Your assumption that is the AMHT followed laws and public comment the mental health care in Alaska would be better is not sound.  There is no evidence that no following public opinion or the rouge actions cause bad mental health care or poor access to care.

They should follow the law.  And when they don't, they should be held accountable.

Good mental health care access and professional deliverance of the mental heath care are problems of geography (getting people to it, or it too people) and not being able to have Alaska appeal to more mental health care providers.

Public opinion about the use of MHT land seems to me to always be opposed to the development, and potential revenue.  Ketchikan timber would provide needed funds.  The MHT land was not intended to be a park.