According to this article, Roger Waters supports BDS "to end what Palestinians regard as an Israeli occupation." Nowhere does the article mention that virtually the entire international community regards it as an occupation as well. The UN Security Council so declared (yet again) in 2016, and did so unanimously. The International Court of Justice so declared in 2004, and did so unanimously. The high contracting parties of the 4th Geneva Convention agree. So too does the International Red Cross, the UN General Assembly, and even the Canadian government under Harper and Trudeau (not to mention previous Prime Ministers). Why does the G&M say nothing of this overwhelming international consensus? Why does it intimate that the Palestinian view is the outlier? In reality, Israel's claim that it is not occupying Palestinian territory makes Israel the outlier, and radically so. The G&M's readers cannot fairly assess the vicious attacks on Roger Waters without this critical information.