In Table 1, we compare the quer rewriting and fine-tuning methods across five datasets in the zero-shot setting. More details about these datasets can be found in SS5.2.1. We conduct experiments on a state-of-the-art retriever, Dragon (Lin et al., 2023), and a strong unsupervised retriever, E5-unsupervised (Wang et al., 2022), which is not finetuned on MS MACRO (Nguyen et al., 2016). In terms of the experiments on Dragon, we find that fine-tuning performs marginally worse than query rewriting in average top-1 recall by 1.74%, while it achieves better results on average top-5 recall by 0.54%. It demonstrates the effectiveness of the fine-tuning approach for the conversational retrieval. In addition, we observe that the results are comparable between using HumanAnnotatedConvQA and SyntheticConvQA for fine-tuning. This highlights that our human-annotated dataset is in high-quality, and we _do not rely on_ ChatGPT models for building the state-of-the-art multi-turn query retriever.