THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN Citation: 2004 SKCA 75 Date: 20040518 Between: Docket: 906 Coram: Bayda C.J.S., Sherstobitoff Lane JJ.A. Counsel: Tiffany M. Paulsen for the Appellant E.F.A. Merchant, Q.C. for the Respondent Appeal: From: 2003 SKQB 517 (CanLII) Heard: May 3, 2004 Disposition: Dismissed Written Reasons: May 18, 2004 By: The Court THE COURT [1] This appeal from an order respecting custody and access to children cannot succeed. The trial judge made no error of principle, and there was evidence to support his findings of fact. He took all relevant matters into account and relied on no irrelevant matters. Above all, upon a careful consideration of all of the evidence, we have not been persuaded that the interests of the children would be better served by the parenting regime proposed by the appellant. [2] The appeal is accordingly dismissed without costs to either party. DATED at the City of Regina, in the Province of Saskatchewan, this 18th day of May, A.D. 2004. BAYDA C.J.S. FOR THE COURT
Fulltext of judgment follows: [1] This appeal from an order respecting custody and access to children cannot succeed. The trial judge made no error of principle, and there was evidence to support his findings of fact. He took all relevant matters into account and relied on no irrelevant matters. Above all, upon a careful consideration of all of the evidence, we have not been persuaded that the interests of the children would be better served by the parenting regime proposed by the appellant. [2] The appeal is accordingly dismissed without costs to either party.