That's why so many things are called 'theories' in science. 
I can 'believe' that the earth is flat as millions and millions of people did and would have testified to for centuries. 
It was also verified by the theologians. 
That did not make it so. 
Millions and millions of people believe in astrology. (Mrs. Reagan?)
Does that 'belief' overcome science just because millions 'believe' it?
How about 'alchemy'? Can lead yet be turned into gold?
You have not achieved Reductio ad absurdum "which seeks to demonstrate that a statement is true by showing that a false, untenable, or absurd result follows from its denial".
You have merely made an absurd argument.

My response was just killed as well, so here it is again.

1st Re-post