Seems to be a lot of "coulds" in there. The cost could be 20-50% higher; other sources of renewable energy could be cheaper. How about some actual details and analysis used to come up with these suppositions? 

And how about some actual analysis of  these possible"green" energy projects - do they make sense environmentally (including the upstream environmental costs); where would they be built; do they work financially without government  subsidies; do they work without other back-up power plants that would also need to be built; can they somehow be built without any cost overruns etc etc?

The BCUC review "could" have been a total waste of time and money, but analysing things to the point of paralysis is definitely an NDP characteristic. No wonder the Libs bypassed the BCUC.