Likely, family values is at most a constitutional right requiring the protester against the administrative restriction to prove clearly and convincingly that the govt has NO possible rational basis..anywhere... for its regulation.  A rational basis for applying the regulation need not even be relevant to the protester's circumstance.  If cannot meet the burden, the protester loses and the regulation stands.  If "family values" is morphed indirectly into a matter of "fundamental right," then the game changes.