**Model Outputs Can Be Better References** In Table 1, we present the evaluation scores of K1WI-XXL and XCOMET for the gold references, ALMA-13B-LoRA outputs, and GPT-4 outputs. Additionally, we report _Win Ratio_, reflecting the proportion of instances where model outputs surpass the gold standard references. These metrics are calculated as an average across five languages. Remarkably, even comparing with the high-quality Flores-200 dataset, the average performance of translation models in xx\(\rightarrow\)en translations significantly exceeds that of the references, showing approximately 3-4 point increases in K1WI-XXL and 4-6 point gains in XCOMET. Notably, a significant proportion of outputs are rated higher than the references by K1WI-XXL (e.g., **73.24%** for ALMA), with a slightly reduced yet still substantial percentage when assessed using XCOMET (**60.17%** for ALMA). In the en\(\rightarrow\)xx direction, while the overall performance between the translations from reference and two systems is comparable, approximately 40% are still deemed superior to the reference translations.