The WAY liberals go about getting liberal policy is what is at issue.

If liberals got their agenda through the legitimate constitutional means set up by the founders, I would still disagree with it and fight it--but at least I could say that they did it legitimately. 

The courts had no business deciding things as controversial as gay marriage, abortion, foreign policy, etc.  The courts were not set up to create social policy--or foreign policy. They were created to interpret the law. Controversial things are best decided by those who have been given the power by the constitution to decide them: the congress in conjunction with the president--the elected bodies. 

My issue is with unelected and unaccountable justices rendering decisions about things they have no business deciding--thus creating law out of thin air.  The court system has become too powerful--and that power needs to be diluted--so that the people for which the government exists and was created retain their power.