Subsequently, we calculate CnstScore\((\mathbf{x}^{l})\) using \(\mathbf{\hat{x}}^{l}(\alpha)\),4 which allows us to express it as a function CnstScore\((\alpha)\) of \(\alpha\). Then, we examine its derivative, \(\frac{d}{d\alpha}\text{CnstScore}(\alpha)\big{|}_{\alpha=0}\) to understand the direction of change at the current value. A positive derivative indicates that an increase in EntRec\((\mathbf{x}^{l})\) leads to an increase in CnstScore\((\tau_{\text{2H}},\tau_{\text{1H}})\), while a negative one suggests the opposite. By assessing _the relative frequency of positive gradients_ among the two-hop prompts in TwoHopFact, we quantify how often the LLM performs the second hop of the reasoning, with frequencies above 0.5 suggesting that the LLM's chance to perform the second-hop reasoning exceeds random chance for these prompts.