In the paper, we adopt a new approach for highlighting improvements within tables, moving beyond the standard practice of specifying a static improvement threshold in metric \(y\) by score \(x\). Instead, our threshold is dynamic, calibrated to the minimal metric difference \(x\) in metric \(y\) that yields a perceptible distinction between two systems as recognized by humans (Kocmi et al., 2024). For instance, to align with human judgments at an 80% concordance rate, the required improvement margin is \(\geq 1.24\) for both KWI-XXL and COMET-XXL, and \(\geq 0.53\) for KWI-22. A comprehensive delineation of these thresholds can be found in Table 13.