So tell us old great legal expert on the fundamental right to travel, why are salmon also non residents of the State of Alaska, and cannot claim it as a protection?

Now you know why UCID and the Act of 1954 is being discussed in the 9th Circuit Federal Courthouse. 

Just like Mullaney v Anderson(1950) and Carlson v. State (1984). 

Inbreeding Hatchery Fish are as ignorant as inbreeding Alaskans, who still believe the U.S. Citizenship Clause removes the Fundamental Right to Travel. Boats have propellors, and Balboa named it "Pacific" Ocean for a Spanish Season?

Got a non-resident Attorney General, flunk law school, and you can find work in Juneau, spelled "Bong Hits for Jesus" at the United States Supreme Court, by Chief Justice John Roberts.

https://www.cfec.state.ak.us/carlson/Final_Judgment.pdf