[insults to Trump]
I wonder in the future what this kind of baloney will be called as this seems similar to Godwin's "Law."
[the Supreme Court in those two cases plus others, in very clear language told us specifically that the 16th did not introduce any new taxes]
Correct.  Congress _always_ had the power to levy an income tax but were blocked from IMPLEMENTING some forms of it until 16A was added to the Constitution.  You would have read that if you read the anti-tax sections on Eisner like I said.  "Taxes on property and wealth could be levied freely by the states, and could be levied by the Federal Government if each state were required to pay A PROPORTION of the tax RELATIVE to its population."
[if it created no new tax...where did this new tax come from]
From the same source of Congressional power to tax property and wealth as noted above, the Constitution.  16A does not "create" a "new" power of taxation but removed a limitation found in Pollock, ie. "without apportionment."