\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{227.6pt}} \hline \hline Use the provided articles delimited by triple quotes to answer questions. If the answer cannot be found in the articles, write “I could not find an answer.” \\
**Articles:** “\(\sim\)Jao Moutinho is a Portuguese footballer who last played as a central midfielder for Premier League club Wolverhampton Wanderers and the Portugal national team."" \\
**Question:** Is the following sentence plausible? Joao Moutinho was out at third.” \\
**Answer:** Let’s think step by step. Joao Moutinho is a soccer player. Being out at third is part of baseball, not soccer. So the answer is No. \\ \(\sim\)Demonstrations\(>\) \\
**Articles:**\textlessnert articles, each delimited by triple quotes\textgreater{} \\
**Question:**\textlessnert question\textgreater{} \\
**Answer:**\textlessnert. \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} 
\begin{tabular}{p{227.6pt}} \hline \hline Prepare a meta-review by answering the following questions from the reviewer comments (provided after the questions). \\
1. Based on the reviewer’s comments, what are the core contributions made by this manuscript? \\
2. What are the common strengths of this work, as mentioned by multiple reviewers? \\
3. What are the common weaknesses of this work, as highlighted by multiple reviewers? \\
4. What suggestions would you provide for improving this paper? \\
5. What are the missing references mentioned by the individual reviews? \\
**The review texts are below:**\textlessnert three comments \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), \(R_{3}\) from the reviewers\textgreater{} \\
**Meta-review:**\textlessnert meta-review\textgreater{} \\ \(\sim\)Demonstrations\textgreater{} \\ Provide justification for your response in detail by explaining why you made the choices you actually made. A good output should be coherent, highlight major strengths/issues mentioned by multiple reviewers, be less than 400 words in length, and finally, the response should be in English only. \\
**The review texts are below:**\textlessnert three comments \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), \(R_{3}\) from the reviewers\textgreater{} \\
**Meta-review:**\textlessnert meta-review\textgreater{} \\ \(\sim\)Demonstrations\textgreater{} \\ Provide justification for your response in detail by explaining why you made the choices you actually made. A good output should be coherent, highlight major strengths/issues mentioned by multiple reviewers, be less than 400 words in length, and finally, the response should be in English only. \\
**The review texts are below:**\textlessnert three comments \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), \(R_{3}\) from the reviewers\textgreater{} \\
**Meta-review:**\textlessnert meta-review\textgreater{} \\ \(\sim\) \\ Provide justification for your response in detail by explaining why you made the choices you actually made. A good output should be coherent, highlight major strengths/issues mentioned by multiple reviewers, be less than 400 words in length, and finally, the response should be in English only. \\
**The review texts are below:**\textlessnert three comments \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), \(R_{3}\) from the reviewers\textgreater{} \\
**Meta-review:**\textlessnert meta-review\textgreater{} \\ \(\sim\) \\ \hline \hline CREATE TABLE Hightschooler (ID int primary key, name text, grade int ). /* \\
3 example rows: SELECT * FROM Highschooler LIMIT 3; ID name grade 1234 Janie 8 5678 Mary 8 9012 Mike 9 \\
*/ \\ Using valid SQLite, answer the following questions for the tables provided above. \\
**Question:** What is Kyle’s id? \\ SQL: SELECT ID FROM Highschooler WHERE name=“Kyle”; \\ \(\sim\)Demonstrations\textgreater{} \\
**Question:**\textlessnert question\textgreater{} \\ SQL: \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} TABLE XIII: Example instructions collected from [454, 463]. The blue text denotes the task description, the red text denotes the contextual information, the green text denotes the demonstrations, and the gold text denotes the prompt style.