Lynn, you seem to be an intelligent person.  Tell us how you would monetize a resource that is much more valuable than the entire value of the corpus of the Alaska Permanent Fund?

Would you just refuse to build the infrastructure and leave it in the ground?  

Do you understand that Big Oil has other projects around the world and a vested interest in not allowing our gas to be sold?  Why would they want our gas competing with its other projects, and depressing the values of those other assets?

If this was 1968- would you not want to see a oil pipeline built if Big Oil was refusing to advance the project?  What would Alaska be like today without monetizing our oil?  Would you even live here?

What chance does Alaska have to grow and diversify our economy (especially with manufacturing) without really cheap natural gas?  

Do you understand Alaskans are paying way more for energy that they should- because we do not have the really cheap natural gas?  How would you rectify this?