| [05:56] <palhmbs> Hey! I've found a bug on a ubuntu website @ https://help.launchpad.net/BlueprintRoadmaps | |
| [05:56] <palhmbs> where do I go to file bugs against it? | |
| [05:56] <palhmbs> their is an invalid link on that page | |
| [05:57] <palhmbs> also, could somebody point me to a blog post / some help, cause I want to create my own blueprint for a crazy cool idea I have. | |
| [06:46] <micahg> palhmbs: you should probably file a question (answer) against the launchpad project on launchpad | |
| [06:48] <palhmbs> thanks - will do, is there any wiki / tutorial / blog on how to write a blueprint that isn't currentl connected to a project? | |
| [06:48] <palhmbs> I'm guessing it just isn't possible... | |
| [06:49] <palhmbs> I'm sorry, probably the wrong place to ask | |
| [07:08] <micahg> palhmbs: launchpad support questions should go in #launchpad, but no, that's not possible at the moment | |
| [07:39] <palhmbs> thanks again micahg - I got the page fixed | |
| [07:39] <palhmbs> they took it down :D | |
| [10:13] <kamel> hi, is it possible to get a nomination of bug 789259 and 789268 for natty. thanks | |
| [10:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 789259 in batman-adv-kernelland (Ubuntu) "Please remove batman-adv-kernelland from the Ubuntu archives (FTBFS) (affects: 7) (dups: 6) (heat: 60)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789259 | |
| [10:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 789268 in batmand (Ubuntu) "Please remove batmand-gateway-(source|dkms) from the Ubuntu archives (FTBFS) (affects: 8) (dups: 9) (heat: 80)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789268 | |
| [10:14] <micahg> kamel: we generally don't remove a package from a stable release without a *really* good reason | |
| [10:15] <kamel> is: it doesnt build and work - and is replaced by a module already in linux-2.6 not a good reason? | |
| [10:16] <micahg> kamel: our kernels are very different | |
| [10:16] <kamel> so different that they included batman-adv.ko earlier than the debian kernel | |
| [10:17] <micahg> kamel: ugh, I shouldn't say very different, but they are not derived from one another | |
| [10:25] <micahg> kamel: if nothing bad happens when people try to use it, there's no reason to remove the stable release | |
| [10:29] <kamel> there are just upset people which don't know what they do, but report bugs about things they don't know but were installed | |
| [10:30] <micahg> kamel: ok, well, the sponsors will review the bugs and take appropriate action, I see you mentioned in the description about natty | |
| [10:49] <xelister> is there any bug making fglrx not work on maverick recently? | |
| === jibel_ is now known as jibel | |
| [11:41] <xelister> blargh. | |
| [11:46] <benonsoftware> Quick question | |
| [11:47] <benonsoftware> At the top of PChat it says the next meeting is on the 6/9/11 is that the 9th or 6th month? | |
| [11:48] <JoshuaL> benonsoftware, i assume june 9th | |
| [11:48] <jibel> benonsoftware, 2011-06-09 | |
| [11:48] <jibel> benonsoftware, 2nd thursday of each month | |
| [11:48] <benonsoftware> Thanks for that. | |
| [11:49] <benonsoftware> I just saw the meeting Wiki page :) | |
| [11:55] <benonsoftware> Is anyone here wanting to mentor someone age 12? | |
| [12:36] <ohsix> christ, can't get ahead; compiz update that just dropped a while ago really messes up drag/snap edges | |
| [16:05] <roadmr> Hi folks! I have a bug that's actually about a feature not implemented in the package, should it be wishlist? (as I don't see any reports or discussion upstream) bug 793831 | |
| [16:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 793831 in gcalctool (Ubuntu) "3!! is not equal to 720 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793831 | |
| [16:09] <roadmr> I think triaged/wishlist and open a feature request upstream, hopefully I'm not too wrong :) | |
| [16:11] <pedro_> roadmr, that sounds good, please also update the description / title | |
| [16:12] <roadmr> pedro_: OK, i'll do that then, thanks | |
| [16:12] <pedro_> you're welcome, thanks for helping :-) | |
| === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox | |
| [16:35] <roadmr> pedro_: coudl I trouble you with the importance (wishlist) for bug 793831? I opened and linked an upstream request, set it to triaged and changed the title to be more descriptive | |
| [16:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 793831 in gcalctool (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Feature request: support for double factorial (!!) operator (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793831 | |
| [16:35] <pedro_> roadmr, sure, doing it now | |
| [16:36] <pedro_> roadmr, btw you should be able to change the importance :P | |
| [16:36] <pedro_> your team is part of bug control now | |
| [16:37] <pedro_> btw done | |
| [16:37] <roadmr> thanks! | |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | |
| [17:51] <RedSingularity> chrisccoulson: ping | |
| [17:52] <chrisccoulson> RedSingularity ? | |
| [17:52] <chrisccoulson> you should add some context to your ping btw ;) | |
| [17:53] <RedSingularity> chrisccoulson: yeah i just figured ;) Anyway, bug 728797 is not update-manager. Gnome-control-center maybe? | |
| [17:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 728797 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "When using "Make Caps Lock an additional Ctrl" keyboard option, doing a dist-upgrade causes caps lock to revert to a caps lock key (affects: 1) (heat: 36)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728797 | |
| [17:53] <RedSingularity> or something more specific you think? | |
| [17:54] <chrisccoulson> RedSingularity, i'm not sure, sorry. i'm probably not the best person to ask ;) | |
| [17:54] <RedSingularity> chrisccoulson: I thought you work the control-center? | |
| [17:54] <chrisccoulson> RedSingularity, not really | |
| [17:55] <RedSingularity> chrisccoulson: my mistake. Know anyone who does? | |
| [17:55] <RedSingularity> Thats not my area :) | |
| [17:55] <chrisccoulson> hmm, not sure | |
| [17:56] <RedSingularity> chrisccoulson: alright, thanks anyway :) Will ask around. | |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | |
| [18:21] <micahg> RedSingularity: pedro_ should be able to help you | |
| [18:28] <penalvch> Hey I'd like a 2nd opinion on bug 733128 it looks like a kernel panic on a Release Candidate kernel cause a LibreOffice dataloss and seems invalid due to old kernel... what do you think? | |
| [18:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 733128 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "Libreoffice doesn't start (affects: 3) (heat: 16)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/733128 | |
| [18:29] <penalvch> old/non-stable kernel | |
| [18:31] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: bug 769751 might be what you are looking for | |
| [18:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 769751 in libravatar "Allow images to be marked as private (affects: 1) (heat: 3)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/769751 | |
| [18:31] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: bug 769571 might be what you are looking for | |
| [18:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 769571 in console-setup (Ubuntu) "updates cause caps lock to revert until a reboot (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 82)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/769571 | |
| [18:31] <bdmurray> or at least that is probably the right package | |
| [18:33] <charlie-tca> penalvch: is the bug still present in final release of natty? | |
| [18:34] <charlie-tca> The user should verify if the bug is still present now. | |
| [18:37] <penalvch> charlie-tca: I don't know if/think the panic is reproducible in current kernel. I'll request reproduction of the panic w/ current kernel to see if it causes LO dataloss. Thanks for the help! | |
| [18:49] <njin> Hello, are we tracking gallium ? | |
| [18:50] <njin> bug 793834 | |
| [18:50] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 793834 in ubuntu "Gallium\r300g doesn't enable 3D acceleration unless S-video output detects a TV. (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793834 | |
| === davmor2 is now known as Nijerian_Prince | |
| === Nijerian_Prince is now known as davmor2 | |
| [21:07] <brendand> is it bad form to touch hug day bugs before the hug day ? :) | |
| [21:09] <micahg> brendand: nope | |
| [21:09] <pedro_> brendand, nope :-) | |
| [21:10] <roadmr> as long as you leave a couple for the rest :) | |
| [21:10] <micahg> nope, pedro_ can always add more :) | |
| [21:10] <pedro_> oh yes we have plenty :-) | |
| [21:12] <jpiche> hi. i've been struggling with bug 775950 for a while, and I'm wondering if someone could help me figure out the best way to debug or fix it | |
| [21:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 775950 in linux (Ubuntu) "fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed! upon boot (always reproducible on battery only, but sometimes on AC too) (affects: 18) (heat: 92)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/775950 | |
| [21:29] <brendand> seems like it should be critical | |
| [21:31] <brendand> jpiche - do you have an ATI card? | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | |
| [21:33] <jpiche> braiam, yes I do | |
| [21:33] <jpiche> I'm actually the original reporter of the bug | |
| [21:34] <jpiche> brendand, sorry. not braiam. | |
| [21:34] <brendand> jpiche - i know :) i looked at it just now | |
| [21:34] <brendand> jpiche - and you are using fglrx. have you tried with using radeon? | |
| [21:35] <jpiche> brendand, not yet. When I get time, I'll try that next--switching from fglrx to radeon is a bit of a pain | |
| [21:36] <brendand> jpiche - you can just use jockey? | |
| [21:36] <roadmr> how about booting in rescue mode (single), does the problem happen then? | |
| [21:37] <jpiche> roadmr, most of the time it still happens in single. About 1 / 10 reboots, single will work. | |
| [21:40] <jpiche> brendand, jockey doesn't always work for me because I switch secondary monitors all the time and the last time I tried it, my X config got a bit messed up--just annoying though, not a real problem | |
| [21:40] <roadmr> jpiche: no useful logs in /var/log? that might help | |
| [21:42] <jpiche> roadmr, no. I've tried reading through them after plugging in and booting up, but I've never seen anything out of the ordinary | |
| [21:42] <roadmr> jpiche: so, the actual kernel panic log doesn't get written to disk | |
| [21:43] <jpiche> roadmr, that's what it seems like. it happens pretty quick | |
| [21:46] <braiam> Im a bit used to it | |
| [21:47] <braiam> jpiche: ↑ | |
| [21:47] <roadmr> hmm. One way to capture a useful log would be via remote syslog, but it's a bit involved to setup, and it'd require an extra pc | |
| [21:48] <roadmr> not sure it would even work, if the kernel can't set up networking before panicking | |
| [21:54] <brendand> jpiche - what's your kernel version? | |
| [21:54] <brendand> probably on the bug | |
| [21:55] <brendand> 2.6.38-8 | |
| [21:55] <brendand> that's the original kernel (fresh install) | |
| [21:56] <jpiche> brendand, yeah 2.6.38-8-generic | |
| [21:56] <brendand> my own feeling would be that someone from bug control should set it to critical. at least high | |
| [21:56] * micahg wonders where jFo is... | |
| [22:06] <komputes> bdmurray: ping | |
| [22:07] <komputes> bdmurray: I was reviewing the BugControl wiki page and found the following line which doesn't seem right: | |
| [22:07] <komputes> One of the team's administrators should e-mail the team's application to ubuntu-bugcontrol AT lists.launchpad.net. Please give us: | |
| [22:07] <hggdh> komputes: that sounds weird | |
| [22:07] <hggdh> no | |
| [22:07] <hggdh> this is correct | |
| [22:07] <micahg> why is that weird, makes sense for team apps | |
| [22:07] <hggdh> :-) | |
| [22:07] <hggdh> komputes: this is for team applications | |
| [22:08] <komputes> It could read easily as, Please email your team application to... | |
| [22:08] <komputes> ...and include: | |
| [22:08] <hggdh> komputes: as long as it is one of the admins, yes | |
| [22:09] <hggdh> komputes: we only want to hear from team admins; I agree it could be better worded, but the restriction must be present | |
| [22:10] <micahg> I think being explicit in this case is better | |
| [22:10] <komputes> ok | |
| [22:15] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: ah yeah, that looks like it... | |
| [22:18] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: great, i will link it to that. Thanks :) | |
| [22:21] <RedSingularity> micahg: thanks for that info btw. I wasn't aware he worked that package :/ | |
| [22:23] <micahg> RedSingularity: no, he's the defect analyst for the desktop team | |
| [22:23] <RedSingularity> micahg: ahhh, ok | |
| [22:48] <bcj> How do I open a bug on an update to a driver? | |
| [22:48] <bcj> iwlagn was updated yesterday by the Ubuntu 10.04 auto-update tool and it's broken my wireless. | |
| [22:48] <bcj> It looks like the latest driver no longer supports the firmware I have | |
| [22:49] <charlie-tca> ubuntu-bug DRIVER | |
| [22:49] <charlie-tca> and explain in comments that the update for 2011-06-06 broke it | |
| [22:49] <RedSingularity> bcj: may I ask what driver? | |
| [22:49] <bcj> iwlagn | |
| [22:49] <bcj> I think | |
| [22:50] <RedSingularity> ok never mind then :) | |
| [22:50] <bcj> iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: Driver unable to support your firmware API. Driver supports v5, firmware is v0. | |
| [22:50] <RedSingularity> thought it may have been another one.... | |
| [22:51] <bcj> I'll try opening a bug | |
| [22:52] <RedSingularity> bcj: yeah follow charlie-tca's advice | |
| [22:52] <bcj> ubuntu-bug DRIVER doesn't work, nor does ubuntu-bug iwlagn | |
| [22:53] <RedSingularity> charlie-tca: ^ maybe it doesnt have the hooks....? | |
| [22:53] <charlie-tca> !info iwlagn | |
| [22:54] <ubot4> charlie-tca: Package iwlagn does not exist in maverick | |
| [22:54] <bcj> ...so how do I find out what to raise the bug against? | |
| [22:54] <bcj> (you can probably tell that I keep knocking the ethernet cable out) | |
| [22:54] <charlie-tca> bcj: ubuntu-bug module-init-tools | |
| [22:55] <charlie-tca> That includes iwlagn | |
| [23:06] <bcj> Thanks for the help all; here is the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/module-init-tools/+bug/794291 | |
| [23:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 794291 in module-init-tools (Ubuntu) "iwlagn driver update breaks compatibilty with firmware (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | |