Well then we are both sorrowful.  I stand by it that the method of science is the only objective method we have to know.  It is not countered that some fields are less precise.  The usual argument against what I have said is science cannot prove the existence of God or leave the natural world.  My response is that religion has no proof, no evidence for its claims, yet says 'the truth of belief'.  Science has no intention other than studying nature. It is self correcting and as Dr Tyson says is true whether one believes it or not...not so with religion.