Wow, and here I thought I was being a devil's advocate. Or, perhaps your retort fits into the category of 'argumentum ad hominem.' Without getting into a extended debate about grammar, rhetoric and logic, I think my point is fairly clear. Diversity has to represent all significant segments of society or logically it's not actually diversity. There's a tendency these days to confuse diversity with identity, and personally I don't care much for identity focusing. Were I a regular CBC viewer, I'd worry more about the quality of the chosen news anchors, regardless of age, race, gender, sexual orientation, height, disability or economic class. But I guess I'm old fashioned.