A post below suggests that "Truly healthy people typically respond to diverse situations, not with fear and instability, but with a calm commitment to their values". Without parsing the statement it might be asked:
-is it only the "(t)ruly healthy" who so respond?
-who are the "(t)ruly healthy"?
-does "calm commitment to their values" presuppose that these values are compatible with our notion of that is "good", whether individual or common?"
"Instability" can be seen as the opportunity which was capitalized upon by D.J.Trump, family and associates. One can reasonably ask whether the values of this coterie are "typical", the "good"- common or otherwise - or of a "truly healthy person", nation, espoused faith, politics that sustains him.
History is replete with those who saw fear arising from instability as opportunity for personal advantage "...with a calm commitment to their values".
Sun Tzu's calm: "The Are of War" has been a practical guide to more oppressors than to liberators.