I have noted that you regularly don't expend the energy required to understand what I have actually written with a view to grasping MY MEANING, preferring instead to substitute your incorrect presumption of my meaning.

This is perfect example. 

My test, as explicitly stated, can never be conducted by one party to a dialogue. The test engages both sides: 

"There is a test. If Side A truly understands Side B's perspective, then Side A can produce Side B's position with such accuracy that SIDE B RECOGNIZE IT AS THEIR OWN." 

I explicitly stated that we regularly presume our understanding of the other is correct RATHER THAN engage in the test:

"In fact, Side A almost invariably produces a caricature that Side B rejects, but Side A insists is absolutely true."

That is exactly what you just did. Thank you for perfectly demonstrating my point.

Marty, while I find you infuriating, I also am intrigued. Any chance you would be willing to share something of your biography.