Just wondering - is this comment sincere? I feel like I'm caught in some sort of quantum satire field with this article and several other articles on the WW website. When I read about a concept like "Springsteen apologists" my troll alarm goes completely nuts, and I just assume that someone is winding people up for a laugh. Who is apologizing? But then I read through other comments and some of the other opinions of Mr. Cizmer - and I realize that reality for some of you tiny millennial gasbags is now so distorted that it is possible you are actually serious. How depressing.

When the author states his offense at poor people believing Springsteen speaks to something authentic, is he trolling? I feel really lost, because I just can not tell. It's such a ridiculous premise that this small little soft-handed critic would know better than millions of working class people what stories are and are not authentic. I mean, that has got to be a joke, right? No one would be that pompous, right?