I watched the video.

The reporter asked a group of natives, compound, leading questions that would be inadmissible in court.

The reporter asked the police chief to comment on 2nd, or even 3rd hand "hearsay" - again something that is inadmissible.

Natives are hiring a private investigator, but would not cooperate (withholding information, they easily gave to a private investigator) with the police, before doing so?

There is certainly a lack of trust on both sides ("You won't cooperate? fine, we won't investigate", or "Why should we cooperate, since you won't investigate?"), but from what the reporter found, it looks like a native on native crime.

Thunder Bay had the highest murder rate a few yeas ago, and of the 7 or 8 (per 100,000) all but one involved native perpetrators, and victims.

In summation, do all the activists wanting the inquiries to come to the likely conclusion - that the courts have to lock up one half of the native population to protect the other half?