What's it like to be so in love with big government, so inundated and brainwashed by your dependency on others giving you orders based on their own misguided interpretation of the law, that you are unable to differentiate right from wrong? From a purely factual standpoint, this case was was morally, and more importantly, legally indefensible. Using physical force and intimidation, and in the process of seizing and imprisoning her basically just assailing her 1st, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendment Constitutional Rights, because she wouldn't commit a criminal offense (battery by a health care professional) to illegally seize blood, which would have later been suppressed anyways, without a warrant - just to appease the dirty cop.
Inform the posters, and please do so with some hybrid explanation where tangible evidence and legal clarity, not obtuse posits citing 'civil torts,' are at the forefront of how you formulate and articulate your (let's just be polite and say 'unique') viewpoints.