.

Angelo writes:

"no one needs be charged with treason to have committed it, anymore than the liberal mind is complicit in this outrage yet remains unfettered in perpetration of same"

--

Angelo, in jurisdictions where the rule of law is justly applied, no one has committed treason until they have been proven in a court of law to have done so.

The concept is known as "innocent until proven guilty".

You may indeed be convinced of treason on the part of Mr. Khadr, and complicity on the part of those of "liberal mind", but your opinion on such conjecture holds no status or value in Canadian criminal law.

You are neither prosecutor nor judge nor jury, just one more self-appointed, armchair cop.

Canada's Supreme Court has ruled three times in Mr. Khadr's favour.

I'll take their opinion over yours, thanks.

.