If the intentions of someone like Daniel Brown were in fact concern for the public, as seems to be implied, he should start adding more value to the discussion. I entirely disagree with the connection being drawn between the hat and Justice Zabel’s ability to judge on cases. However, they were made… two months ago. If you are concerned for the public and worried about how the judge rules, Daniel Brown and everyone else should begin judging Zabel on his cases. As a side note, Daniel Brown is a defense lawyer. As a defense lawyer, he runs around begging to judges not to prejudge his clients. The clients are innocent until proven guilty. Innocent until proven guilty. This is his mantra right? Why on earth would he ask for the Judge’s role to be limited? Begin punishing the judge for impartially judging cases? From my research on his cases, which isn’t much but seems to be more than anyone else, this is not something Zabel does.