It is remarkable the deceptive and disingenuous tactics fluoridation opponents (FOs)employ. They are unable to change the consensus of nearly all scientists and health professionals that fluoridation is safe and effective. So they try and convince the public to oppose the practice. If you read through comment sections on the issue you will find FOs provide fear-based propaganda usually without any supporting evidence to try and scam the public into accepting their unsupportable opinions. When they actually provide "evidence", and it's shown to be fabricated or "adjusted" as Dr Slott and others demonstrate, they simply move to the next Gish Gallop attack.

A typical FO is like someone in a dark, packed arena who thinks they see a light in the distance that might be a fire, immediately yells "bad fire get out" and causes a stampeded that injures dozens - turns out it was a cell phone. FOs have no proof of even a dim light but pull the alarm.

Carefully evaluate all evidence before voting