That's right. That's the important hurdle, and we'd like to jump that first, but the other ones, Justice, you're right, in 1831 and in 1909 Congress extended terms in a way that is inconsistent with the strongest form of the test that we have advanced. Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.
Congress extended terms in 2009 in an inconsistent way
No Congress extended terms in an inconsistent way in 1831 and 1909
( z0 extend :ARG0 ( z1 government-organization :name ( z2 name :op "Congress" ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 term ) :ARG1-of ( z4 consistent :polarity - ) :time ( z5 date-entity :year 2009 ) )
(z0 / extend-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / government-organization
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "Congress"))
    :ARG1 (z3 / term)
    :ARG1-of (z4 / consistent-02
                 :polarity -)
    :time (z5 / date-entity
              :year 2009))
Congress extended terms in 2009 in an inconsistent way
z1 :name z2
z2 :op1 2
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z3
z0 :time z5
z5 :year 1
z4 :polarity 0
z0 :ARG1-of z4