We adopt the automatic evaluation framework based on GPT-4 proposed by Vicuna [22] to assess the performance of chatbot models. We follow the same GPT-4 hyper-parameters, prompt setting and evaluation approach as Vicuna. To mitigate order bias, we alternate the placement of _WizardLM_ and other models in pairwise comparisons: _WizardLM_ is the first for odd ids and second for even ids. As shown in the Figure 4(a) and 4(b), _WizardLM_ outperforms Alpaca-7B and Vicuna-7B on _Evol-Instruct_ testset by a large margin (i.e., 6.2% and 5.8% for Alpaca-7B and Vicuna-7B, respectively), and achieves comparable performance with Vicuna-7B on Vicuna testset.