Well, we already have her rebuttal on Twitter. It amounts to "of course I am a wonderful progressive person in  favour of more housing because it will reduce prices, but it can't be in my neighbourhood because [insert arbitrary nit-picking objections that would apply almost anywhere]". So it is the classic NIMBY position - "I don't want my neighbourhood to suffer any disruption". Well, building more housing, affordable or not, will entail disruption somewhere, so why not Atwood's area?