I would vote no. 
The city needs thousands more low cost rentals for very low income people, and this project, on the Obie side,  would supply none. This city really doesn't need more housing for the well off. The HACSA project has merit on its own. 
Now, if the Obie project would promise that 10% of his rentals would be available for HACSA's Section 8 low income housing, that would be different. It would help the very poor. 
Lane County's Housing Authority needs to form partnerships with builders and the city, but this isn't a good project for HACSA residents. It feels like a deception to say that HACSA and Obie are in a partnership. If the city isn't getting taxes, why build the project? 
Just a reminder...there are seven HACSA Board members, and five of them are the Lane County Commissioners. I do wonder how that vote would go, would the commissioners not vote because of the conflict of interest, leaving the vote to the two resident members to vote?
Hugh Massengill, Eugene Oregon