Let me pose a polite question to whomever [whatever?] decides whether comments are civil enough to be posted.  [And I carry no water for either Newt or Callista.] But, with no evidence [the comment limits itself to the sure prediction of grievous FUTURE sins]  how on earth do Frank's vicious, ad hominem comments pass muster as "civil"?   Could someone explain the standards to me?  As of right now, I believe I should be able to post anything about anybody.