This has been obvious for some time. The problem with the media during elections is they are to literal. We know when a candidate says something like Trump said in Dodd-Frank out is an expression of intention regardless of the language used: forceful candi language is used for everything. In judging who to view for one had to balance intent (this candidate want to do something I like vs. the other sites not and vice versa), the issues importance to you and the Likud it can be achieved. The odds of Trump completely reversing Dodd-Frank Frank are and have always been close to zero, but he may get change that some will like and some will hate. It is the same thing with Obamacare and it was that way during the election.