[Addressed your points and gave you examples to illustrate]
It seems to me that you don't want to continue this discussion even though I responded to your "addressing my points" most notably a point I didn't even raise.  What did I "selectively ignore or skirt" in specific?  Pointing out how you wrongly conflate FEDERAL and Alaska services and moneys is "selectively ignoring or skirting" what you wrote?
FYI - Selectively ignoring is the appropriate response to a straw man fallacy, i.e. a point presented that doesn't derive from what was raised solely for the purpose of being easily defeated.
Feel free to exit the conversation anytime you want but don't present baloney objections.  That just seems a more veiled way of saying "Nuh-uh!" without bothering to explain with any specificity, ie. arguing like a more sophisticated nine year old.