\(\bullet\)_Safety and alignment._ Safety and alignment has been widely discussed in LLMs, which aim to regulate the behaviors of models by technical approaches [66]. This topic is also important to MLLMs. Even a highly advanced MLLM (_e.g.,_ GPT-4V [133]) can be susceptible to safety issues. For example, GPT-4V might occasionally exhibit factual inaccuracies and baseless inferences about images. In some cases, it may even generate harmful content targeting specific individuals or groups [133]. Furthermore, open-sourced MLLMs are also prone to generate hallucinated response [844] and can be easily manipulated to produce harmful content [858]. To address the aforementioned issues, some studies collect specialized visual instructions to mitigate the problem of hallucination [834]. Another alternative approach is to train a revision model to rectify hallucinated response generated by MLLMs in a post-hoc way [859]. Additionally, aligning MLLMs with RLHF can also assist MLLMs in generating responses with improved factuality [860]. Despite these efforts, existing alignment techniques for MLLMs mainly concentrate on several specific aspects (_e.g.,_ hallucination), lacking a comprehensive consideration of alignment criteria. More efforts should be made to promote the research of safety and alignment for MLLMs.