If the lawmakers in favor of this bill can put forth statistics that show that a certain percentage of injuries and deaths at beaches that involved lifeguards involved negligent actions by the lifeguards that contributed to the injuries/deaths, then OK they may be onto something.  But I don't see anything that says such negligence is currently taking place such that a bill to repeal lifeguards' protection would be an adequate remedy.   In other words, if a certain percentage of beach injuries/deaths were caused by the negligent actions of lifeguards, then maybe this bill would make sense.  But there's no evidence of this.  And so this bill doesn't have sufficient reasoning to justify its passage.