We choose the models in Table 7 by choosing the 'canonical' best versions (that is, the best instruction-tuned or otherwise adapted models released by the same organisation) of the base models we compare against in Table 6. We additionally compare to Tulu 2 to show the current best models trained using the Tulu mix used to finetune OLMo. We display evaluations on MMLU, AlpacaEval, ToxiGen, and Truthfulness to focus on displaying how instruction tuning can generally help capabilities (MMLU), how the models perform in an open-ended chat setting (AlpacaEval), and to test how instruction tuning aids in model safety and truthfulness (AlpacaEval, ToxiGen). We additionally report OLMo's performance over the entire Tulu evaluation suite in Table 10.