Apparently John Kawamoto likes to make things up. Perhaps he might have noticed that the source of the data was from the American Bar Association. The actual article which contains a comprehensive listing of overturned cases is written by Roy E. Hofer and titled ,"Supreme Court Reversal Rates: Evaluating the Federal Courts of Appeals".                          If anyone chose to read the Court's decision regarding the President's Executive order, they would be, or more accurately, should be stunned to notice that the laws supporting the President's temporary ban were neither cited or considered by the Court. Unusual or incompetent, political or foolish, you decide. My decision, as is the same with most Americans, is that when courts do not base decisions on actual, printed, legal, on the books laws, justice is denied. John Kawamoto clearly favors courts not referring to laws or even addressing the law and he has that right. SCOTUS,  contrary to John's belief, would consider the law.