=== Jack87|Away is now known as Jack87 === Jack87 is now known as Jack87|Away === Jack87|Away is now known as Jack87 === Jack87 is now known as Jack87|Away === Jack87|Away is now known as Jack87 === Jack87 is now known as Jack87|Away === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [16:32] Does Oneiric run on the Genesi SmartBook yet ? === Jack87|Away is now known as Jack87 [21:11] rsavoye: i have an sd card running it [21:11] no official release of it though [21:12] of oneiric ? [22:09] I think there is something goofy with the timing on my pandaboard [22:10] I saw it in the test results when I was building go and just now when I was looking at ping times [22:11] ? [22:11] 64 bytes from 10.15.32.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=255 time=1.58 ms [22:11] 64 bytes from 10.15.32.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=255 time=0.000 ms [22:11] 64 bytes from 10.15.32.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=255 time=1.67 ms [22:11] 64 bytes from 74.125.225.48: icmp_req=2 ttl=54 time=18.3 ms [22:11] Running on the Panda, or another host? [22:11] 64 bytes from 74.125.225.48: icmp_req=3 ttl=54 time=0.092 ms [22:11] 64 bytes from 74.125.225.48: icmp_req=4 ttl=54 time=20.1 ms [22:11] on the panda [22:11] from the panda to the gateway and then to google [22:12] I see fluctuations, as I do from any host, but I don't see any 0s. :P [22:13] yeah [22:13] must be superfast! [22:13] 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=0.153 ms [22:13] 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=0.855 ms [22:13] 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=0.488 ms [22:13] 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms [22:13] 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=0.580 ms [22:13] but when I was building go all the /test/time results were failures [22:13] For example. [22:13] Yup [22:15] here's the other thing http://pastebin.com/f26HKCJq [22:16] those are counting clock ticks I think an it's getting done faster than is possible I think [22:16] Possibly. [22:17] Which kernel? [22:17] I did not see this behavior either with ping or on the go test on 10.10 [22:17] Linux localhost 3.0.0-1204-omap4 #9-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Mon Sep 5 19:29:18 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux [22:18] I wouldn't be terribly shocked if we still have a ton of lingering SMP bugs on ARM. [22:18] ok [22:18] You could try booting with 'nosmp' on the command line and see if it magically clears up. [22:18] I will do that after I eat and report back, thanks :) [22:19] Food sounds like a stellar idea. [22:19] As does a weekend in general. :) [23:13] infinity: how do I set that nosmp? [23:46] brandini: Kernel command line. [23:46] brandini: So, either hand-craft a command line in uBoot (irksome), or edit /boot/boot.srcipt and re-run flash-kernel [23:48] I did edit /boot/boot.script [23:48] xA0000000 root=UUID=5e7fa157-723c-4bd5-9a0c-d76ff1f07c64 fixrtc nosmp quiet spla [23:48] is that the right place for it? [23:51] Should do. [23:51] But then you need to re-run flash-kernel. [23:51] done [23:51] testing now [23:52] Check after you reboot that you only have one CPU. :) [23:52] how do I see that? [23:52] cat /proc/cpuinfo would be a good indicator. [23:52] Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) [23:52] processor : 0 [23:52] BogoMIPS : 1576.53 [23:52] processor : 1 [23:52] BogoMIPS : 1539.77 [23:52] ^-- Two cores. [23:53] ahhh yes, only one and the error still occurs [23:53] Kay. [23:54] sorry... I'm a BSD guy so linux isn't my primary system [23:55] http://www.webos-internals.org/wiki/Application:Xapps [23:56] ubuntu runnin in chroot of hp touchpad ^