My concern about the photographing and filming of the Mass is not at all "sudden". I have been concerned about it for many years now.
Your suggestion that I find the 'action of exposure' objectionable (rather than the 'act' of taking photos or film, surreptitiously or otherwise), is pure conjecture on your part - since you cannot know this to be true. And, in fact it, is not true.
I made it very clear in my previous comment that my concern on this point is irrespective of whether the liturgy in question is 'traditional' or what you would think of as 'progressive'.
Remember that comments are now meant to be 'civil', Jay.