\(\bullet\)_Model-based approach_. As a surrogate for human-based approaches, model-based approaches serve to diminish the reliance on human involvement, and enable more efficient and scalable evaluation. In addition, LLMs can provide meaningful explanations for the assigned rating scores,thereby enhancing the interpretability of evaluations. Despite their scalability and explanability, model-based approaches have been found to suffer from several issues, including position, verbosity, and self-enhancement bias [727]. Specially, position bias (_i.e.,_ the order to present the responses) refers to the fact that LLMs tend to assign high scores for the answers at specific positions over others, verbosity bias means that LLMs favor verbose answers even if they are short in quality compared with shorter answers, and self-enhancement bias indicates that LLMs often over-rate in their own generations. In addition, since LLMs have limited capacities in solving complex reasoning problems, they cannot serve as qualified evaluators for some difficult tasks (_e.g.,_ mathematical reasoning). These limitations can be mitigated to some extent by specific prompt engineering and fine-tuning strategies [727].