Hmmmm.... I know of your writings, and know you to be knowledgeable...
The so-called levy cliff bill will maintain the present system one year, which keeps "excess" levies voted in one district from being disseminated to other districts that can't raise their own monies like the districts with high property values.
The thing not talked about is that if the 28% "cliffs" back to 24%, will those monies be additional monies to the not-rich districts (?!). 
So, does the extension maintain favoritism to the already rich districts at the expense of the poor districts (?!).
That's why the 24% lid was decided on in the first place! No?
I put ? marks because the bill doesn't speak to that. Are there different expectations to that 4% differential? What will happen to it? (I think I know)
And, at this point it is a budgeting issue for after Jan. 1, 2018. Says so in the bill itself. Getting to it in lesser priority than McCleary, no big deal? 
Do you know what happens to the 4%?