Actually, no, that is not what this would do.  What this would do is give the Board of Commissioners the absolute power to choose which initiatives they wish to have reach the ballot and which they didn't.  As I explained, there are, already in place, very adequate checks in place to keep frivolous and unconstitutional initiatives from becoming laws. (see my post above).  The proposed measure is designed to avoid the possibility of initiatives which displease the Commissioners' "sponsors" from becoming laws.  Those sponsors aren't concerned about initiatives which would, at one of the three "checkpoints" fail, they're worried about initiatives which a) reach the ballot b) are approved by the voters, c) pass constitutional muster and d) have an adverse impact on their industry... the measure these interests first proposed in a failed lawsuit and now are promoting through their "friendly" Commissioners, would avoid that possibility by shortstoping citizen democratic process.