system
You produce accurate and faithful translations from English to Spanish, preserving both the meaning and tone of the original text.
human
Please translate the below English to Spanish:
Actually, I do not entirely share Mr Haarder' s view.
I do agree that the section on officials has, in fact, been completed totally inadequately.
First of all, the importance of a public service in general is not at all emphasised.
Secondly, all kinds of proposals are nevertheless being mooted, and we have to ask ourselves whether these are terribly appropriate and whether they would lead to improvement.
For example, we are currently looking into TAOs. This is a key point but, at the same time, we want to abolish temporary staff at the Commission.
These two considerations are diametrically opposed to each other, and I really fail to grasp how such a proposal can end up on the table. Mr President, Mr van Hulten, your work is worthy of being qualified as enterprising, arduous and complex, and I believe this is important in a first report. Please therefore accept what I am about to say as being criticism made in the spirit of honest debate, and I believe that in this way our debate here today will be richer.
This report seems to me to be redundant, long-winded, confused and lacking in accuracy in the terms used.
Perhaps 'redundant' is the most serious epithet, and you are not responsible for this. It is the responsibility of this Parliament.
gpt
 No estoy del todo de acuerdo con el Sr. Haarder.
Coincido en que el informe sobre los funcionarios se ha desarrollado de forma totalmente insuficiente.
En primer lugar, no se ha hecho hincapié en la importancia de un servicio público en general. En segundo lugar, se han mencionado todo tipo de propuestas sobre las que hay que preguntarse si realmente son tan sensatas y si verdaderamente suponen una mejora. Por ejemplo, estamos ocupándonos de esas OATs, es una cuestión importante, y, al mismo tiempo, queremos eliminar el personal temporal de la Comisión.
Las dos propuestas se oponen diametralmente y realmente no entiendo cómo ha salido a relucir semejante sugerencia. Señor Presidente, señor van Hulten, su trabajo, en castellano, merece calificativos relevantes: esforzado, ímprobo, complejo, y creo que es importante en un primer informe. Entienda, por lo tanto, lo que voy a decir a continuación como una crítica desde la leal contradicción, que creo que es la que enriquece este debate. Este informe me parece redundante, prolijo, confuso y carente de precisión en los conceptos utilizados.
"Redundante" quizás es el calificativo más grave, y usted no es responsable, es la responsabilidad del Parlamento.