File size: 16,792 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac === aalex is now known as aalex-home [09:40] <kees> pitti: I've added you to the recipient list of the kernel abi checking tool (it runs hourly now) [09:42] <pitti> kees: oh, that's even better; thanks! [09:43] <kees> np :) [09:43] <kees> pitti: oh, btw, I have a demo of bug 726814 for you, if you need. it's very exciting. I was hoping you might have some insight into it. [09:43] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 726814 in linux (Fedora) "udisks-daemon uses a ton of CPU after inserting a SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro usb stick" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/726814 === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara [10:14] <pitti> cjwatson: for the defaults builder, would /usr/share/pkgname/locale.txt with a single default locale be enough to derive a sensible default keyboard layout, or do we always need to specify that explicitly? [10:18] <barry> cr3: daily nag: checkbox :) === hunger_ is now known as hunger [10:40] <Laney> pitti or cjwatson: please moderate my t-b@ mail :-) [10:40] * Laney seeks guidance from the elders [10:40] <pitti> Laney: done [10:40] <Laney> ty [11:07] <cjwatson> pitti: I think it would be better to have people who are preparing defaults packages specify the keyboard layout they want [11:08] <cjwatson> pitti: since there certainly isn't a universally correct mapping from locale to keyboard layout [11:08] <pitti> cjwatson: right, they should be able to, but do they need to? [11:08] <pitti> ISTR that if I select a language in gfxboot, it automatically selects a reasonable layout, too [11:12] <sidd_mak> how to integrate a media player in gnome sound panel...?? [11:12] <cjwatson> pitti: reasonable for you :-) [11:12] <cjwatson> pitti: but I guarantee you that somebody's going to be unhappy with some entry in that giant mapping table [11:12] <cjwatson> pitti: German is a pretty uncontroversial case, but not all locales are so easy [11:12] <pitti> cjwatson: oh, absolutely [11:13] <pitti> cjwatson: I was just asking whether it should require specifying a layout if you specify a locale [11:13] <cjwatson> we could use a default as long as there's some way to override it [11:13] <pitti> and my gut feeling is that we shouldn't [11:13] <cjwatson> ok [11:32] <lifeless> bryceh: ping === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh [13:08] <kirkland> lamont: ping [13:09] <lamont> ? [13:09] <lamont> don't ping, ask [13:10] <nigelb> woah, internet went off in dublin? [13:10] <StevenK> It did? [13:11] <nigelb> Almost everyone with a conference host seems to have disconnected [13:11] <StevenK> That's because it's lunch time! [13:11] <nigelb> Ah, that explains that :) [14:05] <slangasek> lamont: kirkland is pinging about util-linux regression in handling /sys in /etc/mtab [14:06] <slangasek> lamont: have you seen the bug, by chance? [14:25] <pitti> cjwatson: oh, I've been meaning to ask you: what would be a pallatable form of specifying the keyboard layout in a defaults package? the four XKB* variables that /etc/default/keyboard [14:26] <pitti> ... sets? [14:26] <pitti> or only a single value which maps to gfxboot? [14:28] <cjwatson> pitti: I'd go for the format that our loadkeys command accepts: e.g. "de" or "de:dvorak" [14:28] <cjwatson> layout or layout:variant [14:28] * cjwatson checks what gfxboot likes [14:28] <cjwatson> oh, hm, one moment [14:29] <cjwatson> actually, I think layout or layout_variant would be easiest to process [14:30] <StevenK> cjwatson: O hai -- are you attached to Dapper or Karmic, or can we obsolete them? [14:38] <cjwatson> skaet: ^- StevenK above [14:39] <skaet> StevenK, Dapper is ok to obsolete, we have to give an overlap on Karmic. [14:39] <pitti> cjwatson: ok, layout{,_variant} it is then; is there a list of all available ones somewhere, which the documentation could refer to? [14:39] <StevenK> skaet: Hasn't Karmic been EOL'd for months, though? [14:40] <pitti> cjwatson: oh, nevermind; sohuld be in loadkeys, I'll have a look [14:40] <skaet> SteveK, OEM wants a 6 month buffer [14:40] <StevenK> skaet: Right, so when does that get reached? [14:40] <cjwatson> pitti: xkb-data [14:41] <cjwatson> pitti: loadkeys just uses that (indirectly) [14:41] <cjwatson> pitti: don't, whatever you do, refer to any of the old Linux-console-only keyboard maps you might find lying around :) [14:41] <highvoltage> imo there should really be a revisiting of the ubuntu release/support cycle at some point [14:42] <skaet> SteveK, Karmic EOL'd on 4/30, 10/30 we can move off. [14:43] <pitti> cjwatson: so /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/xorg.lst looks very close already; at least it's easy enough to parse to be able to check if the user specified a valid one [14:43] <skaet> StevenK, ^^ [14:43] <pitti> cjwatson: thanks! [14:43] <StevenK> skaet: Ah, thank you. [14:44] <StevenK> skaet: I'm working on obsoleting Dapper. [14:44] <skaet> StevenK, thank you. :) [14:48] <cjwatson> pitti: yes; there's also xorg.xml if that's easier [14:49] <davidboy> ohai. I know this isn't quite the right place, but can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong with this code? http://pastie.org/2134172 [14:50] <davidboy> I've sat in ayatana all day last week and noone knew anything [15:18] <davidboy> Dammit. This is such a tiny problem ... should be easy, but I can't figure out anything I'm doing wrong [15:27] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: ping [15:28] <cjwatson> RoAkSoAx: content please [15:28] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: I seek your advice with something. koan, a tool that comes with cobbler has a feature "--replace-self" where basically downloads a kernel/initrd to replace the installation of the local machien [15:29] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: it uses grubby at the moment, but that's only working for grub1 obviosly [15:29] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: so I'm working on getting grub2 supported. So I was wondering what's the best approach to do this [15:29] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: I'm doing something similar to doign this: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/634324/ (in Python, just hardcoding stuff atm) [15:30] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: once creating the file, running update-grub to add the entry to grub, so on next reboot, I can select that and get Ubuntu reinstalled... [15:31] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: is that a good approach to handle things with grub, in this case? (Just creating a file for the entry everytime I want to replace the current installation?) [16:14] <TheMuso> diwic: Is that jack detection meeting still going ahead? if so I'll be down in 15 minutes or so for it. [16:16] <diwic> TheMuso, it should start in 15 min. Currently there is another meeting in this room and I'm not sure it'll finish in time. === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk [16:50] <tkamppeter> pitti, hi [16:55] <pitti> tkamppeter: hello Till [16:55] <tkamppeter> pitt, can you pass the Natty SRU of CUPS to -updates [16:56] <tkamppeter> pitti, and upload CUPS with my last cups-avahi.dpatch update to Oneiric, so that people can test on the sprint? Thanks. [16:56] <pitti> tkamppeter: natty SRU is only 3 days old, needs 7 days [16:56] <pitti> doing oneiric now [16:57] <pitti> see #u-desktop, cups only moved to testing today, and I was waiting for that [16:57] <tkamppeter> pitti, the SRU is already verified. === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [16:58] <pitti> yes, but it needs to mature in proposed for 7 days to catch regressions [16:58] <pitti> see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates [16:59] <tkamppeter> pitti, OK, so do it on your first SRU day of next week, for the Sprint the Oneiric upload is more important. People hhave Oneiric there. [16:59] <pitti> you could send a call for testing to ubuntu-devel@ [16:59] <pitti> with instructions how to test it [16:59] <tkamppeter> pitti, is there a printer on the Sprint? [17:00] <pitti> tkamppeter: just asked; there is one broken one which we can borrow [17:01] <tkamppeter> pitti, I have already sent one to ubuntu-devel-discuss@ last week. should I simply repeat it on ubuntu-devel@? [17:01] <pitti> tkamppeter: we need to connect it to an oneiric box, and then try to print something from an iphone? [17:02] <pitti> (FWIW, most folks have android here, but we ought to find an iphone here) [17:02] <tkamppeter> pitti, if it is good enough for testing (one can set up a queue and recognize the input file on the paper) then it is OK. [17:02] <tkamppeter> pitti, that's it. [17:03] <tkamppeter> pitti, what about the call for testing? Should I repeat it on ubuntu-devel@? [17:03] <pitti> tkamppeter: you can try [17:03] <tkamppeter> pitti, will do. [17:04] * TheMuso has an iphone. === beuno is now known as bueno-lunch [17:19] <tkamppeter> pitti, done. [17:39] <apw> pitti: hi, i am looking at lp:ubuntu/oneiric/udev and it seems to be majorly out of date compared to the archive [17:41] <cjwatson> apw: try lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/oneiric/udev/ubuntu, which is where the work's actually done [17:41] * cjwatson goes to update the Vcs-Bzr field [17:41] <apw> cjwatson: i am confused how the importer branches can be out of date tho. [17:41] <cjwatson> bug [17:42] <cjwatson> (bugs.launchpad.net/udd) [17:43] <cjwatson> maxb has been nuking vast numbers of importer failures recently; I assume he hasn't got round to this one yet ... [17:43] <maxb> Hello [17:44] <cjwatson> RoAkSoAx: I'm failing to understand, and will come round. Are you in the server room? [17:44] <maxb> Ah, that's one of the NoFinalPath ones [17:44] <maxb> I had a quick look at those, and decided I need to get some support for someone knowing bzrlib internals better than I for that. [17:45] <maxb> apw: Because the importer threw an exception whilst importing [17:45] <maxb> Although annoyingly, it only broke in the bit where it tries to generate a preview merge diff, which I'm not sure really get used much [17:50] <slangasek> jelmer: ^^ maxb is asking for you to help put him to work :-) [17:50] <maxb> hah [17:50] * jelmer ducks [17:51] <jelmer> maxb: hi [17:51] <slangasek> lamont: ribbit [17:54] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: I'm doing this (maybe my code explains itself better :) ): http://paste.ubuntu.com/634419/ [17:55] <cjwatson> RoAkSoAx: it would be easier to see the (grub legacy) original [17:55] <cjwatson> I don't really understand what this is trying to do, right now [17:56] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: this looks better: http://paste.ubuntu.com/634428/ [17:58] <cjwatson> RoAkSoAx: please just tell me where I can see the original? [17:58] <cjwatson> I don't want to read a diff right now, I want to study the original code to understand what it's doing [17:58] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/cobbler , file is under koan/app.py [17:58] <cjwatson> thanks, I'll look at that [17:59] <RoAkSoAx> cjwatson: function starting in line line 937 === bueno-lunch is now known as beuno [18:17] <pitti> apw: right, please don't use the udd branch for udev [18:17] * pitti waves good night === ubott2 is now known as ubottu [18:23] <RobOakes> Howdy, is this a good place to ask package questions or is there a more appropriate channel for that? [18:49] <maxb> RobOakes: It's a good place for questions about packages in Ubuntu itself, especially packages in main. For universe packages, #ubuntu-motu perhaps, though I don't think people will mind asking here. For non-Ubuntu packaging, e.g. PPAs, #ubuntu-packaging. [18:53] <RobOakes> Okay, thanks. [19:06] <RobOakes> I'm a complete noob to packaging, but am trying to configure a daily build. Does anyone know what is meant by "source field" in respect to a debian package build? [19:07] <m4n1sh> RobOakes: where did you encounter that? Please tell the exact place [19:09] <RobOakes> During a build of a daily LyX package I'm trying to create (using a recipe). My build fails because of this error error: "first block lacks a source build." [19:09] <RobOakes> Here is the build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/74251271/buildlog.txt.gz [19:11] <RobOakes> Ugh. Nevermind. I misspelled the first line "Source" [19:22] <lamont> slangasek: sorry - what was the question? [19:40] <lamont> slangasek: util-linux /sys thing - no, I haven't looked at that bug yet [19:40] <lamont> slangasek: otoh, I'm also pretty sure I didn't do the merge for oneiric [20:26] <broder> hmm...have sync runs not happened recently, or do i need to start harassing the AAs to run backport-helper when they run sync-helper? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [20:40] <micahg> broder: first one in about a week I think was today [21:24] <cjwatson> broder: I got a bit put off by the size of the backports queue today, but I will do it today/tomorrow [21:24] <broder> cjwatson: no worries - just wanted to make sure it hadn't been forgotten about === sanchaz is now known as shz === shz is now known as sanchaz [22:09] <slangasek> lamont: no, I did the merge for oneiric... there was no mention of this bug in the BTS, and we were trying to work out if it's even an intended behavior change [22:10] <lamont> oh. nfc [22:10] <lamont> what specifically is the behavior? [22:10] <slangasek> lamont: it seems that for some reason, /sys is no longer written to mtab [22:13] <slangasek> lamont: generalizing, it seems to be any filesystem with 'none' as a mount source [22:19] <broder> that...seems like a terrible idea [22:20] <lamont> that is likely intended behavior [22:21] <lamont> might be related to the push to ln -sf /proc/mounts /etc/mtab [22:21] <lamont> dunno [22:21] <lamont> so after I accidentally manage to get uxterm into anthy input mode, how the *&%)*&%)* do I turn that off? [22:40] <hallyn> cjwatson: if you're around, can you take a look at bug 803159 (and tell me if there is a reason the fix shouldn't be SRUd)? [22:40] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 803159 in eglibc (Ubuntu) "debootstrap fails trying to install libc6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/803159 === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter [22:54] <hallyn> how many times am i going to hose a vm by forgetting to set bridge_ports on the bridge [22:57] <cjwatson> hallyn: dup of bug 802985; I explained the problem there [22:57] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 802985 in debootstrap (Ubuntu) "[lucid] /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 399: arithmetic expression: expecting EOF: "3.0-0-generic"" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/802985 [22:57] <hallyn> cjwatson: ok, thanks - i looked through the buglist but couldn't find that one... [22:57] <cjwatson> I agree it's a serious problem but the fix is ... not as trivial as it looks [22:57] <cjwatson> it was the most recent bug filed on eglibc [22:58] * cjwatson fiddles bug status [22:58] <hallyn> cjwatson: I see [22:59] <hallyn> (just read your explanation of why sru isn't particularly helpful :) [22:59] <cjwatson> necessary but not sufficient [22:59] <hallyn> any suggestion for best workaround? [22:59] <cjwatson> uname LD_PRELOAD [23:00] <cjwatson> lie about utsname.release and pretend it's 3.0.0 rather than 3.0 [23:00] <cjwatson> not a one-liner but shouldn't be too hard [23:00] <hallyn> cjwatson: assuming it's mostly scripts, would it be easier to just have debootstrap, early on, bind [23:00] <hallyn> ok, [23:01] <cjwatson> debootstrap ought to be fixed, but it will be fairly involved [23:01] <hallyn> to do LD_PRELOAD we'll have to ship and build the .so though right? [23:02] <slangasek> wouldn't a dpkg-divert of /bin/uname be simpler yet (wrapping it with a shell script)? [23:03] <cjwatson> hallyn: no, I mean just set that environment variable when running debootstrap [23:03] <cjwatson> oh, but it will probably interact messily with chrooting [23:03] <hallyn> slangasek: that sounds good... [23:03] <cjwatson> slangasek: inserting such a dpkg-divert into debootstrap would be fiddly too [23:03] <cjwatson> there really isn't a good straightforward workaround for this [23:03] <slangasek> yes, but doesn't require writing a custom .so [23:03] <cjwatson> sure [23:04] <hallyn> cjwatson: but you can't LD_PRELOAD a script, so it's arch-dependent, that's where I"m not sure how we woudl handle it [23:04] <cjwatson> hallyn: I'm absolutely not suggesting shipping such a workaround [23:04] <hallyn> writing th e.so, probably easy, but [23:04] <hallyn> oh [23:04] <cjwatson> we shouldn't ship something that isn't a fix, for this [23:04] <hallyn> haha, ok. that's just to get us limping along in the meantime. makes sense [23:07] <cjwatson> it's strictly more difficult than multiple components (which we've done in debootstrap) because you have to deal with the same package being in both lucid and lucid-updates at different versions, and only using the newer one [23:07] <cjwatson> in shell [23:08] <hallyn> but someone's working on it? [23:08] <cjwatson> well, if it's in the pkgdetails interface then it's in perl (normally) or C (in d-i) [23:08] <cjwatson> hallyn: not yet [23:08] <cjwatson> but I probably will === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates |