The GTL concept sounds hopeful. 
A pipeline project doesn't - not if it would cost way more to finance and operate than the revenue it would earn.  
And it seems like a large LNG complex and port would still cost a similar pile of money if built up there versus running a pipeline(not that either would make fiscal sense). Reason is because the pipeline only represents around 30% the cost of the currant proposed project. (LNG complex and port $25b, Gas conditioning plant $10b, actual pipeline $10-$15b). And the interior of the state would still not have a gas source unless LNG were to be trucked south.