Honestly, my first reaction was that this is a solution in search of a problem.

Perhaps more to the point, and with respect to the many commenters here, it seems to me like it should be possible to have room for the EF and the OF, for dialogue Masses and contemplative Masses like the EF and, as I understand it, most of the other rites (the Anglican Use is a nice combination, IMO).  That being said, how to accomplish that while respecting everyone's particular sensibilities (i.e., what moves them), respecting the Church's understanding of what the Mass is, and proper reverence for the Divine?  If, in attempting to be sensitive to all of the above, one gets 'liturgy by committee' and a mish-mash of all of the parts, rather than a coherent whole, no one is happy, so to speak, right?  On the other hand, when given free reign, one gets results like the one in the article, which seems to imply substantial changes in the understanding of what Mass is without coming right out and saying it.