[01:20] gnome-sudoku pristine-tar 40afd9c Jeremy Bicha gnome-sudoku_43.1.orig.tar.xz.delta gnome-sudoku_43.1.orig.tar.xz.id * pristine-tar data for gnome-sudoku_43.1.orig.tar.xz * https://deb.li/8JFE [01:20] gnome-sudoku upstream/latest 30f6b76 Jeremy Bicha * pushed 19 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/Hxmh [01:20] gnome-sudoku upstream/latest f8bb1c6 Jordi Mas po/ca.po * Update Catalan translation * https://deb.li/3SJQc [01:20] gnome-sudoku upstream/latest a1d1d1e Charles Monzat help/fr/fr.po * Update French translation * https://deb.li/NDuC [01:20] gnome-sudoku upstream/latest 6a89f8e Baurzhan Muftakhidinov po/kk.po * Update Kazakh translation * https://deb.li/ig8SG [01:20] gnome-sudoku upstream/latest 2594e01 Sabri Ünal po/tr.po * Update Turkish translation * https://deb.li/2ZUl [01:20] gnome-sudoku upstream/latest bfc6a4b Quentin PAGÈS po/oc.po * Update Occitan translation * https://deb.li/3h81I [01:28] to the individual helping me with my refresh rate issue, thank you for pointing out the 2 problems I had with my system. I removed the bad ppa, purged, and fixed my grub so I'd boot the correct and vastly newer kernel. [03:24] mybalzitch, no problem. But did they fix the flicker? [03:27] nope. it's now different/worse. If I stay at 100hz its fine, but 120/165 I get a different kind of flickering and it's almost worse. [03:28] I was trying to get amdgpu going again, to see if they fixed it, but I'm having no luck. so I'll follow your instructions and submit another bug report [03:33] mybalzitch, for bandwidth problems the best bet is to try a different display cable (or three). If that still doesn't fix it then you can reduce the bandwidth requirement without reducing the refresh rate using this new feature in GNOME 43: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/commit/03336788fb079cb8aa203e031f85d039a87832ce ($HOME/.config/monitors.xml) [03:33] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Commit 0333678 in GNOME/mutter "monitor-config-store: Add parsing support for 'maxbpc' in monitors.xml" [03:34] yeah I was using the dell supplied DP cable [03:34] I will take a look at that, thank you [03:37] Probably equally likely is that you need a newer kernel to fix any signalling problems. You can try the latest kernel here (assuming you have secure boot disabled in the BIOS): https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v6.1.8/amd64/ [04:09] 6.1.8 doesn't like zfs on root (shoulda known) and the amdgpu-install I think blacklisted the default amdgpu driver because x11 won't load on boot with the hwe kernel unless I modprobe amdgpu, so I got more fixing to do in the morning. [07:09] goood morning desktopers! [13:00] good morning [13:52] gtk3 signed tags df641cc Jeremy Bicha ubuntu/3.24.36-2ubuntu1 * gtk+3.0 Debian release 3.24.36-2ubuntu1 * https://deb.li/3VShI [14:43] ricotz, hey, do you have any idea maybe about https://launchpadlibrarian.net/647847075/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-i386.thunderbird_1%3A102.7.1+build1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz ? [14:44] > Duplicate key `lto` in table `profile.release` [14:46] seb128, hi, you can retry the build, it is a race only happening on i386 while patching Cargo.toml [14:49] seb128, do you if a merge of fontconfig 2.14.1 from debian is planned? [14:51] ricotz, thanks, I retried once but maybe it got unlucky again, doing another retry [14:51] ricotz, we should do it yes, nobody got assigned so far though ... are you maybe interested? ;) [14:52] seb128, just asking :), since libreoffice would require a patch for its test-suite [14:52] k, I will try to maybe do it next week [14:52] let's see if I manage to clear other items off my list first, including the thunderbird updates :) [14:53] seb128, okay :) [14:54] seb128, btw you can usually find a tarball in https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages (if you aren't faster) [15:10] ricotz, yes, I noticed ... do you have automation for those? [15:18] seb128, no, just some simple scripts [15:26] ricotz, ack, thanks [15:47] ricotz, there is something weird with translations it seems, I'm testing 102.7.1 in a 22.04 VM with thunderbird-locale-fr and some of the strings are showing in english, like 'To' in the composer, where those are showing translated in the snap for the same version... [16:28] seb128, hmm, I seeing some untranslated strings here too on locale "de" [16:29] :( [16:29] I wonder if that's a side effect of the recent changes for langpacks [16:30] the translations work in the snap and I would expect that to be the same source so to give the same results... [16:35] the packaging invokes the build target for language packs directly, maybe something needs to be adopted [16:35] although I would not expect such subtile problems, but things breaking for real [16:45] seb128, I think things are correct, but the revision reference in comm-esr102 isn't updated [16:45] I guess the upstream packaging simply uses the HEAD of comm-l10n [16:47] https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr102/log/tip/mail/locales/l10n-changesets.json [16:48] 5b6788295358a875cf7ba9032584a069860bc032 is used and there were a lot of changes after that [17:15] ricotz, weird, I would expect strings like 'To' to be translated since forever [17:17] seb128, it is not string based, but position based [17:17] so the translations refer to specific widgets/labels [17:43] well, same I would expect the 'To' entry to not be something that change in the 102 serie but maybe that's naive from me [17:44] so any idea if 1- that's a regression due to the recent changes to our packaging script? [17:44] 2- how we fix that in the deb? [17:47] seb128, it is caused by the upstream switch to a single repo for translations [17:47] upstream should update the revision in l10n-changesets.json [17:48] if we would use the HEAD of comm-l10n the translations generation won't be stable [17:48] oops, translations/tarball [17:54] I wonder why it works in the snap [17:55] do you know who to raise that with upstream? [17:55] I wonder if that's worth blocking the current updates until we get the issue resolved [17:58] seb128, maybe lis_syx can help with upstream? [17:59] hardcoding the latest l10n revision and regenerate the tarball as "*+build1.1" would be an option [18:09] seb128, I am going to push a repack to the mozillateam ppa for lunar [18:51] seb128, https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/14460889/+listing-archive-extra [19:18] gnome-terminal signed tags dcb7844 Gunnar Hjalmarsson ubuntu/3.46.7-1ubuntu2 * gnome-terminal Debian release 3.46.7-1ubuntu2 * https://deb.li/3ivIE [21:55] ricotz[m], thanks