I implied nothing.  I stated unequivocally that you are either ignorant of the brilliant and balanced system enshrined in the Constitution or are willfully avoiding discussing the logical and reasoned system currently in place in pursuit of an agenda whose purpose is the fundamental transformation of our constitutional republic into a tyranny of the majority socialist democracy via the presentation of irrational arguments that have absolutely no foundation in fact.  Were your reading comprehension skills more highly developed, you would have seen more than a single option presented.  Your pro-life analogy is similarly fundamentally flawed in its construction, but as you have demonstrated an inability to reason more than once already I see no benefit to be gained in logically assailing that analogy.
If you wish to have a rational debate, I am more than willing to participate.  If instead you wish to continue spouting illogical nonsense, don't complain about the quality of the exchange.