Recovering
.
1.  Peer-review is a threshold for credibility.  If scientific literature has not even met that threshold it is likely not worth the paper on which it is written.  Antifluoridationists constantly cite junk which has not even met that threshold.
.
2.  I answered your question.  Because you fail to understand that answer is indicative of a cognitive deficiency  on your part, not with the answer. 
.
3.  Whatever bizarre nonsense you mean by "two cheek-fulls of water like a chipmunk" I suppose is a mystery known only to you.
.
4.  See my item #1 in regard to your confusion about peer-review.
.
5. Well, most people have saliva constantly in their mouths which bathes the teeth.  Fluoride becomes incorporated into that saliva systemically.
.
6. Given the intellectual level of your comments, if you believed that I do have "the skills, education, or knowledge to be working in that field", I would be very concerned.
.

Steven D. Slott, DDS