How are voters valued equally in a system that negates the popular vote of a state by handing electors to the candidate that didn't carry the popular vote in that state? Or maybe you and other NPV proponents believe giving their vote no value is giving equal value? 

If this were in effect in 2016, and the popular vote had gone to Trump across the country, you'd be delighted to hand California's electoral votes to put Trump over the top in the EC?