That site is unfortunately not a scientific perspective.  All people have a narrative view of the world.  Most people push science to fit that narrative. It typically leads people to bias data and theory to suit their beliefs. This is imo an example of this, people cherry picking data and theories to suit their narrative. 

From a hard science perspective. Reality is not subjective. It is only that which is explicitly and repeatably measurable that exist. No evidence of a god has been measured (and frankly I dont think I have ever heard a plausible description of what god may exist as). God does not exit as it has not been measurable. Note you are free to posit its existence but no one has proved it; if you can please feel free to share this with the rest of the world. As of this moment all that exists is most of the standard model, maybe. Everything else is a composite.