What is being suggested is forward-looking and solutions-oriented deliberation to inform a planned and well-managed transformation of the national electricity system. 
Examination of the short-comings of the existing system - including non-payment by a variety of consumers and some municipal distributors - is certainly a relevant issue, but hardly a useful departure-point for transformation to advance human rights. 
Why start with what is owed to the prevailing electricity supply system - including all those drawing wealth from it, from old mining houses to 'empowerment players' and new layers of transaction handlers - and how this incumbency may more comprehensively extract payment?
Hence the suggestion that consideration of what society as a whole requires of the electricity system, and the developmental outcomes that most merit public financing, would be a useful focus of public debate.