Alceste, you have argued in the past that there is no need for specific laws to protect against shariah law, FGM, honour killings, gender segregation, etc., because "we already have laws against these, the Charter", etc.

And now you are arguing that we need this motion, when we already have laws against "hate speech", religious discrimination, assault, etc.?

There is a huge difference between "criticism of", "hatred of", and "physical assault against". Judging from comments here, there is plenty of hatred against conservatives, and speech inciting hatred against them, but they are not a "protected class", so that is judged to be acceptable. But most people recognize that speech inciting hatred against conservatives is different from speech inciting actual violence against them, let alone actual violence against them.