But is it addressing the emergency or is it going to maintain the appearance of business as usual? You have a good point if we're spending the $5 billion to try to seed another industry in Alaska, like coding or high-precision machining or anything sustainable and valuable that could replace falling revenue from the natural resources sector long-term. But if we're just throwing the $5 billion overboard like sandbags so that we can pretend our leaking hot air balloon isn't losing altitude for a few extra years, that's not going to save us from plowing into the ground.