|
1 |
|
00:00:15,580 --> 00:00:19,700 |
|
In general, the regression equation is given by |
|
|
|
2 |
|
00:00:19,700 --> 00:00:26,460 |
|
this equation. Y represents the dependent variable |
|
|
|
3 |
|
00:00:26,460 --> 00:00:30,680 |
|
for each observation I. Beta 0 is called |
|
|
|
4 |
|
00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:35,280 |
|
population Y intercept. Beta 1 is the population |
|
|
|
5 |
|
00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:39,400 |
|
stop coefficient. Xi is the independent variable |
|
|
|
6 |
|
00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:44,040 |
|
for each observation, I. Epsilon I is the random |
|
|
|
7 |
|
00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:48,420 |
|
error theorem. Beta 0 plus beta 1 X is called |
|
|
|
8 |
|
00:00:48,420 --> 00:00:53,410 |
|
linear component. While Y and I are random error |
|
|
|
9 |
|
00:00:53,410 --> 00:00:57,130 |
|
components. So, the regression equation mainly has |
|
|
|
10 |
|
00:00:57,130 --> 00:01:01,970 |
|
two components. One is linear and the other is |
|
|
|
11 |
|
00:01:01,970 --> 00:01:05,830 |
|
random. In general, the expected value for this |
|
|
|
12 |
|
00:01:05,830 --> 00:01:08,810 |
|
error term is zero. So, for the predicted |
|
|
|
13 |
|
00:01:08,810 --> 00:01:12,410 |
|
equation, later we will see that Y hat equals B |
|
|
|
14 |
|
00:01:12,410 --> 00:01:15,930 |
|
zero plus B one X.this term will be ignored |
|
|
|
15 |
|
00:01:15,930 --> 00:01:19,770 |
|
because the expected value for the epsilon equals |
|
|
|
16 |
|
00:01:19,770 --> 00:01:20,850 |
|
zero. |
|
|
|
17 |
|
00:01:36,460 --> 00:01:43,580 |
|
So again linear component B0 plus B1 X I and the |
|
|
|
18 |
|
00:01:43,580 --> 00:01:46,860 |
|
random component is the epsilon term. |
|
|
|
19 |
|
00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:53,560 |
|
So if we have X and Y axis, this segment is called |
|
|
|
20 |
|
00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:57,620 |
|
Y intercept which is B0. The change in y divided |
|
|
|
21 |
|
00:01:57,620 --> 00:02:01,480 |
|
by change in x is called the slope. Epsilon i is |
|
|
|
22 |
|
00:02:01,480 --> 00:02:04,480 |
|
the difference between the observed value of y |
|
|
|
23 |
|
00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:10,400 |
|
minus the expected value or the predicted value. |
|
|
|
24 |
|
00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:14,200 |
|
The observed is the actual value. So actual minus |
|
|
|
25 |
|
00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,480 |
|
predicted, the difference between these two values |
|
|
|
26 |
|
00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:20,800 |
|
is called the epsilon. So epsilon i is the |
|
|
|
27 |
|
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:24,460 |
|
difference between the observed value of y for x, |
|
|
|
28 |
|
00:02:25,220 --> 00:02:28,820 |
|
minus the predicted or the estimated value of Y |
|
|
|
29 |
|
00:02:28,820 --> 00:02:33,360 |
|
for XR. So this difference actually is called the |
|
|
|
30 |
|
00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:36,920 |
|
error tier. So the error is just observed minus |
|
|
|
31 |
|
00:02:36,920 --> 00:02:38,240 |
|
predicted. |
|
|
|
32 |
|
00:02:40,980 --> 00:02:44,540 |
|
The estimated regression equation is given by Y |
|
|
|
33 |
|
00:02:44,540 --> 00:02:50,210 |
|
hat equals V0 plus V1X. as i mentioned before the |
|
|
|
34 |
|
00:02:50,210 --> 00:02:53,450 |
|
epsilon term is cancelled because the expected |
|
|
|
35 |
|
00:02:53,450 --> 00:02:57,590 |
|
value for the epsilon equals zero here we have y |
|
|
|
36 |
|
00:02:57,590 --> 00:03:00,790 |
|
hat instead of y because this one is called the |
|
|
|
37 |
|
00:03:00,790 --> 00:03:05,670 |
|
estimated or the predicted value for y for the |
|
|
|
38 |
|
00:03:05,670 --> 00:03:09,670 |
|
observation i for example b zero is the estimated |
|
|
|
39 |
|
00:03:09,670 --> 00:03:12,590 |
|
of the regression intercept or is called y |
|
|
|
40 |
|
00:03:12,590 --> 00:03:18,030 |
|
intercept b one the estimate of the regression of |
|
|
|
41 |
|
00:03:18,030 --> 00:03:21,930 |
|
the slope so this is the estimated slope b1 xi |
|
|
|
42 |
|
00:03:21,930 --> 00:03:26,270 |
|
again is the independent variable so x1 It means |
|
|
|
43 |
|
00:03:26,270 --> 00:03:28,630 |
|
the value of the independent variable for |
|
|
|
44 |
|
00:03:28,630 --> 00:03:31,350 |
|
observation number one. Now this equation is |
|
|
|
45 |
|
00:03:31,350 --> 00:03:34,530 |
|
called linear regression equation or regression |
|
|
|
46 |
|
00:03:34,530 --> 00:03:37,230 |
|
model. It's a straight line because here we are |
|
|
|
47 |
|
00:03:37,230 --> 00:03:41,170 |
|
assuming that the relationship between x and y is |
|
|
|
48 |
|
00:03:41,170 --> 00:03:43,490 |
|
linear. It could be non-linear, but we are |
|
|
|
49 |
|
00:03:43,490 --> 00:03:48,760 |
|
focusing here in just linear regression. Now, the |
|
|
|
50 |
|
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:52,000 |
|
values for B0 and B1 are given by these equations, |
|
|
|
51 |
|
00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:56,480 |
|
B1 equals RSY divided by SX. So, in order to |
|
|
|
52 |
|
00:03:56,480 --> 00:04:01,040 |
|
determine the values of B0 and B1, we have to know |
|
|
|
53 |
|
00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:07,760 |
|
first the value of R, the correlation coefficient. |
|
|
|
54 |
|
00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:24,980 |
|
Sx and Sy, standard deviations of x and y, as well |
|
|
|
55 |
|
00:04:24,980 --> 00:04:29,880 |
|
as the means of x and y. |
|
|
|
56 |
|
00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:39,500 |
|
B1 equals R times Sy divided by Sx. B0 is just y |
|
|
|
57 |
|
00:04:39,500 --> 00:04:43,600 |
|
bar minus b1 x bar, where Sx and Sy are the |
|
|
|
58 |
|
00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:48,350 |
|
standard deviations of x and y. So this, how can |
|
|
|
59 |
|
00:04:48,350 --> 00:04:53,190 |
|
we compute the values of B0 and B1? Now the |
|
|
|
60 |
|
00:04:53,190 --> 00:04:59,350 |
|
question is, what's our interpretation about B0 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
00:04:59,350 --> 00:05:05,030 |
|
and B1? And B0, as we mentioned before, is the Y |
|
|
|
62 |
|
00:05:05,030 --> 00:05:10,510 |
|
or the estimated mean value of Y when the value X |
|
|
|
63 |
|
00:05:10,510 --> 00:05:10,910 |
|
is 0. |
|
|
|
64 |
|
00:05:17,420 --> 00:05:22,860 |
|
So if X is 0, then Y hat equals B0. That means B0 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
00:05:22,860 --> 00:05:26,420 |
|
is the estimated mean value of Y when the value of |
|
|
|
66 |
|
00:05:26,420 --> 00:05:32,280 |
|
X equals 0. B1, which is called the estimated |
|
|
|
67 |
|
00:05:32,280 --> 00:05:36,880 |
|
change in the mean value of Y as a result of one |
|
|
|
68 |
|
00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:42,360 |
|
unit change in X. That means the sign of B1, |
|
|
|
69 |
|
00:05:48,180 --> 00:05:55,180 |
|
the direction of the relationship between X and Y. |
|
|
|
70 |
|
00:06:03,020 --> 00:06:09,060 |
|
So the sine of B1 tells us the exact direction. It |
|
|
|
71 |
|
00:06:09,060 --> 00:06:12,300 |
|
could be positive if the sine of B1 is positive or |
|
|
|
72 |
|
00:06:12,300 --> 00:06:17,040 |
|
negative. on the other side. So that's the meaning |
|
|
|
73 |
|
00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:22,040 |
|
of B0 and B1. Now first thing we have to do in |
|
|
|
74 |
|
00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:23,980 |
|
order to determine if there exists linear |
|
|
|
75 |
|
00:06:23,980 --> 00:06:26,800 |
|
relationship between X and Y, we have to draw |
|
|
|
76 |
|
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,620 |
|
scatter plot, Y versus X. In this specific |
|
|
|
77 |
|
00:06:30,620 --> 00:06:34,740 |
|
example, X is the square feet, size of the house |
|
|
|
78 |
|
00:06:34,740 --> 00:06:38,760 |
|
is measured by square feet, and house selling |
|
|
|
79 |
|
00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:43,220 |
|
price in thousand dollars. So we have to draw Y |
|
|
|
80 |
|
00:06:43,220 --> 00:06:47,420 |
|
versus X. So house price versus size of the house. |
|
|
|
81 |
|
00:06:48,140 --> 00:06:50,740 |
|
Now by looking carefully at this scatter plot, |
|
|
|
82 |
|
00:06:51,340 --> 00:06:54,200 |
|
even if it's a small sample size, but you can see |
|
|
|
83 |
|
00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:57,160 |
|
that there exists positive relationship between |
|
|
|
84 |
|
00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:02,640 |
|
house price and size of the house. The points |
|
|
|
85 |
|
00:07:03,750 --> 00:07:06,170 |
|
Maybe they are close little bit to the straight |
|
|
|
86 |
|
00:07:06,170 --> 00:07:08,370 |
|
line, it means there exists maybe strong |
|
|
|
87 |
|
00:07:08,370 --> 00:07:11,350 |
|
relationship between X and Y. But you can tell the |
|
|
|
88 |
|
00:07:11,350 --> 00:07:15,910 |
|
exact strength of the relationship by using the |
|
|
|
89 |
|
00:07:15,910 --> 00:07:19,270 |
|
value of R. But here we can tell that there exists |
|
|
|
90 |
|
00:07:19,270 --> 00:07:22,290 |
|
positive relationship and that relation could be |
|
|
|
91 |
|
00:07:22,290 --> 00:07:23,250 |
|
strong. |
|
|
|
92 |
|
00:07:25,730 --> 00:07:31,350 |
|
Now simple calculations will give B1 and B0. |
|
|
|
93 |
|
00:07:32,210 --> 00:07:37,510 |
|
Suppose we know the values of R, Sy, and Sx. R, if |
|
|
|
94 |
|
00:07:37,510 --> 00:07:41,550 |
|
you remember last time, R was 0.762. It's moderate |
|
|
|
95 |
|
00:07:41,550 --> 00:07:46,390 |
|
relationship between X and Y. Sy and Sx, 60 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
00:07:46,390 --> 00:07:52,350 |
|
divided by 4 is 117. That will give 0.109. So B0, |
|
|
|
97 |
|
00:07:53,250 --> 00:07:59,430 |
|
in this case, 0.10977, B1. |
|
|
|
98 |
|
00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:08,720 |
|
B0 equals Y bar minus B1 X bar. B1 is computed in |
|
|
|
99 |
|
00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:12,680 |
|
the previous step, so plug that value here. In |
|
|
|
100 |
|
00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:15,440 |
|
addition, we know the values of X bar and Y bar. |
|
|
|
101 |
|
00:08:15,980 --> 00:08:19,320 |
|
Simple calculation will give the value of B0, |
|
|
|
102 |
|
00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:25,340 |
|
which is about 98.25. After computing the values |
|
|
|
103 |
|
00:08:25,340 --> 00:08:30,600 |
|
of B0 and B1, we can state the regression equation |
|
|
|
104 |
|
00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:34,360 |
|
by house price, the estimated value of house |
|
|
|
105 |
|
00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:39,960 |
|
price. Hat in this equation means the estimated or |
|
|
|
106 |
|
00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:43,860 |
|
the predicted value of the house price. Equals b0 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
00:08:43,860 --> 00:08:49,980 |
|
which is 98 plus b1 which is 0.10977 times square |
|
|
|
108 |
|
00:08:49,980 --> 00:08:54,420 |
|
feet. Now here, by using this equation, we can |
|
|
|
109 |
|
00:08:54,420 --> 00:08:58,280 |
|
tell number one. The direction of the relationship |
|
|
|
110 |
|
00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:03,620 |
|
between x and y, how surprised and its size. Since |
|
|
|
111 |
|
00:09:03,620 --> 00:09:05,900 |
|
the sign is positive, it means there exists |
|
|
|
112 |
|
00:09:05,900 --> 00:09:09,000 |
|
positive associations or relationship between |
|
|
|
113 |
|
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:12,420 |
|
these two variables, number one. Number two, we |
|
|
|
114 |
|
00:09:12,420 --> 00:09:17,060 |
|
can interpret carefully the meaning of the |
|
|
|
115 |
|
00:09:17,060 --> 00:09:21,340 |
|
intercept. Now, as we mentioned before, y hat |
|
|
|
116 |
|
00:09:21,340 --> 00:09:25,600 |
|
equals b zero only if x equals zero. Now there is |
|
|
|
117 |
|
00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:28,900 |
|
no sense about square feet of zero because we |
|
|
|
118 |
|
00:09:28,900 --> 00:09:32,960 |
|
don't have a size of a house to be zero. But the |
|
|
|
119 |
|
00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:37,880 |
|
slope here is 0.109, it has sense because as the |
|
|
|
120 |
|
00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:41,450 |
|
size of the house increased by one unit. it's |
|
|
|
121 |
|
00:09:41,450 --> 00:09:46,290 |
|
selling price increased by this amount 0.109 but |
|
|
|
122 |
|
00:09:46,290 --> 00:09:48,990 |
|
here you have to be careful to multiply this value |
|
|
|
123 |
|
00:09:48,990 --> 00:09:52,610 |
|
by a thousand because the data is given in |
|
|
|
124 |
|
00:09:52,610 --> 00:09:56,830 |
|
thousand dollars for Y so here as the size of the |
|
|
|
125 |
|
00:09:56,830 --> 00:10:00,590 |
|
house increased by one unit by one feet one square |
|
|
|
126 |
|
00:10:00,590 --> 00:10:05,310 |
|
feet it's selling price increases by this amount 0 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
00:10:05,310 --> 00:10:10,110 |
|
.10977 should be multiplied by a thousand so |
|
|
|
128 |
|
00:10:10,110 --> 00:10:18,560 |
|
around $109.77. So that means extra one square |
|
|
|
129 |
|
00:10:18,560 --> 00:10:24,040 |
|
feet for the size of the house, it cost you around |
|
|
|
130 |
|
00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:30,960 |
|
$100 or $110. So that's the meaning of B1 and the |
|
|
|
131 |
|
00:10:30,960 --> 00:10:35,060 |
|
sign actually of the slope. In addition to that, |
|
|
|
132 |
|
00:10:35,140 --> 00:10:39,340 |
|
we can make some predictions about house price for |
|
|
|
133 |
|
00:10:39,340 --> 00:10:42,900 |
|
any given value of the size of the house. That |
|
|
|
134 |
|
00:10:42,900 --> 00:10:46,940 |
|
means if you know that the house size equals 2,000 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
00:10:46,940 --> 00:10:50,580 |
|
square feet. So just plug this value here and |
|
|
|
136 |
|
00:10:50,580 --> 00:10:54,100 |
|
simple calculation will give the predicted value |
|
|
|
137 |
|
00:10:54,100 --> 00:10:58,230 |
|
of the ceiling price of a house. That's the whole |
|
|
|
138 |
|
00:10:58,230 --> 00:11:03,950 |
|
story for the simple linear regression. In other |
|
|
|
139 |
|
00:11:03,950 --> 00:11:08,030 |
|
words, we have this equation, so the |
|
|
|
140 |
|
00:11:08,030 --> 00:11:12,690 |
|
interpretation of B0 again. B0 is the estimated |
|
|
|
141 |
|
00:11:12,690 --> 00:11:16,110 |
|
mean value of Y when the value of X is 0. That |
|
|
|
142 |
|
00:11:16,110 --> 00:11:20,700 |
|
means if X is 0, in this range of the observed X |
|
|
|
143 |
|
00:11:20,700 --> 00:11:24,540 |
|
-values. That's the meaning of the B0. But again, |
|
|
|
144 |
|
00:11:24,820 --> 00:11:27,700 |
|
because a house cannot have a square footage of |
|
|
|
145 |
|
00:11:27,700 --> 00:11:31,680 |
|
zero, so B0 has no practical application. |
|
|
|
146 |
|
00:11:34,740 --> 00:11:38,760 |
|
On the other hand, the interpretation for B1, B1 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:43,920 |
|
equals 0.10977, that means B1 again estimates the |
|
|
|
148 |
|
00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:46,880 |
|
change in the mean value of Y as a result of one |
|
|
|
149 |
|
00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:51,160 |
|
unit increase in X. In other words, since B1 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:55,680 |
|
equals 0.10977, that tells us that the mean value |
|
|
|
151 |
|
00:11:55,680 --> 00:12:02,030 |
|
of a house Increases by this amount, multiplied by |
|
|
|
152 |
|
00:12:02,030 --> 00:12:05,730 |
|
1,000 on average for each additional one square |
|
|
|
153 |
|
00:12:05,730 --> 00:12:09,690 |
|
foot of size. So that's the exact interpretation |
|
|
|
154 |
|
00:12:09,690 --> 00:12:14,630 |
|
about P0 and P1. For the prediction, as I |
|
|
|
155 |
|
00:12:14,630 --> 00:12:18,430 |
|
mentioned, since we have this equation, and our |
|
|
|
156 |
|
00:12:18,430 --> 00:12:21,530 |
|
goal is to predict the price for a house with 2 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
00:12:21,530 --> 00:12:25,450 |
|
,000 square feet, just plug this value here. |
|
|
|
158 |
|
00:12:26,450 --> 00:12:31,130 |
|
Multiply this value by 0.1098, then add the result |
|
|
|
159 |
|
00:12:31,130 --> 00:12:37,750 |
|
to 98.25 will give 317.85. This value should be |
|
|
|
160 |
|
00:12:37,750 --> 00:12:41,590 |
|
multiplied by 1000, so the predicted price for a |
|
|
|
161 |
|
00:12:41,590 --> 00:12:49,050 |
|
house with 2000 square feet is around 317,850 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
00:12:49,050 --> 00:12:54,910 |
|
dollars. That's for making the prediction for |
|
|
|
163 |
|
00:12:54,910 --> 00:13:02,050 |
|
selling a price. The last section in chapter 12 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
00:13:02,050 --> 00:13:07,550 |
|
talks about coefficient of determination R |
|
|
|
165 |
|
00:13:07,550 --> 00:13:11,550 |
|
squared. The definition for the coefficient of |
|
|
|
166 |
|
00:13:11,550 --> 00:13:16,190 |
|
determination is the portion of the total |
|
|
|
167 |
|
00:13:16,190 --> 00:13:19,330 |
|
variation in the dependent variable that is |
|
|
|
168 |
|
00:13:19,330 --> 00:13:21,730 |
|
explained by the variation in the independent |
|
|
|
169 |
|
00:13:21,730 --> 00:13:25,130 |
|
variable. Since we have two variables X and Y. |
|
|
|
170 |
|
00:13:29,510 --> 00:13:34,490 |
|
And the question is, what's the portion of the |
|
|
|
171 |
|
00:13:34,490 --> 00:13:39,530 |
|
total variation that can be explained by X? So the |
|
|
|
172 |
|
00:13:39,530 --> 00:13:42,030 |
|
question is, what's the portion of the total |
|
|
|
173 |
|
00:13:42,030 --> 00:13:46,070 |
|
variation in Y that is explained already by the |
|
|
|
174 |
|
00:13:46,070 --> 00:13:54,450 |
|
variation in X? For example, suppose R² is 90%, 0 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
00:13:54,450 --> 00:13:59,770 |
|
.90. That means 90% in the variation of the |
|
|
|
176 |
|
00:13:59,770 --> 00:14:05,700 |
|
selling price is explained by its size. That means |
|
|
|
177 |
|
00:14:05,700 --> 00:14:12,580 |
|
the size of the house contributes about 90% to |
|
|
|
178 |
|
00:14:12,580 --> 00:14:17,700 |
|
explain the variability of the selling price. So |
|
|
|
179 |
|
00:14:17,700 --> 00:14:20,460 |
|
we would like to have R squared to be large |
|
|
|
180 |
|
00:14:20,460 --> 00:14:26,620 |
|
enough. Now, R squared for simple regression only |
|
|
|
181 |
|
00:14:26,620 --> 00:14:30,200 |
|
is given by this equation, correlation between X |
|
|
|
182 |
|
00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:31,100 |
|
and Y squared. |
|
|
|
183 |
|
00:14:34,090 --> 00:14:36,510 |
|
So if we have the correlation between X and Y and |
|
|
|
184 |
|
00:14:36,510 --> 00:14:40,070 |
|
then you just square this value, that will give |
|
|
|
185 |
|
00:14:40,070 --> 00:14:42,370 |
|
the correlation or the coefficient of |
|
|
|
186 |
|
00:14:42,370 --> 00:14:45,730 |
|
determination. So simply, determination |
|
|
|
187 |
|
00:14:45,730 --> 00:14:49,510 |
|
coefficient is just the square of the correlation |
|
|
|
188 |
|
00:14:49,510 --> 00:14:54,430 |
|
between X and Y. We know that R ranges between |
|
|
|
189 |
|
00:14:54,430 --> 00:14:55,670 |
|
minus 1 and plus 1. |
|
|
|
190 |
|
00:14:59,150 --> 00:15:05,590 |
|
So R squared should be ranges between 0 and 1, |
|
|
|
191 |
|
00:15:06,050 --> 00:15:09,830 |
|
because minus sign will be cancelled since we are |
|
|
|
192 |
|
00:15:09,830 --> 00:15:12,770 |
|
squaring these values, so r squared is always |
|
|
|
193 |
|
00:15:12,770 --> 00:15:17,690 |
|
between 0 and 1. So again, r squared is used to |
|
|
|
194 |
|
00:15:17,690 --> 00:15:22,430 |
|
explain the portion of the total variability in |
|
|
|
195 |
|
00:15:22,430 --> 00:15:24,950 |
|
the dependent variable that is already explained |
|
|
|
196 |
|
00:15:24,950 --> 00:15:31,310 |
|
by the variability in x. For example, Sometimes R |
|
|
|
197 |
|
00:15:31,310 --> 00:15:36,590 |
|
squared is one. R squared is one only happens if R |
|
|
|
198 |
|
00:15:36,590 --> 00:15:41,190 |
|
is one or negative one. So if there exists perfect |
|
|
|
199 |
|
00:15:41,190 --> 00:15:45,490 |
|
relationship either negative or positive, I mean |
|
|
|
200 |
|
00:15:45,490 --> 00:15:49,890 |
|
if R is plus one or negative one, then R squared |
|
|
|
201 |
|
00:15:49,890 --> 00:15:55,130 |
|
is one. That means perfect linear relationship |
|
|
|
202 |
|
00:15:55,130 --> 00:16:01,020 |
|
between Y and X. Now the value. of 1 for R squared |
|
|
|
203 |
|
00:16:01,020 --> 00:16:07,040 |
|
means that 100% of the variation Y is explained by |
|
|
|
204 |
|
00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:11,460 |
|
variation X. And that's really never happened in |
|
|
|
205 |
|
00:16:11,460 --> 00:16:15,720 |
|
real life. Because R equals 1 or plus 1 or |
|
|
|
206 |
|
00:16:15,720 --> 00:16:21,140 |
|
negative 1 cannot be happened in real life. So R |
|
|
|
207 |
|
00:16:21,140 --> 00:16:25,180 |
|
squared always ranges between 0 and 1, never |
|
|
|
208 |
|
00:16:25,180 --> 00:16:29,500 |
|
equals 1, because if R squared is 1, that means |
|
|
|
209 |
|
00:16:29,500 --> 00:16:33,440 |
|
all the variation in Y is explained by the |
|
|
|
210 |
|
00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:38,220 |
|
variation in X. But for sure there is an error, |
|
|
|
211 |
|
00:16:38,820 --> 00:16:41,700 |
|
and that error may be due to some variables that |
|
|
|
212 |
|
00:16:41,700 --> 00:16:45,540 |
|
are not included in the regression model. Maybe |
|
|
|
213 |
|
00:16:45,540 --> 00:16:50,870 |
|
there is Random error in the selection, maybe the |
|
|
|
214 |
|
00:16:50,870 --> 00:16:53,210 |
|
sample size is not large enough in order to |
|
|
|
215 |
|
00:16:53,210 --> 00:16:55,770 |
|
determine the total variation in the dependent |
|
|
|
216 |
|
00:16:55,770 --> 00:16:58,990 |
|
variable. So it makes sense that R squared will be |
|
|
|
217 |
|
00:16:58,990 --> 00:17:04,450 |
|
less than 100. So generally speaking, R squared |
|
|
|
218 |
|
00:17:04,450 --> 00:17:09,870 |
|
always between 0 and 1. Weaker linear relationship |
|
|
|
219 |
|
00:17:09,870 --> 00:17:15,690 |
|
between X and Y, it means R squared is not 1. So |
|
|
|
220 |
|
00:17:15,690 --> 00:17:20,070 |
|
R², since it lies between 0 and 1, it means sum, |
|
|
|
221 |
|
00:17:21,070 --> 00:17:24,830 |
|
but not all the variation of Y is explained by the |
|
|
|
222 |
|
00:17:24,830 --> 00:17:28,410 |
|
variation X. Because as mentioned before, if R |
|
|
|
223 |
|
00:17:28,410 --> 00:17:32,510 |
|
squared is 90%, it means some, not all, the |
|
|
|
224 |
|
00:17:32,510 --> 00:17:35,830 |
|
variation Y is explained by the variation X. And |
|
|
|
225 |
|
00:17:35,830 --> 00:17:38,590 |
|
the remaining percent in this case, which is 10%, |
|
|
|
226 |
|
00:17:38,590 --> 00:17:42,790 |
|
this one due to, as I mentioned, maybe there |
|
|
|
227 |
|
00:17:42,790 --> 00:17:46,490 |
|
exists some other variables that affect the |
|
|
|
228 |
|
00:17:46,490 --> 00:17:52,020 |
|
selling price besides its size, maybe location. of |
|
|
|
229 |
|
00:17:52,020 --> 00:17:57,900 |
|
the house affects its selling price. So R squared |
|
|
|
230 |
|
00:17:57,900 --> 00:18:02,640 |
|
is always between 0 and 1, it's always positive. R |
|
|
|
231 |
|
00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:07,180 |
|
squared equals 0, that only happens if there is no |
|
|
|
232 |
|
00:18:07,180 --> 00:18:12,620 |
|
linear relationship between Y and X. Since R is 0, |
|
|
|
233 |
|
00:18:13,060 --> 00:18:17,240 |
|
then R squared equals 0. That means the value of Y |
|
|
|
234 |
|
00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:20,870 |
|
does not depend on X. Because here, as X |
|
|
|
235 |
|
00:18:20,870 --> 00:18:26,830 |
|
increases, Y stays nearly in the same position. It |
|
|
|
236 |
|
00:18:26,830 --> 00:18:30,190 |
|
means as X increases, Y stays the same, constant. |
|
|
|
237 |
|
00:18:31,010 --> 00:18:33,730 |
|
So that means there is no relationship or actually |
|
|
|
238 |
|
00:18:33,730 --> 00:18:37,010 |
|
there is no linear relationship because it could |
|
|
|
239 |
|
00:18:37,010 --> 00:18:40,710 |
|
be there exists non-linear relationship. But here |
|
|
|
240 |
|
00:18:40,710 --> 00:18:44,980 |
|
we are. Just focusing on linear relationship |
|
|
|
241 |
|
00:18:44,980 --> 00:18:50,020 |
|
between X and Y. So if R is zero, that means the |
|
|
|
242 |
|
00:18:50,020 --> 00:18:52,400 |
|
value of Y does not depend on the value of X. So |
|
|
|
243 |
|
00:18:52,400 --> 00:18:58,360 |
|
as X increases, Y is constant. Now for the |
|
|
|
244 |
|
00:18:58,360 --> 00:19:03,620 |
|
previous example, R was 0.7621. To determine the |
|
|
|
245 |
|
00:19:03,620 --> 00:19:06,760 |
|
coefficient of determination, One more time, |
|
|
|
246 |
|
00:19:07,460 --> 00:19:11,760 |
|
square this value, that's only valid for simple |
|
|
|
247 |
|
00:19:11,760 --> 00:19:14,980 |
|
linear regression. Otherwise, you cannot square |
|
|
|
248 |
|
00:19:14,980 --> 00:19:17,580 |
|
the value of R in order to determine the |
|
|
|
249 |
|
00:19:17,580 --> 00:19:20,820 |
|
coefficient of determination. So again, this is |
|
|
|
250 |
|
00:19:20,820 --> 00:19:26,420 |
|
only true for |
|
|
|
251 |
|
00:19:26,420 --> 00:19:29,980 |
|
simple linear regression. |
|
|
|
252 |
|
00:19:35,460 --> 00:19:41,320 |
|
So R squared is 0.7621 squared will give 0.5808. |
|
|
|
253 |
|
00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:46,120 |
|
Now, the meaning of this value, first you have to |
|
|
|
254 |
|
00:19:46,120 --> 00:19:53,280 |
|
multiply this by 100. So 58.08% of the variation |
|
|
|
255 |
|
00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:57,440 |
|
in house prices is explained by the variation in |
|
|
|
256 |
|
00:19:57,440 --> 00:20:05,190 |
|
square feet. So 58, around 0.08% of the variation |
|
|
|
257 |
|
00:20:05,190 --> 00:20:12,450 |
|
in size of the house, I'm sorry, in the price is |
|
|
|
258 |
|
00:20:12,450 --> 00:20:16,510 |
|
explained by |
|
|
|
259 |
|
00:20:16,510 --> 00:20:25,420 |
|
its size. So size by itself. Size only explains |
|
|
|
260 |
|
00:20:25,420 --> 00:20:30,320 |
|
around 50-80% of the selling price of a house. Now |
|
|
|
261 |
|
00:20:30,320 --> 00:20:35,000 |
|
the remaining percent which is around, this is the |
|
|
|
262 |
|
00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:38,860 |
|
error, or the remaining percent, this one is due |
|
|
|
263 |
|
00:20:38,860 --> 00:20:50,040 |
|
to other variables, other independent variables. |
|
|
|
264 |
|
00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:53,820 |
|
That might affect the change of price. |
|
|
|
265 |
|
00:21:04,840 --> 00:21:11,160 |
|
But since the size of the house explains 58%, that |
|
|
|
266 |
|
00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:15,660 |
|
means it's a significant variable. Now, if we add |
|
|
|
267 |
|
00:21:15,660 --> 00:21:19,250 |
|
more variables, to the regression equation for |
|
|
|
268 |
|
00:21:19,250 --> 00:21:23,950 |
|
sure this value will be increased. So maybe 60 or |
|
|
|
269 |
|
00:21:23,950 --> 00:21:28,510 |
|
65 or 67 and so on. But 60% or 50 is more enough |
|
|
|
270 |
|
00:21:28,510 --> 00:21:31,870 |
|
sometimes. But R squared, as R squared increases, |
|
|
|
271 |
|
00:21:32,090 --> 00:21:35,530 |
|
it means we have good fit of the model. That means |
|
|
|
272 |
|
00:21:35,530 --> 00:21:41,230 |
|
the model is accurate to determine or to make some |
|
|
|
273 |
|
00:21:41,230 --> 00:21:46,430 |
|
prediction. So that's for the coefficient of |
|
|
|
274 |
|
00:21:46,430 --> 00:21:58,350 |
|
determination. Any question? So we covered simple |
|
|
|
275 |
|
00:21:58,350 --> 00:22:01,790 |
|
linear regression model. We know now how can we |
|
|
|
276 |
|
00:22:01,790 --> 00:22:06,390 |
|
compute the values of B0 and B1. We can state or |
|
|
|
277 |
|
00:22:06,390 --> 00:22:10,550 |
|
write the regression equation, and we can do some |
|
|
|
278 |
|
00:22:10,550 --> 00:22:14,370 |
|
interpretation about P0 and P1, making |
|
|
|
279 |
|
00:22:14,370 --> 00:22:21,530 |
|
predictions, and make some comments about the |
|
|
|
280 |
|
00:22:21,530 --> 00:22:27,390 |
|
coefficient of determination. That's all. So I'm |
|
|
|
281 |
|
00:22:27,390 --> 00:22:31,910 |
|
going to stop now, and I will give some time to |
|
|
|
282 |
|
00:22:31,910 --> 00:22:33,030 |
|
discuss some practice. |
|
|
|
|