Ausepat,

You are fine with Vancouver becoming a place where the average house costs three million dollars and are mainly owned by people who do not work at local jobs, where local workers are not able to afford a house because of the flood of money from overseas.

And what that means is that you are okay with turning Vancouver into a resort city for the world's wealthiest.

I am not okay with that. Your approach is an acceptance of the destruction of tradition, of destroying the long-standing cultural tradition in Canada that, in any of our cities, local workers could work and buy a home locally.

You want to flush that cultural tradition down the toilet, gleefully welcoming the replacement of Vancouver with, in its place, a World Resort City, kind of like a Disneyland with a three-million-dollar entrance ticket.

Why do you want to do that?

Will Vancouver be even better to you if houses cost ten million and if the service workers live a hundred miles away in worker ghettos?