"Even if not shot in the back, he was not moving away. The officer shot him out of fear, which does not make for a righteous shoot since the officer had been chasing him."

It's becoming clear.  You've failed to honestly digest the facts of the Brown and Martin cases.  First you said Brown was shot in the back . . . a major point for the BLM side, which now even you abandon.  Have you asked why BLM hasn't abandoned it?  

You say "Even if not shot in the back, he was not moving away."  Precisely.  BLM would have it that Brown was retreating.  Now, you say he wasn;t.  THAT support's the officer's testimony --- Brown was charging.  

You say "the officer shot him out of fear."  Precisely.  Shooting a charging man out of RATIONAL  fear is the paradigm of self-defense.  You say the fact that the officer was in fear does not make the shooting "righteous," because the officer had been chasing him.  But when Brown turned and charged, and kept coming --- after having 
cont'd