Some of the early people came from the original design firm, Parsons Brinkerhoff. I don't know if that firm is still in business here, many of the employees who worked on HART went to work for HART. The extreme cost overruns imply an original design which was incomplete or inadequate. Why were not some of the problems (utilities, historic sites, routing, plastic pads, and so on) identified during the design phase? Don't the designers have some responsibility for these cost overruns, these potential mistakes? Why does a really big firm like Kiewitt decide not to bid again? They said that they were not getting reimbursed for all the extra work they were having to do. What happened with that? What is the story? I am all for a forensic audit if it is a thorough audit, from the beginning including the design and planning phase. If nothing else, we would understand what went wrong. And, given sea level rise, there are going to be more really really big projects coming up.