"...Not a single instance of coercion, failure, targeting, insurance scam or any of the fears expressed by opponents has come to pass..."

What is the evidence to back this up this statement?  Was this ever studied or investigated? 

"...Nine in ten die at home...."

I am a supporter of aid in dying, but cringe whenever I hear advocates being dismissive of the reasonable and heartfelt concerns of opponsnts.

The bill has several safeguards, however there is little review or oversight other than DOH keeping statistics.  When there's only a cursory glance at paperwork, most activities will appear "flawless". This should be fixed.

Another concern is that while there are multiple "off-ramps" in the process, it appears that the only time mental capacity and absence of deoression (psychisis?) are formally evaluated is at the first stage. What if the individual becomes confused or depressed later on, as might be expected?  Is there no provision for a psychiatric evaluation when it counts?