Mr. Mason, just because something is older doesn't mean it is a dump.  The Saddledome has: 5th highest capacity in the NHL, one of the highest gate revenues in the NHL, (though has less seating in lower bowl), as many corporate suites as many other NHL venues, a professional Lacrosse team (Edmonton doesn't)   Also the Saddledome has an antiquated video replay screen and clock that cannot be removed easily for concert venues which if lowered would allow most acts.  (assuming Flames ownership group would upgrade structure for lighting & sound equipment)  Saddledome doesn't have wide concourse or upgraded food facilities.  The proposed arena site will not revitalize the area as the area is currently being upgraded.   The simple fact Mr. Mason,  after a few renovations the facility would be very similar to the new arenas.  Why do taxpayers who gave the dome to the billionaire Flames ownership group another tax subsidy so they can pay multi millionaire hockey players?