**What other errors, beyond faithfulness, do LLM summarizers make? (SS5)** By coding all of the summary-level free-form comments in Tables, we find that annotators frequently point out _omissions_ of critical information. We develop the first taxonomy of omission errors in book-length summarization and observe that key events, details, and themes are frequently omitted by all LLMs. We also observe other content selection errors: for example, even our strongest summarizers, Claude-3-Opus and GPT-4-Turbo, over-emphasize content towards the end of books to the detriment of the beginning.