Dated: 19991214 Docket: C.A. No 3243 THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN Coram: Cameron, Vancise, and Lane JJ.A. MILDRED ROSE SCOTT and DONALD WALTER SCOTT COUNSEL: Ms. Jo-Ann Parker for the appellant Mr. James Vogel for the respondent DISPOSITION: On Appeal From: Q.B.F.L.D. 730/106 J.C. Regina Appeal Heard: December 14, 1999 Appeal Dismissed: December 14, 1999 (orally) Written reasons: December 15, 1999 Reasons By: The Honourable Mr. Justice Cameron for the Court CAMERON J.A. [1] In light of the standard of appellate review (laid down in cases such as Lensen v. Lensen, 1987 CanLII 4 (SCC), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 672 and Fontaine v. British Columbia (Official Administrator), 1998 CanLII 814 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 424), and having regard for the evidence in support of the findings of fact made by Mr. Justice Maurice, we are of the view there is no tenable basis to interfere with his judgment, both as it pertains to the inventory and valuation of the matrimonial property of the parties and to the issue of spousal support. [2] Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent, such costs to be taxed in the usual manner.
No facts were cited. HELD: The appeal was dismissed with taxed costs to the respondent. There was no tenable basis to interfere with the judgment with respect to the inventory and valuation of matrimonial property and issue of spousal support given the standard of appellate review and the evidence in support of the findings of fact.