* _Suggestions_: LLMs and small models have their own merits in different aspects: LLMs are can provide unified solutions to various NLP tasks and achieve competitive performance (especially in the zero/few-shot setting), while small models are economical to develop and can be specially tuned according to target tasks, which can achieve good performance with sufficient high-quality labeled data [770, 771, 754, 770, 771]. In applications, one can make suitable choices based on the actual needs, comprehensively considering flexibility, data availability, training compute, and efficiency. * _Future direction:_ Despite the excellent general capacities, LLMs still cannot effectively process the NLP tasks in low-resource domains, _e.g._, minor language translation. To tackle such tasks, it needs to develop effective approaches to injecting necessary task information or domain-specific knowledge into LLMs, either through fine-tuning or prompting. In addition, it is still challenging for LLMs to handle complex semantic relations in classic NLP tasks (_e.g._, nested entity extraction), which is worth more exploration from the underlying working mechanism of LLMs. It is also promising to combine LLMs and fine-tuned small language models for complementing with each other in solving complex cases of classic NLP tasks [772]. Another promising direction is to conduct human-machine collaborative research (_e.g._, conversational translation [768]) on NLP tasks, since LLMs can effectively understand human instructions and make meaningful responses.