That's fair to a degree. My point wasn't that drones are the same, but that there are frameworks, organizations, and existing rules to govern this stuff already. 

You are right that common consumer drones means that more people are getting their hands on them. But your earlier statement that "there is no legit use for these" is unfair, and unfounded.

Your "fear" of being observed from above if you're in your back-yard could be just as easily realized by an amateur pilot flying over your home, or a go-pro on a stick, or someone in a high-rise appartment a mile away with a strong telephoto lense.

The reality is there are already a hundred ways to violate our privacy out there, drones are just one more tool in the toolbox (and to be honest, there are cheaper, more accessible ways). And the laws already have ways to address that if/when it happens. (criminal charges, etc).

Do you argue that because 1 in a million hammers may be used to kill people hammers should be banned?