According to a recent article in PBN, "While more than 3 million American women have a history of breast cancer, 85 percent of cases occur in women who have no family history of the disease." So, why does HMSA only cover those with a history when most cases occur in women who have no family history of the disease? In the cases of false positives leading to unnecessary procedures, that sounds like it's more of an issue with doctors and their training rather than an issue with covering the screening. Why not tackle the problem in the right area instead of taking away vital coverage from women?