U.S. v. Lumberton, Texas Complaint

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No.
LUMBERTON MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Defendant.
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, the United States of America, alleges:
1. This action is brought on behalf of the United States to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII").
2. This Court has jurisdiction over the action under 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-5 (f) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1345.
3. Defendant Lumberton Municipal Utility District, Texas (hereinafter referred to as "LMUD") is a political subdivision of the State of Texas created pursuant to Texas law.
4. Defendant LMUD is a person within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e(a) and an employer within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e(b).
5. Defendant LMUD has discriminated against Michelle L. Brewer, a female formerly employed by the LMUD as a part-time accountant clerk, because of her sex in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-2(a), among other ways, by:
a. subjecting Ms. Brewer to sexual harassment that adversely affected the

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcom.htm

8/14/2007

U.S. v. Lumberton, Texas Complaint

Page 2 of 4

terms, conditions and privileges of Ms. Brewer's employment; and
b. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Brewer.
6. Defendant LMUD has discriminated against Jennifer Gay Soape, a female formerly employed by the LMUD as a bookkeeper, because of her sex in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-2(a), among other ways, by:
a. subjecting Ms. Soape to sexual harassment that adversely affected the terms, conditions and privileges of Ms. Soape's employment; and
b. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Soape.
7. Defendant LMUD has discriminated against Patsy Lamb, a female currently employed by the LMUD as a purchasing/inventory clerk, because of her sex in violation of Section 703(a) of Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-2 (a), among other ways, by:
a. subjecting Ms. Lamb to sexual harassment that adversely affected the terms, conditions and privileges of Ms. Lamb's employment; and
b. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Lamb.
8. Defendant LMUD has discriminated against Judy Biscamp, a female formerly employed by the LMUD as a collection clerk, because of her sex in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-2(a), among other ways, by:
a. subjecting Ms. Biscamp to sexual harassment that adversely affected the terms, conditions and privileges of Ms. Biscamp's employment; and
b. failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of the discriminatory treatment of Ms. Biscamp.

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcom.htm

8/14/2007

U.S. v. Lumberton, Texas Complaint

Page 3 of 4

9. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received timely charges filed by Michelle L. Brewer (Charge Number 330-97-1610), Jennifer Gay Soape (Charge Number 330-97-2491), Patsy Lamb (Charge Number 330-972291) and Judy Biscamp (Charge Number 330-97-2097). Pursuant to Section 706 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-5, the EEOC investigated the charges filed by Ms. Brewer, Ms. Soape, Ms. Lamb and Ms. Biscamp, found reasonable cause to believe that the
charging parties' allegations of sexual harassment were true, unsuccessfully attempted to achieve through conciliation a voluntary resolution of these matters, and subsequently referred the charges to the Department of Justice.
10. All conditions precedent to the filing of suit have been performed or have occurred.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff United States prays that this Court grant the following relief:
(a) Enjoin the Defendant LMUD and its directors, officers, agents, employees, successors, and all persons in active concert or participation with the Defendant from failing or refusing to:
(i) promptly and effectively investigate allegations of sexual harassment at the LMUD and take prompt and effective action to prevent and correct any acts that constitute allegations of sexual harassment at the LMUD; and
(ii) take other appropriate nondiscriminatory measures to overcome the effects of the discrimination.
(b) Award compensatory damages to Michelle L. Brewer, Jennifer Gay Soape, Patsy Lamb, and Judy Biscamp for mental and/or physical injuries incurred as a result of the discrimination against them alleged in this complaint as would fully compensate them for such injuries, pursuant to and within the statutory limitations of Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981a.
The plaintiff prays for such additional relief as justice may require, together with its costs and disbursements in this action.
JURY DEMAND

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcom.htm

8/14/2007

U.S. v. Lumberton, Texas Complaint

Page 4 of 4

The United States hereby demands a trial by jury of all issues so triable pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981a.
JANET RENO Attorney General
By: _________________________________
BILL LANN LEE Acting Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division U.S. Department of Justice _________________________________
WILLIAM B. FENTON D.C. Bar Registration No. 414990
JENNY R. YANG Member, N.Y. Bar
Attorneys Civil Rights Division U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 65968 Washington, D.C. 20035-5968
_________________________________
J. MICHAEL BRADFORD United States Attorney
Eastern District of Texas

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcom.htm

8/14/2007

 </s> Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree

Page 1 of 8

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
v. LUMBERTON MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT,

CIVIL ACTION NO.

Defendant.
CONSENT DECREE
This action was brought by the United States against the Lumberton Municipal Utility District ("LMUD" or "Defendant") to enforce the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000e, et <seq., as amended (Title VII), following receipt by the Department of Justice from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of charges of discrimination filed by Michelle L. Brewer, Jennifer Gay Soape, Patsy Lamb, and Judy Biscamp ("charging parties"), EEOC charge numbers 330-97-1610, 330-97-2491, 330-97-2291 and 330-97-2097.
In its Complaint, the United States alleges that Defendant LMUD has discriminated against Michelle L. Brewer, Jennifer Gay Soape, Patsy Lamb, and Judy Biscamp, females currently or formerly employed by the LMUD, because of their sex in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-2(a), by subjecting them to sexual harassment that adversely affected the terms, conditions and privileges of their employment and failing or refusing to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of the discriminatory treatment.
The LMUD denies that it has discriminated against the charging parties on the

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree

Page 2 of 8

basis of their sex in violation of Title VII. Nevertheless, the parties, desiring that this action be settled by appropriate Decree and without the burden of protracted litigation, agree to the jurisdiction of this Court over the parties, and the subject matter of this action, and hereby waive, for the purposes of this Decree only, hearings and findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues, and further agree to the entry of this Order as final and binding among themselves as to the issues raised in the Complaint filed in this case.
This Decree, being entered with the consent of the parties, shall in no way constitute an adjudication or finding of any wrongdoing or violation of any applicable federal or state law or regulation, nor be construed as an admission by the LMUD.
In resolution of the action, the parties hereby AGREE and the Court expressly APPROVES, ENTERS and ORDERS the following:
SPECIFIC RELIEF
1. The Defendant shall pay Michelle L. Brewer a monetary award of $35,000.00. This monetary award shall be considered compensatory damages.
2. The Defendant shall pay Jennifer Gay Soape a monetary award of $25,000.00. This monetary award shall be considered compensatory damages.
3. The Defendant shall pay Patsy Lamb a monetary award of $15,000.00. This monetary award shall be considered compensatory damages.
4. The Defendant shall pay Judy Biscamp a monetary award of $15,000.00. This monetary award shall be considered compensatory damages.
5. The parties agree that these monetary awards represent a reasonable settlement of the United States' and charging parties' claims of compensatory damages under Title VII and are not tied to any claims for back or future wages. They are therefore mutually understood to be payments on account of personal injury for pain and suffering. No amounts will be withheld for taxation purposes against the monetary awards. Defendant LMUD shall inform each charging party in a notice letter to her (Appendix A, attached hereto) that this award may be subject to federal income tax and state income tax.

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree

Page 3 of 8

6. The Defendant shall ensure that if inquiry is made by prospective employers or third parties concerning Ms. Brewer, Ms. Soape, Ms. Lamb or Ms. Biscamp's employment with the LMUD, the Defendant shall not make any reference to the charging parties' complaints of sexual discrimination or harassment.
7. The Defendant agrees to notify each charging party of the terms of this Decree within ten (10) days of its entry by sending a copy of the letter set forth in Appendix A to this Decree, along with a copy of this Decree and payment in the full amount of the monetary award for each charging party.
GENERAL RELIEF
8. The Defendant by and through its officials, agents, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with the Defendant in the performance of employment or personnel functions shall not engage in any act or practice that has the purpose or effect of unlawfully discriminating against any employee in any term, condition or privilege of employment because of such employee's sex.
9. The Defendant agrees not to retaliate against or in any respect adversely affect any person because that person has
opposed allegedly discriminatory policies or practices; filed a charge, either formal or informal, with the Defendant; filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or the Texas Commission on Human Rights; or participated in or cooperated with the initiation, investigation, litigation or administration of this case or this Consent Decree ("Decree").
Complaint and Investigation Procedure
10. The Defendant agrees to take appropriate measures to ensure that sexual harassment complaints are promptly investigated and that prompt and effective remedial action is taken in response to such complaints. These measures include, but are not limited to, establishing an internal complaint and investigatory procedure that designates one or more Board Members or supervisory level officials with the responsibility for receiving and investigating all allegations of sexual harassment, making factual findings,

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree

Page 4 of 8

and recommending discipline where appropriate. If any LMUD supervisor or Board Member receives a complaint of sexual harassment, he or she shall promptly forward it to the designated individual(s) for investigation unless the complaint is against the designated individual(s), in which case the LMUD shall designate another appropriate person to conduct the investigation.
11. No later than thirty (30) days after entry of this Decree, and periodically thereafter as appropriate, the designated individual(s) shall be provided with training on the law of sexual harassment and the appropriate methods for investigating and responding to complaints of sexual harassment. The LMUD shall provide the United States with written confirmation of this training no later than ten (10) days after it is provided.
12. The investigation of a complaint of sexual harassment shall be completed and written findings, including any recommended discipline, shall be issued promptly. A copy of the written findings shall be provided to the complainant within five (5) days of issuance.
13. The LMUD shall provide the United States with a copy of any complaint of sexual harassment within five (5) days of its receipt of such complaint. The LMUD shall provide the United States with a copy of the written findings of the investigation into the complaint of sexual harassment and a written explanation of any disciplinary proceeding resulting from a complaint within five (5) days after such written findings are issued and any disciplinary proceeding is held.
Issuance and Distribution of Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment
14. No later than thirty (30) days after the entry of this Decree, the Defendant shall issue and revise, as necessary, its written policy prohibiting sexual harassment. This policy shall embody the provisions set forth in Appendix B.
15. Defendant shall issue and distribute the policy prohibiting sexual harassment to all of its employees within seven (7) days of its issue, and to all employees whom it hires after entry of this Decree, within seven (7) days of their hire. Defendant shall require each current and future employee to sign an acknowledgment of receipt of the policy statement.
16. Defendant shall post the sexual harassment policy statement in a

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree

Page 5 of 8

prominent, conspicuous, centrally-located place commonly used for posting notices (e.g., bulletin boards) in all LMUD buildings and facilities. This posting requirement shall survive the expiration of this Decree.
Sexual Harassment Training
17. No later than ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this Decree, the LMUD shall provide training to all employees, both supervisory and nonsupervisory, and all LMUD Board Members regarding sexual harassment. This training shall at a minimum instruct employees on what acts may constitute sexual harassment; the procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of sexual harassment, including the employee's freedom to report sexual harassment to someone other than his or her immediate supervisor; and assure employees that they will not be subject to retaliation for filing a sexual harassment complaint. The United States shall review and approve any proposed training program prior to its administration.
18. Participation in the training program shall be mandatory for all employees and LMUD Board Members. All LMUD employees shall sign an acknowledgment of attendance for any and all training instituted concerning sexual harassment. The LMUD shall retain a copy of the registry of persons attending the seminar and a list of employees of the LMUD on the day of the seminar-training session.
Implementation
19. The parties shall attempt to resolve informally any disputes that may occur under this Decree. If the parties are unable to reach agreement after a matter has been brought to the attention of one of the parties by the other party, the issue may be submitted by either party to the Court for resolution.
20. The Defendant shall retain during the life of this Decree records necessary to document the implementation of the Decree. The Defendant shall make those records and all other documents relevant to its compliance with and implementation of this Decree available for inspection and copying, within thirty (30) days of any written request sent by the Department of Justice to the Defendant's attorney. The Defendant shall similarly furnish information or reports on matters relevant to compliance with and implementation of the Decree to the Department of Justice within thirty (30) days of any written

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree

Page 6 of 8

request to the Defendant's attorney.
21. The parties shall bear their own costs in this action, including attorney's fees, except that the parties shall retain the right to seek costs for any matter which, in the future, may arise from this Decree and require resolution by the Court.
22. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for one (1) year from the date of entry of this Decree for the purpose of enforcing the Decree as may be necessary. After one year, this matter shall be dismissed unless the United States moves, for good cause shown upon notice to the Defendant, for its continuation to carry out the purpose or provisions of this Decree. In the event that the United States moves to extend this Decree, this Decree shall remain in effect until the motion is resolved.
DONE and ORDERED this day of ______ 2000.
____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
By Consent:
For the Defendant: _____________________________ Christopher T. Coco, Esq. Germer, Bernsen & Gertz, L.L.P. 805 Park Street Beaumont, Texas 77701 ____________________________ Nick Carter President Lumberton Municipal Utility District Board of Directors
For the Plaintiff:
____________________________ William B. Fenton Jenny R. Yang Dawn Henry

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree

Page 7 of 8

U. S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Employment Litigation Section P. O. Box 5968 Washington, D.C. 20035-55968
APPENDIX A
NOTICE LETTER
Ms. [Charging Party]
[Address]
Dear Ms. [Charging party]:
Enclosed please find a copy of the consent decree that has been entered settling a complaint of employment discrimination filed by the United States against the Lumberton Municipal Utility District ("LMUD").
Under the terms of the Consent Decree entered in the case of United States v. Lumberton Municipal Utility District, Civil No. ____ (E.D. Tex.), you are receiving a monetary award of $_________. The parties, by their counsel, understand that you are, after having consulted with private counsel, agreeable to signing a release requested by defendant LMUD.
Although the LMUD will not withhold federal income tax from this award, you should be aware that pursuant to Section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by Section 1605 of the Federal Small Job Protection Act of 1996, damages related to pain and suffering or emotional distress are generally taxable under Federal law. Your monetary award may also be taxable under Texas law. You should consult with a tax adviser in determining the taxability of this monetary award.
If you have any questions concerning this settlement, you may contact Jenny R. Yang, attorney for the United States Department of Justice at (202) 3073925.
Sincerely,

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

Lumberton, Texas Consent Decree
_________________________ Christopher T. Coco, Esq. Germer, Bernsen & Gertz, L.L.P. Attorneys at Law 805 Park Street Beaumont, Texas 77701

Page 8 of 8

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/emp/documents/lumbcd.htm

8/14/2007

 </s> CLOSED, FRC, JURY

U.S. District Court [LIVE] Eastern District of TEXAS LIVE (Beaumont) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-00243-JJF

United States v. Lumberton MUD Assigned to: Judge Joe J. Fisher Demand: $0 Cause: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Date Filed: 04/07/2000 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Plaintiff United States of America

represented by John Michael Bradford Benckenstein & Oxford 3535 Calder Ave Suite 300 Beaumont, TX 77704 Jeffe 409/833-9182 Fax: 14098338819 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

William B Fenton Civil Rights Division U S Dept of Justice P O Box 65968 Washington, DC 20035-5968 202/616-9509 Fax: 202/616-9509 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
Lumberton Municipal Utility District

represented by Christopher Todd Coco Provost Umphrey - Beaumont 490 Park St. P.O. Box 4905

Beaumont, TX 77704-4905 409/835-6000 Fax: 14098138653 Email: ccoco@provostumphrey.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 04/07/2000 04/10/2000
04/10/2000 04/17/2000
04/17/2000 12/02/2002

#

Docket Text

1 Original Complaint with jury demand filed. Cause: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) (mrp) (Entered: 04/10/2000)

2 In compliance with section b of Local Rule CV-26 and after a review of the pleadings, this action has been assigned to track 3 for case management purposes. (mrp) (Entered: 04/10/2000)

Magistrate consent forms mailed to attys for United States, Lumberton MUD. (mrp) (Entered: 04/10/2000)

3 Consent judgment for United States against Lumberton MUD . ( signed by Judge Joe J. Fisher ) cc: attys 4/18/00 (fbc) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

Case closed (fbc) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

Shipped to FRC on 11/04/02 Accession number: 021-03-0018, Location B3001573 Box 27 of 29 (bca) (Entered: 12/02/2002)


[CONTENT] April 7th, 2000 | the United States Department of Justice | Title VII | 42 | 2000e | the Lumberton Municipal Utility District | the United States | the Eastern District | Texas ||| DOJ | Title VII ||| Lumberton Municipal Utility District | the State of Texas | Texas ||| DOJ ||| April 17th, 2000 | the District Court | Joe J. Fisher | a Consent Decree ||| Decree ||| Court | one year [SUMMARY] On April 7th, 2000, the United States Department of Justice ("D.O.J.") filed a lawsuit under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., against the Lumberton Municipal Utility District in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.  The DOJ sought injunctive relief, alleging that the defendant violated Title VII by discriminating against female employees because of sex. 

Lumberton Municipal Utility District is a political subdivision of the State of Texas created pursuant to Texas law.  The DOJ alleged that the discrimination against female employees took the form of sexual harassment that adversely affected the terms, conditions, and privileges of employment, and failing or refusing to take appropriate action to correct the effects of the discrimination. 

On April 17th, 2000, the District Court (Judge Joe J. Fisher) entered a Consent Decree.  The Decree ordered specific monetary relief as well as general injunctive relief, including mandatory complaint and investigation procedures, the issuance and distribution of policy prohibiting sexual harassment, and sexual harassment training.  The Court retained jurisdiction one year pursuant to the terms of the decree.

