I'm sorry, but I don't get what you're saying here. Which of those seem plausible? The notion that the horrible murders of little school children at Sandy Hook was actually "staged" and that the killings never happened is no more plausible than that the earth is flat. So what causes you to believe, for example, that the World Trade Centers were not flown into by hijacked airliners but rather were destroyed by controlled demolitions, yet you reject that the world is flat? Are you suggesting Obama was actually born in Kenya, that this is plausible, when it's been proven he was born in Hawaii? You believe the government is flying chemical-laden planes high up in the atmosphere spreading poison? Which of these is plausible while flat earth is not, and explain why you think any other is plausible.