File size: 10,603 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 |
=== orated_ is now known as orated === doko_ is now known as doko [09:12] <torpor> i am trying to get my beagleboard booting after a year of coma. anyone know if the latest ubuntu arm (12.04) runs on the beagle at the moment? its a b5 rev .. [09:17] <ogra_> torpor, it should, there might be some issues (sound not working out of the box for example) but generally it should just work [09:18] <ogra_> though i would recommend using the server image and picking a lighter desktop at install time ... [09:25] <torpor> interesting idea ogra_ thanks for the hint. wouldn't have thought to use the server image. [09:47] <orated> Hi ogra_! On your suggestion, I used Ubuntu 12.04 server image on BeagleBoard XM and from command line installed lubuntu-desktop package. But it didn't give gui after boot, it used to always revert back to tty1 with tty7 blank. What else is required to be installed other than lubuntu-desktop package? [09:59] <torpor> Error: Bad compare! failed [09:59] <torpor> ah crap [10:47] <hrw> linux-libc-headers-dev_3.6.0-r0_aarch64.ipk done [10:47] <hrw> easy parts were done, time for hard ones [10:47] <ogra_> orated, how about an X server ? :) [10:50] <orated> ogra_: Yes, I checked for it. I inputted startx command and it was missing so installed xserver, xinit and other related packages.Even then there were errors. I don't remember the exact errors but it was always reverting to tty1 [10:51] <ogra_> orated, you also want the fbdev xserver [10:52] <orated> fddev xserver [10:52] <orated> fbdev* [10:53] <orated> No, I didn't know that and it wasn't tried [10:53] <ogra_> what exactly did you install ? [10:53] <ogra_> (should have been apt-get install xorg) [10:53] <orated> One moment, I'll pull that exact command [10:53] <ogra_> xorg is the metapackage that pulls in everything needed [10:57] <orated> ogra_: sudo apt-get install lubuntu-desktop xserver-xorg-video-omap3 [10:57] <orated> And, then xinit package was attempted [11:19] <orated> ogra_: ? [11:19] <ogra_> ? [11:20] <orated> Um, well. I installed those packages and still it wasn't giving display :) So, is that all the packages required or am I missing anything? [11:21] <ogra_> you did what i sadi above (apt-get install xorg) ? [11:21] <orated> Uh, what's the difference between xserver-xorg-video-omap3 and xorg then? [11:22] <orated> Ok, wait. So from ubuntu-server install, installing lubuntu-desktop, xorg should be enough to get to the gui? [11:23] <ogra_> try it [11:23] <orated> Thanks [11:24] <orated> I'll that out. I went back to desktop install, will have to shut it down and insert ubuntu-server image [11:24] <orated> try that* === orated_ is now known as orated [13:14] <marvin24> oh boy, http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg193914.html === prpplague^2 is now known as prpplague === mythos_ is now known as mythos === orated_ is now known as orated === orated_ is now known as orated [16:24] <orated> Hello! How can I compile a package, say ffmpeg/OpenCV on x86 for ARM? cross-compilation ... === orated_ is now known as orated [17:01] <ogra_> rsalveti, what happened to the kernel patch for panda ? are we waiting for anything ? [17:02] <rsalveti> plars: were you able to test it as well? [17:03] <rsalveti> ogra_: there's this dpms green screen from time to time, but other than that it seems to be working [17:03] <rsalveti> it's better, but still with a few bugs [17:03] <plars> rsalveti: breifly, it worked fine on my panda, but I was wanting to ask you... [17:03] <ogra_> sure, i dont expect it to be the last upload [17:03] <rsalveti> so unless robclark decides to fix it this week, we can move it forward and push to the archive [17:03] <ogra_> so better get it in asap so we get wider testing [17:03] <plars> rsalveti: you said you had issues after the screen blanked? I let it blank a few times with no ill effect [17:03] <plars> it's certainly an improvement over what we had before [17:04] <rsalveti> plars: yeah, can't reproduce it all the time here as well [17:04] * ogra_ hasnt see the weird behavior anymore either [17:04] <rsalveti> cool, will move this up today and send the proposal to ppisati [17:04] <ogra_> great [18:59] <zma> Just set up precise-omap4 image on Pandaboard-ES. I installed glmark2-es2, and it says it's using software rasterizer, and the FPS figures are also very low. Is this a bug? [19:07] <zma> es2_info says: libEGL warning: DRI2: failed to authenticate === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === TRON is now known as TypoNAM === orated_ is now known as orated [20:14] <GrueMaster> zma: Install the powervr drivers. Sounds like you are still using the default framebuffer driver. [20:59] <zma> GrueMaster: After installing pvr-omap4, es2_info shows: PVR:(Error): PVRSRVBridgeCall: Failed to access device. Something in pvr_bridge_u.c:250 [21:00] <rsalveti> zma: precise or quantal? [21:00] <zma> rsalveti: precise [21:01] <rsalveti> I think for precise one kernel config changed, which broke the module support [21:01] <rsalveti> let me find the bug covering this issue [21:02] <rsalveti> actually the bug I have is related with quantal, an old one [21:03] <rsalveti> zma: what is the dkms build output once you installed the pvr-omap4 package? [21:03] <rsalveti> check with lsmod if you have the omapdrm_pvr module available [21:05] <zma> rsalveti: no omapdrm_pvr listed. I had a restart after installing pvr-omap4 package, don't have install log available anymore. [21:06] <rsalveti> zma: you can find the dkms log at /var/lib/dkms, look for a file named make.log [21:08] <zma> rsalveti: I search recursively /var/lib/dkms, no any *log files there [21:10] <zma> rsalveti: I take it as installing pvr-omap4 package should have created kernel module, which it didn't for some reason. Is this correct? [21:10] <rsalveti> zma: hm, mind reinstalling/reconfiguring the pvr-omap4 package to see if it'll try to build the module again? [21:10] <rsalveti> yup [21:15] <zma> rsalveti: http://pastebin.com/K7v07FMY [21:16] <infinity> zma: You don't have headers installed for your kernel, it would seem. [21:17] <infinity> zma: apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r) linux-headers-omap4 && dpkg-reconfigure pvr-omap4 [21:17] <zma> infinity: good point, I didn't even think about it. That's probably necessary when building kernel modules. [21:18] <infinity> zma: Of course, you have headers for a newer kernel installed (-1418), perhaps upgrading your kernel wouldn't be an awful idea. :P [21:18] <rsalveti> yup, missing headers [21:19] <zma> infinity: The first thing I did was apt-get update apt-get upgrade. Only after that I started to experiment if and how opengl is supproted. [21:19] <infinity> zma: s/upgrade/dist-upgrade/ ? [21:19] <infinity> zma: upgrade won't pull in new packages (which new kernels are) [21:19] <infinity> zma: Note the "10 not upgraded" that apt is whining about. [21:20] <GrueMaster> It won't? When did that change? [21:20] <infinity> GrueMaster: It never has. [21:20] <infinity> GrueMaster: upgrade won't change the set of installed packages, ever. Only dist-upgrade will. [21:20] <infinity> GrueMaster: On desktops, we work around this by allowing update-manager to be sort of a "half-dist-upgrade" that can add new packages, but never remove. [21:21] <GrueMaster> Odd. When I was doing the QA testing, I would use upgrade to get the latest packages without removing due to pool skew. [21:22] <infinity> I assure you that it never installed anything that wasn't already installed. [21:22] <infinity> Just upgraded. [21:22] <rsalveti> bug 1033091 [21:22] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1033091 in pvr-omap4 "pvr-omap4 1.7.10.0.1.21-0ubuntu1: pvr-omap4 kernel module failed to build" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1033091 [21:22] <rsalveti> related with kernel config change [21:23] <rsalveti> /var/lib/dkms/pvr-omap4/1.7.10.0.1.21/build/eurasiacon/binary2_omap4430_linux_release/target/kbuild/services4/srvkm/env/linux/osfunc.c:85:2: エラー: #error "A preemptible Linux kernel is required when using workqueues" [21:23] <rsalveti> fun [21:23] <infinity> rsalveti: That log is trying to build for an omap kernel, not omap4. [21:24] <infinity> DKMS make.log for pvr-omap4-1.7.10.0.1.21 for kernel 3.2.0-24-omap (armv7l) [21:24] <rsalveti> infinity: true, then it's not a bug [21:24] <rsalveti> even better [21:24] <infinity> Though, why the -omap headers are installed is another bug. [21:24] <infinity> zma also appears to have them installed. [21:24] <infinity> dkms is probably pulling them in. [21:25] <rsalveti> the annoying kernel header mess [21:25] <rsalveti> yeah [21:25] <infinity> dkms shouldn't be depending on kernel headers at all, IMO. [21:25] <rsalveti> +1 [21:25] <infinity> It's never going to be correct. [21:25] <infinity> server/generic/virtual on x86 had the same issue for years. [21:25] <rsalveti> and now we also got many other different kernels available [21:25] <infinity> The solution being to just get rid of server and virtual. :P [21:26] <infinity> But that's not helpful for arm, yet. [21:26] <infinity> But, this case seems to be the same case as zma's, in both senses. One, the -omap headers are installed (which can cause weirdness), but two, the user has upgraded -omap4 headers, but an old -omap4 kernel. [21:26] <infinity> Not much we can do about that situation except to educate. [21:27] <infinity> Well, Andy and I have some plans to make kernels suggest their correctly-versioned headers, so that autoremove won't remove headers for kernels you still have installed. [21:27] <infinity> But can't land that until I land the kernel autoremoval magic. [21:27] <infinity> Or people will end up with 23 sets of headers installed to match their 23 non-purged kernels. [21:27] <infinity> Which would be pretty unpleasant. [21:27] <rsalveti> hahaha, yeah [21:31] <zma> Still no pvr module reported by lsmod. Should I manually insmod it? I updated: http://pastebin.com/K7v07FMY [21:33] <infinity> Sure looks like it built omapdrm_pvr this time. [21:34] <infinity> lsmod won't show it, since it's not inserted, but modinfo should list it now. [21:34] <infinity> And yeah, you could either manually restart X or reboot. [21:36] <zma> Just wondering, should those kernel headers be dependency to pvr-omap4 package? [21:36] <infinity> You already have the right headers metapackage installed. [21:37] <infinity> The problem is that your headers have been upgraded (to -1418-), but you're still on the old (-1412-) kernel. [21:37] <infinity> So, not much pv-omap4 can do in that situation. [21:39] <zma> thanks guys, now it works, glmark2-es2 runs fine! [21:40] <rsalveti> cool |