Your relentless rants against the MSM may make you feel oh so good, but they have no relation to the facts.
According to Editor and Publisher:  "At least one-third of the top newspapers in this country (the U.S.) came out against President Bush taking us to war at that time. Many of the papers may have fumbled the WMD coverage, and only timidly raised questions about the need for war, but when push came to shove ... they wanted to wait longer to move against Saddam, or not move at all."   A third of the papers in U.S. backed the invasion, and the other third did not take a stance.
As to your reference about the recent U.S. election: Almost all polls showed Hillary leading throughout the campaign. The MSM reported what those polls said. And, in the end, Hillary led Trump by 3,000,000 votes.
I think the word "fake,"  could be more appropriately applied to your posts.