The point being made here is the electricity price plan (though for some reason this is not explicitly stated so I could be wrong). I think there are valid criticism here but if not Wynne then what? It is disingenuous to criticize something without offering an alternative policy. Is the Fraser Institute's alternative policy "Make up what you want, who cares what are the consequences"? Really for a 'think' tank this is a valid approach?

I am pleased to see the praise for the Quebec government. When did the Fraser Institute start supporting the Couliard administration? I infer that the Couliard administration's policies hold the key to an Ontario utopia. What are those better polices? Higher taxes are a feature if I'm not mistaken. So this is what the Fraser Institute wants for Ontario. No wonder then the lack of explicit detail.