1/2
<Using a shamrock to explain the Trinity is a heresy...but I digress.>
You don't so much digress as evade: the point was and is that the fact that a particular way of presenting or talking about church teaching is not in the catechism is irrelevant to an evaluation of the validity of the approach.
<Seamless garment [sic] promotes moral equivalency which is not Catholic.>
Since I've already corrected this erroneous interpretation of the consistent ethic of life, one has to assume that you're misrepresenting it deliberately.  How does that advance your position? If you wish to defend your claim, find something in the writings of Cardinal Bernardin to support it.