Doesn't this make it glaringly obvious that in most cases financial support is expected quid pro quo? Otherwise I'm not sure why anyone would think that they would continue to give money to a candidate that isn't supporting them. So, um, what's the real point you made other than that a contributor is upset and withdrew their financial support. Which is kind of the point. You do lose two points for squeezing in "union" and "bribes". Duh, but all the other millions unleashed by C.United is just grassroots joes, lol.