Not related directly to this topic, but a large part of the "progressive" platform involves limiting individual rights.  How is that "progress?"

The gist of Caldara's thesis is not that there's no anthropogenic influence on climate.  It's that the "solutions" or ways the issues are addressed by "progressives" deserve scrutiny.  I must be in the pocket of Big Oil for mentioning that, right?  Most "progressives" can't get economics, a "soft science," correct as they buy into the Broken Window Fallacy and Keynesian economics (not to mention the associated moral depravity of forced redistribution of wealth).  Why would anyone listen to their solutions?  They purport that they're the same solutions proposed by the scientists who recognize that we influence the climate.  There are actually a mixed bag of suggestions. BTW, I'm at least as qualified to comment on this issue as the "Science Guy."