Nothing but yellow journalism.  Since you can't find any evidence of wrong doing,  you write a nonsense story about politicians interacting with constituents and  participating in dinners and charity functions.  Good Grief.  Implying wrong doing through innuendo.  The meals and the amounts including the names of participants were  disclosed and reported  as required by law.  Unless there is personal gain or direct quid pro quo,  as the Justices just stated in the recent corruption case review,  politicians interact attend functions,  participate and go to meetings, dinners, conventions, seminars.  That's their job.  Even the Supreme Court of the United States just rejected this nonsense of attempts to criminalize the everyday things politicians do to help constituents.