Rather than giving in to the false narrative of "tree hugger anti-hunters vs. red blooded Alaskans," I am hoping we'll delve into details. There are two that hit me, right now:
1.  Intensive management costs too much - Mr. Dale states that hunters fees pay for this, but fees are simply not the only source of funding. I challenge Mr. Dale to open the Fish and Game budget to scrutiny, and to show all the funding streams that support IM. Scientific monitoring in support of IM costs money, and the current funding crisis invites closer scrutiny.  
2.  IM is not simply about filling Alaskans' freezers. IM has become a political mindset, serving powerful, behind-the-scenes interests. It has taken over the department and board to an unhealthy extent. Example: the board just inappropriately forwarded an out-of-cycle proposal to its upcoming Bethel meeting. The proposal would increase predator killing activities in Unit 15, despite the fact that the local AC unanimously opposed it.