The scaling laws of large language models remain a pivotal area of research, enabling predictions about the performance of extremely large models through experiments with smaller ones. On the training time aspect, established scaling laws [1, 13, 14, 16, 21] discuss the optimal training flops versus model size. However, recent studies [12, 24, 25] challenge these laws, demonstrating that training smaller models with significantly more flops can yield superior results. While these laws talk about how much time/data is needed to train a model of a certain size, another fundamental question is: _what is the ultimate performance a model can achieve, assuming sufficient training_?