I find it interesting in the choice of words used in this article. They used the word "killed" which implied more of an accidental state or legal combat. The common word that should be is "murdered" shouldn't it? The 22 people were not killed....they were murdered by a suicide bomber. When you shoot someone in cold blood, you didn't killed him....you murdered him....right? Maybe "murder" is not a politically correct word anymore. Maybe it just too aggressive of a word to use? Of course, in combat between legitimate combatants, the word "killed" may be use. Like "12 American soldiers were killed in a fight for "so and so" against Iraqi forces" for example. So is this an effort by the media to legitimatized terrorists who only "killed" like a combatants instead of "murdered" as like a criminal?  Just food for thought.