permits all eligible employees to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value . participants may authorize the company to withhold up to 5% ( 5 % ) of their annual salary to participate in the plan . the stock purchase plan authorizes up to 2600000 shares to be granted . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company issued 165306 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.36 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company issued 161903 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.57 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company issued 187754 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 20.85 per share . sfas no . 123r requires compensation expense to be recognized based on the discount between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price for shares sold to employees . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 799000 of compensation cost related to employee share purchases and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 295000 . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 400000 shares were reserved for future issuance . other employee benefit plans the company sponsors a contributory profit sharing and savings plan that covers substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have at least six months of service . the company has agreed to make matching contributions equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 2% ( 2 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed and 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 4% ( 4 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed . the company also makes additional discretionary profit sharing contributions to the plan on an annual basis as determined by the board of directors . the company 2019s matching and profit sharing contributions under this plan are funded in the form of shares of the company 2019s common stock . a total of 4200000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 6429000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2372000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 6606000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2444000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company recorded $ 5278000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 1969000 . the compensation cost recorded in 2006 includes matching contributions made in 2006 and profit sharing contributions accrued in 2006 to be funded with issuance of shares of common stock in 2007 . the company issued 204000 shares in 2006 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 34.34 . the company issued 210461 shares in 2005 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 25.79 . the company issued 238828 shares in 2004 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 19.36 . a portion of these shares related to profit sharing contributions accrued in prior periods . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 1061000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . the company has in effect a performance incentive plan for the company 2019s senior management under which the company awards shares of restricted stock that vest equally over a three-year period and are held in escrow until such vesting has occurred . shares are forfeited when an employee ceases employment . a total of 800000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . shares awarded under this plan are valued based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period . the company recorded $ 416000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 154000 . the company recorded $ 289000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 107000 . the company recorded $ 248000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 93000 . the total fair value of shares vested ( at vest date ) for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 were $ 503000 , $ 524000 and $ 335000 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 was $ 536000 . the company awarded 18698 shares under this plan in 2006 with an average grant date fair value of $ 33.12 . the company awarded 14986 shares under this plan in 2005 with an average grant date fair value of $ 25.41 . the company awarded 15834 shares under this plan in 2004 with an average grant date fair value of $ 19.05 . compensation cost for shares awarded in 2006 will be recognized over the three-year vesting period . changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were as follows : weighted- average grant date shares fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2005</td><td>15052</td><td>$ 22.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted during the period</td><td>18698</td><td>33.12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested during the period</td><td>-15685 ( 15685 )</td><td>26.49</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited during the period</td><td>-1774 ( 1774 )</td><td>27.94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006</td><td>16291</td><td>$ 30.80</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 659000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( cont inued ) . Conversations: Question: what were the number of shares issued in 2015 times the average share price per share? Answer:

4463665.71

convfinqa382

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: o 2019 r e i l l y a u t o m o t i v e 2 0 0 6 a n n u a l r e p o r t p a g e 38 $ 11080000 , in the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 , was $ 7702000 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 3.3 years . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan permits all eligible employees to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value . participants may authorize the company to withhold up to 5% ( 5 % ) of their annual salary to participate in the plan . the stock purchase plan authorizes up to 2600000 shares to be granted . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company issued 165306 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.36 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company issued 161903 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.57 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company issued 187754 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 20.85 per share . sfas no . 123r requires compensation expense to be recognized based on the discount between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price for shares sold to employees . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 799000 of compensation cost related to employee share purchases and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 295000 . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 400000 shares were reserved for future issuance . other employee benefit plans the company sponsors a contributory profit sharing and savings plan that covers substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have at least six months of service . the company has agreed to make matching contributions equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 2% ( 2 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed and 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 4% ( 4 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed . the company also makes additional discretionary profit sharing contributions to the plan on an annual basis as determined by the board of directors . the company 2019s matching and profit sharing contributions under this plan are funded in the form of shares of the company 2019s common stock . a total of 4200000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 6429000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2372000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 6606000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2444000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company recorded $ 5278000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 1969000 . the compensation cost recorded in 2006 includes matching contributions made in 2006 and profit sharing contributions accrued in 2006 to be funded with issuance of shares of common stock in 2007 . the company issued 204000 shares in 2006 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 34.34 . the company issued 210461 shares in 2005 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 25.79 . the company issued 238828 shares in 2004 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 19.36 . a portion of these shares related to profit sharing contributions accrued in prior periods . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 1061000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . the company has in effect a performance incentive plan for the company 2019s senior management under which the company awards shares of restricted stock that vest equally over a three-year period and are held in escrow until such vesting has occurred . shares are forfeited when an employee ceases employment . a total of 800000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . shares awarded under this plan are valued based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period . the company recorded $ 416000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 154000 . the company recorded $ 289000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 107000 . the company recorded $ 248000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 93000 . the total fair value of shares vested ( at vest date ) for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 were $ 503000 , $ 524000 and $ 335000 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 was $ 536000 . the company awarded 18698 shares under this plan in 2006 with an average grant date fair value of $ 33.12 . the company awarded 14986 shares under this plan in 2005 with an average grant date fair value of $ 25.41 . the company awarded 15834 shares under this plan in 2004 with an average grant date fair value of $ 19.05 . compensation cost for shares awarded in 2006 will be recognized over the three-year vesting period . changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were as follows : weighted- average grant date shares fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2005</td><td>15052</td><td>$ 22.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted during the period</td><td>18698</td><td>33.12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested during the period</td><td>-15685 ( 15685 )</td><td>26.49</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited during the period</td><td>-1774 ( 1774 )</td><td>27.94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006</td><td>16291</td><td>$ 30.80</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 659000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( cont inued ) . Conversations: q0: what were the number of shares issued in 2015 times the average share price per share? 4463665.71 Question: what is that value simplified? Answer:

4.46367

convfinqa383

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: growth focused . for example , in december 2005 , 3m announced its intention to build an lcd optical film manufacturing facility in poland to support the fast-growing lcd-tv market in europe and to better serve its customers . the company expects 2006 capital expenditures to total approximately $ 1.1 billion , compared with $ 943 million in 2005 . in the third quarter of 2005 , 3m completed the acquisition of cuno . 3m acquired cuno for approximately $ 1.36 billion , including assumption of debt . this $ 1.36 billion included $ 1.27 billion of cash paid ( net of cash acquired ) and the assumption of $ 80 million of debt , most of which has been repaid . in 2005 , the company also entered into two additional business combinations for a total purchase price of $ 27 million . refer to note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on these 2005 business combinations , and for information concerning 2004 and 2003 business combinations . purchases of investments in 2005 include the purchase from ti&m beteiligungsgesellschaft mbh of 19 percent of i&t innovation technology ( discussed previously under the transportation business segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 55 million is reported as 201cinvestments 201d in the consolidated balance sheet and as 201cpurchases of investments 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows . other 201cpurchases of investments 201d and 201cproceeds from sale of investments 201d in 2005 are primarily attributable to auction rate securities , which are classified as available-for-sale . prior to 2005 , purchases of and proceeds from the sale of auction rate securities were classified as cash and cash equivalents . at december 31 , 2004 , the amount of such securities taken as a whole was immaterial to cash and cash equivalents , and accordingly were not reclassified for 2004 and prior . proceeds from the sale of investments in 2003 include $ 26 million of cash received related to the sale of 3m 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership in durel corporation to rogers corporation . additional purchases of investments totaled $ 5 million in 2005 , $ 10 million in 2004 and $ 16 million in 2003 . these purchases include additional survivor benefit insurance and equity investments . the company is actively considering additional acquisitions , investments and strategic alliances . cash flows from financing activities : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>change in short-term debt 2014 net</td><td>$ -258 ( 258 )</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ -215 ( 215 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repayment of debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>-656 ( 656 )</td><td>-868 ( 868 )</td><td>-719 ( 719 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>429</td><td>358</td><td>494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total change in debt</td><td>$ -485 ( 485 )</td><td>$ -111 ( 111 )</td><td>$ -440 ( 440 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchases of treasury stock</td><td>-2377 ( 2377 )</td><td>-1791 ( 1791 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reissuances of treasury stock</td><td>545</td><td>508</td><td>555</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends paid to stockholders</td><td>-1286 ( 1286 )</td><td>-1125 ( 1125 )</td><td>-1034 ( 1034 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributions to minority interests and other 2014 net</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>$ -3679 ( 3679 )</td><td>$ -2534 ( 2534 )</td><td>$ -1627 ( 1627 )</td></tr></table> total debt at december 31 , 2005 , was $ 2.381 billion , down from $ 2.821 billion at year-end 2004 , with the decrease primarily attributable to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes . there were no new long- term debt issuances in 2005 . in 2005 , the cash flow decrease in net short-term debt of $ 258 million includes the portion of short-term debt with original maturities of 90 days or less . the repayment of debt of $ 656 million primarily related to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes and commercial paper retirements . proceeds from debt of $ 429 million primarily related to commercial paper issuances . total debt was 19% ( 19 % ) of total capital ( total capital is defined as debt plus equity ) , compared with 21% ( 21 % ) at year-end 2004 . debt securities , including the company 2019s shelf registration , its medium-term notes program , dealer remarketable securities and convertible note , are all discussed in more detail in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . 3m has a shelf registration and medium-term notes program through which $ 1.5 billion of medium- term notes may be offered . in 2004 , the company issued approximately $ 62 million in debt securities under its medium-term notes program . no debt was issued under this program in 2005 . the medium-term notes program and shelf registration have remaining capacity of approximately $ 1.438 billion . the company 2019s $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) were remarketed for one year in december 2005 . in addition , the company has convertible notes with a book value of $ 539 million at december 31 , 2005 . the next put option date for these convertible notes is november 2007 , thus at year-end 2005 this debt . Conversations: Question: what was the change in net cash used in financing activities from the year of 2004 to 2005, in millions? Answer:

1145.0

convfinqa384

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: growth focused . for example , in december 2005 , 3m announced its intention to build an lcd optical film manufacturing facility in poland to support the fast-growing lcd-tv market in europe and to better serve its customers . the company expects 2006 capital expenditures to total approximately $ 1.1 billion , compared with $ 943 million in 2005 . in the third quarter of 2005 , 3m completed the acquisition of cuno . 3m acquired cuno for approximately $ 1.36 billion , including assumption of debt . this $ 1.36 billion included $ 1.27 billion of cash paid ( net of cash acquired ) and the assumption of $ 80 million of debt , most of which has been repaid . in 2005 , the company also entered into two additional business combinations for a total purchase price of $ 27 million . refer to note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on these 2005 business combinations , and for information concerning 2004 and 2003 business combinations . purchases of investments in 2005 include the purchase from ti&m beteiligungsgesellschaft mbh of 19 percent of i&t innovation technology ( discussed previously under the transportation business segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 55 million is reported as 201cinvestments 201d in the consolidated balance sheet and as 201cpurchases of investments 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows . other 201cpurchases of investments 201d and 201cproceeds from sale of investments 201d in 2005 are primarily attributable to auction rate securities , which are classified as available-for-sale . prior to 2005 , purchases of and proceeds from the sale of auction rate securities were classified as cash and cash equivalents . at december 31 , 2004 , the amount of such securities taken as a whole was immaterial to cash and cash equivalents , and accordingly were not reclassified for 2004 and prior . proceeds from the sale of investments in 2003 include $ 26 million of cash received related to the sale of 3m 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership in durel corporation to rogers corporation . additional purchases of investments totaled $ 5 million in 2005 , $ 10 million in 2004 and $ 16 million in 2003 . these purchases include additional survivor benefit insurance and equity investments . the company is actively considering additional acquisitions , investments and strategic alliances . cash flows from financing activities : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>change in short-term debt 2014 net</td><td>$ -258 ( 258 )</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ -215 ( 215 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repayment of debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>-656 ( 656 )</td><td>-868 ( 868 )</td><td>-719 ( 719 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>429</td><td>358</td><td>494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total change in debt</td><td>$ -485 ( 485 )</td><td>$ -111 ( 111 )</td><td>$ -440 ( 440 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchases of treasury stock</td><td>-2377 ( 2377 )</td><td>-1791 ( 1791 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reissuances of treasury stock</td><td>545</td><td>508</td><td>555</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends paid to stockholders</td><td>-1286 ( 1286 )</td><td>-1125 ( 1125 )</td><td>-1034 ( 1034 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributions to minority interests and other 2014 net</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>$ -3679 ( 3679 )</td><td>$ -2534 ( 2534 )</td><td>$ -1627 ( 1627 )</td></tr></table> total debt at december 31 , 2005 , was $ 2.381 billion , down from $ 2.821 billion at year-end 2004 , with the decrease primarily attributable to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes . there were no new long- term debt issuances in 2005 . in 2005 , the cash flow decrease in net short-term debt of $ 258 million includes the portion of short-term debt with original maturities of 90 days or less . the repayment of debt of $ 656 million primarily related to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes and commercial paper retirements . proceeds from debt of $ 429 million primarily related to commercial paper issuances . total debt was 19% ( 19 % ) of total capital ( total capital is defined as debt plus equity ) , compared with 21% ( 21 % ) at year-end 2004 . debt securities , including the company 2019s shelf registration , its medium-term notes program , dealer remarketable securities and convertible note , are all discussed in more detail in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . 3m has a shelf registration and medium-term notes program through which $ 1.5 billion of medium- term notes may be offered . in 2004 , the company issued approximately $ 62 million in debt securities under its medium-term notes program . no debt was issued under this program in 2005 . the medium-term notes program and shelf registration have remaining capacity of approximately $ 1.438 billion . the company 2019s $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) were remarketed for one year in december 2005 . in addition , the company has convertible notes with a book value of $ 539 million at december 31 , 2005 . the next put option date for these convertible notes is november 2007 , thus at year-end 2005 this debt . Conversations: q0: what was the change in net cash used in financing activities from the year of 2004 to 2005, in millions? 1145.0 Question: and what was the total net cash used in financing activities in 2004, also in millions? Answer:

2534.0

convfinqa385

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: growth focused . for example , in december 2005 , 3m announced its intention to build an lcd optical film manufacturing facility in poland to support the fast-growing lcd-tv market in europe and to better serve its customers . the company expects 2006 capital expenditures to total approximately $ 1.1 billion , compared with $ 943 million in 2005 . in the third quarter of 2005 , 3m completed the acquisition of cuno . 3m acquired cuno for approximately $ 1.36 billion , including assumption of debt . this $ 1.36 billion included $ 1.27 billion of cash paid ( net of cash acquired ) and the assumption of $ 80 million of debt , most of which has been repaid . in 2005 , the company also entered into two additional business combinations for a total purchase price of $ 27 million . refer to note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on these 2005 business combinations , and for information concerning 2004 and 2003 business combinations . purchases of investments in 2005 include the purchase from ti&m beteiligungsgesellschaft mbh of 19 percent of i&t innovation technology ( discussed previously under the transportation business segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 55 million is reported as 201cinvestments 201d in the consolidated balance sheet and as 201cpurchases of investments 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows . other 201cpurchases of investments 201d and 201cproceeds from sale of investments 201d in 2005 are primarily attributable to auction rate securities , which are classified as available-for-sale . prior to 2005 , purchases of and proceeds from the sale of auction rate securities were classified as cash and cash equivalents . at december 31 , 2004 , the amount of such securities taken as a whole was immaterial to cash and cash equivalents , and accordingly were not reclassified for 2004 and prior . proceeds from the sale of investments in 2003 include $ 26 million of cash received related to the sale of 3m 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership in durel corporation to rogers corporation . additional purchases of investments totaled $ 5 million in 2005 , $ 10 million in 2004 and $ 16 million in 2003 . these purchases include additional survivor benefit insurance and equity investments . the company is actively considering additional acquisitions , investments and strategic alliances . cash flows from financing activities : years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>change in short-term debt 2014 net</td><td>$ -258 ( 258 )</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ -215 ( 215 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repayment of debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>-656 ( 656 )</td><td>-868 ( 868 )</td><td>-719 ( 719 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from debt ( maturities greater than 90 days )</td><td>429</td><td>358</td><td>494</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total change in debt</td><td>$ -485 ( 485 )</td><td>$ -111 ( 111 )</td><td>$ -440 ( 440 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchases of treasury stock</td><td>-2377 ( 2377 )</td><td>-1791 ( 1791 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reissuances of treasury stock</td><td>545</td><td>508</td><td>555</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends paid to stockholders</td><td>-1286 ( 1286 )</td><td>-1125 ( 1125 )</td><td>-1034 ( 1034 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributions to minority interests and other 2014 net</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>$ -3679 ( 3679 )</td><td>$ -2534 ( 2534 )</td><td>$ -1627 ( 1627 )</td></tr></table> total debt at december 31 , 2005 , was $ 2.381 billion , down from $ 2.821 billion at year-end 2004 , with the decrease primarily attributable to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes . there were no new long- term debt issuances in 2005 . in 2005 , the cash flow decrease in net short-term debt of $ 258 million includes the portion of short-term debt with original maturities of 90 days or less . the repayment of debt of $ 656 million primarily related to the retirement of $ 400 million in medium-term notes and commercial paper retirements . proceeds from debt of $ 429 million primarily related to commercial paper issuances . total debt was 19% ( 19 % ) of total capital ( total capital is defined as debt plus equity ) , compared with 21% ( 21 % ) at year-end 2004 . debt securities , including the company 2019s shelf registration , its medium-term notes program , dealer remarketable securities and convertible note , are all discussed in more detail in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . 3m has a shelf registration and medium-term notes program through which $ 1.5 billion of medium- term notes may be offered . in 2004 , the company issued approximately $ 62 million in debt securities under its medium-term notes program . no debt was issued under this program in 2005 . the medium-term notes program and shelf registration have remaining capacity of approximately $ 1.438 billion . the company 2019s $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) were remarketed for one year in december 2005 . in addition , the company has convertible notes with a book value of $ 539 million at december 31 , 2005 . the next put option date for these convertible notes is november 2007 , thus at year-end 2005 this debt . Conversations: q0: what was the change in net cash used in financing activities from the year of 2004 to 2005, in millions? 1145.0 q1: and what was the total net cash used in financing activities in 2004, also in millions? 2534.0 Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2004 total? Answer:

0.45185

convfinqa386

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: acquire operations and facilities from municipalities and other local governments , as they increasingly seek to raise capital and reduce risk . we realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allows us to reduce capital expenditures and expenses associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high-quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360-degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with local management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single-driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 19% ( 19 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is the most prudent approach to realizing the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2017 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront capital costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2017 , we operated 37 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the seventh largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2017 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>approximate number of vehicles</td><td>approximate average age</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>residential</td><td>7200</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>small-container</td><td>4600</td><td>7.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>large-container</td><td>4100</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>15900</td><td>7.7</td></tr></table> . Conversations: Question: as of december 31, 2017, how much did the number of vehicles for residential represent in relation to the one for large-container? Answer:

1.7561

convfinqa387

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: acquire operations and facilities from municipalities and other local governments , as they increasingly seek to raise capital and reduce risk . we realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allows us to reduce capital expenditures and expenses associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high-quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360-degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with local management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 75% ( 75 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single-driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 19% ( 19 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is the most prudent approach to realizing the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2017 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront capital costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2017 , we operated 37 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the seventh largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2017 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>approximate number of vehicles</td><td>approximate average age</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>residential</td><td>7200</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>small-container</td><td>4600</td><td>7.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>large-container</td><td>4100</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>15900</td><td>7.7</td></tr></table> . Conversations: q0: as of december 31, 2017, how much did the number of vehicles for residential represent in relation to the one for large-container? 1.7561 Question: and what was the amount of vehicles that were converted to compressed natural gas? Answer:

3021.0

convfinqa388

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 53.8</td><td>$ 55.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-38.5 ( 38.5 )</td><td>-43.9 ( 43.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-43.0 ( 43.0 )</td><td>-43.3 ( 43.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ 3.8</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: . Conversations: Question: what were the sublease revenues in 2008? Answer:

7.1

convfinqa389

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 53.8</td><td>$ 55.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-38.5 ( 38.5 )</td><td>-43.9 ( 43.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-43.0 ( 43.0 )</td><td>-43.3 ( 43.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ 3.8</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: . Conversations: q0: what were the sublease revenues in 2008? 7.1 Question: and what were they in 2007? Answer:

7.7

convfinqa390

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 53.8</td><td>$ 55.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-38.5 ( 38.5 )</td><td>-43.9 ( 43.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-43.0 ( 43.0 )</td><td>-43.3 ( 43.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ 3.8</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: . Conversations: q0: what were the sublease revenues in 2008? 7.1 q1: and what were they in 2007? 7.7 Question: what was, then, the change over the year? Answer:

-0.6

convfinqa391

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 53.8</td><td>$ 55.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-38.5 ( 38.5 )</td><td>-43.9 ( 43.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-43.0 ( 43.0 )</td><td>-43.3 ( 43.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ 3.8</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: . Conversations: q0: what were the sublease revenues in 2008? 7.1 q1: and what were they in 2007? 7.7 q2: what was, then, the change over the year? -0.6 Question: what were the sublease revenues in 2007? Answer:

7.7

convfinqa392

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively . leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no . 13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) . from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million . as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 53.8</td><td>$ 55.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-38.5 ( 38.5 )</td><td>-43.9 ( 43.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-43.0 ( 43.0 )</td><td>-43.3 ( 43.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ 3.8</td></tr></table> 9 . mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company . for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k . reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: . Conversations: q0: what were the sublease revenues in 2008? 7.1 q1: and what were they in 2007? 7.7 q2: what was, then, the change over the year? -0.6 q3: what were the sublease revenues in 2007? 7.7 Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to these 2007 sublease revenues? Answer:

-0.07792

convfinqa393

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. . Conversations: Question: what was the long-term debt in 2015? Answer:

1610.3

convfinqa394

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. . Conversations: q0: what was the long-term debt in 2015? 1610.3 Question: and what was it in 2014? Answer:

1612.9

convfinqa395

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. . Conversations: q0: what was the long-term debt in 2015? 1610.3 q1: and what was it in 2014? 1612.9 Question: what was, then, the total long-term debt for those two years combined? Answer:

3223.2

convfinqa396

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. . Conversations: q0: what was the long-term debt in 2015? 1610.3 q1: and what was it in 2014? 1612.9 q2: what was, then, the total long-term debt for those two years combined? 3223.2 Question: and what was the total debt in that same period? Answer:

3484.5

convfinqa397

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. . Conversations: q0: what was the long-term debt in 2015? 1610.3 q1: and what was it in 2014? 1612.9 q2: what was, then, the total long-term debt for those two years combined? 3223.2 q3: and what was the total debt in that same period? 3484.5 Question: how much, then, does the long-term debt represent in relation to this total debt, in the two year period? Answer:

0.92501

convfinqa398

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. . Conversations: q0: what was the long-term debt in 2015? 1610.3 q1: and what was it in 2014? 1612.9 q2: what was, then, the total long-term debt for those two years combined? 3223.2 q3: and what was the total debt in that same period? 3484.5 q4: how much, then, does the long-term debt represent in relation to this total debt, in the two year period? 0.92501 Question: and how much is that in percentage? Answer:

92.50108

convfinqa399

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: challenging investment environment with $ 15.0 billion , or 95% ( 95 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients , with the remaining $ 0.8 billion , or 5% ( 5 % ) , generated by retail and hnw clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows . this client group added $ 13.1 billion of net new business in 2012 . during the year , americas net inflows of $ 18.5 billion were partially offset by net outflows of $ 2.6 billion collectively from emea and asia-pacific clients . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 52% ( 52 % ) , or $ 140.2 billion , of multi-asset class aum at year-end , up $ 14.1 billion , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 1.6 billion and $ 12.4 billion in market and foreign exchange gains . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . 2022 target date and target risk products ended the year at $ 69.9 billion , up $ 20.8 billion , or 42% ( 42 % ) , since december 31 , 2011 . growth in aum was driven by net new business of $ 14.5 billion , a year-over-year organic growth rate of 30% ( 30 % ) . institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum . the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings , which are qualified investment options under the pension protection act of 2006 . these products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . 2022 fiduciary management services accounted for 22% ( 22 % ) , or $ 57.7 billion , of multi-asset aum at december 31 , 2012 and increased $ 7.7 billion during the year due to market and foreign exchange gains . these are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of plan management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives . alternatives component changes in alternatives aum ( dollar amounts in millions ) 12/31/2011 net new business acquired market /fx app ( dep ) 12/31/2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>net new business</td><td>net acquired</td><td>market /fx app ( dep )</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>core</td><td>$ 63647</td><td>$ -3922 ( 3922 )</td><td>$ 6166</td><td>$ 2476</td><td>$ 68367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>currency and commodities</td><td>41301</td><td>-1547 ( 1547 )</td><td>860</td><td>814</td><td>41428</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>alternatives</td><td>$ 104948</td><td>$ -5469 ( 5469 )</td><td>$ 7026</td><td>$ 3290</td><td>$ 109795</td></tr></table> alternatives aum totaled $ 109.8 billion at year-end 2012 , up $ 4.8 billion , or 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting $ 3.3 billion in portfolio valuation gains and $ 7.0 billion in new assets related to the acquisitions of srpep , which deepened our alternatives footprint in the european and asian markets , and claymore . core alternative outflows of $ 3.9 billion were driven almost exclusively by return of capital to clients . currency net outflows of $ 5.0 billion were partially offset by net inflows of $ 3.5 billion into ishares commodity funds . we continued to make significant investments in our alternatives platform as demonstrated by our acquisition of srpep , successful closes on the renewable power initiative and our build out of an alternatives retail platform , which now stands at nearly $ 10.0 billion in aum . we believe that as alternatives become more conventional and investors adapt their asset allocation strategies to best meet their investment objectives , they will further increase their use of alternative investments to complement core holdings . institutional investors represented 69% ( 69 % ) , or $ 75.8 billion , of alternatives aum with retail and hnw investors comprising an additional 9% ( 9 % ) , or $ 9.7 billion , at year-end 2012 . ishares commodity products accounted for the remaining $ 24.3 billion , or 22% ( 22 % ) , of aum at year-end . alternative clients are geographically diversified with 56% ( 56 % ) , 26% ( 26 % ) , and 18% ( 18 % ) of clients located in the americas , emea and asia-pacific , respectively . the blackrock alternative investors ( 201cbai 201d ) group coordinates our alternative investment efforts , including . Conversations: Question: what is the value of alternative assets in 2012? Answer:

109795.0