I'm not a Calgary taxpayer, but I would just like to make the point that if the Flames leave, that would be a negative on the city's economy. It's been shown over and over that building for sports teams does not grow the economy. Instead, I think it is done, as others have made the point, as part of discretionary infrastructure (culture, city design, etc.) and taxpayers should not reject it for ideological reasons. Yes, the millionaires will use it, but it is a city asset in the end. What I can only suggest is that the Flames recognize what the city can or cannot afford, and not insult the city, which in turn insults their fans, during the process. It does no-one any good. If there is anywhere that would turn down a team over ideological reasons, I think it would be Calgary. Remember that the Flames were brought to Calgary by citizens who cared about the city, and I hope the Flames owners try to remember that. That said, I am certain in the end there will be an agreement.