What's SAD is that you simply don't know what you're talking about. Roe v. Wade was not an equal protection case. I challenge you to show where anyone who voted with the majority said anything about equal protection in Roe.  It's not there.  Indeed, you --- without a grain of understanding --- agree that "Roe v. Wade grounds constitutional protections for women’s decision wheth­er to end a pregnancy in the DUE PROCESS Clauses." And although some lower courts since Roe MAY have decided an abortion case on EP grounds, I know of none. THE recognized basis in Roe was Due Process, not EP.  

Meanwhile, your reply is a hoax, as the entire second paragraph is plagiarized word for word from a UCLA law review article.  Law review articles are not Supreme Court opinions.    Show me one Supreme Court decision where the Court squarely held that the right to abortion is grounded in the equal protection clause.   Until then, I'll regard your writing as that of a poseur and a mere plagiarist. SAD.