I have no clue as to what qualifies as a "good theology text" in your modernist mind, but it is beyond dispute that EENS is dogma. It is one thing to say you don't like the teaching, or even that you reject it , but to claim EENS is not the {dogmatic} teaching is intellectually dishonest. It is also beyond bufoonery to claim that dogma is confined to the Creed {which?} or the Marian pronouncements.