I give credit to the SA for asking the question. The poll raises some interesting questions. For one, how is it possible for government to move forward on a project that benefits so few, will likely have little impact on traffic, is not affordable (which, should be obvious by now), is of lesser priority than immediate pressing issues (such as bringing back UH's unbelievable sharp dark green helmets; I was going to say "only kidding", but it too is likely more important than rail), and in my mind does not "fit" in with the image of a tropical paradise. So now, what's next? And the project isn't near completion. I believe to finish the project will cost much more than the 3 plus billion dollar shortfall. Many contributors to this site warned early on the cost and wisdom to pursue a rail project that will be outdated when the first train leaves the station, if that ever happens.