UbuntuIRC / 2009 /08 /15 /#ubuntu-kernel.txt
niansa
Initial commit
4aa5fce
=== lamont` is now known as lamont
[04:09] <dtchen> ogasawara: i'll look at the realtek stuff from hardy-lum tomorrow (sat 15 aug)
=== bjf is now known as bjf-afk
=== lexical is now known as acelan
=== acelan is now known as lexical
[10:51] <krgn> hi
[10:51] <krgn> if I want to host a kernel on a ppa, do I use the build-mkppa script or is there another process?
[10:52] <krgn> or does it just come down to debuild -S -sa?
[13:28] <laga> apw: ping. i hear you're the guy to bug if we (mythbuntu) needs a kernel option enabled. we need CONFIG_AUFS_BR_RAMFS=y so we can properly use aufs in our diskless setups
[13:45] <samgee> what are the debian/d-i/modules/ files for?
[13:45] <samgee> why do most lines have a question mark, but some don't?
=== samgee_ is now known as samgee
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
=== CarlFK1 is now known as CarlF1
=== CarlF1 is now known as CarlK
[23:35] <ijuz_> stupid question: a security updates going to be released because of the recent kernel root exploit (the one from 2 days ago)?
[23:42] <crimsun_> ijuz_: it's likely; a more precise answer will be had during the work week.
[23:43] <elmo> it's probably worth pointing out that unless you installed wine or dosemu, recent versions of ubuntu aren't vulnerable
[23:43] <elmo> (6.06 is though, so I'm sure there'll be USNs on Monday)
[23:43] <ijuz_> ok, thanks
[23:48] <crimsun_> on the other hand, spender seems intent on insisting that his exploit(s) works regardless of protection mechanism
[23:49] <crimsun_> (http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Aug/0190.html)
=== spOO` is now known as spO
=== spOO` is now known as spO