I explained the mathematical fallacies, itemized as (1) through (3), very clearly.  It was a logical argument.  You did not respond  to it or counter it.  I explained the fact that not a single science society or organization in the world disagrees with AGW.  That is an indisputable fact, so it is logical.  You did not respond to it or counter it.  You have no response, and you have no argument.  That is intellectually dishonest by any measure.  I am through discussing this.