[00:08] huwshimi: is this you - http://huw.ugbox.net/ ? [00:12] lifeless: It was, a loooong time ago, yes [00:12] lifeless: How come? [00:13] huwshimi: its linked from the bottom of http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/IPv6 [00:14] lifeless: Oh yeah :) [03:58] Project windmill-devel build #207: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 5 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/207/ === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away [07:23] stub: \o/ thanks for fix-releasing that bug [07:23] stub: the followup branch with the journal etc is all landed and just passed bb [07:23] One down... [07:24] I'll be starting on the extension. Hopefully importance and the two booleans won't bloat things to impractical levels. [07:24] stub: I think it ended up being a 54MB table [07:24] stub: e.g. still quite compact [07:25] How many discreet importances are there? [07:26] unknown wishlist low medium high critical (+ perhaps 2 backwards compat ?) [07:28] huh... we have some bugtasks with priority set [07:29] Only 30k or so... must have been a bug in bugs [07:29] Or is that settable via the API? [07:29] Project windmill-db-devel build #383: STILL FAILING in 2 min 43 sec: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/383/ [07:30] stub: unmigrated early-days stuff? [07:30] I'm not sure python even knows about the column now [07:30] stub: ah, your branches were targeted at db-devel [07:58] Someday I need to get around to fixing that sorting. I've been holding it off. [08:03] Any reviewers in the house? I'm pretty sure the topic is out of date! https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/pre-bug-791204-getPackageUploads-name-filter/+merge/64345 === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: - | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 [08:04] stub: are you ocr'ing today? [08:09] Aww, the branding wiki linked in the email isn't accessible outside of Canonical :( [08:10] nigelb: Oh, apologies about that. I'll see if there's another link I can use [08:11] huwshimi: Ah, thanks! [08:13] Anybody want to review an extensive but relatively straightforward lint branch? https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/more-pre-791204-lint/+merge/64365 [08:24] jtv: yo [08:24] stub: got time to review this one? Not hard: https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/more-pre-791204-lint/+merge/64365 [08:24] and hi, btw :) [08:25] If it is just lint, r=jtv would be fine. Or do you want another pair of eyeballs on it? [08:25] stub: there's a few places where I went beyond the entirely trivial. Not far, but still. [08:28] One place I see, and that is pretty obviously an improvement. r=stub [08:29] Off for a quick bite to eat [08:29] thanks stub! [08:30] np :) [08:31] Project devel build #798: STILL FAILING in 5 hr 50 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/798/ [08:34] Project parallel-test build #30: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 21 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/30/ [08:49] Yay. http://pgreplay.projects.postgresql.org/ might let us actually create a DB benchmark. [08:56] Project windmill-db-devel build #384: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 11 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/384/ [09:00] huwshimi: hello [09:00] jml: Hey [09:01] huwshimi: skype? [09:01] jml: Just logging in [09:01] jml: Just one sec [09:02] Hello! [09:03] jml: back [09:04] mrevell: hi [09:15] nigelb: Here is that link: https://dev.launchpad.net/Projects/Rebranding [09:15] huwshimi: thanks :-) [09:16] Can we introduce a bug into launchpad that will report the number of critical bugs against lauchpad as zero? ;-) [09:22] nigelb: no. [09:22] jml: Drat. I tried :-) === jtv1 is now known as jtv === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [09:42] nigelb: we could, but it would be a regression and so critical :P [09:43] jml: btw, hi [09:43] lifeless: hello [09:43] stub: that looks interesting [09:47] jml: hows today looking ? [09:48] lifeless: Hehe [09:49] huwshimi: http://lpqateam.canonical.com/doc/scope.html [09:49] lifeless: otp [09:54] lifeless: should have time for a call if you'd like one [09:56] that would be nice [10:01] lifeless: now? skype? [10:05] lifeless: Since you're not answering. I'm going to go wash the dishes. Will be back soon. [10:11] * bigjools adds a bug tag subscription and rejoices [10:11] bigjools, nooooo, we didn't make it to be used! [10:11] (ab)used [10:14] back [10:15] jml: yes, and yes === stub1 is now known as stub [10:30] wgrant, StevenK: has either of you touched the Upgrade button on df's oneiric/+localpackagediffs lately? Mind if I hit it in a few minutes? [10:31] jtv: I seriously doubt it, since .au has a public holiday today. [10:31] that's never stopped you before [10:32] you geocontrarian bunch of workaholics === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away [11:32] Project windmill-devel build #208: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 8 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/208/ [12:02] Review needed! https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/pre-bug-791204-getPackageUploads-name-filter/+merge/64345 [12:16] jtv: looking at it now [12:16] thanks! [12:16] jtv: are you doing full substring on the name_filter? [12:16] No, prefix. [12:16] jtv: the old code did full substring [12:16] Didn't look like it. [12:16] "sourcepackagename.name LIKE '%%' || %s || '%%'" [12:17] argh [12:17] there's also an exact_match param in the old code [12:17] oh well, good thing I isolated that in a function. [12:17] Yes [12:17] I'll have to mimick that as well, for the script. [12:17] not sure where that was used though [12:17] In the script. :( [12:17] I just found it. [12:17] But it won't be hard, again because I isolated the match in a separate function. [12:18] ok [12:19] Maybe I should tackle both of these issues together in a separate branch: instead of prefix match, give a choice of exact match or full substring match. [12:19] (There were some intricacies w.r.t. pattern escaping) [12:20] well you'd be landing a regression... === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [12:25] No, because we're not actually calling that method yet. [12:25] Or at least not with that argument! [12:25] oh you've not changed code to call it yet [12:26] No, because that requires both this branch and the other one that I'm currently writing an MP for. [12:27] ok [12:27] the substring query is going to cack up the performance something rotten [12:28] jtv: also the old getQueueItems had some messed up ordering that was discarded when it did the union at the bottom [12:28] I wonder if we can fix that [12:29] but the problem is that the old query ordered on different things depending on the upload type [12:33] What kind of ordering do we want, from the user's perspective? [12:33] not entirely sure tbh, but anything consistent will be better than the current code [12:33] it's quite hard to order because of the different types of upload [12:34] Yeah… if it weren't for custom uploads, I'd say we clearly need to sort by package. [12:34] sorting by packageupload.id is a good start, it just won't order the items that share the same PU [12:34] And then maybe have a separate more queue-oriented page for seeing how the work goes. [12:35] Isn't it just the builds that share a PU? [12:37] Anyway, it's probably not going to be _that_ hard to treat that as a separate issue? [12:38] jtv: a single upload can have builds, sources AND custom files [12:38] there's not many of those in practice any more, but the model allows it [12:38] Oh ewll [12:38] well [12:39] That's for a separate query though. [12:40] This query only returns the PUs. [12:40] When we display those, I have a feeling the sorting of items within a PU will work out without too much difficulty. [12:46] Oh this just had to happen to me, didn't it? [12:46] Diff against target:666 lines (+391/-50) 8 files modified (has conflicts) [12:47] Woe to you, oh earth and sea… [12:47] jtv: reviewed, needs-fixing [12:47] thanks [12:53] jtv: so FYI there's one PCJ with a PU in the dogfood DB now, since I synced an unknown package. It'll be good QA fodder :) [12:53] * jtv cackles nastily [13:13] /topichttps://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: benji | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 [13:13] /topichttps://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: benji | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 [13:13] pfft === benji changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: benji | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer [13:15] benji, hey, hey, I've got a few branches awaiting review, the first one at https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-772754-other-subscribers-lp-names/+merge/64178 [13:15] danilos: I'll take a look [13:15] benji, cool, thanks [13:15] jml: sorry, cut the last bit off [13:16] jml: was good talking; have a great day [13:21] Project db-devel build #630: FAILURE in 5 hr 51 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/630/ === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [13:40] benji: Hi! Could you take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~rvb/launchpad/initseries-bug-795537/+merge/64231 ? [13:40] rvba: sure [13:40] benji: Thanks! [14:06] Project windmill-devel build #209: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 7 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/209/ [14:23] danilos: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-772754-other-subscribers-lp-names/+merge/64178 [14:24] benji, cool, thanks, care to take on the next one: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-772754-other-subscribers-subscribers/+merge/64179? :) [14:25] danilos: sure, you're second in line, but I don't think it'll be a very long wait [14:25] benji, great, thanks [14:30] rvba: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~rvb/launchpad/initseries-bug-795537/+merge/64231 [14:30] benji: Thanks! [14:32] benji: Hi! Can I add another branch to your queue? [14:32] jelmer: absolutely [14:33] benji: Thanks :) MP is at https://code.launchpad.net/~jelmer/launchpad/auto-upgrade/+merge/64398 [14:36] benji: Can I push another merge proposal (shortish, some javascript) on your stack? https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-latest-comment-bug-746379/+merge/64334 [14:36] allenap: sure [14:36] Thanks :) === Ursinha is now known as Ursula === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [15:40] can someone explain the purpose of lazr.canonical.timeout.urlfetch when urllib2.urlopen already supports a timeout parameter? [15:43] danilos and jelmer,done with your reviews [15:44] Project parallel-test build #31: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 0 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/31/ [15:51] benji, cool, thanks again [15:51] np [15:51] benji: thanks :) [15:51] np === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch [16:00] sinzui: hi [16:00] hi [16:01] sinzui: would you like to have a call about disclosure? [16:01] okay [16:01] Project windmill-db-devel build #385: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 14 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/385/ [16:01] jml: I am on mumble [16:02] sinzui: mumble hates my guts. I have dared to change my hardware. Give me a sec. [16:02] jml: I will also learn is mumble works for me on oneiric [16:06] allenap: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-latest-comment-bug-746379/+merge/64334 === Ursula is now known as Ursinha [16:07] benji: Thank you :) [16:07] my pleasure [16:08] sinzui: just saw bug 707234 bumped up. think i might tackle that today. [16:08] <_mup_> Bug #707234: Ajax controls disabled on bugs with many tasks due to multiple redundant copies of person picker make_picker function in view-source:https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-project/+bugs?advanced=1

< https://launchpad.net/bugs/707234 > [16:09] up for chatting about it when you're done talking with jml? === jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett [16:14] Project devel build #799: STILL FAILING in 6 hr 2 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/799/ [16:24] jcsackett: I am available to chat now === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [16:41] nevermind my question about urlfetch, I suspect the reason is that the timeout parameter was only added to urllib2.urlopen in 2.6 [16:46] mrevell: you might find this interesting reading (then again it may put you to sleep) https://dev.launchpad.net/Soyuz/DerivativeDistributions [16:48] bigjools, Thanks :) [16:51] Project windmill-devel build #210: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 6 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/210/ [16:55] bigjools, Cody ran the complete test suite before landing my fix for #724740 and I had one failure... does that have to mean I introduced a regression? If so it's causing some serious head scratching, because the failure seems completely unrelated to my change (and if there is a relationship, I'm scared :)) [16:55] <_mup_> Bug #724740: setting a ppa private cannot be done over the API

< https://launchpad.net/bugs/724740 > [16:55] timrc: can you paste the failure? It's not unheard of to have random failures :/ [16:57] bigjools, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/625962/ [16:57] bigjools, I'll dig deeper into this, myself... it just struck me as odd as this being the one place of failure [16:58] timrc: ah that does look related [16:58] timrc: where's your merge proposal? [16:59] bigjools, https://code.launchpad.net/~timrchavez/launchpad/set_ppa_private_from_api_724740-2/+merge/63950 [17:00] timrc: if you run that test locally does it fail again? [17:02] bigjools, yes, when I run the test locally it fails [17:06] timrc: if you revert your changes does it still fail? [17:07] benji: Got time for another shortish javascript branch? https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-commenting-bug-795573/+merge/64418 [17:07] allenap: sure [17:08] Thanks again :) [17:10] * jml has to run. [17:10] see y'all later. [17:10] timrc: I'm testing locally too [17:12] bigjools, testing now === m4n1sh is now known as manish [17:17] bigjools, yeah, must be a regression caused by me :( test ran fine with my changes removed [17:18] ok let's work out why [17:19] and indeed it fails for me too [17:21] allenap: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-commenting-bug-795573/+merge/64418 === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [17:22] Thanks benji. [17:48] is there a naming convention for urls in the web and webservice interfaces for referring to sets and individual elements within sets, eg plural for the former (/foos) and singular for the latter (/foo/1) [17:51] good question [17:52] what I'm observing from the apidoc is plural all the way, eg /foos and /foos/1 taking my above example. I can understand that motivation for people playing with urls manually, so removing /1 from the latter would immediately resolve into a working url [17:53] I would appreciate some confirmation whether I'm observing a legacy decision or one that still holds today [18:00] timrc: I can see where that test is failing but I can't work out why [18:00] timrc: IArchiveSet.getArchivesForDistribution() is not returning the copy_archive created at the top of the test [18:00] so the script that needs it doesn't do anything [18:01] timrc: I have to go now, maybe someone else can help you or grab wgrant when he's around later in your day [18:01] cr3: I think /foos is a good pattern [18:01] launchpad tells me that it cannot import subunit using python 2.6 when running on oneiric :( [18:01] the singular is up for debate [18:02] it depends on the domain [18:02] bigjools, alrighty... thanks for the help [18:02] timrc: you're welcome. Good luck. === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:03] bigjools: implying /foos/1 for an individual element under /foos, right? [18:04] cr3: well one example is /builders and /builders/ [18:04] bigjools: I just tried accessing /people/cr3 on launchpad, which redirects me to /~cr3 whereas /person/cr3 asks me if I lost somthing :) [18:04] * bigjools has to run for the day [18:05] there you go thenb [18:05] good night all [18:08] Good night my comrades. [19:01] matsubara: hi :) did you file bugs for any of your dd exploratory testing notes? [19:04] Ursinha, not yet [19:06] Project windmill-devel build #211: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 7 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/211/ [19:07] benji: could you please review https://code.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/ppa-api-errors/+merge/64425 ? [19:07] abentley: sure [19:11] I'm having an issue running 'make schema' on my launchpad dev system [19:12] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/626039/ [19:16] abentley: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/ppa-api-errors/+merge/64425 I had one thought that you might want to consider. [19:16] benji: ? [19:17] abentley: I don't understand what you don't understand. :) [19:17] benji: You said there was something I might want to consider. I was saying "Hmmm? Go on..." [19:17] ah, it's in a comment on the MP [19:17] benji: BadRequest is only emitted for status 400 AFAIK. [19:20] abentley: since the test docstring explicityly says 400, it would be good to actually test for that, and I'm paranoid enough to expect that same message to one day be given a different status code [19:22] benji: Very well, I'll change the test to say "Bad Request". [19:22] k [19:23] benji: I submit that if you're afraid standards bodies are out to get you, you truly are paranoid. [19:24] heh; it's more that the people writing the software are fallible [19:31] benji: I think that if I tested the status code of BadRequest, I'd be violating the principle of "Test only one thing", because I'd be testing the behaviour of lazr.restfulclient. [19:32] abentley: I'd buy that. [19:56] hi james_w, i need to create a new test data suite for archiveuploader. do you know how to do that, specifically working out getting them properly signed? [19:59] abentley, flacoste: ^^ [20:00] bac: what do you want to do exactly? [20:00] flacoste: create a test for a maintainer with a bad email address (bug 519857) [20:00] <_mup_> Bug #519857: Upload processor OOPSes with bad email addresses

< https://launchpad.net/bugs/519857 > [20:00] benji: if you have time, could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~flacoste/launchpad/bug-781993-1/+merge/64258 pretty please? [20:01] flacoste: so i figure i need to create a new suite, with a bad maintainer or Changed-by email address...but it has to be properly signed [20:01] flacoste: sure [20:01] thanks benji [20:02] bac: why don't you write this as a unit test to safe_fix_maintainer [20:02] bac: which operates on a hash [20:02] err, dictionary [20:02] * flacoste again showed he's a former perl hacker [20:02] flacoste: i'll look into that. thanks. [20:04] bac: if you want to go end-to-end, i think there are probably some helper method in soyuz for that, but would be best to ask bigjools, StevenK or wgrant about it [20:04] flacoste: actually, no. i was intending for safe_fix_maintainer to still raise the same error, but i'd just handle it in process [20:04] flacoste: which is why i wanted an end-to-end test [20:05] and it looked like the way things are done in test_uploadprocessor.py is to create novel suites... [20:07] bac, from what I remember the checking of real packages tends to operate on packages contained in the LP source tree [20:10] which is more a case of missing test architecture i think [20:10] but i may be mistaken [20:10] bac: you want to make the fix in processChanges? [20:10] james_w: what i think i need to do is in lib/lp/archiveuploader/tests/data/suite create a new suite, say, bar_1.0-1_bad_maintainer_email and in it change bar_1.0-1_source.changes to futz with the maintainer or changed-by email address to invoke the failure. but when i do that i need to sign that file [20:10] Project db-devel build #631: STILL FAILING in 5 hr 39 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/631/ [20:11] flacoste: i was intending something like http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/626072/ [20:11] Project parallel-test build #32: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 5 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/32/ [20:12] flacoste, there's no support in the test suite for signing packages that I know of, which is why all of those are already signed [20:13] james_w, flacoste: right, so that's what i'm trying to figure out. i see a secring.gpg but it doesn't seem to have in it what i need. so i'm trying to figure out where the keys are and perhaps some instructions... [20:13] bac, ah, got it [20:13] james_w: sorry it was so circuitous [20:13] I've never had to do it myself [20:14] so I can't help you I'm afraid [20:14] james_w: ah, right then. of the people awake you seemed like the best candidate [20:14] james_w: thanks anway! [20:15] flacoste: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/initialise-to-initialize/+merge/64121 [20:15] flacoste: perhaps i should put this aside until i can talk to bigjools [20:15] benji: EWRONGURL I suspect. [20:15] pfft! [20:15] bac: yeah, probably a good idea [20:16] allenap: the curse of having multiple tabs open at once [20:16] benji: But thanks for reviewing that one :) [20:19] flacoste: I actually meant that I'm done with this https://code.launchpad.net/~flacoste/launchpad/bug-781993-1/+merge/64258 ;) [20:19] benji: ah, cool, thanks! [20:24] allenap: I just had a thought about your branch that I want to check out, so if you're panning on jumping on the merge, hold off for one sec [20:25] benji: Sure. [20:29] Project windmill-db-devel build #386: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 13 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/386/ [20:31] allenap: ok, we're good, my negative thought didn't pan out (I was concerned that one or more symbols exposed by the web service might have been changed) [20:32] benji: Thanks for thinking of it and checking :) === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [20:45] flacoste: this explains a lot :P [20:45] lifeless: ??? [20:46] 07:02 * flacoste again showed he's a former perl hacker [20:46] :P [20:46] lol [20:57] Project windmill-devel build #212: STILL FAILING in 47 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/212/ [20:58] lifeless: call time? === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 [20:59] yup [21:13] hi flacoste, lifeless [21:28] I sorted out my question [21:29] might there be an interface for accessing oops reports? I'm wondering what might be wrong with this one: OOPS-1990AP106 [21:39] Yippie, build fixed! [21:39] Project devel build #800: FIXED in 5 hr 24 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/800/ [21:42] Project windmill-devel build #213: STILL FAILING in 44 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/213/ === benji changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: - | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 [22:25] Project windmill-devel build #214: STILL FAILING in 42 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/214/ === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [23:22] o/ poolie [23:43] sinzui: Was your team touching on bug 66552 ? I think its a dupe or something [23:43] <_mup_> Bug #66552: Unhelpful error when reporting bug with non-existent package entered and "I don't know" chosen < https://launchpad.net/bugs/66552 > [23:56] I'm now getting an error trying to run most tests [23:56] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/626204/ [23:57] fun