Doesn't anyone else find this sanctuary city position risky, self serving and bizarre. To begin any declaration of such not only should but must be at the direction of the citizens. Yes, a vote. Why? Because this isn't any frivolous position that is free of risk for the City..i.e., it's citizens. No dozen or so individuals, mayor or counsilors, have the right to elevate their personal politics to declare a position whereby the city could lose large sums of money and denounce Federal Law. Really? What is your rational that permits you to do such a thing? You are each saying..my political views are the only one's that count. Just in case you forgot...we left the Kingdom behind over 200 years ago! Placing Federal subsidies the City may receive at risk is assuming power you do not morally have.