We investigate the performance of different base model with varying parameter sizes after fine-tuned on our CQIA-Subset. Notably, Yi-6B surpasses \(\mathtt{Qwen}\)-14B and InternLM-20B, which have at least twice its parameter size. Further, Yi-34B achieved comparable results to \(\mathtt{Qwen}\)-72B in both C-Eval and CMMLU benchmarks. This observervation underscores the balance between model size, architectural optimizations, and training methodologies. While the scaling law might suggest that larger models inherently perform better due to their increased language understanding capacity, our results indicate that this is not always the case.