This is for Gary66:  Another example for your hopper to chew on.  This time from Wapo.  I know it's off topic, but you brought this up.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/12/us/trump-immigration-border-hiring.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fus&action=click&contentCollection=us&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=5&pgtype=sectionfront

I know, I know.  It's from nyt, but it talks about the story from Wapo.  You tell me.  Now that the left has temporarily stopped the vetting process so the people we need to keep out aren't allowed into our country, they have now moved on to negatively characterizing an alternative.  Hiring of more CBP.  But it goes beyond that.  It characterizes the effort as a "detainment" effort when in fact if you read the entire story, it talks mostly about predictions of mass roundups and deportations.  Bait and switch.  Many news orgs do it.  Wapo, nyt, msnbc, abc, cbs, nbc, npr, huffington puffington, la times, etc., etc.  Fox?