You silly goose!  Your attention span is so short that you apparently forgot I already said--more than once--that all you have to do is copy and paste anything from the NYP op-ed you posted that you perceive as "fact", and then cite an original source for any factual assertions you think can be found in the NYP op-ed.  

Otherwise, it appears you are simply trying to save face again by trying to imply I am ducking your question.  

Once again, only you know what you perceive as fact in the NYP op-ed.  So I don't think I am asking too much of you to do what I have now requested three times.  

It seems like a simple assignment because it is "open book", and requires no additional effort on your part other than to identify at least one source that you think independently corroborates what you perceive as facts in the opinion piece you posted.  

So I have to ask again, is there some reason you are unwilling to do this, or are you simply incapable of doing this for some reason?