It turns out that I am a scientist (full professor, NSERC funding and all), so I think I understand how science works fairly well (I can explain it to you, if you don't understand). Precisely because of that, I know not to take scientists' words as dogma, in particular when we are talking wild extrapolation from certain models. 

I would like to see the "more evidence" of storms. And how it all relates to more draughts. Or, more generally, how could it be that every possible consequence of warming is negative.