One or two a year.  Usually one.  And that's specifically the ones addressing the public health and environmental issues concerning free-roaming invasive felines.  I've also written three anti-war commentaries, one in rebuttal to Paul Jenkins.  That's a total of seven op-ed pieces in 12 years, or a little more than 1/2 an editorial per year. 

So do you find less access to this state's major media outlet preferable to more, or do you only apply that standard to those you disagree with?  Won't apologize for defending my views.  Just wish the critics would promulgate better arguments, because the playground tantrums by Boy-Roy and his ilk accomplish nothing worthwhile.

Neither does incessant whining about media bias.  But of course you might ask yourself how what I write furthers whatever 'agenda' you imagine this particular organ of the media might have.

Calvin: "I wonder why we think so much faster than we talk?"
Hobbes: "Maybe so we can think twice."