ExperimentWe demonstrate that EntRec is a reasonable approximation of the internal recall of the bridge entity with indirect evidence. Note that EntRec\({}^{l}(e_{2},\tau_{\text{2H}})\) is calculated not at the last token of \(\tau_{\text{2H}}\) but at the last token of the bridge entity's descriptive mention, where it is grammatically natural to prepend a comma followed by the name of \(e_{2}\) (e.g., "The mother of the singer of 'Superstition', _Stevie Wonder_"). In the resulting string, grammatically \(\mu(r_{1}(e_{1}))\)) becomes the _antecedent_ and \(e_{2}\) becomes the _appositive_; an appositive is a noun phrase that follows another noun phrase in opposition to it and provides information that further identifies or defines it, and the antecedent is the noun phrase that the appositive describes. Then, if EntRec\({}^{l}(e_{2},\tau_{\text{2H}})\) reasonably approximates the internal recall of the bridge entity \(e_{2}\), it is expected that _there will be at least some layers \(l\) where increasing EntRec\({}^{l}(e_{2},\tau_{\text{2H}})\) increases the relative frequency of the LLM to generate \(e_{2}^{(0)}\) with a relative frequency higher than random chance_.