John Stokes, you are probably *the last person* who should be taking others to task re: transparency.

Let's help educate the public re: PAC support, shall we? I consider myself a fairly informed voter and I didn't understand this about PACs until yesterday: they can do what they want independent of the candidates they support. In other words, a PAC decides it wants to support Candidate A so it sends out mailers, runs ads, and makes robocalls in that candidate's name. Candidate A has nothing to do with any of those things, has no control over them, and doesn't know about them until after the fact when they hear about them. Yet, an uninformed public believes those communications are coming directly from the candidate's camp. So... a Republican PAC made a robocall (and didn't pronounce Fricke's name right) for the men but that *doesn't* mean they are Republicans. Nobody's hiding anything except you hiding the truth about what PACs can do.

"Neighborhood Party"... you'll never be a member