Some interesting spin in that article Brian, I certainly hope you're willing to admit that.

It starts with the allegation that the headline leaves the public "confused" however there is no evidence presented to support that. Then it assumes that this is an attack on legal gun owners, who I guess don't care one way or another about gun safety. Then it trots out some apparent quotes from Dr Langman although curiously it provides a link to a study by Langman that most would assume is the source of the quotes. However that's not the case and the study - which dates to 2012 - has nothing to do with the article. Looks like your friends at CCFR are torquing their own article and trying to make it seem like it has more depth than it actually does. The richly ironic thing is that Langman's study does use the 15-24 age group tat you have been ranting about. Maybe you were so eager to try and post something - anything - to support your position that you didn't do your homework?