Well the only things that are still missing is a crime (the "something of value" argument is really stretching the law to far - see Obama 2008's 2 million in illegal contributions) and then of course an action / behavior grave enough to justify a two-thirds bi-partisan political vote for impeachment. So on the crime and political front, the prospects are still slim, but as the article points out it certainly keeps the 9 months DNC / media Russian narrative alive. 

It is also worth noting that the meeting took place before the whole DNC email / Russian hacking saga. Secondly, that the lawyer denies ties to the Kremlin and corroborated the Trump team account. It is perhaps also worth mentioning that a Clinton associate met with Ukraine officials on opposition research; Obama's Iran deal chicanery (ransom money) or for that matter the Clinton Foundations role in selling strategic Uranium stockpiles to Russia - none of that let to criminal investigations.