[Many of the comments here are just distractions from the main point of the legislation.]
Let's get this straight.  You believe this proposal was brought up not because of political or personal benefit by Rep. Eastman but because it is to "protect the unborn?"  If this is true, why didn't Eastman bring it up BEFORE he was censured for speaking about a different issue with arguably racial or misogynistic overtones?  Why didn't he bring it up BEFORE the 90 day statutory limit had elapsed?  What changed recently except Rep. Eastman's credibility and good standing in the Legislature to put such a political charged and socially provocative proposal?