Interesting the timing and nature of this article given the big meeting on 01-12-17 about what has already been disclosed but seems to be highlighted a different manner buy this author. 1. The CEO contract is being disputed because of the way it was passed in the first place buy the former chair and counsel only"not the whole BOT" which violates procurement laws.  2. The current chair bought up in open session the decline in moral and hostile feeling between staff and administration and noted the complaints against her stem from one employee the former CFO who just resigned. But now we see it again with a different narative? 3. The 3 LLC's that were created buy OHA and now are supposedly independent but are are being owned and run buy the CEO and staff have no accounting for eight years now? 4. The OHA check registerers going back to 2000 show widespread misspending and no accountability. Lastly 5. A forensic audit which everyone wants keeps being suppressed buy out-stead trustees? Why