Fertility issues are serious and should be treated with sensitivity for people who truly need them.

That is fine and good when it is a direct health issue. No problem there.

But when it is a created health issue...then I have a problem supporting those bills.

But when fertility medicine (subsidized infertility treatments) is used because a woman wanted to wait, what many are calling "circumstantial infertility" then I think that needs to be looked at more closely.

If women's expectations, and value of themselves are too high for what the market will bear, than why should society pick up that tab and expense of a woman to become a single mother..?

The costs to society in conceiving, and then in subsidizing her children, is where I take issue..?

If you do not want to pair up when you are young enough...if you are too good for the men you can attract...if you wanted to "have it all" but missed your window...

You pay for it, why should the rest of us have to support you..?