Mr Welles:  In order to prevail in this suit a plaintiff needs to show both breach of duty AND legally recognized harm.  We can see the breach of duty on the state's (or election workers) part, but where is the harm?  You WERE able to vote a regular ballot.  It seems like Mr. Carey was trying to give you the benefit of some "harm" by suggesting you may have suffered confusion or embarrassment.  But if you in fact didn't suffer any harm, what exactly is your standing in this suit?