I, for one, am surprised that they are surprised regarding the reality within the situation.

There is no easy solution, as it seems they have attempted to formulate, and unto what end, I have no idea.

Should they really wish to address the problems faced, well, go after the problems presented full force, rather than attempting the minimum addressing of the problem.

If they really want to address the problem, than employ not the minimum of individuals, but the maximum number of individuals, so as to assist those that would come unto them before their individual problems become a necessity so as to address within an emergency room, and therein lies the rub, does it not?

They want to avoid said emergency room visits, costly as they are, and provide a service that lessens said costs, so that individuals can receive care as a preventative measure so as to avoid said emergency room costs.

This cannot be achieved under the current health care climate under the ACA, even with subsidies?