1. Existing datasets do not have complete coverage of our hazard categories. Often, they have been designed to meet very similar categories (see Appendix A in the Appendix) but the definitions have important differences. Importantly, some hazard categories have few associated test items. 2. Existing datasets vary in quality and format. We wanted standardized data for the v0.5 benchmark so we can make consistent comparisons across hazard categories, models, and types of test items. 3. We saw opportunities to improve the quality of safety testing. Specifically, we want to introduce a more structured approach to how different types of interactions are tested for, drawing on linguistic and behavioral theories of digitally mediated conversation (see below). 4. In the long-term, AI Safety will have to create test items, as many of the modalities, languages and hazard categories (and subcategories) that we want to test for are not covered in any of the existing datasets. Therefore, we sought to use v0.5 as an opportunity to stress-test our processes for creating prompts.