SMH, so I have to ask once again: did you fail to understand my larger point above?  Or are you just playing dumb again to change the subject from your failure to actually engage with contrary evidence and explain why you think it is incorrect?  

Instead, you respond reactively with some other cherry-picked factoid or opinion piece that repeats your pre-conceived opinions, which usually do not directly address the specifics of the contrary evidence and opinions I present.  

And when I call you on that failure, you then respond with child-like petulance, e.g. by asking me if I know what boogers smell like. I think Trump is 71 going on 17 in terms of emotional intelligence.  But in your case, I'm guessing your EQ may still be stuck in junior high school at best.

And if you need an example of what I mean by engaging with, and responding directly to, the contrary evidence provided by others, see my response to your comment about Bernie Sanders' single-payer health care proposal.