Lin et al. (2023b) propose an approach for instruction-tuning. They update the query encoder using a generalised LM supervised retrieval (LSR) (Shi et al., 2023b)training target that completes the computation through a combination of supervised tasks and unsupervised text. This enables the retriever to produce more contextually relevant results that are consistent with LLM preferences. Inspired by this instruction-tuning approach, Asai et al. (2023) proposed a more sophisticated model trained on an instruction-tracking dataset: SELF-RAG. As a result of their refinements, SELF-RAG can retrieve and select the best possible model outputs on demand through fine-grained self-reflection, making it broadly applicable, more robust, and controllable. In contrast to approaches that aim to enhance the quality of retrieved documents through the use of external models, such as natural language inference (Yoran et al., 2023) and summarization(Xu et al., 2023) models, SELF-RAG proposes entirely novel ideas. The model divides the retrieved document into parallel segments and compares their relevance. It then combines the most similar parts of the document. Yan et al. (2024) improves on SELF-RAG by designing a correction strategy to address inaccurate retriever results. They classify the information into three categories: CORRECT, INCORRECT, and AMBIGUOUS. If the information is CORRECT, the document is refined and filtered. If it is INCORRECT, the document is discarded and the web is searched for retrieval. The term AMBIGUOUS indicates a lack of confidence in the accuracy of a judgement. In this case, a combination of the two methods mentioned above will be used. Additionally, Wang et al. (2023c) proposed FILCO, a method for retrieving document content with sentence precision through three filters: STRING, lexical overlap, and conditional cross-mutual information (CXMI).