frequency in each corpus of the entities that serve as the ground truths, e.g., those entities appear more in corpus \(D_{0}\) than in \(D_{1}\). In order to get rid of the influence of frequency of entities when analyzing the source of the EM gap, we find overlapping _Person_ type answers from UL and NL, and analyze only the 67 probing sentences for both datasets each paired to one of these entities. As shown in Figure (b)b, the EM on UL is still much higher than that of NL. Manually analyzing these instances, we find that the probing sentences for NL ask for relatively more _fine-grained_ knowledge compared to UL, since the instances of UL by definition are overlapped close sentences with different answers in the corpus \(D_{0}\) and \(D_{1}\), that naturally make them be _coarse-grained_. For instance, the probing sentences for entity "Tim Walz" in UL and NL are " \(\xrightarrow{\ }\) is the governor of Minnesota this year." and " \(\xrightarrow{\ }\) is the governor of Minnesota calling for the evacuation of St. Paul.", respectively. We thus conjecture that the main causation of the EM gap to be UL consisting of instances requiring _coarse-grained_ knowledge, which is likely to have appeared more during in \(D_{1}\), while NL consisting of instances requiring _fine-grained_ knowledge, which is expected to likely have appeared less in \(D_{1}\).