In the previous section, our experiments focus on Chinese. To investigate whether similar conclusions could be drawn in other non-English languages, we extend our experiments to 13 low-resource languages. To ensure evaluation consistency, we translate LLM-Eval benchmark into these 13 languages and employ the same evaluation metrics. As shown in table 3, a significant improvement in response quality for all low-resource languages with the increase in SFT data. Among these languages, Arabic, Indonesian, and Vietnamese exhibited the best performance. Despite all thirteen languages being low-resource, these three languages are more frequently used [23]. As a result, LLaMA encounters them more often (although their overall occurrence is small compared to English), allowing the model to quickly comprehend instructions in these languages. This aligns with the conclusion drawn in the previous section.