I think journalists from Globe and Mail Laura Stone, Robert Fife, and Sean Fine did a much better job at giving facts and not being so polarizing as compared to Natalie Paddon of the spectator. I wish journalism could be a little more scientific or at least fact based. If you want to get on the cover of the New England Journal of Medicine with a hypothesis, it’s impossible to do in a day. You need to try to prove your hypothesis wrong. If you are incorrect, you go back to the drawing board or you choose a different project. The exact opposite is true for journalism. The more outlandish the conclusions you are trying to draw, the better and no need for anything to back up your opinions. Opinions. People do turn to newspapers as a source of information and authors of articles like this should know this and should be diligent with the biased rhetoric they peddled.