I have had a judge ignore facts and information provided by the Attorney Generals office because one of the parties had political influence. The other party was and still is living with a then sitting Alaska house representative. After the hearing the AG's office called me at home and stated  that something was wrong,  they have never had a judge in similar cases dismiss their findings. I had a call from CSED shortly afterwards basically saying the same. During the hearing the judge asked both the AG's office and CSED if their information could be wrong. Both said they had never known their information to be wrong especially since the information came from the State of Alaska as the party involved was a state employee. They went further to say they had a years worth of reports confirming their findings. The judge said," I see". The judge then made his ruling omitting the income information provided by the AG and CSED.
 I call it corruption. Vote them out.