Indeed, you should educate yourself. Your link is to an attempt at a bit of persuasive writing by a columnist with no science credentials. He cites a contrarian meteorologist in an attempt to convince readers that there is no connection between warming and cyclones. They are both wrong.

Anyone who attempts to use trends of cyclone frequency or U.S. landfalls as alleged evidence of no warming/cyclone link is either clueless or dishonest. Both are largely random events. It is true that cyclone intensity is projected to increase along with SSTs, and that has been the case in the Atlantic basin (with assistance from a positive AMO). But global trends are inconclusive. That is as expected as historic trends are slow to reflect change.

Regarding the dishonesty bit, I found the dramatically decreasing trend line for the graphic of Intensity by Decade in your linked piece rather odd. In preforming my own linear regression for that same data, the trend line is flat.