Forget about any bias that may exist in the questions, a  spokesman for the Minister says that the 'analysis' can TRY to'filter out multiple responses from the same user while maintaining multiple responses from a single computer". If the survey accepts multiple responses, which it does, you have to accept that any results they publish will have been manipulated in some manner.  Isn't it reasonable then to accept that the results have also been manipulated to show what the Minister wants? I think the Minister's spokesman just relegated the survey to the wasted spending basket. Maybe the whole group in this Electoral Reform cabal should join it there.