I am confused by why there is no punitive damage being sought/pursued due to Trimble's apparent effort to manipulate the market in such an overt, anti-competative way. My understanding is that RDS has to prove the value of lost revenue. I don't think that should be the criteria. Trimble needs a serious spanking so they don't pull this crap again.

This is fundamental to why our country is getting so stacked against the majority of its citizens. Some small entrepreneurs want to make something but they're squashed by a system that is set up to favor the rich and powerful who buy influence in Congress and, as so recently confirmed, on the Supreme Court bench.
There should be punitive damages commensurate with the size of the perpetrator. Give part of the settlement to the plaintiffs and the rest to campaign finance reform or the schools or public defenders or something rather than just the paychecks of the corporate lawyers on both sides!
Save our country!! John Adams, indeed!!!