In this subsection, we compare the Mamba with Transformer, and CNN based backbone for the tracking task4 based on OSTrack [210]. Specifically, the CNN based trackers are TrDiMP [211], ToMP50 [212], DiMP50 [213], PrDiMP [214], KYS [215], and ATOM [216]; the Transformer based trackers are HDETrack [217], AiATrack [218], STARK [219], TransT [220], MiFormer [212], and SimTrack [222]. To achieve a fair comparison, we train and test these trackers on a large-scale event-based tracking dataset, EventVOT [217], which contains 841, 18, and 282 videos, respectively. The detailed experimental results are reported in Table XI and Fig. 13. Note that, three widely used evaluation metrics are used for the comparison, including Success Rate (SR), Precision Rate (PR), and Normalized Precision Rate (NPR). According to Table XI, we can find that the performance is slightly decreased when replacing the ViT using the Mamba backbone network, meanwhile, it brings about a huge reduction in the number of parameters (4.1M only). Therefore, we can draw the conclusion that the Mamba network will be a promising choice for the event-based tracking.