I'm apalled that some comments blame the woman for a cleavage that was not entirely covered. Have you seen the picture? I haven't, so what we assume about her attire is just that -- an assumption. There are ways to photograph a person (unless she is covered head-to-toe in a burka) that may show a part of her that polite people would not make the main, framed object of focus. Even if she *had* a wardrobe malfunction, wouldn't most people quietly say, "You have an extra button undone," rather than taking a picture?

Above all, nothing she may have worn excuses the fact that 2 open job positions were filled without posting as required by law, excluding her from being able to apply while appointing others with less seniority. This is clearly sexual harrassment: the denial of quid pro quo advancement for not putting up with sexual objectification on the job. 

Finally, what the EEOC would once have enforced in a civil nation must now be enacted locally if we are to retain any safety at all.