Decorum Est asked WesternPatriot how he knew Ahmed Khadr was a "terrorist", when he was released from the Pakistani torture prison, in 1995.

WP replies that Khadr going underground, and joining the joint front, and being killed in a firefight in 2003, establishes he was a "terrorist" in 1995.

That is merely one scenario.  Alternately, he may merely have KNOWN suspicious characters, and have been uninvolved himself in the plot that lead to his 1995 arrest.  But, following a year of torture, in 1995, and strongly suspecting the USA suspected him, he decided to go underground, when the USA invaded.

Other people who went underground were captured by bounty hunters.  Maybe getting the protection from bounty hunters the united front enjoyed was the key factor for why he joined the united front?  

Would Ahmed Khadr, and his children, have all ended up in one of the CIA's torture camps, if he had surrendered to the USA?  You can count on it.

This is why torturing captives is a bad idea...