No, that is not how your article is written. It presupposes that the underlying complaint was based on racial belief. It didn't attempt to tie the facts that the domain and website owner had clear ties to a family so deep in corruption, the country is drowning.  It also grandstands to say all speech should be acceptable, no matter how biased or corrupted its ideology is. And the facts are, as soon as you open that pandora's box, then you must accept that the rhetoric it spews will have an impact on people's lives.  In the same way as crying fire in a cinema, killing people in a stampede, and then claiming free speech, is unacceptable and should face no consequences, so too is spewing false messages via the internet.  I more than welcome the discussion on how to uplift all disadvantaged members of society. I encourage it. But you cannot give advantage to one, at the disadvantage to the other, and claim all things are now equal. Else you may as welcome another form of apartheid back.