| [03:54] <clerum> is there anything futher I could do to help get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/254622 | |
| [03:54] <ubot3> Malone bug 254622 in linux "TCP uses wrong MTU/MSS size for IPv6" [Medium,Triaged] | |
| [03:54] <clerum> moved along? | |
| [03:54] <clerum> is there more information I could provide? | |
| [03:56] <clerum> unfortunatly I have no clue where to start in fixing this...and java is my only language so I doubt I would be much help | |
| [09:42] <apw> dtchen, hi there ... question about a quirk you are suggesting on a bug, about? | |
| [12:45] <JesperHansen> This seems like the right channel to ask this | |
| [12:45] <JesperHansen> Was wondering if there's an updated version of https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CustomRestrictedModules#Modify%20debian/rules somewhere. abi_version doesn't exist in the enlisted file debian/rules | |
| [12:47] <JesperHansen> Compared against linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27 | |
| [13:43] <Kano> hi rtg ,did you read my mail about rt2860/2870? | |
| [13:45] <Kano> rtg: the drivers are working, no patching needed, you can copy em over from 2.6.29 | |
| [13:46] <Kano> just dont forget to add the firmware as well | |
| [13:46] <rtg> Kano: I'' get to it later today. I just got back from 3 days off and have a bunch of emails. | |
| [13:46] <Kano> you will see the 2 firmware links for it in the mail | |
| [14:24] <apw> sconklin, hi, i did another change for the apport stuff, to send the stress log as well as the flag file. this is up for review now | |
| [14:25] <sconklin> apw: I was just coming to those in my email for the morning | |
| [14:26] <apw> matt's emails yes? | |
| [14:30] <apw> sconklin, anyhow, just wanted you to know i had taken care of the strees.log part, so i think once all these changes hit the relevant packages we should be 'good' | |
| [14:34] <JesperHansen> Was wondering if there's an updated version of https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CustomRestrictedModules#Modify%20debian/rules somewhere. abi_version doesn't exist in the enlisted file debian/rules compared howto against linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27 | |
| [14:36] <rtg> JesperHansen: Its in debian/rules.d/0-common-vars.mk | |
| [14:37] <JesperHansen> rtg: thanks | |
| [14:38] <JesperHansen> rtg: and abi_version has been renamed? Cant see its presence in there either | |
| [14:39] <rtg> JesperHansen: Its called abinum. The LRM package structure changed quite a lot from Hardy to Intrepid. | |
| [14:40] <JesperHansen> rtg: ye, I figured it was some old stuff I was trying to decipher | |
| [14:42] <sconklin> apw: ack'd your patches for suspend/resume | |
| [14:43] <apw> ahh thanks | |
| [14:49] <sconklin> apw: git question - during a rebase of one branch onto another, which contains dozens of commits delta - I see a number of them apply, a few apply with three-way merge, it stops for me to manually merge a couple, and then at one point after I manually merge one and try to "git rebase --continue", I get the following from git: | |
| [14:49] <sconklin> Applying Remove lpiacompat | |
| [14:49] <sconklin> No changes - did you forget to use 'git add'? | |
| [14:50] <sconklin> and git is in a state where it thinks there is more to rebase yet can't seem to apply any changes | |
| [14:50] <apw> that means that the result of the merge was that there was no actual changes | |
| [14:50] <sconklin> oh well, then a rebase --skip should do it, right? | |
| [14:51] <apw> so either you forgot to git add the files which were changed, or the result was an unchanged files completely | |
| [14:51] <apw> at that point a git diff HEAD should be null, and then a git rebase --skip is appropriate | |
| [14:52] <sconklin> no, I definitely did an add, and status shows no uncommitted changes, so I'll just skip it, thanks | |
| [14:52] <apw> that sounds appropriate | |
| [14:52] <apw> i seem to remember something similar actually when i was doing my quick and dirty run at uds | |
| [14:53] <sconklin> I had forgotten that it's possibly to end up with no actual changes, ~especially~ when manually editing in a failed merge. | |
| [14:53] <apw> particularly for a patch called 'remove something' | |
| [14:54] <sconklin> haha | |
| [14:54] <apw> if it wasn't there, then removing it is already done, and the merge is null | |
| [14:55] <sconklin> right. | |
| [14:55] <apw> i actually think i had the same merge in the lpia tree i did | |
| === smb_tp_ is now known as smb_tp | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| [17:07] <smb_tp> kirkland, while we are waiting for the meeting. Do you happen to know issues with vol_id in the encrypted installation of Jaunty? | |
| [17:08] <kirkland> smb_tp: hmm, you should probably ask cjwatson about that | |
| [17:08] <kirkland> smb_tp: there were some blockers breaking lvm+crypt | |
| [17:08] <smb_tp> kirkland, Well ok. When I think of encryption, you come to my mind. ;-) | |
| [17:09] <kirkland> smb_tp: :-) woohoo | |
| [17:09] <smb_tp> :) | |
| [17:11] <smb_tp> kirkland, Generally, if I got a partition that contains the encrypted volume. Do you know whether it should get a special partition ID? | |
| [17:12] <kirkland> smb_tp: not necessarily ... i'm using encrypted LVM on my Intrepid laptop now, and my mount is just "/dev/mapper/vg0-lv0 on / type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)" | |
| [17:12] <kirkland> smb_tp: which is what I named it when I installed | |
| [17:14] <smb_tp> kirkland, Ok, what I have here is vol_id on the initramfs being more stupid than the one in the rescue system (so it seems) | |
| [17:14] <kirkland> smb_tp: hmm | |
| [17:15] <smb_tp> The one from the rescue system shows the uid of it while the one from initramfs is confused because it thinks it might be swap or ecryptfs_LUKE | |
| [22:26] <HDAPS> Hi, just wondering if there is anyway to confirm that Disk Head Parking is enabled? "hdaps-gl" shows only a static image (kernel 2.6.28 on 9.04) | |
| [23:49] <Kano> rtg: you did not add the rtxxx drivers yet? what else do you need? i tested it already | |
| [23:49] <rtg> Kano: I'm just now looking at it. | |
| [23:50] <Kano> ok | |