In this paper, we revisit the scaling-law formulas proposed by [20], confirming that they _remain generally applicable when scaling the model size up to 33B_. Other works obtain different conclusions primarily due to (1) Many factors such as the data distribution, context length, tokenization affect the constant coefficients in scaling-law formulas, so the constant coefficients, unlike the formulas themselves, are not universal; and (2) The loss value adheres to an analytical power law relationship with the training step under infinite batch size. With a finite batch size, fitting the loss value with an analytical function is problematic. As a result, none of other works have provided compelling evidence to reliably predict the full loss trajectory of larger models by training solely on smaller models.