Who exactly are the 'working classes'? All people who work? Is a poor business owner who struggles, but nevertheless manages to employ one or two workers an exploiter? If he should, say over 10 years, gradually start to succeed and reward himself by, say, improving his home or better educating his children is he then somehow heading towards ruling class status? If he continues his whole life to contribute 20-30 percent of his profits to the state (i.e. pay tax) but still manages to advance is he somehow to be reviled? Must he hold back and eschew success? What better course of action for him? How else does society progress without incentivization of the individual. 

The article is mind blowing meaningless drivel... the author is of no practical use to this planet. I'll bet that should the university be renamed, after some years she'll be claiming she studied at the former RHODES University - she'll be wanting to downplay the new name and its inevitable descent...