File size: 19,738 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 |
[01:22] <menn0> waigani: would you mind looking at: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/2456/ [01:22] <waigani> menn0: sure [01:22] <menn0> waigani: it's a fix for intermittent allenvwatcher test failures that i've noticed [01:22] <menn0> waigani: there's another problem to fix as well but this one issue is happening more often [01:25] <waigani> menn0: shipit [01:36] <menn0> waigani: thanks [01:39] <davecheney> i love the fact that all our upgrade and provisioner tests use "ppc64le" as the "i cannot possibly happen" operating system [01:41] <anastasiamac> davecheney: isn't it easier to support impossible operating systems? :D [02:06] <davecheney> we're basically using quantal-ppc64le as our "nope, cannot happen" sentinal [02:37] <mwhudson> davecheney: good think the ubuntu architecture is called ppc64el then [02:37] <mwhudson> *THING [02:37] <mwhudson> doh can't brain today [02:49] <davecheney> axw_: godeps: cannot get information on "/home/dfc/src/launchpad.net/gwacl": bzr revision-info has unexpected result "244.1.1 [email protected]\n" [02:50] <davecheney> mwhudson: oh god [02:50] <davecheney> don't mention the war [02:50] <davecheney> or the worst joke in the world that continues to keep on giving [03:09] <davecheney> state tests now take 450+ seconds to pass [03:09] <davecheney> % go test ./state/... [03:09] <davecheney> ok github.com/juju/juju/state 438.504s [03:09] <davecheney> golf clap [03:09] <davecheney> FAIL github.com/juju/juju/state/leadership 600.006s [03:09] <davecheney> fucking fantastic [03:12] <mup> Bug #1487947 opened: provider/ec2: localServerSuite.TestNetworkInterfaces <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1487947> [06:46] <mup> Bug #1487947 changed: provider/ec2: localServerSuite.TestNetworkInterfaces <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1487947> [07:16] <dimitern> rogpeppe, hey, have you seen https://code.launchpad.net/~dimitern/godeps/fix-bzr-revision-info-parsing/+merge/268223 ? [07:16] <rogpeppe> dimitern: nope :) [07:16] <rogpeppe> dimitern: only just back from 2 weeks' holiday [07:17] <dimitern> rogpeppe, have a look when you have a moment :) it's just 2 characters change [07:17] <rogpeppe> dimitern: looking [07:17] <dimitern> dooferlad, TheMue, hey guys, it seems net-cli is blessed for merging in master [07:20] <rogpeppe> dimitern: interesting. out of interest, do you actually want to use non mainline revision numbers as dependencies? [07:21] <dimitern> rogpeppe, I suppose not, but at least when there is such a case now godeps refuses to work anymore [07:21] <rogpeppe> dimitern: yeah, i agree it shouldn't fail in that case [07:21] <dimitern> rogpeppe, maybe print a warning when there are dots in the bzr revision and go on? [07:22] <rogpeppe> dimitern: i think i'll just go with your fix actually. if you really want a non mainline revision, you can have one [07:22] <rogpeppe> dimitern: it should be obvious in the .tsv file anyway [07:22] <dimitern> rogpeppe, sounds good [07:26] <rogpeppe> dimitern: reviewed [07:31] <dimitern> rogpeppe, thanks! [07:32] <dimitern> rogpeppe, I think you should manually merge the MP, as there's no bot to pick it up [07:38] <rogpeppe> dimitern: merged (ooo, my bzr-fu is getting rusty!) [07:40] <dimitern> rogpeppe, :) mine too [07:57] <dooferlad> dimitern: great! Lets do it and go drink some beer! [07:57] * dooferlad knows that TheMue would rather drink whisky [07:57] <TheMue> dooferlad: good idea, got time next week monday. wonna meet in London? [07:57] <dimitern> \o/ [07:58] <TheMue> dooferlad: ah, you know me right [08:00] <dooferlad> TheMue: I think you meen tuesday. Well, maybe Monday evening... [08:01] <TheMue> dooferlad: yeah, Monday evening [09:01] <dimitern> dooferlad, voidspace, standup? [09:01] <voidspace> dimitern: trying, it's not letting me in :-/ [09:01] <voidspace> restarting the browser [09:01] <dimitern> voidspace, oh boy :/ monday hangout issues [09:02] <voidspace> dimitern: not having used this machine for six weeks issues too... [09:02] <voidspace> 350mb of updates [09:02] <voidspace> including a new firefox - that maybe the issue [09:02] <voidspace> that looks better [10:03] <voidspace> dimitern: ready [10:03] <dimitern> voidspace, omw [11:33] <dimitern> fwereade, hey, are you around today? [12:49] <TheMue> dimitern: btw, the provider I meant has been the vsphere one. i has a partial implementation of the networking interface [12:53] <dimitern> TheMue, ok, so for vsphere then SupportsSpaces will be false, but the other method will remain [12:53] <TheMue> dimitern: yep, did it that way [12:54] <dimitern> TheMue, +1 [13:11] <redelmann> hi, im having some problem with juju-gui [13:11] <redelmann> machine-0 logs says: error stopping *state.Multiwatcher resource: unit not found [13:12] <redelmann> everytime i load juju-gui on browser [13:12] <redelmann> and no icons appears [13:12] <redelmann> this is a juju bug or gui? [13:18] <redelmann> i open this issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-gui/+bug/1485249 [13:18] <mup> Bug #1485249: Juju gui is not loading. <juju-gui:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1485249> [13:56] <rogpeppe> anyone know about the openstack provider? [13:57] <urulama> dimitern: ^ [13:59] <mup> Bug #1486106 changed: TestNetworkInterfaces fails on vivid/wily <ci> <ec2-provider> <intermittent-failure> <test-failure> <juju-core:Fix Released by dooferlad> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1486106> [13:59] <rogpeppe> in particular at this moment I'm interesting in understanding the different roles of the tenant-name (taken from env var OS_REGION_NAME) and region (no env var) attributes [14:01] <mgz> rogpeppe: you have that mixed up, tenant-name is taken from OS_TENANT_NAME [14:02] <mgz> it's a user-specific grouping of resources [14:02] <rogpeppe> mgz: so they are - not sure how i read that wrong [14:02] <mgz> whereas regions are a cloud-level seperation [14:03] <rogpeppe> mgz: for some reason i'd copied/pasted the wrong env vars and didn't check back to the source [14:03] <rogpeppe> mgz: i did think it was potentially very confusing :) [14:04] <rogpeppe> mgz: one weird thing: why does openstack fall back to using the ec2 passwords? [14:07] <mgz> rogpeppe: there's a semi-compatible ec2 api, so many of the rcs set the same vars for ec2 [14:07] <rogpeppe> mgz: it seems like a potential security leak to me [14:08] <rogpeppe> mgz: and i don't see any other values that do the same thing [14:08] <wwitzel3> fwereade: ping [14:08] <fwereade> wwitzel3, pong [14:09] <wwitzel3> fwereade: katco isn't feeling well, are you able to move up our discussion to now? so she can take off and get some rest [14:09] <fwereade> wwitzel3, sure, let's [14:09] <rogpeppe> mgz: and surely if it was using AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY it ought to use AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID too? [14:09] <wwitzel3> fwereade: we are in moonstone, https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/moonstone?authuser=1 [14:12] <mgz> rogpeppe: the names used are just based on what was looked at in practice by the clients [14:15] <mgz> and there's not really a security issue, the access ley/secret key are not passed along unless you say you're using that authmode [14:15] <rogpeppe> mgz: do you think it might be reasonable to drop support for using AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY and EC2_SECRET_KEYS for the openstack password? [14:15] <mgz> so you need to be pretty deliberate about wanting it [14:16] <rogpeppe> mgz: isn't userpass the default auth mode? [14:17] <rogpeppe> mgz: so ISTM that it'll send that password in the usual case [14:17] <mgz> and it's basically always going over https to somewhere that won't be loging your auth attempts [14:18] <mgz> you'd need to have and endpoint url manually set to something hostile, or dns poisoned [14:18] <rogpeppe> mgz: from the p.o.v. of the user that's not necessarily true - they don't know what's at the other end [14:18] <mgz> and also have accidentally sourced your ec2 creds [14:18] <mgz> I don't think the ec2 provider is robust against that [14:19] <mgz> we don't check that the ec2 endpoint is really amazon [14:19] <rogpeppe> mgz: i think we do, don't we [14:19] <rogpeppe> mgz: 'cos we use https [14:19] <rogpeppe> mgz: without using InsecureSkipVerify [14:19] <rogpeppe> ? [14:19] <mgz> that just verifies it has been signed by something in your chain [14:20] <mgz> it doesn't verify what it is. [14:20] <rogpeppe> mgz: well, same security as any website :) [14:20] <rogpeppe> mgz: and, yes, i'm well aware that https security is a farce [14:21] <mgz> the ec2 signing mechanism is better though, in not passing along the secret [14:21] <rogpeppe> mgz: but we all blithely go on assuming that verisign et al are somewhat reliable [14:22] <rogpeppe> mgz: i mean, fair enough i guess if people actually use AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY for their openstack password, we don't wanna break that [14:22] <rogpeppe> mgz: it just triggers my Something Wrong Here sense. [14:23] <mgz> I think it's likely not really used any more, all the current rc things will at least include both, and generally only the OS_ versions [14:23] <mgz> just whether it's worth futzing with [14:24] <rogpeppe> mgz: i'm moving the env vars into the openstack provider to do the environschema stuff, and it made me wonder... [14:25] <rogpeppe> mgz: i mean, maybe goose.v1/identity should export the env var names [14:29] <mup> Bug #1465404 changed: worker/provisioner: fail lxcBrokerSuite.TestStartInstanceLoopMountsDisallowed <intermittent-failure> <unit-tests> <juju-core:Fix Released by dooferlad> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1465404> [14:29] <mup> Bug #1473209 changed: github.com/juju/juju/service/windows undefined: newConn <ci> <intermittent-failure> <test-failure> <unit-tests> <windows> <juju-core:Fix Released by bteleaga> <juju-core trunk:Fix Released by bteleaga> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1473209> [14:35] <mup> Bug #1465404 opened: worker/provisioner: fail lxcBrokerSuite.TestStartInstanceLoopMountsDisallowed <intermittent-failure> <unit-tests> <juju-core:Fix Released by dooferlad> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1465404> [14:35] <mup> Bug #1473209 opened: github.com/juju/juju/service/windows undefined: newConn <ci> <intermittent-failure> <test-failure> <unit-tests> <windows> <juju-core:Fix Released by bteleaga> <juju-core trunk:Fix Released by bteleaga> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1473209> === redelmann is now known as popi_ === popi_ is now known as redelmann === redelmann is now known as s0plete === s0plete is now known as redelmann [14:39] <dimitern> fwereade, hey [14:40] <dimitern> fwereade, does this look in line with what we discussed? http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/2463/ [14:41] <rogpeppe> mgz: this is what i've got: http://paste.ubuntu.com/12184056/ [14:41] <mup> Bug #1465404 changed: worker/provisioner: fail lxcBrokerSuite.TestStartInstanceLoopMountsDisallowed <intermittent-failure> <unit-tests> <juju-core:Fix Released by dooferlad> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1465404> [14:41] <mup> Bug #1473209 changed: github.com/juju/juju/service/windows undefined: newConn <ci> <intermittent-failure> <test-failure> <unit-tests> <windows> <juju-core:Fix Released by bteleaga> <juju-core trunk:Fix Released by bteleaga> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1473209> [14:41] <rogpeppe> mgz: does that look reasonable to you? [14:42] <rogpeppe> mgz: actually, i should avoid copy/pasting those env vars [14:45] <mgz> rogpeppe: you have EC2_SECRET_KEYS ... with an S [14:46] <rogpeppe> mgz: that's what goose uses [14:46] <mgz> also, not really to do here, but we should add tenant-id already [14:47] <mgz> heh, in which case you probably can just delete it, as it's been wrong for a while then [14:47] <rogpeppe> mgz: :) [14:47] <rogpeppe> mgz: i suspect the same of AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY too [14:47] <mup> Bug # changed: 1458717, 1461393, 1463641, 1467372, 1474788, 1478660, 1484617 [14:47] <rogpeppe> mgz: but i'm actually thinking i don't want to risk breaking anything at all [14:48] <mgz> rogpeppe: no, that one is right, the old naming there was just dumb [14:48] <rogpeppe> mgz: i know it's right - i just think that using an AWS name for openstack creds is silly [14:49] <rogpeppe> mgz: particularly when it doesn't use AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID for one of the user names [14:49] <mgz> it was the only way to use non-password auth on the old hp cloud [14:49] <mgz> as there aren't OS names for the different values [14:51] <rogpeppe> mgz: ah, makes sense [14:59] <rogpeppe> mgz: ok, here's a review for you: https://github.com/go-goose/goose/pull/14 [14:59] <mup> Bug #1459064 changed: worker/leadership: data races in test and code <intermittent-failure> <tech-debt> <unit-tests> <juju-core:Fix Released by dave-cheney> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1459064> [14:59] <dimitern> voidspace, dooferlad, TheMue, please have a look at these last 2 PRs we need to unblock merging net-cli into master: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/2463/ and http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/2464/ [14:59] <mup> Bug #1460893 changed: many unhandled assigned values <tech-debt> <juju-core:Fix Released by dave-cheney> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1460893> [15:01] * dimitern steps out, bbl [15:02] <frobware> hello all - new starter on the Juju Sapphire team today. [15:02] <mgz> rogpeppe: looks fine. as I hinted earlier, there are some bigger bits that could do with fixing in the os auth stuff, but nothing that blocks this change. [15:02] <mgz> frobware: hey there! [15:02] <rogpeppe> mgz: thanks [15:03] <mgz> frobware: another Andrew? [15:03] <frobware> mgz, tis the way... [15:06] <ericsnow> fwereade: we didn't mean to chase you away! :) [15:11] <mup> Bug #1459064 opened: worker/leadership: data races in test and code <intermittent-failure> <tech-debt> <unit-tests> <juju-core:Fix Released by dave-cheney> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1459064> [15:11] <mup> Bug #1460893 opened: many unhandled assigned values <tech-debt> <juju-core:Fix Released by dave-cheney> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1460893> [15:14] <rogpeppe> mgz: could you land my goose branch for me please? i'm not a member of goose collaborators currently [15:17] <mup> Bug #1459064 changed: worker/leadership: data races in test and code <intermittent-failure> <tech-debt> <unit-tests> <juju-core:Fix Released by dave-cheney> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1459064> [15:17] <mup> Bug #1460893 changed: many unhandled assigned values <tech-debt> <juju-core:Fix Released by dave-cheney> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1460893> [15:18] <redelmann> anyone know about juju-gui? [15:18] <redelmann> im trying to debug an issue [15:18] <natefinch> redelmann: probably better to ask in #juju [15:19] <redelmann> thank natefinch [15:19] <voidspace> dooferlad: I see you reviewed the first one, are you looking at the second too? [15:19] <mgz> rogpeppe: erm... can't remember exactly but the bot may actually just still check if you're a juju memeber [15:19] <dooferlad> voidspace: yes [15:19] <mgz> rogpeppe: added the comment anywa [15:19] <rogpeppe> mgz: thanks [15:21] <voidspace> dooferlad: ok, I'll leave it to you :-) [15:21] <voidspace> thanks [15:21] <dooferlad> voidspace: I haven't graduated yet. I suggest you look at the first one first - it seems to have been committed with the second as well. [15:21] <dooferlad> voidspace: then you know which bits to ignore :-) [15:22] <voidspace> ah [15:22] <voidspace> I did think the second had some extraneous stuff in it [15:23] <voidspace> dooferlad: dimitern: first looks good and it tells me which bits of the second I can ignore too [15:24] <voidspace> in which case the second looks trivial [15:24] <voidspace> dooferlad: although I missed the concern you raised, need to read the code agian! [15:24] <voidspace> *again [15:29] <mup> Bug #1488139 opened: juju should add nodes IPs to no-proxy list <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1488139> [15:35] <mup> Bug #1488139 changed: juju should add nodes IPs to no-proxy list <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1488139> [15:48] <mup> Bug #1488139 opened: juju should add nodes IPs to no-proxy list <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1488139> [16:01] <bodie_> is the answer to why godeps is used rather than godep a simple one? [16:01] <alexisb> welcome frobware ! [16:05] <mgz> bodie_: godeps is older than godep [16:07] <bodie_> I see. thanks mgz o/ [16:26] <rogpeppe> mgz and anyone else: fancy a smallish review of a change to the openstack provider code? http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/2465/ [16:27] <dimitern> katco & moonstone: fwereade texted me about an hour ago his power's out and wanted to convey this apologies [16:27] <dimitern> voidspace, dooferlad, thanks for the reviews guys! [16:30] <mgz> rogpeppe: looks fine in general, the descriptions are a bit all over the place though, do you want nitpicks? [16:30] <rogpeppe> mgz: specific suggestions would be great [16:30] <rogpeppe> mgz: i copied the descriptions from the boilerplate [16:31] <rogpeppe> mgz: much appreciated [16:31] <mgz> ah, so they're now it two places? that's a bit unfortunate. [16:31] <rogpeppe> mgz: when i get some extra time, the plan is to generate the boilerplate from the schema [16:31] <mgz> how much will you hit me over the head if I ask you about generating the boilerplate from the schema? [16:32] <mgz> eheh, you win. [16:32] <rogpeppe> :) [16:33] <rogpeppe> mgz: i'm also not liking my decision to go with partial sentences for the descriptions. using go-like full sentences seems like it's a better plan in the end. [16:34] <rogpeppe> mgz: but these things are fairly easy to change [16:38] <mgz> rogpeppe: review'd [16:38] <rogpeppe> mgz: ta v much [16:39] <rogpeppe> mgz: not sure about mentioning that control-bucket will be auto-generated - that's kinda true of every parameter that's optional. [16:41] <mgz> I'm a little antsy on that one as setting it can be actually harmful... but it can also just be required [16:46] <rogpeppe> when would it be required? [16:47] <rogpeppe> mgz: perhaps a comment in the description saying "(do not set this unless you know what you are doing)" might be appropriate [16:47] <mgz> rogpeppe: yeah, but leave it for now, don't need to futz with here. [16:48] <rogpeppe> mgz: k [16:48] <mgz> we need it for ci testing on canonistack, I *think* it's related to being able to cleanup reliably === urulama is now known as urulama__ [16:57] <mup> Bug #1488166 opened: Service with just one unit left which doesn't think it's the leader <landscape> <leadership> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1488166> [17:21] <perrito666> bbl groceries shopping [17:44] <natefinch> ericsnow: getting this error when running featuretests: charm not found in "/home/nate/src/github.com/juju/juju/testcharms/charm-repo": local:quantal/workload-actions [17:46] <ericsnow> natefinch: is it actually there (/home/nate/src/github.com/juju/juju/testcharms/charm-repo/quantal/workload-actions)? [17:47] <ericsnow> natefinch: perhaps still named "proc-actions"? [17:47] <ericsnow> natefinch: (which should be fixed) [17:49] <natefinch> ericsnow: doh, yep [17:49] <natefinch> I blame wwitzel3 [17:49] <ericsnow> natefinch: :) [17:51] <natefinch> ericsnow: I'll submit a PR to rename them [17:51] <ericsnow> natefinch: sounds good [18:19] <wwitzel3> :( [19:28] <natefinch> I think I got whatever katco has. I should remember to wear a mask to hangouts from now on. [20:54] <mup> Bug #1488245 opened: Recurring lxc issue: failed to retrieve the template to clone <canonical-bootstack> <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1488245> === natefinch is now known as natefinch-afk [21:47] <davechen1y> ping http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/2458/ [22:22] <perrito666> davechen1y: ship it, I am happy that that is being worked :) [22:22] <perrito666> there is only a typo in the description [23:10] <davechen1y> perrito666: thanks |