OK, now I'm going to willingly go to the edge of civility here and say bull. First, I said IF you do not see Griffin in the same light as Nugent, you were being dishonest. And you are. Most of all, to yourself. You're cloaking your harsher response to Griffin in meaningless nonsense about which is 'grosser', when really, both are downright uncivil, and both deserve the exact same thing you asked "why?" to upthread: a visit by the secret service, an uncomfortable conversation about what is appropriate RE: the POTUS, and some community service (after Due Process, of course). 

You're willing to turn a blind eye to what Nugent has done, and believe that what Griffin has done is somehow worse because of some arbitrary measure you insist on measuring it by. We here criticizing your blind disregard of Nugent's and others attacks while attacking Griffin for her attacks can't help but wonder why the disparity. It couldn't be that Griffin attacked a Republican, could it?