I  seem to remember that Justice Souter and Chief Justice Roberts were also supposed to be uber conservative loonies intent on the destruction of our liberal democracy.  WTF happened there?  We don't know how Gorsuch would decide on any hypothetical case.  All that is known is that he has a record of fairly linear thinking about following the written intent of the law as passed by Congress as to its application and its faithful adherence to the US Constitution.   Wouldn't you expect that  a Justice of  the Supreme Court's mission is not to make law,  but to "judge" its strict faithfulness to the Constitution,   the law as created and written by the Congress or the Executive?  The Congress can change any law,  and the people can vote to amend the Constitution.  Bad law, or temporally unacceptable law,   can be changed in this country,  which is beautiful and comforting.  But only by the people through free elections.     Not by  the Executive or the Judiciary by their action alone .