You do understand the difference between belief & fact right? A belief is something that needs no evidence to support (by definition). A fact is something one can support through evidence. Beliefs are black and white. They are individual. Facts on the other hand, are universal tested truisms with measurable and observable properties or mechanistic explanations. For a believer to imply one need evidence for God as to God's existence is, in fact, a little heretical. No offense, I'm just trying to point out that beliefs and measurable, repeatable facts (upon which science is based), are completely compatible, as they are completely different creatures. A scientist's logic and reason, doesn't concern itself with a theologian's beliefs. All we can say, is that we have no measurable observations to support your belief -- which according to the very definition of "belief," in a way, supports your belief. Logic, philosophy - it's kind of cool huh? Not trying to hassle you. Really think this.