While the above aggregate statistics do not suggest a very prevalent use of the latent multi-hop reasoning pathway, it is worth pointing out that up to 23% of the fact composition types demonstrate strong evidence of latent multi-hop reasoning, occurring in more than 80% of the cases. This suggests that the pathway _exists_ but is highly contextual. Additionally, we focus on a very narrow interpretation of the pathway - in reality, we expect it to be more distributed across layers and tokens. Hence, the effects we see might be a lower bound on the model's ability to perform latent two-hop reasoning. We also find striking scaling behavior: while the first hop clearly improves substantially with parameter count, the second hop (and the round-trip performance) remains relatively constant. This might indicate a fundamental limitation in today's architecture or pretraining.