**Results and Analysis** We show the detailed results for en\(\rightarrow\)xx and xx\(\rightarrow\)en in Table 10 and 11, respectively. The inclusion of human-labeled preference data does not significantly enhance overall translation performance. For en\(\rightarrow\)zh, marginal improvements are observed, though they are minimal. Conversely, for en\(\rightarrow\)de, a slight decline in performance is noted. In summary, the addition of human-labeled data shows no substantial difference in the en\(\rightarrow\)xx direction, and a minor decrease in performance for xx\(\rightarrow\)en on average. We hypothesize that the limited impact of these human-labeled data may stem from a high proportion of tied evaluations and potential human bias in the evaluation process. For instance, there are instances where the author consider GPT-4's translations to be superior, while human evaluators favor those produced by Google Translate.