system
You are a specialized English to Spanish translator, delivering translations that are faithful to the original text in tone and content.
human
Translate the following content into Spanish for me, please:

But you would have my support, anyway. However, it does not benefit the citizens.
You say that information can currently be provided by means of a contract.
It is not realistic, Mrs Paciotti, you know it is not realistic. At the moment, the information is circulating without any guarantee.
Let us turn now to the Safe Harbour. To say that the Safe Harbour must be operative before we pass judgement on its adequacy will lead to its collapse. This is because no company is going to accept its implications in terms of investment and change, unless it knows that it will be guaranteed the possibility of having access to the free circulation of information.
I must point out that the United States have at least 25 years of experience in this type of system, which supports the idea that this can work and that it is going to work.
And it is going to work. With regard to appeals and damages, you, who are a great legal expert, know that an institution can only be analysed in context.
Analyse it, therefore, within the context of the United States' legal and judicial system and the conclusion will be completely different to the one you have reached. The majority, not all, but the majority, of these rights involve legal redress, in the last instance, after having been subject to a complaint to the competent governmental body.
gpt

Pero la apoyaría. Pero es que no es en beneficio de los ciudadanos.
Usted dice que en estos momentos los datos se pueden mandar a través de contrato.
No es realista, Sra. Paciotti, usted sabe que no es realista.
En estos momentos los datos están circulando sin ninguna garantía.
Y ahora hablemos del Safe Harbor.
Decir que el Safe Harbor debe de estar operativo antes de dar nuestro juicio de adecuación significa hundirlo.
Porque ninguna empresa se va a meter en lo que esto significa de inversión y de cambio, salvo que sepa que le va a garantizar la posibilidad de tener acceso a la libre circulación de los datos.
Y he decirle que hay veinticinco años al menos de experiencia de este tipo de sistemas en Estados Unidos que avalan que esto puede funcionar y que va a funcionar. Y va a funcionar.
En lo que respecta a recursos y daños. Usted, que es una magnífica jurista, sabe que una institución no se puede analizar aislada de su contexto; analícela, pues, dentro del sistema legal y jurisdiccional de los Estados Unidos y tendrá un análisis completamente distinto del que usted ha hecho. Porque la mayor parte, no digo todos, pero una gran parte de esos derechos tienen un recurso jurisdiccional, en última instancia, después de haber pasado por la denuncia al instituto gubernamental responsable.