I’m not sure this letter needed to be read beyond the headline, but I was curious what the alleged RG bias might be. After reading, I’m still not sure. And I’m curious about the “thoughtful readers who would like to submit an occasional comment” … how does John know what/who has been excluded?

I consider myself a thoughtful reader, but I don’t need to see Jewish-Palestine events covered in the letters section. The issue of guns at home might be more relevant, but I’m at a loss wondering what kind of letter would give that issue whatever attention it needs.

All that said, I hope John is thankful that the RG published his letter, and that the couple of inches of space it occupies was not wasted (at least in his eyes).