Tim,

I will ask you several questions.  If you answer them honestly, or do your own research, you will reconsider your assertions:

1.  Art. VIII of the Constitution reads: "The legislature shall provide for the utilization, development, and conservation of all natural resources belonging to the State, including land and waters, for the maximum benefit of its people."  Tell us how allowing the oil to be given away tax- free is consistent with Article VIII?  

2.  You mentioned the Koch Brothers.  Do you realize they are beneficiaries of the welfare we are arguing against?  (Flint Hills, of Alaska) is owned by Charlie and David Koch.

3.  You defend ISER.  Do you think ISER's Scott Goldsmith was credible when he was given more than $100,000 to publish "research" that supported SB-21?  Do you understand Goldsmith was wrong in his assertions, particularly the corporate welfare provisions of SB-21?   Do you understand Gunnar has mostly ignored the value of the oil taken from Alaskans?