When I said, CORRECTLY, that the reasoning in Loving was the same as in Obergefell, you said that the Fourteenth Amendment specifically mentions race. In fact, it does not. I will chalk that up to your vast ignorance, rather than saying you deliberately mistated it. The Amendment says "all persons".

You are quibbling about the cases in that list. Are you trying to show off?

Your "in theory, it could include more than two people" is an attempt to drag in the logical fallacy of the Slippery Slope. Please try to avoid illogic, it doesn't make you or your arguments look good.