[Oh look, a "whataboutism" you love to make fun of.]
How so?  It seemed that your point was Trump and his rally including protesters to the Trump rally.
[I don't agree with giving thugs a pass because of political affiliation.]
Perhaps you should re-read what I wrote if that is what you think my point was.  I started off by questioning your independence when you adopt Trump's own made up term _and_ compound that by admitting you look for reasons to agree with him rather than functioning under a default approach of being critical of him.  This is especially when Trump's conduct makes even his own aides and party members questioning his reliability/accuracy.
[1) leave Hillary alone]
Source?  We've had it out before about how you misunderstand what other people write (in directly contradiction to Hanlon's razor for example) but it seems you still practice that.  IIRC all I argued was that Hillary was investigated up, down, and sideways and there was no legal basis to lock her up.