Steve and Paula, using your logic, people with wildlife violations would be the absolute best people to make recommendations about enforcing wildlife laws because they make up 100% of wildlife enforcement cases. The wildlife doesn't belong solely to hunters, it belongs to everyone. Of course sport hunters and guides should be represented on the panel, but other people interested in or dependent on wildlife should too. For example, subsistence hunters, birdwatchers, photographers and artists, bear-viewing guides, people who eat game but don't hunt.  This panel is clearly not interested in cooperation because it was and is operating in secret while attempting to avoid any real public advice, interaction, and oversight.