"It would appear that I am much more so than you since my remark was precisely the logical outcome of your claim. It's a precise paraphrase of what you said."

I love it when people make obvious errors of logic, but can't figure out where their error is even when it's pointed out, and then go on to make arrogant statements that only serve to amplify their ignorance of logic.

You're using a fallacy called "affirming the consequent". Would you like me to explain it to you, or do you want to look it up and figure it out for yourself?