Legal Instruction ConstructionWe synthetically generate comprehensive conversations addressing fundamental legal competencies across multiple legal document types Ding et al. (2023). We leverage a Mistral-7B-instruct to transform legal texts augmented with metadata into coherent conversations. The methodology involves initiating the conversation with \(3\) predefined turns: (1) the user articulates a request related to the legal document, (2) the assistant responds by rephrasing the metadata (e.g., document type, date, name of a judge), and (3) the user prompts the assistant to elaborate on its reasoning. Subsequently, we extend the conversation through a series of turns, where a user model progressively poses more specific questions to grasp the assistant's reasoning. Simultaneously, an assistant model provides in-depth insights. An illustrative example is presented in Figure 2. Notably, we ensure the exclusion of the test set from existing benchmarks.