Thanks for the article. As a long term supporter and prior board member, it really resonated with me. I have struggled with the name change and the shifted priorities. Of course it is important to stay solvent and keep up with the times, but I am not sure you couldn’t do that while putting a stake in the ground for a healthy environment overall. It is a bit sad to me that an organization cannot seemingly remain strong can’t by advocating for the environment and biodiversity- at least as an overarching vision. The salmon and energy are pieces, but as you point out: something is missing here.