argyle5663, it's hard to see how your comment responds to mine at all, except that you don't like M-103 - probably because you don't understand it.  M-103 was all about debate and only about debate - despite the immediate rush of poorly-educated comments saying it had created new crimes.  A motion calling for tolerance in no way "intends to suppress such discussion", even though those against it (and tolerance) want only to shout, not discuss.

Example: I posted a brief comment containing two statements:
1. M-103 didn't protect any faith.
2. Education can protect against ignorance.

So far, 18 people have hit the 'disagree' emoji.  Only two of them actually wrote a response: the first was 'uncivil', the second argued with the concept of education.  No one else had the intellectual courage to post a response.  Some debate.