Couple things:

You're language suggests that because someone is an "environmentalist", they're obviously in the wrong and against any resource development. That is patently false, in many cases, environmentalists are the counter balance to the "develop to produce profits at any cost" constituencies. It would be absurd to ignore the environmental implications of development, and these folks provide the counterpoint to developers who's sole motivation is maximizing profits.

Second, your final statement is a false choice. One can promote responsible development and enjoy products based from extracted resources. To suggest otherwise is a myopic and uninformed viewpoint which I'm sure you are smarter than. Go beyond ad hominem attacks, pithy comments and opinion based "facts" and contribute something intelligent to the debate. You're more than capable of it.