In other words you could have -- right now, if Congress decides to have a law, and this law is going to give copyrights in 1) the Bible, 2) Shakespeare, 3) Ben Jonson, and the reason they do it is that they think that that would lead publishers to produce those and distribute them, and they're right, they will, okay? In your view, that's perfectly constitutional?
if congress decided to have law it doesn't have to give copyrights.
The law doesn't have to have copyrights. it says if the law has copyrights. I tricked it by saying the opposite it said while being a true statement.
( z0 obligate :ARG1 ( z1 government-organization :name ( z2 name :op "Congress" ) ) :ARG2 ( z3 give :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z4 copyright ) ) :condition ( z5 decide :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z6 have :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z7 law ) ) ) :polarity - )
(z0 / obligate-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / government-organization
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "Congress"))
    :ARG2 (z3 / give-01
              :ARG0 z1
              :ARG1 (z4 / copyright-01))
    :condition (z5 / decide-01
                   :ARG0 z1
                   :ARG1 (z6 / have-03
                             :ARG0 z1
                             :ARG1 (z7 / law)))
    :polarity -)
if congress decided to have law it does n't have to give copyrights .
z1 :name z2
z2 :op1 1
z5 :ARG0 z1
z5 :ARG1 z6
z6 :ARG0 z1
z6 :ARG1 z7
z0 :polarity 0
z0 :condition z5
z0 :ARG1 z1
z0 :ARG2 z3
z3 :ARG0 z1
z3 :ARG1 z4