However, it is notable that the overall performance of the model when answering questions with retrieved context, as observed in Table 3 (approximately 33%), is relatively low. To further explore this observation, we conduct an additional experiment: evaluating Adapt-LLM (both versions trained on NQ and SQuAD) on the NQ and SQuAD development splits, comparing performance when using the gold passages of the dataset and the context retrieved by our IR system, Contriever [11]. Unfortunately, PopQA does not provide the gold passages, so direct evaluation there was not possible.