. . . The only logical outgrowth, and logically expected or unwanted consequence of hate speech aimed at exclusion, removal, or subordination of individuals based on their race or national origin is that it may happen.  That is clearly inconsistent with and violative of the constiution, as well as Federal and most State and local laws.

It is no different than speech calling for the murder of another in that respect.

There is no legitimate or legal argument to support the idea of White Supremacy in American law.

If the result being advocated is unobjectvely, indisputably wrong, then the advocacy of something unobjectively, indisputably wrong should also be made wrong.

I'm sure the ACLU would be supportive of that concept, and relieved if it came to fruition.

I respect the ACLU for being true to its stated mission, based on the current state of the law. 
 It takes courage, principle, and integrity to do that.

But, I don't think ACLU lawyers agreed with the ideas in any way.