I read the polls. I see the blue-red bar on the NYT homepage now shows Clinton has a better than ninety percent chance of willing.

I don't know about you, but I've lived more than half a century watching extraordinarily good women lose to colossally mediocre men, and as often as not the polls showed the woman winning three weeks before the election. I saw Martha Coakley lose two elections to men who weren't half as capable, because voters thought she just wasn't "likable." 

I'd like to vote for Evan McMullin, but I'm going to vote for Clinton, because I have a sneaking suspicion she'll need the vote; even in Massachusetts.