The experimental results are presented in Table 1. We observed the following: (1) **chat vector enables the model to follow instruction:** as shown in table 1, \(\text{llama2}\rightarrow\text{CP}+\text{chat}\) vector have comparable result with \(\text{llama2}\rightarrow\text{CP}\rightarrow\text{FT}\) in both \(\text{Trandtional}\) Chinese LLaMA and Chinese LLaMA. This states the chat vector contains information about the instruction following, which the model can use to guide its output. (2) **FT and chat vector have a complementary effect:** FT and adding a chat vector together gives better performance than doing either one alone. (3) \(\text{llama2-chat}\rightarrow\text{CP}+\text{FT}\)** makes the chat ability lost:** although it outperform than the \(\text{llama2}\rightarrow\text{CP}\rightarrow\text{FT}\), it is worse than the \(\text{llama2}\) CP \(+\text{chat}\) vector or \(\text{llama2}\rightarrow\text{CP}\rightarrow\text{FT}+\text{chat}\) vector. This indicates that \(\text{llama2-chat}\rightarrow\text{CP}+\text{FT}\) will cause information loss, and also shows the importance of using the chat vector. To conclude, the chat vector augments model capabilities in following instructions, independent of the CP model's native language. Furthermore, introducing the chat vector subsequent to fine-tuning elevates generation prowess.