Perhaps if the good bishop of Greensburg had spoken out a little more forcefully before last November's election about the need to elect politicians who will continue to fund programs that help people with opioid addiction he might have helped tilt Pennsylvania into Hillary's camp. But I'm guessing he did one of two other things: like most bishops, he spoke about the need to vote for people who support "life" (read: fetuses, read: Republicans) or, he said nothing at all to avoid controversy. Either way, he enabled Trump's election since Pennsylvania put Trump over the line. Now the good bishop will have to explain to his own flock why billions of dollars that had been set aside under the last administration are being stripped from the Republican budget in order to give tax cuts to millionaires. I'm glad it's his job to explain that to his flock - I certainly wouldn't want to have to face them knowing that I'd just enabled their possible death due to lack of funds. How very "pro-life."