This is a lazy, hackneyed approach to conflict: Peterson is followed by "dangerous" people who are "targeting" people online and elsewhere. Newsflash, people are targeted and doxxed for all sorts of reasons, not just the reasons given by Choise. Peterson's contribution to that world, such as it is, is a mere drop in the bucket. Moreover, there are a lot of Peterson supporters who do not hide behind pseudonyms. And believe me, those of us in the academic world are taking a (real, actual) risk when we do so. So much of what is written here is unsubstantiated, a report written by a "private detective" (nameless, of course), being the most laughable of the lot. I'm sorry, but invoking unsubstantiated physical violence of the they-eat-babies sort has got me rolling my eyes as I write this. Ms Choise needs to go back to J-school, provided she can tolerate the spectre of "evil" debate haunting higher education's hallowed halls. Sigh.