[00:53] Hello, I am interested in testing Ubuntu and creating bug reports. Can anyone help me? [00:55] Is it possible for me to help test Ubuntu releases. [00:59] Hello? [01:01] how can I help find bugs in Linux? === tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who [07:27] Where do I need to file a mistake in Keyboard layout of my language?simply ubuntu bug, is it related to Ubuntu Translation team? [07:43] Where do I need to file a mistake in Keyboard layout of my language?simply ubuntu bug, is it related to Ubuntu Translation team? === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson [08:11] ok so the ubuntu kernel upgrade in maverick to 2.6.38 is toasted [08:12] it kills dropertiary ati driver. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10854316 [08:12] this appears unresolved problem? [08:22] maverick has a 2.6.38 kernel? [08:23] 2.6.38-10-generic [08:24] Get:1 http://extras.ubuntu.com maverick Release.gpg [72B] [08:24] it would seems so, cwillu [08:24] !info linux-meta maverick [08:24] cwillu: Package linux-meta does not exist in maverick [08:25] !info linux maverick [08:25] cwillu: linux (source: linux-meta): Generic complete Linux kernel.. In component main, is optional. Version 2.6.35.28.36 (maverick), package size 5 kB, installed size 32 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia all armel) [08:25] hm? [08:26] i linux-image-2.6.38-10-generic - Linux kernel image for version 2.6.38 on x86/x86_64 [08:26] ii linux-image-2.6.38-10-generic 2.6.38-10.44 Linux kernel image for version 2.6.38 on x86/x86_64 [08:28] I'm guessing you installed it from another ppa? [08:28] nope... [08:28] wtf. [08:28] how to check where from it was installed? [08:28] check your /etc/sources.list and /etc/sources.list.d/ [08:28] yeah, just maveric there [08:29] how to verify from what repo it was installed? [08:29] synaptic | origin might tell you something [08:29] indeed it is not in my current packages... E: I wasn't able to locate file for the linux-image-2.6.38-10-generic package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package. [08:29] if it's in "local", then you installed it via debs directly [08:29] could dpkg -i of ati drivers pooled that kernel in? [08:30] no; dpkg -i doesn't download dependencies, so unless you included it on the dpkg -i line... [08:30] oh, you know what [08:30] do you have -proposed enabled? [08:31] if so, you really should be subscribed to ubuntu-devel-announce@lists.ubuntu.com [08:31] yes :[ [08:31] so that you get lovely notices like these [08:31] * xelister *@&$#!%^! [08:31] "Today we released another round of Linux kernel updates to [08:31] lucid/maverick/natty-proposed. However, the proposed natty update [08:31] (2.6.38 based kernel) was accidentally copied to lucid-proposed and [08:31] maverick-proposed, and thus had been on the master archive.ubuntu.com [08:31] between 09:00 and 14:00 UTC." [08:32] was accidentally copied to lucid-proposed .... :don't care face: [08:32] "-proposed" is for those wanting to help test updates, not just a fancy way to get things a bit quicker [08:32] * xelister :seriously: ??? [08:32] you're rapidly losing my sympathy [08:32] so is ubuntu ;) [08:32] if you don't want things to break, don't enable proposed [08:32] don't blame this on ubuntu [08:32] downgrading to normal kernel is possible? [08:33] google for the text I pasted, you'll find instructions [08:33] and then disable -proposed [08:33] then reinstall debian ;) [08:33] "you must be this tall to use the package manager" :p [08:34] what, the folks who disabled the random number generator in openssl? [08:34] people make mistakes. experimental repositories are for catching those mistakes [08:35] if you enable the experimental repositories, you're going to find things break once in a while [08:35] let me guess, you also use btrfs (without backups), and whine to the list when the experimental filesystem eats your data? [08:35] btrs was fun to do that [08:36] I should really stop testing new linux software other then the one I actually develop [08:37] *fs [08:38] lol, that was you in #btrfs [08:38] and in fact we had this same conversation :p [08:48] yeap, milions of broken things to bumb into [08:53] ha it literally costed me 25 usd [08:54] first time I can calculate production loss so detailed -> stoped bitcoin generation ;) Anyway, funny bug good that it is resolved... so I had to look into the Natty's amd-dont-work bug a bit earlier thanks to it. Btw, so now on 11.04 amd's fglrx does work without problems, are theses .38 patches applied tehre [10:07] If a bug is a real bug, but is a bug in d-i, so cannot be fixed without an image respin, is it appropriate to Won't Fix it? If so, please do so to bug 681396 [10:07] Launchpad bug 681396 in preseed (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "auto url=autoserver fetches wrong preseed file (squeeze, not maverick/natty/oneiric) (affects: 3) (heat: 20)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/681396 === tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who === xelister is now known as Foreman === tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who === Foreman is now known as xelister === tgall_foo is now known as Dr_Who [14:46] pedro_, Hi [14:47] pedro_, I get bug 790613 on Oneiric, do you think it's accerciser's fault or a problem with the gnome transition? [14:47] Launchpad bug 790613 in gnome-python (Debian) (and 1 other project) "accerciser crashed with AttributeError in __main__: 'module' object has no attribute 'PARAM_APP_DATADIR' (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/790613 [14:56] jibel, seems a packaging issue according to the upstream bug [14:56] jibel, hello btw :-) [14:57] jibel, lets close the accerciser task and track it at the gnome-python [14:57] pedro_, k === augustinT is now known as augustin [15:01] pedro_, what packaging issue? [15:01] gnome-python is deprecated anyway [15:01] it should not be used [15:02] seb128, bug 790613 [15:02] Launchpad bug 790613 in gnome-python (Debian) (and 1 other project) "accerciser crashed with AttributeError in __main__: 'module' object has no attribute 'PARAM_APP_DATADIR' (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 18)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/790613 [15:02] at the upstream tracker they say it's a packaging issue [15:03] can you mention it on #ubuntu-desktop? [15:03] done [16:09] charlie-tca: I think that's a script that makes kernel bugs confirmed fwiw [16:09] oh [16:10] seemed like a better answer than "this is the wrong place to demand a fix", though [16:30] i'm looking at nautilus bugs. looks like this bug could be considered triaged: [16:30] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/662258 [16:30] Launchpad bug 662258 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "Nautilus list view file rename text displays badly (affects: 11) (heat: 55)" [Low,Confirmed] [16:30] reproducible and has importance set === augustin is now known as augustint === deryck_ is now known as deryck [17:09] I think this bug is 'Medium' importance because it is a usability issue that does not limit the functionality of a core application: [17:09] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/783534 [17:09] Launchpad bug 783534 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "Move to Workspace have to be pressed twice (affects: 4) (heat: 18)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [17:11] brendand, i don't think that's a nautilus issue [17:12] pedro_ - can i ask why? [17:12] pedro_ - do you reckon compiz then? [17:13] brendand, cause nautilus is not a window manager, that's probably a compiz bug [17:13] brendand, yup sounds like it [17:15] pedro_ - i'm suspecting now it only happens the first time you do it within a session. logging out to check [17:19] dang, now i can't reproduce it :( [17:34] I think bug 794507 should be marked as wishlist [17:34] Launchpad bug 794507 in ubuntu "the user can hardly notice if a printer is offline [UI bug] (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/794507 [18:38] bah, shimi has left [18:39] they are moving bugs to launchpad that are nothing to do with Launchpad other than circumstantially [18:39] :( [20:36] hey guys, is there a bug with unity where super+1-9 keys doesn't work? [20:37] on natty that is === yofel_ is now known as yofel