We present the primary results for en\(\rightarrow\)xx and xx\(\rightarrow\)en in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Our emphasis is primarily on reference-free evaluation models, due to our analysis in Section 2, which questions the reliability of gold references and highlights that evaluations can be compromised by poor-quality references (Kocmi et al., 2023; Freitag et al., 2023). These models include KIWI-XXL, XCOMET, and a smaller yet popular model, Unbabel/wmt22-cometkiwi-da (hereinafter referred to as **KIWI-22**). Scores highlighted in **bold** represent the highest achieved across all systems. For a comprehensive comparison, we also include reference-based evaluations using sacreBLEU (Post, 2018) and COMET-22 (Unbabel/wmt22-comet-da) (Rei et al., 2022) in Appendix A.