I read it in its' entirety.  Did you see any references to peer-reviewed scientific literature?  Anywhere?  Neither did I.  He has some footnotes, but they are laughably just more ranting.

If you can support your statement that this memo was an "An objective review of the scientific literature", then truly, I'd like to hear your side.  

I called BS on your unsupported statement.  So take it like an adult, show me where I errd instead of throwing out weak ad-hominem attacks.