I don't want to dispute what you saying but your method of argument I find problematic. Your opening statement lumps a bunch of "conspiracy theories" together in a manner that is meant to make them look ridiculous - implying that you are coming from a context of knowing better. Also by lumping all those items together you imply all of them have the implausibility of the most implausible. I won't argue the vaccination issue or the 911 issue but I will say that there is valid cause for at least asking questions on these two topics - without making a claim. There are questions that are not satisfactorily answered and any attempt to go near those topics searching for answers meets with varied resistance from ridicule to violent threats - which makes me curious as to why. I am not advocating simply believing every crackpot theory that comes around - but I do believe in asking questions - and when those questions are not answered or there is backlash for asking them I have a problem.