ResultFigure 8 demonstrates that, in most of the mid-late layers, increasing the latent recall of the bridge entity when the LLM processes \(\mu(r_{1}(e_{1})))\) also increases the relative frequency of the LLM to output \(e_{2}^{(0)}\) to generate the appositive of \(\mu(r_{1}(e_{1})))\) followed by a comma.7 The result indicates that EntRec at the \(n\)-th token has controllability of the token to be generated as the \(n+2\)-th token to make it more likely to be the first token of the appositive, serving as an indirect evidence that EntRec\({}^{l}(e_{2},\tau_{\text{2H}})\) is a reasonable proxy of the internal recall of the bridge entity.