Your answer is, at best, disingenuous; at worst, purposefully misleading.

You do not address the reasons why...you know, the reasons I gave you above.  You do not address that an alleged paragon of women's rights is also paying women somewhat less...yet she is someone you admire.  You did not say 75%...you said 70%. 

You do not admit that things are evening out...precisely because of the reasons I gave you above.

Your argument lacks substance and validity...yet you use it as some sort of actual fact to base an accusation on.  Yes.  Disingenuous at best.  At worst?????

*smh*