No, clearly it's far better to passionately condemn a series of books about which you know nothing at all, along with the blameless local community that was chosen willy-nilly by a writer in Utah to be the setting for them.  And to work yourself up into a truly bizarre frenzy about a single word in a review of a movie you've never seen.  

BTW, since you're so fond of dictionary definitions, are you familiar with the words "fiction" and "novel"?  When a book is clearly labeled as both  --  nobody but you mistakes the Twilight novels for non-fiction  --  you don't call the author "an obvious liar," you call them "a creative writer."