First question should be answered is Burgess hearing this case on a diversity of citizenship issue or a federal question? The diversity is Wes Keller's brother-in-law who doesn't live here. (David Thompson Wisconsin resident). Then Burgess, if it's diversity must apply Alaska Law ie: validity of the question before the voters when the limit was instituted and the state Constitution concerning donations. Second, if its a federal question what is the law to apply? Strange how the federal courts always ignore the moribund 9th and 10th Amendment to the Bill of Rights when coming to a question. Plenty of issues really aren't federal questions.