Your original scenario was that Mass was being celebrated for 'ten atheists'. When I asked you why the priest in your scenario was celebrating Mass for ten atheists, you then changed the basis of your example (because you realised that you had made a mistake) to: your priest celebrating Mass because he 'desired to do so'.
Your use of capital letters, in various of your 'replies' (and this is now your 18th), has only been to yell.
And you are indeed repeating yourself - yet again.
The 'point under discussion' between us, was the point that I chose to raise with you - namely, the validity or otherwise of a priest celebrating Mass without a minister or lay faithful present. The validity of your original scenario (or 'hypo', as you call it).
Your general GIRM-lessness [General Instruction of the Roman Missal] has been evident throughout this discussion.
I will leave it there, as I can see that there is no end to your desire to have the last word. Please feel free to have it now....