Thank you, Patrick, for permission to make comments in the comments section. I still don't see how this proves I prefer assumptions over investigations. I am merely stating that the attacker's actions appear to be politically motivated. This assertion is supported by reported witness accounts and reported investigations into the attacker's online activity. I fail to see how stating that it the attacker's motives appear to be politically motivated due to overwhelming information that has been made publicly available proves that I prefer assumptions over investigations. Aren't the reported facts about the case also the results of an investigation (albeit a journalistic investigation)? If you also care about facts and truth, then are you saying that only a police investigation can provide facts and truths? If so, then are you saying that a police investigation can never produce untruthful and factually baseless results? I doubt that is the case either.