I fully understood what you have said. You haven't said enough to make a point I can work with.  As for strawman, I think you need to relook what it means. I also haven't lied to you.

I haven't mischaracterized your arguments, I am trying desperately to get one out of you, to appease MY boredom.


(1) You haven't presented why a third party would present something to you that would be different,  why you would like it more. This is KEY to the whole argument.


(2) I couldn't care less what you other choices, or you could have a 1000, or only two. They are irrelevant to my point.

(3) GREAT, then explain how a 3rd party would be more accountable, as I had asked several posts ago..

(4) They serve us all. A 3rd party won't change that. Some serve themselves more than others (both presidential candidates come to mind) Others are much more serving of the public. This is the nature of humanity not a political party.