Too bad most of the data has been "adjusted" or as they say "homogenized". The only data that is worth anything is the RSS Satellite data - which coincidentally shows almost no warming over almost 20 years. The insiders have been adjusting the data to closer match the models. And those computer models? Almost without exception, EVERY model grossly over-estimated the amount of warming when compared to the estimates that were made over the years. One would think that some would OVER-estimate and some would UNDER-estimate. It shows that there is a HUGE built-in bias among the modelers. 

It's sad to see ignorant zeolots running around screaming "Climate Change is Real" as if they never believed in it until now. Craziness. Humans contribute to Climate Change - the skeptics tend to think that we are NOT the driving force. The TRUE deniers are those who refuse to even CONSIDER that other factors could be largely responsible.