Did you really watch the Sessions testimony ? He claimed he never had these "long conversations" that you are so helpfully and hypothetically are explaining as regular business for a US senior senator. How do you know there were no quid pro quod or collusion was involved ? You admit we don't know what was actually said. You cast doubt and label it fake news yet your entire argument is based on woulds  and the very questionable testimony Sessions put forward. Fact: Sessions said he didn't remember much and that the conversations were very short or of a light nature. This report indicates that is clearly not true as US intelligence recorded it. So there is something here. What Sessions testified happened in regard to these conversations  is untrue. They were long and detailed and campaign related. Sessions has misled Congress.  Yes they could be innocent and I'm sure we would all like them to be. But let's deal in facts and not hypotheticals positive or negative shall we?