The Gustafson interview is informative for me, e.g.,
a) I don't think it clarifies sufficiently the distinction between sinner, sin, sickness, harmful evil. 
b) I have a slightly better understanding of SOME church people who seek to help a sick priest; the resistance to public scandal. But it changes nothing. Especially as the victim is simply a minor digit in an equation; that "is in the way"; is either erased or trampled - as far as church reps are concerned. 
c) In the interview, seemingly in the articles, the issue seems between abuser and victim. I understand, I think, the effort to focus on the human dimension of victim/abuser and the significance of relationship (such a broad term) but church is getting pretty much a free ride here.
d) the despicable ugliness of the abuse seems shrouded in a kind of "compassion" that I find difficult. The reality, the extent of hurt/harm is wrapped-up in "healing" that seems to ignore body/soul/damage/pain/destruction, the trapped victim.