|
=== mhall119 is now known as mhall119|fossetc |
|
=== happyaro1 is now known as happyaron |
|
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin |
|
[04:06] <pitti> Good morning |
|
[04:15] <TheMuso> Hey pitti, how are you? |
|
[04:25] <pitti> hey TheMuso! a bit tired still, but good, thanks! how about yourself? |
|
[04:27] <TheMuso> pitti: Not too bad thanks, glad to have air conditioning here today, 40+ degrees in Sydney, can't wait for the southerly cool change so I can open my windows again. :) |
|
[04:27] <pitti> urgh, steaming |
|
[04:27] <TheMuso> Pretty much. |
|
[04:33] <pitti> Laney: meh, more weird MemoryErrors and segfaults -- time to reboot this box |
|
[04:33] <pitti> Laney: maybe the piled up ksplices eventually made the kernel's head explode |
|
[05:51] <darkxst> pitti, how did this manage to migrate through proposed? bug 1518035 |
|
[05:51] <ubot5> bug 1518035 in libjpeg9 (Ubuntu) "package libjpeg-progs 1:9a-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/djpeg.1.gz', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs 1.3.0-0ubuntu2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1518035 |
|
[05:52] <pitti> darkxst: we don't do upgrade tests as part of proposed-migration |
|
[05:52] <pitti> apparently a fresh install works |
|
[05:57] <darkxst> pitti, right that makes sense |
|
[06:06] <didrocks> good morning |
|
[06:14] <pitti> bonjour didrocks ! |
|
[06:20] <hikiko> Morning ! |
|
[06:27] <didrocks> good morning pitti, hikiko! |
|
[06:39] <pitti> Laney: dbus tests are reeeeally unhappy, the root tests keep timing out |
|
[06:39] * pitti cancels the currently running ones, no point |
|
[06:52] <seb128> good morning desktopers |
|
[06:52] <seb128> hey didrocks, pitti |
|
[06:52] <seb128> pitti, Laney is off today :-/ |
|
[06:52] <pitti> bonjour seb128 ! |
|
[06:52] <seb128> though I would not be surprised if he reads IRC |
|
[06:57] <didrocks> re seb128 |
|
[06:58] <didrocks> Laney: preventively: "go away"! :) |
|
[08:04] <pitti> ok, that should have cleared a lot of -proposed stuff |
|
[08:06] <seb128> pitti, "that"? |
|
[08:07] <pitti> seb128: retrying tests, adding hints, retrying some failed builds |
|
[08:07] <seb128> ah, ok |
|
[08:07] <pitti> a lot of arm64 builds failed in a weird way |
|
[08:07] * seb128 wonders what transitions is the solid block at the bottom of update_output |
|
[08:07] <pitti> seb128: and bringing moah powah to my clouds, so the queues finally cleared up \o/ |
|
[08:08] <pitti> seb128: isn't that just the concatenation of everything it tries to migrate? |
|
[08:08] <pitti> that "autohinter" thing |
|
[08:08] <seb128> does it always does that? |
|
[08:09] <pitti> there's certainly a bunch of valid candidates which wait for finishing lib transitions, like imobiledevice |
|
[08:09] <seb128> libimobiledevice seems to miss a upower rebuild |
|
[08:10] <seb128> pitti, did you have any content to include for that one or should we go for a no change? |
|
[08:10] <pitti> ah, easy; want me to, or are you on it? |
|
[08:10] <seb128> I can do it |
|
[08:10] <pitti> heh |
|
[08:10] <seb128> just wanted to check if you had actually patches pending or something |
|
[08:10] <pitti> seb128: I suppose your "upload a no-change rebuild" script is as good as everyone else's :) |
|
[08:10] <seb128> doing it then ;-) |
|
[08:11] <pitti> cheers |
|
[08:11] <seb128> yw! |
|
[08:21] <larsu> happy Friday! |
|
[08:21] <seb128> hey larsu, happy friday! |
|
[08:21] <seb128> wie gehts? |
|
[08:23] <Trevinho> morning |
|
[08:27] <seb128> hey Trevinho! |
|
[08:27] <Trevinho> hey seb128 |
|
[08:28] <seb128> how are you? |
|
[08:28] <larsu> seb128: gut danke. und idr? |
|
[08:28] <larsu> *dir |
|
[08:28] <didrocks> happy Friday larsu, Trevinho! |
|
[08:28] <larsu> hi Trevinho! Sup? |
|
[08:28] <seb128> larsu, auch gut, danke :-) |
|
[08:28] <larsu> bonjour didrocks |
|
[08:38] <Trevinho> hi larsu .... Trying to fix my broken head... :-/ |
|
[08:40] <larsu> Trevinho: oh what's up? |
|
[08:42] <Trevinho> larsu: still the same.... I've not been able to fix myself yet. Trying to fight with nightly panic attacks. |
|
[08:42] <larsu> Trevinho: sorry to hear. All the best! |
|
[08:42] <Trevinho> larsu: thanks |
|
[08:43] <pitti> hey larsu! |
|
[08:43] <pitti> hello Trevinho |
|
[08:43] * seb128 just spent ~1.5 hours going through the 300 or so "most recently changed" bugs on launchpad, enough triaging for today |
|
[08:44] <seb128> (trying to do a bit of that every day since wily to keep on top of new issues reported/important ones) |
|
[08:44] <larsu> morgen pitti! Wie gehts? |
|
[08:44] <Trevinho> hi pitti |
|
[08:44] <larsu> seb128: good work! Thanks |
|
[08:44] <pitti> larsu: prima, danke! |
|
[08:44] <seb128> :-) |
|
[08:45] <seb128> shotwell is another unhappy program because of the glib file monitor improvements :-/ |
|
[08:45] <seb128> segfault when editing photos with an external editor |
|
[08:45] * pitti hugs seb128 |
|
[08:46] * seb128 hugs pitti back |
|
[08:49] <larsu> seb128: "improvements" |
|
[08:50] <seb128> larsu, yeah :-) |
|
[08:52] * didrocks will not get the card of backward compatibility in term of behaviors :p |
|
[08:52] <larsu> didrocks: that would mean we could never fix behaviour bugs |
|
[08:52] <larsu> there's a balance |
|
[08:52] <larsu> but yeah ... this situation is breaking all kinds of things |
|
[08:53] <didrocks> larsu: well, some frameworks do that and add new calls |
|
[08:53] <didrocks> or flags to enable the new "fixed" behavior |
|
[08:53] <didrocks> larsu: the extreme would be to fix "this" in javascript for instance :p |
|
[08:53] <didrocks> it's the kind of things we do, and thus, the result in crashing apps… |
|
[08:56] <larsu> indeed |
|
[08:56] <larsu> like I say, it's a balance :) |
|
[08:58] <larsu> seb128: which nautilus version do you need the menubar patch for? Will we stay on 3.14? |
|
[08:58] <seb128> larsu, 3.18 |
|
[08:58] <larsu> nice :) |
|
[08:58] <seb128> larsu, no, if we were to stay on 3.14 we wouldn't need a patch since that has a menubar :p |
|
[08:58] <larsu> not for me :/ |
|
[08:58] <seb128> well or at least our package has one |
|
[08:59] <seb128> but it's built on old code |
|
[08:59] <larsu> ah, restart |
|
[08:59] <seb128> which got rewriten to use moder gaction, etc |
|
[08:59] <larsu> weird |
|
[08:59] <larsu> right right |
|
[09:06] <larsu> woah, got asked about which login manager I want to use, again |
|
[09:12] <larsu> and I need to restart nautilus after logging in before I have correct fonts or the global menubar |
|
[09:12] * larsu blames xsettings not being there from the beginning |
|
[09:12] <didrocks> pitti: do you know well how subprocess and os.environ interacts? I'm really puzzled on some weird behaviors when running tests… |
|
[09:14] <larsu> hm firefox theme as well |
|
[09:14] <larsu> is anyone else seeing this? |
|
[09:20] <seb128> larsu, I don't |
|
[09:20] <seb128> but I didn't upgrade yet today |
|
[09:22] <happyaron> where is the latest snappy image? |
|
[09:25] <seb128> happyaron, #snappy should know |
|
[09:37] <pitti> didrocks: normally the spawned process should inherit the parent's env, unless you explicitly set env= |
|
[09:37] <happyaron> seb128: thanks, :) |
|
[09:37] <didrocks> pitti: agreed, it's not what happens here though |
|
[09:38] <didrocks> pitti: I have reduced it to few lines, and it behaves different if I have one test class or multiple… |
|
[09:56] <didrocks> pitti: if you have a minute, I have a gist to reproduce the issue: https://gist.github.com/didrocks/ae12d61138090b837c18 |
|
[09:57] <pitti> didrocks: oh, are you sure that assigning the whole os.environ array works? |
|
[09:58] <pitti> didrocks: I'm not sure, but I faintly remember having run into this before too |
|
[09:58] <pitti> didrocks: untested, but can you try instead: |
|
[09:58] <didrocks> pitti: it does from the output, like the output doesn't contain http_proxy for instance |
|
[09:58] <pitti> os.environ.clear() |
|
[09:58] <pitti> os.environ.update(self.original_env) |
|
[09:58] <didrocks> ah |
|
[09:59] <didrocks> pitti: but it's still weird that a impacts b, isn't it? |
|
[09:59] <pitti> i. e. keep the os.environ dict object itself unchanged, but only change its keys |
|
[09:59] <didrocks> let me try |
|
[09:59] <didrocks> (I can see that SHELL is restored though) |
|
[10:00] <didrocks> pitti: yeah, it passes now :) |
|
[10:00] <didrocks> I'm still unsure what happens under the hood though |
|
[10:00] <didrocks> ohhhhhhh, I see |
|
[10:00] <didrocks> so, what happens is that subprocess still reference os.environ, the original one |
|
[10:00] <pitti> didrocks: os.environ is "magic" -- changing the reference to a different object apparenlty loses that magic |
|
[10:00] <didrocks> not the one we replaced |
|
[10:00] <pitti> and you assign it to a normal "dumb" dict |
|
[10:01] <pitti> right |
|
[10:01] <pitti> you shouldn't change the object itself (i. e. the reference to it) |
|
[10:01] <didrocks> that's why it still got the env variable only if a ran |
|
[10:01] <didrocks> happened before* |
|
[10:01] <didrocks> pitti: it all makes sense now :) |
|
[10:01] <didrocks> thanks a bunch, I was really fighting on that one (first, to reduce at that state) |
|
[10:02] <didrocks> and so, if I only ran b, there was no issue, because I didn't touch os.environ assignement before |
|
[10:02] <didrocks> still weird that in this magic, when I changed b, it was changing the new os.environ that I assigned |
|
[10:02] <didrocks> but subprocess keeps using the old os.environ |
|
[10:02] <didrocks> even if not called before |
|
[10:03] <pitti> self.original_env = os.environ.copy() |
|
[10:03] <pitti> didrocks: ^ maybe the .copy() just returns an ordinary dict, not the special "magic" one that actually calls setenv()? |
|
[10:03] <pitti> but I don't know for sure |
|
[10:04] <didrocks> pitti: that would make sense, indeed |
|
[10:04] <pitti> just as far as "never assign os.environ", got burned and only remembered the "don't do that then" |
|
[10:04] <didrocks> so we don't have anymore _Environ |
|
[10:04] <didrocks> and so, it doesn't setenv() |
|
[10:04] <didrocks> ahah :) |
|
[10:04] <didrocks> pitti: rightly noted now! |
|
[10:04] <didrocks> thanks a lot |
|
[10:04] * didrocks hugs pitti |
|
[10:05] <pitti> de rien ! |
|
[10:26] <Laney> pitti: ERROR:../../test/uid-permissions.c:129:test_uae: assertion failed (dbus_message_get_type (m) == DBUS_MESSAGE_TYPE_METHOD_RETURN): (3 == 2) <- there's a related UpdateActivationEnvironment change in this release - check with smcv? |
|
[10:26] <Laney> might be that this should fail now |
|
[10:27] <Laney> (3 is error) |
|
[10:32] <seb128> hey Laney |
|
[10:37] <Laney> hi seb128 |
|
[10:37] * Laney is looking at cake recipes |
|
[10:37] <Laney> what's up? |
|
[10:37] <seb128> how did the cake go? |
|
[10:37] <Laney> not made yet |
|
[10:37] <seb128> oh, not done yet :-) |
|
[10:37] <seb128> new gtk migrated! |
|
[10:38] <Laney> so I saw |
|
[10:38] <Laney> yay cloud |
|
[10:40] <Laney> someone can follow up with that dbus thing if they want or I can look on monday |
|
[10:46] <seb128> if somebody things it's urgent I can have a look |
|
[10:46] <seb128> otherwise I think it can wait monday |
|
[10:51] <Laney> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93036 |
|
[10:51] <ubot5> Freedesktop bug 93036 in core "/uid-permissions/uae/root test fails with 1.10.4" [Normal,New] |
|
[10:51] * Laney goes to buy more ingredients now |
|
[10:51] <Laney> later! |
|
[10:51] <seb128> Laney, have fun! |
|
[10:52] <seb128> oh, good, libimobiledevice transition went through |
|
[10:52] <Sweet5hark> hmmm, no will.cooke in here today? |
|
[10:52] <seb128> he said he would swap the morning |
|
[10:52] <seb128> he should be there after lunch |
|
[10:52] <seb128> speaking of lunch I start being hungry ;-) |
|
[10:53] * didrocks does as well, going out for lunch, see you later guys :) |
|
[10:53] <seb128> didrocks, enjoy! |
|
[10:53] <didrocks> thanks, you too seb128 |
|
[11:25] <pitti> Laney: FYI, memory errors seem to be real; committed https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/commit/?id=17776035 and will re-deploy once the queue settled down |
|
[12:26] <desrt> hello desktop-types. i hope you are having a good morning. |
|
[12:40] <seb128> hey desrt, happy friday! |
|
[12:40] <desrt> indeed! |
|
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln |
|
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch |
|
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk |
|
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko |
|
[13:56] <didrocks> phew, all tests passed, finally! :p |
|
[13:56] <pitti> didrocks: \o/ |
|
[13:57] <didrocks> pitti: thanks again! And with the large tests refactoring, I divided the testing time by two! |
|
[13:57] <didrocks> (~50 minutes vs 1h40) |
|
[13:57] <pitti> wow |
|
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g |
|
[14:14] * didrocks celebrated with pushing 3 new tests |
|
=== dpm-afk is now known as dpm |
|
[14:51] <didrocks> tkamppeter: hey, why is hplip depending on pexpect? It seems just to be for testing, right? So build-dep, but not runtime dep? |
|
[14:52] <didrocks> hum, seems that hplip has a pexpect embeeded version… |
|
[14:53] <didrocks> and the dep was added in 2009 with the idea of removing the embeeded version |
|
[14:53] <didrocks> which wasn't done in 5 years :p |
|
[14:53] <didrocks> 6* |
|
[14:54] <didrocks> ok, they are using pexpect in utils.py for handling some subprocess and giving password and such to it (urgh) |
|
[14:56] <tkamppeter> didrocks, this is not done by me but by the Debian folks, perhaps a Debian bug should get reported. |
|
[14:56] <didrocks> tkamppeter: mind opening one? are you maintaining this stack as well? :) |
|
[14:56] <didrocks> tkamppeter: sounds like this kind of things shouldn't even be in main |
|
[14:57] <didrocks> maybe I should ask for some security team review, but passing password to subprocess sounds like something I would have kicked the MIR out |
|
[15:02] <didrocks> seb128: mind creating a https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-make-builddeps ppa? |
|
[15:02] <didrocks> I want to ensure that testing/build-deps are not installed on user's machine if they add the ubuntu make ppa |
|
[15:03] <didrocks> (like… pexpect that we install by default :/) |
|
[15:03] <seb128> didrocks, done |
|
[15:03] <didrocks> thanks! |
|
[15:05] <seb128> yw! |
|
[15:18] <didrocks> Sweet5hark: it seems that willcooke is here. I think you were looking for him ^ |
|
[15:18] <didrocks> btw, good morning willcooke :-) |
|
[15:18] <willcooke> morning |
|
[15:31] <Sweet5hark> heya! :) |
|
[15:32] <Sweet5hark> willcooke: was just wondering about the lack of feedback on the 2oitg thing ... but I assume, if this is "morning" you are sprinting somewhere in the US? |
|
[15:32] <willcooke> Sweet5hark, just swapped some hours this week |
|
[15:33] <willcooke> Sweet5hark, seen you mail, but not digested it yet |
|
[16:29] <attente> how does someone grep the archive? |
|
[16:31] <didrocks> attente: what do you mean, grepping through all the sources ? |
|
[16:32] <attente> didrocks: yeah. i think Laney had a web interface for it, but the url doesn't work any more |
|
[16:32] <didrocks> attente: oh, I don't know about a web interface. archive admins can grep directly in the source file system, but that's it |
|
[16:33] <didrocks> attente: if you only look for file names, though, you can do it throuh a web interface |
|
[16:34] <attente> didrocks: could you do a couple greps for me? i'm looking for QT_IM_MODULE and maliitphablet |
|
[16:34] <didrocks> attente: quite late to do that (I'm leaving in ~10 minutes), could do on Monday for sure |
|
[16:34] <didrocks> or if seb128 is still there for some times, he might (or wait for Laney if he thinks there is a web interface) |
|
[16:34] <attente> ah, ok, sure. have a good w.e! |
|
[16:35] <didrocks> thanks (not left yet, but soon) ;) |
|
[16:35] <seb128> I don't know of an handy way no |
|
[16:35] <seb128> jdstrand had a script I think |
|
[16:35] <seb128> Laney had a https://codesearch.debian.net/ equivalent up somewhere |
|
[16:35] <seb128> but unsure if that's still a thing |
|
[16:36] <attente> yeah, i think it used to be http://ubuntu-codesearch.surgut.co.uk/, but it hasn't been online in a while |
|
[16:54] * didrocks goes, see you on Monday guys! |
|
[16:54] <willcooke> see ya didrocks |
|
[16:54] <didrocks> have a good week-end willcooke :) |
|
=== popey_ is now known as popey |
|
[17:09] <seb128> have a good w.e! |
|
[17:11] <willcooke> see ya seb128 |
|
[17:11] <seb128> see you on monday ;-) |
|
[17:19] <Trevinho> guys, have nice weekend ! |
|
[17:20] <willcooke> see ya Trevinho |
|
[17:20] <Trevinho> willcooke: see u |
|
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD |
|
[19:13] <willcooke> g'night |
|
|