The decision is being appealed but there are no cries for disciplinary action due to :
"“compromised the public’s perception of the independence of the judiciary from politics” and were an abuse of power. "
At least none that I have heard of even though most reasonable people reading his decision would have an apprehension of bias against anyone coming before him accused of sexual assault, discrimination against women etc. It is a political bias because these issues are political issues... they just don't happen to fall on a left-right axis.