The news article as revised at 9:10 AM now says "Doug Chin took a nuanced view of today’s order. 'The important thing is that by a vote of 6-3, today’s order ...'"

No hon.  That's Doug Chin and this newspaper twisting the truth to make themselves look like they did not suffer a total defeat.  The 3 most conservative justices wrote a concurrence, not a dissent.  That means they agreed with the other 6 but wanted to go further.  Those 3 wanted to decide totally in favor of Trump's order.  The other 6 decided in favor of most of Trump's order, except for a few technicalities.  For Chin to call this a 6-3 decision is absurd; an effort to save face for his disastrous loss.