That you believe a woman's uterus is more heavily regulated than firearms demonstrates your capacity to reason, let alone your tenuous tether to reality.
In 1791 the term "well regulated" indicated well trained, not highly restricted. That the general and State governments have chosen a standing army as the best source of security for the Union in the face of technological advancements over the last couple of centuries does not alter or abolish the individual right to keep and bear arms in common use and capable of being used for military purposes that predate the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment (which protects, not establishes the right) and the United States of America itself. Were there still official militias in every neighborhood and town, I promise you they would be well attended. However, the ability to effectively disarm the population by not establishing militias to join was specifically spoken to in the Federalist Papers if you're at all interested in becoming educated.