Multnomah – “No, what you’re saying is just wrong from a factual and health base of information available.”
ME — Please explain what is wrong with what I posted. Be specific:
1. is the "regulation limit" for these particular metals something different than the exposure thought to cause one excess case of cancer for a lifetime of exposure?
2. Is it thought to be linear - 110 times the "regulation limit" gives 110 times the risk?
3. Is the 22.8% wrong?
4. Is 22.8% NOT 228,000 per million?
5 Is my conclusion that the increased cancer risk is from 220,000 to 220,110?
6. Is that NOT a 0.05% increase?