This article has already been debunked.

The New York Times, reporting on the exact same CIA assessment, writes that the assessment panel only has a “high confidence” that Russia was involved, while Reuters, reporting on the same CIA assessment, writes "Intelligence agencies did not have specific intelligence showing the Kremlin directed the individuals to pass the hacked emails to WikiLeaks," and also “A senior U.S. official said there remained minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the assessment because some questions are unanswered.”
 
OK... so which is it? Well, anything less than True is False, and the NYT and Reuters reporting invalidates the Huffington Post's assertion, and renders it as False. So... is it then false propaganda to say that the CIA concluded that Russia intervened to help Trump win the 2016 USA federal election? Yes, it is.