Our investigation begins with a critical look at how individual tokens' losses evolve during standard pre-training. We continue pre-training Tinyllama-1B with 15B tokens from OpenWebMath, saving checkpoints after every 1B tokens. We then evaluate token-level loss at these intervals using the validation set of approximately 320,000 tokens. Figure 3(a) reveals a striking pattern: tokens fall into four categories based on their loss trajectory--persistent high loss (H\(\rightarrow\)H), increasing loss (L\(\rightarrow\)H), decreasing loss (H\(\rightarrow\)L), and consistent low loss (L\(\rightarrow\)L). For further details on these categories, see SSB.1. Our analysis uncovers that a mere 26% of tokens show a notable loss reduction (H\(\rightarrow\)L), while the majority (51%) remain in the L\(\rightarrow\)L category, indicating they have already been learned. Interestingly, 11% of the tokens are persistently challenging (H\(\rightarrow\)H), likely due to high aleatoric uncertainty [16]. Additionally, 12% of tokens experience an unexpected loss increase (L\(\rightarrow\)H) during training.