A major difference between our approach and Stanford Alpaca is that we only use the prompt template designed for examples without an _input_ field, whereas Stanford Alpaca employs two templates for examples both with and without an _input_ field. If the example contains a non-empty _input_ field, we concatenate the _instruction_ and _input_ with an "\(\backslash\)" to form the new instruction. Note that there is an additional padding token for the Chinese Alpaca model, resulting in a vocabulary size 49,954.