Wow. So the Charter is now the bedrock instrument that supports prejudice in this country, even if only tangentially? People can harbor and for the most part express whatever prejudicial views they wish, whether religiously grounded or not, but this goes both ways. It's a free country and the Charter gives people the right to express their opinions. But you can't cloak prejudice in respectability merely by describing it as a function of multiculturalism or freedom of expression. Prejudice is prejudice, whatever its motivation or supposed justification. Singh needs to make it clear to the broader population as to whether his religious identity informs his primary values or whether he believes above all else in the mainstream secular values held by most Canadians. He can't have it both ways.