From the article:

<<the British anthropologist Mary Douglas accused them of turning the faith into an airy set of bourgeois ethical commitments.>>

One wonders what makes these bourgeois ethical commitments "airy" and why ritual piety in a dead language is somehow more virtuous.

Mind you, I'm laissez-faire about liturgical preferences. It's the retrograde ideological package embraced by traditionalists that I find objectionable.