So to sum up, the judge was wrong, the reporter was wrong, the video that you haven't seen was inconclusive and because you spent every minute in the courtroom, your absolute belief in justice compels you to set the record straight, because you are right.

My guess is you're the father-in-law, living under the same roof as the defendant -- excuse me, the convicted, to be factual -- or someone close to the family. You have no reason to lie, you say, but you have every reason to advocate. No one -- or to borrow your parlance, NO ONE -- would strain this hard if it weren't personal. (In case you're wondering, your unbiased description of the victim as "an admitted pot smoking drunk loser" punctured your veil of impartiality.)

Now, about those facts. Let's start with your assertion that you know "for a fact that most of what has been reported by the media is NOT factual." That's a serious charge. Care to back it up with something more substantive than you know best?