It is interesting how somethings are factual versus "feelings" based.

The NP doesn't try to make me "feel" anything - especially feeling guilty for who I am, or how things were in the past..

The opinions in the NP may be hard, or even wrong/misguided but they don't point fingers...at least they don't run something with such a methodologically poor foundation like "unfounded" to push a made - up point. It was telling when the G&M dropped comments in the series, after 2/3rds of the posters pointed out glaringly obvious holes in the theories about what the shallow statistics presented actually meant.

Another point - you could fill a small bus with female columnists who dress a certain, obvious way here at the G&M, and it makes me wonder what exactly the point is....how many angles/times does the same position need to be re-hashed and explained?