Destiny: Politics, Free Speech, Controversy, Sex, War, and Relationships | Lex Fridman Podcast #337
agi ai ai podcast artificial intelligence artificial intelligence podcast debate destiny discourse factorio lex ai lex fridman lex jre lex mit lex podcast mit ai streaming video games
Steven Bonnell, aka Destiny, is a progressive political commentator and a live streamer on YouTube. Melina Goransson is a live streamer on Twitch. Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- True Classic Tees: https://trueclassictees.com/lex and use code LEX to get 25% off
- Athletic Greens: https://athleticgreens.com/lex to get 1 month of fish oil
- MasterClass: https://masterclass.com/lex to get 15% off
- Blinkist: https://blinkist.com/lex to get 25% off premium

EPISODE LINKS:
Destiny's YouTube: https://youtube.com/destiny
Destiny's Subreddit: https://reddit.com/r/Destiny
Destiny's Website: https://destiny.gg
Destiny's Instagram: https://instagram.com/destiny
Melina's Twitch: https://twitch.tv/melina
Melina's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/melina.goransson
Melina's Twitter: https://twitter.com/melinagoranson

PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4
Clips playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOeciFP3CBCIEElOJeitOr41

OUTLINE:
0:00 - Introduction
3:06 - Politics and debates
19:28 - War in Ukraine
32:37 - Trans athletics
35:46 - AI
48:29 - Lowest point in Destiny's life
1:08:40 - Hate speech and language
1:45:02 - Misogyny
2:00:13 - Big government and institutions
2:39:57 - Hasan and Vaush
2:56:06 - Joe Biden
3:06:56 - Donald Trump
3:12:56 - Free speech
3:15:49 - Melina joins the conversation
3:19:03 - Melina and Destiny
3:29:34 - Open relationship
3:36:56 - Red pill community
3:47:10 - Sex body count
3:59:25 - Advice for young people

SOCIAL:
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lexfridman
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lexfridman
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lexfridman
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lexfridman
- Medium: https://medium.com/@lexfridman
- Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lexfridman
 If you have a democratic style of governance, you are entrusting people with one of the most awesome and radical of responsibilities. And that's saying that you're going to pick the people that are gonna make some of the hardest decisions in all of human history. If you're gonna trust people to vote correctly, you have to be able to trust them to have open and honest dialogue with each other. Whether that's Nazis or KKK people or whoever talking, you have to believe that your people are going to be able to rise above and make the correct determinations when they hear these types of speeches. And if you're so worried that somebody is gonna hear a certain political figure and they're gonna be completely radicalized instantly, then what that tells me is that you don't have enough faith in humans for democracy to be a viable institution, which is fine. You can be anti-democratic, but I don't think you can be pro-democracy and anti-free speech. The following is a conversation with Steven Bennell, also known online as Destiny. He's a video game streamer and political commentator, one of the early pioneers of both live streaming in general and live streamed political debate and discourse. Politically, he is a progressive, identifying as either left or far left, depending on your perspective. There are many reasons I wanted to talk to Steven. First, I just talked to Ben Shapiro, and many people have told me that Steven is the Ben Shapiro of the left in terms of political perspective and exceptional debate skills. Second reason is he skillfully defends some nuanced, non-standard views, at the same time, being pro-establishment, pro-institutions and pro-Biden, while also being pro-capitalism and pro-free speech. Third reason is he has been there at the beginning and throughout the meteoric rise of the video game live streaming community. In some mainstream circles, this community is not taken seriously, perhaps because of its demographic distribution skewing young, or perhaps because of the sometimes harsh style of communication. But I think this community should be taken seriously and shown respect. Millions of young minds tune in to live streams like Destiny's to question and to try to understand what is going on with the world, often exploring challenging, even controversial ideas. The language is sometimes harsher and the humor sometimes meaner than I would prefer. But I, Grandpa Lex, put on my rain boots and went into the beautiful chaotic muck of online discourse and have so far survived to tell the tale with a smile and even more love in my heart than before. On top of all this, we were lucky to have Malina Goranson, a popular streamer and world traveler, join us at the end of the conversation. You can check out her channel on twitch.tv slash Malina, and you can check out Stephen's channel on youtube.com slash Destiny. This is the Lex Freedom podcast. To support it, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now, dear friends, here's Destiny. I don't know if you watched me watching your yay interview. Yeah, thank you so much. I'm so curious, when you're navigating a conversation like that, how intentional is the thought process between building rapport and pushing and giving a little and letting it like. Zero, zero intention. I was watching and thank you so much. It was very kind for you to review that conversation. It meant a lot that you were complimenting parts on the technical aspects of the conversation, but no, zero. And I'm actually deliberately trying to avoid, I think you've called it debate brain, which is just another flavor of thinking about the meta conversation, trying to optimize how should this conversation go? Because I feel like the more you do that, the better you get at that, the less human connection you have. The less genuinely you're actually sitting there in the moment and listening to the person, you're more like calculating what's the right thing to say versus feeling what is that person feeling right now? What are they thinking? That's what I'm trying to do is putting myself in their mind and thinking, what does the world look like to them? What does the world feel like to them? And so from that, I truly try to listen. Now I'm also learning, especially because Rogan and others have been giving me shit for not pushing back. It's good sometimes to say from a place of care for the other human being to say stop. What did you just say? I don't think that represents who you are and what you really mean. Or maybe if it does at that time represents who they are, I can see a better world if they grow into a different direction, try to point that direction out to them. There's a really complicated dance between letting somebody share their full story versus letting somebody like essentially, I guess like proselytize your audience. And it's like, okay, hold on, let's take him in here. But yeah, I used to be four or five years ago, it was attack, attack, attack, attack, attack, whatever you said. And now I'm leaning way more towards they're like, okay, well, tell me how you feel about everything and then we'll go from there. So a lot of people like my new approach, some older fans will watch and they're like, why are you letting this guy just ramble on? You know, he said like five or six wrong things and you're only gonna call him out on two of them. And it's like, it's just different styles of conversation. Do you do a lot of research beforehand too? Depending on the conversation, yeah. So if we're gonna talk like vaccines and stuff, yeah, that's a ton of reading and stuff that I never thought I'd know going into it. If it's a more personal, like political philosophy conversation, there's not as much you can prepare for just, it truly depends on the conversation. How much are you actually listening to the other person? I'm always listening, you have to listen. Cause as soon as you stop listening, the quality of everything falls apart. The connection disappears, the quality of the conversation disappears. But my natural inclination is to just be way more aggressive than normal. So I have to constantly remind myself, I guess you would call it a meta conversation, when you're like, okay, he's probably saying this because of that, or we'll let him go here and then we'll stop later. But yeah, cause my preferred style of conversation is like, I'm gonna talk and the second I say something that you disagree with, then let's iron it out, right? I got like, I think I'm like syllogisms, like, okay, here's premise A, good, okay, premise B, okay. And then conclusion. And then as long as we're both deductively sound, we're not crazy, no psychosis, then we're gonna agree on everything. Whereas other people like to, most people think in stories, like narratives, like a whole, there's a whole like narrative and the individual facts don't matter as much cause they'll pick and choose what they want. And it's really hard cause everybody thinks narratives, I have to function in that world, but it's frustrating for me sometimes. Well, I've seen, you've had a lot of excellent debates. One of them I just recently last night watched is on systemic racism. And it's the first time I've seen you completely lose your shit. Oh shoot, who was that against? I'm not sure exactly, but you were just very frustrated and sorry, not lose your shit, but you were frustrated constantly because of the thing, let's lay out one, two, three. And every time you try to lay it out, it would falter. I think it had to do with sort of, can you use data to make an argument or do you need to use a study that does an interpretation of that data? And then there's like this tension between, I think this is a behavioral economist that you were talking to. The point is you do this kind of nice layout that the whole point of behavioral economics that says there's more to it than just the data. You have to give a context and like do the rich, rigorous interpretation in the context of the full human story. And then there was like a dance back and forth. Sometimes you use data, sometimes not, and you were getting really frustrated and shutting down. And so that felt like a failure mode. I've seen Sam Harris have similar sticking points. Like if we can't agree on the terminology, we can't go on. To me, I feel like, the Wittgenstein perspective is like, I think if you get stuck on any one thing, you're just not gonna make progress. You have to, part of the conversation has to be about doing a good dance together versus being dogmatically stuck on the path to truth. I think the true challenge is identifying what of those sticking points are important versus what is not important. It's like if I'm having an argument with somebody about like Jewish representation in media, it might be like a big conversation and they might say a couple things. Like I think Jewish people, they tend to help their own or whatever and saying, okay, but like for the purpose of the conversation, we can keep moving. But if they casually drop like, yeah, and I think that's why the Holocaust numbers are blown up from like 100,000 to 6 million. And that's when it's like, okay, well, hold on, wait, wait. If you think this, we have to stop here because this is gonna be, it's not just a language game in this part. If you really believe this fact, then the whole rest of the conversation is gonna be informed by that belief. And it has to be something that doesn't bother you personally. You have to step outside your own ego. So Holocaust denial is somebody that would bother a lot of people. And there's some things just observing you. I feel like when you get really good at conversation, you can become a stickler to, you might have your favorite terms that really bothers you. People don't agree on those terms. Begs the question. You mean raising the question. Yeah, I usually just want, see, when people say stuff, I just let it slide, yeah. Cause if you fight, when you're having a conversation with somebody and you're talking to their audience at the same time, cause that's really what's happening, you never wanna come off as over combative or over aggressive because it puts people in like, there's like a trigger in your brain. And this is true of relationships, of friendships, of persuasive rhetoric or whatever. There's a trigger in the brain. And as soon as that defensive trigger gets like flipped on, everything is over. You've lost the ability to persuade because everything becomes a fight at that point. Well, I wanted to talk to you cause I heard somewhere that you were referred to as the Ben Shapiro of the left. And since I'm talking with Ben as well, I wanted to sort of complete spiritually this platonic political philosophy puzzle in my head. You are a progressive, but a progressive with many non-standard progressive views. And you had a heck of a fascinating journey through all of that. And like I said, I think you argue with passion sometimes with excessive amounts of passion, but almost- That's a really polite way of saying that. Almost always with good faith and with rigor, with seriousness. I asked on your subreddit, which is an excellent subreddit, shout out to the destiny subreddit, so much, at least for that particular post. What I really loved is when I asked for questions for you, they were like, holy shit, there's adults in there, let's all behave. Nobody say incest. I was like, what? What's going on here? But actually the questions that rose to the top were really good. So somebody said that destiny was, speaking of your journey, was a conservative in his early teens. Then he became a libertarian. Then he became a left-wing social justice warrior. Then he flirted with socialism, and now he is a social democrat liberal. I've also heard you refer to yourself as a far left person. So to the degree there's truth to that journey, can you take me through your evolution through the landscape of political ideologies that you went through? So my dad comes from Kentucky, and my mom is a Cuban immigrant. Cubans are notorious for being very conservative in the United States for historical reasons and for other reasons, but my upbringing was a very Republican one. I grew up listening to Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, on the radio, Billy Cunningham. I think Sean Hannity a little bit later on, that was my whole upbringing politically. I remember I was writing, I had written articles for the school journal in favor of defending the war in Iraq and defending Bush from all the criticism, et cetera. So that was my upbringing. I think once I hit high school college, I had my edgy, like libertarian-esque high school phase of like reading Ayn Rand, of figuring out that like, oh my God, nothing in life matters except for class and money. That's actually the answer to everything. And I got to college, I became a Ron Paul fan, very big Ron Paul fan. And then from there, I kind of work, do life, life happens. At the kind of the lowest point of my life in terms of where I'm working, financially everything is like kind of in ruin in my life. There's just a whole bunch of dumb stuff that's happened. Probably my most conservative point. I don't know what it is about like being poor and thinking like you can work your way out of it, you can do whatever. It's just my upbringing is always just like, if you're not having financial success, just work, work, work, work, work. And then I got into streaming, very, very lucky break. Everything just lined up at the right time. And then as I've progressed through streaming, I would say through the years, I've gradually fallen more and more to the left, especially once my kid turned four, five, six years old. And I started to see like how much different his life was just because of the financial opportunities that I was able to provide for him through no merit of his own. And that started to radically change how I viewed the world in a lot of ways. So actually let's like linger on that low point. You worked at McDonald's, you worked at a casino, you did carpet cleaning. What was the lowest point? Definitely the carpet cleaning. Really? Absolutely. Why was it the lowest point? That's when you were just flirting with starting streaming? My whole life has been a series of lucky breaks, really, truly. I grew up playing a lot of video games, but back in my day, our day, you had to read. There was a lot of text on the screen. Back in my day, we used to play. They didn't all talk to you. Yeah, because nowadays everything's voice acted, but back then you had to read a lot. I was a really good reader and a really good vocabular. Yeah, I've heard you actually say that. Well, what games are we talking about? What do you mean just reading? You're talking about like RPGs? Yeah, JRPGs. So like Final Fantasy games, Fantasy stars, like all of these, like any RPG that would have been on the SNES, Sega, PlayStation, these are the things that I'm- Let's pause on that. Okay. So you just talked to Todd Howard, who's of the Elder Scrolls fame and the Fallout fame and beyond. What's your thoughts on Elder Scrolls? Why is Skyrim the greatest RPG of all time? Man, I really don't like Skyrim or Fallout or those types of games. You don't love it? Oh, really? No, not at all. Why do you hate Skyrim? Yeah, so I really like characters and like compelling stories and narratives around those characters. And I like to see them kind of like grow and change, kind of like a movie or a story. So in your like Final Fantasy games, you've got characters. There are a lot of like classical tropes of like a character starts off kind of like edgy, angsty, all on their own. They develop relationships, friendships. They realize that the life is more about themselves and they do that. And I like that growth. That's kind of what you see in all of those old role-playing games. I didn't like the open world ones as much because your main character is just like a blank slate, never talks. It's for you to like project onto, but there's not the same like linear narrative of like growth for the character. Oh, that's fascinating. There's an actual story arc to the character that's more crafted in a beautiful way by the designers of the game. Yeah. I don't think one is better or worse. I tend towards like, I want to hear a compelling story around like a set of characters that like grow and change as the game goes on. Oh, that's beautifully put then. Yeah, I just really loved being able to leave the town. You go outside the town and you look outside its nature and the world of possibilities is before you. You can do whatever the fuck you want. I mean, that immensity of just being lost in the world is really immersive for me. But yeah, you're right. Whatever attracts you about a world. So you were just starting to play video games. You go out and play video games. That's one of your lucky breaks. There's just like a lot of random skills you pick up depending on the type of game you play. I played a lot of text-based games on the computer. So I was a very fast typer. I'm still a very fast typer. Read a lot, you know, learned weird kind of math stuff for some of the calculations, some of the games. I think I'm pretty good at getting information, figuring stuff out, learning patterns, all of that. And then that plus the reading and everything with the games meant that I, I don't wanna say I excelled in school because my grades were pretty bad, but I was in like all honors, all AP classes or whatever. A lot of dual enrollment, a lot of AP credit going into college. So I did pretty well in school. Probably better than I should have, but it was because I had the game stuff that was like really powering a lot of my brain there while I was trying to sleep through class. So you're able to soak in information, integrate it, quickly take notes. Generally, I think I'm pretty good at that, yeah. You do this a lot when you stream your typing stuff. Is there a system in that note taking? And what note, what do you use for note taking? Does it matter? I use a notepad. Like notepad.exe notepad? Yep, notepad.exe, not the plus plus, not. Is there genius to the madness behind that or you just don't give a shit? No, I mean like it's gonna depend on the style of conversation. If I'm with somebody that is very meticulously organized their thoughts and they're a, find a better word here for Rambler, you can edit that in, better word for Rambler. Somebody that talks a lot and a lot, I'll start like taking notes, bullet points, like this, this, this, this, this, this, this, because there's a style of conversation where I say seven or eight different things and then when you go to respond to everything I said, I cut you off immediately and we argue that point. But if somebody's gonna do that, he's just like, hold on, you just said these eight things, I'm gonna respond to every single one, I've written them all down and then you can go, if you wanna go point by point, we can, but you just said all this and I wrote it down, so we're gonna go. So what are you actually writing down like a couple of words per point they left? Honestly, like there are very few unique conversations in politics. Like a lot of them are kind of retreading old ground. So if we're having a debate on abortion, somebody might say like, oh, well, I believe this thing about viability and I believe this thing about, you know, when they're a fetus versus a human and I'll just write down like those points so that when I go to respond, I kind of have like a, like note cards, like a guiding thing there to keep me centered on my response. Political discourse is the kind of tree you're walking down, I got it, and you're like taking. Just to keep my focus guided, so I'm not like running off on a weird tangent or responding to something I didn't say or something. What about like doing research? It's just, is there a system to your note taking because mentally you seem to be one of the most organized people I've listened to. So is there, is it in your mind or is there a system that's on paper? A little of both. I feel like the human mind is a beautiful thing if you have interest in an area. So like what I'll tell people is, let's say there's like a totally new topic that I'm researching, I don't know anything. And I'll do a couple of these on stream. I think they're boring, but people watch it. I might open a Wikipedia article and I'll read and I hit something I don't know. And then I open the next Wikipedia article and I'll read it and then I might have like seven tabs open and I'll read and I'll read and I'll read. And I'll read a ton of stuff, maybe for hour two, three, four hours of stuff. And then by the end, someone in chat will ask me like, do you even remember like this particular thing? And I'll say, not really, no, not too much. But what happens is, as long as you've seen it once, what'll happen is like the next day of the day after we'll read something else and we'll be like, oh, I remember that thing from this thing. I remember like vaguely that. And then if you see it like a third time, you're like, oh, this makes sense because especially when it comes to, oh, here's like a little trick on stuff. If you're ever reading any news and there's a place that pops up, always look at it on a map because so much of history is like on a map. It's so important to like know the geography. It makes things make so much more sense. But yeah, once I start to see stuff over and over again, just because I've like read it a few times, stuff will start to kind of connect to my mind and like, oh yeah, well, this makes sense. Of course, these people believe this because of this. Or of course, like this happened here. It's because, you know, that happened there. So yeah, it's a lot of that. If there's like a topic that I'm doing specific research for, so like a vaccine related stuff is a big one. The Ukrainian Russian conflict is a big one. That I'll break out a note. I'll probably get like a Google doc and I'll just start like writing like an outline of kind of the rough points of everything just to organize my thoughts around different topics. We're just gonna go on tangent upon attention upon attention. So we'll return to the low point of your life at some point. Always returning from the philosophy to the psychology. So you did the Ukraine topic. One question is, what role does US play in this war? Could they have done something to avoid the war? Did they have a role to play in forcing Vladimir Putin's hand? Do they have a role to play in deescalating the war towards a peace agreement and the opposite? If it does escalate towards something like the use of a tactical nuclear weapon, are we to blame? Oh man, somebody sent me an email a while ago with great words. There's a specific way to navigate a conversation where you can kind of like contribute to a negative event, but you're not really the one responsible for it. Like the classic example is a woman goes out late at night, gets a little bit too drunk and then something happens. And it's like, while there might've been steps she could have taken to mitigate the risk, it's not her fault of what happened because the responsibility rests on the agent making the choice, right? There's a chooser at some point that is choosing to do wrong or evil. I don't believe in any of the arguments that say the United States has contributed to Russia's position on Ukraine or the actions that they've taken on Ukraine. There are several arguments that some people, some even political scholars are putting out there to say that the United States is to blame, but I find them completely unconvincing. I think that when you ask the question of like, what is the United States role or what has our role been? I think it's really important for us. I don't think we even agree as a country on what our role should be, which I think is a hard one because you've got this kind of, there's this growing populist movement in the United States. It might be the far left and the far right. And I think populists tend to have this kind of isolationist view of the world where the United States should just be our own thing. We shouldn't be telling anybody what to do. We shouldn't be the world police. And then kind of more in these like center left, center right positions. And then across a lot of Europe, you've got, well, okay, the United States is kind of like the big kid on the block. Like we're looking to them for guidance and leadership on situations like what's going on in Ukraine. So insofar as the original question is like, what is like the United States responsibility? I think we have a responsibility to ensure the relative like freedom, prosperity and stability across Europe. I think that defending Ukraine's sovereignty and right to their borders is a part of that. And I don't believe that prior to the invasion in 2022, I don't think the United States was contributing to Russia invading that country. I know there are arguments given that like the expansion of NATO, you know, has something that's been threatening to Russia, but the Baltics joined and Russia didn't do anything about it. The invasion to Crimea was very clearly a response to the revolution in 2014. The invasion on the borders is clearly a response to Ukraine winning that civil war in the Southeast and the Donbass and Russia becoming more aggressive. I don't think that you can blame any of that on NATO expansion. There's no NATO countries that are threatening Russia or invading Russia. Do you think there is a nuclear threat? Do you think about this? Do you worry about this? That there is a threat of a tactical nuclear weapon being dropped. I think that possibility exists either way. And I think the responsibility for that is on Russia because it just can't be the case that if you have nukes, you're allowed to invade countries and take their land. Because of anything, I think that that down the road also increases the potential for nuclear problems in the future, right? Because at that point, either every single country has to acquire their own nuclear weapons. Cause if you don't, Russia is gonna mess with you. Or every single country has to join NATO. And now what? We're back at square zero, ground zero, square one, where people are like, oh, well look, all these countries joining NATO is aggressive towards Russia. Like, what are you gonna do? Yeah, you've mentioned that there's a complicated calculus going on with the countries that have nuclear weapons. And what's our responsibility? Are you allowed to do anything you want to countries that don't have nuclear weapons? That's a really tricky discussion. For sure. Because what is US supposed to do if Russia drops a tactical nuclear weapon? There's a set of options, none of which are good. And it's such a tricky moment right now because the things that Biden and other public figures say I feel like has a significant impact on the way this game turns out. Cause I think mutually assured destruction is partially a game of words. I mean, I believe in the power of conversation of leaders talking to each other. I feel like you have to have a balance between threat and compromise and like empathy for the needs, the geopolitical, the economic needs of a nation, but also sort of respect and represent your own interests. So it's a tricky one. Like how do you play the hand? It reminds me of, I don't know if you've ever heard in like evolutionary psychology or evolutionary biology, there are things called tit for tat strategies. It kind of reminds me of that where it's like, there are a whole bunch of these little biological mechanisms where creatures will develop like socializing like tit for tat. If you do something bad to me, I'm gonna do something bad for you. And then more complicated schemes will come out where it'll be like tit, tit for tat, where it's like you can make one mistake and then I'm gonna get you if you do a second one or it could be tit, tit, tit for tat, or they're gonna be tit for tat, tat for tit. So there's like all these like back and forth where creatures kind of optimize themselves. And yeah, I think something the United States did really well in terms of that kind of conversational strategy. And I approved of this in the beginning was Biden was very clear about setting out like the exact level of US involvement for the war. We're not gonna do a no fly zone. There's not gonna be US troops in the ground in Ukraine, but we are gonna send a whole bunch of money and a whole bunch of arms and a whole bunch of Intel to them. And I thought he did a good job at laying out like the limitation of the US involvement while opening as much as we could in the ways that we could help. But the, yeah, that looming threat of some sort of tactical nuclear weapon, I think on the table right now is like, it's gonna be the annihilation of like Russian sea forces and everything, but you know, what happens if it continues to escalate? That's like a world that nobody wants to be in, yeah. So we talked about difficult conversations. And again, thank you so much for reviewing the yay conversation. Let me ask you about Putin. Speaking of difficult conversations. So if you sit down, if I sit down with somebody like Vladimir Putin or Vladimir Zelensky, what's the right way to have that conversation? Oh man. We can talk about that one, or we could talk about somebody more well understood through history, like something like Stalin or Hitler, something like that. Maybe that's an easier example to illustrate how to handle extremely difficult conversations. Yeah, I mean, I can handle really difficult conversations with like two people, leaders of countries though. There's so much that you are representing in that conversation. I guess the thing that would be interesting to me would be like, what is Vladimir Putin's interest? Like what is the genuine interest that he has in the conflict? Because I think finding out like, what is your buy-in or what is the driving force keeping you here is probably the most important thing. I think for Zelensky, I think it's quite a bit more simpler because he's on the defense. So it's defending his country and his people. For Putin, I've heard all sorts of things. Dugan has his writings on like the East versus the West, the collapse of the West in the face of like all of the liberalism and the weird LGBT stuff that they criticize. You've got the desire to like return to this like former Soviet Union-esque thing. You've got Putin's quotes that collapse of the Soviet Union was the biggest geopolitical disaster of 20th century. And I guess figuring out like, what is Putin after? I'm not actually sure. I don't know the answer to that question. I know a lot of people write about it, but yeah. Well, there's a lot of answers to that question. There's a lot of answers that he can give to that question. So say I sit down with him for three hours and talk about it. I think this is a really interesting distinction because you do do difficult conversations in the space of ideas, but also in your stream, you have, I mean, there's a bunch of drama going on. There's the human psychology is laid out in its full richness before you. So to me with leaders, I think a part of the conversation has to be about the human psychology. Not like a meta conversation, but like really understand what they feel, what they fear, who they are as a human being, like as a family man, as a person proud of their country, as a person with an ego, as a person who's been affected, if not corrupted by powers, all of us can be and likely are. So all of that, that gives context to then the answers about what do you want in this war? Is that the answers about what you want in this war will be political answers. It's like a game that's being played again with words and politicians are incredibly good at playing that game. I think the deeper truth comes from understanding the human being from which those words come. And I think that's what you do. I don't know if you do those kinds of conversations where- Never talked to any country leaders, so. No, not a country leader, but say a controversial figure or somebody that represents a certain idea. Don't just talk in the space of ideas or challenge the ideas, but understand who is this person and how did you come to those ideas? Oh yeah, when I've had, there've been a couple of very controversial, right-leaning figures. So the two, obviously the mainstream is maybe Lauren Southern and Nick Fuentes. And those types of conversations initially aren't very political at all. Yeah, it's more like, obviously we believe in very, very different things, but like beliefs don't happen accidentally, so how did you get to where you are? Those are way more personal conversations, that's true. Is there things you regret about those conversations where you failed? Is there things you're proud of where you succeeded? For things that I'm proud of, I feel like I'm really good at attempting to understand people without judgment. That I think a lot of people feel like they can have conversations with me where they can share a lot and I'm not gonna jump down their throat for them having a politically incorrect observation or for them being judgmental to somebody else or having a feeling that's maybe not something they should have, something they're embarrassed about. So I think I do a really good job at that. And then by extension of that, I've gotten the ability to hear perspectives from so many different people that I think I can understand a lot of different perspectives. For failures of mine, I mean, it's always gonna be, on stream it'll be like I didn't push back hard enough or I didn't know a certain fact for a conversation. These are usually, they're gonna be on these very technical grounds generally. I'm pretty happy with the direction my conversations have gone recently, especially over like the past six months. So your goal is to de-radicalize the audience of those folks. And so that used to be my goal. My goal was de-radicalization. Now I'm kind of hoping that that's just the byproduct. So the goal I think is to talk to somebody and to show they believe this because of these reasons. And if you wanna change people's beliefs, we have to talk about the underlying reasons for why they think the things they think. It's not enough to just say like that belief is bad because it's like, well, they believe it for a whole bunch of things that are true and real to them at least. So you have to address all of the underlying things that they believe before you can change the overlying belief. So if I'm having a conversation with somebody, it'll be like, okay, why do you feel this about that, that and that? Okay, I understand that. Maybe like a better way to solve that would be like this or that instead of this thing. So to what degree do you have to empathize with the person's worldview versus pushback? That's always the hard one. When I'm talking to other people, it's almost always me stepping as much inside their bubble as I can. I have to like live and breathe their worldview and be able to speak their worldview in order to like navigate their thoughts because my worldview is, I'm not even use this as an insult. I don't know if I am a little bit autistic or something, but when I break apart things, I just wanna see like study, study, study, fact, fact, fact. That's how my mind works for everything. That's what I like to see. Like personal stories don't do much for me, narratives don't do much for me. Just show me like the data and the studies or whatever. But for other people, I think most brains are more human than that and they tend to see things that more kind of like surreal pictures that are kind of painted and the brush strokes are way broader and they don't care about the itty bitty tiny fact. So if I'm talking to somebody else and I'm trying to get into their head and I'm trying to change their mind on things, I'm gonna be stepping into their world and I'm gonna try to be working through that framework. Really good example might be, we'll say like when it comes to trans issues for minors, 16 or 17 year old needs to get on puberty blockers. The way that I want that debate to play out is let's look at all the data, let's see what are the outcomes, let's see what are the processes for getting a medication and then we'll evaluate all of that and then we'll go in whatever like points more favorably. But that's wholly unconvincing to most people, right? So as a parent, if I'm having that conversation with another parent, the easiest way for me to have that conversation is like, hey, we both have kids. Imagine how horrible it would be if we felt like our kids needed help and the government was trying to get between us and their doctor in that conversation. That might be how that talk plays out, which I think that's a really good argument because I think there probably are times when the government should get in between it, but I'll have that conversation because now I'm in a world where they understand what I'm saying, I'm resonating with the way that they feel about things and then I can make progress with the way that they're kind of viewing the world because I'm talking in a language they understand. So on this particular topic of trans issues, is that the reason you were banned from Twitch? I'm not sure, I don't know. They just said hate speech, but I don't use like slurs or anything, so it's hard to know exactly. So I think you made the claim that trans women shouldn't compete with cis women in women's athletics. Can you make this case and can you still man the case against it? I think in your community, there's a lot of trans folks who love you and there's a lot who hate you. Yeah. And so if you can walk the tight rope of this conversation to try to still man both sides. One of the argumentative strategies I say is that like anytime you have a conversation, you should be able to argue both sides better than anybody else, you know. So for the my side, the genuine belief side, it feels like overwhelmingly all of the data is showing that trans, mostly trans women, even after I think three years on some sort of like HRT or you know, estrogen stuff, they're still maintaining these advantages from their male puberty over cis gender women. And if that is the case, if we are gonna draw these distinctions around our sports between women and men, it feels unfair to have a category inside the women's sports that are maintaining advantages that are coming from a male puberty regardless of the amount of time they've spent on hormone replacement therapy. So that would be my argument on that side. So it's unfair from a performance enhancement aspect. So the same way we ban performance enhancing drugs that involve increasing of testosterone in that same way would be unfair. Essentially, yeah. So what's the case against? Yeah, so the case in favor of them competing together is that realistically, there's not gonna be a trans sports category. Realistically, trans women aren't gonna be competitive with cis men because they've gone through these huge, you know, like hormone changes by the medication they're taking. And that when we look at how sports are kind of done anyway, there's a whole bunch of biological differences between people within sports categories that are determining their placement in the professional world. So for instance, somebody like me is probably never gonna go far on the NBA because I'm not tall enough. I think the average height in the NBA- Don't doubt yourself. Don't doubt myself, yeah. I wanna say like six, six or something. They're huge people. Or, you know, you look at like Michael Phelps as a classic example of a guy whose torso is like so long, his body is built for swimming. And I think there are some trans people that will look at that or somebody advocating for this position. They'll look at that and they'll go, okay, realistically, the way that Michael Phelps' body processes lactic acid, the shape physiologically of his body, is gonna put him in a level of competition that so many men are never gonna reach just because of biology. How is it fair that you can have these biological outliers competing in these categories, but then when we come to like sports categories with trans and cis women, you're gonna take trans women and say that they can't compete against cis women. Can't you also just say that they have some level of biological difference there? Like, is it really gonna be that great of a difference than what Michael Phelps has versus the average swimmer or an NBA player has versus like the average height male? Yeah. Do you think we're gonna get into some tricky ethical territory as we start to be able to, through biology and genetics, modify the human body? Absolutely. I feel like those things are coming sooner than we wanted them to. Oh, man, do the, have you seen the AI art? Yes. That's a- Of course, I'm an AI person. Oh, okay, then yeah, yeah. That's a, that's always been like, what's gonna happen when robots can do art better than humans, LOL? Like, well, we'll see in 20 years, in 20 years, in 20 years. And now you have AI art winning competitions. And it's funny because robots are essentially- There's a robot behind you, by the way. A robot behind me. Oh, nice. Robots are really good at- Careful what you say. Yeah, oh God, I'll be careful. That's not like one of the Chinese ones with a gun on it, right? Oh, okay. Hopefully not. We'll see depending on what you say, yeah. Okay. Robots are really good at showing the limitations of the human mind in categories that we didn't believe we were limited before. I think that humans have this idea intrinsically that we have like some type of like innovative, creative drive that is just outside of the bounds of physical understanding. And with a sophisticated enough program, we see that maybe that's not actually true. And that's a really scary thing philosophically to deal with because we feel like we're very special, right? We own the planet, we make computers, and the idea that you can start to get these robots that can do things that's like, okay, you can do math, fine. Okay, you can do calculations, fine. But you can't do art, that's the human stuff. And then when they start to do that, it's like, oh shoot. And that terrifies you a little bit? Like the human species losing control of our dominance over the Earth? I don't think it's necessarily losing control of our dominance. I mean, I guess like a Skynet thing could come in at some point. But I think it brings us to this really fundamental level of like, what does it mean to be human? What is it that we're good at? What should we be doing with technology? We never really asked that question in the Western world. It's always the technology is like normative in that technology equals good and more technology equals better. That's been like the default assumption. In fact, if you ask a lot of people, how do you know if civilization has progressed over the past 100 or 200 years? They don't say we have better relationships, we have longer marriages, we have blah, blah, blah. They'll say technology has improved. We've got crazy phones, we've got crazy computers. And the idea that more technology might be bad has never even crossed somebody's mind, unless it's used for like a really bad thing. Well, it's interesting. We kind of think as more and more automation is happening, we're going to get more and more meaning from things like being artists and doing creative pursuits. And here's like, oh shit, if the art, if the creative pursuits are also being automated, then what are we gonna gain meaning from? What are the activities from which you'll gain meaning? My whole life I've been working on artificial intelligence systems, there's been different revolutions. One of them is the machine learning revolution. And it's interesting to build up intuition and destroy that intuition about what is and isn't solvable by machines. I think for the longest time, I grew up thinking Go is not, the game of Go is not solvable. Because my understanding of AI systems is ultimately that it's fundamentally a search mechanism that is fundamentally going to be brute force. There's no shortcuts. Sure, like if it can't solve the traveling salesman problem, it's not even gonna be able to give you an approximation. So most interesting problems are giant travel salesman problem. And then, so of course it's not gonna be able to solve that. And then the deep learning revolution made you realize, holy shit, these large neural networks with a giant number of knobs is able to actually somehow estimate functions that can do a pretty good job of understanding deep representation of a thing. Whether that's a game of Go, or whether it's the human natural language, or if it's images and video, or audio, and even actions in different video games and actions of robotics and so on. And then you realize with diffusion models and different generative models, you start to realize, holy shit, it can actually generate not just interesting representations or interesting manifestations of the representations of forms, but it's able to do something that impresses humans in its creativity. It's beautiful in the way we think of art as beautiful. Like it surprises us and makes us chuckle and makes us sit back in awe and all those kinds of things. And yet the thing that it seems to struggle with the most is the physical world currently. So that's counterintuitive. We humans think that it's pretty trivial, being able to pick up a cup, being able to write with a pen in the physical space, we think that's trivial. We give ourselves respect for being great artists and great mathematicians and all that kind of stuff. And that seems to be much easier than the physical space. Bodies are really cool. There was a, I don't know, it's probably Asimov or something. There was some science fiction writer that had a short story, it was like an alien that had landed on earth and it was describing our bodies from a totally alien perspective. And when you think about all the things we can do, it's pretty cool. We can climb through a whole multitude of environments, we can exist in a multitude of temperatures, we can manipulate things just with our hands and the way that we can interact with things around us. And yeah, we're very capable on like a physical level, even though, like you said, we think about ourselves like, oh, well human beings have really big brains and we do, we're really intelligent as well, but yeah, our bodies are pretty cool too. And it's a fascinating hierarchical biological system. Like we're made up of a bunch of different like living organisms that all don't know about the big picture of our body. And it's all functioning in its own little local world and it's doing its thing. But together as of, it forms a super resilient system. All of that comes from a very compressed encoding of what makes a human. You start with the DNA and it builds up from a single cell to a giant organism. And because of the DNA, through the evolution process, you can constantly create new humans and new living organisms that adapt to the environment. Like that resilience to the physical world, it seems like running the whole earth over again, the whole evolutionary process over again might be the only way to do that. Might be the only way to do it. So to create a robot that actually adapts is as resilient to the dynamic world might be a really difficult problem. Possibly. Well, I was gonna say like in a programming environment, you can do things on timescales that are impossible in the real world, right? Like the benefit to AI and computers is a computational they can compute so much data so quickly. Whereas on human timetables, we have to wait. When you talk about evolution, it's generation after generation after generation. Maybe in a virtual environment that could be simulated and then those changes could happen a lot quicker. That's not a human time scale, but you have to look at earth as a quantum mechanical system, the computation is happening super fast. This is a giant computer doing a giant simulation. So just because for us humans, it's slow, there's like trillions of organisms involved in you, destiny being you. Sure, but the next iteration of like from human to human, even if on the quantum level, there's a lot of stuff going on, you talk about like changes in DNA, for instance, right? Like that's happening from a generation to generation time scale. Like in a virtual environment, that could theoretically happen. Well, it already is, there's like protein folding, like huge cloud computing, probably ML stuff that's like working on doing all of that stuff and it'll run like trillions and trillions of simulations, every second and stuff, maybe not every second, but. Still slower than the actual protein folding, much slower. That's for the problem of solving protein folding to estimate the 3D structure, but the actual body does the actual protein folding way faster. So like we're, the question is, can we shortcut the simulation of human evolution, try to figure out how to build up an organism without simulating all the details? Because we have to simulate all the details of biology were screwed, we don't have. Oh, true, we'd have to put something in a pond and then watch it for a billion years. That might be the most efficient way to do it. Sure. That's what the universe most likely is, is a kind of simulation created by a teenager in their basement to try to see what happens. It's a computer game. That might be the most efficient way to create interesting organisms, but within the system is perhaps possible to create other robots that will be of use and will entertain us in the way that other humans entertain us. And that's a really interesting, of course, problem, but it's surprising how difficult it has been to create systems that operate in the physical world and operate in that physical world in a way that's safe to humans and interesting to humans. Because there's also the human factor, the human robot interaction. To me, that's like the most interesting problem, to figure out how to do that well. And so Elon Musk and others, Boston Dynamics have worked on legged robots, so I really care about legged robots. Those are super interesting. How to make them such that they're able to operate successfully in a dynamic environment. Super tricky. They're like the dumbest of dogs, speaking of which, there's a dog barking outside. It's really tricky to create those kinds of organisms that live in the human world. Then again, if more and more of us move into the digital world, so you stream a lot. Like part of who you are exists in the digital space. The fact that you have a physical representation also, maybe more and more will become not important. I hope that's the case, because I bought a lot of stock in Metta, and man, it's down a lot. Metta the company. Is there some degree, can you look at yourself, like Steven, the physical vehicle, and then the destiny, this digital space, like digital avatar. Do you sense that in a certain way, you're the digital avatar? I've always tried to keep my on-stream personality as genuine as possible. So they're one and the same to me. I don't really view them as two separate entities. But I mean, I always view myself as Steven, the real life person. Destiny is my online name. No, but because so many, your social network is established in the digital space, like so many people know you through the digital space. Can there be, can we swap out another person that looks like you? In like an AI system, and then that entity known as destiny will continue existing. So I mean, it must be like, there must be some level of sophistication that could emulate a human brain, I would imagine, right? Probably tech's not there yet, but. Well, the question is, what's the level of sophistication of the audience that would recognize that something has changed? Like it's the Turing test. How hard is it to trick your audience, your large audience of fans that watch your streams, that when you swap out an AI that emulates you, that nothing has changed? And the question is, do you have to really simulate so much of the human brain for that? I don't think so. Probably not. And so, I mean, like you said, a lot of political discourses is just walking down the tree together. So you can probably emulate a lot of that discussion. Yeah, it would depend on if you're doing old data sets and you're training on that and I'm having conversations about abortion and your crane and vaccines, I imagine it could do it for quite a while. The only thing that would be weird is when novel issues pop up, then you probably need a more sophisticated resemblance of the inner brain, right? You have to keep training on the internet, so how the language models, and that's the most incredible breakthroughs is the language models. You just have to keep retraining the system on Reddit, which is actually what a lot of it is trained on, which is hilarious. I do think it's really interesting that like kind of like funny problems, like the trolley problem that we can kind of work through our normative ethical systems on are now like real questions. Like if you're driving a Tesla and it's on autopilot and you're gonna hit somebody, but it can swerve and hit somebody else, like what ought the system do? Like we went very quickly from fun kind of like project in philosophy class to we need to solve this for insurance purposes like as quickly as possible. It's kind of interesting to think about. Well, I actually have, I'll bring up the trolley problem with you later. There's a fascinating version of it that I find hilarious. Okay, let's return to your low point. Oh yeah. You started playing video games, that was a lucky break. You did tech space ones, that was a lucky break because you've gotten to be pretty good at learning. And then you started thinking about going to college and so on, what happened next? I mean, I went to like a prep school. So you kind of have to go to college after that's like the point, right? I was also millennial, all of us had to go to college. That's always what they told us. So my life was kind of, it's hard to describe. I didn't really think much of the future. I was just kind of enjoying the day to day because everything in my life was pretty weird. Both my parents had moved to Florida by the time I was 16, 17. I was living with my grandma, I was working. I had a girlfriend, moved out. We got a place, did college. By the time I got into college, I had transitioned from working at McDonald's to I was like working at a casino restaurant basically. And I was really good at that job. So high level of patience for drunk people, insane people. And I was doing music in school because I've really grown to love music. And my kind of thought process was, my thought process was I can do music as a hobby, I guess, unless I get really good and maybe I can make money with that, but otherwise I love music. I'm okay going to school for music, getting good at it. And then just doing that on the side. And then my main job would kind of be this career I was building at the casino. And basically the trying to balance personal life plus graveyard shift, six day or weeks at a casino and then a full-time music degree was not possible for me. And eventually I had to drop school after, I think it was like three years. And after I dropped school to maintain my casino job, after a few months, I got fired from my casino job. So I'd essentially just thrown away like the past like three or four years of my life. Why did you get fired from the casino job? I heard there's a story behind that. Yeah, there's a story. Basically I was just really dumb when it came to understanding corporate politics. And this is funny because the same attitude kind of followed me into the streaming world. My thought process has kind of always been that like, as long as I'm really good at what I do, I should be untouchable. If I'm really good, you can't do anything to me. I don't have to play any dumb games or whatever. And at the casino, I think I was the youngest, it was originally shifly than supervisor position at the casino. And when I started to get my own shifts, there were problems that I would run into on graveyard shift because of carryover from the swing shift. And one of these problems was underneath the soda machine, they weren't cleaning it properly and fruit flies were showing up. And the manager came in one morning and she was like, hey, what's going on with the machine? And I told her like, listen, I can't do, I can't take everything from swing shift and do everything at grave shift. I can't do this. They need to figure out their stuff better or I need more employees. It's not possible for me. And she's like, what did you tell anybody else? Like, yeah, I complained to the supervisor on the swing shift all the time. And she told me, if you're not getting the answer that you like, then it's your responsibility to email the next person up. And I was like, oh, okay, that's interesting. And some months went on and I ran into more problems because on graveyard, here's how, I don't know if it's everywhere, but morning shift is the easiest and that's when you're the most overstaffed because that's when all the VPs are in and that's when all the managers are there and everybody blah, blah, blah. Swing shift is the most challenging. That's where your highest flow of customers is. You're also decently staffed there, but there's a lot of stuff going on. And graveyard, nobody cares at all about you. They don't give you any employees. You might get swamped, you might not. Who cares? Make sure it's clean for day shift. That's the only thing that matters. A quick question for sort of clarification. So this is a 24 hour? 24 hour dinner, yeah, and it's a casino, yeah. So it's a dining and a casino. Oh, by the way, I had an amazing moment at a dining and a casino recently. It's a special place. A dining and a casino is a place of magic. There's a lot of, I don't know if I'd say magic, but there's a lot of other worldly stuff going on. There's characters, there's, and I had an interaction with a waitress that was the sweetest waitress in the world. And it was just like, I don't know, it made me feel less alone in this cruel world of ours. So graveyard begins when? For me, my shift was 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. or sometimes I get called in early, so it'd be 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. That's no love for that shift. No, especially not trying to do school at the same time. Absolutely not. But yeah, basically, long story short, I ran into a problem with my, where I didn't have enough employees on my shift. VPs were coming in in the morning, they're just like, hey, the diner's kind of dirty. And I'm like, you've cut all my employees past 4 a.m. Like on some nights, I'm literally cooking and doing front of house, like all on my own. Like I can't do this. And my manager, Pam, told me, well, you gotta figure it out. And so I remembered her advice. So I emailed the VP of Food and Beverage and I cc'd her. And I said, I'm not getting the help I need in my restaurant. Now I didn't know at the time that I was basically completely throwing her under the bus, because of that email. But retroactively, when I look back on things, or retrospectively, I see that was the moment that I got like marked for deletion. And I didn't really understand it. Even though I'd heard terminology for papering somebody out the door. But after that point, I started to get written up for like a lot of little random things. Like I'll come, like I'd missed one day of work in my three years at the casino. And I started getting written up for like, showing up like one or two minutes late. That's kind of weird, I don't know, whatever. Or written up for random ways about filing paperwork. And then eventually there came a situation with another employee where they were, it's complicated, it has to be like call out stuff. But basically they wanted to come, or they wanted to call out. And I told them if they called out, they were gonna get fired, because they were at like 10 points. They were at nine points and 10 points is firing, blah, blah, blah. Pam told me, you can tell her that she's gonna get a point, but you can't tell her she's gonna get fired. I don't know what that meant. And then I told her that if you call out, you're gonna get, you know, you're fucked, you're gonna get fired. Or you're gonna be at 10 points. And then I got called in early, like three days later. And Pam was like, you inappropriately communicated with an employee because you said the F word in a text message. And I'm like, really? There's no shot. And she's like, well, you also tried to fire the employee. And I was like, no, I told her she was gonna get 10 points. She's like, well, you used the F word. I'm like, this is insane. And I didn't, just cause I was such a, I was such a high performing employee. It's like, there's no way I'm getting fired. And then I did. And I was like, yeah. Cashed out my 401k and moped for like three months, cause I had thrown away school for this casino job. And then I got fired from this job that like, yeah, nobody believed I got fired. It was just insane. So if you look back, if you were allowed to not just to look back to your own memory, but actually watch yourself, like somebody recorded video that whole time, do you think you would be surprised? You would notice some things that potentially of not having a self-awareness, not having like social, like a civility and social etiquette that's played in the human relations. Yeah, absolutely. So is that, is that at the core of it essentially? Yeah, I think so. I mean, that follows me even to this day. There's a lot of, I don't know if you're recording or not, but when we spoke early about like meta-conversations, I have to think a lot sometimes about meta-conversations cause the way that I want to drive a conversation will sometimes be way different than what is like the best way to have a conversation. Whereas I just want to like go really hard on like some itty bitty, like some idiosyncrasy, some factor figure, whatever. But that's not like the human conversation I need to have. So you got fired slash left that job. And that took you to the job that would be the lowest point. Yeah. There was a huge downgrade in pay. I went from getting like, I think at the casino, cause I worked so much overtime, I was getting like 22.50 an hour on all my overtime. Fifth, and this was back in 2008, 2009, as like a college student, like it was amazing pay. The, I had benefits, like everything was good. And then the carpet cleaning was like, I was probably getting my paycheck like every other week was maybe 1500 bucks or a thousand dollars. And I'm working like 13 day stretches. Like I have every other Sunday off and it's so many hours. Like I have to show up at the shop at like seven or six. And then I go home at like eight or nine, depending on when my jobs are throughout the day. You doing businesses or residential or what are you doing? Everything. Everything. Are you working for a company that is carpet cleaning? Yeah. Okay. And so like there's a schedule thing, you have to go to it and so on. Yeah, but so like, this is why the schedule would suck. Cause sometimes I'd show up at, I think we had to be in the shop at, I think it was 7 a.m. We show up at the shop at 7 a.m. First job might be at eight or nine, but that job might be like a one hour job. So I might show up at 7 a.m. and have a job from 8.30 to 9.30. Then my next job might not be from, until like say 11. So from 8.30 to 9.30, I'll do one job. And then I've got a job from like 11 to 12 or something. Then I might have like a decent job from like five to eight. But like my whole day is destroyed and I'm doing like three smallest jobs. So I'm getting like 30 bucks maybe for being in the shop or, you know, my job for like 10 or 11 hours. And it's just like horrible. So you're somebody that seems to be extremely good at thinking and conversation. And so have a bit of an ego perhaps in both the negative and the positive sense of that word. Was there some aspect of working at McDonald's and then working at the casino and then working for the, as a carpet cleaner that was humbling? No, never. I had a- The ego burned bright through it all. The, well- Or no, you can push back on the ego. Yeah, no, I understand. I totally get what you mean. I had a really close friend growing up who's name is Chris. And I think we probably met when he was, we were like four or five, I think. He lived behind me. And I grew up with him and I'd always been kind of an outsider to the world that I was in once I got to high school for sure. Because all of those kids were incredibly wealthy. You know, Corvettes and Mustangs when they turned 16. It was a prep school. And I was doing the, they had like a work study program there where you could stay after school from 2.30 to five every day to kind of like work to pay for your tuition. So I've been working like throughout all of high school. I got another job at McDonald's when I was 18, worked at the casino. Like I'd always been doing that kind of work. I never really viewed it as like beneath me or anything. It's not like my, I don't have like a family of doctors or lawyers or anything. And then me and my other friend, Chris guy, we'd always make fun of everybody else for being kind of like, you know, like preppy kids and everything. So there is a, there's some pride to that sort of hard work. Yeah, I guess a little bit, yeah. Cause yeah, looking, especially my dad, like the solution to every problem was just throw more hours of work at it basically. So that was always my, yeah, go-to. And I never, yeah. What was psychologically the low point? I think psychologically the low point was that as I'm doing this carpet cleaning job, driving around my city, there's like this feeling of, I guess for a lot of people it's probably college, but there's a feeling when you're in high school that everything is like so exciting and the whole world is kind of in front of you. And there are a trillion, trillion different branching paths of possibilities. And you know, even through high school, you're thinking like, am I gonna be a doctor or a lawyer, or can I join the MBA or can I do this or that? There's all these things in front of you. And when I, I especially felt it when I was doing these carpet cleaning jobs, and I think it was in the fall, I'd be outside some of these houses and I just kind of look around and I'd recognize a lot of these neighborhoods that I drive around with friends in, or I'd be walking through, I ran cross country, some of them I'd be running through these neighborhoods. And it was just kind of like this feeling of looking around and it was like, when I was here in the past, this was like kind of like a transitionary phase of my life where I'm doing this and it's so fun and exciting, and then I'm gonna move on to something else and it's gonna be fun and exciting and awesome. And then like, you know, two years later, my whole life has collapsed. Like I'm in a house that I can't afford anymore. My ex that I hate is pregnant with my kid. And I have no money, I've got no upward mobility, I failed college, my job is horrible. Like just every single, like this is like my, all of those, the wave function had collapsed into one thing and that one thing was the worst thing that could have possibly been at the time for me. Yeah, like everything was gone and horrible. So yeah, that was the feeling I had at the time. Do you ever contemplate suicide? I thought about thinking about it, but I've just never been that kind of person. So. I mean, basically as a way to escape from the hardship. Something that I'm so incredibly lucky, I don't know why or how, I'm just gonna chalk it up to biology. I've always had really high mental baseline. Like depression and all of that. There've been a few short stints I've dealt with it past 30 because I did a lot of drugs. But other than that, my mental baseline is just so high. And even in the carpet cleaning days, like if you, man, the videos might still be there. I think on my old YouTube channel, where I'll be like playing Starcraft when I first started getting into streaming and I'll be calling up customers like, this is Steve from Guaranteed Clean. We had to move your job back one hour. Is it okay if I show up instead of 2.30? And then I hang up, it's like, all right guys, we've got three more games. And it's like, let's go, like stuff like that. So my baseline has always been like really high for mental functioning. So even in low point, there's, that you had strength. Is there anything you can give by way of advice from people that for whom the wave function collapses? As it does for many of us, like, holy fuck, the world is not full of opportunity and you're kind of a failure. Like I've been there. Yeah, I don't know. It's rough because like, I usually ask for compassion from people that I have it better off. Because like, once you're down there, like the only reason I say I got lucky, but it wasn't even really lucky, or it was lucky, but it was more lucky. It wasn't just lucky that I got into streaming. It was lucky that I was into computers at an early age. It was lucky that I played video games at an early age. It was lucky that all the tech came up at exactly that right point in time. Like I was a pretty smart guy, but it was definitely preparation meets opportunity. And that opportunity was like at the exact precise moment of my life. If anything had gone differently, then I would just be cleaning carpets today. So. So in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. This is like one out of like. There's many, many Stevens that are just still carpet cleaning and they're full of pain and resentment. Yeah. The one piece of advice that I give, and I hate that I have to push back against all these crypto bros and everybody online. For decently intelligent people that are successful, I've never heard anybody give a contradiction to this. Maybe you will. You can tell me if you disagree. I always look at kids in high school and I'm like, just try a little bit harder. Like 30 minutes a night, if you don't study, just do 30 minutes, just do a little bit more. It is, you are laying the foundation for the rest of your life and you can't appreciate it in high school and college. But oh my God, when you get out, everything in your life is so much easier. You have probably more responsibility over the direction of your life. When you're like 13, 14 years old, than you ever will once you're like 25 and older. Because this is like when you're determining the foundations that everything's gonna be able to. Yeah, 100%. First of all, it does seem that the liberating aspect of being young is like anything you learn. So working hard at learning something will pay off in like nonlinear ways, like you said with video games. I feel like, so like people who are like, I hate school. All right, well, fine. But find something where you're challenging yourself, you're growing, you're learning, you're learning a skill, you're learning about a thing. Of course, you could push back and say, well, there's some trajectories that might not be productive. Like if you spend the entirety of your teen years playing, I don't know, League of Legends, game you have love and hate relationship with. No, just a hate and hate relationship. Okay, well, we'll talk about, I think you have a love-hate relationship with hate in general, we'll just talk, and love. Okay. We'll try to de-complexify that one. I think in general, just investing yourself fully with passion really does pay off. But that said, also school, I feel like doesn't get enough credit, like high school in particular. Middle school and high school. Because it's general education. If, I think if you're, especially if you're lucky to have good teachers, but honestly, I haven't mostly. The textbooks themselves were good teachers. It's a one chance in life, you have to really explore a subject. Fuck grades, like getting good grades is at tension, I would say, with actual learning. That is true. But just get a biology textbook, and to explore ideas in biology, and allowing yourself to be inspired by the beauty of it. Yeah, I don't know, I think that really, really, really pays off, and you never get a chance to do that again. And maybe not even textbooks, like reading, straight up reading. I think if you read, this is a one time in life, you get a chance to read. Really read, like read a book a day read. You can really invest, you can really grow by reading. I must, all those guys talk about it. It's very, very rare that you meet a dumb person who reads a lot. I don't know if that's ever happened in my life. Dumb or not successful. And the cool thing is, it seems like the reading, it's like investment. The reading you do early on in high school pays off way more than the reading you do later. So like the really influential reading is during those high school years. Because you're basically learning from others the mistakes they've made, the solutions to problems. You're basically learning the shortcuts to life. Like whatever the hell you wanna do. Music, read from the best people that the music theory, like learn music theory, learn, read biographies about jazz musicians, blues musicians. See their, like see all the mistakes, see what they did, see the shortcuts. If you wanna do podcasts and read about other podcasts, if you wanna do streaming, read about other streamers, physicists and so on. I feel like you figure out all the mistakes and you get to a shortcut through life. Because most people show up to college without having done that. And now you get a chance to shortcut your way past them. Yeah, 100%. But nobody really teaches you that. They're like, go to school. This, from this time to that time. That you're, shut up. This is just what you do. Eat your broccoli. I think I was like, there's two huge problems. One is now that I'm older, because you don't know anything as a kid. You can't really criticize adults as a kid. Because you're a kid. You're ageist, if I may say so. I am, I am super ageist. As I get older, I get even more ageist. There are a lot of people where I argue, I was like, man dude, you're really 22, aren't you? I can tell every word you say. There's seeps of like 22 year oldness. But that's okay, I love that for you. Yeah. No, I could just say, because you mentioned this. Your wife is a fellow streamer, Melina. You mentioned that this is a source of fights for the two of you that, and I could just feel that. There is truth to what you're saying, which is like, all right, you're saying that because you're 22. Just wait until you're 25, and you won't be saying that anymore. Now, that is the most annoying thing for people to hear. Yeah, you can't ever say that, of course. Because it's actually usually true. Because we do go through phases in life. And you can understand that most things are phases. So just in general, you can say, just wait. Just wait. You won't see this, you won't feel this way. Again, I could say that to you. You could say that to yourself. Just wait. Whatever you're feeling like, just wait. In five, 10 years, you'll be a different person, and you will laugh at the things you take seriously now, that they're causing you pain now, all that kind of stuff. But people hate hearing that. Anyway, go back. Absolutely. I think the joke that I always say is like, if I could literally step into a time machine, and I could come back out and see myself as a 17 year old, and I could say, hey, I am literally you from the future. You see the time machine, and I would look at me, and I would see the time machine, and I would give myself the best advice in the world to be the most successful person. I would ignore all of it. Even knowing it came from myself, I'd be like, this guy sold out. This dude doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. Like, nah, I'll figure it out better. Like, he must have made some, that's what I would think is a 17. Even if I knew it was myself from the future, I would just 100% never believe it. And knowing that is very frustrating. But I keep that in mind when I deal with younger people. That's why I never, I always stay on stream when I'm talking to, like, there's been stuff with like, Sneak-O is another girl on my stream called Lab. When I see the mistakes they're making, oftentimes, because I've made all of these mistakes, sometimes in the most public and horrible fashion ever, but I'm never like a mentor. I'm not gonna sit there and like tell you like, oh, do this or that or that or that. Cause like, I don't know if you're gonna listen to me, and I don't wanna condescend to you. And you know, you figure stuff out, and I'll be here if you wanna talk about it. But yeah, there was a, one of those stories, there was a company that didn't work with me because I was very adamant on defending, like, very radical notions about language and racial slurs and everything. When I was like 22 or whatever. And there was a company and they said, well, we don't wanna work with this guy for an event. And after they'd said that, I had written an article on my website called, the company was Gigabyte, they make motherboards. I said, fuck Gigabyte in the ass. That was the title to my article. And it was like, well, if they don't wanna work with me, I'm gonna blow them up and never do anything ever with them again. And it was just like, like looking back at it now, obviously as an older person, like, hey, you need to pump the brakes and chill. You're destroying yourself. But yeah, as a young person, it's like, yeah, you're 22. Of course you think that you can say whatever and do whatever. And as long as you're good at what you're doing, you've got the whole world behind you. And yeah, geez. Well, let's go there. You have a history of using offensive language, like the R word, the N word, including the N word with a hard R, calling women bitches, talking about rape in a nonchalant way. What part of that do you regret and what part of that do you not? Language is very complicated. When it comes to stuff relating to slurs, there's been like a whole trajectory of feelings on everything related to language. So my- For you personally and for the internet as a whole. Yeah, I don't care about the internet. For me personally. In my early 20s, I'll say like 22, 23, I think probably when I first started streaming, my feeling is that any word is just a word. And if it hurts you, that's your fault. Take responsibility for yourself. This probably came from my background of being like a really independent person. So that's just kind of like the mind that I had for everything. And there were basically, there were like a collection of experiences that I had that as I grew, I started to realize like, okay, well, I feel differently about some of these words, depending on the context. And I can see how they can affect other people, depending on the context. So as I've kind of like grown, I think I've developed a more sophisticated understanding of how different words are used and how they affect people, whether they like it or not. And more importantly, whether I like it or not. And that words can, even if I don't want it to be, they can be a vehicle for emboldening certain types of ideas that I don't wanna embolden. And yeah, that's kind of been the whole like growth. I've been lucky that in the time that I came up on the internet, I was able to learn these lessons because if I was trying to learn those same lessons today, I would have been completely destroyed because I had insane views on language like 10 years ago. We could talk about the past, we could talk about the present. Let's talk about the past first. So how do you deal with the fact that there's videos of you in the past saying the N word, including the N word with a hard R? So generally- And what's the context? Can you give me like, can you remember what would be the context usually? When I lay out this defense, it's not because I wouldn't have used the N word. Generally, whenever I said the N word, it was usually in an example of like, this is something that like a racist person would say. I don't think I've ever on the internet, I don't think I've ever called anybody like the N word with a hard R. Not because I wouldn't have, but just because it wasn't in my vocabulary. I played RTS, real time strategy, and we use the F slur for gay people. That's the one, and I use that one a ton. I've called people that a ton in the past. So I should actually just as a small tangent. Yeah, go for it. And this is what I'd like to explore with you. There's a ruthlessness to the language in the gaming world. And there's different communities, they have different flavors of language. Of hate speech, yeah. Of hate speech, essentially. And there's also a humor to it, which really bothers me in a dark way that I haven't been able to really think through. Because humor seems to be a kind of catalyst for hate. It seems to normalize hate. Like you say, basically it's like Louis C.K. says a lot of edgy things. But you take something Louis C.K. says and do it in a non-funny way and do it over and over and over and keep increasing the hatefulness of it, the vitriol. And somehow you find yourself like Alice in Wonderland in a world full of hate where there is no good and evil. It's all the same. In fact, the good is to be mocked and the evil is to be celebrated for the humor of it. Basically not taking the ideas of evil seriously. And I don't know what it, it reveals something about human nature that you can let go. The moral relativism that can happen when you do that kind of stuff. At the same time, I'm a fan of dark humor when done well. Anyway, for people who are not familiar, I just wanted to mention that some of the worst hate speech that ends in LOL happens in gaming communities. Yeah, the- And that's where you come from in certain part. So a lot of people don't remember this or don't know this because they're younger, but way back in the day in the late 90s, early, mid 2000s of the internet, the way that online kind of like shit talk worked was you were just trying to ramp up to the most insanely edgy, crazy stuff you could say to like provoke a reaction. Have you ever heard of something called the aristocrats? That it's like a joke, the joke? Oh yeah, the joke, yeah, there's a movie on it, yeah. Okay, basically every single like shit talk back and forth on the internet was like that. Like what is the most increasingly depraved, and back then you didn't get banned for slurs or anything on any of these chat rooms. So it was just like insane world to walk into. And I was fully 100% a part of, a product of, and a contributor to that world. So that probably still goes on on the internet in some way and that probably still goes on the internet in a maybe more pacified way. Only in darker parts of the internet. I'd say for the most part, most, well, compared to back then, compared to 20 years ago, the internet is way cleaned up now. There are still gonna be boards you can go on or parts of the internet where you see that type of humor, but no one near as mainstream. Like back then you could open your mic on Xbox Live and hear some insane stuff when that first started. Nowhere near what you'd hear today, although yeah. There's still elements of escalation that happen. That just seems to be part of human nature on the internet. Because we don't get the feedback of actually hurting people directly. So the trolling, like for the lulz, you'll do like, you will still escalate. Within the bounds, you're just saying that there's more bounds now. On Reddit, there's more bounds and so on. So there's moderators that kinda yell at you, that ban you and so on if you cross those bounds. But overall, that basic human instinct to escalate, especially under the veil of anonymity is still there. I don't know, it's dark, it's dark. Yeah, there's a lot of different ways to look at it. And there's different ways you can break that art. Like for instance, you mentioned dark humor. And you say that sometimes dark humor is funny and sometimes it's not. I think that it's really important to dig into and figure out why certain things are funny. Can I give you an example? Yeah, go. It's from your subreddit. Oh boy. No, that made me laugh and I felt wrong about it. Oh no. So this is a... I already know what this is, yeah. Yeah. So this is a trolley problem. To me, it connects because I think about the... It keeps, because I worked on autonomous vehicles, the trolley problem, the philosophical thought experiment keeps brought up a lot. When AI is part of making the decision, do I kill three people here or five people here? And AI makes that decision, how do you do that calculus? And this particular, there's a deep satire that reveals some kind of flaw in society. I feel like that's why... That's what dark humor does? Successful dark humor does. And I don't know if this... It's a flaw. I feel like there's a certain brand of dark humor. And I think the reason, I think the reason is why it's good or why it is good humor. I think it's because it, it necessarily reveals a flaw. Sometimes I feel like it reveals a virtue, I think. If you look at this particular thing... Can I explain what we're... Yeah, go for it. Oh yeah, sure. We're just listening. The title of the Reddit post is, you know what to pick. And it says, five people are going to die either way, but if you flip the lever, the trolley will do a sick fucking loop first. And also the top comment is a question saying, which I think is also part of the dark humor that's successful. Can I get the gender and ethnic backgrounds of the groups first? And the top answer is both groups are each comprised of five white orphaned cis male heavy meth users who are consistently in and out of drug rehab, all who identify as right-wing extremists. Humor is such a sophisticated thing that we engage in. Humor is like really complicated. But I would argue that like, hopefully the humor here shows the virtue of like, this is obviously horrible, but that's kind of why it's funny. It's funny because it's such a horrible question to ask. Like, do we kill five people in a boring way or in a really entertaining way? And it's like, that's really, that's really... And then when you ask even more like, what are the ethnic backgrounds? Like, that's even worse to say that, you know? So I feel like that's like the type of, there's a way that you can engage with dark humor where it's like, oof, like, it's funny because it's so wrong and so taboo. And we all know that it's wrong and taboo and that's kind of where the shared laugh comes from. So for me, the question that, asking the diversity question is a sophisticated way of revealing the absurdity of asking about diversity when it's talking about human life. Oh, interesting. Cause the way that I took that was, I think it reveals the absurdity of how people will weigh different ethnic backgrounds so differently when it comes to value of human life. Like, I'm actually thinking of that in terms of like, an immigration related question where people are really keen and quick to dehumanize like black or brown people. So like the question is like, well, if five of them are brown and five are white, well, I know which one I'm gonna pull the lever for. That's how I read that. But it's satirizing that aspect. Yeah, exactly. Yes, of course. Yeah. But that's what I mean, that that's the flaw. To me, at least, it showed that humanity or social networks that are easy to be outraged and love the outrage and the chaos, that Twitter and social networks will pull that lever. Mm-hmm. Like they would always try to maximize the fun. And there's like a, there's a sick aspect to all the atrocities, all the tragedies that happen in the world that we kind of always lean towards the outrageous narrative weaved around it. The, yeah, the one that leads to sort of the most clicks, to the most attention, to the most outrage, to all that, all that kind of stuff. So that's almost like a satire of society when they are faced with tragedy, they will maximize. I'm trying to think of a word that's not fun, but- Entertainment. Maximize the entertainment, yeah. This is a big criticism I give, especially to conservative crowds. You know, left-leaning people, everybody doesn't. I don't like when people blame the media for the state of the media today. I very much believe that everything in society is a feedback loop and that if you're really unhappy with the state of the media, I think that the media is a good reflection for what people want to see. Because there is a room right now in the United States where somebody could start a company where all they do is completely factual reporting. They don't have a political slant and they're not giving you these like sensationalist narratives or stories. And that media company would fail in two weeks because people don't want to see that. Generally, people really want to see the, like, show me the guy that really believes in what I say, that calls the other guy an idiot, the guy that are screaming on TV or on the radio, like, this is what I really want. And people will engage in that and that feedback loop will continue for generations. And then all of a sudden people are like, why is the media so biased? Why is the media driving so many narratives? And I was like, well, what do you mean? This is exactly what you want to see. And that's frustrating for me. That's one of my big kind of when I defend establishments or when I talk about like the interplay between citizen and all these institutions we have, that the institutions are very much a reflection of the population, at least in democratic societies. And I think that people very much try to elude the personal responsibility or the country's responsibility to why some of them look the way that they do. But that takes us back to the N word with a hard R. Sure. Why? For the particular examples that I was giving, for the particular conversations that I was having, if you're gonna have challenging conversations around certain words, I think you should probably be able to say them, otherwise it feels really ridiculous to me. That's like my- Do you still believe that? For, yes. And not like calling people those words, but in having conversations about those words, I would say that I still believe that, yeah. But don't you think, as you said, that using those words, actually gives motivation and strength to people who have hate in their hearts? I think depending on the context of what's going on, I think that that's gonna be a big driver in terms of how people are going to perceive or take it. So in a conversation about the N word, I don't think I would normally say the N word, we would just talk about the word, much the same way that like in a movie, like in Django, people use the N word. Should that be censored in that movie, or in the context of that movie, should that be censored in the movie, or in the context of that movie, is it being employed in a way where these aren't good people, you're not supposed to like them, and that's what the audience walks away with. Yeah, but that context is different than conversation. It feels like in conversation, you using that word normalizes it. And that normalizing that word is going to make it easier for people who use that word in a hateful way to use it. Same with the F word, the F slur. If you use that casually and normalize it in a way that's not hateful, you use it in a way that's not hateful, but the side effect is that it normalizes it, then people who do use it in a hateful way will be more likely to use it. Therefore, mathematically looking at the equation of the number of times the N word or the F word is used throughout the world, it increases the number of times it's used in a hateful way. Yeah, I think that human beings- And you're part of that problem, Stephen. I don't agree. I understand the thought process, but I don't know if using certain words within different contexts is going to necessarily normalize the hateful use of that word. That is an argument that I've heard people use. Somebody will say, okay, well, hold on. That should never be used ever, because by virtue of you normalizing it, even in an inoffensive environment, you increase the proclivity for people to use it in a potentially more offensive environment. And my argument is always like, no, I don't think that crossover exists. But if you did want to take that argument, and maybe you do feel this way, I think that you get really problematic when you run into communities that do use certain words that people would say, well, they should be allowed to do it. So for instance, if you think that any utterance of the N word at all is highly problematic and might increase hatred, then the entire rap industry has to dramatically change the way that they engage with the N word. And obviously a lot of people that criticize people's use of the N word aren't going to turn to rappers and say, well, you guys can't say it either. No, it's who uses the N word. That's what, it's not, so it's not just the word. It's the, it is context dependent. But I would say that you as a white person having conversations, the context there is the kind that would lead to an increase in hate. Do you think the N word should be censored in the dictionary? No, and I believe there's a Wikipedia page on it and it's not censored. Yeah, I think it should be in the dictionary. I think the context of casual conversation, like I said, I just believe that on the internet, having humor, having fun conversations as you have on your streams, that leads to the normalization of the word without any educational value. Yeah, I would agree with that. I think I would agree with that. No, sorry, so there's a difference between F slur and N word and both I think should not be used in a fun way. But the F word was used in a fun way for the longest time. For sure. And I'll tell you something that bothers me about your streams, not your streams and basically every other stream is the casual use of the R word. Oh, the ableism, yeah. I don't know if it's about the able, I don't even know, listen, it's complicated. I'm not like virtue signaling here. No, ableism isn't virtue signaling. I mean, it's a legitimate, yeah. Like I get emails from fans that say like, hey, like I deal with this particular issue. Every time you use this word, it kind of feels like you're attacking me. So it's a valid concept, yeah. It's just something cuts wrong for me. Like for example, I'm not bothered by, I am bothered by the excessive use of the word fuck, but not in the same way that moderate use of the word fuck. What is it I'm curious in, when somebody calls somebody an R word, what is the feeling that you get that makes you feel bad about it? It signals to me that you don't give a damn about people who are struggling in ways that you are not struggling. Like that signals to me, like about the experience of others. Do you think that there are other words also that could convey like a similar feeling to you or what? Cause it feels like you've drawn a pretty special circle around. Cause like I imagine, I go, oh, this guy's, you're an uneducated dumb fuck, or you're a nitwicker. Like those words, I don't feel it. That circle keeps changing. Which it can, which is fine. I think that's the whole point with the culture. So I'm trying to feel my feelings is a kind of, I'm a human being that exists in a social context that we're all evolving that language together and just feels wrong. Like the word bitch, for example, it really, like I've heard on your streams and in general, calling a woman a stupid bitch really bothers me. But it's not just the word bitch, it's context. Like for example, me personally, I'm speaking to me personally, like badass bitch is different than stupid bitch. Sure, like a bad bitch or something is different. Yeah, of course. Way different. I think it speaks to a bigger sense of civility and respect for human beings that are not like you. That's what, that's the feeling that I'm bothering. And so I guess what I'm trying to say here is just because people speak in this kind of way in the gaming world and streams doesn't mean that you, like a lot of people look up to you. It doesn't mean young people, especially. Doesn't mean that you don't have the responsibility to sort of stand alone from the crowd because you're somebody that values the power of effective discourse. And to be effective discourse, there's some level of civility. So you can be the sort of the beacon of civility in that world versus giving into the derogatory words. Because like you have to lift people out of that world. Out of the muck of what I would say is like drama in effective discourse. It's like, I think that's one of your missions, right? Is like to inspire the world through conversation, through debate, through effective discourse. So I guess I'm just calling you out that I think using our word for me personally, as a fan that believes in your mission, it just makes you look ineffective and bad and uninspiring to young people that look up to you. Because those young people are going to use those words that you're using and they'll do it much less effectively. That's the problem. Yeah, I guess the challenge is always just like finding the line. Like my vocabulary shifted dramatically from, even from like two or three years ago, I think my vocabulary shifted quite a bit as we've like, we've kind of gotten rid of some words and some things are kind of coming out. The R word is one that has kind of gone out and come back and gone out and come back. That one we've definitely gone back and forth on. I know there are different thoughts about it in different communities on the internet. This is interesting. I mean, I'm just telling you, for me, it cuts, and I'm not a social justice warrior type. It cuts pretty hard. Like what you're saying is I'm going to lose a subscriber if I'm. No, it's not a subscriber. I actually have to empathize harder because I'm like, maybe this is not a very good person. That's what I feel. Like if you're so carelessly using that word, then maybe you're not actually thinking deeply about the suffering in the world. Like to be a student of human nature, you really have to think about other humans and other experiences that are unlike your own. Yeah, of course. And so that's the sense I get. But at the same time, you're also like the grandpa in the ages who's trying to be cool with the young kids. So a lot of the reason young kids look up to you is like you also know the language of the internet. Yeah, but I mean, that's not an excuse to use words that we think shouldn't be used. I guess the question that I would have, because it's always a struggle, and to some extent it's kind of happened, is let's say that like three years ago, I would have said I'm no longer saying the R word. That's just, I'm just going to get rid of that in my vocabulary. Like is there a chance that today we would be having a conversation about like, why do you call people dumb fucks? Like is that really appropriate? Like does this attack at the core of like somebody's like level of intelligence, education, opportunities in life? Like is that a worthy, you don't think so? I think that's a, as the kids say, cope. You really think so? I think that's a cope. Because the words have definitely moved in a way where it's like this was okay, now it's not. This is okay, now it's not. So you're standing your ground by using, listen, you could, you could, you could. But I think it's better to use those words if you want to defend the ground words stand on, to use them rarely and deliberately versus how you currently use them, which is to express an emotion. Like you, I'm going to be honest, you use R word not when you're at your best. True. And so that's not. That's generally, that can be true for a lot of swearing too, that. But yeah, I know. No, but like, you know that R word is offensive. You know, and there's part of it is like, the, you tell yourself that like, you're still kind of fighting political correctness by using it a little bit when you say it. No, I don't think so. I think I'm trying to think in terms of like, where is the virtue where, like there's a whole bunch of arguments for why some words are okay, some words aren't okay or whatever. And I try to like think more along those lines rather than, but like there's going to be like a lot of phrases where like if the R word has come out, the conversation is over. Like I know that like things, my brain is shut down, the person I'm talking to is, but there's like, there's a lot of words also in terms of like, it like, if you ever hear me say like fucking moron in a debate, it's like it's done. Like this conversation is over. There's no way that anything productive is happening past that point. I think fucking moron is not, I think it's ineffective. It's not civil, but it's not, it doesn't bother me in a way. It's basically when you speak in a way that I know there's a group that's going to be hurt by that. Not only do I think about the hurt that group experiences, I think of you as a lesser intellectual. Like as a lesser person who's thinking about the world. What bothers me the most is just what kind of mindset that inspires in young people. So especially when you're in a public figure and a lot of people look up to you. So I definitely don't think sort of this idea that R word is not the battleground of expanding the Orton window of discourse. Okay, like I don't think it'll lead to dumb fuck being canceled two years later. Unless that word is hurting people's experience, which I don't foresee that happening. I think legitimately R word and F slur and calling women bitches, context matters here too. Like of course, but just the way I've heard you use it, it is not, it's from emotion and it's from frustration and it ultimately is rooted in disrespect. I think it's ineffective. And of course, like who gets to say, I don't know. But I'm saying somebody who would, like I admire effective conversations and I admire great humor, dark humor, wit. To me, oftentimes the use of the R word in the way you've used it in the way see the community use it is none of those things. It contributes not at all to the humor and so on. Now I could see it might contribute to the camaraderie of that particular group, especially when they normalize the use of that word. You kind of take some of the edge off, but you forget that there's a large number of other people that don't have the chemistry, that don't hear the music of the friendship that you have, the relationship you have. Instead they hear the normalization of a hateful word and it ultimately has an impact that's hateful. And then people like me who show up, I haven't watched much of your stuff. It turns me off from like a couple of times your content came before me and I listened to it a little bit, it turned me off completely. I didn't understand how good your heart is. I didn't understand how your mission of actually de-radicalize people, help people. And increase the level of good faith discourse in the world. I didn't understand any of that. Because what I was hearing is pretty rough, like the R word type of stuff. And I just feel like the benefit cost analysis is heavy on the cost. Gotcha. So I just have to sort of call this out. And I straight up think it's wrong, but that's my own. Why do you think it's wrong? Because it's hurting people without any benefit to you whatsoever. When you say hurting people, do you mean the person I'm using it at? Or do you think there's like the- No, no, no, no. The affected third group. The third group. It's good feedback, right? I always consider everything. Especially, I respect you a lot. You're a really smart guy. Something that I always kind of like fight over in terms of like language or like who to attack or what to attack or what to do, is that it's very hard to draw like what boxes are okay to insult people on versus what aren't. So for instance, if I call somebody like a Nazi with a lot of vitriol, I am okay with every single Nazi being negatively affected by that. Because that category intrinsically calls upon at some level of moral condemnation for me, right? Whereas like if I'm out there, I try not to do like image related jokes, right? I don't wanna call you like, oh, you're a fat fucking loser. Because there's a lot of people that are fat, that are overweight, where I don't want them to feel bad. I don't want them, I'm not trying to call you out or like insult you. So there's like a lot of, you say cost benefit. I like a lot of collateral damage from a word like that where there's no purpose in doing that. So certain words are easy to get rid of. They're off the table, right? Epsler, N word, like these are not words you call people because there's so much collateral, it's not worth it. We've got some words where it's like, if you have some form of like mental thing, it is a bad thing, you're not a bad person. But just using that word could feel like a collateral damage to those people. And then there's other categories of words. So like, if I say that like, this person is like, it's a stupid fucking Republican, right? There's probably some Republicans that aren't dumb that I don't wanna feel called out by that. Like, are those types of phrases that you think should be completely removed as well? Or I'm kind of curious now. This completely removed, just so we're clear. I'm not referring to censorship. Oh no, I'm not even talking about, I'm just a person like emotionally like. Removed is the wrong word though. Like I care about, like, I'm not trying to listen to people on the internet saying like, you shouldn't say that word, that's not good. I mean, I'm trying to look to your mind and heart. The reason we're talking today is you're betraying your gift. You're better than this. You think it's indicative of like a more flippant thought process where it's like, the only way you can say that word is if you're ignoring the hurt and suffering of those people. And if you're somebody that says. Not even those people, you're ignoring the state of language. Because I think you're getting to the point because it's not about a single word. It's about like, it's music. And I just feel like there is off notes. Very strong note. It's a strong note that ruins the melody. Gotcha. And I don't think I can say, you know, you shouldn't use the R word or whatever. I'm just speaking to, I'm just listening to music and reviewing the final result. It's not necessarily, because maybe one use of the word, the R word strategically or part of an actual like, or when you've built up a camaraderie that's sandwiched in like some love, but then you try to reveal their, like as you're talking about a lot of, there's a bunch of drama. You have friends with whom you're warring and stuff. And they're all a little bit beautifully insane. And you've said that you are becoming more and more insane. It's beautiful to watch. It's the human condition laid before us. Wonderful. And some of that is swearing and so on. So it's a tricky thing. But the whole skill of discourse, just like it is with dark humor is walking that line. I just feel like it's overuse of the R word. And I don't want to die in that grog because I don't think it's that represented. Like there's certain things like that. It feels like it ruins the music. And I don't, you know, it's the same like a dumb Republican or dumb Democrat. I don't, yeah, that ruins it too a little bit. Depends on how you use it. You can be lazy with that. You know, like even overuse of the word, I think bots is what's used for people who don't think or something. I don't actually know the definition. I'm offended on behalf of robots. That might be a compliment soon. Exactly. But I guess bot means you don't think. Yeah, you're like an NPC. You just copy and paste the balance. Again, I'm offended on behalf of NPCs. I count myself as one. There's a sense if you say bots too much that you're just dismissing people. Like everything I say is right. And anyone that disagrees with me is a bot. That's lazy too. Sometimes it's funny. Sometimes it's effective. Basically saying a lot of people in the mainstream media or something like that are bots. Okay, that's a little bit of that is effective. But too much, it becomes ineffective. And I'm trying to speak to that. Yeah. And I'm just, the reason we're highlighting clear examples like the N word. Joe Rogan had to contend with that. Oh yeah, you know. I think it's ineffective. It makes you less effective at discourse. But like you've talked about many times, language is a tricky one. It's always hard because you talk about constructing a melody. There's not one melody that sounds good to everyone. But there are probably certain notes that if you got rid of them, everybody's still gonna like it about as much and you don't really lose anything. There's a whole other part of an audience that might be more willing to listen, of course. And it's not about losing the magic of that melody. You don't wanna be vanilla. I just feel like there's stuff that doesn't need to be there. Yeah, for sure. It's fat. But then again, the other thing that people should understand that might be listening to this, you're streaming many hours a day for many years. I don't know, it's 11 or 12, I think, yeah. Started in 2010. And so one of the things that people can do is just clip out anything. You're going through the full human experience of emotion. Anger, fear, frustration, all of it. So of course there's going to be moments when you're not the best version of yourself. Anything else to say about the language? It's complicated. I'm still always trying to figure it out. There are opinions that I have that have changed throughout the years. It's possible that the R word has always been the next one on the chopping block that we're all kinda looking at, but people are always worried about that treadmill. But it's possible in a year or two I'll have a different view on it or I'll have changed away some of the words I use. Yeah, it's definitely like a, it's always like a work in progress. There's always like different communities that feel different ways about different words, yeah. Yeah, but do you acknowledge that there's people out there that are never gonna talk to you? They're never gonna think of you as a good man because you used the N word with the hard R publicly. In the past? I mean, yeah, those people exist, but I mean, there are some people that are beyond my reach, which I'm okay with. Like there's gonna be some people because of things that have been involved, or even ideas that I have now that might make them beyond my reach. Something you said earlier is very true. I think the goal is to like identify what are the elements that you can cut out that aren't integral to your message, but could be alienating to more people. And those are probably the things that you identify. But I think that you can get lost in yourself or lost in the internet or lost in a, you know, at the outside of yourself, if you're trying to appeal to every single person, it's just never gonna be the case. And for, I actually, I like that I've had the journey that I've had on the internet that you can find me saying and defending a lot of insane stuff 10 years ago, because I think it shows like a level of progress. And I think I do get a lot of respect and buy into certain communities where it's like, I'm not just some random dude telling you that like, oh, you shouldn't say, you know, the F word or the N word. Like I'm a guy that's been there, that's done it, that's defended it. And you can see my whole past, my whole history is laid bare for you to watch every, you know, thousands of hours of it. But I can show that like there's growth and evolution and change that can happen in a person. Yeah, and you're honest about that growth. It's tricky thing because people just call, bring up stuff from your past. For sure. I hope we figure out as a civilization, a mechanism to clearly say this was me two years ago, this was me five years ago, I'm a different person. And like, because Twitter doesn't care about that. These social mechanisms that bring stuff up doesn't care about that. It's like one stupid thing you say, it becomes like a Scarlet Letter. And I don't know how to fight that. It's tricky to fight that. Have you ever seen Men in Black? Yes. When K and J are on the bench and he says, a person is smart, but people are stupid, dumb, finicky animals or whatever. There's something that changes for human dynamics when there is a group of people that make it so hard to control. Like I think one-on-one, anybody can sit across on somebody and admit to some horrible stuff. I used to be, you know, I abused my husband when I was, you know, 20 and now I'm 35 and I see what's wrong or I did this, I was addicted to whatever. And you know, I made these mistakes. One-on-one, it's always easy. But in group environments that in-group, out-group, tribalistic thing of like identifying one thing and then coming to destroy a person's life is like, it's such a huge like impulse we have. And I think probably when we were like hunter-gatherers in the forest, it's probably good because you really wanna push weird people out or anything like that. But now on the internet, when we can hunt for any dissenting opinion and just with ruthless precision, destroy somebody's life over it, it's a pretty scary dynamic. I think one of the mechanisms that could fix it is make it super easy for each individual person to analyze all the stupid shit they themselves have said in the past. Like a full recording. Because I think people are just honestly paint a very rosy picture to their own brain of who they have been in the past. If we can have empathy for the fact that we've said stupid shit or we're drunk, the ridiculous things you say, the offensive things you might've said, the offensive things you might've done, I just feel like that would give us the ammunition to have empathy for others that are like, okay, yeah, this guy five years ago said this. Maybe that doesn't represent who they are any more than stuff I said five years ago represents who I am today. I feel like technology can actually enable that. Maybe, although you're talking about more recording and more stuff which people are already wary of. It's a double-edged sword. I think there is going to be more and more recording. We have to figure out how to do that in the way that respects people's privacy and gives them ownership of their data and so on. I've looked at the search history I've done on Google, which for most people is available, like your Google search history. And it's fascinating to watch the evolution of a human being. It doesn't seem like the same person. It's like a different person. For sure. It's weird. It's also hard too with the internet today. I'm going to be agist again. But now all of the people are thrown together. Whereas I don't want a 27-year-old judging the language of a 15 or 16-year-old. Obviously, he's in high school. There is that story that came out of the, there was a kid that saved the recording of, I think it was some white girl. I think that she got her driver's license. And she was like, I can drive now, N words, with the A or whatever. It was dumb, she shouldn't have said it. But I think she was 15 or 16 when she TikToked this or whatever. And he held on to that recording until she applied and got accepted to college three years later. And then he released it to get her kicked out of college. And I'm like, damn. Everything that I had ever said as a 15, 16-year-old was immortalized on the internet. My life would have never even begun. And those are insanely high standards to hold people to. Not that, like, obviously you shouldn't be saying those, you shouldn't be saying certain words or whatever, but you have to be able to make mistakes in adolescence. Like everybody does, we all did. Everybody did it growing up, you know? Why do you think there is so much misogyny in the streaming community? And how can you fight it? Because you've shown a lot of interest in fighting it, trying to decrease or eliminate misogyny from your community. I think it's really difficult. I think that eliminating racism is easier than eliminating misogyny. On the internet, you mean? On anywhere. Because I think fundamentally, I don't think there's that much difference between white people and black people and brown people and Asian people or whatever. We have different cultures and stuff, but at the end of the day, we're all people. But I think there are differences between men and women throughout all of history and time, and then even today in every culture. And when real differences do exist, it's harder to account for them in a way that can we have conversations with each other without it becoming very gendered in a negative way, right? Negative way of gendering something, be it like a misogynistic way of doing it. Of course, it's unclear to me that it's so difficult to avoid the negative gendering versus the positive, because there's a lot of positive to the tension, the dance between the different genders and so on. Maybe in this particular moment in history, it's not. But it's not trivial to me that racism is easier to eliminate. It's an interesting hypothesis just because there's more biological difference between men and women. That means it's harder to eliminate. I don't know if this is true. I hear this a lot. I feel like I read this somewhere, but I need to get a better source for I repeated it everywhere. But I've heard that like in the US military, for instance, they've gotten exceedingly well, they do an exceedingly good job at getting different people of different races to integrate. And it's like not a huge problem once you're through basic training, all the training, everything. But for different sexes, it still represents a significant problem that the military hasn't figured out. And I actually looked at like, well, what's the military doing? Because if something was solvable, like can we sleep for four hours a night and be healthy? If we could, I bet the military would know. So I kind of look sometimes to them to see their integration, but it might be that there are other issues there that make it kind of worse. Yeah, it feels like the military is a very particular kind of thing. For sure, yeah, it could be. The actual task at hand might bias the difficulty of the process. Potentially, yeah. There's been a lot of interesting talk about like women integrating into male groups and how do you do this in a way where everybody is happy with the outcome and there's not like issues. I think Jordan Peterson spoke about this a little bit. And then workplace culture speaks about this a bit. Would you happen to remember, I wanna say it was like five or 10 years ago, there was a big tech conference and there were two guys behind a woman and they made a joke about like a USB dongle, like dongle was a dick. And this woman turned around, she tweeted pictures of them, spoke about like misogyny of that. And then that blew up into a huge ordeal that like, yeah, there was this interesting phenomenon that in a less misogynistic and more inclusive workplace environment, some women might end up feeling worse because in a more misogynistic environment, you're thinking like, okay, that's a woman, she doesn't get our humor, I'm gonna treat her in a very indifferent, very dispassionate, cold way and whatever. And then I'm gonna have my boys over here. And then you've got like these environments where they're a little bit more warmer and it's like, oh cool, we're gonna bring this woman into our environment and we're gonna make all the same types of like crass jokes we did before. And it's actually worse now. Another woman feels even more otherized because like, oh my God, why do you talk like this? I think that internet communities, especially online ones that do like political debate and video games are very much like big boys clubs. So it's not enough to just say, you can't be misogynistic to get rid of misogyny. There's always gonna be an othering effect on women. There's a lot of like behaviors that are unintuitive that you have to account for and you've gotta try to like push that back. And that's just a very, very, very challenging thing to do. So I like to deal with concrete examples more. So here's a concrete example. And this is like a recent initiative in my community because I'm trying to like be, because misogyny hasn't been fixed anywhere on the internet and I'm curious, well, there are ways that I can push my community to do this. I don't think you should almost ever make a comment on a woman's appearance ever, if they're appearing in like some political or professional manner. Even if it's a positive comment, I think it's equally bad to a negative comment. It's just never good to do. And that's kind of an unintuitive thing because it's like, well, a woman appears, wow, she's really cute. It seems like a nice comment. You're being nice, you know, she looks good at it, but it's like, it's not at all the point of why she's there. And just by saying that, you're kind of like otherizing her as like a person to like think she looks good rather than listening to anything she has to say, you know? Well, there's a lot of stuff that you're saying and that is a part of misogyny. It's almost like obvious. Like any woman will tell you that. Woman will, yeah, but they're not in these spaces and a lot of the guys don't know. But I think what that requires is just empathy. You don't need, you need to consider the female experience. That's it. Like you have to either read about or talk with women. You learn, like the low hanging fruit is very easy to learn. It feels like just the level of social skill oftentimes in internet communities is quite low. I disagree. I don't like to say, here's the problem with empathy is it's very hard to have empathy for experiences that are so outside of your own. Well, maybe some people, there might be some people that can do it, I can't. There's a lot of stuff that I had to learn. Women are half the population. But they're women. They're totally different. They're totally different. So here we have- We'll talk about, we'll write it down. They're not totally different. So here's an example, okay? So especially for me, my archetype makes up a lot of the internet, white man. There's never been a point- The name of a beautiful woman. Who might be a dancer. What's the backstory? From New Orleans or from? I haven't thought that through yet. It's ambiguous, okay? Like an open world. Open world, I want you to project whatever, wherever you want destiny of the dancer to be from. That's in your mind, okay? All right, I'll save that for later tonight. Yeah, okay. As a white guy, I don't know if there's ever been a spot that I've been in where I've been made to feel like I don't belong there just by virtue of who I am. I actually don't, it's impossible for me to empathize that because I don't even have that experience. If you go back eight, nine years, one of the big issues that came up was harassment and gaming against women. And I was one of the big debaters against that saying that like, sure, women might get harassment, but everybody gets harassment. If you're a woman and you're in gaming and you get harassed, congratulations, you're being treated like a man. What you're actually asking for is for us to actually treat you differently. You don't want to be insulted. You don't want to be treated like a man. And that's actually misogyny is women making that argument. You still stand by that? Is that a problem if I do? No, I'm just kidding. Okay, hold on. So a little while after- I disagree with it. Sure, okay, that's good, you should. A little while later, I had a friend, Jessica, super cool girl. We go to play games. She was between jobs and she's like, I've got like two months and we're gonna grind CSGO. And I'm like, okay, this is awesome, let's do it. CSGO, Counter-Strike, Global Offensive, shooter game, FPS, microphones. First day we start playing, okay? Hop into our first game. Obviously she talks, everybody's making, is that a 12 year old boy? Why aren't you making sandwiches? Blah, blah, blah, yeah, okay, whatever. Play our first game, play our second game, same jokes. Third game, fourth game, by like the fourth or fifth game, I was actually starting to feel triggered. Like every time the game started, I was like, can you just like talk so we can get over like the stupid fucking jokes? It's so fucking stupid. And you hear the same fucking joke every single time. And it took one day of that experience for me to realize, it's not about being insulted, it's like this othering feeling that you don't belong. And I've never felt that because I'm a white guy. Like it's just not to be like Virtue Singlers, but like there's just, there's no places where it's like, you're white, you don't belong here, you're a guy, you don't belong here. Like I've never felt that, not inclusion. And playing with her, there's a different feeling when it's the same types of jokes coming from a group of people to make you feel like you don't belong there. Where I was like, damn, this actually feels really bad. And it feels bad in a different way, where it's like, if you call me like an F slur or any other type of swear word or insult, like yeah, you can call me that. But at the end of the day, like we're all kind of the same. We're all white dudes and we call each other names. But like, this is a woman and this is not her place and she doesn't belong here. Kind of the analogy that I would make, because after getting these experiences, I would learn this afterwards. If I tell you that there's another guy in a room and you need to think of the worst insults ever for that person, without ever knowing anything about them or meeting them, if I tell you that it's like a white straight guy and you have to write insults, you're fucked. Maybe you can do like school shooter, but there's not really much you can say at the end of the day. But if I tell you it's a woman, we could, there are so many different jokes you can write. If it's a black person, so many different racist things we can say. For sure, I can come up with a lot of stuff for a white guy. In terms of stuff that is just intrinsic to him being a white guy. Yeah, like there's- Really? Wait a minute, what are you talking about? There's a lot, the internet has sharpened that sword. In terms of like jokes that are targeted at his sex- Incel, virgin, weak. Some of the incel, virgin, maybe, yeah, that's getting there, sure. That's for sure. That's recent though, sorry, I'm older on the internet. We didn't have those words way back then. That wasn't- I'm just saying these analogies, that incel and virgin- Back in my day, we didn't have generalitator. There were no incel's back then. None of us had sex, we just accepted it. We were all computer gamers. Nobody had sex and played video games back then, okay? People don't remember that. There wasn't the big bang theory. You were just a loser that was stuck in a room. You guys didn't even know sex existed. Exactly, yeah. You can use it as an incel. We had to download sexual pictures and it was like two minutes and you didn't even know if you were gonna get the right thing by the time it finished loading. But what I'm saying is like, okay, I think you agree that if somebody gives you a race, like a black person who's a woman, we can write very cutting, scathing insults for that person that are very otherizing. Or words that would really hurt if they're spoken to. Yeah, that are very cutting to the person. But for a white guy, it's kind of hard because that's the default. There's not as much otherizing of those people. Yeah, that's kind of the point. So the insults you have from white guy to white guy, the insults are much harsher. So when you start to apply the same kind of harshness to other groups. You can make them feel like they really don't belong and that otherizing effect is something that's very hard for me. I can't really empathize with it because I never felt it. So I have to intellectualize it and then sympathize with it. It's like a whole process I have to go through. And then I try to walk other people through that. Because if you're a white guy on the internet, which is a lot of the internet, you really don't know what that feels like. You've never felt like that before. So you're now in a leadership position, grandpa destiny. So that's a lot of people look up to you for that. For that sort of pathway to empathy. Yeah. How not to otherize. I mean, you have felt otherizing. You mentioned high school people not being. Yeah, but those are always for things that like, it's different to insult somebody for a non-immutable characteristic. Like, okay, you think poorly about me because I'm like not enough money or I don't have money, but I could get more money and I could change that. But it's different for somebody to really attack you for like your gender or attack you for like your race. A lot of the attacks that hit the hardest is not about gender. It's, I do think that they're like, the way women are attacked on the internet, it's the same kind of attacks you would do towards other guys, but you'd go harsher. I feel like they're fundamentally different. I feel like when we're attacking guys, I'm not usually attacking you on like the virtue of you being a guy, but like if it's a woman and she's typing something like, oh, did your boyfriend type that for you? Or like, what are you even doing here? Like, don't you, shouldn't you be trying to find a husband or like, oh, you're like a stupid kind of like, go start an OnlyFans or whatever. No, but the stupidity, the intelligence aspect is what's attacked. Yeah, but it's so much different. Like you can call a guy stupid, but that's because he's a guy that's being stupid. But when you call a woman stupid, she's stupid because she's a woman. Yeah, but I honestly think that women are called stupid more than men on the internet. But it's nothing to do, like the attack is not gendered. It's the gender inspires an increased level of attack. I feel like it is gendered. I wish we had data on this. Have you ever heard of the XKCD comics? Yes. It's a really good comic where, and this is something that I've dealt with a lot in my community, okay? There's a guy at a board and he fucks up a math equation. And it's like, wow, you suck at math. And then the next panelist, there's a girl that does it and she fucks it up and it's like, wow, women suck at math. And there's like that feeling that happens where when I bring on, I won't use names, but there are like YouTube people that I've brought on that have crazy opinions. And when they're men, that person is crazy. Oh my God, he said the crazy stuff. He's so dumb, he's so crazy, so stupid. But when it's a woman, it's like, oh my God, why do you always bring dumb women here? Why do so many women on the internet have crazy opinions? There's a different like minority character that has to like stand and like represent like their whole group where like white men don't typically have to. Speaking of groups versus individuals, yes. But then what I feel happens is then another person from that group comes, another woman comes and people before she says anything will already feel like they're ready with that attack. For sure. But they're ready for the attack because she's a woman. They're gonna call her, she's stupid because she's a woman, not because she says something to them, but just because she's a woman. So like the group in their brain accumulates all the negative characteristics of the individuals they've met. Not the positive, the negative. And it becomes like this ball of stickiness. And then that becomes the bias for their judgment of a new person that comes. With white men, there's more of a blank slate in terms of bias of how they analyze the person. With any of the minority group, they basically make a judgment based on the negative characteristics of the individuals they've met in the past. That leads to a system where you're just harsher towards minority groups and towards women. How do you solve that? The most important thing for any problem ever is step one is to be aware of it. If you're not aware of it, then you're hopelessly lost at sea. But yeah, the first thing I like to say is just like, be aware of it. I've had, there's a girl that I've had on recently and she says a lot of, in my opinion, kind of crazy things, but people will use her as like, this is why women shouldn't be here. This is like, she's crazy and she's a woman and blah, blah, blah. But I can bring in a guy who says similarly dumb things and he's evaluated on his own merits, cause it's a guy, you know? There's never ever, ever been a case where I brought a stupid guy on stream and everybody's like, this guy makes me hate men. This guy makes me hate white people. That has never happened. But then there's like other women that come on and it's like, now I know why incels exist. Or I totally understand where red pill ideology comes from. And even if the statements are kind of true, when you're making these observations over and over and over and over again, it damages your ability to individually perceive somebody. And then two people that make the same statements, one can be perceived more harshly just because of that like group bias you've got built up. I think there's something about streaming that just brings that out of people. Cause you have to talk for like seven hours. So you're like, all right, well, whatever psychological issues and complexities I have, I'm going to explore them. They're gonna be magnified. Magnified and then it's the, as you talked about, the mimetic theory, so Girardian, like whatever the things that are very similar and you're going to magnify the conflicts that you have and you're going to explore the, all the different perspectives on those different conflicts. And I mean, I don't know if it's just anecdotal, but it's nice to have women on stream. I think the dynamic that you guys have is wonderful. It's really interesting. So it's just the female voice in general. I love having women on the podcast. The female voice I feel like is under heard on the internet. For sure. I would love the internet to be a place where women feel safe to speak. All right, given that you're, like we talked about, a progressive with non-standard progressive views. So you're very pro-free speech, pro-capitalism. So given that, it's very interesting that you're also pro-establishment and pro-institutions. So right now, if you look at the world, there's a significant distrust of institutions, at least in sort of public intellectual discourse. What is the nature of your support for government and institutions? Can you make the case for and against them? Broadly speaking, there is a synergistic effect when two humans come together. If I can speak very broadly in terms of, we'll say utility. Okay, my happiness with one person might be 10. The happiness with another person might be 10. When they come together, it's like 50 between the two of them. There's like the synergistic effect when humans work together that the sum is greater than all the individual parts or whatever. There's like an emergent thing that happens there. There's a capacity, there's a possibility of that. Yeah, a possibility, sure. Things could go really wrong. There could be a cannibalistic tribe that all eats each other, sure. But for the purpose of this- There's all their failure modes, but yes. Okay, sure, yeah. But I think broadly speaking, are you gonna be the well actually guy? Okay, if you wanna well actually. Sometimes cannibalism is actually- Good for both. War and holocaust. True, yeah, sometimes things do go wrong. But I think broadly speaking, the fact that you're sitting here in clothing that you didn't make and I'm sitting here on an airplane that I don't know how to fly or build, like right, there's a lot of cool stuff that happens when people come together and they make civilizations. And part of that civilization building is the fact that we can specialize and it's the fact that we can offload a bunch of trust onto third parties that we delegate the power to make important decisions about our lives, right? I don't know anything about how to like build like a combustion engine, but I know that when I push the button on my car, it's gonna drive around and the fumes aren't gonna kill me and I can park it in garages and the building's not gonna collapse. And the only reason all of this works is because I've offloaded a lot of trust onto these third party things. And I would say that the pillars of these third party things that society has built on are roughly speaking institutions. So that might be the institution of peer review for scientific articles. It might be the institution of voting for government, right? Or the ability for us to vote in that whole process. It might be, yeah, the FDA, like all of these institutions are things that they need to exist because we don't have the time or the capability to individually sort through all of these things individually. We have to rely on some third party to do it. Okay, so you believe at scale, when we're together, we're greater than the sum of our parts. That's the case for institutions. Absolutely. What about the inefficiencies of bureaucracy? Is there some aspect when at scale, different dynamics come into play than they do when there's two people together? Two people that love each other, the birds and the bees. Is there some aspect that leads more to cannibalism at scale? So like corruption, inefficiencies that do to bureaucracy and so on. Bureaucracy, which is not, I hate it when people try to say bureaucracy is government because bureaucracy exists a ton in private environments as well, right? In businesses and everything. Bureaucracy introduces its own set of problems, but I mean, a bureaucracy is necessary because it's coordinating all of the underlying things in order to create something that's greater than the sum of its parts, right? Like all of the software developers in the world are useless without being paired with good designers in order to make their products usable by a person. And the coordination of those people and the coordination of increasingly more and more things necessitates some level of bureaucracy. I think we always say bureaucracy when it's like a bad, it's like a slur almost like you're a bureaucrat, you're bureaucratic. The bureaucracy is slowing everything down. It's like, sure, the bureaucracy slows things down, but bureaucracy also gives us things like safe medicine and safe water to drink for most of the US or safe buildings to live in or safe cars to drive. So the managers in institution versus like the software developers and the designers, the managers is the bureaucracy. The reason bureaucracy is used as a slur is that something about human nature leads to bureaucracy often growing indefinitely. And becoming less and less efficient. Without, I mean, this is where capitalism can come in, that capitalism puts a pressure on the bureaucracy not to grow too much because you want the bureaucracy to be useful, but not large. Yeah, and to be a certain size, yeah, of course. To be the minimum size to get the job done. And so capitalism provides that mechanism. Government does not always. And so that's the criticism of government, of institutions, where it can grow without a significant mechanism that says there's a cost to bureaucracy that's not being accounted for here. We're just paying for the increasing size of government without the benefit. Yeah, government is a special institution because it doesn't have to show itself to be financially viable. And we kind of live in a capitalist economy where that's generally the case. So government gets its powers from votes from the people, which introduces a whole new set of possible positives and possible negatives, right? Having something, for instance, that gives food or shelter to homeless people, maybe you don't want that to have to run at a profit. But giving an organization that can self-justify its budgets perpetually and indefinitely growing, maybe that's not the best thing. Yeah, we always have to figure out how to do the constraints there. What about the corrupting nature of power? That comes with institutions as well. Absolutely. So then you better pick your style of institution very carefully. I think that the democratic institution we have in the United States today, I think works very well. But I mean, there are other styles of government that have been tried in the past that I think lend themselves more to corruption. Not to say that, by the way, there's not corruption in the United States. Of course, there's gonna be varying levels of corruption at like all, at all levels. But you ran into this interesting problem where authoritarian regimes can act with ruthless precision and swiftness because they don't have to ask any questions. They just do, do, do, do, do, and that's it. But the problem is, it's an authoritarian regime. They're prone to missteps. They're slow to respond to changing or evolving needs. There was an interesting study that was put out a while ago that showed that like every single famine that happened around the world, almost like 98% of them happen under authoritarian regimes where like freedom of speech is very limited. It's very rare for a famine to happen under a democracy because press and everything makes the government more responsive to the needs of the people. Power can corrupt. There are levels of corruption, but you have to have like a system of checks and balances on all of those different levels to make sure it doesn't run off the rails, I guess, and do a sick loop-de-loop and half the population gets. Nice callback. There's a lot of people that will listen to you say that the democracy in the United States is working pretty damn well and they will spit out the drink if they're drinking a drink and be very upset. Can you make the case that they're right and you're wrong? Can I make the case that- You're a steel man. They're right, yeah. Well, the steel man for them is that people have a lot of problems on the day to day. And when they look and they see what government is doing, they might see potholes outside their house, homeless people all over their downtown, and the United States just approved another X billion amount of dollars for Ukraine. Or they might be living in a city where half the factories are shut down, a lot of their people are out of work, but the president is on the TV talking about how to find jobs for immigrants coming in from Mexico. And for these people, they have problems that exist in their lives. Some of them are paying taxes to alleviate these problems. And then when they listen to the government talk, it feels like the government is not responding to the needs that they have. And then that's one problem. Then on top of that, you've got all of these people working in alternative media that can show you, well, look at this politician wasting this much money, or look at him double speaking here or there. Look at Hillary Clinton saying she's got a private position and a public position. Look at how all of these politicians have family members that are getting rich because of their relationships with people in Congress. Look at the revolving door between capitalist companies and the government. How can you look at all of that, take into account that the government's not responding to your needs, and then really feel like it's a government by the people and for the people? Yeah, this was a very good steel man and good question. How can you? How can you tell that they're not just politicians that care more about continuously winning the elections versus running government effectively? They should care about winning the elections. That's the first misconception. A lot of people say this guy only cares about getting voted in. This guy, he doesn't even believe in fracking or abortion. He just changed his opinion to get voted in. Anytime somebody says that, you should say, that's really good. You want them to change their opinions so they get voted in. That's the whole point of a democracy. You don't want them to remain obstinate. You don't want them to say, I'm not changing my opinion no matter what the people want. You want them to evolve and adopt new opinions based on what the population, their constituents are voting for. Yeah, but the cynical take is that they're, on the surface, they're changing their opinion, but that there's a boys club or boys means the elite that under, in the smoke-filled rooms in secret, they actually have their own agenda and they're following that agenda and they're just saying anything publicly to placate the public based on whatever the new trends are. So here's- The cynical take of public. Yeah, I understand. Somebody asked me this question and it flipped, I 180'd completely. I was a Bernie Sanders supporter in 2016 and my single issue voting thing was lobbying. I thought that lobbying, the government was corrupt. They weren't responding to these people. It was completely destroyed my faith in government and everything. And I had one question posed to me by a conservative that used to come on my stream and shout at me. And he said, and then he asked me, can you think of any popular opinion that the American public has that the government is unresponsive to? Is there some big piece of legislation or policy or whatever that people want that the government isn't doing? And he asked me that, I couldn't think of a single good answer. And I'm like, oh geez. This is a good answer. There's drugs. There's not. Legalization or drugs, hold on a second. Yeah, go for it. Oh shoot, you're doing the Joe Rogan thing. You're pushing back because I brought up weed. Go ahead. I'm sorry. I have become meme. I don't even, I don't wanna interrupt your quote because there's memes upon memes upon memes I can go with here. But no, because people bring up, okay, there's no issues. There's no issues that the government is not representing of the public. So here's the issue. So somebody will bring up like, well, what about the legalization of drugs? Okay. The first issue people have is one, they look at national polling. Very few things are decided on a national level. So that's the first huge mistake. Arguably a lot of BLM made mistakes in this arena where they're saying like, why isn't the government doing anything about policing? Federal government can't do anything about policing. That's gonna be your, sometimes it's gonna be your state government. Sometimes your local city government. The people that like elect like your chief of police, your police commissioner, that's coming from your mayor, right? So you've got people looking one, at the wrong parts of the government to even figure out the solution to the problem. Two, oftentimes for polling, the questions are vague enough that you can poll very high. But when you get into the weeds on things, no pun intended, you start to realize like, oh shoot, this is more complicated than I thought. I don't know the numbers in particular for legalization of marijuana, but this is what I'm gonna guess is the case. If you poll and you say, should we legalize marijuana? That number might poll at like 65, 70%, but that's including people that are in favor of medical marijuana. If you were to poll like, should we legalize, should we decriminalize recreational use of marijuana? That number might drop to like 52%. And then if you poll like, should we completely legalize, not just decriminalize, but completely legalize recreational use of marijuana? That number might drop to like 40%. There's like all these different ways you can pull around issues where people are like, oh no, we broadly agree on this topic. But when you really figure out, well, do you, do we really agree? Or is it just like broad consensus around a thing that's never gonna show up like in a piece of legislation? A really good example, one example I do know was socialized healthcare. I think if you poll, there was a time a few years ago where if you poll America, do you think every American citizen should have access to like free healthcare? I think that answer, that poll at like 74% yes. But when you asked, should the government be the sole provider of healthcare? It dropped to like 26%, dropped 50 points. And you could see it was both asking questions about single payer, but the way that it was asked was so different that even if you all, it looks like there's consensus, there's not nearly as much consensus as people think around certain ideas. Yeah, go. We already have a little bit. You're right, you're right, you're right, you're right. That polls, the way you ask the polls really matters. But when you ask, should the government be in charge of a thing? That also biases the answer, right? Because there's such a negative experience with government creating a.gov site that runs the thing. But sometimes. Sometimes. I think if you dig in, if you have a one hour conversation with each individual citizen, I think you will understand that, yes, there is support for socialized medicine. Like it's not. The argument has to be made though, yeah. What do you mean the argument has to be made? Like if you just ask a conservative, like what about single payer? They're gonna tell you no. You might be able to build up to an argument for it, but you're gonna have to make the case for it. No, but I thought we're talking about the feeling deep inside your mind and heart. Does the government represent that? Oh. It's not like some shallow surface layer public opinion. Does the government effectively represent what the people want? Not a shallow survey, but deeply what they want. I'm not actually that familiar with the debates over healthcare, but let's maybe look at an easier one. Maybe you'll say it's harder. War. War is a really good example where the government was very responsive, I think, to the people. You think so. So Iraq, Afghanistan, the government didn't manipulate public opinion. There is an argument to be made that they did in terms of like WMD and everything, but after 9-11, were you in the United States after 9-11? After 9-11. That seems accusatory. Like where were you on 9-11? Oh, just checking, okay. All right, cool. I have evidence and witnesses. Oh, sure. No, okay, all right. Well, I'm very defensive right now. That's very strange. Look into it, Alex Jones. I think after 9-11, we could have gone to war with any country in the world. We were ready because all of America was like, oh my God, and they pointed to Iraq. The reasons for the WMDs was kind of dumb, but I don't think we even needed WMDs to go to Iraq. We could have just said, Saddam Hussein was giving medical aid to Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Iraq, let's go, and we would have gone for it. But post-Iraq, Iraq was for a while popular and then became obviously deeply unpopular, Iraq and Afghanistan. And I think you could see that influence other foreign policy that the United States had. For instance, we opted more towards drone warfare than troops on the ground for places like Yemen. We opted more towards sending money and help instead of boots on the ground for places like Syria. And I think that a lot of that was in response to how unpopular the Iraq stuff had became. And when you looked at a lot of elections afterwards, even for Obama, one of the defining characteristics of a lot of campaigns were like, I'm gonna close Guantanamo Bay. I'm gonna get us out of foreign wars. Even up to Trump, I'm not gonna stop doing all this weird stuff in the Middle East. But they didn't still withdraw from Afghanistan. They didn't withdraw, but they definitely tapered off and weren't as aggressively pushing those types of conflicts because they knew it was unpopular. But I think if you also consider perfect information or good information, if you ask a lot of people, are you okay spending this amount of money for this purpose? So military conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan, I think almost from the very beginning, they would say no. After 9-11, I feel like- Maybe like a few days after 9-11. I remember Freedom Prize. We were so mad at- Well, there's some memes and so on, yes. But the nature of the public support for the war, was there public support in 2003, which is when the invasion happened? I feel like initially there was a lot. I remember seeing it on, but then I also lived in a Republican household and I was not very like media savvy at that time. So my parents- And I don't know if the nature of that public support had to do with WMDs or with 9-11. Because the weird- If you came about WMDs. But I wonder what is the, if you were to poll people and let's say hypothetically, there was above 50% support for the war, what would be the nature of that support? And to what degrees the government actually representing the will of the people versus some complex mechanism, like the military industrial complex, is manipulating the narrative that's controlling public opinion. And then there's the media that gets a lot of attention by being divided and how they're shaping the narrative through the mechanism of division. So what- There's a lot of complicated things out there. It's not just like the people and then the government. And that's, yeah, for sure I agree that there are gonna be different elements at play. And how much of those elements that lead us astray can be attributed to the largeness of the different systems. So, and the different institutions, like the media institutions and government, the institutions that have a monopoly on violence, let's put it this way, which is one way to define government. Sure, it's complicated. There's definitely gonna be different institutions at play. But I think that like, all I would say is like in reference to my original point, when there becomes like broad consensus around a thing, I think the government will usually follow, it's not gonna fight, it's gonna follow more often than not. But I think that a lot of times I think Americans think that there's more consensus around certain issues than there actually are. So like a really good example, we're on that war point too. What caused like the lowest dip in Biden's approval rating? I'm pretty sure it was right after we pulled out of Afghanistan, which I think if I would have asked people like a year before, like let's assume that we could pull out of Afghanistan, the government's probably gonna collapse after we leave because they just don't have the will to fight, they don't have the support, they don't whatever, that's just not gonna work. But like no Americans are gonna die. It might be a couple of other people, but like no Americans are gonna die, we're gonna get out of Afghanistan. Would you support that? I think broadly speaking, I think like more than 60 or 70% of Americans are like, yeah, that would be fine. But then when it actually plays on TV, when we see the people hanging onto the planes, when we see like helicopter embassies, some of the courts and politicians, well now it's like, oh my God, this was horrible and it was so botched. And it was so like, it could have gone so much better. It's like, well, could it have gone better? Like maybe, maybe not. But I mean, it seems like you can have consensus around a certain opinion, but the way that things play out and the way that people actually feel, it's actually way, way, way more complicated. And there's not usually this broad consensus opinion. All right, yeah, go ahead. I'd like to believe that. I mean, just to lay my cards on the table, I have faith in the power of effective government. I just have a lot of concern about what happens as institutions grow in size. For sure. And I just have a lot of worry about the natural corrupting influence on the individuals and on the system as a whole. Like the boys club nature of it. I don't know, there must be a better term. But basically they agree to the game and they play the game and there's a generational aspect, momentum to the game. And they more and more stop being responsive to the people that they represent. I just feel like there is that mechanism. And I think the nice thing, democracy, elections are resistance to that natural human mechanism. Also the balances of power is a resistance to that mechanism. In some ways the media that reveals the bullshit of politicians is also a resistance to that mechanism. It's hard to be full of shit as a politician because people will try to catch you on it. So there's a honesty method there that keeps you honest. It's to some degree, but it still feels like, it still feels like politicians are gonna politician. Yeah, they definitely play their games. That is true. But there's probably always gonna be that meta narrative over like governance that just develops as like you have to form relationships and play games to get legislation passed and everything. The only reason why I don't like it when people attack institutions is because one, institutions are incredibly important, arguably paramount. No, they are to keeping society running. And two, I think sometimes when we shift the blame onto institutions too much, I think that we lose sight of what the real problems are. So for instance, in the United States today, people might be very critical of the government not getting much done, but then everybody turns their eyes to the government for being ineffective. But what I would argue is I would say the government is actually incredibly effective and it's showcasing the will of the American people really well right now, which is we are historically more divided than we have ever been. And if I were to just look at the people and I were to say, we have a historic divide that is getting like rapidly blown apart by things like the internet and the media, right? If that exists, well, what would I expect that government to look like? I wouldn't expect that government to be governing very effective. I would expect that government to show that legitimate divide in people. Do you think that divide, we have a perception of a large divide between left and right. Do you think that's a real divide that's in this country? Narrow the language, what do you mean by real divide? Do you think there is that divide in ideology, that there's a large number of people that believe a certain set of policies and the different set of policies? Or is it just the perception on Twitter? No, I think there is a large divide in terms of belief. I don't think there's very much divide between any people in terms of like what they, like on the most fundamental levels want in terms of like human beings. But in terms of like Democrat versus Republican right now, I think there is a huge divide in terms of the direction they wanna see the country go and what they believe really and what they even believe is reality, right? Unfortunately, that's what we've gotten to. Can I just speak about the mechanism of the left and right here, maybe on the mimetic rivalry aspect. Is there some aspect to the left on which you're a part of that attacks their own for ideological impurity more than the right does? Is it the bigotry of small differences? There's a concept where when you're near somebody who is very slightly different than you, you wanna destroy it, but when you're with somebody that's way different than you, you don't. I think the left does it, but I think the right does it too. I didn't realize it until I started dipping more into conservative communities, but oh my God, the people from the Daily Wire and the people from Turning Point and the America First, all these different groups of people hate each other and they fight each other so much. They hire and fire sometimes employees, they talk smack about each other. I think there's a lot of political division between both sides. I think that the left just kinda gets highlighted more because it's like the internet and a lot of the internet spaces have a lot of left-leaning people. So you see like the crazy communist and the crazy progressives and the crazy center left liberals and the crazy blah, blah, blah. Whereas like a lot of the right-leaning people have kinda been pushed off of the main areas of the internet now. Interesting. My sense was that it's hard to exist on the center left, but maybe because I just don't have the full spectrum view of the political divide. It felt like center left is a difficult position to occupy. Yeah, I would definitely say so, yeah. I don't know if it's that difficult to be center right. It's very difficult to be center right. I think actually maybe even more difficult because a center right person might be somebody who's like conservative, but not a fan of Trump. And you're like over, like look like Liz Cheney, right? You've had politicians that are just like, they didn't back the Trump stuff and now they're gone. Or you might be like center right, but like you don't think the election was stolen. And now you're like half the Republican party's looking at you like you're crazy, you know. That's true, that's true. I think there's a Ben Shapiro or how I'm talking with, I think he publicly spoke against Trump, right? He did initially, but I felt like he softened his language upon him pretty significantly, but. So there's a significant pressure to kind of couch out to a certain kind of messaging. Which the whole Republican party is feeling right now. Geez, that two years from now, that election is gonna be insane. It's just hard, okay, so to generalize, it's hard to be in the center, it feels like. For sure. To center and then like do like a random walk among the policies around that. I don't know what that mechanism is. I mean, it makes people like me not feel good being in the center. It seems like people are just not nice to people in the center. Like the public, the Twitter machine is not nice to the people who are open-minded in the center. Is that, is there some truth to that? Two reasons for that. One is because I think a lot of people that market themselves as center are legitimately spineless cowards and deserve to be called out. Like. I've never killed a man, but today might be my first. Oh no. There are. And I'll take over, like I told you, I'll take over your stream. You're with the AI, yeah, we'll see. With the AI. Is that guy gonna be streaming in the background? Hey fellas. Yeah. Okay, gotcha, gotcha, gotcha. Gotcha. Lots of gotchas, lots of gotchas. Okay, gotcha. Okay, gotcha. And decrease the, which already is a pretty low level of emotion, just decrease it completely. When people are screaming at you and accusing stuff, just remain calm. Absolutely. Emotionless. The gas lighter strategy. Yeah. Okay, so what we're talking about. So I don't. I don't even, I don't ever identify a center anything because it's got such a bad reputation because so. Fuck that, I stand center with a spine. It's called being open-minded. And it's not center, left and right, those are just labels. Here's a really good quote my mom said to me when I was really young. She said, Stevie, don't ever let your mind be so open that your brain falls out. And that's what I find that a lot of center people do. That's not what she told me last night. Why are you like this? I'm sorry. Okay, I'm glad I can bring that. I'm glad you feel like this is a safe space. Like I said, people are not judgmental. If you want to talk about fucking my mom, you know what, you're totally within your rights. I didn't say that. You said that. I didn't say that. I support that. She's a beautiful woman. Her husband probably wouldn't be too happy about it, but you know. I didn't say there's any sexual relations. It was just that having a conversation with her. You projected that. That says more by you than me. Anyway, go ahead about spineless center. Spineless center. There is some aspect to that, which is like amorphous. To me, center means you think freely about each individual policy without being stuck to a king. Some ideal, yeah. But a lot of people don't do that. They'll call themselves centrist, but then they just, they're anti-establishment, essentially on everything. I don't know your position on like the vaccines or anything, but like I met a lot of like free and open thinkers who are like, you know what, I'm open to everything and it's an experimental vaccine. I'm gonna eat hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin because that's what the institutions are telling me not to take. And I think Fauci got too much money from that company. And these are, but I'm an open thinker. And they, what open thinker becomes- I'm at MIT. What do you think my position of vaccines is exactly? I hear a lot of crazy things from a lot of people. Okay, you might be from MIT, but I know you're from the internet, okay? People from the internet are weird and crazy, so. Yeah. Well, I- Who knows? I don't like arrogance. And I have criticized scientists during COVID, a lot of people, but scientists included, having arrogance. Which is fair, but- And I think there's a lot of good criticism to be made of different scientific and medical establishments over a lot of stuff, but nobody can make those good criticisms because they're too like obsessed over like just trying to have the anti-establishment answer. And that is what is upsetting me the most. Like I think there are good conversations to be had about a lot of stuff related to how we handle the coronavirus, you know, were lockdowns effective? Was there enough data to support the huge measures we took? You know, why didn't we have the option to show I was infected a month ago? Why do I need to be vaccinated? Why wasn't that option ever a thing in the United States? I don't think it was. There are really good questions to be asked there, but all the people asking the questions are also trying to tell you that ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies are the way to go for everything and the vaccine is evil and they're just gonna turn you gay like the frogs. And it's like, Jesus, like you can't, there's like no place to reasonably criticize from because all of the people that are criticizing aren't doing it with an open mind or, you know, they're not reading studies or doing anything. They're saying like, I do my own research, which means they listen to whatever the last guy on Joe Rogan said and now they're parroting that opinion. Easy no, easy no, bro. The last guy on Joe Rogan, not Joe Rogan, okay? That Robert Malone guy on Joe Rogan got me real fired up. That's one guess. People see him as like the father of mRNA technology. He published one paper, okay? What do you mean people? Which people think that- Joe Rogan fans, I run into these people. I start arguing with people and they start citing me, well, what about- I'm a Joe Rogan fan and I appreciate the vaccine. That's good, I'm glad you do. But there's definitely- But you said there's a type, what's the type? What's the type of Joe Rogan fan? Anti-establishment. I think that's not Joe Rogan. That's a general public discourse. There's a default anti-establishment on the right and the left. That's the default easy thing to go to. I think Joe Rogan fans are definitely a certain type of anti-establishment though. Like I could guess the Joe Rogan fan. Like if I were to do general population versus Joe Rogan fan, who do you think is more likely to be anti-vaccine? Do you have data on this? Or are you just guessing? Just guessing. I think you are actually judging. I am. I think you're judging. Because I think you're also, the beautiful thing about podcasting, this could be similar to streaming, is there's a large number of people that just listen. Like what does it mean to be a Joe Rogan fan? I don't think you just listen. I think people listen and absorb the information. I would say that the Joe Rogan fan base is as divided in the vaccine as the general public. Gotcha. Man, I'm gonna look for polling data on that. I'm sure somebody's got to have done it out there, but. No, but you're basically revealing the fact they have no data, you're using your own judgment. For sure. Based on how he's had conversations about his experience with the coronavirus, and then based on the guests that have come on that have talked and echoed a lot of like anti-vax talking points and been completely unchallenged. And then based on statements he's made about like myocarditis and the vaccine and everything as well, yeah. So it's the level of challenge or not that he's doing. Well, yeah, and then what his true positions are and then the types of guests he typically chooses to bring on to talk about the vaccines, yeah. Okay, but that represents somehow a deep anti-establishment feeling versus just the vaccine. I mean, I've seen the vaccine and other things being, I think that broke people. They seem to- I think all the coronavirus, that whole one or two years broke a lot of people. There's a lot of emotion and emotion quickly solidified into an opinion that almost had nothing to do with like thinking through and updating your knowledge and so on, you just made up your mind. Yeah, but I think a lot of it comes from that anti-establishment place. Like the vaccine represents the ultimate of establishment. It was a huge private company backed by a huge public government and there's Fauci and there's Biden and there's Pfizer and there's all these countries locking us up in our homes, telling us to do a thing. Like the vaccine was like the ultimate like submission tool to like show you that the government owns you. Not only do you have to get injected once, it's a series. And then you gotta get boosters and it's like they're trying to keep you under their thumb and it's that's the control. I feel like that vaccine became like the ultimate rallying cry between like, do you support, are you a sellout that is gonna believe whatever the government tells the sheep to take or are you gonna be like the guy that stands against the crowd and gets fired from his job and pulls his kids from school because they're not gonna let the evil Fauci medicine, jab them in the arm. And the funny thing is the crowd that stands against the institution is not larger than the crowd of sheep. There's like one sheep standing there. Sure, yeah. Or it feels that way sometimes. One vaccinated sheep. Well, okay. Well, what's the defense of institutions? How do you regain the trust of institutions? Like, first of all, do you think that there's ways in which WHO, CDC failed? And do you think there's criticism towards Pfizer and the big pharma companies that's deserved? Damn, it's the pharma companies, I'm not sure. For CDC and WHO, so here's a criticism that I have of all of academia and I feel it stronger and stronger every day. I don't think it's enough to be a researcher or to be correct about issues. Academia needs to increase its ability to communicate. It is just an unbelievable, unmitigated failure that academics are unwilling to wade into the complicated topics that exist today because other people are, you know. First you call me spineless and then you call me a bad communicator. But no, look, you're here, you're doing it. So you get props for me, okay, good job. That motherfucker. But there are like so many, but I'm sure you've, I'm sure that you must have heard another fellow academic, a fellow colleague express some amount of frustration about like in their specific discipline, they know something to be true and they know that like a lot of the messaging is like wrong or bad in the public about it, but they're never gonna step out and say anything because either one, they're very measured and careful with their take, which they feel is incompatible with what people wanna hear. Or two, they're really worried that they might be incorrect. So they're gonna be cautious. While everybody else is going out and like hardcore in their pain. And they also don't have the support of institutions for them to go out on a limb. Yeah, that too. So like to take risks. For example, I've heard that with lab leak theory. I've had a lot of biologists, virologists, friends that are like, yeah, it's obviously leaked from a lab. Like early on. Oh, maybe, okay. We can fight over this one, but sorry, go ahead. No, no, keep talking. We can fight over this. But like they, okay, I should sort of backstep and say like, that's like, you talk about shooting the shit. You haven't really investigated, but it's your gut. Like this doesn't make any sense. They would never say that publicly. Of course. Mostly because you're saying like, what they would all say is like, we want to see data. Yeah, which would be good, which is fine. So they're going with like, like this is too many coincidence in the same place. That's the logic. But they don't wanna say anything because there's no data. You need to have evidence. You need to have actual evidence to say one way or the other. There's that. But there's also just like you said, I mean, effective communication. You're a fan of Sean Carroll. Oh yes. He's like one of the only people in this whole planet that I like besides you. I love Sean Carroll. Anytime Sean Carroll is brought up as evidenced, there's a smile that comes over your face. I love it. Of like joy. Of like a little kid thinking about Santa Claus. Okay, I love Sean Carroll too. We should listen to this podcast. I love Sean Carroll because there, I hate this divide between like you're either STEM or you're like philosophy, arts and all that other stuff. And the two worlds can never cross. And I love that it was so good at physics, but like explores and pays attention to all of the like sociological stuff too. It's so rare to find that quality in a person. He's legit one of the really, really, really specialized, but you don't have to be a Sean Carroll. You can be just a little better at educating. Another person in the medical and the health space is somebody named Andrew Huberman, a friend of mine from Stanford. He's an incredible educator. There's the kind of process in science they usually call like review or survey papers where you basically summarize all that's going on, integrate it and like draw wisdom from it and also project like where's the discipline headed. And Andrew does that basically on all these sub components of the different stuff going on in neuroscience and biology and neurobiology, all of that. He's able to, he does a podcast called Huberman Lab where he just summarizes all and is able to explain like, what does that actually mean for your life in terms of protocols of how to make your life better? I feel like people should be able to do that more and more. But with virology and oh boy, that's a tricky one. That's a really tricky one. I wish that people could have honest conversations. Like I attack a lot of people that do the lab league theory stuff, but truly we should be able to have that conversation publicly. It just, it always feels like the people that are having the conversation don't ever really wanna have the conversation. They're not being honest. Like I'm a guy that like does his own research and it's so boring reading studies and a lot of it, I can only do abstracts and like it's so much work, but I'll never ever say that about myself. I'm a guy that does his own research because every time I hear somebody say that, they don't do any research. When they say they do their own research, what they mean is they've seen one podcast and their opinion on it is completely- What podcast is that? Definitely not mine, cause it was mine. I wouldn't be criticizing anything they say. But yeah, so like lab league is another one where it's like, well, how do you know it's lab league? How do I know it's lab league? Because Fauci lied and Hunter Biden- Right. And it's like, okay, come on, you haven't engaged with it at all. There's really interesting research that shows there's a really strong study that shows that there's like a high degree of certainty that it came from the wet markets. Very, very high degree of certainty. And there was an article that came out recently where it's like Senate concludes that virus actually came from the Wuhan Virology Lab or whatever. And that whole article, if you actually read it, it never says that in the article. I don't know why they tweeted it with that headline. But yeah, to back up, I'm sorry. I think we should have good- You should be sorry. Yeah, I'm not sorry actually. I get to ramble here, okay? I'm here for a long time. I rescind my apology, okay? I actually rescind my apology. We should be able to have challenging conversations about things, but you gotta, man, be well-read on both sides. Not this like, I do my own research, so I don't believe anything that Fauci says. Like, come on, dude. You can do better than that. Not you personally, but- Gotcha. How does that feel? Feels great. So for people who don't know- Feel understood. That's the catchphrase. Gotcha. Through all tragedy and triumph, through all the rollercoaster of life, your response to it is gotcha. Yeah. It's, well actually, let me jump to that before I continue to, with political discourse. Psychologically, you are in a lot of heated debates, and you're usually super calm under fire until you're not. Sometimes you lose your temper completely. Very rarely, but- That's like your opinion, man. Let me ask you about your psychology. What are psychologically your strengths and weaknesses that you're self-aware about? I think I'm very non-judgmental, so I can entertain a lot of different thoughts without agreeing with them or condoning them. I think that's a really big benefit to me. For whatever reason, I seem to be pretty calm in dealing with annoying people. It's why I got promoted at the casino so fast. I could deal with drunks or whatever. It just didn't affect me that much. What percent of the population is annoying? Depends on how you're engaging with them. Most people aren't really annoying, ever. That's what I mean. If you're doing political debate, what percentage is annoying? I guess it depends on who I'm debating and what the topic is. I guess I'm trying to point out the fact that sometimes you can say that reveals something about you if you think a large percent of people are annoying. Well, I would say working graveyard shift when alcohol is involved, that percentage of people goes very, very, very high. Comes up. Or to be more fair, actually. It's not a high percentage, truly, but if you're a server, one bad customer can ruin the rest of your shift. So you only need one or two people acting in that manner to just totally throw you off. And you're able to, at least these days, not allow that one customer to throw you off, quote unquote. Yeah, I'm very much like a, I noticed this especially after having a son, there's something about six-year-old kids or whatever where it's like, if they get mad, they're never gonna be mad for that long. They'll move on. That's my mentality. I'm like a six-year-old kid. I might be mad about something, but I'll get over it in 30 minutes or an hour. I'm pretty good about not carrying that through. It's very rare that I'll hold a grudge against anybody or be angry about something or really disaffected by something over the long term. That almost never happens to me. What are your weaknesses psychologically, would you say? I still have a problem with projecting. I think we all probably do, but my mind onto others is like, if I understand this and I've said this, you should understand it, and if you're not, you're dumb. That's an issue that I, I still have that where I project too much. What about holding grudges and stuff like that? I never hold grudges. I'm the least grudgy person ever. It's kind of a meme on my community because anybody can always come back as long as they're acting different. What about the, as long as they're acting different? As long as they're acting different. I mean, all right. The reason why I say that is because, so for instance, nobody likes this, but I have a strong stance on apologies and that I hate them. I don't ever want to hear an apology. I don't care about them ever. They don't mean anything to me. If you did something bad, as long as you've fixed the behavior and you're not doing that thing, then we're generally chill. So there's been a lot of people that have been involved in weird stuff with me, but then they go off, they do their thing, and they come back and it's like, okay, cool. As long as you don't do it again, we're fine. It's all good. I'm sorry you feel that way. It's not your fault, Steven. It's not your fault. Okay, gotcha. You've said plenty of negative stuff, positive stuff and negative stuff about Hassan. Yeah. This is my podcast. So I get to get you to force you to say positive things. What do you love? Oh no. I'm all about love. Let's go back to grilling me on the R-word stuff. You're gonna make me compliment Hassan? This is gonna be a harder conversation than that. All right. We're gonna get you to feel emotions. Okay. So he's, for people who don't know, he's another popular political streamer. I think you had, as the kids call it, a bridge burning over Bernie Sanders. I don't know. My research is very limited on this, but what do you respect and love most about Hassan? He puts in a lot of work. When he was growing his stream from 2,000 concurrent viewers to 15,000, he was streaming, it was like 12 hours a day, every single day. So that was Adam Irwin. He did a lot of work. He does seem to be pretty good at networking and socializing and making the correct friends and connections to continue to build his business. What about him as a political thinker? I know you don't think highly of him in that regard, but I think that's unfair. Oh, man. I honestly wanna push back on that because- Okay. I have zero respect for him as a political thinker. There's not gonna be almost anything. So you can't- Oh, I will say, I admire the fact that through no actual capability or ability of his own, he manages to wind up at some of the correct answers just because he's towing the lines. That is- Good job for him on that. He's got a lot of correct opinions, just he has no idea why, so. I think that's undeserved. I think that's too harsh, man. Okay. The reason I bring that up is I feel like there is a deep grudge in there somehow. So you're the father now, since you're so old, the grandfather of the political debate on stream, on live stream political debater. So there could be some grudge about that split that happened or not enough credit given or all that kind of stuff. I just think he's somebody that has a left-leaning ideology that's different than yours. He was a Bernie supporter, right? And I guess you were not. Can you explain to me where the division is? He exemplifies everything that I absolutely hate about politics. Which is what? Which is shallow engagement, heavily ideologically driven. And you're not ideologically different? Absolutely not. Free of ideology. That's what we're talking about, like the free thinker in the real meaning of that word. Yeah, so the way, let me qualify. Issue by issue thinking. Let me qualify what I mean when I say that. I spent a lot of time, unfortunate time, delving into the boring world of philosophy. I spent a lot of time thinking about what are my ethical positions? How do I feel about myself, the people around me and how that relates to the world around me? And then from all of these positions, I think you might've used the phrase first principles earlier. From these kind of first principles, out of that is where all of my political positions are built out of, like full stop. So if you ask me a question, how do you feel about like the right to own a firearm? Or how do you feel about social healthcare? Like we can walk through, well, this is how I feel about it as like a thing from the government. This is where the government gets its power. This is ethically how groups of people are supposed to function. This is morally how we relate to each other. And personally, this is how I feel like. Like I'll be able to do every single political belief back there. It's not like I'm telling you, like if I were to ask Hassan, what do you feel about this political topic? He's gonna tell me what progressives are supposed to say. I don't know what he thinks about it. I don't know if he thinks about it. Don't you think that's a cynical take? Why is he, just because his views coincide with the mainstream narrative, mainstream viewpoints of progressive thinkers. I mean, why does that mean he's not thinking? Because his engagement with every subject is incredibly shallow, 100% predictable. Like I could write like a, I could probably program a script to like give you every single potential answer you could have to any single question you could give him. Again, I think that's pretty cynical take. Okay, it could be the case that his brain perfectly aligns with every single mainstream. No, but I don't know if you know it is perfectly aligns. Because I think you're just taking a very select, just like streamers do of each other, a very select slice that represents the perfect alignment, as opposed to looking at a person struggling with ideas and thinking through ideas, and then giving them a pass, like a lot of people, like I give you a pass on just the fact that you say a lot of crazy shit on stream for drama, like which is- I don't say things for drama. They might be dramatic, but. I mean, you've evolved as a fish evolves legs. You've evolved a mechanism which creates controversy. Sure. That you could say it's not intention, but it happens. I think- Okay, sure. The extremists kind of learn that kind of thing. And so I'm sure Hassan does the same kind of stuff. And so like underneath it, there's still a thinking being that's contending with political ideas. You don't think so. Okay, and he does a really good job of hiding it. There are other political figures that I really don't like, that I wouldn't say the same thing about. So like, I don't know if you have Vosh written in there. I'm like, okay, that's the person that- Who's Vosh? He also split out of my community and grew up to something. I know he hates me and he's an anti-fan community. And they all hate me. Okay, tell me something you love about what machine- I can tell you a lot of things about Vosh. I think Vosh legitimately thinks through a lot of his political positions. I admire or did admire that he has like his own like positions. He would take someone's country to people further left than him. He's got some positions that don't fit his ideology kind of at all. Like he's his own independent thinker. Rhetorically, he's very effective. He was willing to sit down and do research for like his debates and everything. He would spend a lot of time practicing like his rhetorical effectiveness and navigating conversations. He intentionally and purposefully built like a community that exemplified his values. Yeah, I've got a lot. I don't, we are completely split and hate each other now, but like I have a lot of- Why, why, why hate? First of all, hate is a strong, why the hate? Okay, I don't hate him, but he hates me because we had a couple of really big debates. What happened? Well, one had to do with whether or not you should live your values. And can you give me the story that's a charitable interpretation? I always give charitable interpretation. You don't. I absolutely do. You don't. Wait, Nate, what happened? Five minutes ago, you talking about Hassan. Everything I said about Hassan is true. There is no steel man there, okay? That's not charitable. That's, I'm sorry. If you can prove me wrong, I would love for you to do it, okay? I'm using my gut instinct. Usually when somebody feels strongly about another person in that way, it's not coming from a place of data and reason. It's coming from a place of emotion. It's coming from a place of resentment and grudge and all that kind of stuff. Yeah, I understand. There's emotions deep in there. So the gachis hiding, the gachis is a surface of an iceberg and there's a deep ocean underneath that you yourself have not explored. I disagree, but I understand why you do that. And love is actually a doorway. The young, love is a doorway for you to explore the depths of your- Get into that ocean and find my fish, my pre-evolved form. Yeah. I understand why you think the way you do and you should, you shouldn't believe me. And I understand that because if somebody told me the same thing, I'd think you probably just really don't like this person for a reason or two. I understand why you think that way, okay? The reality is though, for any political person that I disagree with, I can give them a fair shake. It's one of the few things I think I do exceedingly well on my stream. Even with Hasan, there's been drama that he's been involved in. And when I'm involved in drama, he'll always throw me under the bus. But when he's involved in stuff, I'll always say, oh, I think Hasan was right here. Or I think that he meant this. There was a thing that came up once we're on, live stream fail, he was getting roasted because he referred to somebody, he used the expression shitskin to refer to somebody's like the way they looked. And I have only ever heard that in the context of 4chan people talking about like Indians or like black people. Like it's a racial thing. But I could tell the context and everything that he was saying. He was insulting some guy. I think it was kind of like incel virgin. He was going for like acne skin. I think that's what he meant when he said it. And there were a whole bunch of people that were insulting. It's like, oh my God, did he just say racist term? And I was like, no, I don't think he was racist. I think he was like, he was just reaching for words and that's what came out. So like, that's an example of me being charitable. Okay, but didn't you criticize him for something? I was trying to, I like Googled, why the hell you guys split out? Cause I thought your friends, you should be like- He split up over Kamala Harris video, but go ahead. Is that why, is that the- I feel like you criticized him over something. And I am, okay, this is very vague memory, but you criticize him over something. And I felt that criticism wasn't charitable. Was it Pete Buttigieg stuff? Yeah, Pete Buttigieg, yes, yes, yes, yes. Yeah, so I've said this a million times, but there's no amount of context or no amount of nuances is ever acceptable to people. I don't think Hassan is homophobic, but I think the comments made about Pete Buttigieg were really homophobic. That's what he said, yeah. Yeah, and there were a lot of people making a lot of comments that made me really uncomfortable about Pete Buttigieg. That was insane to me. Spurred by the comments of Hassan? No, but it was an environment of progressives. All the progressives were attacking Pete. And I felt like his gayness became the subject- Yeah, but why throw Hassan under the bus for that? Because he was jumping along with all of those types of insults. You don't think you've done the same kind of stuff? If I do, call me out on it, and I'll probably say I shouldn't have done that. That's what the R-word was about. It's fine, and that's a good call out. No, but your friend, you should privately tell him, right? Well, no, by then we were sworn enemies. So that wasn't the reason- No, no, no, it was over a Kamala Harris video. Sworn enemies. He hates me, what am I supposed to- Listen, for all of these people, I will accept them back into my life if they ever wanna come back in at any point in time. But usually they're the ones that- If they correct themselves, right? No, I'm not expecting anybody to. So here's the deal with Vash and Hassan. These are like the three, we're the three guys online. None of us will talk to each other. Hassan, because he won't give clout to anybody, and Vash, because he thinks I'm bad faith. And then neither of them will talk to me because they both hate me. You guys should go on a camping trip together. It's like broke back Martin, but three way. And just like rejoin, refine- Yeah, that could be a thing. Refine the position for each other. Honestly, just from the internet perspective, for me as just stepping into this world, there's some aspect to which you have a responsibility. I hate that word. Good word, don't run from it. You have an opportunity. I wish you guys would kind of be the beacon of like forgiveness and friendship and like comradery and that kind of stuff. Yeah, I agree. And even if we disagree, it would be really good content across the art reach. Yeah, like shit talk, like friends shit talk. Sure. But it's not like the fact that you guys don't talk to each other. Like I would love for you to shit talk publicly with the comradery always there. Like there's love in the beginning, love in the end, but you beat the shit out of each other in the middle. And that's what live streaming is for, the political discourses. That's great political discourse. Versus I think what underlies is some jealousy and so on. With this, you get this many followers. I just wanna make sure you're clear to your audience. Everybody has to your audience. I'm sure you have flaws that I'm just not, in this dynamic. Hard to find, you know. Your only flaw is you're too modest. Yeah. So why did you guys split up? Because I would love it honestly, just let me just put that idea out there for you guys to make up. Yeah, it's out there. Of course, as everybody talks, me, Vash, Anasana, it's crazy that like the three largest like political debate, left leaning people online, like can't do any type of content or collaboration at all. It's so stupid. Yeah, it's strange. What was the reason you guys split up? The Kamala Harris? So Hassan's entry into kind of like the Twitch political debate world was in, I think 2018, I think he did a debate with Charlie Kirk. And he reached out to me to kind of like review that debate, to like go on, to go over it on stream. And he came on, we went over it, and then we kind of friendship developed. We hung out in real life. I think when I came to LA, I think I slept on his couch. We played with his dog. We were like kind of friends. And as time went on, and then he was a little bit more, he was farther left than he led on. So like I was a social Democrat, he was a social Democrat. But back in those days, like 2018, when people said they were a social Democrat, they really met socialists, but they just didn't wanna say it. So he was farther left than me. And we had a lot of deep divides in our approach to politics. Whereas like I was very much like a first principles, this is my whole political position. And he was very much kind of like a, this is like the political ideology I'm involved in. And this is kind of like the field that I kind of like navigate in. So there were a couple instances where these divides would be laid very bare. One was when it was either him or the young Turks, I think it was him. There was a shooting in a neighborhood where very young black child gets killed by a white shooter. And they did a video about like hate crimes and how hate crimes are on the rise between races and white people are evil and blah, blah, blah. Not that, but like white people committing hate crimes against black people. And I remember saying to him, I was like, hey, we don't have all the data yet for this. It feels really bad to make videos about this beforehand because it's the same type of shit that happens at airports. You know, is there a thing going on? Was it a brown person? Are they Muslim? It's Islamic extremism. We see this played out so many times in recent history, probably not a good idea to jump to conclusions. And he was like, well, no, you don't understand. Like it's not that big a deal, whatever. And obviously as the story goes, tale as old as time, the data comes out. It was just an errant shot. There was like gang violence, shot goes out of nowhere, hits a kid in the car. It wasn't like a hate crime. The guy was trying to kill a kid. But yeah, we basically, we bump up against a few kind of political disagreements like this. And an annoying thing is happening in my community where Hassan is like the serious political figure because he's from the Young Turks. And I'm just kind of like, I do politics, but I also game. And anytime I criticize Hassan, people like Destiny, you need to be more respectful. He does this full time. If you're going to bring criticisms, you need to be like really well read and researched because he's got a, you know, more serious, whatever. Which I thought was ridiculous. So by the way, if people don't know, he worked at the Young Turks, which is like the largest left leaning YouTube channel probably. Or at least at the time, yeah. So finally, he did a video on, we skip ahead to some more minor discriminants. He does a video on Kamala Harris. He calls it Kaatmala Harris. And it's like seven or eight horrible things about Kamala Harris. And I'm like, okay, I know at least one or two of these things are not fully accurate. So I'm going to do all the research. I'm going to have all the sources and we're going to have a long conversation about it. So that now when I provide criticism to him, it's not going to be like this horrible, like just me saying something flippantly or whatever. It's going to be like substantial criticism. So I was on a plane ride, JFK to Orlando, whatever, flying to Sweden to visit my wife. And on the plane, I review all of the video, all the data, do all the research and I write everything. I'm like, okay, I get to my wife's dad's house and I'm at the table. We're having a conversation like, hey, we should talk about the Kamala Harris stuff. And he's like, okay, well, let's do it. And we go over it and I'll leave to the audience to watch the video. Enough people to say this. I feel pretty confident saying this. I was pretty reasonable, pretty measured, pretty calm the whole time. And I think he started to get increasingly irritated that I was levying more and more serious criticisms at the quality of work that he did. Probably because he felt a little bit intimidated, I think by my willingness to dive through political stuff. There'd been a couple of awkward blowups where there was a show called The Raj Royale where sometimes politics would come up and Hassan would try to explain something. And there was another person one time on the show that made the joke. It was like, instead of Hassan taking 10 minutes to explain this, can Destiny just come here and explain it in 30 seconds? And he exploded at that. He got so fucking mad at that. So yeah, I think that when I made that kind of call out or critique of him over the Kamala Harris stuff, he's probably feeling increasingly irritated, threatened, agitated. And then that's kind of what began the huge split from- So you don't think you were a dick at all? I don't think so in that conversation. Especially given that at that point, because this is still 2018 or 20, this might be 2019, I'm still known at that point as being very aggressive towards conservatives or alt-righters. Oh, gotcha. Yeah, and with lefties is what I call them. I think I'm being very gentle. My conversation with conservatives is like, you're a fucking idiot, you're so dumb. That's how I'm doing. So with him, I'm like, well, don't you think that this is a little bit of an inconsistent presentation? I feel like I'm being nice. But I always leave to the audience so they can go and watch that Kamala Harris video, Destiny of the Sun, if they think that I was being a dick. But a lot of people watching said I was being pretty gentle. Well, let me say, as a new fan of this space, I hope you guys make up and I hope you guys fight it out in the space of discourse and ideas. Me too. And also with empathy, understanding what the strength of the other person is, what their buttons are. And there's like an unspoken rule that you don't press the buttons that you need to. Unless you're doing it mutually and it's fun because it's fun to piss each other off. So that's kind of like what friends do. You don't cross a certain line. But then other than that, you fight it out. Okay, let's step back. One other super interesting aspect of your worldview is you're a big supporter of Biden. Can you explain what you love about Biden? Do you love Biden more than Sean Carroll or less? Sean Carroll is just like in another world of admiration. I feel like I'm culturally appropriating you by saying gotcha now. But it's so convenient. It's an easy word. You just, now we're on the same wavelength, okay? We're synchronizing. That's good. I mean, it is really interesting because even the people that support Biden usually don't say they love, sort of they don't support it strongly. Ideologically, philosophically, the reason why I like Biden is because he's really committed to this bringing the left and right together, which is something we so desperately need in the country. And his statements over and over again of like, I'm not the Democrat president or the Republican president. I'm the president of the United States. His desire to bring Republicans together to work on things like the infrastructure bill, that's so incredibly needed. And I have a huge amount of respect and admiration for him for trying to push through on that message. Do you think then it's unfortunate that he made that comment about MAGA? MAGA Republicans? Yeah. I mean, I forget what the comment was, but MAGA Republicans are not good people kind of. I watched the full video and he's right. There is this toxic aspect. And it's hard to call out because they're always gonna spend like, oh, he hates our Republicans. He's not. If you watch the quote, he's very specifically calling out like this group of people that think that the election was fraudulent. Is it clear? It is. That's what he meant by- We can bring it up. All right. This is- Oh, no. But I remember watching our stream, it was like, if he said it, yeah, that's bad. You're probably like YouTube, MAGA Republicans, Biden. But like, it feels like it's pretty clear he's talking about the people that are like, election denying. Too much of what's happening in our country today is not normal. Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic. Now I wanna be very clear. Listen to this part. Very clear up front. Not every Republican, not even the majority of Republicans are MAGA Republicans. Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology. I know, because I've been able to work with these mainstream Republicans. But there's no question that the Republican party today is dominated, driven, and intimidated by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country. I disagree with that, man. He didn't clearly say, extremist ideology. He didn't say the people that doubt the validity of the election. I mean, that's Donald Trump. No, but there's... That's all the candidates that Donald Trump is supporting. How many, what is it, like 40, 50? How many candidates right now that are MAGA candidates are election deniers? No, but there's, you know, 80 million or whatever people voted for Donald Trump. You could say that's the MAGA Republicans. So to me, it sounded like he was referring to not even the majority. I mean, that's one nice, helpful, clarifying statement. But it's basically there's the mainstream Republicans and then there's those that voted for Donald Trump. That's the way I heard it. Okay. And it's like, so maybe you should have done a better job at clarifying, but... Yeah, I feel like there's like a clear, there is a huge problem with this group of Americans that think that like the election is stolen. I feel like that's what he's trying to call it. No matter if that's what he meant, even flirting with that line is not a person who's bringing people together. I feel like the extending a hand to the like most, I've worked with Republicans in Congress, not even a majority of Republicans are like this. No, but why say not the majority of Republicans that like to say like, we're like one country. We believe the same thing. So like focus on the uniting part versus saying... He does before and after, that was 50 seconds, okay. But that you never, the point is you never say something like that. Listen, like that, you've spoken about the Bosnia speech, which is your favorite of his. I went back to it and listened to it. Before I moved to that, just on this, it's really hard for him to call out that group of like election deniers, I think without it always feeling like... Well, why call them out? Because it's arguably one of the most destructive forces that exists in this country today. Did it destroy anything? They were trying to. Did it though? It didn't, did it? So does that mean we don't call it out? We wait till next time? No, because calling it out is giving fuel to the division. Like the people that doubted the validity of the election, that's anger, that's frustration with the other side. You heal that as opposed to saying all those people that believed that at any time are idiots. They're un-American. I mean, they don't think the election was real. I don't know if Biden has the ears of these people at all. I don't know what he can do for... There's people that believe the same thing in 2016 with the Russian hacking, right? There's this- Hold on. Yes. That is a super not fair comparison. There are definitely the mainstream Democrat opinion was that Russian intrusion in terms of like social media and stuff happened, but there was never a claim that like the election was stolen. No main, or at least I don't know of any mainstream Democrat that supported that. Donald Trump is not just saying there was interference and blah, blah, blah. Donald Trump is literally saying the election was literally stolen, that vote boxes were, ballot boxes were hidden, that vote tallies were manipulated. I think the claim is there's a huge gulf of difference between the two. So you can attack Donald Trump for that. Yeah. I believe it's not the words of the uniter to attack people that believe that. You could argue maybe it's okay, but especially not being super clear about that, about who you're referring to when you say MAGA Republicans. Because MAGA is a hat and a slogan that refers to whatever the number is, 70 million people, however, that voted for Donald Trump. Like- Of all the Republicans that consider themselves MAGA Republicans, what percentage of them do you think believe the election was stolen? I feel like that number is, I don't have the pump, I feel like the number is like probably more than 70%. What's a MAGA Republican? Maybe I'm not familiar- Like a Trump-supporting Republican, a MAGA Republican. They're there for Trump. What's the difference between somebody that voted for Trump and a- MAGA Republican? And a MAGA Republican. So my mom is a MAGA Republican. If Trump ran independently and DeSantis ran under the Republican ticket, my mom would vote for Trump. She'll follow him to the end of the earth. That's like a MAGA Republican. I think it's easy to mistake that distinction in these kinds of political speeches. It's to me, anybody who voted for Trump can easily in the context of the speech be interpreted as a MAGA Republican. Gotcha. I understand what you're saying. Maybe you could have been more clear, but I think in listening to that, I think it's pretty obvious who he's talking about. But I guess if you have an emotional response to it, I can understand the emotional response, but- I don't have an emotional response. I just don't like, I think I'm with, what is it? Michelle Obama, they go low, we go high. Meaning like to me, a uniter doesn't participate in derision. Sure, a uniter might not, but a leader has to be able to accurately assess the situation before they vote. And accurately assess the situation before him and make people aware of what's going on. You mean all the impeachment trials, all the censoring from social media, all of that didn't do the job? That's not his job. I don't know about censoring any of that. No, but that mechanism, his job is to inspire a nation to unite a nation. How can he do that when half the people don't believe that he was even legitimately elected? Like I think he's done a good job at working on legislation and doing stuff that hopefully benefits all Americans. But I think it's important to recognize that there is a contingent of Americans that don't even believe that this is really crazy. There's plenty of people that recognize that and are fighting that and are constantly screaming that from the rooftops. His job is to be the inspiring figure that makes the majority of Americans be proud for him to be a president of the nation they love. And that's what the uniting aspect is, is you remind people that we are one and we love this country, we love the ideas that it represents. Tricky does that in other parts of that speech. It's like a 20 minute speech, isn't it? But that's a fuck up. You just don't participate in that division. Anyway, I understand. I understand. I just wanted to push back on the saying one of his strengths is that he's uniting. But yes, that is an ideal, that is a goal, is a great one. And he is one that espouse that goal for a long time. Do you think, what else? So from policy perspective and so on. I thought the way he's handled Ukraine and everything thus far has been almost perfect. I think he did a really good job at the political maneuvering and bringing other countries into the fold, at establishing clearly like what our mission was in relation to Ukraine. I thought he did a good job there. I admire him for pulling out of Afghanistan. Even it was a little bit rough around the edges, like we got out and we're gone. No American lives are lost. The domestic policies passed more major legislation than I think anybody thought possible. The green energy stuff for the last bill, the infrastructure bill, a lot of the coronavirus relief I thought was really good, especially the expansion of the child tax credit. So from a policy perspective, for an end domestic, I think he's been successful. Rhetorically, I think he's generally been above board in terms of like not attacking people or being too divisive. He's trying to bring people together and work on them. What do you think about the sort of popular in the media criticism of his mental decline? Do you think he's experiencing mental decline? You know, he's an old guy. But do you think, I mean, do you? Yeah, maybe a little bit, but he's still doing a good job, so, you know. Not from a speech perspective, you mean from a policy perspective? Yeah, I'm analyzing it as a job, yeah. From a speech perspective, maybe not the greatest, but yeah, I mean, he's definitely, what is he, like 80, 81? How old is he? I lose track after so many years. But you did say that he's probably going to run in 2024 and he's probably going to win. Did I say that? That he's probably gonna win? No way did I say that. He's probably gonna run. Who knows who will win? But I think, I feel like the incumbent advantage is so strong. Are you really gonna throw that away? Like, there's been like one or two times in history in the US, right, where like the non-incumbent, the parties put somebody else up. Yeah, I mean, the concern is like the, just the age and the mental decline, just the wear and tear of the campaign, all of that kind of stuff, all of the speech you have to make, the debates and all that kind of stuff. Yeah, I guess we'll see what happens. He's, what? The least excited. I mean, two years from now is a long time. At his current mental state, he could run and do it. He could do a passable job. In two years, man, I don't know, I've seen videos of Bill Clinton recently. He's looking pretty rough. You know, if Biden is looking a lot more rough, worse for wear in two years, then maybe they actually do have to dig out another person for running on us. What do you think about Trump when he won in 2016, I think is when you came to fruition, politically speaking. So what do you think his winning the 2016 election represents? So for me, Trump, the reason why I got into politics was Trump was like this new epistemic force in American politics that like, you kind of have to like flirt with facts before, even if you wanted to be non-factual, he super didn't care. Lying was like a first language to him, just like in speaking in terms of like, the way that he used language to just say to you what he felt like you needed to hear to support him and not care at all about what is going on about, yeah, that's what Trump represented to me in terms of like things that I cared about. He also represents a lot more obviously that there was this undercurrent of American opinion that a lot of people didn't know still existed and it did, he got elected, that the Overton window was misidentified by even a large amount of the Republican party, that populism was a lot more popular than a lot of people figured, you know. Yeah, there's a lot of it, I guess he represented. Do you think Trump should have been banned from Twitter? Can you make the case for and against it? So you're a big supporter of free speech. Yeah, so the case in favor of it. Do you think he should be brought back? As Elon tweeted. Yeah, because if he gets brought back, there's a higher chance that I'll be brought back, so I'm supporting that all the way. Thank you, Elon, unban my account. So because you called me weak spine, I'm gonna have to message Elon. Okay, at Omnidestiny, it was a verified Twitter account. Omnidestiny. No, no, I'm just kidding. Why'd you get banned from Twitter, Destiny? I don't know. I'll add that to Elon. I saw that there was a screenshot of you referring to the rape of somebody. Okay, that was on an older Twitter account, and that was a bad tweet. You have multiple Twitter accounts, so you're trying to go around the bans that you keep getting. Okay, hold on. You're slandering me a lot right now, okay? Let's get the facts straight, okay? I don't even remember why my first account got banned, but it was a wild account. I tweeted some wildly inappropriate things. You regret? I don't like that word. I'm gonna give the answer that most people give, but it's like, I don't regret it, because I learned a lot, so I'm glad I had the bad experiences that I did. Why don't you like the word regret? I think if we look at where we are, how do you feel about determinism? I believe in the hardest of determinism. That's who I am, okay? Sure. So who I am today is the culmination of everything that's occurred in the past. I believe you speaking, sorry to interrupt, I believe in you speaking about regret as a nice way to communicate that in this deterministic world, you've analyzed the acts of the past, and you're no longer that person. Yeah, of course, for sure. That's what regret usually means. Okay, thanks for giving me the human explanation. Okay, true. So in that sense, there's a lot of things I've done that I regret. Oh, what are you? You're not human, you're a bot? NPC is my preferred term. Okay, all right. Those are your pro-notes. I wish I would have been smart enough at the time to not have to have had made those mistakes. Okay. There you go. Good job. But yeah, obviously really dumb, really crazy off-the-wall tweets, but that account got banned, and then I made another account called Omni, I can't believe I'm giving you a history-made Twitter account. I made another account called Omnidestiny. It's an honor. And that was my, I got verified, I was cool, they let me have that account, because originally they banned it, and I said, appeal, and I was like, oh, let me have one more, and back then Twitter was cool, and they're like, okay, go for it. And that account lasted for a long time, and I don't actually know 100% why that account got banned. I believe that the tweet that showed up in the final, I got banned for hate speech, and it was because there was a picture that I tweeted with three different alt-righters that are kind of like neo-Nazi people, and they were all mixed-race people, and I said, the new alt-right looks like a Disney Channel original movie in terms of racial composition, and somehow they got flagged for instigating violence against minorities, I think. I think that's the tweet that got me banned, because I think that's what showed up in the final report, but I don't know, maybe there were other reasons, because nobody ever communicates, but ever since that account went under, it's just been ban evading ever since, so. Oh, ban evading ever since. So all my new accounts that I've got banned just get banned, because they finally figure out it's me, and then they ban evade. There's like one dude at Twitter HQ who's constantly looking for my new accounts, and they get me, yeah. Yeah. Anyway, yeah, that whole bunch of- So post- Post Trump world. Do you think, okay, I mean- Oh, should he be banned? Oh, you asked me to make both cases. Should he be banned? I mean, damn, dude, when you're tweeting out shit that's arguably leading to stuff like January 6th, I can understand why, because it's like, what else is this wild dude gonna tweet out? Like, is he gonna start instigating other violent events? So I'm sympathetic towards the like, okay, well, he can't just be here saying stuff like this. That's insane, we're gonna ban him. I'm sympathetic- Because it's instigating actual physical violence in the physical world. Yeah, like if I were to tweet stuff like that, I would get banned, probably. On the flip side, this is the president of the United States. It seems like he's like doing presidential decree by social media sometimes. Like, is it really right that one public, or private, I should say, one private company can erase the president of the United States' words from the eyes of a lot of Americans that are using these social media feeds. And one big one, which I for sure am against, is the permanent ban. Yeah, I don't like that, I hate that. Even in my community, if somebody comes back after like a year, I mean- Did you just compare yourself to the president of the United States? No, I compare myself to Twitter banning the president of the United States. Let me put it this way, if I banned Donald Trump in my chat room, I'd unban him in a year. A year? Yeah. What's the process for unbanning Donald Trump? What would he have to do? Usually people send me an email, they're like, listen, I did this stuff, I'm sorry I was dumb, I'll give him another chance. But a year, what if they send an email a month later? Usually I'll unban him. That's usually my problem. I ban pretty quickly in my community, but if you ever ask- You're a big softie. Yeah, usually I'm back, yeah. Well, because I used to be the worst type of internet person, and I think I'm a little bit better than I used to be, so. Now that you're older. Yeah, now that I've matured, yeah, of course. Age bestows a wisdom that just can't be gotten any other way. What's your sense in general? Is there something interesting you could say about your view on free speech? It seems like one of those terms, it's also overused to mean a lot of different things. What does it mean to you? If you have a democratic style of governance, you are entrusting people with one of the most awesome and radical of responsibilities, and that's saying that you're going to pick the people that are gonna make some of the hardest decisions in all of human history. If you're gonna trust people to vote correctly, you have to be able to trust them to have open and honest dialogue with each other. Whether that's Nazis or KKK people or whoever talking, you have to believe that your people are going to be able to rise above and make the correct determinations when they hear these types of speeches. And if you're so worried that somebody is gonna hear a certain political figure and they're gonna be completely radicalized instantly, then what that tells me is that you don't have enough faith in humans for democracy to be a viable institution, which is fine. You can be anti-democratic, but I don't think you can be pro-democracy and anti-free speech, within reason. So what's the within reason? I mean, you can't post like child porn or something on Twitter or people try to get you on that stuff or like direct calls to violence are probably not. You shouldn't be tweeting out like, we're gonna meet up tomorrow and go bomb, blah, blah, blah, probably not. So do you think it's okay to allow racism and anti-Semitism and hate speech? Hate speech, yes, because that can be very broadly defined. I can understand there being some basic rules of like no slurs on like a platform that gets into like acceptable forms of moderation or like excessive harassment and bullying. I can understand, but past that, when the moderation becomes ideological, I get a little bit nervous because, there's a whole other host. Yeah, of course it's all a gray area, but when it feels like ideology has seeped into the censorship. Not good. Yeah, which it's so fascinating to think, especially now that Elon bought Twitter, how do you engineer a system that prevents ideology from seeping in, and nevertheless is able to create a platform that has healthy conversations? Because if you have one guy who's just screaming nonsense, nonstop, it has this effect where the quiet voices at the back of the room are silenced. So like, that's what you usually don't talk about. Like if you let one annoying loud person in, that's actually censoring the voice of a lot of people that would like to speak, but they don't get a chance. That's one of the things, especially around like trans discourse, I have to constantly do that like reminder for my audiences of like, when I'm dealing with these types of people on the internet, a lot of them might seem really crazy. A lot of these types of people might seem insane, but like in the real world, outside of like the crazy Twitter activist world, like the vast majority of people you're meeting from LGBT communities are like the coolest, normalist people. All they want is to like write, to live their life in the way they want to, and to be like unobstructed. And like, yeah, but people will get this impression of like an online activist, like a vegan or LGBT person or whatever. And then they think that every single person in real life is like that. And it's a really negative stereotype. And then even the other people in that group. Oh, is Malina coming over? Oh yeah, I see. I don't know if that's her. Okay, Malina just joined us. What were we talking about? Was it interesting? You were saying that you were gonna talk to Elon about getting at Omni Destiny, the verified Twitter account unbanned. I said, that's so- That sounds like a lie. That's so gracious of you. I can't even believe you would do that for me. And then you admitted that you tried to evade the ban multiple times, which I'm sure would be very looked upon. You know, I heard that in Norway, in their prison system, they don't actually punish you for trying to escape jail. Cause that's like the natural human thing to do. They hug you? I don't know if they, but they don't punish you. Cause of course you're trying to be free. That's all I'm trying to be on Twitter. I'm just trying to be free. Oh, that's the natural humanistic- Yeah, that's the natural human, of course. It's the banning ban. You're not a destructive force. You're just- No, I'm a positive, I'm a force for good. That's why all my accounts only get banned for banning, banning. I don't get banned for doing bad things. Break out of- I'm a progressive show. I'm like far left. I love like progressive causes. I thought this is what you criticized as Han for being. I show them from a place of first principles, not from a mindless AI echoing kind of thing. You're a free thinking bot. I got it. Yeah, exactly. All right, cool. Well, I'm sure we'll return to some politics. That was beautiful. Melia, can you tell us about yourself? You're also a fellow streamer. Yes. What's your story? I stream when I started streaming because I met him basically, kind of, but I don't do the politics. I do like travels or talk about relationships, talk to my audience basically. You're from that part of the world, right, Sweden? Yeah, exactly. So did you escape from prison and then you didn't? That was Norway. You just mentioned Norway. That's different. That's a different way. I've actually really, I've been to Sweden a bunch of times. I love it. There's a tech sector there that's really like flourishing. Where did you go? Which city? I went to Stockholm. I think I gave a few lectures there. There's a vibrant tech sector. It was cool. And people are super nice. Yeah. We're friendly. We're not like very deep. Like we're not really how much deep conversation. It's like a meta conversation. Oh, there's not many intellectuals that come from Sweden. We don't really speak very highly ourselves, but kind of like just chill all the time. We don't make a scene. We don't, we're just like, you know. Do you know what the name for that is? There's a specific name for it. It's a- Jantelagen. Yeah, Jantelagen, yeah. Oh, there's a philosophy behind it. When you're part of like Sweden or Norway, you like, you don't talk too highly of yourself because it's seen as kind of like rude. Like think of like America, except the exact opposite. You don't even really want to like, you don't want to make yourself into a victim too much. You don't want to be too much of anything. You're just like sticking to the group. Don't make big scene about yourself. But that said, you came here and you were, you put yourself in front of a camera and became a streamer. Yes, do you understand how weird that is for my friends in Sweden? Do you have anxiety? I just didn't talk about myself and just like make a big deal about myself for hours every day. Was that like terrifying? Did you have anxiety about that? No, cause I don't see them, but then I come back and I'm like, ooh. So what do you feel like when you're actually streaming? You feel like you're just alone in a room? One-on-one type of thing? No, I see, I see Chad. I'm thinking, oh, they're like little fairies. They're not really real. They're just like out there. I don't know what they look like. I just see little names and they're just cute and just colors, you know? So you're talking to little fairies inside your head. Yeah, that's what I do. Is that how you feel about Chad? They're demons for me, but. They're demons? Okay, I'm on my own of fairies. Are they, so is Chad a source of stress or happiness? Like, is there a- No, for me, that's a source of happiness. I've been very intentional with like the construction of my community. So I'm really happy with where it's at. How are you able to actually have deep political discourse while playing a video game at the same time? I have a really good chat room in terms of like the way that people engage in conversations. Like I was one of the earliest people to embrace the philosophy of like, I am in total control of what people watch me think, that like I have a high level of responsibility for how they conduct themselves. And then if I conduct myself in a certain way, I can expect a certain level of conduct from them. And for the most part, it's like worked pretty well for the past, you know, nine or 10 years, yeah. What about the actual playing of the game? Like you're able to parallelize the brain, like. Oh. Like it seems like, like Factorio seems like a super complex game. Yeah, I don't actually think that's possible. I don't think multitasking for human brain is possible. If you see me playing a game, usually what's happening is the conversation is like, I've had it a million times, so I'm not thinking about it. I've automated that. Or if the conversation is very challenging, then if you watch me, if you really watch what's happening again, I'm probably just running around in circles because I have to think about the conversation. Okay. Because with Factorio, it looks like a lot of stuff is going on. Sometimes, yeah. So I guess it's hard for a person who hasn't played the game to detect that you're not actually. Does that come off as like super intelligent and multitask, or does it come off as like, he's not interested in this conversation at all? Yeah. Yeah, there's a coolness to it. Like when you're not paying attention, like if you're looking elsewhere, like you're checking your phone, you're too cool for this conversation. There is a sense like that. Yeah. The reality is though, is if you watch, it was easier to see in Minecraft, because in Minecraft, when there was a challenging conversation, if you watch me play, I'm literally just running around and jumping in circles, because I have to think about the conversation 100%. I can't do a complicated task and think about the conversation. Or like the people always joke in my chat, like, oh no, the notepad came out. If it's a really challenging conversation, I'll get rid of the game and I'll bring out a notepad and I'll start writing stuff down to keep track of what's going on. So what kind of stuff do you stream? So advice you talk about? Yeah, like either I talk to chat or I travel around basically. Like have a conversation, so we like go to countries. I've been to like Italy. I was in Italy for like one and a half months, just like traveling around alone, going to cities, like having like my camera with me and like streaming for hours. Where's the coolest place you've been to? Ever, it's probably New Zealand. New Zealand? I think so. After it's probably gonna be Italy, I think. Because I like history and yeah. Also both history, because New Zealand is also beautiful. It has both natural beauty and historical beauty. Yeah, for sure. I think it's just really like the Polynesian sort of culture. I think it's very interesting, like the ocean people and it's just really beautiful. People are very relaxed, chill. They're very far away, which is interesting as well, because whenever they talk about politics, so they talk about just like the world, it feels really far away. So where's home for you? Is Austin home? Did you? Home for me. So a human being is home? Yeah. We've lived in a lot of different places and traveled around a lot. So that's why you think of home as like human. I think so, yeah. I mean, if they're gonna be a place, it's probably gonna be like my childhood places, probably. Like my old country house or something like that. We don't have it anymore, but like that's like home for me, I guess. So how'd you guys meet each other? You're currently married. Yes. To each other, yeah. Yeah. To each other. Yeah. Just making sure we're on the same page. All right, cool. How'd you guys meet? I was watching his YouTube stuff, like 2018, I think, like because it was the speedy election around that time and I was interested in politics. And then I think he said in one of his videos that he had an Instagram and that he needed people to stop DMing him. That wasn't cutie pies. And then I messaged him and said, am I a cutie pie? And then you're a pie in like two minutes. And then that's when I was in New Zealand. And I guess you wanted to escape America or like LA for a little bit and include New Zealand. Where were you mentally there? Because we've talked through this timeline. Where's 2018? Was it 18, 19? Where was the low point? Or that was way earlier. Low point, carbon cleaning. That was like 2010. Oh, okay. 2018 was probably your peak. What are you, every day now is my peak. What do you mean? That was my peak. Why would you say that? No, nobody ever admits being past their prime. Just so you know. Well, I mean, my prime is still coming up. It was probably around the time where you were getting a lot of lefties to your community and you were really like thinking about that they would go too far. Maybe, I think that was still when Hasan and Vash were both in my community. Exactly, so I would say it feels like there was not really like much issues when it come to like to your stuff or like your work stuff back then. Oh, something we didn't talk about is that like there were no politics on Twitch. I exclusively inhabited that place for like two years because nobody else did it because it was a really toxic environment for politics. So for a couple of years as it grew, like I kind of grew the whole space because it wasn't, nobody was doing it yet. What did that look like? You're having like political debates, political discourse. Yeah, mainly like going into YouTube people to try to argue with them or just doing politics on stream like reading stories, researching stuff, talking about stuff. But there's not like other people on Twitch to debate about politics because there was no politics. It was, yeah. Was there a debate in the space of communism, socialism, social democrats, kind of like this? Are you trying to outline your own position during that time? I think it was mainly me fighting against conservatives because it was like Trump stuff. And then it was coming off the back of like, there was this movement called Gamergate and there was all this anti SJW stuff on the internet. And I was like the SJW, like the progressive that was fighting on the progressive side of things. So I think that's what I was known for. But I was fighting with people off of Twitch because on Twitch there weren't very many political discussions happening. So you were holding the SJW flag. Yeah. To what degree do you still hold it? Like what's the best, what's the steel man case for SJW? I mean, like I'm still very much that SJW from 2018, 2019 but the positions have moved so much farther left that some people might not call me that anymore. I'm not sure. It depends on who I'm talking to. So it's basically, what is social justice where you like being sensitive to the experience of others? Yeah, being sensitive and empathetic towards the experience of others. And then trying to build a better world that like suits as many different types of people as possible while being like aware of like their needs. Okay. So you guys met, what's your, from your perspective? Is that, does she, she, she telling lies? Is it accurate? No, it's pretty accurate. Okay. When'd you guys actually meet? I flew out in 2019. Like in February. Yeah. Basically there was like weird stuff happening in LA. I just come off of kind of a weird, not kind of sort of relationship and I just wanted to like go away for a while. Another company reached out to me and they had like a fun streaming device and they said they'd sponsor a trip if I went somewhere. And I was like, oh, well, I know this person. I know a couple of people in New Zealand. Malina was one of them. It's like, I'll go to New Zealand. New Zealand. It'll be fun. And yeah, I did that for two weeks. Do you guys believe in love? I feel like you're, you lack the gotcha got us into this. I'm not sure to the degree to which you have human emotions. I have quite a few. Okay. From your perspective, when did you, when did you fall in love with Malina? When did you fall in love with Mellie Mel? The minute I saw her. I don't know. We, our first two weeks together were a lot of fun. We got a lot of chemistry in person. I was kind of shocked. I wasn't thinking about it. Cause it was like, we spent like a week together and you said, I really want to tell you something. And you were like, you were like stalling that for the longest time. I think she was, oh, he said that like, I love you. No, he basically just said like, I really like you and it never really happens. That's what he said. And I was like, oh, and I thought, hey, I thought. So let's still run, we said Trump getting banned from Twitter. Is that what we were talking about before? Oh yeah. You agreed to me coming on here. Of course I'm going to be doing this. How long, so how long did that take? Two weeks you said? That took like a week. No, I don't know. I think it was just like. The thing is my mind processes like information so quickly. Two weeks to somebody like you is actually like years for me. So. That's it. Oh, like me. Yeah. So there was like a lot of like factorial type of strategic thinking. Yeah, going on. I was seeing like all the events, like Dr. Strange or whatever. And the Avengers when he's like seeing it to all the futures. When you saw me, you just saw the future. Yeah, I was looking at all of them. So you're doing like some game theoretic simulation of all the possible outcomes. Yeah, exactly. Okay. But no, yeah, it was probably pretty soon. I realized that we had a lot of chemistry. Yeah. I think before I left after my two weeks there, I was like, we need to make sure you get like a ticket to come visit me in the United States because it'll be fun and everything. And then. I kind of decided that last minute too. It was like really like five hours before your flight back. We kind of realized because it was kind of like, man is just like a one time thing. And then that was it. But we were like, oh no, this is a lot of fun. We should probably hang out again. Oh, so you realized you would miss each other. Yeah. This was one time thing. The melancholy side of love. Okay, when did you fall in love with Steven? I thought he like hated me. I don't know. I thought, not hated me. She still thinks I hate her. But no, no, I remember like what he said that he really liked me. I was kind of a little shocked about that. Cause I, I don't know. There was a lot of like random things happening in New Zealand. It was a lot of fun, but it was definitely like very interesting like things that happened because I was like around a lot of other people as well. So I thought he might've had like a really bad time. But when he said that I was thinking about it more. And then we spent like more time together, like a week after that. And then it felt like that was more like real. And I think when he was about to leave, I kind of realized like, no, I really like him. Do you guys ever say love to each other? Like I love you. Yeah, of course. Yeah. Okay. I wasn't sure. Why would you ask that? What has he said before? Cause I haven't, I don't think I've heard you speak. The only time I've heard Steven talk about love is when you're like criticizing the, the Red Pill community saying they don't ever talk about love and relationships. Almost all the time I'm giving criticism to people. Like I said, I'm kind of stepping in. I'm very disconnected from my own emotional experience cause I'm trying to talk with them there. So it's pretty rare that I'll talk about my- What is your own emotional experience exactly? Highly blunted, I guess. There's a lot. Okay. What does that mean? I mean, what's the, what's deep in there? Are you, is this just who you are genetically or are you running from something? I think I have a pretty good understanding of myself. A lot of people make that accusation to me, but I don't think I am. Okay. This is just who you are. It's just who I am, yeah. Okay. There's not childhood stuff like trauma. It's all sorted and done. You figured it all out? Yeah. In your old age? As I grow every year, I figure out more and more. He did mention, I think I heard this somewhere that this is a source of fights for the two of you, the age thing. I felt the ageism throughout this whole conversation. He's basically, he's saying that he gambles like with time. He's just like, oh, I think she will be good later. And then just like- It's like an investment, yeah. Yeah. It's like what he's doing. When this treasury bond matures, I'm gonna be able to cash out for a good- What do you think so far? Is the stocks going up or? It's tumultuous. What's that mean? It's like Bitcoin. Oh my God. Yeah, like Bitcoin. Crypto mail. All right. If you guys don't mind, one interesting aspect of your relationship is you're in an open relationship. What's that like? From a game theoretic simulation perspective, what went into that calculation? And like, how does that- Like how that started or? Yeah, how did that start, sure. The only relationships I've ever done has been open relationships since I was like in high school because I didn't really understand like why wouldn't you be able to like do other things with other people, but then just like have your main partner basically. So what is an open relationship, generally speaking? That means you have one main partner? Not a monogamous relationship. Like you're somehow allowed like in different ways. You can see other people sexually. Sexually, but like there's one main station. It doesn't have to be there for some people, but like I think it's probably easier and we probably don't really have time or the energy for like more than like one person to like really like- What about like emotional? It's really complicated. There's a lot of complicated stuff going on under the hood there. Yeah. I think broadly speaking, you've got like polyamorous relationships and you've got like open relationships where polyamorous is like, oh, I've got like three different girlfriends and we all hang out or sometimes even live together or three boyfriends or whatever. And then you've got like open relationships, which is like, oh, you know, like you can basically hook up with other people. And then you've got like your main relationship and that's it. I think ours is probably somewhere in the middle of that to where like we've got like long-term friends. Some of them we hook up with and that's kind of how we, yeah, it's a delicate dance that explodes every six months on itself. So it does explode, you guys fight over it? We fight over some things, yeah. It things happen, yeah. I think it's mostly because a lot of people can't handle it and they agree to something and then they realize that we're way too cool and then they get really obsessed and they think that they can like get in there and then it gets really dramatic. Have you figured it out? Like this is a complicated dance. I feel like we figure out things more and more like when it comes to like what's a good person for us to hang out and what's not a good person for us to hang out with or like, I probably have more opinions on like who he hangs out with because he likes the fucking psychos. Yeah, so you like to surround. He likes the nut, like the crazy ones, like the baby trap sort of women. That's the ones and I don't like that because that affects me. That affects your game theory. Yeah, obviously, yeah. Right, you like to surround yourself like in general you've talked about with crazy people. I say crazy and I really shouldn't. It's humorous. It's like, yeah. They're very unstable. Very, can be unstable, but people that are very unique. Like when I meet this person, that's like. Not boring. Yeah, not boring, yeah. And you said that you're progressively becoming not boring yourself. No, I think I'm pretty stable. I don't let them affect me much, but. So you don't think they affect your. No, if I've said that, I've said a joke. I think I've like, I've got my stuff like really well figured out. It's what allows me to engage with people like this so easily because I can engage. I can make them feel seen and heard. And then if it gets insane, I can cut off and I can be chill. Like very few things affect me in the longterm. Do you guys experience jealousy? Usually like whenever I feel like he's not spending the amount of time that I'm asking for and he spends it on his video games or his stream or like he sees someone else like more than he sees me or something like that. That would like not be good. Because then it affects like our relationship. Do you have a good sense of like, is it literally time or is it the energy put into the. It's probably like, if like, if he's with me, that like the attention in the time, like when he hangs out with me, and then there's also probably the time. So if I feel like something else is distracting too much, like it could be work or it could be a friend or it could be anything. Like if I feel like it starts to take away from like me, then I'm having an issue with it. I don't think he really cares much. I guess the only jealousy you experience is probably when you feel like, like if I get upset about him seeing someone too much, and then I go see someone more, and then he's like, why can I go see my friend more, like as much as you. So like, that's the sort of like thing that we're trying to navigate on, I guess. I think we are like diametrically opposed sometimes in terms of how we view like engagement with people or engagement with the world sometimes. So like on her end of the spectrum, like a perfect week for her might be like being in a cabin, watching like fireflies at night, going hiking every morning, going swimming at the beach, because it's like you're taking in like the grandeur of nature, you're like connected with yourself, you're like very at peace, everything is like chill and cool, there's the wind, the feeling of nature, everything, that's like her peak living experiences. I like being present. Yeah, and like my peak experiences are like people trying to destroy my life, like the challenge of like navigating really complicated discussion, like, you know, several different dramatic events unfolding that might end my career. Like these things are like very, I like the stress and the action and the entertainment and everything's like very cool for me. So when we're together, she generally wants me to be like more chill, but if I don't feel like I'm being like stimulated a lot, then it's easy for like my mind to wander on my phone. To wander somewhere else. Yeah, that's kind of the issue. We have a very different way of like engaging with the world. So how can you find happiness in the stillness? I feel like if we're just like aware of it and we're trying our best, like whenever we like, we're supposed to do this one thing. So let's say that we wanna go to New York and I'm like, we should just like go out and do this one specific thing. We try to find something that he enjoys doing, like now that we're in Texas, we can go shooting, or do something fun that he enjoys, then we can do it. And then I think like, just like for me also to be aware that like when he spends a lot of time on crazy people, it's not because he like loves them or wants to be with them. It's just because he likes being like having his life destroyed, like you said, which I don't really do. It's just a completely different thing. So like for me to like understand more like how he's thinking because it's so different from mine. And for him to understand how I'm thinking about things and like what I prioritize in my life, I think that's like how we navigate. But I think it's good. I think the differences can be good, like when we're finding a way. Well, I think you're relatable. More of a you than your AI. No, I'm definitely very difficult to get along with. Like I always tell people that, that like if you're dating me for like more than a few years, like you get like an award for that. It's like a war zone that you've survived. Absolutely. You're like a veteran, you get medals and stuff. And it's always like, I think there's probably been like six different, I don't think she says it anymore, but there are like six different times in our relationship where she's like, is it always like this? This is actually, and like every next year it's like. Why was it in the beginning of about, like you were lying about that. I'm just kidding. It got more. You were like, no, it's just like right now I'm having a huge argument online about saying the N-word in private and it's just gonna be like this and I'm gonna be streaming 24 hours a day. And I'm like, when are you gonna come to bed? It's been a week. Yeah. What is this? I did playing League come into this. A little bit, but I'm clean. I'm clean of League like six months right now. Yeah, what do you hate about League of Legends? I never got humans. Well, speaking of which, my participation in League involved on the robot side. Good. Cause that's an improvement. Cause both with Starcraft 2 and League of Legends cause OpenAI and DeepMind both participated in creating bots in those. I was a professional Starcraft 2 player. So I remember when the AI started to play, it's interesting the types of restrictions that you would have to put on like a gaming robot to make it like functional and not totally unfair to the other side. Yeah, to make it human-like. Yeah. Was that interesting to you to see AI be able to play those video games? I think in some ways people think things are more complicated than they actually are. And I think video games is one of those things where we're like, oh my God, there's like a million possibilities at every second and who knows? And it's like, no, there's like three or four things going on at any point in time. And I'm willing to bet that like an AI could probably solve some of these games like pretty easily, especially if there are no constraints on how they can learn. Can I talk to you about relationships? Yeah. We already have so. Yeah, I know. But more generally speaking, we didn't get a chance to talk about the Red Pill community. Oh, sure. Well, first of all, what is the Red Pill community, the Manosphere in general? I'd love to get both of your opinions on this. Sure. I know you're probably not as opinionated on that whole. I'd say, do you think I am that? Like probably not as you, like as much as you, but I do have opinions. You do? Okay. I usually don't like speak out too much on it because I feel like there's like a language barrier. That's why I don't really do politics because this is my second language. That's right. So you have to know the. A little bit like that, yeah. You know how to use, have to use derogatory terms every other sentence so they understand you, right? Exactly. I don't know anything about that. Steven and I talked about. You need like a good, like you need to be able to like speak really well for people to take you seriously, I think. And like that's a thing. Like if I don't have like the words and I don't have the, like I can't pronounce things correctly. Yeah. And a yes-all person searching for words looks stupid. Essentially. That's how people view it. Tell me about it. I have a podcast that a bunch of people listen to and I mumble and they, yeah. Wait, is your, what's your first language? Russian. Oh, okay. But I speak both languages horribly. I'm just not, I'm not like, there is definitely a big disconnect between my brain and my mouth module. Like I'm not able to generate the thoughts efficiently. Like the things you're able to do, like the da-da-da-da-da, like speak like that, I'm not. It's very, very tough. Plus there's huge amount of anxiety and social interaction that I have, which makes speaking even harder. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's tough. I understand it. Gotcha. Makes sense. Yeah. The gotcha is both a symbol of compassion and derision at once. I'm just letting you know, I understand what you're saying. I'm just gonna sit there and stare at you and say. Confirm. No, you can just say like, yeah, I get it. Like, yeah. I get it. Gotcha. No, no, gotcha sounds, no, it's so, it's so short. It's like, say it's longer sentence, but that means the same thing. I understand you. Yeah, that's good. That's like not chills, you know? You get chills, so you understand me. Yeah, it feels good. Yeah. I hear you. I hear you. And like, if you just like, hold the other person's hand, that's even better. You gotta put in some emotion there, okay? Show that you have some. I understand. What do you think about? Gotcha. What do you think about Red Pill? What, sorry, what is it first of all for people who don't know? Yeah, the Red Pill community, obviously it's the matrix reference. The Red Pill that you take is when you realize what dating standards and norms really are in the world, that men are providers and have to become some great thing to hunt and attract, you know, the woman who are just kind of there floating around looking for people to give them the most resources. And it's like coming to a realization of what the world of dating really is, broken away from the Hollywood standards and the romantic stuff that they try to sell you and, you know, stories. So there was kind of, maybe you can kind of educate me on this, but Red Pill used to be associated with just maybe anti-establishment views. I don't know, maybe Republican conservative viewpoints. People use, yeah, they use Red Pill a lot in like different communities. Like when you say the Red Pill community. Yeah, that usually means dating. The dating thing. But a lot of people say, oh, Trump voters, they're Red Pilled. Are you Red Pilled on like politics or whatever? People will say stuff like that, yeah. Okay, cool. And then there's like the Manosphere, that's all the similar type of stuff. And Andrew Tate is somebody that represents kind of the figurehead. Of the Manosphere of like the Red Pill stuff. Yeah, I would say so, I'm pretty sure, yeah. Okay, all right, cool. So what are some ideas that they represent and what do you think about them? I think they do a good job at speaking to disaffected young men who feel like the rest of the world has kind of left them behind or isn't willing to speak to them. And they do identify some true and real problems. Feels like on the left, we have a really hard time doing like self-improvement or telling people how to better themselves. We focus too much on like structural or systemic issues rather than what can an individual do to uplift or empower themselves. And it also feels like they do a good job at speaking to some of the positive aspects of masculinity. That it's okay to be like strong and brave and a soldier and a warrior and provide for your family and blah, blah, blah. So I would say like those are like positive messages like self-improvement and everything that come from the Red Pill community. What's the negative? I think the analysis on how men and women interact is a way too transactional. All of like the romanticism and love and chemistry is totally sucked out of it. Everything is very like sex-based, like how do you basically have sex with the most amount of women possible and that's gonna make you happy. And then I think people's motivation sometimes are just spoken about in such a shallow derogatory way that I don't think is always reflective of reality. Like woman only wants you because you make six figures and you're tall and a guy only wants you because he wants to have sex with you and blah. Like it feels like there's a lot of that going on a lot. Yeah, and that misses some fundamental aspects about relationships, about meaningful relationships and so on. I don't think I've never heard Red Pill people ever, ever talk about like meaningful relationships. It's always just how to get in one or how to have sex really. Mel, what bothers you about some of that philosophy? I feel like the people that are like the Red Pill people, I feel like their solution is something that doesn't actually work out. Like it works out for some people, people that makes a lot of money is like really successful in that sort of way, but it's not gonna help most men out there. So I feel like it's just like a pointless like speech to give to these like really lost guys. And they really do believe that they can like, they can become successful, they can get money and like when they get all these things, they can get girls, but most of them is not gonna achieve that ever. To get the money part or become successful. Just become a billionaire, you know, like and you will get all the girls and which is true, but not everyone can do that. So I feel like when these guys are speaking to these men and there's like, we just care about these men out there, you know, they need to hear this. It doesn't really help a lot of them. And it doesn't inspire them to develop compassion towards the opposite sex, which is probably something required to have a meaningful relationship. And also like they seem to complain a lot about women, like only wanting men that have money and that's tall and that's muscular, whatever, you know, all those things. But they complain about that, but that's like also kind of what they're trying to make the men try to do for themselves. So they kind of like falling to the same sort of behavior and it seems like they're kind of unaware of that as well. They're just playing a part of the game instead of trying to find a woman that doesn't look for those things and that are looking for not those things, yeah. I actually would love to have like straight up data on people in that world versus not in that world, how often they get laid. Yeah, like literally. So I think for sure people in that world have fewer meaningful long-term relationships that are fulfilling, that actually helped them succeed in life, that helped them be happy and content and all that kind of stuff. But just even the straight up, the shallow goal of getting laid, I wonder. Because it's very possible that like just the roughness with which they treat intellectually women, that might lead to lower success, not higher success. It's very adversarial, which I think is always disappointing. Anything that talks about men and women, I think it's good to acknowledge differences, but when it becomes like adversarial, especially when you talk about sex, sex is something that men are getting and it's something that women are giving and that type of like trade-off and the way they talk about it is like, yeah, it sets people against each other in a really toxic way, I think. How do you talk to people from that world, from the red pill world? Like would you ever talk to like somebody like Andrew Tate? Oh yeah, if I had the chance to. I've been on the Fresh and Fit podcast a few times and then I've got a friend, Sneko, who's like very red pill, that stuff. If I'm trying to talk to them, usually the, it's kind of like approaching it like a scared cat. The first thing you have to do is like be very gentle and say like, I understand your issues, I understand your complaints, I know that you're, I'm scary because you think I'm gonna say like toxic masculinity and feminism and all these scary words at you. So the first thing is always to recognize it. Like a lot of what they talk about, there are like true aspects to what they're talking about that people on the left won't recognize. So I think it's good to acknowledge those things that like men and women are kind of different. We do look for different things in general when it comes to relationships. It's okay to say that, there's nothing bad there. And then it'll usually be like, once I've got your trust and I'm in your bubble, like let's talk about the things that you want. And maybe some of the strategies that you're employing aren't necessarily gonna get you some of the things that you want. So for instance, if you're really worried about like shallow girls, like ruining your life, like Malina said, it's probably not best to build your entire worldview around trying to get shallow girls that are gonna ruin your life. Like if your way of attracting a girl is to go to the gym, get a whole bunch of money and try to like flaunt your wealth as much as possible, you're gonna be attracting the very same type of women that you're here like decrying on your stream. Yeah, I think we talked about that on the podcast. Like you probably wanna have a woman that's gonna be there if you lose your job, but still there. Like that cares about the things that's not just your job. Yeah. It's more stable. And also I don't help you become a great man or a great, like grow, like I feel like a great friendship and a partnership. Like it helps you make you a better person. Some of the most successful people I know, I mean they have families and there's clearly dynamic there that's like, that makes them, they wouldn't be that without. They're not an island, yeah. Yeah, and the kids actually a big part of that too. Like for most people, if you're like a good parent, they make you step up somehow in life. You have to take responsibility for getting your shit together and excelling in ways that I guess the philosophy of the red pole does not quite get to. That's always an interesting, I think I've asked that a couple of times where it's like, would you let your daughter date Andrew Tate? And it's always funny to watch them kind of like squirm around those answers sometimes. But see if they don't have a daughter, like I don't have a daughter. I think your whole philosophy changes once you have a daughter. Sure, well, but even at that, like they know that what they're answering, they feel a little bit weird about it. It's funny to watch them. Like they even they know it's like, ah fuck. Well, they might say like, I want my daughter to date like a high value male to the degree that he's a high value male, yes. But like, I don't think you'll feel that way. The definition of high value changes completely. Certainly the stereotypical measures of value contribute to the calculation, but it's so much more than that, I think. The chemistry of the whole thing is bigger. You've also mentioned about body count. You guys both have a high body count. Does body count matter? Or it depends, like you said, it's low in some people's eyes, it's high in other people's eyes. Does body count matter in relationships? Does the past matter? Well, the past matters. I don't think body count, not to me, I don't really care. Not just as it is, no. I mean, it could be. But the past does. Yeah, well, the past is who you are, right? So if somebody tells me they have a 200 body count and they're 16, something's probably going on or that's not good. I was thinking about that too. Because there could be really young people that are having some sort of mental problems going on. Or somebody's 45 and they've never had sex before, there's probably something going on, right? So it could be indicative. But if somebody's in their 20s and they've had sex with 100 people or 50 people, whatever, it's, you know, whatever. It's more experience, which can be good. Sure. Okay, so that just represents you're sexually open and so it doesn't really necessarily mean any kind of. Not necessarily, it could though. The number alone doesn't mean anything. Yeah. Okay. Well, you could meet a guy that's like, I just really, really like when I fuck a lot of people because it makes me so cool. You can meet someone like that, which is like, maybe. So the body count doesn't matter, but like where it comes from. Yeah, like why have you slept with the people that you slept with, yes. Does it hurt like the romantic aspect of the relationship knowing that there's a lot of people in the past? I don't think. Not for us, no. Is a part of the relationship fundamentally romantic? For us? Yeah, I'd say so. For us, yeah, for us, yeah. Okay. What? You come off as such a cold person. No, I was just in my head thinking and I wanted to just say, gotcha right there. Oh, nice. It's so judgmental. I think when it comes to the sex thing, there's always like, the way that I explain it is, and I understand like, I have to say this because I don't advocate for what I do for everybody or what she does for everybody because obviously there's a whole bunch of natural feelings of jealousy that pop up for a lot of people. But when people ask me, it's always like, oh, isn't this horrible that you guys are doing this and you don't love each other? From my perspective, I can have sex with any person and it can be sex. That's not like a special thing between two people. In my eyes, it's like anybody can have sex. But there are certain activities and ways you can spend time with each other where you're carving out these precious little moments in time with a certain person that can do things that are special to that person. And those are the kind of events that I remember more than anything else. So the idea of like, oh wow, I had sex with a person that was so special doesn't mean as much as like, us traveling to like New Zealand or sharing some special moment, doing like some really fun activity or event or whatever. That's usually how I like it. So a shared intimate moment. Yeah. I kind of agree, but I can definitely connect the romance with sex. Boring. I'm curious why you can't do that. That's because she's a woman, see? That's where the red pill's right. That's exactly what I'm saying. We've also talked about misogyny, which is clearly the embodiment of that. What were you saying? So there's a connection between romance and sex. Yeah, I think it is because I think sex could be a lot of things, right? It's some sort of bonding, I'd say, in some way. They say that you really like BDSM. You kind of like, you become submissive to someone or you take control over someone. It's like in a very bonding, like intimate moment, I'd say. And that's romantic. The intimacy is romantic. I think it is. If you can show yourself as really submissive or like weak or you have like absolutely no control over yourself and you let someone else do it, or you are the one being that, like you are the dominant force someone. I think that's a really like intimate thing because you show like the weakest part of yourself, kind of. I just feel like I personally, to me, some component of romantic, but to me, this is not judging to others. To me, maybe this call was brought up. The romance increases if the number of intimate interactions are limited to one person. For me, for some reason, spreading it out decreases like exponentially the feeling of romance you feel. I don't know what, that could be just like sort of having grown up in the Soviet Union. There's a kind of, there's the fairy tale stories and you're kind of maybe living through them. Yeah, I mean, I think what you're saying is like really normal. Like most people probably show that way, yeah. But because you guys are able to successfully not do that, I just want to question my own understanding of it. You know, like. Like why is that? Why is that? Why am I being very jealous for no reason? Like maybe you can maximize the number of intimate experiences if you just open up and let go of the jealousy, essentially. I think, I feel like in Sweden, like in Scandinavia, we're extremely just sexually open, like in general. We're not like super religious either. We're very like relaxed. We don't like, we don't feel bad about ourselves. Like it's just like a different sort of thing. And I would say like it's, we're more progressive when it comes to feminism and stuff. So it's more common that you will meet women with a higher body count than like, when I meet like American girls, all of them have like vaginism, like super suppressed like sexually. And they have like- What did you just use? They have like issues to like, they can't relax during sex, so it just hurts for them. Vaginism. Vaginism, isn't that what it's called? Yeah. So like I meet so many girls that are having like a lot of issues with sex. And they have like a very low body count because they just can't relax or they, yeah. And it's probably, usually they come from like a very religious background. So they have just been told like, you cannot wear that, you cannot be like that, you can't like, you know. And like where I grew up, it wasn't like that at all. We just see it as more like a casual thing. So then you can just maximize the awesomeness of the experience. Yeah, I guess I don't like have like a- You don't have a trauma over it. Exactly, yeah. I think that the important thing I think for everybody to realize is there's always pros and cons to everything. Like my lifestyle, like obviously I get to have a lot of fun experiences. That's like a huge pro and that's super cool. And if you're like a more monogamy brain person, you're not gonna get those experiences. But if you're a monogamy brain person, like when you're sharing that special moment of time with somebody else, like that moment can be really, really, really special because now it's the thing that you're showing yourself and opening yourself up to another person and they're only trusting you to do that. And that's like a really special thing that only the two of you are sharing with each other. So I mean, like there's always like pros and cons to everything. Like I think we both would say like, like doing an open relationship is probably not, like we would not recommend it. Yeah, no, of course not. I don't think we would, no. Yeah, I recently fasted for three days and I ate a chicken breast at the end of that. And it was like the most delicious food I've ever eaten. So like there's some aspect of fasting and scarcity and so on that like, and you have to figure out for your own psyche what works the best. It's good to be a little bored or like not do something or like work because you can just enjoy the time when you're doing something really fun is more fun. Otherwise you're just gonna get numb in general with everything. Yeah, I personally just never get bored. Like I guess the boring thing is exciting to me. The just like everything. You're like me, because everything I like is boring. I gotta ask you, we talked about massaging and he's trying to battle it out on the internet. What's your sense as a woman about the level of massaging and the internet and the streaming community and how to fight it? For me, because I guess I get it every single day somehow. Like because I have an online, like I have a chat that goes that's live, right? And, but I have like mods moderating that all the time. So I don't really need to see much of it. I think it's just pretty annoying because you get to like see it all the time. So it's become like background noise. Yeah, a little bit. And it's like the same comments over and over again. But it's usually for me, I don't personally care that much. I understand that other people do, especially when it comes into like, when there's like a lot of sexism and stuff. And when there's a lot of like men not taking women seriously, like I definitely get that. And I used to get that even more like a few years ago with my accent and everything. Like I used to be blonde as well, like a few months ago. So I feel like people wouldn't take me seriously because of that. That's a bit annoying, but I feel like it's pretty easy to like see through when someone acts that way. And for me personally, I don't really care. But it's a bit annoying, like being online and like getting stuff every single day. I would say like probably the worst thing is when you feel like you put in a lot of effort into some sort of work, everyone is just gonna say, you just got that because you're a woman and you're attractive. And that's probably like the worst thing. Is there a way to fight that you think? Yeah, I don't think you can. I think it just comes up all the time. It's just like, it is what it is, I guess. You just gotta keep doing whatever you do and like not let it like emotionally control you somehow. I think having more women in those spaces is always good. It's probably good, yeah. Like a lot of the guys you can tell online that they don't ever- Don't bring on the worst ones then, Steven and I, you weren't here. See, she just did it. She did the misogyny thing. By having some bad women on, she's saying all women, see? Well, you know it's true, right? See, but yeah, I disagree with you and I'm older than both of you and therefore wiser, right? So- Well combined, we're older than you, so careful. We're one, only matronomy. Yeah, we've got combined age. Well, it could be the same thing. It was like, also the age thing and like the woman thing. A lot of people think that I'm just copying every single thing that he says, which I think is a bit annoying as well. So I can never really like- Oh, Sonic used to have that one too. Yeah, which is a bit annoying. I know you like so much, you know? It was about the defunding police. Like my dad is a cop. I like friendship, camaraderie, and love and respect, which you both have had for a time and have lost it and I would like you to regain it. Let's try to increase, not decrease, the amount of love in the space. What do you think about some of the harshness of his language, which we talked about? Our word in the past when he used N-word, all of that kind of stuff. What he used to do, I mean- No, like what do you think about it? Like do you give him advice? To not speak a certain way. No, like a little more civility. I was just trying to get a second opinion on this. Second opinion about- Normie people, non-internet people, are way more extreme than- Yeah, yeah. She's way more extreme than I am. No, that's not true. Okay, so here's the thing for me, okay? I was not online until three years ago, at all. Like I would watch YouTube. That's pretty much all I would do. I wouldn't do anything else, really. I didn't grow up playing video games or anything. So I'm like extremely new to everything. So when I came into this world and I started seeing clips from him in the past, I don't think I really had much of an opinion because it just sounded like it was just a different like words that we're using, but it didn't mean anything. That's what it feels like. It was just like, if you're saying the R word, it's because you just want to call someone stupid, but you want to like do it a little bit more. But it's not like, it didn't feel like it was like a, it's not like racist more like, you know, it's not- Agreement on this side here, right? So like if he was saying the F word because it was just like a word to like insult someone and he wasn't like, I don't think he was ever, I don't think you were ever homophobic back in the day or anything like that. I think it was just like a way to express yourself maybe back then. I don't know, I didn't do it. There's no videos of me or anything because I wasn't even online back then. But I don't know. Yeah, so my case was, I definitely don't think Steven is homophobic or racist or any of those, obviously. So there's a good heart there and a good mind. I was just saying- He just likes being mean, I think. Well, there is some, you lose yourself and forget the bigger picture that he's pushing for more effective discourse on the internet. He's like an inspiration to a lot of people, especially now, of how you can use effective conversation to make for a better world, to radicalize people and so on. And then you lose some of that power by losing yourself in the language, just more language of emotion versus effective communication. I would say- But it's a gray area. I would say something that is probably recently done in that case, because it's been joking about women a lot. It's women's fault, they're bad. It's been a lot of jokes when it comes to misogyny, I guess, in your community. And I think it's actually turned people a little bit that way. That's why we've done the recent misogyny. Yes, so I guess that's actually true because I don't think it was clear enough. I don't think it actually was. I think you did that mistake. But I think back then I was even saying, like, hey, you should probably not, like you probably should not do that. Because it actually is pretty hard for me because whenever I come into his community, like his chat, people are just gonna spam, it's like a woman moment. It's a woman moment whenever I say something and it's kind of like, yeah, it's getting pretty annoying as I said, it's just annoying when you see it every single day. There you go. Wisdom from somebody younger than you. Wisdom can come from all kinds of people. Yeah, of course. Just sometimes in very limited quantities depends on the age. Oh boy. And learn something from anybody. What advice would you give to young people, the both of you? That you have both audiences where young people look up to you. In general, if you were to give advice to somebody in high school, like how to create a life they can be proud of, what would you say? The most important thing that I've learned is to view people as different and not better or worse. And when you view people as different instead of better or worse, you learn that there's almost something that you can learn from anybody. Like be open and empathetic towards other people's experiences. Nobody does anything by random choice. Like there's always reasons why people act the way they do. And as long as you're willing to kind of like be open and receptive to the lived experiences of other people, you're gonna be able to gather information and create like a more cohesive and better view of the world than any of your peers will. Do you have any kind of advice you can give to young folks? I feel like something that I see, especially in America a lot, is that a lot of people kind of get told what to do early on. Like in high school, they're supposed to become this thing. Like education-wise, like they're supposed to like become a doctor or this thing or whatever. And then they kind of just like give up on things that they're actually passionate about. So I think a lot of teenagers get really confused. They get an education and then they get that job and they hate everything. And they think that when they're reaching the job, when they're reaching like the journey, they're gonna get happy. That's like where the happiness is gonna be. But then when they get to there, they just hate everything. And then they become really depressed. And I've seen this so much. Like I've seen this all the time. And it's pretty sad to me to see so many people that are just wasting time. And then they just get really confused. And I don't know. It's the same thing with relationships too. No one really knows what they want anymore. I feel like everyone is just kind of doing whatever like society is saying or their parents are saying or their friends are saying. And they're never really doing anything that's super meaningful anymore. And like they don't. So what I would say is like try to find something that is important to you. It could be anything really. Like some sort of passion, maybe like your friends, maybe like like what matters to you. Like figuring those things out I think is really important. And that comes from being able to listen to like some inner voice. So it's not gonna come from elsewhere. It's really hard because you're living the life. And like there's things happening around you and people tell you what to do and what not to do. No one really has like their own opinions. Everyone is just kind of like listening to the cooler thing or you know. Except Steven, he seems to stand on his own. True. Yeah I guess. Yeah I'd say so. And like something I realized too like, cause we just went to TwitchCon and we were talking to a lot of streamers. How was that? It was interesting. I thought it was interesting because the few people that I feel like I, that seemed really cool and that I look up to like in the streaming world, all of them wants to quit streaming. All of them wants to do it. No one wants, like no one likes it. And they're so successful. Like they are around successful people. They're working every single day. They're working hard. They're making so much money. And everyone is just complaining. And like they're complaining about like not being able to see their partner or you know, because they need to live somewhere else. Because I see these things and they seem extremely unhappy. And but it's so hard for them to just like cut all these successful stuff off because that's like what you, you know, learn to do. And that's like supposed to be like your happiness, but it isn't. Everyone is really unhappy. Yeah there's something about maybe streaming is different, but YouTube folks too have interacted with a few. And even in podcasting space, people become obsessed about the views and numbers and subscribers and stuff like that. So I turned, I never talk about that. I don't pay attention to that. I feel like that's a drug that destroys your mind. Your mind is an artist, the ability to create truly unique things. Also your mind in terms of the anxiety, the ups and downs of the attention mechanism. And then also being just, if it's something that you make is not popular, but it meant a lot to you, you will think of it less because it's not popular. That's a really dangerous thing. And because everyone around you is reinforcing, like I'll get messages like, wow, this thing got this many views or something. Great job. It's like, no, you don't get it. Like that's not, that's not, everyone is enforcing this language of views and likes and so on. And it's correlated of course, cause truly impactful things will get a lot of attention often. But it's not on the individual local scale, like temporarily is, it can really fuck with your mind. And I see that in the creators, they become addicts to the algorithm. Lost and chasing views. Like we know friends that we know cool people and then they start streaming and eventually they're like chasing the dragon of like. And they change like, yeah. It's like hard to engage for them. They change who they are completely. And there's like, this is something I've always said that like one of the biggest blessings and biggest curses of humanity is we are very good at acclimating. Like you can become paralyzed. You can have all sorts of horrible things happen to you and you'll get used to it and you'll be okay. You're gonna have like a good baseline. But it works the other way too and that you can get more and more and more and more and you acclimate to it almost immediately. There's like, this is a phenomenon that I bet it happens in the YouTube world but I know what happens in the streaming world where you're streaming 1000 viewers every day, huge event happens and you blow up and you got like 15,000 viewers for a day or two. And then it starts to go down and down and down and down and down. And then after all the drama stayed off, you're at like 3000 concurrent viewers. Now in the macro, you went from 1000 to 3000. That feels awesome. But you actually feel like shit the whole time because you're remembering when you had 10 or 15,000 and now everything feels horrible. And you'll see people climb over time. They're like, fuck, like, but whatever that one huge stream I had like, I've never like been able to, and it's like, dude, you're doing great. Yeah, that happens a lot. There's so many people that we know that we find super, super cool. They're passionate about things. They have so much interest. And then they just get like so addicted to these numbers. And like all the, everything is just ruined. Like all the cool things about them is ruined because they stopped doing the things that they actually like to do something else that gives them more viewers and more money. And it's really sad to see. Yeah, that temporary sacrifice that seems temporary is that it actually destroys you. Like for one time making a choice. Cause I come across those choices often. Like I can do this. You can kind of know what's going to be popular and not. And you have to ask yourself the question, like, is this going to sacrifice? Cause if people are sacrificing like intimate relationships, they're sacrificing time with their family. They're like sacrificing time with the things that they feel good about and that they like. And that's something I kind of realized last year cause I was working so much and I was just grinding, grinding, grinding, grinding. Cause it was kind of new for me. And then new years came by and I was like, wait, what did I even do like the entire year? Like I traveled to a bunch of places, but nothing actually really meant anything to me because I felt like I was just working the entire time. I felt like I was just numb through the entire year. I was really scary. Like I rented like a super pretty house, like for a week with my dad and my sister cause I wanted to spend time with them. But the entire time I was just streaming and I actually didn't ever like calm down and just like chill with them. And I like, that's like time I'll never get back. I don't give a shit about the money that I made that week, but I lost the time. And like that is really important to me. And I, yeah, and a lot of people are doing that. And I feel like you, as you said, like you can definitely see that in like artists for sure. I feel like if you look at like artists, like back in the sixties or seventies, I feel like things were just so much better back then. And it feels like they were actually making music that meant something to them. They were actually making art. And I feel like today everything is just kind of like, whatever is cool, whatever sells, whatever, you know, sounds in a certain way, everything is kind of the same thing. And everything that is very artistic and very cool is actually not that popular at all. And that's kind of sad, I think. Yeah, of course there's now bigger mechanisms and platforms to spread stuff, music. So as long as you can be content with not being popular, I think you can still create great art. Yeah, but not like, when people get a little popular, they get addicted to that so fast. Yeah, it's weird. You have been somewhat good, at least from my outsider perspective, because I think you, I can at least imagine you making choices that could make you more popular and you don't seem to make those choices. Yeah, that was my career. Like having orbits of drop on. But it is very intentional, like you said. And I made that choice at every single stage of my life. One is because from the perspective of being a carpet cleaner, my life is way better than that was, or ever would have been. So I'm already doing way better than I ever thought somebody like me ever could be. But then two, I super love my job. Every time I wake up, every time I fly to a place to do a podcast, every time I get to talk to really cool people, every single part of my job, I super like. If there's something I don't like, I just cut it off because I don't care. Because I'm already making plenty of money doing what I do. And why would I ever wake up and not like what I'm doing when I can like what I'm doing? How do you guys find through that, given that you love it and sometimes maybe lose yourself in the drug of it, how do you find like work life balance together inside a relationship? Like time for each other? I don't at all, so I'm not a good person to ask. What do you love more, Mel or Factor? Factor is a really good game. That's like not a fair comparison, okay? You're talking about one of the best, cleanest games, best support ever made, cleanest code base. Yeah, this is. I think I understand all the problems you're talking about. Yeah, it's more Factor time for me. Starting to understand where the massaging comes from. By the way, is Factor a legit, really good game? Yeah, of course, yeah. Okay. If you're like, do you enjoy programming? Of course, that's all I do, that's all. Okay. To me, programming is a game in itself that I enjoy probably more than anything else, but yeah. It's very much a game like that. Like if you're into stuff like that, like you can lose hundreds of hours like very quickly to like you have a problem and then you think of a solution and then you iterate on that over and over and over again in larger, larger schemes. Sometimes you gotta redesign stuff, sometimes you got like, it's very much like that kind of game. So you're essentially building a factory, like what, on a foreign planet or something like that? Basically, it's like a bunch of, you're trying to automate different problems so that you can build bigger things so that you can automate bigger problems so you can build bigger things and automate bigger problems. So it's more complicated than like a city building game, like some city type of thing? I wouldn't say it's more complicated. It's more like, Factory is like a game of like logic, like strictly like logic. Like almost like a building a circuit or something. Yes, yeah, there's like there's circuitry and you've got your N or XOR gates, there's stuff like that. It's very much like that, like problems. What are the enemies in the game? Like what's something attacking? There are like bugs that try to bite you and you can get guns and shoot and kill them, but it's like that. I saw there's like shooting going on. Yeah, but that's like a minor, just like another problem to solve in the game basically. Okay, all right. See what we do there? We just started talking about the game as we're trying. Oh my God, that's like a- It's a really good game, okay. That's horrible. Anyway, is that basically the struggle, not a stop struggle, how to get human, like intimate human time? I feel like it was like that a little bit more in the past. I feel like it's been better lately, but I think it's because when we started dating, I wasn't streaming and I kind of just like gave up like my trip in New Zealand. I give up like I left Sweden. So I was just like in LA, which I hate. I hate LA, I don't like LA at all. It's hard to make friends that are like real, that are into the same stuff as you. It was just really hard for me to connect with anyone, especially also like being a European and like being around Americans was very strange. So the only thing I had when I came here was him. And I didn't expect- Bad situation. Because yeah, because we had like two weeks of hanging out and like he would be in his computer sometimes and like do emails and stuff, but I wasn't thinking that he would stream like 12 hours a day. And it was pretty intense like in the beginning of it as well. And I realized it was really hard to like get attention or get time because his like love meter would be like full if I was just in the house. And that's just kind of like the way he is. And for me back then, when I didn't have anything else to do was kind of like a, it was kind of crazy for me. I feel like right now, because I do work as well and I have things going for me and I have other friends now that I made, I feel like it's a lot easier. And I can definitely like enjoy just like being in separate rooms and just like hear him in the background is really nice. So I can sit and paint in like in my room and I will do that for hours while I'm just like hearing a scream in the background. It's kind of like comforting that he's just there. It feels nice. I like it. Oh, because to you that's the sound of happiness. Yes, because I know he's right there. Yeah, it's nice and they'll come in and check on me sometimes. And it's kind of like, it's actually very comforting. It's very nice. I like it. Yeah. I think that's kind of what a relationship is. Like you do fun things together, you share moments together, but also just like having someone like around you is really, really nice. And I think that's probably, maybe it's me growing up. Maybe that's what it is. And like I start liking like the kind of, I feel like we're like an old couple, like we're like 80 and we're just like around. We don't really have to talk much. It's nice to just do that. That fills your love meter. That press. I like this terminology. I need both. I mean, okay. You're making it sound like that I'm like craving like crazy time. I haven't said anything. I'm not saying anything. I'm just making face right now. I know exactly what you're thinking. There's so much judging going on. There's no judging. No, but like we, I think whenever we do plan something out, like if we go on a trip, like every other month or once a month, I feel like usually like that's enough, as long as he's not playing Victoria the entire time. Like if I feel like he's going on these trips with me and he's not like doing things for me, or he's not interested in like spending time or like being present with me, then I'll feel like, I just feel like I'm just wasting time right now. And then I get kind of disappointed, but otherwise I think this, like this is fun. I think this is like spending time together because we're like doing something together. Yeah, it's fun. Yeah. My love meter is full. It's my social life. Otherwise, we like to think about it that way. That like, I need like a little bit more of like this, one thing like quality time. And he needs like almost zero quality time. But like, let's say that we took away like physical touch, you would probably not be very happy. So you need physical touch. So it's not just Victoria. No, I'm a very cuddly person. Yeah, like cuddly and then you're like, I guess like acts of service. Like if I do something for you, you get really happy. Like hot chocolate. Yeah. Like if I give him hot chocolate in the morning, he gets really happy. So. The actual, it's not the hot chocolate, it's the giving of the hot chocolate. No, it's just the hot chocolate. But if she gives it to me, I didn't have to get it myself. Maybe it's just physical touch that you like. That's really nice. All right, well, if you have to choose between factorial and the drama or political discourse. Probably political discourse, probably my calling, but I am a good factorial player. Like what role exactly does factorial play in your streaming life? Oh, well right now it's just, usually there are like these games that I play in the background as I have conversations, because it's hard for me to just sit on the computer and just talk and not like be playing a game at the same time. So it's just something to keep me kind of like occupied. You know, I was thinking about like those little like widget things, I guess. Yeah, that's what yours is. Yeah, basically, yeah. It's like Minecraft or factorial for me. All right. Well, my love meter is full from this. Mel, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you for having me. This was really fun. You guys are fascinating human beings. Thank you for existing. I'm glad to live in a world where you exist. I can't wait to see what kind of beautiful thing you create next and the crazy kind of art that you create through the different people you interact with. Destiny, Stephen, you're an amazing human. Thank you so much for talking to me. It's an honor. Hope to talk with you again. I'm talking to Ben Shapiro. You've given me a lot of inspiration. It's an honor to talk to the Ben Shapiro of the left. Well, thanks a lot for having me. I appreciate it. Thank you guys. Thank you. Thanks for listening to this conversation with Destiny. To support this podcast, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now let me leave you with some words from Lewis Carroll. It's no use going back to yesterday because I was a different person then. Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.
 If you have a democratic style of governance,
 you are entrusting people with one of the most awesome
 and radical of responsibilities.
 And that's saying that you're going to pick the people
 that are gonna make some of the hardest decisions
 in all of human history.
 If you're gonna trust people to vote correctly,
 you have to be able to trust them to have open
 and honest dialogue with each other.
 Whether that's Nazis or KKK people or whoever talking,
 you have to believe that your people are going to be able
 to rise above and make the correct determinations
 when they hear these types of speeches.
 And if you're so worried that somebody is gonna hear
 a certain political figure and they're gonna be
 completely radicalized instantly,
 then what that tells me is that you don't have enough faith
 in humans for democracy to be a viable institution,
 which is fine.
 You can be anti-democratic,
 but I don't think you can be pro-democracy
 and anti-free speech.
 The following is a conversation with Steven Bennell,
 also known online as Destiny.
 He's a video game streamer and political commentator,
 one of the early pioneers of both live streaming
 in general and live streamed political debate and discourse.
 Politically, he is a progressive,
 identifying as either left or far left,
 depending on your perspective.
 There are many reasons I wanted to talk to Steven.
 First, I just talked to Ben Shapiro,
 and many people have told me that Steven is the Ben Shapiro
 of the left in terms of political perspective
 and exceptional debate skills.
 Second reason is he skillfully defends some nuanced,
 non-standard views, at the same time,
 being pro-establishment, pro-institutions and pro-Biden,
 while also being pro-capitalism and pro-free speech.
 Third reason is he has been there at the beginning
 and throughout the meteoric rise
 of the video game live streaming community.
 In some mainstream circles,
 this community is not taken seriously,
 perhaps because of its demographic distribution
 skewing young, or perhaps because
 of the sometimes harsh style of communication.
 But I think this community should be taken seriously
 and shown respect.
 Millions of young minds tune in to live streams
 like Destiny's to question and to try to understand
 what is going on with the world,
 often exploring challenging, even controversial ideas.
 The language is sometimes harsher
 and the humor sometimes meaner than I would prefer.
 But I, Grandpa Lex, put on my rain boots
 and went into the beautiful chaotic muck
 of online discourse and have so far survived
 to tell the tale with a smile
 and even more love in my heart than before.
 On top of all this, we were lucky to have Malina Goranson,
 a popular streamer and world traveler,
 join us at the end of the conversation.
 You can check out her channel on twitch.tv slash Malina,
 and you can check out Stephen's channel
 on youtube.com slash Destiny.
 This is the Lex Freedom podcast.
 To support it, please check out our sponsors
 in the description.
 And now, dear friends, here's Destiny.
 I don't know if you watched me watching your yay interview.
 Yeah, thank you so much.
 I'm so curious, when you're navigating
 a conversation like that,
 how intentional is the thought process
 between building rapport and pushing
 and giving a little and letting it like.
 Zero, zero intention.
 I was watching and thank you so much.
 It was very kind for you to review that conversation.
 It meant a lot that you were complimenting parts
 on the technical aspects of the conversation,
 but no, zero.
 And I'm actually deliberately trying to avoid,
 I think you've called it debate brain,
 which is just another flavor of thinking about
 the meta conversation, trying to optimize
 how should this conversation go?
 Because I feel like the more you do that,
 the better you get at that,
 the less human connection you have.
 The less genuinely you're actually sitting there
 in the moment and listening to the person,
 you're more like calculating what's the right thing to say
 versus feeling what is that person feeling right now?
 What are they thinking?
 That's what I'm trying to do is putting myself
 in their mind and thinking,
 what does the world look like to them?
 What does the world feel like to them?
 And so from that, I truly try to listen.
 Now I'm also learning, especially because Rogan
 and others have been giving me shit for not pushing back.
 It's good sometimes to say from a place of care
 for the other human being to say stop.
 What did you just say?
 I don't think that represents who you are
 and what you really mean.
 Or maybe if it does at that time represents who they are,
 I can see a better world if they grow
 into a different direction,
 try to point that direction out to them.
 There's a really complicated dance
 between letting somebody share their full story
 versus letting somebody like essentially,
 I guess like proselytize your audience.
 And it's like, okay, hold on, let's take him in here.
 But yeah, I used to be four or five years ago,
 it was attack, attack, attack, attack, attack,
 whatever you said.
 And now I'm leaning way more towards they're like,
 okay, well, tell me how you feel about everything
 and then we'll go from there.
 So a lot of people like my new approach,
 some older fans will watch and they're like,
 why are you letting this guy just ramble on?
 You know, he said like five or six wrong things
 and you're only gonna call him out on two of them.
 And it's like, it's just different styles of conversation.
 Do you do a lot of research beforehand too?
 Depending on the conversation, yeah.
 So if we're gonna talk like vaccines and stuff,
 yeah, that's a ton of reading and stuff
 that I never thought I'd know going into it.
 If it's a more personal,
 like political philosophy conversation,
 there's not as much you can prepare for just,
 it truly depends on the conversation.
 How much are you actually listening to the other person?
 I'm always listening, you have to listen.
 Cause as soon as you stop listening,
 the quality of everything falls apart.
 The connection disappears,
 the quality of the conversation disappears.
 But my natural inclination is to just be way more aggressive
 than normal.
 So I have to constantly remind myself,
 I guess you would call it a meta conversation,
 when you're like, okay,
 he's probably saying this because of that,
 or we'll let him go here and then we'll stop later.
 But yeah, cause my preferred style of conversation is like,
 I'm gonna talk and the second I say something
 that you disagree with, then let's iron it out, right?
 I got like, I think I'm like syllogisms, like, okay,
 here's premise A, good, okay, premise B, okay.
 And then conclusion.
 And then as long as we're both deductively sound,
 we're not crazy, no psychosis,
 then we're gonna agree on everything.
 Whereas other people like to,
 most people think in stories, like narratives,
 like a whole, there's a whole like narrative
 and the individual facts don't matter as much
 cause they'll pick and choose what they want.
 And it's really hard cause everybody thinks narratives,
 I have to function in that world,
 but it's frustrating for me sometimes.
 Well, I've seen, you've had a lot of excellent debates.
 One of them I just recently last night watched
 is on systemic racism.
 And it's the first time I've seen you
 completely lose your shit.
 Oh shoot, who was that against?
 I'm not sure exactly, but you were just very frustrated
 and sorry, not lose your shit,
 but you were frustrated constantly because of the thing,
 let's lay out one, two, three.
 And every time you try to lay it out, it would falter.
 I think it had to do with sort of,
 can you use data to make an argument
 or do you need to use a study
 that does an interpretation of that data?
 And then there's like this tension between,
 I think this is a behavioral economist
 that you were talking to.
 The point is you do this kind of nice layout
 that the whole point of behavioral economics
 that says there's more to it than just the data.
 You have to give a context and like do the rich,
 rigorous interpretation in the context
 of the full human story.
 And then there was like a dance back and forth.
 Sometimes you use data, sometimes not,
 and you were getting really frustrated and shutting down.
 And so that felt like a failure mode.
 I've seen Sam Harris have similar sticking points.
 Like if we can't agree on the terminology, we can't go on.
 To me, I feel like,
 the Wittgenstein perspective is like,
 I think if you get stuck on any one thing,
 you're just not gonna make progress.
 You have to, part of the conversation has to be
 about doing a good dance together
 versus being dogmatically stuck on the path to truth.
 I think the true challenge is identifying
 what of those sticking points are important
 versus what is not important.
 It's like if I'm having an argument with somebody
 about like Jewish representation in media,
 it might be like a big conversation
 and they might say a couple things.
 Like I think Jewish people,
 they tend to help their own or whatever and saying,
 okay, but like for the purpose of the conversation,
 we can keep moving.
 But if they casually drop like, yeah,
 and I think that's why the Holocaust numbers
 are blown up from like 100,000 to 6 million.
 And that's when it's like, okay, well, hold on, wait, wait.
 If you think this, we have to stop here
 because this is gonna be,
 it's not just a language game in this part.
 If you really believe this fact,
 then the whole rest of the conversation
 is gonna be informed by that belief.
 And it has to be something
 that doesn't bother you personally.
 You have to step outside your own ego.
 So Holocaust denial is somebody
 that would bother a lot of people.
 And there's some things just observing you.
 I feel like when you get really good at conversation,
 you can become a stickler to,
 you might have your favorite terms
 that really bothers you.
 People don't agree on those terms.
 Begs the question.
 You mean raising the question.
 Yeah, I usually just want,
 see, when people say stuff, I just let it slide, yeah.
 Cause if you fight,
 when you're having a conversation with somebody
 and you're talking to their audience at the same time,
 cause that's really what's happening,
 you never wanna come off as over combative
 or over aggressive because it puts people in like,
 there's like a trigger in your brain.
 And this is true of relationships,
 of friendships, of persuasive rhetoric or whatever.
 There's a trigger in the brain.
 And as soon as that defensive trigger gets like flipped on,
 everything is over.
 You've lost the ability to persuade
 because everything becomes a fight at that point.
 Well, I wanted to talk to you
 cause I heard somewhere that you were referred to
 as the Ben Shapiro of the left.
 And since I'm talking with Ben as well,
 I wanted to sort of complete spiritually
 this platonic political philosophy puzzle in my head.
 You are a progressive,
 but a progressive with many non-standard progressive views.
 And you had a heck of a fascinating journey
 through all of that.
 And like I said, I think you argue with passion sometimes
 with excessive amounts of passion, but almost-
 That's a really polite way of saying that.
 Almost always with good faith
 and with rigor, with seriousness.
 I asked on your subreddit,
 which is an excellent subreddit,
 shout out to the destiny subreddit,
 so much, at least for that particular post.
 What I really loved is when I asked for questions for you,
 they were like, holy shit,
 there's adults in there, let's all behave.
 Nobody say incest.
 I was like, what?
 What's going on here?
 But actually the questions that rose to the top
 were really good.
 So somebody said that destiny was,
 speaking of your journey,
 was a conservative in his early teens.
 Then he became a libertarian.
 Then he became a left-wing social justice warrior.
 Then he flirted with socialism,
 and now he is a social democrat liberal.
 I've also heard you refer to yourself as a far left person.
 So to the degree there's truth to that journey,
 can you take me through your evolution
 through the landscape of political ideologies
 that you went through?
 So my dad comes from Kentucky,
 and my mom is a Cuban immigrant.
 Cubans are notorious for being very conservative
 in the United States for historical reasons
 and for other reasons,
 but my upbringing was a very Republican one.
 I grew up listening to Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck,
 Michael Savage, on the radio, Billy Cunningham.
 I think Sean Hannity a little bit later on,
 that was my whole upbringing politically.
 I remember I was writing,
 I had written articles for the school journal
 in favor of defending the war in Iraq
 and defending Bush from all the criticism, et cetera.
 So that was my upbringing.
 I think once I hit high school college,
 I had my edgy, like libertarian-esque high school phase
 of like reading Ayn Rand,
 of figuring out that like, oh my God,
 nothing in life matters except for class and money.
 That's actually the answer to everything.
 And I got to college, I became a Ron Paul fan,
 very big Ron Paul fan.
 And then from there, I kind of work, do life, life happens.
 At the kind of the lowest point of my life
 in terms of where I'm working,
 financially everything is like kind of in ruin in my life.
 There's just a whole bunch of dumb stuff that's happened.
 Probably my most conservative point.
 I don't know what it is about like being poor
 and thinking like you can work your way out of it,
 you can do whatever.
 It's just my upbringing is always just like,
 if you're not having financial success,
 just work, work, work, work, work.
 And then I got into streaming, very, very lucky break.
 Everything just lined up at the right time.
 And then as I've progressed through streaming,
 I would say through the years,
 I've gradually fallen more and more to the left,
 especially once my kid turned four, five, six years old.
 And I started to see like how much different his life was
 just because of the financial opportunities
 that I was able to provide for him
 through no merit of his own.
 And that started to radically change
 how I viewed the world in a lot of ways.
 So actually let's like linger on that low point.
 You worked at McDonald's, you worked at a casino,
 you did carpet cleaning.
 What was the lowest point?
 Definitely the carpet cleaning.
 Really?
 Absolutely.
 Why was it the lowest point?
 That's when you were just flirting with starting streaming?
 My whole life has been a series of lucky breaks,
 really, truly.
 I grew up playing a lot of video games,
 but back in my day, our day, you had to read.
 There was a lot of text on the screen.
 Back in my day, we used to play.
 They didn't all talk to you.
 Yeah, because nowadays everything's voice acted,
 but back then you had to read a lot.
 I was a really good reader and a really good vocabular.
 Yeah, I've heard you actually say that.
 Well, what games are we talking about?
 What do you mean just reading?
 You're talking about like RPGs?
 Yeah, JRPGs.
 So like Final Fantasy games, Fantasy stars,
 like all of these, like any RPG
 that would have been on the SNES, Sega, PlayStation,
 these are the things that I'm-
 Let's pause on that.
 Okay.
 So you just talked to Todd Howard,
 who's of the Elder Scrolls fame
 and the Fallout fame and beyond.
 What's your thoughts on Elder Scrolls?
 Why is Skyrim the greatest RPG of all time?
 Man, I really don't like Skyrim or Fallout
 or those types of games. You don't love it?
 Oh, really? No, not at all.
 Why do you hate Skyrim?
 Yeah, so I really like characters
 and like compelling stories and narratives
 around those characters.
 And I like to see them kind of like grow and change,
 kind of like a movie or a story.
 So in your like Final Fantasy games, you've got characters.
 There are a lot of like classical tropes
 of like a character starts off kind of like edgy, angsty,
 all on their own.
 They develop relationships, friendships.
 They realize that the life is more about themselves
 and they do that.
 And I like that growth.
 That's kind of what you see
 in all of those old role-playing games.
 I didn't like the open world ones as much
 because your main character is just like a blank slate,
 never talks.
 It's for you to like project onto,
 but there's not the same like linear narrative
 of like growth for the character.
 Oh, that's fascinating.
 There's an actual story arc to the character
 that's more crafted in a beautiful way
 by the designers of the game.
 Yeah.
 I don't think one is better or worse.
 I tend towards like, I want to hear a compelling story
 around like a set of characters
 that like grow and change as the game goes on.
 Oh, that's beautifully put then.
 Yeah, I just really loved being able to leave the town.
 You go outside the town and you look outside its nature
 and the world of possibilities is before you.
 You can do whatever the fuck you want.
 I mean, that immensity of just being lost in the world
 is really immersive for me.
 But yeah, you're right.
 Whatever attracts you about a world.
 So you were just starting to play video games.
 You go out and play video games.
 That's one of your lucky breaks.
 There's just like a lot of random skills you pick up
 depending on the type of game you play.
 I played a lot of text-based games on the computer.
 So I was a very fast typer.
 I'm still a very fast typer.
 Read a lot, you know, learned weird kind of math stuff
 for some of the calculations, some of the games.
 I think I'm pretty good at getting information,
 figuring stuff out, learning patterns, all of that.
 And then that plus the reading and everything
 with the games meant that I,
 I don't wanna say I excelled in school
 because my grades were pretty bad,
 but I was in like all honors, all AP classes or whatever.
 A lot of dual enrollment,
 a lot of AP credit going into college.
 So I did pretty well in school.
 Probably better than I should have,
 but it was because I had the game stuff
 that was like really powering a lot of my brain there
 while I was trying to sleep through class.
 So you're able to soak in information,
 integrate it, quickly take notes.
 Generally, I think I'm pretty good at that, yeah.
 You do this a lot when you stream your typing stuff.
 Is there a system in that note taking?
 And what note, what do you use for note taking?
 Does it matter?
 I use a notepad.
 Like notepad.exe notepad?
 Yep, notepad.exe, not the plus plus, not.
 Is there genius to the madness behind that
 or you just don't give a shit?
 No, I mean like it's gonna depend
 on the style of conversation.
 If I'm with somebody that is very meticulously
 organized their thoughts and they're a,
 find a better word here for Rambler,
 you can edit that in, better word for Rambler.
 Somebody that talks a lot and a lot,
 I'll start like taking notes, bullet points,
 like this, this, this, this, this, this, this,
 because there's a style of conversation
 where I say seven or eight different things
 and then when you go to respond to everything I said,
 I cut you off immediately and we argue that point.
 But if somebody's gonna do that,
 he's just like, hold on, you just said these eight things,
 I'm gonna respond to every single one,
 I've written them all down and then you can go,
 if you wanna go point by point, we can,
 but you just said all this and I wrote it down,
 so we're gonna go.
 So what are you actually writing down
 like a couple of words per point they left?
 Honestly, like there are very few
 unique conversations in politics.
 Like a lot of them are kind of retreading old ground.
 So if we're having a debate on abortion,
 somebody might say like, oh, well,
 I believe this thing about viability
 and I believe this thing about, you know,
 when they're a fetus versus a human
 and I'll just write down like those points
 so that when I go to respond, I kind of have like a,
 like note cards, like a guiding thing there
 to keep me centered on my response.
 Political discourse is the kind of tree
 you're walking down, I got it, and you're like taking.
 Just to keep my focus guided,
 so I'm not like running off on a weird tangent
 or responding to something I didn't say or something.
 What about like doing research?
 It's just, is there a system to your note taking
 because mentally you seem to be one of the most
 organized people I've listened to.
 So is there, is it in your mind
 or is there a system that's on paper?
 A little of both.
 I feel like the human mind is a beautiful thing
 if you have interest in an area.
 So like what I'll tell people is,
 let's say there's like a totally new topic
 that I'm researching, I don't know anything.
 And I'll do a couple of these on stream.
 I think they're boring, but people watch it.
 I might open a Wikipedia article and I'll read
 and I hit something I don't know.
 And then I open the next Wikipedia article
 and I'll read it and then I might have like seven tabs open
 and I'll read and I'll read and I'll read.
 And I'll read a ton of stuff,
 maybe for hour two, three, four hours of stuff.
 And then by the end, someone in chat will ask me like,
 do you even remember like this particular thing?
 And I'll say, not really, no, not too much.
 But what happens is, as long as you've seen it once,
 what'll happen is like the next day of the day after
 we'll read something else and we'll be like,
 oh, I remember that thing from this thing.
 I remember like vaguely that.
 And then if you see it like a third time,
 you're like, oh, this makes sense
 because especially when it comes to,
 oh, here's like a little trick on stuff.
 If you're ever reading any news
 and there's a place that pops up,
 always look at it on a map
 because so much of history is like on a map.
 It's so important to like know the geography.
 It makes things make so much more sense.
 But yeah, once I start to see stuff over and over again,
 just because I've like read it a few times,
 stuff will start to kind of connect to my mind and like,
 oh yeah, well, this makes sense.
 Of course, these people believe this because of this.
 Or of course, like this happened here.
 It's because, you know, that happened there.
 So yeah, it's a lot of that.
 If there's like a topic that I'm doing specific research for,
 so like a vaccine related stuff is a big one.
 The Ukrainian Russian conflict is a big one.
 That I'll break out a note.
 I'll probably get like a Google doc
 and I'll just start like writing like an outline
 of kind of the rough points of everything
 just to organize my thoughts around different topics.
 We're just gonna go on tangent upon attention
 upon attention.
 So we'll return to the low point of your life at some point.
 Always returning from the philosophy to the psychology.
 So you did the Ukraine topic.
 One question is, what role does US play in this war?
 Could they have done something to avoid the war?
 Did they have a role to play
 in forcing Vladimir Putin's hand?
 Do they have a role to play in deescalating the war
 towards a peace agreement and the opposite?
 If it does escalate towards something like
 the use of a tactical nuclear weapon, are we to blame?
 Oh man, somebody sent me an email a while ago
 with great words.
 There's a specific way to navigate a conversation
 where you can kind of like contribute to a negative event,
 but you're not really the one responsible for it.
 Like the classic example is a woman goes out late at night,
 gets a little bit too drunk and then something happens.
 And it's like, while there might've been steps
 she could have taken to mitigate the risk,
 it's not her fault of what happened
 because the responsibility rests on the agent
 making the choice, right?
 There's a chooser at some point
 that is choosing to do wrong or evil.
 I don't believe in any of the arguments
 that say the United States has contributed
 to Russia's position on Ukraine
 or the actions that they've taken on Ukraine.
 There are several arguments that some people,
 some even political scholars are putting out there
 to say that the United States is to blame,
 but I find them completely unconvincing.
 I think that when you ask the question of like,
 what is the United States role or what has our role been?
 I think it's really important for us.
 I don't think we even agree as a country
 on what our role should be, which I think is a hard one
 because you've got this kind of,
 there's this growing populist movement in the United States.
 It might be the far left and the far right.
 And I think populists tend to have this kind of
 isolationist view of the world
 where the United States should just be our own thing.
 We shouldn't be telling anybody what to do.
 We shouldn't be the world police.
 And then kind of more in these like
 center left, center right positions.
 And then across a lot of Europe, you've got, well, okay,
 the United States is kind of like the big kid on the block.
 Like we're looking to them for guidance and leadership
 on situations like what's going on in Ukraine.
 So insofar as the original question is like,
 what is like the United States responsibility?
 I think we have a responsibility to ensure the relative
 like freedom, prosperity and stability across Europe.
 I think that defending Ukraine's sovereignty
 and right to their borders is a part of that.
 And I don't believe that prior to the invasion in 2022,
 I don't think the United States was contributing
 to Russia invading that country.
 I know there are arguments given that like the expansion
 of NATO, you know, has something that's been threatening
 to Russia, but the Baltics joined
 and Russia didn't do anything about it.
 The invasion to Crimea was very clearly a response
 to the revolution in 2014.
 The invasion on the borders is clearly a response
 to Ukraine winning that civil war in the Southeast
 and the Donbass and Russia becoming more aggressive.
 I don't think that you can blame any of that
 on NATO expansion.
 There's no NATO countries that are threatening Russia
 or invading Russia.
 Do you think there is a nuclear threat?
 Do you think about this?
 Do you worry about this?
 That there is a threat of a tactical nuclear weapon
 being dropped.
 I think that possibility exists either way.
 And I think the responsibility for that is on Russia
 because it just can't be the case that if you have nukes,
 you're allowed to invade countries and take their land.
 Because of anything, I think that that down the road
 also increases the potential for nuclear problems
 in the future, right?
 Because at that point, either every single country
 has to acquire their own nuclear weapons.
 Cause if you don't, Russia is gonna mess with you.
 Or every single country has to join NATO.
 And now what?
 We're back at square zero, ground zero, square one,
 where people are like, oh, well look,
 all these countries joining NATO is aggressive
 towards Russia.
 Like, what are you gonna do?
 Yeah, you've mentioned that there's a complicated calculus
 going on with the countries that have nuclear weapons.
 And what's our responsibility?
 Are you allowed to do anything you want to countries
 that don't have nuclear weapons?
 That's a really tricky discussion.
 For sure.
 Because what is US supposed to do
 if Russia drops a tactical nuclear weapon?
 There's a set of options, none of which are good.
 And it's such a tricky moment right now
 because the things that Biden and other public figures say
 I feel like has a significant impact
 on the way this game turns out.
 Cause I think mutually assured destruction
 is partially a game of words.
 I mean, I believe in the power of conversation
 of leaders talking to each other.
 I feel like you have to have a balance between threat
 and compromise and like empathy for the needs,
 the geopolitical, the economic needs of a nation,
 but also sort of respect and represent your own interests.
 So it's a tricky one.
 Like how do you play the hand?
 It reminds me of, I don't know if you've ever heard
 in like evolutionary psychology or evolutionary biology,
 there are things called tit for tat strategies.
 It kind of reminds me of that where it's like,
 there are a whole bunch of these little biological mechanisms
 where creatures will develop like socializing
 like tit for tat.
 If you do something bad to me,
 I'm gonna do something bad for you.
 And then more complicated schemes will come out
 where it'll be like tit, tit for tat,
 where it's like you can make one mistake
 and then I'm gonna get you if you do a second one
 or it could be tit, tit, tit for tat,
 or they're gonna be tit for tat, tat for tit.
 So there's like all these like back and forth
 where creatures kind of optimize themselves.
 And yeah, I think something the United States
 did really well in terms of that kind
 of conversational strategy.
 And I approved of this in the beginning was
 Biden was very clear about setting out
 like the exact level of US involvement for the war.
 We're not gonna do a no fly zone.
 There's not gonna be US troops in the ground in Ukraine,
 but we are gonna send a whole bunch of money
 and a whole bunch of arms and a whole bunch of Intel to them.
 And I thought he did a good job at laying out
 like the limitation of the US involvement
 while opening as much as we could
 in the ways that we could help.
 But the, yeah, that looming threat
 of some sort of tactical nuclear weapon,
 I think on the table right now is like,
 it's gonna be the annihilation of like Russian sea forces
 and everything, but you know,
 what happens if it continues to escalate?
 That's like a world that nobody wants to be in, yeah.
 So we talked about difficult conversations.
 And again, thank you so much
 for reviewing the yay conversation.
 Let me ask you about Putin.
 Speaking of difficult conversations.
 So if you sit down,
 if I sit down with somebody like Vladimir Putin
 or Vladimir Zelensky,
 what's the right way to have that conversation?
 Oh man.
 We can talk about that one,
 or we could talk about somebody more well understood
 through history, like something like Stalin or Hitler,
 something like that.
 Maybe that's an easier example
 to illustrate how to handle
 extremely difficult conversations.
 Yeah, I mean, I can handle really difficult conversations
 with like two people, leaders of countries though.
 There's so much that you are representing
 in that conversation.
 I guess the thing that would be interesting to me
 would be like, what is Vladimir Putin's interest?
 Like what is the genuine interest
 that he has in the conflict?
 Because I think finding out like, what is your buy-in
 or what is the driving force keeping you here
 is probably the most important thing.
 I think for Zelensky,
 I think it's quite a bit more simpler
 because he's on the defense.
 So it's defending his country and his people.
 For Putin, I've heard all sorts of things.
 Dugan has his writings on like the East versus the West,
 the collapse of the West in the face
 of like all of the liberalism
 and the weird LGBT stuff that they criticize.
 You've got the desire to like return
 to this like former Soviet Union-esque thing.
 You've got Putin's quotes that collapse of the Soviet Union
 was the biggest geopolitical disaster of 20th century.
 And I guess figuring out like, what is Putin after?
 I'm not actually sure.
 I don't know the answer to that question.
 I know a lot of people write about it, but yeah.
 Well, there's a lot of answers to that question.
 There's a lot of answers that he can give to that question.
 So say I sit down with him for three hours
 and talk about it.
 I think this is a really interesting distinction
 because you do do difficult conversations
 in the space of ideas, but also in your stream,
 you have, I mean, there's a bunch of drama going on.
 There's the human psychology is laid out
 in its full richness before you.
 So to me with leaders, I think a part of the conversation
 has to be about the human psychology.
 Not like a meta conversation, but like really understand
 what they feel, what they fear,
 who they are as a human being, like as a family man,
 as a person proud of their country,
 as a person with an ego, as a person who's been affected,
 if not corrupted by powers, all of us can be and likely are.
 So all of that, that gives context
 to then the answers about what do you want in this war?
 Is that the answers about what you want in this war
 will be political answers.
 It's like a game that's being played again with words
 and politicians are incredibly good at playing that game.
 I think the deeper truth comes from understanding
 the human being from which those words come.
 And I think that's what you do.
 I don't know if you do those kinds of conversations where-
 Never talked to any country leaders, so.
 No, not a country leader, but say a controversial figure
 or somebody that represents a certain idea.
 Don't just talk in the space of ideas
 or challenge the ideas, but understand who is this person
 and how did you come to those ideas?
 Oh yeah, when I've had, there've been a couple
 of very controversial, right-leaning figures.
 So the two, obviously the mainstream is maybe
 Lauren Southern and Nick Fuentes.
 And those types of conversations initially
 aren't very political at all.
 Yeah, it's more like, obviously we believe in very,
 very different things, but like beliefs don't happen
 accidentally, so how did you get to where you are?
 Those are way more personal conversations, that's true.
 Is there things you regret about those conversations
 where you failed?
 Is there things you're proud of where you succeeded?
 For things that I'm proud of, I feel like I'm really good
 at attempting to understand people without judgment.
 That I think a lot of people feel like they can have
 conversations with me where they can share a lot
 and I'm not gonna jump down their throat for them having
 a politically incorrect observation or for them
 being judgmental to somebody else or having a feeling
 that's maybe not something they should have,
 something they're embarrassed about.
 So I think I do a really good job at that.
 And then by extension of that, I've gotten the ability
 to hear perspectives from so many different people
 that I think I can understand a lot of different perspectives.
 For failures of mine, I mean, it's always gonna be,
 on stream it'll be like I didn't push back hard enough
 or I didn't know a certain fact for a conversation.
 These are usually, they're gonna be on these very technical
 grounds generally.
 I'm pretty happy with the direction my conversations
 have gone recently, especially over like the past six months.
 So your goal is to de-radicalize the audience
 of those folks.
 And so that used to be my goal.
 My goal was de-radicalization.
 Now I'm kind of hoping that that's just the byproduct.
 So the goal I think is to talk to somebody and to show
 they believe this because of these reasons.
 And if you wanna change people's beliefs,
 we have to talk about the underlying reasons
 for why they think the things they think.
 It's not enough to just say like that belief is bad
 because it's like, well, they believe it for a whole bunch
 of things that are true and real to them at least.
 So you have to address all of the underlying things
 that they believe before you can change
 the overlying belief.
 So if I'm having a conversation with somebody,
 it'll be like, okay, why do you feel this about that,
 that and that?
 Okay, I understand that.
 Maybe like a better way to solve that would be like
 this or that instead of this thing.
 So to what degree do you have to empathize
 with the person's worldview versus pushback?
 That's always the hard one.
 When I'm talking to other people,
 it's almost always me stepping as much inside
 their bubble as I can.
 I have to like live and breathe their worldview
 and be able to speak their worldview
 in order to like navigate their thoughts
 because my worldview is,
 I'm not even use this as an insult.
 I don't know if I am a little bit autistic or something,
 but when I break apart things,
 I just wanna see like study, study, study,
 fact, fact, fact.
 That's how my mind works for everything.
 That's what I like to see.
 Like personal stories don't do much for me,
 narratives don't do much for me.
 Just show me like the data and the studies or whatever.
 But for other people,
 I think most brains are more human than that
 and they tend to see things that more kind of like
 surreal pictures that are kind of painted
 and the brush strokes are way broader
 and they don't care about the itty bitty tiny fact.
 So if I'm talking to somebody else
 and I'm trying to get into their head
 and I'm trying to change their mind on things,
 I'm gonna be stepping into their world
 and I'm gonna try to be working through that framework.
 Really good example might be,
 we'll say like when it comes to trans issues for minors,
 16 or 17 year old needs to get on puberty blockers.
 The way that I want that debate to play out
 is let's look at all the data,
 let's see what are the outcomes,
 let's see what are the processes for getting a medication
 and then we'll evaluate all of that
 and then we'll go in whatever like points more favorably.
 But that's wholly unconvincing to most people, right?
 So as a parent,
 if I'm having that conversation with another parent,
 the easiest way for me to have that conversation is like,
 hey, we both have kids.
 Imagine how horrible it would be
 if we felt like our kids needed help
 and the government was trying to get between us
 and their doctor in that conversation.
 That might be how that talk plays out,
 which I think that's a really good argument
 because I think there probably are times
 when the government should get in between it,
 but I'll have that conversation
 because now I'm in a world
 where they understand what I'm saying,
 I'm resonating with the way that they feel about things
 and then I can make progress
 with the way that they're kind of viewing the world
 because I'm talking in a language they understand.
 So on this particular topic of trans issues,
 is that the reason you were banned from Twitch?
 I'm not sure, I don't know.
 They just said hate speech,
 but I don't use like slurs or anything,
 so it's hard to know exactly.
 So I think you made the claim
 that trans women shouldn't compete
 with cis women in women's athletics.
 Can you make this case
 and can you still man the case against it?
 I think in your community,
 there's a lot of trans folks who love you
 and there's a lot who hate you.
 Yeah.
 And so if you can walk the tight rope of this conversation
 to try to still man both sides.
 One of the argumentative strategies I say
 is that like anytime you have a conversation,
 you should be able to argue both sides
 better than anybody else, you know.
 So for the my side, the genuine belief side,
 it feels like overwhelmingly all of the data is showing
 that trans, mostly trans women,
 even after I think three years on some sort of like HRT
 or you know, estrogen stuff,
 they're still maintaining these advantages
 from their male puberty over cis gender women.
 And if that is the case,
 if we are gonna draw these distinctions around our sports
 between women and men,
 it feels unfair to have a category inside the women's sports
 that are maintaining advantages
 that are coming from a male puberty
 regardless of the amount of time they've spent
 on hormone replacement therapy.
 So that would be my argument on that side.
 So it's unfair from a performance enhancement aspect.
 So the same way we ban performance enhancing drugs
 that involve increasing of testosterone
 in that same way would be unfair.
 Essentially, yeah.
 So what's the case against?
 Yeah, so the case in favor of them competing together
 is that realistically,
 there's not gonna be a trans sports category.
 Realistically, trans women
 aren't gonna be competitive with cis men
 because they've gone through these huge, you know,
 like hormone changes by the medication they're taking.
 And that when we look at how sports are kind of done anyway,
 there's a whole bunch of biological differences
 between people within sports categories
 that are determining their placement in the professional world.
 So for instance, somebody like me
 is probably never gonna go far on the NBA
 because I'm not tall enough.
 I think the average height in the NBA-
 Don't doubt yourself.
 Don't doubt myself, yeah.
 I wanna say like six, six or something.
 They're huge people.
 Or, you know, you look at like Michael Phelps
 as a classic example of a guy whose torso is like so long,
 his body is built for swimming.
 And I think there are some trans people
 that will look at that
 or somebody advocating for this position.
 They'll look at that and they'll go, okay,
 realistically, the way that Michael Phelps' body
 processes lactic acid,
 the shape physiologically of his body,
 is gonna put him in a level of competition
 that so many men are never gonna reach
 just because of biology.
 How is it fair that you can have these biological outliers
 competing in these categories,
 but then when we come to like sports categories
 with trans and cis women,
 you're gonna take trans women
 and say that they can't compete against cis women.
 Can't you also just say that they have some level
 of biological difference there?
 Like, is it really gonna be that great of a difference
 than what Michael Phelps has versus the average swimmer
 or an NBA player has versus like the average height male?
 Yeah.
 Do you think we're gonna get into some tricky
 ethical territory as we start to be able to,
 through biology and genetics, modify the human body?
 Absolutely.
 I feel like those things are coming sooner
 than we wanted them to.
 Oh, man, do the, have you seen the AI art?
 Yes.
 That's a- Of course, I'm an AI person.
 Oh, okay, then yeah, yeah.
 That's a, that's always been like,
 what's gonna happen when robots can do art
 better than humans, LOL?
 Like, well, we'll see in 20 years,
 in 20 years, in 20 years.
 And now you have AI art winning competitions.
 And it's funny because robots are essentially-
 There's a robot behind you, by the way.
 A robot behind me.
 Oh, nice.
 Robots are really good at-
 Careful what you say.
 Yeah, oh God, I'll be careful.
 That's not like one of the Chinese ones
 with a gun on it, right?
 Oh, okay.
 Hopefully not.
 We'll see depending on what you say, yeah.
 Okay.
 Robots are really good at showing the limitations
 of the human mind in categories
 that we didn't believe we were limited before.
 I think that humans have this idea intrinsically
 that we have like some type of like innovative,
 creative drive that is just outside of the bounds
 of physical understanding.
 And with a sophisticated enough program,
 we see that maybe that's not actually true.
 And that's a really scary thing philosophically
 to deal with because we feel like we're very special, right?
 We own the planet, we make computers,
 and the idea that you can start to get these robots
 that can do things that's like, okay, you can do math, fine.
 Okay, you can do calculations, fine.
 But you can't do art, that's the human stuff.
 And then when they start to do that, it's like, oh shoot.
 And that terrifies you a little bit?
 Like the human species losing control
 of our dominance over the Earth?
 I don't think it's necessarily losing control
 of our dominance.
 I mean, I guess like a Skynet thing
 could come in at some point.
 But I think it brings us to this really fundamental level
 of like, what does it mean to be human?
 What is it that we're good at?
 What should we be doing with technology?
 We never really asked that question in the Western world.
 It's always the technology is like normative
 in that technology equals good
 and more technology equals better.
 That's been like the default assumption.
 In fact, if you ask a lot of people,
 how do you know if civilization has progressed
 over the past 100 or 200 years?
 They don't say we have better relationships,
 we have longer marriages, we have blah, blah, blah.
 They'll say technology has improved.
 We've got crazy phones, we've got crazy computers.
 And the idea that more technology might be bad
 has never even crossed somebody's mind,
 unless it's used for like a really bad thing.
 Well, it's interesting.
 We kind of think as more and more automation is happening,
 we're going to get more and more meaning
 from things like being artists and doing creative pursuits.
 And here's like, oh shit, if the art,
 if the creative pursuits are also being automated,
 then what are we gonna gain meaning from?
 What are the activities from which you'll gain meaning?
 My whole life I've been working on artificial intelligence
 systems, there's been different revolutions.
 One of them is the machine learning revolution.
 And it's interesting to build up intuition
 and destroy that intuition about what is
 and isn't solvable by machines.
 I think for the longest time, I grew up thinking Go is not,
 the game of Go is not solvable.
 Because my understanding of AI systems is ultimately
 that it's fundamentally a search mechanism
 that is fundamentally going to be brute force.
 There's no shortcuts.
 Sure, like if it can't solve the traveling salesman problem,
 it's not even gonna be able to give you an approximation.
 So most interesting problems
 are giant travel salesman problem.
 And then, so of course it's not gonna be able to solve that.
 And then the deep learning revolution made you realize,
 holy shit, these large neural networks
 with a giant number of knobs is able to actually
 somehow estimate functions
 that can do a pretty good job
 of understanding deep representation of a thing.
 Whether that's a game of Go,
 or whether it's the human natural language,
 or if it's images and video, or audio,
 and even actions in different video games
 and actions of robotics and so on.
 And then you realize with diffusion models
 and different generative models,
 you start to realize, holy shit,
 it can actually generate not just interesting representations
 or interesting manifestations
 of the representations of forms,
 but it's able to do something
 that impresses humans in its creativity.
 It's beautiful in the way we think of art as beautiful.
 Like it surprises us and makes us chuckle
 and makes us sit back in awe and all those kinds of things.
 And yet the thing that it seems to struggle with the most
 is the physical world currently.
 So that's counterintuitive.
 We humans think that it's pretty trivial,
 being able to pick up a cup,
 being able to write with a pen in the physical space,
 we think that's trivial.
 We give ourselves respect for being great artists
 and great mathematicians and all that kind of stuff.
 And that seems to be much easier than the physical space.
 Bodies are really cool.
 There was a, I don't know, it's probably Asimov or something.
 There was some science fiction writer
 that had a short story,
 it was like an alien that had landed on earth
 and it was describing our bodies
 from a totally alien perspective.
 And when you think about all the things we can do,
 it's pretty cool.
 We can climb through a whole multitude of environments,
 we can exist in a multitude of temperatures,
 we can manipulate things just with our hands
 and the way that we can interact with things around us.
 And yeah, we're very capable on like a physical level,
 even though, like you said, we think about ourselves like,
 oh, well human beings have really big brains
 and we do, we're really intelligent as well,
 but yeah, our bodies are pretty cool too.
 And it's a fascinating hierarchical biological system.
 Like we're made up of a bunch of different
 like living organisms that all don't know
 about the big picture of our body.
 And it's all functioning in its own little local world
 and it's doing its thing.
 But together as of, it forms a super resilient system.
 All of that comes from a very compressed encoding
 of what makes a human.
 You start with the DNA and it builds up from a single cell
 to a giant organism.
 And because of the DNA, through the evolution process,
 you can constantly create new humans
 and new living organisms that adapt to the environment.
 Like that resilience to the physical world,
 it seems like running the whole earth over again,
 the whole evolutionary process over again
 might be the only way to do that.
 Might be the only way to do it.
 So to create a robot that actually adapts
 is as resilient to the dynamic world
 might be a really difficult problem.
 Possibly.
 Well, I was gonna say like in a programming environment,
 you can do things on timescales that are impossible
 in the real world, right?
 Like the benefit to AI and computers is a computational
 they can compute so much data so quickly.
 Whereas on human timetables, we have to wait.
 When you talk about evolution,
 it's generation after generation after generation.
 Maybe in a virtual environment that could be simulated
 and then those changes could happen a lot quicker.
 That's not a human time scale,
 but you have to look at earth
 as a quantum mechanical system,
 the computation is happening super fast.
 This is a giant computer doing a giant simulation.
 So just because for us humans, it's slow,
 there's like trillions of organisms involved in you,
 destiny being you.
 Sure, but the next iteration of like from human to human,
 even if on the quantum level, there's a lot of stuff going on,
 you talk about like changes in DNA, for instance, right?
 Like that's happening from a generation
 to generation time scale.
 Like in a virtual environment,
 that could theoretically happen.
 Well, it already is, there's like protein folding,
 like huge cloud computing, probably ML stuff
 that's like working on doing all of that stuff
 and it'll run like trillions and trillions of simulations,
 every second and stuff, maybe not every second, but.
 Still slower than the actual protein folding, much slower.
 That's for the problem of solving protein folding
 to estimate the 3D structure,
 but the actual body does the actual protein folding
 way faster.
 So like we're, the question is, can we shortcut
 the simulation of human evolution,
 try to figure out how to build up an organism
 without simulating all the details?
 Because we have to simulate all the details of biology
 were screwed, we don't have.
 Oh, true, we'd have to put something in a pond
 and then watch it for a billion years.
 That might be the most efficient way to do it.
 Sure.
 That's what the universe most likely is,
 is a kind of simulation created by a teenager
 in their basement to try to see what happens.
 It's a computer game.
 That might be the most efficient way to create
 interesting organisms, but within the system
 is perhaps possible to create other robots
 that will be of use and will entertain us
 in the way that other humans entertain us.
 And that's a really interesting, of course, problem,
 but it's surprising how difficult it has been
 to create systems that operate in the physical world
 and operate in that physical world in a way
 that's safe to humans and interesting to humans.
 Because there's also the human factor,
 the human robot interaction.
 To me, that's like the most interesting problem,
 to figure out how to do that well.
 And so Elon Musk and others,
 Boston Dynamics have worked on legged robots,
 so I really care about legged robots.
 Those are super interesting.
 How to make them such that they're able to operate
 successfully in a dynamic environment.
 Super tricky.
 They're like the dumbest of dogs,
 speaking of which, there's a dog barking outside.
 It's really tricky to create those kinds of organisms
 that live in the human world.
 Then again, if more and more of us move
 into the digital world, so you stream a lot.
 Like part of who you are exists in the digital space.
 The fact that you have a physical representation also,
 maybe more and more will become not important.
 I hope that's the case,
 because I bought a lot of stock in Metta,
 and man, it's down a lot.
 Metta the company.
 Is there some degree, can you look at yourself,
 like Steven, the physical vehicle,
 and then the destiny, this digital space,
 like digital avatar.
 Do you sense that in a certain way,
 you're the digital avatar?
 I've always tried to keep my on-stream personality
 as genuine as possible.
 So they're one and the same to me.
 I don't really view them as two separate entities.
 But I mean, I always view myself as Steven,
 the real life person.
 Destiny is my online name.
 No, but because so many,
 your social network is established in the digital space,
 like so many people know you through the digital space.
 Can there be, can we swap out another person
 that looks like you?
 In like an AI system,
 and then that entity known as destiny will continue existing.
 So I mean, it must be like,
 there must be some level of sophistication
 that could emulate a human brain, I would imagine, right?
 Probably tech's not there yet, but.
 Well, the question is,
 what's the level of sophistication of the audience
 that would recognize that something has changed?
 Like it's the Turing test.
 How hard is it to trick your audience,
 your large audience of fans that watch your streams,
 that when you swap out an AI that emulates you,
 that nothing has changed?
 And the question is,
 do you have to really simulate
 so much of the human brain for that?
 I don't think so.
 Probably not.
 And so, I mean, like you said,
 a lot of political discourses
 is just walking down the tree together.
 So you can probably emulate a lot of that discussion.
 Yeah, it would depend on if you're doing old data sets
 and you're training on that
 and I'm having conversations about abortion
 and your crane and vaccines,
 I imagine it could do it for quite a while.
 The only thing that would be weird
 is when novel issues pop up,
 then you probably need a more sophisticated resemblance
 of the inner brain, right?
 You have to keep training on the internet,
 so how the language models,
 and that's the most incredible breakthroughs
 is the language models.
 You just have to keep retraining the system on Reddit,
 which is actually what a lot of it is trained on,
 which is hilarious.
 I do think it's really interesting
 that like kind of like funny problems,
 like the trolley problem
 that we can kind of work through our normative ethical systems
 on are now like real questions.
 Like if you're driving a Tesla and it's on autopilot
 and you're gonna hit somebody,
 but it can swerve and hit somebody else,
 like what ought the system do?
 Like we went very quickly from fun kind of like project
 in philosophy class to we need to solve this
 for insurance purposes like as quickly as possible.
 It's kind of interesting to think about.
 Well, I actually have,
 I'll bring up the trolley problem with you later.
 There's a fascinating version of it that I find hilarious.
 Okay, let's return to your low point.
 Oh yeah.
 You started playing video games, that was a lucky break.
 You did tech space ones, that was a lucky break
 because you've gotten to be pretty good at learning.
 And then you started thinking about going to college
 and so on, what happened next?
 I mean, I went to like a prep school.
 So you kind of have to go to college after
 that's like the point, right?
 I was also millennial, all of us had to go to college.
 That's always what they told us.
 So my life was kind of, it's hard to describe.
 I didn't really think much of the future.
 I was just kind of enjoying the day to day
 because everything in my life was pretty weird.
 Both my parents had moved to Florida
 by the time I was 16, 17.
 I was living with my grandma, I was working.
 I had a girlfriend, moved out.
 We got a place, did college.
 By the time I got into college,
 I had transitioned from working at McDonald's
 to I was like working at a casino restaurant basically.
 And I was really good at that job.
 So high level of patience for drunk people, insane people.
 And I was doing music in school
 because I've really grown to love music.
 And my kind of thought process was,
 my thought process was I can do music as a hobby, I guess,
 unless I get really good and maybe I can make money
 with that, but otherwise I love music.
 I'm okay going to school for music, getting good at it.
 And then just doing that on the side.
 And then my main job would kind of be this career
 I was building at the casino.
 And basically the trying to balance personal life
 plus graveyard shift, six day or weeks at a casino
 and then a full-time music degree was not possible for me.
 And eventually I had to drop school after,
 I think it was like three years.
 And after I dropped school to maintain my casino job,
 after a few months, I got fired from my casino job.
 So I'd essentially just thrown away like the past
 like three or four years of my life.
 Why did you get fired from the casino job?
 I heard there's a story behind that.
 Yeah, there's a story.
 Basically I was just really dumb
 when it came to understanding corporate politics.
 And this is funny because the same attitude
 kind of followed me into the streaming world.
 My thought process has kind of always been
 that like, as long as I'm really good at what I do,
 I should be untouchable.
 If I'm really good, you can't do anything to me.
 I don't have to play any dumb games or whatever.
 And at the casino, I think I was the youngest,
 it was originally shifly than supervisor position
 at the casino.
 And when I started to get my own shifts,
 there were problems that I would run into
 on graveyard shift because of carryover from the swing shift.
 And one of these problems was underneath the soda machine,
 they weren't cleaning it properly
 and fruit flies were showing up.
 And the manager came in one morning and she was like,
 hey, what's going on with the machine?
 And I told her like, listen, I can't do,
 I can't take everything from swing shift
 and do everything at grave shift.
 I can't do this.
 They need to figure out their stuff better
 or I need more employees.
 It's not possible for me.
 And she's like, what did you tell anybody else?
 Like, yeah, I complained to the supervisor
 on the swing shift all the time.
 And she told me, if you're not getting the answer
 that you like, then it's your responsibility
 to email the next person up.
 And I was like, oh, okay, that's interesting.
 And some months went on and I ran into more problems
 because on graveyard, here's how,
 I don't know if it's everywhere,
 but morning shift is the easiest
 and that's when you're the most overstaffed
 because that's when all the VPs are in
 and that's when all the managers are there
 and everybody blah, blah, blah.
 Swing shift is the most challenging.
 That's where your highest flow of customers is.
 You're also decently staffed there,
 but there's a lot of stuff going on.
 And graveyard, nobody cares at all about you.
 They don't give you any employees.
 You might get swamped, you might not.
 Who cares?
 Make sure it's clean for day shift.
 That's the only thing that matters.
 A quick question for sort of clarification.
 So this is a 24 hour?
 24 hour dinner, yeah, and it's a casino, yeah.
 So it's a dining and a casino.
 Oh, by the way, I had an amazing moment
 at a dining and a casino recently.
 It's a special place.
 A dining and a casino is a place of magic.
 There's a lot of, I don't know if I'd say magic,
 but there's a lot of other worldly stuff going on.
 There's characters, there's,
 and I had an interaction with a waitress
 that was the sweetest waitress in the world.
 And it was just like, I don't know,
 it made me feel less alone in this cruel world of ours.
 So graveyard begins when?
 For me, my shift was 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.
 or sometimes I get called in early,
 so it'd be 8 p.m. to 6 a.m.
 That's no love for that shift.
 No, especially not trying to do school at the same time.
 Absolutely not.
 But yeah, basically, long story short,
 I ran into a problem with my,
 where I didn't have enough employees on my shift.
 VPs were coming in in the morning,
 they're just like, hey, the diner's kind of dirty.
 And I'm like, you've cut all my employees past 4 a.m.
 Like on some nights, I'm literally cooking
 and doing front of house, like all on my own.
 Like I can't do this.
 And my manager, Pam, told me, well, you gotta figure it out.
 And so I remembered her advice.
 So I emailed the VP of Food and Beverage and I cc'd her.
 And I said, I'm not getting the help I need
 in my restaurant.
 Now I didn't know at the time
 that I was basically completely throwing her under the bus,
 because of that email.
 But retroactively, when I look back on things,
 or retrospectively, I see that was the moment
 that I got like marked for deletion.
 And I didn't really understand it.
 Even though I'd heard terminology
 for papering somebody out the door.
 But after that point, I started to get written up
 for like a lot of little random things.
 Like I'll come, like I'd missed one day of work
 in my three years at the casino.
 And I started getting written up for like,
 showing up like one or two minutes late.
 That's kind of weird, I don't know, whatever.
 Or written up for random ways about filing paperwork.
 And then eventually there came a situation
 with another employee where they were,
 it's complicated, it has to be like call out stuff.
 But basically they wanted to come,
 or they wanted to call out.
 And I told them if they called out,
 they were gonna get fired,
 because they were at like 10 points.
 They were at nine points and 10 points is firing,
 blah, blah, blah.
 Pam told me, you can tell her
 that she's gonna get a point,
 but you can't tell her she's gonna get fired.
 I don't know what that meant.
 And then I told her that if you call out,
 you're gonna get, you know, you're fucked,
 you're gonna get fired.
 Or you're gonna be at 10 points.
 And then I got called in early, like three days later.
 And Pam was like,
 you inappropriately communicated with an employee
 because you said the F word in a text message.
 And I'm like, really?
 There's no shot.
 And she's like, well, you also tried to fire the employee.
 And I was like, no,
 I told her she was gonna get 10 points.
 She's like, well, you used the F word.
 I'm like, this is insane.
 And I didn't, just cause I was such a,
 I was such a high performing employee.
 It's like, there's no way I'm getting fired.
 And then I did.
 And I was like, yeah.
 Cashed out my 401k and moped for like three months,
 cause I had thrown away school for this casino job.
 And then I got fired from this job that like,
 yeah, nobody believed I got fired.
 It was just insane.
 So if you look back,
 if you were allowed to not just to look back to your own
 memory, but actually watch yourself,
 like somebody recorded video that whole time,
 do you think you would be surprised?
 You would notice some things that potentially
 of not having a self-awareness,
 not having like social, like a civility and social etiquette
 that's played in the human relations.
 Yeah, absolutely.
 So is that, is that at the core of it essentially?
 Yeah, I think so.
 I mean, that follows me even to this day.
 There's a lot of, I don't know if you're recording or not,
 but when we spoke early about like meta-conversations,
 I have to think a lot sometimes about meta-conversations
 cause the way that I want to drive a conversation
 will sometimes be way different than what is like
 the best way to have a conversation.
 Whereas I just want to like go really hard on like some
 itty bitty, like some idiosyncrasy,
 some factor figure, whatever.
 But that's not like the human conversation I need to have.
 So you got fired slash left that job.
 And that took you to the job that would be the lowest point.
 Yeah.
 There was a huge downgrade in pay.
 I went from getting like, I think at the casino,
 cause I worked so much overtime,
 I was getting like 22.50 an hour on all my overtime.
 Fifth, and this was back in 2008, 2009,
 as like a college student, like it was amazing pay.
 The, I had benefits, like everything was good.
 And then the carpet cleaning was like,
 I was probably getting my paycheck like every other week
 was maybe 1500 bucks or a thousand dollars.
 And I'm working like 13 day stretches.
 Like I have every other Sunday off and it's so many hours.
 Like I have to show up at the shop at like seven or six.
 And then I go home at like eight or nine,
 depending on when my jobs are throughout the day.
 You doing businesses or residential or what are you doing?
 Everything.
 Everything.
 Are you working for a company that is carpet cleaning?
 Yeah.
 Okay. And so like there's a schedule thing,
 you have to go to it and so on.
 Yeah, but so like, this is why the schedule would suck.
 Cause sometimes I'd show up at,
 I think we had to be in the shop at,
 I think it was 7 a.m.
 We show up at the shop at 7 a.m.
 First job might be at eight or nine,
 but that job might be like a one hour job.
 So I might show up at 7 a.m.
 and have a job from 8.30 to 9.30.
 Then my next job might not be from, until like say 11.
 So from 8.30 to 9.30, I'll do one job.
 And then I've got a job from like 11 to 12 or something.
 Then I might have like a decent job from like five to eight.
 But like my whole day is destroyed
 and I'm doing like three smallest jobs.
 So I'm getting like 30 bucks maybe for being in the shop
 or, you know, my job for like 10 or 11 hours.
 And it's just like horrible.
 So you're somebody that seems to be extremely good
 at thinking and conversation.
 And so have a bit of an ego perhaps
 in both the negative and the positive sense of that word.
 Was there some aspect of working at McDonald's
 and then working at the casino
 and then working for the,
 as a carpet cleaner that was humbling?
 No, never.
 I had a-
 The ego burned bright through it all.
 The, well-
 Or no, you can push back on the ego.
 Yeah, no, I understand.
 I totally get what you mean.
 I had a really close friend growing up
 who's name is Chris.
 And I think we probably met when he was,
 we were like four or five, I think.
 He lived behind me.
 And I grew up with him
 and I'd always been kind of an outsider
 to the world that I was in
 once I got to high school for sure.
 Because all of those kids were incredibly wealthy.
 You know, Corvettes and Mustangs when they turned 16.
 It was a prep school.
 And I was doing the,
 they had like a work study program there
 where you could stay after school from 2.30 to five
 every day to kind of like work to pay for your tuition.
 So I've been working like throughout all of high school.
 I got another job at McDonald's when I was 18,
 worked at the casino.
 Like I'd always been doing that kind of work.
 I never really viewed it as like beneath me or anything.
 It's not like my,
 I don't have like a family of doctors or lawyers or anything.
 And then me and my other friend, Chris guy,
 we'd always make fun of everybody else
 for being kind of like, you know,
 like preppy kids and everything.
 So there is a,
 there's some pride to that sort of hard work.
 Yeah, I guess a little bit, yeah.
 Cause yeah, looking, especially my dad,
 like the solution to every problem
 was just throw more hours of work at it basically.
 So that was always my, yeah, go-to.
 And I never, yeah.
 What was psychologically the low point?
 I think psychologically the low point was that
 as I'm doing this carpet cleaning job,
 driving around my city,
 there's like this feeling of,
 I guess for a lot of people it's probably college,
 but there's a feeling when you're in high school
 that everything is like so exciting
 and the whole world is kind of in front of you.
 And there are a trillion, trillion different branching paths
 of possibilities.
 And you know, even through high school,
 you're thinking like, am I gonna be a doctor or a lawyer,
 or can I join the MBA or can I do this or that?
 There's all these things in front of you.
 And when I, I especially felt it
 when I was doing these carpet cleaning jobs,
 and I think it was in the fall,
 I'd be outside some of these houses
 and I just kind of look around
 and I'd recognize a lot of these neighborhoods
 that I drive around with friends in,
 or I'd be walking through, I ran cross country,
 some of them I'd be running through these neighborhoods.
 And it was just kind of like this feeling of looking around
 and it was like, when I was here in the past,
 this was like kind of like a transitionary phase of my life
 where I'm doing this and it's so fun and exciting,
 and then I'm gonna move on to something else
 and it's gonna be fun and exciting and awesome.
 And then like, you know, two years later,
 my whole life has collapsed.
 Like I'm in a house that I can't afford anymore.
 My ex that I hate is pregnant with my kid.
 And I have no money, I've got no upward mobility,
 I failed college, my job is horrible.
 Like just every single, like this is like my,
 all of those, the wave function had collapsed
 into one thing and that one thing was the worst thing
 that could have possibly been at the time for me.
 Yeah, like everything was gone and horrible.
 So yeah, that was the feeling I had at the time.
 Do you ever contemplate suicide?
 I thought about thinking about it,
 but I've just never been that kind of person.
 So.
 I mean, basically as a way to escape from the hardship.
 Something that I'm so incredibly lucky,
 I don't know why or how,
 I'm just gonna chalk it up to biology.
 I've always had really high mental baseline.
 Like depression and all of that.
 There've been a few short stints I've dealt with it past 30
 because I did a lot of drugs.
 But other than that, my mental baseline is just so high.
 And even in the carpet cleaning days,
 like if you, man, the videos might still be there.
 I think on my old YouTube channel,
 where I'll be like playing Starcraft
 when I first started getting into streaming
 and I'll be calling up customers like,
 this is Steve from Guaranteed Clean.
 We had to move your job back one hour.
 Is it okay if I show up instead of 2.30?
 And then I hang up, it's like, all right guys,
 we've got three more games.
 And it's like, let's go, like stuff like that.
 So my baseline has always been like really high
 for mental functioning.
 So even in low point, there's, that you had strength.
 Is there anything you can give by way of advice
 from people that for whom the wave function collapses?
 As it does for many of us, like, holy fuck,
 the world is not full of opportunity
 and you're kind of a failure.
 Like I've been there.
 Yeah, I don't know.
 It's rough because like, I usually ask for compassion
 from people that I have it better off.
 Because like, once you're down there,
 like the only reason I say I got lucky,
 but it wasn't even really lucky,
 or it was lucky, but it was more lucky.
 It wasn't just lucky that I got into streaming.
 It was lucky that I was into computers at an early age.
 It was lucky that I played video games at an early age.
 It was lucky that all the tech came up
 at exactly that right point in time.
 Like I was a pretty smart guy,
 but it was definitely preparation meets opportunity.
 And that opportunity was like
 at the exact precise moment of my life.
 If anything had gone differently,
 then I would just be cleaning carpets today.
 So.
 So in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.
 This is like one out of like.
 There's many, many Stevens that are just still
 carpet cleaning and they're full of pain and resentment.
 Yeah.
 The one piece of advice that I give,
 and I hate that I have to push back
 against all these crypto bros and everybody online.
 For decently intelligent people that are successful,
 I've never heard anybody give a contradiction to this.
 Maybe you will.
 You can tell me if you disagree.
 I always look at kids in high school and I'm like,
 just try a little bit harder.
 Like 30 minutes a night, if you don't study,
 just do 30 minutes, just do a little bit more.
 It is, you are laying the foundation for the rest of your life
 and you can't appreciate it in high school and college.
 But oh my God, when you get out,
 everything in your life is so much easier.
 You have probably more responsibility
 over the direction of your life.
 When you're like 13, 14 years old,
 than you ever will once you're like 25 and older.
 Because this is like when you're determining the foundations
 that everything's gonna be able to.
 Yeah, 100%.
 First of all, it does seem that
 the liberating aspect of being young
 is like anything you learn.
 So working hard at learning something will pay off
 in like nonlinear ways, like you said with video games.
 I feel like, so like people who are like, I hate school.
 All right, well, fine.
 But find something where you're challenging yourself,
 you're growing, you're learning, you're learning a skill,
 you're learning about a thing.
 Of course, you could push back and say,
 well, there's some trajectories that might not be productive.
 Like if you spend the entirety of your teen years playing,
 I don't know, League of Legends,
 game you have love and hate relationship with.
 No, just a hate and hate relationship.
 Okay, well, we'll talk about,
 I think you have a love-hate relationship with hate
 in general, we'll just talk, and love.
 Okay.
 We'll try to de-complexify that one.
 I think in general,
 just investing yourself fully with passion
 really does pay off.
 But that said, also school,
 I feel like doesn't get enough credit,
 like high school in particular.
 Middle school and high school.
 Because it's general education.
 If, I think if you're,
 especially if you're lucky to have good teachers,
 but honestly, I haven't mostly.
 The textbooks themselves were good teachers.
 It's a one chance in life,
 you have to really explore a subject.
 Fuck grades, like getting good grades
 is at tension, I would say, with actual learning.
 That is true.
 But just get a biology textbook,
 and to explore ideas in biology,
 and allowing yourself to be inspired by the beauty of it.
 Yeah, I don't know,
 I think that really, really, really pays off,
 and you never get a chance to do that again.
 And maybe not even textbooks,
 like reading, straight up reading.
 I think if you read, this is a one time in life,
 you get a chance to read.
 Really read, like read a book a day read.
 You can really invest, you can really grow by reading.
 I must, all those guys talk about it.
 It's very, very rare that you meet a dumb person
 who reads a lot.
 I don't know if that's ever happened in my life.
 Dumb or not successful.
 And the cool thing is,
 it seems like the reading, it's like investment.
 The reading you do early on in high school
 pays off way more than the reading you do later.
 So like the really influential reading
 is during those high school years.
 Because you're basically learning from others
 the mistakes they've made, the solutions to problems.
 You're basically learning the shortcuts to life.
 Like whatever the hell you wanna do.
 Music, read from the best people that the music theory,
 like learn music theory, learn,
 read biographies about jazz musicians, blues musicians.
 See their, like see all the mistakes,
 see what they did, see the shortcuts.
 If you wanna do podcasts and read about other podcasts,
 if you wanna do streaming,
 read about other streamers, physicists and so on.
 I feel like you figure out all the mistakes
 and you get to a shortcut through life.
 Because most people show up to college
 without having done that.
 And now you get a chance to shortcut your way past them.
 Yeah, 100%.
 But nobody really teaches you that.
 They're like, go to school.
 This, from this time to that time.
 That you're, shut up.
 This is just what you do.
 Eat your broccoli.
 I think I was like, there's two huge problems.
 One is now that I'm older,
 because you don't know anything as a kid.
 You can't really criticize adults as a kid.
 Because you're a kid.
 You're ageist, if I may say so.
 I am, I am super ageist.
 As I get older, I get even more ageist.
 There are a lot of people where I argue,
 I was like, man dude, you're really 22, aren't you?
 I can tell every word you say.
 There's seeps of like 22 year oldness.
 But that's okay, I love that for you.
 Yeah.
 No, I could just say, because you mentioned this.
 Your wife is a fellow streamer, Melina.
 You mentioned that this is a source of fights
 for the two of you that, and I could just feel that.
 There is truth to what you're saying,
 which is like, all right, you're saying that
 because you're 22.
 Just wait until you're 25,
 and you won't be saying that anymore.
 Now, that is the most annoying thing for people to hear.
 Yeah, you can't ever say that, of course.
 Because it's actually usually true.
 Because we do go through phases in life.
 And you can understand that most things are phases.
 So just in general, you can say, just wait.
 Just wait.
 You won't see this, you won't feel this way.
 Again, I could say that to you.
 You could say that to yourself.
 Just wait.
 Whatever you're feeling like, just wait.
 In five, 10 years, you'll be a different person,
 and you will laugh at the things you take seriously now,
 that they're causing you pain now, all that kind of stuff.
 But people hate hearing that.
 Anyway, go back. Absolutely.
 I think the joke that I always say is like,
 if I could literally step into a time machine,
 and I could come back out and see myself as a 17 year old,
 and I could say, hey, I am literally you from the future.
 You see the time machine, and I would look at me,
 and I would see the time machine,
 and I would give myself the best advice in the world
 to be the most successful person.
 I would ignore all of it.
 Even knowing it came from myself,
 I'd be like, this guy sold out.
 This dude doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
 Like, nah, I'll figure it out better.
 Like, he must have made some,
 that's what I would think is a 17.
 Even if I knew it was myself from the future,
 I would just 100% never believe it.
 And knowing that is very frustrating.
 But I keep that in mind when I deal with younger people.
 That's why I never, I always stay on stream
 when I'm talking to, like, there's been stuff with like,
 Sneak-O is another girl on my stream called Lab.
 When I see the mistakes they're making, oftentimes,
 because I've made all of these mistakes,
 sometimes in the most public and horrible fashion ever,
 but I'm never like a mentor.
 I'm not gonna sit there and like tell you like,
 oh, do this or that or that or that.
 Cause like, I don't know if you're gonna listen to me,
 and I don't wanna condescend to you.
 And you know, you figure stuff out,
 and I'll be here if you wanna talk about it.
 But yeah, there was a, one of those stories,
 there was a company that didn't work with me
 because I was very adamant on defending, like,
 very radical notions about language
 and racial slurs and everything.
 When I was like 22 or whatever.
 And there was a company and they said,
 well, we don't wanna work with this guy for an event.
 And after they'd said that,
 I had written an article on my website called,
 the company was Gigabyte, they make motherboards.
 I said, fuck Gigabyte in the ass.
 That was the title to my article.
 And it was like, well, if they don't wanna work with me,
 I'm gonna blow them up
 and never do anything ever with them again.
 And it was just like, like looking back at it now,
 obviously as an older person, like, hey,
 you need to pump the brakes and chill.
 You're destroying yourself.
 But yeah, as a young person, it's like, yeah, you're 22.
 Of course you think that you can say whatever and do whatever.
 And as long as you're good at what you're doing,
 you've got the whole world behind you.
 And yeah, geez. Well, let's go there.
 You have a history of using offensive language,
 like the R word, the N word,
 including the N word with a hard R,
 calling women bitches,
 talking about rape in a nonchalant way.
 What part of that do you regret
 and what part of that do you not?
 Language is very complicated.
 When it comes to stuff relating to slurs,
 there's been like a whole trajectory of feelings
 on everything related to language.
 So my-
 For you personally and for the internet as a whole.
 Yeah, I don't care about the internet.
 For me personally.
 In my early 20s, I'll say like 22, 23,
 I think probably when I first started streaming,
 my feeling is that any word is just a word.
 And if it hurts you, that's your fault.
 Take responsibility for yourself.
 This probably came from my background
 of being like a really independent person.
 So that's just kind of like the mind
 that I had for everything.
 And there were basically,
 there were like a collection of experiences that I had
 that as I grew, I started to realize like, okay,
 well, I feel differently about some of these words,
 depending on the context.
 And I can see how they can affect other people,
 depending on the context.
 So as I've kind of like grown,
 I think I've developed a more sophisticated understanding
 of how different words are used
 and how they affect people, whether they like it or not.
 And more importantly, whether I like it or not.
 And that words can, even if I don't want it to be,
 they can be a vehicle for emboldening
 certain types of ideas that I don't wanna embolden.
 And yeah, that's kind of been the whole like growth.
 I've been lucky that in the time
 that I came up on the internet,
 I was able to learn these lessons
 because if I was trying to learn those same lessons today,
 I would have been completely destroyed
 because I had insane views on language like 10 years ago.
 We could talk about the past,
 we could talk about the present.
 Let's talk about the past first.
 So how do you deal with the fact
 that there's videos of you in the past saying the N word,
 including the N word with a hard R?
 So generally-
 And what's the context?
 Can you give me like, can you remember
 what would be the context usually?
 When I lay out this defense,
 it's not because I wouldn't have used the N word.
 Generally, whenever I said the N word,
 it was usually in an example of like,
 this is something that like a racist person would say.
 I don't think I've ever on the internet,
 I don't think I've ever called anybody
 like the N word with a hard R.
 Not because I wouldn't have,
 but just because it wasn't in my vocabulary.
 I played RTS, real time strategy,
 and we use the F slur for gay people.
 That's the one, and I use that one a ton.
 I've called people that a ton in the past.
 So I should actually just as a small tangent.
 Yeah, go for it.
 And this is what I'd like to explore with you.
 There's a ruthlessness to the language in the gaming world.
 And there's different communities,
 they have different flavors of language.
 Of hate speech, yeah.
 Of hate speech, essentially.
 And there's also a humor to it,
 which really bothers me in a dark way
 that I haven't been able to really think through.
 Because humor seems to be a kind of catalyst for hate.
 It seems to normalize hate.
 Like you say, basically it's like Louis C.K.
 says a lot of edgy things.
 But you take something Louis C.K. says
 and do it in a non-funny way
 and do it over and over and over
 and keep increasing the hatefulness of it, the vitriol.
 And somehow you find yourself like Alice in Wonderland
 in a world full of hate where there is no good and evil.
 It's all the same.
 In fact, the good is to be mocked
 and the evil is to be celebrated for the humor of it.
 Basically not taking the ideas of evil seriously.
 And I don't know what it,
 it reveals something about human nature
 that you can let go.
 The moral relativism that can happen
 when you do that kind of stuff.
 At the same time, I'm a fan of dark humor when done well.
 Anyway, for people who are not familiar,
 I just wanted to mention that some of the worst hate speech
 that ends in LOL happens in gaming communities.
 Yeah, the-
 And that's where you come from in certain part.
 So a lot of people don't remember this
 or don't know this because they're younger,
 but way back in the day in the late 90s,
 early, mid 2000s of the internet,
 the way that online kind of like shit talk worked was
 you were just trying to ramp up to the most insanely edgy,
 crazy stuff you could say to like provoke a reaction.
 Have you ever heard of something called the aristocrats?
 That it's like a joke, the joke?
 Oh yeah, the joke, yeah, there's a movie on it, yeah.
 Okay, basically every single like shit talk
 back and forth on the internet was like that.
 Like what is the most increasingly depraved,
 and back then you didn't get banned for slurs or anything
 on any of these chat rooms.
 So it was just like insane world to walk into.
 And I was fully 100% a part of, a product of,
 and a contributor to that world.
 So that probably still goes on on the internet in some way
 and that probably still goes on the internet
 in a maybe more pacified way.
 Only in darker parts of the internet.
 I'd say for the most part, most, well,
 compared to back then, compared to 20 years ago,
 the internet is way cleaned up now.
 There are still gonna be boards you can go on
 or parts of the internet where you see
 that type of humor, but no one near as mainstream.
 Like back then you could open your mic on Xbox Live
 and hear some insane stuff when that first started.
 Nowhere near what you'd hear today, although yeah.
 There's still elements of escalation that happen.
 That just seems to be part of human nature on the internet.
 Because we don't get the feedback
 of actually hurting people directly.
 So the trolling, like for the lulz,
 you'll do like, you will still escalate.
 Within the bounds, you're just saying
 that there's more bounds now.
 On Reddit, there's more bounds and so on.
 So there's moderators that kinda yell at you,
 that ban you and so on if you cross those bounds.
 But overall, that basic human instinct to escalate,
 especially under the veil of anonymity is still there.
 I don't know, it's dark, it's dark.
 Yeah, there's a lot of different ways to look at it.
 And there's different ways you can break that art.
 Like for instance, you mentioned dark humor.
 And you say that sometimes dark humor is funny
 and sometimes it's not.
 I think that it's really important
 to dig into and figure out why certain things are funny.
 Can I give you an example?
 Yeah, go.
 It's from your subreddit.
 Oh boy.
 No, that made me laugh and I felt wrong about it.
 Oh no.
 So this is a...
 I already know what this is, yeah.
 Yeah.
 So this is a trolley problem.
 To me, it connects because I think about the...
 It keeps, because I worked on autonomous vehicles,
 the trolley problem, the philosophical thought experiment
 keeps brought up a lot.
 When AI is part of making the decision,
 do I kill three people here or five people here?
 And AI makes that decision, how do you do that calculus?
 And this particular, there's a deep satire
 that reveals some kind of flaw in society.
 I feel like that's why...
 That's what dark humor does?
 Successful dark humor does.
 And I don't know if this...
 It's a flaw.
 I feel like there's a certain brand of dark humor.
 And I think the reason,
 I think the reason is why it's good
 or why it is good humor.
 I think it's because it,
 it necessarily reveals a flaw.
 Sometimes I feel like it reveals a virtue, I think.
 If you look at this particular thing...
 Can I explain what we're...
 Yeah, go for it.
 Oh yeah, sure.
 We're just listening.
 The title of the Reddit post is,
 you know what to pick.
 And it says, five people are going to die either way,
 but if you flip the lever,
 the trolley will do a sick fucking loop first.
 And also the top comment is a question saying,
 which I think is also part of the dark humor that's successful.
 Can I get the gender and ethnic backgrounds
 of the groups first?
 And the top answer is both groups are each comprised
 of five white orphaned cis male heavy meth users
 who are consistently in and out of drug rehab,
 all who identify as right-wing extremists.
 Humor is such a sophisticated thing that we engage in.
 Humor is like really complicated.
 But I would argue that like,
 hopefully the humor here shows the virtue of like,
 this is obviously horrible, but that's kind of why it's funny.
 It's funny because it's such a horrible question to ask.
 Like, do we kill five people in a boring way
 or in a really entertaining way?
 And it's like, that's really, that's really...
 And then when you ask even more like,
 what are the ethnic backgrounds?
 Like, that's even worse to say that, you know?
 So I feel like that's like the type of,
 there's a way that you can engage with dark humor
 where it's like, oof, like,
 it's funny because it's so wrong and so taboo.
 And we all know that it's wrong and taboo
 and that's kind of where the shared laugh comes from.
 So for me, the question that,
 asking the diversity question is a sophisticated way
 of revealing the absurdity of asking about diversity
 when it's talking about human life.
 Oh, interesting.
 Cause the way that I took that was,
 I think it reveals the absurdity of how people will weigh
 different ethnic backgrounds so differently
 when it comes to value of human life.
 Like, I'm actually thinking of that in terms of like,
 an immigration related question
 where people are really keen and quick to dehumanize
 like black or brown people.
 So like the question is like,
 well, if five of them are brown and five are white,
 well, I know which one I'm gonna pull the lever for.
 That's how I read that.
 But it's satirizing that aspect.
 Yeah, exactly. Yes, of course.
 Yeah.
 But that's what I mean, that that's the flaw.
 To me, at least, it showed that humanity
 or social networks that are easy to be outraged
 and love the outrage and the chaos,
 that Twitter and social networks will pull that lever.
 Mm-hmm.
 Like they would always try to maximize the fun.
 And there's like a, there's a sick aspect
 to all the atrocities, all the tragedies
 that happen in the world that we kind of always lean
 towards the outrageous narrative weaved around it.
 The, yeah, the one that leads to sort of the most clicks,
 to the most attention, to the most outrage,
 to all that, all that kind of stuff.
 So that's almost like a satire of society
 when they are faced with tragedy, they will maximize.
 I'm trying to think of a word that's not fun, but-
 Entertainment.
 Maximize the entertainment, yeah.
 This is a big criticism I give,
 especially to conservative crowds.
 You know, left-leaning people, everybody doesn't.
 I don't like when people blame the media
 for the state of the media today.
 I very much believe that everything in society
 is a feedback loop and that if you're really unhappy
 with the state of the media,
 I think that the media is a good reflection
 for what people want to see.
 Because there is a room right now in the United States
 where somebody could start a company
 where all they do is completely factual reporting.
 They don't have a political slant
 and they're not giving you these
 like sensationalist narratives or stories.
 And that media company would fail in two weeks
 because people don't want to see that.
 Generally, people really want to see the, like,
 show me the guy that really believes in what I say,
 that calls the other guy an idiot,
 the guy that are screaming on TV or on the radio,
 like, this is what I really want.
 And people will engage in that
 and that feedback loop will continue for generations.
 And then all of a sudden people are like,
 why is the media so biased?
 Why is the media driving so many narratives?
 And I was like, well, what do you mean?
 This is exactly what you want to see.
 And that's frustrating for me.
 That's one of my big kind of when I defend establishments
 or when I talk about like the interplay
 between citizen and all these institutions we have,
 that the institutions are very much a reflection
 of the population, at least in democratic societies.
 And I think that people very much try to elude
 the personal responsibility or the country's responsibility
 to why some of them look the way that they do.
 But that takes us back to the N word with a hard R.
 Sure.
 Why?
 For the particular examples that I was giving,
 for the particular conversations that I was having,
 if you're gonna have challenging conversations
 around certain words,
 I think you should probably be able to say them,
 otherwise it feels really ridiculous to me.
 That's like my-
 Do you still believe that?
 For, yes.
 And not like calling people those words,
 but in having conversations about those words,
 I would say that I still believe that, yeah.
 But don't you think, as you said,
 that using those words,
 actually gives motivation and strength
 to people who have hate in their hearts?
 I think depending on the context of what's going on,
 I think that that's gonna be a big driver
 in terms of how people are going to perceive or take it.
 So in a conversation about the N word,
 I don't think I would normally say the N word,
 we would just talk about the word,
 much the same way that like in a movie,
 like in Django, people use the N word.
 Should that be censored in that movie,
 or in the context of that movie,
 should that be censored in the movie,
 or in the context of that movie,
 is it being employed in a way
 where these aren't good people,
 you're not supposed to like them,
 and that's what the audience walks away with.
 Yeah, but that context is different than conversation.
 It feels like in conversation,
 you using that word normalizes it.
 And that normalizing that word
 is going to make it easier for people
 who use that word in a hateful way to use it.
 Same with the F word, the F slur.
 If you use that casually and normalize it
 in a way that's not hateful,
 you use it in a way that's not hateful,
 but the side effect is that it normalizes it,
 then people who do use it in a hateful way
 will be more likely to use it.
 Therefore, mathematically looking at the equation
 of the number of times the N word
 or the F word is used throughout the world,
 it increases the number of times it's used in a hateful way.
 Yeah, I think that human beings-
 And you're part of that problem, Stephen.
 I don't agree.
 I understand the thought process,
 but I don't know if using certain words
 within different contexts
 is going to necessarily normalize
 the hateful use of that word.
 That is an argument that I've heard people use.
 Somebody will say, okay, well, hold on.
 That should never be used ever,
 because by virtue of you normalizing it,
 even in an inoffensive environment,
 you increase the proclivity for people to use it
 in a potentially more offensive environment.
 And my argument is always like,
 no, I don't think that crossover exists.
 But if you did want to take that argument,
 and maybe you do feel this way,
 I think that you get really problematic
 when you run into communities that do use certain words
 that people would say, well, they should be allowed to do it.
 So for instance, if you think that any utterance
 of the N word at all is highly problematic
 and might increase hatred,
 then the entire rap industry has to dramatically change
 the way that they engage with the N word.
 And obviously a lot of people that criticize
 people's use of the N word
 aren't going to turn to rappers and say,
 well, you guys can't say it either.
 No, it's who uses the N word.
 That's what, it's not, so it's not just the word.
 It's the, it is context dependent.
 But I would say that you as a white person
 having conversations, the context there
 is the kind that would lead to an increase in hate.
 Do you think the N word should be censored in the dictionary?
 No, and I believe there's a Wikipedia page on it
 and it's not censored.
 Yeah, I think it should be in the dictionary.
 I think the context of casual conversation,
 like I said, I just believe that on the internet,
 having humor, having fun conversations
 as you have on your streams,
 that leads to the normalization of the word
 without any educational value.
 Yeah, I would agree with that.
 I think I would agree with that.
 No, sorry, so there's a difference between
 F slur and N word and both I think
 should not be used in a fun way.
 But the F word was used in a fun way for the longest time.
 For sure.
 And I'll tell you something that bothers me
 about your streams,
 not your streams and basically every other stream
 is the casual use of the R word.
 Oh, the ableism, yeah.
 I don't know if it's about the able,
 I don't even know, listen, it's complicated.
 I'm not like virtue signaling here.
 No, ableism isn't virtue signaling.
 I mean, it's a legitimate, yeah.
 Like I get emails from fans that say like,
 hey, like I deal with this particular issue.
 Every time you use this word,
 it kind of feels like you're attacking me.
 So it's a valid concept, yeah.
 It's just something cuts wrong for me.
 Like for example, I'm not bothered by,
 I am bothered by the excessive use of the word fuck,
 but not in the same way that moderate use of the word fuck.
 What is it I'm curious in,
 when somebody calls somebody an R word,
 what is the feeling that you get
 that makes you feel bad about it?
 It signals to me that you don't give a damn about
 people who are struggling
 in ways that you are not struggling.
 Like that signals to me,
 like about the experience of others.
 Do you think that there are other words also
 that could convey like a similar feeling to you or what?
 Cause it feels like you've drawn
 a pretty special circle around.
 Cause like I imagine, I go, oh, this guy's,
 you're an uneducated dumb fuck,
 or you're a nitwicker.
 Like those words, I don't feel it.
 That circle keeps changing.
 Which it can, which is fine.
 I think that's the whole point with the culture.
 So I'm trying to feel my feelings is a kind of,
 I'm a human being that exists in a social context
 that we're all evolving that language together
 and just feels wrong.
 Like the word bitch, for example,
 it really, like I've heard on your streams and in general,
 calling a woman a stupid bitch really bothers me.
 But it's not just the word bitch, it's context.
 Like for example, me personally,
 I'm speaking to me personally,
 like badass bitch is different than stupid bitch.
 Sure, like a bad bitch or something is different.
 Yeah, of course.
 Way different.
 I think it speaks to a bigger sense of civility
 and respect for human beings that are not like you.
 That's what, that's the feeling that I'm bothering.
 And so I guess what I'm trying to say here is
 just because people speak in this kind of way
 in the gaming world and streams
 doesn't mean that you, like a lot of people look up to you.
 It doesn't mean young people, especially.
 Doesn't mean that you don't have the responsibility
 to sort of stand alone from the crowd
 because you're somebody that values the power
 of effective discourse.
 And to be effective discourse,
 there's some level of civility.
 So you can be the sort of the beacon of civility
 in that world versus giving into the derogatory words.
 Because like you have to lift people out of that world.
 Out of the muck of what I would say is like drama
 in effective discourse.
 It's like, I think that's one of your missions, right?
 Is like to inspire the world through conversation,
 through debate, through effective discourse.
 So I guess I'm just calling you out that I think
 using our word for me personally,
 as a fan that believes in your mission,
 it just makes you look ineffective and bad
 and uninspiring to young people that look up to you.
 Because those young people are going to use those words
 that you're using and they'll do it much less effectively.
 That's the problem.
 Yeah, I guess the challenge is always just like finding
 the line.
 Like my vocabulary shifted dramatically from,
 even from like two or three years ago,
 I think my vocabulary shifted quite a bit
 as we've like, we've kind of gotten rid of some words
 and some things are kind of coming out.
 The R word is one that has kind of gone out and come back
 and gone out and come back.
 That one we've definitely gone back and forth on.
 I know there are different thoughts about it
 in different communities on the internet.
 This is interesting.
 I mean, I'm just telling you, for me, it cuts,
 and I'm not a social justice warrior type.
 It cuts pretty hard.
 Like what you're saying is I'm going to lose a subscriber
 if I'm.
 No, it's not a subscriber.
 I actually have to empathize harder because I'm like,
 maybe this is not a very good person.
 That's what I feel.
 Like if you're so carelessly using that word,
 then maybe you're not actually thinking deeply about
 the suffering in the world.
 Like to be a student of human nature,
 you really have to think about other humans
 and other experiences that are unlike your own.
 Yeah, of course.
 And so that's the sense I get.
 But at the same time, you're also like the grandpa
 in the ages who's trying to be cool with the young kids.
 So a lot of the reason young kids look up to you
 is like you also know the language of the internet.
 Yeah, but I mean, that's not an excuse to use words
 that we think shouldn't be used.
 I guess the question that I would have,
 because it's always a struggle,
 and to some extent it's kind of happened,
 is let's say that like three years ago,
 I would have said I'm no longer saying the R word.
 That's just, I'm just going to get rid of that
 in my vocabulary.
 Like is there a chance that today
 we would be having a conversation about like,
 why do you call people dumb fucks?
 Like is that really appropriate?
 Like does this attack at the core of like somebody's like
 level of intelligence, education, opportunities in life?
 Like is that a worthy, you don't think so?
 I think that's a, as the kids say, cope.
 You really think so?
 I think that's a cope.
 Because the words have definitely moved in a way
 where it's like this was okay, now it's not.
 This is okay, now it's not.
 So you're standing your ground by using,
 listen, you could, you could, you could.
 But I think it's better to use those words
 if you want to defend the ground words stand on,
 to use them rarely and deliberately
 versus how you currently use them,
 which is to express an emotion.
 Like you, I'm going to be honest,
 you use R word not when you're at your best.
 True.
 And so that's not.
 That's generally, that can be true
 for a lot of swearing too, that.
 But yeah, I know.
 No, but like, you know that R word is offensive.
 You know, and there's part of it is like,
 the, you tell yourself that like,
 you're still kind of fighting political correctness
 by using it a little bit when you say it.
 No, I don't think so.
 I think I'm trying to think in terms of like,
 where is the virtue where,
 like there's a whole bunch of arguments
 for why some words are okay, some words aren't okay
 or whatever.
 And I try to like think more along those lines rather than,
 but like there's going to be like a lot of phrases
 where like if the R word has come out,
 the conversation is over.
 Like I know that like things, my brain is shut down,
 the person I'm talking to is,
 but there's like, there's a lot of words also
 in terms of like, it like, if you ever hear me say
 like fucking moron in a debate, it's like it's done.
 Like this conversation is over.
 There's no way that anything productive
 is happening past that point.
 I think fucking moron is not, I think it's ineffective.
 It's not civil, but it's not,
 it doesn't bother me in a way.
 It's basically when you speak in a way
 that I know there's a group that's going to be hurt by that.
 Not only do I think about the hurt that group experiences,
 I think of you as a lesser intellectual.
 Like as a lesser person who's thinking about the world.
 What bothers me the most is just what kind of mindset
 that inspires in young people.
 So especially when you're in a public figure
 and a lot of people look up to you.
 So I definitely don't think sort of this idea
 that R word is not the battleground
 of expanding the Orton window of discourse.
 Okay, like I don't think it'll lead to dumb fuck
 being canceled two years later.
 Unless that word is hurting people's experience,
 which I don't foresee that happening.
 I think legitimately R word and F slur
 and calling women bitches, context matters here too.
 Like of course, but just the way I've heard you use it,
 it is not, it's from emotion and it's from frustration
 and it ultimately is rooted in disrespect.
 I think it's ineffective.
 And of course, like who gets to say, I don't know.
 But I'm saying somebody who would,
 like I admire effective conversations
 and I admire great humor, dark humor, wit.
 To me, oftentimes the use of the R word
 in the way you've used it in the way
 see the community use it is none of those things.
 It contributes not at all to the humor and so on.
 Now I could see it might contribute
 to the camaraderie of that particular group,
 especially when they normalize the use of that word.
 You kind of take some of the edge off,
 but you forget that there's a large number of other people
 that don't have the chemistry,
 that don't hear the music of the friendship that you have,
 the relationship you have.
 Instead they hear the normalization of a hateful word
 and it ultimately has an impact that's hateful.
 And then people like me who show up,
 I haven't watched much of your stuff.
 It turns me off from like a couple of times
 your content came before me
 and I listened to it a little bit,
 it turned me off completely.
 I didn't understand how good your heart is.
 I didn't understand how your mission
 of actually de-radicalize people, help people.
 And increase the level of good faith discourse in the world.
 I didn't understand any of that.
 Because what I was hearing is pretty rough,
 like the R word type of stuff.
 And I just feel like the benefit cost analysis
 is heavy on the cost.
 Gotcha.
 So I just have to sort of call this out.
 And I straight up think it's wrong, but that's my own.
 Why do you think it's wrong?
 Because it's hurting people
 without any benefit to you whatsoever.
 When you say hurting people,
 do you mean the person I'm using it at?
 Or do you think there's like the-
 No, no, no, no.
 The affected third group.
 The third group.
 It's good feedback, right?
 I always consider everything.
 Especially, I respect you a lot.
 You're a really smart guy.
 Something that I always kind of like fight over
 in terms of like language or like who to attack
 or what to attack or what to do,
 is that it's very hard to draw like what boxes
 are okay to insult people on versus what aren't.
 So for instance, if I call somebody like a Nazi
 with a lot of vitriol, I am okay with every single Nazi
 being negatively affected by that.
 Because that category intrinsically calls upon
 at some level of moral condemnation for me, right?
 Whereas like if I'm out there,
 I try not to do like image related jokes, right?
 I don't wanna call you like,
 oh, you're a fat fucking loser.
 Because there's a lot of people that are fat,
 that are overweight, where I don't want them to feel bad.
 I don't want them, I'm not trying to call you out
 or like insult you.
 So there's like a lot of, you say cost benefit.
 I like a lot of collateral damage from a word like that
 where there's no purpose in doing that.
 So certain words are easy to get rid of.
 They're off the table, right?
 Epsler, N word, like these are not words you call people
 because there's so much collateral, it's not worth it.
 We've got some words where it's like,
 if you have some form of like mental thing,
 it is a bad thing, you're not a bad person.
 But just using that word could feel like a collateral damage
 to those people.
 And then there's other categories of words.
 So like, if I say that like, this person is like,
 it's a stupid fucking Republican, right?
 There's probably some Republicans that aren't dumb
 that I don't wanna feel called out by that.
 Like, are those types of phrases that you think
 should be completely removed as well?
 Or I'm kind of curious now.
 This completely removed, just so we're clear.
 I'm not referring to censorship.
 Oh no, I'm not even talking about,
 I'm just a person like emotionally like.
 Removed is the wrong word though.
 Like I care about, like, I'm not trying to listen
 to people on the internet saying like,
 you shouldn't say that word, that's not good.
 I mean, I'm trying to look to your mind and heart.
 The reason we're talking today is you're betraying your gift.
 You're better than this.
 You think it's indicative of like a more
 flippant thought process where it's like,
 the only way you can say that word is if you're ignoring
 the hurt and suffering of those people.
 And if you're somebody that says.
 Not even those people, you're ignoring
 the state of language.
 Because I think you're getting to the point
 because it's not about a single word.
 It's about like, it's music.
 And I just feel like there is off notes.
 Very strong note.
 It's a strong note that ruins the melody.
 Gotcha.
 And I don't think I can say, you know,
 you shouldn't use the R word or whatever.
 I'm just speaking to, I'm just listening to music
 and reviewing the final result.
 It's not necessarily, because maybe one use of the word,
 the R word strategically or part of an actual like,
 or when you've built up a camaraderie
 that's sandwiched in like some love,
 but then you try to reveal their,
 like as you're talking about a lot of,
 there's a bunch of drama.
 You have friends with whom you're warring and stuff.
 And they're all a little bit beautifully insane.
 And you've said that you are becoming more and more insane.
 It's beautiful to watch.
 It's the human condition laid before us.
 Wonderful.
 And some of that is swearing and so on.
 So it's a tricky thing.
 But the whole skill of discourse,
 just like it is with dark humor is walking that line.
 I just feel like it's overuse of the R word.
 And I don't want to die in that grog
 because I don't think it's that represented.
 Like there's certain things like that.
 It feels like it ruins the music.
 And I don't, you know, it's the same like a dumb Republican
 or dumb Democrat.
 I don't, yeah, that ruins it too a little bit.
 Depends on how you use it.
 You can be lazy with that.
 You know, like even overuse of the word,
 I think bots is what's used for people
 who don't think or something.
 I don't actually know the definition.
 I'm offended on behalf of robots.
 That might be a compliment soon.
 Exactly.
 But I guess bot means you don't think.
 Yeah, you're like an NPC.
 You just copy and paste the balance.
 Again, I'm offended on behalf of NPCs.
 I count myself as one.
 There's a sense if you say bots too much
 that you're just dismissing people.
 Like everything I say is right.
 And anyone that disagrees with me is a bot.
 That's lazy too.
 Sometimes it's funny.
 Sometimes it's effective.
 Basically saying a lot of people in the mainstream media
 or something like that are bots.
 Okay, that's a little bit of that is effective.
 But too much, it becomes ineffective.
 And I'm trying to speak to that.
 Yeah.
 And I'm just, the reason we're highlighting clear examples
 like the N word.
 Joe Rogan had to contend with that.
 Oh yeah, you know.
 I think it's ineffective.
 It makes you less effective at discourse.
 But like you've talked about many times,
 language is a tricky one.
 It's always hard because you talk about
 constructing a melody.
 There's not one melody that sounds good to everyone.
 But there are probably certain notes that
 if you got rid of them,
 everybody's still gonna like it about as much
 and you don't really lose anything.
 There's a whole other part of an audience
 that might be more willing to listen, of course.
 And it's not about losing the magic of that melody.
 You don't wanna be vanilla.
 I just feel like there's stuff
 that doesn't need to be there.
 Yeah, for sure.
 It's fat.
 But then again, the other thing that people should understand
 that might be listening to this,
 you're streaming many hours a day for many years.
 I don't know, it's 11 or 12, I think, yeah.
 Started in 2010.
 And so one of the things that people can do
 is just clip out anything.
 You're going through the full human experience of emotion.
 Anger, fear, frustration, all of it.
 So of course there's going to be moments
 when you're not the best version of yourself.
 Anything else to say about the language?
 It's complicated.
 I'm still always trying to figure it out.
 There are opinions that I have
 that have changed throughout the years.
 It's possible that the R word has always been
 the next one on the chopping block
 that we're all kinda looking at,
 but people are always worried about that treadmill.
 But it's possible in a year or two
 I'll have a different view on it
 or I'll have changed away some of the words I use.
 Yeah, it's definitely like a,
 it's always like a work in progress.
 There's always like different communities
 that feel different ways about different words, yeah.
 Yeah, but do you acknowledge that there's people out there
 that are never gonna talk to you?
 They're never gonna think of you as a good man
 because you used the N word with the hard R publicly.
 In the past?
 I mean, yeah, those people exist,
 but I mean, there are some people that are beyond my reach,
 which I'm okay with.
 Like there's gonna be some people
 because of things that have been involved,
 or even ideas that I have now
 that might make them beyond my reach.
 Something you said earlier is very true.
 I think the goal is to like identify
 what are the elements that you can cut out
 that aren't integral to your message,
 but could be alienating to more people.
 And those are probably the things that you identify.
 But I think that you can get lost in yourself
 or lost in the internet or lost in a, you know,
 at the outside of yourself,
 if you're trying to appeal to every single person,
 it's just never gonna be the case.
 And for, I actually, I like that I've had the journey
 that I've had on the internet that you can find me saying
 and defending a lot of insane stuff 10 years ago,
 because I think it shows like a level of progress.
 And I think I do get a lot of respect
 and buy into certain communities where it's like,
 I'm not just some random dude telling you that like,
 oh, you shouldn't say, you know, the F word or the N word.
 Like I'm a guy that's been there, that's done it,
 that's defended it.
 And you can see my whole past,
 my whole history is laid bare for you to watch every,
 you know, thousands of hours of it.
 But I can show that like there's growth and evolution
 and change that can happen in a person.
 Yeah, and you're honest about that growth.
 It's tricky thing because people just call,
 bring up stuff from your past.
 For sure.
 I hope we figure out as a civilization,
 a mechanism to clearly say this was me two years ago,
 this was me five years ago, I'm a different person.
 And like, because Twitter doesn't care about that.
 These social mechanisms that bring stuff up
 doesn't care about that.
 It's like one stupid thing you say,
 it becomes like a Scarlet Letter.
 And I don't know how to fight that.
 It's tricky to fight that.
 Have you ever seen Men in Black?
 Yes.
 When K and J are on the bench and he says,
 a person is smart, but people are stupid,
 dumb, finicky animals or whatever.
 There's something that changes for human dynamics
 when there is a group of people
 that make it so hard to control.
 Like I think one-on-one, anybody can sit across on somebody
 and admit to some horrible stuff.
 I used to be, you know, I abused my husband
 when I was, you know, 20 and now I'm 35
 and I see what's wrong or I did this,
 I was addicted to whatever.
 And you know, I made these mistakes.
 One-on-one, it's always easy.
 But in group environments that in-group, out-group,
 tribalistic thing of like identifying one thing
 and then coming to destroy a person's life
 is like, it's such a huge like impulse we have.
 And I think probably when we were like hunter-gatherers
 in the forest, it's probably good
 because you really wanna push weird people out
 or anything like that.
 But now on the internet, when we can hunt
 for any dissenting opinion and just with ruthless precision,
 destroy somebody's life over it,
 it's a pretty scary dynamic.
 I think one of the mechanisms that could fix it
 is make it super easy for each individual person
 to analyze all the stupid shit they themselves have said
 in the past.
 Like a full recording.
 Because I think people are just honestly
 paint a very rosy picture to their own brain
 of who they have been in the past.
 If we can have empathy for the fact
 that we've said stupid shit or we're drunk,
 the ridiculous things you say,
 the offensive things you might've said,
 the offensive things you might've done,
 I just feel like that would give us the ammunition
 to have empathy for others that are like,
 okay, yeah, this guy five years ago said this.
 Maybe that doesn't represent who they are
 any more than stuff I said five years ago
 represents who I am today.
 I feel like technology can actually enable that.
 Maybe, although you're talking about more recording
 and more stuff which people are already wary of.
 It's a double-edged sword.
 I think there is going to be more and more recording.
 We have to figure out how to do that
 in the way that respects people's privacy
 and gives them ownership of their data and so on.
 I've looked at the search history I've done on Google,
 which for most people is available,
 like your Google search history.
 And it's fascinating to watch the evolution
 of a human being.
 It doesn't seem like the same person.
 It's like a different person.
 For sure.
 It's weird.
 It's also hard too with the internet today.
 I'm going to be agist again.
 But now all of the people are thrown together.
 Whereas I don't want a 27-year-old judging
 the language of a 15 or 16-year-old.
 Obviously, he's in high school.
 There is that story that came out of the,
 there was a kid that saved the recording of,
 I think it was some white girl.
 I think that she got her driver's license.
 And she was like, I can drive now, N words,
 with the A or whatever.
 It was dumb, she shouldn't have said it.
 But I think she was 15 or 16
 when she TikToked this or whatever.
 And he held on to that recording until she applied
 and got accepted to college three years later.
 And then he released it to get her kicked out of college.
 And I'm like, damn.
 Everything that I had ever said as a 15, 16-year-old
 was immortalized on the internet.
 My life would have never even begun.
 And those are insanely high standards to hold people to.
 Not that, like, obviously you shouldn't be saying those,
 you shouldn't be saying certain words or whatever,
 but you have to be able to make mistakes in adolescence.
 Like everybody does, we all did.
 Everybody did it growing up, you know?
 Why do you think there is so much misogyny
 in the streaming community?
 And how can you fight it?
 Because you've shown a lot of interest in fighting it,
 trying to decrease or eliminate misogyny
 from your community.
 I think it's really difficult.
 I think that eliminating racism is easier
 than eliminating misogyny.
 On the internet, you mean?
 On anywhere.
 Because I think fundamentally,
 I don't think there's that much difference
 between white people and black people and brown people
 and Asian people or whatever.
 We have different cultures and stuff,
 but at the end of the day, we're all people.
 But I think there are differences between men and women
 throughout all of history and time,
 and then even today in every culture.
 And when real differences do exist,
 it's harder to account for them in a way
 that can we have conversations with each other
 without it becoming very gendered in a negative way, right?
 Negative way of gendering something,
 be it like a misogynistic way of doing it.
 Of course, it's unclear to me that it's so difficult
 to avoid the negative gendering versus the positive,
 because there's a lot of positive to the tension,
 the dance between the different genders and so on.
 Maybe in this particular moment in history, it's not.
 But it's not trivial to me
 that racism is easier to eliminate.
 It's an interesting hypothesis
 just because there's more biological difference
 between men and women.
 That means it's harder to eliminate.
 I don't know if this is true.
 I hear this a lot.
 I feel like I read this somewhere,
 but I need to get a better source
 for I repeated it everywhere.
 But I've heard that like in the US military, for instance,
 they've gotten exceedingly well,
 they do an exceedingly good job
 at getting different people of different races to integrate.
 And it's like not a huge problem
 once you're through basic training,
 all the training, everything.
 But for different sexes,
 it still represents a significant problem
 that the military hasn't figured out.
 And I actually looked at like,
 well, what's the military doing?
 Because if something was solvable,
 like can we sleep for four hours a night and be healthy?
 If we could, I bet the military would know.
 So I kind of look sometimes to them
 to see their integration,
 but it might be that there are other issues there
 that make it kind of worse.
 Yeah, it feels like the military
 is a very particular kind of thing.
 For sure, yeah, it could be.
 The actual task at hand
 might bias the difficulty of the process.
 Potentially, yeah.
 There's been a lot of interesting talk
 about like women integrating into male groups
 and how do you do this in a way
 where everybody is happy with the outcome
 and there's not like issues.
 I think Jordan Peterson spoke about this a little bit.
 And then workplace culture speaks about this a bit.
 Would you happen to remember,
 I wanna say it was like five or 10 years ago,
 there was a big tech conference
 and there were two guys behind a woman
 and they made a joke about like a USB dongle,
 like dongle was a dick.
 And this woman turned around, she tweeted pictures of them,
 spoke about like misogyny of that.
 And then that blew up into a huge ordeal
 that like, yeah, there was this interesting phenomenon
 that in a less misogynistic
 and more inclusive workplace environment,
 some women might end up feeling worse
 because in a more misogynistic environment,
 you're thinking like, okay, that's a woman,
 she doesn't get our humor,
 I'm gonna treat her in a very indifferent,
 very dispassionate, cold way and whatever.
 And then I'm gonna have my boys over here.
 And then you've got like these environments
 where they're a little bit more warmer
 and it's like, oh cool,
 we're gonna bring this woman into our environment
 and we're gonna make all the same types of like
 crass jokes we did before.
 And it's actually worse now.
 Another woman feels even more otherized
 because like, oh my God, why do you talk like this?
 I think that internet communities,
 especially online ones that do like political debate
 and video games are very much like big boys clubs.
 So it's not enough to just say,
 you can't be misogynistic to get rid of misogyny.
 There's always gonna be an othering effect on women.
 There's a lot of like behaviors that are unintuitive
 that you have to account for
 and you've gotta try to like push that back.
 And that's just a very, very, very challenging thing to do.
 So I like to deal with concrete examples more.
 So here's a concrete example.
 And this is like a recent initiative in my community
 because I'm trying to like be,
 because misogyny hasn't been fixed anywhere on the internet
 and I'm curious, well, there are ways
 that I can push my community to do this.
 I don't think you should almost ever make a comment
 on a woman's appearance ever,
 if they're appearing in like some political
 or professional manner.
 Even if it's a positive comment,
 I think it's equally bad to a negative comment.
 It's just never good to do.
 And that's kind of an unintuitive thing
 because it's like, well, a woman appears,
 wow, she's really cute.
 It seems like a nice comment.
 You're being nice, you know, she looks good at it,
 but it's like, it's not at all the point of why she's there.
 And just by saying that, you're kind of like otherizing her
 as like a person to like think she looks good
 rather than listening to anything she has to say, you know?
 Well, there's a lot of stuff that you're saying
 and that is a part of misogyny.
 It's almost like obvious.
 Like any woman will tell you that.
 Woman will, yeah, but they're not in these spaces
 and a lot of the guys don't know.
 But I think what that requires is just empathy.
 You don't need, you need to consider the female experience.
 That's it.
 Like you have to either read about or talk with women.
 You learn, like the low hanging fruit is very easy to learn.
 It feels like just the level of social skill
 oftentimes in internet communities is quite low.
 I disagree.
 I don't like to say, here's the problem with empathy
 is it's very hard to have empathy for experiences
 that are so outside of your own.
 Well, maybe some people,
 there might be some people that can do it, I can't.
 There's a lot of stuff that I had to learn.
 Women are half the population.
 But they're women.
 They're totally different.
 They're totally different.
 So here we have-
 We'll talk about, we'll write it down.
 They're not totally different.
 So here's an example, okay?
 So especially for me, my archetype makes up
 a lot of the internet, white man.
 There's never been a point-
 The name of a beautiful woman.
 Who might be a dancer.
 What's the backstory?
 From New Orleans or from?
 I haven't thought that through yet.
 It's ambiguous, okay?
 Like an open world.
 Open world, I want you to project whatever,
 wherever you want destiny of the dancer to be from.
 That's in your mind, okay?
 All right, I'll save that for later tonight.
 Yeah, okay.
 As a white guy,
 I don't know if there's ever been a spot that I've been in
 where I've been made to feel like I don't belong there
 just by virtue of who I am.
 I actually don't, it's impossible for me to empathize that
 because I don't even have that experience.
 If you go back eight, nine years,
 one of the big issues that came up was harassment
 and gaming against women.
 And I was one of the big debaters against that saying that
 like, sure, women might get harassment,
 but everybody gets harassment.
 If you're a woman and you're in gaming and you get harassed,
 congratulations, you're being treated like a man.
 What you're actually asking for is for us
 to actually treat you differently.
 You don't want to be insulted.
 You don't want to be treated like a man.
 And that's actually misogyny is women making that argument.
 You still stand by that?
 Is that a problem if I do?
 No, I'm just kidding.
 Okay, hold on.
 So a little while after-
 I disagree with it.
 Sure, okay, that's good, you should.
 A little while later, I had a friend, Jessica,
 super cool girl.
 We go to play games.
 She was between jobs and she's like,
 I've got like two months and we're gonna grind CSGO.
 And I'm like, okay, this is awesome, let's do it.
 CSGO, Counter-Strike, Global Offensive,
 shooter game, FPS, microphones.
 First day we start playing, okay?
 Hop into our first game.
 Obviously she talks, everybody's making,
 is that a 12 year old boy?
 Why aren't you making sandwiches?
 Blah, blah, blah, yeah, okay, whatever.
 Play our first game, play our second game, same jokes.
 Third game, fourth game, by like the fourth or fifth game,
 I was actually starting to feel triggered.
 Like every time the game started, I was like,
 can you just like talk so we can get over
 like the stupid fucking jokes?
 It's so fucking stupid.
 And you hear the same fucking joke every single time.
 And it took one day of that experience for me to realize,
 it's not about being insulted,
 it's like this othering feeling that you don't belong.
 And I've never felt that because I'm a white guy.
 Like it's just not to be like Virtue Singlers,
 but like there's just, there's no places where it's like,
 you're white, you don't belong here,
 you're a guy, you don't belong here.
 Like I've never felt that, not inclusion.
 And playing with her, there's a different feeling
 when it's the same types of jokes
 coming from a group of people
 to make you feel like you don't belong there.
 Where I was like, damn, this actually feels really bad.
 And it feels bad in a different way,
 where it's like, if you call me like an F slur
 or any other type of swear word or insult,
 like yeah, you can call me that.
 But at the end of the day, like we're all kind of the same.
 We're all white dudes and we call each other names.
 But like, this is a woman and this is not her place
 and she doesn't belong here.
 Kind of the analogy that I would make,
 because after getting these experiences,
 I would learn this afterwards.
 If I tell you that there's another guy in a room
 and you need to think of the worst insults
 ever for that person, without ever knowing anything
 about them or meeting them,
 if I tell you that it's like a white straight guy
 and you have to write insults, you're fucked.
 Maybe you can do like school shooter,
 but there's not really much you can say
 at the end of the day.
 But if I tell you it's a woman,
 we could, there are so many different jokes you can write.
 If it's a black person,
 so many different racist things we can say.
 For sure, I can come up with a lot of stuff for a white guy.
 In terms of stuff that is just intrinsic
 to him being a white guy.
 Yeah, like there's-
 Really?
 Wait a minute, what are you talking about?
 There's a lot, the internet has sharpened that sword.
 In terms of like jokes that are targeted at his sex-
 Incel, virgin, weak.
 Some of the incel, virgin, maybe,
 yeah, that's getting there, sure.
 That's for sure.
 That's recent though, sorry, I'm older on the internet.
 We didn't have those words way back then.
 That wasn't-
 I'm just saying these analogies,
 that incel and virgin-
 Back in my day, we didn't have generalitator.
 There were no incel's back then.
 None of us had sex, we just accepted it.
 We were all computer gamers.
 Nobody had sex and played video games back then, okay?
 People don't remember that.
 There wasn't the big bang theory.
 You were just a loser that was stuck in a room.
 You guys didn't even know sex existed.
 Exactly, yeah.
 You can use it as an incel.
 We had to download sexual pictures and it was like two minutes
 and you didn't even know if you were gonna get the right thing
 by the time it finished loading.
 But what I'm saying is like, okay,
 I think you agree that if somebody gives you a race,
 like a black person who's a woman,
 we can write very cutting, scathing insults for that person
 that are very otherizing.
 Or words that would really hurt
 if they're spoken to. Yeah, that are very cutting
 to the person.
 But for a white guy, it's kind of hard
 because that's the default.
 There's not as much otherizing of those people.
 Yeah, that's kind of the point.
 So the insults you have from white guy to white guy,
 the insults are much harsher.
 So when you start to apply the same kind of harshness
 to other groups.
 You can make them feel like they really don't belong
 and that otherizing effect is something
 that's very hard for me.
 I can't really empathize with it because I never felt it.
 So I have to intellectualize it and then sympathize with it.
 It's like a whole process I have to go through.
 And then I try to walk other people through that.
 Because if you're a white guy on the internet,
 which is a lot of the internet,
 you really don't know what that feels like.
 You've never felt like that before.
 So you're now in a leadership position,
 grandpa destiny.
 So that's a lot of people look up to you for that.
 For that sort of pathway to empathy.
 Yeah.
 How not to otherize.
 I mean, you have felt otherizing.
 You mentioned high school people not being.
 Yeah, but those are always for things that like,
 it's different to insult somebody
 for a non-immutable characteristic.
 Like, okay, you think poorly about me
 because I'm like not enough money or I don't have money,
 but I could get more money and I could change that.
 But it's different for somebody to really attack you
 for like your gender or attack you for like your race.
 A lot of the attacks that hit the hardest
 is not about gender.
 It's, I do think that they're like,
 the way women are attacked on the internet,
 it's the same kind of attacks you would do
 towards other guys, but you'd go harsher.
 I feel like they're fundamentally different.
 I feel like when we're attacking guys,
 I'm not usually attacking you on like the virtue
 of you being a guy, but like if it's a woman
 and she's typing something like,
 oh, did your boyfriend type that for you?
 Or like, what are you even doing here?
 Like, don't you, shouldn't you be trying to find a husband
 or like, oh, you're like a stupid kind of like,
 go start an OnlyFans or whatever.
 No, but the stupidity, the intelligence aspect
 is what's attacked.
 Yeah, but it's so much different.
 Like you can call a guy stupid,
 but that's because he's a guy that's being stupid.
 But when you call a woman stupid,
 she's stupid because she's a woman.
 Yeah, but I honestly think that women are called stupid
 more than men on the internet.
 But it's nothing to do, like the attack is not gendered.
 It's the gender inspires an increased level of attack.
 I feel like it is gendered.
 I wish we had data on this.
 Have you ever heard of the XKCD comics?
 Yes.
 It's a really good comic where,
 and this is something that I've dealt with a lot
 in my community, okay?
 There's a guy at a board and he fucks up a math equation.
 And it's like, wow, you suck at math.
 And then the next panelist, there's a girl that does it
 and she fucks it up and it's like, wow, women suck at math.
 And there's like that feeling that happens
 where when I bring on, I won't use names,
 but there are like YouTube people that I've brought on
 that have crazy opinions.
 And when they're men, that person is crazy.
 Oh my God, he said the crazy stuff.
 He's so dumb, he's so crazy, so stupid.
 But when it's a woman, it's like, oh my God,
 why do you always bring dumb women here?
 Why do so many women on the internet have crazy opinions?
 There's a different like minority character
 that has to like stand and like represent
 like their whole group where like white men
 don't typically have to.
 Speaking of groups versus individuals, yes.
 But then what I feel happens is then another person
 from that group comes, another woman comes
 and people before she says anything will already feel
 like they're ready with that attack.
 For sure.
 But they're ready for the attack because she's a woman.
 They're gonna call her, she's stupid
 because she's a woman, not because she says something
 to them, but just because she's a woman.
 So like the group in their brain accumulates
 all the negative characteristics
 of the individuals they've met.
 Not the positive, the negative.
 And it becomes like this ball of stickiness.
 And then that becomes the bias for their judgment
 of a new person that comes.
 With white men, there's more of a blank slate
 in terms of bias of how they analyze the person.
 With any of the minority group,
 they basically make a judgment based
 on the negative characteristics of the individuals
 they've met in the past.
 That leads to a system where you're just harsher
 towards minority groups and towards women.
 How do you solve that?
 The most important thing for any problem ever
 is step one is to be aware of it.
 If you're not aware of it,
 then you're hopelessly lost at sea.
 But yeah, the first thing I like to say is just like,
 be aware of it.
 I've had, there's a girl that I've had on recently
 and she says a lot of, in my opinion, kind of crazy things,
 but people will use her as like,
 this is why women shouldn't be here.
 This is like, she's crazy and she's a woman and blah, blah,
 blah.
 But I can bring in a guy who says similarly dumb things
 and he's evaluated on his own merits,
 cause it's a guy, you know?
 There's never ever, ever been a case
 where I brought a stupid guy on stream
 and everybody's like, this guy makes me hate men.
 This guy makes me hate white people.
 That has never happened.
 But then there's like other women that come on
 and it's like, now I know why incels exist.
 Or I totally understand where red pill ideology comes from.
 And even if the statements are kind of true,
 when you're making these observations over and over
 and over and over again, it damages your ability
 to individually perceive somebody.
 And then two people that make the same statements,
 one can be perceived more harshly
 just because of that like group bias you've got built up.
 I think there's something about streaming
 that just brings that out of people.
 Cause you have to talk for like seven hours.
 So you're like, all right, well,
 whatever psychological issues and complexities I have,
 I'm going to explore them.
 They're gonna be magnified.
 Magnified and then it's the, as you talked about,
 the mimetic theory, so Girardian,
 like whatever the things that are very similar
 and you're going to magnify the conflicts that you have
 and you're going to explore the,
 all the different perspectives on those different conflicts.
 And I mean, I don't know if it's just anecdotal,
 but it's nice to have women on stream.
 I think the dynamic that you guys have is wonderful.
 It's really interesting.
 So it's just the female voice in general.
 I love having women on the podcast.
 The female voice I feel like is under heard on the internet.
 For sure.
 I would love the internet to be a place
 where women feel safe to speak.
 All right, given that you're, like we talked about,
 a progressive with non-standard progressive views.
 So you're very pro-free speech, pro-capitalism.
 So given that, it's very interesting
 that you're also pro-establishment and pro-institutions.
 So right now, if you look at the world,
 there's a significant distrust of institutions,
 at least in sort of public intellectual discourse.
 What is the nature of your support
 for government and institutions?
 Can you make the case for and against them?
 Broadly speaking, there is a synergistic effect
 when two humans come together.
 If I can speak very broadly in terms of, we'll say utility.
 Okay, my happiness with one person might be 10.
 The happiness with another person might be 10.
 When they come together,
 it's like 50 between the two of them.
 There's like the synergistic effect
 when humans work together that the sum is greater
 than all the individual parts or whatever.
 There's like an emergent thing that happens there.
 There's a capacity, there's a possibility of that.
 Yeah, a possibility, sure.
 Things could go really wrong.
 There could be a cannibalistic tribe
 that all eats each other, sure.
 But for the purpose of this-
 There's all their failure modes, but yes.
 Okay, sure, yeah.
 But I think broadly speaking,
 are you gonna be the well actually guy?
 Okay, if you wanna well actually.
 Sometimes cannibalism is actually-
 Good for both.
 War and holocaust.
 True, yeah, sometimes things do go wrong.
 But I think broadly speaking,
 the fact that you're sitting here in clothing
 that you didn't make and I'm sitting here on an airplane
 that I don't know how to fly or build,
 like right, there's a lot of cool stuff that happens
 when people come together and they make civilizations.
 And part of that civilization building
 is the fact that we can specialize
 and it's the fact that we can offload a bunch of trust
 onto third parties that we delegate the power
 to make important decisions about our lives, right?
 I don't know anything about how to like build
 like a combustion engine,
 but I know that when I push the button on my car,
 it's gonna drive around and the fumes aren't gonna kill me
 and I can park it in garages
 and the building's not gonna collapse.
 And the only reason all of this works
 is because I've offloaded a lot of trust
 onto these third party things.
 And I would say that the pillars of these third party things
 that society has built on are roughly speaking institutions.
 So that might be the institution of peer review
 for scientific articles.
 It might be the institution of voting for government, right?
 Or the ability for us to vote in that whole process.
 It might be, yeah, the FDA,
 like all of these institutions are things
 that they need to exist because we don't have the time
 or the capability to individually sort through
 all of these things individually.
 We have to rely on some third party to do it.
 Okay, so you believe at scale,
 when we're together, we're greater than the sum of our parts.
 That's the case for institutions.
 Absolutely.
 What about the inefficiencies of bureaucracy?
 Is there some aspect when at scale,
 different dynamics come into play
 than they do when there's two people together?
 Two people that love each other, the birds and the bees.
 Is there some aspect that leads more to cannibalism at scale?
 So like corruption, inefficiencies
 that do to bureaucracy and so on.
 Bureaucracy, which is not,
 I hate it when people try to say bureaucracy is government
 because bureaucracy exists a ton
 in private environments as well, right?
 In businesses and everything.
 Bureaucracy introduces its own set of problems,
 but I mean, a bureaucracy is necessary
 because it's coordinating all of the underlying things
 in order to create something that's greater
 than the sum of its parts, right?
 Like all of the software developers in the world
 are useless without being paired with good designers
 in order to make their products usable by a person.
 And the coordination of those people
 and the coordination of increasingly more and more things
 necessitates some level of bureaucracy.
 I think we always say bureaucracy when it's like a bad,
 it's like a slur almost like you're a bureaucrat,
 you're bureaucratic.
 The bureaucracy is slowing everything down.
 It's like, sure, the bureaucracy slows things down,
 but bureaucracy also gives us things like safe medicine
 and safe water to drink for most of the US
 or safe buildings to live in or safe cars to drive.
 So the managers in institution
 versus like the software developers and the designers,
 the managers is the bureaucracy.
 The reason bureaucracy is used as a slur
 is that something about human nature
 leads to bureaucracy often growing indefinitely.
 And becoming less and less efficient.
 Without, I mean, this is where capitalism can come in,
 that capitalism puts a pressure on the bureaucracy
 not to grow too much because you want the bureaucracy
 to be useful, but not large.
 Yeah, and to be a certain size, yeah, of course.
 To be the minimum size to get the job done.
 And so capitalism provides that mechanism.
 Government does not always.
 And so that's the criticism of government, of institutions,
 where it can grow without a significant mechanism
 that says there's a cost to bureaucracy
 that's not being accounted for here.
 We're just paying for the increasing size of government
 without the benefit.
 Yeah, government is a special institution
 because it doesn't have to show itself
 to be financially viable.
 And we kind of live in a capitalist economy
 where that's generally the case.
 So government gets its powers from votes from the people,
 which introduces a whole new set of possible positives
 and possible negatives, right?
 Having something, for instance, that gives food
 or shelter to homeless people,
 maybe you don't want that to have to run at a profit.
 But giving an organization that can self-justify
 its budgets perpetually and indefinitely growing,
 maybe that's not the best thing.
 Yeah, we always have to figure out
 how to do the constraints there.
 What about the corrupting nature of power?
 That comes with institutions as well.
 Absolutely.
 So then you better pick your style of institution
 very carefully.
 I think that the democratic institution we have
 in the United States today, I think works very well.
 But I mean, there are other styles of government
 that have been tried in the past
 that I think lend themselves more to corruption.
 Not to say that, by the way,
 there's not corruption in the United States.
 Of course, there's gonna be varying levels of corruption
 at like all, at all levels.
 But you ran into this interesting problem
 where authoritarian regimes can act
 with ruthless precision and swiftness
 because they don't have to ask any questions.
 They just do, do, do, do, do, and that's it.
 But the problem is, it's an authoritarian regime.
 They're prone to missteps.
 They're slow to respond to changing or evolving needs.
 There was an interesting study that was put out a while ago
 that showed that like every single famine
 that happened around the world,
 almost like 98% of them happen under authoritarian regimes
 where like freedom of speech is very limited.
 It's very rare for a famine to happen under a democracy
 because press and everything makes the government
 more responsive to the needs of the people.
 Power can corrupt.
 There are levels of corruption,
 but you have to have like a system of checks and balances
 on all of those different levels
 to make sure it doesn't run off the rails, I guess,
 and do a sick loop-de-loop and half the population gets.
 Nice callback.
 There's a lot of people that will listen to you say
 that the democracy in the United States
 is working pretty damn well
 and they will spit out the drink if they're drinking a drink
 and be very upset.
 Can you make the case that they're right and you're wrong?
 Can I make the case that-
 You're a steel man.
 They're right, yeah.
 Well, the steel man for them is that people
 have a lot of problems on the day to day.
 And when they look and they see what government is doing,
 they might see potholes outside their house,
 homeless people all over their downtown,
 and the United States just approved
 another X billion amount of dollars for Ukraine.
 Or they might be living in a city
 where half the factories are shut down,
 a lot of their people are out of work,
 but the president is on the TV talking about
 how to find jobs for immigrants coming in from Mexico.
 And for these people,
 they have problems that exist in their lives.
 Some of them are paying taxes to alleviate these problems.
 And then when they listen to the government talk,
 it feels like the government is not responding
 to the needs that they have.
 And then that's one problem.
 Then on top of that,
 you've got all of these people
 working in alternative media that can show you,
 well, look at this politician wasting this much money,
 or look at him double speaking here or there.
 Look at Hillary Clinton saying she's got a private position
 and a public position.
 Look at how all of these politicians have family members
 that are getting rich because of their relationships
 with people in Congress.
 Look at the revolving door between capitalist companies
 and the government.
 How can you look at all of that,
 take into account that the government's
 not responding to your needs,
 and then really feel like it's a government
 by the people and for the people?
 Yeah, this was a very good steel man and good question.
 How can you?
 How can you tell that they're not just politicians
 that care more about continuously winning the elections
 versus running government effectively?
 They should care about winning the elections.
 That's the first misconception.
 A lot of people say this guy only cares
 about getting voted in.
 This guy, he doesn't even believe in fracking or abortion.
 He just changed his opinion to get voted in.
 Anytime somebody says that, you should say,
 that's really good.
 You want them to change their opinions
 so they get voted in.
 That's the whole point of a democracy.
 You don't want them to remain obstinate.
 You don't want them to say,
 I'm not changing my opinion no matter what the people want.
 You want them to evolve and adopt new opinions
 based on what the population,
 their constituents are voting for.
 Yeah, but the cynical take is that they're,
 on the surface, they're changing their opinion,
 but that there's a boys club or boys means the elite
 that under, in the smoke-filled rooms in secret,
 they actually have their own agenda
 and they're following that agenda
 and they're just saying anything publicly
 to placate the public based on whatever the new trends are.
 So here's-
 The cynical take of public.
 Yeah, I understand.
 Somebody asked me this question and it flipped,
 I 180'd completely.
 I was a Bernie Sanders supporter in 2016
 and my single issue voting thing was lobbying.
 I thought that lobbying, the government was corrupt.
 They weren't responding to these people.
 It was completely destroyed my faith
 in government and everything.
 And I had one question posed to me by a conservative
 that used to come on my stream and shout at me.
 And he said, and then he asked me,
 can you think of any popular opinion
 that the American public has
 that the government is unresponsive to?
 Is there some big piece of legislation or policy
 or whatever that people want that the government isn't doing?
 And he asked me that, I couldn't think of a single good answer.
 And I'm like, oh geez.
 This is a good answer.
 There's drugs.
 There's not.
 Legalization or drugs, hold on a second.
 Yeah, go for it.
 Oh shoot, you're doing the Joe Rogan thing.
 You're pushing back because I brought up weed.
 Go ahead.
 I'm sorry.
 I have become meme.
 I don't even, I don't wanna interrupt your quote
 because there's memes upon memes upon memes
 I can go with here.
 But no, because people bring up, okay, there's no issues.
 There's no issues that the government
 is not representing of the public.
 So here's the issue.
 So somebody will bring up like,
 well, what about the legalization of drugs?
 Okay.
 The first issue people have is one,
 they look at national polling.
 Very few things are decided on a national level.
 So that's the first huge mistake.
 Arguably a lot of BLM made mistakes in this arena
 where they're saying like,
 why isn't the government doing anything about policing?
 Federal government can't do anything about policing.
 That's gonna be your, sometimes it's gonna be your state government.
 Sometimes your local city government.
 The people that like elect like your chief of police,
 your police commissioner,
 that's coming from your mayor, right?
 So you've got people looking one,
 at the wrong parts of the government
 to even figure out the solution to the problem.
 Two, oftentimes for polling,
 the questions are vague enough that you can poll very high.
 But when you get into the weeds on things, no pun intended,
 you start to realize like, oh shoot,
 this is more complicated than I thought.
 I don't know the numbers in particular
 for legalization of marijuana,
 but this is what I'm gonna guess is the case.
 If you poll and you say, should we legalize marijuana?
 That number might poll at like 65, 70%,
 but that's including people
 that are in favor of medical marijuana.
 If you were to poll like, should we legalize,
 should we decriminalize recreational use of marijuana?
 That number might drop to like 52%.
 And then if you poll like, should we completely legalize,
 not just decriminalize,
 but completely legalize recreational use of marijuana?
 That number might drop to like 40%.
 There's like all these different ways
 you can pull around issues where people are like,
 oh no, we broadly agree on this topic.
 But when you really figure out, well, do you,
 do we really agree?
 Or is it just like broad consensus around a thing
 that's never gonna show up like in a piece of legislation?
 A really good example, one example I do know
 was socialized healthcare.
 I think if you poll, there was a time a few years ago
 where if you poll America,
 do you think every American citizen
 should have access to like free healthcare?
 I think that answer, that poll at like 74% yes.
 But when you asked,
 should the government be the sole provider of healthcare?
 It dropped to like 26%, dropped 50 points.
 And you could see it was both asking questions
 about single payer,
 but the way that it was asked was so different
 that even if you all, it looks like there's consensus,
 there's not nearly as much consensus
 as people think around certain ideas.
 Yeah, go.
 We already have a little bit.
 You're right, you're right, you're right, you're right.
 That polls, the way you ask the polls really matters.
 But when you ask,
 should the government be in charge of a thing?
 That also biases the answer, right?
 Because there's such a negative experience
 with government creating a.gov site
 that runs the thing.
 But sometimes.
 Sometimes.
 I think if you dig in, if you have a one hour conversation
 with each individual citizen,
 I think you will understand that,
 yes, there is support for socialized medicine.
 Like it's not.
 The argument has to be made though, yeah.
 What do you mean the argument has to be made?
 Like if you just ask a conservative,
 like what about single payer?
 They're gonna tell you no.
 You might be able to build up to an argument for it,
 but you're gonna have to make the case for it.
 No, but I thought we're talking about
 the feeling deep inside your mind and heart.
 Does the government represent that?
 Oh.
 It's not like some shallow surface layer public opinion.
 Does the government effectively represent
 what the people want?
 Not a shallow survey, but deeply what they want.
 I'm not actually that familiar
 with the debates over healthcare,
 but let's maybe look at an easier one.
 Maybe you'll say it's harder.
 War.
 War is a really good example
 where the government was very responsive,
 I think, to the people.
 You think so.
 So Iraq, Afghanistan,
 the government didn't manipulate public opinion.
 There is an argument to be made
 that they did in terms of like WMD and everything,
 but after 9-11,
 were you in the United States after 9-11?
 After 9-11.
 That seems accusatory.
 Like where were you on 9-11?
 Oh, just checking, okay.
 All right, cool.
 I have evidence and witnesses.
 Oh, sure.
 No, okay, all right.
 Well, I'm very defensive right now.
 That's very strange.
 Look into it, Alex Jones.
 I think after 9-11,
 we could have gone to war with any country in the world.
 We were ready because all of America was like,
 oh my God, and they pointed to Iraq.
 The reasons for the WMDs was kind of dumb,
 but I don't think we even needed WMDs to go to Iraq.
 We could have just said,
 Saddam Hussein was giving medical aid to Taliban,
 Al-Qaeda, Iraq, let's go,
 and we would have gone for it.
 But post-Iraq, Iraq was for a while popular
 and then became obviously deeply unpopular,
 Iraq and Afghanistan.
 And I think you could see that influence
 other foreign policy that the United States had.
 For instance, we opted more towards drone warfare
 than troops on the ground for places like Yemen.
 We opted more towards sending money and help
 instead of boots on the ground for places like Syria.
 And I think that a lot of that was in response
 to how unpopular the Iraq stuff had became.
 And when you looked at a lot of elections afterwards,
 even for Obama,
 one of the defining characteristics of a lot of campaigns
 were like, I'm gonna close Guantanamo Bay.
 I'm gonna get us out of foreign wars.
 Even up to Trump, I'm not gonna stop doing all this
 weird stuff in the Middle East.
 But they didn't still withdraw from Afghanistan.
 They didn't withdraw, but they definitely tapered off
 and weren't as aggressively pushing those types of conflicts
 because they knew it was unpopular.
 But I think if you also consider perfect information
 or good information, if you ask a lot of people,
 are you okay spending this amount of money
 for this purpose?
 So military conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan,
 I think almost from the very beginning, they would say no.
 After 9-11, I feel like-
 Maybe like a few days after 9-11.
 I remember Freedom Prize.
 We were so mad at-
 Well, there's some memes and so on, yes.
 But the nature of the public support for the war,
 was there public support in 2003,
 which is when the invasion happened?
 I feel like initially there was a lot.
 I remember seeing it on,
 but then I also lived in a Republican household
 and I was not very like media savvy at that time.
 So my parents-
 And I don't know if the nature of that public support
 had to do with WMDs or with 9-11.
 Because the weird-
 If you came about WMDs.
 But I wonder what is the, if you were to poll people
 and let's say hypothetically,
 there was above 50% support for the war,
 what would be the nature of that support?
 And to what degrees the government actually representing
 the will of the people versus some complex mechanism,
 like the military industrial complex,
 is manipulating the narrative
 that's controlling public opinion.
 And then there's the media that gets a lot of attention
 by being divided and how they're shaping the narrative
 through the mechanism of division.
 So what-
 There's a lot of complicated things out there.
 It's not just like the people and then the government.
 And that's, yeah, for sure I agree
 that there are gonna be different elements at play.
 And how much of those elements that lead us astray
 can be attributed to the largeness
 of the different systems.
 So, and the different institutions,
 like the media institutions and government,
 the institutions that have a monopoly on violence,
 let's put it this way,
 which is one way to define government.
 Sure, it's complicated.
 There's definitely gonna be different institutions at play.
 But I think that like,
 all I would say is like in reference to my original point,
 when there becomes like broad consensus around a thing,
 I think the government will usually follow,
 it's not gonna fight,
 it's gonna follow more often than not.
 But I think that a lot of times I think Americans
 think that there's more consensus around certain issues
 than there actually are.
 So like a really good example,
 we're on that war point too.
 What caused like the lowest dip in Biden's approval rating?
 I'm pretty sure it was right after we pulled out
 of Afghanistan, which I think if I would have asked people
 like a year before,
 like let's assume that we could pull out of Afghanistan,
 the government's probably gonna collapse after we leave
 because they just don't have the will to fight,
 they don't have the support, they don't whatever,
 that's just not gonna work.
 But like no Americans are gonna die.
 It might be a couple of other people,
 but like no Americans are gonna die,
 we're gonna get out of Afghanistan.
 Would you support that?
 I think broadly speaking,
 I think like more than 60 or 70% of Americans are like,
 yeah, that would be fine.
 But then when it actually plays on TV,
 when we see the people hanging onto the planes,
 when we see like helicopter embassies,
 some of the courts and politicians,
 well now it's like, oh my God, this was horrible
 and it was so botched.
 And it was so like, it could have gone so much better.
 It's like, well, could it have gone better?
 Like maybe, maybe not.
 But I mean, it seems like you can have consensus
 around a certain opinion,
 but the way that things play out
 and the way that people actually feel,
 it's actually way, way, way more complicated.
 And there's not usually this broad consensus opinion.
 All right, yeah, go ahead.
 I'd like to believe that.
 I mean, just to lay my cards on the table,
 I have faith in the power of effective government.
 I just have a lot of concern about what happens
 as institutions grow in size.
 For sure.
 And I just have a lot of worry
 about the natural corrupting influence on the individuals
 and on the system as a whole.
 Like the boys club nature of it.
 I don't know, there must be a better term.
 But basically they agree to the game and they play the game
 and there's a generational aspect, momentum to the game.
 And they more and more stop being responsive
 to the people that they represent.
 I just feel like there is that mechanism.
 And I think the nice thing,
 democracy, elections are resistance
 to that natural human mechanism.
 Also the balances of power is a resistance to that mechanism.
 In some ways the media that reveals the bullshit
 of politicians is also a resistance to that mechanism.
 It's hard to be full of shit as a politician
 because people will try to catch you on it.
 So there's a honesty method there that keeps you honest.
 It's to some degree, but it still feels like,
 it still feels like politicians are gonna politician.
 Yeah, they definitely play their games.
 That is true.
 But there's probably always gonna be that meta narrative
 over like governance that just develops
 as like you have to form relationships and play games
 to get legislation passed and everything.
 The only reason why I don't like it
 when people attack institutions is because one,
 institutions are incredibly important, arguably paramount.
 No, they are to keeping society running.
 And two, I think sometimes when we shift the blame
 onto institutions too much, I think that we lose sight
 of what the real problems are.
 So for instance, in the United States today,
 people might be very critical of the government
 not getting much done, but then everybody turns their eyes
 to the government for being ineffective.
 But what I would argue is I would say the government
 is actually incredibly effective and it's showcasing
 the will of the American people really well right now,
 which is we are historically more divided
 than we have ever been.
 And if I were to just look at the people
 and I were to say, we have a historic divide
 that is getting like rapidly blown apart
 by things like the internet and the media, right?
 If that exists, well, what would I expect
 that government to look like?
 I wouldn't expect that government
 to be governing very effective.
 I would expect that government to show
 that legitimate divide in people.
 Do you think that divide, we have a perception
 of a large divide between left and right.
 Do you think that's a real divide that's in this country?
 Narrow the language, what do you mean by real divide?
 Do you think there is that divide in ideology,
 that there's a large number of people
 that believe a certain set of policies
 and the different set of policies?
 Or is it just the perception on Twitter?
 No, I think there is a large divide in terms of belief.
 I don't think there's very much divide between any people
 in terms of like what they, like on the most fundamental
 levels want in terms of like human beings.
 But in terms of like Democrat versus Republican right now,
 I think there is a huge divide in terms of the direction
 they wanna see the country go and what they believe really
 and what they even believe is reality, right?
 Unfortunately, that's what we've gotten to.
 Can I just speak about the mechanism
 of the left and right here,
 maybe on the mimetic rivalry aspect.
 Is there some aspect to the left on which you're a part of
 that attacks their own for ideological impurity
 more than the right does?
 Is it the bigotry of small differences?
 There's a concept where when you're near somebody
 who is very slightly different than you,
 you wanna destroy it, but when you're with somebody
 that's way different than you, you don't.
 I think the left does it, but I think the right does it too.
 I didn't realize it until I started dipping more
 into conservative communities, but oh my God,
 the people from the Daily Wire
 and the people from Turning Point and the America First,
 all these different groups of people hate each other
 and they fight each other so much.
 They hire and fire sometimes employees,
 they talk smack about each other.
 I think there's a lot of political division
 between both sides.
 I think that the left just kinda gets highlighted more
 because it's like the internet
 and a lot of the internet spaces
 have a lot of left-leaning people.
 So you see like the crazy communist
 and the crazy progressives
 and the crazy center left liberals
 and the crazy blah, blah, blah.
 Whereas like a lot of the right-leaning people
 have kinda been pushed off of the main areas
 of the internet now.
 Interesting.
 My sense was that it's hard to exist on the center left,
 but maybe because I just don't have the full spectrum view
 of the political divide.
 It felt like center left is a difficult position
 to occupy.
 Yeah, I would definitely say so, yeah.
 I don't know if it's that difficult to be center right.
 It's very difficult to be center right.
 I think actually maybe even more difficult
 because a center right person might be somebody
 who's like conservative, but not a fan of Trump.
 And you're like over, like look like Liz Cheney, right?
 You've had politicians that are just like,
 they didn't back the Trump stuff and now they're gone.
 Or you might be like center right,
 but like you don't think the election was stolen.
 And now you're like half the Republican party's looking at
 you like you're crazy, you know.
 That's true, that's true.
 I think there's a Ben Shapiro or how I'm talking with,
 I think he publicly spoke against Trump, right?
 He did initially, but I felt like he softened his language
 upon him pretty significantly, but.
 So there's a significant pressure to kind of couch out
 to a certain kind of messaging.
 Which the whole Republican party is feeling right now.
 Geez, that two years from now,
 that election is gonna be insane.
 It's just hard, okay, so to generalize,
 it's hard to be in the center, it feels like.
 For sure.
 To center and then like do like a random walk
 among the policies around that.
 I don't know what that mechanism is.
 I mean, it makes people like me not feel good
 being in the center.
 It seems like people are just not nice
 to people in the center.
 Like the public, the Twitter machine is not nice
 to the people who are open-minded in the center.
 Is that, is there some truth to that?
 Two reasons for that.
 One is because I think a lot of people
 that market themselves as center
 are legitimately spineless cowards
 and deserve to be called out.
 Like.
 I've never killed a man, but today might be my first.
 Oh no.
 There are.
 And I'll take over, like I told you,
 I'll take over your stream.
 You're with the AI, yeah, we'll see.
 With the AI.
 Is that guy gonna be streaming in the background?
 Hey fellas.
 Yeah.
 Okay, gotcha, gotcha, gotcha.
 Gotcha.
 Lots of gotchas, lots of gotchas.
 Okay, gotcha.
 Okay, gotcha.
 And decrease the, which already is a pretty low level
 of emotion, just decrease it completely.
 When people are screaming at you
 and accusing stuff, just remain calm.
 Absolutely.
 Emotionless.
 The gas lighter strategy.
 Yeah.
 Okay, so what we're talking about.
 So I don't.
 I don't even, I don't ever identify a center anything
 because it's got such a bad reputation because so.
 Fuck that, I stand center with a spine.
 It's called being open-minded.
 And it's not center, left and right,
 those are just labels.
 Here's a really good quote my mom said to me
 when I was really young.
 She said, Stevie, don't ever let your mind be so open
 that your brain falls out.
 And that's what I find that a lot of center people
 do.
 That's not what she told me last night.
 Why are you like this?
 I'm sorry.
 Okay, I'm glad I can bring that.
 I'm glad you feel like this is a safe space.
 Like I said, people are not judgmental.
 If you want to talk about fucking my mom,
 you know what, you're totally within your rights.
 I didn't say that.
 You said that.
 I didn't say that.
 I support that.
 She's a beautiful woman.
 Her husband probably wouldn't be too happy about it,
 but you know.
 I didn't say there's any sexual relations.
 It was just that having a conversation with her.
 You projected that.
 That says more by you than me.
 Anyway, go ahead about spineless center.
 Spineless center.
 There is some aspect to that, which is like amorphous.
 To me, center means you think freely
 about each individual policy without being stuck to a king.
 Some ideal, yeah.
 But a lot of people don't do that.
 They'll call themselves centrist,
 but then they just, they're anti-establishment,
 essentially on everything.
 I don't know your position on like the vaccines or anything,
 but like I met a lot of like free and open thinkers
 who are like, you know what, I'm open to everything
 and it's an experimental vaccine.
 I'm gonna eat hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin
 because that's what the institutions are telling me
 not to take.
 And I think Fauci got too much money from that company.
 And these are, but I'm an open thinker.
 And they, what open thinker becomes-
 I'm at MIT.
 What do you think my position of vaccines is exactly?
 I hear a lot of crazy things from a lot of people.
 Okay, you might be from MIT,
 but I know you're from the internet, okay?
 People from the internet are weird and crazy, so.
 Yeah.
 Well, I-
 Who knows?
 I don't like arrogance.
 And I have criticized scientists during COVID,
 a lot of people, but scientists included, having arrogance.
 Which is fair, but-
 And I think there's a lot of good criticism to be made
 of different scientific and medical establishments
 over a lot of stuff,
 but nobody can make those good criticisms
 because they're too like obsessed over like just trying
 to have the anti-establishment answer.
 And that is what is upsetting me the most.
 Like I think there are good conversations to be had
 about a lot of stuff related to how we handle
 the coronavirus, you know, were lockdowns effective?
 Was there enough data to support the huge measures we took?
 You know, why didn't we have the option to show
 I was infected a month ago?
 Why do I need to be vaccinated?
 Why wasn't that option ever a thing in the United States?
 I don't think it was.
 There are really good questions to be asked there,
 but all the people asking the questions are also trying
 to tell you that ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies
 are the way to go for everything and the vaccine is evil
 and they're just gonna turn you gay like the frogs.
 And it's like, Jesus, like you can't,
 there's like no place to reasonably criticize from
 because all of the people that are criticizing
 aren't doing it with an open mind or, you know,
 they're not reading studies or doing anything.
 They're saying like, I do my own research,
 which means they listen to whatever the last guy
 on Joe Rogan said and now they're parroting that opinion.
 Easy no, easy no, bro.
 The last guy on Joe Rogan, not Joe Rogan, okay?
 That Robert Malone guy on Joe Rogan got me real fired up.
 That's one guess.
 People see him as like the father of mRNA technology.
 He published one paper, okay?
 What do you mean people?
 Which people think that-
 Joe Rogan fans, I run into these people.
 I start arguing with people and they start citing me,
 well, what about-
 I'm a Joe Rogan fan and I appreciate the vaccine.
 That's good, I'm glad you do.
 But there's definitely-
 But you said there's a type, what's the type?
 What's the type of Joe Rogan fan?
 Anti-establishment.
 I think that's not Joe Rogan.
 That's a general public discourse.
 There's a default anti-establishment
 on the right and the left.
 That's the default easy thing to go to.
 I think Joe Rogan fans are definitely a certain type
 of anti-establishment though.
 Like I could guess the Joe Rogan fan.
 Like if I were to do general population versus Joe Rogan fan,
 who do you think is more likely to be anti-vaccine?
 Do you have data on this?
 Or are you just guessing?
 Just guessing.
 I think you are actually judging.
 I am.
 I think you're judging.
 Because I think you're also,
 the beautiful thing about podcasting,
 this could be similar to streaming,
 is there's a large number of people that just listen.
 Like what does it mean to be a Joe Rogan fan?
 I don't think you just listen.
 I think people listen and absorb the information.
 I would say that the Joe Rogan fan base
 is as divided in the vaccine as the general public.
 Gotcha.
 Man, I'm gonna look for polling data on that.
 I'm sure somebody's got to have done it out there, but.
 No, but you're basically revealing the fact
 they have no data, you're using your own judgment.
 For sure.
 Based on how he's had conversations
 about his experience with the coronavirus,
 and then based on the guests that have come on
 that have talked and echoed a lot
 of like anti-vax talking points
 and been completely unchallenged.
 And then based on statements he's made
 about like myocarditis and the vaccine
 and everything as well, yeah.
 So it's the level of challenge or not that he's doing.
 Well, yeah, and then what his true positions are
 and then the types of guests he typically chooses
 to bring on to talk about the vaccines, yeah.
 Okay, but that represents somehow
 a deep anti-establishment feeling versus just the vaccine.
 I mean, I've seen the vaccine and other things being,
 I think that broke people.
 They seem to- I think all the coronavirus,
 that whole one or two years broke a lot of people.
 There's a lot of emotion and emotion quickly solidified
 into an opinion that almost had nothing to do
 with like thinking through and updating your knowledge
 and so on, you just made up your mind.
 Yeah, but I think a lot of it comes
 from that anti-establishment place.
 Like the vaccine represents the ultimate of establishment.
 It was a huge private company backed
 by a huge public government and there's Fauci
 and there's Biden and there's Pfizer
 and there's all these countries locking us up
 in our homes, telling us to do a thing.
 Like the vaccine was like the ultimate like submission tool
 to like show you that the government owns you.
 Not only do you have to get injected once, it's a series.
 And then you gotta get boosters
 and it's like they're trying to keep you under their thumb
 and it's that's the control.
 I feel like that vaccine became
 like the ultimate rallying cry between like,
 do you support, are you a sellout that is gonna believe
 whatever the government tells the sheep to take
 or are you gonna be like the guy that stands
 against the crowd and gets fired from his job
 and pulls his kids from school
 because they're not gonna let the evil Fauci medicine,
 jab them in the arm.
 And the funny thing is the crowd that stands
 against the institution is not larger
 than the crowd of sheep.
 There's like one sheep standing there.
 Sure, yeah.
 Or it feels that way sometimes.
 One vaccinated sheep.
 Well, okay.
 Well, what's the defense of institutions?
 How do you regain the trust of institutions?
 Like, first of all, do you think that there's ways
 in which WHO, CDC failed?
 And do you think there's criticism towards Pfizer
 and the big pharma companies that's deserved?
 Damn, it's the pharma companies, I'm not sure.
 For CDC and WHO, so here's a criticism that I have
 of all of academia and I feel it stronger
 and stronger every day.
 I don't think it's enough to be a researcher
 or to be correct about issues.
 Academia needs to increase its ability to communicate.
 It is just an unbelievable, unmitigated failure
 that academics are unwilling to wade
 into the complicated topics that exist today
 because other people are, you know.
 First you call me spineless
 and then you call me a bad communicator.
 But no, look, you're here, you're doing it.
 So you get props for me, okay, good job.
 That motherfucker.
 But there are like so many, but I'm sure you've,
 I'm sure that you must have heard another fellow academic,
 a fellow colleague express some amount of frustration
 about like in their specific discipline,
 they know something to be true
 and they know that like a lot of the messaging is like wrong
 or bad in the public about it,
 but they're never gonna step out and say anything
 because either one, they're very measured
 and careful with their take,
 which they feel is incompatible
 with what people wanna hear.
 Or two, they're really worried that they might be incorrect.
 So they're gonna be cautious.
 While everybody else is going out
 and like hardcore in their pain.
 And they also don't have the support of institutions
 for them to go out on a limb.
 Yeah, that too.
 So like to take risks.
 For example, I've heard that with lab leak theory.
 I've had a lot of biologists, virologists, friends
 that are like, yeah, it's obviously leaked from a lab.
 Like early on.
 Oh, maybe, okay.
 We can fight over this one, but sorry, go ahead.
 No, no, keep talking.
 We can fight over this.
 But like they, okay, I should sort of backstep and say like,
 that's like, you talk about shooting the shit.
 You haven't really investigated,
 but it's your gut.
 Like this doesn't make any sense.
 They would never say that publicly.
 Of course.
 Mostly because you're saying like,
 what they would all say is like, we want to see data.
 Yeah, which would be good, which is fine.
 So they're going with like,
 like this is too many coincidence in the same place.
 That's the logic.
 But they don't wanna say anything
 because there's no data.
 You need to have evidence.
 You need to have actual evidence
 to say one way or the other.
 There's that.
 But there's also just like you said,
 I mean, effective communication.
 You're a fan of Sean Carroll.
 Oh yes.
 He's like one of the only people in this whole planet
 that I like besides you.
 I love Sean Carroll.
 Anytime Sean Carroll is brought up as evidenced,
 there's a smile that comes over your face.
 I love it.
 Of like joy.
 Of like a little kid thinking about Santa Claus.
 Okay, I love Sean Carroll too.
 We should listen to this podcast.
 I love Sean Carroll because there,
 I hate this divide between like you're either STEM
 or you're like philosophy, arts and all that other stuff.
 And the two worlds can never cross.
 And I love that it was so good at physics,
 but like explores and pays attention
 to all of the like sociological stuff too.
 It's so rare to find that quality in a person.
 He's legit one of the really, really, really specialized,
 but you don't have to be a Sean Carroll.
 You can be just a little better at educating.
 Another person in the medical and the health space
 is somebody named Andrew Huberman,
 a friend of mine from Stanford.
 He's an incredible educator.
 There's the kind of process in science
 they usually call like review or survey papers
 where you basically summarize all that's going on,
 integrate it and like draw wisdom from it
 and also project like where's the discipline headed.
 And Andrew does that basically on all these sub components
 of the different stuff going on in neuroscience
 and biology and neurobiology, all of that.
 He's able to, he does a podcast called Huberman Lab
 where he just summarizes all and is able to explain like,
 what does that actually mean for your life
 in terms of protocols of how to make your life better?
 I feel like people should be able to do that more and more.
 But with virology and oh boy, that's a tricky one.
 That's a really tricky one.
 I wish that people could have honest conversations.
 Like I attack a lot of people
 that do the lab league theory stuff,
 but truly we should be able
 to have that conversation publicly.
 It just, it always feels like the people
 that are having the conversation
 don't ever really wanna have the conversation.
 They're not being honest.
 Like I'm a guy that like does his own research
 and it's so boring reading studies and a lot of it,
 I can only do abstracts and like it's so much work,
 but I'll never ever say that about myself.
 I'm a guy that does his own research
 because every time I hear somebody say that,
 they don't do any research.
 When they say they do their own research,
 what they mean is they've seen one podcast
 and their opinion on it is completely-
 What podcast is that?
 Definitely not mine, cause it was mine.
 I wouldn't be criticizing anything they say.
 But yeah, so like lab league is another one where it's like,
 well, how do you know it's lab league?
 How do I know it's lab league?
 Because Fauci lied and Hunter Biden-
 Right.
 And it's like, okay, come on, you haven't engaged
 with it at all.
 There's really interesting research
 that shows there's a really strong study
 that shows that there's like a high degree of certainty
 that it came from the wet markets.
 Very, very high degree of certainty.
 And there was an article that came out recently
 where it's like Senate concludes that virus actually came
 from the Wuhan Virology Lab or whatever.
 And that whole article, if you actually read it,
 it never says that in the article.
 I don't know why they tweeted it with that headline.
 But yeah, to back up, I'm sorry.
 I think we should have good-
 You should be sorry.
 Yeah, I'm not sorry actually.
 I get to ramble here, okay?
 I'm here for a long time.
 I rescind my apology, okay?
 I actually rescind my apology.
 We should be able to have challenging conversations
 about things, but you gotta, man, be well-read on both sides.
 Not this like, I do my own research,
 so I don't believe anything that Fauci says.
 Like, come on, dude.
 You can do better than that.
 Not you personally, but-
 Gotcha.
 How does that feel?
 Feels great.
 So for people who don't know-
 Feel understood.
 That's the catchphrase.
 Gotcha.
 Through all tragedy and triumph,
 through all the rollercoaster of life,
 your response to it is gotcha.
 Yeah.
 It's, well actually, let me jump to that before I continue
 to, with political discourse.
 Psychologically, you are in a lot of heated debates,
 and you're usually super calm under fire until you're not.
 Sometimes you lose your temper completely.
 Very rarely, but-
 That's like your opinion, man.
 Let me ask you about your psychology.
 What are psychologically your strengths and weaknesses
 that you're self-aware about?
 I think I'm very non-judgmental,
 so I can entertain a lot of different thoughts
 without agreeing with them or condoning them.
 I think that's a really big benefit to me.
 For whatever reason, I seem to be pretty calm
 in dealing with annoying people.
 It's why I got promoted at the casino so fast.
 I could deal with drunks or whatever.
 It just didn't affect me that much.
 What percent of the population is annoying?
 Depends on how you're engaging with them.
 Most people aren't really annoying, ever.
 That's what I mean.
 If you're doing political debate,
 what percentage is annoying?
 I guess it depends on who I'm debating and what the topic is.
 I guess I'm trying to point out the fact
 that sometimes you can say that reveals something about you
 if you think a large percent of people are annoying.
 Well, I would say working graveyard shift
 when alcohol is involved,
 that percentage of people goes very, very, very high.
 Comes up.
 Or to be more fair, actually.
 It's not a high percentage, truly,
 but if you're a server,
 one bad customer can ruin the rest of your shift.
 So you only need one or two people acting in that manner
 to just totally throw you off.
 And you're able to, at least these days,
 not allow that one customer to throw you off, quote unquote.
 Yeah, I'm very much like a,
 I noticed this especially after having a son,
 there's something about six-year-old kids or whatever
 where it's like, if they get mad,
 they're never gonna be mad for that long.
 They'll move on.
 That's my mentality.
 I'm like a six-year-old kid.
 I might be mad about something,
 but I'll get over it in 30 minutes or an hour.
 I'm pretty good about not carrying that through.
 It's very rare that I'll hold a grudge against anybody
 or be angry about something
 or really disaffected by something over the long term.
 That almost never happens to me.
 What are your weaknesses psychologically, would you say?
 I still have a problem with projecting.
 I think we all probably do,
 but my mind onto others is like,
 if I understand this and I've said this,
 you should understand it, and if you're not, you're dumb.
 That's an issue that I,
 I still have that where I project too much.
 What about holding grudges and stuff like that?
 I never hold grudges.
 I'm the least grudgy person ever.
 It's kind of a meme on my community
 because anybody can always come back
 as long as they're acting different.
 What about the,
 as long as they're acting different?
 As long as they're acting different.
 I mean, all right.
 The reason why I say that is because,
 so for instance, nobody likes this,
 but I have a strong stance on apologies
 and that I hate them.
 I don't ever want to hear an apology.
 I don't care about them ever.
 They don't mean anything to me.
 If you did something bad,
 as long as you've fixed the behavior
 and you're not doing that thing,
 then we're generally chill.
 So there's been a lot of people
 that have been involved in weird stuff with me,
 but then they go off, they do their thing,
 and they come back and it's like, okay, cool.
 As long as you don't do it again, we're fine.
 It's all good.
 I'm sorry you feel that way.
 It's not your fault, Steven.
 It's not your fault.
 Okay, gotcha. You've said plenty of negative stuff,
 positive stuff and negative stuff about Hassan.
 Yeah. This is my podcast.
 So I get to get you to force you to say positive things.
 What do you love?
 Oh no. I'm all about love.
 Let's go back to grilling me on the R-word stuff.
 You're gonna make me compliment Hassan?
 This is gonna be a harder conversation than that.
 All right.
 We're gonna get you to feel emotions.
 Okay.
 So he's, for people who don't know,
 he's another popular political streamer.
 I think you had, as the kids call it,
 a bridge burning over Bernie Sanders.
 I don't know.
 My research is very limited on this,
 but what do you respect and love most about Hassan?
 He puts in a lot of work.
 When he was growing his stream from 2,000 concurrent viewers
 to 15,000, he was streaming, it was like 12 hours a day,
 every single day.
 So that was Adam Irwin.
 He did a lot of work.
 He does seem to be pretty good at networking
 and socializing and making the correct friends
 and connections to continue to build his business.
 What about him as a political thinker?
 I know you don't think highly of him in that regard,
 but I think that's unfair.
 Oh, man.
 I honestly wanna push back on that because-
 Okay.
 I have zero respect for him as a political thinker.
 There's not gonna be almost anything.
 So you can't- Oh, I will say,
 I admire the fact that through no actual capability
 or ability of his own, he manages to wind up
 at some of the correct answers
 just because he's towing the lines.
 That is- Good job for him on that.
 He's got a lot of correct opinions,
 just he has no idea why, so.
 I think that's undeserved.
 I think that's too harsh, man.
 Okay.
 The reason I bring that up is I feel like
 there is a deep grudge in there somehow.
 So you're the father now, since you're so old,
 the grandfather of the political debate on stream,
 on live stream political debater.
 So there could be some grudge about that split
 that happened or not enough credit given
 or all that kind of stuff.
 I just think he's somebody that has
 a left-leaning ideology that's different than yours.
 He was a Bernie supporter, right?
 And I guess you were not.
 Can you explain to me where the division is?
 He exemplifies everything that I absolutely hate
 about politics. Which is what?
 Which is shallow engagement, heavily ideologically driven.
 And you're not ideologically different?
 Absolutely not.
 Free of ideology. That's what we're talking about,
 like the free thinker in the real meaning of that word.
 Yeah, so the way, let me qualify.
 Issue by issue thinking.
 Let me qualify what I mean when I say that.
 I spent a lot of time, unfortunate time,
 delving into the boring world of philosophy.
 I spent a lot of time thinking about
 what are my ethical positions?
 How do I feel about myself, the people around me
 and how that relates to the world around me?
 And then from all of these positions,
 I think you might've used the phrase
 first principles earlier.
 From these kind of first principles,
 out of that is where all of my political positions
 are built out of, like full stop.
 So if you ask me a question,
 how do you feel about like the right to own a firearm?
 Or how do you feel about social healthcare?
 Like we can walk through,
 well, this is how I feel about it
 as like a thing from the government.
 This is where the government gets its power.
 This is ethically how groups of people
 are supposed to function.
 This is morally how we relate to each other.
 And personally, this is how I feel like.
 Like I'll be able to do every single
 political belief back there.
 It's not like I'm telling you,
 like if I were to ask Hassan,
 what do you feel about this political topic?
 He's gonna tell me what progressives are supposed to say.
 I don't know what he thinks about it.
 I don't know if he thinks about it.
 Don't you think that's a cynical take?
 Why is he, just because his views coincide
 with the mainstream narrative,
 mainstream viewpoints of progressive thinkers.
 I mean, why does that mean he's not thinking?
 Because his engagement with every subject
 is incredibly shallow, 100% predictable.
 Like I could write like a,
 I could probably program a script
 to like give you every single potential answer
 you could have to any single question you could give him.
 Again, I think that's pretty cynical take.
 Okay, it could be the case that his brain
 perfectly aligns with every single mainstream.
 No, but I don't know if you know it is perfectly aligns.
 Because I think you're just taking a very select,
 just like streamers do of each other,
 a very select slice that represents the perfect alignment,
 as opposed to looking at a person struggling with ideas
 and thinking through ideas,
 and then giving them a pass,
 like a lot of people, like I give you a pass
 on just the fact that you say a lot of crazy shit
 on stream for drama, like which is-
 I don't say things for drama.
 They might be dramatic, but.
 I mean, you've evolved as a fish evolves legs.
 You've evolved a mechanism which creates controversy.
 Sure.
 That you could say it's not intention, but it happens.
 I think- Okay, sure.
 The extremists kind of learn that kind of thing.
 And so I'm sure Hassan does the same kind of stuff.
 And so like underneath it,
 there's still a thinking being
 that's contending with political ideas.
 You don't think so.
 Okay, and he does a really good job of hiding it.
 There are other political figures that I really don't like,
 that I wouldn't say the same thing about.
 So like, I don't know if you have Vosh written in there.
 I'm like, okay, that's the person that-
 Who's Vosh?
 He also split out of my community and grew up to something.
 I know he hates me and he's an anti-fan community.
 And they all hate me.
 Okay, tell me something you love about what machine-
 I can tell you a lot of things about Vosh.
 I think Vosh legitimately thinks
 through a lot of his political positions.
 I admire or did admire that he has like his own like positions.
 He would take someone's country
 to people further left than him.
 He's got some positions that don't fit his ideology
 kind of at all.
 Like he's his own independent thinker.
 Rhetorically, he's very effective.
 He was willing to sit down and do research
 for like his debates and everything.
 He would spend a lot of time practicing
 like his rhetorical effectiveness
 and navigating conversations.
 He intentionally and purposefully built
 like a community that exemplified his values.
 Yeah, I've got a lot.
 I don't, we are completely split and hate each other now,
 but like I have a lot of-
 Why, why, why hate?
 First of all, hate is a strong, why the hate?
 Okay, I don't hate him, but he hates me
 because we had a couple of really big debates.
 What happened?
 Well, one had to do with whether or not
 you should live your values.
 And can you give me the story
 that's a charitable interpretation?
 I always give charitable interpretation.
 You don't.
 I absolutely do.
 You don't.
 Wait, Nate, what happened?
 Five minutes ago, you talking about Hassan.
 Everything I said about Hassan is true.
 There is no steel man there, okay?
 That's not charitable.
 That's, I'm sorry.
 If you can prove me wrong,
 I would love for you to do it, okay?
 I'm using my gut instinct.
 Usually when somebody feels strongly
 about another person in that way,
 it's not coming from a place of data and reason.
 It's coming from a place of emotion.
 It's coming from a place of resentment
 and grudge and all that kind of stuff.
 Yeah, I understand.
 There's emotions deep in there.
 So the gachis hiding,
 the gachis is a surface of an iceberg
 and there's a deep ocean underneath
 that you yourself have not explored.
 I disagree, but I understand why you do that.
 And love is actually a doorway.
 The young, love is a doorway
 for you to explore the depths of your-
 Get into that ocean and find my fish,
 my pre-evolved form.
 Yeah.
 I understand why you think the way you do
 and you should, you shouldn't believe me.
 And I understand that
 because if somebody told me the same thing,
 I'd think you probably just really don't like this person
 for a reason or two.
 I understand why you think that way, okay?
 The reality is though,
 for any political person that I disagree with,
 I can give them a fair shake.
 It's one of the few things I think I do
 exceedingly well on my stream.
 Even with Hasan, there's been drama
 that he's been involved in.
 And when I'm involved in drama,
 he'll always throw me under the bus.
 But when he's involved in stuff,
 I'll always say, oh, I think Hasan was right here.
 Or I think that he meant this.
 There was a thing that came up once we're on,
 live stream fail, he was getting roasted
 because he referred to somebody,
 he used the expression shitskin
 to refer to somebody's like the way they looked.
 And I have only ever heard that
 in the context of 4chan people talking about like Indians
 or like black people.
 Like it's a racial thing.
 But I could tell the context
 and everything that he was saying.
 He was insulting some guy.
 I think it was kind of like incel virgin.
 He was going for like acne skin.
 I think that's what he meant when he said it.
 And there were a whole bunch of people that were insulting.
 It's like, oh my God, did he just say racist term?
 And I was like, no, I don't think he was racist.
 I think he was like, he was just reaching for words
 and that's what came out.
 So like, that's an example of me being charitable.
 Okay, but didn't you criticize him for something?
 I was trying to, I like Googled,
 why the hell you guys split out?
 Cause I thought your friends, you should be like-
 He split up over Kamala Harris video, but go ahead.
 Is that why, is that the-
 I feel like you criticized him over something.
 And I am, okay, this is very vague memory,
 but you criticize him over something.
 And I felt that criticism wasn't charitable.
 Was it Pete Buttigieg stuff?
 Yeah, Pete Buttigieg, yes, yes, yes, yes.
 Yeah, so I've said this a million times,
 but there's no amount of context
 or no amount of nuances is ever acceptable to people.
 I don't think Hassan is homophobic,
 but I think the comments made about Pete Buttigieg
 were really homophobic.
 That's what he said, yeah.
 Yeah, and there were a lot of people making a lot
 of comments that made me really uncomfortable
 about Pete Buttigieg.
 That was insane to me.
 Spurred by the comments of Hassan?
 No, but it was an environment of progressives.
 All the progressives were attacking Pete.
 And I felt like his gayness became the subject-
 Yeah, but why throw Hassan under the bus for that?
 Because he was jumping along
 with all of those types of insults.
 You don't think you've done the same kind of stuff?
 If I do, call me out on it,
 and I'll probably say I shouldn't have done that.
 That's what the R-word was about.
 It's fine, and that's a good call out.
 No, but your friend, you should privately tell him, right?
 Well, no, by then we were sworn enemies.
 So that wasn't the reason-
 No, no, no, it was over a Kamala Harris video.
 Sworn enemies.
 He hates me, what am I supposed to-
 Listen, for all of these people,
 I will accept them back into my life
 if they ever wanna come back in at any point in time.
 But usually they're the ones that-
 If they correct themselves, right?
 No, I'm not expecting anybody to.
 So here's the deal with Vash and Hassan.
 These are like the three, we're the three guys online.
 None of us will talk to each other.
 Hassan, because he won't give clout to anybody,
 and Vash, because he thinks I'm bad faith.
 And then neither of them will talk to me
 because they both hate me.
 You guys should go on a camping trip together.
 It's like broke back Martin, but three way.
 And just like rejoin, refine-
 Yeah, that could be a thing.
 Refine the position for each other.
 Honestly, just from the internet perspective,
 for me as just stepping into this world,
 there's some aspect to which you have a responsibility.
 I hate that word.
 Good word, don't run from it.
 You have an opportunity.
 I wish you guys would kind of be the beacon
 of like forgiveness and friendship and like comradery
 and that kind of stuff.
 Yeah, I agree.
 And even if we disagree, it would be really good content
 across the art reach.
 Yeah, like shit talk, like friends shit talk.
 Sure.
 But it's not like the fact that you guys
 don't talk to each other.
 Like I would love for you to shit talk publicly
 with the comradery always there.
 Like there's love in the beginning, love in the end,
 but you beat the shit out of each other in the middle.
 And that's what live streaming is for,
 the political discourses.
 That's great political discourse.
 Versus I think what underlies is some jealousy and so on.
 With this, you get this many followers.
 I just wanna make sure you're clear to your audience.
 Everybody has to your audience.
 I'm sure you have flaws that I'm just not,
 in this dynamic.
 Hard to find, you know.
 Your only flaw is you're too modest.
 Yeah.
 So why did you guys split up?
 Because I would love it honestly,
 just let me just put that idea out there
 for you guys to make up.
 Yeah, it's out there.
 Of course, as everybody talks, me, Vash, Anasana,
 it's crazy that like the three largest like political debate,
 left leaning people online,
 like can't do any type of content or collaboration at all.
 It's so stupid.
 Yeah, it's strange.
 What was the reason you guys split up?
 The Kamala Harris?
 So Hassan's entry into kind of like
 the Twitch political debate world was in, I think 2018,
 I think he did a debate with Charlie Kirk.
 And he reached out to me to kind of like review that debate,
 to like go on, to go over it on stream.
 And he came on, we went over it,
 and then we kind of friendship developed.
 We hung out in real life.
 I think when I came to LA, I think I slept on his couch.
 We played with his dog.
 We were like kind of friends.
 And as time went on,
 and then he was a little bit more,
 he was farther left than he led on.
 So like I was a social Democrat,
 he was a social Democrat.
 But back in those days, like 2018,
 when people said they were a social Democrat,
 they really met socialists,
 but they just didn't wanna say it.
 So he was farther left than me.
 And we had a lot of deep divides
 in our approach to politics.
 Whereas like I was very much like a first principles,
 this is my whole political position.
 And he was very much kind of like a,
 this is like the political ideology I'm involved in.
 And this is kind of like the field
 that I kind of like navigate in.
 So there were a couple instances
 where these divides would be laid very bare.
 One was when it was either him or the young Turks,
 I think it was him.
 There was a shooting in a neighborhood
 where very young black child gets killed by a white shooter.
 And they did a video about like hate crimes
 and how hate crimes are on the rise
 between races and white people are evil and blah, blah, blah.
 Not that, but like white people
 committing hate crimes against black people.
 And I remember saying to him, I was like,
 hey, we don't have all the data yet for this.
 It feels really bad to make videos about this beforehand
 because it's the same type of shit that happens at airports.
 You know, is there a thing going on?
 Was it a brown person?
 Are they Muslim?
 It's Islamic extremism.
 We see this played out so many times in recent history,
 probably not a good idea to jump to conclusions.
 And he was like, well, no, you don't understand.
 Like it's not that big a deal, whatever.
 And obviously as the story goes,
 tale as old as time, the data comes out.
 It was just an errant shot.
 There was like gang violence,
 shot goes out of nowhere, hits a kid in the car.
 It wasn't like a hate crime.
 The guy was trying to kill a kid.
 But yeah, we basically,
 we bump up against a few kind of
 political disagreements like this.
 And an annoying thing is happening in my community
 where Hassan is like the serious political figure
 because he's from the Young Turks.
 And I'm just kind of like, I do politics, but I also game.
 And anytime I criticize Hassan, people like Destiny,
 you need to be more respectful.
 He does this full time.
 If you're going to bring criticisms,
 you need to be like really well read and researched
 because he's got a, you know, more serious, whatever.
 Which I thought was ridiculous.
 So by the way, if people don't know,
 he worked at the Young Turks,
 which is like the largest left leaning
 YouTube channel probably.
 Or at least at the time, yeah.
 So finally, he did a video on,
 we skip ahead to some more minor discriminants.
 He does a video on Kamala Harris.
 He calls it Kaatmala Harris.
 And it's like seven or eight horrible things
 about Kamala Harris.
 And I'm like, okay, I know at least one or two
 of these things are not fully accurate.
 So I'm going to do all the research.
 I'm going to have all the sources
 and we're going to have a long conversation about it.
 So that now when I provide criticism to him,
 it's not going to be like this horrible,
 like just me saying something flippantly or whatever.
 It's going to be like substantial criticism.
 So I was on a plane ride, JFK to Orlando, whatever,
 flying to Sweden to visit my wife.
 And on the plane, I review all of the video,
 all the data, do all the research and I write everything.
 I'm like, okay, I get to my wife's dad's house
 and I'm at the table.
 We're having a conversation like, hey,
 we should talk about the Kamala Harris stuff.
 And he's like, okay, well, let's do it.
 And we go over it and I'll leave to the audience
 to watch the video.
 Enough people to say this.
 I feel pretty confident saying this.
 I was pretty reasonable, pretty measured,
 pretty calm the whole time.
 And I think he started to get increasingly irritated
 that I was levying more and more serious criticisms
 at the quality of work that he did.
 Probably because he felt a little bit intimidated,
 I think by my willingness to dive through political stuff.
 There'd been a couple of awkward blowups
 where there was a show called The Raj Royale
 where sometimes politics would come up
 and Hassan would try to explain something.
 And there was another person one time
 on the show that made the joke.
 It was like, instead of Hassan taking 10 minutes
 to explain this, can Destiny just come here
 and explain it in 30 seconds?
 And he exploded at that.
 He got so fucking mad at that.
 So yeah, I think that when I made that kind of call out
 or critique of him over the Kamala Harris stuff,
 he's probably feeling increasingly irritated,
 threatened, agitated.
 And then that's kind of what began the huge split from-
 So you don't think you were a dick at all?
 I don't think so in that conversation.
 Especially given that at that point,
 because this is still 2018 or 20, this might be 2019,
 I'm still known at that point as being very aggressive
 towards conservatives or alt-righters.
 Oh, gotcha.
 Yeah, and with lefties is what I call them.
 I think I'm being very gentle.
 My conversation with conservatives is like,
 you're a fucking idiot, you're so dumb.
 That's how I'm doing.
 So with him, I'm like, well, don't you think that
 this is a little bit of an inconsistent presentation?
 I feel like I'm being nice.
 But I always leave to the audience
 so they can go and watch that Kamala Harris video,
 Destiny of the Sun, if they think that I was being a dick.
 But a lot of people watching said
 I was being pretty gentle.
 Well, let me say, as a new fan of this space,
 I hope you guys make up and I hope you guys fight it out
 in the space of discourse and ideas.
 Me too.
 And also with empathy,
 understanding what the strength of the other person is,
 what their buttons are.
 And there's like an unspoken rule
 that you don't press the buttons that you need to.
 Unless you're doing it mutually and it's fun
 because it's fun to piss each other off.
 So that's kind of like what friends do.
 You don't cross a certain line.
 But then other than that, you fight it out.
 Okay, let's step back.
 One other super interesting aspect of your worldview
 is you're a big supporter of Biden.
 Can you explain what you love about Biden?
 Do you love Biden more than Sean Carroll or less?
 Sean Carroll is just like in another world
 of admiration.
 I feel like I'm culturally appropriating you
 by saying gotcha now.
 But it's so convenient.
 It's an easy word.
 You just, now we're on the same wavelength, okay?
 We're synchronizing.
 That's good.
 I mean, it is really interesting
 because even the people that support Biden
 usually don't say they love,
 sort of they don't support it strongly.
 Ideologically, philosophically,
 the reason why I like Biden
 is because he's really committed
 to this bringing the left and right together,
 which is something we so desperately need in the country.
 And his statements over and over again
 of like, I'm not the Democrat president
 or the Republican president.
 I'm the president of the United States.
 His desire to bring Republicans together
 to work on things like the infrastructure bill,
 that's so incredibly needed.
 And I have a huge amount of respect and admiration for him
 for trying to push through on that message.
 Do you think then it's unfortunate
 that he made that comment about MAGA?
 MAGA Republicans?
 Yeah.
 I mean, I forget what the comment was,
 but MAGA Republicans are not good people kind of.
 I watched the full video and he's right.
 There is this toxic aspect.
 And it's hard to call out
 because they're always gonna spend like,
 oh, he hates our Republicans.
 He's not.
 If you watch the quote,
 he's very specifically calling out
 like this group of people
 that think that the election was fraudulent.
 Is it clear?
 It is.
 That's what he meant by-
 We can bring it up.
 All right.
 This is-
 Oh, no.
 But I remember watching our stream,
 it was like, if he said it, yeah, that's bad.
 You're probably like YouTube, MAGA Republicans, Biden.
 But like, it feels like it's pretty clear
 he's talking about the people that are like,
 election denying.
 Too much of what's happening in our country today
 is not normal.
 Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans
 represent an extremism
 that threatens the very foundations of our Republic.
 Now I wanna be very clear.
 Listen to this part.
 Very clear up front.
 Not every Republican,
 not even the majority of Republicans are MAGA Republicans.
 Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology.
 I know,
 because I've been able to work
 with these mainstream Republicans.
 But there's no question
 that the Republican party today is dominated,
 driven, and intimidated
 by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans.
 And that is a threat to this country.
 I disagree with that, man.
 He didn't clearly say,
 extremist ideology.
 He didn't say the people that doubt
 the validity of the election.
 I mean, that's Donald Trump.
 No, but there's...
 That's all the candidates that Donald Trump is supporting.
 How many, what is it, like 40, 50?
 How many candidates right now
 that are MAGA candidates are election deniers?
 No, but there's, you know, 80 million
 or whatever people voted for Donald Trump.
 You could say that's the MAGA Republicans.
 So to me, it sounded like he was referring
 to not even the majority.
 I mean, that's one nice, helpful, clarifying statement.
 But it's basically there's the mainstream Republicans
 and then there's those that voted for Donald Trump.
 That's the way I heard it.
 Okay.
 And it's like, so maybe you should have done a better job
 at clarifying, but...
 Yeah, I feel like there's like a clear,
 there is a huge problem
 with this group of Americans that think
 that like the election is stolen.
 I feel like that's what he's trying to call it.
 No matter if that's what he meant,
 even flirting with that line
 is not a person who's bringing people together.
 I feel like the extending a hand to the like most,
 I've worked with Republicans in Congress,
 not even a majority of Republicans are like this.
 No, but why say not the majority of Republicans
 that like to say like, we're like one country.
 We believe the same thing.
 So like focus on the uniting part versus saying...
 He does before and after, that was 50 seconds, okay.
 But that you never,
 the point is you never say something like that.
 Listen, like that, you've spoken about the Bosnia speech,
 which is your favorite of his.
 I went back to it and listened to it.
 Before I moved to that, just on this,
 it's really hard for him to call out
 that group of like election deniers,
 I think without it always feeling like...
 Well, why call them out?
 Because it's arguably one of the most destructive forces
 that exists in this country today.
 Did it destroy anything?
 They were trying to.
 Did it though?
 It didn't, did it?
 So does that mean we don't call it out?
 We wait till next time?
 No, because calling it out is giving fuel to the division.
 Like the people that doubted the validity of the election,
 that's anger, that's frustration with the other side.
 You heal that as opposed to saying
 all those people that believed that at any time are idiots.
 They're un-American.
 I mean, they don't think the election was real.
 I don't know if Biden has the ears of these people at all.
 I don't know what he can do for...
 There's people that believe the same thing in 2016
 with the Russian hacking, right?
 There's this-
 Hold on.
 Yes.
 That is a super not fair comparison.
 There are definitely the mainstream Democrat opinion
 was that Russian intrusion
 in terms of like social media and stuff happened,
 but there was never a claim that like the election was stolen.
 No main, or at least I don't know of any mainstream Democrat
 that supported that.
 Donald Trump is not just saying there was interference
 and blah, blah, blah.
 Donald Trump is literally saying the election
 was literally stolen, that vote boxes were,
 ballot boxes were hidden, that vote tallies were manipulated.
 I think the claim is there's a huge gulf of difference
 between the two.
 So you can attack Donald Trump for that.
 Yeah.
 I believe it's not the words of the uniter
 to attack people that believe that.
 You could argue maybe it's okay,
 but especially not being super clear about that,
 about who you're referring to when you say MAGA Republicans.
 Because MAGA is a hat
 and a slogan that refers to whatever the number is,
 70 million people, however, that voted for Donald Trump.
 Like-
 Of all the Republicans that consider themselves
 MAGA Republicans, what percentage of them do you think
 believe the election was stolen?
 I feel like that number is, I don't have the pump,
 I feel like the number is like probably more than 70%.
 What's a MAGA Republican?
 Maybe I'm not familiar-
 Like a Trump-supporting Republican, a MAGA Republican.
 They're there for Trump.
 What's the difference between somebody that voted for Trump
 and a-
 MAGA Republican?
 And a MAGA Republican.
 So my mom is a MAGA Republican.
 If Trump ran independently and DeSantis ran
 under the Republican ticket, my mom would vote for Trump.
 She'll follow him to the end of the earth.
 That's like a MAGA Republican.
 I think it's easy to mistake that distinction
 in these kinds of political speeches.
 It's to me, anybody who voted for Trump
 can easily in the context of the speech
 be interpreted as a MAGA Republican.
 Gotcha.
 I understand what you're saying.
 Maybe you could have been more clear,
 but I think in listening to that,
 I think it's pretty obvious who he's talking about.
 But I guess if you have an emotional response to it,
 I can understand the emotional response, but-
 I don't have an emotional response.
 I just don't like, I think I'm with, what is it?
 Michelle Obama, they go low, we go high.
 Meaning like to me, a uniter doesn't
 participate in derision.
 Sure, a uniter might not, but a leader has to be able
 to accurately assess the situation before they vote.
 And accurately assess the situation before him
 and make people aware of what's going on.
 You mean all the impeachment trials,
 all the censoring from social media,
 all of that didn't do the job?
 That's not his job.
 I don't know about censoring any of that.
 No, but that mechanism, his job is to inspire a nation
 to unite a nation.
 How can he do that when half the people
 don't believe that he was even legitimately elected?
 Like I think he's done a good job at working
 on legislation and doing stuff
 that hopefully benefits all Americans.
 But I think it's important to recognize
 that there is a contingent of Americans
 that don't even believe that this is really crazy.
 There's plenty of people that recognize that
 and are fighting that and are constantly screaming that
 from the rooftops.
 His job is to be the inspiring figure
 that makes the majority of Americans be proud
 for him to be a president of the nation they love.
 And that's what the uniting aspect is,
 is you remind people that we are one
 and we love this country, we love the ideas
 that it represents.
 Tricky does that in other parts of that speech.
 It's like a 20 minute speech, isn't it?
 But that's a fuck up.
 You just don't participate in that division.
 Anyway, I understand.
 I understand.
 I just wanted to push back on the saying
 one of his strengths is that he's uniting.
 But yes, that is an ideal, that is a goal,
 is a great one.
 And he is one that espouse that goal for a long time.
 Do you think, what else?
 So from policy perspective and so on.
 I thought the way he's handled Ukraine and everything
 thus far has been almost perfect.
 I think he did a really good job at the political maneuvering
 and bringing other countries into the fold,
 at establishing clearly like what our mission was
 in relation to Ukraine.
 I thought he did a good job there.
 I admire him for pulling out of Afghanistan.
 Even it was a little bit rough around the edges,
 like we got out and we're gone.
 No American lives are lost.
 The domestic policies passed more major legislation
 than I think anybody thought possible.
 The green energy stuff for the last bill,
 the infrastructure bill,
 a lot of the coronavirus relief I thought was really good,
 especially the expansion of the child tax credit.
 So from a policy perspective,
 for an end domestic, I think he's been successful.
 Rhetorically, I think he's generally been above board
 in terms of like not attacking people
 or being too divisive.
 He's trying to bring people together and work on them.
 What do you think about the sort of popular in the media
 criticism of his mental decline?
 Do you think he's experiencing mental decline?
 You know, he's an old guy.
 But do you think, I mean, do you?
 Yeah, maybe a little bit,
 but he's still doing a good job, so, you know.
 Not from a speech perspective,
 you mean from a policy perspective?
 Yeah, I'm analyzing it as a job, yeah.
 From a speech perspective, maybe not the greatest,
 but yeah, I mean, he's definitely, what is he, like 80, 81?
 How old is he?
 I lose track after so many years.
 But you did say that he's probably going to run in 2024
 and he's probably going to win.
 Did I say that?
 That he's probably gonna win?
 No way did I say that.
 He's probably gonna run.
 Who knows who will win?
 But I think, I feel like the incumbent advantage
 is so strong.
 Are you really gonna throw that away?
 Like, there's been like one or two times in history
 in the US, right, where like the non-incumbent,
 the parties put somebody else up.
 Yeah, I mean, the concern is like the,
 just the age and the mental decline,
 just the wear and tear of the campaign,
 all of that kind of stuff, all of the speech you have to make,
 the debates and all that kind of stuff.
 Yeah, I guess we'll see what happens.
 He's, what?
 The least excited.
 I mean, two years from now is a long time.
 At his current mental state, he could run and do it.
 He could do a passable job.
 In two years, man, I don't know,
 I've seen videos of Bill Clinton recently.
 He's looking pretty rough.
 You know, if Biden is looking a lot more rough,
 worse for wear in two years,
 then maybe they actually do have to dig out another person
 for running on us.
 What do you think about Trump when he won in 2016,
 I think is when you came to fruition, politically speaking.
 So what do you think his winning the 2016 election
 represents?
 So for me, Trump, the reason why I got into politics
 was Trump was like this new epistemic force
 in American politics that like,
 you kind of have to like flirt with facts before,
 even if you wanted to be non-factual,
 he super didn't care.
 Lying was like a first language to him,
 just like in speaking in terms of like,
 the way that he used language to just say to you
 what he felt like you needed to hear to support him
 and not care at all about what is going on
 about, yeah, that's what Trump represented to me
 in terms of like things that I cared about.
 He also represents a lot more obviously
 that there was this undercurrent of American opinion
 that a lot of people didn't know still existed
 and it did, he got elected,
 that the Overton window was misidentified
 by even a large amount of the Republican party,
 that populism was a lot more popular
 than a lot of people figured, you know.
 Yeah, there's a lot of it, I guess he represented.
 Do you think Trump should have been banned from Twitter?
 Can you make the case for and against it?
 So you're a big supporter of free speech.
 Yeah, so the case in favor of it.
 Do you think he should be brought back?
 As Elon tweeted.
 Yeah, because if he gets brought back,
 there's a higher chance that I'll be brought back,
 so I'm supporting that all the way.
 Thank you, Elon, unban my account.
 So because you called me weak spine,
 I'm gonna have to message Elon.
 Okay, at Omnidestiny, it was a verified Twitter account.
 Omnidestiny.
 No, no, I'm just kidding.
 Why'd you get banned from Twitter, Destiny?
 I don't know.
 I'll add that to Elon.
 I saw that there was a screenshot of you
 referring to the rape of somebody.
 Okay, that was on an older Twitter account,
 and that was a bad tweet.
 You have multiple Twitter accounts,
 so you're trying to go around the bans
 that you keep getting.
 Okay, hold on.
 You're slandering me a lot right now, okay?
 Let's get the facts straight, okay?
 I don't even remember why my first account got banned,
 but it was a wild account.
 I tweeted some wildly inappropriate things.
 You regret?
 I don't like that word.
 I'm gonna give the answer that most people give,
 but it's like, I don't regret it,
 because I learned a lot, so I'm glad
 I had the bad experiences that I did.
 Why don't you like the word regret?
 I think if we look at where we are,
 how do you feel about determinism?
 I believe in the hardest of determinism.
 That's who I am, okay?
 Sure.
 So who I am today is the culmination
 of everything that's occurred in the past.
 I believe you speaking, sorry to interrupt,
 I believe in you speaking about regret
 as a nice way to communicate
 that in this deterministic world,
 you've analyzed the acts of the past,
 and you're no longer that person.
 Yeah, of course, for sure.
 That's what regret usually means.
 Okay, thanks for giving me the human explanation.
 Okay, true.
 So in that sense, there's a lot of things I've done
 that I regret.
 Oh, what are you?
 You're not human, you're a bot?
 NPC is my preferred term.
 Okay, all right.
 Those are your pro-notes.
 I wish I would have been smart enough at the time
 to not have to have had made those mistakes.
 Okay. There you go.
 Good job.
 But yeah, obviously really dumb,
 really crazy off-the-wall tweets,
 but that account got banned,
 and then I made another account
 called Omni, I can't believe I'm giving you
 a history-made Twitter account.
 I made another account called Omnidestiny.
 It's an honor.
 And that was my, I got verified, I was cool,
 they let me have that account,
 because originally they banned it,
 and I said, appeal, and I was like,
 oh, let me have one more,
 and back then Twitter was cool,
 and they're like, okay, go for it.
 And that account lasted for a long time,
 and I don't actually know 100% why that account got banned.
 I believe that the tweet that showed up in the final,
 I got banned for hate speech,
 and it was because there was a picture that I tweeted
 with three different alt-righters
 that are kind of like neo-Nazi people,
 and they were all mixed-race people,
 and I said, the new alt-right
 looks like a Disney Channel original movie
 in terms of racial composition,
 and somehow they got flagged
 for instigating violence against minorities, I think.
 I think that's the tweet that got me banned,
 because I think that's what showed up in the final report,
 but I don't know, maybe there were other reasons,
 because nobody ever communicates,
 but ever since that account went under,
 it's just been ban evading ever since, so.
 Oh, ban evading ever since.
 So all my new accounts that I've got banned
 just get banned, because they finally figure out it's me,
 and then they ban evade.
 There's like one dude at Twitter HQ
 who's constantly looking for my new accounts,
 and they get me, yeah.
 Yeah.
 Anyway, yeah, that whole bunch of-
 So post-
 Post Trump world.
 Do you think, okay, I mean-
 Oh, should he be banned?
 Oh, you asked me to make both cases.
 Should he be banned?
 I mean, damn, dude, when you're tweeting out shit
 that's arguably leading to stuff like January 6th,
 I can understand why, because it's like,
 what else is this wild dude gonna tweet out?
 Like, is he gonna start instigating other violent events?
 So I'm sympathetic towards the like,
 okay, well, he can't just be here saying stuff like this.
 That's insane, we're gonna ban him.
 I'm sympathetic-
 Because it's instigating actual physical violence
 in the physical world.
 Yeah, like if I were to tweet stuff like that,
 I would get banned, probably.
 On the flip side, this is the president of the United States.
 It seems like he's like doing presidential decree
 by social media sometimes.
 Like, is it really right that one public,
 or private, I should say,
 one private company can erase the president
 of the United States' words from the eyes
 of a lot of Americans that are using
 these social media feeds.
 And one big one, which I for sure am against,
 is the permanent ban.
 Yeah, I don't like that, I hate that.
 Even in my community, if somebody comes back
 after like a year, I mean-
 Did you just compare yourself
 to the president of the United States?
 No, I compare myself to Twitter banning
 the president of the United States.
 Let me put it this way, if I banned Donald Trump
 in my chat room, I'd unban him in a year.
 A year?
 Yeah.
 What's the process for unbanning Donald Trump?
 What would he have to do?
 Usually people send me an email,
 they're like, listen, I did this stuff,
 I'm sorry I was dumb, I'll give him another chance.
 But a year, what if they send an email a month later?
 Usually I'll unban him.
 That's usually my problem.
 I ban pretty quickly in my community,
 but if you ever ask-
 You're a big softie.
 Yeah, usually I'm back, yeah.
 Well, because I used to be the worst type
 of internet person, and I think I'm a little bit better
 than I used to be, so.
 Now that you're older.
 Yeah, now that I've matured, yeah, of course.
 Age bestows a wisdom that just can't be
 gotten any other way.
 What's your sense in general?
 Is there something interesting you could say
 about your view on free speech?
 It seems like one of those terms,
 it's also overused to mean a lot of different things.
 What does it mean to you?
 If you have a democratic style of governance,
 you are entrusting people with one of the most awesome
 and radical of responsibilities,
 and that's saying that you're going to pick the people
 that are gonna make some of the hardest decisions
 in all of human history.
 If you're gonna trust people to vote correctly,
 you have to be able to trust them to have open
 and honest dialogue with each other.
 Whether that's Nazis or KKK people or whoever talking,
 you have to believe that your people are going to be able
 to rise above and make the correct determinations
 when they hear these types of speeches.
 And if you're so worried that somebody is gonna hear
 a certain political figure
 and they're gonna be completely radicalized instantly,
 then what that tells me is that you don't have enough faith
 in humans for democracy to be a viable institution,
 which is fine.
 You can be anti-democratic,
 but I don't think you can be pro-democracy
 and anti-free speech, within reason.
 So what's the within reason?
 I mean, you can't post like child porn or something
 on Twitter or people try to get you on that stuff
 or like direct calls to violence are probably not.
 You shouldn't be tweeting out like,
 we're gonna meet up tomorrow and go bomb,
 blah, blah, blah, probably not.
 So do you think it's okay to allow racism
 and anti-Semitism and hate speech?
 Hate speech, yes, because that can be very broadly defined.
 I can understand there being some basic rules
 of like no slurs on like a platform
 that gets into like acceptable forms of moderation
 or like excessive harassment and bullying.
 I can understand, but past that,
 when the moderation becomes ideological,
 I get a little bit nervous because,
 there's a whole other host.
 Yeah, of course it's all a gray area,
 but when it feels like ideology
 has seeped into the censorship.
 Not good.
 Yeah, which it's so fascinating to think,
 especially now that Elon bought Twitter,
 how do you engineer a system
 that prevents ideology from seeping in,
 and nevertheless is able to create a platform
 that has healthy conversations?
 Because if you have one guy who's just screaming nonsense,
 nonstop, it has this effect where the quiet voices
 at the back of the room are silenced.
 So like, that's what you usually don't talk about.
 Like if you let one annoying loud person in,
 that's actually censoring the voice of a lot of people
 that would like to speak, but they don't get a chance.
 That's one of the things,
 especially around like trans discourse,
 I have to constantly do that like reminder
 for my audiences of like,
 when I'm dealing with these types of people on the internet,
 a lot of them might seem really crazy.
 A lot of these types of people might seem insane,
 but like in the real world,
 outside of like the crazy Twitter activist world,
 like the vast majority of people you're meeting
 from LGBT communities are like the coolest,
 normalist people.
 All they want is to like write, to live their life
 in the way they want to, and to be like unobstructed.
 And like, yeah, but people will get this impression
 of like an online activist,
 like a vegan or LGBT person or whatever.
 And then they think that every single person
 in real life is like that.
 And it's a really negative stereotype.
 And then even the other people in that group.
 Oh, is Malina coming over?
 Oh yeah, I see.
 I don't know if that's her.
 Okay, Malina just joined us.
 What were we talking about?
 Was it interesting?
 You were saying that you were gonna talk to Elon
 about getting at Omni Destiny,
 the verified Twitter account unbanned.
 I said, that's so-
 That sounds like a lie.
 That's so gracious of you.
 I can't even believe you would do that for me.
 And then you admitted that you tried to evade the ban
 multiple times, which I'm sure would be very looked upon.
 You know, I heard that in Norway, in their prison system,
 they don't actually punish you for trying to escape jail.
 Cause that's like the natural human thing to do.
 They hug you?
 I don't know if they, but they don't punish you.
 Cause of course you're trying to be free.
 That's all I'm trying to be on Twitter.
 I'm just trying to be free.
 Oh, that's the natural humanistic-
 Yeah, that's the natural human, of course.
 It's the banning ban.
 You're not a destructive force.
 You're just-
 No, I'm a positive, I'm a force for good.
 That's why all my accounts only get banned for banning,
 banning.
 I don't get banned for doing bad things.
 Break out of-
 I'm a progressive show.
 I'm like far left.
 I love like progressive causes.
 I thought this is what you criticized as Han for being.
 I show them from a place of first principles, not from a mindless AI echoing kind of thing.
 You're a free thinking bot.
 I got it.
 Yeah, exactly.
 All right, cool.
 Well, I'm sure we'll return to some politics.
 That was beautiful.
 Melia, can you tell us about yourself?
 You're also a fellow streamer.
 Yes.
 What's your story?
 I stream when I started streaming because I met him basically, kind of,
 but I don't do the politics.
 I do like travels or talk about relationships,
 talk to my audience basically.
 You're from that part of the world, right, Sweden?
 Yeah, exactly.
 So did you escape from prison and then you didn't?
 That was Norway.
 You just mentioned Norway.
 That's different.
 That's a different way.
 I've actually really, I've been to Sweden a bunch of times.
 I love it.
 There's a tech sector there that's really like flourishing.
 Where did you go?
 Which city?
 I went to Stockholm.
 I think I gave a few lectures there.
 There's a vibrant tech sector.
 It was cool.
 And people are super nice.
 Yeah.
 We're friendly.
 We're not like very deep.
 Like we're not really how much deep conversation.
 It's like a meta conversation.
 Oh, there's not many intellectuals that come from Sweden.
 We don't really speak very highly ourselves,
 but kind of like just chill all the time.
 We don't make a scene.
 We don't, we're just like, you know.
 Do you know what the name for that is?
 There's a specific name for it.
 It's a-
 Jantelagen.
 Yeah, Jantelagen, yeah.
 Oh, there's a philosophy behind it.
 When you're part of like Sweden or Norway,
 you like, you don't talk too highly of yourself
 because it's seen as kind of like rude.
 Like think of like America, except the exact opposite.
 You don't even really want to like,
 you don't want to make yourself into a victim too much.
 You don't want to be too much of anything.
 You're just like sticking to the group.
 Don't make big scene about yourself.
 But that said, you came here and you were,
 you put yourself in front of a camera and became a streamer.
 Yes, do you understand how weird that is
 for my friends in Sweden?
 Do you have anxiety?
 I just didn't talk about myself
 and just like make a big deal about myself
 for hours every day.
 Was that like terrifying?
 Did you have anxiety about that?
 No, cause I don't see them,
 but then I come back and I'm like, ooh.
 So what do you feel like when you're actually streaming?
 You feel like you're just alone in a room?
 One-on-one type of thing?
 No, I see, I see Chad.
 I'm thinking, oh, they're like little fairies.
 They're not really real.
 They're just like out there.
 I don't know what they look like.
 I just see little names and they're just cute
 and just colors, you know?
 So you're talking to little fairies inside your head.
 Yeah, that's what I do.
 Is that how you feel about Chad?
 They're demons for me, but.
 They're demons?
 Okay, I'm on my own of fairies.
 Are they, so is Chad a source of stress or happiness?
 Like, is there a-
 No, for me, that's a source of happiness.
 I've been very intentional
 with like the construction of my community.
 So I'm really happy with where it's at.
 How are you able to actually have deep political discourse
 while playing a video game at the same time?
 I have a really good chat room
 in terms of like the way that people engage
 in conversations.
 Like I was one of the earliest people
 to embrace the philosophy of like,
 I am in total control of what people watch me think,
 that like I have a high level of responsibility
 for how they conduct themselves.
 And then if I conduct myself in a certain way,
 I can expect a certain level of conduct from them.
 And for the most part, it's like worked pretty well
 for the past, you know, nine or 10 years, yeah.
 What about the actual playing of the game?
 Like you're able to parallelize the brain, like.
 Oh.
 Like it seems like,
 like Factorio seems like a super complex game.
 Yeah, I don't actually think that's possible.
 I don't think multitasking for human brain is possible.
 If you see me playing a game,
 usually what's happening is the conversation is like,
 I've had it a million times,
 so I'm not thinking about it.
 I've automated that.
 Or if the conversation is very challenging,
 then if you watch me,
 if you really watch what's happening again,
 I'm probably just running around in circles
 because I have to think about the conversation.
 Okay.
 Because with Factorio,
 it looks like a lot of stuff is going on.
 Sometimes, yeah.
 So I guess it's hard for a person
 who hasn't played the game to detect that you're not actually.
 Does that come off as like
 super intelligent and multitask,
 or does it come off as like,
 he's not interested in this conversation at all?
 Yeah.
 Yeah, there's a coolness to it.
 Like when you're not paying attention,
 like if you're looking elsewhere,
 like you're checking your phone,
 you're too cool for this conversation.
 There is a sense like that.
 Yeah.
 The reality is though,
 is if you watch,
 it was easier to see in Minecraft,
 because in Minecraft,
 when there was a challenging conversation,
 if you watch me play,
 I'm literally just running around and jumping in circles,
 because I have to think about the conversation 100%.
 I can't do a complicated task
 and think about the conversation.
 Or like the people always joke in my chat,
 like, oh no, the notepad came out.
 If it's a really challenging conversation,
 I'll get rid of the game and I'll bring out a notepad
 and I'll start writing stuff down
 to keep track of what's going on.
 So what kind of stuff do you stream?
 So advice you talk about?
 Yeah, like either I talk to chat
 or I travel around basically.
 Like have a conversation,
 so we like go to countries.
 I've been to like Italy.
 I was in Italy for like one and a half months,
 just like traveling around alone,
 going to cities,
 like having like my camera with me
 and like streaming for hours.
 Where's the coolest place you've been to?
 Ever, it's probably New Zealand.
 New Zealand?
 I think so.
 After it's probably gonna be Italy, I think.
 Because I like history and yeah.
 Also both history,
 because New Zealand is also beautiful.
 It has both natural beauty and historical beauty.
 Yeah, for sure.
 I think it's just really like the Polynesian sort of culture.
 I think it's very interesting,
 like the ocean people and it's just really beautiful.
 People are very relaxed, chill.
 They're very far away,
 which is interesting as well,
 because whenever they talk about politics,
 so they talk about just like the world,
 it feels really far away.
 So where's home for you?
 Is Austin home?
 Did you?
 Home for me.
 So a human being is home?
 Yeah.
 We've lived in a lot of different places
 and traveled around a lot.
 So that's why you think of home as like human.
 I think so, yeah.
 I mean, if they're gonna be a place,
 it's probably gonna be like my childhood places, probably.
 Like my old country house or something like that.
 We don't have it anymore,
 but like that's like home for me, I guess.
 So how'd you guys meet each other?
 You're currently married.
 Yes.
 To each other, yeah.
 Yeah.
 To each other.
 Yeah.
 Just making sure we're on the same page.
 All right, cool.
 How'd you guys meet?
 I was watching his YouTube stuff, like 2018, I think,
 like because it was the speedy election around that time
 and I was interested in politics.
 And then I think he said in one of his videos
 that he had an Instagram
 and that he needed people to stop DMing him.
 That wasn't cutie pies.
 And then I messaged him and said, am I a cutie pie?
 And then you're a pie in like two minutes.
 And then that's when I was in New Zealand.
 And I guess you wanted to escape America
 or like LA for a little bit and include New Zealand.
 Where were you mentally there?
 Because we've talked through this timeline.
 Where's 2018?
 Was it 18, 19?
 Where was the low point?
 Or that was way earlier.
 Low point, carbon cleaning.
 That was like 2010.
 Oh, okay.
 2018 was probably your peak.
 What are you, every day now is my peak.
 What do you mean?
 That was my peak.
 Why would you say that?
 No, nobody ever admits being past their prime.
 Just so you know.
 Well, I mean, my prime is still coming up.
 It was probably around the time
 where you were getting a lot of lefties to your community
 and you were really like thinking about
 that they would go too far.
 Maybe, I think that was still when Hasan and Vash
 were both in my community.
 Exactly, so I would say it feels like
 there was not really like much issues
 when it come to like to your stuff
 or like your work stuff back then.
 Oh, something we didn't talk about is that like
 there were no politics on Twitch.
 I exclusively inhabited that place for like two years
 because nobody else did it
 because it was a really toxic environment for politics.
 So for a couple of years as it grew,
 like I kind of grew the whole space
 because it wasn't, nobody was doing it yet.
 What did that look like?
 You're having like political debates, political discourse.
 Yeah, mainly like going into YouTube people
 to try to argue with them or just doing politics on stream
 like reading stories, researching stuff, talking about stuff.
 But there's not like other people on Twitch
 to debate about politics because there was no politics.
 It was, yeah.
 Was there a debate in the space of communism,
 socialism, social democrats, kind of like this?
 Are you trying to outline your own position during that time?
 I think it was mainly me fighting against conservatives
 because it was like Trump stuff.
 And then it was coming off the back of like,
 there was this movement called Gamergate
 and there was all this anti SJW stuff on the internet.
 And I was like the SJW, like the progressive
 that was fighting on the progressive side of things.
 So I think that's what I was known for.
 But I was fighting with people off of Twitch
 because on Twitch there weren't very many
 political discussions happening.
 So you were holding the SJW flag.
 Yeah.
 To what degree do you still hold it?
 Like what's the best, what's the steel man case for SJW?
 I mean, like I'm still very much that SJW from 2018, 2019
 but the positions have moved so much farther left
 that some people might not call me that anymore.
 I'm not sure.
 It depends on who I'm talking to.
 So it's basically, what is social justice where you like
 being sensitive to the experience of others?
 Yeah, being sensitive and empathetic
 towards the experience of others.
 And then trying to build a better world
 that like suits as many different types of people
 as possible while being like aware of like their needs.
 Okay.
 So you guys met, what's your, from your perspective?
 Is that, does she, she, she telling lies?
 Is it accurate?
 No, it's pretty accurate.
 Okay. When'd you guys actually meet?
 I flew out in 2019.
 Like in February.
 Yeah.
 Basically there was like weird stuff happening in LA.
 I just come off of kind of a weird, not kind of
 sort of relationship and I just wanted to like
 go away for a while.
 Another company reached out to me
 and they had like a fun streaming device
 and they said they'd sponsor a trip if I went somewhere.
 And I was like, oh, well, I know this person.
 I know a couple of people in New Zealand.
 Malina was one of them.
 It's like, I'll go to New Zealand.
 New Zealand. It'll be fun.
 And yeah, I did that for two weeks.
 Do you guys believe in love?
 I feel like you're, you lack the gotcha got us into this.
 I'm not sure to the degree to which you have human emotions.
 I have quite a few.
 Okay.
 From your perspective, when did you,
 when did you fall in love with Malina?
 When did you fall in love with Mellie Mel?
 The minute I saw her.
 I don't know.
 We, our first two weeks together were a lot of fun.
 We got a lot of chemistry in person.
 I was kind of shocked.
 I wasn't thinking about it.
 Cause it was like, we spent like a week together
 and you said, I really want to tell you something.
 And you were like, you were like stalling that
 for the longest time.
 I think she was, oh, he said that like, I love you.
 No, he basically just said like,
 I really like you and it never really happens.
 That's what he said.
 And I was like, oh, and I thought, hey, I thought.
 So let's still run, we said Trump getting banned
 from Twitter.
 Is that what we were talking about before?
 Oh yeah.
 You agreed to me coming on here.
 Of course I'm going to be doing this.
 How long, so how long did that take?
 Two weeks you said?
 That took like a week.
 No, I don't know.
 I think it was just like.
 The thing is my mind processes like information so quickly.
 Two weeks to somebody like you is actually like years for me.
 So.
 That's it.
 Oh, like me.
 Yeah.
 So there was like a lot of like factorial type
 of strategic thinking.
 Yeah, going on.
 I was seeing like all the events,
 like Dr. Strange or whatever.
 And the Avengers when he's like seeing it
 to all the futures.
 When you saw me, you just saw the future.
 Yeah, I was looking at all of them.
 So you're doing like some game theoretic simulation
 of all the possible outcomes.
 Yeah, exactly.
 Okay.
 But no, yeah, it was probably pretty soon.
 I realized that we had a lot of chemistry.
 Yeah.
 I think before I left after my two weeks there,
 I was like, we need to make sure you get like a ticket
 to come visit me in the United States
 because it'll be fun and everything.
 And then.
 I kind of decided that last minute too.
 It was like really like five hours before your flight back.
 We kind of realized because it was kind of like,
 man is just like a one time thing.
 And then that was it.
 But we were like, oh no, this is a lot of fun.
 We should probably hang out again.
 Oh, so you realized you would miss each other.
 Yeah.
 This was one time thing.
 The melancholy side of love.
 Okay, when did you fall in love with Steven?
 I thought he like hated me.
 I don't know.
 I thought, not hated me.
 She still thinks I hate her.
 But no, no, I remember like what he said
 that he really liked me.
 I was kind of a little shocked about that.
 Cause I, I don't know.
 There was a lot of like random things happening in New Zealand.
 It was a lot of fun,
 but it was definitely like very interesting
 like things that happened
 because I was like around a lot of other people as well.
 So I thought he might've had like a really bad time.
 But when he said that I was thinking about it more.
 And then we spent like more time together,
 like a week after that.
 And then it felt like that was more like real.
 And I think when he was about to leave,
 I kind of realized like, no, I really like him.
 Do you guys ever say love to each other?
 Like I love you.
 Yeah, of course.
 Yeah.
 Okay.
 I wasn't sure.
 Why would you ask that?
 What has he said before?
 Cause I haven't, I don't think I've heard you speak.
 The only time I've heard Steven talk about love
 is when you're like criticizing the,
 the Red Pill community saying they don't ever talk
 about love and relationships.
 Almost all the time I'm giving criticism to people.
 Like I said, I'm kind of stepping in.
 I'm very disconnected from my own emotional experience
 cause I'm trying to talk with them there.
 So it's pretty rare that I'll talk about my-
 What is your own emotional experience exactly?
 Highly blunted, I guess.
 There's a lot.
 Okay.
 What does that mean?
 I mean, what's the, what's deep in there?
 Are you, is this just who you are genetically
 or are you running from something?
 I think I have a pretty good understanding of myself.
 A lot of people make that accusation to me,
 but I don't think I am.
 Okay.
 This is just who you are.
 It's just who I am, yeah.
 Okay.
 There's not childhood stuff like trauma.
 It's all sorted and done.
 You figured it all out?
 Yeah.
 In your old age?
 As I grow every year, I figure out more and more.
 He did mention, I think I heard this somewhere
 that this is a source of fights for the two of you,
 the age thing.
 I felt the ageism throughout this whole conversation.
 He's basically, he's saying that he gambles like with time.
 He's just like, oh, I think she will be good later.
 And then just like-
 It's like an investment, yeah.
 Yeah.
 It's like what he's doing.
 When this treasury bond matures,
 I'm gonna be able to cash out for a good-
 What do you think so far?
 Is the stocks going up or?
 It's tumultuous.
 What's that mean?
 It's like Bitcoin.
 Oh my God.
 Yeah, like Bitcoin.
 Crypto mail.
 All right.
 If you guys don't mind,
 one interesting aspect of your relationship
 is you're in an open relationship.
 What's that like?
 From a game theoretic simulation perspective,
 what went into that calculation?
 And like, how does that-
 Like how that started or?
 Yeah, how did that start, sure.
 The only relationships I've ever done
 has been open relationships
 since I was like in high school
 because I didn't really understand
 like why wouldn't you be able to like
 do other things with other people,
 but then just like have your main partner basically.
 So what is an open relationship, generally speaking?
 That means you have one main partner?
 Not a monogamous relationship.
 Like you're somehow allowed like in different ways.
 You can see other people sexually.
 Sexually, but like there's one main station.
 It doesn't have to be there for some people,
 but like I think it's probably easier
 and we probably don't really have time
 or the energy for like more than like one person
 to like really like-
 What about like emotional?
 It's really complicated.
 There's a lot of complicated stuff going on
 under the hood there.
 Yeah.
 I think broadly speaking,
 you've got like polyamorous relationships
 and you've got like open relationships
 where polyamorous is like,
 oh, I've got like three different girlfriends
 and we all hang out or sometimes even live together
 or three boyfriends or whatever.
 And then you've got like open relationships,
 which is like, oh, you know,
 like you can basically hook up with other people.
 And then you've got like your main relationship
 and that's it.
 I think ours is probably somewhere in the middle of that
 to where like we've got like long-term friends.
 Some of them we hook up with and that's kind of how we,
 yeah, it's a delicate dance
 that explodes every six months on itself.
 So it does explode, you guys fight over it?
 We fight over some things, yeah.
 It things happen, yeah.
 I think it's mostly because a lot of people can't handle it
 and they agree to something
 and then they realize that we're way too cool
 and then they get really obsessed
 and they think that they can like get in there
 and then it gets really dramatic.
 Have you figured it out?
 Like this is a complicated dance.
 I feel like we figure out things more and more
 like when it comes to like what's a good person
 for us to hang out and what's not a good person
 for us to hang out with or like,
 I probably have more opinions on like who he hangs out with
 because he likes the fucking psychos.
 Yeah, so you like to surround.
 He likes the nut, like the crazy ones,
 like the baby trap sort of women.
 That's the ones and I don't like that
 because that affects me.
 That affects your game theory.
 Yeah, obviously, yeah.
 Right, you like to surround yourself
 like in general you've talked about with crazy people.
 I say crazy and I really shouldn't.
 It's humorous.
 It's like, yeah.
 They're very unstable.
 Very, can be unstable, but people that are very unique.
 Like when I meet this person, that's like.
 Not boring.
 Yeah, not boring, yeah.
 And you said that you're progressively becoming
 not boring yourself.
 No, I think I'm pretty stable.
 I don't let them affect me much, but.
 So you don't think they affect your.
 No, if I've said that, I've said a joke.
 I think I've like, I've got my stuff
 like really well figured out.
 It's what allows me to engage with people
 like this so easily because I can engage.
 I can make them feel seen and heard.
 And then if it gets insane, I can cut off
 and I can be chill.
 Like very few things affect me in the longterm.
 Do you guys experience jealousy?
 Usually like whenever I feel like he's not spending
 the amount of time that I'm asking for
 and he spends it on his video games or his stream
 or like he sees someone else like more than
 he sees me or something like that.
 That would like not be good.
 Because then it affects like our relationship.
 Do you have a good sense of like,
 is it literally time or is it the energy put into the.
 It's probably like, if like, if he's with me,
 that like the attention in the time,
 like when he hangs out with me,
 and then there's also probably the time.
 So if I feel like something else is distracting too much,
 like it could be work or it could be a friend
 or it could be anything.
 Like if I feel like it starts to take away from like me,
 then I'm having an issue with it.
 I don't think he really cares much.
 I guess the only jealousy you experience
 is probably when you feel like,
 like if I get upset about him seeing someone too much,
 and then I go see someone more,
 and then he's like, why can I go see my friend more,
 like as much as you.
 So like, that's the sort of like thing
 that we're trying to navigate on, I guess.
 I think we are like diametrically opposed sometimes
 in terms of how we view like engagement with people
 or engagement with the world sometimes.
 So like on her end of the spectrum,
 like a perfect week for her might be like being in a cabin,
 watching like fireflies at night,
 going hiking every morning, going swimming at the beach,
 because it's like you're taking in like the grandeur
 of nature, you're like connected with yourself,
 you're like very at peace, everything is like chill
 and cool, there's the wind, the feeling of nature,
 everything, that's like her peak living experiences.
 I like being present.
 Yeah, and like my peak experiences are like people trying
 to destroy my life, like the challenge of like navigating
 really complicated discussion, like, you know,
 several different dramatic events unfolding
 that might end my career.
 Like these things are like very, I like the stress
 and the action and the entertainment and everything's like
 very cool for me.
 So when we're together, she generally wants me
 to be like more chill, but if I don't feel like I'm being
 like stimulated a lot, then it's easy for like my mind
 to wander on my phone.
 To wander somewhere else.
 Yeah, that's kind of the issue.
 We have a very different way of like engaging with the world.
 So how can you find happiness in the stillness?
 I feel like if we're just like aware of it
 and we're trying our best, like whenever we like,
 we're supposed to do this one thing.
 So let's say that we wanna go to New York
 and I'm like, we should just like go out
 and do this one specific thing.
 We try to find something that he enjoys doing,
 like now that we're in Texas, we can go shooting,
 or do something fun that he enjoys, then we can do it.
 And then I think like, just like for me also to be aware
 that like when he spends a lot of time on crazy people,
 it's not because he like loves them or wants to be with them.
 It's just because he likes being like having
 his life destroyed, like you said,
 which I don't really do.
 It's just a completely different thing.
 So like for me to like understand more like how he's thinking
 because it's so different from mine.
 And for him to understand how I'm thinking about things
 and like what I prioritize in my life,
 I think that's like how we navigate.
 But I think it's good.
 I think the differences can be good,
 like when we're finding a way.
 Well, I think you're relatable.
 More of a you than your AI.
 No, I'm definitely very difficult to get along with.
 Like I always tell people that,
 that like if you're dating me for like more than a few years,
 like you get like an award for that.
 It's like a war zone that you've survived.
 Absolutely.
 You're like a veteran, you get medals and stuff.
 And it's always like, I think there's probably been
 like six different, I don't think she says it anymore,
 but there are like six different times in our relationship
 where she's like, is it always like this?
 This is actually, and like every next year it's like.
 Why was it in the beginning of about,
 like you were lying about that.
 I'm just kidding.
 It got more.
 You were like, no, it's just like right now
 I'm having a huge argument online
 about saying the N-word in private
 and it's just gonna be like this
 and I'm gonna be streaming 24 hours a day.
 And I'm like, when are you gonna come to bed?
 It's been a week.
 Yeah.
 What is this?
 I did playing League come into this.
 A little bit, but I'm clean.
 I'm clean of League like six months right now.
 Yeah, what do you hate about League of Legends?
 I never got humans.
 Well, speaking of which,
 my participation in League involved on the robot side.
 Good.
 Cause that's an improvement.
 Cause both with Starcraft 2 and League of Legends
 cause OpenAI and DeepMind both participated
 in creating bots in those.
 I was a professional Starcraft 2 player.
 So I remember when the AI started to play,
 it's interesting the types of restrictions
 that you would have to put on like a gaming robot
 to make it like functional and not totally unfair
 to the other side.
 Yeah, to make it human-like.
 Yeah.
 Was that interesting to you to see AI
 be able to play those video games?
 I think in some ways people think things are more complicated
 than they actually are.
 And I think video games is one of those things
 where we're like, oh my God,
 there's like a million possibilities at every second
 and who knows?
 And it's like, no, there's like three or four things
 going on at any point in time.
 And I'm willing to bet that like an AI
 could probably solve some of these games like pretty easily,
 especially if there are no constraints
 on how they can learn.
 Can I talk to you about relationships?
 Yeah.
 We already have so.
 Yeah, I know.
 But more generally speaking,
 we didn't get a chance to talk about
 the Red Pill community.
 Oh, sure.
 Well, first of all, what is the Red Pill community,
 the Manosphere in general?
 I'd love to get both of your opinions on this.
 Sure.
 I know you're probably not as opinionated on that whole.
 I'd say, do you think I am that?
 Like probably not as you, like as much as you,
 but I do have opinions.
 You do? Okay.
 I usually don't like speak out too much on it
 because I feel like there's like a language barrier.
 That's why I don't really do politics
 because this is my second language.
 That's right.
 So you have to know the.
 A little bit like that, yeah.
 You know how to use,
 have to use derogatory terms every other sentence
 so they understand you, right?
 Exactly.
 I don't know anything about that.
 Steven and I talked about.
 You need like a good,
 like you need to be able to like speak really well
 for people to take you seriously, I think.
 And like that's a thing.
 Like if I don't have like the words
 and I don't have the,
 like I can't pronounce things correctly.
 Yeah.
 And a yes-all person searching for words looks stupid.
 Essentially.
 That's how people view it.
 Tell me about it.
 I have a podcast that a bunch of people listen to
 and I mumble and they, yeah.
 Wait, is your,
 what's your first language?
 Russian.
 Oh, okay.
 But I speak both languages horribly.
 I'm just not,
 I'm not like,
 there is definitely a big disconnect
 between my brain and my mouth module.
 Like I'm not able to generate the thoughts efficiently.
 Like the things you're able to do,
 like the da-da-da-da-da,
 like speak like that, I'm not.
 It's very, very tough.
 Plus there's huge amount of anxiety
 and social interaction that I have,
 which makes speaking even harder.
 Yeah.
 Yeah.
 Yeah.
 It's tough.
 I understand it.
 Gotcha.
 Makes sense.
 Yeah.
 The gotcha is both a symbol of compassion
 and derision at once.
 I'm just letting you know,
 I understand what you're saying.
 I'm just gonna sit there and stare at you and say.
 Confirm.
 No, you can just say like,
 yeah, I get it.
 Like, yeah.
 I get it.
 Gotcha.
 No, no, gotcha sounds,
 no, it's so, it's so short.
 It's like, say it's longer sentence,
 but that means the same thing.
 I understand you.
 Yeah, that's good.
 That's like not chills, you know?
 You get chills, so you understand me.
 Yeah, it feels good.
 Yeah.
 I hear you.
 I hear you.
 And like, if you just like,
 hold the other person's hand, that's even better.
 You gotta put in some emotion there, okay?
 Show that you have some.
 I understand.
 What do you think about?
 Gotcha.
 What do you think about Red Pill?
 What, sorry, what is it first of all for people
 who don't know?
 Yeah, the Red Pill community,
 obviously it's the matrix reference.
 The Red Pill that you take is when you realize
 what dating standards and norms really are in the world,
 that men are providers and have to become some great thing
 to hunt and attract, you know,
 the woman who are just kind of there floating around
 looking for people to give them the most resources.
 And it's like coming to a realization
 of what the world of dating really is,
 broken away from the Hollywood standards
 and the romantic stuff that they try to sell you
 and, you know, stories.
 So there was kind of, maybe you can kind of educate me
 on this, but Red Pill used to be associated
 with just maybe anti-establishment views.
 I don't know, maybe Republican conservative viewpoints.
 People use, yeah, they use Red Pill a lot
 in like different communities.
 Like when you say the Red Pill community.
 Yeah, that usually means dating.
 The dating thing.
 But a lot of people say, oh, Trump voters, they're Red Pilled.
 Are you Red Pilled on like politics or whatever?
 People will say stuff like that, yeah.
 Okay, cool.
 And then there's like the Manosphere,
 that's all the similar type of stuff.
 And Andrew Tate is somebody that represents
 kind of the figurehead.
 Of the Manosphere of like the Red Pill stuff.
 Yeah, I would say so, I'm pretty sure, yeah.
 Okay, all right, cool.
 So what are some ideas that they represent
 and what do you think about them?
 I think they do a good job at speaking
 to disaffected young men who feel like the rest
 of the world has kind of left them behind
 or isn't willing to speak to them.
 And they do identify some true and real problems.
 Feels like on the left, we have a really hard time
 doing like self-improvement or telling people
 how to better themselves.
 We focus too much on like structural or systemic issues
 rather than what can an individual do to uplift
 or empower themselves.
 And it also feels like they do a good job
 at speaking to some of the positive aspects of masculinity.
 That it's okay to be like strong and brave
 and a soldier and a warrior and provide for your family
 and blah, blah, blah.
 So I would say like those are like positive messages
 like self-improvement and everything
 that come from the Red Pill community.
 What's the negative?
 I think the analysis on how men and women interact
 is a way too transactional.
 All of like the romanticism and love and chemistry
 is totally sucked out of it.
 Everything is very like sex-based,
 like how do you basically have sex
 with the most amount of women possible
 and that's gonna make you happy.
 And then I think people's motivation sometimes
 are just spoken about in such a shallow derogatory way
 that I don't think is always reflective of reality.
 Like woman only wants you because you make six figures
 and you're tall and a guy only wants you
 because he wants to have sex with you and blah.
 Like it feels like there's a lot of that going on a lot.
 Yeah, and that misses some fundamental aspects
 about relationships, about meaningful relationships
 and so on.
 I don't think I've never heard Red Pill people ever,
 ever talk about like meaningful relationships.
 It's always just how to get in one or how to have sex really.
 Mel, what bothers you about some of that philosophy?
 I feel like the people that are like the Red Pill people,
 I feel like their solution is something
 that doesn't actually work out.
 Like it works out for some people,
 people that makes a lot of money
 is like really successful in that sort of way,
 but it's not gonna help most men out there.
 So I feel like it's just like a pointless like speech
 to give to these like really lost guys.
 And they really do believe that they can like,
 they can become successful, they can get money
 and like when they get all these things,
 they can get girls,
 but most of them is not gonna achieve that ever.
 To get the money part or become successful.
 Just become a billionaire, you know,
 like and you will get all the girls and which is true,
 but not everyone can do that.
 So I feel like when these guys are speaking to these men
 and there's like, we just care about these men out there,
 you know, they need to hear this.
 It doesn't really help a lot of them.
 And it doesn't inspire them to develop compassion
 towards the opposite sex,
 which is probably something required
 to have a meaningful relationship.
 And also like they seem to complain a lot about women,
 like only wanting men that have money and that's tall
 and that's muscular, whatever, you know, all those things.
 But they complain about that,
 but that's like also kind of what they're trying to
 make the men try to do for themselves.
 So they kind of like falling to the same sort of behavior
 and it seems like they're kind of unaware of that as well.
 They're just playing a part of the game
 instead of trying to find a woman
 that doesn't look for those things
 and that are looking for not those things, yeah.
 I actually would love to have like straight up data
 on people in that world versus not in that world,
 how often they get laid.
 Yeah, like literally.
 So I think for sure people in that world
 have fewer meaningful long-term relationships
 that are fulfilling, that actually helped them succeed in life,
 that helped them be happy and content
 and all that kind of stuff.
 But just even the straight up,
 the shallow goal of getting laid, I wonder.
 Because it's very possible that like just the roughness
 with which they treat intellectually women,
 that might lead to lower success, not higher success.
 It's very adversarial,
 which I think is always disappointing.
 Anything that talks about men and women,
 I think it's good to acknowledge differences,
 but when it becomes like adversarial,
 especially when you talk about sex,
 sex is something that men are getting
 and it's something that women are giving
 and that type of like trade-off
 and the way they talk about it is like, yeah,
 it sets people against each other
 in a really toxic way, I think.
 How do you talk to people from that world,
 from the red pill world?
 Like would you ever talk to like somebody like Andrew Tate?
 Oh yeah, if I had the chance to.
 I've been on the Fresh and Fit podcast a few times
 and then I've got a friend, Sneko,
 who's like very red pill, that stuff.
 If I'm trying to talk to them, usually the,
 it's kind of like approaching it like a scared cat.
 The first thing you have to do is like be very gentle
 and say like, I understand your issues,
 I understand your complaints,
 I know that you're, I'm scary because you think
 I'm gonna say like toxic masculinity and feminism
 and all these scary words at you.
 So the first thing is always to recognize it.
 Like a lot of what they talk about,
 there are like true aspects to what they're talking about
 that people on the left won't recognize.
 So I think it's good to acknowledge those things
 that like men and women are kind of different.
 We do look for different things in general
 when it comes to relationships.
 It's okay to say that, there's nothing bad there.
 And then it'll usually be like,
 once I've got your trust and I'm in your bubble,
 like let's talk about the things that you want.
 And maybe some of the strategies that you're employing
 aren't necessarily gonna get you
 some of the things that you want.
 So for instance, if you're really worried
 about like shallow girls, like ruining your life,
 like Malina said, it's probably not best
 to build your entire worldview around trying
 to get shallow girls that are gonna ruin your life.
 Like if your way of attracting a girl is to go to the gym,
 get a whole bunch of money
 and try to like flaunt your wealth as much as possible,
 you're gonna be attracting the very same type of women
 that you're here like decrying on your stream.
 Yeah, I think we talked about that on the podcast.
 Like you probably wanna have a woman that's gonna be there
 if you lose your job, but still there.
 Like that cares about the things that's not just your job.
 Yeah.
 It's more stable.
 And also I don't help you become a great man or a great,
 like grow, like I feel like a great friendship
 and a partnership.
 Like it helps you make you a better person.
 Some of the most successful people I know,
 I mean they have families
 and there's clearly dynamic there that's like,
 that makes them, they wouldn't be that without.
 They're not an island, yeah.
 Yeah, and the kids actually a big part of that too.
 Like for most people, if you're like a good parent,
 they make you step up somehow in life.
 You have to take responsibility
 for getting your shit together and excelling
 in ways that I guess the philosophy of the red pole
 does not quite get to.
 That's always an interesting,
 I think I've asked that a couple of times where it's like,
 would you let your daughter date Andrew Tate?
 And it's always funny to watch them kind of like
 squirm around those answers sometimes.
 But see if they don't have a daughter,
 like I don't have a daughter.
 I think your whole philosophy changes
 once you have a daughter.
 Sure, well, but even at that,
 like they know that what they're answering,
 they feel a little bit weird about it.
 It's funny to watch them.
 Like they even they know it's like, ah fuck.
 Well, they might say like,
 I want my daughter to date like a high value male
 to the degree that he's a high value male, yes.
 But like, I don't think you'll feel that way.
 The definition of high value changes completely.
 Certainly the stereotypical measures of value
 contribute to the calculation,
 but it's so much more than that, I think.
 The chemistry of the whole thing is bigger.
 You've also mentioned about body count.
 You guys both have a high body count.
 Does body count matter?
 Or it depends, like you said,
 it's low in some people's eyes,
 it's high in other people's eyes.
 Does body count matter in relationships?
 Does the past matter?
 Well, the past matters.
 I don't think body count,
 not to me, I don't really care.
 Not just as it is, no.
 I mean, it could be.
 But the past does.
 Yeah, well, the past is who you are, right?
 So if somebody tells me they have a 200 body count
 and they're 16, something's probably going on
 or that's not good.
 I was thinking about that too.
 Because there could be really young people
 that are having some sort of mental problems going on.
 Or somebody's 45 and they've never had sex before,
 there's probably something going on, right?
 So it could be indicative.
 But if somebody's in their 20s
 and they've had sex with 100 people or 50 people,
 whatever, it's, you know, whatever.
 It's more experience, which can be good.
 Sure.
 Okay, so that just represents you're sexually open
 and so it doesn't really necessarily mean any kind of.
 Not necessarily, it could though.
 The number alone doesn't mean anything.
 Yeah.
 Okay.
 Well, you could meet a guy that's like,
 I just really, really like when I fuck a lot of people
 because it makes me so cool.
 You can meet someone like that, which is like, maybe.
 So the body count doesn't matter,
 but like where it comes from.
 Yeah, like why have you slept with the people
 that you slept with, yes.
 Does it hurt like the romantic aspect of the relationship
 knowing that there's a lot of people in the past?
 I don't think. Not for us, no.
 Is a part of the relationship fundamentally romantic?
 For us? Yeah, I'd say so.
 For us, yeah, for us, yeah.
 Okay.
 What?
 You come off as such a cold person.
 No, I was just in my head thinking
 and I wanted to just say, gotcha right there.
 Oh, nice.
 It's so judgmental.
 I think when it comes to the sex thing,
 there's always like, the way that I explain it is,
 and I understand like, I have to say this
 because I don't advocate for what I do for everybody
 or what she does for everybody
 because obviously there's a whole bunch of natural feelings
 of jealousy that pop up for a lot of people.
 But when people ask me, it's always like,
 oh, isn't this horrible that you guys are doing this
 and you don't love each other?
 From my perspective, I can have sex with any person
 and it can be sex.
 That's not like a special thing between two people.
 In my eyes, it's like anybody can have sex.
 But there are certain activities and ways
 you can spend time with each other
 where you're carving out these precious little moments
 in time with a certain person
 that can do things that are special to that person.
 And those are the kind of events
 that I remember more than anything else.
 So the idea of like, oh wow, I had sex with a person
 that was so special doesn't mean as much as like,
 us traveling to like New Zealand
 or sharing some special moment,
 doing like some really fun activity or event or whatever.
 That's usually how I like it.
 So a shared intimate moment.
 Yeah.
 I kind of agree,
 but I can definitely connect the romance with sex.
 Boring.
 I'm curious why you can't do that.
 That's because she's a woman, see?
 That's where the red pill's right.
 That's exactly what I'm saying.
 We've also talked about misogyny,
 which is clearly the embodiment of that.
 What were you saying?
 So there's a connection between romance and sex.
 Yeah, I think it is
 because I think sex could be a lot of things, right?
 It's some sort of bonding, I'd say, in some way.
 They say that you really like BDSM.
 You kind of like, you become submissive to someone
 or you take control over someone.
 It's like in a very bonding, like intimate moment, I'd say.
 And that's romantic.
 The intimacy is romantic.
 I think it is.
 If you can show yourself as really submissive or like weak
 or you have like absolutely no control over yourself
 and you let someone else do it,
 or you are the one being that,
 like you are the dominant force someone.
 I think that's a really like intimate thing
 because you show like the weakest part of yourself, kind of.
 I just feel like I personally,
 to me, some component of romantic,
 but to me, this is not judging to others.
 To me, maybe this call was brought up.
 The romance increases if the number of intimate interactions
 are limited to one person.
 For me, for some reason, spreading it out
 decreases like exponentially the feeling of romance you feel.
 I don't know what, that could be just like sort of
 having grown up in the Soviet Union.
 There's a kind of, there's the fairy tale stories
 and you're kind of maybe living through them.
 Yeah, I mean, I think what you're saying is like really normal.
 Like most people probably show that way, yeah.
 But because you guys are able to successfully not do that,
 I just want to question my own understanding of it.
 You know, like.
 Like why is that?
 Why is that?
 Why am I being very jealous for no reason?
 Like maybe you can maximize the number of intimate experiences
 if you just open up and let go of the jealousy, essentially.
 I think, I feel like in Sweden, like in Scandinavia,
 we're extremely just sexually open, like in general.
 We're not like super religious either.
 We're very like relaxed.
 We don't like, we don't feel bad about ourselves.
 Like it's just like a different sort of thing.
 And I would say like it's,
 we're more progressive when it comes to feminism and stuff.
 So it's more common that you will meet women
 with a higher body count than like,
 when I meet like American girls,
 all of them have like vaginism,
 like super suppressed like sexually.
 And they have like-
 What did you just use?
 They have like issues to like,
 they can't relax during sex, so it just hurts for them.
 Vaginism.
 Vaginism, isn't that what it's called?
 Yeah.
 So like I meet so many girls
 that are having like a lot of issues with sex.
 And they have like a very low body count
 because they just can't relax or they, yeah.
 And it's probably,
 usually they come from like a very religious background.
 So they have just been told like,
 you cannot wear that, you cannot be like that,
 you can't like, you know.
 And like where I grew up, it wasn't like that at all.
 We just see it as more like a casual thing.
 So then you can just maximize
 the awesomeness of the experience.
 Yeah, I guess I don't like have like a-
 You don't have a trauma over it.
 Exactly, yeah.
 I think that the important thing I think
 for everybody to realize is there's always pros
 and cons to everything.
 Like my lifestyle, like obviously I get to have
 a lot of fun experiences.
 That's like a huge pro and that's super cool.
 And if you're like a more monogamy brain person,
 you're not gonna get those experiences.
 But if you're a monogamy brain person,
 like when you're sharing that special moment
 of time with somebody else,
 like that moment can be really, really, really special
 because now it's the thing that you're showing yourself
 and opening yourself up to another person
 and they're only trusting you to do that.
 And that's like a really special thing
 that only the two of you are sharing with each other.
 So I mean, like there's always like pros and cons
 to everything.
 Like I think we both would say like,
 like doing an open relationship is probably not,
 like we would not recommend it.
 Yeah, no, of course not.
 I don't think we would, no.
 Yeah, I recently fasted for three days
 and I ate a chicken breast at the end of that.
 And it was like the most delicious food I've ever eaten.
 So like there's some aspect of fasting and scarcity
 and so on that like, and you have to figure out
 for your own psyche what works the best.
 It's good to be a little bored or like not do something
 or like work because you can just enjoy the time
 when you're doing something really fun is more fun.
 Otherwise you're just gonna get numb
 in general with everything.
 Yeah, I personally just never get bored.
 Like I guess the boring thing is exciting to me.
 The just like everything.
 You're like me,
 because everything I like is boring.
 I gotta ask you, we talked about massaging
 and he's trying to battle it out on the internet.
 What's your sense as a woman
 about the level of massaging and the internet
 and the streaming community and how to fight it?
 For me, because I guess I get it every single day somehow.
 Like because I have an online,
 like I have a chat that goes that's live, right?
 And, but I have like mods moderating that all the time.
 So I don't really need to see much of it.
 I think it's just pretty annoying
 because you get to like see it all the time.
 So it's become like background noise.
 Yeah, a little bit.
 And it's like the same comments over and over again.
 But it's usually for me, I don't personally care that much.
 I understand that other people do,
 especially when it comes into like,
 when there's like a lot of sexism and stuff.
 And when there's a lot of like men not taking women seriously,
 like I definitely get that.
 And I used to get that even more like a few years ago
 with my accent and everything.
 Like I used to be blonde as well, like a few months ago.
 So I feel like people wouldn't take me seriously
 because of that.
 That's a bit annoying,
 but I feel like it's pretty easy to like see through
 when someone acts that way.
 And for me personally, I don't really care.
 But it's a bit annoying,
 like being online and like getting stuff every single day.
 I would say like probably the worst thing is
 when you feel like you put in a lot of effort
 into some sort of work,
 everyone is just gonna say,
 you just got that because you're a woman
 and you're attractive.
 And that's probably like the worst thing.
 Is there a way to fight that you think?
 Yeah, I don't think you can.
 I think it just comes up all the time.
 It's just like, it is what it is, I guess.
 You just gotta keep doing whatever you do
 and like not let it like emotionally control you somehow.
 I think having more women in those spaces is always good.
 It's probably good, yeah.
 Like a lot of the guys you can tell online
 that they don't ever-
 Don't bring on the worst ones then,
 Steven and I, you weren't here.
 See, she just did it.
 She did the misogyny thing.
 By having some bad women on, she's saying all women, see?
 Well, you know it's true, right?
 See, but yeah, I disagree with you
 and I'm older than both of you and therefore wiser, right?
 So-
 Well combined, we're older than you, so careful.
 We're one, only matronomy.
 Yeah, we've got combined age.
 Well, it could be the same thing.
 It was like, also the age thing and like the woman thing.
 A lot of people think that I'm just copying
 every single thing that he says,
 which I think is a bit annoying as well.
 So I can never really like-
 Oh, Sonic used to have that one too.
 Yeah, which is a bit annoying.
 I know you like so much, you know?
 It was about the defunding police.
 Like my dad is a cop.
 I like friendship, camaraderie,
 and love and respect, which you both have had for a time
 and have lost it and I would like you to regain it.
 Let's try to increase, not decrease,
 the amount of love in the space.
 What do you think about some of the harshness
 of his language, which we talked about?
 Our word in the past when he used N-word,
 all of that kind of stuff.
 What he used to do, I mean-
 No, like what do you think about it?
 Like do you give him advice?
 To not speak a certain way.
 No, like a little more civility.
 I was just trying to get a second opinion on this.
 Second opinion about-
 Normie people, non-internet people,
 are way more extreme than-
 Yeah, yeah.
 She's way more extreme than I am.
 No, that's not true.
 Okay, so here's the thing for me, okay?
 I was not online until three years ago, at all.
 Like I would watch YouTube.
 That's pretty much all I would do.
 I wouldn't do anything else, really.
 I didn't grow up playing video games or anything.
 So I'm like extremely new to everything.
 So when I came into this world
 and I started seeing clips from him in the past,
 I don't think I really had much of an opinion
 because it just sounded like it was just a different
 like words that we're using, but it didn't mean anything.
 That's what it feels like.
 It was just like, if you're saying the R word,
 it's because you just want to call someone stupid,
 but you want to like do it a little bit more.
 But it's not like, it didn't feel like it was like a,
 it's not like racist more like, you know, it's not-
 Agreement on this side here, right?
 So like if he was saying the F word
 because it was just like a word to like insult someone
 and he wasn't like, I don't think he was ever,
 I don't think you were ever homophobic back in the day
 or anything like that.
 I think it was just like a way to express yourself
 maybe back then.
 I don't know, I didn't do it.
 There's no videos of me or anything
 because I wasn't even online back then.
 But I don't know.
 Yeah, so my case was, I definitely don't think
 Steven is homophobic or racist or any of those, obviously.
 So there's a good heart there and a good mind.
 I was just saying-
 He just likes being mean, I think.
 Well, there is some, you lose yourself
 and forget the bigger picture that he's pushing for
 more effective discourse on the internet.
 He's like an inspiration to a lot of people,
 especially now, of how you can use effective conversation
 to make for a better world, to radicalize people and so on.
 And then you lose some of that power by losing yourself
 in the language, just more language of emotion
 versus effective communication.
 I would say-
 But it's a gray area.
 I would say something that is probably recently done
 in that case, because it's been joking about women a lot.
 It's women's fault, they're bad.
 It's been a lot of jokes when it comes to misogyny,
 I guess, in your community.
 And I think it's actually turned people
 a little bit that way.
 That's why we've done the recent misogyny.
 Yes, so I guess that's actually true
 because I don't think it was clear enough.
 I don't think it actually was.
 I think you did that mistake.
 But I think back then I was even saying,
 like, hey, you should probably not,
 like you probably should not do that.
 Because it actually is pretty hard for me
 because whenever I come into his community,
 like his chat, people are just gonna spam,
 it's like a woman moment.
 It's a woman moment whenever I say something
 and it's kind of like, yeah, it's getting pretty annoying
 as I said, it's just annoying
 when you see it every single day.
 There you go.
 Wisdom from somebody younger than you.
 Wisdom can come from all kinds of people.
 Yeah, of course.
 Just sometimes in very limited quantities
 depends on the age.
 Oh boy.
 And learn something from anybody.
 What advice would you give to young people,
 the both of you?
 That you have both audiences
 where young people look up to you.
 In general, if you were to give advice
 to somebody in high school,
 like how to create a life they can be proud of,
 what would you say?
 The most important thing that I've learned
 is to view people as different and not better or worse.
 And when you view people as different
 instead of better or worse,
 you learn that there's almost something
 that you can learn from anybody.
 Like be open and empathetic
 towards other people's experiences.
 Nobody does anything by random choice.
 Like there's always reasons why people act the way they do.
 And as long as you're willing to kind of like be open
 and receptive to the lived experiences of other people,
 you're gonna be able to gather information
 and create like a more cohesive and better view
 of the world than any of your peers will.
 Do you have any kind of advice you can give to young folks?
 I feel like something that I see,
 especially in America a lot,
 is that a lot of people kind of get told what to do early on.
 Like in high school, they're supposed to become this thing.
 Like education-wise, like they're supposed to like
 become a doctor or this thing or whatever.
 And then they kind of just like give up on things
 that they're actually passionate about.
 So I think a lot of teenagers get really confused.
 They get an education and then they get that job
 and they hate everything.
 And they think that when they're reaching the job,
 when they're reaching like the journey,
 they're gonna get happy.
 That's like where the happiness is gonna be.
 But then when they get to there, they just hate everything.
 And then they become really depressed.
 And I've seen this so much.
 Like I've seen this all the time.
 And it's pretty sad to me to see so many people
 that are just wasting time.
 And then they just get really confused.
 And I don't know.
 It's the same thing with relationships too.
 No one really knows what they want anymore.
 I feel like everyone is just kind of doing
 whatever like society is saying
 or their parents are saying or their friends are saying.
 And they're never really doing anything
 that's super meaningful anymore.
 And like they don't.
 So what I would say is like try to find something
 that is important to you.
 It could be anything really.
 Like some sort of passion, maybe like your friends,
 maybe like like what matters to you.
 Like figuring those things out I think is really important.
 And that comes from being able to listen to like
 some inner voice.
 So it's not gonna come from elsewhere.
 It's really hard because you're living the life.
 And like there's things happening around you
 and people tell you what to do and what not to do.
 No one really has like their own opinions.
 Everyone is just kind of like listening
 to the cooler thing or you know.
 Except Steven, he seems to stand on his own.
 True.
 Yeah I guess.
 Yeah I'd say so.
 And like something I realized too like,
 cause we just went to TwitchCon
 and we were talking to a lot of streamers.
 How was that?
 It was interesting.
 I thought it was interesting because the few people
 that I feel like I, that seemed really cool
 and that I look up to like in the streaming world,
 all of them wants to quit streaming.
 All of them wants to do it.
 No one wants, like no one likes it.
 And they're so successful.
 Like they are around successful people.
 They're working every single day.
 They're working hard.
 They're making so much money.
 And everyone is just complaining.
 And like they're complaining about like not being able
 to see their partner or you know,
 because they need to live somewhere else.
 Because I see these things and they seem extremely unhappy.
 And but it's so hard for them to just like cut all
 these successful stuff off because that's like what you,
 you know, learn to do.
 And that's like supposed to be like your happiness,
 but it isn't.
 Everyone is really unhappy.
 Yeah there's something about maybe streaming is different,
 but YouTube folks too have interacted with a few.
 And even in podcasting space,
 people become obsessed about the views and numbers
 and subscribers and stuff like that.
 So I turned, I never talk about that.
 I don't pay attention to that.
 I feel like that's a drug that destroys your mind.
 Your mind is an artist,
 the ability to create truly unique things.
 Also your mind in terms of the anxiety,
 the ups and downs of the attention mechanism.
 And then also being just,
 if it's something that you make is not popular,
 but it meant a lot to you,
 you will think of it less because it's not popular.
 That's a really dangerous thing.
 And because everyone around you is reinforcing,
 like I'll get messages like,
 wow, this thing got this many views or something.
 Great job.
 It's like, no, you don't get it.
 Like that's not, that's not,
 everyone is enforcing this language of views
 and likes and so on.
 And it's correlated of course,
 cause truly impactful things will get
 a lot of attention often.
 But it's not on the individual local scale,
 like temporarily is,
 it can really fuck with your mind.
 And I see that in the creators,
 they become addicts to the algorithm.
 Lost and chasing views.
 Like we know friends that we know cool people
 and then they start streaming
 and eventually they're like chasing the dragon of like.
 And they change like, yeah.
 It's like hard to engage for them.
 They change who they are completely.
 And there's like, this is something I've always said
 that like one of the biggest blessings
 and biggest curses of humanity
 is we are very good at acclimating.
 Like you can become paralyzed.
 You can have all sorts of horrible things happen to you
 and you'll get used to it and you'll be okay.
 You're gonna have like a good baseline.
 But it works the other way too
 and that you can get more and more and more and more
 and you acclimate to it almost immediately.
 There's like, this is a phenomenon that
 I bet it happens in the YouTube world
 but I know what happens in the streaming world
 where you're streaming 1000 viewers every day,
 huge event happens and you blow up
 and you got like 15,000 viewers for a day or two.
 And then it starts to go down and down and down
 and down and down.
 And then after all the drama stayed off,
 you're at like 3000 concurrent viewers.
 Now in the macro, you went from 1000 to 3000.
 That feels awesome.
 But you actually feel like shit the whole time
 because you're remembering when you had 10 or 15,000
 and now everything feels horrible.
 And you'll see people climb over time.
 They're like, fuck, like, but whatever that one huge stream
 I had like, I've never like been able to,
 and it's like, dude, you're doing great.
 Yeah, that happens a lot.
 There's so many people that we know that we find
 super, super cool.
 They're passionate about things.
 They have so much interest.
 And then they just get like so addicted to these numbers.
 And like all the, everything is just ruined.
 Like all the cool things about them is ruined
 because they stopped doing the things
 that they actually like to do something else
 that gives them more viewers and more money.
 And it's really sad to see.
 Yeah, that temporary sacrifice that seems temporary
 is that it actually destroys you.
 Like for one time making a choice.
 Cause I come across those choices often.
 Like I can do this.
 You can kind of know what's going to be popular and not.
 And you have to ask yourself the question,
 like, is this going to sacrifice?
 Cause if people are sacrificing like intimate relationships,
 they're sacrificing time with their family.
 They're like sacrificing time with the things
 that they feel good about and that they like.
 And that's something I kind of realized last year
 cause I was working so much and I was just grinding,
 grinding, grinding, grinding.
 Cause it was kind of new for me.
 And then new years came by and I was like, wait,
 what did I even do like the entire year?
 Like I traveled to a bunch of places,
 but nothing actually really meant anything to me
 because I felt like I was just working the entire time.
 I felt like I was just numb through the entire year.
 I was really scary.
 Like I rented like a super pretty house,
 like for a week with my dad and my sister
 cause I wanted to spend time with them.
 But the entire time I was just streaming
 and I actually didn't ever like calm down
 and just like chill with them.
 And I like, that's like time I'll never get back.
 I don't give a shit about the money that I made that week,
 but I lost the time.
 And like that is really important to me.
 And I, yeah, and a lot of people are doing that.
 And I feel like you, as you said,
 like you can definitely see that in like artists for sure.
 I feel like if you look at like artists,
 like back in the sixties or seventies,
 I feel like things were just so much better back then.
 And it feels like they were actually making music
 that meant something to them.
 They were actually making art.
 And I feel like today everything is just kind of like,
 whatever is cool, whatever sells, whatever,
 you know, sounds in a certain way,
 everything is kind of the same thing.
 And everything that is very artistic and very cool
 is actually not that popular at all.
 And that's kind of sad, I think.
 Yeah, of course there's now bigger mechanisms
 and platforms to spread stuff, music.
 So as long as you can be content with not being popular,
 I think you can still create great art.
 Yeah, but not like, when people get a little popular,
 they get addicted to that so fast.
 Yeah, it's weird.
 You have been somewhat good,
 at least from my outsider perspective,
 because I think you, I can at least imagine
 you making choices that could make you more popular
 and you don't seem to make those choices.
 Yeah, that was my career.
 Like having orbits of drop on.
 But it is very intentional, like you said.
 And I made that choice at every single stage of my life.
 One is because from the perspective of being a carpet cleaner,
 my life is way better than that was,
 or ever would have been.
 So I'm already doing way better than I ever thought
 somebody like me ever could be.
 But then two, I super love my job.
 Every time I wake up,
 every time I fly to a place to do a podcast,
 every time I get to talk to really cool people,
 every single part of my job, I super like.
 If there's something I don't like,
 I just cut it off because I don't care.
 Because I'm already making plenty of money doing what I do.
 And why would I ever wake up and not like what I'm doing
 when I can like what I'm doing?
 How do you guys find through that,
 given that you love it
 and sometimes maybe lose yourself in the drug of it,
 how do you find like work life balance together
 inside a relationship?
 Like time for each other?
 I don't at all, so I'm not a good person to ask.
 What do you love more, Mel or Factor?
 Factor is a really good game.
 That's like not a fair comparison, okay?
 You're talking about one of the best, cleanest games,
 best support ever made, cleanest code base.
 Yeah, this is.
 I think I understand all the problems you're talking about.
 Yeah, it's more Factor time for me.
 Starting to understand where the massaging comes from.
 By the way, is Factor a legit, really good game?
 Yeah, of course, yeah.
 Okay.
 If you're like, do you enjoy programming?
 Of course, that's all I do, that's all.
 Okay.
 To me, programming is a game in itself
 that I enjoy probably more than anything else, but yeah.
 It's very much a game like that.
 Like if you're into stuff like that,
 like you can lose hundreds of hours like very quickly
 to like you have a problem and then you think of a solution
 and then you iterate on that over and over and over again
 in larger, larger schemes.
 Sometimes you gotta redesign stuff,
 sometimes you got like, it's very much like that kind of game.
 So you're essentially building a factory,
 like what, on a foreign planet or something like that?
 Basically, it's like a bunch of,
 you're trying to automate different problems
 so that you can build bigger things
 so that you can automate bigger problems
 so you can build bigger things and automate bigger problems.
 So it's more complicated than like a city building game,
 like some city type of thing?
 I wouldn't say it's more complicated.
 It's more like, Factory is like a game of like logic,
 like strictly like logic.
 Like almost like a building a circuit or something.
 Yes, yeah, there's like there's circuitry
 and you've got your N or XOR gates,
 there's stuff like that.
 It's very much like that, like problems.
 What are the enemies in the game?
 Like what's something attacking?
 There are like bugs that try to bite you
 and you can get guns and shoot and kill them,
 but it's like that.
 I saw there's like shooting going on.
 Yeah, but that's like a minor,
 just like another problem to solve in the game basically.
 Okay, all right.
 See what we do there?
 We just started talking about the game as we're trying.
 Oh my God, that's like a-
 It's a really good game, okay.
 That's horrible.
 Anyway, is that basically the struggle,
 not a stop struggle, how to get human,
 like intimate human time?
 I feel like it was like that a little bit more in the past.
 I feel like it's been better lately,
 but I think it's because when we started dating,
 I wasn't streaming and I kind of just like gave up
 like my trip in New Zealand.
 I give up like I left Sweden.
 So I was just like in LA, which I hate.
 I hate LA, I don't like LA at all.
 It's hard to make friends that are like real,
 that are into the same stuff as you.
 It was just really hard for me to connect with anyone,
 especially also like being a European
 and like being around Americans was very strange.
 So the only thing I had when I came here was him.
 And I didn't expect-
 Bad situation.
 Because yeah, because we had like two weeks of hanging out
 and like he would be in his computer sometimes
 and like do emails and stuff,
 but I wasn't thinking that he would stream
 like 12 hours a day.
 And it was pretty intense like in the beginning of it as well.
 And I realized it was really hard to like get attention
 or get time because his like love meter would be like full
 if I was just in the house.
 And that's just kind of like the way he is.
 And for me back then, when I didn't have anything else to do
 was kind of like a, it was kind of crazy for me.
 I feel like right now, because I do work as well
 and I have things going for me
 and I have other friends now that I made,
 I feel like it's a lot easier.
 And I can definitely like enjoy just like being
 in separate rooms and just like hear him in the background
 is really nice.
 So I can sit and paint in like in my room
 and I will do that for hours
 while I'm just like hearing a scream in the background.
 It's kind of like comforting that he's just there.
 It feels nice.
 I like it.
 Oh, because to you that's the sound of happiness.
 Yes, because I know he's right there.
 Yeah, it's nice and they'll come in
 and check on me sometimes.
 And it's kind of like, it's actually very comforting.
 It's very nice.
 I like it.
 Yeah.
 I think that's kind of what a relationship is.
 Like you do fun things together,
 you share moments together,
 but also just like having someone like around you
 is really, really nice.
 And I think that's probably, maybe it's me growing up.
 Maybe that's what it is.
 And like I start liking like the kind of,
 I feel like we're like an old couple,
 like we're like 80 and we're just like around.
 We don't really have to talk much.
 It's nice to just do that.
 That fills your love meter.
 That press.
 I like this terminology.
 I need both.
 I mean, okay.
 You're making it sound like that I'm like craving like
 crazy time.
 I haven't said anything.
 I'm not saying anything.
 I'm just making face right now.
 I know exactly what you're thinking.
 There's so much judging going on.
 There's no judging.
 No, but like we, I think whenever we do plan something out,
 like if we go on a trip,
 like every other month or once a month,
 I feel like usually like that's enough,
 as long as he's not playing Victoria the entire time.
 Like if I feel like he's going on these trips with me
 and he's not like doing things for me,
 or he's not interested in like spending time
 or like being present with me,
 then I'll feel like,
 I just feel like I'm just wasting time right now.
 And then I get kind of disappointed,
 but otherwise I think this, like this is fun.
 I think this is like spending time together
 because we're like doing something together.
 Yeah, it's fun.
 Yeah.
 My love meter is full.
 It's my social life.
 Otherwise, we like to think about it that way.
 That like, I need like a little bit more of like this,
 one thing like quality time.
 And he needs like almost zero quality time.
 But like, let's say that we took away like physical touch,
 you would probably not be very happy.
 So you need physical touch.
 So it's not just Victoria.
 No, I'm a very cuddly person.
 Yeah, like cuddly and then you're like,
 I guess like acts of service.
 Like if I do something for you, you get really happy.
 Like hot chocolate.
 Yeah.
 Like if I give him hot chocolate in the morning,
 he gets really happy.
 So.
 The actual, it's not the hot chocolate,
 it's the giving of the hot chocolate.
 No, it's just the hot chocolate.
 But if she gives it to me, I didn't have to get it myself.
 Maybe it's just physical touch that you like.
 That's really nice.
 All right, well, if you have to choose
 between factorial and the drama or political discourse.
 Probably political discourse, probably my calling,
 but I am a good factorial player.
 Like what role exactly does factorial play
 in your streaming life?
 Oh, well right now it's just,
 usually there are like these games
 that I play in the background as I have conversations,
 because it's hard for me to just sit on the computer
 and just talk and not like be playing a game
 at the same time.
 So it's just something to keep me kind of like occupied.
 You know, I was thinking about like
 those little like widget things, I guess.
 Yeah, that's what yours is.
 Yeah, basically, yeah.
 It's like Minecraft or factorial for me.
 All right.
 Well, my love meter is full from this.
 Mel, thank you so much for joining us.
 Thank you for having me.
 This was really fun.
 You guys are fascinating human beings.
 Thank you for existing.
 I'm glad to live in a world where you exist.
 I can't wait to see what kind of beautiful thing
 you create next and the crazy kind of art that you create
 through the different people you interact with.
 Destiny, Stephen, you're an amazing human.
 Thank you so much for talking to me.
 It's an honor.
 Hope to talk with you again.
 I'm talking to Ben Shapiro.
 You've given me a lot of inspiration.
 It's an honor to talk to the Ben Shapiro of the left.
 Well, thanks a lot for having me.
 I appreciate it.
 Thank you guys.
 Thank you.
 Thanks for listening to this conversation with Destiny.
 To support this podcast,
 please check out our sponsors in the description.
 And now let me leave you with some words from Lewis Carroll.
 It's no use going back to yesterday
 because I was a different person then.
 Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.