**Pass@256 _v.s._ PassRatio@256 To deepen the understanding behind the performance improvements, we tracked Pass@N metric and PassRatio@N metric under different data size. The results are shown in Figure 3. With very limited synthetic data (_e.g._ 7.5K samples), the Xwin-Math-70B model already has very high Pass@256, indicating the strong ability to generate correct answers through multiple attempts. Meanwhile, the Pass@256 metric only changed slightly with increasing the amount of used data. In contrast, PassRatio@256, which reflects the stability to generate correct answer, increases significantly with the amount of synthetic data, and its growth trend is similar to that of Pass@1. This result confirms our hypothesize that the performance improvements is mainly caused by the better stability in answer generation rather than stronger ability to answer the question.