File size: 2,051 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[11:34] <Cas> Hi, I just noticed that the main page for our project is saying that the latest version is 1.3.9 yet 1.3.11 is available and it is listed in history https://launchpad.net/deluge
[11:35] <cjwatson> That means the latest version that was actually uploaded to LP directly
[11:35] <Cas> except that in all downloads 1.3.11 is there
[11:36] <cjwatson> hm, right, one moment
[11:39] <cjwatson> Cas: if you hover over the date under "Released:" on https://launchpad.net/deluge/1.3/1.3.9 and https://launchpad.net/deluge/1.3/1.3.11, it shows 1.3.9 as being released five seconds after 1.3.11
[11:39] <Cas> lol
[11:40] <cjwatson> Cas: you should be able to edit the released times though, to avoid that
[11:40] <cjwatson> and hopefully model reality a bit more closely
[11:42] <Cas> I can't see where to edit release date
[11:42] <Cas> it suggests a launchpad bug fetching files from our ftp
[11:42] <Cas> it was working fine up until july 2014
[11:43] <wgrant> Cas: There's an edit icon next to the release date, if you have privileges.
[11:44] <wgrant> There was a bug with the release finder for a few months, which probably explains why those were found around the same time.
[11:44] <Cas> not seeing that here and I have full privs for Deluge afaik
[11:46] <Cas> oh wait
[11:46] <Cas> sorry was looking on the wrong page
[11:47] <Cas> would be handy to have edit options on https://launchpad.net/deluge/+milestones
[11:47] <Cas> :)
[11:49] <Cas> Thanks cjwatson, wgrant :D
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer
=== persia_ is now known as persia
=== Spads_ is now known as Spads
=== anthonyf is now known as Guest61698
=== Guest61698 is now known as anthonyjf
[16:26] <zyga> hey, it seems to be impossible to link a bug to a git branch that fixes it, is that accurate or is it just me not knowing how to do that?
[16:27] <cjwatson> there is no such feature in LP today
[16:28] <cjwatson> and may not ever be because git branches are more transient than bzr branches; we may just implement linking directly to a merge proposal instead