| [00:00] <wgrant> Just make sure lucid-lp-base isn't running while the clones are. | |
| [00:00] <wgrant> Doesn't matter wth the btrfs variant, but for aufs it does. | |
| [00:00] <wgrant> Also, it needs to have your SSH key in authorized_keys, as you may be able to tell. | |
| [00:03] <wgrant> There's probably some huge piece I've completely forgotten, but hunting for that can happen tomorrow. | |
| [00:09] <LPCIBot> Project db-devel build #676: FAILURE in 5 hr 48 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/676/ | |
| [00:09] <lifeless> wgrant: well, I am probably going to keep 100GB or so of windows around Just In Case | |
| [00:10] <lifeless> I'm assuming dmraid will handle the dell raid setup | |
| [00:10] <wgrant> Bah. | |
| [00:10] <wgrant> Possibly. | |
| === jkakar_ is now known as jkakar | |
| [03:21] <lifeless> mwhudson: you have a sandybridge machine right ? | |
| [03:38] <mwhudson> lifeless: i do | |
| [03:50] <lifeless> did you have any issues with the natty desktop cd ? | |
| [03:50] <lifeless> I get the fine grey crosshatch and nothing more | |
| [03:53] <mwhudson> lifeless: no, installation went absurdly smoothly | |
| [04:09] <LPCIBot> Yippie, build fixed! | |
| [04:09] <LPCIBot> Project devel build #846: FIXED in 5 hr 29 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/846/ | |
| [05:42] <lifeless> mwhudson: interestingly, its happy with lcd, but it hated my analogue monitor. | |
| [05:42] <mwhudson> lifeless: heh | |
| [05:43] <lifeless> 50% of my desktop backed up | |
| [05:43] <mwhudson> lifeless: i've tested mine with a projector over vga and that worked | |
| [05:43] <mwhudson> (post-install) | |
| [05:43] <lifeless> mwhudson: this has a non-intel graphics card in it, for additional fun | |
| [05:43] <lifeless> being a desktop and all | |
| [05:44] <mwhudson> ah ok | |
| [05:44] <mwhudson> well i can't help you with that then :) | |
| [05:45] <lifeless> :) | |
| [06:00] <LPCIBot> Yippie, build fixed! | |
| [06:00] <LPCIBot> Project db-devel build #677: FIXED in 5 hr 51 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/677/ | |
| [06:26] <lifeless> jml: https://dev.launchpad.net/ArchitectureGuide/ServicesRequirements#preview | |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | |
| [09:06] <wgrant> bigjools: Any objections to my comments on bug #797599? | |
| [09:07] <_mup_> Bug #797599: Copying archivepermissions cross-distro is wrong. <derivation> <qa-untestable> <Launchpad itself:Fix Committed by rvb> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/797599 > | |
| [09:07] <bigjools> wgrant: I don't see any comments from you | |
| [09:09] <wgrant> bigjools: Packagesets are per series. | |
| [09:09] <wgrant> bigjools: So after duplicating the sets we need to regrant permissions. | |
| [09:09] <StevenK> Why did that just get removed? It's trivial to fix. | |
| [09:09] <wgrant> launchpad_dev=# \d packageset | |
| [09:09] <wgrant> [...] | |
| [09:09] <wgrant> distroseries | integer | not null | |
| [09:12] <wgrant> abentley: You has QA. | |
| [09:12] <bigjools> wgrant: RARGH | |
| [09:12] <StevenK> Haha | |
| [09:12] <StevenK> That's my line. | |
| [09:12] <wgrant> bbiRargh? | |
| [09:12] <wgrant> Er. | |
| [09:12] <wgrant> bigjools: Rargh? | |
| [09:13] <bigjools> having to re-init *archive* level permissions on a new series is crack | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> Well. | |
| [09:13] <bigjools> the model is broken | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> Yes. | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> Sort of. | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> Packagesets have to be per-series. | |
| [09:13] <bigjools> I know | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> So permissions based on them have to be. | |
| [09:13] <bigjools> the FK is wrong | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> How? | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> Well, how would it be improved? | |
| [09:13] <bigjools> NFI ATM | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> Besides nuking from orbit. | |
| [09:13] <wgrant> Right. | |
| [09:14] <wgrant> Exactly. | |
| [09:14] <bigjools> need to think about it | |
| [09:14] <bigjools> but not in a plenary! | |
| [09:14] <wgrant> True. | |
| [09:14] <wgrant> I won't roll it back for now, but will file a critical regression bug. | |
| [09:14] <bigjools> that's fine, we can fix it | |
| [09:14] <bigjools> next week | |
| [09:16] <lifeless> morning d'blin | |
| [09:16] <wgrant> Hi lifeless. | |
| [09:17] <lifeless> apparently dmraid doth not split IO across underlying devices | |
| [09:17] <lifeless> this saddens me | |
| [09:17] <wgrant> Yay! | |
| [09:17] <wgrant> Fakeraid must die. | |
| [09:17] <StevenK> wgrant: Including MD? | |
| [09:18] <lifeless> wgrant: its not substantially different to mdraid other than needing to match BIOS supported layouts, *and* being able to boot sanely. | |
| [09:18] <StevenK> And wgrant has the deployment report open. Who would have thunk it. | |
| [09:18] <lifeless> wgrant: i like being able to boot sanely. | |
| [09:19] <StevenK> lifeless: Er? GRUB2 can boot off RAID | |
| [09:19] <lifeless> StevenK: last I saw it requires the device to be on a single disk, because its not actually bringing up all the layers | |
| [09:19] <lifeless> its essentially running in degraded form | |
| [09:20] <StevenK> lifeless: My fileserver boots off RAID1 just fine | |
| [09:20] <lifeless> this means it won't work for anything other than a vanilla mirror | |
| [09:20] <StevenK> But I can't check, since my home DSL is down. | |
| [09:20] <lifeless> StevenK: e.g. vanilla mirror | |
| [09:20] <StevenK> You're closer, so go check. :-P | |
| [09:20] <lifeless> StevenK: ring your wife :) | |
| [09:20] <wgrant> StevenK: MD is not fakeraid. | |
| [09:20] <wgrant> It's software RAID. | |
| [09:20] <lifeless> wgrant: so is fakeraid | |
| [09:21] <wgrant> It is, but with an extra layer of proprietary crap. | |
| [09:21] <lifeless> wgrant: its really not that proprietary. | |
| [09:21] <lifeless> crappy docs though | |
| [09:21] <wgrant> Stupid and pointless and non-standard, then. | |
| [09:21] <lifeless> wgrant: what would make it a standard? | |
| [09:21] <wgrant> Not being chipset-dependent. | |
| [09:21] <StevenK> It mainly exists because versions of Windows didn't do RAID, right? | |
| [09:22] <lifeless> StevenK: *booting* from RAID requires either fragile gymnastics or a BIOS (or lower) support for the raid layout | |
| [09:23] <lifeless> StevenK: the ICH (and similar) raid implementations exist because controller cards that have ATAPI/SCSI on the topside and N disks on the bottom side are hugely expensive for entry-level environments, and *other* than such cards ... you had to do gymnastics | |
| [09:24] <lifeless> so fakeraid does *exactly* what the early boot BIOS interrupt calls do for SCSI and IDE disks, and run just long enough to let the OS load its drivers. | |
| [09:25] <lifeless> if fakeraid is stupid, so is being able to boot off of IDE and SCSI disks. | |
| [09:30] <gmb> wgrant: Is it possible to set append-revisions-only on an existing branch? I can only find references to it on bzr init. | |
| [09:31] <wgrant> gmb: You probably have to edit .bzr/branch/branch.conf using something like hitchhiker. | |
| [09:31] <wgrant> bzr reconfigure doesn't seem to have an option. | |
| [09:32] <gmb> wgrant: Ah, right, thanks. | |
| [09:32] <wgrant> Just add a line with 'append_revisions_only = True' to branch.conf | |
| [09:37] <maxb> You can use bzr config now to set append_revisions_only | |
| [09:37] <wgrant> Ahh, true. | |
| [09:37] <wgrant> Forgot about the new shiny. | |
| [09:43] <StevenK> LIFELESS! | |
| [09:43] <StevenK> RARGH | |
| [09:43] <wgrant> StevenK: Oh? | |
| [09:44] <StevenK> parellel-test #80 has been building for *13* hours | |
| [09:45] <wgrant> Heh. | |
| [09:46] <StevenK> hudson 25142 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z Jun28 0:14 [/usr/bin/python] <defunct> | |
| [09:46] <StevenK> ORSUM | |
| [09:47] <StevenK> wgrant: Shall I kill it with fire? | |
| [09:54] <lifeless> jml: hi | |
| [09:54] <lifeless> jml: I've put some prose into the servicesrequirements page | |
| [09:54] <jml> lifeless: yeah, I saw, thanks. | |
| [09:54] <jml> lifeless: will look soon. | |
| [09:54] <lifeless> I think it captures all that we spoke about, and includes sufficient rationale | |
| [09:54] <lifeless> jml: if it doesn't, please fix-or-tell-me | |
| [09:54] <lifeless> ? | |
| [09:56] <nigelb> StevenK: heh, weren't you about to kill all of windmill with fire? :) | |
| [09:56] <nigelb> *windmill tests | |
| [09:57] <LPCIBot> Project parallel-test build #80: ABORTED in 12 hr: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/80/ | |
| [09:57] <StevenK> DIE, FIEND | |
| [09:58] <nigelb> lol | |
| [09:58] <jml> lifeless: ok, will do. | |
| [09:59] <StevenK> nigelb: parallel-test has nothing to do with Windmill. | |
| [09:59] <nigelb> StevenK: ah! | |
| [09:59] <nigelb> One of my merge requests has become sort of stale. Before I work on that branch, I want to "rebase" it wth master | |
| [09:59] <nigelb> is there a bzr equivalent of that? | |
| [10:00] <nigelb> (this is an LP merge proporsal that I need to finish working on) | |
| [10:00] <StevenK> Don't rebase, just bzr merge devel in | |
| [10:01] <jml> lifeless: any ideas for useful LP (or related) hacking for me this week? | |
| [10:01] <wgrant> lifeless: :( resetting rabbit is hard. | |
| [10:02] <lifeless> jml: just about anything is useful | |
| [10:02] <StevenK> wgrant: Do you think there is any point to keeping the windmill-{db-,}devel jobs on Jenkins, or shall I delete them? | |
| [10:02] <wgrant> StevenK: I'd keep them for now, just in case. It is cheap... | |
| [10:02] <lifeless> jml: one thing that you and I probably have most experience around is getting the test suite to stop stomping on stdout when something goes wrong | |
| [10:02] <jml> lifeless: yeah, I know. that's largely the problem :D | |
| [10:02] <lifeless> jml: that messes up subunit | |
| [10:02] <nigelb> er, I did "bzr merge ../devel" and now it seems to have just gotten stuck | |
| [10:03] <jml> lifeless: yeah, ok, I could try with that. | |
| [10:03] <StevenK> nigelb: Is devel up-to-date? | |
| [10:03] <nigelb> doesn't merge give me feedback on stdout on what's going on? | |
| [10:03] <nigelb> StevenK: yeah | |
| [10:03] <nigelb> oh | |
| [10:03] <nigelb> done :D | |
| [10:03] <StevenK> Heh | |
| [10:03] <stub> I always wanted to make tests fail that spat stuff out to stdout or stderr | |
| [10:03] <StevenK> More patience required | |
| [10:03] <stub> Not sure the most bulletproof method of doing that though | |
| [10:03] <jml> stub: interestingly, the way we patch the login object practically guarantees that tests will | |
| [10:04] <nigelb> Sadly, I can't apt-get install patience :) | |
| [10:04] <StevenK> I'd like to see an option to bin/test that will stop spewing the librarian log out on test failure | |
| [10:04] <lifeless> deprecation warnings and bzr's __del__ methods are particularly hard to get at to fix this | |
| [10:04] <lifeless> StevenK: its an attachment to the test | |
| [10:04] <lifeless> StevenK: something you could do that is better | |
| [10:04] <lifeless> StevenK: would be to teach the layer to only attach the *per-test* component of the log | |
| [10:04] <lifeless> StevenK: rather than the log-since-fixture-start. | |
| [10:05] <lifeless> StevenK: e.g. truncate the log or record the position or whatever in the layer per test setup | |
| [10:05] <lifeless> StevenK: if you use tribunal though,t he librarian log won't be in your face anyway | |
| [10:05] <spiv> lifeless: most of bzr's __del__ methods are being deleted. | |
| [10:05] <lifeless> spiv: I know :) | |
| [10:05] <lifeless> spiv: (and I'm glad) | |
| [10:05] <StevenK> lifeless: Bleh, more reason to learn tribunal | |
| [10:06] <nigelb> wow, I updated my devel again. | |
| [10:06] <nigelb> Lots of deletions \o/ | |
| [10:07] <StevenK> % apt-cache search tribunal | wc -l | |
| [10:07] <StevenK> 0 | |
| [10:07] <nigelb> I guess that's the windmill being burned with fire. | |
| [10:07] <StevenK> jml killed lots of line too | |
| [10:07] <lifeless> StevenK: poolie: can get you going with tribunal | |
| [10:07] <nigelb> I now realzie I'm going to fix the same bug 4 times. | |
| [10:08] <_mup_> Bug #4: Importing finished po doesn't change progressbar <lp-translations> <Launchpad itself:Fix Released by carlos> <Ubuntu:Invalid> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/4 > | |
| [10:08] <lifeless> StevenK: it has testr integration, so its basically just tribunal . | |
| [10:08] <StevenK> I don't have testr either ... | |
| [10:08] <lifeless> StevenK: that one is packaged; shiniest version is in the testing cabal ppa, but the one in natty is eminently usable | |
| [10:11] <wgrant> lifeless: It seems there is no way to list all rabbitmq queues without using rabbitmqctl, which is 100-200ms :( | |
| [10:11] <wgrant> lifeless: Which makes fixture reset difficult. | |
| [10:13] <lifeless> wgrant: :( | |
| [10:13] <lifeless> wgrant: there are some alternatives | |
| [10:14] <wgrant> Creating a new vhost is also 100-200ms. | |
| [10:14] <wgrant> Seems to be erlang startup. | |
| [10:14] <lifeless> wgrant: such as, use the in python api to note queue access and connect-and-flush-all-those at the end of the test | |
| [10:15] <wgrant> lifeless: Yeah, possibly... | |
| [10:15] <wgrant> lifeless: But that becomes really bad when we have multiple consumers. | |
| [10:15] <wgrant> That we don't control. | |
| [10:15] <lifeless> wgrant: for an LP test run, all consumers should be test fakes | |
| [10:16] <lifeless> wgrant: which means we have a testing interface to them, and can tell them to do their own reset dance | |
| [10:16] <wgrant> "should" | |
| [10:16] <lifeless> wgrant: the page has been changed. | |
| [10:16] <wgrant> Also, I am talking about now. | |
| [10:16] <wgrant> Not in two years. | |
| [10:16] <lifeless> wgrant: *must*, or it can't go live. Existing things like the librarian are excluded | |
| [10:16] <wgrant> Hmm. | |
| [10:17] <lifeless> I'm flexible on this, but I think that being waffly would make it harder for folk to design well | |
| [10:17] <lifeless> so I've stopped waffling on this aspect. | |
| [10:19] <lifeless> by flexible I mean I am willing to be wrong and discuss; however your objection seemed to be that there was no requirement so we would have trouble in the future. | |
| [10:20] <StevenK> abentley: Can haz QA? And not submitting branches with [r=me] ? | |
| [10:20] <wgrant> Well, I told him to verbally, but I didn't think he'd take it literally :) | |
| [10:21] <lifeless> StevenK: do you mean 'please use r=<ownname> rather than r=me when self reviewing' ? | |
| [10:21] <lifeless> StevenK: if so, +1 | |
| [10:22] <StevenK> r=me or rs=me is so pointless it may as well not be there. | |
| [10:22] <StevenK> Since loggerhead on devel won't tell us who commited it | |
| [10:23] <StevenK> Which means you either need to know, or ask buildbot. And asking buildbot makes me sad. | |
| [10:23] <wgrant> Or check the committer of the merge revs. | |
| [10:27] <wgrant> lifeless: Hmm, FixtureResource doesn't use reset()? | |
| [10:32] <wgrant> The rabbitmq management plugin does what we want, but the rabbitmq plugin build system seems to be designed primarily to make people want to die. | |
| [10:32] <lifeless> ha. headdesk. ha. | |
| [10:32] <StevenK> 103 files mention 'unseen' -- some would be false-positives | |
| [10:34] <wgrant> Perhaps we should use carrot. | |
| [10:35] <wgrant> (it has a memory-based backend, as well as a rabbit one) | |
| [10:36] <wgrant> Which would allow us to do unit tests with a nice fake. | |
| [10:54] <lifeless> wgrant: that only helps if we're not talking to a microservice | |
| [10:59] <Riddell> simple review needed https://code.launchpad.net/~jr/launchpad/797688-packaging-branches-label | |
| [11:04] <StevenK> Riddell: I'd like to see some test changes, to be honest. | |
| [11:06] <benji> someone asked about this yesterday and I wan't yet aware that it existed: http://ricostacruz.com/js2coffee/ | |
| [11:07] <lifeless> benji: wicked | |
| [11:10] <benji> poolie: this just came up on my feeds and wondered if you'd seen it: https://www.mergebox.net/ | |
| [11:10] <benji> they bill themselves as the GitHub of bzr | |
| [11:11] <lifeless> benji: they announced themselves on the bzr dev list | |
| [11:11] <lifeless> benji: very interesting project | |
| [11:12] <benji> ahh, I should have figured they would engauge in some way | |
| [11:12] <lifeless> not at all | |
| [11:12] <lifeless> its good to raise interesting things | |
| [11:12] <wgrant> lifeless: Sure. | |
| [11:23] <LPCIBot> Project parallel-test build #81: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 11 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/81/ | |
| [11:33] <lifeless> usb2 is so slow! | |
| [11:33] <wgrant> bigjools: It is the 'ppa' name. | |
| [11:33] <wgrant> bigjools: Not 'Test' | |
| [11:33] <wgrant> So it's not quite so easy. | |
| [11:34] <bigjools> yeah just saw | |
| [11:51] <LPCIBot> Project db-devel build #678: FAILURE in 5 hr 51 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/678/ | |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | |
| [12:01] <LPCIBot> Project parallel-test build #82: STILL FAILING in 37 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/82/ | |
| [12:01] <LPCIBot> Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=jml][no-qa] Remove syncUpdate. | |
| [12:07] <poolie> benji, lifeless, has anyone actually got a login yet? | |
| [12:07] <lifeless> I haven't; I can't decide if I should, or should not :) | |
| [12:07] <benji> heh | |
| [12:12] <nigelb> poolie: maco did get a login for it if you're looking for feedback | |
| [12:12] <nigelb> (it being mergebox) | |
| [12:25] <lifeless> bigjools: dsds are shaping up really quite nice | |
| [12:25] <bigjools> lifeless: hellyeah! | |
| [12:25] <lifeless> bigjools: I hit a small usability thing today, not sure if its a bug or not. | |
| [12:26] <lifeless> bigjools: I wanted to answer, for a friend 'whats different between debian and ubuntu for virt-manager and libvirt-bin' | |
| [12:26] <bigjools> that is not enough info to properly ascertain an answer | |
| [12:27] <lifeless> bigjools: localpackagediffs doesn't seem to have a unfiltered view | |
| [12:27] <bigjools> it's always series-dependent | |
| [12:27] <bigjools> lifeless: ! | |
| [12:27] <bigjools> yes it does | |
| [12:27] <lifeless> like there is unignored, ignored, ignored-and-newer, and resolved | |
| [12:27] <bigjools> oh that | |
| [12:27] <bigjools> there's a bug about tha | |
| [12:27] <bigjools> t | |
| [12:27] <lifeless> kk | |
| [12:27] <lifeless> I shall not file one then | |
| [12:28] <lifeless> did I mention usb2 is painfully slow ? | |
| [12:28] <bigjools> lifeless: thx for feedback though | |
| [12:28] <lifeless> de nada | |
| [12:29] <lifeless> my friend uses Debian and then whinges that stuff doesn't Just Work :) | |
| [12:29] <StevenK> lifeless: USB 2 sucks, use something better. | |
| [12:29] <bigjools> there's an answer to that | |
| [12:29] <lifeless> StevenK: would-if-I-could | |
| [12:29] <StevenK> lifeless: There is this thing, called eSATA? | |
| [12:30] <lifeless> StevenK: external disk only having usb2 | |
| [12:30] <lifeless> StevenK: I just backed up everything from my old desktop onto it, and it got 30MB/s sustained... restoring at the same rate :( | |
| [12:32] <StevenK> lifeless: The last time I copied stuff over USB 2, I copied 800GiB at an average of 3MB/s, and it took 4 days. | |
| [12:34] <lifeless> StevenK: -ouch- | |
| [12:34] <lifeless> StevenK: I'm only doing 400GB and still its painfule | |
| [12:36] <huwshimi> StevenK: https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+bugs?field.tag=easy+ui&field.tags_combinator=ALL | |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | |
| [14:26] <huwshimi> StevenK: I forgot to mention, if you fix a bug then tag it with "dublin" so we can keep track of the bugs fixed here | |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | |
| [14:34] <huwshimi> benji: I have updated this branch, just wanted to check the fix looks ok: https://code.launchpad.net/~huwshimi/launchpad/table-headings-728187/+merge/66008 | |
| [14:44] <benji> huwshimi: I made positive sounds on the MP. | |
| [14:44] <huwshimi> benji: Thank you! | |
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | |
| [15:00] <Riddell_> StevenK: are you able to point me in the direction of writing tests for my 797688-packaging-branches-label branch at some point? | |
| === Riddell_ is now known as Riddell | |
| [15:56] <StevenK> benji: https://code.launchpad.net/~stevenk/launchpad/archive-picker-value/+merge/66318 | |
| [15:56] <jtv> bigjools, StevenK, wgrant: any objections to a df app restart? | |
| [15:56] <StevenK> jtv: No, doit. | |
| [15:56] <wgrant> jtv: None. | |
| [15:56] <jtv> StevenK: who are you calling a doit? | |
| [15:57] <jtv> …or whommm? | |
| [15:57] <StevenK> jtv: You, duh. | |
| [15:57] <jtv> oh, I see. | |
| [15:58] <benji> StevenK: done | |
| === danilo_ is now known as danilos | |
| [16:02] <danilos> jtv, hey, I've got a question about the expander widget: how do I make it start out expanded? | |
| [16:03] <jtv> danilos: disable JS. :) | |
| [16:03] <danilos> jtv, ok, so that's a feature we are missing: if "expanded" flag is on it on load, we should probably not fold it | |
| [16:03] <jtv> Sure. | |
| [16:03] <danilos> jtv, it's a case I hit on a page | |
| [16:03] <jtv> I mentioned this yesterday as "nice for later"; I guess "later" came early | |
| [16:03] <danilos> jtv, ok, I'll assume that works and just set the "expanded" class on the content node | |
| [16:04] <jtv> BTW where is that flag exactly? Is it a CSS class, a config arg..? | |
| [16:04] <danilos> jtv, yeah, I was not sure if it was implemented or not, and it's needed to be able to replace the existing collapsible stuff | |
| [16:04] <jtv> Ah | |
| [16:04] <danilos> jtv, a CSS class state_marker.expanded | |
| [16:04] <jtv> OK | |
| [16:07] <Riddell> StevenK: https://code.launchpad.net/~jr/launchpad/797688-packaging-branches-label/+merge/66146 | |
| [16:09] <bigjools> jtv: nup | |
| [16:10] <jtv> ? | |
| [16:13] <Riddell> StevenK: voila | |
| [16:13] <Riddell> hmm, wait | |
| [16:31] <StevenK> benji: https://code.launchpad.net/~mbp/lazr.restfulclient/789369-getattr/+merge/62743 | |
| [16:41] <matsubara> anyone available to review a branch that attempts to fix bug 404279? https://code.launchpad.net/~matsubara/launchpad/404279-private-ppa-link/+merge/66335 | |
| [16:41] <_mup_> Bug #404279: apt urls on private ppa pages are incorrect (missing credentials) <bugjam2010> <easy> <lp-soyuz> <p3a> <ppa> <ui> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by matsubara> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/404279 > | |
| [17:03] <poolie> i will try | |
| [17:10] <bigjools> stub: addAfterCommitHook doesn't work.... | |
| [17:10] <bigjools> he no callee backee | |
| [17:10] <stub> You said it worked! | |
| [17:10] <bigjools> I LIED | |
| [17:11] <stub> commit is being called? | |
| [17:11] <bigjools> yes, we just stepped in pdb | |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | |
| [17:12] <stub> bigjools: So we know the concept is sound, or else PostgreSQL connections would never be committed. | |
| [17:13] <stub> bigjools: Oh.... aftercommithook... not sure if they are used anywhere. | |
| [17:13] <bigjools> indeed | |
| [17:13] <stub> Maybe just a standard commit hook? | |
| [17:13] <bigjools> define "standard" ? | |
| [17:13] <stub> We can worry about ordering of rabbit or pg first later | |
| [17:13] <bigjools> the other one I can see in the doc is beforeCommitHook() | |
| [17:14] <bigjools> stub: maybe we need registerSynch | |
| [17:15] <stub> Now I can't find the documentation... | |
| [17:15] <bigjools> stub: http://readthedocs.org/docs/zodb/en/latest/transactions.html | |
| [17:15] <wgrant> It's not a synchronizer. | |
| [17:15] <stub> You can register a class with the prepare, commit, rollback hooks like a pg database connection does | |
| [17:15] <wgrant> It's not a beforeCommitHook. | |
| [17:15] <wgrant> It's also not an IDataManager | |
| [17:16] <bigjools> stub: how do you register that? | |
| [17:17] * stub wonders if our transaction package is out of date with those docs | |
| [17:17] <bigjools> and buggy | |
| [17:17] <stub> Writing it as a full blown datamanager should work | |
| [17:17] <stub> And not too traumatic since most of the methods will be noops | |
| [17:17] <bigjools> ok | |
| [17:18] <bigjools> stub: got an example we can see? | |
| [17:18] <bigjools> preferably in our code :) | |
| [17:19] <stub> bigjools: Those docs have one. Otherwise ZStorm has one. Nothing in the lp tree though. | |
| [17:20] <stub> The one in the docs will be simpler, and that api has been stable for over 10 years (apart from doom which we added) | |
| [17:23] <stub> Hmm... but I wonder if something else is going on. Given the aftercommit api exists, I would sort of expect it to do what it says on the tin | |
| [17:25] <stub> bigjools: Your hook has the right signature? | |
| [17:25] <stub> foo(success, args, kwargs) | |
| [17:25] <stub> kws | |
| [17:26] <stub> finished here - popping down | |
| [17:44] <LPCIBot> Yippie, build fixed! | |
| [17:44] <LPCIBot> Project db-devel build #679: FIXED in 5 hr 52 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/679/ | |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | |