Isn't it weird how we hear how we keep hearing about "alleged"  manipulation, but nobody's able to tell us where, exactly this occurred? 

Real science is about building a theory that is well supported by experimental data. The "deniers" have yet to do anything of the sort, being completely unable to for example demonstrate an empirically supported model suggesting that observed changes are the product of purely natural processes, Instead, you have... vague and very poorly supported *allegations* about data quality.