The logical inconsistency is in comparing a family choosing to take action based on their intimate knowledge of a loved one's needs to remove potential threats, which can include guns just as easily as keys and gas lines, which no one opposes, and laws empowering law enforcement to do so based on mere allegations by third parties without requiring a showing of personal knowledge of the situation nor any due process or even notification of the affected individual.

You do see how private action and state action are two different things right? That one can applaud the latter, and oppose the former?