Perhaps I am mistaken, but was it not this paper that a few years back had an article that pointed out that the futile extension of "honorary citizenship" to others was in fact a vanity move on the part of the country doing the extension, and not a benefit or honour to the recipient?

After the first round years ago (Raoul Wallenberg? Mandella?), the novelty has worn off, and  reduced the value anyway.

And this has nothing to do with the young lady in question and what she stands for who I generally agree with.....