**LLMs as IR Models.** Existing IR models can be overall categorized into _sparse models_ (relying on term-based lexical similarity) and _dense models_ (relying on embedding based semantic similarity) [740]. Specially, dense models are mainly implemented by fine-tuned PLMs (_e.g._, BERT). Compared to PLMs, LLMs have more strong model capacities in capturing text semantics, thus having the potential to improve existing dense IR models. However, due to the high overhead of LLMs, the majority of studies concentrate on employing LLMs as rerankers, aiming to refine the ranking of retrieved candidates. To achieve this, recent efforts often formulate special instructions that enable LLMs to perform reranking on a small set of provided candidate documents. Typically, such an approach does not necessitate model training, and achieve promising results compared with well-trained reranking methods [774, 775].