I am not on the right.  I do not think expanded medical care is bad.  Obamacare is bad primarily because it does nothing to address the cost issue.  Medical compensation must be reduced.  The industry charges too much.  As far as the cardiac arrest study, I doubt it correctly identifies the causal factor associated with a reduced number of events.  But that suspicion does not stem from a dislike of Obamacare, only from evaluation of the numbers given and other technical factors.  Even the Harvard dude commented that it seemed too good to be true which in scientific circles is an extreme statement.  It is tempting to equate technical questions with partisan questions, but they are separate.  Time will tell if the cardiac arrest study stands up to scrutiny.  That is the scientific way.