Just as a follow-up, Wohlforth wrote a hit piece.  As one commentator pointed out, if the article had been filled with all the positive things done by Don...it would be considered a fluff article.  Unless an author were introducing some new and signicant information, a "true" journalist would be would be presenting all the background, both positive and negative.  I call the articles like I see them, in this case the original article was a typical Wohlforth hit piece.  I'm always suspicious of any article that doesn't present all sides.