OK. So righteous BCers oppose pipelines, one of the resource activities with the smallest ecological footprint in the province.

Here is the big question:  Why do these same BCers support new low-density suburbs, heavily subsidized farms and ranches that destroy watersheds and fish habitat, and open-pit coal mines in SE BC? 

Is it the cheap energy entitlement?   Feel good about stopping fossil-emitting fuels while still enjoying very low excise taxes on fossil fuels -- among the lowest in the rich OECD countries? 

Do these same BCers support subsidized farmers and ranchers because they believe there are not enough obese BCers and that 200kg men are a thing of beauty? 

Do  BCers hate fish?  Is that why they support open-access style resource allocation policies?  

Are these same BCers Neo-Marxists in the Baran and Sweezy tradition?  Do they seek to destroy wealth because they want to save the capitalist from a chronic crisis of over production?