I've pointed out your errors previously. Repeating them won't make them right.

'Precision' can also be achieved with chemical weapons. Not in all circumstances of course, but it can be achieved nonetheless.

Every weapon deployed in war must be chosen to limit the harm it does to civilians. When the harm is too great, that weapon may not be lawfully used. Yet in just the past few weeks we've seen a banned chemical weapon deployed that killed far fewer civilians than did a conventional weapon strike by the USA.

The story we're told is that the bad guys- in their cruel and wanton disregard for civilian safety- used a banned weapon that killed 80 people in an airstrike. The alternative story is that the good guys- taking pains to spare all civilians possible- used lawful weapons to destroy an entire neighbourhood, killing 300 people. And they're still digging victims out of the rubble.