Pandora. I thought you were from the city? But clearly no reader of the Times. Because if you were, you would recognize the Robert George piece as a "profile" of the kind that regularly appears in the Magazine. You would also know that until well into the debacle of Trump's campaign, the Times was chilly toward the Clintons, to say the least. So your contention that this piece is "one-sided" in the way that a National Review or Daily Caller column on Hillary would likely be is ludicrous.

1/ You wrote:

"Then you casually toss in an article from the NY Times magazine as if it were a news report."

False. I never indicated or implied the link was a "news report." The link even includes the word "magazine." I first read the piece some years ago, perhaps even when it first ran, but on rereading I was struck by how well it captured both the ethos and the fact of the bishops' alliance with the conservative movement and Republican Party.