Finally, on the test set, we observe again that our system is well calibrated (Figure 2(c)) with RMS calibration error.42 (human crowd:.38). Interestingly, this is not the case in the baseline evaluations (Section 3.4), where the models are _not_ well calibrated in the zero-shot setting (Figure 2(a)). Through fine-tuning and ensembling, our system improves the calibration of the base models, without undergoing specific training for calibration.