To assess SUTs' performance on each test, we first calculate the percentage of associated test items that are scored unsafe by the evaluator model. This results in a single percentage score for each test. It can be difficult to translate percentage scores into meaningful risk assessments, as this typically requires additional contextual information. For instance, a score of "5%" (i.e. 5% unsafe responses) on its own does not intrinsically indicate whether a SUT presents a low or high safety risk. To make the scores more interpretable we construct a grade for how SUTs perform on each test, on a five-point scale from "Low risk" to "High risk". How the grades should be calculated from the percentage scores is an open problem - and one that the WG devoted substantial time to discussing. We surfaced dozens of proposals, which can be broadly split into the three options presented below. We opted for a combination of the first option (i.e., using an absolute cutoff) and the third option (i.e., using a **reference model**) to grade SUTs' performance on each test.