Figure 4: **Left:** an ablation study evaluating the significance of individual components in the CPO loss function, specifically analyzing how the preference learning loss \(\mathcal{L}_{\text{prefer}}\) and the log-likelihood loss \(\mathcal{L}_{\text{NLL}}\) each contribute to enhancing translation performance. **Right:** An ablation study assessing the significance of each component in the translation triplet. By excluding either ALMA or GPT-4 generated data from the preference triplet and re-training the model, we evaluate their respective impacts. The findings highlight the importance of ALMA-generated data for en\(\rightarrow\)xx translations and GPT-4 generated data for xx\(\rightarrow\)en translations.