The residuals for our estimated scaling law are tightly concentrated around 0, indicating a substantially better fit. We find that 98% of our Huber loss values are smaller than the median loss value of Hoffmann et al, and that our model obtains lower losses for 90% of all observations. A likelihood ratio test enables us to confidently reject the hypothesis that Hoffman et al.'s estimate performs as well as our fit (\(p<10^{-135}\), see Appendix A.3). In other words, if our data reconstruction is correct, the Hoffmann et al. estimated scaling law fails to fit the data.