Excellent article - and I would add a few points: 

1. In my opinion one of the true purposes of this bill is to siphon yet more tax money into the administrative complex and create make-work jobs for professional social justice advocates. It is an insult to the judiciary that our best legal minds should have to sit there and and be "taught" sexual assault law. 

2. But really, the TRUE purpose of this is simple: to scare judges into convicting people more often in sex assault cases. That is what this "education" is about. Same with the provisions designed to name and sham judges who haven't been "trained" in sexual assault (why isn't special training required for murder, aggravated assault, financial crimes, or any of the other 500-or-so Criminal Code offences, or any other aspect of financial law, family law, tax, securities, tort, business, immigration, child protection.......?). 

That is the purpose, to make judges fearful of the professional consequences of acquitting people.