That may be true with some venues, but not with the ones I am familiar with. Do you think, given the circumstances of McConnel's absolute and publicly expressed determination that the senate would never give Obama's nominee Derrick Garland, also a universally respected jurist, that Democrats would be happy with Gorsuch, who is considered to be far to the right of Scalia? When Gorsuch was nominated Democrats were relieved it wasn't the other two candidates, who were awful. But from the start, legal scholars, while complimenting Gorsuch's temperament, used his past rulings and statements, not to criticize, but to point out how Gorsuch had ruled in the past. If the past predicts the future, Gorsuch will rule in favor of corporations and in opposition to the rights of actual humans. Revisionist? Absolutely nothing has changed since Gorsuch came onto the stage. 

I don't know how you came to your conclusion. The facts on Gorsuch are pretty well known, nothing much has changed.