system
You are deeply knowledgeable in both English and Spanish, enabling you to deliver precise and accurate translations.
human
Could you please translate this to Spanish:
A good deal in the report under discussion is based on the assumption that the EU will be enlarged by six new Member States in 2004.
What is more, that may be an underestimate. A few days ago, the Commission said it was its own objective to be able to welcome ten new Member States by the year 2005.
I am among those for whom the greatest challenge for the EU is an enlargement whose ultimate goal is the reunification of a Europe which has always been divided by artificial borders.
I nonetheless believe that it is more realistic to proceed on the basis of the somewhat lower figure quoted in the report by the Committee on Budgets.
Even that figure is awfully large, bearing in mind the number of new languages involved.
Proceeding on the basis that there will be "5+1 countries" in the first round of negotiations - a lot can obviously happen during the next few years, but these six countries nonetheless have a two-year head start in terms of the negotiations - this means that five new official languages will be added to the eleven we already have at present.
There is no question of these newly welcomed countries and their languages being treated any differently from the way in which the existing Member States are treated. It must equally go without saying that Hungarian, Polish or Estonian Members of this Parliament should be able to speak their own languages, just as we existing Members are entitled to speak ours.
Nor can we put ourselves in a situation whereby a country with access to trained interpreters and translators can become a Member State of the EU, while another country which does not have professionals of these kinds cannot.
That is precisely why it is so important that the issue is highlighted right now. That is what the rapporteur is doing, and I think it is excellent.
We must not, in a few years' time, find ourselves in a situation in which the issue has still not been resolved.
We should also be clear about the fact that things are happening very quickly right now. We are dealing with countries which are developing very rapidly, which means that we too must act quickly in order to have settled the language question by the time these countries join the Union. Mr President, I congratulate Mr Ferber on his report.
These types of reports are never easy and he has done a good job.
My only criticism is that Amendments Nos 4 and 5 should have been tabled in someone else's name for the PPE Group.
By saying that I am being consistent: I said the same to Mrs Müller in the Green Group when she did that.
gpt

Muchos aspectos del informe que estamos tratando se fundamentan en que la UE contará con seis nuevos miembros a partir del año 2004.
Tal vez sean más. Hace algunos días la Comisión hizo pública su meta de incorporar diez nuevos países miembros hasta el año 2005. Yo soy de aquellos que consideran la ampliación, cuyo objetivo final es la reunificación de una Europa que siempre ha estado dividida por fronteras artificiales, como el mayor reto de la UE. Con todo, pienso que es más realista contar con un número menor que el que se menciona en el informe de la Comisión de Presupuestos. Incluso una cantidad menor resulta grande si se piensa en la cantidad de lenguas nuevas que se incorporarán. Si se parte de la base que en la primera fase de negociaciones se trata de "5+1" - obviamente pueden pasar muchas cosas en los próximos años, pero esos seis países tienen dos años de ventaja en las negociaciones - eso implica que se añaden cinco nuevas lenguas a las once lenguas oficiales existentes actualmente.
No podemos dar a los nuevos países y a sus lenguas un tratamiento diferente al que nos damos a nosotros mismos.
El uso de su propia lengua tiene que ser tan obvio para los diputados húngaros, polacos o estonios como lo es para nosotros el uso de las nuestras. No podemos crear una situación en la que sólo los países que tengan intérpretes y traductores puedan llegar a ser miembros de la UE.
Por este motivo resulta tan importante que se discuta este asunto ahora, cosa que hace el ponente y que me parece muy bien.
No nos podemos permitir que este asunto siga sin solución. También hay que tener claro que los acontecimientos evolucionan muy rápidamente.
Los países a los que nos referimos se desarrollan con gran velocidad, lo que también nos obliga a reaccionar rápidamente para resolver el asunto de las lenguas, antes de la llegada de esos nuevos países. Señor Presidente, felicito al Sr. Ferber por su informe. Los informes de este tipo nunca resultan fáciles y él ha realizado un buen trabajo. Mi única crítica es que las enmiendas 4 y 5 deberían haber sido presentadas en otro nombre que no fuera el del Grupo PPE. Al decir esto, estoy siendo coherente; dije lo mismo a la Sra. Müller del Grupo de los Verdes cuando hizo lo propio.