To place myself in your categories (and to place a prospective candidate) I'd have to know how "anti-abortion" and "anti-contraception" would be defined.  If it means keeping abortion legal but not federally funding it, that's one thing.  If it means actively working to reduce access to the procedure, or even re-criminalizing it, that's another.  With contraception, the whole Obamacare kerfluffle had to do with funding it, especially for types some consider de facto abortive measures.  

The "Why?" part of answering those categorization questions would almost certainly involve a candidate's personal views and how he/she would work to impose those views, or not, on constituents.  

I'm glad to see this article and the Dem. rebuttal to Ms. West's NYT article, which I found very alarming and short-sighted.