Was there any reason to believe the centralization of authority over translations was anything but a (necessary) corrective, given the abysmally deficient ICEL translation of the rite of Ordination, followed by the 1998 "translation" of the Mass that was even worse?

And as such, limited in time. Collegiality had to be put aside so that the people had faithful translations of the liturgy, and not one rite in the English speaking world with different language, actions, and theology than the normative Latin or the translations in the rest of the world.

 And if this change is used to re-litigate settled matters and to attempt to impose something like the monstrous 1998 translation, collegiality it will have to be put aside again.  There are higher ends than collegiality.