We've gone over-and-over the merits of using a pseudonym ID, and the only people who still seem to be bothered by it are you and Paul Scott.  Commenting unanimously does have its merits, otherwise the RG wouldn't offer it.  

It lets people express their candid opinion without being subjected to profession impacts, besides it's the content of the comment that matters, not who wrote it.  If the "cheap shot" comments really bother you, I would suggest that you either avoid reading them, avoid dwelling on them, and quite going back-and-forth with those people.  (Although, I think you somehow enjoy doing so, maybe for ego proposes.)

No, I'm not going to answer your silly question.