Yes, ignore all those news stories that circulated showing the works side by side and what should have been plainly called outright as plagiarism. When even the signatures are barely discernible as by two people, right down to the paint colour, it's untenable to claim anything but plagiarism.

Why would any gallery reward that with payment, while a bunch of privileged classes, a group not known either for inclusion of people of colour for anything on a full and equal level, will decide on the obvious or not? Talk about the height of blowhard privilege.

Thanks, Visions for doing the decent thing, even in the face of derision from those who have benefited most from the theft of all things Indigenous over the last 200 years.