**False Positive Analysis.** Despite the premises in these experiments being artificially disturbed, we would like to know if MFT might generate false positives due to the reduced use of neighboring features. False positives in this context refer to instances where intermediate steps are incorrect, yet the final result is accurately predicted. This analysis is conducted using GPT-4, which achieves an accuracy of 92% on the specified dataset. The findings, as detailed in Table 6, indicate that MFT does not result in a significant rise in the occurrence of false positives. The model's autoregressive prediction process not only improves the accuracy of the final answer but also preserves the correctness of the intermediate steps. We provide the prompt of GPT-4 and the cases of false positives in Appendix F.