1. Their estimated model fits the reconstructed data very poorly. These conclusions hold even when accounting for potential noise in data reconstruction and excluding outlier models. 2. The confidence are implausibly tight given the number of data points. Obtaining confidence intervals that tight would require many hundreds of thousands of observations, while they likely had only \(\sim\)400. 3. Their estimated model implies a scaling policy that is inconsistent with their other approaches and their 20-tokens-per-parameter rule-of-thumb.