| [02:30] <fta> crimsun, bug 311334 | |
| [02:30] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 311334 in pulseaudio "Audio cuts out when playing ogg natively in Shiretoko" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/311334 | |
| [04:03] <crimsun> wrong package, but ok | |
| [04:03] <crimsun> (fixed) | |
| === jetsaredim1 is now known as jetsaredim | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| [12:23] * asac back | |
| [12:24] <asac> white: thanks | |
| [12:24] <asac> let me know ... i will start to work on icedove 2.....19 today | |
| [12:24] <asac> happy new year everyone | |
| [12:31] <fta> hi | |
| [12:32] <fta> what is icedove 2? | |
| [12:32] <asac> 2.0.0.19 ;) | |
| [12:32] <asac> fta: ^^ | |
| [12:32] <asac> hi | |
| [12:33] <fta> tb2 ? | |
| [12:33] <asac> yeah | |
| [12:33] <asac> white is from debian security team and also seems to be iterested in helpign out a bit more | |
| [12:33] <fta> the package looks like my tb3 | |
| [12:33] <asac> on tbird 3 | |
| [12:33] <asac> fta: no icedove package looks like the tbird 2 packages we have | |
| [12:34] <asac> i mean the icedove 2 ;) | |
| [12:34] <fta> really? | |
| [12:34] <asac> fta: of course ... i am the icedove maintainer ;) | |
| [12:34] <asac> fta: icedove 3 doesnt exist yet ... but white wnated to look at them and i told him to base this on tbird 2 | |
| [12:34] <asac> err 3 | |
| [12:36] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/98974/ | |
| [12:36] <fta> looks like icedove 3 to me | |
| [12:36] <asac> fta: nice ... seems he already diud it then | |
| [12:36] <asac> fta: yeah | |
| [12:37] <asac> i never questioned that ;) | |
| [12:37] <asac> i guess the branding dir is a bit fucked still ... but that shouldnt be hard to fix | |
| [12:37] <fta> so a mozilla-devscripts file and it rocks | |
| [12:38] <asac> we could move it there ... but i think it makes most sense to just use tbird 3 moz-devscript stuff | |
| [12:38] <asac> and patch the branding and so in debian/rules | |
| [12:38] <asac> if you want to add a icedove.mk ... why not ;)= | |
| [12:38] <asac> though i thought we wanted to stop putting more orig logic into -devscripts | |
| [12:38] <fta> remember the project file could live in the package now | |
| [12:39] <BUGabundo> hi | |
| [12:39] <asac> fta: right ... thats what i would want in this case | |
| [12:39] <BUGabundo> will someone moderate my email on the ML? | |
| [12:39] <BUGabundo> thanks in advance! | |
| [12:39] <fta> i mean, use a project file instead of the new stuff in the diff | |
| [12:39] <asac> BUGabundo: i would if i could | |
| [12:39] <asac> remember | |
| [12:39] <asac> ;) | |
| [12:39] <asac> the pass | |
| [12:39] <asac> usually gnomefreak does that | |
| [12:39] <BUGabundo> ehehe | |
| [12:39] <asac> fta: sure. can you guide white how to do that? | |
| [12:42] <fta> yep | |
| [12:48] <fta> asac, but that mean m-d in debian... | |
| [12:57] <asac> fta: thats ok | |
| [12:57] <asac> nobody raised any real concern and even if ... ;) | |
| [12:57] <asac> who cares? | |
| [12:57] <asac> :-Ü | |
| [13:05] <asac> ok 64-bit native plugin backed out :) | |
| [13:05] <fta> why? | |
| [13:05] <asac> because we dont have a stable URL ;) | |
| [13:06] <asac> already discussed that right? | |
| [13:06] <fta> oh | |
| [13:06] <asac> also kees dumped nspluginwrapper support | |
| [13:06] <asac> which is supposed to be optional | |
| [13:07] <asac> fta: native will come back when adobe has final ... so we can download it from partner | |
| [13:07] <asac> also latest nspluginwrapper is quite perfect | |
| [13:07] <asac> shouldnt make much a difference anymore ... except that ffox doesnt crash | |
| [13:09] <asac> fta: give it a try on 32-bit | |
| [13:09] <asac> for me it just rocks ;) | |
| [13:34] <fta> is there a cdbs hook for lintian? | |
| [13:35] <fta> i mean, an existing .mk | |
| [13:35] <asac> fta: in which way? | |
| [13:35] <asac> so that it gets run automatically? | |
| [13:35] <fta> just build-dep on lintian, include a file and done | |
| [13:35] <fta> yep | |
| [13:35] <asac> fta: purpose: run auto? | |
| [13:35] <asac> ah ok | |
| [13:36] <asac> i dont think so ... i think the current hook is: "use debuild" | |
| [13:36] <asac> not dpkg-buildpackage | |
| [13:37] <asac> fta: what was the prob with mozilla bug 470379 ? | |
| [13:37] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 470379 in Add-ons Manager "Remove code to upgrade from 1.0 profiles" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470379 | |
| [13:38] <asac> breaks our gre patch? | |
| [13:38] <asac> Jazzva: there? | |
| [13:38] <asac> ;) | |
| [13:38] <fta> well, no real problem, a chunk of code disappeared | |
| [13:39] <fta> so part of the patch is gone now | |
| [13:39] <asac> fta: did our code touch V10 function? | |
| [13:40] <asac> _upgradeFromV10 i mean | |
| [13:41] <fta> asac, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.2.head/revision/396 | |
| [13:41] <Jazzva> asac: yep | |
| [13:43] <asac> Jazzva: hi ... i uploaded nspluginwrapper ,) | |
| [13:43] <Jazzva> asac: thanks :) | |
| [13:43] <asac> Jazzva: we have one rather important feature we need for nspluginwrapper: auto-update of wrappers | |
| [13:44] <asac> my current idea is that nspluginwrapper has a registry dir like: /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/wrapper.d/ | |
| [13:44] <asac> which nspluginwrapper looks at during postinst and recreates the wrappers | |
| [13:45] <asac> i hope we can just put the wrapper.so's in there and nspluginwrapper is smart enough to find the "source" when using the -u flag | |
| [13:45] <Jazzva> we can try that :) | |
| [13:45] <asac> like nspluginwrapper -u /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | |
| [13:45] <asac> err | |
| [13:46] <asac> but of course a different path | |
| [13:46] <asac> nspluginwrapper -u /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/wrapper.d/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | |
| [13:46] <asac> if we cannput put the wrappers there directly we can have text files in there with lines like: | |
| [13:46] <asac> /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplugin.so | |
| [13:47] <asac> but i hope that nspluginwrapper -u just works | |
| [13:47] <asac> (though it seems to not do anything - at least when i dont change the /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplugin.so ...) | |
| [13:48] <asac> nspluginwrapper -v -n -u /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | |
| [13:48] <asac> Update plugin /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | |
| [13:48] <asac> nspluginwrapper -v -n -u /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | |
| [13:48] <asac> Update plugin /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | |
| [13:48] <asac> oops | |
| [13:48] <asac> ;) | |
| [13:48] <asac> it doesnt touch it ... so maybe its rewally smart and checks md5sums? | |
| [13:49] <asac> or its broken | |
| [13:49] <Jazzva> maybe they're already updated :)? | |
| [13:50] <asac> yes thats what i mean ... but that would mean its smart and checks md5sums ... or maybe it doesnt do anything if the api is ok? | |
| [13:50] <Jazzva> the last time I needed to recreate wrappers was when we moved from 1.1.8 to 1.1.10 | |
| [13:50] <asac> no clue | |
| [13:50] <asac> we should try | |
| [13:50] <asac> yeah | |
| [13:50] <asac> i am just curious if its smart enough or if its broken :) | |
| [13:50] <Jazzva> let me downgrade to 1.1.8, and test | |
| [13:51] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/99011/ | |
| [13:51] <asac> thats the code | |
| [13:51] <asac> yeah downgrade would help | |
| [13:54] <asac> else if (strcmp(plugin_info.ident, NPW_PLUGIN_IDENT) != 0) { | |
| [13:54] <asac> seems to do something smart at least | |
| [13:54] <Jazzva> right, looking at that part | |
| [13:54] <asac> else if (strcmp(plugin_info.ident, NPW_PLUGIN_IDENT) != 0) { | |
| [13:55] <asac> oh so maybe a touch of the .so is enough | |
| [13:55] <asac> to trigger it | |
| [13:55] <Jazzva> brb, lunch time... | |
| [13:55] <asac> yeah | |
| [13:56] <asac> ok so upgrading plugins would work that way | |
| [13:56] <asac> now just to check whether upgrading/downgradiung nspluginwrapper works too | |
| [14:30] <Jazzva> asac, where does nspluginwrapper put its wrappers? | |
| [14:31] <Jazzva> asac: npwrapper.libflashplayer.so -> /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree//npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | |
| [14:31] <asac> Jazzva: currently its undefined | |
| [14:31] <Jazzva> but /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/ is empty... | |
| [14:31] <asac> Jazzva: we can either say: they always have to be in /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/wrapper.d | |
| [14:31] <asac> or we can say that they have to put a text file in that directory | |
| [14:32] <asac> that describes where the parts are | |
| [14:32] <asac> Jazzva: well ... it shouldnt be empty | |
| [14:32] <asac> Jazzva: if you are on jaunty its because kees dropped nspluginwrapper support | |
| [14:32] <asac> completely | |
| [14:32] <asac> i uploaded a fixed version earlier today | |
| [14:32] <Jazzva> ah... ok | |
| [14:32] <asac> maybe its already on your mirror m | |
| [14:32] <Jazzva> that explains it :) | |
| [14:32] <asac> flashplugin-nonfree that is | |
| [14:33] <asac> yeah ;) | |
| [14:33] <asac> Jazzva: i think we should put the wrappers directly there | |
| [14:33] <asac> and make a link in /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin.so ... which is then used also if you dont use wrapper | |
| [14:34] <asac> but i can fix the flashplugin-nonfree mess | |
| [14:34] <asac> will do it when renaming the package to flashplugin-installer | |
| [14:36] <asac> Jazzva: so the idea is to ship a script in /usr/sbin/update-npwrappers | |
| [14:36] <asac> that updates the wrappers .... flashplugin-nonfree will then just call that in postinst | |
| [14:36] <asac> hmm | |
| [14:37] <Jazzva> we should still have an option for people that don't want to use npw for some reason... | |
| [14:38] <Jazzva> can't we just call npw -u? | |
| [14:38] <asac> Jazzva: imo thats independent ... postinst of flashplugin-nonfree should still check whether nspluginwrapper is on system before doing that | |
| [14:39] <asac> urg ... http://paste.ubuntu.com/99048/ | |
| [14:39] <asac> fta: ^^ | |
| [14:39] <asac> whats up with launchpad cert? | |
| [14:40] <Jazzva> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/99049/ | |
| [14:40] <asac> Jazzva: its a bit difficult | |
| [14:40] <Jazzva> npw -u should work :) | |
| [14:40] <asac> Jazzva: yeah i think thats ok | |
| [14:40] <asac> Jazzva: i just wonder if we need more magic | |
| [14:40] <asac> i mean: postinst would have to check whether a wrapper was already created | |
| [14:41] <asac> question here is: does postinst know the name? | |
| [14:41] <asac> and path ... where to look at? | |
| [14:41] <asac> maybe nspluginwrapper should ship a ensure-npw <FILE> ... which would then do the magic of | |
| [14:41] <asac> a) guessing whether its already wrapped | |
| [14:41] <asac> b) run -u or -i depending on the result | |
| [14:42] <asac> do we know whether its safe to guess the wrapper filename like: npwrapper.<ORIGINAL-FILENAME> ? | |
| [14:43] <asac> imo we should put that logic in nspluginwrapper ... so we just have to change it at that place if that guessing changes at some point | |
| [14:43] <fta> asac, tar: icedove-branding-2.0.0.x.tar.gz: Cannot open: No such file or directory | |
| [14:43] <asac> fta: yeah but thats the followup issue | |
| [14:43] <asac> fta: the issue is that bzr branch bails out due to cert issues | |
| [14:43] <Jazzva> asac: I'll check in the source | |
| [14:43] <asac> so i dont have a tarball | |
| [14:44] <fta> asac, is that a signed branch ? or a branch with signed commits ? | |
| [14:44] <asac> Jazzva: i think its curently safe ... what i mean is that we need a script to do the update-install stuff in nspluginwrapper ... so we dont have to put that guess-logic in each and every package | |
| [14:44] <asac> fta: i think its a ssl cert issue | |
| [14:45] <asac> because its a curl issue | |
| [14:45] <asac> bzr: ERROR: pycurl.error: (60, 'server certificate verification failed. CAfile: /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt') | |
| [14:45] <fta> do you have that file? | |
| [14:45] <fta> i do | |
| [14:45] <Jazzva> asac: right, we could run "nspluginwrapper -l" to check for installed wrappers, and then to run "nspluginwrapper -u" on them, if that works | |
| [14:45] <asac> fta: try to run: | |
| [14:45] <fta> i need to run, cu ~7pm | |
| [14:46] <asac> sh -c "cd $tmpdir; bzr export --format=tgz --root= icedove-branding-2.0.0.x.tar.gz lp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/icedove-branding-2.0.0.x ; tar xzf icedove-branding-2.0.0.x.tar.gz" | |
| [14:46] <asac> Jazzva: do you run jaunty? can you try the command above? | |
| [14:46] <asac> fta: ok | |
| [14:46] <asac> cu | |
| [14:46] <Jazzva> asac: ok | |
| [14:46] <james_w> bug 310675 | |
| [14:46] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 310675 in gnutls26 "failure to trust login.launchpad.net, while openssl does" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/310675 | |
| [14:46] <asac> Jazzva: err sorry | |
| [14:46] <asac> ;) | |
| [14:46] <asac> Jazzva: rock thanks | |
| [14:46] <asac> james_w: ^^ | |
| [14:47] <fta> "--root= icedove-branding-2.0.0.x.tar.gz" ? | |
| [14:47] <asac> Jazzva: so nevermind ;) | |
| [14:47] <asac> fta: thats ok ... it always worked | |
| [14:47] <Jazzva> ok :) | |
| [14:47] <asac> james_w: happy new year .... do you know that bzr bd _always_ recreates tar if we have .bzr-builddeb/default.conf magic? | |
| [14:47] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/99053/ | |
| [14:47] <asac> james_w: that caused issue for me because the orig doesnt match everywhere | |
| [14:47] <james_w> asac: yes | |
| [14:47] <james_w> it's a known problem | |
| [14:48] <asac> james_w: ok so its accepted as a problem. thanks | |
| [14:48] <asac> james_w: is there a bug | |
| [14:48] <asac> fta: yeah i was dumb | |
| [14:49] <asac> fta: i pasted the wrong code ;) ... the code that fails uses https://code.launchpad.net/~mozillateam | |
| [14:49] <asac> as branch | |
| [14:49] <asac> fta: thanks anyway | |
| [14:50] <james_w> asac: can't find one | |
| [14:50] <Jazzva> asac: this should update wrappers, at least it seems logical to me :)... nspluginwrapper -v -n -u `nspluginwrapper -l | grep "npwrapper"` | |
| [14:52] <asac> Jazzva: hmm ... for that we would need to teach nspluginwrappera bout our other locations | |
| [14:52] <asac> e.g. xulrunner-addons/plugins firefox-addons/plugins/ | |
| [14:53] <asac> but i think thats the right way to go | |
| [14:53] <asac> otoh what if users have their own wrapper installed? | |
| [14:53] <Jazzva> shouldn't npw already know about it? | |
| [14:53] <asac> Jazzva: how? i think the current -l logic is quiet dump. will probably scan a fixed set of directories (e.g. profile + system dirs) | |
| [14:54] <asac> i dont think it checks whether the plugin originates from itself | |
| [14:54] <Jazzva> ok, i'll check | |
| [14:55] <asac> Jazzva: we could whitelist a bunch of locations | |
| [14:56] <asac> Jazzva: but maybe we should really just do what you suggested | |
| [14:56] <asac> and teach npw about more locations | |
| [14:56] <asac> and later fix the "dont do that if its not generated by the packaged npw" | |
| [14:56] <Jazzva> asac: it's in process_list, and it checks dirs returend by get_mozilla_plugin_dirs() | |
| [14:57] <Jazzva> (in file npw-config.c) | |
| [14:57] <asac> Jazzva: yes. do you see any meta info field that points to the npw lib? | |
| [14:57] <asac> strings /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so | grep /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/ | |
| [14:57] <asac> /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/linux/npwrapper.so | |
| [14:58] <asac> Jazzva: ^^ | |
| [14:58] <asac> so there seems to be some meta info available that we could use to limit output of -l | |
| [14:58] <Jazzva> ah... I see... | |
| [14:58] <asac> of course at best fix -l itself and not write something around it | |
| [14:58] <asac> ok lets go for it | |
| [14:59] <asac> question now is whether we want to provide a convenice ensure-and-update-npw <FILE> | |
| [14:59] <asac> convenience | |
| [14:59] <asac> also we might want to have something like delete-npw <FILE>2D | |
| [15:00] <Jazzva> NPW_PluginInfo should be the struct that holds all information about wrapper... | |
| [15:00] <asac> yeah | |
| [15:01] <asac> typedef struct __attribute__((packed)) { char ident[NPW_PLUGIN_IDENT_SIZE]; char path[PATH_MAX]; time_t mtime; char target_arch[65]; char target_os[65]; | |
| [15:01] <asac> } NPW_PluginInfo; | |
| [15:01] <asac> in sysdeps.h | |
| [15:02] <Jazzva> right... | |
| [15:03] <asac> so is "path" the path from above? | |
| [15:03] <asac> maybe a printf(..) would help | |
| [15:03] <asac> ;) | |
| [15:03] <Jazzva> asac: we could just add our dirs in "static const char *default_dirs[]" in npw-config.c, which I think we already do in one patch | |
| [15:04] <asac> +static const char *debian_link_dirs[] = { | |
| [15:04] <asac> thats all quiet messy imo | |
| [15:04] <Jazzva> yeah ;) | |
| [15:05] <asac> i think its really just a hack for the "instalL" | |
| [15:05] <asac> doesnt register the dirs in there properly | |
| [15:05] <asac> 000_debian_make_symlinks.diff | |
| [15:05] <asac> or? | |
| [15:06] <asac> Jazzva: so we have NSPLUGIN_DIR ... whiuch we use to installl "just" to a specific dir | |
| [15:06] <asac> maybe we can just use the current dirs ... and the NSPLUGIN_DIR (if set) to implement -l | |
| [15:07] <Jazzva> asac: btw, path field is the path to the original plugin "printf(" Original plugin: %s\n", plugin_info.path);" | |
| [15:08] <asac> hmm | |
| [15:08] <asac> so its not in that struct | |
| [15:09] <asac> Jazzva: we have: | |
| [15:09] <asac> src/npw-config.c: && strcmp(plugin_info.path, NPW_OLD_DEFAULT_PLUGIN_PATH) != 0; // exclude ARCH npwrapper.so | |
| [15:09] <asac> src/sysdeps.h:#define NPW_OLD_DEFAULT_PLUGIN_PATH NPW_LIBDIR "/" HOST_ARCH "/" NPW_WRAPPER | |
| [15:09] <asac> src/npw-config.c: && strcmp(plugin_info.path, NPW_OLD_DEFAULT_PLUGIN_PATH) != 0; // exclude ARCH npwrapper.so | |
| [15:09] <asac> src/sysdeps.h:#define NPW_OLD_DEFAULT_PLUGIN_PATH NPW_LIBDIR "/" HOST_ARCH "/" NPW_WRAPPER | |
| [15:09] <asac> for me this seems like plugin_info.path is really supposed to be the wrapper.so path | |
| [15:09] <asac> and not the original plugin | |
| [15:09] <asac> strange | |
| [15:09] <asac> maybe there are two plugin_info ? | |
| [15:11] <Jazzva> not sure... | |
| [15:11] <asac> Jazzva: oh ok | |
| [15:11] <asac> maybe the wrapper.so is a valid plugin and this function just ensures that it doesnt wrap itself | |
| [15:11] <asac> so yeah | |
| [15:11] <asac> so there is most likely no such info available | |
| [15:11] <asac> too bad | |
| [15:13] <asac> so we would need to extent this thing ... but well | |
| [15:13] <asac> should be possible to do in future | |
| [15:13] <asac> so nothing really blocking us imo | |
| [15:14] <asac> Jazzva: i think if we have all right dirs registered, just running | |
| [15:14] <asac> nspluginwrapper -u | |
| [15:14] <asac> (without file) should just work | |
| [15:14] <asac> well i mean its supposed to work | |
| [15:14] <asac> ;) | |
| [15:14] <asac> semantic like: upgrade all | |
| [15:15] <Jazzva> asac: will work, if we change it :). I think I already tried running "npw -u" :) | |
| [15:15] <Jazzva> npw -a? | |
| [15:16] <Jazzva> asac: nspluginwrapper -v -a -u | |
| [15:17] <asac> yeah ;9 | |
| [15:17] <asac> just found it too | |
| [15:17] <asac> sudo nspluginwrapper -v -a -u | |
| [15:17] <asac> hehe | |
| [15:17] <Jazzva> :) | |
| [15:17] <asac> i think we also need -n ? | |
| [15:17] <Jazzva> which is done here: static int auto_update_plugins(void) on line 952 in npw-config.c | |
| [15:18] <Jazzva> so, if we need to add more dirs, we can patch get_mozilla_plugin_dirs... | |
| [15:19] <asac> yes. so hard code or use NSPLUGIN_DIRS=dir1,dir2,dir3 ... to extend that list? | |
| [15:20] <asac> maybe hardcode and send upstream | |
| [15:21] <asac> so adding xulrunner-addons firefox-addons mozilla and /var/lib/nspluginwrapper/wrapper.d/ | |
| [15:32] <Jazzva> asac, so are we going that way? to patch default_dirs? | |
| [15:32] <asac> Jazzva: yep ... want to do that? | |
| [15:32] <Jazzva> ok... | |
| [15:33] <Jazzva> do we use /usr/lib64/firefox-addons and stuff for x64 sysstems? | |
| [15:33] <asac> Jazzva: you could also adjust the nspluginwrapper dir used by the debian patch that creates symlinks | |
| [15:33] <Jazzva> *systems | |
| [15:33] <asac> it should use the wrapper.d too i think | |
| [15:33] <asac> hmm | |
| [15:33] <asac> yeah i thkink that would be right | |
| [15:34] <asac> Jazzva: i think we dont need /usr/lib64/ for now ... just /usr/lib/ i think | |
| [15:34] <asac> but we might want to revisit that situation when we come to 64-bit native plugin and stuff | |
| [15:35] <Jazzva> asac: also, take a look at this :) | |
| [15:35] <asac> s/situation/decision/ ;) i am stupid | |
| [15:35] <Jazzva> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/99071/ hehe :) | |
| [15:36] <Jazzva> 'n' for "native", and 'n' for "nosymlinks" | |
| [15:37] <asac> lets use "z" then ;) | |
| [15:37] <asac> for nosymlinks | |
| [15:37] <asac> and send that changed patch to debian | |
| [15:37] <Jazzva> and to also document it in print_usage | |
| [15:37] <Jazzva> since it's documented in manpage, as -n parameter, and it's not documented in --help | |
| [15:38] <asac> yeah | |
| [15:38] <Jazzva> ok, I'll fix that later. I'm gonna work on school project a bit :) | |
| [15:38] <Jazzva> so we can continue this later tonight :) | |
| [15:38] <asac> yeah and iam going http://identi.ca/notice/1684595 | |
| [15:38] <asac> cu later | |
| [15:38] <Jazzva> have fun, cu | |
| [15:39] <asac> sport isnt much fun for me | |
| [15:39] <asac> ;) | |
| [15:39] <asac> but thanks! | |
| [15:39] <asac> u2 | |
| [15:39] <Jazzva> heh | |
| [15:39] <Jazzva> thanks | |
| [18:31] <fta> crimsun, it's back ? http://paste.ubuntu.com/99150/ | |
| [19:41] <asac> fta: upload.ubuntu.com ftp is down? | |
| [19:41] <fta> no idea | |
| [19:46] <asac> so the glue in debian will go to icedove-dev | |
| [19:47] <asac> as it seems | |
| [19:47] <asac> and iceape will be dropped or EOL'ed once we find that we cannot provide sec support in lenny | |
| [19:48] <fta> do you mean, no seamonkey at all in debian? | |
| [19:56] <asac> yes | |
| [19:56] <asac> nobody cares enough to prepare a build and QA that based on new tarballs | |
| [19:57] <asac> for security updates | |
| [19:57] <fta> maybe someone should inform upstream | |
| [19:58] <asac> about what? | |
| [19:58] <asac> that nobody wants to step up for iceape? | |
| [20:01] <asac> or that they managed to make seamonkey become another victim of heavy maintenance burden due to mozilla security policy? | |
| [20:01] <asac> ;) | |
| [20:01] <asac> seriously, it shows how hard it is for mozilla software to stay in a distro | |
| [20:12] <asac> Jazzva: ok so just running -u as root sounds a bit scary as it seems to update user profile wrappers too | |
| [20:13] <Jazzva> asac: patching the source to add option --no-profile-dirs? | |
| [20:14] <Jazzva> so, if that's set, then we can skip return of profile dir in get_mozilla_plugin_dirs :)... | |
| [20:15] <fta> #rank name inst vote old recent no-files (maintainer) | |
| [20:15] <fta> 4976 seamonkey-browser 9732 4262 4565 903 2 (Ubuntu Mozilla Team) | |
| [20:15] <fta> 6136 iceape-browser 6465 118 4236 13 2098 (Ubuntu Mozilla Team) | |
| [20:15] <fta> 33581 seamonkey-2.0-browser 42 16 19 7 0 (Unknown) | |
| [20:15] <asac> wow | |
| [20:15] <asac> no-files ok | |
| [20:15] <asac> quiet a bunch of gutsy users? | |
| [20:16] <asac> i think no-files is transitional package | |
| [20:16] <fta> 8565 seamonkey 2993 0 6 0 2987 (Ubuntu Mozilla Team) | |
| [20:16] <asac> and just iceape?` | |
| [20:16] <fta> 10448 iceape 1798 0 0 0 1798 (Ubuntu Mozilla Team) | |
| [20:17] <asac> so seamonkey is probably | |
| [20:17] <asac> ~ the same as the users thatinstalled it to use it | |
| [20:17] <asac> the rest is pulled in by rdepends? | |
| [20:17] <asac> are there rdepends? | |
| [20:17] <asac> hmm | |
| [20:18] <asac> fta: look at mozilla-noscript | |
| [20:19] <asac> that has rank 5630 and pulls in seamonkey-browser? | |
| [20:19] <fta> 5815 mozilla-noscript 7233 955 4953 801 524 (Arnaud Renevier) | |
| [20:19] <asac> yeah ... that pulls in seamonkey-browser | |
| [20:19] <asac> i have the feeling that this is an accident then | |
| [20:19] <asac> almost everyone wanted -noscript | |
| [20:19] <asac> but well ... quiet guesswork | |
| [20:20] <fta> i dropped -noscript since ff3.0, adblock is enough | |
| [20:20] <asac> just seems strange that almost every seamonkey user uses noscript ;) | |
| [20:20] <asac> fta: yes :) | |
| [20:20] <asac> fta: but it seems that we didnt transition it for firefox users | |
| [20:20] <asac> and now users that used that in the past have seamonkey-browser ;) | |
| [20:20] <asac> (just one/my theory) | |
| [20:20] <fta> 1514 thunderbird 180467 45689 122773 11956 49 (Alexander Sack) | |
| [20:20] <fta> 1667 mozilla-thunderbird 131112 617 48249 114 82132 (Alexander Sack) | |
| [20:20] <fta> 25793 thunderbird-3.0 141 16 66 59 0 (Unknown) | |
| [20:21] <fta> 141, lol | |
| [20:21] <fta> most were at uds then ;) | |
| [20:21] <asac> its b1? | |
| [20:21] <asac> why not upload to jaunty? | |
| [20:21] <fta> it's my ppa | |
| [20:22] <fta> no reason | |
| [20:22] <asac> ok will look and if i have any idea that we need something before let you know | |
| [20:23] <fta> 14973 firefox-3.1 891 146 312 433 0 (Unknown) | |
| [20:23] <fta> 35431 firefox-3.2 40 5 0 35 0 (Unknown) | |
| [20:23] <asac> +EXTRA_SYSTEM_CONFIGURE_FLAGS | |
| [20:23] <asac> why do we set that to NULL? | |
| [20:23] <asac> what harmful stuff is in there by default? | |
| [20:24] <asac> (xul ...head) | |
| [20:24] <fta> nothing, i like to set default, habits | |
| [20:24] <asac> the "fix permissions" commit is a good one ;) | |
| [20:24] <asac> good catch | |
| [20:25] <asac> fta: yeah lets dump it. otherwise its not easy to set from outside | |
| [20:26] <asac> fta: so you are now officially a icedove uploader ;) | |
| [20:26] <fta> ? | |
| [20:26] <asac> oh you just ahve to send your key to the debian keyring thing | |
| [20:26] <asac> ;) | |
| [20:26] <asac> hmm ... too bad. i didnt sign your key right? | |
| [20:26] <asac> dump | |
| [20:27] <Nafallo> asac: you never signed mine either ;-) | |
| [20:29] <asac> Nafallo: yeah. i am not really a fan of key-parties ;) not beerful enough | |
| [20:30] <Nafallo> asac: ...we had an office... ;-) | |
| [20:30] <fta> damn, i wanted to do that at UDS | |
| [20:32] <asac> fta: you could visit mh ;) | |
| [20:33] <asac> he probably is in paris (not sure) | |
| [20:33] <fta> he's in the area, but i don't remember where | |
| [20:33] <asac> hmm ... my fox hangs | |
| [20:33] <asac> otherwise i would look | |
| [20:33] <fta> ? | |
| [20:34] <asac> ok lets see | |
| [20:34] <asac> too bad that i had to kill ffox | |
| [20:36] <fta> each time mine dies or freezes, it's sound related | |
| [20:37] <asac> mine was "large" page | |
| [20:40] <asac> fta: seems to live outside of paris | |
| [20:40] <asac> 10km from centre north west | |
| [20:40] <fta> i'm ~10k west | |
| [20:41] <asac> quiet close then ;) | |
| [20:41] <asac> hehe | |
| [20:42] <fta> quite, yes | |
| [20:45] <fta> are the *.install files bashisms or not? | |
| [20:45] <asac> good question | |
| [20:45] <fta> i mean, can i use {foo,bar} in there? | |
| [20:45] <asac> /usr/bin/dh_install | |
| [20:46] <fta> hm, perl globs | |
| [20:46] <Nafallo> asac: pm :-) | |
| [20:47] <asac> http://identi.ca/notice/1687030 | |
| [20:47] <asac> Nafallo: ^^ | |
| [20:47] <Nafallo> ah. hehe. | |
| [20:49] <fta> well.. https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=fennec | |
| [21:15] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/99213/ | |
| [21:23] <asac> fta: license file will make it fail anyway ;) | |
| [21:26] <fta> maybe | |
| [21:26] <fta> it's not clear what i should do with this testsuite now. is that even supposed to run fine? | |
| [21:28] <fta> just tried one at random, it's scary: http://paste.ubuntu.com/99219/ | |
| [21:30] <asac> fta: are those mochitests failing? | |
| [21:32] <fta> donno, this is what is installed with --enable-tests --enable-mochitest | |
| [21:32] <asac> fta: try without mochitest | |
| [21:33] <fta> i can run make check at build time, it looks nicer | |
| [21:33] <asac> fta: i think you have to run "make check" | |
| [21:33] <fta> it fails at some point: http://paste.ubuntu.com/99221/ | |
| [21:50] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/uriloader/exthandler/tests/unit/test_handlerService.js#155 | |
| [21:51] <asac> fta: maybe gconf? | |
| [21:51] <fta> mozilla bug 470307 | |
| [21:51] <asac> err gnome-support i mean ;) | |
| [21:51] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 470307 in File Handling "'make check' on OSX depends on Mail.app being installed" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470307 | |
| [21:51] <asac> do_check_eq(0, protoInfo.possibleApplicationHandlers.length); | |
| [21:51] <asac> do_check_false(protoInfo.alwaysAskBeforeHandling); | |
| [21:51] <asac> thats for http | |
| [21:51] <asac> what profile is the "test" using? | |
| [21:52] <fta> i have no clue | |
| [21:53] <fta> i'm walking in dark here | |
| [22:05] <fta> i have a whole lot of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | |
| [22:07] <fta> i should ship _tests too. | |
| [22:07] <fta> but where? | |
| [22:07] <fta> /usr/share/doc ? /usr/lib ? | |
| [22:17] <fta> stuck.. | |
| [22:17] <fta> dpkg-buildpacka───rules───make───sh───make───sh───make───sh───make───sh───make───sh───run-mozilla.sh───test_all.sh───xpcshell───2*[{xpcshell}] | |
| [22:18] <fta> or slow? | |
| [22:24] <fta> asac, build-tree/mozilla/_tests/xpcshell-simple/test_update/profile/cookies.sqlite | |
| [22:37] <asac> good | |
| [22:38] <fta> it seems i'm stuck in test_0040_general.js | |
| [22:38] <fta> log ends with: Testing: url constructed with %LOCALE% - http://localhost:4444/data/%LOCALE%/ | |
| [22:39] <fta> not sure what to expect | |
| [22:41] <asac> fta: which test? | |
| [22:41] <asac> pt1, 2, 3? | |
| [22:42] <asac> probably updateChecker doesnt work | |
| [22:42] <fta> not sure | |
| [22:42] <fta> fta 18643 0.0 0.7 48972 14840 ? Sl+ 23:05 0:00 ../../../../dist/bin/xpcshell -j -s -f ../../../../tools/test-harness/xpcshell-simple/head.js -f ../../../../_tests/xpcshell-simple/test_update/unit/head_update.js -f ../../../../_tests/xpcshell-simple/test_update/unit/test_0040_general.js -f ../../../../tools/test-harness/xpcshell-simple/tail.js -f ../../../../tools/test-harness/xpcshell-simple/execute_test.js -f ../../../../_tests | |
| [22:42] <fta> /xpcshell-simple/test_update/unit/tail_update.js | |
| [22:42] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/update/test/unit/test_0040_general.js.in#309 | |
| [22:43] <asac> yes i the tail is probably waiting for the async event to set something | |
| [22:43] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/99261/ | |
| [22:43] <asac> like "do_timeout" ;) | |
| [22:43] <fta> there's a process listening on localhost:4444 | |
| [22:45] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/99264/ | |
| [22:46] <fta> btw, this is 1.9.1, not trunk | |
| [22:48] <fta> mozilla Bug 446527 | |
| [22:48] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 446527 in Application Update "major update not offered when some language packs are installed" [Blocker,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446527 | |
| [22:49] <asac> fta: are you running stuff shipped in testsuite or in build tree? | |
| [22:49] <asac> (testsuite - package) | |
| [22:49] <fta> make check in the build tree for now | |
| [22:50] <asac> fta: why does -testsuite conflict with 1.9.2? | |
| [22:50] <asac> those ship different paths from what i see in .install | |
| [22:50] <fta> because it installs files in the -dev dirs, and -dev conflicts | |
| [22:51] <fta> (it installs idl/h files) | |
| [22:51] <asac> fta: yes. but they already conflict | |
| [22:52] <fta> doesn't matter much for now, it's still just an experiment | |
| [22:53] <asac> yeah | |
| [22:54] <fta> maybe it fails because i have no locales for 3.1.. | |
| [22:56] <asac> you know whether the same happens on 1.9.2? | |
| [22:56] <asac> (i only have such a tree) | |
| [22:57] <fta> donno | |
| [23:22] <fta> asac, it seems make check is not what i want, according to this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421611#c5 | |
| [23:22] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 421611 in Build Config "Need to be able to run tests on arbitrary build" [Normal,New] | |
| [23:27] <[reed]> asac: upstream doesn't care about Debian's non-branded builds | |
| [23:27] <[reed]> if you want an honest answer | |
| [23:27] <[reed]> :) | |
| [23:28] <fta> imho, upstream doesn't care enough about linux/unix as a whole | |
| [23:28] <fta> and even worse, upstream cares only about firefox | |
| [23:29] <[reed]> eh, I disagree | |
| [23:29] <[reed]> they care about linux/unix, or else we wouldn't spend so much time on stuff... Linux/Unix is especially important with Mobile | |
| [23:29] <[reed]> however, I can agree that upstream cares more about Firefox than anything else | |
| [23:29] <[reed]> but that's just how things are | |
| [23:30] <asac> i think its human to do that | |
| [23:30] <fta> you don't care about desktop users, mostly because you can't count us | |
| [23:30] <asac> but the weight is not perfectly balanced imo | |
| [23:30] <[reed]> if your blocklist code isn't broken, we do count you | |
| [23:30] <[reed]> Linux is just tiny | |
| [23:30] <[reed]> even Mac is so much bigger | |
| [23:31] <fta> we have more choices too | |
| [23:32] <asac> problem with using stats to allocate investments is that it will bias the future ;) | |
| [23:32] <asac> (not really saying that this is happening here ... more like a general statement) | |
| [23:33] <[reed]> I think Linux is still being considered upstream pretty heavily, imho... now, packaging/embedding, maybe no, but support for Linux is definitely a priority | |
| [23:34] <asac> i have no real complains about linux in specific | |
| [23:35] <asac> my only criticism would be that resource allocation is done based on how popular a product is atm | |
| [23:54] <asac> fta: TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | ../../../_tests/xpcshell-simple/test_libjar/unit/test_bug407303.js | test failed, see log | |
| [23:54] <fta> asac, as i said, i have tons of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | |
| [23:55] <[reed]> that's not good | |
| [23:55] <[reed]> you should be passing the test suite, as we do | |
| [23:55] <[reed]> :( | |
| [23:56] <fta> that's what i'm trying to do | |
| [23:57] <[reed]> how are you running them? #developers and Waldo are two good sources of help | |
| [23:58] <fta> make check for now | |
| [23:59] <[reed]> I don't know enough about the test suite to help you that much... gavin and dolske might can help. | |