File size: 26,720 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 |
[01:19] <white> asac: i was wondering about CVE-2008-4066 for icedove/iceape. Do we need something like https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=356697 backported? Just wondering, because i couldn't find the original bugnumber (448166) for CVE-2008-4066 (second part of MFSA 2008-43) in the series file [09:05] <asac> white: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=356697 [09:05] <asac> which bug number is that? [09:06] <asac> the patch looks familiar [09:24] <asac> white: ok found the bug number in your line ;) [09:25] <asac> white: yes, thats why stransky has asked for approval1.8.0.next.... e.g. it will be in next patchset unless we hit regressions [09:26] <asac> white: also mozilla bug 316859 (regression) and the original escape patch (so three for this one in total) [09:27] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 316859 in XPCOM "undefined symbol in components/libhtmlpars.so" [Critical,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316859 [09:28] <judu> hi [09:44] <iaindalton> fta: your Ubuntu 8.10 PPA's firefox-3.1 requires libasound2 1.0.18 but Ubuntu 8.10 only has 1.0.17; is this intentional? Should users of your PPA install 1.0.18 manually? === iaindalton is now known as iain|away [10:04] <asac> iain|away: you sure you are using intrepid lines for PPA? [10:05] <asac> if so, then fta probably added libasound2 to his archive ... which makes it hard to not pull it in [12:06] <fta2> iain|away, asac_: i didn't do anything special with libasound2, you may be using the wrong apt line [12:11] <asac_> yeah .... i assume so too [12:16] <ubuntizate> hi, can someone see me (hear me)? [12:16] <ubuntizate> there is someone there? [12:25] <asac_> sigh [12:25] <asac_> those folks that just quit [12:25] <asac_> i answered again for nothing in query [12:34] <asac_> oh PPA's are now signed ;) [12:36] <fta2> yep, i µblogged about that yesterday [12:37] <asac_> hmm ... probably too much traffic in my gwibber backlog ;) ... i didnt see that particular entry of yours [12:40] <fta2> i noticed because the lp guys used me as an example to explain the feature to users. so yesterday, my xchat was blinking like a Christmas tree [12:41] <fta2> asac_, http://identi.ca/fta [12:48] <asac_> nice ;) [13:01] <asac_> sigh sound is gone again [13:03] <asac_> hmm ... now everything is busted ... typing this from console now [13:03] <asac_> radeon ... missing symbol :/ [13:04] * asac_ runs update;upgrade in hope [13:04] <asac_> pulse 0.9.14 coming [13:04] <asac_> yay [13:05] <asac_> could this be what i want? [13:05] <asac_> i doubt this will cure radeon driver though [13:09] <asac_> hah ... X is back ;) [13:57] <hyperair> hi. i'm having issues trying to get a package to link with xulrunner-1.9-dev. it links fine with libxul-dev, but with xulrunner-1.9-dev (linking using flags from mozilla-gtkmozembed-embedding), ld throws a hissy fit about undefined references and whatnot. what should i do to get it to link? [13:57] <asac_> hyperair: yes. [13:57] <asac_> hyperair: if its standalone app use the standalone glue [13:58] <asac_> if its xpcom compnent or plugin use the dependent glue [13:58] <hyperair> asac_: yes i'm using the standalone glue. -lxpcom_glue or something [13:58] <hyperair> it uses gtkmozembed stuff [13:58] <asac_> standalone glue == libxul-embedding(-unstable) [13:58] <hyperair> and all the gtk_moz_embed_* functions are undefined [13:58] <asac_> dependent glue == libxul(-unstable) [13:58] <hyperair> asac_: tried with that, doesn't work eitehr [13:58] <hyperair> libxul-unstable won't link without -R [13:59] <hyperair> libxul-embedding-unstable won't link at all [13:59] <asac_> hyperair: use standalone glue ... you also need some code magic [13:59] <hyperair> asac_: what kind? [13:59] <asac_> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XPCOM_Glue [14:00] <asac_> let me check [14:00] <asac_> hyperair: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XulrunnerGecko [14:00] <asac_> its a bit outdated but should give you the basics [14:00] <asac_> hyperair: and gives example patches on how various other apps had to be fixed [14:01] <asac_> look at the yelp example for instance [14:01] <asac_> if you are using unstable headers use 1.9.0.* as max version (not 1.9.*) [14:02] <hyperair> yeah i'm using the unstable headers [14:02] <hyperair> i mean the package requires headers from unstable/ [14:02] <asac_> thats what i ment yes. [14:02] <asac_> 1.9.0.* is your maxversion then [14:03] <asac_> e.g. for GREVersionRange [14:03] <asac_> (or if yoiu link against 1.9.1 use 1.9.1b1 and 1.9.1.* as bounds [14:03] <hyperair> i see [14:04] <asac_> important is the glue initialization code as well as +#include <gtkmozembed_glue.cpp> [14:04] <asac_> the rest is more or less the same [14:04] <hyperair> where does gtkmozembed_glue.cpp come from? [14:04] <hyperair> it's also in /usr/include? [14:04] <asac_> yes [14:05] <hyperair> i see [14:05] <asac_> thats also in unstable i think .... as all gtkmozembed is unstable ;) [14:05] <hyperair> right [14:05] <hyperair> okay.. [14:05] <hyperair> i'll give it a go [14:05] <asac_> enjoy [14:06] <hyperair> meh. i've spent over 24 hours working on this package. the last thing i'd do is enjoy, lol [14:06] <asac_> heh ... success is in reach ;) [14:06] <asac_> and finally you found where to ask :-P [14:06] <asac_> thats a win [14:06] <hyperair> i sure hope so [14:06] <hyperair> heh yeah [14:07] <hyperair> some guys at #ubuntu-motu guided me [14:07] <hyperair> i found some blog posts by you, so if all else failed, i was going to start emailing and/or pinging you on IRC =p [14:07] <asac_> i know ... its just that you left so i couldnt answer there [14:07] <hyperair> ah i did? [14:08] <asac_> you left -motu channel ... yes :) [14:08] <hyperair> hmm when was that [14:08] <asac_> hyperair: not sure ... some time between you asking and me opening my screen this morning ;) [14:08] <asac_> could be 1 or 6 hours :) [14:08] <hyperair> i was having some connectivity issues. everytime i enter a certain lecture, my wireless goes haywire. almost as if somebody's aireplaying me off the net [14:08] <hyperair> must be during that time [14:09] <asac_> sure... no problem. i didnt complain ;) [14:09] <hyperair> i figured i was throwing up a lot of spurious disconnect/reconnect/nick collision messages, so i quit [14:09] <hyperair> =p [14:09] <asac_> heh. ok [14:09] <asac_> i dont see QUITS/JOINS [14:13] <hyperair> hmm [14:13] <hyperair> must be when i went to sleep then [14:13] <hyperair> but that's over 12 hours ago [14:13] <hyperair> maybe not [14:14] <hyperair> or maybe i was shifting location [14:14] <hyperair> anyway, what's the difference between xpcomglue and xpcomglue_s? [14:24] <asac_> hyperair: the xpcomglue includes the standalone pieces [14:25] <hyperair> asac_: what standalone pieces? [14:26] <asac_> hyperair: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/glue/standalone/ [14:28] <hyperair> what does gtkmozembed startup code look like minus the glue? [14:28] <hyperair> i can't seem to figure out where to put the XPCOMGlue startup stuff [14:29] <asac_> hyperair: do that before you do anything else with xpcom [14:30] <asac_> dont understand your question i guess [14:30] <asac_> hyperair: depends on how its done [14:30] <asac_> look for gtk_moz_embed_push_startup (); [14:30] <hyperair> i can't find it [14:30] <asac_> or gtk_moz_embed_set_comp_path (MOZILLA_HOME); [14:30] <hyperair> which is strange [14:30] <hyperair> also not there [14:30] <asac_> gtk_moz_embed_set_pat [14:31] <asac_> hyperair: maybe your app uses stuff like XRE_* ? [14:31] <asac_> XRE_InitEmbedding or something like that [14:32] <asac_> but that isnt good ... if you use gtk_moz_embed symbols you really should push/pop startup stuff ;) [14:32] <asac_> err [14:32] <hyperair> @_@ [14:33] <asac_> found it? [14:33] <hyperair> okay, a list of functions starting with gtk_moz_embed which are used... can_go_back, can_go_forward, get_js_status, get_link_message, get_location, go_back, go_forawrd, load_url, new, reload, set_chrome_mask, stop_load [14:34] <hyperair> all prefixed with gtk_moz_embed_ [14:34] <hyperair> are any of them relevant? [14:34] <asac_> hyperair: and XRE_ ? [14:34] <hyperair> none [14:34] <asac_> NS_Ini ? [14:35] <asac_> (as a substring) [14:35] <hyperair> NS_InitXPCOM2 (getter_AddRefs (sm), directory, nsnull); [14:35] <hyperair> would that be it? [14:35] <hyperair> no wait [14:35] <hyperair> shit [14:35] <hyperair> that's in gecko.m4 [14:36] <hyperair> how do gnome-panel applets get started? [14:36] <hyperair> i mean this looks like an ELF executable [14:36] <asac_> hyperair: gnome-panel applets get started by gnome-panel ;) [14:37] <hyperair> but i don't see a main() anywhere [14:37] <hyperair> uh gee, i think i know that much. more like what functions are there? [14:37] <asac_> its a bonobo activation thing i guess [14:37] <hyperair> =p [14:37] <hyperair> hmm [14:37] <asac_> hyperair: i think the NS_InitXPCOM thing is a good point to start [14:38] <asac_> and see in which function thats called [14:38] <hyperair> asac_: it's test code inside m4/gecko.m4 [14:39] <hyperair> hmm it seems everything begins from init_libs [14:39] <hyperair> void init_libs (int argc, char *argv[]) [14:40] <hyperair> i guess i'll just toss the xpcom init stuff there and hope it works [14:41] <asac_> hyperair: so you try to fix the testcode now? [14:41] <asac_> hyperair: look at epiphany or yelp gecko.m4 [14:41] <hyperair> eh? [14:41] <hyperair> test code? [14:41] <asac_> that might be a good start [14:41] <hyperair> no the test code doesn't really do much does it [14:41] <asac_> 5:38 < hyperair> asac_: it's test code inside m4/gecko.m4 [14:41] <hyperair> i mean it doesn't fail [14:41] <asac_> hmm [14:41] <asac_> probably doesnt run anthing then [14:42] <asac_> (pure luck) ;) [14:42] <hyperair> so if it clears ./configure, i don;'t really have to bother right =p [14:42] <hyperair> heh [14:42] <hyperair> well [14:42] <hyperair> i patched a few things [14:42] <hyperair> it was complaining about needing gtk2 [14:42] <hyperair> because some default toolkit macro thing was set to cairo-gtk2 [14:42] <asac_> hyperair: well. thts just installing a -dev package ;) [14:42] <hyperair> so i replaced strcmp with strstr [14:42] <asac_> ah [14:42] <asac_> dumb [14:42] <hyperair> yep [14:43] <asac_> hyperair: i would suggest to take a look at latest ephy or yelp gecko.m4 [14:43] <asac_> maybe you can even just copy that over [14:43] <asac_> might need a few adaptions in main configure.in i guess though ... but well [14:43] <hyperair> i'm packaging this thing, so i'd rather not end up with a humongous patch [14:43] <hyperair> =p [14:44] <asac_> hyperair: patch properly, and send upstream [14:44] <hyperair> hmm [14:44] <asac_> i mean sending them a "more" modern gecko.m4 shouldnt be that bad ;) [14:44] <hyperair> heh yeah i guess [14:44] <asac_> i saw many gecko.m4 and they are all a mess ;) [14:44] <hyperair> there hasn't been a release in years [14:44] <hyperair> i wonder if i should even bother continuing to package this =\ [14:44] <asac_> yeah. that means that the gecko.m4 probably comes from 2000 [14:44] <asac_> ;) [14:44] <asac_> or before [14:45] <hyperair> hmm [14:45] <hyperair> 2006 [14:45] <hyperair> probably [14:45] <asac_> how do you know;)? [14:45] <hyperair> http://www.kaskaras.net/vazaar/index.php <-- it says 2007 [14:45] <hyperair> no wait [14:45] <hyperair> 2006 [14:45] <hyperair> =p [14:45] <asac_> gecko.m4 gets copied around [14:45] <asac_> nobody knows where it originates form i think ;) [14:46] <asac_> maybe it was once in the mozilla tree ;) [14:46] <hyperair> heh [14:46] <hyperair> seriously? [14:46] <hyperair> why don't they ship it? [14:46] <hyperair> then aclocal can just add it [14:46] <asac_> nowadays there is pkg-config ;) [14:46] <hyperair> gecko.m4 still uses PKG_CHECK_MODULES [14:47] <asac_> yes. only reason why it exists is to provide backward compatibility i think [14:47] <hyperair> so it seems to be something built on top of pkg-config [14:47] <hyperair> ah damn [14:47] <hyperair> so i should just convince upstream to toss out his gecko.m4? [14:47] <hyperair> =p [14:47] <asac_> hyperair: i think evolution was : gecko.m4 -> manually; then later someone added stuff using pkg-config ... and so on [14:47] <asac_> and folks copied that around on the net [14:47] <hyperair> evolution uses xulrunner? [14:48] <hyperair> i wasn't aware [14:48] <asac_> no ... evolution like "how things became like they are at present" ;) [14:48] <asac_> darwin ;) [14:48] <hyperair> oh [14:48] <hyperair> heh [14:48] <hyperair> then it should be put into aclocal-archive or something [14:49] <asac_> yeah [14:49] <hyperair> i mean if it's so common and being copied around [14:49] <asac_> whatever [14:49] <asac_> its definitly a pain that its floating around [14:49] <hyperair> yeah [14:49] <hyperair> definitely [14:49] <hyperair> but what's more frustrating is why mozilla can't just use proper SONAMEs damnit [14:49] <hyperair> that would make linking so much easier [14:49] <hyperair> rather than using the stupid glue [14:49] <asac_> hyperair: previously nobody really used the glue ;) [14:50] <asac_> which caused the main issue [14:50] <hyperair> feels like an extremely cheap hack gone wrong [14:50] <asac_> now we enforce it. which is better ;) [14:50] <asac_> but painful [14:50] <hyperair> miserable [14:50] <asac_> (like -rpath is not working anymore) [14:50] <hyperair> there are still apps which link on libxul-dev [14:50] <asac_> its more cross-platform [14:50] <hyperair> particularly all the java gecko stuff [14:50] <asac_> so i agree to some degree with them ;) [14:51] <hyperair> i don't see gtk and gtkmm folks messing around with glues [14:51] <hyperair> i mean i don't know how they pull it off on windows, but at least they use proper SONAMEs on POSIX systems [14:53] <asac_> no clue. i think windows solution is to ship your own copy or do some registry rumbling ;) [14:54] <hyperair> fugly shit [14:54] <hyperair> X_X [14:54] <asac_> one thing that one has to accept is that xulrunner is not designed to be a lib, but a runtime ;) [14:54] <asac_> + and sdk [14:54] <asac_> if one looks from that perspective things become saner imo [14:55] <asac_> the fact that there is gtkmozembed is a different story [14:55] <asac_> and its degree of messyness is understood ... which is why there is work on a new, stable abi for embedding [14:55] <hyperair> oh there is? [14:55] <hyperair> awesome [14:55] <asac_> http://hg.mozilla.org/incubator/embedding/ [14:56] <asac_> hyperair: thats supposed to be shipped on top of xulrunner providing the stability required to solve all the issues in the world ;) [14:56] <hyperair> mm cool [14:56] <asac_> probably will take some time [14:57] <asac_> but definitly result of years of complains combined with webkit mania [14:58] <asac_> they even use libtool ;) [14:59] <asac_> so hopefully gtkmozembed will die soonish ;) [15:02] <hyperair> then a lot of programs will have to switch [15:02] <hyperair> and those that are abandoned... will have to be dropped out i suppose [15:05] <asac_> depends. if anyone is interested it will be ported i guess [15:05] <asac_> most apps shouldnt be that hard to port imo [15:28] <hyperair> hmm finished patching. let's see if it builds [15:30] <asac_> hehe [15:30] <asac_> dont give up ;) [15:30] <asac_> you are really close (i have the feeling) [15:32] <hyperair> hmm [15:32] <hyperair> okay, i'm having a whole series of compilation issues [15:32] <hyperair> mostly from gtkmozembed_glue.cpp [15:32] <hyperair> am i supposed to #include it or just compile it together? [15:33] <hyperair> asac_: ^ [15:33] <asac_> hyperair: just include it [15:34] <hyperair> asac_: only in one file or in multiple files? [15:34] <hyperair> i added it on top of all instances of #include <gtkmozembed.h> [15:35] <asac_> hyperair: thats ok [15:36] <asac_> hyperair: whats the problem? [15:36] <hyperair> In file included from blah blah blah /usr/include/xulrunner-bla/unstable/nscore.h:117:1: Warning: NS_HIDDEN redefined [15:36] <hyperair> wait those are warnings [15:37] <hyperair> error expected = , ; asm or __attribute__ before nsISupports [15:38] <hyperair> implicit declaration of GRE_GetGREPathwhatever. [15:38] <hyperair> hmmmmmmm [15:38] <asac_> hyperair: missing an include i guess [15:38] <hyperair> yeah [15:43] <hyperair> asac_: are there any needed includes before including gtkmozembed_glue.cpp? [15:46] <asac_> no. === asac_ is now known as asac [15:46] <asac> include nsXPCOMGlue.h [15:47] <asac> but thats included through glue.cpp implicitly iirc [15:51] <hyperair> aaaaaah i think i know what's wrong now [15:51] <hyperair> this is a C file [15:51] <asac> yeah ;) [15:51] <hyperair> not a C++ file [15:51] <asac> thats a good pit-fall ;) [15:51] <hyperair> meh [15:51] <asac> hyperair: the idea is to rename it [15:51] <hyperair> so can i still #include it? [15:52] <hyperair> uh rename what? [15:52] <hyperair> i mean i can't use C++ code inside a C file right [15:52] <asac> the c file to cpp ;) [15:52] * hyperair gapes [15:52] <hyperair> you can't be serious [15:52] <asac> hyperair: no. but you can use C++ for that individual file usually [15:53] <hyperair> renaming a file in a patch.... makes the patch twice the size of the original patch [15:53] <hyperair> of the original file* [15:53] <asac> you can also add a tiny .cpp file that only does the bootup [15:53] <hyperair> hmm [15:53] <hyperair> good idea [15:53] <asac> e.g. with function startup_standalone_glue [15:53] <asac> or something [15:53] <hyperair> what about the other .c files? [15:53] <asac> hyperair: you only need the _glue.cpp once [15:53] <asac> and only once [15:54] <hyperair> in only one of the files? [15:54] <asac> yes [15:57] <hyperair> i'll have to put extern "C" right? [16:01] <asac> yeah [16:01] <asac> #ifdef __cplusplus [16:01] <asac> extern "C" { [16:01] <asac> #endif /* __cplusplus */ [16:02] <asac> #ifdef __cplusplus [16:02] <asac> } [16:02] <asac> #endif /* __cplusplus */ [16:04] <asturubuntu> Hi, I need help [16:05] <asturubuntu> I'm a member of Ubuntu Asturian Translators, and I need help about Firefox [16:09] <asac> asturubuntu: are you the one whose email i answered a minute ago? [16:09] <asac> Marcos Alvarez ...? [16:10] <asturubuntu> no.... but I know Marcos Alvarez. [16:10] <asturubuntu> he's a member of Ubuntu Asturian Translators too. [16:10] <asac> asturubuntu: ah. i updated the bug and marked it as pet-bug (if its about the same issue) [16:10] <asac> bug 309312 [16:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 309312 in langpack-o-matic "make po2xpi aware of per-release whitelists (Was: Please update asturian translation)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/309312 [16:11] <asac> so will get fixed soon i guess [16:11] <asturubuntu> That's me https://launchpad.net/~malditoastur [16:11] <asturubuntu> and this is Marcos https://launchpad.net/~marcos.alvarez.costales [16:12] <asac> asturubuntu: did you test your translations yet? [16:12] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation [16:13] <asturubuntu> thanks for the link [16:13] <asturubuntu> yes. [16:14] <asac> asturubuntu: you used it already? [16:14] <asturubuntu> We have tested it [16:14] <asac> with those instructions? nice [16:14] <asturubuntu> yes. [16:15] <asturubuntu> Wait a moment (I need to think in english, arf, arf.... I want to say many things but you are more quickly than me... :-$) [16:16] <asturubuntu> Actually, we have Firefox in Asturian language. To do that, we have to place some files into /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.5/chrome [16:16] <asac> asturubuntu: go ahead ... write down what you want to ask and so on ;) [16:16] <asac> i have to make a coffee anyway ;) [16:16] <asac> i will answer your questions if you number them when back ;) [16:17] <asturubuntu> ok [16:17] <asturubuntu> arf, arf... arf.. :P [16:18] <asturubuntu> long time ago, we did the translations in Launchpad. (Firefox and Xulrunner templates) [16:19] <asturubuntu> you can see it here: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+lang/ast [16:20] <asturubuntu> When Intrepid was released, we thought that we can use Firefox in our language. But it was no possible. [16:22] <asturubuntu> Then, Marcos Alvarez, tried doing https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation , we have get a .jar! files. [16:25] <asturubuntu> You can find it here: http://code.google.com/p/softasturubuntutranslations/ If you go to this site, and download the compressed file named intrepid_tornes_ast_Firefox_3.0.x_v.0.2.zip , you can see the files that we must put into /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.5/chrome and /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.5/chrome to get Firefox in Asturian language. [16:26] <asturubuntu> We are happy, but we have to do this routine everytime that Firefox updates [16:26] <asac> asturubuntu: right [16:27] <asturubuntu> The question is: [16:27] <asac> you also have to run the second script ... which is a .xpi [16:27] <asac> that can be installed by all users then [16:27] <asac> asturubuntu: see point 6. of the instructions [16:27] <asac> that produces a .xpi [16:29] <asturubuntu> I don't know how to do that. (I need to talk with Marcos)... wait a moment [16:31] <asac> no problem. i have a meeting now ... include my nick if your question and i will glance over to answer [16:33] <marcos_ast> hi [16:33] <asturubuntu> I'm talking with marcos right know (he's in his job) [16:33] <marcos_ast> Hi asturubuntu [16:33] <marcos_ast> Hi asac [16:34] <asturubuntu> and now is here! :D [16:34] <asturubuntu> hi marcos! [16:34] <marcos_ast> I writed asac 1/2 hour ago [16:34] <marcos_ast> :P [16:34] <asturubuntu> I don't understand very well what asac is telling me... [16:34] <marcos_ast> what's? [16:35] <asturubuntu> about the 6th point in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation [16:35] <marcos_ast> i will go to red [16:35] <marcos_ast> read [16:36] <asac> marcos_ast: asturubuntu explained to me that you cop ythe jar! files to chrome/ ... with step 6 you should be able to produce proper .xpi's out of them [16:36] <asac> which would allow you to ship stuff from websites or anywhere [16:37] <marcos_ast> well, 2 persons work in this, I and Mikel [16:37] <marcos_ast> I learn create the xpi from US language [16:37] <marcos_ast> Do you need the step 6, asac? [16:38] <marcos_ast> do you like that I check it? [16:38] <marcos_ast> (Now i'm working, but in 4 hours, I can try it) [16:39] <hyperair> asac: IT BUILT OH MY GOD IT BUILT [16:39] * hyperair dances around the room [16:40] <hyperair> oh fsck it doesn't run [16:40] <asac> hehe [16:40] <asac> hyperair: now check that it doesnt crash [16:40] * hyperair deflates [16:40] <hyperair> it crashes [16:41] <hyperair> T_T what could be wrong [16:41] <asac> marcos_ast: step 6 is important as it does everything automatically for you [16:41] <asac> i dont need it to be tested [16:41] <asac> just wanted to point out that its easy for you to distribute the .xpi to asturians until its in officially [16:41] <marcos_ast> ok [16:41] <marcos_ast> ;) [16:42] <marcos_ast> then you're working in the update [16:42] <marcos_ast> I can see later [16:42] <marcos_ast> do you need something? :) [16:42] <marcos_ast> for it? [16:42] <marcos_ast> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309312 [16:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 309312 in langpack-o-matic "make po2xpi aware of per-release whitelists (Was: Please update asturian translation)" [Undecided,In progress] [16:56] <marcos_ast> ? [16:59] <marcos_ast> asac [16:59] <marcos_ast> we had a problem with the xpi in the past [16:59] <asac> hyperair: how does it crash? [16:59] <marcos_ast> because it's a bug in po2xpi [16:59] <marcos_ast> that not create fine locale/ast-ES/global/netError.dtd [16:59] <marcos_ast> but us xpi is fine [17:00] <asac> it doesnt? [17:00] <asac> marcos_ast: i think it does that [17:00] <asac> all other translations have that too afaik [17:00] <hyperair> asac: it's a little hard to debug because there's no main() function [17:00] <hyperair> don't ask me how it even got compiled into an ELF [17:01] <hyperair> asac: i'm trying to write a small program that loads the said function through dlopen [17:01] <hyperair> but it's not working very well [17:01] <marcos_ast> asac: I will check in the night [17:01] <marcos_ast> ;) [17:01] <marcos_ast> are you here? [17:01] <marcos_ast> will you here? [17:01] <marcos_ast> :P [17:01] <marcos_ast> will you be here? [17:02] <asac> yes [17:02] <marcos_ast> ;) ok [17:03] <asac> marcos_ast: i might not be here [17:03] <asac> but i will read and answer if you are here [17:04] <asac> if you go offline in between just ping me when you are back so i remember to send the answer [17:06] <marcos_ast> ok ;) [17:20] <white> asac: ok thanks, i'll add a note that it comes into the next patchset [17:21] <asac> sure [17:53] <white> asac: i guess we'll need the fix in the next icedove as well? :) [18:07] <white> asac: what about CVE-2008-5023 aka MFSA 2008-57? bugnumber 424733, attachement: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=343670 [18:13] <white> asac: also I believe CVE-2008-5510 aka MFSA 2008-67, bugnumber 228856, attachement: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=345028 needs to go into the next patchround, right? [18:19] <white> asac: and can you confirm that https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=256470 is the complete patch for bugnumber 367428? [18:24] <hyperair> asac: ping [18:25] <hyperair> http://pastebin.com/f5c27793e <-- for some reason, the segfault happens right at the end of the function, after gtk_moz_embed_set_path (xpcomLocation); [18:25] <white> asac: i am also unsure about CVE-2008-5019 aka MFSA 2008-53 regarding xulrunner [18:25] <white> asac: we are approaching the end :) [18:27] <white> asac: do we need a fix for CVE-2008-5504 aka MFSA 2008-62, bugnumber 453526 for xulrunner? [18:30] <white> asac: i'll put this in an email, might be easier [18:36] <white> asac: mail sent :) [18:40] <[reed]> white: what distro are you representing? Debian? [18:41] <hyperair> asac: okay, it seems i can't call gtk_moz_embed_set_path at all without segfaulting [18:43] <white> [reed]: debian, yes [18:44] <[reed]> k [18:44] <white> [reed]: in this case debian stable (etch) [18:45] <[reed]> cool [19:25] <hyperair> asac: solved the issue. it builds and runs fine now =D [19:28] <hyperair> asac: thanks for the help, and could you revu this for me please? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=vazaar :D [19:50] * Nafallo haz a question [19:51] <Nafallo> in the menu it says "Firefox Web Browser", but "Mozilla Thunderbird Mail/News". [19:51] <Nafallo> inconsistent... [19:51] <Nafallo> asac, fta: ^^ [21:42] <marcos_ast> hi |