I, to the best of my knowledge and belief, unless I am mistaken, that the 2013 Legislative Counsel gave Mr. Hawker the authority to broker this deal as "it's agent." Judge McKay found it unenforceable. But, didn't Mr. Hawker also scribe a separate agreement with guarantee's as the agent of the counsel ? Seems like I read that somewhere leaving the state clearly on the hook for money damages to the developer. (BTW the 2013 legislative Counsel where different state actors granting that authority, look them up).