You continue to veer from the point of the conversation and instead choose to add unrelated issues.  Let me refresh your memory.  The argument is whether or not it is barbaric to allow the unsolicited harvesting  of organs from incarcerated prisoners.  Your argument is that part of a persons prison sentence should be mandatory organ harvesting in order to compensate for the amenities of prison life.  So theoretically,  someone incarcerated for writing a bad check or other non-violent crime could potentially be forced to give up their eyes or kidneys, maybe a lung or other organ as part of restitution to society.  When they have served their sentence and released back into the general population who will be responsible for the health related issues that would likely occur?  BTW, most, if not all prisons have discontinued such things as gyms, HBO TV, etc.  Prisoners also are allowed to work for far less than minimal wage making furniture used in government offices, license plates, etc.