So, help us, or maybe just me, here.  What exactly HOW is his wink, wink, not a travel ban(that he just admitted once again, is a travel ban, despite his followers heading to the supreme court to argue otherwise)  going to stop terrorism on U.S. soil?  The whole point of this moratorium was to strengthen the vetting process but to date he has done nothing.  Now any reasonably intelligent person would ask, why not - given the court delay of said not a travel ban -go ahead with the updating of the vetting process?  And since none of the countries on his banned list has committed a terrorist act on U.S. soil, how are they relevant to this (not a) ban....other than to attempt to copy from BO intelligent approach, which was to be vigilant about vetting from these countries, among others.