Hello Alceste,

You speak of a law society - meaning a group of activist LAWYERS - as if that group is the only group to listen to.

Hello?

I think you might want to listen to the JUDGES ruling in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, which ruled in FAVOUR of the university in question:

"A society that does not admit of and accommodate differences cannot be a free and democratic society – one in which its citizens are free to think, to disagree, to debate and to challenge the accepted view without fear of reprisal," wrote the judges, as they upheld a lower court decision that also sided with the university, adding: "This case demonstrates that a well-intentioned majority (the law society) acting in the name of tolerance and liberalism, can, if unchecked, impose its views on the minority in a manner that is in fact intolerant and illiberal."

Sorry, but in my books, Supreme Court Judge trumps the activist law society executive you embrace...