Figure 4 shows human evaluation results with \(\mathtt{CQIA}\) and other 5 baselines, namely Yi-6B-Chat, Baichuan2-7B-Chat, ChatGLM2-6B, Qwen-7B-Chat and InternLM-7B-Chat. The results demonstrate that, compared to strong baselines, \(\mathtt{CQIA}\)-Subset achieved higher human preference, with at least over 60% of responses being better than or on par with the baseline models. This can be attributed to \(\mathtt{CQIA}\) not solely in generating high-quality responses to human questions or instructions, but also in its responses being more aligned with real-world human communication patterns, leading to higher human preference.