The inconsistency of the pro-niqab position is glaring.  On the one hand they claim its a free *choice* they  arrive at independently while on the other hand they oppose the law on the frounds that face covering is constituionally protected as a religious *requirement*.
,
But iin fact it can't be both. If its a free choice they have to oppose bill 62 as a freedom of expression issue; saying everyone is entitled to mask themselves.   If its a religious practice they have to oppose bill 62 because their faith demands they cover themselves, explicitly pitting their relgiom against our norms of gender equality and l idnividual autonomy.

Predictably the open-border, wage-suppressionist, faux-progressive corporate media evades the inconsistency and sacrifices the liberty of women in favour of cultural dilution and mass immigration.