"The Federal courts will explain it to both you and Dogbert as well as the Oregon Governor and AG in more detail later."
Isn't that the old saying of "time will tell"? Is this a way of confirming ones accuracy in an argument by claiming some future decision will prove one right?
Let's face it. Making a prediction about the future does not substantiate an argument. It's a variation of "just wait and see". And besides, who would ever remember to go back and say, "see, I told you so"?