Decomposing summaries into claims:Following prior works on evaluating long-form summary faithfulness (Krishna et al., 2023; Min et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2024), we decompose our summaries into _atomic claims_ to enable fine-grained annotation. We prompt an LLM (GPT-4) with two primary instructions: (1) each atomic claim must be fully understandable on its own without requiring additional context from the summary (e.g., resolved pronouns), and (2) whenever possible, each claim should be situated within its relevant temporal, locational, and causal context. Human validation by the authors of a random sample of 100 extracted claims demonstrated 100% precision (i.e., each claim can be traced to the summary without any extra or incorrect information). See Figure 2 for example of summary and its extracted claims; see SB for exact prompt.