The general point about hypocrisy and the renewed fashionableness of old prejudices, and the tacit provision of an ideological safe-harbour for Ezra Pound  is fair enough.  But this does not excuse a virtually complete failure to understand Wodehouse as a writer, whose whole output is riddled with ironic detachment. He was not an apologist for Bertie Wooster, Roderick Spode, or the commandant in Upper Silesia.  He therefore doesn't need to benefit from the Ezra Pound exemption.  The article is rather loose on facts and its overall thesis is base over apex (as Wooster might have said).