The data doesn't change for 2012 from year to year, and so it is just fine and it also continues, even after all your specious objection, to stand as originally made. See, you need to argue some point; we agree on the data, as already discussed. Scroll up and read it again.

Why would I have specifics, I'm hardly a policy expert, now am I? But you don't need to be a policy expert to see failed policy for what it is based upon the consequences that it creates.