I find it interesting that there are (at this time) 7 "likes" - 
I'm guessing none of them saw the words used in the article and simply agreed with your assessment and condemnation....

Yet?  When Purg pointed out exactly where the terms were used, and you graciously accepted that correction?  Not one of the  "upvoters" made a similar acknowledgement.  

So I'm guessing for some, discussion is not the agenda.