What is the difference between " false prophets and dodgy pastors" and the Pope, Ray Creepy Crawley or any priest, pastor,  reverend, imam, guru, apostle or other fraudster waving a "holy" text?  What yardstick do you use that makes "promoting a scripturally based, structured approach to Hinduism" any more relevant, real or less dishonest than the promotion of any other fantastic tales of gods?

The real evidence for the non-existence of all gods comes in the failure of theists to demonstrate their claims with good, reasonable data.  They can bleat all they like, but in consistently failing to demonstrate their god's existence, they are the ones revealing that their chosen god does not exist.  And all the people peddling gods are equally false and fake.

The logical thing to believe is that no gods exist until such time as evidence arises which proves that they do!  And no one, throughout recorded history has been able to provide such empirical evidence.