Wow, Mr. Perriello!  It appears that you are engaged in a game of "How low can we set the bar?"
Honestly?  The fact that Trump did not do something catastrophic now makes him "presidential"?  
You state: "He consulted his advisors. He considered a number of alternatives with which he was presented. He selected the least radical of the options offered."  Then, you conclude, that "[t]his is what presidents do."  Well, yes, but so do most rational and semi-rational people.  This is not evidence of being "presidential".  
Then, you point to his moving Bannon.  But no one knows why he did so, so this points to nothing.
One act, in isolation, is not evidence of anything, other than that one fact.
Please, don't attempt to normalize this man on such flimsy evidence.