As a hunter and a trapper (above all a conservationist) i have many thoughts on this subject. First of all, depending on the timeframe, the pelt may have been past-prime and should not have been hunted. If there is only two wolves in the area, the hunter should have recognized the lack of "sign" and let the wolf live. I am for managing populations, not for the removal of populations. Secondly, as with the rise and fall of all species, the moose population in this region will also return, thus bringing in new wolves. I am curious what happened to the other wolves. Natural die-off or moved out of the area due to the lack of food? Third, I am not sure why we dont have articles written about single mothers not able to feed their children when their dead-beat husbands/boyfriends leave them? If there was an equal amount of outrage for that as there is comments here, we wouldnt have starving mothers or children. Priorities?