1. Will improve our quality of life.
2. The benefits outweigh the problems
3. Will create NEW jobs, affordable housing, guarantee ridership and give equal access to opportunity.
4. Is THE engine to drive future economy
5. Will be the social utility alternative to the auto
6. Cheaper to now throw good money after the bad investment
7. Shame.  Think charitably for those with jobs elsewhere
8. The opposition offers no solutions themselves!
Who wrote this vacuous speech?  Where's the beef behind each glittering generality stated?  Meanwhile, neither has Rail yet established clear offer, or proven itself as the viable traffic solution, all the while deeply mired in ruinous native Hawaiian cultural issues and financial problems.  Opponents can't propose solution, so throw good money after this super-heavyweight loser?  These empty declarations are grounds for justifying Rail as a guilt trip and the opposition not being any smarter.  Eh bradda Joey, ..fo real?