Evidence coverage and reasoning-claim relationshipTo investigate the quality of evidence provided by annotators, we analyze the coverage of evidence with respect to the annotators' reasoning. In addition, we also analyze the relationship between the claim and the annotators' reasoning. Results are summarized in Table 16. 51.6% of the time, annotators provide some evidence to justify every component of their reasoning (i.e., _complete coverage_). In 56% of _partial coverage_ (i.e., some part of the reasoning does not have corresponding evidence) cases and all cases of _N/A coverage_ (i.e., no evidence is provided at all), the missing evidence is due to the annotator's inability to find any relevant information that either supports or refutes the claim.