That's not how I read his piece, which sounded like typical alarmist propaganda.  He quotes Vox, which has proven to be little more than a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party and the Clinton Campaign over the course of the election, and the headline reads: "Widespread suffering and misery from climate change are now effectively inevitable" [because Trump was elected].

He then goes on to list state policies and actions that he supports, which definitely do not seem market oriented.  The entire premise is that we have to drastically reduce emissions or something really bad will happen.  We hear about cities being underwater but they give the impression of a massive tsunami or flooding rather than a gradual increase over centuries.

For all we know, some massive technological breakthrough could come in the next 10 or 15 years which reduces CO2 emissions in half.  That's exactly how we reached the Kyoto Protocols without ever signing them.  Capitalism reduced emissions.