The writer did site several instances where soft money worked well.     It can take some time, it certainly doesn't have the steroid level excitement of shock and awe.   If America being great, means we get to show off our military muscle every so often then I suppose you're right.      There is good evidence though that 'occupation', not any particular ideology, is the cause of most major wars.     If the President can avoid putting troops is a position of occupation, them more power to him, I'll be supportive.    

Just know that the MIC profitability depends on demand first, and the President has already assured the complex public/private industry that he will create more demand.     But that burst of money will fade if the product doesn't get used and need to be replaced.    I hope I'm wrong, but I believe President Trump is already looking for a 'winnable' conflict.

The MIC also has 'soft' selling.   We offer many nations access to our surplus weapon, for inventory reduction.