I agree that previous motions covered the same ground and personally think that M103 wasn't necessary or a good use of parliament's time however it's bizarre some people reacted so strongly to it while not objecting to the previous Islamophobia motion or to a similar motion about anti-semitism. Neither of which show any evidence of a "detrimental effect on our society".

I think it's easily understood that Islamophobia and anti-semitism are similar despite being directed at two different religious groups. Even the text of the motion supports that when it states "Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination". I think it's sufficiently clear and not "indiscriminately" placed at all.