Does anyone else find it odd that the G&M editors passed this article exactly as it is written here? - -
I'll make my point with an analogous design: what would happen if you were reading an article about an evidently SERIOUS topic, and the author proceeded into his argument, and 1/2 way through the thing he took 1.5 paragraphs to explain how at the age of 30, Zoroaster saw a shining being on a riverbank named Vohu Manah and proceeded to instruct him in the ways of Ahura Mazda? And how the Avesta teaches tolerance and respect for those with a different viewpoint.
-
Meanwhile, this is imparted as though it was a scientifically verifiable historic fact that was witnessed and documented by multiple unrelated witnesses...
-
Is it time to preemptively decree a separation of church and press? THIS COMMENT is too PRESCIENT for you? You think it's UNcivil? What world do you want to live in...