F.L.D. of A.D. 1996 100 J.C. S. IN THE QUEEN'S BENCH (FAMILY LAW DIVISION) JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON BETWEEN: BEVERLY JOANNE BOYKO RESPONDENT (CLAIMANT) and MARK DUPRE MAGINEL APPLICANT (RESPONDENT) V. WATSON for the respondent (claimant) No one appearing for the applicant (respondent) FIAT McINTYRE, J. DATE: MARCH 12, 1996 On the confirmation hearing the Respondent testified that at the time judgment for divorce and corollary relief was granted the Applicant was receiving $880.00 per month in unemployment insurance. Evidence was also lead which suggested that subsequent to the provisional order the Applicant received promotion at Safeway (September). The Applicant may also have source of income as musician. It has been source of income in the past. I am not satisfied that the court has accurateinformation as to the applicant's present income so as to besatisfied there is a substantial change in circumstance such asto warrant variation. I will adjourn the confirmation hearingand remit the matter back for further information as to theapplicants income. note that despite having obtained provisional order and promotion the applicant has not paid any support since obtaining that order.
On the confirmation hearing the Respondent testified that the Applicant was receiving unemployment insurance when the judgment for divorce and corollary relief were granted. Subsequent to the provisional order there was evidence that the applicant had received a promotion and may also have income as a musician. HELD: The confirmation hearing was adjourned and the matter was remitted back for further information. The court was not satisfied that it had accurate information as to the applicant's present income so as to warrant variation.