Wow - these two know more than the SCC. Amazing. Maybe they should try to get on.

This "nation-to-nation" stuff is just plain, wishful thinking among first "nations" and their sympathizers (they actually live in Canada, like it or not, and are subject to this country's laws and constitution). And they (like these two) think natives should have veto power over everything (including reversing the flow of oil in a pipeline, which somehow has great impacts on indigenous peoples' rights) , which they clearly do not (by our constitution). 

Why doesn't the G&M present a more balanced viewpoint, instead of one that is totally one-sided and out-to-lunch - won't sell?