guestsquared:  Again, I don't have to endorse anything.  However, I do "endorse" the Constitution and numerous decisions have found that banning panhandling is a violation of one's First Amendment Rights.  We all know and most of us acknowledge that this law is simply a way around the Constitutional issues.  

I'd be more than happy to, once again, have the discussion regarding the cost/benefit analysis of panhandling as it impacts the panhandling individual and the community.  

Your snarky comments which highlight your post aren't necessary and do nothing to strengthen your argument for the panhandling "ban."