PL9fwy3NUQKwa0Sd0s-XLQCrtFM4_s2KMt/CwFequR3Y5g_raw.srt

1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,800
You.

2
00:00:34,780 --> 00:00:38,200
Bismillah ar-Rahman ar-Rahim. Today we are going

3
00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:42,360
to continue with infinitive and gerund in English

4
00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:47,800
versus overt and covert derived nominal in Arabic.

5
00:00:52,260 --> 00:00:55,860
Last time we saw the function, we've seen the

6
00:00:55,860 --> 00:00:59,820
function of the syntactic function of infinitive

7
00:00:59,820 --> 00:01:03,120
in English. We mentioned that the syntactic

8
00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:09,390
function covers Four points. The infinitive can be

9
00:01:09,390 --> 00:01:10,510
a subject.

10
00:01:13,950 --> 00:01:19,710
Yes. Can stand as a subject, as object, as subject

11
00:01:19,710 --> 00:01:25,710
complement, and object complement. Okay? This is

12
00:01:25,710 --> 00:01:30,870
in English. It is also the same in Arabic. We have

13
00:01:30,870 --> 00:01:36,370
the derived nominal, derived nominal stands as a

14
00:01:36,370 --> 00:01:41,610
subject, as object, as subject complement, or

15
00:01:41,610 --> 00:01:42,490
object complement.

16
00:01:53,450 --> 00:01:56,690
Then we shifted to what is called sensation verbs.

17
00:01:58,510 --> 00:02:03,160
We've seen that the sensation verbs like C, Here,

18
00:02:03,900 --> 00:02:12,620
touch, notice. Look, these only accept bare

19
00:02:12,620 --> 00:02:16,720
infinitive. Bare infinitive. Yani infinitive

20
00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:20,500
without to. Okay? I heard them talk about the

21
00:02:20,500 --> 00:02:25,340
plan. I heard them talk about the plan. I saw Ali

22
00:02:25,340 --> 00:02:29,420
stand at the gate. I noticed her pick a flower.

23
00:02:30,380 --> 00:02:34,970
Okay? However, in Arabic, we don't have bare

24
00:02:34,970 --> 00:02:41,030
infinitive. We have the present imperfect

25
00:02:41,030 --> 00:02:44,990
indicative form of the verb. This means that the

26
00:02:44,990 --> 00:02:49,030
verb stands with inflections. We have persons

27
00:02:49,030 --> 00:02:54,330
added to the verb. Samaatuhu yatakellamu 3an

28
00:02:54,330 --> 00:02:59,730
alkhatta. Samaatuhu yatakellam. Okay, so

29
00:02:59,730 --> 00:03:04,500
yatakellam, this is present. Verb present in

30
00:03:04,500 --> 00:03:10,300
perfect indicative form. Yeah this is third person

31
00:03:10,300 --> 00:03:18,720
inflection in Arabic يتكلم تكلم أتكلم sorry يتكلم

32
00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:22,880
أتكلم نتكلم تتكلم so we have four inflections

33
00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:27,930
representing persons in Arabic okay it's different

34
00:03:27,930 --> 00:03:31,810
from English which has only one inflection that is

35
00:03:31,810 --> 00:03:39,870
the subject verb agreement us okay

36
00:03:39,870 --> 00:03:44,530
still we have three verbs in English which are

37
00:03:44,530 --> 00:03:50,090
related to sensation verbs these are like help let

38
00:03:50,090 --> 00:03:56,180
and and make yes let help and make these accept

39
00:03:56,180 --> 00:04:03,860
both their infinitive and to infinitive now this

40
00:04:03,860 --> 00:04:07,380
cannot be corresponded to Arabic since Arabic has

41
00:04:07,380 --> 00:04:12,640
the inflections added to the verb okay دعه يتكلم

42
00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:13,460
عن الخطة

43
00:04:18,340 --> 00:04:25,160
present in perfect indicative form of the verb now

44
00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:30,340
we have a problem with infinitives and gerunds

45
00:04:30,340 --> 00:04:33,760
verbs which accept infinitives infinitive or

46
00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:40,040
gerund we just have

47
00:04:40,040 --> 00:04:44,370
this point Very tricky just for it appears very

48
00:04:44,370 --> 00:04:48,970
tricky for our students since they confuse just in

49
00:04:48,970 --> 00:04:52,630
using either infinitive or gerund. So they commit

50
00:04:52,630 --> 00:04:57,050
serious mistakes in this side. Most of them are

51
00:04:57,050 --> 00:05:02,090
interlingual or interlingual? Interlingual. These

52
00:05:02,090 --> 00:05:05,230
are interlingual. Interlingual.

53
00:05:14,340 --> 00:05:20,440
Most of them are intralingual. So we try to solve

54
00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:29,250
this problem by having a new account. a theory

55
00:05:29,250 --> 00:05:33,750
that accounts for the use of infinitive or gerund.

56
00:05:34,330 --> 00:05:37,250
But before introducing this theory, we need to

57
00:05:37,250 --> 00:05:40,770
introduce the previous theories in this or the

58
00:05:40,770 --> 00:05:44,030
previous principles in this regard. We have

59
00:05:44,030 --> 00:05:50,350
Bollinger's principle, okay, in which the choice

60
00:05:50,350 --> 00:05:53,750
of infinitive correlates in some degree with

61
00:05:53,750 --> 00:05:58,160
events that are theoretical or hypothetical. Okay,

62
00:05:58,580 --> 00:06:02,680
or hypothetical, all hypothetical actions are in,

63
00:06:03,620 --> 00:06:08,320
they take infinitive. However, the vivid or actual

64
00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:14,760
or already fulfilled actions are gerund. Okay, so

65
00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:18,460
speak about real actions that take gerund. We have

66
00:06:18,460 --> 00:06:23,080
hypothetical actions which only take infinitive.

67
00:06:23,500 --> 00:06:26,620
Speak about things which will happen. This is

68
00:06:26,620 --> 00:06:30,940
infinitive. Things which have already happened or

69
00:06:30,940 --> 00:06:36,020
are in progress, they take gerund as well. Okay?

70
00:06:36,500 --> 00:06:39,800
But applying this principle on the verb, for

71
00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:44,700
example, start, comes out with negative results.

72
00:06:45,840 --> 00:06:49,360
It stands to rain. Sorry, it's start. It starts to

73
00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:53,240
rain. It starts raining. Is there any difference

74
00:06:53,240 --> 00:06:57,450
in translation? There's no difference. Okay?

75
00:06:57,570 --> 00:07:01,190
There's no difference. Richard continued to work.

76
00:07:01,690 --> 00:07:06,050
Richard continued working. Okay? We don't have

77
00:07:06,050 --> 00:07:10,010
dissimilarities or any difference just in

78
00:07:10,010 --> 00:07:13,210
translating these two sentences. I prefer to eat

79
00:07:13,210 --> 00:07:18,730
sandwiches. I prefer eating sandwiches. So, these

80
00:07:18,730 --> 00:07:22,890
verbs start, prefer, continue

81
00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:32,440
cannot accept Bollinger's principle. This

82
00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:37,960
necessitates thinking of a new principle that can

83
00:07:37,960 --> 00:07:42,020
be applied on all the verbs of English which

84
00:07:42,020 --> 00:07:46,780
accept either infinitive or gerund or both we are

85
00:07:46,780 --> 00:07:49,820
in front of some verbs which accept both the

86
00:07:49,820 --> 00:07:53,640
alternate between infinitive and gerund and some

87
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:58,780
other verbs only accept gerund we have verbs only

88
00:07:58,780 --> 00:08:02,840
accept infinitive so

89
00:08:05,510 --> 00:08:12,910
I came with a new account which divides the verbs

90
00:08:12,910 --> 00:08:17,510
accepting infinitive and gerund or either one of

91
00:08:17,510 --> 00:08:22,910
them. I divided them into four categories. Okay.

92
00:08:23,310 --> 00:08:29,110
First of all, the emotive verbs, aspectual verbs,

93
00:08:30,450 --> 00:08:35,480
reactive verbs and forward oriented verbs. Okay?

94
00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:41,960
So for emotive verbs, these

95
00:08:41,960 --> 00:08:50,600
verbs are not associated with time. Okay? They are

96
00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:55,320
like dread, hate, like, love, lose, prefer, and

97
00:08:55,320 --> 00:09:01,040
rejoice. These verbs are not connected to time.

98
00:09:01,680 --> 00:09:07,810
Okay? So they accept both infinitive and gerund. I

99
00:09:07,810 --> 00:09:11,290
hated to meet the boss. I hated meeting the boss.

100
00:09:12,390 --> 00:09:16,690
We have difference in translation here. The first

101
00:09:16,690 --> 00:09:21,150
sentence refers to an action that has not

102
00:09:21,150 --> 00:09:26,010
happened. Okay? Future action. Okay? The second

103
00:09:26,010 --> 00:09:30,330
one refers to an action which happened. Okay?

104
00:09:32,840 --> 00:09:35,460
Would you like to see my dad? Would you like

105
00:09:35,460 --> 00:09:36,260
seeing my dad?

106
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:43,280
Here we have also some sort of difference between

107
00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:46,760
the two sentences. The first one, the verb see,

108
00:09:47,300 --> 00:09:51,660
refers to, I mean, the infinitive to see refers to

109
00:09:51,660 --> 00:09:56,280
future action, hypothetical action. However, the

110
00:09:56,280 --> 00:10:02,960
second one refers to real action, okay? Do you

111
00:10:02,960 --> 00:10:07,100
prefer to read the daily or watch the TV? Or to

112
00:10:07,100 --> 00:10:10,480
watch the TV? Do you prefer reading the daily or

113
00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:14,060
watching the TV? Again, the first sentence is

114
00:10:14,060 --> 00:10:17,160
hypothetical. It is theoretical, refers to an

115
00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:20,800
action that is to happen. However, the second one

116
00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:25,280
refers to a habit which actually happens every

117
00:10:25,280 --> 00:10:28,360
day. I mean action which already happened. We

118
00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,180
speak about vivid or real action which is

119
00:10:31,180 --> 00:10:31,700
fulfilled.

120
00:10:37,380 --> 00:10:40,780
Do we have emotive verbs in Arabic? What about

121
00:10:40,780 --> 00:10:45,120
their structure? Yes, we have emotive verbs in

122
00:10:45,120 --> 00:11:00,440
Arabic like يفضل يخاف يبغض يكره يحب يخشى يعجب يعشق

123
00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:06,380
etc These are emotive verbs They touch the feeling

124
00:11:08,060 --> 00:11:13,920
They are not related to time influence. Okay? We

125
00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:20,680
have يحب زيد قراءة القرآن. يحب زيد أن يقرأ القرآن.

126
00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:25,100
So they accept both. So the emotive verbs of

127
00:11:25,100 --> 00:11:28,300
Arabic are the same like the emotive verbs of

128
00:11:28,300 --> 00:11:28,700
English.

129
00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:44,460
Yes. We have يكره الولد اللعب في الشارع يكره الولد

130
00:11:44,460 --> 00:11:49,900
اللعب في الشارع So we have the first sentence it

131
00:11:49,900 --> 00:11:53,840
is of overt derived nominal while the second one

132
00:11:53,840 --> 00:12:02,620
is of a modified derived nominal يفضل

133
00:12:02,620 --> 00:12:07,380
زيدن شرب الشاي Overt, derived nominal, as you see.

134
00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:09,860
يفضل زيد أن يشرب الشاي.

135
00:12:14,740 --> 00:12:20,620
يخاف المؤمن ارتكاب الكبار. يخاف المؤمن أن يرتكب

136
00:12:20,620 --> 00:12:24,840
الكبار. So we have overt derived nominal and

137
00:12:24,840 --> 00:12:27,760
covert derived nominal within the same time. So

138
00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:31,540
this, I mean the emotive verbs, the emotive verbs

139
00:12:33,380 --> 00:12:37,360
are alternating between infinitive and gerund.

140
00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:41,940
What about aspectual verbs?

141
00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:52,380
They are associated with time. Yes. The aspectual

142
00:12:52,380 --> 00:12:55,620
verbs are associated to time. They refer to a

143
00:12:55,620 --> 00:13:02,670
variety of time. Okay? So these refer to a variety

144
00:13:02,670 --> 00:13:08,910
of time aspects like initiation, continuation,

145
00:13:09,670 --> 00:13:14,090
repetition, termination. So we have verbs like

146
00:13:14,090 --> 00:13:16,650
begin.

147
00:13:17,150 --> 00:13:20,730
This is initiation. Resume.

148
00:13:23,870 --> 00:13:27,870
Resume. This is repetition. Okay.

149
00:13:34,950 --> 00:13:40,690
It is more related to repetition. You repeat the

150
00:13:40,690 --> 00:13:48,830
action. Okay? Remain. Continuation. Commence.

151
00:13:50,030 --> 00:13:55,570
Initiation. Finish. Continue. Discontinue.

152
00:13:59,630 --> 00:14:11,050
Termination. End up. Seize. Repeat. Complete. Give

153
00:14:11,050 --> 00:14:20,290
up. Postpone. Proceed. Continuation. Quit. Keep.

154
00:14:20,550 --> 00:14:27,610
Keep on. Start. Initiation. Stay. Continuation.

155
00:14:27,690 --> 00:14:34,240
Stop. Termination. Okay, so we have these verbs

156
00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:40,380
refer to refer to a variety of time aspects okay

157
00:14:40,380 --> 00:14:44,320
so we have either initiation continuation

158
00:14:44,320 --> 00:14:49,420
repetition or termination these verbs in English

159
00:14:49,420 --> 00:14:54,260
almost accept both infinitive and gerund except

160
00:14:54,260 --> 00:15:00,190
only in termination we have some words related to

161
00:15:00,190 --> 00:15:04,770
this matter. Okay? Mostly they accept only gerund.

162
00:15:05,350 --> 00:15:08,410
Okay? He began to answer the question. He began

163
00:15:08,410 --> 00:15:11,470
answering the question. We have a slight

164
00:15:11,470 --> 00:15:14,610
difference between the two sentences. The first is

165
00:15:14,610 --> 00:15:18,550
hypothetical. It is to happen. It's about to

166
00:15:18,550 --> 00:15:22,150
happen. Okay? However, the second one already

167
00:15:22,150 --> 00:15:26,710
happened or in progress. Okay?

168
00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:41,520
The emotive verb does not refer to time.

169
00:15:42,380 --> 00:15:44,600
Semantically, there is some sort of difference

170
00:15:44,600 --> 00:15:49,720
between them. Okay. But it's the same meaning. I

171
00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:52,660
know that the first one is not related to time and

172
00:15:52,660 --> 00:15:55,000
the second one is not related to time. But we can

173
00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:59,380
mingle between them or mix between them and have

174
00:15:59,380 --> 00:16:02,220
the same meaning. The first category is a special

175
00:16:02,220 --> 00:16:04,040
category. No, no. They are similar. They are

176
00:16:04,040 --> 00:16:07,280
similar in their syntactic function. But

177
00:16:07,280 --> 00:16:11,340
semantically they differ. Okay. And here we have a

178
00:16:11,340 --> 00:16:17,880
big question that appears in this point why does

179
00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:26,260
this verb accept infinitive or gerund and that

180
00:16:26,260 --> 00:16:30,260
verb does not accept infinitive or does not accept

181
00:16:30,260 --> 00:16:35,300
gerund okay so this is semantic question it needs

182
00:16:35,300 --> 00:16:39,940
semantic interpretation that will be available

183
00:16:39,940 --> 00:16:45,200
just later Okay? He began to answer the question.

184
00:16:45,660 --> 00:16:49,260
He began answering the question. Having said that

185
00:16:49,260 --> 00:16:52,760
he would be frank, we all commenced to listen to

186
00:16:52,760 --> 00:16:52,960
him.

187
00:16:57,320 --> 00:17:00,860
We all commenced to listen to him. Having said

188
00:17:00,860 --> 00:17:03,760
that he would be frank, we all commenced listening

189
00:17:03,760 --> 00:17:07,140
to him. Okay? So we speak about theoretical

190
00:17:07,140 --> 00:17:11,880
actions and vivid or real actions. Okay?

191
00:17:17,420 --> 00:17:20,600
So we have some verbs which refer to duration of

192
00:17:20,600 --> 00:17:25,980
time, okay? That end with what is called

193
00:17:25,980 --> 00:17:30,380
termination. These verbs which have this meaning

194
00:17:30,380 --> 00:17:35,040
only accept gerund. John finished doing his

195
00:17:35,040 --> 00:17:39,180
homework at midnight. We cannot say John finished

196
00:17:39,180 --> 00:17:46,100
to do his homework. He quit smoking cigarettes. He

197
00:17:46,100 --> 00:17:47,140
quit smoking.

198
00:17:50,240 --> 00:17:54,960
The committee postponed making the decision on the

199
00:17:54,960 --> 00:18:00,900
matter. We'll stop for an hour and resume working

200
00:18:00,900 --> 00:18:06,560
at three o'clock. So we have these verbs only

201
00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:14,820
accept gerunds. Because they refer to a duration

202
00:18:14,820 --> 00:18:21,460
of time. Okay We

203
00:18:21,460 --> 00:18:27,920
have aspectual verbs in Arabic as well These

204
00:18:27,920 --> 00:18:37,640
aspectual verbs Are

205
00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:44,000
like يستأنف يوقف

206
00:18:47,920 --> 00:18:52,820
يستمر يواصل ينهي

207
00:18:52,820 --> 00:18:56,380
ينهي

208
00:18:56,380 --> 00:19:02,680
يؤجل we

209
00:19:02,680 --> 00:19:06,860
speak about aspectual verbs okay we spoke about

210
00:19:06,860 --> 00:19:09,760
them in English and found that they accept both

211
00:19:09,760 --> 00:19:14,420
infinitive and gerund now we have aspectual verbs

212
00:19:14,420 --> 00:19:22,640
of Arabic As we mentioned, these verbs only accept

213
00:19:22,640 --> 00:19:29,060
overt derived nominal. For example, يبدأ المعلم

214
00:19:29,060 --> 00:19:34,020
مناقشة الطلاب. We cannot say يبدأ المعلم أن يناقش

215
00:19:34,020 --> 00:19:35,580
الطلاب. It's not accepted.

216
00:19:43,630 --> 00:19:49,970
يبتدئ المعلم أن يناقش الطلاب is not accepted ينهي

217
00:19:49,970 --> 00:19:55,430
علي كتابة الدرس ينهي

218
00:19:55,430 --> 00:20:00,930
علي أن يكتب الدرس is not accepted so aspectual

219
00:20:00,930 --> 00:20:04,830
verbs in Arabic only accept overt derived nominal

220
00:20:04,830 --> 00:20:09,330
however in English they accept both except the

221
00:20:09,330 --> 00:20:14,440
verbs of termination so you have to take care you

222
00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:17,120
have to be very careful just once you translate

223
00:20:17,120 --> 00:20:19,320
from Arabic to English.

224
00:20:22,120 --> 00:20:24,360
Okay, or from English to Arabic.

225
00:20:27,320 --> 00:20:29,920
Now, semantically,

226
00:20:32,760 --> 00:20:40,210
the emotive verbs and aspectual verbs have

227
00:20:40,210 --> 00:20:42,870
difference in meaning just in the use of

228
00:20:42,870 --> 00:20:48,650
infinitive and gerund. So a sentence like, I love

229
00:20:48,650 --> 00:20:55,090
to eat sandwiches. I love eating sandwiches. The

230
00:20:55,090 --> 00:20:58,110
two sentences are different in meaning. The first

231
00:20:58,110 --> 00:21:02,110
one is hypothetical. The second one not fulfilled,

232
00:21:02,290 --> 00:21:07,290
yes. And the second one is actual, achieved. Okay,

233
00:21:07,730 --> 00:21:11,900
it's real. He stopped to smoke. He stopped

234
00:21:11,900 --> 00:21:13,540
smoking. Could you translate?

235
00:21:16,220 --> 00:21:17,840
He stopped to smoke.

236
00:21:21,500 --> 00:21:24,500
Hard luck. Yes.

237
00:21:28,120 --> 00:21:28,780
Yes.

238
00:21:39,660 --> 00:21:44,740
The first sentence, Mary stopped to eat. I stopped

239
00:21:44,740 --> 00:21:48,520
to smoke. He stopped doing an activity to smoke.

240
00:21:48,700 --> 00:21:53,120
Yes. So he stopped to smoke. This means that he

241
00:21:53,120 --> 00:21:56,660
stopped some action. He terminated, he quit some

242
00:21:56,660 --> 00:22:00,180
action in order to have another action to smoke.

243
00:22:01,260 --> 00:22:08,210
He stopped smoking. This means that he quit. So

244
00:22:08,210 --> 00:22:12,110
you have difference in meaning you have to take

245
00:22:12,110 --> 00:22:17,170
care of that John forgot to buy the linguistics

246
00:22:17,170 --> 00:22:25,210
book John forgot to buy Sorry if John forgot

247
00:22:25,210 --> 00:22:27,990
buying the linguistics book is there any

248
00:22:27,990 --> 00:22:31,950
difference No, no difference at all

249
00:22:34,940 --> 00:22:39,180
So how can you interpret the two sentences? John

250
00:22:39,180 --> 00:22:43,660
forgot to buy the linguistics book. John forgot

251
00:22:43,660 --> 00:22:48,700
buying the linguistics book. Yes. He forgot to buy

252
00:22:48,700 --> 00:22:57,680
this

253
00:22:57,680 --> 00:23:01,880
means that he forgot to buy this book he has He

254
00:23:01,880 --> 00:23:05,540
hasn't bought it. However, the second one, he

255
00:23:05,540 --> 00:23:09,080
bought the book, but he forgot that he bought it.

256
00:23:09,660 --> 00:23:09,920
Okay?

257
00:23:16,460 --> 00:23:23,200
Mary quit to cook. Mary quit cooking. Mary quit

258
00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:27,800
cooking. Is there any difference? Yes. What about

259
00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:32,910
this group? Yes? that means Mary's stopped

260
00:23:32,910 --> 00:23:35,610
activities but doing now in order to go and cook.

261
00:23:36,030 --> 00:23:39,410
While Mary quit cooking, that Mary doesn't cook

262
00:23:39,410 --> 00:23:45,870
anymore. Very good. Excellent. John remembered to

263
00:23:45,870 --> 00:23:50,690
wash the plates. John remembered washing the

264
00:23:50,690 --> 00:23:54,930
plates. Still, we have difference between the two

265
00:23:54,930 --> 00:23:58,940
sentences semantically. So in translation, The two

266
00:23:58,940 --> 00:24:01,780
sentences are different, are divergent. Who could

267
00:24:01,780 --> 00:24:07,420
translate them? John stopped to wash the plates.

268
00:24:08,260 --> 00:24:13,100
John stopped washing the plates. It is the same.

269
00:24:13,380 --> 00:24:13,420
Marco.

270
00:24:16,780 --> 00:24:22,340
Iman? Yes, number two, that he, in the action

271
00:24:22,340 --> 00:24:26,550
order two, The first action is hypothetical, is

272
00:24:26,550 --> 00:24:30,710
theoretical, that has not happened. Okay? He

273
00:24:30,710 --> 00:24:34,990
remembered to wash. He did not wash. But the

274
00:24:34,990 --> 00:24:39,570
second one, he has already washed them, but he

275
00:24:39,570 --> 00:24:41,370
forgot. Good.

276
00:24:46,530 --> 00:24:52,070
Mary stopped to eat. Mary stopped eating. Mary

277
00:24:52,070 --> 00:24:55,130
stopped to eat or Mary stopped eating? The second

278
00:24:55,130 --> 00:25:01,710
one is that Mary stopped to eat. Mary stopped in

279
00:25:01,710 --> 00:25:08,910
order to eat. However, the second one, she

280
00:25:08,910 --> 00:25:13,430
finished or quit eating. Okay.

281
00:25:17,350 --> 00:25:20,850
Do we have semantic distinction between the

282
00:25:20,850 --> 00:25:24,070
emotive verbs and aspectual verbs in Arabic? Do

283
00:25:24,070 --> 00:25:26,450
you have this semantic distinction in Arabic? Is

284
00:25:26,450 --> 00:25:30,830
this applicable to Arabic or not? Let's see Okay,

285
00:25:30,830 --> 00:25:35,790
I think that it corresponds to Arabic The first

286
00:25:35,790 --> 00:25:36,470
one

287
00:25:47,400 --> 00:25:51,060
refers to an action that has not happened. The

288
00:25:51,060 --> 00:25:54,380
second one refers to an action that happened but

289
00:25:54,380 --> 00:25:58,240
forgotten. Okay? It's like English.

290
00:26:01,300 --> 00:26:06,140
Now we come to the third category that is reactive

291
00:26:06,140 --> 00:26:11,840
verbs. It refers to actions that are in progress.

292
00:26:13,710 --> 00:26:20,030
The verbs which refer to reactive meaning only

293
00:26:20,030 --> 00:26:25,390
accept gerund. They only accept gerund. Okay?

294
00:26:31,390 --> 00:26:32,350
Yes.

295
00:26:37,710 --> 00:26:40,210
These verbs only accept gerund.

296
00:26:44,270 --> 00:26:51,770
These are like resist, resent, repent, remember,

297
00:26:52,590 --> 00:26:58,570
reject, regret, recommend, recall, abhor, enjoy,

298
00:26:59,210 --> 00:27:05,950
dislike, detest, deny, consider, confess, okay?

299
00:27:06,310 --> 00:27:09,470
Imagine, mind, and propose.

300
00:27:13,430 --> 00:27:16,430
These verbs refer to what's called continuity,

301
00:27:17,370 --> 00:27:21,970
okay? Continuity of action or continuity in

302
00:27:21,970 --> 00:27:27,670
meaning. These only accept gerund. We discussed

303
00:27:27,670 --> 00:27:29,850
going to the zoo in the weekend.

304
00:27:32,390 --> 00:27:37,210
We can say we discussed to go to the zoo. The

305
00:27:37,210 --> 00:27:39,990
family has seriously considered selling the house.

306
00:27:42,220 --> 00:27:45,280
is not available to say the family has seriously

307
00:27:45,280 --> 00:27:49,100
considered to sell the house. The suspect denies

308
00:27:49,100 --> 00:27:54,980
ever committing the crime. The suspect denies ever

309
00:27:54,980 --> 00:28:00,980
to commit? No. He repented having shot the dog. He

310
00:28:00,980 --> 00:28:05,380
repented having shot it, not to have. Okay,

311
00:28:05,380 --> 00:28:09,300
because the action happened. So reactive verbs

312
00:28:09,300 --> 00:28:14,040
refer to real actions, to vivid actions, to

313
00:28:14,040 --> 00:28:20,140
actions which have been already done. Okay? Or at

314
00:28:20,140 --> 00:28:25,980
least in progress. So they only accept gerund.

315
00:28:26,860 --> 00:28:29,860
Okay? Yes.

316
00:28:37,540 --> 00:28:46,980
Yes. These emotive verbs, you see, they are in the

317
00:28:46,980 --> 00:28:50,820
process of continuity. We speak about habitual

318
00:28:50,820 --> 00:28:56,040
actions. Yes. We speak about habitual actions or

319
00:28:56,040 --> 00:28:59,740
actions which are more or less related to habits

320
00:28:59,740 --> 00:29:05,960
and customs. Okay? Actions which are associated

321
00:29:05,960 --> 00:29:11,640
with daily work. I mean, the action already or

322
00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:15,680
always happens every day as accustomed by the

323
00:29:15,680 --> 00:29:19,320
subject or the doer of the action. Okay? So in

324
00:29:19,320 --> 00:29:22,960
that sense, we consider them reactive verbs. But

325
00:29:22,960 --> 00:29:26,120
if you speak hypothetically or theoretically about

326
00:29:26,120 --> 00:29:33,370
the verb as emotive verb, it takes both. Okay? He

327
00:29:33,370 --> 00:29:38,530
detests socializing with students at school. He

328
00:29:38,530 --> 00:29:42,310
detests to socialize. This is a custom, permanent

329
00:29:42,310 --> 00:29:45,510
custom with the speaker. I mean, his mood is like

330
00:29:45,510 --> 00:29:53,570
this. The suspect confessed murdering the man. We

331
00:29:53,570 --> 00:29:56,430
can't say that the subject confessed to murder the

332
00:29:56,430 --> 00:29:59,230
man because the action happened.

333
00:30:02,820 --> 00:30:08,460
We have Arabic, the Arabic reactive verbs. These

334
00:30:08,460 --> 00:30:26,700
are like يثمن يناقش يقدر يقيم يقاوم يتذكر ينسى

335
00:30:26,700 --> 00:30:32,660
يتخيل And these verbs, as you see, accept both.

336
00:30:33,400 --> 00:30:36,980
Overt derived nominal and covert derived nominal.

337
00:30:37,580 --> 00:30:40,700
They accept both. However, in English, they only

338
00:30:40,700 --> 00:30:48,180
accept gerund. قَدَّرَ اللَّهُ أَن يَتِمَّ ذَلِكَ

339
00:30:48,180 --> 00:30:54,280
We can say also, قَدَّرَ اللَّهُ أَتْمَامَ ذَلِكَ

340
00:30:54,280 --> 00:30:57,400
لَنَ

341
00:30:57,400 --> 00:31:04,550
تَسَوَّر أن نقبل الظلم لا نتصور قبول الظلم so we

342
00:31:04,550 --> 00:31:13,650
accept here we both are accepted يفضل

343
00:31:13,650 --> 00:31:18,810
عليهم أن يرفض

344
00:31:18,810 --> 00:31:23,390
عليهم أن يظلم الناس يرفض عليهم ظلم الناس

345
00:31:29,050 --> 00:31:35,730
يفترض زيدن أن يجيء عمرن يفترض زيدن ماجيء عمرن

346
00:31:35,730 --> 00:31:39,170
يتطلب

347
00:31:39,170 --> 00:31:48,350
النجاح الاشتهاد أو أن أشتهد يتطلب النجاح الاشتهاد

348
00:31:48,350 --> 00:31:51,530
okay now the derived nominal in Arabic

349
00:31:51,530 --> 00:31:56,370
syntactically works as a verb it assigns case

350
00:31:57,790 --> 00:32:02,890
Mostly it assigns genitive case. It has the

351
00:32:02,890 --> 00:32:05,870
requirements of a verb. You know, the verb assigns

352
00:32:05,870 --> 00:32:12,710
accusative case. كتب زيدن الدرسة. الدرسة is an

353
00:32:12,710 --> 00:32:16,330
object. John wrote the lesson. The lesson is an

354
00:32:16,330 --> 00:32:23,430
object assigned accusative case. Okay? Now يفضل

355
00:32:23,430 --> 00:32:32,260
زيدن كتابة الدرسي. الدرسي is an object but here it

356
00:32:32,260 --> 00:32:35,940
is we have the genitive case assigned to this noun

357
00:32:35,940 --> 00:32:40,120
this directly comes from the derived nominal the

358
00:32:40,120 --> 00:32:48,820
overt derived nominal okay we

359
00:32:48,820 --> 00:32:51,360
have some reactive verbs in Arabic only accept

360
00:32:51,360 --> 00:32:57,760
nouns not derived nominal like لا يثمن تعب

361
00:32:57,760 --> 00:33:04,900
الوالدين بالنقود. Ta'ab is referred to as a noun

362
00:33:04,900 --> 00:33:13,080
in Arabic. لا يثمن أن يتعب الوالدين بالنقود. This

363
00:33:13,080 --> 00:33:16,660
is not accepted. In case of having a noun coming

364
00:33:16,660 --> 00:33:22,880
after the reactive verb, then we have only the

365
00:33:22,880 --> 00:33:24,580
overt derived nominal accepted.

366
00:33:30,650 --> 00:33:39,410
Okay? يقاوم الجنود هجوم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم

367
00:33:39,410 --> 00:33:39,870
العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن

368
00:33:39,870 --> 00:33:44,370
يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود

369
00:33:44,370 --> 00:33:45,370
أن يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم العدو يقاوم

370
00:33:45,370 --> 00:33:48,090
الجنود أن يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم العدو

371
00:33:48,090 --> 00:33:48,490
يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم

372
00:33:48,490 --> 00:33:48,490
العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن

373
00:33:48,490 --> 00:33:50,850
يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود أن يهجم العدو يقاوم الجنود

374
00:33:50,850 --> 00:33:56,150
أن يهجم العد not a noun following the reactive

375
00:33:56,150 --> 00:34:00,890
verb then we have both derived nominal overt and

376
00:34:00,890 --> 00:34:03,170
covert or modified derived nominal.

377
00:34:05,850 --> 00:34:10,710
We have the last category that is forward oriented

378
00:34:10,710 --> 00:34:11,190
verbs.

379
00:34:14,020 --> 00:34:17,200
These verbs refer to theoretical actions to

380
00:34:17,200 --> 00:34:22,060
hypothetical actions to actions that will be

381
00:34:22,060 --> 00:34:29,860
fulfilled in future Okay So

382
00:34:29,860 --> 00:34:34,780
all the verbs here are hypothetical and they

383
00:34:34,780 --> 00:34:41,280
accept only infinitive Okay,

384
00:34:41,760 --> 00:34:47,860
we expected to stop the security disorder soon.

385
00:34:48,660 --> 00:34:56,700
Expect, hope, imagine. Okay? These verbs refer to

386
00:34:56,700 --> 00:35:03,320
action that is to happen. Okay? We expect to stop

387
00:35:03,320 --> 00:35:06,080
the security disorder. We cannot say we expect

388
00:35:06,080 --> 00:35:12,320
stopping. We hope to submit the paper soon. We

389
00:35:12,320 --> 00:35:16,880
cannot say, we hope submitting. Okay? Because it

390
00:35:16,880 --> 00:35:21,200
refers to action that has not happened. Okay? They

391
00:35:21,200 --> 00:35:25,140
planned to spend the vacation in London. We cannot

392
00:35:25,140 --> 00:35:29,340
say they planned spending because the action has

393
00:35:29,340 --> 00:35:30,160
not happened yet.

394
00:35:35,860 --> 00:35:39,900
Mary aspired to be a famous advocate.

395
00:35:42,350 --> 00:35:46,110
تتصور أنها ستكون. We speak about things which have

396
00:35:46,110 --> 00:35:49,890
not been happened. So, the verbs like these are

397
00:35:49,890 --> 00:35:57,890
like Britain, persuade, urge, tend, tell, order,

398
00:35:58,490 --> 00:36:04,750
learn, aspire, ask, force, fear, decline, agree,

399
00:36:05,770 --> 00:36:12,230
we have managed, Long seek, remind, refuse, swear,

400
00:36:13,670 --> 00:36:19,850
mean, offer, strive, and vow. Okay? Of course, we

401
00:36:19,850 --> 00:36:29,070
have hope as well. Own and expect. Okay? Ahmed was

402
00:36:29,070 --> 00:36:34,730
obliged to attend the

403
00:36:34,730 --> 00:36:35,050
meeting.

404
00:36:43,200 --> 00:36:47,880
The suspect abstained to answer the detective's

405
00:36:47,880 --> 00:36:52,480
questions. The action has not happened.

406
00:36:56,220 --> 00:37:00,200
Now, if you look to Arabic, we also have forward

407
00:37:00,200 --> 00:37:06,460
-oriented verbs. Okay? They accept both modified

408
00:37:06,460 --> 00:37:15,040
and overt derived nominal. يتوقع يعني expect يخطط

409
00:37:15,040 --> 00:37:24,200
يريد ينوي يصمم These verbs are forward oriental

410
00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:28,400
verbs. They still have the meaning that has not

411
00:37:28,400 --> 00:37:30,420
been fulfilled.

412
00:37:33,660 --> 00:37:43,040
So يتوقع زيدن أن يصل أخاه من السفر اليوم أن يصل

413
00:37:44,570 --> 00:37:48,030
يتوقع زيدون وصول أخيه من السفر اليوم يتوقع زيدون

414
00:37:48,030 --> 00:37:51,510
وصول أخيه من السفر اليوم So they have both forward

415
00:37:51,510 --> 00:37:56,530
oriented verbs except both overt and covert

416
00:37:56,530 --> 00:37:58,690
derived nominal however in English once you

417
00:37:58,690 --> 00:38:06,030
translate you only have infinitive okay so we have

418
00:38:06,030 --> 00:38:11,450
here a point of dissimilarity between Arabic and

419
00:38:11,450 --> 00:38:18,080
English He intends for the sinner to repent to God

420
00:38:18,080 --> 00:38:26,960
He intends for the sinner to repent to God Zayd

421
00:38:26,960 --> 00:38:31,560
suggests that he meet a Indian He suggests that

422
00:38:31,560 --> 00:38:36,220
Zayd meet an Indian The father plans

423
00:38:48,660 --> 00:38:49,980
Okay,

424
00:39:01,480 --> 00:39:06,550
we have both infinitive and gerund okay sorry we

425
00:39:06,550 --> 00:39:11,330
have both overt derived nominal and covert derived

426
00:39:11,330 --> 00:39:18,550
nominal you see so this shows that Arabic here is

427
00:39:18,550 --> 00:39:24,290
different from English regarding the use of overt

428
00:39:24,290 --> 00:39:27,550
and covert derived nominal their equivalents in

429
00:39:27,550 --> 00:39:31,370
English are gerund and infinitive however not

430
00:39:31,370 --> 00:39:37,510
necessarily We have the same translation. So once

431
00:39:37,510 --> 00:39:43,590
we have a sentence involving infinitive, it's not

432
00:39:43,590 --> 00:39:47,570
necessarily to be translated into covert derived

433
00:39:47,570 --> 00:39:51,490
nominal. And once we have a sentence involving

434
00:39:51,490 --> 00:39:55,050
overt derived nominal, it's not necessarily to be

435
00:39:55,050 --> 00:39:58,650
translated into gerund. You have to take care. We

436
00:39:58,650 --> 00:40:03,010
have four categories. You have to understand them

437
00:40:03,010 --> 00:40:08,110
very, very carefully in order to facilitate your

438
00:40:08,110 --> 00:40:11,030
translation and you come out with correct

439
00:40:11,030 --> 00:40:14,050
translation at the end of the day. So we have four

440
00:40:14,050 --> 00:40:17,410
categories. We speak about emotive verbs,

441
00:40:17,870 --> 00:40:21,350
aspectual verbs, reactive verbs, and forward

442
00:40:21,350 --> 00:40:27,190
-oriented verbs. Why do we have these verbs of

443
00:40:27,190 --> 00:40:31,950
different semantic functions, different syntactic

444
00:40:31,950 --> 00:40:36,410
functions? Sometimes we use both infinitive and

445
00:40:36,410 --> 00:40:39,850
gerund, sometimes we have only gerund and some

446
00:40:39,850 --> 00:40:46,010
other times we have only infinitive. This relies

447
00:40:46,010 --> 00:40:51,200
on the lexical entry of the verb. the lexical

448
00:40:51,200 --> 00:40:53,860
entry of the verb, the lexical capacity of the

449
00:40:53,860 --> 00:40:59,480
verb. Okay? So it either accepts infinitive, it

450
00:40:59,480 --> 00:41:04,380
either accepts gerund, it may accept both. Okay?

451
00:41:04,840 --> 00:41:09,960
So it depends on the lexical capacity. Completely

452
00:41:09,960 --> 00:41:12,900
like the verbs of giving once accepting double

453
00:41:12,900 --> 00:41:18,990
object construction. John gave Mary a book. john

454
00:41:18,990 --> 00:41:21,430
gave a book to mary so we have double object

455
00:41:21,430 --> 00:41:29,350
construction and we have dative construction okay

456
00:41:29,350 --> 00:41:32,750
still

457
00:41:32,750 --> 00:41:36,090
we have one object the direct object plus the

458
00:41:36,090 --> 00:41:41,220
dative object john gave a book to mary okay so we

459
00:41:41,220 --> 00:41:44,280
have this verb the verbs of giving alternate

460
00:41:44,280 --> 00:41:47,900
between double object construction and dative here

461
00:41:47,900 --> 00:41:51,580
we have these verbs some of them alternate between

462
00:41:51,580 --> 00:41:55,160
accepting overt derived nominal in Arabic or

463
00:41:55,160 --> 00:42:00,620
covert derived nominal or gerund or infinitive or

464
00:42:00,620 --> 00:42:07,360
both this is attributed to the lexical entry of

465
00:42:07,360 --> 00:42:11,490
the verb Okay, the semantic capacity as well can

466
00:42:11,490 --> 00:42:14,990
be considered. Okay, that's it for today. Thank

467
00:42:14,990 --> 00:42:15,130
you.