2011/06/29/#kubuntu-devel.txt

[00:02] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/svgpart] Rohan Garg * 3 * debian/changelog More changelog fixes
[00:06] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/svgpart] Rohan Garg * 4 * debian/control Add libsvgpart to libsvgpart-dbg depends
[00:07] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/gwenview] Rohan Garg * 2 * debian/control Make gwenview suggest libsvgpart
[00:11] <yofel> Might be worth to make svgpart enhance gwenview, not sure if that would make any difference in this case
[00:11] <shadeslayer> i'll look at the policy manual
[00:12] <shadeslayer> yeah sounds ok
[00:15] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/svgpart] Rohan Garg * 5 * debian/control Make svgpart 'Enhance' gwenview
[00:17] <shadeslayer> ok i'm taking a bit of a break now, have to do some GSoC stuff :)
[00:17] <shadeslayer> will be back in a couple of hours
[00:18] <yofel> gah, ouch, libkdeedu has a lgpl-2.1/gpl-3 file too
[00:18] <yofel> or rather, why does nokia like things complicated? http://paste.kde.org/89347/
[00:18] <shadeslayer> darn i have a typo in svgpart
[00:19] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/svgpart] Rohan Garg * 6 * debian/control Fix typo
[00:22] <yofel> I totally don't get what I'm required to add to meed that license requirements. LGPL + exception, GPL, both?
[00:23] <yofel> *meet
[00:23] <yofel> apachelogger: ^ ?
[00:24] <yofel> that's libkdeedu/qtmmlwidget/qtmmlwidget.* btw.
[00:25] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/gwenview] Rohan Garg * 3 * debian/control Set Section as graphics
[00:26] <apachelogger> do not compute
[00:26] <shadeslayer> for some reason lintian doesn't complain about the section being uknown in the Source: part of the control file
[00:26] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: hmm?
[00:26] <apachelogger> yofel: both, if ther eis gpl involved
[00:26] <apachelogger> also I am drunk
[00:26] <yofel> apachelogger: here's the license text http://paste.kde.org/89347/
[00:27] <apachelogger> if you were finished with 4.7 I'd just upload it neverminiding the stupid licenses
[00:27] <apachelogger> also if we got ScottK drunk he would let em in :P
[00:27] <apachelogger> yofel: tldr;
[00:27] <shadeslayer> ^^
[00:27] <yofel> ..
[00:27] <yofel> well, can wait till tomorrow
[00:28] <yofel> this is a mess -.-
[00:38] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: does cmake take relative paths? like set( foo_SRCS ../me.cpp) ?
[00:59] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/smokegen] Philip Muškovac * 3 * debian/ (changelog patches/series) disable smokegen_load_system_defines.diff to fix smokekde build failure
[00:59] <yofel> this breaks apart just looking at it
[01:10] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/smokekde] Philip Muškovac * 2 * debian/ (changelog control libsmokekate3.install) add libsmokekate3 package and enable libsmokeakonadi3 again
[01:12] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/smokegen] Philip Muškovac * 4 * debian/control fix Vcs links
[01:15] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/smokeqt] Philip Muškovac * 2 * debian/control fix Vcs links
[01:16] <yofel> good night
[01:16] <shadeslayer> night yofel
[04:44] <ScottK> apachelogger: It's Riddell you want for that.
[08:41] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: .. is a kaput way of writing your cmake stuff
[08:42] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: best to use cmake vars?
[08:43] <shadeslayer> is it just me or does dolphin only pretend to be done copying files
[08:44] <Tm_T> shadeslayer: hmmm, there's no disk sync done yet?
[08:44] <shadeslayer> dunno, don't see it in KDE Trunk anyways
[08:45] <Tm_T> well, open konsole and run "sync"
[08:45] <shadeslayer> well thats the manual method
[08:45] <Tm_T> indeed it is
[08:45] <shadeslayer> which i've been doing for the past 2-3 months
[08:46] <bambee> morning
=== hunger_ is now known as hunger
[08:48] <shadeslayer> morning bambee
[08:48] <bambee> shadeslayer: yo! ;)
[10:16] <yofel> o/
[10:16] <yofel> bah, I made smokdekde depend on kate forgetting that's not done
[10:16]  * yofel wonders how that built in pbuilder
[10:17] <shadeslayer> iirc i uploaded kate
[10:17] <yofel> shadeslayer: any ETA on that?
[10:17] <shadeslayer> lemme look
[10:17] <yofel> ah
[10:17] <shadeslayer> maybe i simply forgot to upload it
[10:17] <shadeslayer> because of licensing issues
[10:17] <yofel> *sigh*, a 56k mobile connection *is* horrible :(
[10:17] <shadeslayer> yofel: welcome to my world :>
[10:18] <shadeslayer> uh
[10:18] <shadeslayer> yofel: kate	 4.6.90-0ubuntu1~ppa2	Rohan Garg (2011-06-26)
[10:18] <shadeslayer> its there
[10:20] <yofel> uh... k
[10:26] <yofel> shadeslayer: smokekde failure:  kate-dev : Depends: kate (= 4:4.6.3-1ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed
[10:26] <yofel> did you drop the -dev package?
[10:27] <shadeslayer> nope
[10:27] <shadeslayer> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kate/view/head:/debian/kate-dev.install <<
[10:30] <yofel> wtf then...
[10:30] <yofel> even LP shows that kate-dev was built
[10:31] <yofel> shadeslayer: on another note: why is -dev arch any?
[10:32] <yofel> or are there non-link .so's in there
[10:33] <shadeslayer> non-link so's ?
[10:38] <yofel> well, any so's that aren't versioned so you have actual binaries in -dev
[10:38] <yofel> smoke-dev-tools has such a case for example
[10:38] <shadeslayer> there are un versioned so's in there
[10:39] <yofel> k
[10:39] <shadeslayer> i should probably fix those VCS links too
[10:41] <yofel> hm, kate-dev might be built it seems, but it's not published
[10:41] <shadeslayer> whaaaattttt
[10:41] <shadeslayer> it hasn't been published for 3 days? :O
[10:41] <yofel> well, I get the same failure in my servers pbuilder just now
[10:41] <yofel> and apt-cache policy kate-dev doesn't list 4.6.90
[10:42] <yofel> er now
[10:42] <yofel> er no
[10:42] <yofel> shadeslayer: may I hit you
[10:42] <yofel> and remind you that 4.6.90 << 4:4.6.3 ?
[10:42] <shadeslayer> ffffffuuuuuuu
[10:42] <shadeslayer> darn epoch
[10:42] <yofel> :P
[10:42] <shadeslayer> fixing
[10:43] <shadeslayer> i think i made that mistake 2-3 times in the first few packages, but noticed them when i was about to upload them
[10:43] <shadeslayer> this one slipped through
[10:43] <yofel> well, problem found, so nvm ^^
[10:44]  * shadeslayer fixes
[10:45] <yofel> this dep graph is becoming a mess
[10:45] <yofel> what's there besides graphviz? I can't say I like dia
[10:45] <shadeslayer> inkscape? :P
[10:45] <yofel> too complicated :P
[10:46] <shadeslayer> not really, but for such a huge dep graph, it might become complicated and too difficult to maintain
[10:59]  * yofel tries dia again
[11:05] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kate] Rohan Garg * 5 * debian/ (changelog control) Fix epoch's
[11:06] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdelibs] Philip Muškovac * 360 * debian/ (changelog control) Fix Vcs lines
[11:09] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/gwenview] Rohan Garg * 4 * debian/ (changelog control) Fix Epoch's
[11:14] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdepimlibs] Philip Muškovac * 129 * debian/ (changelog control) Fix Vcs lines
[11:15] <shadeslayer> yofel: fixed kate in ppa
[11:16] <yofel> :)
[11:16] <shadeslayer> thanks for noticing that
[11:17] <yofel> took me a while, since I didn't expect to find 4.6.90 at the BOTTOM of the policy list ^^
[11:18] <shadeslayer> yeah, my stupid mistake
[11:18] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/libkipi] Rohan Garg * 2 * debian/control Fix Vcs entries
[11:20] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kruler] Rohan Garg * 5 * debian/control Fix Vcs entries
[11:22]  * shadeslayer takes up kdegames
[11:39] <shadeslayer> !find kajongg
[11:39] <ubottu> Found: kajongg
[11:45] <shadeslayer> debfx: around?
[11:45] <shadeslayer> debfx: is kajongg still built if we don't set python-kde4/sqllite/some other deps in the build deps
[11:47] <shadeslayer> looks like a runtime dep to me
[11:48] <debfx> shadeslayer: we don't have those in kdegames build-deps
[11:49] <debfx> -DINSTALL_KAJONGG:BOOL=TRUE overrides the useless runtime dependency checks
[11:50] <shadeslayer> right
[12:16] <debfx> uh at some point I need to learn how to sponsor udd merge requests :/
[13:25] <ScottK> debfx: That or tell people to do it the normal way if they want to get sponsored by you.
[14:21] <bambee> normally dh_strip should move all debugging symbols into kde-userconfig-dbg with this debian/rules http://paste.kde.org/89605/ ?
[14:21] <bambee> (kcm-userconfig-dbg is present into debian/control)
[14:21] <bambee> the result is: an empty kcm-userconfig-dbg
[14:21] <bambee> (the package is built but nothing is installed except a changelog.gz and a copyright)
[14:22] <bambee> the plugin is built with debugging cflags... so what's wrong?
[14:22] <yofel> I *think* $(overridden_command) is dhmk specific. Replace it with dh_strip
[14:22] <bambee> mhhh...
[14:22] <bambee> I try
[14:25] <bambee> yofel: same thing ^^
[14:25] <yofel> give me the build log
[14:27] <bambee> yofel: http://paste.ubuntu.com/635025/
[14:28]  * yofel remembers when Quintasan was fighting with project-neon-qt to get debugging symbols out of it ^^
[14:28] <yofel> man, that was like a year ago...
[14:28] <bambee> ohh:
[14:28] <bambee> W: kcm-userconfig-dbg: empty-binary-package W: kcm-userconfig: empty-binary-package
[14:28] <bambee> ^^
[14:29] <bambee> aah
[14:30] <bambee> found
[14:30] <yofel> ah yeah, that would be a good reason ^^
[14:42] <debfx> ScottK: I don't want to discourage contributors by such formalities
[14:42] <ScottK> OK.  Your call.
=== Riddell_ is now known as Riddell
[15:01] <Riddell> ScottK: Mark was asking me if the kde-unity seed had made any progress, can I assume it hasn't?
[15:01] <ScottK> Riddell: No.  We're completely jammed up on getting the KDE 4.7 package splits and oversized CDs.
[15:04] <Riddell> agateau: would you be interested in doing that since unity-qt is your area?
[15:06] <ScottK> Doing what?
[15:13] <debfx> bug #800857 is what made our cd images explode (again)
[15:13] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 800857 in firefox (Ubuntu Oneiric) "language packs pull in Firefox on upgrade" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/800857
[15:13] <debfx> ScottK: could you bring that up in the release meeting if it's not fixed by then?
[15:15] <ScottK> debfx: Sure.  Please let me know on Friday.
[15:17] <debfx> ok
[15:35] <CIA-52> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/libkdcraw] Philip Muškovac * 1 * (14 files in 3 dirs) New upstrem release candidate
=== tazz_ is now known as tazz
[17:13] <agateau> Riddell: not much interested actually... quite busy already
[19:51] <ryanakca> Is http://people.canonical.com/~jriddell/wiki/baseg.jpg the finalised mockup of the wiki?
[20:01] <yofel> should be, sheytan would know best since he created it. Riddell_ ^
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== tazz_ is now known as tazz
[22:14] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: poke poke
[22:34] <shadeslayer> i think grantier was dropped from kdegames
[22:35] <shadeslayer> *granatier
[22:35] <shadeslayer> ah ... nope, nvm
[22:44] <Riddell_> ryanakca: yes
[22:45] <Riddell_> feel free to change the links in the black bar and other bits to make it sensible