Were you deliberately misreading my post or did you do so inadvertently?

At any rate, after a decade of reading their comments it's easy enough to spot a fake skeptic or an ignorant one. For example, your remarks on climate variability could fall into either (or both) categories.

Of course you could clear matters up by stating that an individual local or regional meteorological extreme event can rarely be *directly* attributable to AGW, which  is currently increasing mean global temperatures by 0.02 °C/yr, even if the probability of such events is increased by rising temperatures.

I won't hold my breath waiting for such a clarification.