Methinks  reality has to come into play here. Reality is that they've got ONLY 90 days (per the current rules/attitude) to gather, greet, organize, review, discuss, schedule public hearings (only so many can be conducted in/at/during a given period due to conflicts in time/space/resources), parse, plan, commiserate, amend, and finally and hopefully agree and vote. I have maintained that the 90-day rule has been an inhibiting, frustrating, confining, counter-productive thing since it started. It would make much more sense to make it 120, or even 150 days - every other year.
One of the biggest problems there is our 'citizen legislators,' many of whom 'depend on' summer jobs - fishing, construction - for their 'real earnings.' I don't know how to keep 'citizen lawmakers' as part-time employees in the mix, and lengthen the sessions. As noted, they 'leave-in-place' when THEIR priorities conflict with the states.
No pay for 'overtime' sounds good to me. There's more to this.