Nys Cof - Please cite the best example of these "over 300 studies linking fluoride to neurological effects".
Anyone with a basic understanding of science can review the “best evidence” presented by fluoridation opponents and see why it has been repeatedly rejected by the majority of science and health experts:
1) The study will have nothing to do with drinking optimally fluoridated water (OFW);
2) The study will deal with exposure to fluoride ions at far higher levels of exposure than found in OFW;
3) Actual conclusions have been deliberately distorted/misused/misstated to fit anti-F propaganda;
4) Conclusions will only be suggestion of a possible correlation without proper adjustment for other potential causes and they are proof of nothing;
5) The study will be unrepeatable;
&/or
6) the claim will be a complete fabrication.

Your interpretation of the "Mexican study" is an example.

Unfortunately, it is far easier to sell fear than a considered evaluation of the actual evidence.