I remember the Ghomeshi case quite well and it wouldn't be fair to say he was innocent of any wrongdoing. He was found not guilty at the first trial, and prior to the second trial the complainant agreed to forgo the proceedings if Ghomeshi would issue a formal apology for his behavior, which he did. 

In the case before us now, Justice Camp was not alleged to have committed an offence. He simply didn't do his job the way it needed to be done. He freely and openly admits his errors in thinking concerning sexual assault law and has taken concrete steps to rectify the deficiency.

Despite those striking differences, it's interesting to note that the outcome for both Ghomeshi and Camp are quite similar. Both have been publicly vilified and their careers destroyed. I submit that the similarity in outcome is evidence that the public and its institutions fail to keep a balanced perspective when allegations of male-on-female sexism are made.