First, the phrase was used in the sense of "It's only the [N word] that'll suffer". That's why you should read in context. The comment concerned the attitudes of many activists. That was pretty clear and certainly should have been if you went back to read my comment in context as I suggested.

Second, in your world view we can't say "It's only the victims of theft that suffer" because some thief somewhere might feel bad about what they've done. To use your word for it that's a "ridiculous" attitude, your objection to my comment is a"serious falsehood" and "ridiculous" and so is your consequent "blatant" attempt at a rationalization.
You might try reacting more politely next time you feel the need to criticise me - yours is not the only viable viewpoint you know.