To understand how different choices of \(n_{i}\) and \(M_{i}\) impact reasoning performance, we conduct a comparative analysis (Tab. 3). Results show that this framework is effective as long as (1) \(M_{i}\) should follow a Bernoulli distribution within the target sequence, ensuring that only a subset of tokens in the chain of thought are subjected to noise, and (2) \(n_{i}\) is capable of removing the original semantic information at the noisy positions. We find methods that retain some semantics, such as synonym substitution, are less effective.