"The cancer mortality rate is highest among Native Hawaiians."  Nope.

Anyone with a single drop of Hawaiian native blood is counted as 100% “Native Hawaiian” and is not counted as any of the other ethnicities in his heritage. So isn’t it obvious that counting that way badly skews the data to make it look like “Native Hawaiians” are the worst victims?

If somebody gets cancer and has ancestry 1/8 Hawaiian, 3/8 Chinese, and 1/2 Caucasian, then anyone in his right mind who does data analysis should chalk up 1/8 of a tally mark for Hawaiian cancer, 3/8 of a tally mark for Chinese cancer, and 1/2 tally mark for Caucasian cancer. The people compiling victimhood date don’t do it that way. They profit by having it look like Native Hawaiians are the worst victims, because all the grant money goes to studying Native Hawaiian victimhood and not for studying victimhood of other ethnicities.

See
http://tinyurl.com/j3aolqg