Evaluating the quality of text produced by LLMs involves analyzing their performance on various downstream tasks using standard metrics. These metrics assess linguistic quality, coherence, accuracy, and the extent to which the generated text reflects ground-truth data. Linguistic quality and coherence are evaluated through metrics such as BLEU (Papineni et al., 2002), which measures fluency and similarity to human-produced text, and ROUGE-L (Lin, 2004), which quantifies the overlap with reference summaries to gauge the text's capacity to encapsulate main ideas and phrases. Accuracy and overlap with ground-truth data are gauged using metrics like EM and F1 Score, which respectively determine the percentage of answers that are entirely correct and offer a balanced assessment of precision and recall in retrieving relevant answers while minimizing inaccuracies.