[03:54] is there anything futher I could do to help get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/254622 [03:54] Malone bug 254622 in linux "TCP uses wrong MTU/MSS size for IPv6" [Medium,Triaged] [03:54] moved along? [03:54] is there more information I could provide? [03:56] unfortunatly I have no clue where to start in fixing this...and java is my only language so I doubt I would be much help [09:42] dtchen, hi there ... question about a quirk you are suggesting on a bug, about? [12:45] This seems like the right channel to ask this [12:45] Was wondering if there's an updated version of https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CustomRestrictedModules#Modify%20debian/rules somewhere. abi_version doesn't exist in the enlisted file debian/rules [12:47] Compared against linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27 [13:43] hi rtg ,did you read my mail about rt2860/2870? [13:45] rtg: the drivers are working, no patching needed, you can copy em over from 2.6.29 [13:46] just dont forget to add the firmware as well [13:46] Kano: I'' get to it later today. I just got back from 3 days off and have a bunch of emails. [13:46] you will see the 2 firmware links for it in the mail [14:24] sconklin, hi, i did another change for the apport stuff, to send the stress log as well as the flag file. this is up for review now [14:25] apw: I was just coming to those in my email for the morning [14:26] matt's emails yes? [14:30] sconklin, anyhow, just wanted you to know i had taken care of the strees.log part, so i think once all these changes hit the relevant packages we should be 'good' [14:34] Was wondering if there's an updated version of https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CustomRestrictedModules#Modify%20debian/rules somewhere. abi_version doesn't exist in the enlisted file debian/rules compared howto against linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27 [14:36] JesperHansen: Its in debian/rules.d/0-common-vars.mk [14:37] rtg: thanks [14:38] rtg: and abi_version has been renamed? Cant see its presence in there either [14:39] JesperHansen: Its called abinum. The LRM package structure changed quite a lot from Hardy to Intrepid. [14:40] rtg: ye, I figured it was some old stuff I was trying to decipher [14:42] apw: ack'd your patches for suspend/resume [14:43] ahh thanks [14:49] apw: git question - during a rebase of one branch onto another, which contains dozens of commits delta - I see a number of them apply, a few apply with three-way merge, it stops for me to manually merge a couple, and then at one point after I manually merge one and try to "git rebase --continue", I get the following from git: [14:49] Applying Remove lpiacompat [14:49] No changes - did you forget to use 'git add'? [14:50] and git is in a state where it thinks there is more to rebase yet can't seem to apply any changes [14:50] that means that the result of the merge was that there was no actual changes [14:50] oh well, then a rebase --skip should do it, right? [14:51] so either you forgot to git add the files which were changed, or the result was an unchanged files completely [14:51] at that point a git diff HEAD should be null, and then a git rebase --skip is appropriate [14:52] no, I definitely did an add, and status shows no uncommitted changes, so I'll just skip it, thanks [14:52] that sounds appropriate [14:52] i seem to remember something similar actually when i was doing my quick and dirty run at uds [14:53] I had forgotten that it's possibly to end up with no actual changes, ~especially~ when manually editing in a failed merge. [14:53] particularly for a patch called 'remove something' [14:54] haha [14:54] if it wasn't there, then removing it is already done, and the merge is null [14:55] right. [14:55] i actually think i had the same merge in the lpia tree i did === smb_tp_ is now known as smb_tp === asac_ is now known as asac [17:07] kirkland, while we are waiting for the meeting. Do you happen to know issues with vol_id in the encrypted installation of Jaunty? [17:08] smb_tp: hmm, you should probably ask cjwatson about that [17:08] smb_tp: there were some blockers breaking lvm+crypt [17:08] kirkland, Well ok. When I think of encryption, you come to my mind. ;-) [17:09] smb_tp: :-) woohoo [17:09] :) [17:11] kirkland, Generally, if I got a partition that contains the encrypted volume. Do you know whether it should get a special partition ID? [17:12] smb_tp: not necessarily ... i'm using encrypted LVM on my Intrepid laptop now, and my mount is just "/dev/mapper/vg0-lv0 on / type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)" [17:12] smb_tp: which is what I named it when I installed [17:14] kirkland, Ok, what I have here is vol_id on the initramfs being more stupid than the one in the rescue system (so it seems) [17:14] smb_tp: hmm [17:15] The one from the rescue system shows the uid of it while the one from initramfs is confused because it thinks it might be swap or ecryptfs_LUKE [22:26] Hi, just wondering if there is anyway to confirm that Disk Head Parking is enabled? "hdaps-gl" shows only a static image (kernel 2.6.28 on 9.04) [23:49] rtg: you did not add the rtxxx drivers yet? what else do you need? i tested it already [23:49] Kano: I'm just now looking at it. [23:50] ok