\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**GitHub**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Books3**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Pile-CC**} \\ \cline{2-7}
**Method** & **\# Coeff.** & Train & Validation & Train & Validation & Train & Validation \\ \hline Random & - & 0.8895 & 0.8758 & 0.1291 & 0.1331 & 0.0768 & 0.1045 \\ M1 & 2M+1 & **0.0292** & **0.0312** & 0.0082 & 0.0121 & 0.0045 & **0.0050** \\ M2 & M+2 & 0.1558 & 0.3327 & 0.0114 & 0.0119 & 0.0072 & 0.0083 \\ M3 & M+2 & 0.3389 & 0.2177 & 0.0914 & 0.0465 & 0.0746 & 0.0947 \\ M4 & M+2 & 0.0298 & 0.0365 & **0.0062** & **0.0074** & **0.0036** & 0.0078 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Mean absolute errors (MAE) of different candidate functions for predicting the target domain losses. We also include random guesses that randomly predict between the maximum and minimum loss of the training samples for reference. In specific, we report the MAE of the expectation of this random guess which predicts the median of the maximum and minimum loss. The training data contain \(M=3\) domains and we fit each function with the same 24 mixtures and validate on 8 other mixtures. The split is random. The lowest error for each target domain are in **bold** while the second lowest are underlined.