Really, so that's how it works around here? Just 3 people can decide to ban something without a public vote?  What is special about 21? Could they have just said all tobacco products plus e-cigs (which contain no tobacco) are banned for those under 30 and those over 32?  Great that it makes these 3 folks feel good about themselves,  but where is the cost-benefit analysis, and one wonders what else they may pass on a whim so they can have a warm-fuzzy feeling.