| [00:19] <mbiebl> Keybuk: still around? | |
| [09:06] <Keybuk> mbiebl: am back around now | |
| [09:07] <mbiebl> Keybuk: morning | |
| [09:07] <Keybuk> morning | |
| [09:07] <mbiebl> just wanted to let you know, that I stumbled upon a bug in 0.5.2 | |
| [09:07] <mbiebl> which I then reported as 388753 | |
| [09:08] <Keybuk> a bug not present in 0.5.1? | |
| [09:09] <mbiebl> not sure, but iirc not | |
| [09:10] <mbiebl> I was also wondering, when you plan to land more of the exiting stuff in trunk | |
| [09:10] <mbiebl> like the new process monitoring etc. | |
| [09:10] <mbiebl> currently the only difference I see between trunk and the 0.5 branch, is that 0.5 uses D-Bus for it's support utils | |
| [09:11] <Keybuk> The D-Bus stuff was a bit of a nightmare | |
| [09:11] <Keybuk> so I wanted to get that out of the way first, and make a release with it | |
| [09:11] <Keybuk> otherwise it would have forever been over my head | |
| [09:11] <Keybuk> (along with our security guy's knife :p) | |
| [09:11] <mbiebl> ah, nice ;-) | |
| [09:12] <Keybuk> going to start merging in the netlink stuff from today | |
| [09:12] <Keybuk> needs some main loop changes first | |
| [09:13] <mbiebl> looking forward to it. | |
| [09:14] <Keybuk> when do you head into London? Sunday? | |
| [09:14] <mbiebl> yeah | |
| [09:14] <mbiebl> will be there around 14:00 | |
| [09:16] <Keybuk> cool | |
| [09:16] <Keybuk> you can't miss our office building really - it's the only tall one ;) | |
| [09:16] <Keybuk> I get down sometime Sunday evening | |
| [09:17] <mbiebl> cool | |
| [09:18] <mbiebl> Will the office building be open on Sunday? | |
| [09:18] <Keybuk> no :p probably not | |
| [09:19] <Keybuk> there's free wifi at the hotel though | |
| [09:19] <Keybuk> plus London's nice to wander around | |
| [09:19] <Keybuk> weather is supposed to be good | |
| [09:20] <mbiebl> yeah, I planned to do explore London a little on sunday afternoon | |
| [09:22] <mbiebl> so I guess we will meet on sunday evening in the hotel then. | |
| [09:25] <mbiebl> looking forward to it. | |
| [14:23] <sadmac2> Keybuk: is this part of the time stuff you fixed recently? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506679 | |
| [14:23] <sadmac2> and did that make it to 0.3* | |
| [14:37] <Keybuk> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/388873 | |
| [14:38] <Keybuk> the same guy just filed that in LP | |
| [14:38] * Keybuk links them | |
| [14:38] <Keybuk> handy tip btw | |
| [14:38] <Keybuk> (+) Also affects distribution | |
| [14:38] <Keybuk> Distribution: Fedora | |
| [14:38] <Keybuk> Source Package Name: upstart | |
| [14:38] <Keybuk> URL: paste bugzilla URL | |
| [14:38] <Keybuk> links the two together, and syncs information from BZ into LP | |
| [14:39] <Keybuk> it's not fixed, because I didn't know about it until literally minutes ago ;) | |
| [14:39] <Keybuk> going to confirm shortly | |
| [14:42] <sadmac2> Keybuk: theres 2 more things I want to try to get into 0.3.11: The state transfer stuff, and the -f option for shutdown (reboot has it, shutdown seems to be missing it for some reason) | |
| [14:42] <Keybuk> err, do you mean -f ? | |
| [14:43] <Keybuk> -f and -F on shutdown did strange things | |
| [14:43] <sadmac2> yeah | |
| [14:43] <sadmac2> we have a BZ complaining about it | |
| [14:44] * sadmac2 wonders if jkatz' ticket about wanting upstart to eject CDs is still open... | |
| [14:44] <Keybuk> again, please do file bugs in LP if you have them in BZ and link them ;) | |
| [14:44] <sadmac2> never rolled that one, for reasons of "eeeew" | |
| [14:44] <Keybuk> it makes sense to file all your bugs upstream | |
| [14:45] <sadmac2> happily | |
| [14:45] <Keybuk> damn, mbiebl wandered off, was going to nag him too :p | |
| [14:47] <sadmac2> Keybuk: I'm a support engineer now, and the triager knows I have upstart knowledge, so come RHEL 6 all upstart bugs in RHEL will probably be going through me | |
| [14:48] <sadmac2> (unless they find so many that I can't handle them all :) | |
| [15:56] <sadmac2> Keybuk: I still don't see your patch in linus | |
| [15:56] <Keybuk> akpm has it | |
| [15:57] <Keybuk> it's somewhere in the firehose, it may not be part of the torrent yet ;) | |
| [15:58] <sadmac2> Keybuk: yeah. You didn't actually send it to Linus, I was wondering how it was going to get there :) | |
| [15:59] <Keybuk> you don't have to send everything to Linus | |
| [16:00] <sadmac2> yeah, but when you send a patch to lkml you usually CC /someone/ who gives a particular damn (unless you're just looking for reviews) | |
| [16:00] <Keybuk> right, Ingo and akpm saw it first | |
| [16:02] <Keybuk> sadmac2: use Also affects when adding BZ links | |
| [16:03] <sadmac2> Keybuk: yeah. Figuring that out from the update emails :) | |
| [16:04] <Keybuk> did you notice what I did on bug #388745 ? :p | |
| [16:05] <sadmac2> changed the summary | |
| [16:06] <Keybuk> I replied with a sentence with "however" without a following comma ;) | |
| [16:08] <sadmac2> oic | |
| [19:02] <joshk> Keybuk: still there? | |
| [19:05] <Keybuk> yes | |
| [19:06] <joshk> see scrollback from 22:27 UTC yesterday? | |
| [19:10] <Keybuk> I don't keep scrollback | |
| [19:14] <Keybuk> what did you ask? | |
| [19:15] <sadmac2> Keybuk, joshk: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/17/%23upstart.html | |
| [19:15] <sadmac2> big brother is watching | |
| [19:17] <arekm> hi, which dbus has function dbus_message_iter_abandon_container() ? stable 1.2.14 doesn't have it and upstart wants it | |
| [19:18] <arekm> that irclog was actually useful | |
| [19:18] <sadmac2> arekm: you need to apply the patch specified in the release notes | |
| [19:18] <Keybuk> joshk: you need to add "console output" to the job that runs rc.local | |
| [19:20] <joshk> Keybuk: just the word? | |
| [19:20] <joshk> like, in a comment or something? | |
| [19:20] <sadmac2> joshk: on a line of its own. no comment | |
| [19:20] <joshk> oh | |
| [19:20] <joshk> to the *job*.. huh. | |
| [19:20] <joshk> okay, and that'll kill the splash screen and display the output? | |
| [19:21] <sadmac2> joshk: it won't kill the splash screen unless the splash screen is designed to die when input is requested or strange output occurs. | |
| [19:22] <joshk> hmmm.. ok then. thanks | |
| [19:25] <arekm> sadmac2: ok, builds now but fails at | |
| [19:25] <arekm> BAD: wrong value for dbus_message_get_reply_serial (reply), expected 2 got 3 at tests/test_dbus_message.c:155 (test_message_error). | |
| [19:25] <arekm> test | |
| [19:29] <Keybuk> arekm: odd, the test suite is not _always_ perfect | |
| [19:29] <Keybuk> though that implies something a little strange | |
| [19:32] <arekm> also UPSTART_INIT_DAEMON isn't defined in sources so build fails (0.5 bzr branch) | |
| [19:35] <Keybuk> arekm: *cough* fixed and push | |
| [19:53] <Keybuk> sadmac2: don't suppose you put the debug symbols from your upstart builds anywhere? | |
| [19:53] <sadmac2> Keybuk: upstart-debuginfo-<versioncrap>.arch.rpm | |
| [19:54] <Keybuk> do you have older versions around? | |
| [19:54] <sadmac2> Keybuk: how old do you need? | |
| [19:54] <Keybuk> upstart-0.3.9-22.fc11.3586.rpm | |
| [19:54] <Keybuk> plus debuginfo | |
| [19:54] <Keybuk> i386.rpm | |
| [19:54] <Keybuk> sorry | |
| [19:55] <sadmac2> should be i586 | |
| [19:55] <sadmac2> build policy bumped our minimum 32-bit arch | |
| [19:55] <Keybuk> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): | |
| [19:55] <Keybuk> upstart-0.3.9-22.fc9.i386 | |
| [19:55] <Keybuk> from your BZ :p | |
| [19:56] <sadmac2> Keybuk: koji.fedoraproject.org is our build system. Its purged now and again, but its not terribly aggressive. All the packages are there. | |
| [19:56] * sadmac2 finds that upstart version | |
| [19:56] <sadmac2> Keybuk: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=93252 | |
| [19:56] <sadmac2> specifically: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/upstart/0.3.9/22.fc11/i586/upstart-debuginfo-0.3.9-22.fc11.i586.rpm | |
| [19:57] <Keybuk> those are fc11? | |
| [19:57] <Keybuk> not f9? | |
| [19:57] <sadmac2> oh, f9. missed your update | |
| [19:57] <sadmac2> we have that one too | |
| [19:57] <sadmac2> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80006 | |
| [19:58] <sadmac2> And if you need more: | |
| [19:58] <sadmac2> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5768 | |
| [19:58] <sadmac2> Keybuk: what are you inspecting? | |
| [19:59] <Keybuk> BZ #506679 | |
| [20:01] <sadmac2> ah. | |
| [20:02] <sadmac2> wow. this guy filed an f9 bug a week before EOL | |
| [20:02] <sadmac2> impressive | |
| [20:05] <Keybuk> hmm | |
| [20:05] <Keybuk> still doesn't seem to match | |
| [20:06] <Keybuk> I can't apply his core files to your bianries | |
| [20:06] <sadmac2> notting: ^^prelink?? | |
| [20:08] <notting> sadmac2: shouldn't affect corefiles, iirc | |
| [20:09] <Keybuk> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/388873 | |
| [20:09] <Keybuk> core files are attached there | |
| [20:09] <Keybuk> if you run gdb on them, do you get better results? | |
| [20:11] <sadmac2> I don't have an F9 box handy | |
| [20:11] * sadmac2 should probably be doing something about this IOMMU thing he's working on | |