I read the whole link you supplied (thanks!) to Judge Robart's seven page ruling. The judicial specialists at both the NYTimes and WSJ agreed with the content, and I merely made a quick summation. I am clear about what the ruling says. I did not make up anything. I am perplexed that you would think so, and that you would say such a thing, It would help if you said in detail what you think the ruling means, and where you think my "made-up" summary is wrong. Otherwise, your post is useless to me, and likely to anyone else.