Yet you keep coming back, asserting again and again that your version of civility as well as your "truth" are superior. Your argument on this issue fails in several ways, but here's the most disturbing among them: If you had a friend or relative with the hint of an addiction problem, you certainly wouldn't want to contribute to it. However, you have no trouble taking that kind of risk with a total stranger in exchange for your own self-approbation. The proof is in the way you gloat about being charitable, provided it's convenient.

A challenge on constitutional (lowercase) grounds is not an appeal. Remember, words matter. You predict that a challenge is rather likely and soon, even though Cottage Grove, also in Lane County where such a case would be heard in circuit court, has had a similar ordinance for several years. Relying on an activist judge doesn't seem like a wise strategy.

Again, you're not ignorant so much as obtuse. I'm just not as impressed with you as you are with you.