You continue to conflate the science (which you do not understand) and the political policies that might result from dealing with the findings of that science. This was made clear when you interjected your answer (which was all policy) to the question that I posed to Kim (which was all about science).

You are certainly not alone (see Kim). There has been research conducted finding that political ideology will pretty much force many to argue that the sky is green if that denial is seen by those deniers to somehow forestall their fear of political consequences.