Did Mr Sword vote on former Chief Kealoha’s termination plan and buyouts without disclosing his conflict of interest and recusing himself? I think that this should be looked at by attorneys for the City and/or State (or the FBI for that matter). Given his connection to Kealoha through his wife,  he should have recused himself and disclosed  to authorities including the FBI any knowledge he had of the case that would  disqualify Kealoha for a termination  fee. They should also sue Kealoha to recover the fee for failure to disclose the potential criminal case against him which could disqualify him for a termination fee.