Actually, the Harvard study clearly showed a media bias that's been overwhelmingly negative. That was just for the first 100 days. Wasn't CNN's Jones who famously described the POTUS Election win as a "Whitelash"?  Harvard put the negative press in context. It's simply "propaganda". There are few stories that are substantive. There are accurate criticisms of his long-term fiscal policies, foreign policy objectives, and on and on. The substantive discussions are important but they're not provided by most media outlets.    

The fact is that Trump is a political chameleon. He's now nominally a Repub, was a Demo who partied with Bill, Hillary, and Chuck, and once was an Indy. He's a direct repudiation to the Deep State. His POTUS Administration will be transformative just as every other POTUS Administration was transformative. He's a threat to the political status quo. I just don't get emotional about politics.