Okie dokie then. This article comes off as a PR piece for Khan and for the diversity, tolerance agenda in general. She's been accused of being a blatant racist and her public comments show that clearly enough.  Her quoted, strange theory on racism and how it relates to white people -that this article failed to mention-  certainly calls into question her suitability for her position as a representative of the entire student body. Such as it is. I'm not sure why we're expected to give so much credence to some jumped up, power tripping student body president anyway?