“How do we spend the resources we do have to maximally benefit the people of Ontario?”   That's the question alright.

But how do we compare the cost of one gender reassignment surgery to the value of 100+ robot-assisted prostate surgeries that avoid incontinence and impotence?  How does the quality of life for one compare to the quality of life for 100+?  It's a tough question, but the whole point here is the need to ask some tough questions.

And why is the government restricting doctor-assisted death far more than the SCC issued in its decision?  We are keeping some people suffering with terminal illnesses alive, against their wishes, at great cost.  Then plead "limited resources" on something like robot-assisted prostate surgery?