**Metrics**: In order to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of the agents, designing proper metrics is significant, which may influence the evaluation accuracy and comprehensiveness. Ideal evaluation metrics should precisely reflect the quality of the agents, and align with the human feelings when using them in real-world scenarios. In existing work, we can conclude the following representative evaluation metrics. (1) _Task success metrics:_ These metrics measure how well an agent can complete tasks and achieve goals. Common metrics include success rate [12, 57, 59, 22], reward/score [22, 59, 138], coverage [16], and accuracy [18, 40, 102]. Higher values indicate greater task completion ability. (2) _Human similarity metrics:_ These metrics quantify the degree to which the agent behaviors closely resembles that of humans. Typical examples include trajectory/location accuracy [164, 38], dialogue similarities [79, 102], and mimicry of human responses [29, 102]. Higher similarity suggests better human simulation performance. (3) _Efficiency metrics:_ In contrast to the aforementioned metrics used to evaluate the agent effectiveness, these metrics aim to assess the efficiency of agent. Commonly considered metrics encompass the length of planning [57], the cost associated with development [18], the speed of inference [16, 38], and number of clarification dialogues [138].