Understood, Ms. Nolen: The same way The New York Times occasionally translates an article about China into Mandarin.  Lately, they've been similarly translating articles about North Korean into Korean.  But, while explaining the article is available in another language, it is the English version that features in the newspaper and online, while the native-language version is prominently promoted near the headline.  Here (at least online) your editors have provided no explanation at all - in fact I thought the piece might have been slipped onto the site by accident.  

This is clearly a major reportorial undertaking by you, and it seems a pity that so few Globe readers will be able to appreciate it ... until they notice the one-line notice hidden under your byline.

It must be disheartening for you to be working for such a poorly-edited newspaper-cum-website.