We couldn't prove a lot of things before DNA. It wasn't my assertion, I was just replying to your post. Unless the dead victim wore gloves EVERY time he held "his gun" how do you explain none of his DNA was found on the gun? But the shooter's DNA was.

gun owners...question posed to you guys.......does your gun have zero of your DNA on it but it has the DNA of someone you've never met? I'm guessing right out of the box maybe.