ANILCA was sought in the 70s to protect certain federal lands, water and wildlife against the the kind of brutalized predator control savagery meted out as state policy by the Alaska Board of Game. That consists on state lands of helicopters and fixed wing who to pursue and kill bears and wolves while airborne, taking bear over bait, all the game board trademark horrors practiced on state lands is now possible on our national wildlife refuges. As example 652 wolves have been slaughtered in the Upper Tanana Preadtor Control area since 2005, 40 or so within the past few weeks. The refuge rule that was removed by Murkowski, Sullivan and Young as resolution sponsors exempts rural subsistence but Walker doesn't bother with that detail as he pleads the rule would take food away from rural reaches. Nowhere does ANILCA cede wildlife management authority.  Absurd. It does stipulate standards however which a morally corrupt  statewildlife management regime fails to meet. This must be rejected.