I've decided to delete any of my posts that, through my ill-advised tendency to repeatedly respond to Roy-Boy's posts regardless of how hysterical, immature, or stupid in an attempt to reduce the obscuring effect on the actual message.  Except those I can't bear to delete because they were so funny.

BUT...I will also repeat my previously-posted invitation to Roy-Boy: if he comes correct, I will respond in kind.  Although honestly I believe he's painted himself in a corner by his inability to logically refute the scientific evidence I've presented demonstrating the fallacies of his arguments, and thus is no longer in a position to accept my invitation without 'losing face', as he doubtless would consider it, by admitting he was wrong.

Perhaps a more 'face-saving' approach might be for him to follow my example and delete those posts which I hope he realizes fit the descriptions provided in the first paragraph of this post.  I doubt this will happen, but would gladly be proved wrong.