Which would work 100% against the prosecution - if past 'victims' make an allegation, but the fact pattern is different than the mode, plan, common scheme, or absence of mistake than how the current alleged victims describe his actions, the empty allegations bolster Vasquez's defense. The prosecutors are looking for a uniform M.O, victim profile, or other specific acts that don't vary, or simply that are not tangential to other allegations. If his defense is predicated on false accusations, then the more that any other number of 'accusers' who offer a different narrative come forward, that's just more and more Brady evidence for Vasquez. Every charged act must stand on its own merits, irrespective of any other charges or even mere allegations. This is the time where prosecutors are biting their nails that your theory (a poor one) doesn't become their reality. If they convict him on these 3charges alone, he never sees the light of day again, certainly not as a sex offender in Colorado.