Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 1 of 32 Page ID #:13
FILED

FULL NAME
COMMI1'TED NAMe (If diffeteD!)
to.lr 1>~,i..X:~ ~\A-\G PIl;.r:soN ' '10 18 IlL...~~
FULl. ADDRESS INCLUDiNG NAME OF wsrmmoN
tto~b - ~.6.Bol< SOO.t- CA-\.t:~AT~AI CA ,\-t\33
\'=~1~03
PRISON NUMBER (If applicable)

2u"U""t! PnO"¥ - 7 ur-,,:, Ii'": L'"'.?..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL D

CT OF CALIFORNIA

lILC( CSVS UFi/!/ ctlOct- CASE NUMBER.. To be ~ by the Cleric

_ :)

L,~, C..:l'I.
I...,(l•. cd. U ... cr1.

. 'Bot.h. of 'suil...;,
!:.:".te:Lt~ hsl-T~
&sillltA-L TA..cL/i'o

IxL~teAlLLv~r..Coa'>~fEA5IN~A\,.o,cl{-!A.~tlE>F.JEleP''Lf~D,AA~.N--LT-(-S)-.---So--B-42-iv-Ue-n.-ss.-vC-C..-SI§-ViPx1-UI9-UL8R-n3R-Sk-IUnG-oAw-HN-nT-TAS-Tg-CeO-nO-t(sM-C4h-Pe0-cL3k-oA-Une-I.)NS-.-T3-8-8-(-1-9-7-1-) --

A. PREVIOUS LAWSUlTS
1. Have you brought any other lawsuits in a federal comt while a prisoner: Ila Yes 0 No 2. If your answer to "1." is yes, how many? _...!oD::.;..I\.l;::,;E":;....-_ _ __
Descnoe the lawsuit in the space below. (lfthere is more than one lawsuit, describe the additional lawsuits on an attached piece of paper using the same outline.)

o
td
(.:1
o
C~
-1
CV-66()197)

RECEIVED CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
-','"
OCT 2 4 2008

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BY /

DEPUTY

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

~lof6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 2 of 32 Page ID #:14

a~

Parties to this previous law~: ~~ ~A~~re~ ~.

O~~v~eJ~)

b. Court

\..\.~i\e.\> 5,""36'> ~~\fl'];;c:\ Co cult., C.tC.M\It.A\.. '~:t:s.\/t..:t"<t\ .0r
c.A-\..~'fotl/ll~~ ~6~\"6W ~~"'t:.s~oAl

c. Docketorcasenumber C-...t-C'1-4'1.14\-'3rW d. Name of judge to whom case was assigned __~..:;;..:::c>....:.\-\.:!.cl.1..-...:.~..;..'_~....:..::~:...:\,;=-:\:....:e:..:R.:-:...._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

e. Disposition (For example: Was the case dismissed? If so, what was the basis for dismissal? Was it
appealed? IsitstiIlpending?) "(':::5- ~B v.s. c' 1.;t;t!)3('c)C.t)-'ics- iES f-lo. o'1-~<O\O"
f. Issues raised: ~eNM- co~e SEC,\3:0"-l ~%), '-I17bl p,,\'6S \\-\4:; ~A."t:. ~xLe-(,6"S of r€bE~~L
<:'"L'T1:'ZwNS I AAJ~ ,~6 \SQ..-.l.,..L ~('..or~"T.t:"o~ ot: \'I\e \..MAJS Gu."P,.AA.lTe6

g. Approximate date of filing lawsuit: _.!..t'\~""'(....:.-....;..;\O;...;/~.;l,._O_O_'1~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
h. Approximate date of disposition feNb"tlJb ~At -rt{& 1\\.:rAl\~ c.x~eu.J;T of A-~?eALs

B. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

1. Is there a grievance procedure available at the institution where the events relating to your current complaint occurred? iii Yes 0 No

2. Have you filed a grievance concerning the facts relating to your current complaint? 0 Yes ~ No
If your answer is DO, explain why not eCI..WT"{ "l'A:r:\.. A~~~£LA.A1¢&5 L~IZ AcJ."..(.c~:ssTi, ~A\u..\oR.'< o~ ti·'C'\\E."¥.1Z-~i:: \0 Il.S,o\.."E \,~ Ct,~STt;Tv\:t'ClIi.I..L "t.~So.(;' c:>\=- ~"Ei.:rIGArL \erAWS; ~~S, (See i E)C\~~i\~ o~ C:l~W\5 \-ott. bM lI,b6$ \'0 ~6~C)1I.( 0'- ~~¥Slt1'( "",,,k ~S'Al~ Le<~2

3. Is the grievance procedure completed? !J Yes 0 No If your answer is no, explain why not _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

/

4. Please attach copies of papers related to the grievance procedure.

c. JURISDICTION

This complaint alleges that the civil rights of plaintiff tI\ /I.\.I.R..s;<!..E fzettlS ()l-r.~

.

(print plaintiff's name)

t> - who presently resides at ilo\~ ~L~"[;~ \<.O~

~·O- ~O)( 5C'o~
(1DilliIig aaaress or pliCC of

- CA-br~~
coiifiIiement)

J

cAr

"~,, 3~

were violated by the actions of the defendant(s) named below, which actions were directed against plaintiff at
L05 ~C:r&L C()U.,.rc'< CIS"At ::5'A-'l:'L / Lc~ A",,&elb~ I ~h;f'C>;!Ar~~ 900 i.;t.
mst1tu1J City W ere VIOlation

CV-66 \1/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 2 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 3 of 32 Page ID #:15

"

on (date or dates) rfl/'J./clc lbo tilIii /0 b oct/cJ/ck'ThA.U (eli'S/o'='

(CJaiiill)

,

. (QaJID 11)

• 01/lfIDle Thc..u. Ol/-l¢ 101 . (Chum ill)

NOTE: You need not name more than one defendant or allege more than one claim. If you are namIDg more than five (5) defendants, make a copy of this page to provide the information for additional defendants.

1. Defendant Glof'l..'1;~ ,"",C\..'tN A (fUll IllII!le Of firSt aetenaant)

resides or works at

Seo wlaIT \eM~lG' s'(~, ~ooM. 85" Lol. AII1b-@LI3S 1 GA. '\00 I~

(full address of first defendant)

~Ol\"'b of Sv.:~~t..\j+~O~1 ~-..s.T ~"'S.l~~
(aefendaiih posmon ana title, if aDy)

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): 2!i individual ~ official capacity.

Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law: LAX o-J~t;c,..ftr o~ 'l',..l:l, o~el.,f..\rC'\A.5J "'AA~ KISCj(lGSS k~RGC:ri\jl/') o~ M,'t \>($-T~xl ~€TAr;.teG
i'tM~, 'R.~\)fr6~:t;~ To~\u..(,ou.'::I~ riJ~u'lW {ANt> he(,l.",-~~&-:rIl.~L (!.CAtA.ifJ;cAJS,

2.

duh0 Defendant

NN t,;;

\:I. \5 v..~ KG"

name Of fiISi aeteDdilIit)

boo \tJes\ \~M.~6 <:''1A.. R.CCM&,"," '-coS ~(,GL6'> leA. '100;.;1...

(full addIess of first defendant)
~c...,.,~ of Sv?6iC.-,u;~f!. I SeCON~ ~.toS.\llU-:-r
(aefend8Iii'S posmon aDd ode. if aDyr

resides or works at

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): ~ individual 181 official capacity.

Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

"

L",,'-t o~elt.s.~\ ov :r~ ~~eM:r1:t;:ll.1S. AN~ ~edler5S. ~~~ o~ I\l'( ~(.e:ru:1I.\. ~iSlA-1lIi.UsG

Il:tb-it-T~( ~-.wiTel> 'W ioj([vllcLVSJ "r:u.\1JMMI, {:uJ~ ~G(,. u.Aw& -:!A-:xL e.c NAi.-ilrrY\l~'

3. Defendant (~lJcQ~~)S\('{

resides or works at

520 \tJeS\-:(efo\~ ~, ~COj~ A~\ Los ~~~ i C!...~

(full address of firSt defendant)

.

i

"oMJ~ o"t= S9 ~et..'IJ:$of!..../ ""C Ih"~ ~ i.~

(defeDdiiIit'S posltlon aDd title. If aDY) •

'tOol).

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): Il9 individual IS official capacity.
Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:
t..A-)( ()\J~\ bF ~~ o~at\.TuY\l.S{• /V'J~ t.~l8'$5 b~~&AM~ at:- M.\{ ~16:rIU:"Al ~el~G' 12-~I"n~, ~iU5'"~ ~TcC\ul!.ou"::'i ~t\JMM1) AN6. ~~tN & ':r~ <!.oNA:r:TroAiS
I

CV-66(JJ97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 3 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 4 of 32 Page ID #:16

, )

4. Defendant ~"-\ 'J..", ~\) 6"
(full nameot tim: fenaant)

resides or works at

~c wa.s-C \EM~\'6 S(~. (4ofl\. SAJ.. \..o~ AN'-'bl6S, CAs '\ool~

(full address of first defendant)

/

Ba~b. e,F £u}~"l.--£,o(., fO\Jt-'"t~ 'b.~l~
(defendant'S poSlOon and title. if any) ,

The defendant is sued 'in.hislher (Check one or both): lS individual ~ official capacity.

Explain bow this defendant was acting under color of law:
Lp..)t O"~~T of' :n.,'lll. o~ec.Mt;CI\t S I NA~ Rsq4es's' ~&~ of" MY. ~Il.e=rt.~A-l ~(A-~"'HiG \t~~1 ~,,\\e~ ~N \o~\.I,,~u.5,t "t:t..I~Mtscll AN.& he&~u.!(;,. -:!A.xL C!.oI\I.6:&-tJr(Yv..s,

resides or works at

(full name of first defendant)
5ot:> 'iJe~'T TeM~L6 ~L· ~~b'\ It>~ I\;.A~~ I
(full addIess of first defendant)
"E:.oAIt~ of <;~e~..,...&o~ i \-r.~n,," \).tS.TIt~
(ae£enaant'S poSItIon title. if any) ,

C.!\ ~OOI Pl.

The defendant is sued in bislher (Check one or both): S individual IS official capacity.
Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law: LI'.)l. o\LeMIlrl~ or.:l~ o?~,.:r'Ul1\lS I t\-t.L~ ~e-SS bt..&6-~ of ~'( elE:rU7Al ~6~G"G
W\-tS; ~vcrs-6. -"N \oP"Tu«.ou..s., 'IN"~ I ,y,~ ~e6~~(,. '~A-"Ji\.. CbolL~S.

cv-f>5 '[1/97)

crvn. RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 4 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 5 of 32 Page ID #:17

\.

l)

~... Defendant ,-E~~'r=~~~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ resides or works at

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): I5iI individual IE official capacity.

Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:
lA..)C o\le~S~~\ o~ "!A.t;\. O~IStt.MroNS« ("tNt:. RI:f'-ktqss ~.o;s.itJS&4 oF- M'l r.c.B.:.Tt..t::M-
. , ~e"tA·~N 66 t!;(,{""\~ i B6~u mtb SN 'D~Tu..I4Jv..6i l:NHvM,w J f>rN~ ~~&~.tn&- e.c",l>iST.t().dS~

r· f. Defendant ~o b:. Co M \> J;Q

\?'" ~u e"z' M. h .

resides or works at

(full name of first defe1ldant)
i.{L(.\ ~Au.c.I~eT ~T~ Lo> A.;\l~ i CA qOO\ ~

(full address of first defendant)

,

M.A«AL boc\.9& L,A- c:.'t"'l~ ~e;JtiU4L ~~
(defenaant's POSltlon and title, if any)

The defendant is rued in bislher (Check one or both): [!!I individual t5l official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under CQlor of law:
L-.sc O'4611$~tT elF Me-ht4IL o~&IC.Mrt:NS, tw~ ~sc.(((6SS b.itD~ or M.'l~=Cu-Ai­
~"(~~G \4&t{f~ I ResvlTerl>:rN l~\V~O=$1 '3:N~1 A;IIi> ~&~pJf,. Ae~ O:\~

CV-66 (7197)

CIVILRlGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 4 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 6 of 32 Page ID #:18
CLAIM I The follovving civil right has been violated:
7/1; /1h~/p-lLj 4e-"J:(rctL je74:r/Yc-§ ~~ ~~G"cJ .6V 774Y Jue
hess..$ eq"tiO W-1S J/.ro47i~ .dV //1'5 Jc:.4¥d~73 ~.v riVe t?~'<~7,kV &'r T/$- k /'h~G6F.S c;,C/A/'T)/ ~U~.L cMr,i,

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly. in your own words. and without citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnbe. in separately numbered paragraphs. exactly what each
DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
-r/~1 "{-'~,<yA /'1pL::rA/,If ;feTe-ii wffll tY~~SS .¢ttfLr6€-A/~bL ~-ILreg.' .T,v/e,yT
# 4 ,(e-e,{Z9"SS ):&-.1,1(8&-".<) (?J# /I~:rIlVh-ErJ ~j; ~~L .js7j;PYG-i9
£r6H7J.. wlz?,q ~ bsW' 7&tr 7& ~If)O ~¥'G/s.J &~7V ~~ cU::rt. w# cuv)e-,( frJ6~ ~d..<7 t?.(J~,( 7i:> ..wr' ;PA"oq< .s'lfe~6t
~~M t?7//i//d{. 77k~ t:>?/dftb ...T,v "'77ie- tl(p-tJ.rfWI-t. :7..v7..#'(s- 4<1711'{= dPT¥ ~~.s '##i-F~FS ~".vzY ~~~J. V'~, zt¥6" //,IJ'~~
W-'fS rJ~('d /P £:rl/F" A-N-tl cf/I#r/ t?-'I/ '" t'.,.vu$""@ r4oa(,r::,~

Y<~d7&f5?VT A'e-ucdZ€d rAt' ~~~~~ .6~ ~-¥' 7' ~ 'i£~7&L?!:. -'/N4 (!./MOA/TC. .s//o(,(/~6'!( hrA/,
*Ifthere is more than one claim, describe the additional claim(s) on another attachedpiece ofpaper using the same outline.

CV-66\1f97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 7 of 32 Page ID #:19
..

D. CLAIMS'" The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM!

. Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without

citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnoe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each

rIv'(Ke- ~A DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your righL

("f,) /v'IIII4/d sI

wr771

6-{D&S

..ve-6'6kw~F<.

~K-/r~G .:rN/~~j

. '~-.5S .J.r4'<G~~ or /lit ;iF-7Zr.#. )e7#k~§:.t'~, w//e~ c.f//t!Y

7iP'G'" ./pJ 4v6G-M /Jwv'7Y' ~e-A/~ ;:;r~L. w-# vNo.

*If there is more than one claim, describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same
outline.

CY-66 [1/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 8 of 32 Page ID #:20

D.·cLAiM.s*
The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

Supporting Facts: Include au facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and withriut
citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnoe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each
DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
".f;' Zej 1AA..o!JLA"sKf i\C\Ii~ vJJ::r\\. &...o~s. tJ.eb\s(,.gl\l.c-b / M~\J;c.h :1:AiTe",J: AIJA.
He- gg:.KLE&S 'b"l:&&eb-~ o~ tJ\'f ~~:-rO:A-L \ 6\A-:r:NeE' ,ttbt-4'TS, 'WI{~N

erN" '1~'l':\t: A1'6

RDb-u.LM;pN$ 'c )A..~"ehl\ p. C. SeE \I-\OMA~ "" ~A~A •( cL{ -o81\1.{~-

"h\)(sKx.) f~otl\ o"1/IJ../oft, 1'~&1..l o1/17/ob ::!M ,1.\:6 tl\e\.~CAL 1NT~\\E. ArteA of

,\\6" lo;, ~b-eles c..oUN'':{ C.et\lIIlA-L :\~\..:., Il-\G ~lA-'rNT~Fr 'Y-41\~ foltu:.&

r

>

A.C,C6S.~ \0 \}~s~c.. \~\lM!\N lJee-hS 5u.f..\! AS A Se~ 'BlANK.t:ITj ):xLL6WI

HI\~~\:\

F
/

~t.l~

r
"l:N."l\,ll\rb4..>

'Il..\;rATM~:r

&Ss.u.l.Jc~;

:ttd

yertMANTe:'"

*Jf there is more than one claim. describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same outline.

CV-66 (7/97)

CIVIL RlGHTS COMPLAINT

PageS of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 9 of 32 Page ID #:21

· .
D. CLAIl\.fS*
The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider importa.i:Jt. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without
citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnoe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each
DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
I:Ll·") boN. l.<NABE' Ac:teb N'I.'\t-\ (,b'O~S Neb-lr&G"t~G i MAhU! :rNleW &A11.. ktllt5~ , h~'i;)ru;&AiLb. of ~'l ):>tte-=TtE\... bE\I'\~~E~ it~~~\~, wl-t-Ekl HE" \<....te:w :0" q:

*If there is more than one claim. describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same
outline.

CV-66 (7/97)

crvn.. RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 ofo

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 10 of 32 Page ID #:22

D. cLAtMsi:
The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and withOut
citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnoe, in separately II!lIDbered paragraphs, exactly what each
DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
(~1 t\rc..\\ PlGL 't>. A"lToklo\ll:c..l-\- ~e...\E~ v.l't'\-\ (,./l.o~S I\l& l:rt't (,etVcG I MA-lx:~t; "':t~15",T AN~ Rge!lless \'t~R.6C:rp,.~b> or ~'t ~tte-"TR.~A.L \efll;r"lEE R't.<:rl{-T~·. -wH-611t tic;we"" "l1-tA-T \1-\.; Lru J\.-tL-sLG$ to",,,",! CeM\ft.A-L ~A"T.L wAS .W\l~ER.. f6~~tA-L
Cown ott\.eA.. \0 r:,lDl' Flooe.. S\eehN&,J AtJ ~ t4l>L6 \) \0 l:N.t:\Xf\.\&' ANY

=s\\~> }\AA6H- A.Nb J:Nj\A.B.ro""s. ,,,!CAT""sMT &e-.su.LlcO 3"N )r:.(MIWAlcr
~&4. Y~'P4 \0 '\\-\e ~lAr,:rr~fv;, ,tINJ ~c.y.Te O'hhu/.J6?( ~

*If there is more than one claim, describe the additional c1aim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same
outline.

CV-66 (J /91)

crvn... RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 11 of 32 Page ID #:23

The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

... .. - -------------------~

~ ~.

-...~..-.=-~ ...-.--~.-.~~----

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and withOut

citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnbe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each

DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.

[~I LU.b'l ~AI!4 Ac.. 6

1.,1-\-' oSs. 1\16 ll: b-6N,c..,- MA,\t'u:r :r~6M-r ANI

R.ocI~ls-~$ h.-x.~REiG,.A-!U). of ~'l ~1l6 -TIf..~A-L heTI\-~N&G j4b-t+T.S. wf-(EJ\I HE

.

.

*1/ there is more than one claim. describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same

outline..

CV-66 [7/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 12 of 32 Page ID #:24

\'\.\.w
c..L~uc..G vuA.l ~l:t:L~e:k ?:.'l A.lcI\..lFeA.S-o.MOC Acllbh.l ),'1 \"-&~EtElJ~A::rr­ ~M --r\.\-S- ~Lr:i:T~O,-J ~ F'Tf+E ~ Il-~&-&L~ C.Wt.l'r'-l Ce-.?iltttL ::ra.L-
\
.su't~L~ ~Z-~ ~

Lt= l2..urrob.'-I c::-~.:>Lrr:LD""i AT '\'-is L~ ~..u.~lt:..~ Ccu;.;:N e.e,J\L~:rtl:l:L ~CSs.wn~b.. :t:Wl \llAhth\'==P's Ml>.\:r.I!...tDUS. ~N'::ru.t.:t:-E3.. . DIU 6~/D\ J~L. CDUA.i"\'-1

~\.\eu~\: i:M)lo"e8"S..M.c~b-ruG~ "\lh; ~LA~.,.i\r-FI= \0 Ll::\l~"':rN ~b\0LE

.J.50LJ c.t2LL ",-lD_ .:t"t...IJ.l::h6;;'"t\\.~ '"':lA.L c...e\l '\\t-E:: '\LA.~ulrFF u.All

L~\Il:>\..l\s... ~W\of\.d... tl.b'UlT~T CLCM..l:-t\lb-S J "-I\.l~ G.o:r-,Jb-~ ot= LA-H I

k'h Mctia J QDA.d-h:,~, A'-JA

A-hlT :lilh:.-g-A-TX:D.~... tu../L'lI-l-eMortP) ~~L:rns:-

\\~e t.~l\ i..uA..\~ v...l~S Ll::~:t:J\.lbl ~k.lh.. ~L~S-~::J:-..J 6.. AIl.DU.\J~ "\\.-\-&""

h \ub~ ~r1..Ji?~ ~u. I\l\iT:l:;O,,l, '-(\\£ ).L~~rt- f:" CDI\A\I!.ZTt;: lrLF

t"LDJ\A \l4.~ M ~'\\L~ \-\. g- W.I.\cL oS. \ C; g-'U:t>.U L- DAl. -n-itr'r ~ ~ tl..A u.l

rellnr",\.M~ .s'i.~,J bl::~c..£)\OIlIL h-o,w k l\..iLou.u '\\b ~LA.r..:i"\rFF~ ..LhJA...U:;!

-Ul..::&i-l l:ri..o~A1 A:L~A.S.. \'~E )LA-b'\.tr"I:'FF '\.UAt Will!b~ TD lr-v&""

rlU. ll-l~1C; \-\DU.~~ (!of\Jh.iT~o.Jl roL 4.5 hA.Y.s.. u ...tT:t-L \u.~

(l~L0 ""fDtU.E.l '\:\.\c (icu.'\..L\'I. :!"1\-:t;L ~~\IY\1:>U~~llLt'l...\.Dtt1 iO (~.t&A-.JJ

jA.AAt;\L'Lb:J o...'-.lh i=.'ll.:.,-yy\~~~ \')\~ ~~\ I A.....!l ~v~eA1Ti :Th.d~~1;.

k. \'\~15" ~ I\l I A....t w\~\uU;;-

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 13 of 32 Page ID #:25

\"~ ~\...u., 'b€\LrtJe~ ..i\I:l='F\. ""(ILE-\l1::L\..\'" \.s:b\l\~ SE.c..u.LEh "Yl~ \\-\:E ~"E ~~BS..C.

l:." c.l..~\..l.si; --..I\l.~ -.J~D\...~t::~

tJ\:r~~n..SA..l\l.c..E k<!ho,J ~i \~ 'hErlSl\.lh..A-rJr"

...c1l.1. -\\l~ =~.aLA..-\.kDlI1. b~ M.E~u~L ~SL\l:LIL~ ~-r "\\-it;, Ld.. ~{,...j;"1 F$. ~y

l!.eullLA...L :::r..rLw

u.1 ~/!)\....l::c!"I>..L~t:> ~. ~rJQ_:d~ ......E2'~ ~n.o.1S.. J.od" \:rGeA1l!"B J IV\ ~b:-~b :nlT&..Tr, il.,J~

L ~-.L o~efl.S.:t.G-IIT rl'\l. 'f'~rl~,J.(,... \ b '>lEt1:1='1 II-l-A.T\I~E' Al~fleo~u, A:\2:1
t+eA..L't'lt- C!~ ~Ei').atIlVu;~-~~ "1':rM.B..u. rD\\Dw-U~ OIU \ir:S. otbGfS

b. "l" 'h ~t;!:'u..L\I2'n -rl'.l ~h.h::u;ou~ 'I:".ili.l.U~. f:::;tu D9 /I~ / c.~ ....O.\.-~ XI\-~:tFF

"hl t\-S th B~"t"t!.AL\"''' IN aL.1. Q.\"EO

ouoll.. £l\J U-Q...J E;;2. ~u. w ~:rcJ..l- Hb

\\~~ flo. W\DI\l\HL~ ~!L~t:r\ou""'\"t='h YVl2h:r:c-~l::D"J. )1lof:r.LA-r/\ I ttL

'\\-IS )lA.:ru\l:FF lD \1-AN" }. ~-rL." Me-k:t-t<t-\~ tOL A,kMi?lWl~ dt=

\\-tlA ].\..r::o\ ~~s.un.EJ \~A.hcl'~J A:tlAl t\Lt:h ~FW)[ t:UE:A-~~" \~WC\J~IL

au" '""t\\Q ~LAr.1lt:FF b.l:1. UDl ~E~t;.

l"I\S-'1l:~M:t-£)Al fOIL lh~t;:

Ml2b~ C-oAlh\ro.-J ~ 1bIL I.H ~A,."S. ~L.,-It-£IVlD,u; I \wb..Li.:... -rli.:r5:..

g" cU...O\tb...l --;:\\~ ')LA~;rr'd-1- :t:l..i"fOLMt?~ 'illE hCLloL AlkJT 6LiC~
~~L.,.. \~\'LD~G~ J A""~ A- LsFT BuA. IDD"r-U rrLh.Ll,.. r~Ll.rl\A~
6~' ->C.u ~,u.LJA..LJ D~ ~oo'1 ~--J c.vuLT 6L~~--t \D '\+iE \&lfAL
b.';).Y:\M~-r \\ie; ~l~hl\rFtiw~t LelU. DLAL {u~bi:.Lj
Q."-M.D~rUb- '""1\ie- lOOl\·t \\.eLA.0~G ~T l-l-~ ~MC.E~e1., AU/1 ·~SLA..,,~k

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 14 of 32 Page ID #:26 c..\.. A.~w\.. "I:I:r
hWb \[) '\\l.£ "-ALi.. r..¥ )i.bM~ '~M~ --rill ..~k\rD~J -n.b:~ Gu-z\
CL}...l3l ~\....{.t::> ~\.Lo..wbh \\~t=: )\..~A.l\:r:~ (Uue..U \l) -ALl. 't'h:: CAllE" \>\l~s.t:C~A-rJ. Vf\.L \.L..se.J-.l. Q.6~uITsh hA. -,-\-I.a '?~l:>\LlI;t-F ~A.lL\.,I ~£l.I?:r:\J.J:x..l&r

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 15 of 32 Page ID #:27
·E.REQU, ESTFORRELffiF
I believe that I am entitled to the followjp.g specific relief:
<!..orJ\":t'-1u:rl\l(,- bI'\-MA.&e:S of 't'\t:S:j(.'"N-II+l(eb \\~O"""~~N& kal\A&?, r tcl flchb~otJ, \l.\.a ~LA-p':t\L"fF BsQus,::r f\.l~nl:'\IG b.ftM~6-6:> of \,1{L.el5'- J{~Atbtte/) A-MA ,lhfL\'{- \\tt.e5 \1\0 ,,~AN f> \011 It\,(,S .
-~--------------.-.:.:...---~,~---~~

(Date)
CV-66 (1197)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPl.A.llIT

Page 6 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 16 of 32 Page ID #:28
,, .
' ..

EXHIBIT COVER PAGE

EXHIBlT

Descriptio~ of this exhibit:
t..ou~\: ""e-\];.e-M.. o{t.h:~L,

.# .
\..eM.~~'- Le1'T6l..,

b. p........ LL.Q. 'rM.s

,Y fot. b./I,f/\A.l:rS 5 \0 ?crtso"",, 0((.. \>/t.o ~61l.

~ u B.M.'3-'fTs-b. \'D

\l\..~ Lc>u.-.l,\:'i c:> t::: \..c.!;.. ~1"\.lG-6L6S ~

Number of paQes to .this Exhibit: _1.:.-.'"\..:......,...._ pages.
JURISDICTION: . (Check only one)
o Municipal Court o Superi'or Court
o Appellate Court
o State Supreme Court
~ United States District Court
o State Circuit Court o United. States Supreme Court o Grand Jury

~.

ICase 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR DoMcEumDeICntA3L FOileRdD1E1R/07/08 Page 17 of 32
1
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Page ID #:29

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
PIA1NTIFF
Vs

CASE NO. 5/1 c/,6c? 3 ) ~__

BKG#

9 /v~_I''f J'o.....:"b=/_ __

DISTRICT

Il;At(,rZ~d {;/'// ~/'i be. ,DEFENDANT

DEPARTMENT __ ;3____

ro THE SHERIFF (IF THE COUNTY OF LOS f.~!GELES, AND MEDICAl, SERVICES, LOS Ai"GELI:~
COUNTY JAiL:

WHEREAS, the above-named defendant has moved this court for an order requiring a medical examination or ~r·~cific r.wdi(~:d trc:)tmcnL

NOW, THEREFORE, the above-named defendant appeZITs to need the following:

fi,( Medical Examination

ADental Examination

Specify treatment: Ciitffi'/1,;/li/k</v iii/)L 64;:5'£:.5:..f /f':;f.//

I '¥/ ! ,-)
(~.o/

o HIV Testing (pursuant to 1202.1, 1202_6 p.e, 199.96, 199.97, 199.99 H&S).

o AIDS Education Class to be completed on or before

(date).

~The Court does wish to be advised of the results on or before
o The Court does not wish to be advised of the results.

( date).

DEFENDANT ORDERED TO RETURN TO COURT: _____________(date).

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED.

L-:-/.
D.,\TED:.

JUDICIAL OFFICER: ____.k(£/'-t/:-...v.(hc-'~Z'?.£.LL')L,~ __

)

Signature!Stamp

ROem P. O'NEIll

COlJrt Address:

8 Department LX-
Airport Branch COLIn
1170 I s. LaCienega Blvd_
Los Ange-les, CA 90045

FAX TRANSr-.-UTIAL DATE:_ _ _ _ __

By:

FAX 10 Sheriffs Dcpanment. Medical Recor<.lS: FAX# J1.!31 620:13lJ<'S rtr '.:! -" ~2~ Place [oml in Coure fil, afr,·, I.-i.\ rronsllulwL
n~P.v 11"-:1') ~ ( ' )

· .
Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 18 of 32 Page ID #:30
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRA TION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713

RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.
County Counsel

May 14,2008

TELEPHONE (213) 974-1913 FACSIMILE (213) 687-8822
TDD
(213) 633-0901

Maurice Olivier #F83603 C.S.P. Bldg. B-5 Cell 107 P.O. Box 5002 Calpatria, California 92233

Re: Claim Filed: File Number:

January 16, 2007 07-1050420*001

Dear Claimant:

This letter is to inform you that the above-referenced claim which you filed with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors was rejected on May 13, 2008.

An investigation of this matter fails to indicate any liability on the part of the County of Los Angeles. Accordingly, your claim was rejected on that basis and no further action will be taken on this matter.

STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT YOU BE GIVEN THE FOLLOWING "WARNING":

Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. SEE GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 945.6.

This time limitation applies only to causes of action for which Government Code sections 900 - 915.4 required you to present a claim. Other causes of action, including those arising under federal law, may have different time limitations.

HOA411633.1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 19 of 32 Page ID #:31
Maurice Olivier #F83603 May 14, 2008 Page 2

You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you desire to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately.
Very truly yours,
RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.
::1Jooosel

HAN:jm

Principal Deputy County Counsel General Litigation Division

HOA.411633.1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 20 of 32 Page ID #:32
I
DECLARATION FOR SERVICE BY MAIL

STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles

I am and at all times herein mentioned been a citizen of the United States and resident ofthe County of Los Angeles, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to nor interested in the within action; that my business address is 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall ofAdministration, 500 West Temple Street, City ofLos Angeles, County ofLos Angeles, State of California.
That on the 1Lf..r!i day of May 2008, I served the attached "Notice of Denial" of
claim upon claimant by depositing a copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in a United States mailbox in Los Angeles, California addressed as follows:

Maurice Olivier #F83603 C.S.P. Bldg. B-5 Cell 107 P.O. Box 5002 Calpatria, California 92233

and that the person on whom said service was made resides or has hislher office at a place where there is regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and the place so addressed.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed

on

this

1LLt!L
I T

day

of May

2008

at

Los

Angeles,

California.

~ur'ek

HOA.404292.1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 21 of 32 Page ID #:33
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713

RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.
County Counsel

June 12, 2008

TELEPHONE (213) 974-1841 FACSIMILE (213) 617-7182 TDD (213) 633-0901

Maurice P. Oliver F83603 CSP-BLDG B5 #107 P.O. Box 5002 Calipatria CA 92233

Re: Your Request for Documents Received May 23, 2008

Dear Mr. Oliver:

In reply to your undated request for documents which was received on May 23, 2008, enclosed please find the following:

1. A copy of your claim filed January 14,2008, and multiple amendments thereto.

2. A copy of our letter to you dated May 14, 2008.

The other items requested by you are exempt from disclosure under Government Code section 6254, subd. (k), as they are protected by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine.

Very truly yours,

RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.

::unJjMA, IV~ 7 ~ Deputy~~nty H. ANTHONY({LIN

Principal

Counsel

General Litigation Division

APPROVED AND RELEASED:
~~~lo~unsRel,JR

HANlsb Enclosures

HOA.529868.1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 22 of 32 Page ID #:34
DECLARATION FOR SERVICE BY MAIL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles I am and at all times herein mentioned been a citizen of the United States and resident of the County of Los Angeles, over the age ofeighteen years and not a party to nor interested in the within action; that my business address is 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall ofAdministration, 500 West Temple Street, City ofLos Angeles, County ofLos Angeles, State of California.
That on the ILfg. day of May 2008, I served the attached "Notice of Denial" of
claim upon claimant by depositing a copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in a United States mailbox in Los Angeles, California addressed as follows:
Maurice Olivier #F83603 C.S.P. Bldg. B-5 Cell 107 P.O. Box 5002 Calpatria, California 92233 and that the person on whom said service was made resides or has hislher office at a place where there is regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and the place so addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this ;tit!!- day of May 2008 at Los Angeles, California.
~ur- e~
HOA.404292.1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 23 of 32 Page ID #:35
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES

(OUNTY or LOS ANGELES

TO PERSON OR PROPERTY

Li'!2TR\LCIlQNS~

o

1. Read claim thoroughly.
2. Fill out claim as Indicated; attach additional information if necessary.

-.....J

3. Please return this original signed claim and any attachments

supporting your claim. This form !1"IltS! be signed.

DELiVER OR US MAIL TO:

EXECUTIVE OFfiCER. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. ATIENTlON: CLAIMS

500 WEST TEMPLE STREET. ROOM 383, KENNETH HAHN HALL OF

---r-.--a-.- t~Mr.r=-i;is:r- "M-ist'S>' A~ADMMTINp:IS-T-R-ATION,
_____.____ . ________. ____ ..Qb.V!f...__ ._

lOS ANGELES, CA 90012
.~~~__~f!l~"I";N;'t'"

lo.WHvoovoua:A;;;«:~~f~'iLi.i-C--"--'--
_': ."",', ~:F·".\8'l!'~ (t..Jll. ~l..jlHf.''''

't,,_(,_. 2

\AID..D<RJe.S~-S

OF

(l'-lMANTi l~noRNEY
!:.<. :.tf.-..··

___

ll>l. ".j,;!·:·~,·A .-;.-",.11/

':'d "~h,," {'tll,v,},',1 ,,,,It-_;(,!4 :.\.

Slmt-·--~-------··-·-"

CIt'i.St.ne

IIp(ode

h'O••,ETmPHt.iii"i:----'

!. B1Jsit,tS$ Ttl£J>HOOC"

bt. _\{'> "'ht~h,,\ \~ \JM.~' I \4 Ull-1/t.v,

D

___ · o:t. { ClJ,MAW-saiRiiiooc:----....· .N' u. t<

- ~ ~U"Mt.'fSSOCIAt.s<CURITYNUMH9'------- 11. ~~jO~NTYEM~OYEES!O~~~.~ENT~------~---

; ~ q ~ • I) ~/~ Co. ~ I \o!t

I>"'OlVED IN INJUl!YOR DAMAGE IlfAPPLICABlEI'

':'~:':l~Z'='""~;~'~'V_ ;1:~11:;~ :==---=-:F.~I<A1.\~jI'(

__I::... L_ "".J <, __~-ili,--~~,:: -:t."'l:~~ .. ~.~~ ~L_ '6-WHE~DlD DA"i.fJiG£ORi~ji·iP.y OC(UR)- --!V\

-- -

-- - - --- -~ ~-- - - -~- l"i. WHltESSfS TO DA.MAGEOR l~JUhY~ UST Alt PERSONS AND AOOfIESSB---- ----

tC.

Atft /It..

Of Pl'RSON' KNOWN TO HAIlE INfOllMAOOr;,

_______ . .

~~~ \ i) AII Itfi ET~~_.c't;..__~ ~ bJ!~~~L~_.__ 'ttJ ;.,): AM.

·------::.==-rHCNE

..

-- .----...--.

'1 O£sc;mBE lNO£TI\H..~'OWO.v.~AGEORINJURYOCCUHA.m

lJ}OOl:'SS

------

TOTAL [Sl1MATED PROSPECIl\'E OAMAGfS;

----- . . -- ..- - . - - - - - - . . -...---------------------c::-:-:-::~=___-----------WARNING

. CLAIMS fOR DEAni,Ii'lJUIIYTO PERSON ORTO PERSONAL PROP~RTY MUST BE FILED NOT LATER niAN & MONTHS AFT1iR niE O<:CURENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2)
. ALlOTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THE OCCURReNCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2)

- $UIIIECT1'() CeRTAIN EXCEPTIONs, YOU HP,VE: ON\.YSIX {~l MONTl-IS fROM Tl-IE PATE Of THE WRITTEN NOTICE OF RIUEtTlON OF YOU!! CLAIM TO FILE ACOURT A.CTION. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 945.6)

... IF WRITTEN NonCE OF REJECTION OF YOUR CLAIM IS NOT GIVEN, YOU HAVE TWO III YEARS FRO TO FIL£--A COURT ACTION: (GOVERNM£NT CODE SECTION 945.6)
.. ii-p~'Tif:I'fN'A~r------·--······--··-··-·--·- ·-----~-·---~--·--'--'---DATt---

\"-,\,·ttt~

D! f,it i.e','J

ACCRUAL Ol'THE CAUSE OF ACTION

. ,It. .• ::!'. f-,- ; Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 24 of 32 " P. a}ge ID #:36

5T~Fr

II. t4. 7 !,i,~.,i.,1fl,t7; 6:r-'.~'"
!oft!~i,) 06 V~

b frH{ S :t ~

A· {(

M'\ It\ •....h'\'i."""l' (.'

A·

~~:;';.:.('\ q-f &;r/,', N~(~IJ:~,.j.:'i;" I ANi1 \1'1.4:l!q: 1!N.1~MTl

,~,h~.J .-n··,t:;: t l.v~.1 t~ A~!ht,:G ~ll'\/~~r 1ht<·'~' J-to ~t.~! ___C~ !~I~~) s
E:.'cY~lesh '

, ,

07-111.j ••

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 25 of 32 Page ID #:37
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES

(OUr,flY OF LOS ANC,ELf'"

TO PERSON OR PROPERTY -- ,.,

1. Read claim thoroughly. L Fill out claim as indicated; attach additional information if necessary. .J Plea<e return this original signed claim and any attachments
supporting your claim. This form m\Jst be signed.

llEliVEH OR U5 MAIL TO:

EXECUnVE OFFICER. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AITENTION: CLAIMS

500 WEST TEMPLE STREET, ROOM 383, KENNETH HAHN HALL OF

_______ AD~I~~A_TI~~:_:Os ANGELES, CA 90012

~)974-1~_0_._

r.-.'a"

1_~~~_r~_-~l~:~~__ ~r~_~~I~~'E~~:.J.\;:'R~~A~;fl

'"A';v "~W~t~;"_~1J~~r"'I:_L~"f~~ AI ;;_~___~~_"-Jc F Ii

;:'~~~A£S~._r~~~~:.:_-~_n0~;rti:'~,J ;~l f~_~~ l~~!:_} ~~_i:__ ~,_~!l~ ~.~_. _ ._~~__~__~:~~_______~:~_>~~.:~.:~ ~ t •.:: ;{

__ _

! __-___

__ ____ •

. .:. _ _}. f' ... - .. -------- '_~~r) ~. ~ .~- HO-ME--mr-rl-!(-'l'~-~f:.1...".... __

__..: .. _ ',0.......

("!tl\ <;I;~' :1 ,""
·······-----rmiSf~{c..=:i~l.fpH5N[

___________~_fb_-(_OOI_~_::.

. , . 1 ~ CL,;.\-:~4_~' -.-----t----~--~~\..-·~,;-i-,.-.-..--,-,--"--;r-;;--'-f-"'".'...J.!;.it·i·t--.--H ·•--r-·-"--'---~---------f

L J J L J u d ____:~ ______ l.-.C "'.( G Slt~1J ~~ b"';'W~""; ::. _CJifo.!ij!:-.I_::n~'

J. (~IM.<\NT·5 OI!f1rlD~-Tr:

kI ClJ\!MANn S~)UlIl S-KUr.iTY tWMBfR

__ __ ,,_L.t...l;lf.d..:~_-~ +~

~~_~ J_]_~t1_.=

J\t~!"l :; OAT?

_ _ _ _• _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
nMi:Oi- +N' mFNl

____

1,~.-

~ l!

:..

1ji·~1i1.\\NlINAl-M-J-'E-OS.l.OV-f-f-DA-I-NN-!V-N-JC-UO-fU-\t;Y-.-'OT-PY-.;UEtAMMPIl\OGY~\ElEfS

lAND THEIR DEPAflTMEN1'51
I\PPU-j-C->o\'ff-lVl£!r-----

;,.;

--n-'·t'.m--tilf~n--- nn-"'DfP-i-------

~--t;-HEf{ii)iG-

f~;A~:t"(,-{tjk

t-~j

,lj~f(
..

!:i;~C!

In:

-----------~----------ll!-~'LWirNEssti'TO A~L . - •..

DAMAGEo6iliIURY'lIST P£OSONS AND AfJOiiiiK,sn.-

4", ~ A,j~,

----------. _";i:~:X_~~~l.::.. :,~~,~. J.- 11:\ ~}. ~"f~ L

OfPE~S{JN$.KNOWNTOHAV£INFORMAnON

c ("Y~'A ,-~~-~--------:-:-·--;~::~~~:{d·~t~----N7~_:--lPHONE

j~ ric:cr,iBfIf./nEf;.·i;.-j~C·W-f)A!,1-it;[O;!-i:;I)ijfi;:;_X(ljRRtD:--

.. '.: ;.; ;,<,1 t.:___~~~.~:_·_~~_.~~ ._j~~g ~~'1;' ~~_~_~Q_r~_ \\~ i't ~ _.~~~_:-~__~[:'.

___

~

_:

___

I
.-1_11!.:~t~

__

'c
._':~,.~~_~__:o

* _
___?~~_.:___:_.

__

~_

jADDRES!:
:ii"ME---~

-jr-H{~..j[----·

----~------.---
_________ _

TOTAL ESTtMA.TtD I'RQ!;PEC!M: DAMAGES:

WARNING

CLAIMS FOR DEATH, INJURY TO PERSON OR TO PERSONA~ PROPERTY MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE OCCURENU. (GOVERNMENT CODe SECTION 911.21
ALL OTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THE OCCURRENCE, (GOVERNMENT CODe SECTION 911.21

~UBJE<;T TO CfRTAIN EXCEPTIONS, YOU HAVE ON!.Y51)(16) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE WRITTEN NOTICE OF REJECTION Of YOUR CLAIM TO FILE ACOURT ACTION, (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 945.6)

F - IF WRlmN NOTICE OF REJECTION OF YOUR CLAIM IS NOT GIVEN, YOU HAVE TWO (2) YEARS FROM ACCRUAL OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION TO FILE ACOIJRT ACTION, (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 945.6)

!4~flqj"Nfi1lfT'fP[ NMU-------

<~ .~-~----!1S-!.!GNA-i'UfiEOFctlilM~ANTE~R50NF1Ufk-;-O:..(Hi~jHW~E'""BBIEH-fT;,G'"'V'"I"irli<------

Iv\l\v~':"';;

r-.\. >

()\,.,Jl&( ()i/1!1~1--.-1 ,-- -~ ~- \

•

I

; RflATtOMH!PTOCll\IMA '

~ - ------------

----

----- -

~_ ~ ~~~

,.

4 - ,1"'" ~ ::..::....

-

---- ~ --~~·RfVISEU4700-- ---

. .

-.:it )-.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 26 of 32 Page ID #:38

07-119 ..

HE ~\;,\(E- \') MG ON ',~e lOb AN (;,. € IE} (;0",..;7,( .sf.{ fiA ~ ~~ r ~
~6~~;r\1t\&~t· SElF.. KC'~tc~TrorJ ~ltoGj(!sM 0", ihAT ~/ne·
"o~"e(, "1 ~'l\) "'oT ~ECEf\/~ AN'! me ~.c.A1l:o.1\) Fo.",
m'l~ \-t6'A~TI-\ YJ'!o\'\&v\£ v.A SelF 1f\EAs VNTJ;L. '0 ~ 30·0<0. ""''t.$ AC\TON CO;J5T'lrtlT~S b'(o.sS tJ6blrfN~Er ON ,hE PAAT
oF the:- A~~sTM--rlil)N aF '\.¢s \'ltob"ArV\~ F\1.<'The-l!¥It)'t<€,
1~$"> \..""f56 l;.f l~M.6 t>F 0,,6-... A .N\O~iTt+ I <?Av$t!f ~ m& $·e"IGP,.6 P~:rN I ~N ~ StI'FFeM:WAi:r #

~j

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 27 of 32 Page ID #:39

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY

07-118

""',i ,'"

!,'1 II: 36

o
...... 1
I
t-I' t-I'
CO
•.a
:::r
"

------------,----------
-------------------
lOTAL£SfIMATEOPRQSP£cnV£ DAMAGES;

THIS CLAIM ,MUST aE SIGNED NOTE~ PRESENTATION OF A FALSE CLAIM IS A FELONY (PENAL CODE SECTION 72J
- ____"'C'C----------'-,. ---------------
WARN1N§

- CLAIMS FOR DEATH,INJURYTO PERSON ORTO PERSONAL PROPERTY MUST 8E FILED NOT LATER THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE OCCURENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECf10N 911.2J
- ,All-OTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES MUST 8E ~ILEO NOT LAT£R THAN ONE Y£AR AFTER THE OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENT Ct)DE SECf1o.. 9t 1.2)

- S\iIiJECT TO CERTAINEXCEPTtONS, YOU HAVE ONLY SIX (II) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THEWRIITEN NOTICE OF REJECTION
OF YOUR CLAIM TO FlU ACOURT ACTION. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 94U)

-- IF WIIITTEN NOTICE Of REJECTION OF YOUR CLAIM IS NOT GIVEN, YOU HAVE TWO (2) YEAIISFROM ACCRUAL OFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

TO F1L~ ACOURT ACTION. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIQN 945.6)

,

;W/hILJ:'e.G~ (/Av.t~ j., PRJNTOR'fYiiEi'iiJ.\E-----
__ /

/~A~DAVT.1'~~..z7:....J.'..t..~..e..~.J~.'~~~'~E~..~c=~~\-. ING

5 4106

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 28 of 32 Page ID #:40

II
.

.. , ..\ \

\,_ ') )(~'i, ~ {,. .;.

07-118~·

f'!I\J\l. ~
I
{lei!)

'-:);"J H"l)vi',!'t

(':>;'l

I\~

•.
\

';,{UIS",

s..v(I'

A~

~

, !

FilA,cM

A «1 t.i

, - ' "'... .1

A~;..t\' L,~FiJt.~\,;'' r~:Of! ,..t \,l}\llt~T '{Ai, 1~\I. I A·",..'.40- L%.;t..;'

P .:h.),f~;\A~\Hi~,J I -Yo Lt.!,:'\' ,l;'.l h,~L'}> \hM.·..·'. t'C!lt .J;.,,; 0. \J ~l t\ .. v

j::N>~t)t: ~\\r,£ {r iV, c,f ~\~\t -lor·:.~T. !~J:~ \.. I Ar.'! 1"1"::<'1.;'

A 'j}f..~ffHN\:iO· ~:""J~~\\i,f '"l~I t CV"',",' II' ("I A"'"tCl> I ' l>1i.4I,';:' I .$t)I.t;i~-r/.iJ~/

At:l~ .. L~~~ ~Al;~ .. ~tt3h;l.JJ.' .~ . A~)~t),:.1 ~. 1htffi:......)l~.';L~~. _.' ...._...

~r!~

t 1CO.L_.

....\~H

'-

f

.. pt.' t\..

A"J": ~

W.6d"i:~

(u(AkJJ~& 7~" .~{

fib eNtiitt Yn V \1 l ~ sot rJ (2j; U ~~.t.'J -lh .4./~~<~'" ..

be.'lJ~"46 ..t:>\!~i: t\.,t M"I SA-F i }<{4J;~/ AI'f.4 v'V~.~~~ -.

01<.1 O~· o~ , (;) <- .~\~~. . Yfl. ci ;'~ ~q\A~".... ~'] II\. ff" .6:1!;t{.{f... .. J)1~: ..

N':! iT AIt.t-j AM ~ 1;(''t AM4 ti,ll~ to~.d· At~''1t> M.~ ~~ Q~e~M) rori,.

Jt.ti: A.,li ~'X;te:.,j' Ad

1< AHh1:~

(h I),,;

S:

;t-.i~~~er.~,F~._.

\\I\'-11"'tl.:;\S} ... , ..,... , ......

ANO ...... ,

__ Fpt( SB\'~.H~HI'\ ~vll~AE ~4ITtt11'\1 -- .....

.,'. .,-... , ....., .... , .. ' .........-.. -

lhG L"t-.i.~~*<.d·:t}i{~~r};liA.) I~~ X .....",;f »1'1 H:lil>1.Ji* ,\'.5 WJ,ll,

A '/f\1.' tN h·(4 v!f z. /'" A I.}~. ""'I he ,.,JuliS,G A-. PCll.iY\ F'(jl(.
Hst. \D:.t~~?~:r 'ft\'1 Cttfi /- blJ} ""ll1E ~e:t>~l'l w,,*,/A

Mol k~'r Hei.,._

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES

P0ag/e-219 o1f 392,.Page ID #:41

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

TO PERSON OR PROPERTY·

i!'J~TRUQJONS:
1. Read claim thoroughly, 2, Fill out claim as indicated; attach additional information if necessary, 3, Please return this original Signed claim and any attachment~'
supporting your claim, This form !lliill be signed.
DELIVER OR U.s MAIL TO: EXECUnVE OFFlCER, BOARD Of SUPERVISORS, AffiNTION: ClAIMS 500 WESTTEMPLf STREET. ROOM 383. KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATlON. LOS ANGELES. CA 90012

;' !/: :;}

IPHONE
--DREs5~------------··--"""""'-------·---··-"- .------------~---
.. - .----- --- .. NAME-·-----------l~--------
13. USTOAMAGESINCURREOTOOATE (a«Ciattach"cQPie; ohe~-;Q7r~ilt-----­
~tlmate3·

------.-'----,
,,;~~TEOPR""P$:TiVf
1'//~4

THISCl.AIM MUST IBE SIQ#JeD NOTE: PRESENTATIOtlOFA FAL$E CLAIM IS AI=ELONY(PENAL COOESECrrON12)

WARNING

- Q.A1MS FOItDEATH, INJURY TO PERSON OR TO PERSONAL PROPERTY MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE ocdi"~ (GOVERNMENT CODE !leCTION 911.2)
- ALL OTHeR C1.A1MS fOR DAMAQeS MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AfTER THE OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENTCODE
SECfION .n.21

, SlllUliCTT(I CIIRTAIN RXCIlPTlONS, YOU HAVE ONLY SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATEQF THE WRITTEN Nonce-OF REJECTION OF YOUR a,AIMTO FILE A COURT ACTION. (GOVERNMENT COOf:sECI'ION 945.6)

- IF WRlmN NOTICE OF REJEcnOM Of YOUR CLAIM IS NOT GIVEN, YOU HAVE TWO (2) YEAlIS FROM ACCRUAL OF TH£CAUSE OF ACTION

TO FILE ACOU.RT ACTION. (GO\I£RNMENT CDOE SECTION 94$.6)

",

,E

R iD04-106

, ..
Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page0370-o1f 3129~Page ID #:42

'\ooltl vJ€1ILi;; flt \ f\ ~1\:.6'A-\(X:~ \)c-rS f

or \\ 1 \-. I:: \\e p- ~ A£-tteS rllotJ\ \-.\

~.J~N c,.

A l>b:.~v\'l S-r~(>~ ON l"hEV'A oN

Af1 vJ6rl
&(,'1.>685 " ~j1-(J..- c:>Gv

AS
"B e c..l'r.v Sb
A-N ~ The ~'

\~e co".1 "SSv E: h p.. ME: b~(;..p. L ott ~6~ ON £>1· 12.. or(

:i

r 10 o"oIA"N ~M6.~G-6t{ e-'-( ~6fL":rC.ES. Ot>J ol-tCf- 4>1( I.

ot-/:30 \>,f'J\. ~ ~fiC.~r-..JG'~ o~.'tL - fwA..(,8fL'I \b ~~;H4\QS

r \"'~1o()\ t* \>\L6' \() ""(he A(T ~T ~6-CA 6: !~f< A~~ fl L'I.

-\'ne,M ON o\-~~-ol\ t v.lAS EX"'fV\l-Nl:!~ ~'/ A E- '/ r;:

-r ~Tot:-f 1) '~o~5:t'-o\ 'i ~'-';Irvt; lSO/IPOe;

!l.

ThG COsT c~\h6 ~\i,J'J~L 'TCD PAP '1".t,.6 ·CoeiT;.A

1'1.

\n1~- l' vJA-5.

~6f1/\oJJE~~

~,.,- '('Y1f1

ovlfll

~7(;)1)·, Ct,)

::io.

-rH. \s,;i(A: k h woP- r<.. p A-I" tl\y &14$Slf'S (Crt ClY(!Ji(

/1_

4 \la.OP. m .w"'~tJl+ -r 6)l~aT 10 ~6 ~'M ~fPJ6~~1

f

;';'

t> toIL \..~1 JU. v;51/ ItS ''The; ~ A:,~ / 14>,../

13,

~v~F~Il-1'MJ& w",'J;'I-s~& c{ ,(;'t1.llJTltS. lFo~ GMfiA friiMC--Y

)'/.

~el.~~; ,

;){,.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 31 of 32 Page ID #:43
""'VERIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ., ::;:~":~:'~~:=~~:=':;~~,:,,'

'COUNTY OF IMPERIAL '

.'.'---:~~~:

(C.c.P. SEC.446 & 201.5; 28 U.S.c. SEC. 1746)

'<'~::':i:::i:.t~~~:;;

"I~ MAugeEj ~- O\r:.~'r::e f-...

DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERiuRY'~'"""-'7'~'-

THAT: 1AM THE

t>BUoN

INTHEAB'OVEENTITLEDAcTiO,N;

"',' " "

I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING DOCUMENTS AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND THE SAME I S ' ,

, TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE, EXCEPT AS TO MATTERS STATEpfrHEREINUPON INFORNiATION, AND '

" BELIEF, AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS, I BELIEVE THEM TO,BE TRL "

' '

EXECUTED THIS

'~1'4 "

DAYOF: --,=,-Oc.=~=O~....,tL=-_ _ _~ 200!

STATE PRISON", CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA #92233-5002

CALlPATRIA "

..
. "..,...
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

'(C.c.P. ,SEC.1013 (a) & 2015.5; 28 U.S.c. SEC.1746) , ' , ' " ,

o.;+er u.: .,' I." \/;·1i;am KLa(lC

AM A RESIDENT OF CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, iN THE COUNTY.~.c:..:~~.-c

@ ,OF IMPERIAL.,STATE OF CALIFORNIA. I AM OVER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS OF AGE AND AM

_ '

A PARTY OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION; MY STATE PRISON ADDRESS IS: P.O. BOX 5002.

", '

CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA #92233-5002.

.

'

"

,

,

, , ,ON Q/OcJ

20((' I SEl~.vED THE FOREGOING:

,,,GC/l1s;6hib;} Gve.r B,I!- "A"

:.~.{. ~ .
(SET FORTH EXACT TiTLE OF DOCr)lHENTS SERVED)
ON THE PARTY (S)HEREIN BY PLACING A TRUE COPY (S) THEREOF, ENCLOSED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE (S)" WITH POSTAGE THEREON FULLY PAID, IN THE UNITED STATES MAIL; IN A DEPOSIT BOX SO ,PROVIDED AT CALlPATRIASTATE PRISON, CAL~ATRIA, CALIFORNIA #92233~5002_

UNi\s~ STA-.\l:7:::>~~L~ C6\J~\

CshTltLr\-'-- bJ:S.l~ at'" C-A-k-toi.M:t-A

3l~ I\.lbl't..~ ~~~b- tt'LeL~

~0bW'\ G- - ~ A '\"'tN ~ ~tLa/.sG CL&>t-1(.

-.",' '

'L..bS- AI"t6-G:Le,>/ c::!....A. 9 DO t ~ <

THERE IS DELIVERY SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MAIL AT THE PLACE SO ADDRESSED. AND THERE IS

REGULAR COMNIUNICATION BY MAIL BETWEEN THE PLACE OF MA ING AND THE PLACE ADD~SSED.

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FO OIN

UE AND C ,ECT.

--.. ....

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 3 Filed 11/07/08 Page 32 of 32 Page ID #:44

District Court Executive and Clerk of Court
Friday, November 07, 2008
MAURICE PIERRE OLIVIER F-83603 P.O. BOX 5002 CALIPATRIA, CA 92233

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-7984

SOUTHERN DIVISION
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4570

EASTERN DIVISION
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450

Dear Sir/Madam:
A Complaint for Civil Rights was filed today on your behalf and assigned civil case number CV08- 7169 JFW (JWJ)

Please refer to this case number in all future communications.

Please Address all correspondence to the attention of the Courtroom Deputy for: [] District Court Judge __________________________________________

~ Magistrate Judge ______~J~e~f~f~r~e~y~W~.~J~o~hn~s~o~n~__________________

at the following address:
~ u.S. District Court 312 N. Spring Street Civil Section, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012

[] Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 411 West Fourth St., Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516

[] U.S. District Court 3470 Twelfth Street Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501

The Court must be notified within fifteen (15) days of any address change. If mail directed to your address of record is returned undelivered by the Post Office, and if the Court and opposing counsel are not notified in writing within fifteen (15) days thereafter of your current address, the Court may dismiss the case with or without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Sincerely,
Clerk, U.S. District Court
JSZABO By:
Deputy Clerk

CV-19 (04/01)

LETTER re FILING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

 </s> Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:101

",.",••e'" ~""H;;, O'-"'-'.rxE~

".:I". c..~~

p, S T.:\G "'-.._...."!'.DIIU·

h" c>frxc.e. 'Ct>")( Sot>;(.
'10.R Il.L.~l2.. !t" .. 'b.
C..h\A.lt:dl", <'...1>. "",,,,33

fDt..63

',.~d""l:N[,.- ~S
0_

CELL -'?oL(

FILED - WESTERN DIVISION CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
AUG 1 '22009

u,1\I.:t'\",\:' -""TAleS ~t~\o..:tc.':T c.ou.lI...\
t" O\lIt..A.L ":t:~1l.!:0 Dr C...L", fO'-AJ"J: A

"'.....O!." ..6 'h:eU-E o\..~":te)(,1
~L .. ~",\"Fr

C-A. SIS 1,\ ",MBe/'{. _<.-J 0$- '11(0,\- !F~ tAC,P.)

,I rc..."

'D (; h t..MEn!

to"," \> LA."l:lI.I.l'l

Los 1I.",6-..L""" Co ",,,,", Il.b"t.'t. bF S ..... ~6t."l.SOltS

c..\.o..~/». "" b ~""II.

'( \10" /J E P , 1Ou.<.\(E;
'< 1..1l>-J ~~D>LA" .1(.'(

t>oAl v..1\1~ \!OS

'_Ib'<\>r~~II". .".,(L"...L~j\

;

I'o"o'Jre.H
C."'UA1'Y

~IIEIll:rF";

\:'E»"~"E.;il

~~""JL blAT" C!b"l>L.",.rr
~v. fLS L.l A-A.J.\' To
Q!j 4 <l. \.I.,~. c.. \ .'183 t::I 1',.-" ..". \I. Sx>< l.l"'~",oWAl A6e.J\s
,\"" u,s. ·,u (\'1'1\")

Lea.b'l i'; AC. ~

-:r 1...0 ";Il.G!.= e.bu....,. i C'.e.,JiJU\.L A..::tL
"o\...""U.i>~o E;lu':'~G<' 1<>,1\., J

I

>::.Gf.....'h..w-~

i

'-'1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 2 of 47 Page ID #:102

FUU.NAME
COMMITTED NAME(Jr~
c.~\'_ ~L\'6- ~S *<0'1 ~o. 1'>0\< 500?x
POLL. ADDIlESS lNCLUD~ NAME OF INsnnmON

PIUSON NUMBER Clfapplieabic)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

'-I. t.", r....('d..-s, c.cu.v.1'i i>o~A oF' "',,'\>e<utioLs..
{,·t","f."t /l. MbL't1-..t /l..
Z."1" aU",' 'b. !.w<!(E
'(.1>0,1."" SI( '<
boo"" \L1\l,o.~E
!'Itt" ...L \:". .6. ~"io"'o,,:r<.H"<!o","",u"C,> -,,~, I A"

c." CASE NUMBER 08-'111.,\ - AF"Y c'A&R.)

T. 1>0 suppli<d by rho Cluk

Il ~-"4 f.\IV\Etl-lh __

")LA--"J:" I,

CIVIL RIGHTS COMJ>LAINT
PURSUANT TO (Check ."")
ti!I 42U.s.C.§ 1983
o Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

A. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

1. Have you brought any other lawsuits in a federal court while a prisoner. jl!I Yes 0 No

2. If your answer to "1." is yes, how many? _-"ot-l=G::-_ _ __

Describe the lawsuit in the space below. (If there is more than one lawsuit, descn"be the additional lawsuits on an attached piece of paper using the same out1ine.)

'"EO CuCCl..,\." 0,," Lc~ A",l,-aES oThe,u.L ~o\.~e.'l of ~LO~E(!.U.\:rJJ/'" rE bEt-jl,L c...\..~e",~ ~'/ :':... to'-M"\~6,j Fait AM ;:NrA"'o..... S, c.I-Vl.,"- ~~<.1L.1.""._iT 10
\""'>.1jl,L t..o\G Sec:\xDA.l t.&J.. \A.lAS P,"i"I:OM I..I.l>.ll>tsll CDLOI!.. o'F LAvJ..

crvn. RlGHTS COMPLAINT

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 3 of 47 Page ID #:103

FUU..NA.ME

COMMITTED HAMS Of differeD[}

"s "- CS~- il,d,.("

~C:( \'-6. I?>ox

PULL ADDRESS INCLUDmG NAME OF INsnnmoN

C~\..,l>.l""Y cA. '\,;[~33

\',OboZ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

-.j.
L.,,< l\u['"L",,, Cou.';;-<'I b\\eLrFF~ 'b,,;~ALI"'E.:;:r[
\..-.0<'0" ~",,-f',
Lc< ~ML..<ok.~ C!..o..c...n'i c..iJl~A.L. -:fl'.L t"'bLl' e..~ tL'?"rb 'E.tJ ~&..w...E. '- \A. b.. ,
~EF"'''~~:

CASE NUMBER
(>-1. 08- '111eC\ -cr£,,-! (A&R.)

To .. "'PplJed by th, Clerk

" ,..:T A.,o '\.

, , - ""

CIVIL RIGID'S CO]l{PLAlNT PURSUANT TO (Cl=ko",)
8 42 U.s.C. §l983
o Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents 403 U.s. 388 (1971)

A. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

1. Have you brought any other lawsuits in a federal court while a prisoner. li!I Yes 0 No

2. 1f your answer to "1." is yes, how many? _-'0"-1.4...6.."'--_ _ __

Describe the lawsuit in the space below. (1f there is more than one lawsuit, descn"be the additional lawsuits on an attached piece of paper using the same outline.)

,.\~'" c...u.ud of" l.",~ !I.",6-EL..s O"f~=""L fuLu.'l or' \>fl.O~e<!.U.\':I:"-'£:" \"..hctAL

c.t.-x t.·£T-n.t; '-l S \!.'( ,;'"ToLIAo£!>:0 tJ t'o L I\I\l ""I".f...1"\0 RS,

I>\l;" ~\.\.LS ,,:rr 1..L... \ 0 \'e: '" /I.L

c.o'!.>;; <;'e.c:\"rb,.( 1..'1.)", wA5. f).C-Iu>N ...",hl;;i. ll.oLD~ 0,," LAvJ.

CV-66 (J 197)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 4 of 47 Page ID #:104
a. Parties to this previous lawsuit:
R Plaintiff MA",p><.8 £g#.G bb,,>ee

c. Docket or case number C",o'\-.:!'11oI-;Sf"l Cosv,r;!")

d. Name of judge to whom case was assigned ->'S"'oC!:l-I"t.J....F"!..:.'-'VV=A"'L"'T""E"',z"'--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

e. Disposition (For example: Was the case dismissed? If so, what was the basis for dismissal? Was it

Yes. appealed? Is it still pending?) '(..-S·.;\8 1.\..5.C..\;/~S3LC.lU)·Y"~-

"\0.01- S('IOIp

f. Issues raised: ""MAL c.p~G ;'<;6;0'" "'$3. "''0\ IITef, J'ltG' t'py:<L.:(..G'> or FEI:\"0<.4L
C;tTqE--I5, 1\,,1:> !ltG .,cihAL. J'",QTgdl:oN of lifE Laws &'M6A",Tec2' 6<=Cu.~~

g. Approximate date of filing lawsuit: ---'~'-'-.".'-''l'_''-'O;..I'__;tc..o;;..::.'''_1.''-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
h.

" ............-
B. EXftA.USTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

1. Is there a grievance procedure available at the institution where the events relating to your current complaint occurred? I!!I Yes 0 No

2. Have you filed a grievance concerning the facts relating to your current complaint? 0 Yes 0 No

Ifyour answer is no,explainwhynot :rAIL A~NlIb"H-r"-ATptt$ \>",6.',,"0 '0 A.T. rd_E 'I.'l:1: $E<.I;o",1

\,\",,·c. .
(·(1 cLA... 5G (,1, II"';:' ;t'll

~
Inl· L ... c.K A"'ll~O".'T'( ,..TI\Tu.To>l.'/' 00. o'Tlt6 .. ""rs.Si To

RE'!:.olYii CONllfTu.\~PI\lAL lJ;.'§,ve'? or hY=s§ tMC!.SSS,

3. Is the grievance procedure completed? 0 Yes ~ No
If your answer is no, explain why not ~YlJ"!,lp-CUJiJ;s.'"'".H..o'"'N""""'......,""='......f..l.S."'b.....,i:I"-"-'-""oA."'·"'l>,.,·...;I...,".''",8".-.1.\~."'E.~..-1t>:..lV,...,.u>Ju..~."'''.-.'.t.._~.1.0",­
AL.(, I1: s",c. t.) 5u.~e!!,S"be- ResluUI:bNS :<M!io~&A ..he, -itt \.\.. ~ _c. "\5 '" ~"'~ 4 ~ -.l,.s.C. I",1e,,,)

4. Please attach copies of papers related to the grievance procedure.

C. JURISDICTION

This complaint alleges that the civil rights ofplaiIJtiff 1'\,,1+4;"-'"

who presently resides at '10

It",,,!> \>,0· ~o g

~",ef,t(<;; Ol"'Y;I;E f.
(print plaintiff's name)
CA

'\;t;\..3.3

were violated by the actions of the defendant(s) named below, which actions were directed against plaintiff at

GL CO -, C..r-.uq.cl r .. '" L I l. sA .... (,. - L = msbtutJ.o City W ere Vl0

A- '- r Fe""M '"

CV-66 [//97)

avu. RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 2 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 5 of 47 Page ID #:105

m on (date or dates) .11o~/'~TI\",&o'1/11Iof", d\;"llo~T~",," lo/.~ /01,. , .qllrID~",(~ 0 I f,{a 10'1.

(claun I>

(CliIiID

ClalIIl )

NOTE:

You need not name more than one defendant or allege more than one claim. If you are naming more than five (5) defendants, make a copy of this page to provide the information for additional defendants.

1. Defendant (,-\..".... "''''->OM Po (fUll name of firit detcndiiit)
'!SOb "IN\. , ...."LiE ~OO ... &~t. \..0' A",(".. LES , c.A '100 I ~ (full address of lint defendant)
l1.o~ 01' $i&"~"'~o* I ru.S\ ~~"T...rrr

resides or works at

The defendant is sued in hisiher (Check one or both): Ill! individual IllI official capacity.

Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

f.~Ly..j!.;; \0 .M\>4",,",,.iT A "o\x~'i 5'416011841, R6lr....Li:),oMf 01\. ~"c:.<StoD"-l 10 C.e~sE

w C""'pov\. pI' "LObi!. '\6""""'(.. A. "n-\-\; \.os ~"'(,. ..

Co,",-"",,! C.. -iTI<.",L :rA>oL.

,,+e;;

2. Defendant ~l!f~~Jha~~~

bOO ...J.IE",\>lii !I.,oM. st.'" Lo' A",("..Les I CA '\00 \?
(full address of lint defendmt>

~¥&~ ( en t'S

ppofSlO5oLn;arned~urief. eitsaoncy)

5ec:.pNC,

buiirq

resides or works at

The defendant is sued in hisiher (Check one or both): IllI individual IllI official capacity .

Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

' e fAll!.>,,;; \0 ~""~\£MENT ,., ~o,-"c" S'"TEM"'.;jl, il-E(,.u..LM:t.O-Yr oil OE.(!.1:Srot-/

C€A~t: ,'f(;"

c...$""1,,'" oS flobll sLeet.:N(.,r AI 1'1{~ los. A"'(,.6LE:!> Lou.UC( C.e:.JtJl.A-L 'l"",rL

3. Defendant WDaI:httMlret~'I'

';)CD \II. IEMIIl6 ~oo·", IPd \..b~ ~"'(,.6lt:~ I eA
(full address of lint defendant)
~A"'~ pf' S~EJ.":i:SO~; \lh..~~r~\O::~
( tenaant's posItIOn Otle, if any

,\00 I...

resides or works at

The defendant is sued in hisiher (Check one or both): Ji1I individual !81 official capacity.
Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:
1 f",'-~"~ \0 ,.....I>\.ell'l"".j"f" ~o'-~.. s'feTeMl'.Jl, f.l.G ('-",,\..A\l:o>J, • A.. 1'lEUSl:o'-.l \0 C,eASl=
1', ~",6 c.'-I.S\o..... or f'l.",p' Sl.e6 P::tN(,- ,j{e: ke~ f>,,,,{,:6lg, c.ow.J"1'l ~E,-,I""A-\... ,"!",,\.. ,

CV.(,6 \1f)7)

CIVIL RlGHTS COMl'LAlNT

Page 30f6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 6 of 47 Page ID #:106

4. Defendant ..\...:w.,.~i~..f.~G~G';r.;==r-______________-:-___ resides or works at
(i'ii1!IlamiOi iffii aetend3llt) 500 vJ.. \6",,"-\...e \l."'bM
(fuJI address of first defendant)
ana (detenaa!lt's poswon nde. if any)

The defendant is sued "in hislher (Check one or both): IX! individual IX! official capacity.

Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:
1=".Lv....G I. J;"""\SIVl5M\ A t>olr'_:1 J>'(ATGMe.n-! P-S(,- .....I..,>("'6N • oR. ).ss;.srll"-/ "il> ceA50e
'"'(\4~ c.u..((01Y'\. or "fL.blt J>leeh-"lz ,,"1 'T1~6 \.0$ ANlrGLS$ G,u.M1X Ce.jT.<.~L -:r~"3:L

resides or works at

(fuJI name of first defendant)
!>op ""eli'S ",~Li5 gOb M &(.'1
(fuJI address of first defendant)

Lc,~ A",lreL..-s! Gilt ,\001J.

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): l!!I individual IZI official capacity.
Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:
Fs,r\."yt§ To ;S:"""\eroe0 A )o\.~e.-{ ~"-"'eME..rr, 1te("u..I.."'roM) (lAo. i\e(!.r~t"oJ\.J 'fb C§A~E"
--ru-" "....'0"" of "floo~ !>L<. '"t"",('- A\" ,1-\-6 L" S AN (,-6 L;;-S CO".:u'l c.",.JI,u..L. -:r",:j; L ,

CV -f,I; (J/97)

CrvIL RlGHTS COMPLAINT

Page4of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 7 of 47 Page ID #:107

m on (date or dates) O'I/I~ /.~ T~ o'1/I~Jc II • 0'1/01/01, TH~",- 'o/IS/%

( lIlIlll)

(Claun

• o'l/I~/D" TW..... "'1.3/6'1.
(Claun W)

NOTE:

You need DOt name more than one defendant or allege more than one claim. If you are naming more than five (5) defendants. make a copy of this page to provide the information for additional defendants.

'-. Defendant Lc/l.o '{ ~"C.A (tUII name ot fiiSt defenaant)
4'\00 /1,,,1'10>.11\ I';L"b., l'\ot-lTE/te'1 ~A/t.K. q\,\!)l(
(full address of fir.;t defendant)

resides or works at

\..o~ A/V.(,..,\,.,;-<;, e.O<A.".cr~( S\.(EIt T''f'F ~v.s\ol:>'l o~e/t.A\",oA.lS
(dCtenaant's posllJon and otIC. if any)

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): S individual jg] official capacity.
Explain how this defendant was acting under color oflaw:
0" LOll .""",.<.>11 of C.'M>Tol::.~ o\>Gi!.ATroMS c",v..SE.h ,., Cu.,ToM. 'FLooR. <,LeePrr-J(,- 1\A1b. 14>,J .,....fI-
J",,;-I co",\'x'f"'ol>l-S :LtJ \/:s:;oL"ixo...! 0"1'- '?\.""MT"FF;' I'rt":'\UI>.\" l:>6tAXMEE" Rt;&t-ITs.

(deten'S posmon antide. it any)

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): I!() individual IX! official capacity•

Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:
FUL~ \0 "1'0\'1..""",-"., 01>1 t<\Gb"",...L ~Ge.D"'rI\G'''''t"..\= ..... s P-",.",LIe-i.> :eM A. "-I,,(,.L<:&,,"-"
-ti \l,,,,,.e.~ <>\" b .... \0 "-.. 6" bV-E C"' ...c5" ,..... ""'0\...'..:0"'" o\" ~l..MI.I"f"~ ~~e·(A.ML " ....,,""'-.,,; il.rlrfll;.

S.

Defendant

=======::-r _
n(full name of fiiSt aefCild3Dtj

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_..,.-_

_

_

_

_

_

resides

or

works

at

(fuji address of fir.it defendant)

(defenaant'S posItIOn and title. d any)

The defendant is sued in bis/her (Check one or both): 0 individual 0 official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

CV-66 (1197)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 8 of 47 Page ID #:108

D. CLA.IMS*
The following civil right has been violated:
,VI", ~l ..."thF~/.!> C.A","~G Ot' "';:-(.0,,(

CLAIM!
"-",51-;' '"~"o""'-

\ ....8, rI2I"X;L&&eS,

A",b

"p.e-' . . (i;~'''\'\<''\\6!>

"A-L 'b6T.. "",,,,.;: R..t:bl-t'T:=., I\"'f:. -THe "'T",,,i;A£~ M""':tM ....1V\

9..~\>&\' FOil- II~;:; 'T~6 ...·TMB;;\ t> r~usoN69,~ ~'-l.. "" ...'-l 0 \'C A VVurl6' i:. 5,,,T€S

\9.ilA''L. I'\Oll.o·JGtl.., \\~G bGf§fo.lb.AM\s. "''''''''1.\ c,., \{GL~ IN.. Crvl'L CoAlTiiMf",

of \1\($ CQt.lS~NT \:Iet!!,ISG MAMI""I:tfo.llr po, eo,,-...\'II.rl\.eiTe~ MQ"'~'O~rM(,-

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnoe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly wl;lat each DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
b\] I\~e Coy...rr'i &0&&'1> of 5v..PElbJlOSOIlS n \f\-G (,.NG'IlN plU- g,o I!.. y' pI" TH G"

*I[there is more than one claim, describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece o[paper using the same
outIine~

CV.£6 \1 /97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 9 of 47 Page ID #:109

F",..-nl,E.fV\olle I Sol\ii! II.b-L6e ~ \M:r\H: O,I{ Ii II... S",hit. ,,:to ~oJ!. !oIl) scTTL~
",,-"0 I/. rLool.. ~L"6~"'(,.. e.l:""1... 11,,-,.,OMS. Alr ... l"".i,' \...o~ A"":b-.rl.8S

c,O'-"M-c{ C."NI/l./\.-L'tl'.-.:;\..... ffl.o",," 0,/,)../0(., Tfi-lI.o'-\,lrM 0'/ /1"1/0("

"""II..( ifi-G M,,~J;"-A-L IMlAv.,Gi ",-Gil', or-- THe- ""TtI:!:L. ,/.(.6' }L",r"l(];r-t

L""", 'OJ."'!O 'i'"c.,.(!\;-\'" 10

ANI:,. S,LGsi> 01\( A C<-N. "-1!.G1e FI-oo/t FoR..

s:~ \:',,'I,s. ~:x'TH-o~ Ac.ce&S 10 i!> ASIC. I~""M"'~ NSC);.S. l> u.ctt

p..S A ~6't:,1 i\,L .... \te;T, \=>J;LLo"'-'.J 5.\.\.0"'1(:1.., T"oi'{B~"'St{J 100,1-+-

»",;r5, ~.p..l>, To....,. .. L I AAJ~ (l..,..~o"-S. ilh-s, HA.lLsH I AAlb.

::t.cr....... "ou..S \/Le;;;lr-\SN.l 'P.&$v..L\eb. l:"N ~G/l.M.1'. NGNt CI.(.II.O""rc.

t-\<9'cl(.) Y,Ac..~ I ANb. &\~o"'Ll>e;-R.. ~AJ:;~ ';1:"-\"l' ....a.-"&~ To \~ 6'

"L.."JJlt:f'F'. C A) See: \:.",I+:':-\.""

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 10 of 47 Page ID #:110

D. CLAIMS* The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

•

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without

citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnoe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each

DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.

c........-.r< (.1.1 'Il.G

~o,,'-~ bF c;,,,).Gllvnoll...'> ~~ '\\6 &o"etJ..u,,,,t,. \\o~'l 01",1-\6" Cp<.LMT{

""'Ii: of" \..o~ ,,-,(.GLE'::o, ~~ S...... M , \l~E'<

\l~e rv..Mu:<oN or Se .."nd,. A~ ,1-\6

*If there is more than one claim, describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same
outline.

CV-66 (J/97)

CIVIL RlGHTI; COMPLAINT

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 11 of 47 Page ID #:111
f~,,-,\~e"I\"'tt" I !>\~G j\(,-P-66~ ""''''~ O"'\+G~ ("v ?6"-. \II: 'oR.s, 10 !;"'Tll~
rr ""-<01.. FLbOi\.. ,.\".,61>" ... (,- C<O'll:L P,c':\r:eM$ Al.- ... "'..... \..0;' A ... u-iOl....,s,
C."'.A.M''l CG •.iIILM- -S",,,,L. t ...OM o"tIIl,lcc.. '"'CK"o",,/:'-/-t 0"1 11'1 lob
rM i~~ ""G~,u.L :r..., .. ll...e (\"-..e"" 01" ,I{ti :fA!:\... II-H; ~LArAl"'ft"FF v.J":; ~oU61:. \0 L",,&, "'N~ ~\6e\:> oN.. A CON c:...<. ..Te F'Leoi( Fo~ s.r')< \,. ..'-15. Wr,\{ouX I"c,C"EiS5 10 ~"';,rc::. I~'-'M"'N MEbhS, s,,-,,,c/-t
flc~ PI -e.",h./ ~\.. ..,,-,IZ.G\J ?l:lLo-..J) {o1~o,,-,e(l(,,/ IOO"'CI{i:!.«..v.s,t{/"'Toe'tH--
"A.~I5'/ SaA~ I leweL I AN~ jlA'Z..e~!;;. "'i\·h.s H ....~S r-I. J ANI.\. r.vJ'-UQ...Io,-,-> III..GP,IMEM'T R,t; ~""L\e-\~ 1:"-\ '\>eI1.MAMe~ t..~A.eNrC!.. /I...IGC~)
~,,<...~/ Il.... ~ S.~."'-Ll:.e-~r ... :r~ :t'M:rv.../!..rE~ \0 \\~e ~l.,..r,,"\:rFF, ( SeE' 10:.')£ I~~~:C\ 1\ ')

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 12 of 47 Page ID #:112

D. CLAIMS* The following civil right has been vioIated:

CLAIM I

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, aud without
citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descn"be, in separately mnnbered paragraphs, exactly what each
DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
(3·1 "1~6 C...",o.+\'l ~bA(t~ 01" ~v..1>eA.-./r"'olLS. n ,flcG (,.O-'/liIlI>lXC"'& I!>ehi, 0 F il{e; G,,,,uT(
OF Los. A",(,.",L~. A. S....<.tI, 'It'';/ ,·L.."" 11!s r ....... <.\"o--.( of Selt.-./:tNG- A. ,I!G I

*Jfthere is more than one claim. describe the additional claim(s) on another attachedpiece ofpaper using the same outline.

CI{-66 [J!97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

D PageS of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 13 of 47 Page ID #:113
I.
, .
! f<A.~\Ho6",ol-B I 1-\6' "&"''''6'1> ",c'r~ o'\I~ .. ~ S", "ea.. VLSO.t& \0 ~s'rTI~
! 'l'1Ll:O,c.. Floo/t ~LGe"'rN(". Cl:\lrL A2\X;ON'i> A&A,rNIT \..o~ A",(;'e-LG6
:r~ I'ftG f'.\ ..l..n....L -.;.i:\M.!..'; "'~61'< 0>" Il.tc; :lArL. ,1.(,; ~L~rNTJ:FI: WI\,,,, \",,,t.c.sb. \0 \.""'" I "'N.I~ "'L.eG~ o>J.. .... c.o".J.c-ItE'Te 'f'Loc/t FoR..
Sr-,e "t::. ..'-IS.-u.>:,\\o....::t A.<!.c,es& To BASl:(. 14""MAN NeG;"'''' -Su.<!..-rt-
,1-\- As ,.. ~eb / ~LA"''''S\J t'I:lLow/ "Ihw~~ J '''o,\·H) .........~ r{ J Too
""''''l6' I s,,,,,,) I \o'A>",L, I'.""~ 1t...<."It..~, \\~rs H.A..c.~ 1-\ I A.NI'). :t".u :r",,~­
);;0 ""~ "\..... "\M6""\ Ra ~""I..T"'b. r...t ~G41'" I'.l'lg'-A\ e HI(.OMI:<!., N"C.l<- I
~~t<. I "'IUI~ .$1.(.O ....L!:.6f(. l>",r"l ;r"':r........;:;"'& ,0 11-tG" ~L~l:".trr FF,
C See: c .. ~"~iT 1\J

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 14 of 47 Page ID #:114

D. CLAIMS" The following civil right has been vio1ated:

CLAIM I

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without
citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnbe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each
DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
rio(,,"> Jlte C.o....",-,,( i?:....!L'h oy S...."I>.. II.""Se/t.!? 1::> ""(~~ bo"ef-AI r'-l(... ~o~" 0 F "T~e

, c.ov-M-r{ ~ ..."'\. c...:Nl:Lr....y I Mah<.AL I <=>11... '-,,"-4 G: .....,stsM e;",T ~£:Ils"'N§L To

"Ifthere is more than one claim, describe the additional claim(s) on another attachedpiece ofpaper using the same
outline.

CV-66arm

CIVIL RJGHTS COMPLAINT

Page SFof6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 15 of 47 Page ID #:115

i.:
t:=v.,1I,,'\J.\EHMM:1) . Ite {I. ~ p. .. a ~ \M"'"1~Ci'\\~J<!C,~""j>e~""J;_S e~ ~ 'r" . ~iirT.'TLI:f

. '?.....:.:ojl.. fLe~1l.. s.LsG'f"""t". ClN:S;L. A(!..'.J;;O~S A(,. .....~rr Los A",(,.eLGS

. C."""M-ct C.eAll~",\.. "!",,,L. F"'eM. O'1!I).J"(."\.\ ... ,, .....I.-!-t 0'7/11/0 l..

-:r ... I :rN\'I\G-. }o\ ..t.~\.. 'I;..ri...Y-b j:\(l.e 1'<0 F'"f~Jj -;I... "\ 1-\ G "L~"N\l>I-F

.. 'M... ~'f,,/.,(!!1;~ 30 \.~e I I\... b ~Lee} OALh c.o....et.lSle ~\.OD~ f'o~

J,S ~y: ~ ...'-I~·W",.,.~ ...-..C A<!.c.e.s '> \'()_~ "'~I;~ \~ """'A_I".! N .. e-I\.S. :;. ~...c;-\

i
t.

1:"$

.&.. ~G~,

~L",,,,,~ci\ I ~"\..Lo>M j

sl-\-owd I

\oo't,J. P'>&.\.\A;{j ICO\;-~'

il t>i\:;-I"',S",,?, '1~w."\.. J "'...I).~~()P,..?<.:-rn.~_J.\-~1.~.j:L,_AM1 ;t'.,.(!<.\.f!.1'.C>1.\,5

b. '.. \'It.e"-rMe;-,,rr\t.e~u...\.."(si> ;}.",... ~B/l."""'Ns_M'TC.l-4~c>""J;'<!. . N~!:-( J ~f\vK AAJ

~\t"~L,;~§p- \lArl\J ~N'JlA.R.re-$To (Ite" \:>I.,.I\-~.,i-r:s: "fF.

I, (SlOE': 1:.)l.j·h-\":iT A.)
Ii

II
I'

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 16 of 47 Page ID #:116

D. CLAIMS* The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without

citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnbe, in separately D!llDbered paragraphs, exactly what each

DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
U;,J 1\~E C.",.rtl ]!,OAd~ oF' S"~6i!."*~Qg,s "' .. ..,.Ite (.0\1"...1:11""16- I!.o't.y OF"I/-\€ Coc<..;;d of

L,,~ e,,(,-eLe$. 1\ .. .su..d-\ • ,H6,( HlhlG ,.I-\\S f""MCllOOtJ pI'" s,e~\l"/>.Lb- 1\-.. II-\-'"

..n'-l t:f£'C...:"(;,,'b. ·IW~ Lq(..r~LJ-wJ; t1ISAl> of C,,,....

(,.O~6tlI\lM"N[. ~"IA"'Lr.H."'(,­

<;,3>6S,:rr"C, il6(Tu..LA'T>:C"-l$ '10.,&,1\6 AhMP;JJOW-A-\rcAi of ko",,,,,--("l \'.;).AlI.llllliONI'S

*If there is more than one claim. describe the additional cIaim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same
outline.

CV-66 rJ 197)

CIVlL RIGHTS COMPl.AINT

Page S l1t 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 17 of 47 Page ID #:117

to~",T{ c."..;i"II..A-1..... "!o.l:L. f~olV\. 0"1/1),/01,:, 1~/I.Cu...{,-t1 0'1/,'7/6"

1:t-I \\\6 ~G't.rCAL r"'IA-Ils- A(l..G/\ of IKe "JA:&l, l'H& ~LA:&"".l""fF

v.L"'~ rollc.G ~ \0 L""," I ANb ~ Lee? oN.. Po CONCLGIEi F 1-00(, Fo.(

50,,, bA'l'S. V<..l"'l~o..zc Ac.c-,"sS 10 ~ .... rc.. (-{"'''''AN 1IJG'B"bS &ucH-
I\~ '" ~",bJ e.LA-Nt<.S"I, 't-.rLLo""-lt .l.i~o""e-j( I loc'1l-t ~~",,&t-l) /oolit-
~"~iG) <;b!<,t I lowell ""N.I~ R","2.0 tt.S, "\\.{n t-l ....u.H I AI\..I.A,

G',:zr :r"lr""R.&OI.A.$ \1iI.€MME.:iT ttGS ....L\e~ r"-l t'1iit..M ....'"

Co H-tt.oA.{XC

l-.Iac.j(1 i?,"-LK I A ....... oS l4-o",-L bs-~ ~ ... r-"-l ;r"l'J~I:<=S 10 \({~

~L... r.;rl: FE
C See: e."'~r\'+T F\")

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 18 of 47 Page ID #:118

D. CLAIMS* The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without

citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you descnbe, in separately DUID.bered paragraphs, exactly what each

DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.

e",IT [;1.0 Lgdld J!, .. cA 't) ;1;'" C\.\&ol-k& Dr

p ):.." oyeILAT=cl,s aT bp::. AN.lrGLe:S

c....,;N C..N1.. tsL ;ruL. A" !i"."d=!j \-\G n :p.t c.~k""-&G ,iF r .... ~L"'MeN.\:r;"'lr

J

•

-:r".. !!'eW~ "'.- 1'li6 "L. $mCG :lbb=( L<26<>;l jl, AC.I!, \{M., BtOEN AWA!C.G'

)
c.eM G \\\:t'> \AN.'-MAfl:qvTt&>Ad- YLftClx:§·

,
),.elU>&J!,,!>iIG' -r..h.;:ffeIl6"'<tt; DF \'l"l>..L'JJ:FFS ~"'6-\"""o\.\. fi."TA-:.-."eE jk(rl+l.s..

*Jf there is more than one claim, describe the additional claim(s) on another atiached piece ofpaper using the same
outline.

CV-66 [1/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

:r
Page 5 of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 19 of 47 Page ID #:119
r'-ol\l., 0'7/1),/0,," '\{.{o",,\rl-l 0"1/1'1 lo(p ~"'l ,Ke M ..h~<....1.. r ....iAcI(G A(.eA.
of' -0\6 :r"",L, <vJl-\s'" ,H6 "1...""'''''"f'F w.A-~ roast. o,y \l~e; 1!-v..ID~"
",A-I"F Ie> \..~"c;. I A",i> & Icst> ",.\J It c.o""c.J(.sli; f'Loc'o(, reI(, $;1;)( 't:,A.'/s.
'I\k:.'l4o.::\ ACU!.e'sS, 10 ~AS~c:. \-\"'M"'~ .<.lG6'~$ ~,""""H A~ A Bs61 ~L""'K.;r:, P:tl..l..bw I !>ho....,d l'b",\+l~oI..v-.H\i 100<1-\ PAs{€'" SOA-\> I \o\.uEL/ >,\-Nt. ~A'Z.oP...S., II·h·~ ~Aot..'\4. I "",t:, r",,"Iu..I..:t:ou.s. l~e.ITrne.;r( 1t".su..Llcl~ ::rJJ
PeIl-MA.MeMI c. l\,....o..u;C!. Ned I 1",-K I A"" ~ ~ ~b~I..b,€ ~ ~",<.,j :t1\J:ru..J(.r~ It> ,1\G "L...:r~~FF, (S""" hlhil"iI A. )

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 20 of 47 Page ID #:120

,"15 \ .... ~\.."~""\<I"f'~ Co ......".,; ,,'i" 1'.0.1.",0.1 ita"" ,,~o'"

s " ..o<'-':S5., ~ ..""rL':(,.€S)

A"'~ "Q.~ ...L. "'"o\"~"I:ON v..",},,,, .. ,ltG LA""'" ." ........"'~ ~'( Tlt .. I":tFiH I A"'~

or ~o",-.c;;ee""Hc AM",,,,bMe.;(~

,l{E

f'el:.eoLA-L. c.ol"s'1.T~Tro"J.

E6TAIoL.s.l-lx".JCS",

'''''A' fo"- ,11.6

IVI.,N\ 01" 1''''"~cl,,ell..'!.' f'\.O<.EiO"Cr(, I 'If .. h;; rShlb A.:tT M.""~(

'E>G \~eL~ 'I"-L (!."""L c.."'''''6",,~T 01" '\·H; c..oNs;;",T t.cC-IlE'S /lAA1\J1.4Txl\J&-
t>.. C.vil b.-(.sc:\...-b,. ""."'.1""-""'(" \'>~(,."'AI\I\ c.cc:"'.. ~r",, ....TGI~ i'l'{ 'TUb

A",,,, ..rc,At..4 c.."""L \."101001..\",",,, v."...."r<>A,J 01'" So",-TUS-J(.,A./ CA-Lz FojC..-uIilt.

C. <; "'Ii ; Ii:.,.: I"\:';\' r\ -e, ")

c..o~""....--{ C"'N."'["A.L.. T/TrL.. (>..~ ~",-(!.t\ J ~G r,> :1'''-\ C.f-I ..... &-E 0 F o".. ItSeGI;",lrl
ol I>.....~ ~""~'eM6I\1Tr"'6- (>.\..\.., " ... ""AI., I.. ov....r"'(,.- 11,,,( 't'l{b ~ .. rL. 11~ .... SI L....
~A.c....'I,,\. ~4..0~~ N.Gt,..\...r~GI\J.c..G I Mh,l..tc..G rl\J.l6"'" I A~~ be\..:r.UG.'i..A'\6" ::rkolhxFFertEMCG"
of Il.ov...r..tl.- ~"'\rT"o",s AT TI.\-& 'SA.xL ;t"'...... LI61> rlo/ I>l.""".FF'$ M...\.." ..:zo ..... ::.
.-i" :r..."'..x~ . 0", 09/., lot. Co~". 5l-i.,llrFF E.M~Lb'i6e~ "'~~r(..",sl~ ,~e-

C.~Ll. 'I-It; ~L~.",\.f'f 'Io.I~ 1...... ""(,. AM.bMlr c"".,,,,,,,\, C.OM.",,,,-(,.~, ...... ,~

c,,'NCQ ",1' ~AI~, """c..~ I ito"'.<!.I(GS, ""'~ It,,\" A.."T r",r:oE.TI\TroA./. r",-.uI{E;MO.c.8')

-:1:....""\,.,, ""I'I~;; C.,L\... ¥.... A\~ weft"" \..~,,,,,,,6- J b. "' .... i:,"-.G6\::.:rN\"'- " ..ou...... ~ ,I{I:T

10L",.i\ AoI..@i'<.. :!i\L ",,,\",Iro,,,) ,I~G \>L ...."'"I-F e.OtJiACt",~ L:«!.E' 1"",,"0"" il-l-C'

'1 (c.e..''''...u.e;\. "'" ~Ab-e 5......

".. ~ 6;:: '" L. (> c..

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 21 of 47 Page ID #:121

"'''''I'.€!>S \.l,6 "-110.':> ~l" ...~~(,.. 0."-- '\I\~\ CAv.&eb. \>El"""'I\-.. e-~ SI<.",N ):,".C.ol.<>"-A\ro"-l A"-O,",-,,"i) ,Ii.. I>l"."".FF Js .c.. "S",,,, .. "Ih(,-~ (,.."-or~ Al<fFAA •
. ",\I.e ~\.."..,;;\"r-=F WA!, 'Fouu.l> -Ie L"",; :r~ ,140,." \\o"-"-:.-b c..o,.. !. ..T2C1IJ S

..-rJ, "'/\Ill. El'TEI(,!V\~,,-,A:l6 ,1\6" '\>E!7\ I ",,,,1). !tob..

't'NSJ;hlG' ,\-\b C.LL& I

b j\I.1 l'i\b'b~l.~.
C SlOG: ;:....I<~n A. ')

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 22 of 47 Page ID #:122
i\l,e. ~\."'''~LF~'' c."v-~e; 0'" P,CT""",-, R60.. u'l-o~ "u..1i t~."S~) ~1(."'''~LI2(,.sS( AMI, EQ""L '\>«>'\""-'''0'''' ..,.,,,,\.,,,,- ,1{1i L"",",s ~ee.u...."~ Ib'l '\{6 Frl<TI+) A.Nb 1'• ...,..:\6<="'-'1-\ t\M""'~/I'\".,;\5. ol'- ,HE r-"k"otAL e.<"..~T.Tul:ro",". G'I<\lohsl-\~""G-
l>"-"-\U~L b.ell<:r..,6E ~(,.f{T::'1 Mb ,I{e; ~TA-vh"J<.1 M"MTMU/IA \{",LlE"S
'Folt. ,116 \il.eA\me~ of ~1U50'''''''~. ('1\0""'0,""'0(./ lIt" ~efs",hANl MIJ~
'0" \~"Lb. .;IN. C.~\14\.. C""""M."l>"T 01'- 'I·h; C"'~S6"N.\ 'b1O<..LE(; M."I\.I~ 4I:Z;Nb- ~
c. ..~<-\ \'...eL(et;. rAo",,, 10"-"='" (,. ~"" !.ri.AM. Ceo A. i:,1:".lI~TG""I~ ~ 'l ,I{G" AMclt:rC.I4-.J
c.~\1~\.. l>ol!>e.II..I",~ U-N.1:0,,",- of !"o,",,\\s;WU C ..Lx f"oL~""
L S... G; 1::-.: Ihi'>iI ~')
, ·l'olI<:."..)"O F. E""l.G~,,,," > (,.t..o~.> rJ.6b-L. (,."..t<-c; I ",..l"ei; r"rre.:IT I AA/&
b.l.\'e,,'\\e. L"-I't,..fF"IlE>.tC.ti ItG~'"'-\..TE~ r"-l M.s1"e,q.s<\",";; CON~u..~. :r---l
"F"sl,.-t<r 10 "Co'" F-{ 1("A-I ,He< A~'l'''''b ~A.I:AT~ ~"4L1"i-l C"1l..5 h"j>".<:(-
",e.tll> ,,,,""6l-{ f"olLc,-.l-,,""~ oN. I·hs. ~,,-"tIe'<'s it6>u.. LI6h IN M.AL".c:tcu.$
::rh\:Iu..,u~. 0"-1 09 II~ 101" ,11" \-lA:I.;j'l'Ff' ""-A5 lAah,"",,-lL'-( E,,<\L u AI6U "'6'1 \,.,,-\o~ EN ihbl",e2. ~...J. "W1<..,,-t4 I~e I'17.6SCR.U,Eb. A. llAo,...tTt+l..~1 ~:rf(I7.I:I.'"'"\tl
t-I'Iab1;"-t\\;O.J \ll.O(,-jC.",IIA. fO«..-mE \l""h\(~fr )0 r\A-lE b,,,,,,l'f lvl6t:."C.I4Txo,,",
"Fet. il\l:"""".7J!> or I·\x.(,.t+ ~l~o~ \>i<6~5U/Z.S, \:, .... I>."'I"'\:"<;;. J 1\"") Ac!.:r,A
~ijrt.V)( ~:t;"ASE,

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 23 of 47 Page ID #:123

\\""",e'lc(., ,1'.(5 "\."''''(4F'F ),.'t. NOI fl6ee:c'l"-' ANY. m",/).",-<>Ttt:>-J 'fc>,~

root ,\\""E" rA6\.c..L (!.c.... h..TrC>"'~

,{3 ~"'"s. F""o<-TI\", I'M.Li; I

~u.J,...""b-

"\j .. ,~

L,,-"'~o,-\ "'(1\6 \>l4• ...;!.1''F x;""fO,LN\"'~ ,\\6' 'ho~'o.(" Ae.e>..::i (;,LAS,SS

M~""\' -r ... "I>.\> ,T",,"", \h~S C""Zl ",,-I.€'I'<. ",Ltc> A\..L6....,~ ,I+G'
~l"• .;rrl:r-F I',~".,,;s."'\o ~\lG C~\O""G.\(l." ~)M\""eM(1 v...dh-<-14 R6>UITc'~

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 24 of 47 Page ID #:124

E.REQUESTFORRELffiF

I believe that I am entitled to tile following specific relief:

1\~" 'her..",\:" t.4\~ /I.e.,,\:' "".,1-\

(,-t.o~~

, N G k b ( . ......C!-ti.

fV\.II.L"LG

~",T6';r. ;

""'~ " .. lor\,-

li~\iS 1;"'I~<F.""E""'It&

h e 01"' ~L... "" "FF Is.

-liL<O,,",- by,]:",,,,,,..

l<x(,.\q;;..

.." t

\>L""..n"Fr

",-",-t~ \\-,..:\ ~-s:.. Ccu.i:\ (;r1/...".rr CbM.~§N§"'\Oo(.{. AN.I> e..o,.,.'\r"-l ",,~G- b~""A-lr¢
tl\= ..\\.,,-"tl-\\~e en.ooo'.> ~.">~",,h t:, ll\'lA<l-~. ,");", r.\..\.i'Tro,j, '''n~6 ll"",,J...

'r~1" ~..Gl.... ~ ~"-"~lr"6 \.."",,,(,-,,,'" 01" 1'11<0<.66'- \-\v..",hot.6~ A-.... ~ -nh£r'l -'~1(.",6

L ?'l>3,.o" ') "\"ev.~&Ml b,QLL",lt-f..

(Date)
CV-66 ,1197)

1
(Signature ofPlaintiff)

crvn.. RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Pog, 6 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 25 of 47 Page ID #:125

EXHIBIT COVER PAGE A
EXHIBIT

Description of this Exhibit:

e... u.U II.\",\..",--M- D~\.e-Il J t.EMXAA- lIl;TTsILJA."'1l. c..L ...,..",.s

\

~bl.. b. ..M ..../.,-~ \0 "",,,uo.v\ OL YJl.ll I>ff"-\'/' ~e~"ON ..r~x b.,t;e,. oE' ~A¥-~

C!.\1 b&- '111./l - :S'FW C. A",/L'\

Number of pages to this Exhibit_...ll'-\.-,,-_pages.

JURISDICTION: (Check only one)·
I:::J Municipal Court I:::J Superior Court I:::J Appellate Court . I::l State Supreme Court
- United States District Court
I:::J State Circuit Court a::::J United States Supreme Court a::::J Grand Jury

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 26 of 47 Page ID #:126
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
The governmental powers of the County of Los Angeles are exercised through a Board of Supervisors, through agents and officers acting under authority of the Board or by authority conferred by law.
Provisions of the Los Angeles County Charter call for a five-member Board of Supervisors, each of whom must be an elector of the district represented, must reside therein during incumbency, must have been such an elector for at least one year immediately preceding election and be elected by the district.
The Board of Supervisors fulfills three major powers in County government: executive, legislative and quasijudicial.
In an executive capacity, the responsibilities of a county supervisor to constituents who reside in unincorporated areas are similar to those of a mayor of an incorporated city. The supervisor is required to administer all local governmental services.
In its legislative role, the Board may adopt ordinances and rules, both to control the administration of County government and to regulate public conduct within the unincorporated areas of the County.
Acting in a quasijudicial capacity, the Board acts as an appeals board on zone exception cases of the Regional Planning Commission. It sits for hearings on county improvement districts and on appeals in licensing matters.
The Board of Supervisors is responsible for the adoption of an annual budget outlining the expenditures of all branches of the County on a fiscal-year basis. It also serves as the governing body of many special districts, including Flood ,Control and Fire Protection Districts. The Board supervises the activities of the chief administrative officer and all County departments, determines County and special district poliCies and sets salaries of County personnel.
Each supervisor has the responsibility of selecting citizens to serve on the various County commissions and committees.
In addition to the duties specifically assigned to the Board of Supervisors by law, each Board office acts as a liaison between the public and the many branches of government.
23
(

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 27 of 47 Page ID #:127

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Rm. 383, Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 W; Temple Si., Los Angeles 90012 Internet home page: http://bos.co.la.ca.us

The Board of Supervisors is the governing body of the County of Los

Angeles. As such, it has the function of serving as the executive and legislative head of County government, enacting ordinances, setting

salaries and establishing specific regulations for the administration of ,

County departments and special districts.

:

< The five Board members are elected by voters from their district for
four-year terms.

The regular meetings of the Board are held on the first, second, third and fifth Tuesdays of each month at 9:30 a.m. in the Board's Hearing Room (381 B Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration, 500 W. Temple St..,.: Los Angeles). Each regular meeting of the Board held on the fourt):'1 -, Tuesday of each month shall be primarily for the purpose of conducting legally required public hearings on zoning matters, fee increases, special district proceedings, property transactions, etc. On Tuesd<lys following a Monday holiday, meetings begin at 1 p.m,

The executive officer of the Board is the administrative head of, the department and is responsible for preparing the Board's agenda~, '1, •
communicating the actions taken by the Board, preparing theminotes .;
of the meetings, and maintaining the Board's records.

Internet users may access the Board of Supervisors'. agendas and

accompanying Board letters for the current week's Board meeting

beginning each Thursday morning preceding the meeting at the

following: http://bos.co.la.ca.us/Categories/Agenda/AgendaHome.asp.

The statements of' proceedings, which indicate the final actions taken

by the Board, are available five business days after the meeting at

http://bos.co.la.ca.us/Categories/Sop/SOPHome.htm. The Board

meeting transcripts are available for access each Wednesday evening

at http://lacounty.info/BOS/SOPITRANSCRIPTS/.

Each Board

meeting may be viewed live on the Internet at

http://bos.co.la.ca.us/Categories/MtgsBoard/LiveBroadcast.htm.

Helpful Phone Numbers

General Information Listen to Board Meeting Live Recorded message of
actions of the Board For copies of Board-related information:
Agenda Statement of Proceedings

(213) 974-1411 (213) 974-4700
(213) 974-7207
(213) 974-1442 (213) 974-1424

68

I Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 28 of 47 Page ID #:128

MEDICAL ORDER

0/-119··1'

SUPERIOR COURT ai' CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
PLA1NTlfF

CASE NO. 5/i (~60 6) ~._
I3KG# 9/;Z lLf..-"'6',-,,'&,"'-.·_ _

DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT" ;3__

ro THE SHERIFF OF TilE COUNTY OF LOS f.~lGELES, AND MEDICAL SERVICES, LOS ANGELI"
COUNTY JAIL:

WHEREAS, the above-named defendant has moved this court (or an order requiring a medical examination or
"'p"'cific: rn(':di(~~d tre:ltment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the above-named defendant appears to need the following:

., :',. roil

(»-00/ ~Medlcal Examination

X"Dental Examination

I· 1'7

Specify treatment: ~'/A//1;;"Y.j ,/;i0z 64.:.51-':..5: [ A':;<//

o HIY Testing (pursuant to 1202.1, 1202.6 P.c., 199.96, 199.97, 199.99 H&S).

o AIDS Education Class to be completed on or before

(date).

I

)21--The Court does wish to be advised of the resuits on or .before
o The Court does not wish to be advised of the results.

(date).

DEFENDANT ORDERED TO RETURN TO COURT: _ _ __

_ _ _(date).

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED.

D!\TED:

d ? « k 7 f~ff JlJDICIALOFFTCER:___

Signature!Slalllp

ROFlEllT P. O'NEIli

Court Address:

Department LX- 8
Airport Branch Court ll70 I S. LaCienega Blvd.
L05 Angeles, CA 90045

FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE:

By:

FAX to Sheriffs Department, Medical Records: fAX#-lfJllilQ-IJUS .0s. t~.:'( ''''1' ~2~ Place form ;11 Court ft'~ a,{/('f L"i,\ rrortSllliIwf-
r'R ...v 11~n <';(""

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 29 of 47 Page ID #:129

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012·2713

RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.
County Counsel

May 14,2008

TELEPHONE (213) 974-1913 FACSIMILE (213) 687-8822
TDD
(213) 633-0901

Maurice Olivier #F83603
es.p. Bldg. B-5 Cell 107

P.O. Box 5002

Calpatria, California 92233

-.

Re: Claim Filed: File Number:

January 16,2007 07-1050420*001

Dear Claimant:

This letter is to inform you that the above-referenced claim which you filed with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors was rejected on May 13, 2008.

An investigation of this matter fails to indicate any liability on the part of the County of Los Angeles. Accordingly, your claim was rejected on that basis and no further action will be taken on this matter.

STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT YOU BE GIVEN THE FOLLOWING "WARNING":

Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. SEE GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 945.6.

This time limitation applies only to causes of action for which Government Code sections 900 - 915.4 required you to present a claim. Other causes of action, including those arising under federal law, may have different time limitations.

HOA.411633.1

'. , , ( " Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 30 of 47 Page ID #:130
Maurice Olivier #F83603 May 14,2008 Page 2
You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you desire to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately.
Very truly yours, RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.

HAN:jm

Principal Deputy County Counsel General Litigation Division

HOA.4Il633.1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 31 of 47 Page ID #:131
DECLARATION FOR SERVICE BY MAIL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles I am and at all times herein mentioned been a citizen of the United States and resident of the County of Los Angeles, over the age ofeighteen years and not a party to nor interested in the within action; that my business address is 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall ofAdministration, 500 West Temple Street, City ofLos Angeles, County ofLos Angeles, State of California.
That on the 1Lf.f!! day of May 2008, I served the attached "Notice of Denial" of
claim upon claimant by depositing a copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in a United States mailbox in Los Angeles, California -. addressed as follows:
Maurice Olivier #F83603 C.S.P. Bldg. B-5 Cell 107 P.O. Box 5002 Calpatria, California 92233 and that the person on whom said service was made resides or has hislher office at a place where there is regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and the place so addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this ;.t;1!f.- day of May 2008 at Los Angeles, California.
SI nature
HOA.404292.1

.. Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 32 of 47 Page ID #:132

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713

RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.
. County Counsel

June 12,2008

Maurice P. Oliver F83603 CSP-BLDG B5 #107 P.O. Box 5002 Calipatria CA 92233

TELEPHONE (213)974-1841 FACSIMILE (213)617-7182
TDD
(213) 633-0901 .

Re: Your Request for Documents Received May 23, 2008

Dear Mr. Oliver:

In reply to your undated request for documents which was received on May 23, 2008, enclosed please find the following:

L A copy of your claim :6led January 14,2008, and multiple amendments thereto.

2. A copy of our letter to you dated May 14, 2008.

The other items requested by you are exempt from disclosure under Government Code section 6254, subd. (k), as they are protected by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine.

. Very truly yours,

RAYMOND G. FORTNER, JR.

couJJM~ IV~

17KLIN 1J~ Deputy~~ty By H. ANTHONY Principal

Counsel

General Litigation Division

APPROVED AND RELEASED:
~~~~?~ounRse,l JR.

HANlsb Enclosures

HOA.529868.1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 33 of 47 Page ID #:133
DECLARATION FOR SERVICE BY MAIL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles I am and at alI times herein mentioned been a citizen of the United States and resident ofthe County of Los Angeles, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to nor interested in the within action; that my business address is 648 Kenneth Hahn HalI ofAdministration, 500 West Temple Street, City ofLos Angeles, County ofLos Angeles, State of California.
That on the /Lf!!i day of May 2008, I served the attached "Notice of Denial" of
claim upon claimant by depositing a copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in a United States mailbox in Los Angeles, California _. addre.ssed as follows:
Maurice Olivier #F83603 C.S.P. Bldg. B-5 Cell 107 P.O. Box 5002 Calpatria, California 92233 and that the person on whom said service was made resides or has hislher office at a place where there is regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and the place so addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this j/f!!f.- day of May 2008 at Los Angeles, California.
HOA.404292.1

-#\ Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 34 of 47 Page ID #:134

COUNTY Of LOS ANGEUS

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY

lNSIB.l.!.C[!Qt!S.;
1. Read claim thoroughly. l. Fill ouf claim <15 Indicated; attach additional information If necessary. 3. Please return Ihi~ orlgioal signed claim and any attachments
suppoitlng your claim. This form Im!ll be signed.
DELIVER OR U.5 MAIL TO: EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ATTENTION; CLAIMS 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET, ROOM 383, KENNETH HAHN HAll OF ADMINISTRATION, lOS ANGElES. CA 90012

r;

. //:]6

C) -...J

....I........

•;~;
"

-...J

Ii

THIS CLA,IM _~.UST BE, SIGNED
NOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSE C/.AIM IS A FELONY (PENAL CODE SECTlOll72)

WARNING

• o..AlMS F.OII DMTH.INJUi\Y TO P.ERSON OR TO PI!~NAL PRoPI!f(lY MUST Bit FILED H.OT LATER THAlli 6 MONTHS AFTER THI! O<:C::UREtt("E. [GOVEItNMENTCOOE SEatON 911,21

• ALLotHER·CLAIM5 Futc I>AMAGI?S MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THEOC(URfI';1>jCIi, (C;:1\1H!.~l"'r..~n· ">:IDE SECnOH,11.2)

· ~UaJ~Q'TO C;:,ERTAIN EXC;I;I"TlONS, YOu H.ltV§ Q!'IL,Y$IX (eil MONTlI$ FflCI:'" THJO PATE OF.TI1~ WRlmN NoTll;1I OF !\j;J£<:TlON OF YOU~ CLAIM TO F.lLE ACOURT ACTION. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 945.61

-1

NOT GIVEN, Y01' H,W' TW'O (:., YEAFIS F'Oj~ .,,<.:OAL OI"H' CAUSE OF ACTION

945.61

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 35 of 47 Page ID #:135

brfa;J47 ~" rL'( \~ 'i Gu, Nr.: "tj l;M~I :',c HDT M 1',;\. S ,~':l<H'" . fJ IE

"'ill

~fl,.1~,L~'" "-['h~, ~~F,J~< CI1!'1™L lAIL 51~ff.~I!'~.o..lfl(jfi~

:t.,I\i\~'l~i'A:\.. rt\.,,.i. )v.\",,,,;i,,",'" tt":l~6d fv,t$.t.)'I £oJl.Yl

1,l~1~L 1,~llt~FLt.l~\l'i 11!1i'r;'\~1~~' -Tl\!:", M\;,"Y .. .~.}; A

J\;;i.il i1~,f 0""~5, . Ns&\;~.Jelf /. A"iJ<Lm!!-lJiJ<~ . kL/$'1>.,I;7.,.... __. ....

...,.~.~"" ihliil.I#.~J;' _A~.MJ~ ':rh,q,! 1hMh.lil!~~!'.L~C4't!tAld~tI'!!L~_ ...,....

¥-~~tl?~ ,

.. .. . . . __..

tAl>tJ)l.I'J:'..X. .. O~V,l:.(,.~

tK, rio.<':fl.l-Ei.~~ .,_....... ........... .

~j)M"\ Mi'Q~.',<\I.. ~""i·.~-" ..._ ..... .

:r c", \.. II <

M/j'1,~'~ (!i~.';i:Il.i~

4 >:L

..... i/'Il a,A.[Ja·h~T.. t>j~~;;f··

,a- ,'!ACfoo (.Q\" ._~."..'._-W._i.l.l._.:.:i.&,1 ...' ". ......-.-......

. - .. ----_ .... .---- .~~ -,

. '.-- -. - ....-

... " .~.--.,....--

. .. ~-..,..

- ' - - - ' - . ,.,.-- ---.---.-~

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 36 of 47 Page ID #:136

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES

O/-119·,4j

COUNll' OF lOS ANGELES

TO PERSON OR PROPERTY,

INSIBUcnONS:

>1] !. (, .

1. Read clatm thofOUghly.

"-:

2. Flit out claim as indicated; attach additional illformatfon if-necessary. 3. Please return this original signed (Iillm and ilny iltta(hme~t~'

supporting your daim. This form rmill. be signed,

.

/': i/: 31

DElIVr;fl OR U.s MAll TO:

EXECunVE OFFICER. BOARD Of SUPERVISORS. ATTENTION: CLAIMS
500W~TTtiMPLE STREET. ROOM 383, II:E'NNETH HAHN HALL Of

ADMINISTfIATlON LOS ANGElES CA 90012

'PtMr·r Ms.r Mrs. ""tI'i..'~t./,;1!.

fllm"~
M'\vtr;,-;,

(11JL974-1440
ee: "r!.ooo1w~doe"". ",j(J,: /~I ~ I-.tll4 "Ai

2.NXlAESSOF CI./oJWIHTf(lTO/WfI' ,
\.. ". C• .,J,· ... "'" ;

Ct.iI.... l. ! ... L

\\'11\ ~"Y'~ iT
"(""1''''7i/ t4

e biJ(.Ci1l',sl:,A) 4r

'\o~ Nod~

II [=.'r"'"""""''NjA.-

~ ,\MlG (I. ~,,(rIj.T '"to "~ ..Qu.,:j.
.. j;ff"".....l: rI'... I...~ l. c.r.i/..f;-.

'~-7 "''f.;il# ''''t)l'l'''' P' _n.AJ!"'t.T~S>:1S'O·C'WI'.IS·fGl/lR.INlHltn(.I.m.I:

. n;~ IMMlS Ofo~cOj,jNffWtoYttS IAliO '1t~jjfbEPAAtM(lml
IIMIlVttl~/IIWfIl'GR~UF"""'iCA8W'

\, OAI~NfD~""Of" I~'
12~-I~- b(., [: (; tI A.,vI.

"" MIA

om

"'''1-1 l... 0 (.,. 'I' () Ii p. ill .

~.,.

".A. e., L. 6. wmfIE [jf() DNMGEQR IHJURY OCCUAr ~",,\ (!",,"\;Li\-l-

;l.."

q. wmrusu 1".0 Q,WAGf.~~;~,~: ~IST AlL"~IISO!'lS ANt)AOOIIf~ tiI'~R$ON5kHpWNTOHA\:'EI~TIOl!:

MIA '.:;'~ I t.w"l. ~1 ",\~;'''''\,.,I. dt.

'1M'jl!'~' AI"

PI"""

7. O~ClII8! ItiOffAA.IfoWOMlAGEOAINJUII::I!lt():

_

O~..O'~l"(·O~ 1. "\:.."".tt:lt.M!I:l: ~t. e.,..nl 1;(J..vlt-"l.. ~\

i...-,"'/ l.r' I..~~. -\u."'~ fx\.r...t~ t\.\, feLl.. ,,';(, ,,~1
",d frl"-'w. \,t.t~lLif '11.,1.,,,,1<1. ':t .....

'\-,"" ",,,,\0.;1. ~lIf:1t..l ....l:. '&...."","1/ :,\.0..0") I l'

-!"""'"
""''''' "'.,

-,."",

-.
---

~.\>o<cl.""\ \\.6\1; ll'h,h",..L \l<JoI"""~ ·ll)-\~;;

aDO" f!.uo,L t.1...,,~. '"\'" ..... M """tE(c.,.{T)

8. MJlErotJaOllI¥.llAMEOICSCALUm

"'f'; "/9

13: usrDAIN<GE!i I/'laIAAEO TO DATF {olIId ~tll"" c<opIesofrupIJt.rre$>lk
0IStifN:tW:
\,.,,:.:i ",.1,.. W~"'I~ ~ -i,,~, ~ D

!;,l"!.lo·"2

$I 1),0. "D

t. ~ f~~~~/rf$~N=.Hw~~A~~'!.A'N!OJP£HD~N&£-N~lIM.WpiA: l~ OF FIIGTIJI§lJ "",D

, ,,~,. W ..r··~·lnllta'I'&.~""r.'i"G!l':;(§;!' '"!W':j,1"(

, ~~AIO~~S
I;"} I....... ~~I".>

(l'""I'W.l- 'l..~l

Nft-

:,mt.r",~.~·~~~~,
~ )C· lI/J

,

"'''', '#IA _.}~~.1:EO'IlQS.~~

TH,•...clJ.!!t.!·MuiS1 ~E $.!C/IIIIl1, NOTE: PReswr~r/qftll!)PA FAI$ECt:i,iMIS;".FE1:QNYrpEt/At C::OOE'SEC110N12)

WARNING

- C\J\:iMS FOR'OEATH,'INJURY TO'PERS(:iN OR T() PERSONAI..:P.ROP.ERTY· MUST BE FILED NOT LATER·THAN·6 MONTHS AFTEJrTHS
c;JcoiA'Ei:kt. (GOVfi.R~MENT C(,toE'slfcnON.gl1 ;2)
- fU,L OTHU.~~1Io!.S fO~ DAMAC,ES'NJUSr 8E-F-IUD'fII0'( i.A"ii;R hiAI'iUjI(b.'ll:'A((AFnltTHE O:fCCU~NCt;.~(Uo"'tn"!'.rr...li.~ -COQE SEC10H91l.lj

• 5UAlEC1'i'll.!;I'RTAiN EXCIPlIONS! YOU HAVli ONLv.s,I)( (lSI t.\ON'tHS FROM THEIJAl'EOf THE WBJTTEN NOTl(t;:Of-RE,lEcnON OF-YOlJR(l.AIM.to ~ltE A'COURT ACTrON. IGOIiERNMENT.'CODE",S~cnON 945.6)
- IF WlllmHNP.nce OF,REJECTION. OF YOU.R CLAIM ISN.OT GIVEN. YOU HAVE TWO (~) YEARS FROM AC;:CRUAL OF TtI~CAUS.E OF-,llCTION TO flt,fA COU,RT' ACi'ION. IGOV"tRNMENT CODE SECT10N 945.6]
"'''

I - ~ Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 37 of 47 Page ID #:137

> '

""6"-" ,~, r ooIH

I'<I A ~",""\("""b- <v,,~) M """ell itS

I..

1 \-- E \\.. ~ t':lllt-HE!;S rf-o.rJ\ Nor \'\ P"J~N (,- &1/ls~IlS_ BE <:./r.vSb

fl.

A l>.'-Ilv\'l

$1'61> elJ, ON l'hE.1"'\

ON

The , 0-:[ ~rJ,.- p~ A-N I!,

~

.

I

~, " ",,&~& b.ESi'<1.l>'/&-h,

1< .. \~e Co,,1l1 ~SS"E:b. PI M&h"",p,L oJl.b.sl<: ON ot·l1.ol1
I. ,0 ololl'\':;N bMGt.&6M,e-,-( ,t;6Il-,,-.c.E S. OJ>.! ol-l"f-bl/ ",T

-.

~5'CAIi~ f<A~'¥6L,/. \/'

Ii

C'-i:30 ?I'I\. 't ~'Gi:.E;r;v!'it o"!\;L· fi,,,,,,r.-fif<-Y \b ~g....,.w~

Ii. !. 1\-.&10011* \:,,,,6'"le '"'(he F:C.T lS'T

Ii ''''fuIiiN.. oN oH,·oft 1: ""'liS f-i"""'l'N"1. t?'l A 1£-'/(;

ie, !: ~LTo"'r I'D "ns.~:t\'\ 'L ~(,.o"r; 6oi!O!l"" d,.ill fT f1

I~,

'\h...\. vJA-!i. jll,8Mo'>J"~ itPt./ '(iI'Q ovlf-.L It 7{;)0· e.g

Jo,

tA'I 'liN- ~"(II< l.., wo~tl-I ~f-.lh

{,-L.tt~ O)IT O'I<P,(,

lJ.

b.' -..-:- -- -_. 4 _._,- ,bG - ,~o.al)l. -:t:NJ
t-olL \.~,

....\0>-.<.11-1- 11" 6"l~rLr 'tID
I'l5. VJEiIi II-§.

V,S (\',(..M ~1SA)64-\J"A
~ A~ / ,4",

JJ,

~v~F~1''''''~ ",,.,,'17;146' ~ fI>\/lJJTlts 1Fi>,t., Gmliilt f':riiMt:.y

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 38 of 47 Page ID #:138

COUNTY OF lOS ANGELES

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY

07-118

)NSTBUCIlONS'

?ili7 I'"

I. Read claim thoroughly.

2. Fill out claim as Indicated; attach addltional!nformatlon If nece~~ary, 3. Please return this original slgned claim and any atta.chrnents . ~

supporting your claim. This fbrm mw..t. be signed.

n [I: 36

OEL1V1:11 OR U5 MAil TO:

EXECUnvE OFFlaR, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ATTEtffiON: ClAIMS

I::)

500 WEST TEMPLE STREET, ROOM 363, KfNNrn-t HAHN HAll Of

ADMINISTRATION, LOS ANGEl£S, CA 90012

--..J

'~Mr.rMs.r Mrs:''Or..vn~

lit loUfi1lRHSTN,.

""t\ b \: ..

(213)97<1-1440

lo.I't"HVt;lOYOU~<:r.1'I$I\ES:\'.t1.EJ

Ih " £-

i ~'l.N&e;' ":t

..I....

r ;

'·W~OI'~MA.NfO/mUooP"$ttlJ'- bL~V'"

"". \..<l\. j\.~'!n...4J.ltt..... g, n!.t.1<\

HOME TEUI'HONE'

.

'UW; TEL£~

".-D'~"'J1

y;tr.;:w-"- ''''''_1.;1/'' ! !

J 'I,

1'1' e:!

;I~N)l"S~stC-lJllftVHUM~£JI
C/

S (U,TE'NIOTIMEOF 1""IDHIl

~!I!.~J!:;",I"..n( 1/ p,col" '!. ~ HI ~ l'I\

IkltLi 0:''\;1) ~ (011. \ I MO("

,. tl.tL'i . ~,,~i I> ~;-i>\J,.T UN 1\6L \ud ~i1.,,1tBti ......

10 cllli..·.../ , A_'I,. (:>*..;t~

00 A

lMUWit laha;.

II, w.M~Qf~C01JN(f~to'l"E6t.\J'1D1HEillOOAlrrMENTSI

ItNOlVEO IN INJUI(YOR D"'AAGe Pf M'!'I.fCA!llfl.'

.~

om

, ",IA- m.

;r,tA- 6.. 'MlM£OOOAIMQ~O~IN.IU~voocu~....
I..,A. Co. MiIII.I!'

L.. ;)AvL Uoo·A 16·U) n. ~:~o=;o~~;~~~DJOORES£E5

'q':/I a4 IIe1.9'" '!>r "··'k';.. I e-A

~ t>" I"'£" "" AliA- "''''

1. ~ 1If.OO"~tIOWXOllII-IJUlI'I'qccURREI).
LWM ~~. lr.J '1hs- hi!\ t .• !;.) ....e 1010&,,,"
C•. I"~' 'Thf IkM:\ AI''TI>;[~ l~"'l!: It: .~~,.j ~-,"" JJT-l..,j. Il.'-I rh" t!c ulT M ~·cl-c".

"""'"
r=---
i"P""

I!'HOIiE

:t..tl>t~' ThG \t~¢''''I'>hI!1 1'1.&..110 \,Qo/.t.\ r""'

IPI1IJNE

g.IHO , ibeilt.€ ~('~o • Po.

we>i..S' NV",~'WI)';) 11 :-=~ INalRRIDT.O DATE IloIIdllhdll;DI"'" 0(recl!1pU'.". ropa~

e I&JlIIi !tQV~ I ~6 t.1."i-. 'IN b- ~6ts.,p. M,'j

;./7,1!

II. \\ItfIl! r'oI.Id:OII~AI'IAMl:DIC5Ci\l.LfOI

'" r ~I;i!

D. if I'tfW!ItlI\N WA~ ....SfTID QUI; TOINJU/IV,1Nd1IOtUAn:OFfJR'iTV1SIT Oltlp
"I~rAH'S IoI,WE; ~IiORFjSANOI'HONE'"N\JMSEI\:
i!1:.-1~r.. 'J. , iJt:~$'#·"'JC!l~;(rA.JflIl>'"
'Z;:l;;'';il (iN7W ,fAJ"/ II~;

'rOTALOM\MlES·TO·I:!....Th
•

T9TA.t.l:S:IlMAlW PAOSPECfIVl
,O~lSi

THIS CLAtM MUST BE SIGNEIJ. NOTE' PRESENTATION OFA FAtsECLAlliHs A FELONY (PENAL CODE SECTiON 72J

- CLAI~5 fOR DEATHi INJURYT() fE~50N 9~TO PERs9N:Al PROPERTY M.UST BE FILED NOT lATER THAN I> MONTHS.AFTER THE
OCC\JRENCE.IGOVERNMeNT-CODE SECTION 91 i.21
- • ALJ..0.THIiR CLAIMS F.OR DAMI\GIiS MU5-T BE r:1l£O NOr LATER YHAlt ON~ YEAR Ji.HI;R'ili.£. QC(:URRENcr. ((;OVERNMi:.'(i ~vac
5f.GnON".11.2)

" SIl~i;CTTPQ:ItTAIN_·.EXCEpnONSr.VOU H.AVE·ONLY SIX {1S1.M.O.,N,Tt-!S FR9M TH.E DATE OF THE"WRITTEN NOTICE OF REJECTION OF VOU.R ctAlPY\ TO FfLE A COURT ACTION. (GOYEfiNMEf«"CODE SECTION 945.6)

• I.F.wROTEN·~'tltE,OFREfEcrION OF YOUR CLAIM"IS .NOTGllJEN. YOU HAVE TWO (I) YEAtt5-F.QOM ~CCRUAL'OfTl:I CAUSE OF ACTION

TO F1i.'~ A·CO.URT ACTION. ~GOVtRNMENt CODE sEcrIO:rr~~5,.6J

.

OAn-

RP

'.01'1

\.

;, f', Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 39 of 47 Page ID #:139

l »><\' .~ (" ·.~o 7-11R""1II

"" ",h "l')NYIV',,\d tON~%ttONSI "vel,1 A:;' .1~OAtt±,,, Af'.L4
P.6"1~ A'IT t:.~f"t:\I~Tr(>.j / 10\1-[,1 KMltT I I4fJ~ L:t.:.s
P ;lJ"flf.:~V.:\\·;»J, loLt,;Y J"I rli,aL'''';..\\'~<J.\WILH\ o.Vl';lt~ -"

4:"?"~~ -lh!O ~1 ;'<', ~J -:1 ~ ~J-(p t·~;It1"· ~ i\ i., A!'l! tI1fCf.>':" ~.9.!'>r"""b-:J;N~thF. 'T~~ Celi $ I I4"-1L H....I:!,s, /i,$.b;,.}l'!JI
"'....A~~ . J,,!l;~j;. .. VI\~.~gAl~r..Jb:~ .~.£y."'~_'J::hllt_..-:i!~I1I"_'~ _...... "'" .. ..~.rl,~ t:ltll)~...J~~l~t A",/}i.. WJ;;d.E. lliLA."",l'hw6:: .~J.·L.. _..._
cNli~ ~l .·~I!1~'It\'o!~ J2sJI ~'~ . J .. lh.d._~~~.... ... _.
. .b.e:U. ~t>:_4:>l;/Jd.>~' MY ..aM; J4!.t'!l; !u.y-A V'Y_~.t1!I,M!..M&..L ..

..g~)Q"I.·a"" ~ol" --:~Ii ..W\!i~ 1,~ ..""h.. . _$J1ff'... 6·~I(£ .._)n;:.: _.. __...... ..

.. . tiY_4AT.t.~ ...A-.'" .~. 1J!..t "M4~.>,I.l!J 9'-i6A<l.~To M;>~~ ..~~~:tt\.I .....E<!."'... .. - •
.. ]hli' .. ';;C ... ~1:Jl?:;...,!A...,t~ .. P:,-"'~H~~~ . ~.y_'Jh.!,!_~!"oth.{......~.:.,.o.._.. __......... _
'. ~(t Jh~~~.$,. ~A-.-t~~.~~J§i~~.IJ!Y\ .... SI/ L~~cL,~T.~.!!~~._E:t4_..
. 1\-:I.G;. ·.bl.~ ...NE~{AT~~\~I~~m'i . NI'\.1:~~,...:...'Th~I11-A"

A~~J\\!~
J:L....L

.~~~~. (,A~:'I
.........1 Jwl . _. -

r~r...bh:_:~..~_ .

.

.

_~"S. . .:,. ~i_.~__'. . .

_._~c. .4.~_J._t. _i_

...'

__ .

..:t4'tiT;h~1. !i:S;i,,-.

.. - . .-

--'

-_.. -.--,_._ .. -"

.. ..- ...-.. . '-~--'-"-'---~-'--'--" ----.-----.-.~-

---.-,,-.-.-~ --~-.,

--.-.-..,..._ _'._------._-------..---- .. ,'--.. -- .. '

_ '"---;----.--.----.----~-.--:-.--.~-

..

----.------ ------,---.- -- -----"'---- - ,--~

..

.. •.. .. .-..-- ,~.--

.'~"-' ---.-."-~ ,,- ~

.....

. .- - - - - - - - - . -

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/0097-P1ag1e94'0"of 47 Page ID #:140

(OUNT{ Of lOS III'lGEl£'>

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
t~_SJRUCTI.Q1i~
1. Read claim Ihoroughly. 1. Fill out claim as indicated; attach additional inforrnation if ne(e~$ary, 3. Please return Ihis .)riglnal signed claim and any altachmenls
supporting your claim. This form ml!~_t be signed.

, 1-' . ./.

-.

TOTAl ESTlM,o.'1l11I'llOSPKIM OMMGB:

WARNING

CLAIMS FOR DEATH,JNJURV TO PERSON OR TO PJ;RSONAl PROPERTY MUST BE FILED Nor LATERTHAN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE OCCURENCE, {GOVERNMENT CODE semON 911.21
. ALL OTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES MUST BE FILE.D NOr"LATER THAN'OHE YEM AFTER THlOCCOliflliNCL'ic.iovERNMEN;" CODE
SECTION 911.21

. ~,ueJ:';.(;T To c;eRTM" ~XWTIQN:i, YQU HI\¥E ON.!..YSIl{ (1$01 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE WRITTEN NOTICE OF REJEcnON OF YOUR CLAIM TO FilE ACOURT ACTION. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 945.61

- IF WRlmN NOTICE OF REJECTION OF YOUR CLAIM 15 NOT GIVEN, YOU HAVE nNO (2) YEARS FROM ACCRUAL OFTHE CAUSE OF ACTION

TO FilE ACOURT ACTION. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION_'o4ii",'J~_ _

1~ POllHTOlfm'f NlM[
t<\1."~lH

t. c1 I _.

om

0\..,,1.1; l O l l ill

liS. ~~~I~~~~m(iij"fj[l~.~~:I$!H~ ..9. 'J GI f>.
<,-.~::-t!t.c~~=j ' . c--.._..",,,,,,,,.-__

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 41 of 47 Pi~a;ge)-ID #:141 07-119 ..

\-\t:: ~\"'(6-t;, !VII> ON ,\,.e:; \...Ob A",hIE} Cou"o'TY f>"h.orfS ~r>\>iA;rI'V\&N\ SElF. ME-~tC,.TtorJ' ~ltoGlI."M ON-thAT lA=iG'

~O"'l'hl\::(, 'l&~~ NoT ~E-C.Er"E?" )'\N'l me~TtA"hoN fo.~_
my \t&A\TI-\- ~j!ob\EmS " ..A S6LF ;rIGAs VNTJ;L.. 10·30·0(".
~'t5 Aei.oN CoNn'trt.lr~s blfo5S tJeG-h:f.\.uz~ o,.l 'ThE PA-i/

\hE: cF

Abiiv..1MsT.tA:fooN of lks t>lloGICj\rV\. r",.(ThEi/M'ol{6",

,.~> \"",f56 :11\1 l~MJ5 of rNi:(l A II'\lI,AIil+ I QA"£Ed~~

ME $.e"i~6 P/ll'N I AN ~ SIlf'feP.~·

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 42 of 47 Page ID #:142
EXHIBIT COVER PAGE B
EXHIBIT Description of this Exhibit: 1\ IC \... LA.. / !,(c. b It x ,"'.11: " "\x 0 "-l L..u.."\,..;. "'0 t. I '" M AI<=. So ~ N.\ K G
I...~' ~LYGL8<;' CO u...u."-N '::3;1\.l:L.$:
Number of pages to this Exhibit__Y.=--_pages.
JURISDICTION: (Check only one)· E::J Municipal Court r:::::::J Superior Court E::J Appellate Court . t:::I State Supreme Court
- United States District Court
r:::::::J State Circuit Court r:::::::J United States Supreme Court E::J Grand Jury

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 43 of 47 Page ID #:143

:'\..

,KNOW

YOUR

,

r

,

~:

. RIGHTS.,
"·'C",,_,,·_ .. __

----_.- -.-~. . -
ACLU/SC ORIENTATION

.. - - - - - - - - -~~-----ifV -

GUIDE FOR INMATES IN THE

105 ANGELES COUNTY JAILS:

\

-+ "RIGHTS AN, D RESOURCES

,

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 44 of 47 Page ID #:144

Inmates in any Los Angeles County Jail Facility have certain rights under state regulations and sheriffs dept policy concerning the following matters:
1. MEDICAL SERVICES
• SICK CALL: Inmates have the right to have sick call available 5 days a week, and pill call available 7 days a week.
• EMERGENCIES: Emergency medical and dental services _are available 24 hours a day. Inmat~s who 1 request emergency attention must have a face to face meeting with medical personnel as soon as possible.
Inmates who request a dental exam should receive treatment within 3 weeks. Inmates may be prescribed dentures if necessary.
• PREGNANCY AND CHILD CARE SERVICES: Female inmates are entitled to abortions. Inmates have the rightto have childbirths take place outside of the jail. Expecting mothers have" the right to have access
_ -.!9_~Q.tiE.n_a[1Q [Q~.ter ca~e services, but will not be
forced to use the services. Nursing mothers may be admitted to the nursery progr;lm.
• MENTAL HEALTH: Mental health services should include but are not limited to (1) screening for mental illness, {2} crisis intervention and management of acute psychiatric episodes, (3) stabilization and treatment of mental disorders, and (4) medication support services.
• INDIGENT KITS: Inmates who cannot afford .hygiene kits can get one for free. These free kits, which are called "Indigent Kits," include a toothbrush,' toothpaste, soap, a comb and shaving implement. If . at some point an indigent inmate receives money in his/her account the inmate will be charged later for any indigent kit he/she received earlier..
2. MEALS
Inmates. have the right to receive three meals in any 24' hour period. At least one ofthese meals must include hot food. Inmates have the right to a minimum of 15 minutes for the actual consumption of each meal.

3. TELEPHONES
Inmates have the right to reasonable access to telephones.
4. VISITING
All inmates may get visits from family and friends, which total at least one hour each week per inmate. There is no limit to the number of attorney visits, but they must happen during the jail's attorney room hours. Attorney visits should be held In a designated attorney room.
5. MAIL
There is no limit on the amount of mail that an inmate may send or receive.
Inmate mail may be read only when there is a valid security reason an"d the facility manager approves. Inmates may r~tain ten letters and five photos at any given time. "
Inmates may correspond, confidentially, with state "and federal courts, any member of the State Bar or holder ."" of public office, and the State Board of Corrections. Jail authorities may open and inspect sudl"mail onry"to search for contraban"d, cash, checks, or money orders': and in the presence of the inmate.
Inmates may correspond, confidentially, with the facility manager or the facility administrator.
• LEGAL MAil: Outgoing legal mail should be given to the module prowler and inspected in the presence ofthe inmate to ensure that it does not contain contraband. Incoming legal mail should be delivered unopened and then opened in the presence of the inmate.
• INDIGENT MAIL: Those inmates who are without funds have the right to at least two postage paid letters each week for "correspondence with family members and friends and an unlimited number of postage letters to his or her attorney and to the courts.
• CONTRABAND: Inmates· may not send or receive any contraband material, such as sharp objects, money, or illegal substances.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 45 of 47 Page ID #:145

6. SHOWERS
Inmates have the right to shower/bathe upon
assignment to a housing unit and at least every other
day or more often if possible. Enhanced Schedule due 10 slaph infections: Inmales should be allowed 10 shower every day.

the inquiry, or by higher authority. Complaints should be resolved within 10 days of receipt unless justifiable reasons exist to delay the final disposition. Such reasons should be documented on the complaint. Inmates must be given a written reason for any denial of a complaint.

7. CLOTHING EXCHANGE
Inmates have the right to have outer garments (except footwear) exchanged once each week and to have undergarments and socks exchanged twice each week. Inmates have the right to have blankets exchanged
once each month. Enhanced Schedule due 10 slaph Infections: Inmates halle the right to receive a clothing exchange twice each week. Each exchange should include two sets ofundergarments and one set ofoutergarments.
8. BOOKS. NEWSPAPERS AND PERIODICALS
Inrryates may subscribe to, and receive through the mail magazines, books, newspapers, and periodicals I ~""acceptable for distribution by the U.S. Postal Office and deemed appropriate by the Unit Commander. The puolication must be mailed from the publisher or originate from an approved vendor or distributor.
... Inmates may have a maximum ofthree books In their possession at any time.
-. Inmates may have a maximum of one newspaper In , their possession at any time.
-. Inmates may have a maximum of two periodicals In' their possession at any time.
9. RECREATION'
Inmates have the right to a minimum of three hours of
exercise a week outside of their cell.
10. SEARCHES
A sergeant should be present during hous'ing area searches. Any complaints regarding a search should be directed to the supervising sergeant.

12. DISCIPLINE

-t A Discipline Review Board ("Sergeants Court")

hearing shall be conducted within 72 hours of the

incident. If more than 72 hoJrs have elapsed, no

discipline can be imposed and a hearing is not

necessary.

,'.'

I-+ Inmates held in discipline longer than 30 days must receive a consultation by health care staff after' 30 ,, days, and every '5 days thereafter. '
:+ The disciplinary diet should norbe maintained,
in any case, for more than 72 consecutive hours , without written approval of the Unit Commander.

-to Minor disciplinary action may include,_ but is

//'

not limited to: extra work detail, removal from

/'

mEF--'---- -w(teorrekpahSoSniegsn,mteelnetv,isteiomnp, ovrisairtyin"logscso1offfl'pfrfiiv~islaergy)e,s

lockdown for up to 24' hours.

'

... Ir:tmates should never be denied food, showers, c9rrespondence privileges (uniess discipline resulted from a violationof policy related to correspondence privileges), or access toJheir
attorney,. for disciplinary action or otherWise.
I
13. VOTIN!'
I\'In in mate whq is registered to vote may vote by mail .,Jith, an absentee ballot. To vote, inmates should ' sLbmit-a request form to Inmate SerVices for a voter r~gistra:tion card and an absentee ballot form. Inmates afe still eligible to vote if:
.... They have been ~onvicted of a misdemeanor.

... They are awaiting trial for any crime and not yet convicted.

11. INMATE COMPLAINTS
Inmates should have unrestricted access to complaint forms. Inmates have the right to be advised of their complaint disposition by the staff assigned to conduct

-. They have previously been convicted of a felony and have completed their sentence and parole.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 46 of 47 Page ID #:146

til.
~Provide5 h~lp with contacting family/community :::> organizations. Fill aut an inmate request farm-and laJl check the box for Friends Outside or contact t~em ~. directly at:
...:464E. WalnutS!reet
Pasadena, CA 91101 (6261 795-7607
-
Ifyou have a complaint about physicai canditi6ns, medical services, or mental health services, pl~ase contacttheACLU Jails Project at:
1616 Beverly Blvd . .los Angeles~ CA 90026 (21 31977-9543

YOUR MAILING ADDRESS AT ANY LA.
COUNTY CUSTODY FACILITY,
Name Booking Number (7 Digits) P.O, Box 86164 Terminal Annex Los Angeles. CA 90086-0164

•Every Inmate has the right to request religiOUS r\

serv(ces. Chaplain- services' are made available5y

filling'out an inmate request farm. Chaplains may

_. __ 'assistinmates ,in'obtaining wrfting-materials arid
__ -~-'':,~~_~Sl iE~? rrangLnK f?:.!!1 [0.3:tes :_l~_Ug!g_~ 5 ~ead ~r.~-to._,. ~:<,
·. ~ _':',:I.!£s'it:tfiem: in-the visitingarea~ These services',jre~'
,; ;WaHable1a all and any religion.
"'-',:'
Provides assistance with ho.using/shelter, alc. ab' oll

drug rehabilitation or employment/job develo"ment

.'contactc.T.U. fill out a request form 01' call (Sool

QU-9909 upon release.

'

May be contacted for legal assistance at:

26T5. Fig~eroa-St;,

~uit"e30a
-,' los Ang,eles;.CAgoo12.

. (213)243-1525

•For assistance with mental health questions ai,

complaints, please contact;

.

.

Pati,ents' Rights Office/Department .of Mental Health. 5505'. VermontAve -: LO~,Angehes,;CA 90~20
(8"o) 7.00-9966"

JAILS PROJECT

1\ HI

ACLU/SC 1616 BEVERLY BLVD. LOS ANGELES, CA 90026 PHONE (213) 977-9543

-~

1 'LIBERTY' !

ACLUi AND JUSTICE:
___ ~_=-.J FOR ALL i

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 16 Filed 08/12/09 Page 47 of 47 Page ID #:147

VERIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

"

(C.C.P. SEC. 446 & 2015.5: 28 U.S.c. 1746)

"-

IN

THE

I, I"\~~...,~c r· O\<~'Bf-..
ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION.

I

DECLARE UNDER PENALY OF PERJURY THAT: HAVE READ THE FOREGOING DOCUMENTS AND

IKANMOWTHTEH=E::-'YC~6O:<::.:N~T=c=EN==!NT=S:-:T==HE=R:-:E:-:OC=F

AND THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO MATTERS STATED THEREIN UPON INFORMATION,

AND BELIEF, AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS, I BELIEVE THEM TO BE TRUE.

EXECUTED THIS AUG 10 200 l DAYOF
CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA CALIF·"'0"'RN-=-=IA:-;:,92::-::2"'3::-3--::5"'00'"'2:----"'?-·
C::: ...

{SIGNATURE)I---D;;E;C:;Lt;;7,;A;;N,,T,;/;P:R,;I,S,;O::N..:E:R::.....f:-_·-=.-·::::---~

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

A 9.--,-..

(C.c.P. SEC. 1013 (a) & 2015.5 28 U.S.c. 1746)

I,

...~ f'.... . .fJOHNtii'"fL. AMARESIDENTOFCALIPATRIASTATEPRISON,INTHECOUNTYOF

IMPERIAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, I AM OVER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS OF AGE AND AM / AM NOT A

PARTY OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION. MY STATE PRISON ADDRESS IS P.O. BOX 5002, CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON,

CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

\ I r t-, - -, n('l ......: ...,

f rW.l t>.-IM6"'\'8\ ON ':'J' t: .

".

2009 IS SERVED THE FOREGOING:

C.b1'A~LA;:;\

t.'< \~:<\",,\ CD\j e.e... \> A Gc S

,I

A ,\ 1.

SET FORTH EXACT TITLE OF DOCUMENTS SERVED

ON THE PARTY{S) HEREIN BY PLACING A TRUE COPY{S) THEREOF, ENCLOSED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE{S) WITH POSTAGE THEREON FULLY PAlD, IN THE UNITED STATES MAlL, IN A DEPOSIT BOX SO PROVIDED AT CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

v\,tV.-r\o~ $.\\~w '\...l-~ILt..d CbuJ
L~IU'""-I.ILA.L ~.L~'LL2"t bt== C:A--Ll:""foLrJ.:t:~
ClE-L"-. CoL \\~" 1\"." c.L,J"lc ~o<e'" '" GLG-

. v-.",-,'\,,\" ,<,\,\"1:,,,> (be> d \-\CLLi8

o.\}. "\0,,-,1\ S\L=.llr. s:LLee\-

\..0; !\~\L,.G L co· ', c'r''. "'ObI)....

r"

THERE IS DELIVERY SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MAlL AT THE PLACE SO ADDRESSED, AN THERE IS REGULAR COMMUNICATION BY MAIL BETWEEN THE PLACE OF MAlLING AND THE ~ ADDR S~D. I DECLARE
UNDER PEN~~~ OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS ~= AN?,4:0RRE~;;;';_ .-.........,.

. ATE

ii' "

,2009 --~---Jy:;;.;E;;-;";'-R ;-;=;C_17:=RISO~=Q:3:-r-/{~.~.

 </s> Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:532

MAV.!X'C!.~ ~.r~ ft.L.~ OLt:~"!2L
FULL NAME
COMMITTED NAME (if different)
C&,\..II: i:8"l8.~8. ~\i~-r~ rlt.rs.o~ /i~L~~ bS" 13\
FULL ADDRESS INCLUDING NAME OF INSTITUTION
t:-t). Be-x 500~ C"Lx ~AT!l.&A , CA "a~33
F&3~o3
PRISON NUMBER (if applicable)

~':H.. o .... l AM.~U~ b. IS. c..:I~~LA.I:"/l..Ll
A I"\':-M h.. ~ "d.,.- e...LA.1:1"\ l:I
CFL,IEL.:F.i,-D<.._uv.-VsE. SDTicS:TRFNI'CDT!VclSqI~O~T
~llG 23 lOlO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DI~T Of CAL~¥~~~0
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BY

CASE NUMBER
t" oS-'1(<..'t"SF'w ("A.b~)
To be supplied by the Clerk
PLAINTIFF, \--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

v.

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO (Check one)

111 42 U.S.C. § 1983

o DEFENDANT(S).

Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

A. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1. Have you brought any other lawsuits in a federal court while a prisoner: 111 Yes 0 No
2. If your answer to "1." is yes, how many? _--",o<LM=-~=.~_ _ _ __
Describe the lawsuit in the space below. (If there is more than one lawsuit, describe the additional lawsuits on an attached piece of paper using the same outline.)

1""'; c.."'.L.U\'\ e.~ L .. ~ A.1Ul.-IELc~ o'i"Frc.rA.L ~cL%c..'i or ~ot.o!'G,,-...:\~ ....d.3" FS~~L""'­
C.t:Tr2.ek.\!I ~'i -:S::1\.l~"'t..""A.\cc...l l=-cd... A.AI. rJU~""M.o..u;. C«...x:M.oS ~\'\'LS'-LA.l\.Ll \ 0
tr:!MA..\.. c.t>~G: s..~(!.\::ou 10&2.. \iJiIk~ A£..I:cc,,", .... I\.\~L£L c.."L",.L of LA...v..l..

CV-66 (7/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page lof6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 2 of 26 Page ID #:533
a. Parties to this previous lawsuit: Plaintiff _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Derendarns ___________________________________________________
b. Court _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
c. Docketorcasenumber _____________________________________________________ d. Name of judge to whom case was assigned ________________________________ e. Disposition (For example: Was the case dismissed? If so, what was the basis for dismissal? Was it
appealed? Is it still pending?) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ f. Issues raised: _______________________________________________
g. Approximate date of filing lawsuit: ______________________________________ h. Approximate date of disposition ___________________________________
B. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 1. Is there a grievance procedure available at the institution where the events relating to your current complaint occurred? 0 Yes 0 No 2. Have you filed a grievance concerning the facts relating to your current complaint? 0 Yes 0 No If your answer is no, explain why not _____________________________

3. Is the grievance procedure completed? 0 Yes 0 No If your answer is no, explain why not ___________________________________

4. Please attach copies of papers related to the grievance procedure.
C. JURISDICTION This complaint alleges that the civil rights ofplaintiff _________________________________________
(print plaintiff's name)
who presently resides at ----------"'-=::!(mTa!llm:g=ad-d:res:s =or=pl-ac:e :of:co:nf:in-em:e=nt)=r-====~---------­ were violated by the actions of the defendant(s) named below, which actions were directed against plaintiff at
(institution/city where vIOlation occurred)

CV-66 (7/97)

CIVIL RIGIITS COMPLAINT

Page 2 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 3 of 26 Page ID #:534

on (date or dates) _ _ _--,7"T:"=-,.,-___,d\/oilr;~ n~et."" lolll'J loCo

(Claim I)

(Claim II)

(Claim III)

NOTE: You need not name more than one defendant or allege more than one claim. If you are naming more than five (5) defendants, make a copy of this page to provide the information for additional defendants.

1. Defendant nl.l':'IErr./I.:::C>'=:<:':-::fiB~~::?:iA.==:T.::=-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ resides or works at (fuTI name of tll'St defendant)
'-1.'100 K.N-\ON A &L. . . ~. j
(full address of first defendant)

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): Gil individual ~ official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law: F.....rL""jli;; "\ 0 ~"",~li:I"\5"I\lT A. \..A'i>~ ?DI...,-c..'1 ~;'-'M6M..;N\, ~6t.-.....LM:t;o'..i, 0(, ~IifMOlC..lv-.I~L411.t 10 b.s-?",,'\[;,s;> \0 c.O=....c;.\O: '1:'~.5 C... sToM. Clf" \-\0<4"1::""''''' rll..;'T~cAL ~~\"';["A.lC:GS C'-l I-tNSAsN rlAif-.-{ C.cLL~,
2. Defendant 7(fulrl n.aimrero:f f:ir:st=de'fe:n7aanFt) =;-:r:==::-r-------------------- resides or works at
(full address of first defendant) (defendant's posItIOn and tItle, If any)
The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): 0 individual D official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

3. Defendant .",..",..,....,,,,o-:,"--,.-,...,,,,,...,,..,.=,.-.-,...-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ resides or works at (full name of ftrst defendant) (full address of first defendant) (defendant's position and tItle, If any)
The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): 0 individual D official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

CV-66 (7/97)

CIVIL. RIGHTS COMPL.AINT

Page 3 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 4 of 26 Page ID #:535

4. Defendant

resides or works at

n(f~ul~l~na~m~e~o~f~h~~~t~de~t~en~dLan~t~)----------------------------------------

(full address of first defendant)
(defendant's poSitIOn and title, If any)

The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): 0 individual 0 official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

5. Defendant ------------------------------------------------------- resides or works at
(full name of first defendant)
(full address of first defendant)
(defendant's position and title, If any)
The defendant is sued in hislher (Check one or both): 0 individual 0 official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

CV-66 (7/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 4 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 5 of 26 Page ID #:536

D. CLAIMS*
The following civil right has been violated: 1\-\1i: ~l",:x;..u ~rF/.:. CA\.\'!.G of AeT.t:C>IU

CLAIMIl K,,,,,-t.T.. "'-~b''-I II\:';

~'4..:7 ~I(.o""'~

t.LA, ...dG

of n-tlS

r.d'''\I-\ AM!;;., fCl ....ilet;A.ll!=\ A,",,-=IIL~I"l':=M\$,.. I'-'\."L~O\j~Ie., T~~ It-liiA.I'/ Gs. ,,,13. Lc '\\.:rul.-

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you describe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.
OI\L 0"/ C'll/o~ C,.c; .....w.,'1 f:.\-4GIl.d~f C.\c\,.To~-< ~LS?-""T~b~ ~SS.,",b",,\S ~ J,*~ ~L"~N.T,3;-i="F
To L.\:''-IG r", M.C>bu....\..~ ~Soo Cell A.-ott>. ~".ur~i: ,~C~ :fAd.... C~\..L -n\\S I"LA"'N'\rFF

I\tlA.c:.~~"" i ~",b. 11...6b- AI\L\ rAt FGs.'T A \J::O~. t= ....1L '('I\~ M.fJi-C I "(',",r~ Ce LL C!.o.u\ A'I',\.II3' ~

eo \(", ...1."0::. '\\\/H WGoII...G Lr"~",,,G-! "'''' ~ A..:c b. X:Al.lY \:!. A.1l.c. ......... ''''leG To LeeT A'l.~A·

M"IlGo\Le.e..., i~L"'.c".l\tl"'t= c..,,!,.LrA.C!-T.s~ Lre.E i=.t.OA\ A AATT.c.-=s~ \"\6' """,,-So <;'L~~~rl\l,lr O..J-

"'4....v.4b. ~ ",<:(...\-1. (.,1"""l>S~ r~1!.. MA-II.I~n4\ <"l~", b...:f.(.bi..o';';""JOO,,",

t-L..,,-OO',,"" .c-FF ~ rnt l\.l~Is..

:fltclTl\ lrll.."r", At-o;;-/1ot. \\~~ PLA-r..tl~ FF- W. '\-s. F",,,-(!'e-(\. \0 \""00\1': .t::....t IL{ 0;;-$\2 I+o~.r- i:)

fo~rN..Lr ~JL~"TLrA.-L.. h>E"T~~NW~> L~'lG tN
. F...a-I\-GMOU:, .s\t-~l(oC'P.~ ~Ae.A: v.1A-'::, A.VN....t..c;-

.......I\ISA.IIJ 'tTA.jI..::/ e...~LL CDl':..tlltT..s::-PNS, of TH-~ w.~~,;s~It"'-A-b CI.o\.!.TcM., [to"'T~l

*If there is more than one claim, describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same

outline.

CV-66 (7/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 6 of 26 Page ID #:537
s:
~~U\A.A~ \0 ,8 u..$ C. ~ 3<..2(,. Lb~ C'Zl ).

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 7 of 26 Page ID #:538
E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF I believe that I am entitled to the following specific relief:

AUG 19 2010
(Date)
CV-66 (7/97)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 6of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 8 of 26 Page ID #:539

,

,

EXHIBIT COVER PAGE A

EXHIBIT

Desoription of this' Exhibit:

Number of pages to this Exhtbit_-,-/1_ _ pages.
'.'
JURISDICTION: (Check only one)
c:::::J Municipal Court c:::J SuperiO,r Court c::::J Appellate Court
.t=:],State Supreme Court . - United States District Court c:::::JState Circuit Court
't:::J United States Supreme Court .c=J Grand Jury

. ~-

.

'I CJa:s7e~2!:0,c8a-cev-20:77S1-6c9v--J0F4W11-1A-G00RP :Doooccuummeenntt8819 FFilieleddO0S8/1/02/306/10Pa,Pgeag1eof92ofP2a6geP10ag#e:40ID #:540

")"
~.
1
2
3 4 5
6

. MAY 10 3d

Priority Send Enter Closed -
JS-SI1S·6 JS-2I1S_3 Scan Oniy ':::

7

, .

,

8

UNITED-' STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DENNIS RUTHERFORD, et al.

12

Plaintiffs,

13

v.

14 LEROY BACA, et al. ,

15

Defendants.

) Case No .eJP 5- 04111 - Di) P
)
) ,ORDER
) ) ) )
) ) )

16

.

17

The ACLU, attorneys for the plaintiffs, requested that the

18 Court conduct a status conference concerning conditions at the

19 Men's Central Jail. These conditions include allegations of

20 overcrowding. On May 8, 2006, the Court conducted the requested

21 status conference. During the status conference, counsel for the

22 plaintiffs requested that the Court assume, in effect, the role of

23 a mediator in facilitating 'the improvement of conditions at the

24 Men's Central Jail. Counsel for the defendants disputed the

25 allegations that overcrowding existed at the Men's Central Jail,

26 and disputed the presence of other substandard conditions as well.

27 During the hearing, counsel for the ACLU requested that the Court

28 receive an orientation tour of the Men's Central Jail. Counsel for

MAY t 02008

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 FFiilleedd0058/1/203/0/610 PaPgaeg2eo1f02 ofP2a6ge IPDa#g:4e1ID #:541
'.

1 the defendants agreed to arrange the orientation tour. On May 10,

Ll

2 2006 at 3 :30 p.m. the Court received the orientation tour.

Ut :2',

Z

3

The Court sets this matter for further status conference(pn

4 May 11, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.

5
6 Dated: May 10, 2006
7

DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

- - - - - - .. - .._---

. Cas._e,·;r.2/:"0C8a-scv-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9849 FFileilded060/81/62/036/10PaPgeag1eof1115ofP2a6ge PIDa#g:e46ID #:542
;:/

MARK D. ROSENBAUM SBN 59940

2

PREATNEJRAN1.AELNIAATSABERRAGJA1NSB, NSB1N89213100149 ACLU FOUNDATION OF

3

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1616 Beverly Boulevard

4

Los Angeles, CA 90026 Telephone: (213) 977-9500

5 FacsImile: (213) 250-3919

FILED a.ERIC. U.S. DISTRICT COURT

6 Attorneys for Plainti ffs

7 PAUL BEACH, SBN 166265

8

DA VID D. LAWRENCE, SBN 123039 FRANSCELL, STRICKLAND~

9

ROBERTS & LAWRENCE, I"".C. 100 West Broadway;.. Suite 1200

10

Glendale, CA 912HJ-1219 Telephone: (818) 545-1925

S

II Facsimile: (818) 545- I937 12 Attorneys for Defendants

Priority

Send

~

Enter Closed . , -

JS·5IJS-6 -

JS·2/JS·3 -

ScanOnly=

"

13

14

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17 DENNIS RUTHERFORD, et ai,

18

Plainti ffs,

19

20

v.

21 SHERMAN BLOCK, et aI.,

22

Defendants.

Case No. Civ. 75-041 I I-DDP STIPULATION RE PARTIES' SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION~; IlBOP05fdli ORDER THEREON

23

24

25

26

27

DOCKETED ON eM

28

I
I

r'\_; I!'--====~~

, .

,I'

Cas~e,/2!':0C,8a-scv-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9489 FFileilded060/816/2/036/10PagPeag2eof1125ofP2a6ge P10a#g:e47ID #:543

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

2

I. On April 13, 2006, plaintiffs filed with the Court a Request for awtStatus

3 Conference, seeking to establish a collaborative process to effectively addres~

~

4 alleged systemic problems at Men's Central Jail. On April 26,2006, the part~~s

5 through counsel met and conferred on the issues raised by the plaintiffs' request.

6 Subsequently, on May 8, 2006, the Court held a status conference at which the

7 parties and the Court agreed to tour Men's Central Jail. On May 10,2006, the

8 Court toured Men's Central Jail, along with officials of the Los Angeles Sheriffs

9 Department, the ACLU Jails Project Coordinator, and counsel for the parties.

10

2. On May 11, 2006, the Court held a status conference at which counsel

II for the parties agreed to meet and conter regarding the alleged systemic problems at

12 Men's Central Jail raised by the plaintiffs. On May 23, 2006, the parties filed a

13 joint status report with the Court. On May 25, 2006, the Court held another 14 conference. On June 5, 2006, the parties filed another joint status report. On June

15 6, 2006, the Court held another conference and directed the parties to return to

16 court on June 15, 2006 with persons with decision-making authority from the 17 Sheriffs Department and a point-person from the ACLU to discuss and resolve the

18 issues raised.

19

ST) PULATION

20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, that:
21

22

I. Plaintiffs have identified a number of conditions at Men's Central Jail

23 for which Plaintiffs seek amelioration, including: (a) permanent reduction of cell

24 populations of 6-men cells in Modules 2000-4000 to 4-men cells; (b) permanent

25 reduction cell populations of 4-men cells in Modules 2000-4000 to 2-men cells; (c)

26 permanent reduction of the density of Module 5000 and 9000 dormitories to no

27 more than 64 beds each, and conversions of larger dormitories into multiple 64-bed

28 donnitories if necessary; (d) use of dayrooms and/or multi-purpose rooms as

-2-

, .

:;

. Case 2/ :!0C8a-csv-02:77156-c9v--J0F4W11-1A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd0068/1/62/30/610PaPgaeg3eo1f315of P26ageP1a0g#e:4I8D #:544

"
I indoor recreation rooms to provide at least one hour of daily indoor recreation to. all

2 general population inmates, and equipment of indoor recreation rooms with o.

3 televisions and appropriate exercise equipment; (e) provision of one hour of z~

6 4

outdoor recreation to all general population inmates, three times a week; (f)
V'l

5 provision of one hour of recreation, five days a week, with at least one hour of

6 outdoor recreation each week, to inmates placed in disciplinary segregation; (g)

7 expansion of visitation from four days per week to seven days per week; and (h)

8 implementation of staff and inmate accountability measures and operational

9 changes relating to inmate supervision and safety.

10

2. In order to determine the feasibility of the changes proposed in

11 paragraph I above and the most effective, cost-efficient, and sustainable methods

12 by which to make changes that are deemed feasible, the parties agree to convene a

13 panel of experts, which shall be charged with determining the methods by which to

14 ameliorate the above conditions and make any other improvements, including but

15 not limited to population density reduction, increases in out-of-cell time, and

16 enhancement of inmate supervision and safety.

17

3. The panel shall have its initial in-person meeting no later than the

18 week of June 26, 2006. The panel shall produce a final, comprehensive, written

19 plan containing immediate measures for improvement (within six months), 20 intermediate measures (from 6 to 24 months), and long-term measures (2-6 years) 21 to ameliorate conditions. The panel shall, as an initial step, assess the proper time 22 frame for developing the final, comprehensive plan. Upon completion, the plan 23 shall be submitted for review to the parties and the Court, and also to the County 24 Board of Supervisors for its legislative or budgetary consideration. The final plan 25 shall include, but is not limited to, recommendations on which the parties agreed 26 and issues regarding which the parties were not able to reach agreement. Any panel 27 members may include as an attachment to the report an explanation of additional 28 recommendations on which the parties were not able to reach agreement.

-3-

. ,
Case /2.:!.0C~8a-cv-20:7715-6c9v--J0F41W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd060(81/62/306/10PaPgeag4eo1f 415of P2a6gePIDag#e:49ID #:545

1

4. The panel shall make reports of its progress to the Court, the partiesz:,.and

2

the

County

Board

of

Supervisors

every

thirty

days,

starting

with

thirty

days

fro~
z

the

3 date of entry of this Order. The progress reports shall indicate areas of agreeme~t

v')

4 between the parties, areas of disagreement, and topics of the panel's discussions.

5 Within 60 days of the entry of this Order, the panel shall prepare a report to the Court,

6 the parties and the County Board of Supervisors regarding the panel members'

7 recommendations for immediate improvement measures. This report shall indicate

8 areas and issues on which the panel was not able to reach agreement, and shall

9 include as an attachment to the report any panel member's explanation of the

10 additional recommendations on which the parties were not able to reach agreement.

11

5. The panel shall be composed of the following persons: (a} Jody Kent, Jails

12 Project Coordinator at the ACLU of Southern California; (b) David Bogard and no

13 more than three other representatives from the firm ofPultizer/Bogard & Associates,

14 LLC; (c) no more than six representatives from the Los Angeles County Sheriffs

15 Department and the Los Angeles County Chief Administrative Office. At least 2 of

16 the 6 shall be from the Los Angeles County Chief Administrative Office and one

17 member shall be Sharon Harper. The panel members recognize that the continuity of

18 their leadership is critical to the success of this initiative. Therefore, the panel

19 members shall not have others substitute in their place. Nothing shall prevent panel

20 members from being assisted by other personnel.

21

6. Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC is a criminal justice planning and

22 consulting firm, with extensive experience relating to jail systems. Based on tours of

23 Men's Central Jail and review of relevant documents, the firm ofPulitzerlBogard has

24 made an Outline Of An Illustrative Plan For Remedial Measures For The Los Angeles

25 County Men's Central Jail, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Defendants shall

26 compensate the firm ofPulitzerlBogard & Associates, LLC in the amount of

27 $20,000, for services rendered as participants on the panel for the sixty-day period.

28

.4'/-<.(--

Case 2~:0C8a-scv-20:7715-6c9v--J0F41W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd060/81/62/306/10PaPgeag5eo1f 515of P2a6gePIDag#e:50ID #:546

7. Nothing in this stipulation shall be construed as an admission of

2 liability by Defendants.

~ Lu

3 Dated: June 15,2006

j

4

Respectfully Submitted,

CJ

V'l

5

ACLU FOUNDAnON OF

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

6

7 8

BY:~

.

Mark D. Rosenbaum

9

Attorney for Plaintiffs

10

II

FRANSCELL, STRICKLAND,

12

ROBERTS & LAWRENCE

13

14

By~'~=-~~____________

15

ach ey for Defendants

16

17 IT IS SO ORDERED.
18

9 1

Dated: 6·- 1.5"--OG

20

Hon.b~

21

United States District Judge

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-5-

Case 2:0!. 8C-acsve-027:7156-9cv-J-0F4W11-1A-GDDRP DDooccuummeenntt 8949 FFiilleedd 0068/1/263/0/160 PaPgaeg6e o1f61o5f 2P6ageP1a0g#e:5I1D #:547

Outline Of An Illustrative Plan For Remedial Measures For The Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail
June 14,2006
Background
Within the past two weeks, the American Civil Liberties Association of Southern California (ACLU-SC) has retained the firm of Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC (P/BA)1 to assist in the review of operations of the Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail (MCJ). On June 6-7,2006, P/BA staff toured the MCJ to develop a better sense of current conditions and some of the contextual issues that underpin the Rutherford litigation.
A review of numerous documents, coupled with the facility tours and discussions with staff of ACLU-SC, has provided P/BA with only a preliminary understanding of the facility, its massive and complex operations, and the range of challenges faced by the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) in operating the facility safely, efficiently, and effectively. What is clear, is that there are a range of concerns that have been identified in various court documents and by the Judge, relative to such issues as (1) the extreme crowding of more than 6,000 inmates in MCJ, (2) the lack of out of cell time as a means to mitigate the impact of crowding, and (3) safety and supervision concerns that negatively impact on inmates and staff assigned to the MCJ. The gravity of these concerns is clearly apparent to us after only spending a short amount of time on this effort.
The largest jail in the United States cannot be fixed cheaply or quickly. What is truly required is the development and implementation of a comprehensive Master Plan for the facility and its operations to permanently resolve the unabated issues identified in the Rutherford litigation. We recognize that the development of a Master Plan as neither a goal nor a destination. It is the essential road map for ensuring that the entire territory related to the outstanding issues of the litigation is covered and that all identified remedies are sound and acceptable to all parties.
However, while we believe that the development of comprehensive, long-term solutions to the problems that are inherent in the MCJ is the proper course of action, there are nevertheless numerous activities that we believe can proceed immediately and in the near future to mitigate some of the key concerns. As such, this remedial outline identifies a series of illustrative measures that, if adopted by the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors and LASD, would

1 Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC is a New York based criminal justice planning and consulting

firm. P/BA as a firm, and its staff as individuals, has experience with jail systems throughout the

country including those in Harris County, TX (Houston), Philadelphia PA, Washington DC, Suffolk

County, MA (Boston), Suffolk and Nassau Counties (NY), Alachua County, FL (Gainesville).

Arlington County, VA, and New York City. The firm's principals and associates offer substantial

consulting and hands-on correctional experience to its consulting assignments.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

J

cexWt 8fT (J)A/i£

Case 2:.0! C8a-csve-20:77156-c9v--J0F4W11-1A-DGDRP DDooccumeenntt9849 FFilieledd0068/1/62/30/610PaPgaeg7eo1f 715of P2a6geP1a0g#e:5I2D #:548

"

allow the MCJ to operate far more safely and effectively than is presently the case. This outline sets forth both interim steps that can mitigate some of the concerns that are endemic to MCJ, either because of the limitations imposed by the physical plant or because of operating approaches and prerogatives adopted by the LASD, as well as proposed long·term solutions.

"
Q
z z W
~ U
I,l)

We say this plan is illustrative for several reasons. First, we cannot claim to have developed any true, in~epth expertise about the MCJ and how to fix it after such a short period of time and without the benefit of LASD data about the operations, staffing, and incidents. Second, we do not propose this as something to be imposed on the County-rather we offer this to illustrate what can be done and to initiate a dialogue, with LASD and others, concerning short and long term amelioration of critical conditions in the jail. Third, we maintain that there are other measures that could or should be taken and consequently, we do not wish to waive opportunities to identify other issues that impact on these categories of concerns once we learn more about the MCJ and have an opportunity for dialogue with LASD staff. Despite terming them "illustrative," we believe that our suggestions and recommendations are reasonable, have merit and are representative of the considerable expertise and experience of our firm and staff combined with the background information and first·hand observations we have made to date.

We also believe that the current efforts of the LASD relative to the recent awarding of a contract to a firm to develop a security audit of the Los Angeles County jailS and a soon·to-be completed Facilities Master ptan must be carefully scrutinized and considered in this process. These two reports should add considerably to the knowledge base about the jail system in general and MCJ in particular.

This outline plan is divided into three phases, an immediate one (within 6 months) during which immediate measures can be taken to address serious concerns at MCJ, a second phase (6·24 months) during which !ong·term plans are being developed and additional measures taken to address operational and physical deficiencies, and a third phase (2-6 years) of implementation of longterm plans. The measures set forth under each must be viewed as part of a continuum of improvements to MCJ, and, as such, each phase is divided into the same three topics as follows:

I. CROWDING/POPULATION DENSITY REDUCTION OPTIONS II. OUT OF CELL TIME- CROWDING MITIGATION III. INMATE SUPERVISION/SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS

We recommend that a panel of representatives of the County and the ACLU-SC be convened as soon as possible to consider this outline plan as well as other potential initiatives designed to remedy the many serious operational and physical plant deficiencies that have been well~ocumented in the past and that

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

2

-------------._-
Case 2:!0C8a-csve-20:77156-c9v--J0F4W11-1A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd0068/1/62/30/610PaPgaeg8eo1f 815of P2a6geP1a0g#e:5I3D #:549
we have observed most recently. It is our recommendation that the membership of this panel be limited to five-seven individuals, selected by the parties, who have significant expertise in jails and/or L.A. County budgeting and finance. The County's representatives should be decision-makers, or persons who can quickly access those who can make decisions. And, we suggest that attorneys for the . parties not participate on the panel so that there can be a free and open exchange of ideas at all times, unencumbered by the objections and legal technical issues that counsel might reasonably be expected to raise. The panel should receive its charge from the Court, and then be permitted to do its work, with periodic status reports submitted to counsel and the Court. Only if the panel cannot achieve consensus should a mediator be called in, and that should be an infrequent event. 2
We are prepared to participate on such a panel, and to initiate work during the week of June 26, 2006.

2 Two principals of our firm previously partiCipated on a Federal Court appOinted committee that operated in precisely this manner in Michigan in Hadix v. Johnson. Over the course of some ten years, the committee was able to efficiently resolve myriad long-standing disagreements between the parties, develop a master plan, and successfully oversee the implementation of virtually all issues as set forth in a consent decree that called for a complete operational and physical rehabilitation of a 5,OOO-bed prison.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

3

"

Case 2:!0C8a-csve-20:77156-c9v--J0F4W11-1A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd0068/1/62/30/610PaPgaeg9eo1f 915of P2a6geP1a0g#e:54ID #:550

PHASE 1- Immediate Remedial Measures (within 6 months)
I. CROWDING/POPULATION DENSITY REDUCTION OPTIONS
1. Move 1800 high security inmates out of MCJ into Twin Towers.
2. Reduce the number of inmates held pursuant a contract with the state by 500.
3. The impact of these measures would be to allow for the following crowding/population density reduction measures:
a. Convert Level 2000-4000 6-man cells into 4-man cells;3 b. Convert Level 2000-4000 4-man cells into 2-man cells;4 c. Convert Level 2900 12-man cells to 6-man cells;5 d. Reduce the density of LevelSOOO and 9000 dormitories presently
housing 80-130 inmates to 64 beds each6 (the ACA standard for maximum dormitory size) and convert the 2S0-man dormitory to two, 64-bed dormitories.
The impact of beds saved by implementing steps a-c (density reduction in multiple occupancy cells) would be 1,313 beds. The impact of reducing . the density in dormitories would be 810 fewer bedslinmates. The total bed reduction at MCJ would be 2.123. We also recommend that in lieu of using dayrooms for temporary housing, one single cell module of 104 beds be identified as a location for inmates awaiting a more permanent placement at MCJ, consistent with their classification.
4. As the first step in a long term strategy to reform MCJ's physical plant and design driven operations. the County should develop and issue a Request For Proposals to retain a qualified architectural firm initially to develop a cost benefit analysis relative to the complete renovation of MCJ as a contemporary jail facility meeting state and national standards and best practices (including direct supervision) versus the replacement of the facility entirely. This study can be completed within six months, with a decision by the Board of Supervisors immediately thereafter so that

3 Cells would still be significantly short of national standards for unencumbered space for inmates (American Correctional Standards 4-ALDF-1A-10 requires 25 unencumbered square feet per occupant in multiple occupancy cells, unless inmates are locked in for more than 10 hours a day,
in which case 35 square feet are required per occupant). As an interim measure. however. these
reductions would be a modest improvement over current conditions. We have not necessarily tied all recommendations to ACA standards, given the interim nature of the first two phases of this' Outline Plan; we have, however. referenced a few selected such standards as necessary. 4 1d. 5 Id.
a ACA Standards (4-ALDF-1A-10) limits dormitories to 64.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

4

Case 2:~0C8a-scev-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd060/81/62/306/10PaPgeag1e0 2o0f 1o5f 2P6agePa10ge#:5ID5 #:551

designs may be completed to allow for the phasing out of MCJ in its

current configuration within five-six years.

C
lU

2:

5. Consider the implications of the Sheriffs recently announced plan for

Z
r.(

increased arrests and the elimination of early release. Insure that this

U
V~

plan be dealt with in a manner that will not compromise the integrity of

plans to remedy unsafe and unhealthful conditions at MCJ.

II. OUT OF CELL TIME· CROWDING MITIGATION

1. The LASD should equip MCJ dayrooms/unused multipurpose spaces within modules with TVs and appropriate exercise equipment for indoor recreation/out of cell activity by inmates. With population reduction measures in place as per I above, if used on two shifts a day for groups of 20-30 inmates, this would allow for 1.5-2 hours of indoor recreation daily for most inmates? This would require posting one deputy in/or adjacent to the dayroom during each recreation period. 8

2. We recognize the logistical difficulties posed by the current MCJ design relative to LASD having to move inmates to the rooffor recreation.9 Nevertheless, with the population reductions described above, we believe that it is of the utmost importance to explore all possible means to stretch the Title 15 mandated three hours per week of outdoor recreation to as many as three, one hour sessions per week per inmate, in lieu of the current three hours in one block. This would further mitigate the impact of crowding and would increase the chances that inmates would not miss out on a full week of recreation if they miss a scheduled recreation period due to a visit, court appearance, or an operations related cancellation.

3. With the recommended population reduction, it is recommended that all' MCJ inmates held in disciplinary segregation status be afforded an opportunity to receive for at least one hour a day/five days a week of

7 We note that a 2000 Fire Safety Report commissioned by the Plaintiffs identified air-handling system problems in some dayrooms. We would suggest that these deficiencies be corrected. although we contend that if the spaces have been used for the past six years for temporary housing, they can certainly be used for the types of activities described here as a means of increasing out of cell activity time. 8 We recognize that this recommendation and perhaps others related to recreation and enhanced inmate supervision may result in a need for additional staff. However, the staffing implications of these initiatives may be mitigated by the proposed population reductions. Moreover, as we have , not yet requested or been provided access to detailed staffing figures for MCJ, we cannot reasonably say at this juncture whether additional staff will be required. 9 More contemporary hi-rise jails, including the Twin Towers facility, employ a "porch design," with outdoor recreation on each floor adjacent to living modules and requiring no escorts and minimal supervision.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

5

Case 2:~0C8a-scev-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9849 FFileilded060/81/62/036/10PaPgeag11e o2f11o5f 2P6agePaIDg#e:5ID6 #:552
j .
exercise outside their cells, including one hour a week of outdoor recreation. 10
4. The LASD should expand opportunities for families and significant others to visit inmates. We propose expanding the days available for visitation from 4 days to 7 days per week, and expanding each visitation period from 15 minutes to 30-minutes (4 times per week). If adopted, this proposed change would provide greater flexibility in the schedule and thereby reduce the unreasonably long waiting periods for visitors that has been previously documented and routinely observed. This modification also ensures that inmates are not forced to miss visits as a result of unscheduled court appearances, medical appointments and conflicts created by the dynamics offacility operations.
5. The LASD should purchase and place a few legal research kiosks in dayrooms or other spaces on the module so all inmates have access to law library services. This. cost of providing the oppprtunity for additional access to legal research services to benefit the inmates is available from the Inmate Welfare Fund. The option if acceptable is not designed to eliminate or reduce the "Pro-Per's" housing arrangements made available for inmates who are committed to litigate via self-representation.
III. INMATE SUPERVISION/SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
1. We recommend continuing the implementation and refinements of the centralized inmate classification system, including the Northpointe Classification tools. The LASD should attempt to validate the current Northpointe scoring system relative to the LA jails population to insure that, as currently configured, it is adequately and consistently predicting behavior and risks as intended in this system. The process should also include a formal reclassification instrument, so that inmates can be reclassified after a certain period of time based on actual behavior or in the event of changes to their status as a result of legal changes or incidents (e.g., identifying, controlling and militating the effects of the activities of security threat groups such as gangs, etc).
2. We proposed an Enhanced Inmate Supervision Model for use at the MCJ to promote greater accountability and encourage more positive and consistent interactions between staff and inmates. This initiative provides opportunities to improve staff awareness of problems and commits them to taking actions that encourages their ownership of solutions. The Enhanced Inmate Supervision Model would include:

10 American Correctional Association Standards 4·ALDF-2A-64 requires five days a week of one hour of daily out of cell exercise unless security or safety conditions dictate otherwise.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

6

Case 2:!0C8a-scev-20:7715-6c9v--J0F41W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd060/81/62/306/10PaPgeag1e2 2o2f 1o5f 2P6agePa10ge#:5ID7 #:553

• Assignment of deputies to specific rows (75-80 inmates) within the

housing modules;

a
lU

• Make deputies responsible for all aspects of inmate management during their shift for their particular rows, including all Title 15

Z
Z
c:(

requirements (showers, security rounds, etc.) plus receiving inmate

U
v')

complaint forms, ensuring access to dayrooms, documenting

maintenance work orders, ensuring cleanliness and adherence to

sanitation rules, accountability for linen and clothing exchange, and

distributing hygiene supplies (including razors);

• Require security rounds to be documented in all areas at 30-minute

increments in lieu of 60 minutes;

• Review and Sign-off on deputies' performance and accountability

for their assigned areas by sergeants each shift.

3. Enhance fire safety at MCJ by instituting the following measures11 :

• Conducting and documenting quarterly fire/partial evacuation drills for each area of the building (horizontal movement from modules to separate smoke zones only);
• Implement the use of fireproof containers for each inmate to maintain in their cell and in which all property must fit;
• Relocate wheelchair-bound inmates to another facility since they are most vulnerable in a fire, earthquake or other emergency where there is a need to evacuate them, given the identified inadequacies in the MCJ;
• Install and/or change filters to ensure ventilation ducts do not build up debris and cause fires.

4. In 1993.30% of contraband razor incidents at Twin Towers 12 involved \ loose razor blades or altered razors. As such, we recommend that LASD
change the method for razor distribution. accounting and disposal at the MCJ. In lieu of allowing inmates to purchase razors from commissary and maintain these potentially lethal weapons in their cells, razors should be distributed and collected by deputies under a rigorous system of controls. In addition to enhancing staff and inmate safety, this measure would also address blood borne pathogen control issues, and occupational safety and health concerns.

5. Institute maintenance improvements at MCJ including a plan and commitment to:

11 We have identified only a few critical fire safety measures here based on our recent tour of the MCJ. We would hope that the panel would receive and have available a full status report relative to the measures taken by the LASD in response to the recommendations made by the ACLUSC's fire safety expert, Michael Madden, in 2000. 12 We are not privy to comparable or more recent data from the FAST system pertaining to MCJ, but we have no reason to believe the statistics would be appreciably different.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

7

._-_._.-----

I. .Case 2.:0C8a-scev-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9849 FFileilded060/81/62/036/10PaPgeag1e3 o2f31o5f 2P6agePaIDg#e:5ID8 #:554

l'

• Fix toilet leaks fixed within 24 hours or install replacement fixtures:

a
UJ

these leaks were observed throughout the MCJ and present

:2

unacceptable health risks due to bodily wastes on the cell floor and

Z
ot

safety risks due to the increased potential for inmates to slip in an (:J

Vi

already very crowded space;

• Replace light bulbs in cells within 24 hours or install replacement

fixtures: likewise, we observed numerous fixtures in cells that were

either broken or contained burned out bulbs, with the low light and

visibility conditions making it impossible for inmates to read or

groom, and presenting significant obstacles to officers' observation

of activities occurring in the cells.

PHASE II· Long Term Planning (6-24 Months)
I. CROWDING/POPULATION DENSITY REDUCTION OPTIONS

1. The Board of Supervisors should approve and fund implementation of the

MCJ Replacement Master Plan, and authorize the design and construction

.'

of the renovated MCJ or its replacement.

2. The Board of Supervisors should fund a comprehensive plan to study population projections and evaluate alternatives to incarceration/diversion opportunities. This plan should address any long-term population management planning associated with the Sheriffs recently announced proposal for increased arrests and the elimination of early release. 13

3. Move eligible inmates directly from the IRC to the Pitchess facility instead of maintaining them for lengthy periods at MCJ. This initiative may impact the entire system so coordination with all appropriate stakeholders should occur to ensure that arrangements are made to prevent delays in access to medical care or disposition of court documentation.

4. Fund and address all integration issues involving the capabilities of the Automated Jail Information System to interface with Trial Court Information System. Staff at the Inmate Reception Center must sort hundred of court release documents received manually each business day

13 Funding opportunities for planning and programming for alternatives and diversion of special populations from jail, including the mentally ill and homeless, are potentially available from numerous sources. Possible Federal sources include: SAMHSA (Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration); TCE--Targeted Capacity for Substance Abuse and Mental IIIness--Co-occurring Disorders; TCE--Targeted Capacity for Substance Abuse and Mental Illness and Homelessness; Reentry Grants Oointly sponsored by SAMHSA, HUD, and Labor); MIOTCRA (Mentally III Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction Act); and, other Califomia based sources are as well.

Pulitzer/Bogard &AssOCiates, LLC

8

, ,

.

Case 2•:-0C8a-csev-20:77156-c9v--J0F4W11-1A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd0068/1/62/30/610PaPgaeg1e4 2o4f 1o5f 2P6agPe a1g0e#:I5D9 #:555

'.!

because the two information systems do not interface. This problem has system-wide implications that are associated with many of the reported

(£1
LlJ

delays that result in detaining inmates beyond their court-ordered release Z

or transfer.

Z
4~

vU ,

II. OUT OF CELL TIME- CROWDING MITIGATION

1. Expand inmate programming opportunities and use MCJ dining halls to meet space needs for such activities.

2. To further mitigate the difficulties inherent in providing visits to the MCJ population, we recommend that the LASD explore other forms of noncontact visits, including the potential use of video visitation. The prime objectives would be to increase the number of weekly opportunities for inmates and their families to maintain contact, and limit the long waits that visitors experience.

III. INMATE SUPERVISION/SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
1. Procure and implement an automated system of documenting security rounds. This system would involve a series of proximity readers or bar code readers for each modulelrow and would automatically provide Title 15 documentation as well as reports to supervisors or missed or delayed rounds.
2. Given the size of the MCJ, even with the recommended interim capacity reductions, the facility should be divided into semi-autonomous management units to enhance service delivery, inmate supervision, and accountability. Each management unit would be under the direction of a lieutenant, with multiple sergeants assigned to each shift and civilian case managers working as part of a team.
3. Install a reasonable number of digital surveillance cameras throughout the MCJ to afford incident recording capability for disciplinary and prosecution purposes, allow supervisors to view myriad areas of the facility, and serve as a deterrent to inmate misbehavior.
4. Reevaluate all K-10 designations for inmates and develop clearer guidelines for the criteria associated with the use of this designation. Develop a housing plan for K-10 inmates.
5. Implement viable recommendations raised in the systemwide Security Audit report.

Pulitzer/Bogard &Associates, LLC

9

Case 2,:~0C8a-scev-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeenntt9849 FFilieledd060/81/62/036/10PaPgeag1e5 2of51o5f 2P6agePaIDge#:6ID0 #:556
.;
6. Implement additional sanitation enhancements: • Develop and implement a housekeeping plan; including control of hazardous materials • Develop and implement a sanitation Inspection system • Re-evaluate inmate personal property limits • Increase accountability for linen/clothing exchange • Reduce the amount of food items that inmates may maintain in their cells so as to reduce opportunities for them to manufacture 'Pruno'.
PHASE III-Implementation of Long-Term Plans (2-6 years)
Phase'" entails the implementation of the numerous longer-term initiatives that were studies and planned in Phase I and II. The panel can and should play an active role in overseeing and monitoring the implementation of all such activities necessary to carry out the Master Plan for improving the MCJ

\

Pulitzer/Bogard &Associates, LLC

10

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 89 Filed 08/23/10 Page 26 of 26 Page ID #:557

VERIFICATION

(c.C.P. § 446 & 2015.5: 28 U.S.C. § 1746)

)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

I, 11A.,""hcG ~- O\.. ..".t6~

DECLAREUNDERPENALTYOFPERJURYTHAT:IAMTHE

IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION. I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING DOCUMENTS --:-AN-=-:::D~KN=-=-O:::-:W::-:-::T:::-H=E:-:C::-:O:-NTENTS THEREOF AND THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS

TO MATTERS STATED THEREIN UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS, I

BELIEVE THEM TO BE TRUE.

G1 20:1,£\- iA EXECUTED THISAU

9

1 OF

n~ r ? n12010 AT CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON

CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNI 92233-5002.

---'''-c--\r--='''-=-L---......,..,r---~-...:: (DECLARANT/PRISONER)

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
(C.c.P. §1013(a) & 2015.5: U.S.C. § 1746)
I, M~""If-,,(!..G ~- O\.~r~ A RESIDENT OF CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, IN THE COUNTY OF
IMPERIAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. I AM OVER EIGHTEEN (IS) YEARS OF AGE AN~ AM NOT A PARTY OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION. MY STATE PRISON ADDRESS IS P.O. BOX 5002, CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.
f ON _-.:..A....:..;t,-,-'-,-n_l-,,---O_.-,-?.::...:cn_1_n_ 2010 IS SERVED THE FOREGOING: <;~ ec.....b. h.1:>h.. Ac \1.\ ,::;">11. OM ~\....-..~
,/
~~~ 1=o\.l6- II C'..L.-. ~ M. .l: -;r" OUL...J
(SET FORTH EXACT TITLE OF DOCUMENTS SERVED)

ON THE PARTY(S) HEREIN BY PLACING A TRUE COpy THEREOF, ENCLOSED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE(S) WITH POSTAGE THEREON FULLY PAID, IN ATHE UNITED STATES MAIL, IN A DEPOSIT BOX SO PROVIDED AT CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

lA.u.",T ..b. .solA.\~ b...n:\~ C.,,,,;:('
l!. ~ ~T t..-..L ~ ~II..~ <> t= C",,",-r;~cL.t\l..J; I\.
\\"'''~\ 'I c..l.""L\L·, H.. ~"bb!. YA..A1
·1~1. u"'...."(""- ~~~l...- .5.\IL<5~
(l"'bA.\. Lt Q.

,\.e.. \.. ...w~.. ut..o3". 1~15","c..\'l- ~LL..,,,", ~ C.\~or
AT'\OL.u.~-..{~ AT" \"o/I..W
y \1>0 ...u.~&'L ~,-o''''~'''-I ..
~h......,.~ 15" ""#: 1).00 &-LG"-lt\.Arl.G. c.A.. '\I~lo- 1.>..\'\

THERE IS DELIVERY SERVICE BY UNITED STATE MAIL ATTHE PLACE SO ADDRESSED, AND THERE IS REGULAR COMMUNICATION BY MAIL BETWEEN THE PLACE OF MAILING AND THE SO ADDRESSED. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THE FORGOING IS T AND CORRECT.
DATE _ _A_U_G---C"'-I-'.:...9-=2-=-01~O_ _2010
\.

 </s> Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR

Document 92

Filed 09/14/10

Page 1 FIL"'D

o- fW:2"7:SH~Pr aLg-'"e,

ID #:562 :j,\j

'r",:,'~:~'~'r

FULL NAME
COMMITTED NAME [1f diffm:rJt)
t""\..I ~;...\~.rA ':')I'J.I,!G ~rt.'C-:"'h.l/I3i....~b ~~ - 1.3\
FUU. ADDRESS INCLUDING NAME OF IN.mnTnON

CENTHAL DISTRICT OF CALlFl)FlNIA

BY

OCi-'UTY

.' Lo.u~_Ge:.;o~ ~~L.(:,~~ A.MG/u~G'b. Lor-...ylA.rill /,#

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER

PLAINTIFF,

v.

Lc. ...........\. :-{ ",f L.:;s, ML.-~L~ ~

Lt.:" A......G..,L--=.<,. C--"'- ......,.ct.'1 S.\"'-"Il.J:~f'--!:. ~L-).""l.~l""'VN..1

'-ll."'-iL.r~l>:-- L.alLc..f U-A..I.:. ,''''

DEFENDANT(S).

Lt.:. .. ~L.....L='" C.".,~.ul-1 t<E_U\II..A.L j'",~.:t:L

To be &UpplW1 by the Clerk
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO (CheckDne)
11I 42 U.S.C. § 1983
o Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

A. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

1. Have you brought any other lawsuits in a federal com! while a prisoner: [1J Yes 0 No

2. lf your answer to "l." is yes, how many? _-",,"'N"'&______

Descnoe the lawsuit in the space below. (lf there is more than one lawsuit, descnbe the adclitional1awsuits on an attached piece of paper using the same outline.)

t ~2. e.",,~u--c"-\ ~ ,!;, LG'::,. A..t\l.lrGl2~~ G~~-rc..::::I\.\.... ~,,\...zC-'( 6~ ~Ilc> "'Co, t!...""-Tl:l\LG- \'='-=; I\.IC t...AL
t..t:1'C"2.G. ..... s. 31. 'l:..L'Fc..>Lt-\/~1:.c.....l. t"t.>:"" l1r.o..1 ~:.Ll"A.Mt:- ...... ~ c..,L!;.,....~ \-1.. ....\.LS""'-AN,:7 "Ie ~eNA..L t..:.o'b,';; ~""'.'-\:'Cbl--.l. .... f!.:l .. >.A-l-A'o.. A.<'_ILC>"-A. ;,.,.",A.1l<1l. L..",\.....c..;:;"" ci==' S-;A\C;: L,,,,,,,,i. ..

a CV-<,6 197)

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 1 of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 2 of 27 Page ID #:563
a. Parties to this previous lawsuit: Plaintiff r\Au..~t' (.0£ ~c-= 11..«...-'= Cd_x ..;,;.~ L

c." c. Docket or case number

01·;t~ 101';( fv..\ L~ w:s)

d. Name of judge to whom case was assigned \-\o...o"-,,,,>\.o:;; ~ol-\... F W ...I...Tetl..

e. Disposition (For example: Was the case dismissed? If so, what was the basis for dismissal? Was it
appealed? Is it still pending?) '{.;;s. - ,(8 ".,.i:.~ U~ .H.d CJ.) - fcs. .'(6) - I\lo. A'\' !', i. \ oCa

t...t'(tz.G-MS .... ;....l~ 'TI\~ G9-Y>J"'- ?'1...D'.2~\I:Gi.1 of lll,\F \..A=.:..l,? l;:ry..AF.A",,",T~~ ~..ELu...A•.i2b. '>j "t\:\~ f(..""-A..\~Fr....\:n-\. AM~~b.ME~
g. Approximate date of filing lawsuit: _LM"''o..l..L...-'''c,-"c.....:J.:.:c::..:c,;,,',_"\-'-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
h. Approximate date of disposition f~",t>.x",\Y <... ~\\" Mn-ltf\ Cr4.<\.,,,£'i' (~~.:T or ....,.I> ... AL,s.

B. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REM:EDIES
1. Is there a grievance procedure available at the institution where the events relating to your current complaint occurred? lil Yes 0 No
2. Have you flled a grievance concerning the facts relating to your current complaint? ~ Yes 0 No
If your answer is DO, explain why DOt _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

3. Is the grievance procedure completed? IJ!f Yes 0 No
If your answer is no, explain why n D t _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ _ __

4. Please attach copies of papers related to the grievance procedure. ,"G, ",~.i> "." II" • <. •• '" ..I

C. JURISDICTION

tJ..t."".=.u..~.:.L ~..o\..L>.5--t OL<-\.. ",.I, t.L. ,.

This complaint alleges that the civil rights of plaintiff 1'\"""" ,;.;; 'i>~ ....," b'-,~re 12...
(print plaintiffs name)

who presently resides at _'1"'~:.!,2.~_\~1_=\..:;A"'r~""_"~"'"''"'''~..!:..~_i::c4~~~.c;;o~.L!:::::'='~~?:!~~=.r'-~~;u,L--_ _ _ _ __
ga

were violated by the actions of the defendant(s) named below, which actions were directed against plaintiff at

Mcl>l'~ C.cM\llk - t I Lo'

h-GL =-50

Instlt:u1Jo CIty were VIOlation 0

)

A. \...1;: Ft:,~ r

c.'\ C) () , ;.1.."

CV-66 (7/97)

CIV1L RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 2 of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 3 of 27 Page ID #:564

on (date or dates) ci I ,,-Ic~ .,,\'"'-\. ,'(/.1 IOIe , c,\ Iv, h • ., 'k" '0 I ,5 I "(,,

(ClalJIL I)

(Ciaun Il)

(Claun ill)

NOTE:

You need not name more than one defendant or allege more than one claim. If you are naming more than five (5) defendants, make a copy of this page to provide the information for additional defendants.

1. Defendant L~"'ot 1l."''''A. (full name of fuSt defenaant)

"o"' .... 'i'loo jI, ...

III-.... \", t'\o"'\"'Il~'( \'" .. IZ. '\ ~'\S'{

(full adJ!ress of fim defendant)

c..c \..0" AI<1\:r~l~s.

l\ I... ~\J.,.I\,;:~'tff' c..",,~\c~i O~G:t(..AIi:ONS

nt's posltlOn an n e, any

resides or works at

The defendant is sued in hislber (Check one or both): i1i individual [lJ official capacity.
Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law: f'A.!\.u...ILG "it: .rM.i'o\..iC.ft\~".i \ A.lA~\} ~c\..t:.::...:( ~-;-A.TlE'··'l§".""r. ll...;:b ........ I..,t.\rc, ......... r 0& t\t!M.~~d/IJ.t.",M."'fc c..c.,.~i:7
1'~€ c.. . ..;"\,"" (,1(:= fL... o:.,..:., ~~.e..i" ~t:MG- AMI> H.tlJ.,.~X:Ml,y t"1t..;"(~.:r,...L hs::1"At:"-I.t;;e~ rM lMlS,,.,.,N l:\A.Il.::.( t.wLLs..
2. Defendant =====:-===,.,-___________________ resides or works at (full name Of fffit defenctantj

(full address of fim defendant) (detenaant'S posl'oon and uile, It any)

The defendant is sued inhislber (Check one or both): 0 individual 0 official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under cDIDr of law:

3. Defendant ~(fu"ll n"am'e=of=fic=itrae;.fenraa.nt:) ==,,-------------------resides or works at
(full address of firSt defendant)
ana (detenctant's POSItIon oile, if any)
The defendant is sued in hislber (Check one or both): 0 individual 0 Dfficial capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

CV -66 (7197)

crvn. RlGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 3 of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 4 of 27 Page ID #:565
4. Defendant -,;;n-;;='""'===="'___________________ resides or works at (full name of first defendant) (full address of first defendant) (detenaaIlt's pOSItlOn and otle, if any) The defendant is sued in his!her (Check one or both): 0 individual 0 official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:
5. Defendant _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ resides or works at
(full name of first defendant) (full address of first defendant)
(aeteIl£Uii's pOSJlJon ana t.J.tle, Ii any)
The defendant is sued in hisiher (Check one or both): 0 individual 0 official capacity. Explain how this defendant was acting under color of law:

CV-66 ("7t97)

CTVIL RlGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 4 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 5 of 27 Page ID #:566

D. CLAIMS· The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM I

Yk\c: fLeHftrfF':j t.\,. . . . ·a.z p'f A,~\r.VIY. ?-'e;;,\;? "...rON. liAS: t>y...~ CflOC:S=SS. r LA,I.A,..:?£ C\'::

"-t-\~ rrrrH AN.6. fO ......If..\t.:\!#o.lIH. AMEI'IJ.h.I>\ISAJ.-Cs.. f"'\..:;"-6~-.J.\S1t. TI.l.G \fZ..cA..'-{ -.=slA.~L~~H:r...Jb­

TH\5 S·\'bA.lb>A.IIl.b. M..~I':.\,.t:M.v.M... \t ......\.....:.~ f"oll \\-l~ \Q..6ATM.&:I\,i""( ef r'\.r~o",c:ItS '~u..lls';"""AJ..T

supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without

citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you describe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each

DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.

J\.' l~fL~i. \~ .......;,....... • So .'" Ct-lA..c,b..; ~F c."!.~\c!,.bi. c:.?-.;s(A\r(..r.A.S

\."r.:. A'-l\.rb"L€S ,.-,Of Ail''! (:§t...llL"L

J,"'-s::\.... ,,~ ~ ...... e\"'! 71'..\ ci-\/,(l~;; c:,": IM.t"\..I.?t'\iiNT::/'IJ,k A.\.L IN.M=I\IG i-4,c;"",<;'r'N,.b--, M.g"\iM.~/"'C\s.(

(1o.."",t). C. ...... .,.,"\c'b'< C.LAi.';tF\="J:.:..,~\rQ"'" c.:..C'I<4C.';:'iL;..".S 1"'-\ n-\..:;- :tAl;L. S-rl\.l\!.-c -<o(""~l l...1.Etl...oi.

, ttl f>. .. \.. %. t:>u-4. AlE ~~ ~ ~ F"FG-!L.:,....H:_G 0 F f" L .... rN.T.r r F/~ ?- fl.ci - \ILe AL b..{(\"A~"'tG ,,{ t l1 ~
r ,...H.\G...t "0\6 ~'-"":t:""\i: Ff::: \;...LA-So F(JtLe-~~ ~1 ,tie (...A.,~ T" ~ '-i ~ fA r f "',,'-..lTrN.Vd.::-h ")
*If there is more than one claim. describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ojpaper using the same outlin.e.

CV-Q6 (7197)

CIVIL RlGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 5 of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 6 of 27 Page ID #:567

_ _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ _ _-'C,!C.'L ... I M. l~___________.____________.______

_ _-_ _-- __ - - - - - - _.. .. _._ .._-------_._.- _.. -.---_..._..

... -_..---_. . - - - - - - - - -

--.-----.------~--------------------

--------_._--
.--------.

-----------.---------------~-.--
----_.__ . _ - - - - - . - - - - - - - _.. _ - - - -------
._--_.-_._-_•.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . _ -

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 7 of 27 Page ID #:568

D. CLAIMS' The following civil right has been violated:

CLAIM II

'i="rf"n" I\"N.'> F.., ..... L.TiEGM1~ AMG."q\MEI'J.\:); """.~C."''''\$1l.1 ''fl1:~ \t.. .=. I...xj 'G"'\A~Lt.:§l*rAJ.G- ,\.I,;e ..:.'\AN-t> .....C..-'e> M."'A,U:M. ..U"", tl. ..... L~-:::. Fe.6- TI"tc: \1t.~A\M.*""" ..;' (=" rlt~'>~"'-l~A..'S. r ......i/L~UA,...t\ \ 0

Supporting Facts: Include all facts you consider important. Stale the facts dearly, in your own words, and without

citing legal authority or argument. Be certain you describe, in separately numbered paragraphs, exactly what each

DEFENDANT (by name) did to violate your right.

c" ... 0, cr:;/c.lc~

M\i ~\h?~cf"F C>6'3Icb.'i b(:; ~u..\r6S A~'i.r~-A.l!,:;~ Il1lf i?LArIV.\rF 1= To

~L,..rr..tT&FF/S ~NMFl. -'n~~Gll (:,e.c.~....i A.Le", "H\G ~L/Iro't'.,,('l;'~F '\t..lA50 ,"I:I;-.J..Llt.b. To L~-J;!! ~"'"
lk\c>c- \:lo~'> c..~.u.~iTro",.> fc;f." '15 hbis - \A." IsL '?L"-l:N,\.t; FF' c..c.. •..lTACTf~b 'T"I"-G Ae.l\.\ \Ut\c \lAp.. ~/"c..l" A,t.,.., ... ,..",'r,S,"\It.A.To.::...s .t;S>y..tr '" ""-.1P.;£ c'"q'>§j(, ",p C.L¢ A,.,J , ~"-";I:Tr'1...lC'« A;.Jb.
e,,:lc-LM,rN.)."[E- ,l'e r5?-:.T fo,.",6... ltpb.e,...:is. c"uz-l)t::' 1lJ.. r.o'\6'Au.LG" '''AL~ c..eLL. s.\+G""It.~FF
\..~"e;i ~"c." ANh. \..lAlAtA.""U~:b. ~6~u..r~t5$;a \.\1\6. A.. C.\A$a,lpM of \~o~e.r:..:d.,· ?.t.eT(,~A.L
b,'i'''tN.eG::' r "flO "''''' S ,,'" rT 1"1."

*If there is more than one claim. describe the additional claim(s) on another attached piece ofpaper using the same outline.

CV-66 () 197)

CIVIL RlGHTS COMPLAINT

8
Page 5 of 6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 8 of 27 Page ID #:569
~
~".u",-,,~ To i$ u.., ce. ,. l .... <.Cb') Ll).

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 9 of 27 Page ID #:570
E. REQUESTFORRELlliF
I believe that I am entitled to the following specific relief:
\\-\c::. "b~ fe:"-I.b.h~ AC\'::~ """"~""" Ga..c>'..~ r-.l~& k"- YS"",-cC: ( rAAL:s::c...~ :!""",T\?-...I..T. /IIr"'b,.

(Date)
CV·66 \1/97)

(Signature 'ifPlainti
CIVIL RlGHTS COMPLAINT

Page 6 of6

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 10 of 27 Page ID #:571
EXHIBIT COVER PAGE A
EXHIBIT Description of this Exhibit:
Number of pages to this Exhibit_--,-,1-=--_· pages.
JURISDICTION: (Check only one) c:::J Municipal Court c::J Supenqr Court
t=J Appellate Court .
.c:::J ,State Supreme Coun
- United Slates District Court c:::JState Circuit Court
c::::J United Slates Supreme Court
c:::J GrandJury

,,'~Cla<"s:e~,2:C0a8-ecv2-:07751-c6v9-0-J4F11W1-DADGPR ,DDoocucmumenetn8t192 FiFleidle0d50/190//1046/10Pa,gPea1geof121 oPfa2g7e 10P#a:g4e0 ID #:572

. . .~

\

')"
. .
1 2 3 4 5 6

- dERK ·u.s. DIS1RICT COURT
MAY I 0 3D)

Priority Send Enter Closed -
JS-511S_6 -
15-2IJ5_3 -
Scan Qniy ':::

7

. ,

8

UNITED"STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DENNIS RUTHERFORD, et al.

12

Plaintiffs,

P ) Case No.tl/!5-04111_Du
)
) ,ORDER
)

13

v.

)

)

14 LEROY BACA, et al. ,

)

)

15

Defendants. )

)

16

.

17

The ACLU, attorneys for the plaintiffs, requested that the

18 Court conduct a status conference concerning conditions at the

19 Men's Central Jail. These conditions include allegations of

20 overcrowding. On May 8, 2006, the Court conducted the requested

21 status conference. During the status conference, counsel for the

22 plaintiffs requested that the Court assume, in effect, the role of

23 a mediator in facilitating 'the improvement of conditions at the

24 Men's Central Jail. Counsel for the defendants disputed the

25 allegations that overcrowding existed at the Men's Central Jail,

26 and disputed the presence of other substandard conditions as well.

27 During the hearing, counsel for the ACLU requested that the Court

28 receive an orientation tour of the Men's Central Jail. Counsel for
DOCKETED ON Cnll...-t--""-

MAY I a200B

Case 2:C0a8-ecv2-:07751-c6v9-0-J4F11W1--DADGPR DDooccuummenetn8t192 FiFleidle0d50/190//1046/10PagPea2geof122 oPfa2g7e 10P#a:g41e ID #:573

:l~~/:~

••

1 the defendants agreed to arrange the orientation tour.

On May 10, ~;.l

UI

2 2006 at 3:30 p.m. the Court received the orientation tour. ,2',

Z

3

The Court sets this matter for further status conference~-,on

4 May 11, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.

5
6 Dated: May 10, 2006
7

DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge

8

9
10

11

12 13

14

15
16

17

18

19
20

21

22
23

24

25
26

27

28

2

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._~ ~_'---.J

Ca.s~e/2~:a08s-cv2-:7057-1c6v-90-4J1F1W1--DADGPR DDocoucmumenet n9t492FilFedile0d6/0196//0164/1P0agPe a1goef 1153 oPf a2g7e IPDa#g:4e6ID #:574

"

MARK D. ROSENBAUM SBN 59940

2

PREATNEJRANJ.AELNIAASTBAERRAGJA1 SJBt NSB1N89213100149 ACLU FOUNDATION Ot

3

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1616 Beverly Boulevard

4

Los Angeles, CA 90026 Telephone: (213) 977-9500

5 FacSimile: (213) 250-3919

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7 PAUL BEACH, SBN 166265

8

DA VID D. LAWRENCE, SBN 123039 FRANS CELL, STRICKLAND",

9

ROBERTS & LAWRENCE, I'.C. 100 West Broadway;, Suite 1200

10

Glendale, CA 91211..1-1219 Telephone: (818) 545-1925

)

II Facsimile: (818) 545-1937 12 Attorneys for Defendants

Priority _
Send ..a..:::::-"
Enter Closed •. -
JS-5IJS-6 -
JS-2/JS-3 -
ScanOn/y=

13

14

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17 DENNIS RUTHERFORD, et ai,

18

Plaintiffs,

19

20

v.

21 SHERMAN BLOCK, et aI.,

22

Defendants.

Case No. Civ. 75-041 I I-DDP STIPULATION RE PARTIES' SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION~; 11JWPOS(,I)I ORDER THEREOr~

23

24

25

26

27

28
JUN I 6 2006

------- -

Ca"s/e'C2.:0a8s-cv2-:7057-1c6v-90-4J1F1W1--DADGPR DDocoucmumenet n9t492FileFdile0d6/0196/0164/1P0agPe a2goef 154 oPf a2g7e IDPa#g:4e7ID #:575

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

2

1. On April 13, 2006, plaintiffs filed with the Court a Request for awtStatus

3

Conference,

seeking

to

establish

a

collaborative

process

to

effectively

addres~~
...:

4 alleged systemic problems at Men's Central Jail. On April 26,2006, the partr~s

5 through counsel met and conferred on the issues raised by the plaintiffs' request. 6 Subsequently, on May 8, 2006, the Court held a status conference at which the

7 parties and the Court agreed to tour Men's Central Jail. On May 10,2006, the

8 Court toured Men's Central Jail, along with officials of the Los Angeles Sheriffs

9 Department, the ACLU Jails Project Coordinator, and counsel for the parties.

JO

2. On May II, 2006, the Court held a status conference at which counsel

II for the parties agreed to meet and confer regarding the alleged systemic problems at

12 Men's Central Jail raised by the plaintiffs. On May 23,2006, the parties filed a

13 joint status report with the Court. On May 25, 2006, the Court held another

14 conference. On June 5, 2006, the parties filed another joint status report. On June

15 6,2006, the Court held another conference and directed the parties to return to

16 court on June 15, 2006 with persons with decision-making authority from the

17 Sheriffs Department and a point-person from the ACLU to discuss and resolve the

18 issues raised.

19

STIPULATION

20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULA TED, by and between the parties, that:
21

22

1. Plaintiffs have identified a number of conditions at Men's Central Jail

23 for which Plaintitfs seek amelioration, including: (a) permanent reduction of cell

24 populations of6-men cells in Modules 2000-4000 to 4-men cells; (b) permanent

25 reduction cell populations of4-men cells in Modules 2000-4000 to 2-men cells; (c)

26 permanent reduction of the density of Module 5000 and 9000 dormitories to no

27 more than 64 beds each, and conversions of larger dormitories into multiple 64-bed

28 donnitories if necessary; (d) use of dayrooms and/or multi-purpose rooms as

-2--- ---- ---------- --------

Case/2!.C:0a8s-cv2-:07751-c6v9-0-J4F11W1-ADDGPR DDooccuummenetn9t492 FiFleidle0d60/196//1046/10PagPea3geof1155 ofP2a7ge P10a#g:e48ID #:576

. indoor recreation rooms to provide at least one hour of daily indoor recreation to all

2 general population inmates, and equipment of indoor recreation rooms with o. 3 televisions and appropriate exercise equipment; (e) provision of one hour of ~

4

outdoor recreation to all general population inmates, three times a week; (f) (3
V~

5 provision of one hour of recreation, five days a week, with at least one hour of

6 outdoor recreation each week, to inmates placed in disciplinary segregation; (g)

7 expansion of visitation from four days per week to seven days per week; and (h)

8 implementation of staff and inmate accountability measures and operational

9 changes relating to inmate supervision and safety.

10

2. In order to determine the feasibility of the changes proposed in

I I paragraph I above and the most effective, cost-efficient, and sustainable methods

12 by which to make changes that are deemed feasible, the parties agree to convene a

13 panel of experts, which shall be charged with determining the methods by which to

14 ameliorate the above conditions and make any other improvements, including but

15 not limited to population density reduction, increases in out-of-cell time, and

16 enhancement of inmate supervision and safety.

17

3. The panel shall have its initial in-person meeting no later than the

18 week of June 26, 2006. The panel shall produce a final, comprehensive, written

19 plan containing immediate measures for improvement (within six months),

20 intermediate measures (from 6 to 24 months), and long-term measures (2-6 years)

21 to ameliorate conditions. The panel shall, as an initial step, assess the proper time

22 frame for developing the final, comprehensive plan. Upon completion, the plan

23 shall be submitted for review to the parties and the Court, and also to the County

24 Board of Supervisors for its legislative or budgetary consideration. The final plan

25 shall include, but is not limited to, recommendations on which the parties agreed

26 and issues regarding which the parties were not able to reach agreement. Any panel

27 members may include as an attachment to the report an explanation of additional

28 recommendations on which the parties were not able to reach agreement.

-3-

Case/.2! :C0,a8-cv2-:07751-c6v9-0-J4F1W11--ADGDPR DDooccuummenetn9t492 FiFleidle0d60{196//1046/10PagPea4geof1165ofP2a7ge PIDa#g:e49ID #:577

1

4. The panel shall make reports of its progress to the Court, the partiesdnd

w

2 the County Board of Supervisors every thirty days, starting with thirty days from the

L.

3 date of entry of this Order. The progress reports shall indicate areas of agreemet1t
v'>

4 between the parties, areas of disagreement, and topics ofthe panel's discussions.

5 Within 60 days of the entry ofthis Order, the panel shall prepare a report to the Court,

6 the parties and the County Board of Supervisors regarding the panel members'

7 recommendations for immediate improvement measures. This report shall indicate 8 areas and issues on which the panel was not able to reach agreement, and shall

9 include as an attachment to the report any panel member's explanation of the

10 additional recommendations on which the parties were not able to reach agreement.

11

5. The panel shall be composed of the following persons: (a) Jody Kent, Jails

12 Project Coordinator at the ACLU of Southern California; (b) David Bogard and no

13 more than three other representatives from the firm ofPultizerlBogard & Associates, 14 LLC; (c) no more than six representatives from the Los Angeles County Sheriffs

15 Department and the Los Angeles County Chief Administrative Office. At least 2 of

16 the 6 shall be from the Los Angeles County Chief Administrative Office and one

17 member shall be Sharon Harper. The panel members recognize that the continuity of

18 their leadership is critical to the success ofthis initiative. Therefore, the panel

19 members shall not have others substitute in their place. Nothing shall prevent panel

20 members from being assisted by other personnel.

21

6. PulitzerlBogard & Associates, LLC is a criminal justice planning and

22 consulting firm, with extensive experience relating to jail systems. Based on tours of

23 Men's Central Jail and review of relevant documents, the firm ofPulitzerlBogard has

24 made an Outline Of An Illustrative Plan For Remedial Measures For The Los Angeles 25 County Men's Central Jail, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Defendants shall

26 compensate the firm of Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC in the amount of 27 $20,000, for services rendered as participants on the panel for the sixty-day period.

28

K-<f-

Case 2,:0C8a-scev-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11--ADGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9942 FFileilded060/91/61/046/10PaPgeag6eo1f 715of P2a7gePIDag#e:51ID #:578

Outline Of An Illustrative Plan For Remedial Measures For The Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail
June 14,2006

Background

Within the past two weeks, the American Civil Liberties Association of Southern

California (ACLU-SC) has retained the firm of Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

(P/BA)' to assist in the review of operations of the Los Angeles County Men's

Central Jail (MCJ). On June 6-7, 2006, P/BA staff toured the MCJ to develop a

better sense of current conditions and some of the contextual issues that

underpin the Rutherford litigation.

,

A review of numerous documents, coupled with the facility tours and discussions with staff of ACLU-SC, has provided P/BA with only a preliminary understanding of the facility, its massive and complex operations, and the range of challenges faced by the Los Angeles Sheriffs Department (LAS D) in operating the facility safely, efficiently, and effectively. What is clear, is that there are a range of concerns that have been identified in various court documents and by the Judge, relative to such issues as (1) the extreme crowding of more than 6,000 inmates in MCJ, (2) the lack of out of cell time as a means to mitigate the impact of crowding, and (3) safety and supervision concerns that negatively impact on inmates and staff assigned to the MCJ. The gravity of these concerns is clearly apparent to us after only spending a short amount of time on this effort.

The largest jail in the United States cannot be fixed cheaply or quickly. What is truly required is the development and implementation of a comprehensive Master Plan for the facility and its operations to permanently resolve the unabated issues identified in the Rutherford litigation. We recognize that the development of a Master Plan as neither a goal nor a destination. It is the essential road map for ensuring that the entire territory related to the outstanding issues of the litigation is covered and that all identified remedies are sound and acceptable to all parties.

However, while we believe that the development of comprehensive, long-term solutions to the problems that are inherent in the MCJ is the proper course of action, there are nevertheless numerous activities that we believe can proceed immediately and in the near future to mitigate some of the key concerns. As such, this remedial outline identifies a series of illustrative measures that, if adopted by the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors and LASD, would

,
(J
zlLi
;.:"e.
u
v')

, Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC is a New York based criminal justice planning and consulting

firm. P/BA as a firm, and its staff as individuals, has experience with jail systems throughout the

country including those in Harris County, TX (Houston), Philadelphia PA, Washington DC, Suffolk

County, MA (Boston), Suffolk and Nassau Counties (NY). Alachua County, FL (Gainesville),

Arlington County, VA, and New York City. The firm's principals and associates offer substantial

conSUlting and hands-on correctional experience 10 its consulting assignments.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

J

CiXWI 6fT (f);J~

Case 2,:0C8a-scev-20:7751-6cv9--0J4F1W11--ADGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9942 FFileilded060/916/1/046/10PaPgeag7eo1f 815of P2a7gePIDag#e:5I2D #:579
;,

allow the MCJ to operate far more safely and effectively than is presently the case. This outline sets forth both interim steps that can mitigate some of the concerns that are endemic to MCJ, either because of the limitations imposed by the physical plant or because of operating approaches and prerogatives adopted by the LASD, as well as proposed long-term solutions.

,>
c:i W
Z

We say this plan is illustrative for several reasons. First, we cannot claim to have developed any true, in-depth expertise about the MCJ and how to fix it after such a short period of time and without the benefit of LASD data about the operations, staffing, and incidents. Second, we do not propose this as something to be imposed on the County-rather we offer this to illustrate what can be done and to initiate a dialogue, with LASD and others, conceming short and long term amelioration of critical conditions in the jail. Third, we maintain that there are other measures that could or should be taken and consequently, we do not wish to waive opportunities to identify other issues that impact on these categories of concerns once we learn more about the MCJ and have an opportunity for dialogue with LASD staff. Despite temning them "illustrative,· we believe that our suggestions and recommendations are reasonable, have merit and are representative of the considerable expertise and experience of our firm and staff combined with the background information and first-hand observations we have made to date.

We also believe that the current efforts of the LASD relative to the recent awarding of a contract to a fimn to develop a security audit of the Los Angeles County jails and a soon-to-be completed Facilities Master plan must be carefully scrutinized and considered in this process. These two reports should add considerably to the knowledge base about the jail system in general and MCJ in particular.

This outline plan is divided into three phases, an immediate one (within 6 months) during which immediate measures can be taken to address serious concerns at MCJ, a second phase (6-24 months) during which long-ternn plans are being developed and additional measures taken to address operational and physical deficiencies, and a third phase (2-6 years) of implementation of longterm plans. The measures set forth under each must be viewed as part of a continuum of improvements to MCJ, and, as such, each phase is divided into the same three topiCS as follows:

I. CROWDING/POPULATION DENSITY REDUCTION OPTIONS II. OUT OF CELL TIME- CROWDING MITIGATION III. INMATE SUPERVISION/SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS

We recommend that a panel of representatives of the County and the ACLU-SC be convened as soon as possible to consider this outline plan as well as other potential initiatives designed to remedy the many serious operational and physical plant deficiencies that have been well-documented in the past and that

Pulitzer/Bogard & ASSOCiates, LLC

2

Case 2,:0C8a-scev-20:7751-6c9v--0J4F1W11-A-DGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9942 FFileilded060/91/61/046/10PaPgeag8eo1f 915of P2a7gePIDag#e:5I3D #:580
we have observed most recently. It is our recommendation that the membership of this panel be limited to five-seven individuals, selected by the parties, who have significant expertise in jails and/or L.A. County budgeting and finance. The County's representatives should be decision-makers, or persons who can quickly access those who can make decisions. And, we suggest that attorneys for the . parties not participate on the panel so that there can be a free and open exchange of ideas at all times, unencumbered by the objections and legal technical issues that counsel might reasonably be expected to raise. The panel should receive its charge from the Court, and then be permitted to do its work, with periodic status reports submitted to counsel and the Court. Only if the panel cannot achieve consensus should a mediator be called in, and that should be an infrequent even!. 2
We are prepared to participate on such a panel, and to initiate work during the week of June 26, 2006.

2 Two principals of our firm previously participated on a Federal Court appointed committee that operated in precisely this manner in Michigan in Haciix v. Johnson. Over the course of some ten years, Ihe committee was able to efficienlly resolve myriad long·standing disagreemenls between the parties, develop a master plan, and successfully oversee the implemenlation of virtually all issues as set forth in a consent decree that called for a complete operational and physical rehabilitation of a 5,OOD-bed prison.

Pulitzer/Bogard & ASSOCiates, LLC

/
3

Case 2'C:0a8s-cev2-0:7751-6cv9--0J4F1W11-A-0G0PR DDooccuummeentn9t 492 FiFleidled060/196/1/046/10PagPea9geof2105ofP2a7ge P10a#g:e54ID #:581

PHASE I-Immediate Remedial Measures (within 6 months)

b W

z Z

I. CROWDING/POPULATION DENSITY REDUCTION OPTIONS

,:(
U

(r,

1. Move 1800 high security inmates out of MCJ into Twin Towers.

2. Reduce the number of inmates held pursuant a contract with the state by 500.

3. The impact of these measures would be to allow for the following crowding/population density reduction measures:

a. Convert Level 2000-4000 6-man cells into 4-man cells;3 b. Convert Level 2000-4000 4-man cells into 2-man cells;4 c. Convert Level 2900 12-man cells to 6-man cells;5 d. Reduce the density of Level 5000 and 9000 dormitories presently
housing 80-130 inmates to 64 beds each6 (the ACA standard for maximum dormitory size) and convert the 250-man dormitory to two, 64-bed dormitories.

The impact of beds saved by implementing steps a-c (density reduction in multiple occupancy cells) would be 1,313 beds. The impact of reducing . the density in dormitories would be 810 fewer bedslinmates. The total bed reduction at MCJ would be 2,123. We also recommend that in lieu of using dayrooms for temporary housing, one single cell module of 104 beds be identified as a location for inmates awaiting a more permanent placement at MCJ, consistent with their classification.

4. As the first step in a long term strategy to reform MCJ's physical plant and design driven operations, the County should develop and issue a Request For Proposals to retain a qualified architectural firm initially to develop a cost benefit analysis relative to the complete renovation of MCJ as a contemporary jail facility meeting state and national standards and best practices (including direct supervision) versus the replacement of the facility entirely. This study can be completed within six months, with a decision by the Board of Supervisors immediately thereafter so that

3 Cells would still be significantly short of national standards for unencumbered space for inmates (American Correctional Standards 4-AlDF-1A-l0 requires 25 unencumbered square feet per occupant in multiple occupancy ceUs, unless inmates are locked in for more than 10 hours a day,
in which case 35 square feet are required per occupant). As an interim measure, however, these
reductions would be a modest improvement over current conditions. We have not necessarily tied aU recommendations to ACA standards, given the interim nature of the first two phases of this' Outline Plan; we have, however, referenced a few selected such standards as necessary. • Id. sid.
, ACA Standards (4-ALDF-1A-l0) limits dormitories to 64.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

4

Case 2'C:0a8s-ecv2-:07751-c6v9-0-4J1F1W1--DADGPR DDoocucmumenetn9t492 FilFeidle0d6/0196//1046/1P0agPea1g0eo2f 115of P27ageP1a0g#e:5I5D #:582

designs may be completed to allow for the phasing out of MCJ in its

current configuration within five-six years.

o
LLJ

Z

5. Consider the implications of the Sheriff's recently announced plan for

2
<t

increased arrests and the elimination of early release. Insure that this

U
V'l

plan be dealt with in a manner that will not compromise the integrity of

plans to remedy unsafe and unhealthful conditions at MCJ.

II. OUT OF CELL TIME· CROWDING MITIGATION

1. The LASD should equip MCJ dayrooms/unused multipurpose spaces
within modules with TVs and appropriate exercise equipment for indoor recreation/out of cell activity by inmates. With population reduction measures in place as per I above, if used on two shifts a day for groups of 20·30 inmates, this would allow for 1.5-2 hours of indoor recreation daily for most irimates.7 This would require posting one deputy in/or adjacent to the dayroom during each recreation period. 8

2. We recognize the logistical difficulties posed by the current MCJ design relative to LASD having to move inmates to the roof for recreation.9 Nevertheless, with the population reductions described above, we believe that it is of the utmost importance to explore all possible means to stretch the Title 15 mandated three hours per week of outdoor recreation to as many as three, one hour sessions per week per inmate, in lieu of the current three hours in one block. This would further mitigate the impact of crowding and would increase the chances that inmates would not miss out on a full week of recreation if they miss a scheduled recreation period due to a visit, court appearance, or an operations related cancellation.

3. With the recommended population reduction, it is recommended that all' MCJ inmates held in disciplinary segregation status be afforded an opportunity to receive for at least one hour a day/five days a week of

7 We note that a 2000 Fire Safety Report commissioned by the Plaintiffs identified air-handling system problems in some dayrooms. We would suggest that these deficiencies be corrected. although we contend that if the spaces have been used for the past six years for temporary housing, they can certainly be used for the types of activities described here as a means of increasing out of cell activity time. 'We recognize that this recommendation and perhaps others related to recreation and enhanced inmate supervision may result in a need for additional staff. However, the staffing implications of these initiatives may be mitigated by the proposed population reductions. Moreover, as we have . not yet requested or been provided access to detailed staffing figures for MCJ, we cannot reasonably say at this iuncture whether additional staff will be required. , More contemporary hi-rise jails, including the Twin Towers facility, employ a 'porch design: with outdoor recreation on each fioor adjacent to living modules and requiring no escorts and minimal supervision.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

5

Case 2'C:0a8s-ecv2-:07751-c6v9-0-J4F11W1--DADGPR DDooccuummenetn9t492 FiFleidle0d60/196//1046/10PagPea1g1eo2f215of 2P7agePIaDg#e:5I6D #:583
I .

exercise outside their cells, including one hour a week of outdoor

recreation.1o

CJ iJ.J

4. The LASD should expand opportunities for families and significant others

z Z
'1;

to visit inmates. We propose expanding the days available for visitation

U

',I"}

from 4 days to 7 days per week, and expanding each visitation period from

15 minutes to 30-minutes (4 times per week). If adopted, this proposed

change would provide greater flexibility in the schedule and thereby

reduce the unreasonably long waiting periods for visitors that has been

previously documented and routinely observed. This modification also

ensures that inmates are not forced to miss visits as a result of

unscheduled court appearances, medical appointments and conflicts

created by the dynamics of facility operations.

5. The LASD should purchase and place a few legal research kiosks in dayrooms or other spaces on the module so all inmates have access to law library services. This cost of providing the oppprtunity for additional access to legal research services to benefit the inmates is available from the Inmate Welfare Fund. The option if acceptable is not designed to eliminate or reduce the "Pro-Per's· housing arrangements made available for inmates who are committed to litigate via self-representation.

J1J. INMATE SUPERVISION/SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
1. We recommend continuing the implementation and refinements of the centralized inmate classification system, including the Northpointe Classification tools. The LASD should attempt to validate the current Northpointe scoring system relative to the LA jails population to insure that, as currently configured, it is adequately and consistently predicting behavior and risks as intended in this system. The process should also include a formal reclassification instrument, so that inmates can be reclassified after a certain period of time based on actual behavior or in the event of changes to their status as a result of legal changes or incidents (e.g., identifying, controlling and militating the effects of the activities of security threat groups such as gangs, etc).
2. We proposed an Enhanced Inmate Supervision Model for use at the MCJ to promote greater accountability and encourage more positive and consistent interactions between staff and inmates. This initiative provides opportunities to improve staff awareness of problems and commits them to taking actions that encourages their ownership of solutions. The Enhanced Inmate Supervision Model would include:

10 American Correctional Association Standards 4-ALDF-2A-64 requires five days a week of one hour of daily out of cell exercise unless security or safety conditions dictate otherwise.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

6

Case 2'C:0a8s-ecv2-:07751-c6v9-0-J4F11W1--DADGPR DDooccuummenetn9t492 FiFleidle0d60/196//1046/10PagPea1g2eo2f315of 2P7agePIaDg#e:5I7D #:584

• ASSignment of deputies to specific rows (75-80 inmates) within the

housing modules;

a
ill

• Make deputies responsible for all aspects of inmate management during their shift for their particular rows, including all Title 15

Z Z
G:

requirements (showers, security rounds, etc.) plus receiving inmate \..'

\'l

complaint forms, ensuring access to dayrooms, documenting

maintenance work orders, ensuring cleanliness and adherence to

sanitation rules, accountability for linen and clothing exchange, and

distributing hygiene supplies (including razors);

• Require security rounds to be documented in all areas at 3D-minute

increments in lieu of 60 minutes;

• Review and sign-off on deputies' performance and accountability

for their assigned areas by sergeants each shift.

3. Enhance fire safety at MCJ by instituting the following measures":

• Conducting and documenting quarterly fire/partial evacuation drills for each area of the building (horizontal movement from modules to separate smoke zones only);
• Implement the use of fireproof containers for each inmate to maintain in their cell and in which all property must fit;
• Relocate wheelchair-bound inmates to another facility since they are most vulnerable in a fire, earthquake or other emergency where there is a need to evacuate them, given the identified inadequacies in the MCJ;
• Install and/or change filters to ensure ventilation ducts do not build up debris and cause fires.

4. In 1993,30% of contraband razor incidents at Twin Towers 12 involved \ loose razor blades or altered razors. As such, we recommend that LASD
change the method for razor distribution, accounting and disposal at the MCJ. In lieu of allowing inmates to purchase razors from commissary and maintain these potentially lethal weapons in their cells, razors should be distributed and collected by deputies under a rigorous system of controls. In addition to enhancing staff and inmate safety, this measure would also address blood borne pathogen control issues, and occupational safety and health concerns.

5. Institute maintenance improvements at MCJ including a plan and commitment to:

11 We have identified only a few critical fire safety measures here based on our recent tour of the MCJ. We would hope that the panel would receive and have available a full status report relative to the measures taken by the LASD in response to the recommendations made by the ACLUSC's fire safety expert, Michael Madden, in 2000. 12 We are not privy to comparable or more recent data from the FAST system pertaining to MCJ, but we have no reason to believe the statistics would be appreciably different.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

7

, ,
I .Case 2:C08as-cev2-0:7751-c6v9--0J4F1W11--ADGDPR DDooccuummeentn9t492 FiFleidled060/196/1/046/10PagPeag13e o2f415of 2P7agePIaDg#e:5ID8 #:585

• Fix toilet leaks fixed within 24 hours or install replacement fixtures:

o
UJ

these leaks were observed throughout the MCJ and present

2:

« unacceptable health risks due to bodily wastes on the cell floor and 2:

safety risks due to the increased potential for inmates to slip in an

!v,:.,J

already very crowded space;

• Replace light bulbs in cells within 24 hours or install replacement

fixtures: likewise, we observed numerous fixtures in cells that were

either broken or contained bumed out bulbs, with the low light and

visibility conditions making it impossible for inmates to read or

groom, and presenting significant obstacles to officers' observation

of activities occurring in the cells.

PHASE 11- Long Term Planning (6-24 Months)
I. CROWDINGIPOPULATION DENSITY REDUCTION OPTIONS

1. The Board of Supervisors should approve and fund implementation of the MCJ Replacement Master Plan, and authorize the design and construction of the renovated MCJ or its replacement.
2. The Board of Supervisors should fund a comprehensive plan to study popUlation projections and evaluate altematives to incarceration/diversion opportunities. This plan should address any long-term population management planning associated with the Sheriffs recently announced proposal for increased arrests and the elimination of early release. 13
3. Move eligible inmates directly from the IRC to the Pitchess facility instead of maintaining them for lengthy periods at MCJ. This initiative may impact the entire system so coordination with all appropriate stakeholders should occur to ensure that arrangements are made to prevent delays in access to medical care or disposition of court documentation.
4. Fund and address all integration issues involving the capabilities of the Automated Jaillnfonmation System to interface with Trial Court Infonmation System. Staff at the Inmate Reception Center must sort hundred of court release documents received manually each business day
" Funding opportunities for planning and programming for alternatives and diversion of special populations from jail, including the mentally ill and homeless, are potentially available from numerous sources. Possible Federal sources include: SAMHSA (Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration); TCE--Targeted Capacity for Substance Abuse and Mental IIIness--Co-occurring Disorders; TCE·· Targeted Capacity for Substance Abuse and Mental Illness and Homelessness; Reentry Grants OoinUy sponsored by SAMHSA, HUD, and Labor); MIOTCRA (Mentally III Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction Act); and, other California based sources are as well.

Pulitzer/Bogard & ASSOCiates, LLC

8

Case ·2.:0C8a-scev2-0:7751-6cv9--0J4F1W11--ADGDRP DDooccuummeennt t9492 FFileilded060/196/1/046/10PagPeag14e o2f51o5f 2P7agePa10ge#:5ID9 #:586

,

because the two information systems do not interface. This problem has

system-wide implications that are associated with many of the reported delays that result in detaining inmates beyond their court-ordered release or transfer.

zwcb
K::
u'r:

(1"/

II. OUT OF CELL TIME- CROWDING MITIGATION

1. Expand inmate programming opportunities and use MCJ dining halls to
meet space needs for such activities.

2. To further mitigate the difficulties inherent in providing visits to the MCJ population, we recommend that the LASD explore other forms of noncontact visits, including the potential use of video visitation. The prime objectives would be to increase the number of weekly opportunities for inmates and their families to maintain contact, and limit the long waits that visitors experience.

III. INMATE SUPERVISION/SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS
1. Procure and implement an automated system of documenting security rounds. This system would involve a series of proximity readers or bar code readers for each module/row and would automatically provide Title 15 documentation as well as reports to supervisors or missed or delayed rounds.
2. Given the size of the MCJ, even with the recommended interim capacity reductions, the facility should be divided into semi-autonomous management units to enhance service delivery, inmate supervision, and accountability. Each management unit would be under the dirE;1ction of a lieutenant, with multiple sergeants assigned to each shift and civilian case managers working as part of a team.
3. Install a reasonable number of digital surveillance cameras throughout the MCJ to afford incident recording capability for disciplinary and prosecution purposes, allow supervisors to view myriad areas of the facility, and serve as a deterrent to inmate misbehavior.
4. Reevaluate all K-10 designations for inmates and develop clearer guidelines for the criteria associated with the use of this designation. Develop a housing plan for K-1 0 inmates.
5. Implement viable recommendations raised in the systemwide Security Audit report.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

9

Case ,2'C:0a8s-ecv2-:07751-c6v9-0-J4F11W1-DADGPR DDoocucmumenetn9t492 FilFeidle0d6/0196//1046/1P0agPea1g5eo2f 615of P27agePIDag#e:6I0D #:587
.;

6. Implement additional sanitation enhancements:

• Develop and implement a housekeeping plan; including control of hazardous materials

C:l
lzu

• Develop and implement a sanitation Inspection system

Z ~

• Re-evaluate inmate personal property limits

(j
(~

• Increase accountability for linen/clothing exchange

• Reduce the amount of food items that inmates may maintain in their

cells so as to reduce opportunities for them to manufacture 'Pruno'.

PHASE III-Implementation of Long-Term Plans (2-6 years)
Phase III entails the implementation of the numerous longer-term initiatives that were studies and planned in Phase I and II. The panel can and should play an active role in overseeing and monitoring the implementation of all such activities necessary to carry out the Master Plan for improving the MCJ

'.

Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, LLC

10

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 92 Filed 09/14/10 Page 27 of 27 Page ID #:588

STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

VERIFICATION
(CCP. § 446 & 2015.5: 28 USC § 1746)

I, 1'\..........<-6 'p Ob,,~,,1L

DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT: I AM THE

\-""-,<,,.j

IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION. I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING DOCUMENTS

AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND 1'1 IE SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS

TO MATTERS STATED THEREIN UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS, I

BELIEVE THEM TO BE TRUE.

EXECUTED THIS

DAY OF _ _ _ _ _ _ _20 lOAl' CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON

CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

oSf,.iI=\.,G-\:~N=~·_A'__/',_'~\~c"=-==",'=_~ (DECLARANT/PRISONER)

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
(ccr. §1013(0) & 2015.5: U.S.c. § 1746)
f. I, M,~u,,- O\.'~r"2... AM A RESIDENT OF CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, IN THE COUNTY OF
IMPERIAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I AM OVER EIGHTEEN (IS) YEARS OF AGE AND AM / AM NOT A PARTY OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION. MY STATE PRISON ADDRESS IS P.O. BOX 5002, CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.
ON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2010 IS SERVED THE FOREGOING: C,UG,'l ",b, See'","\-. AM",,,,l,,h

(SET FORTH EXACT TITLE OF DOCUMENTS SERVED)
ON THE PARTY(S) HEREIN BY PLACING A TRUE COPY THEREOF, ENCLOSED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE(S) WITH POSTAGE THEREON FULLY PAID, IN ATHE UNITED STATES MAlL, IN A DEPOSIT BOX SO PROVIDED AT CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

bl2 ~o..L\'" C kL tL: M., ~c Lrh ~.; .......;.
~ \ J.. All'>" '1M.. S t.1..,r....d .:r s7"t..~~ it"'."-........ l:. 51 Leo!. AAl.L.-ti LI2~. t.A.. '"\ 0 DId...-

THERE IS DELIVERY SERVICE BY UNITED STATE MAIL AT THE PLACE SO ADDRESSED, AND THERE IS REGULAR COMMUNICATION BY MAIL BETWEEN THE PLACE OF MAILING AND THE SO ADDRESSED. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THE FORGOING IS TRU;; AND CORRECT;
\

DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~2010

LARANT / PRISONER

 </s> Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 1 of 87 Page ID #:776

1 u. ",,;-Ish S.IAo~~ l.r~ils::c \. Co~ e. G";::t\(.o.L. 1.~ , 7 \0 ~ C.o...L:t~b LA1 r:- oA
2 V,lG~\5LI\.\ h_"'-'-IJ::-s.."Cb~
3

4:

5

6

7 v.

8 £:,.",,;::;:\'-1 D'-0 Lo'S.. A.k.1l,,-GltS., e:-\-. c,,-l. /

0

h~\G~~

-'

10

c.v. og-lY1.IL.otlFvJ (AG--~) Zl' e.G .I: \';: C ~ DJ.. ~\A."-1...1. ;~
Tb Ft.:b,\t.C..I::"-~ 3'1 (~)(:J..) (AJ[l?:.)

11.
12 ~L.....~~F"t: I--L_"'Il~-~Y c..~Z\r'Fr~S ~LLdLt",,:l\ 10 (='G~6\LA-L e.u.L_I-=-~
13.· Dt" c..c'-JcL ~wcbb.~.L'LG t~.L.-LG 3.1. C,,-\ CJ) LA) (\~J \\-\,:;::\:

1.4

'll~ ... ..1
~1 O~ :

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

--:r 1\.4=::, ~:~:x:L 'F<2.D IV\. 0'1 /,a / b t.. T\-l-LL> u.L.-l-\. (j '1/ 1'1 If) L,. )'::'0 L

24

~D.£.~:t:~LG \"'lr;\IUG~<:0;,.. ~l-\.LS.UA-~ 10 Ft:?b..(..c:.3::'\j _~ Jl. CA) C~J .

25

c... 26 :I..

~c-~ l':lF ALL ,-.ubl. IZ, CL~b1L.s. 12.G'Lo<\\sJl. \0 ~'-;;-~A-:r:~ s.) .

27

E'It\ELIV\:t:I\lA-\~ot\j~ Dr ~b-<:'\~ A"-lb,. ~t:>~~-~ A,h.I.h.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 2 of 87 Page ID #:777

2

3 .3. As~ -r:tJAA.Mc;, -r:klF"bl.M.M:':'D~ C.c=>~cL ~/.:JDK.r"'lL,.·~ 6\A.rLs

4

DF \-\.ov...s.-c,,",l:.~ LocoU":col\.l t:.F" ~LA.r:~:cFF t..LM~EL ~tu:..K:3;.J.L-

6

8

- - - , 9 i.{. to'£-" e:lF "T\.lc; X:1U~~G'dL:.b~ Fol.1v\ AI\.l~ /JAMb o:r 'It-\.c:;-

10

1Uu.l.~G \.6\l\.\.{~ /~ffetv\ ~ \:-'l\6~ \/:l "I,,-j\(~GC_\ \n\ ... ~"t:"iU \.rFt ~

11

t.G\.L 1f'DlL \..~c..G; ~u..Uu.~..IT 'lb' r-6~.1L~".~. at.. LC\.J (3 ')

C l;)l. 3 ')

14 .5. r.:c)t:.G~ w"F ALL t...r'\'1 l~tUll. tou..,.i\'1 '-! A(,ye".J.(!__ \-\s.a..L\H:

15

~ A..... ~A.\FI?l'1 '!:h1J.~8'l\1:D.,J R6~oLlt;, ~\' LA.c.....-:i. ~ l.( slG;

1.6

~~~rt=f" \.AAI'<-1. \-\ou.\G~ ~i.t)N\ ~.J..-.J. U-~'-V ;,ionb -n~;l.tJul:rH

19 f..., L{~~~ ..t>t= A-LL L'Ci>..\1-s.Lr::\'1 II\J.hHA-AJ(!c;. Covcstl.14-i.:rGJ ~h.t'FD

20 C~u......il" bl\A. ,""("I,,\,(;, I:::>~ Lb~ AflAt,-GG::,~ J L63.. A;Ul..n;-Lb'~ rO\.LkJ.I'/

21 L~l.L YA.:rL A-~ $. \"\&iLr~~ ~ ~A ~lA...L'(U A...~ 1D

22

~~. t. ~".~. J,.<.. (&\.) ( I) C A) C\" ) •

• 23
,(
24

25

26

27

28

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 3 of 87 Page ID #:778
Exhibit·1
L

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 4 of 87 Page ID #:779

1

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL

2

3 CASE, NAME: O\.. 'C'••Il::\:: It.. ". Ct>v.,.M\ '" 0 ~ Le>c;;. AA.d,,.~Le ~

c." 4 CASE NO.:

o~ - '11 c",\ - S\':!vJ LA.&j(.)

5

6 I, KA..""t..s;~G~. O\"'l;\lJ:'Ct( , declare that I am over the age of eight-

7 teen (18) yearSiU: ~a.m not a party to theattached'actioni I

8

served

the

attached

document

entitled:

fI:~\t.l K-li:.ilu,6Sl
t'llo ~u.<!.."'(.I:;o"",, ot:'

- i="oiL
h.o e..u..MSAll !;

9

10

lion the persons/parties specified below by placing a true copy of

12 said document into a sealed envelope with the appropriate postage

13 affixed thereto and surrender;i..ng said envelope (s) to th'estaff of

14 ~he Correctional Training Facility entrusted with ~he logging and

15 mailing of inmate legal mail addressed as follows:

16

c.. \.. 0 !l.AI\lG-ISLeS £:.:.u..1.'1'-1 5 \.\.(:1\.1: 'F F ~ 1-\ a;A.~~\.lA.Il..\\:5l,\. L~WA.G..te..~ BG/~e..\-l- ..... LLI.a'.... d C.l.(.o"t ~.

".;-

c.:. \-l ... It::r: l= ~~1!1 e' ~-'c.~

17

"V" bO 'iA.M.IHJA. aL"~.

A,,,\C\LMI>:i'l ~ /1.."\ LA. '\IJ
\00 W,... !IT" an..o/'~WA."

18

",,"OlJ.l6i..\:;'I ~AL.~I C-A.. ft\,\!S'1

~HA..l:\t! -H: '.).OD

G-Leklb.~\.a;-J CA ~\l.\O ~ \~.\'\

19

,

/

20

Njv ,1

business/residence

address is P.O. Box 705" Sole,dad, California 93960~07D5:

21 There is First Class mail delivery service by the United States

22 Post Office between the place of mailing and the addresses indi-

23 cated above. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws

24 of the United States and the State of California that the foregoing
25 is true and correct and that I executed this service this JAN 052011 26 day of JAN 052011 , in Soledad, CA.

27

28

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 5 of 87 Page ID #:780
lL,l"CTI!\. ~\"'1i!5 hri\C!..:cc:\ Lou.iT
ClUllIUL ~ l:i:>\/lC C,,\ of C. A.lx: FolttJr At
r" v.leS\\E' Itr...\ h. r: ~3:: C l\l

M"ult.:rc..G ~. Dlr~r;E it.
"-.ArM\r r 'fl
v.
Lo~ A",l.,-sLGS L.OU,l\.l\\( B.tJArt~
of Su.~~t.vt:c:.oil~J 'e:-t C\.L J b.c!."fetJ ~p",;\S

t' l

A ~ Id.T: r. f

I £,

f.t: f

\'

,\ 1\

!{.e Q. u.S ~- \

foil t"6.o\..u..c."\x::oAl of.' ~Clc.u.M~tJTf:,

rl.dt~UJHll To F'c.:~. It. tr:.v. \l

l.t.. Lc...) LI ) c. A.) C. i v )

F'O\.\.O\lc\l:n.ll". b.oe..UM.S'M\S. ~\..Il!"A.~b ~!Le~u...c.1Z \l-l~ \..oc..u.""-e'I\.\TS '(0 "(\.-l\3"
~\..Ar"'-'\t:~~ />..\ c;n: / ~\A\1i ~~l:'OO/...\' ~.o. ~o>C 1'(05 ... ~CJ\..G ~A b I c'4...LrF'oiLur)...
'\~<\("o- O"\bS. oL A..'"C' !:.u.c.H ~\.. ..... c..& A..~ A..\"'L ~""fL"'\.s::\S£. s\·h.LL \-l~rtS'A.."telL

e.u.'\ ~ba. u.l"\.e,.:rrs. J ~""'M ~Ln;; C. e/J\.

h.. -r'i A.' \r e A.\ S I A.ki

L r A. \\.:\. ~

'l: t-l S \A. tL A..l\J. Co Ii:

"-1r:'t"l\.ch.L\: ·""""-I/\..r\rMl.-- A. h...r~t'...b"G:t." ~1.St:;tu...as."\ ~~~. Ct. t.'r"V. ~ ~c.. (t\..)(\).

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 6 of 87 Page ID #:781
F'o~ ",,,,So ~(SC.\l;:'oM A.f\1~ C.O~"\cI\.lL.- A...s. ~AdtT of \"'~ :e1l1 SouL\': 'h. ~ ... tl\" ~
1. (. ~G'l=':1\l \'l;lo.I\l\" 15. 1:1\1:t:lrA..L \l...;r$ "-'-0 Sou. -L~ So ~~ Its. LA. A. ~ "\0 f:=.:=. ~e: rt./~ L
M.oA.GO\lE ~ I s. u....~\.l '- l:' A. ~:c l t '\.'1. 'r. '" So u.1t A.N. e. ~ ~ 0 \. x: I!.. 1:: ~ S. J .t: M.e.Lu. ~ J; Nl,- A. L L e..c ~s:; \\rTs. J "-\. ~el\.l h..A.., A.1I.l~ "(\\.~ b.u::c.\...p,. tlA.\'rOAl ~A.l.",.~ J !V\...u...~\ ~cr \V\. I\.. ~-e

~A.\IE ~: JAN 0 52011

t'\A..u.ft'tc-e f. b\..t~rG ~
F~3(."o3
Iu fib/~~L

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 7 of 87 Page ID #:782

lhu:I&:"'b. ~·C,,\G.S. h~~\IlI:Q( Co\..t..e:-\

Dr- tlEMlrtA..L h..~""IJt...t:Cl

c.A.\..rf"o!LAlrA.

M~ut.rc..G ~. bLs:"tef. l>LA:r".iT t:V'F,
v.
.L 0 So Au trLilIiiSo to ,"H.t'T '"( [~6A-1t. h
I /)f s.u.~I:R.."r::'ol2. -;" e.-\-. ~\.I
boo! F'':111't-. A 111\E:.

tv ot\-11l..'l-"lfw CA&R.)
tLA.x:M\d"·F~ fou//...' ~ 1t1.S~\.l.S~
~6tt. ~/U)'h.u.c:TroM Dr 'hO(!'UMeM\~
fUn. ...UA...rr "'t"o FI!.b..~. c.:r:". t::-
l(.,(4.~)L\')l A.",b, ~,(C\,.) (\{)

or FI!: ~'"'~'- R......LI.iO<:::'

e.S>'o1-s;L ~n.o c.r= ~\..t.r.G ~'-\. (.4..\ C. 1':\. AN ~ rl\.lc.L\.L~I!?S RIB Gru..LA.UoI\IS ..

!QO~~I tJ\"'fu\OItA.u"hA.., e.t.lIIl~I.S~~OIl.\~G:IUC.2"1 "I\l~ "e--M.,,--:rLs. fl.l.lt.,(I-\u;M.e.:!..&""J \'1-\.1::5

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 8 of 87 Page ID #:783

0-. W\lcc-~ \\.E!.u..~\:"lS~ :til.! ~"AS3:" G'

rl\l (I ol\...l~l.e-TG b..I:.~c..L.~.s.u.~ ~,

Q",,,.f oIL ~!>).CJA1S~ ~ui..S.u.A.-,;L \0 'f".ch.R..

'3'1 (L\.J LI.{J.

I4.hlSWcit I

- A t.. Sf' hlO \.
A~~r~I\..":r~1' of" 'W.\~~( "'-i'::~("'~l:hl./""'- "('\'\'G t..IlS"lSl~ t=:'oiEl 1\~~co\Je\l!." A..l",.A-.&A.lS\
'\\l.\M bu.t-~sAJ ~\ Woe\..\.... l:t..\.~Cl~1ir ~\1;t.kA.its "('\-I.:~ e..OMI!.Lu.S.l:oM 'Yl~A,\ THS'"
h ~ou..~ S,l.\.ou....L "-.l~""( \:>1Et.M~ ~'"'"\.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 9 of 87 Page ID #:784

r\ l - , 1I...'\:.l<.\l:t~\" ~

~t'n.':'IIs:o,-,-S

S(:e.Okil~

(\\)...\EQ.u..':;--S-l

tC="olt..

~
ff

l

o

"\

"

u

..

£-L- -\ r

o

JJ.

O~ l':,.t:>c"\HA...:".i,s ~\O\ t.1:>M.~\.'t:':;:h.. \""r't"~:

LJ:':."'\ of' A.'-l. l'\u~rulo,.L A"'~ ~6~u."'(""l ~\Ar-~ ,(H,t\.\ vJG'rt~ A~!;:s;(:.. A!G~ 10 TI-\.G'
l"\"'~1:C.A.\__ -r:: ..iT,.. \l G1 A:i..1S A.. 0 ~ \..A..C.;r r flb to\. 0"1 Ill. / b I.e, '\ \-llt ~ O"t 11'\ I 010 •

~li\.'r~,;\rr:F ~ s\Sc..ot..l.l A.M~M~I.Sk. C.OiV\.~\.."'r~ ~\AI.s ~ ,\-\""T

~LI5 to"\IE ~ r 1\.\ \\~G t-'\E~.c ~Ilo.-L :r: t..I.\.... \L~ Jt....vt IS A.r 0 r:: \.. A c., l ' ~rtCl~\ t:J'1/I'J.../O\c,

0'1 I 1'1 I () l.. .

'H\.b t'\.~~rc..A. L

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 10 of 87 Page ID #:785

:l.\..
{

A..t/..trs::F

F

/ ~

~G<!.I.">I\.~l~

A"'-\:lUl:\l>\:;~~

LIl.·..d·\..,~~~ ." e...L~ r

M...

Tw

~,
t:>

~'\A.\6 ~

"(\.\, A.\

\-\ i'5;'

,dA.~

~v..\\!'\E"QI.<.ISIU'tl"I,

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 11 of 87 Page ID #:786
\.I~.:;; h.,ad::·.s:/lJbA.;l~ R..1SS,\>C>/..lSG' ~'l I?"DltvJA~b.r~tr ~1~l~S "-\..,~. 5 3& 'Co !Si-l<" ~b6~ Me.\ s~",c.t:\'='l:C!.A..\..\." 5~ec.t;:;I-'-1 w\\:l3nt.~ "'\\\.~ flf\.~M\.:-i=F VJA.s, AT LAC.T olt. A..roJ.'i \'\ol,.\.s,rlu<"- \...OC!.A.\3:0l-.l 'ftl.cl'i\. 'Sv...,,"'i ,~, ~DO(., \I~llc>u..&'-l-l- -:Jv....L'i 1'1) aCt, (.,

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 12 of 87 Page ID #:787
\It;:r;~ ~oc...llM.E)..~ x:.~ tl6Le"/~I~ s..l:Mc..1! 1~~ f'C\t."'" W"'~ /10..\.0\ t:,,\ ~L"'l:'N\,i;f'f'~
t'\~~~<!..~\... 'fr'-Il::. A.,,-,h x:.~ Ue,",f\~~ \0 ~15' \A.\,'i:Lx:"Z.~ ~ A~ AN Ex \..\rBrT

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 13 of 87 Page ID #:788

STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

VERIFICATION
(C.C.P. § 446 & 2015.5: 28 U.S.C. § 1746)

I, M.AlA.b<!i:; ~. b\..~"/l:EIt. .

DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT: I AM THE

eG6-!:J.:)1\1

IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION. I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING DOCUMENTS

AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS

TO MATTERS STATED THEREIN UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS, I

BELIEVE THEM TO BE TRUE.

'

OCT 06 OCT 06 20H11O EXECUTED THIS

ttl}.'MhF

AT CALiPATRIA STATE PRISON

CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

~' ~4--' ~RE

-~----. (DECLARANT/PRISONER)

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

(C.C.P. §1013(a) & 2015.5: U.S.C. § 1746)

I, M....IA..... "'ee ~. DLtv,Co,( AM A RESIDENT OF CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, IN]~ COUNTY OF
IMPERIAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. I AM OVER EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS OF AGE ANDIMVAM NOT A
PARTY OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION. MY STATE PRISON ADDRESS IS P.O. BOX 5002, CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

O_C__T _ ON __

O_6_,.=2-,,0--"'_0__ 20 10 IS SERVED THE FOREGOING: rite:.b.u..ectb U ., F ~e:.c.u..t'\s~~

(SET FORTH EXACT TITLE OF DOCUMENTS SERVED)
ON THE PARTY(S) HEREIN BY PLACING A TRUE COpy THEREOF, ENCLOSED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE(S) WITH POSTAGE THEREON FULLY PAID, IN ATHE UNITED STATES MAIL, IN A DEPOSIT BOX SO PROVIDED AT CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON, CALIPATRIA, CALIFORNIA 92233-5002.

""l.Loli.Ll: ~{: L\~':;; ~i"-C..A..
'-\ 1'\ 0 0 ~A.Mo III A. Q,W b. •
Mb~~it~i i? ~(I..-'J._ • t k. '\ I"!,I.\.

p.. 'r'r'blt.fIi"::'-l I~ A. 'r \...A. v..l \00 v..la.!..l G.abA ~'VLfA. '{
!lu.. t:lLi' # \~o 0 LrLe:lo.\ ~'1.LG, c.A. '\ I Ol \ () - i.1.. 1'1.

THERE IS DELIVERY SERVICE BY UNITED STATE MAIL AT THE PLACE SO ADDRESSED, AND THERE IS

REGULAR COMMUNICATION BY MAIL BETWEEN THE PLACE OF MAILING AND THE SO ADDRESSED.

I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THE FORGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

:::--.-.....

/,/

DATE _ _O=-C..::......;..,.T_(_J-=-O-c:2::...:;O::....1.l__0____ _ _ _.2010

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 14 of 87 Page ID #:789
(hl:t.tG~ ~\A.\L;.s. ~t~\llX'c..-r c.oui\ C;; ...tlIlAL b.r:.\tt.t:c.."'\ 0 F C. A.L.d::ci...U:c A.
W';~\GItI\l h..r"r'!.1: eM

M. ;. u.1I..r.tt:" ~. OL:~x:li t
~l/~.::t.M\:r f f,
v.
Los. A..d...;:;:liiS Cc.ul\.il.i BOA-I!.. ~
oF' s."\I.~\!:Il.\.Il:s.eIl.S J e..+ C\. \ '/
~e r\:~t:... ...,;f$.

\>LAr"ilxfF..Is "(\hILI\. R. .G&u.G-5-l-
Folt.. t>n..ot-..u.c!:l:r.OIU ot=' ~o~u.Mel\.l\S
x· (\.\/l.'hIAill1'O fe~. c..r-.J.?-
ll.. AUb. ~4.

~u.4.~\.IA.AiT "(0 R.u..LG 1-L. II..Atb..· "!II.\. of "('\'-a:: ~&a~et.AL K.u..LG:::' of C.~\I:t.L ~1'l.bc..E~U.t!.~1
r t'lA."t:~.c f \L.:e Q.~G -:.l' \ \.\. /I..\' "( \-\<:. \.. E. 'f"'IU ~ ....l\.il~ ~ fto b. u.e...C: \' \-\. -=. ll" ~ 0 \..\.. t:.v...L t:' (so
tA.L:t.~""'\'IL:rA ~\'A"\i: ~1Lt:SOIU' "ted! {\'l.i\.r~ RI:>Ab. J ~·D. ~cn( ~(.'lD.1. c.",\..c~"'tl:/:~I..I tA..L~~oLM"C.A. "\.1.,)., ~~I oj!. A..\ Sv..C!.~ ~l.A..e.e A.!:> ALL ~ ....~\.ces .s\lA.LL l..\ellcAFTGit

(>\.wA.5G: t.lo"{': \\l..iII.~ ,,(\,6 "'(ell\-'\. ," h..O<'..""I"\(sM.\:' '/ S:~ ~15 rrl\.\'::~ ~iIl.oA~L'l 1:1\.1. Fe~e-i!..A.L
it......L.; 0\= c.s::.\lc\.. ~1LC~~b.~t..G ";"\.CA.) C.\)I J\.,u'b. :t'1I.Le.Lu.h..\1;S K,C1dj·\..\,..LA.TrO.uS .. So~~; r\;:l"\oR. ....Al~A.1 C.olll..\i~~r.)l.,l~";I..U!..G' I ... Mo. e.- ""'~rL!').
i. A.::'~ l'.uM.A\'~r""fb~M.t\\J::"t,.l, c.cl\l.\eit ~1.:>i:.irL1& 'll.GIArLs. t'>~ \~O\..\.S.t:'MI9- LOC-A.I,rol>.l bF
~LA..s:ul'rFt= u.t..1.~c=L B.oCl"-ra...ll:r ~v...MU.:fI.. '\.lkt48~. ·r/l.oM :Iu..L~ I.l....J ;toot.. '1',-tIt.\A.
~v..L" 11. ;LbO~ IL'\ LA. c.. 3'.
1, C.. ~rG~ ",'F ALL c'!:\'''C( A.t..Il. c..~""'I\.l\'\{ A,6euLa.f. \.\:\$'/1.\..,,", ~ Sc.:i:=I2\"'{ '(u:s}ec.>:1'rc.u R.t.e~oti~ e.bh1.~u..i\&~ A.\ '-A..w f'A.OM. ~Au.ui\.Il\( aoo\'" ,,",i1.u. 'S\A.L'l aeo'i.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 15 of 87 Page ID #:790
~. Ce?'< br "\~G lsa.:a:If"AU<'-.b ~~oc.e~\.lt.~ h.oL.-t..A-M A.l LAc..:r I AI\.! h. ·O\.G r""MA..l,,;:
t."'M~\..I\.-.s:~ r-o>!.AI\. \A.:5\?~ ~A.OM. SIlit-rellA.~fft. ).00(., "(~t..u. :!'\J\..L~ ~b01..
;,t, t~~"-I of ",'.\..(;" FoLK I AI\.I~ T\"'1i NAIV\G 0\= 'rI~,", Nu:t.S.f: R.~~~oiU ~x{!.LG Folt..
\'1~G t:1>ls.~et!.\rorJ ;:, ~ ~L"':S;k.l.lrFF~ C.~LL :(;,,1 \...G~AL ~~~I..L'c'(.!Il. A· \(rS?' ul\.l,;rl~ I~
bGc.LI>..\Lo\.~;t:bk.l. Loel\.'LEh rkl t-\ob.u.\..G J...~oo-A.. r~6b- aD I"-T LA.£!...T .:ro\{
S~~\eM~GI2.. F (;J ~Ob (.,..

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 16 of 87 Page ID #:791
I Exhibit 2
t
J
I
I·
!
i•Ig.
i
j
!
l ~
I
I
I

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 17 of 87 Page ID #:792

1 PAUL B. BEACH, State Bar No. 166265 Qbeach<a2lbac1aw.com
2 DANIEL LEE, State Bar No. 236811 dlee<a2lbac1aw.com
3 LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200
4 Glendale, California 91210-1219 Telephone No. (818) 545-1925
5 FacsImile No. (818) 545-1937

6 Attorneys for Defendant Sheriff Leroy D. Baca
7

8

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

12 MAURICE PIERRE OLIVIER,

13

Plaintiff,

Case No. CV 08-07169 JFW (AGR) Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg

14

vs.

15 LEROYBACA,
16
Defendants.
17

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (FIFTH SET)

18

19

20

21 PROPOUNDING PARTY: 22 RESPONDING PARTY:

Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier Defendant Sheriff Baca

23 SET NO.: 24 III 25 III 26 III

Fifth

27

28

1
OLIVIER\Resp to RPD.5

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 18 of 87 Page ID #:793

1

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 34(b), Defendant Sheriff

2 Baca hereby submits the following written response to Plaintiff Maurice Olivier's

3 Fifth Set ofRequests for Production of Documents.

4

5 UNENUMERATED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION:

6

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iv) of the Federal

7 Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff request [sic] that the Defendant, or the attorney

8 advising the Defendant produce the following documents. Please produce the

9 documents to the Plaintiff at CTF/State Prison, P.O. Box 705, Soledad, California

10 93960-0705. Or at such place as all parties shall hereafter agree [sic]. ,

11

Initial disclosures in general except as otherwise provided by stipulation or

12 court order. [sic] Require each party disclose to other parties certain information

13 regarding witnesses, documents, damage computations, and liability insurance

14 without awaiting a discovery request Fed.R.Civ.P 26(a)(1).

15

Furthermore, any liability insurance policy that may be used to satisfy a

16 potential judgment must be made available for inspection and copying as part of

17 the insured party's [Defendant's] initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rules of

18 Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A)(iv).

19

Moreover, such liability insurance-policies, including all exhibits, addenda,

20 and the declaration page, must be made available for inspection and copying by

21 Plaintiffs without the necessity of a formal discovery request.

22 RESPONSE TO UNENUMERATED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION:

23

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request because it is vague and

24 ambiguous' as to what document is being sought for production. Defendant also

25 objects to this Request because the vague and ambiguous nature ofthis Request is

26 complicated by the compound nature of the Request as a result of Plaintiffs failure

27 to identify by number and delineate the document request accordingly. Further, this

28 Request is overbroad because it is not reasonably limited to the subject matter or

2
OLiVIER\Resp to RPD.5

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 19 of 87 Page ID #:794

1 time period pertinent to this lawsuit. Accordingly, this Request is not reasonably

2 calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence nor related to the subject

3 matter ofthis lawsuit. This Request is also compound and, much of which, does not

4 contain a request for production, but is argumentative because it purports to argue

5 Plaintiff's interpretation ofthe law, i.e., Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.

6

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

7 responds as follows: The County of Los Angeles (which the Los Angeles County

8 Sheriff's Department is a department of) is self-insured. See, California

9 Government Code §§ 989, et seq.

10

11
12 Dated: February 7,2011

LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

13 14

- By /"2-

~

Daniel Lee

15

Attorneys for Defendant

Sheriff Leroy D. Baca

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

·25

26

27

28

3
OLiVIER\Resp to RPD.5

,. " Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 20 of 87 Page ID #:795

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3

4

I, Selina Small, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of California; I

5 am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business

address is 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

6

7

On February 7, 2011, I served the foregoing DEFENDANT'S

RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF

8 DOCUMENTS (FIFTH SET) on the interested parties in this action by placing

9 a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

10 MauriceP. Oliver, CDC F-83603 11 CTFIState Prison
12 Ben Curry Highway 101 N
13 P. O. Box 686 14 Soledad, CA 93960-0686

15

BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection

16 and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be

17 deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully

prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware

18 that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal 19 cancellation date or postage meter date is more than on~ day after date of deposit

for mailing in affidavit. 20

21

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a

22 member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

23
Executed on February 7, 2011, at Glendale, California.
24

25

26 Declarant
27

28

4
OLIVIER\Resp to RPD.5

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 21 of 87 Page ID #:796

1 PAUL B. BEACH, State Bar No. 166265

12beach02lbaclaw.com

2 DANIEL LEE, State Bar No. 236811

dlee02lbaclaw.com

.

3 LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

100 West Broadway, Suite 1200

4 Glendale, California 91210-1219

Telephone No. (818) 545-1925

5 FacsImile No. (818) 545-1937

6 Attorneys for Defendant Sheriff Leroy D. Baca
7

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10

11
Case No. CV 08-07169 JFW (AGR)

Plaintiff,
13
VS.
14

15 LEROY BACA,

16

Defendants.

Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg
DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF"DOCUMENTS (FOURTH SET)

17

18

19

20

21 PROPOUNDING PARTY: 22 RESPONDING PARTY:

Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier Defendant Sheriff Baca

23 SET NO.:
24 III

Four

25 III

26 III

27

28

1
OLIVIER\Resp to RPDA

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 22 of 87 Page ID #:797

1

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 34(b), Defendant Sheriff

2 Baca hereby submits the following written response to Plaintiff Maurice Olivier's

3 Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents.

4

5 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3:

6

List of all medical and deputy staff that were assigned to the medical intake

7 area ofLACJ from 07/12/06 thru [sic] 07117106.

8 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3:

9

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request because it is overbroad in its

to scope of subject matter because it seeks the identification of individuals who have

11 no personal knowledge of Plaintiffs floor sleeping claim, as there were multiple

12 shifts for each day during this time period, most of which are not pertinent to

13 Plaintiff s floor sleeping claim (i.e., presumably, in the evenings). Accordingly,

14 this Request is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible

15 evidence. Finally, this Request is duplicative of a previous discovery request

16 propounded by Plaintiff, specifically, Plaintiffs Request for Production, Set Two.

17

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

18 responds as follows: Defendant has previously produced to Plaintiff documents

19 in response to this Request. Defendant refers Plaintiff to Bates Nos. 288 to 305,

20 which Defendant produced to Plaintiff on or about September 27, 2010.

21

22 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.5:

23

Copies of all work orders related to repairs, extermination, [sic] [sic in

24 original] of pests and rodents and sanitation of Module 2500-A. From September

25 1,2006 thru [sic] [sic in original] March 1,2007.

26 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.5:

27

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request because it is overbroad as to

28 the scope of its time period because it seeks records for a time period of six

2
OLIVIER\Resp to RPD.4

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 23 of 87 Page ID #:798

.1 months, which is well beyond the time period alleged in Plaintiffs operative

2 . pleading. For the same reason, this Request is burdensome, oppressive, and

3 harassing. Finally, this Request is duplicative of a previous discovery request

4 propounded by Plaintiff, specifically, Plaintiffs Request for Production, Set 5 Two.

6

. Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

7 responds as follows: Defendant has previously produced to Plaintiff documents

8 in response to this Request. Defendant refers Plaintiff to Bates Nos. 444 to 537

9 (print.;.outs relating to repair work for Module 2500, Row A from September 1,

10 2006 to March 1, 2007), which Defendant also produced to Plaintiff on or about

11 September 27,2010.
12

13 UNENUMERATED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION:

14

ASD [sic] [sic in original] inmate information center booking details of

15 housing location ofPlaintiffllnder booking number 9121486 from July 12,2006 16 through July 17, 2006 at LACl

17 RESPONSE TO UNENUMERATED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION:

18

Objections: This Request is vague and ambiguous as to what is meant by

19 and/or encompas'sed within the phrases "ASD" and "booking details of housing

20 location." Additionally, this Request is duplicative of a previous discovery

21 request propounded by Plaintiff, specifically, Plaintiffs Request for Production, 22 Set Three.

23

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

24 responds as follows: Defendant has previously produced to Plaintiff documents 25 in response to this Request. Defendant refers Plaintiff to Bates Nos. 538 to 546,

26 which Defendant previously produced to Plaintiff on or about November 9,2010

27 and constitutes the Plaintiff s Inmate Information Center print out for Booking
28

3
OLiVIER\Resp to RPDA

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 24 of 87 Page ID #:799

1 No. 9121486, which is inclusive of July 12,2006 through July 17,2006 at the 2 Los Angeles County jail.
3

4 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

5

Copy of the Form and the Name of the Nurse responsible for the inspection

6 of Plaintiffs cell in legal deputy's A. Kennedy's declaration. Located in Module

7 2500-A Bed-20 at LACJ in September of2006.

8 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

9

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request because it is unintelligible

10 and vague and ambiguous as to what is meant by and/or encompassed within the

11 second incomplete sentence. This Request also assumes facts not in evidence

12 with respect to Deputy Kennedy's declaration. Further, this Request does not

13 comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 34 because it seeks

14 information (i.e., the name of the nurse) rather than the document. Finally, this

15 Request is duplicative of a previous discovery request propounded by Plaintiff,

16 specifically, in Plaintiffs Request for Production, Set Three. Defendant has

17 previously disclosed the document sought to Plaintiff in November 2010 and

18 Plaintiffs attaching of Exhibit "2" to his "Fourth Request for Production of

19 Documents," reveals that he is already in possession of the document he seeks in -

20 this Request.

21

22

23 Dated: January 31, 2011
24 25
26
27

LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

By L"2

a::<z

Daniel Lee

Attorneys for Defendant

Sheriff Leroy D. Baca

28

4
OLIVIER\Resp to RPD.4

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 25 of 87 Page ID #:800

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3

4

I, Selil1a Small, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of California; I

5 am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business

address is 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

6

7

On January 31,2011, I served the foregoing DEFENDANT'S ,RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF

8 DOCUMENTS (FOURTH SET) on the interested parties in this action by

9 placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

10 Maurice P. Oliver, CDC F-83603 11 CTFIState Prison 12 Rainier Hall #311 U
P. O. Box 705 13 Soledad, CA 93960-0705
14
BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection 15 and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be 16 deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully
prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware 17 that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal 18 cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit 19 for mailing in affidavit.

20

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

21 that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a

member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 22

23

Executed on January 31, 2011, at Glendale, California.

24

25

26

Declarant

27
28

5
OLIVIER\Resp to RPDA

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 26 of 87 Page ID #:801

1 PAUL B. BEACH, State Bar No. 166265 pgeach(a),lbac1aw.com
2 MATTHEW P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 265118 mpa(a),lbac1aw.com
3 LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200
4 Glendale, California 91210-1219 Telephone No. (818) 545-1925
5 FaCSImile No. (818) 545-1937

6 Attorneys for Defendant Sheriff Leroy Baca
7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MAURICE PIERRE OLIVIER,

12

Plaintiff,

Case No. CV 08-07169 JFW (AGR) Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg

13

vs.

14 GLORIA MOLINA, et al.

15

Defendants.

DEFENDANT SHERIFF BACA'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET OF REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

16

17

18 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier

19 RESPONDING PARTY:

Defendant Sheriff Baca

20 SET NO.:

Three

21

22

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 34(b), Defendant Sheriff

23 Baca hereby submits the following written response to Plaintiff Maurice Olivier's

24 Third Set of Requests for Production of Documents.

25 III

26 III

27 III

28

OIivier/Resp to RFPJ

1

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 27 of 87 Page ID #:802

1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1:

2

ASD [sic] Inmate Information Center booking details. of housing location of

3 Plaintiff under Booking Number 9121486 from July 12,2006 through July 17,

4 2006 at LACJ.

5 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1:

6

Objections: This Request is vague and ambiguous as to what is meant by

7 and/or encompassed within the phrase "booking details of housing location."

8

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

9 responds as follows: Plaintiffs Inmate Information for Booking No. 9121486 is

10 attached hereto as Bates Nos. 1 to 9.

11

12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2:

.13

Copies of all LACJ and County Agency Health and Safety Inspection

14 Reports conducted at LACJ from January 2006 through July 2007.

15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2:

16

Objections: This Request is overbroad as to the scope of its subject matter.

17 See, Corrected Second Amended Complaint at 5-6. Accordingly, to that extent,

18 this Request is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible

19 evidence.

20

Further, as Plaintiffs request is not limited to Men's Central Jail, but rather

21 encompasses the entire Los Angeles County Jail system ("LACJ"), this Request is

22 overbroad in that regard. The Los Angeles County jail system is one of the

23 largest jail systems in the world. There are multiple jail facilities within the

24 LACJ system. With the exception of Men's Central Jail, no other jail facility

25 gives rise to Plaintiffs claims in this lawsuit. Accordingly, Defendant objects to

26 this Request on the grounds that it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the

27 discovery of admissible evidence. This Request is overbroad because it seeks

28

Olivier/Resp to RFP.3

2

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 28 of 87 Page ID #:803

1 records from multiple jail facilities (all of which have no relevance to this

2 lawsuit) well beyond the scope of this lawsuit.

3

In addition, this Request is burdensome and oppressive because it seeks

4 records not in the possession of the LASD. Nor are these records retained by

5 LASD; they are in the regular custody of the Department of Public Health and are

6 only retained for several years.

7

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

8 responds as follows: Defendants have conducted a diligent search and inquiry,

9 and have not located any responsive documents. However, efforts are continuing,

10 and Defendant will provide an update when more information becomes available.
11

12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3:

13

Copy of the "Grievance Procedure Program" at LACJ and the Inmate

14 Complaint Form used from September 2006 through July 2007.

15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3:

16

Objections: This Request is vague and ambiguous as to what is ineant by

17 andlor encompassed within the phrase "Copy of the 'Grievance Procedure 18 Program. '"

19

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

20 responds as follows: Attached hereto as Bates Nos. 10 to14 are responsive

21 policies regarding the inmate complaint process. Further, attached hereto as

22 Bates Nos. 15 to 16 is a sample inmate complaint form used between September

23 2006 through July 2007. 24 III

25 III 26 III

27

28

Olivier/Resp to RFP.3

3

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 29 of 87 Page ID #:804

1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

2

Copy of the Form and the Name of the Nurse responsible for the inspection

3 of Plaintiffs cell in legal deputy's A. Kennedy's declaration. Located in Module

4 2500-A Bed-20 at LACJ in September of2006.

5 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

6

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request on the grounds that it

7 implicates the privacy rights of non-party individuals. Additionally, this Request

8 is unintelligible as to the second incomplete sentence. Further, this Request does

9 not comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 34.

10

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

11 responds as follows: Please see the attached documents, Bates Nos. 17 to 52.

12 13
14 Dated: November 8, 2010
15

: : nA7<1ll :HOl, PC

16

Matthew P. Allen

17

Attorney for Defendant

Sheriff Leroy Baca

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OIivier/Resp to RFP.3

4

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 30 of 87 Page ID #:805

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3

4

I, Ana Escamilla, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of

California; I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my 5 business address is 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

6

7

On November 8, 2010, I served the foregoing DEFENDANT SHERIFF

BACA'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET OF REQUEST FOR

8 PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS on the interested parties in this action by

9 placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

10 Maurice P. Oliver, CDC F-83603 11 Calipatria State Prison 12 Unit D-5, Cell 204
P. O. Box 5002 13 Calipatria, CA 92233
14
BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection 15 and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be 16 deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully
prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware 17 that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal 18 cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit 19 for mailing in affidavit.

20

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

21 that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a

member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 22

23

Executed on November 8, 2010, at Glendale, California.

24

25

26

Declarant

27

28

OIivier/Resp to RFP.3

5

'""' . " .. '"'..... ........ r. .. , ...•.. ~'=mm"w.W''"~..~=.'''''' .f

,.~ 'w ......,..0~"'_

""'.,~~.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR

Document 108

Filed 07/28/11

Page 31 of 87

Page ID #:806

INMATE INFORMATION
Booking No.: 9121486 Last Name: OLIVIER First Name: MAURICE
Date Of Birth: 02/24/1960 Age: 46 Place Of Birth: WIWISCONS

Middle Name:

Sex: M Race: B Hair: BLK Eyes: BRO Height: 505 Weight: 140

Arrest Information Arrest Charge: 459PC Arrest Date: 07/12/2006 Arrest Agency: 3420 Arrest Officer ld: 088802 Search Officer Id: 115722 Transporting Officer Id: 088802

Charge Description: BURGLARY Arrest Time: 1645 Agency Description: LASD-METRO DETAIL Officer Last Name: BARRIOS Officer Last Name: HERRERA Officer Last Name: BARRIOS

.,"
Booking Information

Overall Charge Level: F

Id Level: P

Booking Date: 07/12/2006

Booking Time: 2156

Booking Location: IRC

Location Description: IRC

," >

Booking Officer Id: 115722 Officer Last Name: HERRERA

Bail Information Total Bail Amount: 0

Total Hold Bail Amount: 0.00

Grand Total Bail: 0.00

Case Detail SAO~i08120 li45~)PC .

Court
~4'£!·L

.B~a~i~lA' ;.F;in;e:m"C"o.u:r;t.Dta'~~_~=+~~':;"""~¥~I-~

. ULL

0 .0007113/2(t07j07II

. '

..... .~~

:: ...

,> f. ~ S'.

Next Court Information
Next Court Case: SA06081201 Court Code: LXB Court Address: NULL

Next Court Date: 07113/2007 Court Name: LAX SUPERIOR DEPT.B Court City: NULL

Next Court Time: 0830

Parole/Probation Information

Parole: N State Parolee Flag:

Probation: N Prior Offense:

Prior Arrest: Gang Id:

Homosexual: N

,..
-,·"'1,
P538:"

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 32 of 87 Page ID #:807
Classification Remark: MED EXP PER SGT BODENSTADT CCHRS
TW

Home Address
Address: 1654 S ORANGE DR City: LOS ANGELES Phone No.: 0000000000 Marital Status: . Number Of Years At Current Address: 0 Number Of Years in LA County: 0 Number Of Years in California: 0

AptNo.: State: CA
Number Of Dependent: 0 Months: 0 Months: 0 Months: 0

Zip: 00000 Live with Whom:

Employer Information
Employer Name: STUDENT Address: 855 W VERMONT City: LA Phone No.: 0000000000 Number Of Years At This Employer: 0 Employee At Time Of Arrest?

Address Type: 2 Apt No.: State: CA Occupation: STUDENT Months: 0

Zip: 90029

..<
, ,.

Emergency Contact
Address Type: 1 Address: City: SAME AS ABOVE Phone No.: 3239396414 Contact Person Last Name: TOLBERT Relation: UNCLE

Apt No.: State: CA Business Phone No.: 0000000000 First Name: ARNOLD

Zip: 00000

Housing Information
Housing Location: Permanent Housing Assigned Date: 08/0612007 Facility: Address:

Module: Assigned Time: 2212
City:

Row:

Cell:

Visitor Status: N

Bunk:

J

'

I'..

' ".~

. ;

".".:.

P539 ~;>

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 33 of 87 Page ID #:808
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
", .,'\1>"
.(". I'
."
.'
P540

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 34 of 87 Page ID #:809 P541

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 35 of 87 Page ID #:810 , P542

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 36 of 87 Page ID #:811 P543

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 37 of 87 Page ID #:812
.;
··P544

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 38 of 87 Page ID #:813

Temp Location

Court Location

Point to "To Facility" to display Temporary Location and Court Name

Special Handling
KeepA way Code: Homo: Spec!:

Highly Dangerous: Protective Custody; Spec2:

288 Arrest: Mental: Spec3:

Escape Risk: E Survey: Spcc4:

Suicidal: Handcuff: SpecS:

IRC Comments: 11M WAS AN ERRONEOUS RELEASE. WHEN SECURITY OFFICERS ATTEMPTED TO ARREST HIM. 11M FLED AND A FOOT PURSUIT EVOWJW INVOLVING LAPD & PRIVATE SECURITY. RECLASSED 07/24/06, JAIL LIAISONI

Release Information
Actual Release Date: 08/07/2007 Release Reason: CUST Release Agency: WACO

Release Time: 0813 Reason Description: CUSTODY RELEASE Agency Description: WASCO STATE PRISON 53191AL

Identification
Driver License No.: Social Security No.: 397746316 CII No.: AI0246947

State Issued: Alien No.: Main No.: 4475039

FBI No.: 271478TA6

File No.:

P545

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 39 of 87 Page ID #:814
IPhy,i,,' Odditi"
None
'.
P546

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 40 of 87 Page ID #:815
LOS ANGE ES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEP RTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

SHERIFF 508054
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 07/13/06 01:54 am Performed by JOLDJIAN, KHATCHIK A/ STAFF NURSE
Entered on 07113/06 01:54 am
JOLDJIAN, KHATCHIK A/ STAFF NURSE SHERIFF 508054

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result Fingerstick Refusal Diabetic Intervention

87 mg/dl Physician notifed. DR. SARKISSIAN NOTIFIED.

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 07/13/06 04:15 am Performed by PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230 Entered on 07/13/06 04:38 am
PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

89 mg/dl

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 07/13/06 08:00 pm Performed by ALEX, MICHAEL J / NASSTS - 512678 Entered on 07/13/06 08:32 pm
ALEX, MICHAEL J / NASSTS - 512678

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Biood Glucose Result Diabetic Medication Given

150 mg/dl metformin 500 mg po

.Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 07/14/06 04:25 am Performed by GEBALA, MARC J / SNS - 509749 Entered on 07/14/06 04:25 am
GEBALA, MARC J / SNS - 509749

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result Is pt. symptomatic?

100 mg/dl No

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 07/23/06 01\:39 am Performed by CAGUNGAO, ROY N. / STAFF NURSE - 508789 Entered on 07/23/06 04:39 am
CAGUNGAO, ROY N. / STAFF NURSE - 508789

94 mg/dl

Pdn~ed By:Sl\tllTH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

HOUlsing Locatioill:

P554

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11€r&Pf age 41 of 87 Page ID #:816
LOS ANG ES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

409406
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 08/02/06 04:40 am Performed by WATERS RN, MARIETTA S. / S'rAFF NURSE -
Entered on 08/02/06 04:38 am
WATERS RN, MARIETTA S. / STAFF NURSE - 409406

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

89 mg/dl

409406
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 08/09/06 04:30 am Performed by WATERS RN, MARIETTA S. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 08/09/06 04:28 am
WATERS RN, MARIETTA S. / STAFF NURSE - 409406

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

90 mg/dl

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 08/16/06 04:33 am Performed by LEGASPI, GILBERT M / STAFF NURSE - 517497 Entered on 08/16/06 04:35 am
LEGASPI, GILBERT M / STAFF NURSE - 517497

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

90 mg/dl

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 08/20/06 04:00 am Performed by WAGGONER, TERESA C / SNS - 511637 Entered on 08/20/06 04:00 am
WAGGONER, TERESA C / SNS - 511637

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

78 mg/dl

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 10/15/06 04: 59 am Performed by DREW RN;' HEIDI A / STAFF NURSE - 507575 Entered on 10/15/06 10:52 pm
DREW RN, HEIDI A / STAFF NURSE - 507575

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

149 mg/dl

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D'/HIM SUP ERVISO R-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

2 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MJ·\UHICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

~-IlousilJ1g Location:

P555

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 42 of 87 Page ID #:817
LOS ANG LES COUNTY SHERIFF'SDEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 02/04/07 04:59 am Performed by UY RN, MARLYN F. / STAFF NURSE - 411915 Entered on 02/04/07 05:00 am
UY RN, MARLYNF. / STAFF NURSE - 411915

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

117 mg/dl

455854
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 02/11/07 03:57 am Performed by HEREDIA RN, RONALDO C. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 02/11/07 03:57 am
HEREDIA RN, RONALDO C. / STAFF NURSE - 455854

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

117 mg/dl

ASSISTANT - 452120
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 02/18/07 05:23 am Performed by SORTIGOSA, FLORDELIZA Q. / NURSING
Entered on 02/18/07 05:24 am
SORTIGOSA, FLORDELIZA Q. / NURSING ASSISTANT 452120

Blood Glucose Monit:.oring & Urine·
Blood Glucose Result

112 mg/dl

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Monitoring 02/25/07 04:46 am Performed by ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880 Entered on 02/25/07 04:46 am
ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880

Blood Gl.ucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

111 mg/d1

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

·Diabetic Moni toring 03/08/07 06:00 am Performed by ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880 Entered on 03/08/07 06:01 am
ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
F:lo· .'. Glucose Resul t

119 mg/dl

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

3 of 37

inmate Ncm'll0: OLIVIEI:;:, IvlAURICE

ell Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P556

(:~~~~I1ff
Case 2:08-cv-07L1O6S9-JAFNWG-AEGLRESDCoOcuUmNenTtY10S8HEFRileIdF0F7'S/28D/1E1PAPRagTeM4E3NofT87 Page ID #:818
Inmate Medical Documentation

455854
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Diabetic Moni t.oring 03/11/07 04:25 am Performed by HEREDIA RN, RONALDO C. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 03/11/07 04:25 am
HEREDIA RN, RONALDO C. / STAFF NURSE - 455854

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine
Blood Glucose Result

116 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

03/18/07 03:00 am Performed by ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880

Entered on 03/18/07 02:59 am
Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

117 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

'03/25/07 02:55 am Performed by DREW RN, HEIDI A / STAFF NURSE - 507575

Entered on 03/25/07 05:54 am

Blood Glucose Moni'toring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

138 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

04/01/07 04:56 am Performed by FELIX, ANNALIZA D./STAFF NURSE- 508795

Entered on 04/01/07 04,56 am

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

110 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

04/08/07 03:03 am Performed by FELIX, ANNALIZA D./STAFF NURSE- 508795

Entered on 04/08/07 03:04 am

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

100 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

04/22/07 03:21 am Performed by ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880

Entered on 04/22/07 03:22 am

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

97 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

04/29/07 08:00 am Performed by CLOUSE RN, JUDY / SUP NURSE - 414391

Entered on 04/29/07 05:36 am

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

137 mg/d1

Printed By:SIVIITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

4 of 37

Inmate Name:

OUVIEP, !\liI\URICE

ell Number:

Ai 0246947

Booldng Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P557

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 44 of 87 Page ID #:819
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPAR'fMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Diabetic Monitoring

OS/06/07 OS:OO am Performed by Yananita, Ratna. / LVN - 5181S9

Entered on OS/06/07 03:28 am

Blood Glucose Monit:oring & Urine

. Blood Glucose Result

96 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring 05/13/07 02:20 am Performed by FELIX, ANNALIZA D./STAFF NURSE- S0879S

Entered on OS/13/07 02:20 am
Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

104 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

OS/20/07 04:20 am Performed by FELIX, ANNALIZA D./STAFF NURSE- S08795

Entered on OS/20/07 04:20 am

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result
',:-'

84 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring OS/27/07 04:44 am Performed by UY RN, MARLYN F. / STAFF NURSE - 411915

Entered on OS/27/07 04:44 am
Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

84 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

06/03/07 04:00 am Performed by ROBEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880

Entered on 06/03/07 04:56 am

Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

111 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

06/10/07 03:39 am Performed by HEREDIA RN, RONALDO C. / STAFF NURSE -

455854

Entered on 06/10/07 03:39 am

Blood Glucose Monitoring &: Urine

Blood Glucose Result

118 mg/dl

Diabetic Monitoring

06/17/07 03:09 am Performed by FELIX, ANNALIZA D./STAFF NURSE- 508795

Entered on 06/17/07 03:10 am

Blood Glucose lYlonit.oring &: Urine

Blood Glucose Result

112 mg/dl

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

5 of 37

inmafi;.! Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing locatiol1:

P558

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 45 of 87 Page ID #:820
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARfMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Diabetic Monitoring.

06/24/07 03:31 am Performed by ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880

Entered on 06/24/07 03:31 am
Blood Glucose Monitoring & Urine

Blood Glucose Result

99 mg/dl

427114
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need· Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 10/29/06 10:47 am Performed by DE LA ROSA RN, ROSA / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 10/29/06 10:48 am
DE LA ROSA RN, ROSA / STAFF NURSE - 427114
Patient None Medications SELF MED PROC. 30 XL, ASA 81 MG , METFORMIN ISSUED WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON SELF MED REFILL PROCESS AND COMPLIANCE. VOICED UNDERSTANDING. Communicated Understanding Explanation, Printed materials

449187
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes
Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 11/14/06 07:57 am Performed by STEVENS, BRENDA F. / NURSE ASSISTANT -
Entered on 11/14/06 07:58 am
STEVENS, BRENDA F. / NURSE ASSISTANT - 449187
Patient None Medications PROCARDIA, ASA 81, GLUCOPHAGE, PREVACID given with instructions on self med program, medication, refill process and compliance. Pt verbalized understanding. Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of Previous Teaching Explanation

449187
Pro1rider/.~uthor 2
Provider/Author

Education & Teaching Record 11/29/06 08:46 am Performed by STEVENS, BRENDA F. / NURSE ASSIS'l'ANT Entered on 11/29/06 08:47 am
STEVENS, BRENDA F. / NURSE ASSISTANT - 449187

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

6 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P559

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 46 of 87 Page ID #:821
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

449187
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 11/29/06 08:46 am Performed by STEVENS, BRENDA F. / NURSE ASSISTANT -
Entered on 11/29/06 08:47 am
Patient None' Medications ASA 81, GLUCOPHAGE, PROCARIDA, PREVACID given with instructions on self med program, medication, refill process and compliance. Pt verbalized understanding. Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of PreviousTeaching Explanation

Provider/Author ~
Provider/Author
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 12/13/06 09:39 am Performed by ESCANDON RN, ALMA R. / STAFF NURSE Entered on 12/13/06 09:40 am
ESCANDON RN, ALMA R. / STAFF NURSE
Patient None Medications, Plan of Care PREVACID, GLUCOPHAGE, ASA, AND NIFEDIPINE Given with instruction ori medication, self med program, compliance, and refill process. Patient verbalized understanding. Communicated Understanding Explanation, Printed materials

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 01/03/07 10:57 am Performed by HAGLER RN, JOJI L. / STAFF NURSE - 475063 Entered on 01/03/07 10:57 am
HAGLER RN, JOJI L. / STAFF NURSE - 475063
Patient None Medications Procardia 30 mg 15 tabs, ASA 81 mg 15 tabs & G1ucophage 500 mg 30 tabs given. Instructions on medication, self-med program, refill process & compliance reinforced. Verbalized understanding of instructions. Communicated Understanding, Reinforcemel :.':' Yf. PreviousTeaching ElCplanatiop

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

7 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAUr{fCE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P560

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 47 of 87 Page ID #:822
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes
Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 01/05/07 11:42 am Performed by HAGLER RN, JOJI L. / STAFF NURSE - 475063 Entered on 01/05/07 11:42 am
HAGLER RN, JOJI L. / STAFF NURSE - 475063
Patient None Medications .Prevacid 30 mg 15 caps given as refill with reinforcement of instructions on medication, self-med program, refill process & compliance. Verbalized understanding of instructions. Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of Previous Teaching Explanation

Provider/Author 2
ProviderlAuthor
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes
Teaching Method I Plan

Education & Teaching Record 01/18/07 10:46 am Performed by De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626 Entered on 01/18/07 10:48 am
De Vase, Kathleen I SNS - 511626
Patient None Medications, Plan of Care 15 TABS ASA, PROCARDIA & PREVACID, 30 TABS GLUCOPHAGE GIvEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON SELF MED PROGRAM, MEDICATION REFILL PROCESS & COMPLIANCE. PT VERBALIZED UNDERSTANDING Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of Previous Teaching Explanation, Printed materials

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Education & Teaching Record 02/02/07 09:22 am Performed by De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626 Entered on 02/02/07 09:23 am
De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626

Pt Teaching record
Individuals 'raught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content

Teaclling Outcomes

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

8 of 37

Patient None Medications, Plan of Care 15 TABS ASA, PROCARDIA, 15 CAPS PREVACID, 30 TABS GLUCOPHAGE GIVEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON SELF MED PROGRAM, MEDICATION REFIl,L PROCESS & COMPLIANCE. PT VERBALIZED UNDERSTANDING. Communicated Underst.anding, Reinforcement of Previous Teaching

Inmate Name: ell Number:

OLIVIER, MAURICE A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486 Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

II-Iousing !Location:

P561

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 48 of 87 Page ID #:823
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPAR'fMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Pt Teaching record
Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 02/02/07 09:22 am Performed by De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626 Entered on 02/02/07 09:23 am
Explanation, Printed materials

p'rovider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes
Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 02/16/07 10: 54 am Performed by De Vase, Kathleen I SNS - .511626 Entered on 02/16/07 10:54 am
De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626
Patient None Medications, Plan of Care 20 TABS GLUCOPHAGE GIVEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON SELF MED PROGRAM, MEDICATION REFILL PROCESS & COMPLIANCE. PT VERBALIZED UNDERSTANDING. Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of PreviousTeaching Explanation, Printed materials

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes
Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teaching Record 02/16107 12:08 pm Performed by De Vase, Kathleen I SNS - 511626 Entered on 02/16/07 12:08 pm
De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626
Patient None Medications, plan of Care 15 TABS ASA, & PROCARDIA GIVEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON SELF MED PROGRAM, MEDICATION REFILL PROCESS & COMPLIANCE. PT VERBALIZED UNDERSTANDING. Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of PreviousTeaching Explanation, Printed materials

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Education & Teaching Record 03/01/07 11:55 am Performed by De Vase, Kathleen I SNS - 511626 Entered on 03/01/07 11:55 am
De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626

Pt Teaching record
In.dividu'::J1."s T'avght J":-;::.r}-:i.e'):~s 'co Lncl.t:'nirlQ

Patient None Medications, Plan of Care 15 TABS ADALAT & ASA GIVEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON

F'runtlJd 18y:SMiTH, GLORIA O.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

9 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

Gil Number:

Ai 0246947

BQQking Number: 9121486

BQQking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date Qf Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P562

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 49 of 87 Page ID #:824
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Pt Teaching record
Teaching Outcomes Teaching Method / Plan
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes Teaching Method / Plan
Pt Teaching record
Individuals Taught Barriers to Learning Learning Need Teaching Content
Teaching Outcomes Teaching Method / Plan

Education & Teadlj.ng Re'cord 03/01/07 11:55 am Performed by De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626 Entered on 03/01/07 11:55 am
SELF MED PROGRAM, MEDICATION REFILL PROCESS, & COMPLIANCE. PT VERBALIZED UNDERSTANDING. Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of Previous Teaching Explanation, Printed materials
Education & Teaching Record 03/15/07 01:22 pm Performed by De Vase, Kathleen / SNS - 511626 Entered on 03/15/07 01:23 pm
Patient None Medications, Plan of Care 15 TABS ASA, & ADALAT GIVEN WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON SELF MED PROGRAM, MEDICATIONS, REFILL PROCESS, & COMPLIANCE. PT VERBALIZED UNDERSTANDING Communicated Understanding, Reinforcement of PreviousTeaching Explanation, Printed materials
Education & Teaching Record 03/22/07 12:43 pm Performed by ESCANDON RN, ALMA R. / STAFF NURSE Entered on 03/22/07 12:45 pm
Patient None Medications, Plan of Care SELF MEDICATION FOLLOW-UP - Patient is noncompliant with all self medications ordered. Pt not taking meds as ordered. Incorrect amt of pills on hand. Dr. Enriquez notified oeders changed. to pill call. Patient verbalized understanding. Communicated Understanding Explanation, Printed'materials

Specialist M.D. - 514553
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 03:38 am Performed by Sarkissian, Hagop Y. / Physician
Entered on 07/13/06 03:41 am
::,,·;·-kissian, Hagop Y. / Physician Specialist M.D. -
:):t.·.1S53

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA O.lHtM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

10 of 37

inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

Gil Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

!HloiJIsiri1g Location:

P563

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 50 of 87 Page ID #:825
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPAR'fMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Clinical Progress Notes

07/13/06 03:38 am Perfor.med by Sarkissian, Hagop Y. / Physician Specialist M.D. - 514553

2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
AND

En·cered on 07/13/06 03: 41 am
HTN, NIDDM, GASTRITIS, ALLERGY, RIGHT LEG BRUISES S: THIS IS 46 YEARS OLD INMATE WITH PMH OF NIDDM, HTN, GASTRITIS

ALLERGY WITH NASAL CONGESTION, DENIES CHEST PAIN, NO HEADACHE NO

SUICIDAL,

BLURRED VISION, IN ISO CELL, DENIES MENTAL PROBLEM, NON

DNEIES DRUG OR ETOH ABUSE, DENIES OPEN WOUNDS, OTHER THAN SUPERFICIAL BRUISES TO THE RIGHT THIGH DURING THE ARREST. 0: AWAKE, ALERT, NAD, HEAD ATRAUMATIC, CHEST SYMMETRIC, BACK NO DEFORMITY, WALKS STEADY IN THE ISO CELL, VITALS BP 15.8/94 A: HTN NIDDM ALLERGY GASTRITIS RIGHT LEG BRUISES P; TRANSFER TO·8000, NIDDM CARE SET NIFEDIPINE AND CLONIDINE PEPCID ASA NEOSPORIN CREAM

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
.2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
BG=89

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 04:15 am Performed by PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230 Entered on 07/13/06 04:38 am
PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230
O======STAT AND INITIAL DOSE OF MEDICATION GIVEN AND TOLERATED WELL BY INMATE. BP 148/100 MMHG TAKEN MANUALLY.
MG/DL. INMATE INSTRUCTED TO FOLLOW MEDICATION AND WOUND CARE REGIMEN AS ORDERED BY MD AND VERBALIZED UNDERSTANDING. NOTED NO ACUTE DISTRESS AT THIS TIME.

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 04:15 am Performed by PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230 Entered on 07/13/06 01:39 am
PARK, . BYE 11. /SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230

:;'·:'dnted By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

11 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

CII Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

HOLlising location:

P564

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 51 of 87 Page ID #:826
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 04:15 am Perfo~ed by PARK, BYE
Entered on 07/13/06 04:39 am
O======HELD INITIAL DOSE OF METFORMIN 500 MG PO DOSE AT THIS TIME. BG= 89MG/DL. DENIES HYPOGLYCEMIA SYMPTOMS AT 'rHIS TIME.

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
PERSONNEL

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 05:38 am Performed by PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230 Entered on 07/13/06 05:43 am
PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230

O=====UNABLE TO REASSESS INMATE BP STATUS REGARDING DEPUTIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ACCOMPANY WITH .NURSING

AT BOOKING FRONT AT THIS TIME. NOTIFIED TO DESK NURSE

AM

SHIFT F/U WITH CONTINUITY OF CARE.

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
nurse

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 07:45 am Performed by LOUISSAINT, DOMINIQUE S. Entered on 07/13/06 07:51 am
LOUISSAINT, DOMINIQUE S.
admit to 8000 Inmate's chart endorsed to me by desk nurse for bp check and housing. Seen in Isocell 103. ss&ox3, in no distress. bp 143/93, p 59. Denies discomfort at this time. Called 8000 and reported to
Woods. Chart placed in envelope with jrc attached and give to custody for 8000 housing.

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 12:59 pm Performed by LOUISSAINT, DOMINIQUE S. Entered on 07/13/06 01:08 pm
LOUISSAIN'I', DOMINIQUE S.
PER DEPUTY KIRBY, INl1ATE IS NOT ABLE TO TR1\NSFER TO 8000 BECAUSE OF KI0 S'C·\,X1yj. NO HfDlc,n,TION FOR KI0 WAS NOTED IN JRC PREVIOUSLY. INM,.... ",'C',,:''; Rf:'Lll,lE '1'0 HI) FOR [,.:,<wER HOOSING.

Printed By: S!'v!lTI-'I, GLOF':;!A D.JHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

12 of 37

Inmate !\iarne: OUViEF<, tvl/\Uf<ICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P565

ij
Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 52 of 87 Page ID #:827
LOSANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author .2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
available

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 03:22 pm Performed by FOTI, MINAKO S / SNS - 512399 Entered on 07/13/06 03:25 pm
FOTI, MINAKO S / SNS - 512399
called 8000 nurse Hwang re; 8000 admission. per nurse Hwang, will admitK 10 inmate usually. But, no bed is
for KI0 at this time.

Provider/Author .2
Provider/Author
.2C-Progress Not:e
2C-Problem SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 08:35 pm Performed by ALEX, MICHAEL J / NASSTS - 512678 Entered on 07/13/06 08:38 pm
ALEX, MICHAEL J / NASSTS - 512678

medication

0, '.

0- talked to nurse hwang from 8000. no bed avaiable for

k -10 i/m. chart endorsed to desk nurse forti, for follow up.

Provider/Author .2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 09:21 pm Performed by FOTI, MINAKO S / SNS - 512399 Entered on 07/13/06 09:21 pm
FOTI, MINAKO S / SNS - 512399
Relined to MDL for proper housing.

493777
Provider/Author .2
Provider/Author
.2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
follow

Clinical Progress Notes 07/13/06 11:36 pm Performed by ANGELES RN, LUWIDA S. / STAFF NURSE Entered on 07/13/06 11:37 pm
ANGELES RN, LUWIDA S. / STAFF NURSE - 493777
per nurse cho from 8000, still no bed available at this time for k-l0. will endorse chart to transport nurse for up.

Provider/Au'chor .2
Provider/Author

Clinical Progress Notes 07/14/06 02:00 am Performed by GEBALA, MARC J / SN!", .. ~;a9749 Entered on 07/14/06 03:52 am
GEBA.LA, MARC J / SNS - 509749

Printed By: SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

13 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

~~ousirhg location:

P566

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 53 of 87 Page ID #:828
LOS ANG ES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DE AR'fMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

2C-Progress Note
- 288113
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
SPECIALIST - 471240
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
490630
:!?rovider/Aut:hor 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 07118/06 04:21 am Performed by DREW RN, HEIDI A / STAFF NURSE - 507575 Entered on 07/18/06 04:24 am
clinic
Clinical Progress Notes 07/24/0606:42 pm Performed by ARELLANO, HERMILA / NURSING ASSISTANT II Entered on 07/24/06 06:43 pm
ARELLANO, HERMILA / NURSING ASSISTANT II - 288113

Ekg test was completed and placed in ekg line for md review, inmate denied any pains or discomfort at this time.
Clinical Progress Notes 07/31/06 12:47 pm Performed by SHIN RN, TAE / STAFF NURSE - 437476 Entered on 07/31/06 12:49 pm
SHIN RN, TAE / STAFF NURSE - 437476

0; power chart. Pt on 2400 cal ADA special diet, P; review line for evals special. diet.
Clinical Progress Notes 08/01/06 03:10 pm Performed by MAHALLATI MD, MARYAM H. / PHYSICIAN
Entered on 08/01/06 03:12 pm
MAHALLATI MD, MARYAM H. / PHYSICIAN SPECIALIST 471240

pt BG is WNL no need for 2400 cal ADA diet.
Clinical Progress Notes 08/01/06 03:42 pm Performed by LAMANO RN, MARIBETH M. / STAFF NURSE Entered on 08/01/06 03:42 pm
LAMANO RN, MARl BETH M. / STAFF NURSE - 490630

P: ·".itli. no fiX. ot men::",l illness or drug abuse, placed

on

x.L /:D C~\ to C[lf.ln ..~.!(~ t:J '"':'.. ~ .:~ rned.

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

15 of 37

irmwte Nal'Jl0:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

Gil Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P567·

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 54 of 87 Page ID #:829
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPAR'fMENt
Inmate Medical Documentation

513958
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 08/07/06 04:35 pm Performed by HAHN, YOUNG I./PHYSICIAN SPECIALISTEntered on 08/07/06 04:35 pm
HAHN, YOUNG I./PHYSICIAN SPECIALIST-513958
CR:CCHANGEALL ACTIVE MEDS EXCEPT BENADRYL TO SELF-MED

452777
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
S: Chief Complaint
General Symptoms

Clinical Progress Notes 08/08/06 09:07 pm Performed by LANG RN, EVELYN C. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 08/08/06 09:10 pm
LANG RN, EVELYN C. / STAFF NURSE - 452777
C/O VENEREAL DS. S: "NURSE I'VE BEEN ASKING TO SEE THE DR. BECAUSE I HAVE VD. I'M HAVING YELLOW DISCHARGE." 0: A/A/O X 3. NAD. A: R/O VD. P: PLACED ON MD LINE
Malaise

SPECIALIST - 470820
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 08/09/06 10:37 am Performed by LAFAYETTE MD, STEPHANIE M. / PHYSICIAN. Entered on 08/09/06 10:37 am
LAFAYETTE MD, STEPHANIE M. / PHYSICIAN SPECIALIST - 470820
PATIENT WITH PURULENT PENILE D/C STD CARESET

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress No·t.e
SOAP. Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 08/09/06 01:16 pm Performed by DAY, SHERRIE Y / SNS - 510704 Entered on 08/09/06 61:22 pm
DAY, SHERRIE Y / SNS - 510704
0: Seen and evaluated by Dr. Lafayette on line orders made.

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM
Page: . 16 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

I-lolilsill1g lOlCatiofi1:

P568

Case 2:08-cv-07L1O69S-JAFWNG-AEGLRESDCocOumUeNnTt Y10S8HFEilRedIF0F7'/S28D/1E1PAPaRg'efM55EoNfT87 Page ID #:830
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
SPEciALIsT '- 471240
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
431416
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
436664 Provider/,~u'thor :2 Provide:r'/Au thor
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 08/16/06 11:00 am Performed by JUNIO RN, AIDA F', / STAFF NURSE - 405834 Entered on 08/16/06 11:01 am
JUNIO RN, AIDA F. / STAFF NURSE - 405834
0- HIV & RPR RESULTS RECEIVED. P- CHART REVIEW.
Clinical Progress Notes 08/17/06 03:18 pm Performed by MAHALLATI MD, MARYAM H. / PHYSICIAN Entered on 08/17/06 03:19 pm
MAHALLATI MD, MARYAM H. / PHYSICIAN SPECIALIST 471240
lab results are seen negative results.
Clinical Progress Notes 09/19/06 07:52 am Performed. by ENRIQUEZ MD, POLICARPIO F. / PHYSICIANEntered on 09/19/06 07:54 am
ENRIQUEZ MD, POLICARPIO F. / PHYSICIAN - 431416
i am itching allover o no pruritus at this time
rash in groin seborrhea scalp
a tinea cruris seborrhea pruritus? etiolgy
p see order
Clinical Progress Notes 09/19/06 10:30 am Performed by SHIN RN, HAI-RYOUNG / STAFF NURSE Entered on 09/19/06 10:31 am
SHIN RN, HAI-RYOUNG / STAFP f\,TURSE - 436664
ACLU 3 31551, 0912-246

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D'/HIM
SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

17 of 37

OLIVIER, MAURICE

Gil Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

HOUlSHIl1Q1 locatiOI1:

P569

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 56 of 87 Page ID #:831
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
509265
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
441774
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-'Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 09/21/06 01:17 pm Performed by KIM, JI E./ SHERIFF STAFF NURSE - 503006 Entered on 09/21/06 01:18 pm
KIM, JI E./ SHERIFF STAFF NURSE - 503006
due for bp this am. inmate in court. endorsed to pm shift.
Clinical Progress Notes 10/11/06 01:02pm Performed by PROTACIO, GLENDA G./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-
Entered on 10/11/06 01:04 pm
PROTACIO, GLENDA G./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-509265
s- "nurse i need to be in doctor's line for my acid reflux " 0- oriented x4. skin warm and dry to touch. denies any pain or discomfort at this time. a- alteration in comfort / hyperacidity of the stomach. p- put on md line for eval.
Clinical Progress Notes 11/22/06 08:29 am Performed by LIPAOEN, CHARLES A. / STAFF NURSE Entered on 11/22/06 08:31 am
LIPAOEN, CHARLES A. / STAFF NURSE - 441774
S: Inmate states" The officers stepped on my seeing glasses last August." Inmate asking for prescription glasses 0: Alert and oriented. Not wearing any glasses at this time. P: Placed on eye line for eval.
Clinical Progress Notes 12/09/06 11:52 am Performed by SANCHEZ, AIMEE Q./STAFF NURSE 517500 Entered on 12/09/06 11:53 am
SANCHEZ, AIMEE Q./STAFF NURSE 517500
Inmate requesting renewal of Benadry1 50mg TID for nasal congestion. Placed on chart review.

Printed By: SMITH, GLORIA DJHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

18 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

CII Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location: .

P570

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 57 of 87 Page ID #:832
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

441774
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
Requesting
ideas
dis.

Clinical Progress Notes 12128/06 09 :21 am Performed by LIPAOEN, CHARLES A. / S'rAFF NURSE -
Entered on 12/28/06 09:25 am
LIPAOEN, CHARLES A. / STAFF NURSE - 441774
S:Inrnate states h/o depression and major affective disorder since 1988. Claims he was taking Elavil , last taken 'April 2006. Denies any suicidal thoughts at this time.
for psych. evaluation. 0: Alert and oriented. Conversant and coherent. No flight of
noted. Deme~or appears appropriate at this time. A: ALt. in thought processes: h/o Depression, Major affective
P: Placed on psych line for eval.

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
or

Clinical Progress Notes 01/23/07 07;27 am Performed by SISON, MANUEL A / PHYSICIAN - 519617 Entered on 01/23/07 07:36 am
SISON, MANUEL A / PHYSICIAN - 519617

blurred vision for ·far EYE EXAM S:

0:

ALLER N demerol

ASTHMA: None

EYE MEDS: None

DIABETES: None

FAM Hx:

CATARACTS

None

GLAUCOMA

None

EYE SURGERY None

NO OTHER OCULAR PROBLEMS OR SERIOUS EYE INjURIES OR

ANYTHING

GLASSES: none

OD: +

OS: +

ADD:

RED/GREEN COLOR SCREENING: Normal for green, blue, grey, yellOl.,

red. VA: OD: 20/400
OS: 20/400

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA DJHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

19 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P571

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 58 of 87 Page ID #:833
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

2C-Progress Note
DUCTIONS
436664
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 01/23/07 07:27 am Performed by SISON, MANUEL A / PHYSICIAN - 519617 Entered on 01/23/07 07:36 am

sc M. REF: OD:
OS: -2.75
EEE:

-2.75 +1.00x120 =20/20

+0.75 x70 =20/20

PD: 64

Add +

Lids: OD Normal

OS Normal

Conjunctivia: OD Normal

OS Normal

Pupils: OD Normal

OS Normal

MARCUS GUNN: OD None

OS None

C.V.F: Full OU,

EMOS:

Normal

& VERSIONS: Normal Limited abduction of OS SLE: Corneae: normal A/C: normal

Irides: normal

Lenses: no significant opacities OU

TA OD: 14 OS: 14
FUNDI: optic discs, macul,ae and retinal vessels are npormal ou

ASSESSMENT/ IMPRESSION 1myopic astigmatism 2. presbyopia.

PLAN: 1. eye exam discussed with patient 2. glass rx given 3. court order sa060812 completed
1.

Clinical Progress Notes 01/23/07 09:55' am Performed by SHIN RN, HAI-RYOUNG / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 01/23/07 09:57 am
SHIN RN, HAI-RYOUNG / STAFF NURSE - 436664

CT orders i~ SA060812, 1-12-07 seen by Dr.Fong,DDS onl-19-07 & tx provided. seen by Dr.Sison onl-23-07 & tx provided. completed Ct orders returned to COU.

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

20 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

CII Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P572

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 59 of 87 Page ID #:834
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
·2C-Problem SOAP Charting
Provider/.~uthor 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
reconsider are
521132
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 01/25/07 12:28 pm Performed by YOUNG MD, DAVID P. Entered on 01/25/07 12:28 pm

/ PHYSICIAN - 465314

YOUNG MD, DAVID P. / PHYSICIAN - 465314

chart revioew no indication for renewal benadryl request denied

Clinical Progress Notes 01/25/07 03:52 pm Performed by YOUNG MD, DAVID P. Entered on 01/25/07 03:55 pm

/ PHYSICIAN - 465314

YOUNG MD, DAVID P. / PHYSICIAN - 465314

chart review inmate requesting benadryl renewal not medically necessary mild niddm on meds no specail diet at mthis time wi·ll
after bgm results on chart have not been ordered x months and
now ordered
Clinical Progress Notes. 02/08/07 01:42 pm Performed by ESTRADA, SAMUELC./NURSING ASSISTANT-
Entered on 02/08/07 01:43 pm
ESTRADA, SAMUEL C./NURSING ASSISTANT-521132

BP. taking not done i/m in lac. 01 per Ajis

Clinical Progress Notes 02/16/07 05:09 pm Performed by YOUNG MD, DAVID P. Entered on 02/16/07 05:09 pm

/ PHYSICIAN - 465314

YOUNG MD, DAVID P. / PHYSICIAN - 465314

no med indication for inmates chart review request old orders culled

Printed By: SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

21 of 37

Inmate Name:
en Number:

OLIVIER, MAURICE Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

HOlLlsing location;

P573

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 60 of 87 Page ID #:835
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

449187
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
490299
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
431416
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting
2C-Progress Note
SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 03/08/07 09:42 am Performed by STEVENS, BRENDA F. / NURSE ASSISTANT -
Entered on 03/08/07 09:42 am
STEVENS, BRENDA F. / NURSE ASSISTANT - 449187
Rec'd one pair of eye glasses. Stated fit and vision good.
Clinical Progress Notes 03/22/07 01:29 pm Performed by JUAREZ, LESTER J / NURSING ASSISTANT -
Entered on 03/22/07 01:29 pm
BP not taken at this time, inmate out on pass lac 01 (atty room) per AJIS.
Clinical Progress Notes 03/26/07 08:11 am Performed by ENRIQUEZ MD, POLICARPIO F. / PHYSICIAN -
Entered on 03/26/07 08:12 am
I AM DIABETIC AND THEY TOOK MY DIET AWAY
o BGM BOTED
BCP-GLUCOSE OF 96 HGB AIC5.7
A DOUBT NIDDM P FASTING BLOOD SUGER ORDERED
Clinical Progress Notes OS/25/07 09:27 am Performed by Placencia, Graciela - LVN 523565 Entered on OS/25/07 09:27 am
0- recieved verbal order from Dr. Enriquez to renew benadry[ for nasal congestion, order carried out
Clinical Progress Notes '06/14/07 12:40 pm Performed by LUNA RN, RAUL M. /STAFF NURSE - 485323 Entered on 06/14/07 12:41 pm
O-BP NUl' DONE, I/M NO'l' IN HIS CELL. PER DEPU'l'Y I/M WENT OUT ON PASS FOR ATTY ROOM.ENDORSED TO NEXT SHIFT.

Printed By:SMITH·, GLOHiA D./I···!ilVI SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

22 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

CII Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P574

Case 2:08-cv-07L16O9S-JAFWNG-AEGLRESDoCcOumUeNnTt 1Y08SHFEilRedIF0F7'/2S8D/1E1 PPAakgfeM61EoNf T87 Page ID #:836
Inmate Medical Documentation

431416
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
464044
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting
464044
2C-Progress Note
2C-Problem SOAP Charting

Clinical Progress Notes 06/27/07 07:57 am Performed by ENRIQUEZ MD, POLICARPIO F. / PHYSICIAN -
Entered on 06/27/07 08:01 am
i cant eat red meat due to religious reason.i need refill of my benadryl o bgm normal
hgb 5.7 bp 129/84 pr 78 rr 18 a doing well at this time p dc bgm referred to dietary renew benadryl
Clinical Progress Notes 06/28/07 09:18 am Performed by AVERIA RN, BRENDA B. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 06/28/07 09:19 am
ACLU 5100-2007-0620-237, # 37705 SEEN BY DR ENRIQUEZ ON 06/27/07 AND TREATMENT PROVIDED.ACLU REQUEST COMPLETED AND RETURNED TO COU.
Clinical Progress Notes 06/28/07 09:22 am Performed by AVERIA RN, BRENDA B. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 06/28/07 09:23 am
ACLU 5100-2007-0620-257, # 37736 SEEN BY DR ENRIQUEZ ON 06/27/07 AND TREATMENT PROVIDED.ACLU REQUEST COMPLETED AND RETURNED TO COU.

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

vital Signs and-Graphics Record 07/14/06 04:25 am Performed by GEBALA, MARC J / SNS - 509749 Entered on 07/14/06 04:25 am
GEBALA, MARC J / SNS - 509749

Vital Signs
Temperature Heart Rate Resp Systolic BP Diastolic BP Temp Route Pulse Description BP Device

97.2 76 20 134 90 Oral Regular Dinamap

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

23 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

Gil Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

HOlUsing Location:

P575

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 62 of 87 Page ID #:837
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Vi.tal Signs
SP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Temperature Heart Rate Resp Systolic BP Diastolic BP Temp Route Pulse Description SP Location
480784
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic SP Diastolic BP BP Device SP Location
- 288113
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP SP Devir.e SP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/14/06 04:25 am Performed by GEBALA, MARC J / SNS - 509749 Entered on 07/14/06 04:25 am
Rt Arm
vital Signs and Graphics Record
07/14/06 08:30 am Performed by YEE RN, LINDA / STAFF NURSE - 470142
Entered on 07/14/06 08:31 am
YEE RN, LINDA / STAFF NURSE - 470142
96.5 74 20 151 72 Oral Regular Rt Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/20/06 08:00 am Performed by DEDIOS RN, FELICISIMO P. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 07/20/06 12:09 pm
DEDIOS RN, FELICISIMO P. / STAFF NURSE - 480784
140 80 Dinamap -Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics. Record 07/24/06 06:43-pm Performed by ARELLANO, HERMILA / NURSING ASSISTANT II
Entered on 07/24/06 06:43 pm
ARELLANO, HERMILA / NURSING ASSISTANT II - 288113
132 77 Dinamap Left Arm

Printed By:SiVIfTH, GLORIA D'/HiiVi SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

24 of 37

inmate Name:

OliVIER, MAURICE

Gil Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P576

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 63 of 87 Page ID #:838
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARfMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

409406
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vi·cal Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/27/06 05:00 am Performed by WATERS RN, MARIETTA S. / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 07/27/06 04:52 am
WATERS RN, MARIETTA S. / STAFF NURSE - 409406

110 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 08/10/06 01:02 am Performed by LANAG RN, HIGIN M. Entered on 08/10/06 01:02 am

STAFF NURSE - 489400

LANAG RN, HIGIN M. / STAFF NURSE - 489400

120 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 08/17/06 00:23 am Performed by LANAG RN, HIGIN M. / STAFF NURSE - 489400 Entered·on 08/17/06 00:24 am
LANAG RN, HIGIN M. / STAFF NURSE - 489400

122 70 Regular Cuff Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 08/23/06 11:40 pm Performed by LEGASPI, GILB~RT M / STAFF NURSE - 517497 Entered on 08/23/06 11:40 pm
LEGASPI, GILBERT M / STAFF NURSE - 517497

124 80 Regular Cuff

Printed By:SIVIITH, GLORIA D.lHIIVI SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

25 of 37

OLiVI ER, MAURIl:E

ell Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P577

Case 2:08-cv-07L16O9S-JAFWN-GAEGLRESDoCcOumUeNnTt 1Y08SHFEilRedIF0F7/'2S8D/1E1 PPAaRgefM64EoNf T87 Page ID #:839
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vi'cal Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 09/07/06 08: 00 am Performed by CHUNG, JENNY J-SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-509204 Entered on 09/07/06 12:28 pm
CHUNG, JENNYJ-SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-509204
120 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm

481267
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Heart Rate Systolic BP Diastolic BP Pulse Description BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 09/14/06 08:00 am Performed by BALABBO RN, MARICAR / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 09/14/06 12:40 pm
BALABBO RN, MARICAR / STAFF NURSE - 481267
93 142 83 Regular Dinamap Left Arm

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 09/28/06 08:00 am Performed by HAMILTON, CECILIA L / LVN - 518556 Entered on 09/28/06 12:51 pm
HAMILTON, CECILIA L / LVN - 518556
132 76 Regular Cuff Left Arm

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 10/12/06 08:00 am Performed by SARMIENTO, RACELITO D Entered on 10/12/06 12:55 pm
SARMIENTO, RACELITO D

Vital Signs
Resp [:;Ystolic B1' ·~·:'i(~.,st.olic BTl
i.~~"';l J.,~)c~·iL.Lo;:J·

18 120 80 Regular Cuff I,eft Arm

Printed Dy:SIVHTH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

26 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

iHolJlsing Location:

P578

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 65 of 87 Page ID #:840
·LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 10/26/06 08,00 am Performed by CHUNG, JENNY J-SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-509204 Entered on 10/26/06 01:19 pm
CHUNG, JENNY J-SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-509204
120 90 Dinamap Left Arm

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 11/02/06 08:00 am Performed by CHUNG, JENNY J-SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-509204 Entered on 11/02/06 12:41 pm
CHUNG, JENNY J-SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-509204
124 90 Dinamap Left Arm

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 11/23/06 12:00 pm Performed by TEJADA RN, NORA / STAFF NURSE - 482171 Entered on 11/23/06 01:00 pm
TEJADA RN, NORA / STAFF NURSE - 482171
110 80 Dinamap Left Arm

481267
Pro1rider /Author 2
Provider/Author

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 11/30/06 08:00 am Performed by BALABBO RN, MARICAR / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 11/30/06 12:48 pm
BALABBO RN, MARICAR / STAFF NURSE - 481267

Vital Signs
Heart Rate Systolic BP Diastolic BP Pulse Description BP Device

78 1.41 74 :t: : r :.:~~J' .! h
U}ni.:;mi::l.r;J

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.n-liM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

27 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIEr<, IvlAUF<:ICE

CII Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P579

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 66 of 87 Page ID #:841
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARfMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

481267
Vital Signs
BP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provi der / Au thor
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Provider/Author 2
provider/Author
Vital Signs
Heart Rate Resp Systolic BP Diastolic BP Pulse Description BP Device BP Location
244820
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Dias tol ic BP BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 11/30/06 08:00 am Performed by BALABBO RN, MARICAR / STAFF NURSE -
Entered on 11/30/06 12:48 pm
Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 12/01/06 04:15 am Performed by DREW RN, HEIDI A / STAFF NURSE - 507575 Entered on 12/01/06 05:09 am
DREW RN, HEIDI A / STAFF NURSE - 507575
140 90 Regular Cuff Left Arm
";
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 12/07/06 08:00 am Performed by SANCHEZ, AIMEE Q./S'rAFF NURSE 517500 Entered on 12/07/06 12:59 pm
SANCHEZ, AIMEE Q./STAFF NURSE 517500
96 18 132 82 Regular Dinamap Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 01(11/07 08:00 am Performed by DOCTOR, CAROLYN / NURSING ASSISTANT -
Entered on 01/11/07 01:36 pm
DOCTOR, CAROLYN / NURSING ASSISTANT - 244820
132 88 Left Arm

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.!HIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

28 of 37

inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

CII Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P580

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 67 of 87 Page ID #:842
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPAR'fMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

ASSISTANT
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 01/25/07 08:00 am Performed by PATA, DARCIE L./ 521133 - NURSING
Entered on 01/25/07 12:59 pm
PATA, DARCIE L./ 521133 - NURSING ASSISTANT
112 72 Regular Cuff Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 02/15/07 08:00 am Performed by LEE RN, DANIEL M. / STAFF NURSE - 500031 Entered on 02/15/07 12:41 pm
LEE RN, DANIEL M. / STAFF NURSE - 500031
110 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 02/22/07 08:00 am Performed by QI RN, WEI/STAFF NURSE - 490236 Entered on 02/22/07 01:14 pm
QI RN, WEI/STAFF NURSE - 490236
123 80 Regular Cuff Rt Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 03/01/07 03:30 pm Performed by PARK, JONG H / SNS - 507154 Entered on.03/01/07 03 :43 pm
PARK, JONG H / SNS - 507154
120 80 Left Arm

Printed By: SMITH, GLOHIA DJ/-1IM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

29 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, M/\UF<ICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P581

Case 2:08-cv-07L1O69S-JAFNWG-AEGLRESDCocOuUmNenTtY10S8HFEiRleIdF0F7'/S28D/1E1PAPaRgfeM6E8 NofT87 Page ID #:843
Inmate Medical Documentation

Vital Signs
Heart Rate Resp Systolic BP Diastolic BP Pulse Description BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 03/29/07 12:30 pm Performed by MUTIA RN, NENA / STAFF NURSE - 425511
Entered oi 03/29/07 01:01 pm
86 18 140 80 Regular Dinamap Left Arm

418470
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 04/05/07 08:00 am Performed by VARNEY, JOSEPH P. / NURSING ASSISTANT -
Entered on 04/05/07 ~1:56 pm
143 71 Regular Cuff Left Arm

Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 04/12/07 08:00am Performed by LAM RN, ELLEN P. / RELIEF NURSE - 433545 . Entered on 04/12/07 10:53 am
124 70 Regular Cuff Left Arm

Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 04/16/07 04:20 am Performed by DREW RN, HEIDI A / STAFF NURSE - 507575
Entered on 04/16/07 06:07 am
120 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm

- 520072
Vital Signs
Heart Rate Systolic BP Diastolic BP Pulse Description BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 04/19/07 08:00 am Performed by EGBUNIWE, BEATRICE M / NURSING ASSISTANT
Entered on 04/19/07 01:01 pm
97 134 80 Regular Dinamap Rt Ann

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D'/HIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

30 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

Gil Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P582

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 69 of 87 Page ID #:844
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARfMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
NURSE - 421333
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

. vital Signs and Graphics Record
05/03/07 08:00 am Performed by SAZON, GENELYN L. / STAFF NURSE - 485766
Entered on 05/03/07 02:03 pm
130 90 Regular Cuff Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 05/10/07 12:00 pm Performed by LEE RN, DANIEL M. / STAFF NURSE - 500031 Entered on 05/10/07 12:29 pm
130 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record
OS/23/07 05:15 am Performed by UY RN, MARLYN F. / STAFF NURSE - 411915 Entered on OS/23/07 05:15 am
130 76 Regular Cuff Left Ann
Vital Signs and Graphics Record
OS/24/07 08:00 am Performed by DELESPIRITUSANT RN, TEODORA A. / STAFF
Entered on OS/24/07 09:11 am
122 76 Regular Cuff Left Arm
Vital Signs and Graphics Record 05/31/07 08:00 am Perforrried by Quitiquit, Edwin J. / RN - 507382
Entered on 05/31/07 09: 13 am
130 70 Regular Cuff Rt Arm

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA O.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

31 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P583

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 70 of 87 Page ID #:845
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARfMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

- 520072
Vital Signs
Heart Rate Systolic BP Diastolic BP Pulse Description BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 06/21/07 08:00 am Performed by EGBUNIWE, BEATRICE M / NURSING ASSISTANT
Entered on 06/21/07 01:39 pm
70 110 80 Regular Dinamap Rt Arm

- 520072
Vital Signs
Heart Rate Systolic BP Diastolic BP Pulse Description BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 06/28/07 08:00 am Performed by EGBUNIWE, BEATRICE M / NURSING ASSISTANT
Entered on 06/28/07 12:58 pm
78 125 83 Regular Dinamap Left Arm

Vital Signs
Resp Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/05/07 08:00 am Performed by RAMOS, JAVIER A. / RN 1 - 506322 Entered on 07/05/07 01:31 pm
18 126 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm

Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic:' BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/12/07 08:00 am Performed by PONCE, FABIOLA Y / NASSTS - 524278 Entered on 07/12/07 12:36 pm
122 64 Regular Cuff Left Arm

ASSISTANT
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/19/07 08:00 am Performed by PATA, DARCIE L./ 521133 - NURSING
Entered on 07/19/07 07:43 am
129 76 Dinamap

Printed lBy:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

32 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAUHICl::

CII Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P584

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 71 of 87 Page ID #:846
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

ASSISTANT
Vi't.al Signs
BP Location
517699
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location
Vital Signs
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/19/07 08:00 am Performed by PATA, DARCIE L./ 521133 - NURSING
Entered on 07/19/07 07:43 am
Left Arm

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 07/26/07 08:00 am Performed by CASTILLO, MARISOL / NURSING ASSISTANT-
Entered on 07/26/07 08:40 am
122 80 Regular Cuff Left Arm

Vital Signs and Graphics Record 08/02/07 08:00 am Performed by CORTEZ, MARIBEL Entered on 08/02/07 12:50 pm

/ NASSTS - 516202

126 80 Dinamap Left Arm

SHERIFF 508054
Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

Data Base 07/13/06 01:54 am Performed by JOLDJIAN, KHATCHIK A/ STAFF NURSE
Entered on 07/13/06 02:09 am
JOLDJIAN, KHATCHIK A/ STAFF NURSE SHERIFF 508054

Medical Services Data Base 2
Temperature Heart Rate Resp Systolic BP Diastolic BP Weight weight Type Chief Complaint
ABD.

98.0 78 20 158 94 140.0 LB Stated S--------- " I HAVE HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE AND DIABETES. I HAVE CUTS ALL OVER MY BODY. I AM IN PAIN." 0------- AFRICAN AMERICAN MALE SEEN IN ISOCELL 103, NOT IN DISTRESS. AAOX4. NO CP, NO SOB. C/O GENERALIZED PAIN OVER BODY. ALLEGES HX OF HTN AND DIABETES X 3 YRS. ON GLUCOPHAGE, DOES NOT REMEMBER NAME OF BP PILL. TAKES ZANTAC FOR GERD. LUNGS CTA,

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA DJHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

33 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

Ai 0246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing location:

P585

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 72 of 87 Page ID #:847
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

SHERIFF 508054
Medical Services Data Base 2
Mode of Arrival Languages spoken Health History Allergy 1. NKA 2. Demerol Medication Grid
1. Medication Reason for Medication Last Dose Date/Time
2. Medication Reason for Medication Last Dose Date/Time
3. Medication Reason for Medication Last Dose Date/Time
Substance Abuse Grid 1. Substance Abuse Substance Abuse Duration
Communicable Diseases List 1. Communicable Disease
TB YIN TB X-Ray TB Skin Test Date of Last Tetanus STD Grid
1. STD Hx of Mental Illness Developmentally Disabled Hx of Suicide Attempt Hallucinations? Delusions? Ref to MH Counselor. Neuro Pupils
Equal Reactive Equal Reactive Respiratory Breath Sounds GI Findings Male Reproductive

Data Base 07/13/06 01.:54 am Performed by JOLDJIAN, KHATCHIK AI STAFF NURSE
Entered on 07/13/06 02:09 am
SOFT/NT/ND. MULTIPLE SUPERFICIAL SCRATCHES ALL OVER BODY. GAIT STEADY. A-------- ALTERATION IN COMFORT R/T PAIN. ALTERED METABOLISM R/T NIDDM. ALTERED CARDIOVASCULAR INTEGRITY R/T HTN. P-------- EXPEDITE MD LINE DENIES PSYCH. NO SII OR H/I. See SOAP Charting English Diabetes, High Blood Pressure, Stomach Problems Reaction

GLUCOPHAGE NIDDM 07/11/06 09:00 BP PILL HTN 07/11/06 09:00 ZANTAC STOMACH PROBLEMS 07/11/0622:00

Denies Denies

Denies No Negative Unknown 2000

Denies No No No No No No Awake, Alert,.

Oriented,

Responsive,

Cooperative

Right Right Left Left No Distress Clear SoU: C(:.n:i..!:;s pX'~..'!')lems

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHilIJJ SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

34 of 37

inmate Name:

OLiVIEi=-<, MAUHICE

Gil Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing Location:

P586

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 73 of 87 Page ID #:848
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPAkfMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

A/ STAFF NURSE SHERIFF 508054
Allergies
Allergy 1. NKA 2. Demerol

Data Base 07/13/06 01:54 am Perfor.med by JOLDJIAN, KHATCHIK
Entered on 07/13/06 02:09 am
Reaction

Diabetic Foot Inspection
Right foot inspection
Left foot inspection
S.O.A.P. Charting

Diabetic Foot Care Inspection 06/03/07 05:00 am Performed by ROSEEN, MARJORIE J / SNS - 506880 Entered on 06/03/07 05:09 am
R ft inspection Q 2 wks, Lubricant provided (R ftl, Patient education (R ftl L ft inspection Q 2 wks, Lubricant provided (L ftl, Patient education (L ftl Rand L feet clean and dry with no 'cuts, sores or wounds noted at this time.

Printed By:SMITH, GLORIA D.lHIM SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30/09 4:33 AM

Page:

35 of 37

Inmate Name: OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

iHlollsing location:

P58?

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 74 of 87 Page ID #:849
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Inmate Medical Documentation

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
IRC Closing Notes
IRC Reviewed IRC Patient Health Teaching
IRC Actions Taken SOAP Charting

IRC Closing Note 07/13/06 04:41 am Performed by PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230 Entered on 07/13/06 04:44 am
PARK, HYE M./SHERIFF STAFF NURSE-413230
Yellow arrestee form, 16 Questions, Database, MD Progress Note, Orders Side effects for medications, Wound care and hand washing, pill call procedures, Follow· up with Nsg. as needed Init. dose of meds given, pill card issued, Orange wristband applied O======UNABLE TO HOUSING 8000 AT THIS TIME. NURSE BASSY AT 8000 STATES," I AM BUSY CAUSE OF COURT LINE CALL ME BACK."

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author
IRC Closing Notes
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Location Blood Glucose Result IRC Reviewed
IRC Patient Health Teaching
IRC Actions Taken
SOAP Charting
custody

IRC Closing Note
07/14/06 10:17 am Performed by YEE RN, LINDA / STAFF NURSE - 470142

Entered on 07/14/06 10:26 am

" "

YEE RN, LINDA / STAFF NURSE - 470142

151 72 Rt Arm 150 mg/dl Yellow arrestee form, 16.Questions, Database, MD Progress Note, Orders Side effects for medications, Pill call procedures, Follow up with Nsg. as needed pill card issued, Orange wristband applied, JRC to Custody, Other: Scheduled doses of med given O===Spoke to nurse Mengista. Per nurse Mengista bed available for patient at 8000/8100. Chart enclosed given
with JRC for housing transfer to 8000/8100.

Provider/Author 2
Provider/Author

IRC Closing Note 07/14/06 08:00 pm Performed by ONG, ARTHUR Q / NASSTS - 510417 Entered on 07/14/06 09:37 pm
ONG, ARTHUR Q / NASSTS - 510417

IRC Closing Notes
Systolic BP Diastolic BP BP Device BP Location 13J.ood GI1ICOS() ~esu.~. ..-..!~:C ·R\fvj.e:\··JI.~'6

130 62 Dinamap Left Arm 163 mg/dl Yellow arrestee form, 16 Questions, Database, DMH ;rogress Note, MD Progress Note, Orders

Prin~ed By:SIVIiTH, GLOr~!A D.ll-mv'1 SUPERVISOR-268088
Print Date: 09/30109 4:33 AM

Page:

36 of 37

Inmate Name:

OLIVIER, MAURICE

ell Number:

A10246947

Booking Number: 9121486

Booking Date: 7/12/06 9:56:00 PM

Date of Birth:

2/24/60 49 years

Housing iLocatioU"l:

P588

" ...
Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 P)age 75 of 87 Page ID #:850

1 PAULB. BEACH, State BarNo. 166265

12beach(a),lbac1aw.com

2 DANIEL LEE, State Bar No. 236811

dlee(a),lbac1aw.com

3 MATTHEW P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 265118

mpa(a),lbaclaw.com

.

4 LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

100 West Broadway, Suite 1200

5 Glendale, California 91210-1219

Telephone No. (818) 545-1925

6 FacsImile No. (818) 545-1937

7 Attorneys for Defendant Sheriff Leroy D. Baca
8

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

12 MAURICE PIERRE OLIVIER,

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15 GLORIA MOLINA, et al.

16

Defendants.

Case No. CV 08-07169 JFW (AGR) Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg DEFENDANT SHERIFF LEROY BACA'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

17

18 PROPOUNDING PARTY: 19 RESPONDING PARTY: 20 SET NO.:
21

Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier Defendant Sheriff Baca Two!

22

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 34(b), Defendant Sheriff

23 Leroy Baca hereby submits the following written response to Plaintiff Maurice

24 Olivier's Requests for Production of Documents. 25

26

27 I Although Plaintiff refers to his production requests as "Second Request for 28 Production of Documents," Defendant was never served with a first set of
production requests in this matter.

1

) Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 76 of 87 Page ID #:851

1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1:

2

All documents that contain, mention, construe, or refer to policies on staff

3 supervision of inmates at Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail.

4 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1:

5

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request because it is overbroad as to

6 the scope of time period because it is not limited to the time period relevant to the

7 allegations in Plaintiffs operative pleading. In addition, this Request is

8 overbroad as to the scope of subject matter, since Plaintiffs operative pleading

9 only asserts claims regarding floorsleeping and unsanitary conditions. As a 10 result, the Request improperly seeks information that is not reasonably calculated

11 to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and is burdensome and 12 oppressive. Additionally, nearly every activity undertaken by the Los Angeles

13 County Sheriffs Department ("LASD") in operating the Los Angeles County Jail

14 system involves the supervision of inmates. Therefore, this Request is overbroad 15 and burdensome because it would require the production of virtually every LASD

16 policy regarding the the Los Angeles County Jail system.

17

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

18, responds as follows: Attached hereto as Bates Nos. 1 to 31 are LASD policies

19 responsive to this Request. 20

21 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2:

22

The complete contents of Plaintiffs LACJ Central File on booking number

23 9121486. Including but not limited to medical, dental, optical, and mental health 24 records.

25 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2:

26

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request on the grounds that it is not

27 reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Further,

28 this Request is compound.

2

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Pa)ge 77 of 87 Page ID #:852

1

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

2 responds as follows: Attached hereto as Bates Nos. 32 to 169 is Plaintiffs

3 booking jacket for booking no. 9121486. In addition, attached hereto as Bates

4 Nos. 170 to 287 are Plaintiffs County jail medical records (which are all

5 inclusive of medical care Plaintiff received while an inmate in the County jail)

6 and mental health records.
7

8 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3:

9

List of all medical and deputy staff that were assigned to the medical intake

10 area ofLACJ from 07112/06 thru [sic] 07117/06.

11 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3:

12

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request on the grounds that it

13 implicates the privacy rights of third party individuals. This Request is not

14 reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Finally,

15 this Request is vague and ambiguous as to which medical and jail staff it seeks, as

16 there were multiple shifts during this time period, most of which are not pertinent

17 to Plaintiffs floorsleeping claim.

18

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

19 responds as follows: Attached hereto as Bates Nos~ 288 to 305 are pertinent in-

20 service sheet pages for 7112/06 through 7117/06.

21

22 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

23

List of all deputy and civilian staff that w.ere assigned to module 2500-A

24 from September 1, 2006 thru [sic] July 20,2007.

25 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

26

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request because it is overbroad as to

27 its scope of time period, as it seeks a time period of almost one year. Finally, this

28 Request is extremely burdensome, oppressive, and harassing because it seeks

3

) Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 78 of 87 Page ID #:853

1 records for a time period (almost one year) well beyond the time period that is the

2 subject of this lawsuit. As such, this Request is not reasonably calculated to lead 3 to the discovery of admissible evidence.

4

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

5 responds as follows: Attached hereto as Bates Nos. 306 to 443 are pertinent in-

6 service sheet pages for 9/1/06 through 10/15/06.
7

8 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.5:

9

Copies of all work orders related to repairs, extermination, [sic] of pests and

10 rodents and sanitation of Module 2500-A. From September 1, 2006 thm [sic]

11 March 1,2007.

12 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.5:

13

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request because it is overbroad as to

14 the scope of its time period because it seeks records for a time period of six

15 months, which is well beyond the time period alleged in Plaintiffs operative

16 pleading. For the same reason, this Request is burdensome, oppressive, and

17 harassing. Further, the Request improperly seeks information that is not

18 reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence insofar as it

19 seeks work orders related to repairs, as this lawsuit only relates to issues of

20 floorsleeping and unsanitary conditions.

21

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

22 responds as follows: Attached hereto as Bates Nos. 444 to 537 are print-outs

23 relating to repair work for Module 2500, Row A from 9/1/06 to 3/1/07.
24

25 Dated: September 27, 2010 26
27 28

LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHO!, PC
Byf£!L1lL
Matthew P. Allen
Attorney for Defendant
Sheriff Leroy D. Baca

4

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 79 of 87 Page ID #:854

1 REQUEST FOR,PRODUCTION NO.1:

2

ASD [sic] Inmate Information Center booking details of housing location of

3 Plaintiff under Booking Number 9121486 from July 12,2006 through July 17,

4 2006 at LACJ.

5 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1:

6

Objections: This Request is vague and ambiguous as to what is meant by

7 and/or encompassed within the phrase "booking details of housing location."

8

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

9 responds as follows: Plaintiffs Inmate Information for Booking No. 9121486 is

10 attached hereto as Bates Nos. 538 to 546.
11

12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2:

13

Copies of all LACJ and County Agency Health and Safety Inspection

14 Reports conducted at LACJ from January 2006 through July 2007.

15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2:

16

Objections: This Request is overbroad as to the scope of its subject matter.

17 See, Corrected Second Amended Complaint at 5-6. Accordingly, to that extent,

18 this Request is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible 19 evidence.

20

Further, as Plaintiffs request is not limited to Men's Central Jail, but rather

21 encompasses the entire Los Angeles County Jail system ("LACJ"), this Request is

22 overbroad in that regard. The Los Angeles County jail system is one of the

23 largest jail systems in the world. There are multiple jail facilities within the

24 LACJ system. With the exception of Men's Central Jail, no other jail facility

25 gives rise to Plaintiffs claims in this lawsuit. Accordingly, Defendant objects to

26 this Request on the grounds that it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the

27 discovery of admissible evidence. This Request is overbroad because it seeks

28

OlivieriResp to RFP.3

2

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 80 of 87 Page ID #:855

1 records from multiple jail facilities (all of which have no relevance to this

2 lawsuit) well beyond the scope of this lawsuit.

3

In addition, this Request is burdensome and oppressive because it seeks

4 records not in the possession of the LASD. Nor are these records retained by

5 LASD; they are in the regular custody of the Department of Public Health and are

6 only retained for several years.

7

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

8 responds as follows: Defendants have conducted a diligent search and inquiry,

9 and have not located any responsive documents. However, efforts are continuing,

10 and Defendant will provide an update when more information becomes available.

11

12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3:

13

Copy of the "Grievance Procedure Program" at LACJ and the Inmate

14 Complaint Form used from September 2006 through July 2007.

15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.3:

16

Objections: This Request is vague and ambiguous as to what is meant by

17 andlor encompassed within the phrase "Copy of the 'Grievance Procedure

18 Program.'"

19

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

20 responds as follows: Attached hereto as Bates Nos. 547 to 551 are responsive

21 policies regarding the inmate complaint process. Further, attached hereto as

22 Bates Nos. 552 to 553 is a sample inmate complaint form used between

23 September 2006 through July 2007. 24 III 25 III 26 III

27

28

Olivier/Resp to RFP.3

3

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 81 of 87 Page ID #:856

1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

2

Copy of the Form and the Name of the Nurse responsible for the inspection

3 of Plaintiffs cell in legal deputy's A. Kennedy's declaration. Located in Module

4 2500-A Bed-20 at LAC] in September of 2006.

5 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.4:

6

Objections: Defendant objects to this Request on the grounds that it

7 implicates the privacy rights of non-party individuals. Additionally, this Request

8 is unintelligible as to the second incomplete sentence. Further, this Request does

9 not comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 34.

10

Notwithstanding the foregoing objections, and subject thereto, Defendant

11 responds as follows: Please see the attached documents, Bates Nos. 554 to 589.

12

13
14 Dated: November 9,2010
15 16 17 18

LA~CE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC
By~/JL~ Matthew P. Allen Attorney for Defendant Sheriff Leroy Baca

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Olivier/Resp to RFP.3

4

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 82 of 87 Page ID #:857

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3

4

I, Ana Escamilla, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of

California; I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my 5 business address is 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

6

7

On November 9,2010, I served the foregoing DEFENDANT SHERIFF

BACA'S CORRECTED RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SET OF

8 REQUEST FOR-PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS on the interested parties

9 in this action by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope,

addressed as follows:
10

11 Maurice P. Oliver, CDC F-83603 12 Calipatria State Prison
Unit D-5, Cell 204 13 P. O. Box 5002 14 Calipatria, CA 92233

15

BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection

16 and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be

17 deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully

prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware

18 that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal

19 cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit

for mailing in affidavit.

20

21

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a

22 member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

23

24

Executed on November 9,2010, at Glendale, California.

25

26
Declarant
27

28

Olivier/Resp to RFP.3

5

Case :08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 99 Filed 11/29/10 Page 9 of 9 Page ID #:7'L.1d , . Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 83 of 87 Page ID #:858

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

4

I, Selina Small, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of California; I

5 am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business

6 address is 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

7

On November 29, 2010, I served the foregoing DECLARATION OF

8 DAWN ABARCA IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO

PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

9 PLAINTIFF'S CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT on the

10 interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed

envelope, addressed as follows: 11

12 Maurice P. Oliver, CDC F-83603 13 Calipatria State Prison
Unit D-5, Cell 204 14 P. O. Box 5002 15 Calipatria, CA 92233

16

BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection·

17 and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully
18 prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware 19 that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal 20 cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit

for mailing in affidavit. 21

22

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a

23 member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

24

25

26

27

28

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 84 of 87 Page ID #:859
Exhibit 3
~
I
I
~ i
I I •
i
i
I
I
I
I
1i .

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 85 of 87 Page ID #:860

ASD Inmate Infonnation Center - Booking Details

Page 1 of2

(The information was current as of: 03/27/200714:14)

Sex: M

Booking No.: 8249149 Last Name: HORNE First Name: WALTER Middle Name: SCOTT Race: 8 Date Of Birth: 1211211978 Age: 25 Hair: BlK Eyes: BRO Height: 508 Weight: 160

\.

Charge Level: F (Felony)

Arrest Date: 08/23/2004

Arrest Time: 1930

ARREST Arrest Agency: 1925

Date Booked: 08123/~004 Time Booked: 2035 Booking Location: 1925

Agency Description: GLENDALE PO Location Description: PD ~ GLENDALE

IITotal Bail Amount: 1,515,000.00

BAIL
Total Hold Bail Amount: NO BAIL

II Grand Total: NO BAil

HOUSING LOCATION Housing Location: IRC
Permanent Housing Assigned Date: 03/2112007 Assigned Time: 1155 Visitor Status: N
Facility: INMATE RECEPTION CENTER Address: 450 BAUCHET STREET City: LOS ANGELES
Public Visiting Guidelines
For County facility visiting hours, Please call (213) 473w6080 at Inmate Information Center.

Next Court Code: 8100

COURT
Next Court Date: 04109/2007 Next Court Time: 0800

Next Court Case: GA05857606

Court Name: L A SUPERIOR COURT DEPT 100 Court Address: 210 W. TEMPLE STREET Court City: LOS ANGELESUPT

RELEASE·
IINo information on Release Datell

IIHold Agency: AWS

HOLD
Agency Name: ORANGE COUNTY REPOSITORY Case No.: 02NF3434

Number Of Hold: 211

CASE INFORMATION
(Click on specific Case No. for detailed info.)

Case No.

Court Name

Court Address

Court City

Bail Amt.

Fine Amt.

I

I

Court Date

ttp:l/app4.lasd.org/iic/details.cfm

EXHIBIT 78

Sent. Date 0164

Sent [];]
Oay(s) Code
.I 1
. 3/2712007

CaCsaes2e:028:0-c8v-c-0v7-0176196-J9F-JWFW-A-GARGRDoDcoucmuemnetn1t0989 FFileiledd0171/2/289/1/110 PPaaggee886ooff987PaPgaegeIDID#:7#2:8861

OIJ/1U:!OOU Ul; 20 FA! 21:1 250 :l9BO

AC L U

I{tJ 028

I'

FAXED
It} .- .3 -. of,

[

Date; 9/11/2006

ACLU ~eoc~d #: 31551

- - - - ._._... .. I%UIlB.te

Name:

Maurice

Olivier
..

~S;ifC,)M~~

:
CSS DATE CSS OAT>
FAG DAff

~mRXCxV'mrDAoC_LU_C.V-l.-.v.._W.v'0-L~\I-.4d-l\L~_.:.~_..:"-

I
!

Inqu.iry). Inmate reports'lioe in his cell and may require medioal
attention as a result. Please .see inmate. Thank you.

ACLU of SQuthern California J~il~ Projeot Faxing Inqui~

FAX # (213) 250-3919

Be~ow ~o Be Filled Out MediQal Sar~~oes Staff Onl

Date Fax Reoeived:
~ Forwar.ded To

Recei-v-ed Ely: COu..:.
Date: OJ ( I C:;/O(C) Time t

Result of Inquiry/Treatment Rendered:

f•l.A'AIJI

follow-up Needed:

Signature of Inmate:

Date:

Signature of Reporting M.D~Staff;

H. Shin. R.IL i436664$·L....

·Da'.:e ::axed to ACtO: SHERIFF I S DEPARTMENT Custody Support Services

COMPLAiNT

SERVtCE

''''',

3n-<1J.S-19S5

8 EXHIBIT "A"

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 108 Filed 07/28/11 Page 87 of 87 Page ID #:862

1

DECLARATION .OF SERVICE BY MAIL

2

3 CASE NAME: Olr-i:t61. '11- C.OU-M.\'( 0 F' Co ... A'-l.(,..~Le:>

c". 4 CASE NO.:

OR-o'li<"C\lf'W (A..c,..i)

5

I declare that I am over the age of eight-

'am.)am 7 teen (18) years;6

not a party to the attached' action; I

8 served the attached document entitled: \'l"'~{)..A 12..66u...",,"-s..L~ l,..oJe;L

c...Oi.JI. ~ t.5LL~ lY \. n.c_La ~ Ll t....S-

9

oL b.~('o\.ls-LV ~ ~~N(!' \=Al~

10

A eeui: t="rL~~"N

11 on the ,persons/~arties specified below by placing a true copy of

12 said document into a sealed envelope with the appropriate postage

13 affixed thereto and surrendering said envelope(s) to the staff of

14 ';::he Correctional Training Facility entrusted wi th'::he logging and

15 mailing of inmate legal mail addressed as follows:

\.l.1U..~'"C~k .slA..l..,;s..'b...l.-UL~ CouLL LA, u/Lsl\1C'.G i1l5Ae-1A - A.LL~ ..,Jc:J-iC)'r;-}~ .e.

16 e..GM'T.t..A-L \..o..{L~ o'F CA.G:i="vLAU:;A..

\/)0 'a.1~ ~t..DA}~w..A.'--1

17

r t!..Lut..-'... c> 'F T\~6 0 u.L L
31.).. N. 0 iilk ~~LDMG- £l.u58r'

So u...r'To #=1.1. DO
&L.l:>N~""'~) C!...A <\\J...ID - lJ.l't

:18

19

20

Mv .1

\
21 There is, First Class mail delivery service by the Uni ted States

22 Post Office betweeri the place of mailing and the addresses indi-

23 cated above. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws

24 of the United States and the' State of California that the foregoing

25 is true and correct and that I executed this service this

26

"27

28

 </s> Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:223

I PAUL B. BEACH, State Bar No. 166265 DANIEL LEE, State Bar No. 236811
2 pbeachla2lbac1aw.con:~ dleela2lbac1aw.com LAWRENCE BEACH ALL'EN & CHOI, PC
3 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200 Glendale, California 91210-1219
4 Telephone No. (818) 545-1925 Facsimile No. (818) 545-1937
5
Attorneys for Defendants 6 Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsk"y Don Knabe,
Michael D. Aritonovich, SheritlLeroy D. Baca, 7 and Policarpio Enriquez, M.D.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10

11 MAURICE PIERRE OLIVIER,
12 Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD 15 OF SUPERVISQli~GLORIA
MOLINA YVOJ"l'lt B. BURKE· 16 ZEVYABOSLAVSKY,DON '
17 KANNTAOBN'EO· VMI~ICIHj~ALEOLSDA. NGELES
COUNTY SEKttIFF'S 18 DEPARTMENT; LEROY BACA;
LOS ANGELES COUNTY 19 CENTRAL JAIL..;,. POLICARPIO
ENRIQUEZ, M.lJ.,
20 Defendants.
21
22

Case No. CV 08-07169 JFW (AGR) Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg
DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST
tt\!~~~fi~~PJ;~~lkTS AND
AUTHORITIES AND DECLARATION OF DEPUTY KEVIN KELLEY IN SUPPORT THEREOF r[Proposed] Order filed concurrently nerewith] Date: December 8, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Crtm: D - 8th Floor

23

24

TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND TO THEIR

25 COUNSEL OF RECORD:

26 III

27 III

28 III

1
OLIYIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 2 of 14 Page ID #:224

1

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 8, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., or as

2 soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, in Courtroom D of the above-referenced

3 court located at 312 N. Spring St., Los Angeles, California 90012, Defendants

4 Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, Sheriff

5 Leroy D. Baca, and Policarpio Enriquez, M.D. (collectively "Defendants") will

6 move this Court for an order dismissing Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier's

7 ("Plaintiff') First Amended Complaint as against Defendants on the following

8 grounds:

9

1. Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to

10

bringing this lawsuit as required by the Prison Litigation Reform

11

Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b).

12

2. Plaintiff has failed to allege facts establishing that the individual

13

Defendants had any personal involvement in the alleged violation of

14

Plaintiffs rights. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. l2(b)(6).

15

This Motion will be based upon this Notice of Motion, the Memorandum

16 of Points and Authorities and Declaration of Deputy Kevin Kelley attached hereto

17 the pleadings on file in this case, and upon such further evidence as may be

18 presented at or before the hearing. 19 III 20 III

21 III

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2
OLlVIER\MTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 3 of 14 Page ID #:225

1

Due to Plaintiffs status as a party appearing pro se, this case is exempt

2 from the requirement of Local Rule 7-3 pursuant to Central District of California

3 Local Rule 16-12.

4

5 Dated: November 9,2009

LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

6

7

By __~s~/_D~an~i~e~IL~e~e~______________

8

Daniel Lee

9

Attorneys for Defendants

Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky,

10

Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich,

11

Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, and

12

Policarpio Enriquez, M.D.

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3
OLlVIER\MTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 4 of 14 Page ID #:226

1

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

2 I. Introduction.

3

There are several grounds upon which to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended

4 Complaint ("FAC") against Defendants. Ffrst, Plaintiff has failed to exhaust his

5 administrative remedies prior to bringing his lawsuit as required by the Prison

6 Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Further, Plaintiff has

7 failed to allege facts that the individual Defendants had any personal involvement

8 in the alleged violations of Plaintiffs rights.

9

While Plaintiffs FAC is unclear as to his specific causes of action, Plaintiff

10 brings this suit under § 1983. Plaintiffs § 1983 allegations regarding floor

11 sleeping purportedly occurred from July 12, 2006 to July 17, 2006, and his

12 allegations regarding his conditions of confinemerit purportedly occurred from

13 September 1,2006 through October 15,2006. Further, Plaintiffs allegations

14 regarding his medical needs purportedly occurred from September 18,2006

15 through January 23, 2007.

16

On August 12,2009, Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier ("Plaintiff') filed his

17 FAC. For the reasons below, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss should be granted.

18 II. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Should Be Dismissed Because

19

Plaintiff Failed To Exhaust His Administrative Remedies As Required

20

By The Prison Litigation Reform Act.

21

The PLRA requires prison litigants to exhaust all of their administrative

22 remedies prior to seeking relief under any federal law. The pertinent portion of

23 the PLRA states:

24

No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions

25

under Section 1983 of this title, or any other Federal law,

26

by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other

27

correctional facility until such administrative remedies as

28

are available are exhausted.

4
OLIVIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 5 of 14 Page ID #:227

1 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (emphasis added).

2

The United States Supreme Court has held that the requirements ofthe

3 PLRA should be strictly applied. Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 740-741

4 (2001) (the PLRA requires exhaustion of administrative remedies regardless of

5 type of relief sought); Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 532 (2002) ("[W]e hold

6 that the PLRA's exhaustion requirement applied to all inmate suits about

7 prison life, whether they involve general circumstances or particular episodes,

8 and whether they allege excessive force or some other wrong." (Emphasis added).

9

In Porter, the Supreme Court explained that the administrative remedies

10 "need not meet federal standards, nor must they be plain, speedy, and effective."

11 Id. at 524. Furthermore, "[t]he language ofthe PLRA ... indicates that Congress

12 had internal prison grievance procedures in mind when it passed the PLRA."

13 Rumbles v. Hill, 182 F.3d 1064, 1069 (9th Cir. 1999) overruled on other grounds;

14 see also, Alexander v. Tippah County, Miss., 351 F.3d 626,630 (5th Cir. 2003)

15 ("Under § 1997e(a), a prisoner must exhaust such administrative remedies as are

16 'available,' whatever they may be.").

17

Further, as evident from the express language of the PLRA, the required

18 exhaustion of administrative remedies must occur prior to the filing of the subject

19 lawsuit. See, e.g., Richardson v. Goard, 347 F.3d 431, 434 (2nd Cir. 2003) ("a

20 prisoner must exhaust his or her administrative remedies prior to filing a claim

21 under § 1983").

22

Moreover, "[a]n action containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims

23 at the time offiling should be dismissed without prejudice." Givens v. City and

24 County a/San Francisco, 2002 WL 31478180 *2 (N.D. Cal. 2002). For instance,

25 in Givens, the plaintiffs complaint alleged that the administrative grievance he

26 had filed pertained to the mail procedures at the jail, but themajority of plaintiffs

27 claims in his complaint pertained to other jail conditions about which plaintiff had

28 not filed any administrative grievances. Id. at *2. The Court held that "Section

5
OLlVIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 6 of 14 Page ID #:228

1 1997e(a) requires that plaintiff present all of his claims to each level of

2 administrative review before raising the claims in a § 1983 action in federal

3 court," and dismissed plaintiffs complaint with prejudice. Id. (emphasis added);

4 see a/so, Graves v. Norris, 218 F.3d 884, 885-86 (8th Cir. 2000) (dismissing

5 § 1983 prisoner action containing exhausted and unexhausted claims because the

6 plain language of § 1997e(a) requires that available administrative remedies be

7 exhausted as to all of the claims brought in a prisoner action); Terrell v. Brewer,

8 935 F.2d 1015, 1018-19 (9th Cir. 1990) (where only a portion ofplaintiffs claims

9 had been exhausted "the proper remedy [was] dismissal without prejudice"). As

10 evident from the language of the PLRA, the required exhaustion of administrative

II remedies must occur prior to the filing of the subject lawsuit. See, e.g.,

12 Richardson v. Goard, 347 F.3d 431,434 (2nd Cir. 2003) ("a prisoner must

13 exhaust his or her administrative remedies prior to filing a claim under § 1983").

14

Here, the requirement of the exhaustion of administrative remedies applies

IS because, as is clear from the FAC, Plaintiff was incarcerated when this action was

16 filed on August 12,2009. In fact, Plaintiff has been in continuous custody since

17 July 12,2006. (See, Declaration of Kevin Kelley ["Kelley Dec!."], ~ 9.)

18

Though it was required of him, Plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative

19 remedies prior to filing this § 1983 action. Indeed, Plaintiff admits in his FAC

20 that he never completed the grievance procedure for the facts relating to this

21 lawsuit. (Complaint, p. 2.) In fact, Plaintiff admits that he never even filed a

22 grievance relating to the subject matter of his Complaint. (FAC, p.2.) As a

23 justification for his failure to exhaust the administrative remedies available to

24 him, Plaintiff makes the unsupported assertions that jail administrators "lack

25 authority statutory or otherwise to resolve Constitutional issues of due process"

26 and "protections secured by U.S. Treaties pursuant to Art. II Sec. [2] supersede

27 restrictions imposed" by the United States Code. (FAC, p. 2.)

28

Under any scenario, Plaintiff failed to exhaust his remedies. Even

6
OLIVIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 7 of 14 Page ID #:229

1 assuming, arguendo, that Plaintiff filed a grievance, he is not exempt from his

2 duty to fully exhaust his remedies, and Plaintiff himself admits that he has done

3 neither. (FAC, p. 2.) Plaintiff's FAC appears to allege three separate claims: (1)

4 he was forced to sleep on a concrete floor for six days; (2) his cell was unsanitary;

5 and (3) County employees failed to follow up on medical recommendations for

6 prescription medications, eyeglasses, and dental procedures (FAC, pp. 5-6.) In

7 addition to Plaintiff's own admission that he has failed to pursue administrative

8 remedies relating to these claims, LASD records confirm that there is no record of

9 related grievances having been filed by Plaintiff. (Kelley Dec!., ~ 13.)

10

Therefore, Plaintiff's lawsuit is barred because Plaintifffailed to exhaust

11 his administrative remedies as required by the PLRA prior to filing suit.

12 III. The Individual Defendants Should Also Be Dismissed Because Plaintiff

13

Has Failed To Allege Any Personal Involvement In The Alleged

14

Violation OfPlaintifrs Rights.

15

To establish a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff must show

16 that: (1) Defendant acted under color of state law, and (2) Defendant deprived

17 him of rights secured by the United States Constitution or federal law. See, Barry

18 v. Fowler, 902 F.2d 770,772 (9th Cir. 1990); Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles

19 Police Dept., 839 F.2d 621,624 (9th Cir. 1986). An individual subjects a

20 plaintiff to the deprivation of a constitutional right, within the meaning of § 1983,

21 ifhe does an affirmative act, or omits to perform an act which he is legally

22 required to do, that caused the deprivation ofthe complainant's rights. Johnson

23 v. DuffY, 588 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978) (emphasis added); Arnold v.

24 International Bus. Machs. Corp., 637 F.2d 1350, 1355 (9th Cir. 1981).

25

In addition, it is well established under Section 1983 that there is no

26 vicarious liability pursuant to a theory of respondeat superior. Monell v.

27 Department o/Social Services o/New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978); City o/St.

28 Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112 (1988). Instead, in order for a defendant to be

7
OLIVIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 8 of 14 Page ID #:230

1 liable under Section 1983, the defendant must have acted personally to cause the

2 alleged constitutional deprivation, either by "personal participation in the

3 deprivation," or "by setting in motion a series of acts by others which the actor

4 knows or reasonably should know would cause others to inflict the constitutional

5 injury." Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371 (1976); Johnson v. Duffy, 588 F.2d

6 740,743-744 (9th Cir. 1978) (emphasis added); McRorie v. Shimoda, 795 F.2d

7 780,783 (9th Cir. 1986). In this regard, the Ninth Circuit has held that "[v]ague

8 and conclusory allegations of official participation in civil rights violations are not

9 sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss." Pena v. Gardner, 976 F.2d 469, 471

10 (9th Cir. 1992)(quoting Ivey v. Board afRegents ofUniv. ofAlaska, 673 F.2d

11 266,268 (9th Cir. 1982)).

12

Here, Plaintiff has named as Defendants County employees in supervisory

13 positions who had no direct involvement in inflicting his alleged constitutional

14 injuries. Plaintiffs § 1983 claims are completely devoid of any factual

15 allegations establishing that Sheriff Leroy Baca, or County Board of Supervisors

16 Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, and Michael D. Antonovich, had

17 direct contact with Plaintiff or that they had actual, personal, first-hand

18 involvement in the alleged violations giving rise to this action. As noted above,

19 under Pena v. Gardner, vague and conclusory allegations that Sheriff Baca and

20 Supervisors Molina, Yaroslavsky, Knabe and Antonovich failed to implement

21 policies to prevent Plaintiffs alleged injuries are insufficient to withstand a

22 motion to dismiss. Pena, supra, 976 F.2d at 471. With regard to Policarpio

23 Enriquez, M.D., Plaintiff alleges only that Dr. Enriquez treated him and offered

24 several medical recommendations, and that Dr. Enriquez had aduty to verify that

25 the appropriate departments followed up on the recommendations. (FAC, p. 50.)

26 Plaintifffaiis to allege any facts establishing that Dr. Enriquez's conduct

27 constituted any kind of constitutional deprivation.

28

8
OLlVIERIMTD.

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 9 of 14 Page ID #:231

1

Plaintiff does not allege, nor could he truthfully allege, that Defendants

2 personally participated in any alleged violation, that Defendants personally

3 disregarded Plaintiff's alleged medical concerns, or that Defendants personally

4 directed any County employee to violate Plaintiff's rights. See, Black v. Lane, 22

5 F.3d 1395, 1401 (7th Cir. 1994) ("an official meets the personal involvement

6 requirement when []he acts or fails to act with a deliberate or reckless disregard

7 of plaintiff's constitutional rights").

8

Therefore, Plaintiff's FAC should be dismissed.

9 IV. Conclusion.

10

Based on the foregoing, Defendants respectfully request this Court grant

11 their Motion to Dismiss.

12

13 Dated: November 9, 2009

LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

14

15

By __~s~/~D~a~nl~·e~I~L~ee~______________

16

Daniel Lee

17

Attorneys for Defendants

Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky,

18

Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich,

19

Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, and

20

Policarpio Enriquez, M.D.

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9
OLlVIER\MTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 10 of 14 Page ID #:232

1

DECLARATION OF DEPUTY KEVIN KELLEY

2

3

I, Kevin Kelley, declare as follows:

4

1. The following is based upon my personal knowledge and if called

5 upon, I could and would testify competently thereto. I have been employed with

6 the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department ("LASD") since August 2007. I am

7 currently assigned as the Custodian of Records for the Men's Central Jail

8 ("MCJ") Legal Unit.

9

2. I am familiar with the administrative remedies procedure for inmates

10 at the Los Angeles County Jails and, particularly, for inmates at MCJ. The

11 process described below has been in place throughout my tenure as Custodian

12 of Records for the MCJ Legal Unit.

13

3. The administrative remedies procedure for Los Angeles County Jail

14 inmates is initiated when an inmate completes and submits an Inmate Complaint

15 Form (or a written complaint of any kind) which may address any number of

16 issues including, but not limited to, personnel conduct, medical care, classification

17 actions and conditions of confinement. In the Los Angeles County Jail system,

18 Inmate Complaint Forms are made available to inmates at various locations in

19 the vicinity of their housing locations. They may also be obtained by making a

20 request of any jail staff member.

21

4. The written complaints can be deposited throughout the day in

22 complaint boxes marked "Inmate Complaints," located in each inmate housing 23 location. They may also be given directly to any jail staff employee. Policy 24 requires that the Inmate Complaint boxes be checked at least once per shift by a

25 supervisor ofthe rank of Sergeant or above. Any jail staff person who receives a 26 written complaint is responsible for routing it to the appropriate supervisor.

27 When a Complaint Form is collected from the Inmate Complaint box, it is hand 28 carried to the on-duty Watch Commander or delivered to the Inmate complaint
Coordinator for logging, processing, and review.

10
OLiVIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 11 of 14 Page ID #:233

1

5. All written complaints are logged into the Facilities Automated

2 Statistical Tracking (F.A.S.T.) system, given a reference number and assigned

3 an investigator. An Inmate Complaint Form's reference number is written at

4 the top of the Inmate Complaint Form. If a particular Inmate Complaint Form

5 does not have a reference number written on it, this usually means that the

6 Inmate Complaint Form is either not authentic or was never submitted by the

7 inmate.

8

6. The investigator assigned to handle the Inmate Complaint contacts

9 the inmate and attempts to resolve the complaint. If the complaint is resolved

10 to the inmate's satisfaction, the inmate acknowledges his satisfaction by

11 signing and dating the back of the Inmate Complaint Form. The investigator

12 forwards the complaint to the shift Watch Commander for review.

13

7. If, however, the inmate is not satisfied or his Complaint is denied,

14 the inmate can appeal to the Watch Commander to exhaust his remedies.

15

8. All information regarding Inmate Complaint Forms, such as dates

16 of complaints and dispositions, are entered into the LASD F.A.S.T. computer

17 system.

18

9. According to LASD records, Plaintiff Maurice Olivier ("Plaintiff')

19 was in custody with the LASD from July 12,2006 through August 6,2007, when

20 Plaintiff was transferred to Wasco State Prison. According to Plaintiff's First

21 Amended Complaint ("FAC"), he is currently incarcerated in Calipatria State

22 Prison.

23

10. On or about October 20,2009, I conducted an inquiry to determine

24 whether Plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies as to the issues raised in

25 his FAC by submitting, and appealing from (via the multiple levels of appeal in

26 the LASD administrative remedies procedure), any Inmate Complaints during his

27 incarceration.

28

11
OLIVIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 12 of 14 Page ID #:234

1

11. I am informed and believe that Plaintiff is asserting claims relating to

2 floor sleeping, conditions of confinement (i.e. unsanitary cell, denial of blanket,

3 pillow, toothbrush, razors), and failure to follow up on medical evaluations (i.e.

4 for eyeglasses and dental problem).

5

12. In conducting this inquiry, I executed comprehensive searches of the

6 LASD computer database, which contains such information, i.e., the dates, the

7 subject matters, and dispositions of Inmate Complaint Forms received and

8 logged. This database is regularly updated by the facility at which each Inmate

9 Complaint Form is received.

10

13. Based upon my review, I determined that Plaintiff submitted no

11 Inmate Complaints regarding the subject matter of the instant lawsuit, i.e., floor

12 sleeping for any period during which he was incarcerated with the County of Los

13 Angeles; failure to provide medical care relating eyeglasses, prescriptions, and

14 dental care; and, issues relating to conditions of his confinement. Instead,

15 Plaintiff submitted only three Inmate Complaints, none of which relates to the

16 claims in his operative pleadings, and all of which were addressed by LASD

17 staff.! As evident from the above, Plaintiff has not even begun the process of

18 exhausting his administrative remedies as to the subject matter ofthis lawsuit.

19 Accordingly, Plaintiff has not exhausted his administrative remedies concerning

20 his claims in this matter.

21

22

23

24

! Based on my review, Plaintiff filed only the following three Inmate Complaints:

25 1. 9111106 - Complaint regarding lice in his cell; PIaintiffwas seen and

treated, his cel[ was inspectedby a nurse and no lice was found. 26 2. 6/18/07 - Request to see a doctor to receive a special diet; Plaintiff was

referred to a dietary specialist and saw a doctor on 6/27/07.

27

3. 6/19/07 - Request to see a doctor to receive a special diet; this was a

follow-up to the previous complaint" Plaintiff was referred to a dietary

28

specialist and saw a doctor on 6/27/u7.

12
OLIVIER\MTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 13 of 14 Page ID #:235

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of

2 America and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

3

Executed this L day of November 2009, at Los Angeles, California.

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

II

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39 Filed 11/09/09 Page 14 of 14 Page ID #:236

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3

4

I, Ana Escamilla, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of

California; I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my 5 business addressis 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

6

7

On November 9, 2009, I served the foregoing DEFENDANTS' NOTICE

OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST

8 AMENDED COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND

9 AUTHORITIES AND DECLARATION OF DEPUTY KEVIN KELLEY IN

SUPPORT THEREOF on the interested parties in this action by placing a true

10 copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

11

12 Maurice P. Oliver, CDC F-83603

Calipatria State Prison

13 Unit D-5, Cell 204

14 P. O. Box 5002

Calipatria, CA 92233
15

16

BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection

and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be 17 deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully

18 prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware

19 that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal

cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit

20 for mailing in affidavit.

21
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California 22 that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a
23 member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

24

Executed on November 9, 2009, at Glendale, California.

25

26

27

Declarant

28

14
OLIVIERIMTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39-2 Filed 11/09/09 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:237

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

II MAURICE PIERRE OLIVIER,

.Case No. CV 08-07169 JFW (AGR)

12

Plaintiffs,

Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg

13

vs.

14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISQli~GLORIA
15 MOLINA- YVONNt B. BURKE' ZEV YABOSLAVSKY, DON '
16 KANNTAOBN'EO- VMI~ICIHj~ALEOLSDA. NGELES 17 COUNTY SEKttIFF'S
DEPARTMENT; LEROY BACA; 18 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CENTRAL JAIL..;,. POLICARPIO 19 ENRIQUEZ, M.l.J.,

20

Defendants.

21

PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT rNotice ofMotion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint concurrently herewith] Date: December 8, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Crtm: D - 8th Floor

22

23

24

This matter came on for hearing on December 8, 2009 before the Honorable

25 Magistrate Alicia G. Rosenberg in Courtroom D of the above-entitled Court. After

26 considering all of the papers and the arguments on counsel, the Court sustained in

27 its entirety the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint filed by

28 Defendants Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich,

1
OLlVIERIPROPOSED ORDER.MTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39-2 Filed 11/09/09 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:238

1 Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, and Policarpio Enriquez, M.D., in the above-captioned

2 action.

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the

4 claims against Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 5

6

7 Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _, 2009
8 9

The Honorable Magistrate Alicia G. Rosenberg

10

11 Submitted by: 12 LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

13

14 By _ _--:---:-_ _ _ _ __

15

Daniel Lee

Attorneys for Defendants

16

Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky,

17

Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich;

18

Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, and

Policarpio Enriquez, M.D.

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
26

27

28

2
OLIVIERIPROPOSED ORDER.MTD

Case 2:08-cv-07169-JFW-AGR Document 39-2 Filed 11/09/09 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:239

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3

4

I, Ana Escamilla, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of

California; I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my 5 business address is 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

6

t 7

GRANOTnINNGovDemEFbEer12~"1JJ0A0N9

I served the foregoing [PROPOSEDl ORDER S' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT on the interested parties in this action by

8 placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

9
Maurice P. Oliver, CDC F-83603 10 Calipatria State Prison
11 Unit D-5, Cell 204 P. O. Box 5002
12 Calipatria,CA 92233

13

14

BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection

and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be

IS deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully

16 prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware

that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal

17 cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit

18 for mailingin affidavit.

19

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

20 that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a

21 member of the bar ofthis Court at whose direction the service was made.

22

Executed on November 9, 2009, at Glendale, California.

23

24

25

Declarant

26

27 28

3
OLiVIERIPROPOSED ORDER.MTD

 </s> Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 1 of 17

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAURICE P. OLIVIER, AKA Maurice Pierre Olivier,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.

No. 13-56371
D.C. No. 2:08-cv-07169-
JFW-AGR

LEROY D. BACA, Los Angeles County Sheriff of Custody Operations,
Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 10, 2018 Pasadena, California
Filed January 11, 2019
Before: Consuelo M. Callahan and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges, and David A. Ezra,* District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Callahan

* The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 2 of 17

2

OLIVIER V. BACA

SUMMARY**

Prisoner Civil Rights
The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant Sheriff Baca in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Baca violated plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with a bed during his three-and-a-half day stay at the Los Angeles Inmate Reception Center while he was a pretrial detainee.
The panel held that the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department was well within the scope of its authority to maintain security when it carried out the lockdowns that delayed plaintiff’s transfer to permanent housing, resulting in three-and-a-half days without a bed. The panel held that, in view of the deference the Supreme Court has prescribed in the area of correctional facility policy, along with Baca’s clarifications of the rationale underlying Department procedures, there was no basis in the record on which to conclude that the response to the inmate disturbances constituted an unnecessary or unjustified response to problems of jail security.
The panel further held that even if a Fourteenth Amendment violation did occur, the district court correctly held that Baca was entitled to qualified immunity because the right asserted by plaintiff—not being forced to sleep on the floor during a jail lockdown—was not clearly established at the time of the events.
** This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 3 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

3

COUNSEL

R. Chris Lim (argued), Los Feliz Law APC, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jonathan Carl Magno (argued), Daniel Lee, and Paul B. Beach, Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi PC, Glendale, California, for Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
On the night of July 12, 2006, Plaintiff-Appellant Maurice Olivier (“Olivier”) was arrested and taken to the Los Angeles County Inmate Reception Center (“IRC”) for processing into permanent housing. Due to a series of disturbances by inmates and lockdowns throughout the Los Angeles County jail system, Olivier was not transferred to permanent housing until the afternoon of July 16, 2006. Olivier brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant-Appellee Sheriff Leroy Baca (“Baca”) in Baca’s official and individual capacities, alleging that Baca violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights by failing to provide him with a bed during his three-and-a-half day stay at the IRC. The district court granted summary judgment in Baca’s favor, holding that Olivier had not raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether disturbances by inmates and lockdowns constituted exigent circumstances justifying the floor sleeping. Olivier appeals. We affirm and hold that the exigent circumstance of inmate disturbances and lockdowns justified denying Olivier a bed for his three-and-a-half day stay at the IRC.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 4 of 17

4

OLIVIER V. BACA

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A.

On May 25, 2006, Olivier was arrested by the Los Angeles Police Department for burglary. He was processed into permanent housing at Los Angeles Men’s Central Jail (“MCJ”) but erroneously released on July 7, 2006. On July 12, 2006, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (“LASD”) located and again arrested Olivier. At 9:56 p.m., he arrived at the IRC for processing into the county jail system.1

Upon Olivier’s arrival at the IRC, he was determined to have health issues. Consequently, Olivier was sent to the medical screening area of the IRC where he waited on a bench for an examination, along with around 100 other people.

LASD officials determined that Olivier could be properly housed only at MCJ in light of his medical needs, his classification as a non-high risk inmate without mental

1 The IRC serves as a hub for processing incoming and outgoing inmates in the jail system. The process occurs in three stages: (1) “booking front,” which involves an initial interview, screening, and photograph; (2) “class rear,” which involves medical screening, fingerprinting and housing classification; and (3) “custody line,” where inmates are fed, provided medication if applicable, and picked up by personnel from the housing facility to which they are assigned. On average, more than 300 inmates are processed daily at the IRC.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 5 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

5

illness, and the proximity of MCJ to the venue of his underlying criminal case.2

While Olivier was being processed at the IRC for transfer to MCJ, inmates at jail facilities across Los Angeles County repeatedly divided themselves along racial lines and fought. This string of inmate disturbances persisted for approximately three days and necessitated lockdowns at multiple facilities, which, in turn, delayed processing at the IRC. LASD logs and declarations from LASD personnel provide accounts of the disturbances.3

2 In 2006, the LASD operated three housing facilities for male inmates within the Los Angeles County jail system: MCJ, Twin Towers Correctional Facility, and Pitchess Detention Center. Twin Towers housed exclusively inmates with high security risk classifications, inmates suffering from severe mental illness, and sexually violent inmates. Pitchess did not have medical services that would have accommodated Olivier’s claimed medical condition. Additionally, Pitchess is located more than forty-five miles by road from the venue where Olivier’s criminal case was scheduled. MCJ was thus the only suitable permanent housing for Olivier.
3 On July 13, 2006, at 8:30 a.m., the IRC class rear was closed due to inmate fighting, causing inmate processing at the IRC to stop. On July 13 at 4:30 p.m., approximately 100 IRC custody line inmates could not be transferred due to inmate disturbances at Pitchess Detention Center. On July 13, Twin Towers was placed on full lockdown. From 11:15 p.m. on July 13 until 1:20 a.m. on July 14, inmate rioting occurred at the MCJ. On July 14, the MCJ remained on full lockdown from 2:05 p.m. to 8:09 p.m. From July 14 at 10:45 p.m. into the following days, the IRC’s class rear and custody line were placed on lockdown. On July 15 at 9:30 a.m., and again at 6:00 p.m., the IRC booking front was on lockdown. On July 15, MCJ was on lockdown until late in the day. On July 16, Twin Towers was on lockdown from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 6 of 17

6

OLIVIER V. BACA

Olivier remained at the IRC for the duration of the inmate disturbances, lockdowns, and post-lockdown procedures before being transferred to MCJ on July 16. In total, Olivier was held at the IRC for approximately three-and-a-half days. Olivier testified that although there were benches in the cell where he was held, there was inadequate space to accommodate the number of detainees at the IRC. Olivier testified that no one slept on the benches because trying to do so would have led to a fight. As a result, Olivier slept on the floor during his time at the IRC. Olivier testified that he never asked for “a mattress, blankets, or any other sort of padding.”

After the lockdowns began on July 13, the first time inmates were picked up from the IRC custody line was on July 16 around 2:00 a.m. Olivier was transferred to the MCJ at 1:14 p.m. on July 16.

B.

On October 30, 2008, Olivier filed a complaint in district court alleging civil rights violations related to both his extended stay at the IRC and events that occurred after he was transferred to MCJ.4 The district court dismissed certain aspects of Olivier’s original claims, and Olivier amended his complaint several times. By the time the case reached the summary judgment stage, the only remaining claim relevant to this appeal was a Fourteenth Amendment claim against

4 Olivier’s claims relating to his experiences at MCJ were dismissed, aside from a Fourteenth Amendment claim regarding exposure to lice in his jail cell. The complaint also named a number of defendants in addition to Baca. On July 10, 2010, the district court dismissed all defendants except Baca.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 7 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

7

Baca in his official and individual capacities regarding Olivier’s being forced to sleep on the floor at the medical intake area of the IRC.

Baca filed a motion for summary judgment. After the magistrate judge recommended denying the motion for lack of evidence that exigent circumstances existed, the district court gave Baca an opportunity to supplement the record. Baca then submitted additional declarations by LASD officials. In 2013, the Operations Deputy at the IRC explained that in response to such disturbances a large proportion of jail staff must work to restore order. Jail personnel who do not respond to the disturbances and remain in other areas of the facility are, therefore, likely to be significantly outnumbered by inmates. Consequently, normal operations must be suspended and the entire facility placed on lockdown until order is restored and the staff-to-inmate ratio returns to normal in all areas of the jail. As part of a lockdown, no inmates are permitted to move in or out of the facility. This means inmate transfers to permanent housing are cancelled by the IRC for the duration of a lockdown. A lockdown at a facility in Los Angeles County may thus prolong processing times at the IRC. The Operations Deputy further explained that a lockdown in any one of the booking front, class rear, or custody line stages necessarily results in a lockdown in the other areas because each stage operates in connection with the others.

An LASD sergeant assigned to the MCJ during the time of the disturbances explained that after a lockdown is lifted, inmate movement cannot immediately resume. Following a lockdown caused by inmate disturbances, detention facility personnel must conduct thorough security checks, survey property damage, and address medical needs. These post-

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 8 of 17

8

OLIVIER V. BACA

lockdown procedures naturally lead to delays in inmate processing in excess of the length of the lockdowns themselves.

The magistrate judge concluded that the newly supplemented record conclusively demonstrated that the Los Angeles County jail system experienced exigent circumstances due to the disturbances and lockdowns. The magistrate judge recommended granting Baca’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety. On July 19, 2013, the district court accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendations, granted summary judgment in favor of Baca, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

II. STANDARD OF REVIEW

A district court’s order granting summary judgment is reviewed de novo. McDonald v. Sun Oil Co., 548 F.3d 774, 778 (9th Cir. 2008). The party moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden of identifying those portions of the pleadings, discovery and affidavits which demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Celotex Corp. v. Cattrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). Where, as here, the opposing party will have the burden of proof at trial, the moving party need only point out “that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s case.” Id. at 325.

III. ANALYSIS

A pretrial detainee is

protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause . . . . Under the Due Process Clause, detainees have a right against

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 9 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

9

jail conditions or restrictions that amount to punishment. This standard differs significantly from the standard relevant to convicted prisoners, who may be subject to punishment so long as it does not violate the Eighth Amendment’s bar against cruel and unusual punishment.

Pierce v. Cty. of Orange, 526 F.3d 1190, 1205 (9th Cir. 2008) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). For Olivier to state an actionable claim against Baca in his official capacity, Olivier must show that “the action that is alleged to be unconstitutional implements or executes a policy statement, ordinance, regulation, or decision officially adopted and promulgated by that body’s officers.” Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978). Local entities may also be “sued for constitutional deprivations visited pursuant to governmental ‘custom’ even though such a custom has not received formal approval through the body’s official decisionmaking channels.” Id. at 690–91. For Olivier to state an actionable claim against Baca in his individual capacity, he must show that Baca was personally involved in his alleged constitutional deprivation by, for example, acting, or failing to act, in a manner that was deliberately indifferent to Olivier’s constitutional rights. Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 2011).

A.

Olivier argues that summary judgment was improper because the evidence in the record establishes a triable issue as to whether the disturbances by inmates and lockdowns justified his floor sleeping.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 10 of 17

10

OLIVIER V. BACA

It has long been recognized that “central to all other corrections goals is the institutional consideration of internal security within the corrections facilities themselves.” Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 823 (1974). The Supreme Court has explained that measures to preserve security and order “may require limitation or retraction of the retained constitutional rights of both convicted prisoners and pretrial detainees.” Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 546 (1979). In this regard, corrections officials “should be accorded wideranging deference in the adoption and execution of policies and practices that in their judgment are needed to preserve internal order and discipline and to maintain institutional security.” Id. at 547; Bull v. City and Cty. of San Francisco, 595 F.3d 964, 972 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). The Supreme Court has reaffirmed this principle, explaining that—in addressing a § 1983 claim brought by a pretrial detainee— “courts must defer to the judgment of correction officials unless the record contains substantial evidence showing their policies are an unnecessary or unjustified response to problems of jail security.” Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholder of Cty. of Burlington, 566 U.S. 318, 322–23 (2012).

In the context of disturbances by inmates and lockdowns, we have held that such issues can delay detention facility procedures and temporarily restrict certain rights without violating the Eighth Amendment. See, e.g., Noble v. Adams, 646 F.3d 1138, 1142–43 (9th Cir. 2011); Norwood v. Vance, 591 F.3d 1062, 1069 (9th Cir. 2010). In Noble, we held that a three-month curtailment of prisoners’ outside exercise rights in response to a riot that hospitalized nine prison staff was not a violation of their Eighth Amendment rights. 646 F.3d at 1143. We stated that it was not yet clearly established “precisely how, according to the Constitution, or

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 11 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

11

when a prison facility housing problem inmates must return to normal operations . . . during and after a state of emergency called in response to a major riot.” Id. In Norwood, we explained that “[o]fficials must balance [the duty to keep inmates safe] against other obligations that our laws impose . . . . ‘[P]rison officials have a right and duty to take the necessary steps to reestablish order in a prison when such order is lost.’” 591 F.3d at 1069 (quoting Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1259 (9th Cir. 1982)).

Although Noble and Norwood involve prisoners and Eighth Amendment rights, the same considerations are relevant in the pretrial detainee context. Jails, just like prisons, “are responsible for maintaining internal order and discipline [and] for securing their institutions against unauthorized access or escape.” Bell, 441 U.S. at 548 n.30 (quoting Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 404 (1974)). Further, “[t]here is no basis for concluding that pretrial detainees pose any lesser security risk than convicted inmates.” Bell, 441 U.S. at 546 n.28. The district court in Thomas v. Baca, 514 F. Supp. 2d 1201, 1225 (C.D. Cal. 2007), for example, recognized this principle when it suggested an exception to the general rule that each inmate in LASD facilities must be provided with a bunk: “A sudden, extreme rise in inmate population caused by an acute event, such as a civil disturbance, may affect the length of time that is reasonable for processing.”

Here, LASD was well within the scope of its authority to maintain security when it carried out the lockdowns that delayed Olivier’s transfer to permanent housing, resulting in three-and-a-half days without a bed. The evidence is uncontroverted that, over this period of time, LASD was confronted with emergencies that threatened the safety and

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 12 of 17

12

OLIVIER V. BACA

security of its facilities. It is also clear that the jail officials’ response to the security threats was reasonable in its scope and effective in controlling the disturbances. See Bell, 441 U.S. at 540 (“Restraints that are reasonably related to the institution’s interest in maintaining jail security do not, without more, constitute unconstitutional punishment, even if they are discomforting . . . .”). Indeed, Olivier was promptly transferred to permanent housing after the disturbances had been controlled. Thus, in view of the “wideranging deference,” id. at 547, the Supreme Court has prescribed in the area of correctional facility policy, along with Baca’s clarifications of the rationale underlying LASD procedures, there is no basis in the record on which to conclude that LASD’s response to the inmate disturbances constituted “an unnecessary or unjustified response to problems of jail security.” Florence, 566 U.S. at 322.

Olivier relies on Thomas v. Ponder, 611 F.3d 1144, 1155 (9th Cir. 2010), to support his argument that his holdover at the IRC raises an issue of material fact, but Ponder is distinguishable. In Ponder, we held that an indefinite deprivation of out-of-cell exercise lasting for fourteen months raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the prison officials acted reasonably. Id. at 1156. The first two months of deprivation of out-of-cell activity was due to a prison-wide lockdown in the wake of stabbings of two correctional officers. Id. Prison officials argued that prolonging the plaintiff’s punishment for an additional year was justified, in part, because of “occasional documented threats” that ensued. Id. We rejected the prison officials’ argument, finding that a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the 14-month deprivation was reasonable. Id. at 1152.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 13 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

13

Here, in contrast, the evidence shows that LASD addressed a nearly uninterrupted series of riots and civil disturbances involving hundreds of inmates, and resumed normal operations within a matter of hours after jail officials regained control of their facilities. The differences in both the extent of the civil disturbances and the length of the deprivation make Ponder unhelpful to Olivier’s argument.5

B.

Olivier also argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Baca based on qualified immunity. He contends that, although the specific issue of floor sleeping during inmate processing due to exigent circumstances had not been held unconstitutional, “the unlawfulness was apparent under the circumstances.” Olivier further contends that Baca should have been “prohibit[ed] . . . from arguing . . . qualified immunity . . . [b]ased upon Appellant’s collateral estoppel arguments.”

“Qualified immunity shields federal and state officials from money damages unless a plaintiff pleads facts showing

5 Olivier also argues that an inference is proper that the disturbances and lockdowns that led to his holdover at the IRC were natural consequences of prison overcrowding. He contends that if such disturbances are common they should not excuse constitutional violations. Olivier, however, has not presented any admissible evidence to demonstrate, as he claims, that riots were the natural and foreseeable consequences of overcrowding in Los Angeles County jails. Olivier cites in his brief two internet articles—published over ten years after the events at issue—reporting generally on overcrowding in Los Angeles jails. However, as these articles were not in the record before the district court, they do not undermine the district court’s decision. See U.S. v. W.R. Grace, 504 F.3d 745, 766 (9th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we reject this argument.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 14 of 17

14

OLIVIER V. BACA

(1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct.” Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 735 (2011). For a right to be “clearly established,” existing “precedent must have placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate,” such that “every” reasonable official would have understood that he was violating a clearly established right. Id. at 741. “This is not to say that an official action is protected by qualified immunity unless the very action in question has previously been held unlawful, but it is to say that in the light of pre-existing law the unlawfulness must be apparent.” Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640 (1987) (citation omitted). The burden is on the party contesting qualified immunity to show that a law was clearly established at the time of an alleged violation. Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 197–98 (1984).

Olivier has not demonstrated that the law regarding floor sleeping, in the context of exigent circumstances, was or is clearly established. Thompson v. City of Los Angeles, 885 F.2d 1439, 1448 (9th Cir. 1989), overruled on other grounds by Bull, 595 F.3d at 981, and Rutherford v. Pitchess, 457 F. Supp. 104, 109 (C.D. Cal. 1978), held that forcing detainees to sleep on the ground is a constitutional violation. However, those cases did not involve exigent circumstances, and thus any “unlawfulness” cannot be said to have been “apparent” to Baca in the context of the inmate disturbances at issue here. Olivier also cites Thomas to support his argument that it is clearly established that inmate processing should take no longer than twenty-four hours. 514 F. Supp 2d at 1215. Thomas, a district court decision, was not decided until over a year after the events at issue, so that case could not have “placed the . . . constitutional question beyond debate” at the time of Olivier’s delay at the IRC. See al-Kidd,

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 15 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

15

563 U.S. at 741. Additionally, Thomas explicitly recognized an exception to its general inmate processing guidelines for exigent circumstances such as civil disturbances. 514 F. Supp. 2d at 1218–19.

Finally, we reject Olivier’s argument that collateral estoppel should have prevented Baca from claiming qualified immunity. Collateral estoppel bars successive litigation of an issue of fact or law actually litigated and resolved in a prior court determination even if the issue recurs in the context of a different claim. See Howard v. City of Coos Bay, 871 F.3d 1032, 1040–41 (9th Cir. 2017). The issue presented in this case—floor sleeping due to exigent circumstances—was not addressed in any of the cases cited by Olivier, and the district court in Thomas specifically recognized an exigent circumstances exception to its holding that floor sleeping is unconstitutional. 514 F. Supp. 2d at 1218–19. Accordingly, collateral estoppel does not apply.

In sum, Olivier has not shown that a genuine issue of
material fact exists as to whether Baca was entitled to qualified immunity.6

C.

Olivier also argues that the district court abused its discretion by: (1) declining to transfer the case to another courtroom as a related case; (2) failing to authorize punitive damages against Baca; (3) failing to take judicial notice of his

6 Baca also argues that Olivier failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available to him under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Because we hold that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment, we do not reach this issue.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 16 of 17

16

OLIVIER V. BACA

opposition motion; and (4) admitting declarations from LASD officials. None of these arguments is persuasive.

First, the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to transfer the case because the record does not indicate that Olivier filed a Notice of Related Civil Cases, as he was required to do for the district court to consider transferring the case. C.D. Cal. R. 83-1.3.1. Second, punitive damages are not available against Baca in his official capacity, see Mitchell v. Dupnik, 75 F.3d 517, 527 (9th Cir. 1996), and Olivier’s claim for punitive damages against Baca individually is moot in light of our holding that Baca is entitled to qualified immunity. Third, the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to take judicial notice of Olivier’s opposition motion because “[l]egal memoranda . . . are not evidence, and do not create issues of fact capable of defeating an otherwise valid motion for summary judgment.” Flaherty v. Warehousemen, Garage & Serv. Station Empls.’ Local Union No. 334, 574 F.2d 484, 486 n.2 (9th Cir. 1978). Finally, the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting declarations from LASD officials because the officials had personal knowledge of both the events and the LASD procedures at issue. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4); see, e.g., S.E.C. v. Phan, 500 F.3d 895, 913 (9th Cir. 2007).

IV. CONCLUSION

Olivier has not presented a basis for disturbing the district court’s judgment. The evidence is uncontroverted and summary judgment was proper as a matter of law. In addition, even if a Fourteenth Amendment violation did occur, the district court correctly held that Baca is entitled to qualified immunity because the right asserted by Olivier—not being forced to sleep on the floor during a jail

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-1, Page 17 of 17

OLIVIER V. BACA

17

lockdown—was not clearly established at the time of the events. Finally, Olivier has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in rejecting his various ancillary claims. AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-2, Page 1 of 4

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Office of the Clerk 95 Seventh Street San Francisco, CA 94103

Information Regarding Judgment and Post-Judgment Proceedings

Judgment •

This Court has filed and entered the attached judgment in your case. Fed. R. App. P. 36. Please note the filed date on the attached decision because all of the dates described below run from that date, not from the date you receive this notice.

Mandate (Fed. R. App. P. 41; 9th Cir. R. 41-1 & -2) • The mandate will issue 7 days after the expiration of the time for filing a petition for rehearing or 7 days from the denial of a petition for rehearing, unless the Court directs otherwise. To file a motion to stay the mandate, file it electronically via the appellate ECF system or, if you are a pro se litigant or an attorney with an exemption from using appellate ECF, file one original motion on paper.

Petition for Panel Rehearing (Fed. R. App. P. 40; 9th Cir. R. 40-1) Petition for Rehearing En Banc (Fed. R. App. P. 35; 9th Cir. R. 35-1 to -3)

(1) A. Purpose (Panel Rehearing): • A party should seek panel rehearing only if one or more of the following grounds exist: ► A material point of fact or law was overlooked in the decision; ► A change in the law occurred after the case was submitted which appears to have been overlooked by the panel; or ► An apparent conflict with another decision of the Court was not addressed in the opinion. • Do not file a petition for panel rehearing merely to reargue the case.

B. Purpose (Rehearing En Banc) • A party should seek en banc rehearing only if one or more of the following
grounds exist:

Post Judgment Form - Rev. 12/2018

1

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-2, Page 2 of 4
► Consideration by the full Court is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions; or
► The proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance; or ► The opinion directly conflicts with an existing opinion by another
court of appeals or the Supreme Court and substantially affects a rule of national application in which there is an overriding need for national uniformity.
(2) Deadlines for Filing: • A petition for rehearing may be filed within 14 days after entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1). • If the United States or an agency or officer thereof is a party in a civil case, the time for filing a petition for rehearing is 45 days after entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1). • If the mandate has issued, the petition for rehearing should be accompanied by a motion to recall the mandate. • See Advisory Note to 9th Cir. R. 40-1 (petitions must be received on the due date). • An order to publish a previously unpublished memorandum disposition extends the time to file a petition for rehearing to 14 days after the date of the order of publication or, in all civil cases in which the United States or an agency or officer thereof is a party, 45 days after the date of the order of publication. 9th Cir. R. 40-2.
(3) Statement of Counsel • A petition should contain an introduction stating that, in counsel’s judgment, one or more of the situations described in the “purpose” section above exist. The points to be raised must be stated clearly.
(4) Form & Number of Copies (9th Cir. R. 40-1; Fed. R. App. P. 32(c)(2)) • The petition shall not exceed 15 pages unless it complies with the alternative length limitations of 4,200 words or 390 lines of text. • The petition must be accompanied by a copy of the panel’s decision being challenged. • An answer, when ordered by the Court, shall comply with the same length limitations as the petition. • If a pro se litigant elects to file a form brief pursuant to Circuit Rule 28-1, a petition for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc need not comply with Fed. R. App. P. 32.

Post Judgment Form - Rev. 12/2018

2

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-2, Page 3 of 4
• The petition or answer must be accompanied by a Certificate of Compliance found at Form 11, available on our website at www.ca9.uscourts.gov under Forms.
• You may file a petition electronically via the appellate ECF system. No paper copies are required unless the Court orders otherwise. If you are a pro se litigant or an attorney exempted from using the appellate ECF system, file one original petition on paper. No additional paper copies are required unless the Court orders otherwise.
Bill of Costs (Fed. R. App. P. 39, 9th Cir. R. 39-1) • The Bill of Costs must be filed within 14 days after entry of judgment. • See Form 10 for additional information, available on our website at www.ca9.uscourts.gov under Forms.
Attorneys Fees • Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1 describes the content and due dates for attorneys fees applications. • All relevant forms are available on our website at www.ca9.uscourts.gov under Forms or by telephoning (415) 355-7806.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari • Please refer to the Rules of the United States Supreme Court at www.supremecourt.gov
Counsel Listing in Published Opinions • Please check counsel listing on the attached decision. • If there are any errors in a published opinion, please send a letter in writing within 10 days to: ► Thomson Reuters; 610 Opperman Drive; PO Box 64526; Eagan, MN 55123 (Attn: Jean Green, Senior Publications Coordinator); ► and electronically file a copy of the letter via the appellate ECF system by using “File Correspondence to Court,” or if you are an attorney exempted from using the appellate ECF system, mail the Court one copy of the letter.

Post Judgment Form - Rev. 12/2018

3

Case: 13-56371, 01/11/2019, ID: 11149418, DktEntry: 56-2, Page 4 of 4

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Form 10. Bill of Costs
Instructions for this form: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form10instructions.pdf
9th Cir. Case Number(s)
Case Name The Clerk is requested to award costs to (party name(s)):

I swear under penalty of perjury that the copies for which costs are requested were actually and necessarily produced, and that the requested costs were actually expended.

Signature

Date

(use “s/[typed name]” to sign electronically-filed documents)

COST TAXABLE DOCUMENTS / FEE PAID

REQUESTED (each column must be completed)

No. of Copies

Pages per Copy

Cost per Page

TOTAL COST

Excerpts of Record*

$

$

Principal Brief(s) (Opening Brief; Answering
Brief; 1st, 2nd , and/or 3rd Brief on Cross-Appeal; Intervenor Brief)

$

$

Reply Brief / Cross-Appeal Reply Brief

$

$

Supplemental Brief(s)

$

$

Petition for Review Docket Fee / Petition for Writ of Mandamus Docket Fee $

TOTAL: $

*Example: Calculate 4 copies of 3 volumes of excerpts of record that total 500 pages [Vol. 1 (10 pgs.) + Vol. 2 (250 pgs.) + Vol. 3 (240 pgs.)] as: No. of Copies: 4; Pages per Copy: 500; Cost per Page: $.10 (or actual cost IF less than $.10); TOTAL: 4 x 500 x $.10 = $200.
Feedback or questions about this form? Email us at forms@ca9.uscourts.gov

Form 10

Rev. 12/01/2018

 </s> Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 1 of 20
194,APPEAL,CLOSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division − Los Angeles)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08−cv−07169−JFW−AGR

Maurice P. Olivier v. Gloria Molina et al Assigned to: Judge John F. Walter Referred to: Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Case in other court: 9th CCA, 13−56371 Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 10/30/2008 Date Terminated: 07/18/2013 Jury Demand: Defendant Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Maurice Pierre Olivier

represented by Maurice Pierre Olivier CDC F−83603 Pleasant Valley State Prison D Yard Bldg. D−2 Cell 150 P O Box 2500 Coalinga, CA 93210 PRO SE

V. Defendant Gloria Molina Board of Supervisor, First District TERMINATED: 08/23/2010
Defendant Yvonne B. Burke Board of Supervisor, Second District TERMINATED: 08/23/2010 Defendant Zey Yaroslavsky Board of Supervisor, Third District TERMINATED: 08/23/2010
Defendant Don Knabe Board of Supervisor, Fouth District

represented by Paul B Beach Lawrence Beach Allen and Choi PC 100 West Broadway Suite 1200 Glendale, CA 91210−1219 818−545−1925 Fax: 818−545−1937 Email: pbeach@lbaclaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Daniel Lee Lawrence Beach Allen and Choi PC 100 West Broadway Suite 1200 Glendale, CA 91210−1219 818−545−1925 Fax: 818−545−1937 Email: dlee@lbaclaw.com TERMINATED: 01/04/2017
represented by Paul B Beach (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Daniel Lee (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/04/2017
represented by Paul B Beach (See above for address)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 2 of 20

TERMINATED: 08/23/2010

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Lee (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/04/2017

Defendant
Michael D. Antonovich Board of Supervisor, Fifth District TERMINATED: 08/23/2010

represented by Paul B Beach (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Lee (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/04/2017

Defendant
LeRoy Baca Los Angeles County Sheriff of Custody Operations

represented by Paul B Beach (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Alexandra B Zuiderweg Office of the County Counsel 211 West Temple Street 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 213−229−3097 Fax: 323−415−3307 Email: azuiderweg@counsel.lacounty.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Lee (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/04/2017

Defendant
Policarpio F. Enriquez Medical Doctor L.A. City Central Jail TERMINATED: 08/23/2010

represented by Paul B Beach (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Daniel Lee (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/04/2017

Date Filed 10/30/2008
10/30/2008
11/07/2008

# Docket Text
LODGED COMPLAINT forwarded to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson. Complaint sought to be filed by Plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (ghap) (Entered: 11/04/2008)
1 REQUEST to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (Attachments: # 1 Lodged face page of Complaint)(ghap) (Entered: 11/04/2008)
2 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson: GRANTING re REQUEST to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees, Declaration in Support 1 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, accordance with 28 USC Section 1915, the prisoner−plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $2.40 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this is filed. Failure to remit the initial partial filing fee may be result in dismissal of your case. Thereafter, monthly

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 3 of 20

11/07/2008 11/07/2008 11/17/2008 11/20/2008 12/03/2008
12/30/2008 01/30/2009 02/20/2009 03/24/2009
04/13/2009 04/30/2009 07/14/2009 07/21/2009

payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with 28 USC Section 1915. (et) (Entered: 11/10/2008)
3 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Gloria Molina, Yvonne B. Burke, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson. (Filing fee: IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED.), filed by Plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (et) (Entered: 11/10/2008)
4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson. (et) (Entered: 11/10/2008)
5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (ca) (Entered: 11/21/2008)
6 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson, ORDERING Motion requesting court filed documents and summons submitted by Plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier received on 11/17/2008 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: requesting documents not related to the above case number. (ca) (Entered: 11/21/2008)
7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (filedNovember 17, 2008) by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson: The Court has received plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 5 . The plaintiffsmotion is DENIED. The Court has very little ability to appoint counsel in civil rights matters except in "exceptional circumstances. Moreover, the Court does not have the ability to provide for payment to any attorney who might be willing to represent plaintiff. Plaintiff should consider what other alternatives he has to assist him in prosecuting this case. (ca) (Entered: 12/08/2008)
8 OBJECTION to Magistrate's Order Denying Appointment of Counsel 7 , filed by Plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (ag) (Entered: 12/30/2008)
9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson. (ca) (Entered: 02/02/2009)
10 MOTION SHOWING CAUSE filed by Plaintiff Maurice P. Olivierto Order to Show Cause, 9 . (ca) (Entered: 02/20/2009)
11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) PLAINTIFFS MOTION SHOWING CAUSE (filed February 20, 2009) by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson: The Court hereby vacates its Order to Show Cause re Dismissal For Failure to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee. Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional forty−five (45) days from the date of this order to make an initial payment of $2.40. Thereafter, plaintiff shall monthly pay 20 percent of the preceding monthly income credited to [plaintiffs] account. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The Court hereby directs the California Department of Corrections to forward payments from [plaintiff Maurice P. Oliviers] account to the Clerk of this Court each time the account in plaintiff Oliviers [trust fund] account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, re: Motion 10 . (ca) (Entered: 03/24/2009)
12 Motion Requesting Confirmation of Receiving Initial Filing Fee Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (b)(1) filed by Plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (ag) (Entered: 04/13/2009)
13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) PLAINTIFFS MOTION REQUESTING CONFIRMATION OF RECEIVING INITIAL FILING FEE (filed April 13, 2009) by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson: Plaintiff is advised that his initial partial filing fee of $2.40 was received on February 19, 2009, re: REQUEST 12 . (ca) (Entered: 05/01/2009)
14 ORDER OF THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE − OCMJ# 09−063 by Acting Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Due to the Resignation of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson, this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. All documents subsequently filed shall bear this new case designation CV 08−07169 JFW(AGR). (sn) (Entered: 07/16/2009)
Proposed MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson.

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 4 of 20

07/21/2009 08/12/2009 09/02/2009
09/02/2009
09/02/2009 09/04/2009 09/08/2009 09/17/2009 09/17/2009 09/17/2009 09/18/2009 09/21/2009

Re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) 3 . Approved by the District Judge.(ag) (Entered: 07/22/2009)
15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 3 by District Judge John F. Walter. (ag). (Entered: 07/22/2009)
16 FIRST AMENDED CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against defendants Gloria Molina, Yvonne B. Burke, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 , filed by plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (ca) (Entered: 08/13/2009)
17 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re First Amended Complaint, 16 . Pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Marshal is directed to proceed with service of process upon the defendant(s) named below only without prepayment of costs, until further order of the Court. A copy of this Order shall be served with the summons and complaint. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants are directed to respond to the complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mp) (Entered: 09/03/2009)
18 ORDER RE: SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF'S MAILING ADDRESS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re First Amended Complaint, 16 . The Court having reviewed plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed on August 12, 2009, IT IS ORDERED THAT: No later than November 2, 2009, plaintiff shall file with the Clerk of Court a Notice of Submission indicating that all required documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal for service of the Complaint. If plaintiff does not file the Notice of Submission by November 2, 2009, his action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice. No later than October 19, 2009, plaintiff shall serve and file with the court a Notice of Current Address which shall set forth plaintiff's current mailing address. The United States Marshal is ordered to serve the summons and complaint, as indicated on the attached Order Directing Service of Process by the United States Marshal filed on September 2, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Submission of Documents to United States Marshal) (mp) (Entered: 09/03/2009)
20 DAY DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint, 16 as to Defendants Gloria Molina, Yvonne B. Burke, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez. (mp) (Entered: 09/03/2009)
PROPOSED ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING ON MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL issued by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(mp) (Entered: 09/04/2009)
19 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING ON MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL by Judge John F. Walter, re Objections − non−motion 8 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 09/10/2009)
20 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS TO UNITED STATES MARSHAL filed by plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (ag) (Entered: 09/17/2009)
21 NOTICE OF CURRENT ADDRESS filed by plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier.(ag) (Entered: 09/17/2009)
22 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1), filed by plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier. (ag) (Entered: 09/17/2009)
23 (IN CHAMBERS): APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 22 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. ***See document for further details*** (ag) (Entered: 09/18/2009)
24 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Board of Supervisor − Gloria Molina served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon Ernestina Rhind. Remarks: P/S 9/16. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 5 of 20

09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 09/21/2009 10/05/2009
10/06/2009

25 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Board of Supervisor, Zey Yaroslavsky served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon Ernestine Rhind, Deputy Clerk. Remarks: P/S 9/16. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
26 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Board of Supervisore − Don Knabe served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon Ernestina Rhind, Deputy Clerk. Remarks: P/S/ 9/16. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
27 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Board of Supervisor − Michael D. Antonovich served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon Ernestina Rhind, Deputy Clerk. Remarks: P/S 9/16. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
28 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Los Angeles County Sheriff − LeRoy Baca served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon Denise Dougherty (OAZ). Remarks: P/S 9/16. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
29 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Michael D. Antonovich answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon (not indicated). Remarks: none. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
30 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon LeRoy Baca served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009 served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon (not indicated). Remarks: none. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
31 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Policarpio F. Enriquez served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon (not indicated). Remarks: none. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
32 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Don Knabe served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009 served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon (not indicated). Remarks: none. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
33 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Zey Yaroslavsky served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon (not indicated). Remarks: none. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
34 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons and Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 upon Gloria Molina served on 9/16/2009, answer due 10/6/2009, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon (not indicated). Remarks: none. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
35 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons unexecuted re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 for Yvonne B. Burke. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
36 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM−285) of summons unexecuted re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 3 for Board of Supervisor − Yvonne B. Burke. (ca) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
37 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extend Time to File Answer to 11/9/2009 re Amended Complaint, 16 filed by DEFENDANTS Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A TO DANIEL LEE DECLARATION, # 2 Proposed Order)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 10/05/2009)
38 ORDER GRANTING Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Answer 37 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: IT IS ORDERED that Defendants have until November 9, 2009, to respond to Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier's First Amended Complaint. (ca) (Entered: 10/06/2009)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 6 of 20

11/09/2009 11/10/2009
11/10/2009
12/10/2009 12/10/2009 12/10/2009 12/10/2009 01/08/2010 01/19/2010

39 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by DEFENDANTS Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez. Motion set for hearing on 12/8/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 11/09/2009)
40 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT and NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OF THEREQUIREMENTS OF AN UNENUMERATED MOTION UNDER FEDERAL RULE 12(b) by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO YOU BY THE COURT. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. On November 9, 2009, defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss by which they seek to have your case dismissed on the ground that you failed to exhaust your administrative remedies. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies is subject to an unenumerated Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) motion. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir.), cert. denied,540 U.S. 810 (2003). DEADLINES: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his opposition to defendants motion to dismiss no later than December 9, 2009. Defendants are ORDERED to serve and file a reply no later than January 8, 2010. The Court will take the motion under submission without oral argument as of the date defendants reply is due. See order for details. (Attachments: # 1 Local Rule 12) (ca) (Entered: 11/10/2009)
41 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Paul B Beach counsel for Defendants Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez. Adding Paul B Beach as attorney as counsel of record for Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, Policarpio Enriques for the reason indicated in the G−06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Gloria Molina, Zev Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, Policarpio Enriquez (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 11/10/2009)
42 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, ORDERING 1. Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories to Kevin Kelly; 2. Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents (Seven Requests) submitted by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier received on December 10, 2009 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Discovery is not to be filed with the Court. (Attachments: # 1 Discovery by Plaintiff) (mp) (Entered: 12/11/2009)
43 NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Pursuant to Title 28 Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 201(b) in support of plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (ca) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
44 MOTION in OPPOSITION to Motion to Dismiss COMPLAINT Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1997e(a), Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), 39 filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (ca) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
45 MOTION requesting subpoenas to attach with subpoena duces tecums filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (ca) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
46 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 39 filed by Defendants Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 01/08/2010)
47 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting 45 Motion for Subpoenas. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS. Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with three Subpoenas to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or their equivalent, sign and date the subpoenas in the appropriate boxes, and complete the case caption at the top of the subpoenas. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. On or before February 26, 2010, Plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition that includes any additional evidence related to exhaustion. 2. On or before January 29, 2010, Defendants shall file a supplemental brief that further explains the exhaustion process at the Los Angeles County Jail. 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the court will take the motion to dismiss under submissionon the date Plaintiff's supplemental brief is due. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 01/19/2010)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 7 of 20

01/29/2010 02/03/2010 02/03/2010 02/05/2010 02/08/2010
02/17/2010 02/24/2010 02/24/2010 03/02/2010 03/02/2010 03/02/2010 03/05/2010 03/08/2010 03/08/2010 03/09/2010
03/11/2010

48 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 39 filed by Defendants Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky, Don Knabe, Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 01/29/2010)
49 Affidavit for Subpoea Duces Tecum issued as to ACLU/SE Jaels Project Coordinator/Custodian of Records. (es) (Entered: 02/08/2010)
50 Affidavit for Subpoena Duces Tecum issued as to Yagman & Yagman & Reichman/ Custodian of Records. (es) (Entered: 02/08/2010)
51 AFFIDAVIT FOR SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM IN A CIVIL CASE issued as to U.S. Department of Justice. (mp) (Entered: 02/08/2010)
52 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S SUBPOENAS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: re: Subpoena (AO 88) Issued 51 , Subpoena (AO 88) Issued 49 , Subpoena (AO 88) Issued 50 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff notify the subpoenaed parties as soon as possible that the documents shall be produced ONLY to Plaintiff, and NOT to the Court. Pursuant to this court's order dated January 19, 2010, Plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition that includes any additional evidence related to exhaustion on or before February 26, 2010. If Plaintiff does not file a timely supplemental opposition, the court will decide the motion to dismiss based on the papers in the record. (See Order for details) (mp) (Entered: 02/08/2010)
53 Supplemental Motion in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. Rule 803(6)d the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act 39 filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
54 MOTION Requesting Order to Comply Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 45(e) filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
55 MOTION Requesting Extension of Time filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
56 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg 54 . The Custodian of Records is ORDERED, on or before March 16, 2010, to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's motion. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 03/02/2010)
57 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting 55 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition on or before April 1, 2010. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 03/02/2010)
70 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier, served on 3/24/10 by mail. (se) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
59 NOTICE OF MOTION SHOWING RE MAILING OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 03/08/2010)
58 RESPONSE OF CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR YAGMAN & YAGMAN & REICHMANN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Custodian of Record for Yagman & Yageman & Reichmann 56 (mp) (Entered: 03/08/2010)
61 MOTION Requesting Order for to Comply Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(c) filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
60 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RE YAGMAN & YAGMAN & REICHMANN 54 . On March 8, 2010, the Custodian (Attorney Marion Yagman) filed a response and an accompanying declaration. According to the Custodian, due to a clerical error, the subpoena was not brought to her attention. She did not learn of the subpoena until receiving the Court's March 2 order. On March 4, 2010, she mailed to Plaintiff "copies of the complete contents of the file maintained for Mr. Olivier." Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED as moot. (mp) (Entered: 03/10/2010)
62 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE of Custodian of Records for Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann to Order to Show Cause filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivierto 56 (es)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 8 of 20

03/17/2010
03/23/2010 03/23/2010 03/24/2010
03/26/2010 03/26/2010 03/26/2010 04/01/2010
04/05/2010 04/07/2010 04/13/2010 04/13/2010
04/19/2010
06/01/2010

(Entered: 03/12/2010)
63 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SUBPOENA by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 61 Motion for Order. The documents Plaintiff seeks from the Civil Rights Division are unrelated to the exhaustion issue. At this stage of the proceedings there is a pending motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff's renewing the motion if the Court denies the motion to dismiss. (See Order for details) (mp) (Entered: 03/17/2010)
64 MOTION Requesting an Extension of Time filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 03/24/2010)
65 MOTION for Order to Comply Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 45(e) filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 03/24/2010)
66 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting 64 Motion for Extension of Time. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RE ACLU SUBPOENA AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Plaintiff is ORDERED, on or before April 8, 2010, to file a declaration indicating whether the documents requested in Category No. 4 relate to the exhaustion issue and,if so, how. Also on March 23, 2010, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file his supplemental opposition. Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. Plaintiff may have until April 29, 2010, to file a supplemental opposition. (mp) (Entered: 03/24/2010)
67 OBJECTIONS to Magistrate Judge's Order Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(a) filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 03/26/2010)
68 SUPPLEMENTAL Motion in Opposition Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 45(a)(1) filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 03/26/2010)
69 (STRICKEN PER NOTICE DATED APRIL 13, 2010)OBJECTIONS to Magistrate Judge's Order on Motion for Order 63 filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (se) Modified on 4/13/2010 (mp). (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/13/2010: # 1 Document Stricken) (mp). (Entered: 03/30/2010)
71 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: ORDER OVERRULING Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order 67 Pursuant to FRCP 72(a), the Court has reviewed the plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge's Order filed 3/17/2010 [Dkt. No. 63]. The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and overrules plaintiff's objections. (jp) (Entered: 04/01/2010)
72 OBJECTIONS to Magistrate Judge's Order Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(a) filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 04/06/2010)
73 DECLARATION of Maurice P. Olivier re Order on Motion for Extension of Time 66 filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 04/07/2010)
74 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: Objections − non−motion 69 . Duplicate entry due to clerical error. Document Number 69 is stricken. (mp) (Entered: 04/13/2010)
75 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, ORDERING Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. R. 72(a) submitted by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier received on April 12, 2010 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Duplicate filing. The same document was received and filed on April 5, 2010. (Attachments: # 1 Objection) (mp) (Entered: 04/13/2010)
76 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 65 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RE ACLU SUBPOENA. Plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 65) is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff's renewing the motion if the Court denies the motion to dismiss. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
77 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2010. A party may respond to another party's Objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 9 of 20

06/01/2010
06/24/2010 06/24/2010 07/06/2010
07/08/2010 07/20/2010 07/22/2010
07/26/2010 07/27/2010
08/09/2010

Objections. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge) (mp) (Entered: 06/01/2010)
78 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Re MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 39 . The Court submits this Report and Recommendation to the Honorable John F. Walter, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order No. 05−07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons set forth below, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint be granted in part and denied in part. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 06/01/2010)
79 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued) 78 filed by DEFENDANTS Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Policarpio F. Enriquez, Don Knabe, Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − C)(Allen, Matthew) (Entered: 06/24/2010)
80 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation 78 filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier.(es) (Entered: 06/25/2010)
81 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is adopted; (2) Defendants' unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion based on failure to exhaust remedies is granted in part and denied in part; (3) Claim Three is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (4) Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted in part and denied in part; (5) Defendants Molina, Burke, Yaroslavsky, Knabe, and Antonovich are dismissed; and (6) Claim Two is dismissed with leave to amend solely to allege a claim against Sheriff Leroy Baca in his individual and/or official capacity. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 days after the date of this order. 39 (es) (Entered: 07/08/2010)
82 REPLY TO OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued) 78 filed by DEFENDANTS Michael D. Antonovich, LeRoy Baca, Yvonne B. Burke, Policarpio F. Enriquez, Don Knabe, Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky.(Allen, Matthew) (Entered: 07/08/2010)
83 MOTION to Compel Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 45(e) filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
84 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re: MOTION to Compel Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 45(e) 83 . PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RE ACLU SUBPOENA. The ACLU of Southern California is ORDERED, on or before August 6, 2010, to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's motion to compel. Alternatively, the ACLU may produce all the documents to Plaintiff at Calipatria State Prison, CDC F−83603, Building D−5 #131, P.O.Box 5002, Calipatria, CA 92233. Despite the directions in the subpoena, the ACLU should not produce the subpoenaed documents to this Court. If the ACLU chooses to comply with the subpoena, it shall, on or before August 6, 2010, file and serve a Notice that it has done so. (mp) (Entered: 07/22/2010)
85 MOTION for Extension of Time and Copy of First Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (es) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
86 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting 85 Motion for Extension of Time. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND A COPY OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's "Motion Requesting Extension of Time and Copy of First Amended Complaint" filed on July 26, 2010. Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is due no later than September 7, 2010. The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of his First Amended Complaint. (mp) (Entered: 07/28/2010)
87 NOTICE of Compliance filed by Third Party Filer (se) (Entered: 08/10/2010)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 10 of 20

08/23/2010 08/23/2010 08/25/2010
08/26/2010
09/14/2010 09/24/2010 09/24/2010 09/27/2010 09/27/2010
10/08/2010 11/24/2010 11/29/2010

88 MOTION REQUESTING RE−ISSUANCE OF ORDER TO COMPEL filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 08/24/2010)
89 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Leroy Baca; Party Policarpio F. Enriquez, Don Knabe, Gloria Molina, Zey Yaroslavsky, Michael D. Antonovich and Yvonne B. Burke terminated amending First Amended Complaint, 16 ,filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier (mp) (Entered: 08/24/2010)
90 IN CHAMBERS: SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Plaintiff was correct not to name the dismissed defendants in the SAC. Plaintiff was also correct not to allege dismissed Claim Three. However, Plaintiff did not reallege Claim One. In addition, Plaintiff must state a request for relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(3). Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a corrected SAC on or before September 16, 2010. ***See Order for further, important, details*** (ag) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
91 IN CHAMBERS: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RE ACLU SUBPOENA by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Accordingly, the ACLU of Southern California is ORDERED, on or before September 9, 2010, to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's motion to compel. Alternatively, the ACLU may produce the following documents to Plaintiff: (1) the documents described in Categories 1, 3, and 4; and (2) any additional responsive documents described in Category 2 (through August 2007). If the ACLU chooses to comply with the subpoena, it shall, on or before September 9, 2010, file and serve a Notice of Compliance that it has done so. ***See Order for further details*** (ag) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
92 CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant LeRoy Baca correcting Amended Complaint, 89 , filed by plaintiff Maurice P Olivier (es) (Entered: 09/15/2010)
93 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Corrected Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. Motion set for hearing on 10/26/2010 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 09/24/2010)
95 NOTICE of Compliance filed by ACLU of Southern California, Third Party Filer. (es) (Entered: 09/27/2010)
94 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg ORDERING ThirdParty filer Notice of Compliance submitted by ThirdParty ACLU of Southern California received on 9/245/10 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (es) (Entered: 09/27/2010)
96 ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT and NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OF THEREQUIREMENTS OF AN UNENUMERATED MOTION UNDER FEDERAL RULE 12(b) by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO YOU BY THE COURT. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. On September 24, 2010, defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss by which they seek to have your case dismissed on the ground that you failed to exhaust your administrative remedies. 93 Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss no later than October 25, 2010. Defendants are ORDERED to serve and file a reply no later than November 24, 2010. The Court will take the motion under submission without oral argument as of the date defendants' reply is due. (See attached order for further details.) (Attachments: # 1 F.R.C.P. Rule 12) (es) (Entered: 09/28/2010)
97 MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CASE PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1997 (c)(a) AND FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Corrected Second Amended Complaint 93 filed by Plaintiff Maurice P Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 10/13/2010)
98 REPLY in support of MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Corrected Second Amended Complaint 93 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 11/24/2010)
99 DECLARATION of Dawn Abarca in support of MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Corrected Second Amended Complaint 93 and Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition 98 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 11/29/2010)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 11 of 20

12/22/2010 01/11/2011 02/03/2011 03/11/2011 03/24/2011 07/14/2011
07/15/2011
07/28/2011 07/28/2011 08/01/2011 08/08/2011 08/10/2011 08/10/2011
08/15/2011

100 NOTICE of Change of address Changing plaintiff address to California Training Facility, P O Box 686, Soledad, CA 93960−0686 Filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (es) (Entered: 01/04/2011)
101 NOTICE of Change of address Changing address to CTF State Prison, Rainier Hall #311U, P O Box 705, Soledad, CA 93960−0705. Filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (es) (Entered: 01/13/2011)
102 MOTION REQUESTING STATUS OF COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P 7(b)(1) filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 02/07/2011)
103 SECOND Request for Status of Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b)(1) filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (es) (Entered: 03/15/2011)
104 MOTION REQUESTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 636 & FED.R.CIV.P. 41(b)filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 03/30/2011)
105 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Re MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Corrected Second Amended Complaint 93 . The Court submits this Report and Recommendation to the Honorable John F. Walter, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order No. 05−07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons set forth below, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be granted in part and denied in part. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 07/15/2011)
106 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Objections to R&R due by 8/8/2011. A party may respond to another party's Objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Objections. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (mp) (Entered: 07/15/2011)
107 MOTION Requesting Order Compelling Disclosure or Discovery and Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 37(A)(1) and (c)(1)(A) filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (es) Modified on 8/1/2011 (es). (Entered: 08/01/2011)
108 Certification Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 37(a)(2)(A)(B) filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (es) (Entered: 08/01/2011)
109 OBJECTIONS W/EXHIBITS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED 7/15/11 to Report and Recommendation (Issued) 105 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier.(mp) (Entered: 08/03/2011)
110 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued) 105 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca.(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 08/08/2011)
111 REPLY TO OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued) 105 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Objections) (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 08/10/2011)
112 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 102 Motion for Order; denying 103 Request for Order; denying 104 Motion for Order. PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS. On February 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the "status" of his complaint. On March 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed a second motion requesting status. On March 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion asking whether a Report and Recommendation had been filed. On July 14, 2011,a Report and Recommendation was filed. (Dkt. No. 105.)Accordingly, Plaintiff's three motions (Dkt. Nos. 102−104) are DENIED as moot. (mp) (Entered: 08/10/2011)
113 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 105 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 12 of 20

08/17/2011 08/19/2011 08/22/2011 08/22/2011
08/30/2011 08/31/2011
09/12/2011 09/23/2011 10/04/2011
10/06/2011

engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the parties have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is adopted; (2) Defendant's unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion based on failure to exhaust remedies is granted in part and denied in part; (3) Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted in part and denied in part; (4) Claim Two with respect to cell infestation other than lice is dismissed without prejudice; (5) Defendant Baca in his individual capacity in Claim Two is dismissed with prejudice; (6) both claims based on the Fifth Amendment are dismissed with prejudice; (7) both claims based on the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners are dismissed with prejudice; and (8) the failure to train claim with respect to Claim Two is dismissed with prejudice. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 08/16/2011)
114 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(E)(1) filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (es) (Entered: 08/18/2011)
117 REPLY TO OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued) 105 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier.(mp) (Entered: 08/23/2011)
115 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 114 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. PLAINTIFF'S THIRD REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Plaintiff's Motion (Dkt. No. 114) is DENIED without prejudice. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 08/22/2011)
116 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: re: MOTION to Compel or Discovery and Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 27(A)(1) and (c)(1)(A) 107 . On July 28, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Defendant to make further responses to Plaintiff's discovery requests. Defendant is ORDERED to file an opposition on or before September 12, 2011. If Plaintiff wishes to file a reply, he must do so within two weeks of the filing of Defendant's opposition. The Court will take the matter under submission on the date Plaintiff files his reply or on the date it is due, whichever is sooner. (mp) (Entered: 08/22/2011)
118 ANSWER to Corrected Complaint 92 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca.(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
119 ORDER RE DISCOVERY AND MOTIONS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re Corrected Complaint 92 . All discovery shall be completed on or before March 30, 2012. No discovery may be taken after that date without the prior approval of the Court. Any motion challenging the adequacy of a discovery response, or seeking an order compelling further discovery, shall be filed and served not later than ten (10) calendar days after the discovery cut−off date. The Court expects the parties to resolve discovery problems among themselves whenever possible. Each party shall file and serve a status report on or before November 30, 2011. Any motions directed to the Court's jurisdiction or to the merits of any claim or defense(such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment) shall be filed and served not later than April 30, 2012. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 08/31/2011)
120 OPPOSITION to re: MOTION to Compel or Discovery and Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 27(A)(1) and (c)(1)(A) 107 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A−B, Nos. 18−83, # 2 Exhibit B−D, Nos. 84−150)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 09/12/2011)
121 REPLY to Defendant's Opposition Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7(a) 107 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (es) (Entered: 09/27/2011)
122 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 107 Motion to Compel. On July 28, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Defendant to make further responses to Plaintiff's requests for production of documents. On September 12, 2011, Defendant filed an opposition. On September 23, 2011, Plaintiff filed a reply. As explained above, Plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 107) is DENIED. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is also DENIED. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 10/05/2011)
123 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to take Plaintiff Maurice Olivier's deposition filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 10/06/2011)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 13 of 20

10/07/2011
11/10/2011 11/15/2011
11/21/2011 11/30/2011 01/11/2012 01/13/2012 01/13/2012 01/18/2012
01/18/2012
02/15/2012 02/15/2012 02/15/2012 02/21/2012

124 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE PLAINTIFF MAURICE OLIVIERS DEPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, RE: 123 Ex Parte Application for Leave. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Application is hereby granted; 2. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 30(a)(2) and(b)(4), Defendant is granted leave to take the oral deposition of Plaintiff Maurice Olivier who is currently in custody at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, California, with Plaintiff to be provided at least ten (10) calendar days notice of the date of the deposition. (gr) (Entered: 10/07/2011)
125 MOTION REQUESTING ORDER TO PRODUCE TRANSCRIPT OF DEPOSITION PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P.30(e) filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (gr) (Entered: 11/14/2011)
126 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 125 Motion for Order. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT. On October 7, 2011, the court granted Defendants' request to take Plaintiff's deposition. On November 10, 2011, Plaintiff filed a request for an order to produce a transcript of his deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(e). Plaintiff does not indicate that his deposition has been taken or, if it has, that he requested a transcript. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED without prejudice. (mp) (Entered: 11/15/2011)
127 PLAINTIFF'S COURT ORDERED STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 11/23/2011)
128 STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 11/30/2011)
129 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Appoint Expert Witnesses filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (gr) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
131 NOTICE OF MOTION Requesting Certified Copy of Court Granting IFP Status filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (gr) (Entered: 01/19/2012)
132 MOTION REQUESTING Third Party Subpoenas filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (gr) (Entered: 01/19/2012)
130 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APPOINT EXPERTS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Fed. R. Evid. 706. Plaintiff states he needs a jail classification expert and a constitutional law expert. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion to appoint expert witnesses is DENIED without prejudice. 129 [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS] (gr) (Entered: 01/18/2012)
133 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER: PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On November 7, 2008, former Magistrate Judge Johnson granted Plaintiff's IFP request. (Dkt. No. 2.) Plaintiff states he lost his copy during a prison transfer in 2010. Plaintiff's IFP Request (Dkt. No. 132) is GRANTED. Fed R. Civ. P. 45(a)(3) states that a "clerk must issue a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party who requests it." Plaintiff's Subpoena Request (Dkt. No. 132) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED (1) to send Plaintiff a copy of Dkt. No. 2 and (2) to issue and send Plaintiff two Subpoenas to Produce Documents (Form AO 88B). 131 132 (gr) (Entered: 01/19/2012)
134 NOTICE OF MOTION REQUESTING WAIVER OF WITNESS FEES & TRAVEL ALLOWANCES filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (gr) (Entered: 02/21/2012)
135 Notice of and REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (gr) (Entered: 02/22/2012)
136 MOTION REQUESTING U.S. MARSHALS SERVE SUBPOENAS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1915[a] filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 02/23/2012)
137 NOTICE OF MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 7(b) − NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 02/23/2012)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 14 of 20

02/21/2012 02/21/2012 02/23/2012
02/23/2012
02/23/2012
02/23/2012 02/24/2012 02/24/2012 02/24/2012 02/24/2012 02/28/2012
02/29/2012

138 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 02/23/2012)
139 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL 138 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (mp). (Entered: 02/23/2012)
140 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 134 Motion to Waive; denying 136 Motion for Order. On February 15, 2012, Plaintiff filed a request for the U.S. Marshal to serve subpoenas(Service Request), a request for judicial notice (Judicial Notice Request), and a request for waiver of witness fees and travel allowances (Witness Fees Request). The Service Request (Dkt. No. 136) is DENIED without prejudice aspremature. The Judicial Notice Request (Dkt. No. 135) is DENIED. TheWitness Fees Request (Dkt. No. 134) is DENIED without prejudice as premature. (See Order for details) (mp) (Entered: 02/23/2012)
141 ****** STRICKEN PER NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR DATED 2/24/2012 ***** MINUTES OF MOTION HEARING RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR HEARING APPLICATION AND HEARING FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT held before Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The Court questions the parties and hears oral arguments. Supplemental evidence must be filed on or before March 2, 2012. The matter will be taken under submission on that date.Court Recorder: CS 2/23/2012. (mp) Modified on 2/24/2012 (mp). (Entered: 02/23/2012)
143 ***** STRICKEN PER NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR DATED 2/24/2012 ****** MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. MOTION FOR HEARING APPLICATION AND HEARING FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT. Case is called. Counsel state their appearances. Matthew T. Bechtel, Esq. appears on behalf of Plaintiffs. Van Allyn Goodwin, Esq. appears telephonically on behalf of Defendant. The Court questions the parties and hears oral arguments. Supplemental evidence must be filed on or before March 2, 2012. The matter will be taken under submission on that date.Court Recorder: CS 2/23/2012. (mp) Modified on 2/24/2012 (mp). (Entered: 02/24/2012)
146 MOTION REQUESTING HOUSING IN FEDERAL METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 5003 & 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4042 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 02/27/2012)
142 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR. Due to clerical error Document No. 141 is stricken. The Minute Order was processed in the wrong case. 141 (mp) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
144 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re: MOTION to Compel Discovery 138 . On February 21, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. Defendant is ORDERED to file a response to the motion to compel on or before March 9, 2012. If Plaintiff wishes to file a reply, he must do so within 14 days of the date of service of Defendant's opposition. (mp) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
145 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR. Due to clerical error Document No. 143 is stricken. The Minute Order was processed in the wrong case. 143 (mp) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
147 MOTION REQUESTING CLERK OF COURT SERVE SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO FED.R.P.RULES 5, 11, & 45(c)92)(A) filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 02/27/2012)
148 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 146 Motion for Order. PLAINTIFF'S HOUSING REQUEST. On February 23, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that he be housed at the Metropolitan Detention Center instead of the Los Angeles County Jail during his "up comingCivil Trial." Plaintiff's request (Dkt. No. 146) is DENIED without prejudice. No trial date has been set in this matter. (mp) (Entered: 02/28/2012)
149 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: re: MOTION for Order 147 . PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL. On February 24, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document entitled "Motion Requesting Clerk of Court Serve Subpoena Pursuant to Fed. R. P. Rules 5. 11. & 45(c)(2)(A)" ("Motion to

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 15 of 20

03/01/2012 03/01/2012 03/05/2012 03/05/2012 03/06/2012
03/08/2012 03/09/2012
03/12/2012
03/22/2012 03/22/2012 03/28/2012 03/29/2012
03/30/2012

Compel"),which the court construes as a motion to compel. The Custodian is ORDERED to file a response to the Motion to Compel on or before March 16, 2012. (mp) (Entered: 02/29/2012)
150 MOTION REQUESTING ORDER TO COMPLY PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. RULE 45(e) filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (san) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
155 Plaintiff's Response to Objections Received on 02/23/12 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 03/12/2012)
151 **** STRICKEN PER NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR DATED 4/27/2012 AND RE−DOCKETED AS A RESPONSE TO DKT. NO. 149. REFER TO DKT NO. 165 ***** OPPOSITION Re:MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Defendant Gloria Molina. 138 (gr) Modified on 4/27/2012 (mp). (Entered: 03/08/2012)
165 RESPONSE to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive − no proceeding held, 149 filed by Yagman & Reichmann. (mp) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
153 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenbergre: MOTION to Produce documents pursuant to FRCP 45(a)(3) 150 . PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL. On March 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document entitled "Motion Requesting Order to Comply Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 45[e]" (Motion to Compel), which the court construes as a motion to compel. According to Plaintiff, he served by mail a subpoena for production of documents on January 29, 2012, on the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to produce documents described in an attached affidavit. The Office of the County Counsel is ORDERED to file a response to the Motion to Compel on or before March 22, 2012. (mp) (Entered: 03/08/2012)
152 Opposition re: MOTION to Compel Discovery MOTION for Discovery 138 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 03/08/2012)
154 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. YAGMAN & REICHMANN'S RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the United States Marshal is ORDERED to serve the attached subpoena and a copy of this minute order on Yagman & Reichman. The return date on the subpoena is MODIFIED to be two weeks after the date of service of the subpoena. (See Order for details.) (Attachments: # 1 Subpoena) (mp) (Entered: 03/09/2012)
156 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 155 Request for Order. On March 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document entitled "Plaintiff's response to Objections Received on 02/12/12" (Request). Plaintiff's request (Dkt. No. 155) is DENIED without prejudice. Discovery is served on the parties, not filed with the court. There is nothing currently before the court for it to disregard. (mp) (Entered: 03/12/2012)
157 OPPOSITION to re: MOTION to Produce documents pursuant to FRCP 45(a)(3) 150 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 03/22/2012)
158 SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE issued to Law Firm of Yagman and Reichman was served upon Receptionist on 3/13/2012 by personal service service. RE: Subpoena (AO 88) Issued 154 . (gr) (Entered: 03/23/2012)
159 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Plaintiff's Further Responses to First Set and Second Set of Written Discovery filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. Motion set for hearing on 5/1/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 03/28/2012)
160 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re: MOTION to Compel Plaintiff's Further Responses to First Set and Second Set of Written Discovery 159 . On March 28, 2012, Defendant filed a motion to compel. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to the motion to compel on or before April 30, 2012. If Defendant wishes to file a reply, he must do so within 14 days of the date of service of Plaintiff's opposition. The hearing set for May 1, 2012 is VACATED. (mp) (Entered: 03/29/2012)
161 RESPONSE from the Law Offices of Yagman & Reichmann to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive − no proceeding held, 154 . (mp) (Entered: 04/02/2012)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 16 of 20

04/02/2012 04/12/2012
04/27/2012
04/30/2012 04/30/2012 04/30/2012 04/30/2012 05/02/2012
05/10/2012 05/31/2012 05/31/2012 05/31/2012 05/31/2012 05/31/2012

162 Correspondence from the Law Offices of Yagman & Reichman to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive − no proceeding held, 154 . (mp) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
163 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On February 24, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document that the court construed as a motion to compel the law firm Yagman & Reichmann to produce documents. Because the Marshal did not serve Yagman & Reichmann until March 20, 2012 (the return date was April 3, 2012), Plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 147) is premature and is DENIED without prejudice. 147 [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS] (gr) (Entered: 04/12/2012)
164 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 151 . Due to clerical error Dkt. No. 151 was incorrectly linked to Dkt. No. 138. Dkt. No. 151 is not an opposition to motion to compel it is a response to the minute order dated February 29, 2012, Dkt. No. 149. Dkt. No. 151 is stricken and re−docketed as a response to minute order dated February 29, 2012, Dkt. No. 149 by Yagman & Reichmann. (mp) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
166 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Attachments: # 1 Separate Statement, # 2 Proposed Order)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 04/30/2012)
167 DECLARATION of Christina Shilinga, Adam Kennedy and Daniel Lee in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 and Exhibits A−J filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 04/30/2012)
168 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION to Defendant's MOTION to Compel & Memorandum Of Points & authorities filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. 159 (gr) (Entered: 05/01/2012)
169 MOTION REQUESTING COURT Required Documents filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (gr) (Entered: 05/01/2012)
170 ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF OF THEREQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL RULE 56 AND LOCAL RULE 56 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 . On April 30, 2012, defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment by which they seek to have your case dismissed. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion no later than June 14, 2012. Defendants are ORDERED to serve and file a reply no laterJuly 16, 2012. The Court will take the motion under submission without oral argument as of the date defendants' reply is due. (See Order for details.) (Attachments: # 1 Central District Local Rule 56, # 2 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56) (mp) (Entered: 05/02/2012)
171 REPLY in support of MOTION to Compel Plaintiff's Further Responses to First Set and Second Set of Written Discovery 159 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A−C)(Beach, Paul) (Entered: 05/10/2012)
172 OBJECTIONS to Declaration of LASD Christina Shilinga (Motion related) 167 and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support thereof filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
173 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
174 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
175 SUBMISSION OF STATEMENT of Genuine Issues Pursuant to Rule 56−2 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
176 EVIDENCE EXHIBITS filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits Part 2)(lmh) (Entered: 06/04/2012)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 17 of 20

05/31/2012 06/29/2012 06/29/2012
07/02/2012
07/12/2012 07/13/2012 07/13/2012 07/16/2012

177 RESPONSE in Opposition to Statement of Uncontroverted Facts & Conclusion of Law 166 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
178 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 169 Motion for Order. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST. On September 14, 2010, Plaintiff filed a corrected second amended complaint. On April 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting "the forms needed to file a 'related case statement' in this District Court." (Motion at 1.) Local Rule 83−1.3.1 requires that a Notice of Related Cases be filed at the time a civil complaint is filed if any previous or current action in the Central District appears to relate in the ways described in subdivisions (a)−(d). However, there is no standard form. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 169) is DENIED. (mp) (Entered: 06/29/2012)
179 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting in part and denying in part 159 Motion to Compel. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 159) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. On or before July 31, 2012, Plaintiff shall provide further responses to Document Request No. 10, Set Two. 2. On or before July 31, 2002, Plaintiff shall provide further responses to Interrogatory No. 9; 3. On or before July 31, 2012, Plaintiff shall provide further responses to Request for Admissions, Set Two, Nos. 5−6. 4. In all other respects, Defendant's motion to compel is DENIED. Defendant's request for sanctions is DENIED. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 06/29/2012)
180 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting in part and denying in part 138 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 138 Motion for Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 150 Motion to Produce. PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's February Motion (Dkt. No. 138) is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 1. The inmate information request is GRANTED. Defendant is ORDERED to produce a list of the names and booking numbers of all inmates housed in the same module as Plaintiff during the period from September 1 through September 10, 2006. Defendant shall produce the list within 21 days of the date this order is entered. 2. In all other respects, the February Motion is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's March Motion (Dkt. No. 150) is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 3. Within 21 days after the date of this order, Defendant shall comply with one of the following two options: Option 1: Defendant shall file and serve a list of each set of discovery responses he served on Yagman & Reichmann during the Thomas litigation, and a supplemental brief setting forth, as to each set of discovery responses, his objections to production in this case. The list shall, at a minimum, contain (1) the date of service, (2) the title of the discovery response served, and (3) to the extent the title is not self−explanatory, a description of the discovery sufficient to identify its contents. For document requests, Defendant must attach the document request responses and corresponding requests. Option 2: Defendant shall produce the nonprivileged discovery responses he served on Yagman & Reichmann during the Thomas litigation, and file a Notice with the court indicating compliance with the request. 4.In all other respects, Plaintiff's March Motion is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's requests for sanctions are DENIED. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 07/02/2012)
181 OBJECTIONS to Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion for Discovery, Order on Motion to Produce 180 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
182 NOTICE OF MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 7[b] 1 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
183 MOTION REQUESTING ORDER FOR COPY OF LOCAL RULE 83−1.3.1 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
184 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re: MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 . DEFENDANT'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION− SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Based on the additional ordered discovery, the parties may file one supplemental brief each regarding the summary judgment motion on or before August 14, 2012. (mp) (Entered: 07/16/2012)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 18 of 20

07/16/2012 07/16/2012 07/16/2012 07/16/2012 07/17/2012
07/19/2012 07/23/2012 08/14/2012 10/19/2012 11/21/2012 11/27/2012
11/27/2012
12/14/2012 12/20/2012 12/26/2012

185 REPLY to Plaintiff's Opposition re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Zuiderweg, Alexandra) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
186 REPLY to Plaintiff's Seperate Statement of Genuine Issues re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Zuiderweg, Alexandra) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
187 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A" Nos. 4−44, # 2 Exhibit "A" Nos. 45−74)(Zuiderweg, Alexandra) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
188 OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENCE re: MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Zuiderweg, Alexandra) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
189 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: denying 183 Motion for Order. On July 6, 2012, the court received a request from Plaintiff for a copy of L.R. 83−1.3.1. On July 13, 2012, the Clerk mailed Plaintiff a copy of the rule. On July 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a copy of the same rule. Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 182) is DENIED as moot. (mp) (Entered: 07/17/2012)
190 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order filed on July 2, 2012 180 . The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to the law and overrules the plaintiff's objections. (kbr) (Entered: 07/19/2012)
191 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT'S JULY 2, 2012 ORDER filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 07/23/2012)
192 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 [Pursuant to Court's July 16, 2012 Order] filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 08/14/2012)
193 NOTICE of Change of address Filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 10/22/2012)
194 REQUESTING Court acknowledge receipt of Address Change filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 11/26/2012)
195 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 . The court submits this Report and Recommendation to the Honorable John F. Walter, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order No. 05−07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons set forth below, the magistrate judge recommends that Defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 11/27/2012)
196 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Objections to R&R due by 12/20/2012. A party may respond to another party's Objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Objections. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (mp) (Entered: 11/27/2012)
197 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued) 195 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 12/18/2012)
198 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued) 195 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca.(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
199 REPLY TO OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued), Report and Recommendation (Issued) 195 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca.(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 12/26/2012)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 19 of 20

01/22/2013
01/23/2013
02/15/2013 03/07/2013 06/21/2013
06/21/2013 07/03/2013 07/03/2013 07/10/2013 07/18/2013 07/18/2013 07/24/2013

200 MINUTE IN CHAMBERSORDER RE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge John F. Walter: The Court declines to accept the R & R and returns this action to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration after receiving supplemental briefing on the lock down issue from Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier and Defendant Leroy Baca in accordance with the briefing schedule to be set forth by the Magistrate Judge. (jp) (Entered: 01/22/2013)
201 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive − no proceeding held, 200 . SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Accordingly, this court sets the following supplemental briefing schedule. The parties may also address Plaintiff's processing and housing during the period July 12−17, 2006, and how any lockdown affected it. 1. Defendant's supplemental papers shall be filed on or before February 15, 2013. 2. Plaintiff's supplemental papers shall be filed on or before March 8, 2013. 3. Unless otherwise ordered, this court will take the matter under submission without oral argument as of the date the last brief is due. (mp) (Entered: 01/23/2013)
202 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 02/15/2013)
203 SUPPLEMENT BRIEF in Opposition filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (lmh) (Entered: 03/12/2013)
204 AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 . The court submits this Amended Report and Recommendation to the Honorable John F. Walter, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 and General Order No. 05−07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons set forth below, the magistrate judge recommends that Defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted. (See Order for details.) (mp) (Entered: 06/21/2013)
205 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Objections to R&R due by 7/15/2013. A party may respond to another party's Objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Objections. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (mp) (Entered: 06/21/2013)
206 NOTICE OF MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 7(b)(1) filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mp) (Entered: 07/05/2013)
207 PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE'S AMENDED PROPOSED FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. RULE 72(b)(2) to Report and Recommendation (Issued),, 204 filed by Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier.(mp) (Entered: 07/05/2013)
208 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 AND RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. (Zuiderweg, Alexandra) (Entered: 07/10/2013)
209 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John F. Walter, IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing this action with prejudice. Report and Recommendation (Issued) 204 (lmh) (Entered: 07/19/2013)
210 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter, IT IS ADJUDGED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted and Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. Related to: MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Corrected Second Amended Complaint 166 , Amended Complaint, 89 , Report and Recommendation (Issued),, 204 (MD JS−6, Case Terminated). (lmh) (Entered: 07/19/2013)
211 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Defendant LeRoy Baca filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. Application set for hearing on 8/9/2013 at 10:00 AM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Bill of Costs)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 07/24/2013)

Case: 2:08-cv-7169 As of: 04/01/2018 06:43 PM PDT 20 of 20

07/30/2013
07/30/2013 08/01/2013 08/01/2013 08/01/2013 08/07/2013 08/27/2013
09/12/2013 08/18/2016
01/04/2017

212 BILL OF COSTS DEFICIENCY NOTICE RE: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Defendant LeRoy Baca 211 . The following error(s) was found: L.R. 54−2.2: Hearing should be noticed before the clerks designee and not the judge. Counsel is to re−notice the corrected hearing information, L.R. 54−2.2: Scheduled for incorrect time of day. Counsel is to re−notice the corrected hearing information and Room number no longer required − location is telephonic hearing. Counsel is to re−notice with the correct hearing location. Please refer to the Courts website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov for local rules, forms, and Bill of Costs Handbook. (lmh) (Entered: 07/30/2013)
213 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier filed by Defendant LeRoy Baca. Application set for hearing on 8/16/2013 at 10:00 AM before Clerk of Court. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Application to Clerk to Tax Costs; Itemized Bill of Cost sheet and Exhibits)(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 07/30/2013)
214 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. Appeal of Judgment, 210 Filed On: 7/18/13; Entered On: 7/19/13; Forma Pauperis Pending. cc: Maurice Pierre Olivier. (car) (Entered: 08/06/2013)
215 Notice Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 7(b)(1) re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 214 (car) (Entered: 08/06/2013)
216 MOTION for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), filed by plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (car) (Entered: 08/06/2013)
217 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 13−56371, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 214 as to Plaintiff Maurice Pierre Olivier. (mat) (Entered: 08/08/2013)
218 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 214 filed by Maurice Pierre Olivier CCA # 13−56371. Appellant Maurice P. Olivier, prison identification number F−83603, has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal and has completed and filed the required authorization form directing the appropriate prison officials to assess, collect, and forward to the district court the filing and docketing fees for this appeal. See the order for all of the details. Order received in this district on 8/27/2013. (dmap) (Entered: 08/27/2013)
219 BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $ 2109.00 in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. RE: 213 (mb) (Entered: 09/13/2013)
220 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 214 filed by Maurice Pierre Olivier. CCA # 13−56371. The (9th CCA) Clerk shall enter an order appointing pro bono counsel to represent appellant for purposes of this appeal only. If appellant objects to the court's appointment of counsel in this appeal, appellant shall file a written objection within 14 days after the date of this order. [See document for all details] (mat) (Entered: 08/19/2016)
221 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Paul B Beach counsel for Defendant LeRoy Baca. Daniel Lee is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G−123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Leroy D. Baca. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 01/04/2017)


[CONTENT] October 30, 2008 | the Los Angeles City | the U.S. District Court | the Central District | California | Los Angeles County | the Los Angeles County Sheriff |||  ||| 43 days ||| 33,000 | 333,000 ||| July 2006 |||  |||  |||  ||| November 9, 2009 | Magistrate | Alicia G. Rosenberg ||| June 6, 2010 | the District Court | John F. Walter | Magistrate ||| September 14, 2010 | second | the Los Angeles County Sheriff ||| Second Amended | the District Court ||| April 30, 2013 ||| the Los Angeles County ||| District Court | July 18, 2013 ||| 2013 WL 3791419 ||| July 30, 2013 | the Ninth Circuit ||| January 11, 2019 | the Court of Appeals | Consuelo Callahan ||| Olivier v. Baca | 913 | 852 | 9th Cir. 2019 |||  |||  [SUMMARY] On October 30, 2008, a pre-trial detainee of the Los Angeles City Central Jail filed a pro se complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Los Angeles County officials, the Los Angeles County Sheriff, and a medical doctor that served the jail. The plaintiff alleged that the conditions of confinement, specifically lack of a bed and infestation, violated his constitutional rights. Additionally, the plaintiff alleged he was denied prompt medical care when the defendant doctor failed to supply prescribed medication for 43 days.  The plaintiff sought compensatory damages in the amount of $33,000 and punitive damages in the amount of $333,000.

The plaintiff had entered jail custody in July 2006, and as he was being processed, there was a string of racially charged violent disturbances at several jail facilities.  Officials locked down multiple facilities, which delayed in-processing. As a result, the plaintiff was held at a facility without sufficient bench space for sleeping, and no beds or mattresses. He slept on the floor.

On November 9, 2009, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, which the Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg recommended be granted in part and denied in part. On June 6, 2010, the District Court (Judge John F. Walter) adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and dismissed all claims except the claim against the Sheriff in his individual and official capacities for failure to provide adequate sleeping accommodations. 

On September 14, 2010, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint against the Los Angeles County Sheriff in his official and individual capacities, alleging substantively the same claims for conditions of confinement. In response to the defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended complaint, the District Court dismissed all claims except the claim against the Sheriff in his individual capacity for failure to provide adequate sleeping conditions. 

On April 30, 2013, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the remaining claim. A magistrate judge found that the newly supplemented record demonstrated that the Los Angeles County jail had faced difficult exigent circumstances in the aftermath of the disturbances and lockdown, and that this meant there had been no constitutional violation. The District Court agreed, dismissing the case on July 18, 2013. 2013 WL 3791419.  

Plaintiff appealed, and On July 30, 2013, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit. After appointing counsel to represent the plaintiff pro bono, on January 11, 2019, the Court of Appeals affirmed in an opinion by Judge Consuelo Callahan. Olivier v. Baca, 913 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2019). In light of the exigent circumstances, the opinion explained, there was no constitutional violation, and the sheriff was entitled to qualified immunity. The case is now closed.