There is an enormous amount of work that goes on in committees when members put aside some of their partisanship and focus on how to build an excellent health care system, on how to build a good research and development program and how to deal with issues of equity when you are looking at issues of debt reduction.
For the greater good the group should put aside their differences so they can get work done
The speaker suggests that groups will get work done if they put aside their differences. This makes my statement correct. The model was probably fooled by my vague word choices
( z0 recommend :purpose ( z1 good :ARG1-of ( z2 have-degree :ARG2 ( z3 great ) :ARG3 ( z4 more ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z5 put :purpose ( z6 possible :ARG1 ( z7 get :ARG0 ( z8 group ) :ARG1 ( z9 do :ARG0 z8 :ARG1 ( z10 work :ARG0 z8 ) ) ) ) :ARG0 z8 :ARG1 ( z11 differ :ARG0 z8 ) :ARG2 ( z12 aside ) ) )
(z0 / recommend-01
    :purpose (z1 / good-04
                 :ARG1-of (z2 / have-degree-91
                              :ARG2 (z3 / great)
                              :ARG3 (z4 / more)))
    :ARG1 (z5 / put-01
              :purpose (z6 / possible-01
                           :ARG1 (z7 / get-04
                                     :ARG0 (z8 / group)
                                     :ARG1 (z9 / do-02
                                               :ARG0 z8
                                               :ARG1 (z10 / work-01
                                                          :ARG0 z8))))
              :ARG0 z8
              :ARG1 (z11 / differ-01
                         :ARG0 z8)
              :ARG2 (z12 / aside)))
For the greater good the group should put aside their differences so they can get work done
z2 :ARG2 z3
z2 :ARG3 z4
z1 :ARG1-of z2
z0 :purpose z1
z0 :ARG1 z5
z5 :ARG0 z8
z5 :ARG2 z12
z5 :ARG1 z11
z11 :ARG0 z8
z5 :purpose z6
z6 :ARG1 z7
z7 :ARG0 z8
z10 :ARG0 z8
z9 :ARG1 z10
z7 :ARG1 z9
z9 :ARG0 z8