|
1 |
|
00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:09,680 |
|
Assalamualaikum and good morning from Gaza. This |
|
|
|
2 |
|
00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:12,100 |
|
is English poetry at the Islamic University of |
|
|
|
3 |
|
00:00:12,100 --> 00:00:18,000 |
|
Gaza. Today we move to do something perhaps a |
|
|
|
4 |
|
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:22,180 |
|
little bit different from Neoclassicism. But don't |
|
|
|
5 |
|
00:00:22,180 --> 00:00:25,640 |
|
be mistaken, this is not that much different from |
|
|
|
6 |
|
00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:29,400 |
|
Metaphysical poetry or the poetry of John Donne. |
|
|
|
7 |
|
00:00:29,480 --> 00:00:32,560 |
|
Unfortunately, when we read many English |
|
|
|
8 |
|
00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:35,800 |
|
literature books, English poetry books, they will |
|
|
|
9 |
|
00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:39,700 |
|
tell you that the real Modernist movement started |
|
|
|
10 |
|
00:00:39,700 --> 00:00:42,380 |
|
with the Romantic poets, with the likes of William |
|
|
|
11 |
|
00:00:42,380 --> 00:00:46,980 |
|
Blake, Wordsworth, and Coleridge. This is true to |
|
|
|
12 |
|
00:00:46,980 --> 00:00:51,260 |
|
some extent, but sadly this erases the likes of |
|
|
|
13 |
|
00:00:51,260 --> 00:00:53,900 |
|
John Donne, who himself was practicing this |
|
|
|
14 |
|
00:00:53,900 --> 00:00:57,640 |
|
probably 100 years before the Romantics. We've |
|
|
|
15 |
|
00:00:57,640 --> 00:01:00,940 |
|
seen how John Donne categorically refused the |
|
|
|
16 |
|
00:01:00,940 --> 00:01:05,220 |
|
rules of decorum, how he put meaning over rule, |
|
|
|
17 |
|
00:01:05,340 --> 00:01:08,540 |
|
how he didn't like the collective idealistic |
|
|
|
18 |
|
00:01:08,540 --> 00:01:13,180 |
|
poetry of the Elizabethan age. But with the |
|
|
|
19 |
|
00:01:13,180 --> 00:01:15,920 |
|
Romantics, we speak about totally, also in a way, |
|
|
|
20 |
|
00:01:16,020 --> 00:01:18,700 |
|
totally different poets and their sensibility and |
|
|
|
21 |
|
00:01:18,700 --> 00:01:22,440 |
|
their approach to individualism and the universe, |
|
|
|
22 |
|
00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:28,420 |
|
nature. If I want to draw a timeline, a random |
|
|
|
23 |
|
00:01:28,420 --> 00:01:35,030 |
|
timeline, of Neoclassicism, I usually claim that |
|
|
|
24 |
|
00:01:35,030 --> 00:01:39,270 |
|
this is where perhaps John Donne was writing |
|
|
|
25 |
|
00:01:39,270 --> 00:01:43,910 |
|
poetry. He was writing poetry during the heyday, |
|
|
|
26 |
|
00:01:44,070 --> 00:01:48,460 |
|
the peak of Neoclassicism, when people, the giants |
|
|
|
27 |
|
00:01:48,460 --> 00:01:53,160 |
|
like Samuel Johnson and later on, the great names |
|
|
|
28 |
|
00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:58,620 |
|
50 years later, 100 years later, like Ben Jonson, |
|
|
|
29 |
|
00:01:58,900 --> 00:02:03,060 |
|
Samuel Johnson, John Dryden, and Alexander Pope |
|
|
|
30 |
|
00:02:03,060 --> 00:02:06,060 |
|
later on, were dominating the scene. For John |
|
|
|
31 |
|
00:02:06,060 --> 00:02:11,400 |
|
Donne, it was swimming not against one current, |
|
|
|
32 |
|
00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,820 |
|
but swimming against currents of giants, people |
|
|
|
33 |
|
00:02:14,820 --> 00:02:17,280 |
|
who were already loved, who were writing some of |
|
|
|
34 |
|
00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:20,920 |
|
the greatest literature, poetry in English. So it |
|
|
|
35 |
|
00:02:20,920 --> 00:02:23,780 |
|
wasn't easy for him. And that's why this is the |
|
|
|
36 |
|
00:02:23,780 --> 00:02:26,480 |
|
reason why he, to a great extent, was |
|
|
|
37 |
|
00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:29,120 |
|
negatively framed, like we explained before. |
|
|
|
38 |
|
00:02:30,430 --> 00:02:32,990 |
|
He was largely kicked out of the English canon, was not |
|
|
|
39 |
|
00:02:32,990 --> 00:02:36,670 |
|
taken seriously for many years. If I want to talk about |
|
|
|
40 |
|
00:02:36,670 --> 00:02:41,430 |
|
Romanticism, probably this is where they were |
|
|
|
41 |
|
00:02:41,430 --> 00:02:44,470 |
|
writing, when Neoclassicism was already in |
|
|
|
42 |
|
00:02:44,470 --> 00:02:48,010 |
|
decline, and people had already had enough of the |
|
|
|
43 |
|
00:02:48,010 --> 00:02:50,770 |
|
same poetry being written in the same way, |
|
|
|
44 |
|
00:02:50,810 --> 00:02:52,930 |
|
following the same rules, you know, rules of |
|
|
|
45 |
|
00:02:52,930 --> 00:02:57,010 |
|
decorum, the subject matter, and the form, and the |
|
|
|
46 |
|
00:02:57,010 --> 00:02:59,620 |
|
language, et cetera. I'm not saying that the |
|
|
|
47 |
|
00:02:59,620 --> 00:03:01,560 |
|
Romantics, I'm not suggesting that the Romantics |
|
|
|
48 |
|
00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:04,060 |
|
had it easy; they didn't, because most of the |
|
|
|
49 |
|
00:03:04,060 --> 00:03:06,480 |
|
Romantic poets, you will be surprised to know that they |
|
|
|
50 |
|
00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:11,000 |
|
were not famous during their lifetimes. Again, |
|
|
|
51 |
|
00:03:11,220 --> 00:03:13,760 |
|
there is this connection between them and |
|
|
|
52 |
|
00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:17,360 |
|
individualism. The four great Romantic poets, |
|
|
|
53 |
|
00:03:17,780 --> 00:03:21,500 |
|
probably except for Shelley, almost all of them were |
|
|
|
54 |
|
00:03:21,500 --> 00:03:24,380 |
|
not famous, were not sometimes taken seriously by |
|
|
|
55 |
|
00:03:24,380 --> 00:03:27,800 |
|
their contemporaries. We'll see this as we go. Today, we |
|
|
|
56 |
|
00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:33,890 |
|
begin with the one and only William Blake. William |
|
|
|
57 |
|
00:03:33,890 --> 00:03:37,050 |
|
Blake wrote some of the most beautiful poetry in |
|
|
|
58 |
|
00:03:37,050 --> 00:03:41,170 |
|
English. Many people like to classify him as a |
|
|
|
59 |
|
00:03:41,170 --> 00:03:44,550 |
|
unique poet, a poet of his own, in his own |
|
|
|
60 |
|
00:03:44,550 --> 00:03:48,810 |
|
world. But others like to consider him as a pre- |
|
|
|
61 |
|
00:03:48,810 --> 00:03:51,470 |
|
Romantic, somebody who started, who pioneered |
|
|
|
62 |
|
00:03:51,470 --> 00:03:53,950 |
|
this movement, who ushered in this movement, and who influenced |
|
|
|
63 |
|
00:03:53,950 --> 00:03:57,330 |
|
Wordsworth and Coleridge. So whether he is a |
|
|
|
64 |
|
00:03:57,330 --> 00:03:59,350 |
|
Romantic or a pre-Romantic, it's not a big issue |
|
|
|
65 |
|
00:03:59,350 --> 00:04:01,930 |
|
for us, but we'll find so many similarities |
|
|
|
66 |
|
00:04:01,930 --> 00:04:05,570 |
|
between him and Wordsworth and some other Romantic |
|
|
|
67 |
|
00:04:05,570 --> 00:04:12,190 |
|
poets, like even Shelley and Keats. Now, I don't |
|
|
|
68 |
|
00:04:12,190 --> 00:04:13,970 |
|
want to speak much about his background. I don't want to give |
|
|
|
69 |
|
00:04:13,970 --> 00:04:16,470 |
|
you the background and the context. Let's see his |
|
|
|
70 |
|
00:04:16,470 --> 00:04:21,230 |
|
poetry and then try to draw some conclusions or |
|
|
|
71 |
|
00:04:21,230 --> 00:04:26,010 |
|
come up with the features that we might find in |
|
|
|
72 |
|
00:04:26,010 --> 00:04:30,470 |
|
his poetry. This is a short poem by William |
|
|
|
73 |
|
00:04:30,470 --> 00:04:35,570 |
|
Blake. Again, you already studied this perhaps or |
|
|
|
74 |
|
00:04:35,570 --> 00:04:38,990 |
|
read it before. Small, short, beautiful, cute, |
|
|
|
75 |
|
00:04:39,150 --> 00:04:42,010 |
|
punchy poem. It's just eight lines, not only |
|
|
|
76 |
|
00:04:42,010 --> 00:04:45,630 |
|
eight lines. Is it the shortest poem so far in this |
|
|
|
77 |
|
00:04:45,630 --> 00:04:49,070 |
|
course? Perhaps yes, but also look at the lines. |
|
|
|
78 |
|
00:04:50,500 --> 00:04:53,580 |
|
Even the short lines, probably if you count the |
|
|
|
79 |
|
00:04:53,580 --> 00:04:56,040 |
|
syllables, you'll come across about five syllables, |
|
|
|
80 |
|
00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,820 |
|
which is half the syllables we had in the sonnet |
|
|
|
81 |
|
00:04:59,820 --> 00:05:05,860 |
|
and other poems. So this says, "The Sick Rose," O |
|
|
|
82 |
|
00:05:05,860 --> 00:05:11,900 |
|
rose, thou art sick. The invisible worm that flies |
|
|
|
83 |
|
00:05:11,900 --> 00:05:16,600 |
|
in the night in the howling storm has found out |
|
|
|
84 |
|
00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:22,120 |
|
thy bed of crimson joy, and his dark secret love |
|
|
|
85 |
|
00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:28,020 |
|
does thy life destroy. Somebody read, please. |
|
|
|
86 |
|
00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:34,200 |
|
The aurora of the Arctic, the invisible worm that |
|
|
|
87 |
|
00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,880 |
|
flies in the night in the howling storm. Howling |
|
|
|
88 |
|
00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:41,700 |
|
storm. The howling storm has found out thy bed of |
|
|
|
89 |
|
00:05:41,700 --> 00:05:46,800 |
|
crimson joy, and his dark secret love does thy |
|
|
|
90 |
|
00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:48,660 |
|
life destroy. Thank you very much. |
|
|
|
91 |
|
00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:09,680 |
|
Can you focus on the tone? How would you...? Is this |
|
|
|
92 |
|
00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:13,100 |
|
a celebratory poem? Is it sad, dark, happy, |
|
|
|
93 |
|
00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:18,500 |
|
optimistic, pessimistic? Can you capture this in |
|
|
|
94 |
|
00:06:18,500 --> 00:06:19,200 |
|
the way you read it? |
|
|
|
95 |
|
00:06:23,260 --> 00:06:27,900 |
|
Okay. So how would you read it? Would |
|
|
|
96 |
|
00:06:27,900 --> 00:06:30,060 |
|
you read it with this tone in mind? |
|
|
|
97 |
|
00:06:42,380 --> 00:06:46,600 |
|
Okay. Thank you |
|
|
|
98 |
|
00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:47,240 |
|
very much. Very good. |
|
|
|
99 |
|
00:06:58,990 --> 00:06:59,470 |
|
Okay, |
|
|
|
100 |
|
00:07:03,650 --> 00:07:06,670 |
|
thank you very much, very good readings. Now, if |
|
|
|
101 |
|
00:07:06,670 --> 00:07:11,710 |
|
this were a short story, a narrative, what type of |
|
|
|
102 |
|
00:07:11,710 --> 00:07:17,250 |
|
narrator do we have here? First person? Are you |
|
|
|
103 |
|
00:07:17,250 --> 00:07:17,470 |
|
sure? |
|
|
|
104 |
|
00:07:34,210 --> 00:07:38,930 |
|
That's not what a first-person narrator is. First- |
|
|
|
105 |
|
00:07:38,930 --> 00:07:43,610 |
|
person narration uses "I." So there's no "I" |
|
|
|
106 |
|
00:07:43,610 --> 00:07:46,330 |
|
like "Shall I compare thee..." or "Come live with me..." and |
|
|
|
107 |
|
00:07:46,330 --> 00:07:51,450 |
|
most of the poetry we studied already uses a first-person |
|
|
|
108 |
|
00:07:51,450 --> 00:07:54,410 |
|
narrator, whether it is a personal experience like |
|
|
|
109 |
|
00:07:54,410 --> 00:07:56,650 |
|
in John Donne's work, or a collective personal experience |
|
|
|
110 |
|
00:07:56,650 --> 00:08:00,970 |
|
like in Shakespeare's works, for example. So |
|
|
|
111 |
|
00:08:00,970 --> 00:08:05,290 |
|
there is "you" and "your," but basically this is a |
|
|
|
112 |
|
00:08:05,290 --> 00:08:07,810 |
|
poem that talks about something using the third- |
|
|
|
113 |
|
00:08:07,810 --> 00:08:08,530 |
|
person pronoun. |
|
|
|
114 |
|
00:08:11,330 --> 00:08:17,170 |
|
making it a third-person narrative. So the |
|
|
|
115 |
|
00:08:17,170 --> 00:08:19,670 |
|
speaker is talking to someone; true, there's |
|
|
|
116 |
|
00:08:19,670 --> 00:08:22,030 |
|
some kind of dialogue with the other being silent, |
|
|
|
117 |
|
00:08:22,910 --> 00:08:30,430 |
|
but also the persona, the speaker here, who is not |
|
|
|
118 |
|
00:08:30,430 --> 00:08:32,590 |
|
a character in this text, unlike in |
|
|
|
119 |
|
00:08:32,590 --> 00:08:35,290 |
|
Shakespeare's "Shall I compare thee...", the speaker is |
|
|
|
120 |
|
00:08:35,290 --> 00:08:38,970 |
|
a character in the poem. Here, the speaker is not; |
|
|
|
121 |
|
00:08:39,090 --> 00:08:45,470 |
|
he is basically an outsider to the poem. And the |
|
|
|
122 |
|
00:08:45,470 --> 00:08:47,470 |
|
second question I want to ask is, who are the |
|
|
|
123 |
|
00:08:47,470 --> 00:08:52,910 |
|
characters here? Who are the characters? Okay, |
|
|
|
124 |
|
00:08:53,630 --> 00:08:58,590 |
|
please, okay. Okay, you're saying rose, like |
|
|
|
125 |
|
00:08:58,590 --> 00:08:58,910 |
|
this, |
|
|
|
126 |
|
00:09:01,770 --> 00:09:03,390 |
|
Like what? Rose? |
|
|
|
127 |
|
00:09:06,610 --> 00:09:13,290 |
|
Or rose? Would it make a |
|
|
|
128 |
|
00:09:13,290 --> 00:09:13,730 |
|
difference? |
|
|
|
129 |
|
00:09:17,610 --> 00:09:19,690 |
|
In the title it says—I'm not sure if this is the |
|
|
|
130 |
|
00:09:19,690 --> 00:09:22,770 |
|
exact title—it says "The Sick Rose," particularly |
|
|
|
131 |
|
00:09:22,770 --> 00:09:27,070 |
|
"The Sick Rose," but the first line says "O Rose" with |
|
|
|
132 |
|
00:09:27,070 --> 00:09:27,750 |
|
a capital R. |
|
|
|
133 |
|
00:09:31,100 --> 00:09:33,880 |
|
So if you're saying rose, somebody said rose, this |
|
|
|
134 |
|
00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:37,540 |
|
is a name, somebody's name, right? |
|
|
|
135 |
|
00:09:40,100 --> 00:09:44,400 |
|
The "Rose," with a capital R here could be a proper noun, "Rose," also a |
|
|
|
136 |
|
00:09:44,400 --> 00:09:47,300 |
|
rose is possible, could be... You say, for example, |
|
|
|
137 |
|
00:09:47,780 --> 00:09:52,860 |
|
grammatically speaking, "A Mr. Smith is |
|
|
|
138 |
|
00:09:52,860 --> 00:09:55,140 |
|
waiting for you." So somebody whose name is Mr. |
|
|
|
139 |
|
00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:58,060 |
|
Smith and you don't know this man before. The Mr. |
|
|
|
140 |
|
00:09:58,300 --> 00:10:03,120 |
|
Smith, like he's a man and the one and only, in a |
|
|
|
141 |
|
00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:09,780 |
|
way. So this is the main character, and the worm, |
|
|
|
142 |
|
00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:16,990 |
|
are you sure? And so okay, we have the worm. The |
|
|
|
143 |
|
00:10:16,990 --> 00:10:21,030 |
|
speaker...The speaker is usually, in a narrative, if |
|
|
|
144 |
|
00:10:21,030 --> 00:10:24,030 |
|
it is a third-person narrator, we don't count the |
|
|
|
145 |
|
00:10:24,030 --> 00:10:29,070 |
|
narrator as one of the characters, most often. So, |
|
|
|
146 |
|
00:10:29,630 --> 00:10:32,550 |
|
the worm and the rose. That's very good. What |
|
|
|
147 |
|
00:10:32,550 --> 00:10:35,910 |
|
about the timing? The setting? Before we come to |
|
|
|
148 |
|
00:10:35,910 --> 00:10:38,030 |
|
talk more about this, what about the setting? The |
|
|
|
149 |
|
00:10:38,030 --> 00:10:43,890 |
|
setting, sorry. It's taking place at |
|
|
|
150 |
|
00:10:43,890 --> 00:10:45,630 |
|
night, in the night. |
|
|
|
151 |
|
00:10:49,310 --> 00:10:53,030 |
|
What's happening during this night? A howling |
|
|
|
152 |
|
00:10:53,030 --> 00:10:58,130 |
|
storm. So probably this is winter, right? Because |
|
|
|
153 |
|
00:10:58,130 --> 00:11:02,450 |
|
there is a storm that is not only a storm, but a |
|
|
|
154 |
|
00:11:02,450 --> 00:11:06,250 |
|
howling storm. Look at the choice of word here. In |
|
|
|
155 |
|
00:11:06,250 --> 00:11:09,890 |
|
a way, this is onomatopoeic. "Howling." The sound |
|
|
|
156 |
|
00:11:09,890 --> 00:11:15,910 |
|
that's like a sound a storm could make in a poem, |
|
|
|
157 |
|
00:11:16,110 --> 00:11:21,510 |
|
if not in real life. So a howling storm, it's |
|
|
|
158 |
|
00:11:21,510 --> 00:11:27,410 |
|
dark, stormy, and the storm is very strong. The wind |
|
|
|
159 |
|
00:11:27,410 --> 00:11:30,330 |
|
could be heard through the howling storm. |
|
|
|
160 |
|
00:11:34,690 --> 00:11:36,570 |
|
Okay, what else is there in the poem? |
|
|
|
161 |
|
00:11:41,210 --> 00:11:43,570 |
|
What else do you notice? Like other than the |
|
|
|
162 |
|
00:11:43,570 --> 00:11:46,450 |
|
place, the time, the setting? |
|
|
|
163 |
|
00:11:49,420 --> 00:11:51,900 |
|
It is in the present tense. Are you sure? Yes. |
|
|
|
164 |
|
00:11:52,020 --> 00:11:56,220 |
|
Where is the main tense? Grammatically speaking, |
|
|
|
165 |
|
00:11:56,640 --> 00:11:58,580 |
|
what sentence is it? How many sentences do we have |
|
|
|
166 |
|
00:11:58,580 --> 00:12:06,340 |
|
here? Two. Two? Where are they? First stanza or |
|
|
|
167 |
|
00:12:06,340 --> 00:12:09,320 |
|
first line? First line. First stanza is one |
|
|
|
168 |
|
00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:13,140 |
|
sentence? No, first line. Because here it says, "O |
|
|
|
169 |
|
00:12:13,140 --> 00:12:15,980 |
|
Rose, thou art sick," the invisible worm that flies in the |
|
|
|
170 |
|
00:12:15,980 --> 00:12:20,580 |
|
night in the howling storm. Still a dependent |
|
|
|
171 |
|
00:12:20,580 --> 00:12:24,280 |
|
clause. Dependent clause because we have the |
|
|
|
172 |
|
00:12:24,280 --> 00:12:27,120 |
|
subject, we have the adjectival clause. So the |
|
|
|
173 |
|
00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:30,860 |
|
first... please. Two sentences. Where are they? The |
|
|
|
174 |
|
00:12:30,860 --> 00:12:35,560 |
|
first line is a sentence. Okay. And then there's... |
|
|
|
175 |
|
00:12:35,820 --> 00:12:40,700 |
|
This is one whole sentence? Three sentences. Three |
|
|
|
176 |
|
00:12:40,700 --> 00:12:43,400 |
|
sentences, are you sure? Yes. What is a sentence? |
|
|
|
177 |
|
00:12:44,940 --> 00:12:46,740 |
|
We have a verb in a sentence. |
|
|
|
178 |
|
00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:52,780 |
|
Are you sure? What is a sentence? |
|
|
|
179 |
|
00:12:57,780 --> 00:13:02,260 |
|
But this |
|
|
|
180 |
|
00:13:02,260 --> 00:13:08,640 |
|
is a comma, Raf. But this is a comma. A sentence |
|
|
|
181 |
|
00:13:08,640 --> 00:13:11,840 |
|
is a group of words with at least one main clause. |
|
|
|
182 |
|
00:13:12,680 --> 00:13:16,640 |
|
A group of words that begins with a capital letter |
|
|
|
183 |
|
00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:20,470 |
|
and ends with a full stop. A full stop, a question |
|
|
|
184 |
|
00:13:20,470 --> 00:13:22,550 |
|
mark sometimes, or an exclamation mark, like in this |
|
|
|
185 |
|
00:13:22,550 --> 00:13:25,330 |
|
case. So this is one sentence, one simple |
|
|
|
186 |
|
00:13:25,330 --> 00:13:29,130 |
|
sentence. "O Rose, thou art sick." "Thou art sick." |
|
|
|
187 |
|
00:13:30,930 --> 00:13:35,150 |
|
"Thou art sick." And I really can't understand |
|
|
|
188 |
|
00:13:35,150 --> 00:13:39,630 |
|
exactly what... like imagine the situation here |
|
|
|
189 |
|
00:13:39,630 --> 00:13:43,490 |
|
clearly; like is he talking to the rose? Is the |
|
|
|
190 |
|
00:13:43,490 --> 00:13:45,910 |
|
speaker... what is the speaker? Is the speaker, like |
|
|
|
191 |
|
00:13:45,910 --> 00:13:50,030 |
|
because here we have a few saying "rose," and a |
|
|
|
192 |
|
00:13:50,030 --> 00:13:55,430 |
|
worm, or "the" worm, it's "the" here, right? So is the |
|
|
|
193 |
|
00:13:55,430 --> 00:14:01,610 |
|
speaker a bird? A tree? Or is it a human |
|
|
|
194 |
|
00:14:01,610 --> 00:14:04,290 |
|
being? Like observing and saying, does the rose |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
00:15:42,850 --> 00:15:44,870 |
|
complicated, it's the sentence that you say, but |
|
|
|
224 |
|
00:15:44,870 --> 00:15:48,050 |
|
everything else gets complicated because things |
|
|
|
225 |
|
00:15:48,050 --> 00:15:53,070 |
|
get inside others. I like how the worm is |
|
|
|
226 |
|
00:15:53,070 --> 00:15:56,610 |
|
described and yet described again with a phrase |
|
|
|
227 |
|
00:15:56,610 --> 00:15:58,730 |
|
and another phrase, and then the verb, and then the |
|
|
|
228 |
|
00:15:58,730 --> 00:16:01,110 |
|
object, and then another prepositional phrase; |
|
|
|
229 |
|
00:16:01,230 --> 00:16:05,730 |
|
things get inside each other. Interesting. What |
|
|
|
230 |
|
00:16:05,730 --> 00:16:09,890 |
|
else do you notice? Other things about the poem? |
|
|
|
231 |
|
00:16:11,750 --> 00:16:14,090 |
|
What do you find interesting, different, |
|
|
|
232 |
|
00:16:14,670 --> 00:16:20,010 |
|
intriguing? Okay, okay, I'll go to the jump; I'll |
|
|
|
233 |
|
00:16:20,010 --> 00:16:23,810 |
|
jump to the rhyme scheme. There is sick, a; are |
|
|
|
234 |
|
00:16:23,810 --> 00:16:30,590 |
|
you sure? Are you sure? Are you sure? Should it be |
|
|
|
235 |
|
00:16:30,590 --> 00:16:33,170 |
|
a? This is the /kah/ sound. |
|
|
|
236 |
|
00:16:38,610 --> 00:16:43,970 |
|
It's always A? Okay, good. Always A. And then |
|
|
|
237 |
|
00:16:43,970 --> 00:16:52,110 |
|
worm, B. And then night, C. And storm, possibly |
|
|
|
238 |
|
00:16:52,110 --> 00:16:57,690 |
|
another B. Not one hundred percent, but still. Now |
|
|
|
239 |
|
00:16:57,690 --> 00:17:00,190 |
|
I know, like I told you before, that people would |
|
|
|
240 |
|
00:17:00,190 --> 00:17:03,270 |
|
continue with A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, but I like |
|
|
|
241 |
|
00:17:03,270 --> 00:17:06,330 |
|
doing it differently, where we go back to the |
|
|
|
242 |
|
00:17:06,330 --> 00:17:08,370 |
|
alphabet with every new stanza, because sometimes |
|
|
|
243 |
|
00:17:08,370 --> 00:17:11,410 |
|
you have long poems, and then you run out of |
|
|
|
244 |
|
00:17:11,410 --> 00:17:14,310 |
|
letters, and then what should I do next? Different |
|
|
|
245 |
|
00:17:14,310 --> 00:17:19,050 |
|
scenarios, okay? So go back again to the rhyme |
|
|
|
246 |
|
00:17:19,050 --> 00:17:21,390 |
|
scheme. We have here A, |
|
|
|
247 |
|
00:17:25,130 --> 00:17:27,530 |
|
B? C? Are you sure? |
|
|
|
248 |
|
00:17:30,410 --> 00:17:31,410 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
249 |
|
00:17:31,450 --> 00:17:31,930 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
250 |
|
00:17:31,930 --> 00:17:32,010 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
251 |
|
00:17:32,010 --> 00:17:33,030 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
252 |
|
00:17:33,330 --> 00:17:34,250 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
253 |
|
00:17:34,250 --> 00:17:38,450 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
254 |
|
00:17:38,450 --> 00:17:38,550 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
255 |
|
00:17:38,550 --> 00:17:42,230 |
|
Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. Joy. |
|
|
|
256 |
|
00:17:46,490 --> 00:17:46,890 |
|
Joy. |
|
|
|
257 |
|
00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:58,320 |
|
Okay, so the rhyme scheme is perfect. What else do you |
|
|
|
258 |
|
00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:03,580 |
|
notice? Please. Thank you very much. Look at the |
|
|
|
259 |
|
00:18:03,580 --> 00:18:06,880 |
|
simple words. I'm not sure which word you checked |
|
|
|
260 |
|
00:18:06,880 --> 00:18:09,220 |
|
using; you used the dictionary to check to |
|
|
|
261 |
|
00:18:09,220 --> 00:18:13,380 |
|
understand. How many words did you check? |
|
|
|
262 |
|
00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:16,680 |
|
Honestly, those of you who looked at the report. |
|
|
|
263 |
|
00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:23,950 |
|
That's the word crimson. Okay, and? Howling, even |
|
|
|
264 |
|
00:18:23,950 --> 00:18:26,130 |
|
if you don't know what howling is, you can always |
|
|
|
265 |
|
00:18:26,130 --> 00:18:30,170 |
|
guess, because usually we don't say a calm storm; |
|
|
|
266 |
|
00:18:30,450 --> 00:18:34,410 |
|
usually a storm is windy, |
|
|
|
267 |
|
00:18:34,810 --> 00:18:42,470 |
|
stormy, strong, powerful, so howling storm, and |
|
|
|
268 |
|
00:18:42,470 --> 00:18:47,860 |
|
then crimson, possibly. Again, you're not a native |
|
|
|
269 |
|
00:18:47,860 --> 00:18:50,000 |
|
speaker, so if you don't know one or two words, |
|
|
|
270 |
|
00:18:50,120 --> 00:18:52,820 |
|
that's still a good achievement, but it means that |
|
|
|
271 |
|
00:18:52,820 --> 00:18:57,290 |
|
this man is using simple language. Simplicity of |
|
|
|
272 |
|
00:18:57,290 --> 00:18:59,790 |
|
language. Remember the neoclassicists, who would |
|
|
|
273 |
|
00:18:59,790 --> 00:19:02,170 |
|
always, every couple of lines, they would send you |
|
|
|
274 |
|
00:19:02,170 --> 00:19:04,650 |
|
rushing to the dictionary, checking the meaning, and |
|
|
|
275 |
|
00:19:04,650 --> 00:19:08,130 |
|
even going Googling stuff to understand what he |
|
|
|
276 |
|
00:19:08,130 --> 00:19:11,250 |
|
means by these references and these allusions, and |
|
|
|
277 |
|
00:19:11,250 --> 00:19:13,610 |
|
translating this Latin and translating this Greek, |
|
|
|
278 |
|
00:19:13,610 --> 00:19:15,650 |
|
and understanding why he's intertexting with |
|
|
|
279 |
|
00:19:15,650 --> 00:19:19,240 |
|
Horace and everything. You come to the poem, and |
|
|
|
280 |
|
00:19:19,240 --> 00:19:21,200 |
|
you stay for the poem. Unlike the NAE classes, |
|
|
|
281 |
|
00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:23,340 |
|
where usually you come for the poem, and then you |
|
|
|
282 |
|
00:19:23,340 --> 00:19:27,200 |
|
rush out to dictionaries and the internet, and then you |
|
|
|
283 |
|
00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:31,820 |
|
come back and go on and on. Simple language. |
|
|
|
284 |
|
00:19:32,180 --> 00:19:34,060 |
|
That's very good. A very good thing to notice. |
|
|
|
285 |
|
00:19:34,400 --> 00:19:36,680 |
|
Please. The number of syllables are not the same |
|
|
|
286 |
|
00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:37,200 |
|
in English. |
|
|
|
287 |
|
00:19:40,250 --> 00:19:43,370 |
|
Okay, I'll come to this, but again, let's move |
|
|
|
288 |
|
00:19:43,370 --> 00:19:46,830 |
|
gradually, Rosanne. What about the words, the |
|
|
|
289 |
|
00:19:46,830 --> 00:19:50,210 |
|
choice of words? Tell me this word is interesting, |
|
|
|
290 |
|
00:19:50,310 --> 00:19:52,010 |
|
for example, or that word; this phrase is |
|
|
|
291 |
|
00:19:52,010 --> 00:19:53,950 |
|
interesting. What things do you find interesting? |
|
|
|
292 |
|
00:19:56,720 --> 00:19:59,580 |
|
We'll come to symbolism, like again it's always |
|
|
|
293 |
|
00:19:59,580 --> 00:20:02,640 |
|
better to work gradually; look at the poem, notice |
|
|
|
294 |
|
00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,260 |
|
the shape and the form, and then look at individual |
|
|
|
295 |
|
00:20:05,260 --> 00:20:09,660 |
|
words, so what does every individual word inspire |
|
|
|
296 |
|
00:20:09,660 --> 00:20:15,150 |
|
in you, or what does it connote? And then you go |
|
|
|
297 |
|
00:20:15,150 --> 00:20:17,110 |
|
for, for example, reading the poem, trying to |
|
|
|
298 |
|
00:20:17,110 --> 00:20:18,950 |
|
understand. We'll do this. We try to link |
|
|
|
299 |
|
00:20:18,950 --> 00:20:22,370 |
|
everything to a possible reading of the poem. Is |
|
|
|
300 |
|
00:20:22,370 --> 00:20:24,490 |
|
there one word or one phrase you find interesting, |
|
|
|
301 |
|
00:20:24,590 --> 00:20:26,710 |
|
like we did with, for example, here, the howling |
|
|
|
302 |
|
00:20:26,710 --> 00:20:31,890 |
|
storm, or other words? He's giving a bad image |
|
|
|
303 |
|
00:20:31,890 --> 00:20:34,670 |
|
about what we already know. Again, my question is |
|
|
|
304 |
|
00:20:34,670 --> 00:20:37,830 |
|
one particular word, one particular phrase. We're |
|
|
|
305 |
|
00:20:37,830 --> 00:20:40,090 |
|
not going to comment on the meaning now. We're |
|
|
|
306 |
|
00:20:40,090 --> 00:20:41,690 |
|
working step by step. |
|
|
|
307 |
|
00:20:45,960 --> 00:20:48,920 |
|
A worm is beautiful? Do you like worms? |
|
|
|
308 |
|
00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:55,740 |
|
Worms? Ah, that's because you're reading it "warm." |
|
|
|
309 |
|
00:20:55,840 --> 00:21:00,580 |
|
It's not warm. And it's a character. It's a thing. |
|
|
|
310 |
|
00:21:00,980 --> 00:21:06,480 |
|
It's a creature. So is worm good or bad? Positive |
|
|
|
311 |
|
00:21:06,480 --> 00:21:10,870 |
|
or negative? It's what makes the rose sick. Thank |
|
|
|
312 |
|
00:21:10,870 --> 00:21:14,170 |
|
you. At least it is, even if worm is good, it is |
|
|
|
313 |
|
00:21:14,170 --> 00:21:20,330 |
|
what is making the rose sick. And the worm is |
|
|
|
314 |
|
00:21:20,330 --> 00:21:23,950 |
|
described as? Invisible. That's a very good word. |
|
|
|
315 |
|
00:21:24,490 --> 00:21:29,530 |
|
So it's not only dark and winter and cold and |
|
|
|
316 |
|
00:21:29,530 --> 00:21:33,350 |
|
stormy and howling. This creature, the cause of |
|
|
|
317 |
|
00:21:33,350 --> 00:21:38,820 |
|
this sickness, is working invisibly. It's not; |
|
|
|
318 |
|
00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:41,820 |
|
it's invisible. What does it mean, invisible? |
|
|
|
319 |
|
00:21:42,080 --> 00:21:47,760 |
|
Because it's like, is the worm in disguise, |
|
|
|
320 |
|
00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:50,520 |
|
disguised? Is it a close; is it a family member? |
|
|
|
321 |
|
00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:53,080 |
|
Is it somebody you trust, somebody you try, you |
|
|
|
322 |
|
00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:56,040 |
|
seek safety, security, and protection from? And |
|
|
|
323 |
|
00:21:56,040 --> 00:21:59,380 |
|
then it turns out that this person, this thing is |
|
|
|
324 |
|
00:21:59,380 --> 00:22:03,430 |
|
the very opposite of what you think. The person |
|
|
|
325 |
|
00:22:03,430 --> 00:22:09,970 |
|
you seek, the person whose protection and stuff |
|
|
|
326 |
|
00:22:09,970 --> 00:22:14,390 |
|
you seek, is the very reason for your destruction. |
|
|
|
327 |
|
00:22:14,910 --> 00:22:16,650 |
|
That's invisible. What does it mean? What does it |
|
|
|
328 |
|
00:22:16,650 --> 00:22:19,470 |
|
indicate? Why is it invisible? Other words, we'll |
|
|
|
329 |
|
00:22:19,470 --> 00:22:21,170 |
|
come back again to wrap things up. What other |
|
|
|
330 |
|
00:22:21,170 --> 00:22:23,990 |
|
words do you find peculiar? |
|
|
|
331 |
|
00:22:29,420 --> 00:22:34,260 |
|
Okay, so we jump to the kind of love. There is |
|
|
|
332 |
|
00:22:34,260 --> 00:22:40,060 |
|
love. Love is good, right? Oh Rose, thou art sick. |
|
|
|
333 |
|
00:22:40,500 --> 00:22:43,100 |
|
Blah blah, night, visible worm, howling storm. But |
|
|
|
334 |
|
00:22:43,100 --> 00:22:45,920 |
|
then there is love. If you look at the poem, *From |
|
|
|
335 |
|
00:22:45,920 --> 00:22:48,500 |
|
Afar*, you see the word love. Could give you a good |
|
|
|
336 |
|
00:22:48,500 --> 00:22:54,760 |
|
impression, against the mostly negative words. |
|
|
|
337 |
|
00:22:55,360 --> 00:22:59,050 |
|
Sick. Rose is good, yeah? But this is a rose that |
|
|
|
338 |
|
00:22:59,050 --> 00:23:02,930 |
|
is sick. There's a worm that is invisible. It's |
|
|
|
339 |
|
00:23:02,930 --> 00:23:09,130 |
|
night. It's stormy, and it's howling. And then |
|
|
|
340 |
|
00:23:09,130 --> 00:23:11,990 |
|
there is love. But this is not an ordinary love. |
|
|
|
341 |
|
00:23:12,870 --> 00:23:16,910 |
|
This is a love that is, number one, first, it's |
|
|
|
342 |
|
00:23:16,910 --> 00:23:20,870 |
|
secret. Is it one-sided, unrestricted love? |
|
|
|
343 |
|
00:23:24,150 --> 00:23:29,350 |
|
But why is it secret? When is love secret? When it |
|
|
|
344 |
|
00:23:29,350 --> 00:23:33,470 |
|
is harming, like destroying its life. Okay. And |
|
|
|
345 |
|
00:23:33,470 --> 00:23:39,750 |
|
the thing is that it's dark. Like say hey to خلصنا |
|
|
|
346 |
|
00:23:39,750 --> 00:23:43,550 |
|
or لا. Why would you say it's dark love, love? |
|
|
|
347 |
|
00:23:45,990 --> 00:23:51,570 |
|
It's a disease. Love is not always good, and not |
|
|
|
348 |
|
00:23:51,570 --> 00:23:55,280 |
|
all kinds of love are good. So you're saying this |
|
|
|
349 |
|
00:23:55,280 --> 00:23:58,680 |
|
is; this means unhealthy love? Unhealthy love. For |
|
|
|
350 |
|
00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:02,280 |
|
example, the character of the worm. Let's, let's, |
|
|
|
351 |
|
00:24:03,020 --> 00:24:06,660 |
|
for example, consider that; consider the rose as a |
|
|
|
352 |
|
00:24:06,660 --> 00:24:09,020 |
|
woman, and the worm as a man. He could be an |
|
|
|
353 |
|
00:24:09,020 --> 00:24:11,040 |
|
oppressive person if he loves her, but he's |
|
|
|
354 |
|
00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:13,360 |
|
oppressive at the same time. So that's going to |
|
|
|
355 |
|
00:24:13,360 --> 00:24:17,630 |
|
destroy her life. So, the dark secret. Do you |
|
|
|
356 |
|
00:24:17,630 --> 00:24:20,650 |
|
think that toxic people, toxic lovers, understand |
|
|
|
357 |
|
00:24:20,650 --> 00:24:22,770 |
|
this? They know that they're not doing a good job, |
|
|
|
358 |
|
00:24:22,890 --> 00:24:24,670 |
|
that they're being abusive and everything? It's |
|
|
|
359 |
|
00:24:24,670 --> 00:24:26,610 |
|
their nature. They don't know that what they're |
|
|
|
360 |
|
00:24:26,610 --> 00:24:32,410 |
|
doing is unhealthy, but it is unhealthy. That's |
|
|
|
361 |
|
00:24:32,410 --> 00:24:35,510 |
|
why it's invisible. That's why it's invisible? |
|
|
|
362 |
|
00:24:36,050 --> 00:24:39,370 |
|
Invisible to whom? To the rose? |
|
|
|
363 |
|
00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:46,060 |
|
The speaker knows. The speaker is diagnosing |
|
|
|
364 |
|
00:24:46,060 --> 00:24:49,180 |
|
everything. The speaker is all-knowing. He's a |
|
|
|
365 |
|
00:24:49,180 --> 00:24:52,200 |
|
third-person narrator. He knows that there is a |
|
|
|
366 |
|
00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:55,940 |
|
worm that is feeding and that it is invisible. Is |
|
|
|
367 |
|
00:24:55,940 --> 00:24:59,480 |
|
there |
|
|
|
368 |
|
00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:01,240 |
|
an indication in the text that the speaker is |
|
|
|
369 |
|
00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:07,540 |
|
guessing? No. Or probably invisible to the rose. |
|
|
|
370 |
|
00:25:08,470 --> 00:25:10,770 |
|
But yeah, these are all valid points. We don't |
|
|
|
371 |
|
00:25:10,770 --> 00:25:12,990 |
|
have, and it's again the beauty of poetry. This is |
|
|
|
372 |
|
00:25:12,990 --> 00:25:15,690 |
|
the beauty of even romanticism. It's an extra |
|
|
|
373 |
|
00:25:15,690 --> 00:25:18,110 |
|
feature we have in romanticism. You can talk about |
|
|
|
374 |
|
00:25:18,110 --> 00:25:21,770 |
|
a poem for a year and have different opinions and |
|
|
|
375 |
|
00:25:21,770 --> 00:25:25,570 |
|
everything. There are many gaps. These are poems |
|
|
|
376 |
|
00:25:25,570 --> 00:25:29,320 |
|
that encourage us to think, to link; try to make |
|
|
|
377 |
|
00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:31,420 |
|
up our mind, and then something shows up, and then |
|
|
|
378 |
|
00:25:31,420 --> 00:25:34,980 |
|
yeah, possibly the other reading is, is also, is also |
|
|
|
379 |
|
00:25:34,980 --> 00:25:39,460 |
|
valid, so this is a love that is secret, but it's |
|
|
|
380 |
|
00:25:39,460 --> 00:25:45,280 |
|
also a love that is dark, destructive. What else? |
|
|
|
381 |
|
00:25:45,280 --> 00:25:48,660 |
|
There's one word, one key word, that is significant |
|
|
|
382 |
|
00:25:48,660 --> 00:25:53,840 |
|
that you haven't highlighted; there's |
|
|
|
383 |
|
00:25:53,840 --> 00:25:56,460 |
|
one word here that is also, other than the ones we |
|
|
|
384 |
|
00:25:56,460 --> 00:25:58,100 |
|
highlighted, a word we didn't highlight. |
|
|
|
385 |
|
00:26:01,630 --> 00:26:02,270 |
|
Okay, |
|
|
|
386 |
|
00:26:04,970 --> 00:26:11,470 |
|
I like that you paid attention to his, yeah. But |
|
|
|
387 |
|
00:26:11,470 --> 00:26:15,290 |
|
you're saying that she's a woman because the worm |
|
|
|
388 |
|
00:26:15,290 --> 00:26:18,810 |
|
is a he; not necessarily, but rose is usually taken |
|
|
|
389 |
|
00:26:18,810 --> 00:26:21,770 |
|
as feminine. I think this is a key word in the |
|
|
|
390 |
|
00:26:21,770 --> 00:26:25,650 |
|
whole poem. He could have simply said "it." |
|
|
|
391 |
|
00:26:30,230 --> 00:26:36,590 |
|
Does it make a difference that the worm is a "he"? In |
|
|
|
392 |
|
00:26:36,590 --> 00:26:41,630 |
|
what sense? He's personifying the worm in order to |
|
|
|
393 |
|
00:26:41,630 --> 00:26:44,270 |
|
show that this… He's also personifying the rose, |
|
|
|
394 |
|
00:26:44,350 --> 00:26:46,390 |
|
don't forget. Yes, okay, but here he's |
|
|
|
395 |
|
00:26:46,390 --> 00:26:49,410 |
|
personifying the rose to raise, let's say, raise |
|
|
|
396 |
|
00:26:49,410 --> 00:26:53,850 |
|
her awareness, to raise her awareness to what she |
|
|
|
397 |
|
00:26:53,850 --> 00:26:56,890 |
|
is facing, but she does not know. Like we're saying, |
|
|
|
398 |
|
00:26:56,890 --> 00:27:00,250 |
|
hey, we're saying here that you are sick, and you |
|
|
|
399 |
|
00:27:00,250 --> 00:27:02,790 |
|
do not know that there is an invisible worm. Why |
|
|
|
400 |
|
00:27:02,790 --> 00:27:05,780 |
|
is the worm a "he"? The worm is here because he |
|
|
|
401 |
|
00:27:05,780 --> 00:27:09,360 |
|
wants to give it the traits of people, of human |
|
|
|
402 |
|
00:27:09,360 --> 00:27:11,780 |
|
beings; like they are deceptive. Why isn't the |
|
|
|
403 |
|
00:27:11,780 --> 00:27:13,040 |
|
worm a "she"? |
|
|
|
404 |
|
00:27:17,920 --> 00:27:25,220 |
|
We can consider his return to "worm," because his |
|
|
|
405 |
|
00:27:25,220 --> 00:27:31,340 |
|
return to the worm itself. Yeah, "his" refers to |
|
|
|
406 |
|
00:27:31,340 --> 00:27:33,220 |
|
worm. Do I agree on this? |
|
|
|
407 |
|
00:27:37,340 --> 00:27:40,940 |
|
Because the poet wants to say that his dark; maybe |
|
|
|
408 |
|
00:27:40,940 --> 00:27:43,840 |
|
the rest she doesn't know about this love; she |
|
|
|
409 |
|
00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:47,600 |
|
doesn' |
|
|
|
445 |
|
00:29:48,410 --> 00:29:52,170 |
|
a mess like this. He's informing her, please. I |
|
|
|
446 |
|
00:29:52,170 --> 00:29:55,730 |
|
think this poem goes beyond a relationship between |
|
|
|
447 |
|
00:29:55,730 --> 00:29:58,630 |
|
a man and a woman. I think he's actually lamenting |
|
|
|
448 |
|
00:29:58,630 --> 00:30:01,850 |
|
the loss of innocence in any way. But there's |
|
|
|
449 |
|
00:30:01,850 --> 00:30:04,450 |
|
nothing wrong even with taking it on this |
|
|
|
450 |
|
00:30:04,450 --> 00:30:07,090 |
|
particular level, on a man-woman relationship. |
|
|
|
451 |
|
00:30:09,590 --> 00:30:12,470 |
|
As I said, he's lamenting the loss of innocence in |
|
|
|
452 |
|
00:30:12,470 --> 00:30:15,270 |
|
any kind of way. Okay. The warmth is something |
|
|
|
453 |
|
00:30:15,270 --> 00:30:19,630 |
|
that makes you lose your interest. Okay. Now we'll |
|
|
|
454 |
|
00:30:19,630 --> 00:30:22,750 |
|
come now to the symbolism, but somebody said |
|
|
|
455 |
|
00:30:22,750 --> 00:30:25,730 |
|
something about the number of syllables. Okay. How |
|
|
|
456 |
|
00:30:25,730 --> 00:30:27,230 |
|
many syllables do we have in line number one? |
|
|
|
457 |
|
00:30:27,250 --> 00:30:32,890 |
|
Five. Usually, if you have five, it means there are |
|
|
|
458 |
|
00:30:32,890 --> 00:30:37,740 |
|
two feet. Because some feet consist of three |
|
|
|
459 |
|
00:30:37,740 --> 00:30:40,260 |
|
syllables. Yes, most feet consist of two syllables. |
|
|
|
460 |
|
00:30:40,260 --> 00:30:42,840 |
|
But some of them consist of three syllables, so |
|
|
|
461 |
|
00:30:42,840 --> 00:30:47,620 |
|
we'll take this as, you know, as a two-feet line. |
|
|
|
462 |
|
00:30:47,620 --> 00:30:53,620 |
|
Number two, how many, how many syllables are |
|
|
|
463 |
|
00:30:53,620 --> 00:31:03,950 |
|
there? You sure? Say again: "the invisible worm." Okay, three |
|
|
|
464 |
|
00:31:03,950 --> 00:31:10,650 |
|
feet. And then, "that flies in the night," five; in |
|
|
|
465 |
|
00:31:10,650 --> 00:31:16,770 |
|
the howling storm," also five; and then, "has found out |
|
|
|
466 |
|
00:31:16,770 --> 00:31:23,770 |
|
thy bed," five syllables; "of crimson joy," four; and |
|
|
|
467 |
|
00:31:23,770 --> 00:31:30,930 |
|
then, "his dark secret love?" And then |
|
|
|
468 |
|
00:31:30,930 --> 00:31:34,050 |
|
finally, "does thy life destroy?" |
|
|
|
469 |
|
00:31:36,810 --> 00:31:40,850 |
|
Of course |
|
|
|
470 |
|
00:31:40,850 --> 00:31:43,510 |
|
it's irregular, going from four to five to five to six |
|
|
|
471 |
|
00:31:43,510 --> 00:31:49,730 |
|
to four to five. Does this make "The Sick Rose" any |
|
|
|
472 |
|
00:31:49,730 --> 00:31:52,070 |
|
less of a poem? |
|
|
|
473 |
|
00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:58,520 |
|
It doesn't make it unpoetic; it doesn't lose some of |
|
|
|
474 |
|
00:31:58,520 --> 00:32:01,400 |
|
its poeticality, some of its beauty, because it |
|
|
|
475 |
|
00:32:01,400 --> 00:32:05,860 |
|
doesn't conform, it doesn't obey the rules of |
|
|
|
476 |
|
00:32:05,860 --> 00:32:10,940 |
|
decorum. Now, we'll talk about this in a bit, what |
|
|
|
477 |
|
00:32:10,940 --> 00:32:14,400 |
|
the Romantics think about the rules of decorum. |
|
|
|
478 |
|
00:32:15,260 --> 00:32:18,220 |
|
And I'm sure that the likes of Alexander Pope, |
|
|
|
479 |
|
00:32:18,500 --> 00:32:21,640 |
|
methodized and systematized, speaking about rules, |
|
|
|
480 |
|
00:32:24,270 --> 00:32:26,370 |
|
and those people will be pulling their hair now, |
|
|
|
481 |
|
00:32:26,470 --> 00:32:29,810 |
|
that those people are like, "Sorry, this is not the |
|
|
|
482 |
|
00:32:29,810 --> 00:32:33,090 |
|
way we should do poetry. This is the way how we |
|
|
|
483 |
|
00:32:33,090 --> 00:32:35,950 |
|
should do poetry." So what about the symbolism? |
|
|
|
484 |
|
00:32:36,170 --> 00:32:42,390 |
|
What does the poem stand for? What is the key |
|
|
|
485 |
|
00:32:42,390 --> 00:32:46,430 |
|
issue in the poem? Like, thinking of this, thinking |
|
|
|
486 |
|
00:32:46,430 --> 00:32:49,730 |
|
of the words, the negative words, even the |
|
|
|
487 |
|
00:32:49,730 --> 00:32:54,130 |
|
beautiful word here is negative. The rose itself |
|
|
|
488 |
|
00:32:54,130 --> 00:32:58,290 |
|
or herself. That's it. So what do you think? What |
|
|
|
489 |
|
00:32:58,290 --> 00:33:01,450 |
|
does the rose symbolize? Please. |
|
|
|
490 |
|
00:33:15,470 --> 00:33:17,350 |
|
This doesn't apply to William Blake. William Blake |
|
|
|
491 |
|
00:33:17,350 --> 00:33:20,150 |
|
was a Londoner. He lived in London. He stayed in |
|
|
|
492 |
|
00:33:20,150 --> 00:33:23,050 |
|
London. And some say he even loved London despite |
|
|
|
493 |
|
00:33:23,050 --> 00:33:25,710 |
|
the fact that he was severely critical of London |
|
|
|
494 |
|
00:33:25,710 --> 00:33:29,770 |
|
and the life there. So what does the rose in |
|
|
|
495 |
|
00:33:29,770 --> 00:33:34,150 |
|
specific symbolize? Please. I think this word |
|
|
|
496 |
|
00:33:34,150 --> 00:33:39,070 |
|
symbolizes one thing. Stop counting. Do this. |
|
|
|
497 |
|
00:33:39,990 --> 00:33:45,310 |
|
Okay, the rose symbolizes love where one half of |
|
|
|
498 |
|
00:33:45,310 --> 00:33:48,710 |
|
this relationship, love relationship, is sick, |
|
|
|
499 |
|
00:33:48,870 --> 00:33:51,510 |
|
destroyed, and the other half is causing this |
|
|
|
500 |
|
00:33:51,510 --> 00:33:55,270 |
|
destruction. Thank you, interesting. Also, stop |
|
|
|
501 |
|
00:33:55,270 --> 00:33:58,450 |
|
counting, one. So okay, you think that the word |
|
|
|
502 |
|
00:33:58,450 --> 00:34:02,890 |
|
rose symbolizes nature. What is destroying nature |
|
|
|
503 |
|
00:34:02,890 --> 00:34:05,230 |
|
in your sense? What is man? Please. |
|
|
|
504 |
|
00:34:12,520 --> 00:34:15,680 |
|
You know, yeah, sometimes you feel he loves |
|
|
|
505 |
|
00:34:15,680 --> 00:34:18,160 |
|
London, sometimes you think he, you realize that |
|
|
|
506 |
|
00:34:18,160 --> 00:34:19,500 |
|
he hates London, he doesn't like it. |
|
|
|
507 |
|
00:34:24,340 --> 00:34:28,140 |
|
He, him, oh, yeah, okay. So he's Rose, he's, it's |
|
|
|
508 |
|
00:34:28,140 --> 00:34:30,740 |
|
like, you know, the Da Vinci painting, some people |
|
|
|
509 |
|
00:34:30,740 --> 00:34:33,540 |
|
think that this was a self-portrait, Da Vinci |
|
|
|
510 |
|
00:34:33,540 --> 00:34:36,400 |
|
drawing himself, the Mona Lisa, right? So this |
|
|
|
511 |
|
00:34:36,400 --> 00:34:40,460 |
|
could be, oh, Rose looking in the mirror, and, you |
|
|
|
512 |
|
00:34:40,460 --> 00:34:43,760 |
|
know, liking himself and then saying, "It's the city |
|
|
|
513 |
|
00:34:43,760 --> 00:34:47,660 |
|
that destroyed me." I like this. Thank you very |
|
|
|
514 |
|
00:34:47,660 --> 00:34:53,060 |
|
much. Please. This is innocence and this is |
|
|
|
515 |
|
00:34:53,060 --> 00:34:54,300 |
|
experience. We'll talk about innocence and |
|
|
|
516 |
|
00:34:54,300 --> 00:34:59,640 |
|
experience in a bit. Please. The worm is life, the |
|
|
|
517 |
|
00:34:59,640 --> 00:35:04,500 |
|
rose is life in general. Please. Stop counting. |
|
|
|
518 |
|
00:35:04,580 --> 00:35:08,800 |
|
One thing. Beauty. So if beauty can be destroyed |
|
|
|
519 |
|
00:35:08,800 --> 00:35:11,880 |
|
by what? What's the worm here if this is beauty? |
|
|
|
520 |
|
00:35:12,860 --> 00:35:18,160 |
|
If this is beauty, what is the worm? Make-up? Or |
|
|
|
521 |
|
00:35:18,160 --> 00:35:28,320 |
|
food? Age, thank you. Age. Poetry is the rose and |
|
|
|
522 |
|
00:35:28,320 --> 00:35:33,200 |
|
what is destroying it is the... Okay, I find this far |
|
|
|
523 |
|
00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:38,360 |
|
-fetched, but also I like it. I like it. If you want |
|
|
|
524 |
|
00:35:38,360 --> 00:35:40,360 |
|
to take this... the whole poem is symbolic and also |
|
|
|
525 |
|
00:35:40,360 --> 00:35:49,640 |
|
a parody. Toxic |
|
|
|
526 |
|
00:35:49,640 --> 00:35:51,780 |
|
because it's repressive and restrictive; it |
|
|
|
527 |
|
00:35:51,780 --> 00:35:53,980 |
|
prevents you from expressing yourself, being |
|
|
|
528 |
|
00:35:53,980 --> 00:35:58,440 |
|
yourself. Rose. |
|
|
|
529 |
|
00:35:58,440 --> 00:36:05,280 |
|
rose. Rose. The rules? I think sometimes they do. |
|
|
|
530 |
|
00:36:06,580 --> 00:36:07,720 |
|
Sometimes we do. |
|
|
|
531 |
|
00:36:13,640 --> 00:36:16,480 |
|
That's my opinion. That's your opinion. Again, |
|
|
|
532 |
|
00:36:16,640 --> 00:36:18,760 |
|
this is up to you, whether you want to like |
|
|
|
533 |
|
00:36:18,760 --> 00:36:20,500 |
|
classical poetry, whether in Arabic or English, |
|
|
|
534 |
|
00:36:20,620 --> 00:36:23,180 |
|
whether you like classical poetry more than |
|
|
|
535 |
|
00:36:23,180 --> 00:36:26,520 |
|
metaphysical or Romantic poetry, free verse, blank |
|
|
|
536 |
|
00:36:26,520 --> 00:36:28,800 |
|
verse, or vice versa. This is a personal |
|
|
|
537 |
|
00:36:28,800 --> 00:36:33,600 |
|
preference. Please. I think you can also say that |
|
|
|
538 |
|
00:36:33,600 --> 00:36:38,420 |
|
the "howling storm" symbolizes life. Okay. In this |
|
|
|
539 |
|
00:36:38,420 --> 00:36:40,660 |
|
sense, what is the rose? What is the worm? |
|
|
|
540 |
|
00:36:43,430 --> 00:36:47,650 |
|
Okay, so life, innocence, and experience. Now look |
|
|
|
541 |
|
00:36:47,650 --> 00:36:50,170 |
|
at this. Please, finally. |
|
|
|
542 |
|
00:36:54,370 --> 00:36:59,830 |
|
So you're |
|
|
|
543 |
|
00:36:59,830 --> 00:37:01,870 |
|
connecting it with this understanding that this |
|
|
|
544 |
|
00:37:01,870 --> 00:37:05,650 |
|
could be about the repressive rules, the invasive |
|
|
|
545 |
|
00:37:05,650 --> 00:37:08,690 |
|
rules of life, of modern life, of the city |
|
|
|
546 |
|
00:37:08,690 --> 00:37:11,990 |
|
controlling and limiting our imagination. Thank |
|
|
|
547 |
|
00:37:11,990 --> 00:37:12,110 |
|
you. |
|
|
|
548 |
|
00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:23,700 |
|
Like what? Okay, what else? Who usually depends on |
|
|
|
549 |
|
00:37:23,700 --> 00:37:27,560 |
|
others in society, in our life? Okay. Oh, |
|
|
|
550 |
|
00:37:27,680 --> 00:37:30,240 |
|
don't say that the rose is students and the worm |
|
|
|
551 |
|
00:37:30,240 --> 00:37:34,300 |
|
is a teacher. Okay. Maybe it's vice versa. Maybe |
|
|
|
552 |
|
00:37:34,300 --> 00:37:37,480 |
|
we are, you know, we are sick because of the |
|
|
|
553 |
|
00:37:37,480 --> 00:37:41,380 |
|
invisible worms destroying us. Assignments? What |
|
|
|
554 |
|
00:37:41,380 --> 00:37:46,040 |
|
are the assignments? The "howling storm"? This |
|
|
|
555 |
|
00:37:46,040 --> 00:37:50,680 |
|
sense, this oxymoron here, it's like Hamlet says, |
|
|
|
556 |
|
00:37:50,880 --> 00:37:56,100 |
|
"tough love," "cruel to be kind." So this is, okay. I |
|
|
|
557 |
|
00:37:56,100 --> 00:37:59,180 |
|
like how this poem is helping you use your |
|
|
|
558 |
|
00:37:59,180 --> 00:38:04,100 |
|
imagination even more. With the Romantics, it's |
|
|
|
559 |
|
00:38:04,100 --> 00:38:08,420 |
|
usually, sometimes you feel that they have one |
|
|
|
560 |
|
00:38:08,420 --> 00:38:12,640 |
|
idea, one thing to teach in a poem; to teach and |
|
|
|
561 |
|
00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:15,060 |
|
delight, right? But with the Romantics, you'll |
|
|
|
562 |
|
00:38:15,060 --> 00:38:18,640 |
|
come to a reality where a poem could mean many |
|
|
|
563 |
|
00:38:18,640 --> 00:38:22,080 |
|
things. And I think all your understandings and |
|
|
|
564 |
|
00:38:22,080 --> 00:38:24,620 |
|
interpretations are valid here. But we can also |
|
|
|
565 |
|
00:38:24,620 --> 00:38:26,680 |
|
take this poem to today. I remember last year, one |
|
|
|
566 |
|
00:38:26,680 --> 00:38:31,280 |
|
of the students was saying, "This is women now on |
|
|
|
567 |
|
00:38:31,280 --> 00:38:37,060 |
|
social media, sometimes men, you know, take |
|
|
|
568 |
|
00:38:37,060 --> 00:38:39,620 |
|
advantage, try to take advantage of women, of |
|
|
|
569 |
|
00:38:39,620 --> 00:38:42,540 |
|
their innocence, of their, you know, and they try |
|
|
|
570 |
|
00:38:42,540 --> 00:38:45,580 |
|
to destroy their lives." I like this |
|
|
|
571 |
|
00:38:45,580 --> 00:38:47,640 |
|
interpretation. The other day, a student was |
|
|
|
572 |
|
00:38:47,640 --> 00:38:51,340 |
|
saying, "La Rose is Palestine, the worm is the |
|
|
|
573 |
|
00:38:51,340 --> 00:38:54,500 |
|
Zionist entity coming to Palestine, destroying |
|
|
|
574 |
|
00:38:54,500 --> 00:38:55,520 |
|
Palestine, and... |
|
|
|
575 |
|
00:38:58,450 --> 00:39:01,370 |
|
That is also valid. But there are two things here. |
|
|
|
576 |
|
00:39:01,430 --> 00:39:04,630 |
|
We don't want to mix things. For William Blake, |
|
|
|
577 |
|
00:39:04,970 --> 00:39:07,430 |
|
yes, this could be taken as some might suggest |
|
|
|
578 |
|
00:39:07,430 --> 00:39:09,870 |
|
that the rose is probably an actual rose. He was |
|
|
|
579 |
|
00:39:09,870 --> 00:39:12,010 |
|
walking down the road, I don't know, somewhere in |
|
|
|
580 |
|
00:39:12,010 --> 00:39:13,770 |
|
London. He found a rose, where there is a woman |
|
|
|
581 |
|
00:39:13,770 --> 00:39:17,390 |
|
that he made a fuss out of all of this. Or the |
|
|
|
582 |
|
00:39:17,390 --> 00:39:20,330 |
|
rose could symbolize nature. It could symbolize |
|
|
|
583 |
|
00:39:20,330 --> 00:39:22,490 |
|
life in a city and how it was destroyed by the |
|
|
|
584 |
|
00:39:22,490 --> 00:39:24,290 |
|
Industrial Revolution and the factories and the |
|
|
|
585 |
|
00:39:24,290 --> 00:39:27,820 |
|
pollution, somebody said here. Or it could mean |
|
|
|
586 |
|
00:39:27,820 --> 00:39:30,940 |
|
some woman, a woman he knows, or women in general, |
|
|
|
587 |
|
00:39:31,140 --> 00:39:33,840 |
|
or children. I expected some of you to say |
|
|
|
588 |
|
00:39:33,840 --> 00:39:37,940 |
|
children, but there's not much indication here. |
|
|
|
589 |
|
00:39:38,020 --> 00:39:41,140 |
|
But this could be about, or a child, or childhood, |
|
|
|
590 |
|
00:39:42,100 --> 00:39:46,400 |
|
or innocence and experience, or beauty, or nature, |
|
|
|
591 |
|
00:39:46,520 --> 00:39:48,220 |
|
or the countryside and how it's being destroyed |
|
|
|
592 |
|
00:39:48,220 --> 00:39:54,960 |
|
by... Now what is it about? I think it's about all |
|
|
|
593 |
|
00:39:54,960 --> 00:39:58,140 |
|
of these. And I think this is a feature of |
|
|
|
594 |
|
00:39:58,140 --> 00:40:02,920 |
|
Romanticism, imagination. Encouraging imagination, |
|
|
|
595 |
|
00:40:03,480 --> 00:40:08,920 |
|
encouraging using your mind, not to think |
|
|
|
596 |
|
00:40:08,920 --> 00:40:11,420 |
|
intellectually, to find facts, to create facts |
|
|
|
597 |
|
00:40:11,420 --> 00:40:12,020 |
|
about this, |
|
|
|
598 |
|
00:40:15,340 --> 00:40:20,380 |
|
but to imagine how things could be, how things can |
|
|
|
599 |
|
00:40:20,380 --> 00:40:23,740 |
|
be. The fact that the poem offers so many |
|
|
|
600 |
|
00:40:23,740 --> 00:40:27,180 |
|
possibilities is the very opposite of Neoclassical |
|
|
|
601 |
|
00:40:27,180 --> 00:40:31,940 |
|
literature, where usually there's one main |
|
|
|
602 |
|
00:40:31,940 --> 00:40:34,900 |
|
understanding of the text. This is what it is. |
|
|
|
603 |
|
00:40:34,920 --> 00:40:37,940 |
|
It's like mathematics. In a sense, I don't want to |
|
|
|
604 |
|
00:40:37,940 --> 00:40:40,740 |
|
be extreme. But here, there are so many |
|
|
|
605 |
|
00:40:40,740 --> 00:40:46,240 |
|
possibilities for one poem. So if in your exam I |
|
|
|
606 |
|
00:40:46,240 --> 00:40:51,460 |
|
ask you, "What is the rose a symbol of?", you could |
|
|
|
607 |
|
00:40:51,460 --> 00:40:54,710 |
|
say whatever you like, as long as you support your |
|
|
|
608 |
|
00:40:54,710 --> 00:40:59,770 |
|
argument with things about Blake or things from |
|
|
|
609 |
|
00:40:59,770 --> 00:41:02,170 |
|
the book. But don't go too far to taking it to say |
|
|
|
610 |
|
00:41:02,170 --> 00:41:07,590 |
|
this, "it stands for Palestine or Facebook." What I |
|
|
|
611 |
|
00:41:07,590 --> 00:41:11,050 |
|
mean here is that you could post this poem, you |
|
|
|
612 |
|
00:41:11,050 --> 00:41:16,560 |
|
could have this Photoshop design; put a picture of |
|
|
|
613 |
|
00:41:16,560 --> 00:41:19,040 |
|
the top of the rock or a map of Palestine and |
|
|
|
614 |
|
00:41:19,040 --> 00:41:21,600 |
|
write this and it worked and say, "Oh Rose, thou |
|
|
|
615 |
|
00:41:21,600 --> 00:41:26,420 |
|
art sick. The invisible worm." You could say this to |
|
|
|
616 |
|
00:41:26,420 --> 00:41:29,260 |
|
somebody who has been in a toxic relationship, like |
|
|
|
617 |
|
00:41:29,260 --> 00:41:32,420 |
|
trying to cheer them up. I don't know, tell them |
|
|
|
618 |
|
00:41:32,420 --> 00:41:36,420 |
|
it has been happening. But remember, I don't care |
|
|
|
619 |
|
00:41:36,420 --> 00:41:38,620 |
|
about the authorial intention. I don't care what |
|
|
|
620 |
|
00:41:38,620 --> 00:41:42,140 |
|
he intended, William Blake. He could have intended |
|
|
|
621 |
|
00:41:42,140 --> 00:41:47,280 |
|
all these things you just mentioned. Now, in the |
|
|
|
622 |
|
00:41:47,280 --> 00:41:49,740 |
|
remaining time, I want you to see this other |
|
|
|
623 |
|
00:41:49,740 --> 00:41:52,340 |
|
beautiful poem by William Blake. |
|
|
|
624 |
|
00:41:55,660 --> 00:41:59,320 |
|
William Blake was very famous for |
|
|
|
625 |
|
00:42:02,130 --> 00:42:06,750 |
|
his two groups or two volumes of poetry entitled |
|
|
|
626 |
|
00:42:06,750 --> 00:42:09,470 |
|
"Songs of Innocence," "Songs of Experience," where he |
|
|
|
627 |
|
00:42:09,470 --> 00:42:13,010 |
|
talks about the two statuses of life. Sometimes |
|
|
|
628 |
|
00:42:13,010 --> 00:42:17,490 |
|
the same experience is looked at because he |
|
|
|
629 |
|
00:42:17,490 --> 00:42:20,870 |
|
believes in the fact that the world is our own |
|
|
|
630 |
|
00:42:20,870 --> 00:42:25,690 |
|
perception. We create the world; we create it. How |
|
|
|
631 |
|
00:42:25,690 --> 00:42:30,070 |
|
we see the world is what the world is, and you |
|
|
|
632 |
|
00:42:30,070 --> 00:42:35,270 |
|
see it. I'll quote him in a bit. He says, "Both |
|
|
|
633 |
|
00:42:35,270 --> 00:42:41,870 |
|
read the Bible day and night. Thou saw dark, I saw |
|
|
|
634 |
|
00:42:41,870 --> 00:42:45,010 |
|
light." It's the same Bible, different people, |
|
|
|
635 |
|
00:42:45,170 --> 00:42:48,760 |
|
different understanding and perception. And |
|
|
|
667 |
|
00:44:39,850 --> 00:44:42,690 |
|
Keep going on to play. I have no problem with |
|
|
|
668 |
|
00:44:42,690 --> 00:44:46,710 |
|
that. So this is the nurse first describing what's |
|
|
|
669 |
|
00:44:46,710 --> 00:44:50,030 |
|
going on, and then because the sun is gone |
|
|
|
670 |
|
00:44:50,030 --> 00:44:56,150 |
|
down, come, come. The sun is gone, leave off play |
|
|
|
671 |
|
00:44:56,150 --> 00:44:59,610 |
|
and let us away until the morning appears in the |
|
|
|
672 |
|
00:44:59,610 --> 00:45:05,110 |
|
skies. And then the kids also, this is a quote, |
|
|
|
673 |
|
00:45:05,990 --> 00:45:10,490 |
|
speaking back, talking back. No, no, let us play |
|
|
|
674 |
|
00:45:10,490 --> 00:45:15,890 |
|
for it is yet day. It is still day, Fada. And we |
|
|
|
675 |
|
00:45:15,890 --> 00:45:20,510 |
|
cannot go to sleep. Besides, in the sky, little |
|
|
|
676 |
|
00:45:20,510 --> 00:45:24,370 |
|
birds fly. There are still birds out there. And |
|
|
|
677 |
|
00:45:24,370 --> 00:45:27,310 |
|
the hills are all covered with sheep. So people |
|
|
|
678 |
|
00:45:27,310 --> 00:45:30,210 |
|
are out there; life is there; nature is there. Why |
|
|
|
679 |
|
00:45:30,210 --> 00:45:34,370 |
|
would you take us back home? Well, well, and this |
|
|
|
680 |
|
00:45:34,370 --> 00:45:37,830 |
|
is again the nurse. Well, well, go and play until |
|
|
|
681 |
|
00:45:37,830 --> 00:45:41,410 |
|
the light fades away. And then go home to bed. |
|
|
|
682 |
|
00:45:42,230 --> 00:45:44,570 |
|
That's the end of, again, the speech here, the |
|
|
|
683 |
|
00:45:44,570 --> 00:45:46,670 |
|
dialogue. Look at the dialogue. You will not find |
|
|
|
684 |
|
00:45:46,670 --> 00:45:50,150 |
|
this dialogic thing in neoclassical, this much of |
|
|
|
685 |
|
00:45:50,150 --> 00:45:56,070 |
|
dialogism in neoclassical poetry. The little ones |
|
|
|
686 |
|
00:45:56,070 --> 00:46:01,050 |
|
leaped and shouted and laughed, and all the hills |
|
|
|
687 |
|
00:46:01,050 --> 00:46:06,890 |
|
echoed. Nature is laughing back. Very simple poem, |
|
|
|
688 |
|
00:46:06,970 --> 00:46:09,890 |
|
yeah? It's very simple. Kids playing, come back |
|
|
|
689 |
|
00:46:09,890 --> 00:46:12,450 |
|
home. No, we're not coming back home. There's |
|
|
|
690 |
|
00:46:12,450 --> 00:46:15,490 |
|
still, you know, birds and sheep out there. So |
|
|
|
691 |
|
00:46:15,490 --> 00:46:19,050 |
|
okay, play some more, like one more hour, 30 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
00:46:19,050 --> 00:46:22,290 |
|
minutes more, and then when the light fades away, |
|
|
|
693 |
|
00:46:22,610 --> 00:46:25,710 |
|
come back home. Look at this poem, okay? |
|
|
|
694 |
|
00:46:28,960 --> 00:46:36,640 |
|
This is the same experience, the same story, from a |
|
|
|
695 |
|
00:46:36,640 --> 00:46:40,560 |
|
different point of view, experience. The nurse's |
|
|
|
696 |
|
00:46:40,560 --> 00:46:41,440 |
|
song experience. |
|
|
|
697 |
|
00:46:44,220 --> 00:46:46,800 |
|
The first thing is that this is the whole poem. |
|
|
|
698 |
|
00:46:48,540 --> 00:46:54,280 |
|
Two stanzas. It's 50%, it's half |
|
|
|
699 |
|
00:46:54,280 --> 00:47:00,880 |
|
the song of innocence. When voices of children are |
|
|
|
700 |
|
00:47:00,880 --> 00:47:05,400 |
|
heard on the green, the very same first line, and |
|
|
|
701 |
|
00:47:05,400 --> 00:47:11,660 |
|
not laughing and giggling and playing and sounds |
|
|
|
702 |
|
00:47:11,660 --> 00:47:17,300 |
|
and naughtiness, whisperings. Now there is, why |
|
|
|
703 |
|
00:47:17,300 --> 00:47:19,880 |
|
would we whisper? It's either a secret or there's |
|
|
|
704 |
|
00:47:19,880 --> 00:47:24,670 |
|
fear; you're not allowed to speak. You're not |
|
|
|
705 |
|
00:47:24,670 --> 00:47:26,910 |
|
allowed to speak. You shouldn't speak. And |
|
|
|
706 |
|
00:47:26,910 --> 00:47:31,510 |
|
whisperings are in the dale. The days of my youth. |
|
|
|
707 |
|
00:47:31,610 --> 00:47:33,350 |
|
The poem is about the speaker; it's no longer |
|
|
|
708 |
|
00:47:33,350 --> 00:47:35,210 |
|
about the children. That's why it changes from |
|
|
|
709 |
|
00:47:35,210 --> 00:47:39,030 |
|
innocence to experience. The days of my youth rise |
|
|
|
710 |
|
00:47:39,030 --> 00:47:44,330 |
|
fresh in my mind. My face turns green and pale. |
|
|
|
711 |
|
00:47:45,050 --> 00:47:47,950 |
|
Probably an older person. Feels jealous. Feels, |
|
|
|
712 |
|
00:47:47,970 --> 00:47:54,610 |
|
you know, green and pale. Not happy that the kids |
|
|
|
713 |
|
00:47:54,610 --> 00:47:58,490 |
|
are playing; not happy that the kids are, then |
|
|
|
714 |
|
00:47:58,490 --> 00:48:02,730 |
|
it's not even an attempt to strike a dialogue |
|
|
|
715 |
|
00:48:02,730 --> 00:48:05,330 |
|
here, to begin a conversation. It's just taken |
|
|
|
716 |
|
00:48:05,330 --> 00:48:08,070 |
|
matter-of-factly. Then, come home, my children. |
|
|
|
717 |
|
00:48:08,290 --> 00:48:11,850 |
|
The sun is gone down, and the dews of night arise. |
|
|
|
718 |
|
00:48:12,030 --> 00:48:17,270 |
|
Your spring and your day are wasted in play, and |
|
|
|
719 |
|
00:48:17,270 --> 00:48:19,610 |
|
you, yeah, wasted. That's a very negative word. |
|
|
|
720 |
|
00:48:19,730 --> 00:48:24,750 |
|
And you winter a night in disguise. The good is |
|
|
|
721 |
|
00:48:24,750 --> 00:48:27,890 |
|
yet to come; the bad is yet to come. That's the |
|
|
|
722 |
|
00:48:27,890 --> 00:48:30,510 |
|
whole problem. There's no reply from the kids. |
|
|
|
723 |
|
00:48:31,150 --> 00:48:34,730 |
|
They don't talk back; they're not allowed to speak |
|
|
|
724 |
|
00:48:34,730 --> 00:48:35,450 |
|
back. |
|
|
|
725 |
|
00:48:38,290 --> 00:48:41,770 |
|
They're never taken seriously. Kids are muted. |
|
|
|
726 |
|
00:48:42,170 --> 00:48:46,390 |
|
Kids are repressed. And probably two of the most |
|
|
|
727 |
|
00:48:46,390 --> 00:48:50,250 |
|
important English poets who were fascinated with |
|
|
|
728 |
|
00:48:50,250 --> 00:48:54,500 |
|
the concept of childhood: William Blake and William |
|
|
|
729 |
|
00:48:54,500 --> 00:48:59,340 |
|
Wordsworth. Wordsworth says a child is the father |
|
|
|
730 |
|
00:48:59,340 --> 00:49:03,760 |
|
of man. A child is the father. It's paradoxical |
|
|
|
731 |
|
00:49:03,760 --> 00:49:08,240 |
|
for what it means. So look at the differences here |
|
|
|
732 |
|
00:49:08,240 --> 00:49:10,360 |
|
in language; look at the differences in |
|
|
|
733 |
|
00:49:13,240 --> 00:49:16,220 |
|
and the size and the dialogue. The most important |
|
|
|
734 |
|
00:49:16,220 --> 00:49:18,840 |
|
thing I like about this poem is the fact that the |
|
|
|
735 |
|
00:49:18,840 --> 00:49:21,620 |
|
first, the innocence poem includes the dialogue |
|
|
|
736 |
|
00:49:21,620 --> 00:49:24,620 |
|
that the kids are speaking, having their voice, |
|
|
|
737 |
|
00:49:24,780 --> 00:49:28,420 |
|
representing themselves, you know, asking for |
|
|
|
738 |
|
00:49:28,420 --> 00:49:31,640 |
|
their right to play, to have fun, to laugh, to |
|
|
|
739 |
|
00:49:31,640 --> 00:49:31,940 |
|
run. |
|
|
|
740 |
|
00:49:34,980 --> 00:49:38,560 |
|
And that's why the first poem is, it's a musical, |
|
|
|
741 |
|
00:49:38,940 --> 00:49:43,120 |
|
the positive words; it's not only the kids |
|
|
|
742 |
|
00:49:43,120 --> 00:49:47,160 |
|
playing; also nature, the sheep, the birds, |
|
|
|
743 |
|
00:49:47,260 --> 00:49:50,300 |
|
everything is also happy and singing and dancing |
|
|
|
744 |
|
00:49:50,300 --> 00:49:54,340 |
|
with the kids. Is he saying that when kids are |
|
|
|
745 |
|
00:49:54,340 --> 00:49:56,780 |
|
playing and happy, everything around will be also |
|
|
|
746 |
|
00:49:56,780 --> 00:50:00,220 |
|
happy? But in the second poem, because the kids |
|
|
|
747 |
|
00:50:00,220 --> 00:50:04,850 |
|
are not allowed to speak, we destroy them, but also |
|
|
|
748 |
|
00:50:04,850 --> 00:50:07,370 |
|
we destroy ourselves because we don't see the |
|
|
|
749 |
|
00:50:07,370 --> 00:50:09,950 |
|
beauty of the children playing and being innocent |
|
|
|
750 |
|
00:50:09,950 --> 00:50:15,210 |
|
and all we see is green, pale, |
|
|
|
751 |
|
00:50:17,450 --> 00:50:23,850 |
|
wasted, and also disguised. Yeah? Green, I think |
|
|
|
752 |
|
00:50:23,850 --> 00:50:26,410 |
|
like, has two indications here; it is like gloomy |
|
|
|
753 |
|
00:50:26,410 --> 00:50:28,970 |
|
and it's a sad indication, but there it's like |
|
|
|
754 |
|
00:50:28,970 --> 00:50:32,820 |
|
green, the green helps, and you. So the same thing, |
|
|
|
755 |
|
00:50:32,980 --> 00:50:37,120 |
|
thank you for noticing this; the idea is that this |
|
|
|
756 |
|
00:50:37,120 --> 00:50:41,300 |
|
is what innocence and experience, like innocence |
|
|
|
757 |
|
00:50:41,300 --> 00:50:44,540 |
|
is usually things viewed from the perspective of |
|
|
|
758 |
|
00:50:44,540 --> 00:50:48,100 |
|
children, mostly of innocence or purity. Experience |
|
|
|
759 |
|
00:50:48,100 --> 00:50:51,460 |
|
means like, I don't know, corruption? Like it |
|
|
|
760 |
|
00:50:51,460 --> 00:50:53,240 |
|
doesn't mean like having more experience; having |
|
|
|
761 |
|
00:50:53,240 --> 00:50:55,480 |
|
something that is negative that's destroying your |
|
|
|
762 |
|
00:50:55,480 --> 00:51:00,060 |
|
life. You being corrupted by age, by life, by the |
|
|
|
763 |
|
00:51:00,060 --> 00:51:03,040 |
|
city, by the fact that you have to compete, by |
|
|
|
764 |
|
00:51:03,040 --> 00:51:05,660 |
|
conflicts you have around, by the hate you have |
|
|
|
765 |
|
00:51:05,660 --> 00:51:08,020 |
|
when you grow up. When you are kids, you would |
|
|
|
766 |
|
00:51:08,020 --> 00:51:12,240 |
|
fight with somebody. But ten minutes later, you're |
|
|
|
767 |
|
00:51:12,240 --> 00:51:15,380 |
|
playing again, your friends again. But when you |
|
|
|
768 |
|
00:51:15,380 --> 00:51:18,240 |
|
grow up, if you hate somebody, sometimes you hate |
|
|
|
769 |
|
00:51:18,240 --> 00:51:21,740 |
|
them forever. Even if you later on realize that, |
|
|
|
770 |
|
00:51:21,800 --> 00:51:26,120 |
|
well, it's been some insignificant issue. It's a |
|
|
|
771 |
|
00:51:26,120 --> 00:51:27,040 |
|
silly thing. Please. |
|
|
|
772 |
|
00:51:36,790 --> 00:51:38,630 |
|
Thank you very much. Thank you very much for |
|
|
|
773 |
|
00:51:38,630 --> 00:51:41,530 |
|
bringing up the Industrial Revolution because it's |
|
|
|
774 |
|
00:51:41,530 --> 00:51:44,570 |
|
one reason for why we have the Romantic poets |
|
|
|
775 |
|
00:51:44,570 --> 00:51:46,670 |
|
writing the poetry they wrote. Industrial |
|
|
|
776 |
|
00:51:46,670 --> 00:51:49,970 |
|
Revolution, French Revolution, the American |
|
|
|
777 |
|
00:51:49,970 --> 00:51:51,610 |
|
Revolution. We'll talk about this more when we |
|
|
|
778 |
|
00:51:51,610 --> 00:51:55,810 |
|
speak about William Wordsworth. So the Industrial |
|
|
|
779 |
|
00:51:55,810 --> 00:51:59,010 |
|
Revolution changed life, corrupted life, polluted |
|
|
|
780 |
|
00:51:59,010 --> 00:52:02,730 |
|
life. But the Industrial Revolution also brought |
|
|
|
781 |
|
00:52:02,730 --> 00:52:08,090 |
|
people in masses from the countryside to the city. |
|
|
|
782 |
|
00:52:10,130 --> 00:52:12,690 |
|
And when you go to the city, you go to the city, |
|
|
|
783 |
|
00:52:13,250 --> 00:52:18,230 |
|
why? For the experience? For work, okay? For a |
|
|
|
784 |
|
00:52:18,230 --> 00:52:22,150 |
|
job, to improve your life, for looking, expecting |
|
|
|
785 |
|
00:52:23,050 --> 00:52:26,490 |
|
your dreams to come true. But at that time, when |
|
|
|
786 |
|
00:52:26,490 --> 00:52:31,030 |
|
England was becoming the greatest empire of all |
|
|
|
787 |
|
00:52:31,030 --> 00:52:33,630 |
|
times, the empire on which the sun never set, |
|
|
|
788 |
|
00:52:37,830 --> 00:52:41,210 |
|
The British armies were, and companies and |
|
|
|
789 |
|
00:52:41,210 --> 00:52:44,090 |
|
enterprises, they were bringing raw materials from |
|
|
|
790 |
|
00:52:44,090 --> 00:52:46,710 |
|
the colonies, from India, Africa, around the |
|
|
|
791 |
|
00:52:46,710 --> 00:52:50,210 |
|
world, and bringing most of them to the factories |
|
|
|
792 |
|
00:52:50,210 --> 00:52:53,110 |
|
in London, in Liverpool, in Manchester. And these |
|
|
|
793 |
|
00:52:53,110 --> 00:52:56,550 |
|
factories needed so many laborers and workers, and |
|
|
|
794 |
|
00:52:56,550 --> 00:52:59,510 |
|
they would be leaving the countryside, the rural |
|
|
|
795 |
|
00:52:59,510 --> 00:53:02,090 |
|
areas, hoping for a better life, and they would |
|
|
|
796 |
|
00:53:02,090 --> 00:53:07,520 |
|
end up enslaved in factories. They would end up |
|
|
|
797 |
|
00:53:07,520 --> 00:53:12,440 |
|
being controlled, working from six or eight or |
|
|
|
798 |
|
00:53:12,440 --> 00:53:16,200 |
|
seven a.m. until six or eight or seven p.m. |
|
|
|
799 |
|
00:53:19,040 --> 00:53:23,060 |
|
And thank you very much. And this is, we'll quote |
|
|
|
800 |
|
00:53:23,060 --> 00:53:27,120 |
|
Shelley, describing the situation. Similar to the |
|
|
|
801 |
|
00:53:27,120 --> 00:53:30,760 |
|
situation we live in Gaza nowadays. The poor get |
|
|
|
802 |
|
00:53:30,760 --> 00:53:33,800 |
|
poorer, and the rich get richer. And again, we |
|
|
|
803 |
|
00:53:33,800 --> 00:53:36,180 |
|
always come back to Bernie Sanders saying the 1% |
|
|
|
804 |
|
00:53:36,180 --> 00:53:43,660 |
|
and the 99%. So the 1%, the richest people keep |
|
|
|
805 |
|
00:53:43,660 --> 00:53:46,600 |
|
getting rich no matter what. And the poor people |
|
|
|
806 |
|
00:53:46,600 --> 00:53:49,740 |
|
are destroying their lives. Look at Amazon and GFP |
|
|
|
807 |
|
00:53:49,740 --> 00:53:53,380 |
|
$180 billion. |
|
|
|
808 |
|
00:53:56,890 --> 00:54:00,050 |
|
There was a story the other day about an employee |
|
|
|
809 |
|
00:54:00,050 --> 00:54:04,090 |
|
at Amazon who died, who just fell. He had a heart |
|
|
|
810 |
|
00:54:04,090 --> 00:54:06,750 |
|
attack and died, and nobody noticed him for 20 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
00:54:06,750 --> 00:54:09,970 |
|
minutes. Despite the fact that there are so many |
|
|
|
812 |
|
00:54:09,970 --> 00:54:15,240 |
|
people there. And I think his brother said that a |
|
|
|
813 |
|
00:54:15,240 --> 00:54:20,380 |
|
week before this guy mistakenly labeled a |
|
|
|
814 |
|
00:54:20,380 --> 00:54:22,800 |
|
different product, and within two minutes, the |
|
|
|
815 |
|
00:54:22,800 --> 00:54:26,800 |
|
cameras and the computer managed to find this |
|
|
|
816 |
|
00:54:26,800 --> 00:54:30,880 |
|
error and mistake. Two minutes. If you make a |
|
|
|
817 |
|
00:54:30,880 --> 00:54:33,180 |
|
mistake for a product, for a thing that brings |
|
|
|
818 |
|
00:54:33,180 --> 00:54:36,260 |
|
money, it can be recognized. But when somebody |
|
|
|
819 |
|
00:54:36,260 --> 00:54:41,120 |
|
just falls, dies, has a heart attack, a human |
|
|
|
820 |
|
00:54:41,120 --> 00:54:45,150 |
|
being is not as important as a product that |
|
|
|
821 |
|
00:54:45,150 --> 00:54:50,170 |
|
could cost, I don't know, two or three dollars. So |
|
|
|
822 |
|
00:54:50,170 --> 00:54:54,450 |
|
yeah, there is always this in Romantic poetry. The |
|
|
|
823 |
|
00:54:54,450 --> 00:54:56,210 |
|
Industrial Revolution is always in the background. |
|
|
|
824 |
|
00:55:00,480 --> 00:55:02,400 |
|
We can't apply the Industrial Revolution to this |
|
|
|
825 |
|
00:55:02,400 --> 00:55:06,340 |
|
because when a man lives in a city and he misses |
|
|
|
826 |
|
00:55:06,340 --> 00:55:09,620 |
|
nature, so when he goes to the countryside and he |
|
|
|
827 |
|
00:55:09,620 --> 00:55:13,860 |
|
values nature more because he misses it and he's |
|
|
|
828 |
|
00:55:13,860 --> 00:55:15,880 |
|
not used to it. But people who live in the |
|
|
|
829 |
|
00:55:15,880 --> 00:55:18,300 |
|
countryside, they see these flowers and nature and |
|
|
|
830 |
|
00:55:18,300 --> 00:55:20,740 |
|
beauty every day, so maybe it's the opposite. |
|
|
|
831 |
|
00:55:21,470 --> 00:55:23,470 |
|
You're right, but with the Romantics, even with |
|
|
|
832 |
|
00:55:23,470 --> 00:55:25,230 |
|
Wordsworth and Coleridge, who lived in the |
|
|
|
833 |
|
00:55:25,230 --> 00:55:28,310 |
|
countryside, they loved the countryside. I agree. |
|
|
|
834 |
|
00:55:28,950 --> 00:55:31,270 |
|
They actually talk about this. This is a feature |
|
|
|
835 |
|
00:55:31,270 --> 00:55:35,530 |
|
of Romanticism. They try to defamiliarize their |
|
|
|
836 |
|
00:55:35,530 --> 00:55:40,530 |
|
experiences, to rip the veil of familiarity. When |
|
|
|
837 |
|
00:55:40,530 --> 00:55:43,630 |
|
you live, there are flowers and roses and trees |
|
|
|
838 |
|
00:55:43,630 --> 00:55:46,390 |
|
and cats and birds around campus here, right? But |
|
|
|
839 |
|
00:55:46,390 --> 00:55:48,470 |
|
sometimes, usually we don't pay attention. I |
|
|
|
840 |
|
00:55:48,470 --> 00:55:51,430 |
|
usually say this, like, when is the last time you |
|
|
|
841 |
|
00:55:51,430 --> 00:55:55,930 |
|
looked at the moon? It's because we live in |
|
|
|
842 |
|
00:55:55,930 --> 00:56:01,230 |
|
concrete buildings. We don't have even a crack to |
|
|
|
843 |
|
00:56:01,230 --> 00:56:03,570 |
|
see the moon. We usually don't see it from our windows |
|
|
|
844 |
|
00:56:03,570 --> 00:56:07,170 |
|
from where we live most often. Very few of us |
|
|
|
845 |
|
00:56:07,170 --> 00:56:09,510 |
|
would just wait for the moon to look at how big it |
|
|
|
846 |
|
00:56:09,510 --> 00:56:11,030 |
|
is, how beautiful it is. Remember when we were |
|
|
|
847 |
|
00:56:11,030 --> 00:56:14,490 |
|
kids; we spent most of our time looking at clouds |
|
|
|
848 |
|
00:56:14,490 --> 00:56:17,390 |
|
and what shapes they make. We don't do this now, |
|
|
|
849 |
|
00:56:17,770 --> 00:56:20,050 |
|
even if you like nature, because we're busy; we |
|
|
|
850 |
|
00:56:20,050 --> 00:56:21,690 |
|
have exams; we have to study; we have reflections |
|
|
|
851 |
|
00:56:21,690 --> 00:56:23,590 |
|
to write; we have classes to attend; we have work |
|
|
|
852 |
|
00:56:23,590 --> 00:56:27,090 |
|
to do; we have, you know, we need, we keep rushing |
|
|
|
853 |
|
00:56:27,090 --> 00:56:29,710 |
|
and this is city, this is new, this is life, this |
|
|
|
854 |
|
00:56:29,710 --> 00:56:34,050 |
|
is civilization. Therefore, the Romantics call for |
|
|
|
855 |
|
00:56:34,050 --> 00:56:36,630 |
|
this thing called the childlike experience. We |
|
|
|
856 |
|
00:56:36,630 --> 00:56:40,490 |
|
have to see everything anew, afresh every time. |
|
|
|
857 |
|
00:56:41,760 --> 00:56:44,820 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
00:58:38,980 --> 00:58:42,360 |
|
experiences. The subject matter could be about |
|
|
|
890 |
|
00:58:42,360 --> 00:58:44,380 |
|
anything. It's about a rose. It's about, I don't |
|
|
|
891 |
|
00:58:44,380 --> 00:58:47,220 |
|
know, it's about children playing. This wasn't the |
|
|
|
892 |
|
00:58:47,220 --> 00:58:50,500 |
|
case with neoclassicism. Childhood is also a |
|
|
|
893 |
|
00:58:50,500 --> 00:58:54,150 |
|
feature. They are fascinated with childhood. I |
|
|
|
894 |
|
00:58:54,150 --> 00:58:56,370 |
|
will say something. I think that decriminalization |
|
|
|
895 |
|
00:58:56,370 --> 00:58:58,870 |
|
appears in the word "spring." Like in "Song of |
|
|
|
896 |
|
00:58:58,870 --> 00:59:02,410 |
|
Innocence," he only says "your spring and your day." |
|
|
|
897 |
|
00:59:02,730 --> 00:59:06,290 |
|
But in the "Song of Innocence," he illustrates more. |
|
|
|
898 |
|
00:59:06,390 --> 00:59:10,570 |
|
And he says, "like hell's sky fly and birds fly and |
|
|
|
899 |
|
00:59:10,570 --> 00:59:14,910 |
|
sheep." So this is how children see spring, while |
|
|
|
900 |
|
00:59:14,910 --> 00:59:17,590 |
|
this is like the word "spring" itself is how adults |
|
|
|
901 |
|
00:59:17,590 --> 00:59:18,270 |
|
see spring. |
|
|
|
902 |
|
00:59:21,050 --> 00:59:23,530 |
|
It's possible, but defamiliarization is basically |
|
|
|
903 |
|
00:59:23,530 --> 00:59:28,070 |
|
making familiar things look unfamiliar. Like when |
|
|
|
904 |
|
00:59:28,070 --> 00:59:31,290 |
|
you read "the daffodils," the thousands of daffodils |
|
|
|
905 |
|
00:59:31,290 --> 00:59:33,210 |
|
dancing and tossing their heads and like that. |
|
|
|
906 |
|
00:59:33,330 --> 00:59:35,610 |
|
That is something like, what's his name? The guy |
|
|
|
907 |
|
00:59:35,610 --> 00:59:37,710 |
|
who draws the sunflowers. |
|
|
|
908 |
|
00:59:39,610 --> 00:59:47,150 |
|
Van Gogh. He drew hundreds of these sunflowers, and |
|
|
|
909 |
|
00:59:47,150 --> 00:59:50,030 |
|
every time you see them, they look different. It's |
|
|
|
910 |
|
00:59:50,030 --> 00:59:51,790 |
|
as if you see them for the first time. |
|
|
|
911 |
|
00:59:56,370 --> 01:00:00,910 |
|
I'm sorry, that Blake was interested in the |
|
|
|
912 |
|
01:00:00,910 --> 01:00:05,420 |
|
childlike vision more than childhood itself. And I |
|
|
|
913 |
|
01:00:05,420 --> 01:00:08,800 |
|
think both. I think both. But yeah, the vision is |
|
|
|
914 |
|
01:00:08,800 --> 01:00:11,080 |
|
like, not only the vision, the vision and the |
|
|
|
915 |
|
01:00:11,080 --> 01:00:15,060 |
|
state of innocence. So here we find that the nurse |
|
|
|
916 |
|
01:00:15,060 --> 01:00:19,960 |
|
also has that childlike vision here because she's |
|
|
|
917 |
|
01:00:19,960 --> 01:00:22,320 |
|
telling children to play. Okay, just play. The |
|
|
|
918 |
|
01:00:22,320 --> 01:00:25,240 |
|
first one. Yeah, the nurse. You're speaking about |
|
|
|
919 |
|
01:00:25,240 --> 01:00:28,500 |
|
a mature person here, not only the children. She |
|
|
|
920 |
|
01:00:28,500 --> 01:00:31,140 |
|
has a childlike vision; she supports playing; she |
|
|
|
921 |
|
01:00:31,140 --> 01:00:33,280 |
|
thinks it's healthy and it's something that should |
|
|
|
922 |
|
01:00:33,280 --> 01:00:36,520 |
|
be done. While the nurse in the other one |
|
|
|
923 |
|
01:00:36,520 --> 01:00:40,220 |
|
experienced that belief that it's a waste of time. |
|
|
|
924 |
|
01:00:40,660 --> 01:00:44,300 |
|
And again, there is no room, no space for kids to |
|
|
|
925 |
|
01:00:44,300 --> 01:00:46,580 |
|
express themselves. So she doesn't have the |
|
|
|
926 |
|
01:00:46,580 --> 01:00:52,000 |
|
childlike vision. That's right. True. And look at |
|
|
|
927 |
|
01:00:52,000 --> 01:00:54,700 |
|
how the kids even, I'm imagining a situation where |
|
|
|
928 |
|
01:00:54,700 --> 01:00:57,300 |
|
the kids are playing, and then this nurse comes and |
|
|
|
929 |
|
01:00:57,300 --> 01:01:00,260 |
|
everybody starts whispering rather than laughing. |
|
|
|
930 |
|
01:01:00,460 --> 01:01:02,400 |
|
So they know here already that she's repressive; |
|
|
|
931 |
|
01:01:02,720 --> 01:01:07,820 |
|
she's going to oppress them. I'll go through and |
|
|
|
932 |
|
01:01:07,820 --> 01:01:10,200 |
|
then finish. I'll go through some of William |
|
|
|
933 |
|
01:01:10,200 --> 01:01:15,000 |
|
Blake's fascinating, by the way, if you Google "top |
|
|
|
934 |
|
01:01:15,000 --> 01:01:20,890 |
|
100 most influential British people of all time," |
|
|
|
935 |
|
01:01:20,890 --> 01:01:23,870 |
|
"100 most influential British people," Blake is on the |
|
|
|
936 |
|
01:01:23,870 --> 01:01:28,190 |
|
list. Wordsworth is not. Many people you think of |
|
|
|
937 |
|
01:01:28,190 --> 01:01:30,450 |
|
are not on the list. But William Blake is one of |
|
|
|
938 |
|
01:01:30,450 --> 01:01:32,930 |
|
the people because he's a pioneer of this |
|
|
|
939 |
|
01:01:32,930 --> 01:01:37,850 |
|
movement. Look at what fascinating things. If you |
|
|
|
940 |
|
01:01:37,850 --> 01:01:40,330 |
|
are interested in Blake, you could go for more |
|
|
|
941 |
|
01:01:40,330 --> 01:01:45,070 |
|
quotes or things. "Prisons are built with stones of |
|
|
|
942 |
|
01:01:45,070 --> 01:01:45,310 |
|
law; |
|
|
|
943 |
|
01:01:48,630 --> 01:01:54,040 |
|
brothels with bricks of religion." How this man was |
|
|
|
944 |
|
01:01:54,040 --> 01:01:57,060 |
|
anti-establishment. In his poem "London," you should |
|
|
|
945 |
|
01:01:57,060 --> 01:02:00,620 |
|
read this poem. He clearly, openly attacks the |
|
|
|
946 |
|
01:02:00,620 --> 01:02:03,440 |
|
establishment, the palace, and the church; how |
|
|
|
947 |
|
01:02:03,440 --> 01:02:08,260 |
|
they exploit people, exploit their privileges to |
|
|
|
948 |
|
01:02:08,260 --> 01:02:11,340 |
|
destroy people; how the law is turning people into |
|
|
|
949 |
|
01:02:11,340 --> 01:02:13,900 |
|
criminals; how religion here is used to turn |
|
|
|
950 |
|
01:02:13,900 --> 01:02:17,440 |
|
people. "Great things are done when men and |
|
|
|
951 |
|
01:02:17,440 --> 01:02:23,680 |
|
mountains meet," nature. "Both read the Bible day |
|
|
|
952 |
|
01:02:23,680 --> 01:02:33,020 |
|
and night, but thou read black where I read |
|
|
|
953 |
|
01:02:33,020 --> 01:02:33,380 |
|
white." |
|
|
|
954 |
|
01:02:39,340 --> 01:02:42,980 |
|
He says the Bible is different, not because the |
|
|
|
955 |
|
01:02:42,980 --> 01:02:46,270 |
|
Bible is different, but because we are different. If |
|
|
|
956 |
|
01:02:46,270 --> 01:02:48,610 |
|
you are open-minded, if you see things, you know, |
|
|
|
957 |
|
01:02:49,390 --> 01:02:51,710 |
|
you see good things, positive; you look at the |
|
|
|
958 |
|
01:02:51,710 --> 01:02:54,790 |
|
stupid cliché of looking at the half-empty cup and the |
|
|
|
959 |
|
01:02:54,790 --> 01:02:58,310 |
|
half-full cup. So I read, you |
|
|
|
960 |
|
01:02:58,310 --> 01:03:02,450 |
|
read black because of your, you know, your mind, |
|
|
|
961 |
|
01:03:02,570 --> 01:03:05,230 |
|
your perception. I must—I think this |
|
|
|
962 |
|
01:03:05,230 --> 01:03:07,410 |
|
is the most powerful thing you need to learn about |
|
|
|
963 |
|
01:03:07,410 --> 01:03:10,010 |
|
William Blake. I must—look at the "must" here, not |
|
|
|
964 |
|
01:03:10,010 --> 01:03:14,810 |
|
"should." I must create a system; create my own |
|
|
|
965 |
|
01:03:14,810 --> 01:03:18,530 |
|
rules, my own constructs; or be enslaved by |
|
|
|
966 |
|
01:03:18,530 --> 01:03:21,630 |
|
another man's. Or else I'll be enslaved by another |
|
|
|
967 |
|
01:03:21,630 --> 01:03:28,090 |
|
man's rules. The three? |
|
|
|
968 |
|
01:03:32,370 --> 01:03:37,130 |
|
A, B. Possible, it could be common with him. But |
|
|
|
969 |
|
01:03:37,130 --> 01:03:41,890 |
|
different from the A, B, B, A or A, B, A, B. I |
|
|
|
970 |
|
01:03:41,890 --> 01:03:44,310 |
|
will not reason, but again, it's not only about |
|
|
|
971 |
|
01:03:44,310 --> 01:03:45,930 |
|
the rhyme scheme. The rhyme scheme is just one |
|
|
|
972 |
|
01:03:45,930 --> 01:03:49,570 |
|
indication. I will not reason and compare, like |
|
|
|
973 |
|
01:03:49,570 --> 01:03:52,330 |
|
the age of intellectuality, the age of reason, the |
|
|
|
974 |
|
01:03:52,330 --> 01:03:55,730 |
|
Augustan Age. My business is to create. By the |
|
|
|
975 |
|
01:03:55,730 --> 01:03:58,690 |
|
way, he was a famous painter. If you Google his |
|
|
|
976 |
|
01:03:58,690 --> 01:04:03,190 |
|
poems and look at Google images, he would be doing |
|
|
|
977 |
|
01:04:03,190 --> 01:04:05,850 |
|
these engravings and beautiful paintings for his |
|
|
|
978 |
|
01:04:05,850 --> 01:04:11,120 |
|
poems. They were very expensive. "The tree which |
|
|
|
979 |
|
01:04:11,120 --> 01:04:15,080 |
|
moves some to tears of joy." Again, look at how he |
|
|
|
980 |
|
01:04:15,080 --> 01:04:19,040 |
|
focuses on these two states, how experience and |
|
|
|
981 |
|
01:04:19,040 --> 01:04:22,900 |
|
our perceptions create the world we live in. "In |
|
|
|
982 |
|
01:04:22,900 --> 01:04:27,800 |
|
the eyes of others, only a green thing, only a |
|
|
|
983 |
|
01:04:27,800 --> 01:04:31,080 |
|
green thing could move you." Something that happens |
|
|
|
984 |
|
01:04:31,080 --> 01:04:33,120 |
|
all the time. You find somebody says something, is |
|
|
|
985 |
|
01:04:33,120 --> 01:04:35,860 |
|
telling a story, and some people are like crying |
|
|
|
986 |
|
01:04:35,860 --> 01:04:39,090 |
|
their eyes out, and some people are like, "Nothing. |
|
|
|
987 |
|
01:04:39,290 --> 01:04:41,170 |
|
It means nothing to them." It doesn't mean you're |
|
|
|
988 |
|
01:04:41,170 --> 01:04:43,830 |
|
bad. It means this time, this place is not touching |
|
|
|
989 |
|
01:04:43,830 --> 01:04:45,170 |
|
something new. |
|
|
|
990 |
|
01:04:47,460 --> 01:04:51,640 |
|
But to the eyes of the man of imagination, nature |
|
|
|
991 |
|
01:04:51,640 --> 01:04:54,580 |
|
is imagination itself. We see this in "words, |
|
|
|
992 |
|
01:04:54,780 --> 01:04:57,840 |
|
words, words." Nature is the theme. Some people say |
|
|
|
993 |
|
01:04:57,840 --> 01:04:59,680 |
|
Shakespeare is using nature. "Shall I compare thee |
|
|
|
994 |
|
01:04:59,680 --> 01:05:02,180 |
|
to a summer's day?" He's saying "summer's day," but |
|
|
|
995 |
|
01:05:02,180 --> 01:05:05,620 |
|
he's using nature to ornament his poem, to make |
|
|
|
996 |
|
01:05:05,620 --> 01:05:10,060 |
|
his poem as metaphors. But here nature itself is |
|
|
|
997 |
|
01:05:10,060 --> 01:05:12,140 |
|
the theme. Imagination itself is the theme; it's |
|
|
|
998 |
|
01:05:12,140 --> 01:05:16,550 |
|
not only the medium or the tool. "What is now |
|
|
|
999 |
|
01:05:16,550 --> 01:05:21,310 |
|
proved was once only imagined." Beautiful. What is |
|
|
|
1000 |
|
01:05:21,310 --> 01:05:24,650 |
|
now proved was once imagined in somebody's |
|
|
|
1001 |
|
01:05:24,650 --> 01:05:28,050 |
|
imagination. "Pottery fitted." I love this very much |
|
|
|
1002 |
|
01:05:28,050 --> 01:05:31,610 |
|
again. "Pottery," and this clearly shows how he |
|
|
|
1003 |
|
01:05:31,610 --> 01:05:34,150 |
|
deliberately was saying "sorry" to the rules of |
|
|
|
1004 |
|
01:05:34,150 --> 01:05:38,310 |
|
decorum and classicism. "Pottery fitted." Pottery |
|
|
|
1005 |
|
01:05:38,310 --> 01:05:42,900 |
|
that is restrained, restricted by rules, "fitters" |
|
|
|
1006 |
|
01:05:42,900 --> 01:05:46,380 |
|
the human race. That's an extreme opinion. If you |
|
|
|
1007 |
|
01:05:46,380 --> 01:05:49,880 |
|
control poetry, if you repress poetry, restrict |
|
|
|
1008 |
|
01:05:49,880 --> 01:05:53,320 |
|
poetry, you restrict the human race, our imagination |
|
|
|
1009 |
|
01:05:53,320 --> 01:05:58,280 |
|
and our experiences. "Nations are destroyed or |
|
|
|
1010 |
|
01:05:58,280 --> 01:06:01,780 |
|
flourish in proportion as their poetry, painting |
|
|
|
1011 |
|
01:06:01,780 --> 01:06:05,840 |
|
and music are destroyed or flourish." This feels |
|
|
|
1012 |
|
01:06:05,840 --> 01:06:09,680 |
|
like somebody in the 20th century, 21st century |
|
|
|
1013 |
|
01:06:09,680 --> 01:06:14,010 |
|
said. This is how ahead of his time he was. This |
|
|
|
1014 |
|
01:06:14,010 --> 01:06:17,930 |
|
is another extract from a beautiful poem. What |
|
|
|
1015 |
|
01:06:17,930 --> 01:06:22,370 |
|
he's doing, "to see a world in a grain of sand and |
|
|
|
1016 |
|
01:06:22,370 --> 01:06:26,010 |
|
a heaven in a wildflower; hold infinity in the |
|
|
|
1017 |
|
01:06:26,010 --> 01:06:29,430 |
|
palm of your hand and eternity in an hour." |
|
|
|
1018 |
|
01:06:33,400 --> 01:06:35,740 |
|
When I tell the truth, it's not for the sake of |
|
|
|
1019 |
|
01:06:35,740 --> 01:06:38,740 |
|
convincing those who don't know it, but for the |
|
|
|
1020 |
|
01:06:38,740 --> 01:06:41,820 |
|
sake of defending those that do. |
|
|
|
1021 |
|
01:06:45,100 --> 01:06:49,240 |
|
When I tell the truth, it's not for the sake of |
|
|
|
1022 |
|
01:06:49,240 --> 01:06:52,160 |
|
convincing those who don't know the truth, but |
|
|
|
1023 |
|
01:06:52,160 --> 01:06:54,240 |
|
for the sake of convincing those who know the truth or who are |
|
|
|
1024 |
|
01:06:54,240 --> 01:06:58,350 |
|
willing to know the truth. Those who restrain |
|
|
|
1025 |
|
01:06:58,350 --> 01:07:01,790 |
|
their desires do so because their desire |
|
|
|
1026 |
|
01:07:01,790 --> 01:07:07,230 |
|
is weak enough to be restrained. Desires, |
|
|
|
1027 |
|
01:07:07,890 --> 01:07:11,330 |
|
imagination, feelings shouldn't be controlled. If |
|
|
|
1028 |
|
01:07:11,330 --> 01:07:14,450 |
|
the doors—again the perception issue here—if the |
|
|
|
1029 |
|
01:07:14,450 --> 01:07:18,770 |
|
doors of perception were cleansed, everything would |
|
|
|
1030 |
|
01:07:18,770 --> 01:07:21,610 |
|
appear to man as it is, infinite. |
|
|
|
1031 |
|
01:07:24,800 --> 01:07:28,400 |
|
And again, the city life destroys our perception, |
|
|
|
1032 |
|
01:07:28,800 --> 01:07:32,480 |
|
makes everything mundane, boring, repetitive. |
|
|
|
1033 |
|
01:07:32,480 --> 01:07:39,740 |
|
"Without contraries, there is no progression." If |
|
|
|
1034 |
|
01:07:39,740 --> 01:07:44,300 |
|
something is very black, it could sound very black |
|
|
|
1035 |
|
01:07:44,300 --> 01:07:47,800 |
|
when it's next to a very white color, or something |
|
|
|
1036 |
|
01:07:47,800 --> 01:07:50,180 |
|
like this, very short, very tall, and these things. |
|
|
|
1037 |
|
01:07:50,970 --> 01:07:53,190 |
|
And that's why he's focusing on these two states |
|
|
|
1038 |
|
01:07:53,190 --> 01:07:57,270 |
|
of mind. If you don't understand innocence, unless |
|
|
|
1039 |
|
01:07:57,270 --> 01:08:03,610 |
|
there is experience there, and vice versa. And |
|
|
|
1040 |
|
01:08:03,610 --> 01:08:06,050 |
|
finally, this is a very powerful statement, but it |
|
|
|
1041 |
|
01:08:06,050 --> 01:08:09,850 |
|
shouldn't be fixed here. "I care not whether a man |
|
|
|
1042 |
|
01:08:09,850 --> 01:08:14,950 |
|
is good or evil; all that I care is whether he is |
|
|
|
1043 |
|
01:08:14,950 --> 01:08:23,480 |
|
a wise man or a fool. Go put off holiness and put |
|
|
|
1044 |
|
01:08:23,480 --> 01:08:28,100 |
|
on intellect. Don't disguise under an attire or a |
|
|
|
1045 |
|
01:08:28,100 --> 01:08:33,680 |
|
mask of religion or goodness or whatever. All I |
|
|
|
1046 |
|
01:08:33,680 --> 01:08:37,400 |
|
care about is whether you are a wise man or a fool. If you are a wise man, like if you |
|
|
|
1047 |
|
01:08:37,400 --> 01:08:41,680 |
|
are a fool. |
|
|
|
1048 |
|
01:08:41,680 --> 01:08:42,300 |
|
I'm stopping here. Okay, I want you to think of |
|
|
|
1049 |
|
01:08:45,010 --> 01:08:48,390 |
|
possible features for William Blake and his |
|
|
|
1050 |
|
01:08:48,390 --> 01:08:53,600 |
|
poetry. Read more poetry by William Blake. Many |
|
|
|
1051 |
|
01:08:53,600 --> 01:08:57,180 |
|
students usually approach me and ask me, "I want to |
|
|
|
1052 |
|
01:08:57,180 --> 01:09:00,080 |
|
write poetry. I want to like English poetry. Where |
|
|
|
1053 |
|
01:09:00,080 --> 01:09:01,940 |
|
should I start?" I usually point to William Blake. |
|
|
|
1054 |
|
01:09:04,520 --> 01:09:07,420 |
|
If you want to write poetry, read his many, many, |
|
|
|
1055 |
|
01:09:07,420 --> 01:09:09,220 |
|
many poems. You're lucky if you're doing also the |
|
|
|
1056 |
|
01:09:09,220 --> 01:09:12,800 |
|
Romantic literature course because you will be |
|
|
|
1057 |
|
01:09:12,800 --> 01:09:15,180 |
|
exposed to more poems by William Blake. Thank you |
|
|
|
1058 |
|
01:09:15,180 --> 01:09:17,420 |
|
very much, ladies. If you have a question, you can |
|
|
|
1059 |
|
01:09:17,420 --> 01:09:18,040 |
|
stay behind. |
|
|