Okay, so let's use your expertise, obviously as a auditor, to answer this question. Does what you see constitute a criminal act by anyone at HART or by the sitting administration in Honolulu Hale? Because despite your discoveries of all these discrepancies in the books, and your question of the financial audit, you have not come out and said "this is fraudulent and this is criminal" even though other groups that support your contentions on public media are pointing to your work and saying "crime, fraud, jail them all."

All I am asking for is a responsible viewpoint put forward, and not something that may elude to something that, well, just aint there in the minds of the majority.