While I have substitute taught in a rural school and see and share many of the concerns raised by Schroeder and they are fair questions to ask, I also recall his efforts to convert Mt Edgcumbe High to an ANSEP school last year.  I have to question Schroeder's motives and methods in this current study. Especially when the "study" seems to rate some schools unexpectedly high and others low.  He has shown a tendency to go off "half cocked" and with little consideration for the impacts of his premature remarks. Pretty disappointing for a person occupying his position. I thought he learned his lesson last year.  Is he really qualified to stay in this position?