So an illegal lease that was negotiated primarily by Hawker and Pfeffer - Hawker who was playing with money that was not his, and Pfeffer who was more than willing to dip his hands into the bucket of state money and pull out as much as he could grab - negotiations in which the "customer" and the "seller" colluded repeatedly to circumvent the proper procurement processes, should be honored because it was "agreed-to"??? You and I have different definitions of "right".