The one piece of the puzzle still lying on the floor is where Brown acknowledged Molefe's RESIGNATION in a press release at the time. She went through the normal blah-blah and it was widely reported in the media and social media as such. In fact there was even ridicule of the Molefe tears and Ngubane's utter disgust at the treatment of his dear friend (and fellow Gupta beneficiary). So we are now led to believe that Eskom and Ngubane did not see it fit to correct the overall perception that this was an early retirement and not a resignation as widely reported then? Or is Eskom in the business of deciding what parts of the news should be shared and what not? The Gupta empire sure spends a lot of time on spinning, but the quality has certainly deteriorated since the departure of the arch-evil Bell Pottinger from the books...