Be fair Keiran, you know how thought manipulation works. You said "The report also rejects the claim that the Second Vatican Council and the sexual revolution were responsible for the outbreak of child sexual abuse, as some have claimed", and this is what people will conclude because most won't read the whole study. So, there's another source saying this. But did it say it the way you put it forward here. No. That's all I pointing out. Now you include that there were points which suggest that the sexual revolution and Vat II did contribute (p.193). Good. I'm glad it's been said and I fully agree. But had I not raised it here, would it have been missed? Would most then have thought, "oh, Vat II and the sexual rev. had nothing to do with the outbreak of clergy sexual abuse". And there it is, another group of readers erroneously influenced against the possibility that liberal attitudes did contribute. Agenda achieved! Excuse my cynicism but I trust no one anymore, or no 'side'.