The Constitution expressly allows the Senate to decide how to respond to presidential nominations. The Constitution says that unless the Senate gives advice and consent Garland could not be appointed, but it does not require the Senate to do anything in response to the nomination. Your argument is all about your feelings and not at all based on law or the constitution. Nevertheless, Gorsuch WILL be confirmed by a simple majority vote after the Senate rules are changed. Republicans may as well go nuclear since Democrats have already done so, to pack the lower courts with liberals for a generation.

Were you "so mad" when in 2007 Demorat Senator Schumer, now minority leader, called for blocking any SCOTUS nominee during the last 16 months of the George W. Bush administration? Somehow I doubt it.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/flashback-in-2007-schumer-called-for-blocking-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/