"In the present case it seems pretty clear that Premier Wall is turning to it rather than exercising his right to refer the case immediately to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal for ideological reasons."

Wall could cite any number of practical reasons for using the NWC. Perhaps your own ideology or lawyer's penchant for litigation prevents you from seeing them.

"Feeling free to pick and choose when to over-ride Constitutional rights and freedoms is a dangerous road to go down."

If it's so dangerous, then why is s.33 there in the first place? Politicians ARE free to pick and choose. That's what we elect them for. So what are the specific dangers you see in this instance?

Again I point out that invoking s.33 to deny people their personal rights would be a bad thing. Then it's time to man the barricades. But in this instance Wall has invoked it to protect the rights of individuals. If he doesn't, then following the law will create hardship for a lot of people.