We partially reconstruct the dataset from Hoffmann et al. and attempt to replicate Approach 3. This involves fitting a parametric function to model the final pre-training loss as \(L(N,D)=E+\frac{A}{N^{a}}+\frac{B}{D^{2}}\), where \(N\) represents the number of model parameters and \(D\) represents the number of training tokens. Our analysis reveals that our estimated model differs substantially from the fit reported in Hoffmann et al., and that their fit fails to adequately describe the reconstructed data. We demonstrate that the confidence intervals reported by Hoffmann et al. are implausibly tight and unlikely to be obtained from proper statistical procedures given the size of their dataset. Finally, we finally show that their fit is inconsistent with the scaling policies derived through other approaches, and with the scaling policy suggested by our fit.