So, Scandinavians do not "consider" Hep B vaccination necessary for universal use because they have very low rates.  In Canada, where we also have a near nil incidence of reported cases of Hep B (for the age group in question that's being vaccinated, 0-9 years olds) over the last 30 years, that's just not good enough to make it over the threshold of "very low."  Our policy makers still "consider" it necessary to vaccinate at 2 months of age.  

To summarize, no one's science is wrong, just the "considering" of the science by policy makers differs.  Gotcha.  Phew, glad we got that cleared up.  That was some nifty word play.

Sadly, I'm no closer to being better informed as to who to believe in order to make an informed Hep B vaccine decision.   Follow the Scandinavians and don't give the Hep B?  Wait a few months like we do in Canada?  Do right away like the US?  The decision here for most people would be based on the geography of where they're born, and not real hard science.