As a society it makes no sense to restrict people from suicide, yet be OK with providing drugs that are extremely detrimental to life. Financially, it is much cheaper for society to provide the drugs in a specified area than pay personally or through tax dollars spent for criminal acts resulting from addicts doing anything to make money. Less money spent on insurance, loss of property, police protection from crimes, police arresting addicts, court systems with lawyers, judges, emergency service workers ... a vast number of issues arising from addiction. But is supplying addicts with drugs a slow form of a death sentence if there is no action to rehabilitate included? Families of addicts need to voice their opinions as the addicts themselves have scrambled brains.

Can you imagine if society had more concern with why addicts started using in the first place even when they know the outcome resulting from addiction.