Briefly:

I asked you to cite a SIGNIFICANT change to federal social policy by the social conservatives.  I trust you understand the meaning of significant?

In case you do not, let me enlighten you that closing never used offices of the redundant and useless Status of Women department (which, fittingly, now has a redundant and useless minister) is NOT significant, simply a cost saving measure (Liberals don't understand what "cost saving measure" means - no space here, you'll have to look it up).   

Creating an Office of Religious Freedom is a low cost symbolic measure to throw the poor social conservatives a bone but is hardly significant except among the intolerant lunatic left wing fringe.  

Appointing a minister who happens to believe in creationism is not a significant policy change nor is it as offensive as appointing a parliamentary secretary who believes in Sharia Law and funding terrorist groups as Trudeau has done.

Why should faith based institutions be denied funding?