"I don't see that you answered the question about how we managed to get to only 35% as much money supply as debt." 
.
Your "question" was just a repetition of misleading scare stories from certain political sources disguised as a challenge. You start with unrealistic speculations about projected numbers, treat them as reality, then demand that *I* explain your misplaced conclusions. I don't play those games.
.
"According to money and banking theory, that can't happen."
.
Maybe according to your limited understanding thereof, but between the unrealistic premise and your mistaken beliefs about that body of theory, your claim is pretty much meaningless.