Beg to differ with those who question MSW's inclusion of his history.  It provides context and, in fact, is rather generous.
Sirico has also been painted:
- alleged abuse incidents at a formation house 
- why one bishop provides him cover, income, position, etc. when other bishops will not
- like EWTN, lots of Sirico comments, opinion, etc. do exactly what you accuse MSW
- his departure from the Paulists, etc.

I once posted some of the above history at dotCommonweal and got this response from Sirico:

*I have taken note of your recent personal postings about me on the Commonweal Blog which are inaccurate in several points (possibly due to the source you relied upon) and even where factual, nonetheless misrepresent my character and person. In this I find your posting to border on calumny and detraction.* 

Inaccurate is his opinion only.  He tries to weasel with *where factual, misrepresent*   Really!!!