What? Another additional cost to the rail?  Who didn't see that coming.  Underbid to win the contract then show the true cost....to big to fail.   A lot of the lanes are closed, shifts, and 6 ft beams had to increase to 8ft beams.  Also, steel on steel?  Please give me a reason why this was better?  Cost?  1920s technology?  Steel on Steel, go to Chicago and visit the L.  That is really loud.  Business along that route will def hear and feel the different.  Why not MAGLEV trains?  Safer, quieter and also government has funding for making that a reality at their location.  10x better for MAGLEV trains.  I could understand if they wanted steel on steel if it only carried a few passengers every cart, but this is suppose to be mass transit. Come on