So Atwood would be okay with this if instead of 16 luxury apartments, she was getting a government funded 80 storey tower block containing hundreds of  affordable housing units reserved for families of four that make less than $41,000/year (Canada poverty line), in the same location? After all, I'm told by progressives that gentrification is evil because rich people are forcing poor people out of the best inner-city neighborhoods. Certainly the progressive and caring Atwood would not object to the government stepping in and reversing this diabolical process, next door to herself?