As a Globe reader, I am never entirely happy. I agree with about 50% of the articles and I find that more and more are being written by those who represent special interest groups on all sides. Should articles on First Nation's issues be included when written from the point of view of activists (however well educated they may be) and should articles supporting industries be written from those who benefit from growth in that industry? 
It all comes down to balance - if both sides of an issue are presented it allows the readers to make an intelligent decision as to what to believe. While I believe that the Globe does a better job of this than of many of the other media outlets, I would encourage the Globe to improve in this regard. 
At the same time, I would encourage the Globe readers to add their own comment on stories in a respectful manner - often some of the most interesting information is provided by commenters who understand the issue - it would be nice not to read the insults.