John Hobson.

Your definition of "hate speech" is apparently anything you disagree with.

But let's say there are laws against "hate speech" (even though there are not).  What are you really saying here?

You are saying here that when someone gives a talk you disagree with, you approve not just of protests, but of actual violence that forces the person giving the talk, and everyone who went to the talk, to flee for their lives.

That is what happened at UC Berkeley.  Actual violence for the sake of shutting down free speech.

There's isn't one thing said by Milo Y. you can cite that would justify such violence.   Moreover, Milo  has never in any way encouraged violence against anyone.

But that same can't be said about you, John Hobson.  For you to say people you disagree with "shouldn't be given a voice" in the context of a mob rule riot is absolutely disgraceful.

I might give a pass to a misguided teenager who held such a view, but you should know better.