Hans Blix needs to re-read the UNMOVIC report.  It did not clear Iraq of having WMDs.  Again and again, the UN's commissions stated that Iraq was not providing substantive information about their weapons programs.  The inspectors wrote that those 12,000 pages were merely a re-hash of the same information that had failed to satisfy the inspectors for years.  The UN had been trying to get Saddam Hussein to comply with UN mandates for many years without substantive progress.  UNMOVIC could not say Saddam had no WMDs.  Saddam was giving material support to terrorists.  I don't see much point in re-litigating whether Bush's decision to invade was right or wrong, but if you feel compelled to do so, I suggest you use all the facts available and relate them correctly.