Thank you for researching this, Brett. When I had heard about the death of Eberwein, I checked Google search and the first three pages had no references to any mass media outlets...
https://www.google.com/#q=klaus+eberwein+death+clinton+foundation&start=0

While at the same time, the death of Liu Xiaobo, was front page news...https://www.google.com/#q=death+of+chinese+protester+liu+xiaobo

It does seem, to me, that a matter that involves the Clintons with their sensationally sorted past, the pay-to-play Clinton Foundation, an X-president, and the validity of US charity foundations, would receive more coverage compared to the death of a Chinese political dissident.
Which story, since they unfolded at the same time, do you believe the American public would be more interested in? Which story is more important in the transparency of US politicians, charity foundations, and ongoing investigations of the Clinton dynasty?
Where do MSM journalists get their journalistic priorities?