taxonomy [14] to gain a more granular understanding of SaulLM-7B-Instruct's performance, by partitioning the tasks into \(5\) core legal abilities: Issue Spotting, Rule-Recall, Interpretation, Rhetoric Understanding, and Rule-Conclusion. Results show an interesting trend (Figure 7): SaulLM-7B-Instruct shows clear superior performance over the best non-legal competitor Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1 on the four areas that require the most legal expertise, i.e. Issue, Rule, Interpretation and Understanding. On the other hand, it falls short of Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1 on the Conclusion tasks, which interestingly require much more pure deductive reasoning than actual legal knowledge. We speculate that augmenting our pretraining and fine-tuning corpora with more deductive reasoning content, including but not limited to mathematics datasets could reduce the gap and fully unlock the potential of SaulLM-7B-Instruct.