To complement the performance result using LLM-based automatic evaluator, we also evaluate LLMs tuned with the top methods presented in Section 5.4 on standard NLP benchmarks, MMLU Hendrycks et al. (2020) and BBH Suzgun et al. (2022). We follow the same settings introduced in Wang et al. (2023) without demonstrations or CoT Wei et al. (2022) prompt for evaluating the target models based on LLaMA-7B. For our method, we follow the same setting as in Evol-Instruction benchmark evaluation. We present the evaluation results in Table 4 and use the performance of vanilla LLaMA-7B as a reference. We observe the same performance ranking of all methods as that in Table 1 where we use LLM-based automatic evaluator.