This opinion could be considered Islamophobic, equating Muslims with holocaust deniers in so much that the author is drawing parallels between Islam strictly forbidding abortions and the incendiary and abusive language climate alarmists like to use to shout down other points of view.

But let's apply a semblance of logic here. If some groups want gender selective abortions, no pro choice person should have a problem with that. They are pro choice. Full stop.

Let's apply just a bit more logic here. Provincial health care identifies eye glasses as not medically necessary, and therefore not covered, but this author strangely wants high priced abortion pills and personal choices to be covered by the taxpayer?

Very obtuse article.