re: Mr. Trump also declined to reiterate a long-standing U.S. commitment to the alliance’s mutual pledge to defend any member under attack. He had first cast doubt on the provision during the presidential election.

then what is the point of NATO, if he will not commit to Article 5 
that is rich the only time Article 5 has been invoked was for the benefit of the US after 9-11

why is the 2% sacred, isn't the military a more efficient killing machine after so many years?

besides it is the US that has destabilized the the middle east and they should bear the brunt of managing the monster they created 

time to push back on the bully Donald