Yeah, except the actual 'scandal' value of Clinton and the Clinton Foundation is highly overrated, and given the current admins use of unsecured personal computers, that, too, was a BS charge. The Cons have thrown dirt at Hillary for years, most of it based on false and/or misleading claims. Unfortunately, the smears Cons cooked up and promoted so vigorously have a tendency to stick, even when the truth is readily available.

None of the Clintons receive compensation for their work at the Foundation. Some of Hillary's actions have less than great optic politically, but there is no actual proof that she did anything wrong or illegal or unethical. Indeed, in terms of current politicians, she's pretty damn clean and honest and has worked on behalf of the working class and middleclass. I think she scares the hell out of Cons and that's why they attacked her so relentlessly.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/sep/01/fact-checking-clinton-foundation-controversy/