Evaluating the efficacy of LLMs is an evolving challenge in the field. In our study, we primarily employed tasks from the Huggingface Open LLM Leaderboard as benchmarks for evaluation. While this provided comparative results, future research could benefit from incorporating a wider array of tasks and benchmarks. These could include tasks that judge actual human or strong AI preference alignment. Such additional evaluation would not only enhance the validity of our findings but also contribute to the broader discourse on LLM assessment methodologies.