The author of this article, who is a lawyer needs to go back to school. The judge got it right in tis case, unfortunately.

Unfortunately, is what this so-called lawyer spends the latter 60% bemoaning. But it has NOTHING to do with current law applied. Want a social justice warrior, this lawyer is it.

"If this means that the judge was ruling that until a woman loses consciousness she cannot be said to be “incapable of consent,” then he has made a legal error" What a nonsense statement. While this female lawyer may hate men, it does not absolve women of responsibility. By this logic a person could have sex, then get totally drunk and claim an assault happened. Walk tis through, conscious, have sex, get drunk, unconscious, found by police, don't remember. Does an assault happen here - NO!

As for not remembering, that is nonsense, no matte how blotto you get you remember some things, not completely but some. 

As for Al-Rawi - he is a scumbag.