As noted in 3.2, Hoffmann et al's reported confidence intervals for parameters \(a\) and \(b\) are implausibly narrow if they used on the order of 400 loss values to fit the scaling law. Indeed, in order to yield a confidence interval of 0.001, they would likely have needed to have access to nearly \(600,000\) different loss values. This is vastly higher than the "losses of over 400 models" reported in their paper.