Interesting view. The point you make about the clear evidence of a corrupt Zuma is one which also amazes me in that such an individual should never have been within the leadership space at all, but it also speaks to something that I think is happening and this is that corruption has been part and parcel of democratic South Africa - the Guptas have been wheeling and dealing with the political class since 94 so my take is that it's a case of exceeding the acceptable amount of corruption that inevitably forms part of the relationship between government and business to the point where the offending 'eye' must be plucked out, and/or it's really a question of a hostile takeover of the economy - taking it out of the hands of those who have controlled it ( as described by the Gupta's PR firm- WMC) and of course placing in the hands of another cabal - the narrative of 'radical economic transformation' however has a hook so let us wait and see what tomorrow brings.