The same can be said of "Edible Woman", about a woman who liberates herself from  relationship by running away and hiding. The man is described as controlling and shallow, yet Atwood never actually says what he did wrong. He didn't beat her, rape her, cheat on her, lie to her, or abuse her in any way. He was confused by being abandoned and goes looking for her.  His efforts to simply find out what  happened to the woman he loves  are presented as the utmost in male callousness. Atwood is deep into the female suffering but can't actually explain it: we are simply expected to take it on faith that he was a creep.   For generations of feminists  that is all the proof they need that all men are pigs.

If the same book had been written by a man, about the fickle flightiness of women it would have been called misogynistic.