Directing City resources to be utilized exclusively for assisting private commercial entities to obtain and utilize public assets is offensive and violates the public trust.  Non-city entities are more than capable of navigating the existing City systems.

Moving Proposals 51 and 61 forward is clearly analogous to the disastrous and failed attempt to create/implement the State-wide PLDC (originally staffed by a former employee of Campbell Estate).  Both of these proposals (and the hybrid) should be stopped in their tracks.

In conclusion, one wonders who would specifically gain from these proposals other than development interests (such as James Campbell Company and Kapolei Property Development) and potentially clients of consultant/engineering firms such as SSFM International.

The City and County of Honolulu and the Charter are designed to serve the interests of the public, not the interests of the employers, clients, and associates of Charter Commission members.